From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 00:13:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:13:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480235] Review Request: subtitlecomposer - A text-based subtitles editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010013.n310DDGx012643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480235 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-31 20:13:12 EDT --- subtitlecomposer-0.5.2-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/subtitlecomposer-0.5.2-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 00:12:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:12:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480235] Review Request: subtitlecomposer - A text-based subtitles editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010012.n310CW0P012581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480235 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-31 20:12:31 EDT --- subtitlecomposer-0.5.2-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/subtitlecomposer-0.5.2-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 00:49:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489117] Review Request: tulrich-tuffy-fonts - Generic sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010049.n310nfZH005609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489117 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-03-31 20:49:40 EDT --- Hey Felix and Nicolas, I have a bit of time for the next week or two to push this forward if it's okay with you. Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/tulrich-tuffy-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/tulrich-tuffy-fonts-1.1-3.fc11.src.rpm * Tue Mar 31 2009 Toshio Kuratomi - 1.1-3 - Change fontconfig file to use "sans-serif" generic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 01:42:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226367] Merge Review: reiserfs-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010142.n311gjUh027476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226367 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #8 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-03-31 21:42:45 EDT --- please tell me what's need's to be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 01:54:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:54:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493232] New: Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493232 Summary: Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/redir/redir.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/redir/redir-2.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: a port redirector, used to forward incoming connections to somewhere else. ------- koji scratch build dist-f11 ----> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1269101 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 02:15:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:15:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480235] Review Request: subtitlecomposer - A text-based subtitles editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010215.n312Fu8l021213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480235 --- Comment #14 from nucleo 2009-03-31 22:15:56 EDT --- There is in subtitlecomposer-0.5.2-2 Categories=Qt;KDE;Video;AudioVideoEditing; but it still in Other menu. If I edit /usr/share/applications/kde4/subtitlecomposer.desktop and change Video to AudioVideo it in right place in Multimedia. (In reply to comment #13) > subtitlecomposer-0.5.2-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. > http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/subtitlecomposer-0.5.2-3.fc10 Found Qt-Version 4.4.3 (In reply to comment #12) > subtitlecomposer-0.5.2-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. > http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/subtitlecomposer-0.5.2-3.fc9 Found Qt-Version 4.5.0 But Qt 4.5.0 not in updates in F-9. Is it will be work? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 02:47:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] New: Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 Summary: Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: arthurg.work at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://xmlfy.sourceforge.net/submit/fedora/xmlfy.spec SRPM URL: http://xmlfy.sourceforge.net/submit/fedora/xmlfy-1.4.2-1.src.rpm Description: Hello, I've got a package called xmlfy for your consideration into the Fedora project. I've put together a formal submission page to make things a little easier: http://xmlfy.sourceforge.net/submit/fedora/index.html The xmlfy shell command is a powerful yet lightweight tool that primarily caters for converting text or UTF-8 based output into XML format on the fly and dealing with common issues associated with this kind of transformation. It is predominantly written to alleviate the need for writing custom scripts for this purpose and to produce consistent outcomes in dealing with this kind of transformation problem. Kind regards, Arthur Gouros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 02:54:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:54:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492091] Review Request: zikula-module-Content - Page editing module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010254.n312s3Gm029261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091 --- Comment #6 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-03-31 22:54:02 EDT --- Couple questions: * Is this a post release or a prerelease? ie: Has 3.0.3 already been released? If it has not, then Release should be 0.3.%{alphatag}%{?dist} * Why are we naming things zikula-module-Content instead of zikula-Content? (Just want an explanation... no need to change if there's a reason.) I see that this module bundles other libraries. We'll have to fix that :-( I'm guessing that everything in tags/version-3.0.3/pnincludes will need to be packaged separately. Will explore this further as I complete the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 03:01:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490317] Review Request: rumor - Really Unintelligent Music transcriptOR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010301.n3131eo4010485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490317 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-03-31 23:01:38 EDT --- Thanks a lot! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rumor Short Description: Really Unintelligent Music transcriptOR Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 03:10:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:10:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462560] Review Request: xmlpull-api - XmlPull v1 API is a simple to use XML pull parsing API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010310.n313A1Hi011772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462560 --- Comment #4 from John Guthrie 2009-03-31 23:09:58 EDT --- Before this bug gets closed, I just want to say that I have seen these comments now, and I should have a new spec files out soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 03:12:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:12:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493240] New: Review Request: Droid-fonts - Google Android fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Droid-fonts - Google Android fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493240 Summary: Review Request: Droid-fonts - Google Android fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: feng.shaun at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://amoradi.fedorapeople.org/rpms/droid-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://amoradi.fedorapeople.org/rpms/droid-fonts-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Droid family of fonts consists of Droid Sans, Droid Sans Mono and Droid Serif. Each contains extensive character set coverage including Western Europe, Eastern/Central Europe, Baltic, Cyrillic, Greek and Turkish support. The Droid Sans regular font also includes support for Simplified and Traditional Chinese, Japanese and Korean support for the GB2312, Big 5, JIS 0208 and KSC 5601 character sets respectively. Droid was designed by Ascender's Steve Matteson to provide optimal quality and comfort on a mobile handset when rendered in application menus, web browsers and for other screen text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 03:14:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:14:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493240] Review Request: Droid-fonts - Google Android fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010314.n313EMha012575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493240 Armin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low CC| |feng.shaun at gmail.com, | |rdieter at math.unl.edu Version|rawhide |10 Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 03:40:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:40:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010340.n313eGhm004748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #29 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-03-31 23:40:13 EDT --- New update SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/xmonad.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/xmonad-0.8.1-7.fc10.src.rpm This includes both a start-xmonad and an xmonad-session script. The former will check for a config file or copy a config file over. The latter will call a user's .xsession and then start start-xmonad. There are also .desktop files for both, and both should be installed in the correct location. Let me know if this works for you. Currently, the default config is the default config provided by upstream. Should we convince upstream to have it load the manpage on startup? If you still want to write a script or two, please do, and if it brings any new features / works better than mine, i will be more than happy to include them. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 03:48:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:48:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010348.n313mKP3018119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bos at serpentine.com --- Comment #30 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-03-31 23:48:19 EDT --- Spec file is broken: + install -p -m 0755 -D /home/bos/rpmbuild/SOURCES/start-xmonad /usr/bin/start-xmonad install: cannot create regular file `/usr/bin/start-xmonad': Permission denied error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sfbpdY (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 03:52:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010352.n313qTgG019014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #31 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-03-31 23:52:28 EDT --- With that simple edit made, I get another error: Processing files: ghc-xmonad-devel-0.8.1-7.fc10 error: Could not open %files file /home/bos/rpmbuild/BUILD/xmonad-0.8.1/ghc-xmonad-devel.files: No such file or directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 03:54:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462560] Review Request: xmlpull-api - XmlPull v1 API is a simple to use XML pull parsing API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010354.n313srft006801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462560 --- Comment #5 from John Guthrie 2009-03-31 23:54:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > FYI, the first and third rpmlint issues above aren't something we care about. > As for the second, you should generally not use "Epoch: 0" in a Fedora package. The Epoch: 0 has been removed. > And to address the question in comment #1, the answer depends on whether > upstream believes that version 1.1.4b actually exists. Some upstreams do tag > releases but don't worry about generating tarballs; other upstreams might make > a tag but wouldn't want to get bug reports for a version they didn't release. > So you need to ask them. > > Some other comments: > > Please remove the commented cruft from the specfile. (Well, you can't remove > the horrible license block from the top, of course, but you can remove the > other stuff that just clutters Done. > If you are going to use to use all of those macro forms (%{__cp} and such), you > need to use them consistently. Which means bare "ln" and "mv" should not be > used. The spec file looks much cleaner if you just don't use them, but that's > up to you. I converted everything to bare commands. > Why move the pre-build jars to "jar.no" instead of just deleting them? You can > delete them all with a single find command, so your %prep section could just be > two lines. Done. I have posted a new spec file: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f10/xmlpull-api.spec I have also posted a new SRPM: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f10/xmlpull-api-1.1.4b-3.fc10.src.rpm These are still using the same source. I need to verify that the source code is still up to date. If it is not, then I will be posting a new SRPM with new source tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 04:10:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 00:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462560] Review Request: xmlpull-api - XmlPull v1 API is a simple to use XML pull parsing API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010410.n314APGr022015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462560 --- Comment #6 from John Guthrie 2009-04-01 00:10:24 EDT --- By the way, here is the rpmlint output from the latest code: xmlpull-api-javadoc.i386: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation xmlpull-api.i386: W: non-standard-group Development/Java 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 04:09:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 00:09:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010409.n3149Smh021650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #14 from William Cohen 2009-04-01 00:09:26 EDT --- Started playing with the systemtapgui-server (and finally got it to work). The instructions are not clear but the current code needs to be run as root. It then figures out user from packet information and su to that user. It would be much better if people could run it as normal user for the case where the eclipse and the server are run by the same user. There are a couple questionable cases in datamanager.cpp:DataManager::execStap(): case (SHELL): allows executing arbitary script (as root this seems like a bad idea). what would prevent someone from using this to just connect and run arbitrary commands. cases (BLUEDYE): mentions a package (Bluedye) that doesn't appear to be available in fedora Why scp the file to the server machine? why not send it to the stapgui-server with the command and run with stap -e 'script...'? Currently, the plugin stores the password in plantext in a possibly world readable file. Also the current checks in the plugin do not seem to notice if the transfer failed (due to missing password). The compile server does compile code, but it doesn't perform the other aspects of systemtapgui server such as execute the script and collect stdout/stderr. Could systemtapgui be stripped down just to use staprun to run a compiled script? Make it possible to run systemtap scripts on stripped down machines. This would be useful for cases of running code on compute nodes in a cluster. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 04:57:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 00:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010457.n314vsUr018353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sindrepb at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #6 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2009-04-01 00:57:52 EDT --- Any progress on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 05:00:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476398] Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010500.n3150ovF019000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 --- Comment #38 from Alex Lancaster 2009-04-01 01:00:47 EDT --- [x] builds OK in koji in dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1267138 [x] have a sane main package with versioned so files, relocated to %{_libdir} where they should be [x] -devel package has symlinks [x] added "BuildRequires: ntl-static" (comment #33) [x] fixed compilation flags with Michael's patch (comment #35) this allowed "make check" to work and tests now pass, so tests re-enabled [=] new rpmlint output: $ rpmlint eclib-* eclib.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/librankntl.so.20080310 exit at GLIBC_2.0 eclib-devel.i586: W: no-documentation eclib-static.i586: W: no-documentation eclib-static.i586: W: binaryinfo-readelf-failed 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. can you investigate 1) the shared-lib-calls-exit warning and if we can ignore, please justify and 2) the binaryinfo-readelf-failed for the -static subpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 05:01:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] New: Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Summary: Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://shutter-project.org OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: liangsuilong at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM file:http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/shutter-0.70.2-1.ppa3.fc10.src.rpm Shutter is a GTK+ 2.0 screenshot application written in perl. Description: Shutter is a GTK+ 2.0 screenshot application written in perl. Shutter covers all features of common command line tools like scrot or import and adds reasonable new features combined with a comfortable GUI using the GTK+ 2.0 framework. Sutter depends on perl-Gnome2-Wnck and perl-Goo-Canvas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 05:02:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:02:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] New: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Gnome2-Wnck/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: liangsuilong at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM file: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Gnome2-Wnck-0.16-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module allows a Perl developer to use the Window Navigator Construction Kit library (libwnck for short) to write tasklists and pagers. Shutter depends on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 05:08:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:08:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010508.n3158PNY032430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 Liang Suilong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |493246 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 05:08:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:08:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010508.n3158QMr032447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 Liang Suilong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |493246 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 05:08:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010508.n3158O2V032409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Liang Suilong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |liangsuilong at gmail.com Depends on| |493247, 493250 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 05:07:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:07:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] New: Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 Summary: Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Goo-Canvas/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: liangsuilong at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM file: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Goo-Canvas-0.05-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: GTK+ does't has an buildin canvas widget. GooCanvas is wonderful. It is easy to use and has powerful and extensible way to create items in canvas. Just try it. For more documents, please read GooCanvas Manual and the demo programs provided in the source distribution in both perl-Goo::Canvas and GooCanvas. Shutter depends on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 05:14:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010514.n315ExlY000887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #39 from Liang Suilong 2009-04-01 01:14:57 EDT --- Mamoru Tasaka, I have write a new review request for Shutter. If you have time, I hope you can do a sponsor review. Shutter has two dependencies. So you need to do three reviews. Here is shutter's bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 And here are shutter's dependencies. perl-Goo-Canvas: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 perl-Gnome2-Wnck: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 05:24:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476398] Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010524.n315OxKt002942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 --- Comment #39 from Alex Lancaster 2009-04-01 01:24:56 EDT --- Btw, this fails on F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1269432 because ntl-static doesn't yet exist: No Package Found for ntl-static Is there a pending update for ntl? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 05:29:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:29:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010529.n315T4EA003663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 05:29:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:29:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010529.n315TkOv023855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Depends on|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 05:27:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010527.n315ReGW023706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com Depends on| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 05:31:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:31:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010531.n315VMhX004428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 06:17:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 02:17:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492252] Review Request: libdwarf - Library to access the DWARF Debugging file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010617.n316Hov5000675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492252 --- Comment #6 from Suravee Suthikulpanit 2009-04-01 02:17:49 EDT --- SPEC: http://suravee.fedorapeople.org/libdwarf-0.20090324-4/libdwarf.spec SRPM: http://suravee.fedorapeople.org/libdwarf-0.20090324-4/libdwarf-0.20090324-4.fc10.src.rpm Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1269499 NOTE: - "rpmlint -iv" is quiet on all packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 06:24:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 02:24:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493232] Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010624.n316OnRh013940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493232 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-01 02:24:48 EDT --- Not that you have to use any of them, but the Debian version of this package comes with quite a lot of fixes/patches. They have this packaged for quite a while and they have probably figured out what bugs it has. Did you have a look? Maybe you'll find something really useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 06:42:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 02:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010642.n316g72k004935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-01 02:42:06 EDT --- Hi Rakesh, I had a quick look at your SPEC file. There are few things I would like you to do before the full review. * Please update to the latest version (3.0.4) * %{version} should be dropped from URL. * Please make the description span 80 columns. * For macro consistency you should either convert X to %{__X}, where X=(sed,mv,rm), or convert %{__python} to python * Please preserve the timestamps of the .txt files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 06:59:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 02:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010659.n316xLBm007687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #32 from Till Maas 2009-04-01 02:59:20 EDT --- I will try to test it later today, but I already found some additional issues: - There are now tabs used after Source2 to Source4 - start-xmonad probably needs a "exec xmonad" at the end to make it actually start xmonad - start-xmonad will not find the config file, because there is a doc missing in the path: /usr/share/xmonad-0.8.1/xmonad.hs, nevertheless the sample config should probably copied to /usr/share/xmonad/xmonad.hs, too and not marked as %doc, otherwise the package will not work installed with --nodocs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 07:08:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 03:08:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492252] Review Request: libdwarf - Library to access the DWARF Debugging file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010708.n31786Qu021371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492252 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-01 03:08:05 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1269499 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 4e603955797a1d5d314a9489a4342c24 libdwarf-20090324.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + ldconfig scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package libdwarf-0.20090324-4.fc11.i586 => Provides: libdwarf.so.0.0 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdwarf.so.0.0 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package libdwarf-devel-0.20090324-4.fc11.i586 => Requires: libdwarf.so.0.0 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 08:33:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 04:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226197] Merge Review: nfs-utils-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010833.n318XlDZ010040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226197 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net, | |tcallawa at redhat.com Depends on| |483464 --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-01 04:33:46 EDT --- * License: libnfsidmap is "BSD". librpcseggss is "BSD" and "Sun RPC", which is a "bad license" according to the Fedora Licensing Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Bad_Licenses https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/SunRPC * Static libraries must be moved into a -static subpackage according to the guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries > Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig > Requires(pre): /sbin/ldconfig These are automatically added by rpmbuild, because -p /sbin/ldconfig is specified for the scriptlets. > Requires: libgssglue, openldap These ought to be removed in favour of the automatically added SONAME dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 08:43:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 04:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492252] Review Request: libdwarf - Library to access the DWARF Debugging file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010843.n318hTev012780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492252 --- Comment #8 from Suravee Suthikulpanit 2009-04-01 04:43:28 EDT --- Thank you for your approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 08:47:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 04:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492252] Review Request: libdwarf - Library to access the DWARF Debugging file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010847.n318lYIG013833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492252 Suravee Suthikulpanit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Suravee Suthikulpanit 2009-04-01 04:47:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libdwarf Short Descriptions: Library to access the DWARF Debugging file format Owners: suravee Branches: F-10 InitialCC: paragn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 08:56:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 04:56:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492612] Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010856.n318uF4x015729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492612 Jason Friedland changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thesuperjason at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jason Friedland 2009-04-01 04:56:14 EDT --- Hi Andreas - I'm a new packager here but some changes I thought might be required: 1. You're packaging a library, not a language: Group: Development/Libraries 2. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python BuildRequires: python Package built fine on F10 for me. Jason -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 08:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 04:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490724] Review Request: R-RUnit - R Unit test framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010859.n318xE49001749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490724 --- Comment #7 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-04-01 04:59:13 EDT --- Second mail sent to the R-devel mailing list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 09:13:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 05:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492744] Review Request: python-grizzled - The Grizzled Utility Library is a general-purpose Python library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010913.n319DOJP019691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492744 --- Comment #2 from Jason Friedland 2009-04-01 05:13:23 EDT --- Updated SPEC to conform to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python New SRPM: http://jason.friedland.id.au/pkg/python-grizzled-0.9.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 09:13:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 05:13:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492979] Review Request: python-cliutils - A collection of utilities easing the creation of command line scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010913.n319DKHT019663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492979 --- Comment #1 from Jason Friedland 2009-04-01 05:13:19 EDT --- Updated SPEC to conform to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python New SRPM: http://jason.friedland.id.au/pkg/python-cliutils-0.1.3-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 09:15:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 05:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010915.n319FbER006580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 --- Comment #2 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-04-01 05:15:36 EDT --- arf there is a missing BR on R-Biostrings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 09:14:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 05:14:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010914.n319Ed57006035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 --- Comment #2 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-04-01 05:14:37 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-Biostrings.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-Biostrings-2.10.21-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 09:22:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 05:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490725] Review Request: geanyvc - Version Controler plugin for geany In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010922.n319M1OM021762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490725 --- Comment #6 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-04-01 05:22:00 EDT --- What should we do ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 09:21:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 05:21:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010921.n319L8Dp021567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 --- Comment #3 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-04-01 05:21:08 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-BSgenome.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-BSgenome-1.10.5-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 09:22:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 05:22:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458773] Review Request: geany-vc - Provide uniform access to different version-control systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010922.n319Mr2F008213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458773 --- Comment #8 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-04-01 05:22:52 EDT --- I am willing to port geanyvc into Fedora, please step up if you still want (you were there the first ;-) ) We could also co-maintain it if you like -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 09:22:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 05:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486584] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application - Framework for building reusable web-applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010922.n319Minp008171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486584 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-01 05:22:43 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-4.21-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-4.21-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 09:36:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 05:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226301] Merge Review: planner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010936.n319aGCG011325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226301 --- Comment #5 from Caolan McNamara 2009-04-01 05:36:15 EDT --- Hmm, apparently I still own this, thought I handed it over, probably got mixed up with dia. Anyway (planner-0.14.3-11.fc11) removed the old obsoletes in line with current recommendations to get rid of them after X releases The planner.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/planner.schemas warning is ok The planner-eds.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package warning is fixed The planner-eds.i386: W: and planner-devel.i386: W: no-documentation warnings aren't fixed. Can't see what we could put in for -eds documentation, there just isn't any -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 09:39:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 05:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010939.n319d3vr025514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Novotny 2009-04-01 05:39:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Ping again? hello, I am currently focusing a lot on fixing mailman bugs, so I will look into this right now. The last major thing in mailman was to uprade to 2.1.12. the config file mm_cfg.py is in /usr/lib/mailman/Mailman/ , since it's a part of Python package Mailman. The other warnings seem interesting, too... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 09:54:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 05:54:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458773] Review Request: geany-vc - Provide uniform access to different version-control systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010954.n319spT1029478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458773 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |panemade at gmail.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-01 05:54:49 EDT --- Ok. I see Pierre is interested to package this and no progress made here since months. Therefore closing this and continuing review bug 490725 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 490725 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 09:54:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 05:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490725] Review Request: geanyvc - Version Controler plugin for geany In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010954.n319sqm5029507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490725 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at krishnan.cc --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-01 05:54:50 EDT --- *** Bug 458773 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 10:01:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 06:01:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492091] Review Request: zikula-module-Content - Page editing module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011001.n31A16F3017479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091 --- Comment #7 from LukasHetzi 2009-04-01 06:01:05 EDT --- Hello, This is a post release. The link in the source is from Simon, who gave me the link from the tag in the SVN repository. But now it is also available here: http://code.zikula.org/content/downloads/3 I'll change the link in the next spec file. The module in the name is because I'll also package themes. And somebody pointed out that there could be conflicts between the names of modules and themes. Don't know what to do with pnincludes, but I'll look at it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 10:07:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 06:07:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490725] Review Request: geanyvc - Version Controler plugin for geany In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011007.n31A7ZjX000471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490725 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-01 06:07:35 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1269712 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 643b4b8ac313754e05c2e60db9c2713c geanyvc-0.5.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package geanyvc-0.5-2.fc11.i586 => Provides: geanyvc.so Requires: libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libcairo.so.2 libfontconfig.so.1 libfreetype.so.6 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libgio-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI App Suggestions: 1) package should not own /usr/lib/geany as its owned by geany Change %{_libdir}/geany/ to %{_libdir}/geany/* APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 10:41:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 06:41:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493299] New: Review Request: urlwatch - Tool for monitoring webpages for updates Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: urlwatch - Tool for monitoring webpages for updates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493299 Summary: Review Request: urlwatch - Tool for monitoring webpages for updates Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/urlwatch-1.7/urlwatch.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/urlwatch-1.7/urlwatch-1.7-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This script is intended to help you watch URLs and get notified (via email or in your terminal) of any changes. The change notification will include the URL that has changed and a unified diff of what has changed. The script supports the use of a filtering hook function to strip trivially-varying elements of a webpage. Basic features * Simple configuration (text file, one URL per line) * Easily hackable (clean Python implementation) * Can run as a cronjob and mail changes to you * Always outputs only plaintext - no HTML mails :) * Supports removing noise (always-changing website parts) * Example hooks to filter content in Python RPMLINT: silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 11:05:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 07:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493232] Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011105.n31B59vn012774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493232 --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-01 07:05:08 EDT --- for me there are no problems,I can apply all debian patches, I will include a new spec here soon, feel free to review it if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 11:39:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 07:39:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492612] Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011139.n31Bdg6R006579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492612 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-01 07:39:41 EDT --- Hello Jason, I adapted python-chardet from python-feedparser (which is already in the repository). 1. As python-chardet is a *python* library, it is no system / c / whatever library Group: Development/Languages is the correct one. 2. Well, python-feedparser has BuildRequires: python-devel and as I said, I adapted from that srpm. python-chardet requires the /usr/lib/python2.5/config/ dir and thus needs BuildRequires: python-devel This obsoletes BuildRequires: python Andreas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 11:50:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 07:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226367] Merge Review: reiserfs-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011150.n31BoQS8009618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226367 Xose Vazquez Perez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xose.vazquez at gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Xose Vazquez Perez 2009-04-01 07:50:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > please tell me what's need's to be fixed. Latest release is 3.6.21: This is first stable release since 2004-10-13, and it contains changes made by Jeff Mahoney (everything got testing as a part of latest SuSE distros). 2009-01-09 Patches from Jeff Mahoney: - reiserfsprogs-mkreiserfs-quiet.diff - reiserfsprogs-large-block-warning.diff - reiserfsprogs-fsck-mapid.diff - reiserfsprogs-external-journal-changes.diff - reiserfsprogs-remove-stupid-fsck_sleep.diff - reiserfsprogs-mkfs-use-o_excl.diff - reiserfsprogs-enforce-block-limit.diff - reiserfsprogs-large-fs.diff - reiserfsprogs-better-fsck-a-behavior.diff - reiserfsprogs-remove-dependency-on-asm_unaligned.h.diff - reiserfsprogs-progress.diff - reiserfsprogs-reorder-libs.diff Patches from Ludwig Nussel: - mkreiserfs-set-the-owner-of-the-root-directory-to-the-calling-user.diff Patches from Edward Shishkin: - reiserfsprogs-disable-small-block.diff - reiserfsprogs-new-version.diff The URL tag in the .spec file should be changed to the new $HOME at: http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/fs/reiserfs/ -thanks- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 12:40:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 08:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225950] Merge Review: jpackage-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011240.n31CeXUs020286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225950 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-01 08:40:32 EDT --- Great, APPROVED. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 12:42:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 08:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493299] Review Request: urlwatch - Tool for monitoring webpages for updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011242.n31Cg5Ic001906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493299 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 12:43:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 08:43:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226426] Merge Review: spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011243.n31Ch8TS002032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226426 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(fedora-perl-devel | |-list at redhat.com) | --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-01 08:43:07 EDT --- It was, and I'm busy with $_DAYJOB and real life, as well as many other Fedora things, so I'll take Warren's suggestion. APPROVED. Thanks all for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 12:46:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 08:46:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226367] Merge Review: reiserfs-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011246.n31CkJdc021437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226367 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-01 08:46:18 EDT --- Itamar, basically correct the URL tag. I'd have liked to have had some explanation of the naming being different than upstream (reiserfs-utils/reiserfsprogs), but that would have come from Jeff, ideally, so I'll let that go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 12:49:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 08:49:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226301] Merge Review: planner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011249.n31CnjTn021868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226301 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-01 08:49:45 EDT --- All sounds reasonable. If the Obsoletes are gone, are the Provides needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 12:55:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 08:55:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011255.n31CtxWO023567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #30 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-01 08:55:54 EDT --- Those look solid, and demonstrate progress up the Packaging Guidlines learning curve. :) So you still need a sponsor? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 13:09:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:09:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489929] Review request: libHBAAPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011309.n31D9Ckj026486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489929 --- Comment #5 from Jan Zeleny 2009-04-01 09:09:11 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi-2.2-4.fc10.src.rpm I added one line to the description. It's not much, but hopefully it's enough for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 13:11:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011311.n31DBmJb008734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 13:11:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011311.n31DB9xX008542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |msuchy at redhat.com Alias| |postgresql-orafce Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #17 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-04-01 09:11:05 EDT --- ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [!] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1269956 [x] Rpmlint output: empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [!] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 2a091014fe63e10dc4aa4661453f4b07 orafce-2.1.4.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [!] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the tests pass ToDo: So do you plan to name the package postgresql-orafce or just orafce. In first case you should rename your spec file and Name, in second you should change summary of this BZ. I like the first option as we can have in feature something like mysql-orafce, firebird-orafce... The license is stated BSD, but the text in COPYRIGHT.orafunc differ from BSD licence as I know it (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_license). Can you clarify it? %{_docdir}/pgsql/contrib/*.orafunc That should be %doc COPYRIGHT.orafunc INSTALL.orafunc README.orafunc Do you really want to requires postgresql, I suppose that correct should be be postgresql-server, but IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 13:45:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493335] New: Review Request: perl-RTx-Calendar - Calendar for RT due tasks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-RTx-Calendar - Calendar for RT due tasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493335 Summary: Review Request: perl-RTx-Calendar - Calendar for RT due tasks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-RTx-Calendar.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-RTx-Calendar-0.07-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This RT extension provides a calendar view for your tickets and your reminders so you see when is your next due ticket. You can find it in the menu Search->Calendar. There's a portlet to put on your home page (see Prefs/MyRT.html). You can also enable ics (ICal) feeds for your default calendar and all your private searches in Prefs/Calendar.html. Authentication is magic number based so that you can give those feeds to other people. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 13:47:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:47:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462923] Review Request: jibx - Framework for binding XML data to Java objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011347.n31DltGF003927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462923 Bug 462923 depends on bug 462580, which changed state. Bug 462580 Summary: Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462580 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 13:47:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462580] Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011347.n31Dlrro003869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462580 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Blocks|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #4 from John Guthrie 2009-04-01 09:47:52 EDT --- I apologize for the non-response. I've been looking on a search results page for someone to actually assign this review request to themselves. (It would be nice if there was some way to get last time modified into search results on bugzilla.) Anyway, I am re-opening this bug and I will have a response to the issues brought up soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 13:57:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492398] Review Request: slv2 - LV2 host library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011357.n31DvHPp020956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492398 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-01 09:57:16 EDT --- slv2-0.6.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/slv2-0.6.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 14:09:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:09:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226367] Merge Review: reiserfs-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011409.n31E9KeT024068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226367 --- Comment #11 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-01 10:09:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Itamar, basically correct the URL tag. I'd have liked to have had some > explanation of the naming being different than upstream > (reiserfs-utils/reiserfsprogs), but that would have come from Jeff, ideally, so > I'll let that go. the future of reiserfs is still obscure [1], about the name , I recommend to let the current name, this package will probably removed in next merge review [1] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reiser4 http://ispbrasil.com.br/reiserfs-utils/reiserfs-utils.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/reiserfs-utils/reiserfs-utils-3.6.21-1.fc11.src.rpm koji scratch build dist-f11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1270246 Can I go ahead and commit to cvs ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 14:15:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489929] Review request: libHBAAPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011415.n31EFeGZ011305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489929 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-01 10:15:39 EDT --- All issues are fixed, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 14:17:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:17:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011417.n31EHfHl026530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |feng.shaun at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter 2009-04-01 10:17:37 EDT --- *** Bug 493240 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 14:17:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493240] Review Request: Droid-fonts - Google Android fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011417.n31EHd0L026493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493240 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2009-04-01 10:17:37 EDT --- seems already in fedora, google-droid-fonts bug #475661 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 475661 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 14:18:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493299] Review Request: urlwatch - Tool for monitoring webpages for updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011418.n31EIijQ011839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493299 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-01 10:18:44 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. Python bytecode, OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK The package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 14:21:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490723] Review Request: R-IRanges - Low-level containers for storing sets of integer ranges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011421.n31ELUlM027744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490723 --- Comment #9 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-04-01 10:21:28 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-IRanges.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-IRanges-1.1.55-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 14:33:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490725] Review Request: geanyvc - Version Controler plugin for geany In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011433.n31EXfl1031132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490725 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-04-01 10:33:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: geanyvc Short Description: Version controler plugin for geany Owners: pingou Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 14:45:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:45:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011445.n31Ej8Ig020004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #7 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2009-04-01 10:45:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=337547) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=337547) Adds DESTDIR to BundledLibraries Makefiles, fixes build issue with 0.8.0.1 This simple patch is required to make 0.8.0.1 build successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 14:45:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:45:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226367] Merge Review: reiserfs-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011445.n31EjJKn020131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226367 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-01 10:45:18 EDT --- Looks great. APPROVED. Commit and build. Thanks for finishing this, and taking over the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 15:09:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:09:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490724] Review Request: R-RUnit - R Unit test framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011509.n31F9twk008692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490724 --- Comment #8 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-04-01 11:09:55 EDT --- Answer from the maintainer: > Hello Pierre, > > I must have missed your original email. > > GPL-2 is the intended license specification as given in the DESCRIPTION file. I'll check and update the code headers as soon as I have time for. > > Thanks for pointing this out. > > Best regards, Matthias Update: Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-RUnit.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-RUnit-0.4.21-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 15:21:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011521.n31FL0dx011239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #15 from Anithra 2009-04-01 11:20:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > It would be > much better if people could run it as normal user for the case where the > eclipse and the server are run by the same user. I agree that users could be apprehensive about running the app as root and this is one of the issues that we are looking to fix soon. eclipse and the server in most cases may not be run by the same user as the server could be on a different machine. The server minimally needs to be run as root or users of group stapdev/stapusr to be able to run systemtap scripts, although the current code mandates that the server is run as root. > There are a couple questionable cases in > datamanager.cpp:DataManager::execStap(): > > case (SHELL): allows executing arbitary script (as root this seems like a bad > idea). what would prevent someone from using this to just connect and run > arbitrary commands. > > cases (BLUEDYE): mentions a package (Bluedye) that doesn't appear to be > available in fedora The server was designed to be able to run any script(not just systemtap) and hence the above cases. This part of the code is there for future expansion. Currently these cases are never true and so there is no chance of arbitrary commands being run. > > Why scp the file to the server machine? why not send it to the stapgui-server > with the command and run with stap -e 'script...'? Currently, the plugin stores I had some problems with protocol management due to the variable length of the script. It might be better to transfer as part of the command through the socket connection and remove one step from the setup. Will redesign in subsequent releases. > the password in plantext in a possibly world readable file. Also the current > checks in the plugin do not seem to notice if the transfer failed (due to > missing password). > You should have got an error message saying "File transferred failed". Will look into it > The compile server does compile code, but it doesn't perform the other aspects > of systemtapgui server such as execute the script and collect stdout/stderr. > Could systemtapgui be stripped down just to use staprun to run a compiled > script? Make it possible to run systemtap scripts on stripped down machines. > This would be useful for cases of running code on compute nodes in a cluster. This is one feature we are looking at in future releases of the client. Possibly by the end of the year. We are exploring the option of using the compile-server for compilation, and systemtapguiserver for execution. Thanks for the review. Can we treat the code changes/bug fixes as upstream issues so that this review is not blocked?. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 15:38:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226301] Merge Review: planner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011538.n31FcBD6016795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226301 --- Comment #7 from Caolan McNamara 2009-04-01 11:38:11 EDT --- Should be no need for them either -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 15:45:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:45:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475141] Review Request: python-imdb - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011545.n31FjofM018820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475141 Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 15:56:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:56:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490724] Review Request: R-RUnit - R Unit test framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011556.n31Fucom005643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490724 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Conrad Meyer 2009-04-01 11:56:38 EDT --- Thanks for getting that resolved. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 15:55:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226301] Merge Review: planner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011555.n31FtTJl021639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226301 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-01 11:55:29 EDT --- Ok, drop them and I'll be happy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 15:59:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:59:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011559.n31Fx9Mc006078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #31 from David Carter 2009-04-01 11:59:08 EDT --- I'm willing to commit (figuratively and literally) if you're willing to sponsor :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 16:00:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491545] Review Request: pynac - A modified version of GiNaC using Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011600.n31G08Cm006602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491545 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-01 12:00:07 EDT --- Note that I see 89 additional rpmlint complaints of the type: pynac.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpynac-0.1.so.2.0.1 PyTuple_Type It looks like libpynac isn't linked properly against... something. Maybe libpython? I guess they assume that everything which will use this library will link against libpython itself, as the .pc file indicates. I've always thought that to be bad form, but such things aren't review blockers. Still, do note that you get more rpmlint output if you run it against the installed packages. It would be nice if %description had some indication of what GiNaC is. Maybe: A modified version of the GiNaC symbolic computation library which uses python as its numerical library. or something. Shouldn't the resulting package have some dependency on python or some python library? I guess that's due to the same issue as the undefined-non-weak-symbol rpmlint complaints; since nothing here is actually linked against libpython, rpm won't find a dependency. I guess anything built with this package will end up having the proper dependency (if it's built correctly, that is), so I'm really not sure what the proper dependencies are. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: c7c7538c6dc0da801bb7af6fbbeb1b65800f1a410842416882d02b7bc2381566 pynac-0.1.3.spkg * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. x description is a bit confusing. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. ? final provides and requires: pynac-0.1.3-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm libpynac-0.1.so.2()(64bit) pynac = 0.1.3-1.fc11 pynac(x86-64) = 0.1.3-1.fc11 = /sbin/ldconfig libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libpynac-0.1.so.2()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.1)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.11)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.5)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit) (no python dependency) pynac-devel-0.1.3-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm pynac-devel = 0.1.3-1.fc11 pynac-devel(x86-64) = 0.1.3-1.fc11 = /usr/bin/pkg-config libpynac-0.1.so.2()(64bit) pkgconfig pynac = 0.1.3-1.fc11 pynac-static-0.1.3-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm pynac-static = 0.1.3-1.fc11 pynac-static(x86-64) = 0.1.3-1.fc11 = pynac-devel = 0.1.3-1.fc11 * shared libraries installed: ldconfig is called properly. unversioned .so link is in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * pkgconfig files are in the -devel package; pkgconfig dependency is there. * static libraries present in a separate -static package. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 16:00:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476398] Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011600.n31G0bWU022883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 --- Comment #40 from Conrad Meyer 2009-04-01 12:00:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > can you investigate 1) the shared-lib-calls-exit warning and if we can ignore, > please justify and 2) the binaryinfo-readelf-failed for the -static subpackage 1) Shared-lib-calls-exit means that somewhere in the library a piece of code calls exit(). This is a poor practice for a library but it's not our fault and we can ignore it. 2) I don't know why this happens, it should be resolved before this is approved. (In reply to comment #39) > Btw, this fails on F-10: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1269432 > > because ntl-static doesn't yet exist: > > No Package Found for ntl-static > > Is there a pending update for ntl? No, AFAIK the maintainer only fixed ntl-devel to provide ntl-static in Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 16:11:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:11:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490724] Review Request: R-RUnit - R Unit test framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011611.n31GBflM009080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490724 --- Comment #10 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-04-01 12:11:40 EDT --- Thanks for the review :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-RUnit Short Description: R Unit test framework Owners: pingou Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 16:12:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490724] Review Request: R-RUnit - R Unit test framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011612.n31GC2NX009161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490724 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 16:16:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:16:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491545] Review Request: pynac - A modified version of GiNaC using Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011616.n31GG8Js026399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491545 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2009-04-01 12:16:07 EDT --- Yes, this should link against libpython, and then rpm will autogenerate the correct Requires. I will fix the description and try to fix the build process to link against libpython. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 16:19:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:19:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011619.n31GJikX026955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #32 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-01 12:19:42 EDT --- I am, just wanted to make sure you'd not found another in the interim. APPROVED. I've also marked your FAS account sponsored, so once that all propagates, do you CVS request, import, build, and close this bug. Welcome aboard, and feel free to bug me with questions, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 16:26:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:26:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011626.n31GQUbf012975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-04-01 12:26:29 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 16:28:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220443] Review Request: gnome-commander - A nice and fast file manager for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011628.n31GSPUe028823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220443 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-04-01 12:28:24 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 16:27:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173111] Review Request: gdesklets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011627.n31GRdi2013413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=173111 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #45 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-04-01 12:27:35 EDT --- unsetting cvs request, Please reset with an actual request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 16:29:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:29:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211718] Review Request: thewidgetfactory - A tool for previewing widgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011629.n31GTQxH013622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211718 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #11 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-04-01 12:29:24 EDT --- unsetting cvs flag. please reset with a cvs request if you have one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 16:31:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490724] Review Request: R-RUnit - R Unit test framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011631.n31GVZPZ029989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490724 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-04-01 12:31:33 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 16:32:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490317] Review Request: rumor - Really Unintelligent Music transcriptOR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011632.n31GWVMR015014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490317 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-04-01 12:32:30 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 16:35:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011635.n31GZoGw015754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #14 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-04-01 12:35:48 EDT --- CVS request denied. The package maintainer for fedora should be making the request. if the maintainer doesnt wish to do EPEL then we need some indication that is the case and then you need a full request as you would be the maintainer for the EPEL branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 16:36:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:36:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491875] Review Request: unzoo - ZOO archive extractor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011636.n31GaVE0031182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491875 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-04-01 12:36:30 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 16:38:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:38:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476346] Review Request: python-polybori - Framework for Boolean Rings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011638.n31Gciuj031462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476346 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-04-01 12:38:43 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 16:37:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491570] Review Request: sahana - Disaster Management System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011637.n31Gbq4a031340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-04-01 12:37:51 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 16:39:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490725] Review Request: geanyvc - Version Controler plugin for geany In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011639.n31GdSv7016301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490725 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-04-01 12:39:27 EDT --- CVS done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 16:40:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:40:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492252] Review Request: libdwarf - Library to access the DWARF Debugging file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011640.n31GeWwo016851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492252 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-04-01 12:40:32 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 16:53:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011653.n31Grdnp019512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 --- Comment #15 from Ralf Ertzinger 2009-04-01 12:53:38 EDT --- I have no interest in maintaining an EPEL branch. Are there some formalities to observe, or is this statement sufficient? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 17:05:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:05:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490317] Review Request: rumor - Really Unintelligent Music transcriptOR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011705.n31H5fI9022880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490317 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-01 13:05:40 EDT --- rumor-1.0.3b-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rumor-1.0.3b-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 17:09:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:09:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492252] Review Request: libdwarf - Library to access the DWARF Debugging file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011709.n31H90J7023642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492252 Suravee Suthikulpanit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 17:10:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492946] Review Request: eclipse-dltk - Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011710.n31HAWNV006800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492946 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-04-01 13:10:31 EDT --- I'll take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 17:26:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:26:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454010] Review Request: iaxclient - Library for creating telephony solutions that interoperate with Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011726.n31HQNkm028338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454010 Bug 454010 depends on bug 454008, which changed state. Bug 454008 Summary: Review Request: iax - Implementation of Inter-Asterisk eXchange protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454008 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-01 13:26:21 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 17:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491992] Review Request: mod_falcon - An embedded Falcon interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011731.n31HVti6011383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491992 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-01 13:31:54 EDT --- Lifting FE-Legal, assuming that this code is dual-licensed like the Falcon language interpreter is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 17:36:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:36:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492252] Review Request: libdwarf - Library to access the DWARF Debugging file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011736.n31HaOV4012517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492252 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-01 13:36:23 EDT --- libdwarf-0.20090324-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libdwarf-0.20090324-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 17:37:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:37:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492946] Review Request: eclipse-dltk - Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011737.n31Hb8ip031261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492946 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-04-01 13:37:08 EDT --- Mat, What do you think about dropping the gcj_support? It is giving us nothing as eclipse itself is compiled without it. And benefits for us will be a lot simpler spec file, faster compilation, noarch packages and etc. Also there are 65 errors in the debuginfo which I don't think we should care for but they will be gone also if we remove gcj_support. Sample: eclipse-dltk-debuginfo.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/dltk-1.0.0/org.eclipse.dltk.testing/src/org/eclipse/dltk/internal/testing/util/Resources.java -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 17:48:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:48:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491875] Review Request: unzoo - ZOO archive extractor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011748.n31HmaHb014954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491875 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-01 13:48:35 EDT --- unzoo-4.4-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unzoo-4.4-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 17:48:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:48:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490318] Review Request: frescobaldi - Edit LilyPond sheet music with ease! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011748.n31Hm80P014846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490318 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-01 13:48:07 EDT --- frescobaldi-0.7.8-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/frescobaldi-0.7.8-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 17:49:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490318] Review Request: frescobaldi - Edit LilyPond sheet music with ease! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011749.n31Hn32I015093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490318 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-01 13:49:03 EDT --- frescobaldi-0.7.8-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/frescobaldi-0.7.8-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 17:54:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:54:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011754.n31Hs2RP016290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 --- Comment #2 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-01 13:54:01 EDT --- http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/RabbIT/RabbIT-3.18-5.fc9.src.rpm new upstream release. One serious bug fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 17:49:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:49:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491875] Review Request: unzoo - ZOO archive extractor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011749.n31HnPX7015346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491875 John W. Linville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 17:55:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481159] Review Request: ocaml-autoconf - Autoconf macros for OCaml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011755.n31HtDgk016825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481159 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-01 13:55:11 EDT --- There's not really all that much to this package. I've no idea how to test it, of course, but packaging-wise it's fine. I would generally advise against using https links for Source URLs when the upstream sites have unverifiable certificates; it breaks spectool. Maybe one day cacert will pull its head out with regards to the licensing of its root certificates and we can include them in Fedora by default. Luckily my spectool is patched to pass --no-check-certificate. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 67e85520f65c033c86e99e5438e51657e777579034570527c1b2c62096ecb004 ocaml-autoconf-1.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ocaml-autoconf = 1.0-1.fc11 = automake * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 18:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493432] Review Request: libgdata - Library for the GData protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011810.n31IAO5l019889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493432 --- Comment #1 from Bastien Nocera 2009-04-01 14:10:23 EDT --- Scratch build at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1271012 This package will replace the python-gdata dependency for Totem, as the YouTube plugin is being replaced by a C version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 18:09:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493432] New: Review Request: libgdata - Library for the GData protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libgdata - Library for the GData protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493432 Summary: Review Request: libgdata - Library for the GData protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bnocera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/libgdata/libgdata.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/libgdata/libgdata-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: libgdata is a GLib-based library for accessing online service APIs using the GData protocol --- most notably, Google's services. It provides APIs to access the common Google services, and has full asynchronous support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 18:24:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011824.n31IONE1010669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-01 14:24:22 EDT --- Sorry for taking so long; I had too many reviews in flight and somehow this one slipped through the cracks. Please feel free to ping me if I've let something go idle for too long. You seem to have clarified the license situation well enough, and the static stuff is gone, which is good. However, it's kind of weird to patch up to a CVS snapshot by including a patch thats larger than the source tarball. It's OK to pick patches out of the upstream SCM if that's what you want, but if you want to ship a snapshot, it's better to simply do a checkout and include that as your tarball. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL for information on how we do this. Basically, you make the tarball but include instructions for generating it so that someone else who comes along will know where it came from. Currently you just have this big patch with no information on duplicating it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 18:31:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:31:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011831.n31IV7Xo012384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 Bruno Mahe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bruno at gnoll.org) | --- Comment #30 from Bruno Mahe 2009-04-01 14:31:06 EDT --- Still there and still busy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 18:34:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011834.n31IYaq0012891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-01 14:34:35 EDT --- Well, ! You can base your spec file on what is created from cpanspec (in cpanspec rpm): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Perl/cpanspec Then some notes: - The license tag "GPL" is invalid https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#GPL_and_LGPL (looks like "GPL+ or Artistic" for this package) - Your package does not build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1270974 At least BR: perl(ExtUtils::Depends) is needed - I doubt explicit "Requires: gtk2, glib, cairo" are needed. Such library related dependencies are automatically checked by rpmbuild itself and automatically added to binary rpms. Also I guess "Requires: perl-Gtk2" is also automatically checked by rpmbuild. - Please make the sentence in %description devided into several lines. Fedora suggests one line should not contain more than 79 characters. - Please add dome documents as %doc. - The directory %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/ should not be owned by this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 18:45:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:45:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011845.n31IjRbM027609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-01 14:45:26 EDT --- By the way please also upload the spec file so that we can browse it on the browser. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 18:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011852.n31IqssO029152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-01 14:52:53 EDT --- Also see my comment on bug 493250 (By the way I doubt your package builds on your machine...) Then: - Please use canonical cpan site URL for Source0. - @foo@ in BuildRequires is invalid. Also please consider if such explicit version-specific (Build)Requires are really needed. - For perl modules please don't write the rpm name directory as (Build)Requires but write virtual Provides names the rpms provide (BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Depends) or so) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides - These explicit Requires: ------------------------------------------------------- Requires: libwnck >= %(pkg-config --modversion libwnck-1.0) Requires: perl-Glib >= @PERL_GLIB@ Requires: perl-Gtk2 >= @PERL_GTK@ Requires: gtk2, glib perl-Gtk2, cairo -------------------------------------------------------- should not be needed. Also "Requires: %(perl -MConfig -le 'if (de....." is not needed, I guess. rpmbuild itself should handle these. - Please make %description divided into several lines. - Please add some documents -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 19:11:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 15:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493432] Review Request: libgdata - Library for the GData protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011911.n31JBI51021885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493432 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-01 15:11:17 EDT --- Is there really no upstream URL? You probably want to remove the commented URL tag as it seems unrelated. Unfortunately without an upstream site I don't have a clue as to how you find new version of the source. You also get a few rpmlint complaints: libgdata.x86_64: W: no-url-tag libgdata-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-url-tag libgdata-devel.x86_64: W: no-url-tag which are OK as long as there really isn't some upstream site to point to. Also: libgdata.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgdata.so.2.0.0 /lib64/libgthread-2.0.so.0 libgdata.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgdata.so.2.0.0 /lib64/librt.so.1 libgdata.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgdata.so.2.0.0 /lib64/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgdata.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgdata.so.2.0.0 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 The library is linked against a few things that are not really necessary. This should cause any real problems as those will always be loaded anyway. I don't see where the license is LGPLv2+. The source looks to me as if it's GPLv3+, which might have implications for your planned usage. Unpack the source and grep for 'of the License'. It's true that for whatever bizarre reason, upstream included version 2 of the actual LGPL text, but that has no bearing on the actual license that's on the code. Can you query upstream about this? As far as I can tell, there is a test suite but it makes calls out to network services which must already be set up, so there's no way it could be run during the build process. So really the only must-fix blocker issue I see is the license tag. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: bb19c90e8bb2f1ead0d7f407ba15e2f6b6d8a2a355b263ca9338bf68846a5b72 libgdata-0.1.0.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field does not match the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. ? latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: libgdata-0.1.0-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm libgdata.so.2()(64bit) libgdata = 0.1.0-1.fc11 libgdata(x86-64) = 0.1.0-1.fc11 = /sbin/ldconfig libgdata.so.2()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libsoup-2.4.so.1()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) libgdata-devel-0.1.0-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm pkgconfig(libgdata) = 0.1.0 libgdata-devel = 0.1.0-1.fc11 libgdata-devel(x86-64) = 0.1.0-1.fc11 = /usr/bin/pkg-config gtk-doc libgdata = 0.1.0-1.fc11 libgdata.so.2()(64bit) pkgconfig pkgconfig(libsoup-2.4) pkgconfig(libxml-2.0) * %check is not present; included test suite can't be run at build time. * shared libraries installed: ldconfig is called properly. unversioned .so link is in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * pkgconfig files are in the -devel package, with pkgconfig dependency. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 19:22:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 15:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011922.n31JMVJP024415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-01 15:22:31 EDT --- Is this your first package for Fedora? Have you read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join? Your package does not build for me on my x86_64 machine. You really should not use BuildArch unless you're specifying "BuildArch: noarch". If your code really does not work on anything other than i386, you want "ExclusiveArch: i386", although in the modern world it's hard to imagine anyone writing C code that works only on i386. It is rather odd to put the license file for the program directly into the spec file. It's permissible for you to license the spec file if you want, as long as it's still sufficiently free (which yours is) but honestly it's legally questionable as to whether there's anything significant in a spec file which is eligible for copyright anyway. Really what it does is clutter the spec with a bunch of junk you have to ignore before you get to the useful part. You might consider using the dist tag to make maintaing the package across multiple Fedora versions easier. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 19:38:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 15:38:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493299] Review Request: urlwatch - Tool for monitoring webpages for updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011938.n31Jcwq2027944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493299 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-01 15:38:57 EDT --- Thank you for your very fast review! :-) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: urlwatch Short Description: Tool for monitoring webpages for updates Owners: casssmodiah Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 19:44:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 15:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493299] Review Request: urlwatch - Tool for monitoring webpages for updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011944.n31Ji0NS008291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493299 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-01 15:43:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: urlwatch Short Description: Tool for monitoring webpages for updates Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 19:43:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 15:43:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011943.n31JhXot008178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |sanjay.ankur at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-04-01 15:43:32 EDT --- This one is a go. Though I'm sure someone will report someday weird behaviours in apps du to the strange family/style names. You'll need to relay upstream then. ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Thank you for packaging a new Fedora font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 19:52:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 15:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491875] Review Request: unzoo - ZOO archive extractor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011952.n31JqRuO010355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491875 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #16 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-01 15:52:26 EDT --- Great, now we can update the deco-archive package so that deco can use unzoo instead of zoo, which is not available in Fedora. Where can we download .zoo files for testing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 19:57:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 15:57:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011957.n31JvFxk032556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-01 15:57:14 EDT --- The URL in the spec doesn't seem related. Can you indicate where you get a license of "Freely redistributable without restriction"? The only place I can see any indication of a license is in SpecialRenameuser.php and it says GPLv2+. The upstream web site says "unspecified". I think it's reasonable to assume that GPLv2+ applies to all five php files since they're distributed together. It would be nice to query the author about inserting proper license notices as suggested by the GPL. Also note that in any case, "Freely distributable without restriction" is not sufficiently free for code in Fedora. We need the right to modify as well. The README.fedora file mentions InputBox twice. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: d791117c556ad9af35dc51dbac815ef129e507fcad30db9740bbaa3108bb4f59 RenameUserJob.php 0f73d6727b396dfae1b3fd3126763e74fda852a70204a5d6b98815b3db6d9987 SpecialRenameuser.alias.php 217a14bf162a32a2276b68f4e84ae820711943f259fa4ccb245e535f3aa9a3b1 SpecialRenameuser_body.php b952cb8b5dd7a636faae2ec15945db877a07ee26b3faf35932c2b59488a20b5a SpecialRenameuser.i18n.php 0220b4877670f5bc88a2b76e34ff677b44864a3424d4a4ec80ec82e7ef8aafcb SpecialRenameuser.php * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field does not match the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * BuildRequires are proper (none, as there * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: mediawiki-Renameuser = 0-0.1.20090331svn.fc11 = mediawiki >= 1.14 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 20:07:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:07:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492816] Review Request: show - A SQL-like interface for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012007.n31K7OP3002677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492816 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-01 16:07:23 EDT --- Actually, there's no choice but to change the name, as this package conflicts with nmh which has contained /usr/bin/show for approximately forever. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 20:29:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492797] Review Request: ofl-goudy-bookletter-1911-fonts - Clean serif font based on Kennerly Old Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012029.n31KTBqg018433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492797 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-04-01 16:29:10 EDT --- This one is a go ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue on from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 20:35:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012035.n31KZSul009222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 David Carter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #33 from David Carter 2009-04-01 16:35:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: arm4 Short Description: Application Response Measurement V4.0 Owners: dcarter at entertain-me.com Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: limb at jcomserv.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 20:39:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012039.n31KdJGE020361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #34 from David Carter 2009-04-01 16:39:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: arm4 Short Description: Application Response Measurement V4.0 Owners: grandcross Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: limb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 20:50:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492797] Review Request: ofl-goudy-bookletter-1911-fonts - Clean serif font based on Kennerly Old Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012050.n31KodMT012518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492797 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-01 16:50:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: oflb-goudy-bookletter-1911-fonts Short Description: Clean serif font based on Kennerly Old Style Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: fonts-sig ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 20:51:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493232] Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012051.n31KpAbl023140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493232 --- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-01 16:51:09 EDT --- new version with debian patches included. http://ispbrasil.com.br/redir/redir.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/redir/redir-2.2.1-2.fc11.src.rpm koji scratch build -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1271438 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 20:57:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:57:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492816] Review Request: show - A SQL-like interface for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012057.n31Kv1Tt024277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492816 --- Comment #3 from Dave Malcolm 2009-04-01 16:57:01 EDT --- Doh! Thanks for looking into the naming issue; looks like I need to rename the project. My current favourite name for the project is "squeal". I'd rename "show" to "squeal" throughout. There would be a /usr/bin/squeal, and a "squeal" python module. Does this sound acceptable? It's over the 5 character minimum listed on the guidelines in comment #1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 20:38:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489117] Review Request: tulrich-tuffy-fonts - Generic sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012038.n31KcUHw009754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489117 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-04-01 16:38:29 EDT --- This one is good. Please do register as co-maintainers for this package :p ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Thank you for packaging one of the oldest font packaging requests in Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 21:08:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493432] Review Request: libgdata - Library for the GData protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012108.n31L84Et026418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493432 Philip Withnall changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzilla at tecnocode.co.uk --- Comment #3 from Philip Withnall 2009-04-01 17:08:04 EDT --- I'm the author of libgdata. I've just released version 0.1.1, which fixes the licencing issues (standardises on LGPLv2.1) and adds a website: http://live.gnome.org/libgdata. Re. test suites, you can run the "general" test program, which makes no network requests (and will continue not to do so, since there are no "general" GData service providers). What do you mean by "network services which must already be set up"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 21:17:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:17:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492797] Review Request: ofl-goudy-bookletter-1911-fonts - Clean serif font based on Kennerly Old Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012117.n31LHutG018570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492797 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-01 17:17:56 EDT --- I branched it for F-9 and F-10, but it would not build for either target because the versions of fontforge on those branches does not have support for the python extensions (rawhide does). It is built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 21:20:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:20:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] New: Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Summary: Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/woodardworks-laconic-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Laconic is a typeface font design meant to be dry without quite seeming parched. Curves and diagonals are kept to a bare minimum without sacrificing legibility. What it lacks in design features are more than made up for in OpenType features. All the weights contain small caps, proportial figures, old style figures, tabular figures, ligatures and stylistic alternates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 21:21:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493432] Review Request: libgdata - Library for the GData protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012121.n31LL1Pi019304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493432 --- Comment #4 from Bastien Nocera 2009-04-01 17:21:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Is there really no upstream URL? You probably want to remove the commented URL > tag as it seems unrelated. Unfortunately without an upstream site I don't > have a clue as to how you find new version of the source. That would be because I asked upstream to make their first release shortly before posting this bug :) > You also get a few > rpmlint complaints: > > libgdata.x86_64: W: no-url-tag > libgdata-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-url-tag > libgdata-devel.x86_64: W: no-url-tag > which are OK as long as there really isn't some upstream site to point to. > > Also: > libgdata.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libgdata.so.2.0.0 /lib64/libgthread-2.0.so.0 > libgdata.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libgdata.so.2.0.0 /lib64/librt.so.1 > libgdata.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libgdata.so.2.0.0 /lib64/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 > libgdata.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libgdata.so.2.0.0 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 > The library is linked against a few things that are not really necessary. This > should cause any real problems as those will always be loaded anyway. > > I don't see where the license is LGPLv2+. The source looks to me as if it's > GPLv3+, which might have implications for your planned usage. Unpack the > source and grep for 'of the License'. It's true that for whatever bizarre > reason, upstream included version 2 of the actual LGPL text, but that has no > bearing on the actual license that's on the code. Can you query upstream about > this? LGPLv2+ it is, fixed in 0.1.1 > As far as I can tell, there is a test suite but it makes calls out to network > services which must already be set up, so there's no way it could be run during > the build process. It's not run by default. > So really the only must-fix blocker issue I see is the license tag. > > > * source files match upstream. sha256sum: > bb19c90e8bb2f1ead0d7f407ba15e2f6b6d8a2a355b263ca9338bf68846a5b72 > libgdata-0.1.0.tar.bz2 > * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. > * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. > * summary is OK. > * description is OK. > * dist tag is present. > * build root is OK. > X license field does not match the actual license. > * license is open source-compatible. > * license text not included upstream. > ? latest version is being packaged. > * BuildRequires are proper. > * compiler flags are appropriate. > * %clean is present. > * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). > * package installs properly. > * debuginfo package looks complete. > * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. > * final provides and requires are sane: > libgdata-0.1.0-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm > libgdata.so.2()(64bit) > libgdata = 0.1.0-1.fc11 > libgdata(x86-64) = 0.1.0-1.fc11 > = > /sbin/ldconfig > libgdata.so.2()(64bit) > libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > libsoup-2.4.so.1()(64bit) > libxml2.so.2()(64bit) > > libgdata-devel-0.1.0-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm > pkgconfig(libgdata) = 0.1.0 > libgdata-devel = 0.1.0-1.fc11 > libgdata-devel(x86-64) = 0.1.0-1.fc11 > = > /usr/bin/pkg-config > gtk-doc > libgdata = 0.1.0-1.fc11 > libgdata.so.2()(64bit) > pkgconfig > pkgconfig(libsoup-2.4) > pkgconfig(libxml-2.0) > > * %check is not present; included test suite can't be run at build time. > * shared libraries installed: > ldconfig is called properly. > unversioned .so link is in the -devel package. > * owns the directories it creates. > * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. > * no duplicates in %files. > * file permissions are appropriate. > * no generically named files. > * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). > * code, not content. > * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. > * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. > * headers are in the -devel package. > * pkgconfig files are in the -devel package, with pkgconfig dependency. > * no static libraries. > * no libtool .la files. New version at: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/libgdata/libgdata.spec http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/libgdata/libgdata-0.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 21:23:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:23:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493432] Review Request: libgdata - Library for the GData protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012123.n31LNqPT029678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493432 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-01 17:23:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > What do you mean by "network services which must already be set up"? It looked to me as if it would attempt to connect to a preexisting google account to extract calendar data. I only briefly skimmed the source for the tests so I may have come away with the wrong impression. In any case, the environment in which packages are built for Fedora does not have any reasonable form of network access, so that's right out, but if it's reasonable to run the "general" test then it would be good to do so. I'll look over the updated package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 21:43:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493432] Review Request: libgdata - Library for the GData protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012143.n31Lhaai023481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493432 --- Comment #6 from Philip Withnall 2009-04-01 17:43:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > It looked to me as if it would attempt to connect to a preexisting google > account to extract calendar data. I only briefly skimmed the source for the > tests so I may have come away with the wrong impression. It does, but the account username and password are hardcoded, and the account's specially registered for testing purposes, for what it's worth. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 21:49:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489117] Review Request: tulrich-tuffy-fonts - Generic sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012149.n31Ln5NE002398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489117 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-01 17:49:04 EDT --- Thanks Nicolas and Felix! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tulrich-tuffy-fonts Short Description: Generic sans font Owners: toshio fschwarz Branches: devel InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 21:48:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226301] Merge Review: planner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012148.n31LmETk024531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226301 --- Comment #9 from Caolan McNamara 2009-04-01 17:48:14 EDT --- There's nothing to drop in planner-0.14.3-11.f11 right ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 22:02:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012202.n31M2l6n005655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #59 from Justin Zygmont 2009-04-01 18:02:41 EDT --- hi, I got the bug (478) in rpmfusion now, here is the link: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 22:06:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:06:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012206.n31M6GS9028634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-01 18:06:15 EDT --- Where's the latest package with those changes applied? I only see the 0.9.7-1 spec from comment #5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 22:03:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:03:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492609] Review Request: hmaccalc - Tools for computing and checking HMAC values for files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012203.n31M3T3l027902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492609 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-01 18:03:28 EDT --- Builds fine; rpmlint says: hmaccalc.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib which is true as there's only a directory and some small text files. However, it touches on my ignorance: I understand what this package does, but I don't understand the conventions behind the .hmac files. What specifically would care whether the .hmac files were in a subdirectory of %{_libdir}, whether they're off in /usr/share or even stuck in %{_bindir} with the executables? Other packages that have .hmac files seem to put them directly in with the libraries. openssl, for instance, has them for the four libraries (two symlinked) but not for the executable in /usr/bin. Also, I understand the trick with __spec_install_post to get the hmac files generated after everything's been processed and debuginfo has been stripped. However, the comment before that bit confuses me: # We need to regenerate the HMAC values after the buildroot policies have # mucked around with them. This overrides the default which was in place # at least from Red Hat Linux 9 through Fedora 11's development cycle. I'm reading into that implication there that something will generate .hmac files as a normal part of building things and that needs overriding in this case, but I don't think I've ever seen one that wasn't generated manually by a package using exactly that __spec_install_post manipulation. Am I misunderstanding things? Is it possible to run the included test suite? I tried the naive approach, but I just get: + ./run-tests.sh /usr/lib64/hmaccalc/sha1hmac.hmac: No such file or directory which, I think, might be a clue to my first question above. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: c3f490fb6cbd8d11ba072f9278fc32bac76aa6de51c51167e213add52f5ff153 hmaccalc-0.9.5.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. ? rpmlint has a complaint; I'm not sure how valid it is. * final provides and requires are sane: hmaccalc = 0.9.5-1.fc11 hmaccalc(x86-64) = 0.9.5-1.fc11 = libnspr4.so()(64bit) libnss3.so()(64bit) libnss3.so(NSS_3.2)(64bit) libnss3.so(NSS_3.3)(64bit) libnssutil3.so()(64bit) libplc4.so()(64bit) libplds4.so()(64bit) libsmime3.so()(64bit) libssl3.so()(64bit) ? There's a test suite but I don't know if it can be run at build time. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 22:08:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:08:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492831] Review Request: libmkv - An alternative to the official libmatroska library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012208.n31M8DbQ006759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492831 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier at bachelot.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |xavier at bachelot.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-01 18:08:12 EDT --- + MUST: rpmlint output is ok. The only warning can be ignored : libmkv-devel.i386: W: no-documentation + MUST: package name follows guidelines. + MUST: Spec file name is ok. + MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. + MUST: License is ok for Fedora. + MUST: License field mactch actual license. + MUST: License file is included in %doc + MUST: Spec file in legible American English. + MUST: Source file match upstream. MD5 : 984575069cbfb47dece609e78768ca97 + MUST: builds fine on F10 i386 in mock. + MUST: BuildRequires are ok. + MUST: ldconfig is used in %post and %postun. + MUST: owns all dirs it creates. + MUST: No file listed more than once in %files. + MUST: Permissions on files are appropriate. %defattr is properly used. + MUST: %clean section contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + MUST: Macros are used consistently. + MUST: code, not content. + MUST: %doc not needed at runtime. + MUST: Header files are in a -devel package. + MUST: .so libfile in -devel. + MUST: -devel package requires base package. + MUST: .la libtool archives are not included. + MUST: doesn't own files or directories already owned by other packages. + MUST: %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + MUST: All filenames are valid UTF-8. Notes : - Theses backslashes are un-needed : %{_libdir}/libmkv\.so\.*. This should be fixed. - You can prevent libmkv.a to be built by adding --disable-static to %configure. - URL: and Source0: urls are strange, but I don't think you can do any better unfortunately. Please fix the backslashes, then this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 22:10:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:10:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493299] Review Request: urlwatch - Tool for monitoring webpages for updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012210.n31MA2YJ029497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493299 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-01 18:10:02 EDT --- This package is already in Fedora. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/urlwatch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 22:16:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:16:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012216.n31MG8qa008452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #13 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-01 18:16:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Where's the latest package with those changes applied? I only see the 0.9.7-1 > spec from comment #5. I belive in koji, until the next cleanup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 22:18:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480646] Review Request: urlwatch - A tool for monitoring webpages for updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012218.n31MIXrU008817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480646 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-01 18:18:31 EDT --- *** Bug 493299 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 22:18:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493299] Review Request: urlwatch - Tool for monitoring webpages for updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012218.n31MIVrD008780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493299 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Flag|fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-01 18:18:30 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 480646 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 22:24:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492816] Review Request: show - A SQL-like interface for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012224.n31MORSS009811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492816 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-01 18:24:26 EDT --- I don't see a problem with squeal; the only hit on /usr/bin/squeal is in your blog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 22:57:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:57:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012257.n31Mvfnk015757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-01 18:57:40 EDT --- I desperately need a respite from nss-ldap, so I'll take this. If you have any hints on testing it properly I'd be happy to hear them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 00:14:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 20:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020014.n320EePY018898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #11 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-04-01 20:14:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I desperately need a respite from nss-ldap, so I'll take this. If you have any > hints on testing it properly I'd be happy to hear them. Hopefully the interesting parts of /etc/ldap.conf get pulled in automatically the first time the package gets installed. After that, you may need to chkconfig it on and start it if system-config-authentication didn't record that you're using LDAP for naming information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 00:26:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 20:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492609] Review Request: hmaccalc - Tools for computing and checking HMAC values for files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020026.n320QY3D021399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492609 --- Comment #2 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-04-01 20:26:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Builds fine; rpmlint says: > hmaccalc.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > which is true as there's only a directory and some small text files. However, > it touches on my ignorance: I understand what this package does, but I don't > understand the conventions behind the .hmac files. What specifically would > care whether the .hmac files were in a subdirectory of %{_libdir}, whether > they're off in /usr/share or even stuck in %{_bindir} with the executables? > Other packages that have .hmac files seem to put them directly in with the > libraries. openssl, for instance, has them for the four libraries (two > symlinked) but not for the executable in /usr/bin. Nothing else is checking the contents of the files, but since the same source is used to build the various binaries, they need to be able to figure out where the files are based on their own names. I'd been told that non-binary files in /usr/bin were icky, and they're dependent on the binary, so /usr/share is out, and that leaves /etc and /usr/lib/. At that point it was a toss-up. > Also, I understand the trick with __spec_install_post to get the hmac files > generated after everything's been processed and debuginfo has been stripped. > However, the comment before that bit confuses me: > # We need to regenerate the HMAC values after the buildroot policies have > # mucked around with them. This overrides the default which was in place > # at least from Red Hat Linux 9 through Fedora 11's development cycle. > I'm reading into that implication there that something will generate .hmac > files as a normal part of building things and that needs overriding in this > case, but I don't think I've ever seen one that wasn't generated manually by a > package using exactly that __spec_install_post manipulation. Am I > misunderstanding things? Just a bit. The reason we can't just generate the files during %install is that the buildroot policy hasn't stripped the binaries yet, and we need to compute the value for the binary as it's going to look once it's been installed. Changing the ambiguous "them" to "binaries". > Is it possible to run the included test suite? I tried the naive approach, but > I just get: > + ./run-tests.sh > /usr/lib64/hmaccalc/sha1hmac.hmac: No such file or directory > which, I think, might be a clue to my first question above. You'd have to recompile without a --enable-sum-directory so that the in-tree copy of the binary would use an in-tree .hmac file rather than attempt to read the one for the system copy, which would probably have a different value. I haven't quite sorted out how to get it to run properly when built with --enable-sum-directory, but in such a way that it can't be faked out after the package is built. > * source files match upstream. sha256sum: > c3f490fb6cbd8d11ba072f9278fc32bac76aa6de51c51167e213add52f5ff153 > hmaccalc-0.9.5.tar.gz > * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. > * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. > * summary is OK. > * description is OK. > * dist tag is present. > * build root is OK. > * license field matches the actual license. > * license is open source-compatible. > * license text included in package. > * BuildRequires are proper. > * compiler flags are appropriate. > * %clean is present. > * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). > * package installs properly. > * debuginfo package looks complete. > ? rpmlint has a complaint; I'm not sure how valid it is. > * final provides and requires are sane: > hmaccalc = 0.9.5-1.fc11 > hmaccalc(x86-64) = 0.9.5-1.fc11 > = > libnspr4.so()(64bit) > libnss3.so()(64bit) > libnss3.so(NSS_3.2)(64bit) > libnss3.so(NSS_3.3)(64bit) > libnssutil3.so()(64bit) > libplc4.so()(64bit) > libplds4.so()(64bit) > libsmime3.so()(64bit) > libssl3.so()(64bit) > > ? There's a test suite but I don't know if it can be run at build time. > * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. > * owns the directories it creates. > * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. > * no duplicates in %files. > * file permissions are appropriate. > * no generically named files > * code, not content. > * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. > * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. > * no headers. > * no pkgconfig files. > * no static libraries. > * no libtool .la files. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 00:34:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 20:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020034.n320Y26q022414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 --- Comment #7 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-01 20:34:00 EDT --- Hi Jens, what would you think if we could approve that now and work out the way to include this to tables of ibus-table afterwards? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 01:20:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 21:20:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491946] Review Request: odfpy07 - compat package for odfpy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020120.n321K270030853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491946 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-01 21:20:01 EDT --- The naming is fine. Since there's no compile step in python, the compat-$FOO vs $FOO$VER naming is a little mixed. I think $FOO$VER is better unless we're putting the module in some sort of private directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 02:20:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 22:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020220.n322KuEF020117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #2 from arthurguru 2009-04-01 22:20:55 EDT --- Thanks Jason, The spec file I used originally came from a Java application I used to maintain and had the line "BuildArch: noarch" which I changed in haste to "BuildArch: i386" which I now know is wrong. Thanks also for the other helpful hints you made, they will be keenly applied. Kind regards, Arthur Gouros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 02:32:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 22:32:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491946] Review Request: odfpy07 - compat package for odfpy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020232.n322WEYR012084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491946 --- Comment #4 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-01 22:32:14 EDT --- So, before we do this, has anyone tried submitting a port to odfpy0.8 for python-mwlibs upstream? That's really the right thing to do. (I'll add a patch to the python-mwlibs bug now). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 02:47:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 22:47:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488172] Package Review: ibus-table-zhengma In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020247.n322lnDv015723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488172 --- Comment #1 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-01 22:47:49 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-zhengma-1.1.0.20090402-1.fc11.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-zhengma.spec Description: A split from ibus-table-chinese, which was sub-package of ibus-table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 02:56:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 22:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226205] Merge Review: nss_ldap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020256.n322u0rv027433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226205 Nalin Dahyabhai changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #1 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-04-01 22:56:00 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: nss_ldap New Branches: F-11 I'd like to split the pam_ldap bits into a second binary package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 03:03:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 23:03:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225974] Merge Review: krb5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020303.n3233ont018266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225974 Nalin Dahyabhai changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-04-01 23:03:48 EDT --- Hi Jon, thanks for your patience with this -- it's a lot to wade through every time I find a few minutes to poke at this one. I think the thorniest part of it is the part where krb524d is in two subpackages, because figuring out when it's safe/correct to remove the chkconfig symlinks and shut down the daemon isn't lending itself to any elegant solutions. Since all v4-related items are going to be dropped in the upstream 1.7 release, I figure it can be side-stepped by switching off v4 functionality and just triggering on a package version ugprade. The downside is that it's way too late to be switching off the v4 bits for F11, particularly as it removes libkrb4.so and the hooks libkrb4.so needs from libkrb5.so. Needing those hooks to be there for a recent libkrb4.so to work properly makes the odds of adding a compat package highly unlikely. I'm requesting an early branch so that making this and other review-related changes won't create any unexpected problems as it churns. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: krb5 New Branches: F11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 04:15:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 00:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493521] New: Review Request: perl-Log-Trace - A unified approach to tracing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Trace - A unified approach to tracing Alias: perl-Log-Trace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521 Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Trace - A unified approach to tracing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Log-Trace OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Log-Trace.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Log-Trace-1.070-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module provides a unified approach to tracing. A script can 'use Log::Trace qw( < mode > )' to set the behaviour of the TRACE function.By default, the trace functions are exported to the calling package only. You can export the trace functions to other packages with the 'Deep' option. See the "OPTIONS" manpage for more information. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272037 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 04:41:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 00:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493335] Review Request: perl-RTx-Calendar - Calendar for RT due tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020441.n324fRrt002159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493335 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-02 00:41:26 EDT --- build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272093 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 05:00:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 01:00:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493521] Review Request: perl-Log-Trace - A unified approach to tracing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020500.n3250PsB015735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 05:16:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 01:16:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493521] Review Request: perl-Log-Trace - A unified approach to tracing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020516.n325GP1t018532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-02 01:16:24 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272037 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 773aefa7539b1857edb3e225cfbc4a22 Log-Trace-1.070.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=13, Tests=80, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.03 sys + 0.38 cusr 0.08 csys = 0.54 CPU) + Package perl-Log-Trace-1.070-1.fc11.noarch => Provides: perl(Log::Trace) = 1.070 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Fcntl) perl(strict) perl(vars) Can you please help me understand why to use AutoProv and why not to filter and remove unnecessary provides perl(DB)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 05:28:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 01:28:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493527] New: Review Request: perl-PlRPC - Interface for building pServer Clients Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-PlRPC - Interface for building pServer Clients Alias: perl-PlRPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493527 Summary: Review Request: perl-PlRPC - Interface for building pServer Clients Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PlRPC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-PlRPC.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-PlRPC-0.2020-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: PlRPC (Perl RPC) is a package that simplifies the writing of Perl based client/server applications. RPC::PlServer is the package used on the server side, and you guess what RPC::PlClient is for. PlRPC works by defining a set of methods that may be executed by the client. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272115 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 05:45:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 01:45:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493527] Review Request: perl-PlRPC - Interface for building pServer Clients In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020545.n325jBYC013153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493527 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 05:48:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 01:48:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020548.n325m5F0023463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 --- Comment #1 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-02 01:48:04 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-erbi-1.1.0.20090402-1.fc11.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-erbi.spec Description: A split from ibus-table-chinese, which was sub-package of ibus-table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 05:48:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 01:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493521] Review Request: perl-Log-Trace - A unified approach to tracing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020548.n325mxbq013623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-02 01:48:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Can you please help me understand why to use AutoProv and why not to filter and > remove unnecessary provides perl(DB)? Sure :-) DB is used by the Perl debugger, and as such, is sometimes poked at... It shouldn't be provided by this package. In this case, turning off autoprov and manually providing perl(Log::Trace) is significantly easier than filtering the two provides autoprov finds. ...we've also done this before, e.g. perl-DateTime-Format-DBI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 06:10:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 02:10:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493299] Review Request: urlwatch - Tool for monitoring webpages for updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020610.n326AaPD017790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493299 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-02 02:10:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > This package is already in Fedora. Whoops, didn't remember to check BZ. Adding as first item on my checklist :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 06:22:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 02:22:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020622.n326MNFt029887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #13 from Zarko 2009-04-02 02:22:22 EDT --- Still waiting, or I miss something :( This is very very slow process... Zarko -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 06:33:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 02:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020633.n326Xx33031670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #13 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-04-02 02:33:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Sorry for taking so long; No problem. We have time. I also forgot that I have an open review. :) > However, it's kind of weird to patch up to a CVS snapshot by including a patch > thats larger than the source tarball. It's OK to pick patches out of the > upstream SCM if that's what you want, but if you want to ship a snapshot, it's > better to simply do a checkout and include that as your tarball. See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL for information on how we do > this. Basically, you make the tarball but include instructions for generating > it so that someone else who comes along will know where it came from. > Currently you just have this big patch with no information on duplicating it. OK, repackaged as source and also sent an email to upstream mailinglist, which is asking to release this as stable (or at least official snapshot). New package can be found here: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/libirman.spec http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/10/libirman-0.4.4-5.20090314cvs.fc10.src.rpm It was also possible to strip patch by removing "configure" part, which is autoregenerated later from spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 06:39:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 02:39:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490399] (Rename) Review Request: WebKitGTK - GTK+ Web content engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020639.n326d7Ri032570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490399 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-02 02:39:06 EDT --- I see 1.1.4 is out now. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 06:48:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 02:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493530] New: Review Request: perl-Data-Dumper-Names - Data::Dumper::Names module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Dumper-Names - Data::Dumper::Names module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493530 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Dumper-Names - Data::Dumper::Names module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Data-Dumper-Names.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Data-Dumper-Names-0.03-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Module similar to Data::Dumper but variables are dumped with names and without source filter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 06:53:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 02:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493531] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Test-Most.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Test-Most-0.21-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Most commonly needed test functions and features. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 06:55:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 02:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020655.n326tg1v003026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |493530 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 06:55:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 02:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493530] Review Request: perl-Data-Dumper-Names - Data::Dumper::Names module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020655.n326tftI003002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493530 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |493531 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 07:11:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 03:11:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493527] Review Request: perl-PlRPC - Interface for building pServer Clients In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020711.n327BdXr028225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493527 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-02 03:11:38 EDT --- ah sorry forgot to remove make test checkitem from above review as there is no make check for this package used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 07:08:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 03:08:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493527] Review Request: perl-PlRPC - Interface for building pServer Clients In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020708.n3278Zo8027608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493527 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-02 03:08:34 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272115 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 5361e137e56d037c5e796926ecb5300b PlRPC-0.2020.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. + Package perl-PlRPC-0.2020-1.fc11.noarch => Provides: perl(Bundle::PlRPC) = 0.03 perl(RPC::PlClient) = 0.2020 perl(RPC::PlClient::Comm) = 0.1002 perl(RPC::PlClient::Object) perl(RPC::PlServer) = 0.2020 perl(RPC::PlServer::Comm) = 0.1003 perl(RPC::PlServer::Test) = 0.01 Requires: perl >= 0:5.004 perl(IO::Socket) perl(Net::Daemon) perl(Net::Daemon::Log) perl(Net::Daemon::Test) perl(RPC::PlClient::Comm) perl(RPC::PlServer) perl(RPC::PlServer::Comm) perl(Storable) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 07:13:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 03:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493527] Review Request: perl-PlRPC - Interface for building pServer Clients In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020713.n327Do8f006351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493527 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 07:13:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 03:13:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493521] Review Request: perl-Log-Trace - A unified approach to tracing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020713.n327DNRw006264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-02 03:13:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Log-Trace Short Description: A unified approach to tracing Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 07:13:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 03:13:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493527] Review Request: perl-PlRPC - Interface for building pServer Clients In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020713.n327Dm3C006329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493527 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-02 03:13:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-PlRPC Short Description: Interface for building pServer Clients Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 07:09:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 03:09:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493521] Review Request: perl-Log-Trace - A unified approach to tracing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020709.n3279WMn005458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-02 03:09:31 EDT --- Thanks for explanation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 07:13:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 03:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493521] Review Request: perl-Log-Trace - A unified approach to tracing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020713.n327DPjk028515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 07:31:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 03:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493530] Review Request: perl-Data-Dumper-Names - Data::Dumper::Names module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020731.n327V29s010521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493530 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-02 03:31:01 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272284 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 87fb75627801e323f7bc4430c3c97334 Data-Dumper-Names-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=13, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.05 sys + 0.15 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.24 CPU) + Package perl-Data-Dumper-Names-0.03-1.fc11.noarch => Provides: perl(Data::Dumper::Names) = 0.03 Requires: perl(Data::Dumper) perl(PadWalker) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestions: 1) Please change %description. See what description mean http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Summary_and_description 2) Summary should be "Dump variables with names" 3) you don't need following Requires: perl(PadWalker) >= 0.13 Requires: perl(Test::More) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 07:40:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 03:40:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020740.n327eF01001330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #16 from Stjepan Gros 2009-04-02 03:40:10 EDT --- Sorry for not letting you know, but I wont be able to do much until summer. Feel free to take this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 07:40:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 03:40:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489929] Review request: libHBAAPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020740.n327eQhc001403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489929 Jan Zeleny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Jan Zeleny 2009-04-02 03:40:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libhbaapi Short Description: Package contains HBA API library. It will be used as a connector between FCoE Utilities and libhbalinux. Owners: jzeleny Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 08:04:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 04:04:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489929] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020804.n32847xa006565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489929 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review request: libHBAAPI |Review request: libhbaapi - | |SNIA HBAAPI library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 08:18:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 04:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493299] Review Request: urlwatch - Tool for monitoring webpages for updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020818.n328Ihwt020628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493299 --- Comment #7 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-02 04:18:43 EDT --- My fault, the auto-completion of my browser said i searched for urlwtch. :-( sorry jussi... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 08:38:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 04:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020838.n328cRtl014192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #26 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-04-02 04:38:25 EDT --- I modified the spec-file and build the source rpm (.src.rpm) again. The URLs for this latest files are still the same: Spec: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora/specs/parrot.spec SRPM: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora/SRPMS/parrot-1.0.0-5.fc10.src.rpm - take the parrot source in .src.rpm from svn-revision 37835 - add commands to reduce output of errors when using rpmlint - define RPM_PAR_LIB_DIR added The scratch builds with "koji" from Fedora 8 to Fedora 11 still finished successful, the URLs are: f8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272316 f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272363 f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272424 f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272461 Although "rpmlint" output of parrot rpms writes a lot of errors. I place the output of rpmlint under a directory with the URL: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora/rpmlint The most errors occurs because parrots build system is for different operation systems und use explicit calls to execute scripts. I think this should not aviod the review. Would anyone of the Fedora rpm experts say my if rpmlint errors should still reduced or if it does not matter? P.S. I have holiday until 8th April and go on a trip. So I will not look and work at this before the 9th April. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 09:02:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 05:02:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490725] Review Request: geanyvc - Version Controler plugin for geany In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020902.n3292H17019053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490725 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-04-02 05:02:16 EDT --- Thanks for the review it is being built :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 10:26:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 06:26:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492946] Review Request: eclipse-dltk - Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021026.n32AQV51005568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492946 --- Comment #6 from Mat Booth 2009-04-02 06:26:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Mat, > What do you think about dropping the gcj_support? > It is giving us nothing as eclipse itself is compiled without it. > And benefits for us will be a lot simpler spec file, faster compilation, noarch > packages and etc. I don't have a problem with dropping GCJ support. (Though I don't think it made the spec too much more complicated ;-) ) In these days of stronger, better, faster JDKs, are AOT bits desired in any Java package? If not, we probably ought to change the guidelines. [1] However, try this one on for size: Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-dltk.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-dltk-1.0.0-0.2.M5.fc10.src.rpm [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 12:03:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492946] Review Request: eclipse-dltk - Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021203.n32C3mVn026484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492946 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-04-02 08:03:48 EDT --- When I build this srpm I see a lot of File listed twice warnings. %doc is supposed to be a path in the source archive, e.g. %doc %{eclipse_dropin}/dltk-core/eclipse/epl-v10.html should become %doc org.eclipse.dltk.core-feature/rootfiles/epl-v10.html I think that is the last issue I see. Otherwise the package is working great. I'm even using if for development of next shelled :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 12:23:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:23:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021223.n32CNFDc009975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 Philipp Hagemeister changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at phihag.de --- Comment #38 from Philipp Hagemeister 2009-04-02 08:23:12 EDT --- Additionally, shouldn't the default prefix /usr/local be changed to /usr ? Just calling configure with --prefix=/usr should suffice for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 12:26:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:26:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493603] Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021226.n32CQGgd032049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493603 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Alias| |unclutter-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 12:25:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493603] New: Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493603 Summary: Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: opensource at till.name QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/unclutter.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/unclutter-8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Unclutter hides the mouse cursor when it is not moved for a specified amount of time. It will be restored it once it is moved again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 12:29:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:29:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491084] Review Request: medusa - parallel brute forcing pasword cracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021229.n32CTfc6032757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491084 Jan F. Chadima changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Jan F. Chadima 2009-04-02 08:29:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: medusa Short Description: parallel brute forcing pasword cracker Owners: jfch2222 Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 12:35:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:35:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493530] Review Request: perl-Data-Dumper-Names - Data::Dumper::Names module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021235.n32CZ7Iw002271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493530 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-04-02 08:35:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > 3) you don't need following .. > Requires: perl(Test::More) This dependency is wrong - It must be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 12:48:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226301] Merge Review: planner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021248.n32CmRTX016554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226301 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-02 08:48:26 EDT --- Ah. There isn't. APPROVED. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 12:51:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:51:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225974] Merge Review: krb5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021251.n32Cp7an017341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225974 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-02 08:51:04 EDT --- Ok, that sounds reasonable. I'll await fixes and/or commentary once the new branch is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 12:52:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:52:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021252.n32CqtDS006233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-02 08:52:51 EDT --- Ok. CC list, if I want to put in this package under the aegis of my own ownership, will it require a fresh review, or can I essentially self-approve this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 13:30:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 09:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493638] New: Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 Summary: Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alekcejk at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/kcometen4/kcometen4.spec SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/kcometen4/kcometen4-1.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: KCometen4 is an OpenGL KDE screensaver. Inside a box is a nifty light show that features lightning and exploding comets. It lets you configure various effects like comet behavior, camera movement, box face images, etc. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1273244 $ rpmlint kcometen4-1.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm kcometen4-1.0.4-1.fc10.i386.rpm kcometen4-debuginfo-1.0.4-1.fc10.i386.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 13:36:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 09:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021336.n32Damfo018076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 13:36:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 09:36:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021336.n32Da9lf029759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #27 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-04-02 09:36:07 EDT --- In the source rpm (.src.rpm) I put again the original tar file (parrot-1.0.0.tar.gz). The URL of the SRPM remains the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 13:45:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 09:45:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021345.n32DjanX020595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-02 09:45:35 EDT --- will you please check if Requires: lines are really needed in this package? For perl packages dependencies are automatically resolved at time of their installation using yum. Only those dependencies that yum fails to pick/resolve are needed to be explicitly added in spec file as Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 13:57:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 09:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021357.n32DvEbl003073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #39 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-02 09:57:13 EDT --- @Philipp: Run "rpm --eval %configure|less" in your favourite terminal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 14:39:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:39:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021439.n32EdGTm002564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #42 from Gratien D'haese 2009-04-02 10:39:10 EDT --- Note to myself before requesting CVS access: Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.20-1.fc10.src.rpm RPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.20-1.fc10.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 15:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021524.n32FOYed015437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #33 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-02 11:24:31 EDT --- BTW how about building ghc-X11 for F10 - it would make testing easier for more people I guess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 15:50:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:50:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021550.n32FobYj000744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #40 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-02 11:50:36 EDT --- @Michael Schwendt Ok, I move Fedorian flags after autors, so, if dupes present, system wide will override. It is correct? Or I must use fully only system-defaults flags here? (In reply to comment #36) > Message catalogue .mo file for Chinese Simplified should be > installed under "zh_CN", not "zh_cn". Ok. I assume it is author error. I correct that. Thank you. @Philipp Macros %install provide explicit many default system flags, in this list also --prefix=/usr. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/axel/axel-2.3-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 16:19:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 12:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493335] Review Request: perl-RTx-Calendar - Calendar for RT due tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021619.n32GJF9v026654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493335 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-02 12:19:14 EDT --- I was building against EL-5 where the rt version is 3.6, while Fedora has 3.8, and 3.8 is changing the place where the files are installed. I think this package will need more work. Anyway, even with 3.6 the files installed under /usr/local/lib/rt3 are probably a problem and I'll need to talk with Ralf about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 16:47:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 12:47:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493684] Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021647.n32GlR2m013012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-02 12:47:27 EDT --- Upstream notified about the Version and License issues by mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 16:46:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 12:46:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493684] New: Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 Summary: Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme-20080411-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Compact version of Clearlooks theme, especially great on small screens like the Eee PC, or for intense applications like Eclipse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:10:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:10:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021710.n32HAHr1016515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:10:15 EDT --- dfu-util-0.1-0.8.20090307svn4917.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:10:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:10:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492712] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static - Serve static files with HTTP::Server::Simple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021710.n32HA3Ri016357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492712 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:10:02 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static-0.07-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:10:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:10:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492712] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static - Serve static files with HTTP::Server::Simple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021710.n32HA8E7016395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492712 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.07-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:10:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:10:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021710.n32HAMOI016580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1-0.8.20090307svn4917.fc1 | |0 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:11:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492708] Review Request: xml2 - XML/Unix Processing Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021711.n32HBQf3016833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492708 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:11:26 EDT --- xml2-0.4-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update xml2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3180 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:11:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490317] Review Request: rumor - Really Unintelligent Music transcriptOR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021711.n32HBaaX016891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490317 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:11:35 EDT --- rumor-1.0.3b-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rumor'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3182 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:11:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483451] Review Request: k3guitune - Musical instrument tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021711.n32HBhxx019003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483451 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:11:42 EDT --- k3guitune-1.01-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:12:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:12:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492252] Review Request: libdwarf - Library to access the DWARF Debugging file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021712.n32HCj8R019359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492252 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:12:44 EDT --- libdwarf-0.20090324-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:12:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:12:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492252] Review Request: libdwarf - Library to access the DWARF Debugging file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021712.n32HCn09019387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492252 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.20090324-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:11:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483451] Review Request: k3guitune - Musical instrument tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021711.n32HBmNq019038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483451 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.01-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490462] Review Request: rpmorphan - List the orphaned rpm packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021714.n32HE6Y9019648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490462 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.4-5.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:12:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479008] Review Request: libQGLViewer - Qt based OpenGL generic 3D viewer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021712.n32HCU4l019276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479008 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.3.1-7.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:13:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490318] Review Request: frescobaldi - Edit LilyPond sheet music with ease! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021713.n32HDOMY019465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490318 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:13:23 EDT --- frescobaldi-0.7.8-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update frescobaldi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3196 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:10:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490318] Review Request: frescobaldi - Edit LilyPond sheet music with ease! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021710.n32HATYM018626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490318 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:10:28 EDT --- frescobaldi-0.7.8-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update frescobaldi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3174 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:13:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491875] Review Request: unzoo - ZOO archive extractor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021713.n32HD6b7017443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491875 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:13:05 EDT --- unzoo-4.4-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:14:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490462] Review Request: rpmorphan - List the orphaned rpm packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021714.n32HE1Jp017584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490462 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:13:59 EDT --- rpmorphan-1.4-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:15:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:15:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492110] Review Request: mingw32-libsigc++20 - MinGW Windows port of the typesafe signal framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021715.n32HFdsh018929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492110 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:15:38 EDT --- mingw32-libsigc++20-2.2.2-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:12:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479008] Review Request: libQGLViewer - Qt based OpenGL generic 3D viewer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021712.n32HCQaI017332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479008 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:12:24 EDT --- libQGLViewer-2.3.1-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:16:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:16:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480235] Review Request: subtitlecomposer - A text-based subtitles editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021716.n32HGMqq019042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480235 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:16:21 EDT --- subtitlecomposer-0.5.2-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update subtitlecomposer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3223 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:14:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:14:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021714.n32HEbrL017777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #34 from Till Maas 2009-04-02 13:14:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) > This includes both a start-xmonad and an xmonad-session script. The former will > check for a config file or copy a config file over. The latter will call a > user's .xsession and then start start-xmonad. There are also .desktop files > for both, and both should be installed in the correct location. Let me know if > this works for you. I did not ttest the xsession stuff, but with my patch it works: http://till.fedorapeople.org/files/xmonad_7-8.spec.diff I wrote a simple config that is stored in /etc/skel/.xmonad/xmonad.hs, that opens the manpage using xterm. > Currently, the default config is the default config provided by upstream. > Should we convince upstream to have it load the manpage on startup? If this can be done easily within xmonad, why not. But I guess if xmonad would open the manpage by default, there would be no easy way to stop it doing this using a xmonad.hs currently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:15:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:15:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483451] Review Request: k3guitune - Musical instrument tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021715.n32HFIdM020418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483451 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:15:17 EDT --- k3guitune-1.01-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:15:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:15:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483451] Review Request: k3guitune - Musical instrument tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021715.n32HFNOX020458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483451 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.01-4.fc9 |1.01-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:15:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:15:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492110] Review Request: mingw32-libsigc++20 - MinGW Windows port of the typesafe signal framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021715.n32HFix6020537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492110 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.2.2-6.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:15:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491862] Review Request: kde-style-skulpture - Classical three-dimensional style for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021715.n32HFC2E020383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491862 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:15:12 EDT --- kde-style-skulpture-0.2.2-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kde-style-skulpture'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3215 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021720.n32HKAFv021051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:20:09 EDT --- uml_utilities-20070815-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:20:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:20:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492708] Review Request: xml2 - XML/Unix Processing Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021720.n32HKMGD021191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492708 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:20:21 EDT --- xml2-0.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xml2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3269 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:17:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:17:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492398] Review Request: slv2 - LV2 host library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021717.n32HHBjx019382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492398 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:17:11 EDT --- slv2-0.6.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update slv2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3234 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:20:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:20:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021720.n32HKFC7022465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|20070815-4.fc10 |20070815-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:22:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:22:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492712] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static - Serve static files with HTTP::Server::Simple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021722.n32HMeTO023067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492712 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.07-2.fc10 |0.07-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:21:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480235] Review Request: subtitlecomposer - A text-based subtitles editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021721.n32HL0at022662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480235 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:20:59 EDT --- subtitlecomposer-0.5.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update subtitlecomposer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3275 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:22:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492712] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static - Serve static files with HTTP::Server::Simple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021722.n32HMVHb022182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492712 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:22:30 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static-0.07-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 17:22:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486584] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application - Framework for building reusable web-applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021722.n32HMQKK022137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486584 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-02 13:22:25 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-4.21-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3291 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 18:55:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 14:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021855.n32ItU85013236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(loupgaroublond at gm | |ail.com) --- Comment #35 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-04-02 14:55:28 EDT --- ghc-X11 won't build on F-10, i think because of macro errors. We'll need an updated ghc for this. Meanwhile, users can just pull packages from rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1274046 @Till, i'll have a look at your patches later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 18:55:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 14:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492946] Review Request: eclipse-dltk - Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021855.n32ItMX0013173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492946 --- Comment #8 from Mat Booth 2009-04-02 14:55:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > When I build this srpm I see a lot of File listed twice warnings. > %doc is supposed to be a path in the source archive, e.g. > %doc %{eclipse_dropin}/dltk-core/eclipse/epl-v10.html should become > %doc org.eclipse.dltk.core-feature/rootfiles/epl-v10.html > I think that is the last issue I see. Aha, thanks for the tip. > Otherwise the package is working great. I'm even using if for development of > next shelled :). Cool, a version of shelled based around the DLTK is a great idea. Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-dltk.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-dltk-1.0.0-0.3.M5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 19:46:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 15:46:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493432] Review Request: libgdata - Library for the GData protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021946.n32Jkuo1022020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493432 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-02 15:46:54 EDT --- OK, this looks good now. However, given that Philip indicates that we can run the general test without network access, I think we should do it. This works for me: %check # Only the general test can be run without network access cd gdata/tests ./general It only seems to test two things, but that's better than testing nothing. If you agree, please consider this approved and add something like that when you import the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 21:46:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:46:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904022146.n32Lko2S014458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at v3.sk |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(johnhford at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #21 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-02 17:46:47 EDT --- SPECS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/links.spec SRPMS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/links-2.2-4.fc11.src.rpm Most issues addressed, apart from SSL support (which is in works) and warnings. Anyone please continue this, since the submitter doesn't seem to respond. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 23:04:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 19:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493750] New: Review Request: netcf - a library for managing network configuration Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: netcf - a library for managing network configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493750 Summary: Review Request: netcf - a library for managing network configuration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lutter at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/netcf/download/netcf.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/netcf/download/netcf-0.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A library for modifying the network configuration of a system. Network configurations are expresed in a platform-independent XML format, which netcf translates into changes to the system's 'native' network configuration files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 03:45:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 23:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454010] Review Request: iaxclient - Library for creating telephony solutions that interoperate with Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030345.n333jHYf014577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454010 Deji Akingunola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Deji Akingunola 2009-04-02 23:45:15 EDT --- I am sorry for the delay, I failed to notice you posted the correct link (drowned in a load of other mails at the time). REVIEW: - GOOD: package name according to guidelines - GOOD: spec file named properly - GOOD: license acceptable (LGPLv2+) and COPYING.LIB file shipped as documentation - CHECK: Most of the source codes doesn't include and license header at all - GOOD: the spec file is written in good English - GOOD: the spec file is legible - GOOD: download URL works - GOOD: source tarball is the same as from md5sum: 47d54b9d5d48dc6aa1f6d7e506c72ba7 iaxclient-2.1beta3.tar.gz - GOOD: builds in mock for x86_64/Rawhide - GOOD: all build dependencies (currently available in Fedora) listed - PASS: no locale files - GOOD: post and postun scriplets properly called for the libraries shipped - GOOD: all shipped files and directories owned by package - GOOD: permissions on files are set properly - GOOD: package has a %clean section - GOOD: package uses macros consistently - GOOD: the package contains code, not content - PASS: no large documentation files - GOOD: %doc doesn't affect runtime - GOOD: header files properly shipped in -devel subpackage - PASS: no static libraries - GOOD: pkgconfig file properly shipped in -devel subpackage - GOOD: no *.la libtool archives - GOOD: desktop file is installed properly in %install - GOOD: doesn't own files or directories owned by other packages - GOOD: build root is cleaned at the beginning of %install - PASS: Seems to consistently follow some tcl specific guidelines, which I cannot locate on the wiki - CHECK: rpmlint warning on the iaxclient binary as in comment #5 is still there. Since its a warning and I'm not sure what it means, I'll let it pass. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 04:11:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 00:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492831] Review Request: libmkv - An alternative to the official libmatroska library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030411.n334BLmL018783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492831 --- Comment #2 from Bernard Johnson 2009-04-03 00:11:21 EDT --- Thanks Xavier * Thu Apr 02 2009 Bernard Johnson - 0.6.3.1-2 - remove slashes in %%files list - configure with --disable-static Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/libmkv.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/libmkv-0.6.3.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 04:55:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 00:55:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030455.n334tHGR026367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #3 from arthurguru 2009-04-03 00:55:16 EDT --- Thanks for the feedback, changes have been applied and the package is ready for another review. The same links apply (wasn't sure whether I should up the release number and break the links in the original description, so I left them as they are). Changes I made: Removed that superfluous license blurb inside the spec file. Removed the BuildArch: directive. Added the dist tag to the Release: directive. Tested ok, rpmlint is still content. Looking forward to your feedback. Kind regards, Arthur Gouros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 05:24:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:24:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492231] Review Request: trac-watchlist-plugin - plugin for watching trac wiki pages and tickets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030524.n335O2EQ028653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492231 --- Comment #2 from Jon Stanley 2009-04-03 01:24:01 EDT --- Upstream is really bad about versioned releases for trac plugins. But I see your point, I was following the post-release snapshot guidelines, assuming that the first version ever published was the 0.1 "release". A "release" per se is unlikely to ever occur for this package, so it will be forever a pre-release I guess. New spec: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/trac-watchlist-plugin.spec New SRPM: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/trac-watchlist-plugin-0.1-0.2.svn5357.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 05:27:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492231] Review Request: trac-watchlist-plugin - plugin for watching trac wiki pages and tickets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030527.n335RTqR029375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492231 --- Comment #3 from Jon Stanley 2009-04-03 01:27:28 EDT --- Oh, and the 0.1 version came from setup.py - I didn't just pull it from mid-air :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 05:43:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488172] Package Review: ibus-table-zhengma In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030543.n335hC8s031634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488172 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-03 01:43:11 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1274694 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 5981da2341988d13ebd0c6c01bcb047f ibus-table-zhengma-1.1.0.20090402.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + ibus-table-createdb scriptlet used. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. Suggestions: 1) check header of zhengma.txt table file. Can you confirm license with upstream if it really is GPLv3+? 2) try adding contents to Changelog file in upstream and add it as %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 05:44:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030544.n335i4pC031743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-03 01:44:03 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1274696 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. ibus-table-erbi.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/ibus-table-erbi-1.1.0.20090402/AUTHORS ==> can be fixed by removing AUTHORS file. + source files match upstream url 5b36a300b07cb6eb74be84f74ae63a4b ibus-table-erbi-1.1.0.20090402.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + ibus-table-createdb scriptlet used. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. Suggestions: 1) Drop AUTHORS files from %doc as rpmlint message reported as ibus-table-erbi.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/ibus-table-erbi-1.1.0.20090402/AUTHORS 2) try adding contents to Changelog file in upstream and add it as %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 06:26:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 02:26:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030626.n336Qfvc008663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #22 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-03 02:26:40 EDT --- SPECS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/links.spec SRPMS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/links-2.2-5.fc11.src.rpm + NSS support Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1274783 Anyone to review this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 06:25:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 02:25:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493432] Review Request: libgdata - Library for the GData protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030625.n336PUaC006460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493432 --- Comment #8 from Philip Withnall 2009-04-03 02:25:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > It only seems to test two things, but that's better than testing nothing. If > you agree, please consider this approved and add something like that when you > import the package. None of the test programs are particularly comprehensive yet, but I do plan to improve their coverage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 06:50:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 02:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030650.n336o1j9010465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 --- Comment #3 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-03 02:50:00 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-erbi-1.1.0.20090403-1.fc11.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-erbi.spec Description: A split from ibus-table-chinese, which was sub-package of ibus-table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 07:54:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 03:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490723] Review Request: R-IRanges - Low-level containers for storing sets of integer ranges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030754.n337sKqr023686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490723 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-03 03:54:18 EDT --- Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 08:04:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 04:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490723] Review Request: R-IRanges - Low-level containers for storing sets of integer ranges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030804.n3384xiC024731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490723 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-04-03 04:04:58 EDT --- Thanks for the review :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-IRanges Short Description: Low-level containers for storing set of integer ranges Owners: pingou Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 08:36:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 04:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490724] Review Request: R-RUnit - R Unit test framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030836.n338aigb001405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490724 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-03 04:36:43 EDT --- R-RUnit-0.4.21-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-RUnit-0.4.21-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 08:36:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 04:36:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490724] Review Request: R-RUnit - R Unit test framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030836.n338anmS031958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490724 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-03 04:36:49 EDT --- R-RUnit-0.4.21-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-RUnit-0.4.21-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 08:56:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 04:56:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492946] Review Request: eclipse-dltk - Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030856.n338u248003664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492946 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-04-03 04:56:01 EDT --- Formal review: # OK: rpmlint gives no warnings/errors # OK: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . # OK: The spec file match the base package %{name} # OK: EPL # OK: Every subpackage has it's own license shipping with it and included in %doc. # OK: The spec file must be written in American English. # OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. # OK: Fetch script shipped in the srpm. # OK: Builds fine. # OK: All BuildRequires and Requires are fine # OK: Owns all folders. # OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. # OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. # OK: Each package must have a %clean section # OK: Each package must consistently use macros. # OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. # OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. # OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Package is good to go. Mat, just FYI, If this package is going to be available only F-11+, you can remove -a "-DjavacTarget=1.5 -DjavacSource=1.5" parts. This is added automatically from pdebuild script when needed in F-11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 08:59:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 04:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492946] Review Request: eclipse-dltk - Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030859.n338x3ZV005988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492946 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 09:01:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:01:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479008] Review Request: libQGLViewer - Qt based OpenGL generic 3D viewer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030901.n3391oe4005011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479008 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-03 05:01:49 EDT --- libQGLViewer-2.3.1-8.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libQGLViewer-2.3.1-8.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 09:16:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:16:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030916.n339GjUv009867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-03 05:16:45 EDT --- see bug 490721 comment 3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 09:15:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030915.n339FAhW009606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-03 05:15:09 EDT --- This looks quite good, but if I try to use this package to build the R-BSgenome package I get this error: Loading required package: Biostrings Warning: Multiple methods tables found for 'score' Warning: Multiple methods tables found for 'substr' Warning: Multiple methods tables found for 'substring' Warning: Multiple methods tables found for 'chartr' Error in insertMethod(m1, as.character(sigi), args, el(methods, i), FALSE) : inserting method with invalid signature matching argument '...' to class "ANY\ " Error: package 'Biostrings' could not be loaded Execution halted Is this error caused by the R-Biostrings package not working, or is it used in the wrong way by the R-BSgenome package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 09:12:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030912.n339CUYU009055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ovasik at redhat.com --- Comment #23 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-04-03 05:12:28 EDT --- Ok, just quick check first... 1) #Issue: # There is a symlink in /usr/bin/links to elinks if that package is installed # Should this package use links2 or should I modify elinks to remove the links # symlink from elinks - this comment in spec should be removed as elinks/links2 now uses alternatives. 2) Many warnings "pointer targets in passing argument of differ in signedness" in build.log still ... upstream should address those... maybe just adding Mikulas to that review could be ok. The rest of the spec file looks sane to me (except one trailing space in build section - line with mv converted.AUTHORS ). Question: Shouldn't be that NSS support enabled via configure option (like in elinks?). This should be easier to get into upstream ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 09:21:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030921.n339LE3K009231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #21 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-04-03 05:21:11 EDT --- Package is in repos now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 09:26:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:26:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487365] Review Request: eclipse-oprofile - Eclipse plugin for OProfile integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030926.n339Q0HE010259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487365 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-04-03 05:25:59 EDT --- Builded in repos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 09:26:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:26:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487365] Review Request: eclipse-oprofile - Eclipse plugin for OProfile integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030926.n339QI39010438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487365 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-04-03 05:26:17 EDT --- Builded in repos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 09:25:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:25:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489323] Review Request: ecj - Eclipse Compiler for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030925.n339P9c7010112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489323 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |akurtako at redhat.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-04-03 05:25:07 EDT --- Builded in repos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 09:38:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490724] Review Request: R-RUnit - R Unit test framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030938.n339c9HK014362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490724 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-03 05:38:08 EDT --- R-RUnit-0.4.21-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-RUnit-0.4.21-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 09:38:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490724] Review Request: R-RUnit - R Unit test framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030938.n339cEeF014408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490724 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-03 05:38:13 EDT --- R-RUnit-0.4.21-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-RUnit-0.4.21-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 09:42:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030942.n339gnF4013603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #24 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-03 05:42:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > Ok, just quick check first... If I understand correctly, you're planning to do a more detailed review later, right? In that case, I'll wait with updating the package until then. > 1) > #Issue: > # There is a symlink in /usr/bin/links to elinks if that package is installed > # Should this package use links2 or should I modify elinks to remove the links > # symlink from elinks > - this comment in spec should be removed as elinks/links2 now uses > alternatives. Will remove. > 2) > Many warnings "pointer targets in passing argument of differ in > signedness" in build.log still ... upstream should address those... maybe just > adding Mikulas to that review could be ok. Mikulas? Which one? An upstream developer? > The rest of the spec file looks sane to me (except one trailing space in build > section - line with mv converted.AUTHORS ). Will fix. > Question: Shouldn't be that NSS support enabled via configure option (like in > elinks?). This should be easier to get into upstream ... It should. In fact, I have little motivation to fix configure scripts gotten obviously wrong -- see use of random include directories in openssl detection routine below. So my plan is to throw this upstream and rewrite it (and the openssl detection) only once they complain. I don't really care about user choosing between NSS and OpenSSL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 09:50:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:50:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492946] Review Request: eclipse-dltk - Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030950.n339oaUo015299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492946 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Mat Booth 2009-04-03 05:50:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Package is good to go. > > Mat, just FYI, > If this package is going to be available only F-11+, you can remove -a > "-DjavacTarget=1.5 -DjavacSource=1.5" parts. This is added automatically from > pdebuild script when needed in F-11. Cool, I didn't know this. (Worth mentioning in the PDE build notes in the Eclipse plugin guidelines?) However, I'm going to request an F-10 branch since that's where my machines are at right now. Thanks for the speedy review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-dltk Short Description: Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK) Eclipse plugin Owners: mbooth Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 09:55:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:55:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030955.n339t4fI016450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 --- Comment #4 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-04-03 05:55:03 EDT --- Hm indeed I run in the same problem while just trying to load Biostrings in R. Thanks for pointing this out I will investigate the source of the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 10:10:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 06:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031010.n33AANRi022387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mikulas at artax.karlin.mff.cu | |ni.cz --- Comment #25 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-04-03 06:10:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > > Ok, just quick check first... > If I understand correctly, you're planning to do a more detailed review later, > right? In that case, I'll wait with updating the package until then. Yep, I do plan to check&fill review approval template I have step by step... Hopefully today ;) > > 2) > > Many warnings "pointer targets in passing argument of differ in > > signedness" in build.log still ... upstream should address those... maybe just > > adding Mikulas to that review could be ok. > > Mikulas? Which one? An upstream developer? Exactly... adding him to CC... > > Question: Shouldn't be that NSS support enabled via configure option (like in > > elinks?). This should be easier to get into upstream ... > > It should. In fact, I have little motivation to fix configure scripts gotten > obviously wrong -- see use of random include directories in openssl detection > routine below. > > So my plan is to throw this upstream and rewrite it (and the openssl detection) > only once they complain. I don't really care about user choosing between NSS > and OpenSSL. In general - I'm ok with that - that patch is not very complicated and NSS compat could be full replacement for OpenSSL in that case. I guess that's not review blocker anyway - any maintainer/comaintainer could improve that configure script later to give user a chance to choose which library will be used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 10:16:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 06:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031016.n33AGbVv022495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|mikulas at artax.karlin.mff.cu |mpatocka at redhat.com |ni.cz | --- Comment #26 from Matej Cepl 2009-04-03 06:16:36 EDT --- or what about his Red Hat address :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 10:27:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 06:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493432] Review Request: libgdata - Library for the GData protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031027.n33AR6EY026798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493432 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Bastien Nocera 2009-04-03 06:27:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libgdata Short Description: Library for the GData protocol Owners: hadess Branches: F-11 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 10:32:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 06:32:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473348] Review Request: drraw - Web based presentation front-end for RRDtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031032.n33AWSsk027964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473348 --- Comment #5 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-03 06:32:27 EDT --- New version, add a Group: tag to -selinux subpackage. http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/drraw.spec http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/drraw-2.2-0.5.b2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 11:06:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 07:06:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031106.n33B6adC002987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |hdegoede at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |hdegoede at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-03 07:06:34 EDT --- Hi Johan, As discussed by mail already, I'll review your current 4 package submissions, and once they are all approved, I'll sponsor you. I've done a full review of this package all in all it looks good, except for a few small things (see below). MUST FIX -------- * Drop the patch and (Build)Requires perl(Text::CSV) instead of Text::CSV_XS I know you are upstream, but we do not want to deviate from upstream when not necessary and since you've now also packaged TEXT::CSV, there is no reason for the patch anymore. * Add Changes and README to %doc SHOULD FIX ---------- * Add following to spec: BuildRequires: perl(HTML::Entities) Requires: perl(HTML::Entities) I know this is optional but in Fedora we always try to enable as much features in packaes as possible, even if this drags in a few additional dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 11:16:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 07:16:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031116.n33BG4T8005380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|fabian at bernewireless.net |hdegoede at redhat.com --- Comment #13 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-03 07:16:03 EDT --- Hi Johan, As discussed by mail already, I'll review your current 4 package submissions, and once they are all approved, I'll sponsor you. I've done a full review of this package and I fully agree with Fabian, please change the %'s in the changelog to %% and add a whiteline between the different release entries, iow change this: * Fri Jan 30 2009 Johan Vromans - 4.2-3 - Fixed URL and Source urls - Added %{?dist} to Release - Fixed missing (optional) argument to %defattr - Changed examples to examples/* to include all examples * Fri Jan 30 2009 Johan Vromans - 4.2-2 - Update description - Add patch to fix Makefiles to avoid double install of manual pages - use smp_mflags - use install -p * Thu Jan 29 2009 Johan Vromans - 4.2-1 - First Fedora version To: * Fri Jan 30 2009 Johan Vromans - 4.2-3 - Fixed URL and Source urls - Added %%{?dist} to Release - Fixed missing (optional) argument to %%defattr - Changed examples to examples/* to include all examples * Fri Jan 30 2009 Johan Vromans - 4.2-2 - Update description - Add patch to fix Makefiles to avoid double install of manual pages - use smp_mflags - use install -p * Thu Jan 29 2009 Johan Vromans - 4.2-1 - First Fedora version Otherwise its fine. Fabian, re-assigning to me since I'm going to sponsor Johan, and thanks for your review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 12:00:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:00:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031200.n33C0ta6016040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 --- Comment #14 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-03 08:00:53 EDT --- Oops, I'm afraid that I've not done my review properly, trusting to much on Fabain's initial review. I just checked the AUTHORS file and the licensing discussed in there is a big red flag. Quoting from the AUTHORS file: "CHORD is licensed following the conditions of the general GNU license. You are authorized to use this program free of charge. You are authorized to distribute this program freely as long as the full source is included. You are not allowed to remove the `copyright' notices from the authors nor are you allowed to pretend you wrote it. You are not allowed to charge any money for CHORD. You are not allowed to distribute a modified version of CHORD without written authorizations from the authors. You are not allowed to use parts of CHORD in any other commercial or public-domain software. Sorry for all the negatives rules ... but we've been bitten once!" The GPL of course is fine, however the additional non GPL compatible rules like no selling or not acceptable for Fedora. I notice that you are the new upstream, and that you've written: "CHORD is originally written by Martin Leclerc and Mario Dorion. Unfortunately, they have given up interest and disappeared from the internet." I hope that that is not entirely true, and with some hunting you can still contact them and get them to wave the "extra rules" they've added on top of the GPL, otherwise this program cannot be part of Fedora. --- As discussed already, I would review your current 4 package submissions, and once they are all approved, I would sponsor you. However this package looks like it will hit serious license troubles, so I would like to change the deal (in your benefit) to the following: as soon as the other 3 packages are approved I'll sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 12:04:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:04:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031204.n33C4UO7016886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #15 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-03 08:04:29 EDT --- Hmm, I see in the README that you've already tried to contact the old upstream people several times and failed. Let me run this past our legal stuff vetting person. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 12:53:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031253.n33Cru4U029712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |hdegoede at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-03 08:53:51 EDT --- As discussed already, I'll review this and your other 2 perl package submissions, and once they are all approved, I'll sponsor you. I've done a full review of this package and I fully agree with Mamoru, please fix the points he has addressed and then I'll aprove this. As for the license tag, I've checked the various .pm sources, and the correct license tag would be: License: GPL+ or Artistic -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 13:00:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:00:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031300.n33D0hDS031789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 --- Comment #5 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-04-03 09:00:42 EDT --- After asking the Bioconductor-devel mailing list the answer is that the bug comes from the IRanges. I used the developmental version of IRanges to get the corrected DESCRIPTION file, this seems to not be compatible with the current Biostrings. I normally only package the stable version of Bioconductor but since the new release is coming before the end of the month I took the risk and there is the bug. I will update Biostrings to the development version aswell so that we can finish the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 13:09:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:09:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031309.n33D9mgG031708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-03 09:09:47 EDT --- Thanks, Jussi. I've incorporated your changes, and adjusted it into using a shared library instead of static one. Here you are: SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/healpix.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/healpix-2.11c-3.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 13:14:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:14:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031314.n33DEbBs000382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 Jasper Capel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-jasper at newnewyork.nl --- Comment #9 from Jasper Capel 2009-04-03 09:14:36 EDT --- OK, it's been a while, I was distracted by other projects, but I have some results: * Upstream changed license header, included COPYING file * README corrected * Help text corrected * Init script modified to support spawning multiple daemons http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/gvrpcd.spec http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/gvrpcd-1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 13:20:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:20:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031320.n33DKQfG002289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |493957 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 13:22:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:22:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492831] Review Request: libmkv - An alternative to the official libmatroska library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031322.n33DMq3c002706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492831 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-03 09:22:52 EDT --- You can go ahead with the cvs request, I've already approved the package. One last comment, you may want to delete the .la file in the %install section rather than excluding it in the %files section, but it doesn't really matter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 13:20:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493957] New: Review Request: skyviewer - Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: skyviewer - Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493957 Summary: Review Request: skyviewer - Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 492164 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/skyviewer.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/skyviewer-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm SkyViewer is an OpenGL based program to display HEALPix-based skymaps, saved in FITS format files. The loaded skymaps can be viewed either on a 3D sphere or as a Mollweide projection. In either case, realtime panning and zooming are supported, along with rotations for the 3D sphere view, assuming you have a strong enough graphics card. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 13:23:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489962] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031323.n33DNcfQ005333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489962 --- Comment #1 from Jan Zeleny 2009-04-03 09:23:38 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbalinux/libhbalinux.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbalinux/libhbalinux-1.0.7-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 13:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493958] New: Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493958 Summary: Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: dan at danny.cz ReportedBy: jzeleny at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Jan Zeleny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/fcoe-utils/fcoe-utils-1.0.7-2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/fcoe-utils/fcoe-utils.spec Fibre Channel over Ethernet utilities: fcoeadm - command line tool for configuring FCoE interfaces fcoemon - service to configure DCB Ethernet QOS filters, works with dcbd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 13:52:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490399] (Rename) Review Request: WebKitGTK - GTK+ Web content engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031352.n33DqKJG012958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490399 Xan L?pez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xan at gnome.org --- Comment #6 from Xan L?pez 2009-04-03 09:52:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > 1. I'm a bit confused by what package name we should use here. > > domain: webkitgtk.org > content on website: WebKitGTK+ > link to source on website: WebKitGTK+ > tar file downloaded: webkit-1.1.3.tar.gz > > So, the choices seem to be 'WebKitGTK+', 'webkit', 'webkitgtk'. > Can you please ask upstream what the desired package name should be? > Along with what case? ;) The 'official' name of the project is WebKitGTK+, but I'd say that's a weird name for a package name. IMHO webkitgtk would be the best option. It's a bit similar to GNU Emacs and 'emacs' as package name. And yeah, we should not name our tarball just 'webkit' :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 15:46:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 11:46:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492816] Review Request: show - A SQL-like interface for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031546.n33FkMMT006656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492816 --- Comment #5 from Dave Malcolm 2009-04-03 11:46:22 EDT --- Thanks. "tabulate" is growing on me as well, so would "/usr/bin/tabulate" be acceptable? Note to self: - "tabulate " can be autocompleted as "tab[TAB]" on my system (4 keystrokes, although all 4 are with left hand) - "squeal " requires "sque[TAB]" (5 keystrokes) and breaks autocompletion of "squ[TAB]" to "squid" - "show " requires 5 keystrokes, but the keys are shared between left and right hands. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 15:47:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 11:47:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - KVIrc is a free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031547.n33Fl2nY006755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |atorkhov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-04-03 11:47:00 EDT --- Only duplicate files left to fix in this package: - It lists COPYING, FAQ and README as %doc, but those files simultaneously got installed into %{_datadir}/%{name}. They must be excluded from install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 15:50:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 11:50:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - KVIrc is a free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031550.n33ForSq007816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 15:54:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 11:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492816] Review Request: show - A SQL-like interface for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031554.n33FsRTG011849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492816 --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2009-04-03 11:54:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Thanks. "tabulate" is growing on me as well, so would "/usr/bin/tabulate" be > acceptable? > > Note to self: > - "tabulate " can be autocompleted as "tab[TAB]" on my system (4 keystrokes, > although all 4 are with left hand) http://gadgets.inventivelabs.com.au/tabulate > - "squeal " requires "sque[TAB]" (5 keystrokes) and breaks autocompletion of > "squ[TAB]" to "squid" I can live with that. I doubt there will be many users with both squid and squeal on the same machine. But I'll be happy to be proven wrong :) > - "show " requires 5 keystrokes, but the keys are shared between left and > right hands. show is a .. show stopper, isn't it ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492816#c2 )? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 16:00:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:00:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031600.n33G0W1V013520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-03 12:00:31 EDT --- rpmlint output: chealpix.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libchealpix.so chealpix.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libchealpix.so exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 chealpix-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation healpix-fortran.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libgif.so healpix-fortran.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libhealpix.so healpix-fortran-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. - Did you send the shared library patch upstream? IIRC some package sponsors have frowned on Fedora specific patches to build shared libraries. - Even though there is only one C header, it might be logical to put it into the same place as the Fortran module files. - Maybe Fortran package should be named just 'healpix'. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - The java library seems to be under LGPLv2+, but since it isn't included no problem. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. NEEDSFIX - chealpix and healpix-fortran need to call ldconfig in %post phase. MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. NEEDSFIX - fortran-devel must require fortran since the libraries are in fortran. MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 16:01:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492816] Review Request: show - A SQL-like interface for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031601.n33G1wCp010146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492816 --- Comment #7 from Dave Malcolm 2009-04-03 12:01:58 EDT --- Heh, very good! BTW, I want to wait a while before renaming, in case someone comes up with a better name, and to become happy with the new name. If you have other name ideas, please let me know! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 16:10:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492816] Review Request: show - A SQL-like interface for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031610.n33GAA0r015712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492816 --- Comment #8 from Dave Malcolm 2009-04-03 12:10:10 EDT --- re the "tabulate" link in comment #6, it appears to be a non-Free iPhone/iPod-only app that works around a deficiency of that proprietary platform. I don't see it being a source of name confusion on Fedora, or any other Linux distribution, and, as a common English word, I don't see it being trademarkable, though IANAL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 16:18:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493957] Review Request: skyviewer - Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031618.n33GIYBB017590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493957 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-03 12:18:33 EDT --- - Don't use macros for cat or rm. (Macro for python is in the python guideline for some reason.) - Don't use filelist. - Use %defattr(-,root,root,-) - Remove empty %post and %postun sections. - Change BuildRequires: python, python-devel, python-setuptools to BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel (BR python is redundant, since python-devel already pulls that in. If you BR python-setuptools-devel, then it pulls setuptools and python-devel automatically.) Also, you don't even need python-setuptools unless you want to build for EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 16:21:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493957] Review Request: skyviewer - Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031621.n33GLgZC014743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493957 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-03 12:21:41 EDT --- Damn, wrong tab; meant for bug 492979. I must be daydreaming. Sorry. :) Well, I might as well review this package as it's related to healpix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 16:23:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492979] Review Request: python-cliutils - A collection of utilities easing the creation of command line scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031623.n33GNdY1018653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492979 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-03 12:23:39 EDT --- - Don't use macros for cat or rm. (Macro for python is in the python guideline for some reason.) - Don't use filelist. - Use %defattr(-,root,root,-) - Remove empty %post and %postun sections. - Change BuildRequires: python, python-devel, python-setuptools to BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel (BR python is redundant, since python-devel already pulls that in. If you BR python-setuptools-devel, then it pulls setuptools and python-devel automatically.) You don't even need python-setuptools unless you want to build for EPEL. For a plain Fedora spec you'd just need BR: python-devel. (In the python guideline the BR is actually just python.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 18:11:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 14:11:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904031811.n33IBAH6007984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #21 from wsnyder at wsnyder.org 2009-04-03 14:11:08 EDT --- I've released dinotrace 9.4a that includes the core dump and lisp code fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 20:19:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:19:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491694] Review Request: Anyterm - Web based terminal emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904032019.n33KJgqV002785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694 --- Comment #10 from Mohammed Morsi 2009-04-03 16:19:41 EDT --- Hey sorry for the delay, I got pulled onto something else last week and have been busy since. Some updates (new spec / srpm has been uploaded) - boost requirement has been removed - dist-f11 koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1276085 - been working w/ the anyterm upstream community to get some changes committed, including some necessary bugfixes, new features, and integration w/ httpd. After this no patches / additional changes should be needed for this - because of the previous I don't think anyterm 1.1.29 tarball from the site will cut it, so we'll need to either source this from the version control checkout tarball, or (less preferably) wait for the next release Thanks for the feedback -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 20:33:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:33:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490723] Review Request: R-IRanges - Low-level containers for storing sets of integer ranges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904032033.n33KXUwY001095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490723 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-03 16:33:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 20:34:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226205] Merge Review: nss_ldap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904032034.n33KYAvv006116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226205 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-03 16:34:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 20:37:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489117] Review Request: tulrich-tuffy-fonts - Generic sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904032037.n33KbxLd002155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489117 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-03 16:37:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 20:39:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492946] Review Request: eclipse-dltk - Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904032039.n33KdwCR007372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492946 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-03 16:39:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 20:43:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225974] Merge Review: krb5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904032043.n33KhEDq003243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225974 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-03 16:43:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 20:41:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489929] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904032041.n33Kfwff003095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489929 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-03 16:41:57 EDT --- I used "SNIA HBAAPI library" as the Short Description as that seems more correct. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 20:45:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:45:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491084] Review Request: medusa - parallel brute forcing pasword cracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904032045.n33KjZb7008863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491084 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-03 16:45:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 20:46:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493432] Review Request: libgdata - Library for the GData protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904032046.n33KkWs1004167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493432 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-03 16:46:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 20:47:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493521] Review Request: perl-Log-Trace - A unified approach to tracing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904032047.n33KlQd5004293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-03 16:47:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 20:48:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493527] Review Request: perl-PlRPC - Interface for building pServer Clients In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904032048.n33KmF4v004407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493527 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-03 16:48:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 20:44:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904032044.n33KicQd003459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #35 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-03 16:44:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 20:55:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459925] Review Request: libowfat - Reimplementation of libdjb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904032055.n33KtdL7006236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459925 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-03 16:55:38 EDT --- in repo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 21:45:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 17:45:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491570] Review Request: sahana - Disaster Management System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904032145.n33Ljdpc020381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-03 17:45:39 EDT --- sahana-0.6.2.2-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sahana-0.6.2.2-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 21:45:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 17:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491570] Review Request: sahana - Disaster Management System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904032145.n33LjYw4014827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-03 17:45:34 EDT --- sahana-0.6.2.2-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sahana-0.6.2.2-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 21:50:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 17:50:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904032150.n33LoxXm015704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 --- Comment #16 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-03 17:50:58 EDT --- Hans, thanks for checking my review. So far I wasn't aware of that there are developers out there who put copyright information in the AUTHORS files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 23:12:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 19:12:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458714] Review Request: libkate - Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904032312.n33NCB9Q028900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458714 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-03 19:12:10 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/libkate.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/libkate-0.3.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format Changelog - Prevent getline() conflict in recent rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 01:06:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 21:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904040106.n3416xL4013772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 David Carter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 01:04:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 21:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476346] Review Request: python-polybori - Framework for Boolean Rings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904040104.n3414RAL013190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476346 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #24 from Conrad Meyer 2009-04-03 21:04:25 EDT --- Imported and built in rawhide; closing. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1276530 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 01:07:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 21:07:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458279] Review Request: python-arm4 - Python language bindings for Applicatioon Response Measurement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904040107.n34171fl013800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458279 Bug 458279 depends on bug 458054, which changed state. Bug 458054 Summary: Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 01:13:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 21:13:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] New: Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 Summary: Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/libvmime.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f11/SRPMS/libvmime-0.9.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: VMime is a powerful C++ class library for working with MIME messages and Internet messaging services like IMAP, POP or SMTP. With VMime you can parse, generate and modify messages, and also connect to store and transport services to receive or send messages over the Internet. The library offers all the features to build a complete mail client. rpmlint is silent - f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1276553 (fails because of dependency error) - f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1276589 (succeeds without inkscape builddep) - f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1276554 - f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1276559 A note on the inkscape builddep; if I were to package the documentation I would need inkscape to generate the pdf from the *.tex files, though I'm not sure that I should (the docs don't build for a normal ./configure && make either) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 02:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 22:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904040201.n3421UMn022527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 Keith G. Robertson-Turner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat-bugzilla at slated.org --- Comment #1 from Keith G. Robertson-Turner 2009-04-03 22:01:30 EDT --- Missing BuildRequires: python-devel + cd debug + python install.py install --skip-build --root /var/tmp/b43-tools-0-0.1.git20090125.blag90001-QEJNVW running install error: invalid Python installation: unable to open /usr/lib64/python2.5/config/Makefile (No such file or directory) error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.65195 (%install) Please consider using Mach/Mock for clean chroot builds, as this will identify missing deps at an early stage. Thanks for the package, I need this now I'm running a linux-libre kernel (b43 deblobbed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 02:34:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 22:34:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904040234.n342YvPu028468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 --- Comment #2 from Keith G. Robertson-Turner 2009-04-03 22:34:57 EDT --- Test build succeeded. b43-asm successfully assembled OpenFWWF b43 firmware. Module inserts into kernel (with qos=0 option). NetworkManager establishes WiFi connection. Network responsive and shows no degradation. +1 publish (after fixing missing BuildRequires: python, python-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 03:17:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 23:17:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492831] Review Request: libmkv - An alternative to the official libmatroska library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904040317.n343HAeT003100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492831 Bernard Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Bernard Johnson 2009-04-03 23:17:09 EDT --- Here lately I've been liking using %exclude rather than a rm in the spec. Thanks again for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libmkv Short Description: An alternative to the official libmatroska library Owners: bjohnson Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 04:02:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 00:02:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904040402.n3442Ian009998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #36 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-04 00:02:17 EDT --- Yaakov built it http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=96455 unfortunately now it has higher release number than rawhide which is not good. You should use ghc-X11-1.4.5-5.fc10.1 to bump in F-10 to keep it less than ghc-X11-1.4.5-5.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 05:30:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 01:30:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463035] Review Request: pyroman - Very fast firewall configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904040530.n345UbfS022486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463035 --- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-04 01:30:36 EDT --- Phew, it's been 6 months. This was one of my first reviews and I barely remember it. Anyway, since then, there were some changes in the guidelines too. I had a quick look at the package: * The problem that I reported before remains: When I run the "pyroman" script I get the error: No rule files found in directory './examples/base'! I think you need to change the default_rules_path in the launching script (to %{_sysconfdir}/%name via 'sed', for instance). * Please make use of the %{name} macro in %install * Please use the -p switch of install extensively, to preserve timestamps. * %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version} is not necessary. %setup -q should be enough * We certainly don't want %define _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0 * The new guidelines suggest that, In the first line, %define should be replaced by %global ? Where does SOURCE1 come from? Why the name fedora.init ? ! You probably don't need cp -p %SOURCE1 . because you can use install -pm 0755 %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}/%{_initrddir}/%{name} in the %install section. * Also there are two rpmlints that deserve attention: pyroman.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/pyroman pyroman.noarch: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/pyroman $prog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 05:41:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 01:41:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226659] Merge Review: xsri In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904040541.n345fFRu028453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226659 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-04 01:41:14 EDT --- re-ping? shall I add someone else to CC? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 05:44:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 01:44:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226036] Merge Review: liboil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904040544.n345iACb024143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226036 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-04 01:44:09 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 05:47:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 01:47:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904040547.n345loYr024720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 --- Comment #22 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-04 01:47:48 EDT --- Could you folks update the package according to comment #7 so we can close the merge review? I also noticed that there is one occurrence of rm that should be converted to %{__rm} for macro consistency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 05:51:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 01:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904040551.n345pn5N029792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #43 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-04 01:51:45 EDT --- Is mlt totally useless without kdenlive? Can someone write an application that uses mlt and no ffmpeg? If yes, mlt package belongs to Fedora. Otherwise, we can carry it over to rpmfusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 05:55:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 01:55:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465646] Review Request: python-hachoir-core - Hachoir core parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904040555.n345tGrB025774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465646 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-04 01:55:15 EDT --- re-ping? is there anything wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 06:13:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 02:13:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904040613.n346DsK5000610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-04 02:13:53 EDT --- Added missing BR. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/b43-tools.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/b43-tools-0-0.2.git20090125.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 06:36:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 02:36:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904040636.n346aP89003992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-04 02:36:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > rpmlint output: > chealpix.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libchealpix.so > chealpix.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libchealpix.so > exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 > chealpix-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > healpix-fortran.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libgif.so > healpix-fortran.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libhealpix.so > healpix-fortran-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. I believe these are OK, right? I mean, we don't want to craft a SONAME, do we? We can still ask upstream though. > - Did you send the shared library patch upstream? IIRC some package sponsors > have frowned on Fedora specific patches to build shared libraries. Heh, well, no, I had a little motivation fixing utterly broken makefiles. I may send it upstream, but I'm quite sure it breaks something about the static library compilation, and in fact does it impossible to compile statically w/o modifying the code. I'm not sure they would accept this. > - Even though there is only one C header, it might be logical to put it into > the same place as the Fortran module files. Well, yes, I had exactly the same thought. You see, I decided not to change location when there was not Fortran module. I believe it might be a bad decision as well. We would need to change each program that includes it to -I%{_includedir}/healpix it, the very same thing we do with cfitsio. I believe leaving it in its upstream-decided traditional location has its upsides as well. I have no problem moving it if you insist on it though. > - Maybe Fortran package should be named just 'healpix'. You decide. I see F90 library is called "libhealpix" in contrast to C's "libchealpix", which makes me tend to agree. Depends on where would a typical user of that library expect it to find. Honestly, I'm not exactly that kind of person (and am, in fact, secretly expecting you to comaintain the package and take care of the Fortran bindings ;) Shortly put -- you seem to know the library much better than me, so I'd prefer stuff like naming packages and shifting files around up to you. > MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. NEEDSFIX > - chealpix and healpix-fortran need to call ldconfig in %post phase. Good catch, will fix. > MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base > package using a fully versioned dependency. NEEDSFIX > - fortran-devel must require fortran since the libraries are in fortran. Hah, this was your code, no? ;) Anyways, will fix. New package (probably just fixing the MUST items) following shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 08:08:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 04:08:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493232] Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904040808.n3488dtH013191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493232 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-04 04:08:39 EDT --- Hi, I went through the package. There are a few issues: * Guidelines say: All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment. Since this project is pretty old I don't think it matters to send these patches upstream. But at least, you should briefly explain in the SPEC file what each of them does. Ref: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment * COPYING file _must_ go to %doc ! CHANGES file can go to %doc ? There is a mod and a wrapper shell script in the contrib/ directory. Are they worth packaging? ! %attr(755,root,root) is redundant, can be removed * gcc warnings: There are a couple of these warnings (gcc44): redir.c:496: warning: passing argument 3 of 'getsockname' from incompatible pointer type /usr/include/sys/socket.h:119: note: expected 'socklen_t * __restrict__' but argument is of type 'size_t *' I'm sure these can be fixed easily. * optflags are not passed during the linking phase. At the least "-g -Wall" should be passed. To be safe, you can add LDFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" to the end of the make line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 08:25:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 04:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904040825.n348PRpo021555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-04 04:25:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > rpmlint output: > > chealpix.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libchealpix.so > > chealpix.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libchealpix.so > > exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 > > chealpix-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > > healpix-fortran.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libgif.so > > healpix-fortran.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libhealpix.so > > healpix-fortran-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > > 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. > > I believe these are OK, right? I mean, we don't want to craft a SONAME, do we? > We can still ask upstream though. Probably yes, these are just warnings anyway. > > - Did you send the shared library patch upstream? IIRC some package sponsors > > have frowned on Fedora specific patches to build shared libraries. > > Heh, well, no, I had a little motivation fixing utterly broken makefiles. I may > send it upstream, but I'm quite sure it breaks something about the static > library compilation, and in fact does it impossible to compile statically w/o > modifying the code. I'm not sure they would accept this. Yeah; I spent some time some months ago trying to figure out how to package this, but very quickly found out that I had no idea of how to do it. Your example with the C part helped me get the Fortran stuff working. > > - Even though there is only one C header, it might be logical to put it into > > the same place as the Fortran module files. > > Well, yes, I had exactly the same thought. You see, I decided not to change > location when there was not Fortran module. I believe it might be a bad > decision as well. We would need to change each program that includes it to > -I%{_includedir}/healpix it, the very same thing we do with cfitsio. I believe > leaving it in its upstream-decided traditional location has its upsides as > well. Well, if upstream uses includedir, then I don't see any reason to change it. It's just one file anyway. Still, I'm not sure about how logical it is; to compile a Fortran binding you still need to supply -I/usr/include/healpix. You should make a comment about this to healpix-devel. > I have no problem moving it if you insist on it though. > > > - Maybe Fortran package should be named just 'healpix'. > > You decide. I see F90 library is called "libhealpix" in contrast to C's > "libchealpix", which makes me tend to agree. Depends on where would a typical > user of that library expect it to find. Honestly, I'm not exactly that kind of > person (and am, in fact, secretly expecting you to comaintain the package and > take care of the Fortran bindings ;) > > Shortly put -- you seem to know the library much better than me, so I'd prefer > stuff like naming packages and shifting files around up to you. Yes, in retrospect I think "healpix" is best for the name of the Fortran package and healpix-devel for the Fortran development modules, since IIUC Healpix started out as a purely Fortran package and got the C, IDL and Java stuff later. I don't use healpix myself (I'm in materials physics), but I have a few friends who use it. I can comaintain the package with you. > > MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base > > package using a fully versioned dependency. NEEDSFIX > > - fortran-devel must require fortran since the libraries are in fortran. > > Hah, this was your code, no? ;) > Anyways, will fix. Yes, it was :) > New package (probably just fixing the MUST items) following shortly. OK. Also, it occurred to me that there is a check phase that should be enabled: make c-test and make f90-test -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 08:42:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 04:42:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904040842.n348gPbb024231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #42 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-04 04:42:19 EDT --- @David Please work with the gstreamer maintainer to get the patch merged in gstreamer upstream. Once done we can eventually have it backported in our current version of gstreamer for F-11 (if allowed by the maintainer ). What would you do if gstreamer is later updated with the needed fix (along with others gstreamer bugfixes). You will have to rebuild again SB to an internally QA gstreamer ? quoting from SB #15401 > I don't think the Fedora peeps are going to take this very well, but they won't > have a choice if Songbird is to be stable. Remember that the choice is our. Either to have songbird compliant with the Fedora guidelines either to have it not in repository. And it is more important to have packages that can be maintained easily (without using it own copies) than having packages to "just work". You really need to be convinced by this in order to get sponsored as a Fedora contributor, because there is no other choice. F-11 isn't frozen until then, so please work with gstreamer upstream/maintainer to have the probmem solved. Then, what is the last version of the src.rpm ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 09:15:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 05:15:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904040915.n349FEiC030248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #43 from Peter Robinson 2009-04-04 05:15:12 EDT --- > quoting from SB #15401 > > I don't think the Fedora peeps are going to take this very well, but they won't > > have a choice if Songbird is to be stable. > Remember that the choice is our. Either to have songbird compliant with the > Fedora guidelines either to have it not in repository. > And it is more important to have packages that can be maintained easily > (without using it own copies) than having packages to "just work". By shipping an extra copy of gstreamer it also becomes a security risk if there's a exploit that's fixed in the mainline gstreamer and is missed being updated in the songbird copy. That is why there was an effort a number of releases ago to strip out all the included copies of db4/zlib/etc. EG there was a gstreamer CVE just recently. See RHBZ 481267 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 10:52:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 06:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492946] Review Request: eclipse-dltk - Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041052.n34AqnKJ014558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492946 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Mat Booth 2009-04-04 06:52:48 EDT --- Built for all branches, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 11:36:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 07:36:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041136.n34BaUBV022175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-04 07:36:29 EDT --- I had a look at the check phases, and realized there'd be no sense in running them as they are designed to be interactive. Call me a masochist, but I also packaged the C++ stuff. Seemed straightforward at first, but the makefile is a bit more sick than Fortran. Also, I was a bit too hasty with MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. since the Fortran stuff I added include binaries called "map2gif" and "hotspot" which are a bit too general to go in without modifications. Also the shared library you made, libgif.so, has a too general name. I have fixed these, and the stuff that came up in the review. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/healpix.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/healpix-2.11c-4.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint output is now: chealpix.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libchealpix.so chealpix.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libchealpix.so exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 chealpix-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation healpix.src: W: strange-permission healpix-f90test.sh 0775 healpix.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/healpix-2.11c/test/map_mf.fits healpix.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/healpix-2.11c/test/map.fits healpix.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/healpix-2.11c/test/map_ngfs.fits healpix.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/healpix-2.11c/test/almdec.fits healpix.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/healpix-2.11c/test/alm.fits healpix.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/healpix-2.11c/test/map_LOres.fits healpix.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/healpix-2.11c/test/map_ext.fits healpix.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/healpix-2.11c/test/map_sm.fits healpix.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libhealpix_gif.so healpix.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libhealpix.so healpix-c++.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/healpix-c++-2.11c/test/runtest.sh healpix-c++.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libhealpix_cxxsupport.so healpix-c++.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libhealpix_cxx.so healpix-c++.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libhealpix_fft.so healpix-c++-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation healpix-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 20 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 12:49:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 08:49:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - KVIrc is a free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041249.n34CnhWF002304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 --- Comment #12 from nucleo 2009-04-04 08:49:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) - Exclude duplicate files - svn snapshot 3172 - BR dbus-devel Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/kvirc/kvirc.spec SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/kvirc/kvirc-4.0.0-0.3.20090404svn3172.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 13:24:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 09:24:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041324.n34DOZI7008740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 --- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-04 09:24:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Yeah; I spent some time some months ago trying to figure out how to package > this, but very quickly found out that I had no idea of how to do it. Your > example with the C part helped me get the Fortran stuff working. Exactly, package's configure scripts is kind of sickest shit I've seen for ages. After running it I had to run around and show all my friends :) (In reply to comment #10) > I had a look at the check phases, and realized there'd be no sense in running > them as they are designed to be interactive. I've always been amazed how people writing scientific software can get everything they can wrong, even the regression testing :) I see you've packaged them, I'm fine with that, just moved them to -devel, since they're of more-or-less no use unless you're a developer, and needlessly occupy space when dragged in as dependency. > Call me a masochist, but I also packaged the C++ stuff. Seemed straightforward > at first, but the makefile is a bit more sick than Fortran. Um, yes, you're insane :) I'm honestly hoping that Java bindings aren't going to follow until the package is imported :) Seriously, you're going to have commit access so why delay the review with new features. I'm pretty happy with your changes. I've removed some useless compiler flags, which are not typically used for Fedora, as they're not generic enough, or cause other sort of trouble (such as -fomit-frame-pointer making debugging more difficult, etc.) I've also done some cosmetic changes, such as getting rid of backticks (`) just for the sake of consistency with the rest of the SPEC file, and a personal taste. > Also, I was a bit too hasty with > MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. > since the Fortran stuff I added include binaries called "map2gif" and "hotspot" > which are a bit too general to go in without modifications. > > Also the shared library you made, libgif.so, has a too general name. Sounds reasonable enough. I probably would not have renamed libgif, but I don't object either. You've done pretty good job documenting the changes, so why not. > I have fixed these, and the stuff that came up in the review. I'm starting to wonder who's the packager and who's reviewer here :) If I had been the reviewer, I'd most likely approved the packages now, since I'm reasonably with your changes now. Anyways, I've done some changes, see the changelog. > rpmlint output is now: > chealpix.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libchealpix.so > healpix-c++.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libhealpix_cxxsupport.so > healpix-c++.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libhealpix_cxx.so > healpix-c++.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libhealpix_fft.so > healpix.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libhealpix_gif.so > healpix.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libhealpix.so I would not artifically add soname here, unless absolutely required. I don't think this is going to cause much trouble, I believe we're not going to have many packages that depend on this and API seems to be reasonably sane. > chealpix.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libchealpix.so > exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 This is in printerror(), which is specifically meant to exit the program. No problem here, I'd waive this. > chealpix-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > healpix-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > healpix-c++-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation Documentation in main packages depended on by these. Again, no problem here. > healpix.src: W: strange-permission healpix-f90test.sh 0775 > healpix-c++.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/healpix-c++-2.11c/test/runtest.sh I've fixed the mode, but am not sure what is this script good for. Why pack this in a separate file and not run it in %check? > healpix.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 *.fits No need to comment. SRPMS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/healpix.spec SRPMS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/healpix-2.11c-5.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 13:50:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 09:50:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041350.n34Doopg013250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-04 09:50:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > I had a look at the check phases, and realized there'd be no sense in running > > them as they are designed to be interactive. > > I see you've packaged them, I'm fine with that, just moved them to -devel, > since they're of more-or-less no use unless you're a developer, and needlessly > occupy space when dragged in as dependency. Okay, fine by me. > > > Call me a masochist, but I also packaged the C++ stuff. Seemed straightforward > > at first, but the makefile is a bit more sick than Fortran. > > Um, yes, you're insane :) > > I'm honestly hoping that Java bindings aren't going to follow until the package > is imported :) Seriously, you're going to have commit access so why delay the > review with new features. Well, considering how sick the packaging is, I prefer to get everything in the review and make the least changes possible after that. I have no interest in the Java stuff, if anyone needs it then s/he'll have to send a patch :) > > I have fixed these, and the stuff that came up in the review. > > I'm starting to wonder who's the packager and who's reviewer here :) > > If I had been the reviewer, I'd most likely approved the packages now, since > I'm reasonably with your changes now. Anyways, I've done some changes, see the > changelog. Yes, it seems that the spec file has now been mostly written by me :D Well, I guess this kind of thing is normal with software that is as complicated as this. > > healpix.src: W: strange-permission healpix-f90test.sh 0775 > > healpix-c++.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm > > /usr/share/doc/healpix-c++-2.11c/test/runtest.sh > > I've fixed the mode, but am not sure what is this script good for. > Why pack this in a separate file and not run it in %check? Because, IIUC, it creates a bunch of images and it's up to the user to check that they make sense. -- We both agree on the contents and that the rpm packaging is sane. The package has been found to adhere to the guidelines and is thus APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 14:02:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 10:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - KVIrc is a free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041402.n34E2Ddw009944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 --- Comment #13 from nucleo 2009-04-04 10:02:12 EDT --- File %{_datadir}/%{name}/4.0/license/COPYING is needed for About window. May be COPYING can be both in %doc and %{_datadir}/%{name}? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 14:04:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 10:04:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041404.n34E4uJ2010427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-04 10:04:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: healpix Short Description: Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere Owners: lkundrak, jussilehtola Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: (just watchbugzilla please) astronomy-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 14:18:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 10:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493957] Review Request: skyviewer - Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041418.n34EIriS013121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493957 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-04 10:18:52 EDT --- rpmlint output: skyviewer.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/skyviewer-1.0.0/test_iqu.fits 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. No problem with this one. - You didn't try to build in mock, did you? Missing BRs: BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils BuildRequires: libQGLViewer-devel BuildRequires: qt4-devel After this builds fine. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. NEEDSFIX MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSFIX - There is no license file included, or any license mentioned in the source code or the homepage. Must get license information from upstream before the package can be approved. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSFIX - Add general.txt and notes-ngp.txt MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSFIX SHOULD: The package builds in mock. NEEDSFIX (Missing BRs mentioned above.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 14:20:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 10:20:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493957] Review Request: skyviewer - Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041420.n34EKVXw013630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493957 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-04 10:20:31 EDT --- Also, IIUC there is documentation that can be generated using doxygen, please have a look if you can get it to build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 14:50:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 10:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041450.n34Eo5MF018283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #44 from David Halik 2009-04-04 10:50:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #42) > @David > Please work with the gstreamer maintainer to get the patch merged in gstreamer > upstream. Once done we can eventually have it backported in our current version > of gstreamer for F-11 (if allowed by the maintainer ). > What would you do if gstreamer is later updated with the needed fix (along with > others gstreamer bugfixes). You will have to rebuild again SB to an internally > QA gstreamer ? > AS I said in the above post, gstreamer 0.10.22, which is already in F11, has the necessary patches. > quoting from SB #15401 > > I don't think the Fedora peeps are going to take this very well, but they won't > > have a choice if Songbird is to be stable. > Remember that the choice is our. Either to have songbird compliant with the > Fedora guidelines either to have it not in repository. > And it is more important to have packages that can be maintained easily > (without using it own copies) than having packages to "just work". > You really need to be convinced by this in order to get sponsored as a Fedora > contributor, because there is no other choice. > You're missing the point of my statement. Yes, I totally agree that the package should be compliant with Fedora guidelines and easily maintainable, but my point was that in doing so Fedora Songbird builds will be missing developer patches to vendor packages. Each time a new version of Songbird is release a Fedora build will not be possible until all patches are verified as upstreamed to gstreamer, or risk having a non-functioning Songbird. This last release was a perfect example. Are you ok with this? If so, then so am I and we can move on. > F-11 isn't frozen until then, so please work with gstreamer upstream/maintainer > to have the probmem solved. > As I stated, the F11 Songbird doesn't have the issues. All the issues reported were from my F10 backport. SO no problem there. > Then, what is the last version of the src.rpm ? I'll update the src.rpm for F11 with all the fixes above and post it this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 16:16:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041616.n34GGvQ2030864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-04 12:16:55 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 16:16:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041616.n34GGFpR030786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) --- Comment #36 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-04 12:16:13 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 16:29:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:29:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479147] Review Request: skanlite - A scanning program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041629.n34GTmVq005193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479147 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-04 12:29:47 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 16:28:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041628.n34GShYW005100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #33 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-04 12:28:40 EDT --- Actually no progress for more than one month. Usually under situation the review request is closed as NOTABUG so that other person can take over the package. Would you have time for review request _now_ ? If not, would you consider to once close this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 16:35:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041635.n34GZcbm006426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-04 12:35:37 EDT --- Patrick, for now would you try to finish this review request (i.e. upload the new srpm)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 16:39:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041639.n34Gd0iN006789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(iefremov at unipro.r | |u) --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-04 12:38:58 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 16:47:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:47:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041647.n34GlvTk008421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #43 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-04 12:47:53 EDT --- Well, would you write CVS request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 17:05:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:05:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494119] New: Review Request: perl-Devel-Hide - Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules (for testing) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Hide - Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules (for testing) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494119 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Hide - Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules (for testing) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Devel-Hide.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Devel-Hide-0.0008-1.fc11.noarch.rpm Description: Given a list of Perl modules/filenames, this module makes require and use statements fail (no matter the specified files/modules are installed or not). scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1277284 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 17:39:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491027] Review Request: fb-contrib - Extra findbugs detectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041739.n34Hdjp9015651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491027 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-04-04 13:39:45 EDT --- Shouldn't this package be named findbugs-contrib? This way it will be named similar with the other findbugs packages and ambiguity will be removed from the name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 18:04:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 14:04:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041804.n34I4aqE013856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #8 from David Nielsen 2009-04-04 14:04:36 EDT --- ping, Huzaifa I hope you are still working on this, the list will be helpful if you run into problems - there is no such thing as a dumb question. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 18:22:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 14:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041822.n34IMSvR016717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #34 from Stuart D Gathman 2009-04-04 14:22:27 EDT --- Yes, if someone wants to take over the package fine. I will keep the Fedora specs in CVS, and plug away at additional packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 19:03:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 15:03:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904041903.n34J3fVu028575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 --- Comment #17 from Johan Vromans 2009-04-04 15:03:40 EDT --- It seems that both original authors are back on the net since a couple of months! I'll contact them and see what to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 21:37:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 17:37:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226312] Merge Review: ppc64-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904042137.n34LbOvf019522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226312 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-04 17:37:23 EDT --- Okay, let's get this review done with. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 21:47:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 17:47:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493232] Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904042147.n34Llbpf015243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493232 --- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-04 17:47:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > ? There is a mod and a wrapper shell script in the contrib/ directory. Are they > worth packaging? most people use redir standalone, I belive this script is not packaged it other distros too, I have no plans to package it http://ispbrasil.com.br/redir/redir.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/redir/redir-2.2.1-3.fc11.src.rpm koji scratch build dist-f11 -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1277430 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 21:49:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 17:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226312] Merge Review: ppc64-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904042149.n34LnSDB021164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226312 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-04 17:49:26 EDT --- rpmlint output: ppc64-utils.ppc: W: no-documentation ppc64-utils.ppc: W: no-url-tag ppc64-utils.ppc: E: no-binary ppc64-utils.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install ppc64-utils.src: W: no-url-tag 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK - Doesn't have source url, but there's nothing to point to since the package is empty. MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. NEEDSFIX SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK Summary: - There's no documentation or source since the package is empty. - No binary error is due to package being ExclusiveArch ppc{,64}; noarch is not a possibility due to the nature of the package. - Buildroot is not cleaned, but nothing is installed anyway. Cleaning of buildroot might be a good thing to have, just in case. and most importantly - although Fedora has a policy of requiring code or content in the package, in this case the package is needed due to legacy considerations. I'm closing this from clogging the review request list in BZ. In the long run some other package should probably take the role of this package, e.g. basesystem (which seems to be also a metapackage) [which is actually noarch, and as such can't be used]. You can fix the cleaning issue in CVS, if you bother. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 21:56:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 17:56:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226450] Merge Review: sysreport In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904042156.n34LuQGw016591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226450 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 21:58:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 17:58:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486476] Review Request: xfce4-power-manager - Power management for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904042158.n34LwxbF016778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486476 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-04 17:58:58 EDT --- I request early branching for xfce4-power-manager-0.8-alpha. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xfce4-power-manager New Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 22:05:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 18:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226450] Merge Review: sysreport In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904042205.n34M5W3t023908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226450 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 22:05:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 18:05:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226450] Merge Review: sysreport In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904042205.n34M5GYb023846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226450 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-04 18:05:15 EDT --- rpmlint output: sysreport.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/sysreport/functions 0744 sysreport.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/sysreport/sysreport-fdisk 0744 sysreport.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/sysreport 0744 sysreport.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot Gathers system hardware and configuration information. sysreport.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Gathers system hardware and configuration information. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 2 warnings. Hmm, is this package really in use anymore? I see it's been built in the F11 mass branch, but the other builds are two years old. Shouldn't this package be removed from Fedora altogether? Closing as NOTABUG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 22:12:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 18:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904042212.n34MCJsg024959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 00:19:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 20:19:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050019.n350JgpB004004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide --- Comment #13 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-04 20:19:41 EDT --- All the issues/errors/warnings have been corrected, and I'm waiting for your feedback/approval. Denis -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 01:05:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 21:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] New: Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 Summary: Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denis.arnaud_fedora at m4x.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/opentrep/soci.spec?use_mirror=ovh SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/opentrep/soci-3.0.0-2.fc10.src.rpm?use_mirror=ovh Description: [FE-NEEDSPONSOR] That is my second package for Fedora, and I thus still need a sponsor. ------------------------------------------------ The database access library for C++ programmers provides the illusion of embedding SQL in regular C++ code, staying entirely within the C++ standard. Web site: http://soci.sourceforge.net ------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 01:39:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 21:39:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050139.n351d84J021756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) | --- Comment #37 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-04-04 21:39:07 EDT --- New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-ferret.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f11/SRPMS/rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-8.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 01:46:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 21:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050146.n351kBET016754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 --- Comment #15 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-04-04 21:46:10 EDT --- Kevin, I'd appreciate if you take over the review; Stefan isn't going to any time soon I suspect -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 01:50:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 21:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491875] Review Request: unzoo - ZOO archive extractor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050150.n351ontf017346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491875 --- Comment #18 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-04 21:50:48 EDT --- Anyway, I rebuilt deco-archive with unzoo support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 02:04:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 22:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493232] Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050204.n3524CMO019151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493232 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-04 22:04:11 EDT --- Thanks, everything seems fine, except now we have the rpmlint: redir.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/redir-2.2.1/CHANGES This can be fixed with iconv. Please do that before you commit. ---------------------------------------- This package (redir) is APPROVED by oget ---------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 02:37:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 22:37:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050237.n352bCnI024283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha 2009-04-04 22:37:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts Short Description: Letters Laughing is a decorative/LED sans-serif font Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 03:03:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 23:03:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050303.n3533Tmn028008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 --- Comment #16 from Matthew Truch 2009-04-04 23:03:28 EDT --- Sorry it's been a while; I've been swamped at work. Upstream has dealt with the licensing by explicitly making everything GPLv3+. New files: http://matt.truch.net/fedora/slimdata.spec http://matt.truch.net/fedora/slimdata-2.6.3-2.fc11.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1277605 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 04:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 00:06:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493232] Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050406.n3546Ou6004659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493232 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-05 00:06:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: redir Short Description: Redirect TCP connections Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-11 F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 05:39:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 01:39:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493521] Review Request: perl-Log-Trace - A unified approach to tracing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050539.n355dDtI017048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-05 01:39:12 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 05:57:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 01:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493527] Review Request: perl-PlRPC - Interface for building pServer Clients In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050557.n355vHT8019637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493527 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-05 01:57:16 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 06:38:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 02:38:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050638.n356chuj031948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 Ivan Efremov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(iefremov at unipro.r | |u) | --- Comment #10 from Ivan Efremov 2009-04-05 02:38:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > ping? pong. I'll post ugene 1.4.1 during the next week. Thanks for reviewing and comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 06:59:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 02:59:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494161] New: Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Perl - Perl extension for retrieving terminal size Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Perl - Perl extension for retrieving terminal size https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494161 Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Perl - Perl extension for retrieving terminal size Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Term-Size-Perl.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Term-Size-Perl-0.029-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Yet another implementation of Term::Size. Now in pure Perl, with the exception of a C probe run on build time. scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1277692 note: although the resulting rpm appears to be noarch, the build is arch-dependent and produces different code in Params.pm for ppc and x86 (and consequently, rpmlint moans about no-binary). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 07:28:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 03:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492113] Review Request: mingw32-glibmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050728.n357SQA2031821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492113 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-05 03:28:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=338205) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=338205) rpmlint output -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 07:29:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 03:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492113] Review Request: mingw32-glibmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050729.n357T1U0031894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492113 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-05 03:29:01 EDT --- Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 07:27:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 03:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492113] Review Request: mingw32-glibmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050727.n357RF0r031728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492113 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 492113 depends on bug 492110, which changed state. Bug 492110 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libsigc++20 - MinGW Windows port of the typesafe signal framework for C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492110 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-05 03:27:13 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-glibmm24-2.19.2-1.fc11.src.rpm 2008-04-05 * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint output Only expected Errors/Warnings from a mingw package * Package is named according to Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * Spec file is named as the package * Package follows the Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * The stated license (LGPLv2+) is a Fedora approved license * The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding Fedora package * The package contains the license file (COPYING) * The spec file is written in legible English * Sources matches upstream 9915c92a5a4b55fc2696bedf0d7af4cb glibmm-2.19.2.tar.bz2 9915c92a5a4b55fc2696bedf0d7af4cb SRPM/glibmm-2.19.2.tar.bz2 Accoding to guidelines the version should match the version of the corresponding Fedora package - which it does. (It looks like there is an update of the corresponding Fedora package to 2.20.0 in preparation - the glibmm24 spec in CVS has been updated, so look out for that.) Fedora 10 has 2.18.1 (in case a Fedora 10 package is planned) * Package builds in mock (Fedora 10) * BuildRequires look sane * Owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files * %files has %defattr * %clean clears %buildroot * Specfile uses macros consistently * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears %buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 08:07:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 04:07:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226197] Merge Review: nfs-utils-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050807.n3587KUU005466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226197 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |182235(FE-Legal) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 08:29:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 04:29:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - KVIrc is a free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050829.n358TGLs012166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 --- Comment #14 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-04-05 04:29:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > File %{_datadir}/%{name}/4.0/license/COPYING is needed for About window. > May be COPYING can be both in %doc and %{_datadir}/%{name}? May be make it a symlink (relative, to prevent rpmlint warning) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 08:49:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 04:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050849.n358n8wK021230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 08:54:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 04:54:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494164] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Assertions - Simple set of building blocks for both unit and runtime testing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Assertions - Simple set of building blocks for both unit and runtime testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494164 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Assertions - Simple set of building blocks for both unit and runtime testing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Test-Assertions.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Test-Assertions-1.054-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Test::Assertions provides a convenient set of tools for constructing tests, such as unit tests or run-time assertion checks (like C's ASSERT macro). Unlike some of the Test:: modules available on CPAN, Test::Assertions is not limited to unit test scripts; for example it can be used to check output is as expected within a benchmarking script. When it is used for unit tests, it generates output in the standard form for CPAN unit testing (under Test::Harness). scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1277742 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 09:01:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 05:01:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226483] Merge Review: tcsh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050901.n3591f5C017839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226483 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-05 05:01:39 EDT --- Taking over review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 09:22:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 05:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226483] Merge Review: tcsh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050922.n359M4ME027362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226483 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-05 05:22:03 EDT --- - The patches are not commented. Comments should be added why any specific patch is needed. - A newer version 6.16 has been released in September. - Requires(post): grep and Requires(postun): coreutils, grep are a bit silly, aren't these already required by some minimal system rpm? - Is the autoreconf really necessary? - Drop the buildroot checks [ -n "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" -a "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != / ] in install and clean phase. - Consider safening the %post and %postun phases with %post if [ ! -f /etc/shells ]; then echo "%{_bindir}/tcsh" >> /etc/shells echo "%{_bindir}/csh" >> /etc/shells else grep -q '^%{_bindir}/tcsh$' /etc/shells || \ echo "%{_bindir}/tcsh" >> /etc/shells grep -q '^%{_bindir}/csh$' /etc/shells || \ echo "%{_bindir}/csh" >> /etc/shells fi %postun if [ ! -x %{_bindir}/tcsh ]; then grep -v '^%{_bindir}/tcsh$' /etc/shells | \ grep -v '^%{_bindir}/csh$' > /etc/shells.rpm && mv /etc/shells.rpm /etc/shells fi - Package does not handle locales in the right manner. Installing manually is OK, but after that use %{find_lang} to build the file list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 09:34:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 05:34:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492979] Review Request: python-cliutils - A collection of utilities easing the creation of command line scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050934.n359Y9Ra029218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492979 --- Comment #3 from Jason Friedland 2009-04-05 05:34:09 EDT --- Thanks for the feedback Jussi - I will bear that in mind for future reference. I have edited the SPEC and re-uploaded the files: Spec URL: http://jason.friedland.id.au/pkg/python-cliutils.spec SRPM URL: http://jason.friedland.id.au/pkg/python-cliutils-0.1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 09:39:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 05:39:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226483] Merge Review: tcsh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050939.n359dEhd030144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226483 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-05 05:39:13 EDT --- rpmlint output: tcsh.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/tcsh-6.15/Fixes tcsh.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun rm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. - Convert Fixes file to utf8 with iconv. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. ~OK - Some comments could be nice in the install phase, it would make the spec file a lot easier to read and understand. MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSFIX - The license in source code is 3-clause BSD, not BSD with advertising. Change License tag to BSD. - Contact upstream to clarify this, since CopyRight is 4-clause. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. ~OK - The file matches but source URL is bad; now the correct url has old/ before the release. Switch to newest release will fix this. MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. NEEDSFIX MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX - SMP make is not enabled. - Use -p flag to install in install phase. MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK - Please change %{_mandir}/*/* to %{_mandir}/man1/*.1, since it's safer this way. MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSFIX - Include BUGS and WishList in the package. Remember to convert the files to utf8. SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 10:18:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 06:18:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493957] Review Request: skyviewer - Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051018.n35AI2R7031194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493957 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-05 06:18:02 EDT --- Thanks for the review. (In reply to comment #3) > - You didn't try to build in mock, did you? Missing BRs: > BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils > BuildRequires: libQGLViewer-devel > BuildRequires: qt4-devel Nope, dependencies weren't in yet, and I did not bother constructing repositories. Thanks for that. Will fix. (Will reroll the package once the license is settled) > MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the > Licensing Guidelines. NEEDSFIX > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > NEEDSFIX > - There is no license file included, or any license mentioned in the source > code or the homepage. Must get license information from upstream before the > package can be approved. Trying to do that. Contacted via a web form a week ago, no response. Sent mail to the authors now. > SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from > upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSFIX Done. > MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect > runtime of application. NEEDSFIX > - Add general.txt and notes-ngp.txt (In reply to comment #4) > Also, IIUC there is documentation that can be generated using doxygen, please > have a look if you can get it to build. I'm not going to do this. This is a software package, not a substitution for developer's infrastructure. If upstream wanted me to do this, they would integrate it in the build system. I doubt anyone will miss it anyways. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 10:54:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 06:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494171] New: Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 Summary: Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adel.gadllah at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://193.200.113.196/apache2-default/rpm/hostapd.spec SRPM URL: http://193.200.113.196/apache2-default/rpm/hostapd-0.6.9-0.1.20090405gita0b2f99.fc10.src.rpm Description: hostapd is a user space daemon for access point and authentication servers. It implements IEEE 802.11 access point management, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP Authenticators, RADIUS client, EAP server, and RADIUS authentication server. ---- rpmlint is silent, koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1277840 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 11:03:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 07:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - KVIrc is a free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051103.n35B3F9I006814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 --- Comment #15 from nucleo 2009-04-05 07:03:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > May be make it a symlink (relative, to prevent rpmlint warning) ? - symlink to COPYING Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/kvirc/kvirc.spec SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/kvirc/kvirc-4.0.0-0.4.20090404svn3172.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 14:31:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 10:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494195] New: Review Request: drascula - The Vampire Strikes Back - Adventure Game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drascula - The Vampire Strikes Back - Adventure Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494195 Summary: Review Request: drascula - The Vampire Strikes Back - Adventure Game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hdegoede at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/drascula.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/drascula-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: You play John Hacker, an estate agent accompanying Count Drascula as he attempts to negotiate the sale of a property in Transylvania. Little does Hacker know Drascula's vampire secret, and so his adventure quickly becomes a whole lot more complicated than he imagined. Notice that music for the game is available as an addon in the separate drascula-music package. As are Spanish, German, French and Italian subtitles in the drascula-international package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 14:34:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 10:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494195] Review Request: drascula - The Vampire Strikes Back - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051434.n35EYNPj018398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494195 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |494197 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 14:34:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 10:34:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494195] Review Request: drascula - The Vampire Strikes Back - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051434.n35EYXn0018447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494195 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |494199 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 14:34:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 10:34:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494199] Review Request: drascula-international - Subtitles for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051434.n35EYWNN018427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494199 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |494195 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 14:34:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 10:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494197] Review Request: drascula-music - Background music for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051434.n35EYMxU018377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494197 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |494195 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 14:32:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 10:32:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494197] New: Review Request: drascula-music - Background music for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drascula-music - Background music for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494197 Summary: Review Request: drascula-music - Background music for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hdegoede at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/drascula-music.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/drascula-music-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Background music for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back. The review for the main drascula package is bug 494195 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 14:34:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 10:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494199] New: Review Request: drascula-international - Subtitles for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drascula-international - Subtitles for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494199 Summary: Review Request: drascula-international - Subtitles for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hdegoede at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/drascula-international.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/drascula-international-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Spanish, German, French and Italian subtitles for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back. The review for the main drascula package is bug 494195 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 14:40:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 10:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494195] Review Request: drascula - The Vampire Strikes Back - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051440.n35Eersi013981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494195 --- Comment #1 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-05 10:40:52 EDT --- Note the music package review is bug 494197, and the subtitle package review is bug 494199. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 15:54:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 11:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051554.n35FsmLc025727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 15:54:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 11:54:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051554.n35Fsp4j025759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-05 11:54:51 EDT --- * For all -devel sub-packages change "BuildRequires" to "Requires", because you want the builds to depend on the {mysql,sqlite,postgresql}-devel packages. Plus, add the missing "Requires: %name-devel = %version-%release" as the core soci headers are needed. * For the optional Oracle Database builds, consider adding a conditional build parameter (see /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/conditionalbuilds), so you could simple build "--with oracle" to enable the optional packages instead of having to edit the spec file. * The package %description does not mention the project name "SOCI" anywhere. * Why is the tarball not downloaded from the soci.sf.net download location but from your opentrep project space? It differs by ~4MiB. Where does that tarball come from? Is it a checkout from a source code management system? In that case you need to follow the guidelines for 1) documenting this in the spec file, and 2) proper pre-/post-release package versioning. * Package (except for the MySQL backend) doesn't adhere to the compiler flags guidelines. * Directory %{_includedir}/%{name}/backends/ is not included. > %package devel > [...] > Requires(post): info > Requires(preun): info "info" is not used. -devel package doesn't contain any post/preun scriptlet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 16:05:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 12:05:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051605.n35G5nlW027833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-05 12:05:47 EDT --- Please post where to download the update src.rpm Last was: rmol-0.19.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 16:30:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 12:30:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494171] Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051630.n35GUc1e031731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-05 12:30:37 EDT --- Perhaps you are interested in the previous review request of hostap. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230449 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 16:44:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 12:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226381] Merge Review: ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051644.n35GiDDu006066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226381 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-05 12:44:10 EDT --- Jeroen, would you also update this package? At least lots of .new files must be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 16:46:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 12:46:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051646.n35GkbIe002051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #15 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-05 12:46:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Please post where to download the update src.rpm > Last was: rmol-0.19.0-1.fc10.src.rpm It is at the same place (I have replaced the files, as they were not published anywhere else): Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rmol/rmol.spec?use_mirror=ovh SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rmol/rmol-0.19.0-1.fc10.src.rpm?use_mirror=ovh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 16:45:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 12:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051645.n35GjVhI001843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #35 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-05 12:45:29 EDT --- Okay, then once close this bug. Please feel free to submit a new review request when you have some time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 17:22:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 13:22:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494171] Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051722.n35HM5hw012346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 --- Comment #2 from Adel Gadllah 2009-04-05 13:22:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Perhaps you are interested in the previous review request of hostap. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230449 I know, we talked on IRC about this and the conses was that we should make a new package (upstream issues are fixed in the kernel now and the userspace parts in hostapd git, hence why I have built a git snapshot). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 17:19:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 13:19:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493521] Review Request: perl-Log-Trace - A unified approach to tracing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051719.n35HJ9P6011527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-04-05 13:19:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > > Can you please help me understand why to use AutoProv and why not to filter and > > remove unnecessary provides perl(DB)? > > Sure :-) DB is used by the Perl debugger, and as such, is sometimes poked > at... It shouldn't be provided by this package. In this case, turning off > autoprov and manually providing perl(Log::Trace) is significantly easier than > filtering the two provides autoprov finds. ...we've also done this before, > e.g. perl-DateTime-Format-DBI. @Chis: Please understand that I do not agree with your rationale. I consider this kind of packaging to be grossly negligant sloppiness. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 17:19:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 13:19:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494195] Review Request: drascula - The Vampire Strikes Back - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051719.n35HJqEG007180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494195 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org --- Comment #2 from Lucian Langa 2009-04-05 13:19:51 EDT --- Hans, I've already packaged drascula: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465694 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/drascula -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 17:33:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 13:33:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465694] Review Request: drascula - Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051733.n35HX6Ld009734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465694 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hdegoede at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-05 13:33:05 EDT --- *** Bug 494195 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 17:33:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 13:33:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494197] Review Request: drascula-music - Background music for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051733.n35HX7wd009759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494197 Bug 494197 depends on bug 494195, which changed state. Bug 494195 Summary: Review Request: drascula - The Vampire Strikes Back - Adventure Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494195 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 17:33:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 13:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494199] Review Request: drascula-international - Subtitles for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051733.n35HX8Gt009776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494199 Bug 494199 depends on bug 494195, which changed state. Bug 494195 Summary: Review Request: drascula - The Vampire Strikes Back - Adventure Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494195 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 17:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 13:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494195] Review Request: drascula - The Vampire Strikes Back - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051730.n35HUCCx009368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494195 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-05 13:30:11 EDT --- Well, as Ralf pointed out, the readme.txt file says: 3) You may not charge a fee for the game itself. This includes reselling the game as an individual item. I think this is definitely non-free and not permittable on Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 17:33:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 13:33:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494195] Review Request: drascula - The Vampire Strikes Back - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051733.n35HX5lj009706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494195 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-05 13:33:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Hans, > I've already packaged drascula: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465694 > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/drascula Oh, suck. I did do a bugzilla search for drascula and that returned nothing. Still does not return your review request, so the default search box only searches for open requests . Ah well, I'll close this as a dup of your drascula package. Can you make 2 changes to your package? : 1) Add the following to the description: "Notice that music for the game is available as an addon in the separate drascula-music package. As are Spanish, German, French and Italian subtitles in the drascula-international package." (Those are the other 2 drascula packages I did, which luckily seem to still be valid). 2) Remove drascula.dat from the package, since scummvm-0.12.0 the .dat files are shipped to-gether with scummvm. Yes this is not documented very well. p.s. I would appreciate a review of the 2 add on packages, they are quite simple. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 465694 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 17:42:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 13:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494195] Review Request: drascula - The Vampire Strikes Back - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051742.n35HgB4A015822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494195 --- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-05 13:42:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Well, as Ralf pointed out, the readme.txt file says: > > 3) You may not charge a fee for the game itself. This includes reselling the > game as an individual item. > > I think this is definitely non-free and not permittable > on Fedora. The readme.txt contains the *exact* same license text as many other games set free in cooperation between the original right holders and the scummvm project, and this license has been approved for Fedora, see: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-November/msg00020.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 17:46:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 13:46:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494219] New: Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Account manager plugin for trac Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Account manager plugin for trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494219 Summary: Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Account manager plugin for trac Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lvillani at binaryhelix.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://git.binaryhelix.net/cgit/rpms/plain/trac-accountmanager-plugin/trac-accountmanager-plugin.spec?id=d5ca2fc49091fec96331f599a58e5587787b28f1 SRPM URL:http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/trac-accountmanager-plugin-0.2.1-1.20090406svn5484.fc11.src.rpm Description: The AccountManagerPlugin offers several features for managing user accounts: * allow users to register new accounts * login via an HTML form instead of using HTTP authentication * allow existing users to change their passwords or delete their accounts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 17:55:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 13:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051755.n35HtZAw017965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |hdegoede at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-05 13:55:34 EDT --- Felix, Thanks for the offer to swap reviews, you're lucky as one of the packages I wanted to have reviewed turns out to already be a part of Fedora, so you only need to review 2 packages. Taking review, no full review done yet. My first concern with this package is (was) the legal status of it. But it looks like it is a properly licensed original creation so no issues there. However it comes licenses as GPL, but does not come with sources that is a show stopper. Can you please request the sources (and build instructions) from FooBar (as described in the README). Since this is GPL, we really need to be shipping with sources to meet the legal requirements. And the build from source to meet Fedora's own guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 18:09:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 14:09:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494197] Review Request: drascula-music - Background music for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051809.n35I9wMB015117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494197 --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-05 14:09:57 EDT --- $ cat cvs/pkgs/drascula/devel/sources fe2ee0948159c3acb923c89a1af7cc84 drascula-1.0.zip cde1c1509cd8af5b1dcbdcf6289b3a99 drascula-audio-1.0.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 18:29:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 14:29:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051829.n35ITm4F022592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #38 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-05 14:29:48 EDT --- Notes: - BR: findutils is redundant. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 - Would you check if "setup.rb" "Rakefile" are really needed? If it is needed, I think "setup.rb" should be moved to %doc - %defattr(755, root, root, -) is redundant because the permission of ferret_ext.so is explicitly changed to 0755 ! Note: It is needed anyway to make it sure that ferret_ext.so has 0755 permission before %install ends because otherwise find-debuginfo.sh won't work correctly. - %exclude %{geminstdir}/Rakefile is redundant (no glob is used here) ! Not a blocker, however as ruby maintainer would you examine why "rake test_units" fails on ppc64? By the way it is preferable to enable tests as much as possible like --------------------------------------------------------------- %check pushd .%{geminstdir} %ifarch %{ix86} x86_64 ppc rake test_units %else rake test_units || : %endif --------------------------------------------------------------- But other things are okay. --------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-ferret) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 19:18:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 15:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051918.n35JILKe030560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #2 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-05 15:18:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) * Short answer: I shall implement all the required changes, as soon as I can. * Longer answer: - As I use SOCI in several projects, some of them being open source, I would need to have SOCI officially (eventually) integrated within Fedora to be able to submit, among those projects, the Fedora-compatible ones. For instance, I am the "owner" of OpenTREP (http://sourceforge.net/projects/opentrep), which relies on SOCI, and I would like to eventually submit OpenTREP for Fedora inclusion. - As the SOCI project has not been designed with packaging requirements in mind, the code base needs a lot of structure re-work. For instance: * The C++ header files are, by default, all delivered in /usr/include (without any further structure), and assumed to be installed that way when integrated in other programs. * The build system is very specific: there is a "configure" script, but absolutely not the classical (from the GNU autotools suite) one, and a few "hard-coded" makefiles. * Both the directories for the header files and the libraries must be specified at "configure" time. * A few includes are missing for SOCI to compile with g++ from version 4.3 onwards. * The delivered dynamic libraries do not contain sonames. * The test directories are not designed to be executed by the "make check" command. - SOCI integrates, by default, some database backends (namely, Oracle, Microsoft ODBC and Firebird), which either do not comply with Fedora policy (e.g., Oracle and Microsoft ODBC are proprietary software, even though there is a Unix equivalent for ODBC) or have not been integrated within Fedora (e.g., Firebird). Those backends must be de-activated within Fedora. - I have proposed to the project owners (through the mailing list) to help them package SOCI within Fedora, but they (constantly) did not react. However, a few members of the (SOCI developer) mailing list showed their interest in my packaging project. So, it should prove useful not only for my own projects. - Given the above, I have thus copied version 3.0.0 of the code (available under the Boost license on http://soci.sourceforge.net) and have integrated it into a sub-repository of my own OpenTREP project (http://opentrep.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/opentrep/trunk/soci/), to benefit from a stable environment on which I can work everything easily out. I have patched the code as little as possible (mainly for g++ from version 4.3 onwards compatibility), and I have focused on adding the structure for a classical delivery and packaging process (mainly, GNU Autotools addition). - While this was not intended, the above means, on a formal point of view, that I did a fork of the code from version 3.0.0, even though I intended to re-integrate all the changes from the SOCI actual trunk (CSV repository) to my own repositories. - For maintainability reasons, I shall strive, however, to operate the classical way, that is, base the package on the actual SOCI codebase, and just bring patches, so that eventually the package can be delivered cleanly in a Fedora-compatible way. But, there is still some work to do before achieving that... Thanks for your feedback. I'll keep you updated (it should still take a few days until I can post a new version of the packaging process). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 19:29:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 15:29:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494197] Review Request: drascula-music - Background music for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051929.n35JT33J028141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494197 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 19:30:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 15:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051930.n35JUn0n000476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #44 from Gratien D'haese 2009-04-05 15:30:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Package ======================= Package Name: rear Short Description: Relax and Recover (ReaR) is a Linux Disaster Recovery framework Owners: gdha Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: gdha -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 19:28:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 15:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494197] Review Request: drascula-music - Background music for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051928.n35JSk7t032333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494197 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix at fetzig.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |felix at fetzig.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 19:29:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 15:29:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494199] Review Request: drascula-international - Subtitles for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051929.n35JTAUQ032387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494199 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |felix at fetzig.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |felix at fetzig.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Felix Kaechele 2009-04-05 15:29:09 EDT --- I'm currently on vacation in your beautiful country and will have a look into your packages tomorrow or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 19:46:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 15:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494195] Review Request: drascula - The Vampire Strikes Back - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051946.n35Jk2s3002900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494195 --- Comment #6 from Lucian Langa 2009-04-05 15:46:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Can you make 2 changes to your package? : > > 1) Add the following to the description: > "Notice that music for the game is available as an addon in the separate > drascula-music package. As are Spanish, German, French and Italian subtitles > in the drascula-international package." I've added the music pack to the main package. Game seems incomplete without it (eg. description Piano Playing). The music pack enlarges the main package with ~30M I could probably remove it but I do not like users installing 2 separate packages. > 2) Remove drascula.dat from the package, since scummvm-0.12.0 the > .dat files are shipped to-gether with scummvm. Yes this is not > documented very well. will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 20:35:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 16:35:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493684] Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904052035.n35KZN4p008418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-05 16:35:23 EDT --- Licensing and versioning issues resolved. SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme-1.4-1.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 21:02:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 17:02:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904052102.n35L2Gv5014546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 Alex Eskin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(alexeskin at yahoo.c | |om) | --- Comment #18 from Alex Eskin 2009-04-05 17:02:15 EDT --- Thanks for your patience. I addressed most of the comments in the new version. Python 2.6 patch will be addressed when I get back home (a few weeks). New Spec URL: http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~eskin/xword/xword.spec New SRPM URL: http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~eskin/xword/xword-1.0-5.fc9.src.rpm --Alex -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 21:11:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 17:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904052111.n35LBTgZ020170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk --- Comment #16 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-05 17:11:27 EDT --- What's the status of this? Seems like it's being reviewed, but not flags or assignee is set. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 21:42:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 17:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904052142.n35Lgc6V020845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #39 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-04-05 17:42:37 EDT --- - moved setup.rb to -doc subpackage - removed redundant %defattr(755,root,root,-) - removed %exclude %{geminstdir}/Rakefile - Enabled the unit tests since they now fail softly. rake test_units fail due to segmentation faults; I really need to obtain some skills on these kinds of issues in order to solve them ;-) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-ferret Short Description: Full-featured text search engine library Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 22:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 18:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463080] Review Request: cl-base64 - A Common Lisp BASE64 implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904052239.n35Md1pN030291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463080 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-05 18:39:00 EDT --- Well, it's been another month. I guess I'll close these cl-* tickets soon if there's no way anyone can review them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 22:37:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 18:37:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494238] New: Review Request: pyrrd - A Pure Python Wrapper for RRDTool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pyrrd - A Pure Python Wrapper for RRDTool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494238 Summary: Review Request: pyrrd - A Pure Python Wrapper for RRDTool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pyrrd.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pyrrd-0.0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://code.google.com/p/pyrrd/ Description: PyRRD is an wrapper for the RRDTool (round-robin database tool). The idea is to make RRDTool insanely easy to use and to be aesthically pleasing for python programmers. Below is an example of what you have to do if want to use the python bindings that come with RRDTool. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1278677 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint pyrrd-0.0.7-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint pyrrd-0.0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 22:40:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 18:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226381] Merge Review: ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904052240.n35MeSVh030772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226381 --- Comment #27 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-04-05 18:40:27 EDT --- How does such a snippet look to you? == for i in `find -type f ! -name "*.gif"`; do sh -c " iconv -f utf-8 -t utf-8 $i > /dev/null 2>&1 || \ ( iconv -f euc-jp -t utf-8 $i > $i.new \ && mv $i.new $i \ || rm -f $i.new ) if [ $? != 0 ]; then iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf-8 $i > $.new \ && mv $i.new $i \ || rm -f $i.new fi " done == -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 22:48:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 18:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904052248.n35MmFTG003801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #3 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-05 18:48:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Still from the fork, I have fixed a few issues you had identified, and have replaced the Source RPM, tar-balls and specification file. > * For the optional Oracle Database builds, consider adding a conditional build > parameter (see /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/conditionalbuilds), so you could simple > build "--with oracle" to enable the optional packages instead of having to > edit the spec file. Done. > * The package %description does not mention the project name "SOCI" anywhere. Done. > * Package (except for the MySQL backend) doesn't adhere to the compiler flags > guidelines. The "configure" now reads: %configure --disable-static \ %{?_with_mysql} %{?_without_mysql} \ %{?_with_postgresql} %{?_without_postgresql} \ %{?_with_sqlite} %{?_without_sqlite} \ %{?_with_oracle:%{?_with_oracle} %{?_with_oracle_incdir} %{?_with_oracle_libdir}} \ %{?_without_oracle} make %{?_smp_mflags} It seems to work well. What did you mean by "Package does not adhere to the compiler flag guidelines"? > * Directory %{_includedir}/%{name}/backends/ is not included. The main -devel package (namely, soci-devel) contains the "empty" backend, and thus includes the %{_includedir}/%{name}/backends/empty directory. However, since there may be other backend include directories at the building time, only the backend/empty sub-directory should be taken in charge by the main -devel package. The other -devel sub-packages (namely, soci-{mysql,postgresql,sqlite,oracle}-devel) each includes the correspnding %{_includedir}/%{name}/backends/{mysql,postgresql,sqlite3,oracle} directory. What did you mean by "Directory %{_includedir}/%{name}/backends/ is not included"? > > %package devel > > [...] > > Requires(post): info > > Requires(preun): info > > "info" is not used. -devel package doesn't contain any post/preun scriptlet. Right. Removed. Moreover, as said in comment #2, I'll shortly work on starting from the genuine SOCI codebase (only adding patches) instead of starting from my "technical fork". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 23:56:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 19:56:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904052356.n35Nu26v015755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #4 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-05 19:56:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > It seems to work well. What did you mean by "Package does not adhere to the > compiler flag guidelines"? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags How can I override the compiler flags, so as to use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS/%{optflags}? Should I add something like CPPFLAGS="%{optflags}" in the %configure macro? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 01:09:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 21:09:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060109.n3619hYD022252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 --- Comment #8 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-05 21:09:42 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 01:24:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 21:24:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494238] Review Request: pyrrd - A Pure Python Wrapper for RRDTool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060124.n361OnnU030129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494238 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |david at gnsa.us AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 01:28:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 21:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494238] Review Request: pyrrd - A Pure Python Wrapper for RRDTool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060128.n361S8jK025907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494238 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from David Nalley 2009-04-05 21:28:08 EDT --- OK : rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] Just for kicks here is the output from rpmlint on the spec file itself: [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint pyrrd.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK:: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Ships with BSD license. OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. >From my download from upstream: [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 t2]$ md5sum PyRRD-0.0.7.tar.gz 31cfb812d3a4a5ca11e619ce9dc8f6b4 PyRRD-0.0.7.tar.gz >From the SRPM: [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SOURCES]$ md5sum PyRRD-0.0.7.tar.gz 31cfb812d3a4a5ca11e619ce9dc8f6b4 PyRRD-0.0.7.tar.gz OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. (Build log from koji above shows successful build as well as building on reviewers x86_64 laptop successfully.) N/A: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. N/A: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] OK: Each package must consistently use macros. While macros are used in several places, case makes this impossible in some. Upstream appears to have not decided whether to use PyRRD or pyrrd and uses both in some cases. While the package guidelines do not require that you adopt one case or another, one does wonder whether it would be easier in the spec file to have adopted the PyRRD style. As said earlier though this is left to the packagers discretion: https://fedoraproject.com/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Case_Sensitivity OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. N/A: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. N/A: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. N/A: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. I ran some of the sample scripts shipped and it generates the rrd files and associated pngs as expected. Nothing seen as a blocker in this package, thus approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 01:41:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 21:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060141.n361fxkY000790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #9 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-04-05 21:41:58 EDT --- David, Yes i am working on it. My rawhide machine konked off and i had to re-install which took some time :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 05:09:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 01:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060509.n3659uN8003175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 --- Comment #4 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-06 01:09:56 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 05:14:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 01:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494119] Review Request: perl-Devel-Hide - Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules (for testing) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060514.n365ENuO031820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494119 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-Devel-Hide --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-06 01:14:22 EDT --- The link is to the rpm, not srpm :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 05:26:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 01:26:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060526.n365Qplt006522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-06 01:26:51 EDT --- Can you add Changelog as %doc as asked already in comment#2 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 05:37:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 01:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060537.n365blmc003639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 --- Comment #6 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-06 01:37:46 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-erbi-1.1.0.20090403-2.fc11.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-erbi.spec Description: A split from ibus-table-chinese, which was sub-package of ibus-table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 05:42:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 01:42:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060542.n365gLHx009083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-06 01:42:21 EDT --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 05:47:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 01:47:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494161] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Perl - Perl extension for retrieving terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060547.n365lqT8005609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494161 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 05:47:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 01:47:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060547.n365lq5s005608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-06 01:47:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Hi Jens, what would you think if we could approve that now and work out the way > to include this to tables of ibus-table afterwards? Yes, that should be fine - I think your idea of adding ibus-table- References: Message-ID: <200904060547.n365lscL010054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494161 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 05:50:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 01:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494161] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Perl - Perl extension for retrieving terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060550.n365ot7F006328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494161 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-06 01:50:54 EDT --- Everything looks good... With the exception of a missing BR on Test::Pod; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 05:56:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 01:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060556.n365uMRD011751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-06 01:56:22 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1279006 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is ibus-table-extraphrase.src:54: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ibus-table-extraphrase.pc ==> is this really needed? + source files match upstream url 2dd3e5cf76c8fa36b17a6ade737e0801 ibus-table-extraphrase-1.1.0.20090327.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlet used. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. Suggestions: 1) Add Changelog in upstream tarball. When you add it then you can add this Changelog file as %doc 2) can you check if ibus-table-extraphrase.pc is really needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 06:00:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 02:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494161] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Perl - Perl extension for retrieving terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060600.n3660Ogt008030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494161 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Term-Size-Perl Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-06 02:00:23 EDT --- Everything looks good... With the exception of a missing BR on Test::Pod; please add before importing. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1277692 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): 00699199e149f28a2d57bb1ddbb1d0fde94c9f31 Term-Size-Perl-0.029.tar.gz 00699199e149f28a2d57bb1ddbb1d0fde94c9f31 Term-Size-Perl-0.029.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Term-Size-Perl-0.029-1.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Term-Size-Perl-0.029-1.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Term-Size-Perl-0.029-1.fc10.src.rpm perl(ExtUtils::CBuilder) perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Test::More) =====> perl-Term-Size-Perl-0.029-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint perl-Term-Size-Perl.x86_64: E: no-binary 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Term-Size-Perl-0.029-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm perl(Term::Size::Perl) = 0.029 perl(Term::Size::Perl::Params) = 0.029 perl-Term-Size-Perl = 0.029-1.fc10 perl-Term-Size-Perl(x86-64) = 0.029-1.fc10 ====> requires for perl-Term-Size-Perl-0.029-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Exporter) perl(Term::Size::Perl::Params) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 06:04:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 02:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494164] Review Request: perl-Test-Assertions - Simple set of building blocks for both unit and runtime testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060604.n3664eHg012919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494164 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 06:04:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 02:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494164] Review Request: perl-Test-Assertions - Simple set of building blocks for both unit and runtime testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060604.n3664g44008551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494164 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 06:09:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 02:09:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060609.n3669IJm009399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-06 02:09:17 EDT --- Package Name: ibus-table-erbi Short Description: Erbi input method for ibus-table Owners: cchance Branches: devel InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 06:21:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 02:21:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494164] Review Request: perl-Test-Assertions - Simple set of building blocks for both unit and runtime testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060621.n366LAPQ015930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494164 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-06 02:21:10 EDT --- Looks good. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1277742 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPLv2); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): f2312245ee07f2a6e77eb415860350b7a319fc47 Test-Assertions-1.054.tar.gz f2312245ee07f2a6e77eb415860350b7a319fc47 Test-Assertions-1.054.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Test-Assertions-1.054-1.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Test-Assertions-1.054-1.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Test-Assertions-1.054-1.fc10.src.rpm perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Log::Trace) perl(Test::Pod) perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) =====> perl-Test-Assertions-1.054-1.fc10.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Test-Assertions-1.054-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Test::Assertions) = 1.54 perl(Test::Assertions::TestScript) = 1.18 perl-Test-Assertions = 1.054-1.fc10 ====> requires for perl-Test-Assertions-1.054-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(File::Basename) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Log::Trace) perl(Test::Assertions) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 06:23:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 02:23:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494164] Review Request: perl-Test-Assertions - Simple set of building blocks for both unit and runtime testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060623.n366NaCo011972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494164 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Test-Assertions Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 06:24:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 02:24:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494164] Review Request: perl-Test-Assertions - Simple set of building blocks for both unit and runtime testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060624.n366OdNO012146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494164 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 06:34:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 02:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494119] Review Request: perl-Devel-Hide - Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules (for testing) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060634.n366YrVl013810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494119 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-06 02:34:53 EDT --- However, the koji scratch build has the srpm embedded... http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1277284&name=perl-Devel-Hide-0.0008-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 06:36:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 02:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494119] Review Request: perl-Devel-Hide - Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules (for testing) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060636.n366aont014392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494119 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 06:36:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 02:36:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494119] Review Request: perl-Devel-Hide - Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules (for testing) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060636.n366ap9O014411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494119 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 06:47:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 02:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494119] Review Request: perl-Devel-Hide - Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules (for testing) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060647.n366lOHf016257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494119 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 06:46:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 02:46:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494119] Review Request: perl-Devel-Hide - Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules (for testing) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060646.n366kM1x016151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494119 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-06 02:46:21 EDT --- Looks good. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1277284 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): 4232ba0fe6d38c2c981b480c713270c8d5aa2542 Devel-Hide-0.0008.tar.gz 4232ba0fe6d38c2c981b480c713270c8d5aa2542 Devel-Hide-0.0008.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Devel-Hide-0.0008-1.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Devel-Hide-0.0008-1.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Devel-Hide-0.0008-1.fc10.src.rpm perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) >= 1.18 perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) >= 1.04 =====> perl-Devel-Hide-0.0008-1.fc10.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Devel-Hide-0.0008-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Devel::Hide) = 0.0008 perl-Devel-Hide = 0.0008-1.fc10 ====> requires for perl-Devel-Hide-0.0008-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl >= 0:5.006001 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(lib) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 07:34:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 03:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060734.n367Y4G1029403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-06 03:34:04 EDT --- What about search on license/origin of the Erbi table? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 07:49:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 03:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494197] Review Request: drascula-music - Background music for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060749.n367nunJ032185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494197 --- Comment #2 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-06 03:49:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > $ cat cvs/pkgs/drascula/devel/sources > fe2ee0948159c3acb923c89a1af7cc84 drascula-1.0.zip > cde1c1509cd8af5b1dcbdcf6289b3a99 drascula-audio-1.0.zip Oh, thanks for letting me know. I'm currently discussing with the drascula maintainer on whether to split drascula (seems the right thing to me two seperate upstream tarbals should be 2 separate packages). Or close this as a dup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 07:49:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 03:49:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494195] Review Request: drascula - The Vampire Strikes Back - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060749.n367njqa028356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494195 --- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-06 03:49:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > Can you make 2 changes to your package? : > > > > 1) Add the following to the description: > > "Notice that music for the game is available as an addon in the separate > > drascula-music package. As are Spanish, German, French and Italian subtitles > > in the drascula-international package." > I've added the music pack to the main package. Game seems incomplete without it > (eg. description Piano Playing). The music pack enlarges the main package with > ~30M I could probably remove it but I do not like users installing 2 separate > packages. > Oh, I didn't know you included the music in the main package, I personally would like to see this split, for example on the games live dvd we are short on space and thus do not install any of the -music packages. Also this seems the right thing to me as two seperate upstream tarbals should be 2 separate packages, so that if one of them changes the user does not need to redownload the other (unchanged) package. > > 2) Remove drascula.dat from the package, since scummvm-0.12.0 the > > .dat files are shipped to-gether with scummvm. Yes this is not > > documented very well. > will do. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 07:53:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 03:53:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] New: Review Request:mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 Summary: Review Request:mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kalev at smartlink.ee QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.smartlink.ee/~kalev/mingw32-libp11.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smartlink.ee/~kalev/mingw32-libp11-0.2.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Libp11 is a library implementing a small layer on top of PKCS#11 API to make using PKCS#11 implementations easier. This is the MinGW cross-compiled Windows library. The version of libp11 used here is 0.2.4, while the main Fedora package is still at 0.2.3. The reason for picking a newer version for the mingw32 package is that the older one needs several modifications to successfully build, whereas this one build cleanly with mingw32. Approved packaging guidelines for MinGW are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1279142 I'll also need a sponsor. I have posted a few package review requests (and have done unofficial reviews), but none of my packages are in Fedora yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 07:57:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 03:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060757.n367vCIi029941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |494283(mingw32-libp11) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 07:57:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 03:57:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request:mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060757.n367vA12029901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-mingw at lists.fedorapr | |oject.org Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Depends on| |454410(mingw32-gcc) Alias| |mingw32-libp11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 08:32:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 04:32:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494292] New: Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-html - The HTML component for Spacewalk Proxy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-html - The HTML component for Spacewalk Proxy Alias: spacewalk-proxy-html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494292 Summary: Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-html - The HTML component for Spacewalk Proxy Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-proxy-html/spacewalk-proxy-html-0.4.2-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-proxy-html/spacewalk-proxy-html.spec Description: This package contains placeholder html pages, which the Spacewalk Server display, if you navigate to it using your browser. rpmlint is silent. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1279144 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 08:44:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 04:44:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494161] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Perl - Perl extension for retrieving terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060844.n368i12H012844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494161 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-06 04:44:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Term-Size-Perl Short Description: Perl extension for retrieving terminal size Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 08:45:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 04:45:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494164] Review Request: perl-Test-Assertions - Simple set of building blocks for both unit and runtime testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060845.n368j9m6013283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494164 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-06 04:45:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Assertions Short Description: Simple set of building blocks for both unit and runtime testing Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 08:46:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 04:46:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494119] Review Request: perl-Devel-Hide - Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules (for testing) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060846.n368kMZm010470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494119 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-06 04:46:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Devel-Hide Short Description: Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 08:49:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 04:49:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060849.n368nhnh011016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #37 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-06 04:49:37 EDT --- Thanks for bumping the f11 ghc-X11 build, Yaakov. (In reply to comment #34) > I did not test the xsession stuff Can't it just be merged into xmonad-start? > but with my patch it works: > http://till.fedorapeople.org/files/xmonad_7-8.spec.diff Thanks > I wrote a simple config that is stored in /etc/skel/.xmonad/xmonad.hs, that > opens the manpage using xterm. Could you attach it here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 09:12:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 05:12:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489795] Review Request: backintime - Simple backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060912.n369CRM8019004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489795 --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-06 05:12:27 EDT --- update.... SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/backintime-0.9.20/backintime.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/backintime-0.9.20/backintime-0.9.20-1.fc10.src.rpm RPMLint: backintime-gnome.noarch: W: no-dependency-on usermode backintime-gnome.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/backintime-gnome-root backintime-kde4.noarch: W: no-dependency-on usermode backintime-kde4.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/backintime-kde4-root 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Conffile= who cares? usermode= there is a Requires: usermode-gtk and that will require usermode, so this is okay! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 09:36:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 05:36:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060936.n369aB6b025769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pingou at pingoured.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 09:35:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 05:35:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060935.n369Zd4T025674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pingou at pingoured.fr Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 09:42:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 05:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060942.n369gcPq027521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #10 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-04-06 05:42:37 EDT --- Following changes made to the spec: 1. Dropped noarch 2. Dropped libdir David, regarding your suggestion for separating the plugins into different packages. I feel that there are really a lot of plugins for that isnt it? /usr/share/gnome-do/plugins has 210 files, Assuming two files for each plugin, we have around 105 plugin rpms? SPEC: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnome-do-plugins.spec SRPM: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/gnome-do-plugins-0.8.0-2.fc11.src.rpm Please let me know what you think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 09:53:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 05:53:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060953.n369rkF9030156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #45 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-06 05:53:43 EDT --- Okay, so we are focusing on F-11 for now, once the 1.1.1 package will be good, you will be allowed to backport the needed changes to the Songbird 1.0.0 package which may be more suitable for F-9/F-10. (there is no stric policy about reviewing a package twice, different version for different branches. So I'm only pre-reviewing 1.1.1 for F-11). Given the number of improvements and quality assurance that a songbird version needs, It would be better to only update the Rawhide version as a consequence (so, as you said, you can verify the patches to be upstreamed). As we are good for gstreamer by F-11, taglib is waiting for a future 2.0 release to get built on shared, do you have a newer src.rpm so i can look at SongBird 1.1.1 for F-11 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 09:54:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 05:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060954.n369sKos030245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 --- Comment #3 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-04-06 05:54:19 EDT --- It might be nice to make the license tag clear: the file in /usr/bin says: > # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > # the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or > # (at your option) any later version. the file README says: > All code contained as part of the Buable package is licenced under the GNU GPL. the LICENSE shipped is: > GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE > Version 2, June 1991 the PKG-INFO file says: > License: GPL Please solve this question, the rest of the package is clean and I will approve it once the license issue is solved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 10:06:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 06:06:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061006.n36A62wY000963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-06 06:06:00 EDT --- license is GPLv3+ from COPYING file as erbi_qs.txt file mentions only "GPL" license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 10:35:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 06:35:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493957] Review Request: skyviewer - Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061035.n36AZDT9008942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493957 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-06 06:35:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Thanks for the review. No problem. If you want to repay me you can review some of my packages: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jussilehtola#Awaiting_review All of these are very simple (firehol is the most elaborate since it has a initrd script). > (In reply to comment #4) > > Also, IIUC there is documentation that can be generated using doxygen, please > > have a look if you can get it to build. > > I'm not going to do this. This is a software package, not a substitution for > developer's infrastructure. If upstream wanted me to do this, they would > integrate it in the build system. > > I doubt anyone will miss it anyways. You're right, the package doesn't even have development headers so there's no need to have API information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 10:38:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 06:38:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061038.n36AcrYi005231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 10:42:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 06:42:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492087] Review Request: pidgin-latex - A Pidgin plugin that displays LaTeX equations as images in your conversations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061042.n36AgVhb006353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492087 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 11:03:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:03:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490724] Review Request: R-RUnit - R Unit test framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061103.n36B3j3S011289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490724 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 11:03:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:03:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490723] Review Request: R-IRanges - Low-level containers for storing sets of integer ranges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061103.n36B3kfw011318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490723 Bug 490723 depends on bug 490724, which changed state. Bug 490724 Summary: Review Request: R-RUnit - R Unit test framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490724 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 11:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061119.n36BJRCA015150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch Bug 453851 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453851 depends on bug 453849, which changed state. Bug 453849 Summary: Review Request: globus-libtool - Globus Toolkit - Globus libtool package (virtual GPT glue package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453849 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #7 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-06 07:19:26 EDT --- rpmlint: globus-common.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 211, tab: line1) globus-common-devel.i386: W: no-documentation globus-common-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation globus-common-progs.i386: W: no-documentation globus-common-progs.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post cp globus-common-progs.x86_64: W: no-documentation globus-common-progs.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post cp scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1279217 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 11:23:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061123.n36BNO1m020638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 Mads Villadsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |maxx at krakoa.dk --- Comment #11 from Mads Villadsen 2009-04-06 07:23:22 EDT --- I think it would make sense to split up the plugins in different subpackages only where there is an extra external dependency. So for instance something like this: gnome-do-plugins (contains all the "basic" plugins) gnome-do-plugins-evolution (plugins for evolution) gnome-do-plugins-banshee (plugins for banshee) gnome-do-plugins-flickr (plugins for flickr) So if I do an install of gnome-do and gnome-do-plugins I don't end up pulling in a lot of stuff I don't need as dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 11:31:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061131.n36BVcL8018285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #12 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-04-06 07:31:37 EDT --- hmm sounds good, will do :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 11:33:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061133.n36BXloE018580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-06 07:33:35 EDT --- Legend: * OK ! Needs attention ! rpmlint output - please fix the mixed-spaces-tabs issue. Also consider adding the license file to all packages as doc. I don't quite understand what the %post script for progs does, so please explain. * Package is named according to Fedora packaging guidelines * Spec file is named as the package ! Package follows the Fedora packaging guidelines why are the file lists packaged? (such as /usr/share/globus/packages/globus_common/gcc32pthr_rtl.filelist) * The stated license (ASL 2.0) is a Fedora approved license * The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding Fedora package * The package contains the license file (GLOBUS_LICENSE) * The specfile is written in legible English ! Sources matches upstream, but... If you insist on chopping the source tarball, please do it according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL, section "When upstream uses prohibited code". This section IMO matches best what you want to achieve * Package scratch builds * BuildRequires look sane * Owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files * %files has %defattr * %clean clears %buildroot * Specfile uses macros consistently * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears %buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 11:35:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:35:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061135.n36BZLrS023473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 11:39:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:39:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061139.n36Bdgvr024256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #13 from David Nielsen 2009-04-06 07:39:42 EDT --- That was the general idea. We should aim to be flexible and allowing people to enable only what they need. Remembering that you pull in the world as dependencies for the mega package. I think we need to aim for something sane here, the above looks good at least for a start. We can always break things up some more later if we need it. Maybe it would be good to ask upstream to please take more care to make packaging easy and let us keep dependencies and enablement sane. I have checked a bunch of distros that ship gnome-do-plugins and they all have this mega package that forces me to have evolution, rhythmbox and other apps that are useless to me installed. I filed bugs against all these packages, perhaps it is time to poke upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 11:40:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:40:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061140.n36BeP3c020419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #14 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-04-06 07:40:24 EDT --- So here are the subpackages: gnome-do-plugins-banshee gnome-do-plugins-bibtex gnome-do-plugins-clawsmail gnome-do-plugins-confluence gnome-do-plugins-ephiphany gnome-do-plugins-evolution gnome-do-plugins-eyeofgnome gnome-do-plugins-firefox gnome-do-plugins-flickr gnome-do-plugins-pidgin gnome-do-plugins-rhythmbox gnome-do-plugins-tomboy gnome-do-plugins-thunderbird gnome-do-plugins-tasque gnome-do-plugins-vinagre and gnome-do-plugins Does that sound good? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 11:45:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:45:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492113] Review Request: mingw32-glibmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061145.n36BjpO1026247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492113 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-06 07:45:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-glibmm24 Short Description: MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) Owners: sailer rjones Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 12:04:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061204.n36C4gjU026687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 --- Comment #8 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-06 08:04:42 EDT --- new upstream release Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/vidalia-0.1.12/vidalia.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/vidalia-0.1.12/vidalia-0.1.12-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 12:21:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061221.n36CLJaq030775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #17 from Anithra 2009-04-06 08:21:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > What's the status of this? Seems like it's being reviewed, but not flags or > assignee is set. The request is still waiting for a formal review and approval. It has not been assigned to anybody. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 12:28:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:28:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061228.n36CSvvM004455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 12:43:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:43:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061243.n36ChfB5008622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #15 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2009-04-06 08:43:41 EDT --- Nice to see progress on this, a couple of notes: 0.8.0.1 is available, but requires patch attached in my post above. %{_datadir}/gnome-do is owned by package gnome-do. -plugins should not own this dir. Split looks sane. Good job. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 12:51:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:51:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061251.n36CpVr3006097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 --- Comment #9 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-06 08:51:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > ! rpmlint output - please fix the mixed-spaces-tabs issue. Also consider adding > the license file to all packages as doc. I don't quite understand what the > %post script for progs does, so please explain. The mixed-spaces-tabs warning is due to a bug in rpmlint, if you update to rpmlint-0.87-1 (currently in the testing repo) where the bug has been fixed, the warning goes away. The %post script generates the two files labelled as %ghost in the filelist: %ghost %{_datadir}/globus/setup/globus-sh-tools-vars.sh %ghost %{_datadir}/globus/globus-sh-tools-vars.sh > ! Package follows the Fedora packaging guidelines > why are the file lists packaged? (such as > /usr/share/globus/packages/globus_common/gcc32pthr_rtl.filelist) These are GPT (grid-packaging-tools) metadata files, used by e.g. gpt-verify and other GPT tools. > ! Sources matches upstream, but... > If you insist on chopping the source tarball, please do it according to > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL, > section "When upstream uses prohibited code". This section IMO matches > best what you want to achieve I think a script is an overkill here, since the instructions are quite simple (extract a complete subdirectory) and can be stated in a comment. The reviewer of globus-core had a similar request (at the time there was no comment in the spec files), and when I added the comment as it is now he was satisfied with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 12:58:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:58:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061258.n36Cwbm5007906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #14 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-04-06 08:58:35 EDT --- If somebody interested, here is my email to lirc mailinglist: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=20090402060831.GO6207%40salstar.sk&forum_name=lirc-list Without any reply yet. :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 13:10:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:10:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208051] Review Request: dirvish - Fast, disk based, rotating network backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061310.n36DAxfG011241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208051 Robert Marcano changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Robert Marcano 2009-04-06 09:10:58 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: dirvish New Branches: EL-5 Owners: robmv -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 13:14:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:14:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491090] Review Request: kernel-firmware - firmware files for use with Linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061314.n36DEgce012082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491090 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-06 09:14:42 EDT --- I can review the package itself , but I can expect few problems. While it is definitely better to find firmwares in one place over the web, it is also enhancement to remove various firmwares from the source kernel and then the kernel.src.rpm . I expect having a monolithic kernel-firmware package to lead to various problems. I will try to sort the issues I expect here, but I won't prevent this package to be introduced. So I'm starting the review. 1 - I cannot identify which driver(and license) is related to this file: * atmsar11.fw ? 2 - Some firmware that was previously removed (seen in alsa-firmware or other packages) still appear within WHENCE - minor. 3 - Potential Conflicting files: * Found in alsa-firmware-1.19 File: ess/maestro3_assp_kernel.fw File: ess/maestro3_assp_minisrc.fw * Found in libertas-usb8388-firmware /lib/firmware/usb8388.bin (not exactly the same namespace than kernel-firmware libertas sub-directory) 4 - kernel-firmware size. The kernel-firmware size will grow from a ratio of 10 with new kernel-firmware introduction (320ko -> 3.2Mo) . This lead to two questions. - Are some firmwares bundled in kernel-firmware supposed to be updated? This might not be relevant as soon as we are using presto. But it seems safer to only bundle firmwares files that doesn't move often. - Is it possible for big firmwares image to be splited to another package so they can be un-installed easily. This is very important for LiveCD folk to have a image <700Mo if some old/rare firmwares can be removed. - Do every drivers related to each firmware files are relevant on every CPU ? (x86, x86_64, ppc, ppc64). I expect some are only x86 and x86_64. (minor). 5 - kernel-firmware version. Using a date will allow kernel-firmware to update the one built from the kernel.src.rpm. But it isn't clear what this date means. For example we don't know if the last collection to date is also suitable for 2.6.27 kernel or 2.6.30. One could say it is the last archive that have a firmware update. or the archive that collected others firmwares (even if those firmwares was older than the written date). So keeping the kernel version may eventually suggest that a minimal kernel version is needed with this firmware collection. (like 2.6.27.$date-) 6 - Multiple ABI for firmware. To assure smooth transition, we used to eventually bundle multiple ABI of a firmware (seen in iwl4965-firmware) The request from rel-eng was that the same package should allow to work on kernel from F-n to F-n+2. Hence, this kind of Upgrade can allow a fallback if something went wrong. If a firmware can use different ABI. It would be more relevant to split it in another package. 7 - kernel-firmware and kernel interaction. Since kernel-firmware can be optional. It will be better not to have a Requires: kernel-firmware >= kf-version but a conflict: kernel-firmware < kf-version from the kernel itself. Once that said, each driver could requires a different kernel-firmware version if multiple ABI can be bundled for a given driver. 8 - Building subpackage vs splitting tarball for kernel-firmware. It might be easier at the first sight to build sub-packages if more splitting is needed. (for big firmware). One can say it will not matter since we have presto enabled by F-11. The problem is with sorting the required version for earch firmware and the kernel cannot be solved by splitting sub-package. 9 - kernel-firmware to be a default/optional package ? Since this package bundles various kind of firmwares, it would depends on the case to know if this would be better to have it installed by default or optional. I think it is better to have raid disk, nic adapter and wifi, installed in the default install media while v4l devices can be installed in post install. Other adaptation could be done if the device remains rare or for the LiveMedia case. Actually, there is only one thing that could prevent this package to be introduced in Fedora, it is the unknown redistribution status of some firmwares. We may implicitly consider that if firmwares was contributed to the kernel, it is allowed to redistribute. Do we have a FE-legal advice about that? So, to sum up the package review itself. I would have a general answear on the point I have raised. It will also be better to fix conflicting files along with thinking of a better version scheme that may prevent epoch uses before to introduce the package. * There is a typo in the URL : htp:// * rpmint warning on kernel-firmware.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 7, tab: line 1) * Some licenses are bundled in the sub-directory whereas only License.* and WHENCE are bundled as %doc. Thoses items was checked and are OK: - Timestamps have been keept while installing files. - Every docs/Licenses are either ASCII or UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 13:28:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061328.n36DS6tr015561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-06 09:28:05 EDT --- http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Test-Most-0.21-2.fc11.src.rpm http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Test-Most.spec Checked. Most of requirement are really needed but few were removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 13:25:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493530] Review Request: perl-Data-Dumper-Names - Data::Dumper::Names module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061325.n36DPRwe015093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493530 --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-06 09:25:27 EDT --- http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Data-Dumper-Names-0.03-2.fc11.src.rpm http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Data-Dumper-Names.spec You are right. perl(Test::More) isn't needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 13:33:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - KVIrc is a free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061333.n36DXOg1016947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 --- Comment #16 from nucleo 2009-04-06 09:33:23 EDT --- - patch for using standard compiler flags Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/kvirc/kvirc.spec SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/kvirc/kvirc-4.0.0-0.5.20090404svn3172.fc10.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1279476 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 13:34:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:34:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492991] Review Request: mediawiki-InputBox - An extension to enable input box tags for mediawiki pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061334.n36DYBAl017109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492991 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |david at gnsa.us AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 13:37:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:37:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061337.n36DbBNq018066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #19 from Michael Larabel 2009-04-06 09:37:10 EDT --- Joseph: Phoronix Test Suite 1.8.0 is now available at http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/ and that would be the preferred version now for packaging. Fortunately, there aren't many packaging changes that should be needed. About the only one I can think of is that there is now a phoronix-test-suite.png program icon and also some of the external dependencies for Fedora were revised and removed (checkout the pts/distro-xml/fedora-packages.xml, there's just a couple). If Fedora ends up getting PHP5 GTK (http://gtk.php.net/) down the road, that can be added as a dependency so there can be the GUI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 13:40:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494339] New: Review Request: hyphen-hi - Hindi hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-hi - Hindi hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494339 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-hi - Hindi hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-hi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-hi-0.20081213-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Hindi hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 13:46:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:46:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493432] Review Request: libgdata - Library for the GData protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061346.n36DkN16024174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493432 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Bastien Nocera 2009-04-06 09:46:22 EDT --- Built in F11 and devel, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 13:43:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452387] Review Request: netblox - A console-based, networked falling blocks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061343.n36DhJKU023234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452387 --- Comment #11 from Marcin ?abanowski 2009-04-06 09:43:17 EDT --- Whoops, I'm sorry, I had misconfigured my gmail filters, so I didn't receive notification about your message. The patch was rejected due to the earlier rpm behaviour and guidelines, that allowed fuzzy patches. I'm going to release updated package later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 13:57:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452387] Review Request: netblox - A console-based, networked falling blocks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061357.n36DvCPb023733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452387 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-06 09:57:11 EDT --- Sounds good. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 14:21:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:21:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061421.n36ELnTR001367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #11 from Ivan Efremov 2009-04-06 10:21:47 EDT --- 1) update to v 1.4.1 2) linencse tag fixed 3) version dependecies are necessary - comment added 4) extra source entry removed 5) I fixed 64-bit issue within ugene build system - no workarounds needed now 6) gcc 4.4 compilation issues added to the upstream 7) it's a quite serious issue - please provide a build log (compilation step may be skipped, essential steps are qmake'ing and installing) New links: SPEC: http://ugene.unipro.ru/downloads/ugene.spec SRPM: http://ugene.unipro.ru/downloads/ugene-1.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 14:31:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061431.n36EVY3A004334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-06 10:31:33 EDT --- > on a formal point of view, > that I did a fork of the code from version 3.0.0 This asks for trouble. At least Debian and Mandriva ship packages of SOCI, albeit an older release as it seems. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WhyUpstream Making up SONAMEs and modifying the ABI and API (header location for default include paths) typically is frowned upon. Remains the question whether it would be more convenient for you to rename the project at least slightly? The "empty" and SQLite backends are not included in the upstream 3.0.0 release. The diff between pristine 3.0.0 and your tarball is ~4 MB, not just due to adding the autotools framework. > there is a "configure" script, but > absolutely not the classical (from the GNU autotools suite) one, You need not use the %configure macro, if the available "configure" is a custom one that is incompatible. Could the SOCI configure script be used directly? Or would it need to be patched heavily (it's just 2K) to do a good job? > What did you mean by "Directory %{_includedir}/%{name}/backends/ > is not included"? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories $ diff -u soci.spec.orig soci.spec --- soci.spec.orig 2009-04-05 10:43:01.000000000 +0200 +++ soci.spec 2009-04-06 16:11:59.000000000 +0200 @@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ %doc ABOUT-NLS AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING NEWS README %dir %{_includedir}/%{name} %{_includedir}/%{name}/core +%dir %{_includedir}/%{name}/backends %{_includedir}/%{name}/backends/empty %{_bindir}/%{name}-config %{_libdir}/lib%{name}_core.so > What did you mean by "Package does not adhere to the > compiler flag guidelines"? That only the MySQL backend uses Fedora's global optflags during compilation. The rest of the code builds with other flags. > How can I override the compiler flags, so as to use > $RPM_OPT_FLAGS/%> {optflags}? > Should I add something like CPPFLAGS="%{optflags}" in > the %configure macro? Run "rpm --eval %configure" to see what the macro does. It exports CXXFLAGS, so all you would need to do is make sure all Makefiles inherit $CXXFLAGS (which would be the default with automake/autoconf unless you override the flags in a way that doesn't accept CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS if passed in from the environment). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 14:57:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:57:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061457.n36EvFgY008587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #14 from Matt Domsch 2009-04-06 10:57:13 EDT --- I'm uploading the spec and srpm which match the last koji scratch build, into http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/gpxe/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 15:01:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478605] Review Request: arpcheck - Ethernet Layer 2 checking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061501.n36F1roh012894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478605 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-06 11:01:52 EDT --- Upstream is still working on 2.0. I will close this review for now and reopen a new one as soon as arpcheck 2.0 is available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 15:15:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:15:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494238] Review Request: pyrrd - A Pure Python Wrapper for RRDTool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061515.n36FFdjt016640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494238 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-06 11:15:38 EDT --- The import name of the module is pyrrd, so I will leave the package name untouched. https://fedoraproject.com/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 says 'When in doubt, use the name of the module that you type to import it in a script.' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 15:16:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:16:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494238] Review Request: pyrrd - A Pure Python Wrapper for RRDTool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061516.n36FGg1E016795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494238 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-06 11:16:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pyrrd Short Description: A Pure Python Wrapper for RRDTool Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 15:17:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494238] Review Request: pyrrd - A Pure Python Wrapper for RRDTool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061517.n36FHp7J014387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494238 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-06 11:17:50 EDT --- By the way, thanks for the review David. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 15:42:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452387] Review Request: netblox - A console-based, networked falling blocks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061542.n36FgSFr020418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452387 --- Comment #13 from Marcin ?abanowski 2009-04-06 11:42:27 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rydzyk.net/fedora/netblox.spec SRPM URL: http://rydzyk.net/fedora/netblox-0.52-6.fc10.src.rpm BTW. my rename patch renames T*tris to Tetris(tm) in order for it to look better. Spot said above, that the package can't be "Tetris" or "Tetris clone", but it can be "similar to Tetris". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 15:49:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452387] Review Request: netblox - A console-based, networked falling blocks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061549.n36Fnc3i021974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452387 --- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-06 11:49:38 EDT --- If you're going to do this, don't use (R) or (TM). Instead, have a line that says: "Tetris is a registered trademark of The Tetris Company." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 15:50:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452387] Review Request: netblox - A console-based, networked falling blocks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061550.n36FoSf5022384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452387 --- Comment #15 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-06 11:50:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > If you're going to do this, don't use (R) or (TM). I know this is slightly different from what I said back in 2008, but Red Hat Legal has adjusted their advice about the use of trademark symbols since then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 16:00:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493232] Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061600.n36G0Tp3028236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493232 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-06 12:00:28 EDT --- Uhm, one last little thing. Please update 15_deb_cosmetics.dpatch to point to the correct %doc location. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 16:12:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061612.n36GCXrT030880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #3 from Liang Suilong 2009-04-06 12:12:33 EDT --- SPEC: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Goo-Canvas.spec SRPM: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Goo-Canvas-0.05-3.fc10.src.rpm I have uploaded a new RPM to my fedorapeople's space. Now I just build these packages on my local machine. Because I has not a high-rated Internet connection. It takes me too much time to wait mock or koji system to build a package. I tried to run mock once. But mock had run the processor of yum for more than 2 hours. The yum of mock was still running. Later I killed mock. I do not know why mock takes so much time to run yum and it seemed that the program had crashed. This is the reason that I can not use mock or koji system. You said that - The directory %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/ should not be owned by this package. I think it is needed by this package. Because I removed this directory from %file. Rpmbuild will failed to build this package, Therefore, We can not delete this directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 16:20:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061620.n36GKokv029399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 --- Comment #2 from Liang Suilong 2009-04-06 12:20:50 EDT --- I have uploaded a new SRPM to my space. SPEC: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Gnome2-Wnck.specSRPM: SRPM: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Gnome2-Wnck-0.16-2.fc10.src.rpm Also you can read what I say in this report? bug 493250 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 In addition, I have a question to ask you: Which language is default language of your Fedora, Japanese or English? I find that Packagekit seems to only support UTF8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 16:29:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:29:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493232] Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061629.n36GTKeq001881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493232 --- Comment #9 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-06 12:29:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) ok, I will do this before importing into cvs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 16:32:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:32:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061632.n36GW9o4002919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-06 12:32:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > The %post script generates the two files labelled as %ghost in the filelist: > %ghost %{_datadir}/globus/setup/globus-sh-tools-vars.sh > %ghost %{_datadir}/globus/globus-sh-tools-vars.sh And what are these files used for? > I think a script is an overkill here, since the instructions are quite simple > (extract a complete subdirectory) and can be stated in a comment. The reviewer I don't think "overkill" is the right description for a 3 line script. Everytime there is a globus update, you need to: unpack the original archive, pack the two new archives. Now if you write these 3 commands into a script file, I'm happy. Furthermore, Fedora has guidelines for what to do if one has to repack the source archive. They are there for a reason. There has to be a good reason for not following them, and IMO calling a 3 line script "overkill" is not a good enough reason... Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 16:48:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:48:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061648.n36GmAb9003330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-06 12:48:10 EDT --- Before I check your latest srpm: (In reply to comment #2) > Which language is default language of your Fedora, Japanese or English? Japanese. > I find that Packagekit seems to only support UTF8. Well, I don't know why you are speaking of PackageKit here, however on my system: [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ grep -i packagekit /var/log/rpmpkgs [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 16:56:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454959] Review Request: eclipse-cusp - Eclipse Common Lisp Development Tools (Cusp) plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061656.n36GusNd008506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454959 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(green at redhat.com) | --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-06 12:56:53 EDT --- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:01:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416471] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061701.n36H15Of009697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416471 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 16:58:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:58:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061658.n36GwhCH008882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 16:59:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:59:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061659.n36Gxwxa009122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #6 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-06 12:59:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Thanks for your comments, things appear clearer now. > This asks for trouble. At least Debian and Mandriva ship packages of SOCI, > albeit an older release as it seems. The last Mandriva package for SOCI was for version 2.2.0. However, I've noticed that version 3.0.0 has just landed this morning on Debian unstable: - They (Debian packagers) also deliver a structured directory framework for the header files, but not exactly the same I chose (theirs exposes the different backend types directly in the /usr/include/soci directory: /usr/include/soci/mysql for instance). - For the libraries, they deliver renamed shared libraries like: /usr/lib/libsoci_core-gcc-3_0.so -> libsoci_core-gcc-3_0-3.0.0.so and the soname is libsoci_core-gcc-3_0-3.0.0.so (so, there is one). > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WhyUpstream You are right: I'll work on the upstream version. > Making up SONAMEs and modifying the ABI and API (header location for default > include paths) typically is frowned upon. - For the header files, you may have noticed that I now also deliver the header files in a compatible way with the genuine SOCI package (every header file is delivered both directly in the %{_includedir}/%{name} directory and in the corresponding hierarchy, for instance %{_includedir}/%{name}/backends/mysql). - For the SONAME, it seems to me cleaner to have one. > Remains the question whether it would be more convenient for you to rename the > project at least slightly? That is definitely an option. However, I'll first try to stick to the genuine SOCI upstream codebase, albeit with GNU Autotools, much like GNU Boost: http://boost-extras.sourceforge.net/gnu-boost/gnu-boost.html If I cannot make it, I'll fall-back to a modified version. > The "empty" and SQLite backends are not included in the upstream 3.0.0 release. Hmmm, you are right. Those backends may have been added afterwards. I added them for convenient reasons, but it means that my release is half-way between 3.0.0 and head of trunk, which is not good. Again, if I work directly from the pristine SOCI-delivered codebase, that issue should be solved. > The diff between pristine 3.0.0 and your tarball is ~4 MB, not just due to > adding the autotools framework. To be accurate: $ du -ks soci* 1616 soci-3.0.0 3808 soci4pack-3.0.0 It seems that the main difference comes from the fact that I've added i18n (NLS) support (PO files and makefiles). It may prove to be useful for the i18n support of SOCI (for instance, within Fedora). > You need not use the %configure macro, if the available "configure" is a > custom one that is incompatible. Could the SOCI configure script be used > directly? Or would it need to be patched heavily (it's just 2K) to do a > good job? The native "configure" file is a (very) small Shell script, in turn calling a few TCL commands. Moreover, the makefiles have been manually written, having for consequence that: - the include and library directories must be specified, whatever value they have, just to activate the corresponding backends, for instance: ./configure --include-prefix=/usr/include/soci --lib-prefix=/usr/lib --mysql-include=/usr/include/mysql --mysql-lib=/usr/lib/mysql); - each time a "make" is launched, all the source code is recompiled (no detection of dependencies). So, using that "configure" script would mean hardcoding many file-pathes in the RPM specification file. Thanks again for your valuable feedback and input. I've still a lot of work ahead! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:00:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192436] Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061700.n36H0GHe006129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192436 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:00:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:00:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247983] Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061700.n36H0mZq006283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247983 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:00:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:00:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247984] Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061700.n36H0tjx006331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247984 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:05:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:05:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483108] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061705.n36H5po6011190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483108 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:04:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:04:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490210] Review Request: moc - A ncurses-based audio player (This is my first package-sponsor needed!) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061704.n36H4GGh010518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490210 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:05:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485159] Review Request: anki - Flashcard program for using space repetition learning In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061705.n36H5B22010935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485159 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:07:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:07:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480380] Review Request: python-epdb - extended python debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061707.n36H7O86007941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480380 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:08:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478385] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-synthlab - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061708.n36H8IWI008159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478385 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:07:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061707.n36H7itY008016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:05:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061705.n36H5e9s007546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:09:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:09:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478384] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-mini - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061709.n36H9TJP011847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478384 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:09:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478382] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-edit - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061709.n36H9id9011939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478382 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:09:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478383] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-jam - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061709.n36H9Yov011892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478383 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:07:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:07:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478971] Review Request: scid - A chess database application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061707.n36H7u9l011602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478971 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:09:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478381] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-common - Resources and python libraries for Sugar TamTam activities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061709.n36H9riU008592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478381 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:21:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489962] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061721.n36HLCfI015060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489962 Suzanne Yeghiayan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|488382 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:21:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:21:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489929] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061721.n36HLBgf015011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489929 Suzanne Yeghiayan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|488382 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:40:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:40:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061740.n36Heipq019841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-06 13:40:44 EDT --- > The diff between pristine 3.0.0 and your tarball is ~4 MB I referred to "diff -Nur ..." of the two tarballs. The diff between the soci upstream tarball and the soci subdir in your tarball is still ~2 MB. In either case, this package is not SOCI 3.0.0 as found on their project site. ;-) > For the SONAME, it seems to me cleaner to have one. True, but upstream ought to be involved in deciding which soname to start with _and_ which major library version to include in the soname. Debian's soname scheme breaks the ABI everytime the library version and/or compiler version is changed. With your own soname scheme, the burden of maintaining ABI stability is solely on your shoulders. $ rpm -qp --provides soci-mysql-3.0.0-2.fc10.i386.rpm | grep ^lib libsoci_mysql.so.3 Plus, there is the risk that a future upstream release will conflict with your sonames and soname versions. Perhaps they will restart at .so.3 while you are at .so.4 already. Perhaps they will start at .so.0 or .so.1 for the first stable API. If sonames are made up, it's better to include the full product version in the soname (e.g. libsoci_mysql-3.0.0.so.0 <- libsoci_mysql-3.0.0.so), which will require rebuilds of dependencies everytime the version changes. Consider joining forces with the Debian package maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:44:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:44:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491027] Review Request: fb-contrib - Extra findbugs detectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061744.n36Hi5BK018140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491027 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James 2009-04-06 13:44:05 EDT --- Hmmmm... I'm not sure how to handle this. The name of the upstream project is "fb-contrib". The findbugs developers often tell people to go to that project for extra detectors. So those who have seen a reference to it on the findbugs web site will look for the name "fb-contrib" in Fedora. On the other hand, naming it "findbugs-contrib" would list it with the other findbugs packages, so those browsing the package names would be more likely to find it there. I'm really not sure what to do. It would be nice if the upstream name were "findbugs-contrib". I'd also like a pony. :-) How about naming the package findbugs-contrib, but having it Provide: fb-contrib? Would yum find it then if someone did "yum install fb-contrib"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:45:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061745.n36Hj0w2018365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 --- Comment #15 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2009-04-06 13:45:00 EDT --- My mistake, my review was quite informal (even if I check every MUST in the review list) as I was in a hurry with the translation. I will made a formal and rigourous review as soon as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:53:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061753.n36Hrunn020736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-06 13:53:55 EDT --- Looks much better. Some points * Explicit Requires: ----------------------------------------------------- Requires: perl(Cairo) >= 1.00 Requires: perl(ExtUtils::Depends) >= 0.2 Requires: perl(ExtUtils::PkgConfig) >= 1.0 Requires: perl(Glib) >= 1.103 Requires: perl(Gtk2) >= 1.100 Requires: gtk2, glib, cairo ----------------------------------------------------- - All of these should be removed. Such perl module related dependencies and library related dependencies are automatically detected by rpmbuild itself. (By the way, I think perl(ExtUtils::Depends), perl(ExtUtils::PkgConfig) is really unneeded) * Directory ownership issue - This package should not own the following directories _themselves_ ----------------------------------------------------- %{_bindir}/ %{_mandir}/man3/ %{_mandir}/man1/ %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/ ----------------------------------------------------- ! Note For example, this package should own %_bindir/perlmine.pl, however should not own the directory %_bindir itself. i.e. change the %files entry to %{_bindir}/* or so. CCing to spot: To spot: This package contains a perl script named "/usr/bin/perltetris.pl". Is this allowed on Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:56:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:56:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061756.n36Huice023418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:56:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061756.n36HuuWF021763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:57:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061757.n36HveL1021905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #40 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-06 13:57:38 EDT --- Now I approve this package and sponsor you. --------------------------------------------------------- This package (iptux) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 17:58:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:58:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061758.n36Hw33h023718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 18:17:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 14:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061817.n36IHXgX028376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-06 14:17:32 EDT --- Ehhh. The rule about trademarks is that the program cannot refer to itself as the trademark in a user visible way. Except for the documentation, the only references to the "Tetris" trademark are in code functions or filenames, which is not a problem. The documentation would need to be changed, and since it refers to the filename, the filename needs to be changed as well. However, it is worth noting that the perltetris.pl did not work for me in rawhide. It may be safer to omit it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 18:51:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 14:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478617] Review Request: zsync - Partial/differential file transfer client over HTTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061851.n36IpXmK001288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478617 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-06 14:51:32 EDT --- Acc. to Simon there is still an issue with zlib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 18:55:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 14:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061855.n36ItnJ8004706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |loganjerry at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jerry James 2009-04-06 14:55:48 EDT --- There was a small error in the XEmacs template (since fixed); there is supposed to be a "lisp" directory after %{_datadir}/xemacs/site-packages. That is, please fix the following definitions at the top of the spec file: %if %($(pkg-config xemacs) ; echo $?) %define xemacs_version 21.5 %define xemacs_lispdir %{_datadir}/xemacs/site-packages/lisp %define xemacs_startdir %{_datadir}/xemacs/site-packages/lisp/site-start.d This doesn't cause any problems because pkg-config gives the right values, but it doesn't hurt to be safe... The file %{emacs_lispdir}/proofgeneral/images/README is installed as a regular file in the emacs-proofgeneral package. Shouldn't that be a documentation file? The entire mmm and x-symbol distributions are included in the emacs-proofgeneral and xemacs-proofgeneral packages. (And the x-symbol .el files are NOT included in (x)emacs-proofgeneral-el!) I think this is wrong. The mmm and x-symbol packages should be submitted separately, with the proofgeneral package depending on them. Furthermore, mmm and x-symbol are already available for XEmacs in xemacs-packages-extra, so they only need to be made available for Emacs. If the provides/requires have been setup properly, all you should need to do is NOT install them for XEmacs and add "Requires: xemacs-package-extra" to the xemacs-proofgeneral package. I will do a full review shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 19:11:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061911.n36JBW8d008255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #38 from Till Maas 2009-04-06 15:11:28 EDT --- > (In reply to comment #34) > > I did not test the xsession stuff > > Can't it just be merged into xmonad-start? No, today I found a .xsession I used with an older release of xmonad I guess. It contained a exec xmonad. Btw. a different feature for xmonad-start I want to suggest is to test whether xmonad.hs is newer than the binary and in case it is, recompile it. Or is this something xmonad already does? But it seems it does not recompile itself, when I hit ALT-q. > > but with my patch it works: > > http://till.fedorapeople.org/files/xmonad_7-8.spec.diff > > Thanks > > > I wrote a simple config that is stored in /etc/skel/.xmonad/xmonad.hs, that > > opens the manpage using xterm. > > Could you attach it here? I meant to include it in the patch, otherwise the patch is not functional. I uploaded a new version of the patch to above URL, but the config file is now also available at: http://till.fedorapeople.org/files/xmonad.hs.xterm_manpage.hs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 19:16:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:16:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492609] Review Request: hmaccalc - Tools for computing and checking HMAC values for files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061916.n36JGn5e006606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492609 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-06 15:16:48 EDT --- I understand why you need to generate the checksums after rpm is done poling at the binaries; I was just confused by the language in use: This overrides the default which was in place at least from Red Hat Linux 9 through Fedora 11's development cycle. which (to me, at least) sort of sounds like it's overriding some sort of default checksum generation. Not that's it's in any way material, but perhaps it will explain my confusion. Anyway, I guess it's not reasonable to run the test suite unless you somehow compile a specal version that doesn't check its checksums. I guess it would be nice if the executables had some way to skip the verification, but absent that the test suite isn't useful. Finally, the issue of where to put the checksums. Given the problems with the alternatives, %{_libdir} seems fine, rpmlint's complaint about it nonwithstanding. I guess that covers everything. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 19:19:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061919.n36JJWMm009761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review |Review Request: |Request:mingw32-libp11 - |mingw32-libp11 - MingGW |MingGW Windows libp11 |Windows libp11 library |library | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 19:23:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061923.n36JNOGq007876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #29 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-04-06 15:23:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > Oh, you're right, the build works for F10 x86_64 without the gfortran > dependency. It doesn't build on (mock) EPEL4 though, but maybe that's a lost > cause. We can worry about that later. ;) > These should work now. > > http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64.spec > http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64-4.2.1-8.fc10.src.rpm > > PS. Why do you have the empty > %if %{bootstrapping} > %endif > > in the setup phase? Was some patch supposed to be there? I left it in for the > time being. Yes, there was a patch, but it turned out to be necessary in both bootstrapping and non-bootstrapping case. Note that you might be able to use gcc-4.1 on EL-5 so the patch (and the accompanying gcc34 override) will not be necessary then. I assume this is now ready for full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 19:22:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:22:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061922.n36JMTNI007708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James 2009-04-06 15:22:29 EDT --- MUST items: - rpmlint output: emacs-proofgeneral.noarch: W: no-documentation emacs-proofgeneral-el.noarch: W: no-documentation xemacs-proofgeneral.noarch: W: no-documentation xemacs-proofgeneral-el.noarch: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. - package name - spec file name matches base package name X packaging guidelines: as noted in comment #1, we may have a problem with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Bundling_of_multiple_projects. Also note that some files in the top-level lib directory may violate this rule, too. - good license - license field matches actual license - include license file in %doc - spec file in American English - spec file legible - sources match upstream - builds on at least one primary arch - use ExcludeArch as necessary (N/A) - all build dependencies in BuildRequires - proper locale handling (N/A) - call ldconfig as necessary (N/A) - rationale if relocatable (N/A) - own all created directories - no duplicate %file listings - proper file permissions - %clean section - consistent use of macros - code or permissible content - large documentation files in a subpackage (N/A) - nothing in %doc needed at runtime - header files in -devel (N/A) - static libraries in -static (N/A) - require pkgconfig if necessary (N/A) - .so files in -devel (N/A) - -devel requires base package (N/A) - no libtool archives - desktop files for GUI apps: rationale given in the description above - don't own files or dirs created by other packages - clean at top of %install - filenames are UTF-8 SHOULD items: - query upstream for license file (N/A) - description and summary contain available translations (N/A) ? package builds in mock: not checked ? package builds on all suppported arches: not checked - package functions as described - sane scriptlets - subpackages require main package - pkgconfig files in -devel (N/A) - package dependencies instead of file dependencies So we just need to investigate the use of bundled software and this package is good to go. Thanks for submitting it! This will make a great addition to the other prover-related software that has been pushed into Fedora recently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 19:43:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061943.n36Jh2Wj015233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 --- Comment #3 from Alan Dunn 2009-04-06 15:43:02 EDT --- Thank you for reviewing this. I've been so busy with other things I haven't even had the time to search around for a reviewer and this has been sitting here quite a while. I'll try to tackle these as soon as I possibly can - good catch with the template error btw, guess that reveals that I've mainly used Emacs before eh? (though, of course, I did test that the package works in XEmacs) (In reply to comment #2) > MUST items: > - rpmlint output: > emacs-proofgeneral.noarch: W: no-documentation > emacs-proofgeneral-el.noarch: W: no-documentation > xemacs-proofgeneral.noarch: W: no-documentation > xemacs-proofgeneral-el.noarch: W: no-documentation > 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. > - package name > - spec file name matches base package name > X packaging guidelines: as noted in comment #1, we may have a problem with > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Bundling_of_multiple_projects. > Also note that some files in the top-level lib directory may violate this > rule, too. > - good license > - license field matches actual license > - include license file in %doc > - spec file in American English > - spec file legible > - sources match upstream > - builds on at least one primary arch > - use ExcludeArch as necessary (N/A) > - all build dependencies in BuildRequires > - proper locale handling (N/A) > - call ldconfig as necessary (N/A) > - rationale if relocatable (N/A) > - own all created directories > - no duplicate %file listings > - proper file permissions > - %clean section > - consistent use of macros > - code or permissible content > - large documentation files in a subpackage (N/A) > - nothing in %doc needed at runtime > - header files in -devel (N/A) > - static libraries in -static (N/A) > - require pkgconfig if necessary (N/A) > - .so files in -devel (N/A) > - -devel requires base package (N/A) > - no libtool archives > - desktop files for GUI apps: rationale given in the description above > - don't own files or dirs created by other packages > - clean at top of %install > - filenames are UTF-8 > > SHOULD items: > - query upstream for license file (N/A) > - description and summary contain available translations (N/A) > ? package builds in mock: not checked > ? package builds on all suppported arches: not checked > - package functions as described > - sane scriptlets > - subpackages require main package > - pkgconfig files in -devel (N/A) > - package dependencies instead of file dependencies > > So we just need to investigate the use of bundled software and this package is > good to go. Thanks for submitting it! This will make a great addition to the > other prover-related software that has been pushed into Fedora recently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 19:48:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:48:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061948.n36JmtEs013613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #30 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-06 15:48:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) > > PS. Why do you have the empty > > %if %{bootstrapping} > > %endif > > > > in the setup phase? Was some patch supposed to be there? I left it in for the > > time being. > > Yes, there was a patch, but it turned out to be necessary in both bootstrapping > and non-bootstrapping case. OK, I'll remove it later. > Note that you might be able to use gcc-4.1 on EL-5 so the patch (and the > accompanying gcc34 override) will not be necessary then. Yes, maybe. I think I tried it before, but it didn't work. But that can be worked out later (in koji, if need be). > I assume this is now ready for full review. Yes, please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 19:51:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:51:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446097] Review Request: pytraffic - sliding block puzzle board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061951.n36JpPkY014543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446097 Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sindrepb at fedorapr | |oject.org) | --- Comment #9 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2009-04-06 15:51:22 EDT --- Sorry for the late response. I've written to the author of pytraffic to determine the licensing info of the bundled artwork and sound files. Awaiting response, once I get a response from the author I'll submit the rest of the updates and we can finally go forward with this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 19:52:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:52:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491884] Review Request: atasm - 6502 cross-assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061952.n36JqAUX014648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491884 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-06 15:52:09 EDT --- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. There's really not much to this package; the only thing I can note is that the documentation makes up about 80% of the package, but it's still very small and splitting out the docs would be dumb. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 9822e96baa39a16e8c46c0d4892bd76157f7de1fffd6c8d6ced1bda809450171 atasm106.zip * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: atasm = 1.06-1.fc11 atasm(x86-64) = 1.06-1.fc11 = libz.so.1()(64bit) * %check is present and all tests pass. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 19:54:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:54:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491884] Review Request: atasm - 6502 cross-assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061954.n36Js3hA017630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491884 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-06 15:54:02 EDT --- Hmm, I just noticed that you manually gzip the manpage; I would recommend against that as rpm will do it for you one day we may want to change the compression method. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:27:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:27:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490724] Review Request: R-RUnit - R Unit test framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062027.n36KR2pv025805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490724 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-06 16:27:01 EDT --- R-RUnit-0.4.21-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:23:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:23:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469052] Review Request: ris-linux - RIS for Linux - Boot winpe from the net / Ris Windows Installation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062023.n36KN3s8024444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469052 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-06 16:23:02 EDT --- ris-linux-0.4-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:23:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469052] Review Request: ris-linux - RIS for Linux - Boot winpe from the net / Ris Windows Installation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062023.n36KN7Eb024489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469052 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4-4.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:25:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489135] Review Request: tcpjunk - TCP protocols testing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062025.n36KP1up022150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489135 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-06 16:25:00 EDT --- tcpjunk-2.649-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:28:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:28:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491570] Review Request: sahana - Disaster Management System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062028.n36KSsVM023491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-06 16:28:54 EDT --- sahana-0.6.2.2-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:27:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:27:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490724] Review Request: R-RUnit - R Unit test framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062027.n36KR7hN023117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490724 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.4.21-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:27:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469052] Review Request: ris-linux - RIS for Linux - Boot winpe from the net / Ris Windows Installation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062027.n36KRlK2023244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469052 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-06 16:27:47 EDT --- ris-linux-0.4-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:27:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:27:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469052] Review Request: ris-linux - RIS for Linux - Boot winpe from the net / Ris Windows Installation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062027.n36KRrH6023289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469052 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4-4.fc9 |0.4-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:25:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:25:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489135] Review Request: tcpjunk - TCP protocols testing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062025.n36KP6Dg022455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489135 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.649-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:29:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:29:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491570] Review Request: sahana - Disaster Management System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062029.n36KT9Vw026674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-06 16:29:09 EDT --- sahana-0.6.2.2-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:30:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:30:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489135] Review Request: tcpjunk - TCP protocols testing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062030.n36KUj44027403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489135 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-06 16:30:45 EDT --- tcpjunk-2.649-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:28:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425834] Review Request: portecle - Multipurpose keystore and certificate tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062028.n36KSW4l026574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425834 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-06 16:28:31 EDT --- portecle-1.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:27:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:27:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479008] Review Request: libQGLViewer - Qt based OpenGL generic 3D viewer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062027.n36KRSqq026211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479008 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-06 16:27:27 EDT --- libQGLViewer-2.3.1-8.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:27:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479008] Review Request: libQGLViewer - Qt based OpenGL generic 3D viewer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062027.n36KRX87026246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479008 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.3.1-7.fc10 |2.3.1-8.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:28:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491570] Review Request: sahana - Disaster Management System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062028.n36KSxKa026631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6.2.2-4.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:30:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:30:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489135] Review Request: tcpjunk - TCP protocols testing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062030.n36KUoUF024439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489135 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.649-2.fc10 |2.649-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:29:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491570] Review Request: sahana - Disaster Management System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062029.n36KTEsD023647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.6.2.2-4.fc9 |0.6.2.2-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:34:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490724] Review Request: R-RUnit - R Unit test framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062034.n36KYPS1028440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490724 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-06 16:34:24 EDT --- R-RUnit-0.4.21-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:34:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490400] Review Request: perl-HTML-Strip - Perl extension for stripping HTML markup from text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062034.n36KYAAJ028355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490400 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-06 16:34:09 EDT --- perl-HTML-Strip-1.06-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:34:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490400] Review Request: perl-HTML-Strip - Perl extension for stripping HTML markup from text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062034.n36KYFAP028387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490400 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.06-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:34:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:34:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490724] Review Request: R-RUnit - R Unit test framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062034.n36KYUqL028504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490724 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.21-3.fc10 |0.4.21-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:34:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:34:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490400] Review Request: perl-HTML-Strip - Perl extension for stripping HTML markup from text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062034.n36KYnql028609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490400 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-06 16:34:49 EDT --- perl-HTML-Strip-1.06-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:34:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:34:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490400] Review Request: perl-HTML-Strip - Perl extension for stripping HTML markup from text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062034.n36KYs9q025671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490400 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.06-1.fc9 |1.06-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 20:38:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:38:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062038.n36KcZbR026588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 --- Comment #16 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-06 16:38:34 EDT --- Well, if you checked all the must items it's ok for me. I was under the impression that you only checked for building in mock. Do what you like. If you have spare time for this review, go for it, otherwise I'll initiate the CVS admin procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 21:06:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 17:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062106.n36L6F5I004142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 --- Comment #11 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-06 17:06:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > > The %post script generates the two files labelled as %ghost in the filelist: > > %ghost %{_datadir}/globus/setup/globus-sh-tools-vars.sh > > %ghost %{_datadir}/globus/globus-sh-tools-vars.sh > > And what are these files used for? These files are sourced by many scripts in this and other globus packages in order to find the location of common tools like cat, chmod, sed and so on. Quoting a few lines from the file as an example: GLOBUS_SH_AWK="/bin/gawk" GLOBUS_SH_AUTOCONF="/usr/bin/autoconf" GLOBUS_SH_BASENAME="/bin/basename" GLOBUS_SH_CAT="/bin/cat" GLOBUS_SH_CHGRP="/bin/chgrp" GLOBUS_SH_CHMOD="/bin/chmod" GLOBUS_SH_CHOWN="/bin/chown" GLOBUS_SH_CLEAR="/usr/bin/clear" It doesn't really matter if all tools are found at installation time when the file is created or not, since the scripts, after having sourced this file, uses constructions like ${GLOBUS_SH_SED-sed} so if e.g. GLOBUS_SH_SED is not defined in the file it will use sed from the path. This means there is no need to have Requires(post) conditions requiring every tool the %post script tries to find to ensure that all entries are filled. The important thing is that if the file is not there the scripts will fail when they try to source the file, so it must be there. I agree that doing things this way is a bit silly, but it is the way upstream does it. > > I think a script is an overkill here, since the instructions are quite simple > > (extract a complete subdirectory) and can be stated in a comment. The reviewer > > I don't think "overkill" is the right description for a 3 line script. > Everytime there is a globus update, you need to: unpack the original archive, > pack the two new archives. Now if you write these 3 commands into a script > file, I'm happy. > > Furthermore, Fedora has guidelines for what to do if one has to repack the > source archive. They are there for a reason. There has to be a good reason for > not following them, and IMO calling a 3 line script "overkill" is not a good > enough reason... I was obviously not suggesting I should not follow the guidelines. I was trying to argue that what I had done follows the guidelines. The guidelines says: "There are several cases where upstream is not providing the source to you in an upstream tarball. In these cases you must document how to generate the tarball used in the rpm either through a spec file comment OR a script included as a separate SourceX" (my capitalisation). I was arguing that using a separate script file in this simple case is an overkill and that using a spec file comment is sufficient. The guideline page quoted above uses a subversion checkout as an example of a simple case where a specfile comment is used. Extracting a directory from a tarball is an operation of similar complexity. The example where a separate script is used is much more elaborate and involves removing specific files from a tarball as well as modifying other files using sed expressions. Extracting a directory from a tarball is no way nearly as complicated as that. The operations needed to extract a directory from a tarball are in my opinion simple enough not to warrant creating a separate script to explain them, nor the additional burden of maintaining such a script. If on the other hand your objection really is that the comment was to terse to allow a reviewer or anyone else interested to reproduce the source tarball that is an other matter. I have created an updated specfile where I have made the comment more explicit. (The new comment is similar to the subversion checkout example - which I find more relevant in this case.) I hope this will be to your satisfaction. http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-common.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 21:07:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 17:07:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454010] Review Request: iaxclient - Library for creating telephony solutions that interoperate with Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062107.n36L7ZVe000847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454010 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-06 17:07:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: iaxclient Short Description: Library for creating telephony solutions that interoperate with Asterisk Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 21:17:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 17:17:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062117.n36LHqUT007232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-06 17:17:51 EDT --- Thanks for clarifying how to repack the source archive. Please keep the notes uptodate when you bump the version. APPROVED by sailer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 21:37:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 17:37:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454010] Review Request: iaxclient - Library for creating telephony solutions that interoperate with Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062137.n36Lb0BY012147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454010 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-06 17:37:00 EDT --- iaxclient-2.1-0.3.beta3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/iaxclient-2.1-0.3.beta3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 21:36:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 17:36:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454010] Review Request: iaxclient - Library for creating telephony solutions that interoperate with Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062136.n36Lauad008833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454010 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-06 17:36:56 EDT --- iaxclient-2.1-0.3.beta3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/iaxclient-2.1-0.3.beta3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 21:45:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 17:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062145.n36LjIh2013859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-06 17:45:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-common Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Common Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 22:00:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 18:00:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492609] Review Request: hmaccalc - Tools for computing and checking HMAC values for files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062200.n36M0hjD016852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492609 --- Comment #4 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-04-06 18:00:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I understand why you need to generate the checksums after rpm is done poling at > the binaries; I was just confused by the language in use: > > This overrides the default which was in place at least from Red Hat Linux 9 > through Fedora 11's development cycle. > > which (to me, at least) sort of sounds like it's overriding some sort of > default checksum generation. Not that's it's in any way material, but perhaps > it will explain my confusion. Oh, I see what you mean. It's overriding the macro to wire in the generation of the HMAC values after the default buildroot policies are run. I don't have better text ready, but I'd appreciate any suggestions. > Anyway, I guess it's not reasonable to run the test suite unless you somehow > compile a specal version that doesn't check its checksums. I guess it would be > nice if the executables had some way to skip the verification, but absent that > the test suite isn't useful. Yeah, still trying to come up with a good fix for that. > Finally, the issue of where to put the checksums. Given the problems with the > alternatives, %{_libdir} seems fine, rpmlint's complaint about it > nonwithstanding. > > I guess that covers everything. APPROVED Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 22:20:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 18:20:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062220.n36MKlDc017518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch --- Comment #1 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-06 18:20:46 EDT --- rpmlint: mingw32-libp11.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libp11.dll.a mingw32-libp11.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libp11.dll.a mingw32-libp11.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libp11.h mingw32-libp11.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/libp11.pc mingw32-libp11.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libp11.la mingw32-libp11.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libp11.dll.a mingw32-libp11.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 5 warnings. (this is f10 rpmlint, f11 rpmlint would not have complained) These can be ignored as per: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 22:30:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 18:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062230.n36MUwU0022287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-06 18:30:58 EDT --- + rpmlint output + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora LGPLv2+ + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm 9e2c5cbececde245e2d2f535bd49ce35 libp11-0.2.4.tar.gz 9e2c5cbececde245e2d2f535bd49ce35 p/libp11-0.2.4.tar.gz + package successfully builds on at least one architecture noarch n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel ok for mingw packages to have headers n/a static libraries should be in -static + packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files allowed according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available n/a reviewer should build the package in mock + the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures n/a review should test the package functions as described n/a scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel n/a shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin APPROVED by sailer Note: I am not a sponsor, I cannot sponsor you -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 22:33:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 18:33:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062233.n36MX3VW019410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 23:05:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 19:05:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904062305.n36N5Mru025529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 --- Comment #5 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-04-06 19:05:21 EDT --- ok great. Let's see if we can move this forward. As noted on bug 492395, it seems that you can just require php-common because it requires php. Then, I am not sure if there are guidelines against it, but installing the file in {datadir}/php is probably not a wise idea. What about putting it in a subdirectory (for example feedcreator would do). In that case, please remember to let the package own the directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 00:05:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 20:05:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070005.n3705mQi003842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #46 from David Halik 2009-04-06 20:05:45 EDT --- @kwizart: Ok, I think I made all the changes you requested. The RPM_OPT_FLAGS and some other xulrunner options were carried over from the new thunderbird 3 spec. I also got rid of the unnecessary minimal-toc issue and fixed a few other things. As discussed, this build currently uses the included taglib until the upcoming taglib release is available, but all gstreamer libraries are from the system. I'm focusing soley on the F11 release at this point. Backporting 1.0.0 to F10 should be trivial later. This current F11 release builds fine on all archs, however I installed F11 beta today and I was not able to get it to run. There is a buffer overflow immediately upon run in both i386 and x86_64. I'm currently submitting the bug and backtrace to the Songbird developers and will get back to you. http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird.spec http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird-1.1.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 00:09:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 20:09:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070009.n3709pOY007382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 --- Comment #11 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-06 20:09:50 EDT --- As per enquiry with author acevery on 6 Apr 09, ibus-table-extraphrase.pc is needed for building ibus-table-* with extra_phrase.txt Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase-1.1.0.2009406-1.fc11.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 00:55:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 20:55:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492991] Review Request: mediawiki-InputBox - An extension to enable input box tags for mediawiki pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070055.n370txTQ015287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492991 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(guthrie at counterex | |ample.org) --- Comment #1 from David Nalley 2009-04-06 20:55:58 EDT --- John: This looks pretty good except that the md5sum doesn't match on one of the files. You can see in the comments below. Thanks OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ./mediawiki-InputBox.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/mediawiki-InputBox-0-0.1.20090331svn.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/mediawiki-InputBox-0-0.1.20090331svn.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. FAIL: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Notice the different md5sums for InputBox.il8n.php - I downloaded from the url in the spec 3 times and garnered the same response. >From downloaded source: 767990d83bf15ab24812440ec2d36b29 ./InputBox.classes.php 8f95f91119bd305fbbdf1aa60b6497dc ./InputBox.hooks.php c5fd1f2c2ed152150486598787d6609b ./InputBox.i18n.php 786bb83ce1062752ca00afbe759efb59 ./InputBox.php >From SRPM: 767990d83bf15ab24812440ec2d36b29 ./InputBox.classes.php 8f95f91119bd305fbbdf1aa60b6497dc ./InputBox.hooks.php 2c9ddbe63c16accb24f8e380be6b7d79 ./InputBox.i18n.php 786bb83ce1062752ca00afbe759efb59 ./InputBox.php OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. This builds in at least x86_64 and x86 N/A: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. No real build section so not applicable. N/A: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. N/A: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. N/A: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 02:27:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 22:27:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070227.n372R81s032249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 Armin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |feng.shaun at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Armin 2009-04-06 22:27:07 EDT --- I won't mention the things that are okay. MUST: MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] NOT_DONE MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. (see line 34 and 38, $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ond ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} SHOULD: nothing (yet) I will continue the rest of the review tomorrow. It's not complete yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 02:35:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 22:35:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070235.n372ZiEO030919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-06 22:35:43 EDT --- sorry for my delay here. 1 and 2 look good. 3: I am still a bit nervous about having them available, but I'm not sure it violates any packaging rule. 4. I guess I see the need here as well. These are not packages, but rather just benchmark tests/data in this case. I don't think folks will use this package to install and use them day to day. So, pretty much everything looks ok for me... however, could you spin up a 1.8.0 version and let me give it a final look over before approval? And Thanks to Michael for watching this review and keeping us informed. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 02:42:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 22:42:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491090] Review Request: kernel-firmware - firmware files for use with Linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070242.n372gieZ000354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491090 --- Comment #4 from David Woodhouse 2009-04-06 22:42:43 EDT --- Thanks for the detailed analysis. 1. Well spotted; thanks. Will fix that upstream. 2. We're thinking about changing to a more machine-readable form for the WHENCE file, in which case perhaps we could automatically strip those out. It's harmless enough though. 3. I'll fix the ess one; the usb8388 isn't actually a duplicate AFAIK (it's for the OLPC device supporting mesh, vs. the mass market ones). 4. Spitting into subpackages might make some sense, especially if we can automatically install those packages on demand. 5. The latest one should _always_ be applicable. If firmware ABI changes, the filename must also change (like an soname changes), and the linux-firmware package would then carry _both_ versions. Which takes us to... 6. The upstream repository will continue to carry the old-ABI versions of firmware, and our 'latest' firmware package can continue to include those for as long as we desire. 7. To avoid unpleasant surprises, I've started off with the firmware package not being optional -- and was imagining that those who want _only_ Free Software on their machines would have an alternative package which Provides: kernel-firmware. I'm certainly happy to entertain ideas on how this should turn out in the end, but we do need to make sure that it 'just works' for most people. 8. I think subpackages are probably a good idea, in the end. To start with perhaps we should keep it simple and just provide everything though. Or maybe have just two: 'kernel-firmware-core' and 'kernel-firmware-extra', with the former containing just the firmwares which _used_ to be in the kernel itself (again, to reduce surprises). 9. I agree that we should probably install firmware for core devices (scsi/net) by default, and let non-essential firmware get installed on demand. Which means subpackages. How well does presto actually work? Can we start doing this today? With regard to redistribution status -- everything we've _added_ to the linux-firmware repository has clear permission from an authoritative source. The only ones we can be dubious about are the ones which were previously in the kernel in binary form, which was already a licensing problem... but we were shipping them anyway. I can't see how shipping them in a form such that the GPL _doesn't_ apply to them would make us any _less_ happy to ship them. Will update the package and fix the details you mentioned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 02:48:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 22:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070248.n372msRD004529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-06 22:48:53 EDT --- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 02:59:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 22:59:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070259.n372xAQf006561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #21 from Joseph Smidt 2009-04-06 22:59:09 EDT --- Thanks again for your reveiw. Here are the new packages: Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/phoronix-test-suite.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/phoronix-test-suite-1.8.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 03:13:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208051] Review Request: dirvish - Fast, disk based, rotating network backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070313.n373DUcE006348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208051 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-06 23:13:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 03:15:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070315.n373FV0n009925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-06 23:15:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 03:18:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:18:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070318.n373IPCE007306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #40 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-06 23:18:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 03:20:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:20:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070320.n373KHQa010950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 Armin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 03:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486476] Review Request: xfce4-power-manager - Power management for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070319.n373J3lK010393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486476 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-06 23:19:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 03:19:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070319.n373JjdE007466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 Armin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |feng.shaun at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 03:22:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:22:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492113] Review Request: mingw32-glibmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070322.n373Men5008216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492113 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-06 23:22:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 03:21:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:21:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070321.n373LkQJ008088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |letterslaughing-fonts - |chisholm-letterslaughing-fo |Decorative/LED sans-serif |nts - Decorative/LED |font |sans-serif font Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-06 23:21:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 03:25:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492831] Review Request: libmkv - An alternative to the official libmatroska library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070325.n373PIYp011841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492831 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-06 23:25:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 03:24:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:24:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070324.n373OG8x011386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-06 23:24:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 03:26:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493232] Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070326.n373QO9T008978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493232 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-06 23:26:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 03:31:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:31:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494238] Review Request: pyrrd - A Pure Python Wrapper for RRDTool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070331.n373Vn0K013022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494238 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-06 23:31:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 03:30:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:30:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494161] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Perl - Perl extension for retrieving terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070330.n373U8Mq012744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494161 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-06 23:30:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 03:29:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494119] Review Request: perl-Devel-Hide - Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules (for testing) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070329.n373TF9M012317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494119 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-06 23:29:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 03:30:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494164] Review Request: perl-Test-Assertions - Simple set of building blocks for both unit and runtime testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070330.n373Uuxe009766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494164 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-06 23:30:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 03:44:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:44:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494339] Review Request: hyphen-hi - Hindi hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070344.n373iO5c011792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494339 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 03:47:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488172] Package Review: ibus-table-zhengma In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070347.n373lf9a012497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488172 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-06 23:47:40 EDT --- Looks like patent problem here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 03:49:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:49:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070349.n373nGsm012723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 --- Comment #12 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-06 23:49:15 EDT --- I too had discussion with upstream and he said correct license is GPLv2. Can you correct that in upstream tarball and then build new SRPM and import that in cvs as cvs module is ready now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 03:53:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070353.n373reE5016700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 --- Comment #12 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-06 23:53:40 EDT --- http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase-1.1.0.20090406-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 04:04:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 00:04:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494161] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Perl - Perl extension for retrieving terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070404.n374444Z015394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494161 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 00:04:04 EDT --- perl-Term-Size-Perl-0.029-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Term-Size-Perl-0.029-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 04:04:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 00:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494161] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Perl - Perl extension for retrieving terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070404.n37448su018551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494161 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 00:04:08 EDT --- perl-Term-Size-Perl-0.029-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Term-Size-Perl-0.029-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 04:12:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 00:12:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494119] Review Request: perl-Devel-Hide - Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules (for testing) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070412.n374CbA9017151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494119 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 00:12:37 EDT --- perl-Devel-Hide-0.0008-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-Hide-0.0008-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 04:12:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 00:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494119] Review Request: perl-Devel-Hide - Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules (for testing) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070412.n374CXs8017122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494119 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 00:12:33 EDT --- perl-Devel-Hide-0.0008-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-Hide-0.0008-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 04:14:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 00:14:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494161] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Perl - Perl extension for retrieving terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070414.n374EWed017934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494161 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 04:15:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 00:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494119] Review Request: perl-Devel-Hide - Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules (for testing) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070415.n374F3O6018407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494119 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 04:33:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 00:33:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494339] Review Request: hyphen-hi - Hindi hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070433.n374XwB4021614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494339 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-07 00:33:57 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1281453 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is hyphen-hi.noarch: W: no-documentation ==> can be ignored as there is no document files and license is added in hyph_hi_IN.dic + source files match upstream. 60df0803fa02d6bfaaae80940e89ab50 hyph_hi_IN.dic + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 04:34:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 00:34:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494164] Review Request: perl-Test-Assertions - Simple set of building blocks for both unit and runtime testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070434.n374Yw3x025036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494164 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 00:34:58 EDT --- perl-Test-Assertions-1.054-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-Assertions-1.054-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 04:34:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 00:34:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494164] Review Request: perl-Test-Assertions - Simple set of building blocks for both unit and runtime testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070434.n374Ypg3021722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494164 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 00:34:51 EDT --- perl-Test-Assertions-1.054-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-Assertions-1.054-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 05:15:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 01:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494164] Review Request: perl-Test-Assertions - Simple set of building blocks for both unit and runtime testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070515.n375FXX1000517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494164 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-07 01:15:33 EDT --- Thanks for the reviews, Chris. I forgot to mention in the other bug, but I did add the Test::Pod BR for Term-Size-Perl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 05:37:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 01:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488172] Package Review: ibus-table-zhengma In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070537.n375bMe6004417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488172 --- Comment #5 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-07 01:37:22 EDT --- Patent should be expired in DEC 09. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 05:50:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 01:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070550.n375ohPS003368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 --- Comment #13 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-07 01:50:42 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-erbi-1.1.0.20090407-1.fc11.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-erbi.spec Description: A split from ibus-table-chinese, which was sub-package of ibus-table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 06:03:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 02:03:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070603.n3763C3v005508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 --- Comment #14 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-07 02:03:12 EDT --- FYI it couldn't be built atm because dependency problems of its depending packages. Tested in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 06:14:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 02:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492990] Review Request: zynjacku - LV2 synths and plugins host In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070614.n376EK3G007711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 06:25:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 02:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070625.n376PiQd012853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 --- Comment #2 from nucleo 2009-04-07 02:25:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the > %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] NOT_DONE This package doesn't includes any translations files in %{_datadir}/locale/* %find_lang is useless in this package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files > MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. (see line 34 and 38, > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ond ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} This style of defining the rpm Build Root can be used. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging /Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 06:28:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 02:28:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070628.n376SZah010209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 --- Comment #15 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-07 02:28:34 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-erbi-1.1.0.20090407-2.fc11.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-erbi.spec Description: A split from ibus-table-chinese, which was sub-package of ibus-table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 06:29:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 02:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492113] Review Request: mingw32-glibmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070629.n376T8hG013277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492113 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 02:29:08 EDT --- mingw32-glibmm24-2.19.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-glibmm24-2.19.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 06:35:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 02:35:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070635.n376ZNbt014694@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #39 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-04-07 02:35:20 EDT --- Can you post complete spec files instead of patches? It's too hard to track what's a patch to a spec file, vs a patch to the source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 06:39:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 02:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491884] Review Request: atasm - 6502 cross-assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070639.n376dVBf015242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491884 --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-07 02:39:30 EDT --- Thanks for the review, I will update the spec before importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 06:40:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 02:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491884] Review Request: atasm - 6502 cross-assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070640.n376ehx5015923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491884 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-07 02:40:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: atasm Short Description: 6502 cross-assembler Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 06:49:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 02:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070649.n376nZhf017991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #40 from Till Maas 2009-04-07 02:49:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) > Can you post complete spec files instead of patches? It's too hard to track > what's a patch to a spec file, vs a patch to the source. http://till.fedorapeople.org/files/xmonad-0.8.1-8.fc10.src/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 06:53:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 02:53:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458402] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070653.n376rTFM015159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458402 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sundaram at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #7 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-04-07 02:53:27 EDT --- Sorry for the delay folks. This one required quite a bit of reworking http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/griffith.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/griffith-0.9.9-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 06:58:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 02:58:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491694] Review Request: Anyterm - Web based terminal emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070658.n376wtbA016335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694 --- Comment #11 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-04-07 02:58:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Some updates (new spec / srpm has been uploaded) Ok, please remember to bump the release number when you upload a new spec/srpm so I can be sure I'm looking at an updated spec file. > - been working w/ the anyterm upstream community to get some changes committed, > including some necessary bugfixes, new features, and integration w/ httpd. > After this no patches / additional changes should be needed for this Great > > - because of the previous I don't think anyterm 1.1.29 tarball from the site > will cut it, so we'll need to either source this from the version control > checkout tarball, or (less preferably) wait for the next release Packaging a SVN checkout is OK; what is (still) not good is that I can't verify your tarball matches upstream. If you want to stick to a svn snapshot until the next release, please pick a suitable revision from upstream, then package it with "svn export -r" and be sure to update the package version field according to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 07:10:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 03:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492974] Review Request: calf - Audio plugins pack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070710.n377AZxj019036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492974 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-07 03:10:34 EDT --- rpm -ivh /home/marca/calf-0.0.18.3-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \error: Failed dependencies: liblash.so.1()(64bit) is needed by calf-0.0.18.3-1.fc11.x86_64 Shouldn't be lash in requirements for calf package? Also I can't check md5sum because on the upstream page is for download version 0.0.17. Could you send me a link for download 0.0.18? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 07:13:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 03:13:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070713.n377Dmdb019579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #16 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-04-07 03:13:47 EDT --- So here is what i have done: 1. Bumped to newer upstream 0.8.0.1 after applying the patch Sindre sent. 2. Split the huge rpm into smaller sub-rpms making sure that only those sections which have a dependency [ e.g firefox etc ] would be in a separate rpm. Someone please check if this condition is fully satisfied. SPEC: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnome-do-plugins.spec SRPM: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/gnome-do-plugins-0.8.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm I tried doing a scratch build in koji however it seems that monodevelop does not exists for f11. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1281705&name=root.log However it has been built for F11 at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=95516 So most probably it did not end up in the build root. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 07:17:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 03:17:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493957] Review Request: skyviewer - Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070717.n377H4pq024022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493957 Bug 493957 depends on bug 492164, which changed state. Bug 492164 Summary: Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 07:17:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 03:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070717.n377H3tg023998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-07 03:17:02 EDT --- Thanks for the review and enhancements, Jussi. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 07:32:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 03:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493530] Review Request: perl-Data-Dumper-Names - Data::Dumper::Names module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070732.n377W5Rw027208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493530 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-07 03:32:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Data-Dumper-Names Short Description: Data::Dumper like module for printing and eval data structures Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 07:33:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 03:33:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070733.n377XYUE027485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #17 from David Nielsen 2009-04-07 03:33:33 EDT --- Why are you doing all those excludes? They are listed in the subpackages, it should be enough to have them be owned that way. you may also want to move specific buildrequires into the subpackages, that way we can do some neat stuff with flags Shouldn't it depend on monodevelop-devel, not that it would make a difference in finding it. This one smells like a koji error to me, we may need to contact the koji guys if it presists or ask the mailing list. Does it happen in a local mock build as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 07:53:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 03:53:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070753.n377rWX7028108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 03:53:32 EDT --- healpix-2.11c-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/healpix-2.11c-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 07:54:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 03:54:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070754.n377suqN032003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #18 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-04-07 03:54:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Why are you doing all those excludes? They are listed in the subpackages, it > should be enough to have them be owned that way. > Well if you see the file list in the gnome-do-plugin rpm it includes all the files, So if i dont put excludes the files would go into both the sub packge as well as the gnome-do-plugin package. Reference: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/beagle/devel/beagle.spec?revision=1.165&view=markup > you may also want to move specific buildrequires into the subpackages, that way > we can do some neat stuff with flags > Make sense, will do that. SPEC: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnome-do-plugins.spec However my question is, when the rpm is build from source, you have to build all the sub rpms right? So what is the point in splitting the BRs? > Shouldn't it depend on monodevelop-devel, not that it would make a difference > in finding it. This one smells like a koji error to me, we may need to contact > the koji guys if it presists or ask the mailing list. Does it happen in a >local > mock build as well? Yeah mock is fine. Opened a ticket with buildsys at: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1315 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:05:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:05:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494494] Review Request: hyphen-kn - Kannada hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070805.n3785xwE002768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494494 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:05:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494494] New: Review Request: hyphen-kn - Kannada hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-kn - Kannada hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494494 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-kn - Kannada hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-kn.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-kn-0.20081213-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Kannada hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:02:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494493] New: Review Request: hyphen-gu - Gujarati hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-gu - Gujarati hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494493 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-gu - Gujarati hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-gu.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-gu-0.20081213-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Gujarati hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:08:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494495] Review Request: hyphen-ml - Malayalam hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070808.n37885WP031804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494495 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:07:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:07:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494495] New: Review Request: hyphen-ml - Malayalam hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-ml - Malayalam hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494495 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-ml - Malayalam hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-ml.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-ml-0.20090118-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Malayalam hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:11:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:11:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494498] Review Request: hyphen-pa - Punjabi hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070811.n378Bp2Q004123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494498 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494497] Review Request: hyphen-or - Oriya hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070810.n378AOEW032711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494497 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:09:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:09:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494497] New: Review Request: hyphen-or - Oriya hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-or - Oriya hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494497 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-or - Oriya hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-or.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-or-0.20081213-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Oriya hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:11:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:11:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494498] New: Review Request: hyphen-pa - Punjabi hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-pa - Punjabi hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494498 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-pa - Punjabi hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-pa.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-pa-0.20081213-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Punjabi hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:12:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:12:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492122] Review Request: mingw32-cairomm - MinGW Windows C++ API for the cairo graphics library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070812.n378Ct1G000873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492122 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kalev at smartlink.ee Bug 492122 depends on bug 492110, which changed state. Bug 492110 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libsigc++20 - MinGW Windows port of the typesafe signal framework for C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492110 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-07 04:12:55 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1281702 Rpmlint is quiet: $ rpmlint mingw32-cairomm-1.8.0-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-cairomm-1.8.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint output + Package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora LGPLv2+ + License matches the actual package license It is also the same as in the corresponding Fedora cairomm package + The package contains the license file (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm 15c0f56eee57bb418c38463a6297d715 cairomm-1.8.0.tar.gz 15c0f56eee57bb418c38463a6297d715 SRPM/cairomm-1.8.0.tar.gz + Package builds in mock (Fedora Rawhide i586) n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package n/a Static libraries should be in -static + Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 Note: I am not in packager group, so I cannot set fedora?review+ flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:13:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:13:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494499] Review Request: hyphen-ta - Tamil hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070813.n378DWXd004537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494499 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:16:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494501] Review Request: hyphen-te - Telugu hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070816.n378G2Ej005400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494501 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:12:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:12:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494499] New: Review Request: hyphen-ta - Tamil hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-ta - Tamil hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494499 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-ta - Tamil hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-ta.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-ta-0.20081213-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Tamil hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492122] Review Request: mingw32-cairomm - MinGW Windows C++ API for the cairo graphics library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070819.n378J3rH002470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492122 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-07 04:19:02 EDT --- setting fedora-review+ on the basis of kalev's review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:17:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:17:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494503] New: Review Request: hyphen-sa - Sanskrit hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-sa - Sanskrit hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494503 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-sa - Sanskrit hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-sa.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-sa-0.20081010-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Sanskrit hyphenation rules (also usable for Bengali) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:14:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:14:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494501] New: Review Request: hyphen-te - Telugu hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-te - Telugu hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494501 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-te - Telugu hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-te.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-te-0.20081213-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Telugu hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:21:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494493] Review Request: hyphen-gu - Gujarati hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070821.n378Lf0U007043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494493 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-07 04:21:40 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1281831 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is hyphen-gu.noarch: W: no-documentation ==> can be ignored as there is no document files and license is added in hyph_gu_IN.dic + source files match upstream. c0d49e2c424e38cc20351b7c56ad087a hyph_gu_IN.dic + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:21:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494495] Review Request: hyphen-ml - Malayalam hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070821.n378LSUC006990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494495 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-07 04:21:28 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1281829 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is hyphen-ml.noarch: W: no-documentation ==> can be ignored as there is no document files and license is added in hyph_ml_IN.dic + source files match upstream. c21f722bb896b9cc23db6e4b42141d0e hyph_ml_IN.dic + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:21:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:21:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494494] Review Request: hyphen-kn - Kannada hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070821.n378LsH3003432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494494 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-07 04:21:53 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1281827 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is hyphen-kn.noarch: W: no-documentation ==> can be ignored as there is no document files and license is added in hyph_kn_IN.dic + source files match upstream. fe518ce2a504598a5490f4537c0cef5a hyph_kn_IN.dic + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:25:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:25:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494493] Review Request: hyphen-gu - Gujarati hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070825.n378PW9r008158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494493 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-04-07 04:25:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-gu Short Description: Gujarati hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: F-11, devel InitialCC: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:24:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494495] Review Request: hyphen-ml - Malayalam hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070824.n378Ouce003961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494495 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-04-07 04:24:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-ml Short Description: Malayalam hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: F-11, devel InitialCC: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:29:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:29:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070829.n378T949008764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-07 04:29:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libp11 Short Description: MingGW Windows libp11 library Owners: kalev rjones Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:29:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494494] Review Request: hyphen-kn - Kannada hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070829.n378TuTI008915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494494 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-04-07 04:29:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-kn Short Description: Kannada hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: F-11, devel InitialCC: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:03:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494493] Review Request: hyphen-gu - Gujarati hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070803.n37836bA030440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494493 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:03:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:03:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070803.n3783JFU030540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-07 04:03:19 EDT --- There's something wrong with the import (and your SRPM!). The SRPM spec & sources are still revision 3 instead of 5! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:03:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070803.n3783BIk030487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #16 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-07 04:03:10 EDT --- built to rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:00:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:00:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494339] Review Request: hyphen-hi - Hindi hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070800.n3780Pb9001164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494339 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-04-07 04:00:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-hi Short Description: Hindi hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: F-11, devel InitialCC: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:37:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070837.n378b68V011036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-07 04:37:06 EDT --- I think you first need a sponsor, then get a fedora account, before you can request CVS... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:32:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:32:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070832.n378WFNF009819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:35:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494498] Review Request: hyphen-pa - Punjabi hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070835.n378ZRNh010695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494498 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-07 04:35:27 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1281835 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is hyphen-pa.noarch: W: no-documentation ==> can be ignored as there is no document files and license is added in hyph_pa_IN.dic + source files match upstream. 9115f6afb94ac8a0daa261958ef1070a hyph_pa_IN.dic + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:34:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:34:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494501] Review Request: hyphen-te - Telugu hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070834.n378Yvrq010187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494501 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-07 04:34:56 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1281838 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is hyphen-te.noarch: W: no-documentation ==> can be ignored as there is no document files and license is added in hyph_te_IN.dic + source files match upstream. 44309696cb5528709decc81344c27248 hyph_te_IN.dic + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:35:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494497] Review Request: hyphen-or - Oriya hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070835.n378ZJKB010635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494497 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-07 04:35:19 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1281843 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is hyphen-or.noarch: W: no-documentation ==> can be ignored as there is no document files and license is added in hyph_or_IN.dic + source files match upstream. e3ae59d397fe5baf5f9a6bc785ac4b15 hyph_or_IN.dic + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:35:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:35:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494499] Review Request: hyphen-ta - Tamil hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070835.n378Z8GX006929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494499 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-07 04:35:08 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1281836 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is hyphen-ta.noarch: W: no-documentation ==> can be ignored as there is no document files and license is added in hyph_ta_IN.dic + source files match upstream. 0626a05dcb71b96bd2f56ccfb2277cb9 hyph_ta_IN.dic + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:40:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:40:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494499] Review Request: hyphen-ta - Tamil hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070840.n378eeMa012019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494499 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-04-07 04:40:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-ta Short Description: Tamil hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: F-11, devel InitialCC: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:40:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494501] Review Request: hyphen-te - Telugu hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070840.n378e8rR011832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494501 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-04-07 04:40:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-te Short Description: Telugu hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: F-11, devel InitialCC: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:41:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:41:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494497] Review Request: hyphen-or - Oriya hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070841.n378fDG2012112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494497 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-04-07 04:41:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-or Short Description: Oriya hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: F-11, devel InitialCC: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:40:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070840.n378eVpv008096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 --- Comment #18 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-07 04:40:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > There's something wrong with the import (and your SRPM!). The SRPM spec & > sources are still revision 3 instead of 5! Uff. I suck. I'll fix that and respin the update you've created. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:41:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494498] Review Request: hyphen-pa - Punjabi hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070841.n378fwOb008416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494498 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-04-07 04:41:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-pa Short Description: Punjabi hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: F-11, devel InitialCC: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:47:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070847.n378l0oU013419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 --- Comment #19 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-07 04:47:00 EDT --- That was probably since [1] pointed at the old package. I copied it from -3 and intended to rsync -5 there, but probably the rsync was not successful. [1] http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/healpix-2.11c-5.el5.src.rpm Anyways, the correct version in builds now. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 09:00:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 05:00:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494503] Review Request: hyphen-sa - Sanskrit hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070900.n37907CL016774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494503 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-07 05:00:06 EDT --- I think if hyphen-bn subpackage added to hyphen-sa then we can list that in comps under bengali-support language group -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 09:03:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 05:03:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070903.n3793gRZ017574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 --- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-07 05:03:42 EDT --- Thanks for your very fast review, Thomas. Richard Jones said he is not familiar with how the sponsorship system works and that he'll try setting fedora?cvs? flag for me. That's why I requested CVS without being sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 09:11:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 05:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070911.n379BIGi015412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #8 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-07 05:11:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Consider joining forces with the Debian package maintainer. I've sent an email to Debian QA team for that purpose. However, since that package has been orphaned (http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/soci.html and http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/soci), there is no longer an individual maintainer for it. Once I'll have a pristine SOCI v3.0.0-derived Fedora-compliant package, I'll talk again with the upstream development team, in order to see whether (at least) SONAME can be added. Right now, with the RPM packages I delivered, software using SOCI (for instance, OpenTREP, http://sourceforge.net/projects/opentrep) works almost seamlessly on both installations (either RPM-based or pristine one). So, it should not be a burden for them (SOCI developer team) to accept a few changes so that packages can be cleanly prepared for the major Linux distributions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 09:22:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 05:22:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070922.n379M6T1021851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-07 05:22:05 EDT --- Please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Before you are sponsored, you do not have a fedora account (kalev does not exist), and therefore you cannot be owner of a package in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 09:32:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 05:32:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491805] Review Request: django-sct - A collection of Django applications for building community websites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070932.n379WEkK020305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491805 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2009-04-07 05:32:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: django-sct Short Description: A collection of Django applications for building community websites Owners: ivazquez Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 09:33:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 05:33:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491694] Review Request: Anyterm - Web based terminal emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070933.n379XkC8020551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694 --- Comment #12 from Alexander Bostr?m 2009-04-07 05:33:46 EDT --- Looks pretty good! My comments: * The typical use case for this is a multiuser machine where you'd usually not completely trust all users. Since Apache is configured to proxy to port 8080 then if anytermd is not running for some reason any user will be able to listen to that port and have other users' passwords sent there. So I still think using a port <1024 by default is the way to go. * In anyterm-cmd: read U ssh $U at localhost Here the user could enter any ssh client option into $U, and I'm pretty sure it's possible to do evil that way, for example by causing ~anytermd/.ssh/config and ~anytermd/.ssh/known_hosts to be replaced. I suggest something like this: while :; do echo -n "Username: " read U # Make sure it does not start with a "-" and only contains valid # username characters. if [[ "$U" =~ "^[A-Za-z0-9_]" && ! ( "$U" =~ "[^A-Za-z0-9_-]" ) ]]; then exec ssh "$U at localhost" fi echo "Bad username." done * I'd package the static content in /var/www/anyterm to make it easy for admins to customize it and cut down on proxy traffic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 09:35:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 05:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494503] Review Request: hyphen-sa - Sanskrit hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070935.n379Z59V021095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494503 --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-04-07 05:35:05 EDT --- The package provides hyphen-bn at the moment, so you should be able to do that already, i.e. rpm -qp --provides hyphen-sa-0.20081010-1.fc10.noarch.rpm |grep hyphen-bn hyphen-bn = 0.20081010-1.fc10 The (small) catch to making a physical subpackage called hyphen-bn is that it will contain only a link to hyph_sa_IN.dic (and have a Requires: on hyphen-sa) and then rpmlink will complain about dangling links. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 09:39:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 05:39:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492122] Review Request: mingw32-cairomm - MinGW Windows C++ API for the cairo graphics library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070939.n379dIql025979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492122 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-07 05:39:18 EDT --- Thank you, Kalev and Richard, for the quick review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 09:38:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 05:38:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492122] Review Request: mingw32-cairomm - MinGW Windows C++ API for the cairo graphics library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070938.n379clMT025877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492122 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-07 05:38:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-cairomm Short Description: MinGW Windows C++ API for the cairo graphics library Owners: sailer rjones Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 09:37:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 05:37:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070937.n379bkZv025683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #19 from David Nielsen 2009-04-07 05:37:45 EDT --- Maybe that is the case, it is my impression that using flags one could specifically tell rpmbuild to build things like --with-evolution and so on so you could build the separated plugins. However that would require being able to run the configure script in such a way as to disable the undesired plugins and knowing the gnome-do guys this will not be possible. I doubt we can do this on second thought. Also regarding the excludes, I rewrote the spec you referenced for greater flexibility and I don't remember doing that.. maybe I did and forgot about it. I'll chuck this up to rpm being suboptimal for maintainers here and not doing the right thing by default. Doesn't this contain language files? Regardless I can do a proper review on Thursday, I had my account reenabled so I should also be able to approve it. A quick overview looks very good though. Why is the banshee exclude commented out? Aside that there's a cosmetic enhancement ensuring an equal amount of newlines between the the main package and the plugins packages file listings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 09:45:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 05:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070945.n379jXoH027894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 05:45:32 EDT --- globus-common-10.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-common-10.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 09:42:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 05:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494517] New: Review Request: x-kit - A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: x-kit - A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494517 Summary: Review Request: x-kit - A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/x-kit.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/x-kit-0.4.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 09:43:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 05:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070943.n379hZmV027221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #20 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2009-04-07 05:43:35 EDT --- You don't need the excludes, but you do need to use %dir in the -plugins package. You see, if you do %{_datadir}/gnome-do/plugins/ in %files that package will own all subdirectories and files of that dir, but if you use %dir %{_datadir}/gnome-do/plugins/ it will only own the dir in question, without the subdirs. As for the monodevelop issue, monodevelop is not available for ppc* for some reason, the following works around that: # ppc* not supported: needs monodevelop which is not built for ppc* ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 ia64 armv4l sparc alpha in the long run monodevelop should be fixed to run on ppc though, file a bug against monodevelop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 09:44:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 05:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494518] New: Review Request: dontzap - Allows users to set the "DontZap" option in xorg.conf Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dontzap - Allows users to set the "DontZap" option in xorg.conf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494518 Summary: Review Request: dontzap - Allows users to set the "DontZap" option in xorg.conf Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/dontzap.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/dontzap-0.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: DontZap is an application written in Python which relies on X-Kit and allows users to set the "DontZap" option in xorg.conf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 09:45:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 05:45:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070945.n379jdxb023470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 05:45:39 EDT --- globus-common-10.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-common-10.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 10:01:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 06:01:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494520] Review Request: cdf - The NASA Common Data Format implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071001.n37A1IAZ031745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494520 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-07 06:01:17 EDT --- Blocking FE-LEGAL due to Copyright: Copyright 2008 Space Physics Data Facility NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center This software may be copied or redistributed as long as it is not sold for profit, but it can be incorporated into any other substantive product with or without modifications for profit or non-profit. If the software is modified, it must include the following notices: - The software is not the original (for protectiion of the original author's reputations from any problems introduced by others) - Change history (e.g. date, functionality, etc.) This copyright notice must be reproduced on each copy made. This software is provided as is without any express or implied warranties whatsoever. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 09:59:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 05:59:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494520] New: Review Request: cdf - The NASA Common Data Format implementation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cdf - The NASA Common Data Format implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494520 Summary: Review Request: cdf - The NASA Common Data Format implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/cdf.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/cdf-3.2.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Common Data Format (CDF) is a self-describing data format for the storage and manipulation of scalar and multidimensional data in a platform- and discipline-independent fashion. When one first hears the term "Common Data Format" one intuitively thinks of data formats in the traditional (i.e. messy/convoluted storage of data on disk or tape) sense of the word. Although CDF has its own internal self describing format, it consists of more than just a data format. CDF is a scientific data management package (known as the "CDF Library") which allows programmers and application developers to manage and manipulate scalar, vector, and multi-dimensional data arrays. The irony of the term "FORMAT" is that the actual data format which CDF utilizes is completely transparent to the user and accessible through a consistent set of interface (known as the "CDF Interface") routines. Therefore, programmers are not burdened with performing low level I/O's to physically format and unformat the data file. This is all done for them automatically. rpmlint output: cdf.src: W: invalid-license CDF cdf.x86_64: W: invalid-license CDF cdf.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libcdf.so cdf-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license CDF cdf-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation cdf-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license CDF 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 10:39:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 06:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494520] Review Request: cdf - The NASA Common Data Format implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071039.n37AdNnX008080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494520 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 10:42:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 06:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481159] Review Request: ocaml-autoconf - Autoconf macros for OCaml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071042.n37Agc04004593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481159 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-07 06:42:37 EDT --- Somehow this bug got overlooked, sorry about that ... New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-autoconf Short Description: Autoconf macros for OCaml Owners: rjones Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 10:46:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 06:46:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493232] Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071046.n37AkbQ6005603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493232 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 06:46:37 EDT --- redir-2.2.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/redir-2.2.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 10:47:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 06:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493232] Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071047.n37AlQ1n005729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493232 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 06:47:26 EDT --- redir-2.2.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/redir-2.2.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 10:48:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 06:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491027] Review Request: fb-contrib - Extra findbugs detectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071048.n37Amsxf010175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491027 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-04-07 06:48:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Hmmmm... I'm not sure how to handle this. The name of the upstream project is > "fb-contrib". The findbugs developers often tell people to go to that project > for extra detectors. So those who have seen a reference to it on the findbugs > web site will look for the name "fb-contrib" in Fedora. > > On the other hand, naming it "findbugs-contrib" would list it with the other > findbugs packages, so those browsing the package names would be more likely to > find it there. > > I'm really not sure what to do. It would be nice if the upstream name were > "findbugs-contrib". I'd also like a pony. :-) > > How about naming the package findbugs-contrib, but having it Provide: > fb-contrib? Would yum find it then if someone did "yum install fb-contrib"? Yeah, it will install it. But I would say just name it findbugs-contrib. I don't think that the additional provide is needed, but it's up to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 11:06:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 07:06:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494503] Review Request: hyphen-sa - Sanskrit hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071106.n37B65Cs010192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494503 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-07 07:06:05 EDT --- Thanks for the above info. Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1281841 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is silent. + source files match upstream. b34adf4185eb8f46773627c240b24806 hyph-sa.tex + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 11:28:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 07:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071128.n37BSSdg020318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 --- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-07 07:28:27 EDT --- I am familiar with the HowToGetSponsored page and I do have an FAS account for a while now. Please see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/kalev So far I have posted 3 packages for review (and they all block FE-NEEDSPONSOR). Besides the mingw32-libp11 I have: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=mingw32-opensc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=powwow I have also done a few unofficial reviews and commented in some bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491617 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492165 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492122 In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=mingw32-cairomm I did the official review. Richard Jones checked on my review and set the fedora?review+ flag for me. Regarding this package here, I discussed the situation with Richard Jones and he suggested that he could try setting the fedora?cvs? flag as I still don't have a sponsor, that's the reason I posted the CVS request too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 11:33:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 07:33:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071133.n37BXrO6021556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #14 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-07 07:33:51 EDT --- Ver. 1.1.0-2 http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems-1.1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm * OpenSER specific code is disabled (It's no longer necessary since OpenSER can control SEMS via SIP-headers). * Fixed installation of DSM-plugin The issue with python still not resolved. I'll try to fix ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 11:34:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 07:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071134.n37BYOTR017091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #15 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-07 07:34:24 EDT --- Koji scratchbuild: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1282233 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 11:40:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 07:40:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071140.n37BeusV018951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #20 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-07 07:40:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > the xfce4-panel plugin can't build on RHEL5, because the dependency are not > satisfied. As it can't be built in RHEL4 ether, you need to use %{?rhel} instead of %{?rhel5} Can you please make the suggested changes? We are almost done and I'd like to see this package in F11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 11:54:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 07:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494503] Review Request: hyphen-sa - Sanskrit hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071154.n37Bsrh5026251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494503 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Caolan McNamara 2009-04-07 07:54:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-sa Short Description: Sanskrit hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: F-11, devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:07:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:07:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071207.n37C7Mnc029304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 srinivas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(matt_domsch at dell. | |com) --- Comment #15 from srinivas 2009-04-07 08:07:20 EDT --- Review: Fix all rpmlint warnings: [root at localhost ~]# rpmlint gpxe-* gpxe.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab: line 10) gpxe-bootimgs.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - bootable USB, CD, floppy images and GRUB format gpxe-roms.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - boot roms in .rom format gpxe-roms-qemu.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - boot roms supported by QEMU, .rom format naming: ok spec file name matches: ok license = GPLv2 and BSD: ok license tag: ok spec in english: ok spec legible: ok no prebuild binaries: ok no packager, vendor, copyright, tags: ok summary and description tags: ok no rpaths: ok no config files: ok no initscripts: ok no desktop files: ok consistent use of macros: ok no makeinstall: ok no lang files: ok scriptlets: ok no conditional deps: ok builds with a normal user account: ok not relocatable: ok code, not content: ok directory ownership: ok users and groups: ok not a web app: ok conflicts: ok no kmods: ok no files under /srv: ok source matches: ok calls ldconfig appropriately: ok no duplicate files: ok file permissions: ok libtool archives removed: ok %clean section: ok no large docs, no need for -doc subpackage: ok %doc usage ok no static libs: ok no pkgconfig files: ok all libtool .la files removed: ok dir ownership correct: ok %install does rm: ok filenames UTF8: ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494546] New: Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494546 Summary: Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at redhat.com ReportedBy: rpacheco at redhat.com CC: notting at redhat.com, mchristi at redhat.com, pm-rhel at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Clone Of: 489929 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #489929 +++ Spec URL: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi.spec SRPM URL: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libHBAAPI-2.2-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Package contains HBA API library, used as a wrapper for other vendor specific libraries. Package will be used as a connector between FCoE Utilities and libhalinux. --- Additional comment from dan at danny.cz on 2009-03-30 10:13:18 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: BAD source files match upstream: BAD package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK* rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK headers in -devel OK pkgconfig files in -devel OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - full URLs for Sources are missing - the %name tag should be all in lowercase to be consistent with archive name (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines) - it's preferred to have the Requires for the devel sub-package on separate lines - rpmlint complains a bit: libHBAAPI-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license SNIA libHBAAPI-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license SNIA libHBAAPI.src: W: invalid-license SNIA libHBAAPI.x86_64: W: invalid-license SNIA => SNIA license was recently added to the list of good licenses and is not yet known to rpmlint libHBAAPI.src: E: invalid-spec-name => package name and spec filename are not in sync libHBAAPI-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation => can be ignored - you can apply the "includes" patch supplied by the hbaapi_build archive instead of using an own copy --- Additional comment from jzeleny at redhat.com on 2009-03-31 05:42:35 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi-2.2-3.fc10.src.rpm --- Additional comment from dan at danny.cz on 2009-03-31 06:34:22 EDT --- - the hbaapi_build_2.2.tar.gz tarball differs between this package and upstream URL (length 674018 vs. 672470) - the %description for the main package could be more verbose --- Additional comment from dan at danny.cz on 2009-03-31 06:37:04 EDT --- link to the thread about the SNIA license on fedora-legal mailing list - https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-February/msg00033.html --- Additional comment from jzeleny at redhat.com on 2009-04-01 09:09:11 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi-2.2-4.fc10.src.rpm I added one line to the description. It's not much, but hopefully it's enough for now. --- Additional comment from dan at danny.cz on 2009-04-01 10:15:39 EDT --- All issues are fixed, this package is APPROVED. --- Additional comment from jzeleny at redhat.com on 2009-04-02 03:40:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libhbaapi Short Description: Package contains HBA API library. It will be used as a connector between FCoE Utilities and libhbalinux. Owners: jzeleny Branches: InitialCC: --- Additional comment from kevin at tummy.com on 2009-04-03 16:41:57 EDT --- I used "SNIA HBAAPI library" as the Short Description as that seems more correct. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:32:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:32:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494546] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071232.n37CWD60030165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494546 Ronald Pacheco changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |188271(RHEL5.0-NEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:32:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:32:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071232.n37CWZPP030268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #27 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-04-07 08:32:34 EDT --- Sorry for few days delay... + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM links.src:37: W: unversioned-explicit-provides webclient links.src:38: W: unversioned-explicit-provides text-www-browser - common for those provides in existing packages - could be ignored links.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 37) - should be fixed + rpmlint is NOT silent for RPM. links.i586: W: non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/links 0644 - I guess this is just rpmlint noise, as /usr/bin/links is only via alternatives and should be ignored links.i586: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/links.desktop - links.desktop: error: required key "Encoding" not found + source files match upstream. bf5b20529a2a811701c5af52b28ebdd4 links-2.2.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. - License text is NOT included in package. - COPYING file should be shipped + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc files. + no .la files. + menu translations are available in binary + Does own the directories it creates (none special created) + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate (ignoring false-positive rpmlint warning about ghosted touched file/future alternative symlink). + GUI app with desktop file (expecting addition of Encoding line) and icon Required to fix: - Add Encoding=UTF-8 line to desktop file - Do ship COPYING in %doc - fix mixed tab/spaces and previously mentioned things in spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494549] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071238.n37Cc49R031865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494549 Ronald Pacheco changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |494550 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:35:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:35:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494546] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071235.n37CZuSX031256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494546 RHEL Product and Program Management changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |pm_ack? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:34:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:34:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494546] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071234.n37CYoek030726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494546 Ronald Pacheco changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |494548 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:36:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:36:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489962] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071236.n37CafL5031524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489962 Ronald Pacheco changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |494549 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:36:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494546] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071236.n37Caj09031581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494546 --- Comment #1 from RHEL Product and Program Management 2009-04-07 08:36:44 EDT --- This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:36:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:36:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494549] New: Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494549 Summary: Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at redhat.com ReportedBy: rpacheco at redhat.com CC: notting at redhat.com, mchristi at redhat.com, pm-rhel at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 489962 Blocks: 188271 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Clone Of: 489962 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #489962 +++ SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhalinux/libhbalinux-1.0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhalinux/libhbalinux.spec This is HBAAPI vendor library to manage Fibre Channel Host Bus Adapters. Review request for libHBAAPI: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489929 --- Additional comment from jzeleny at redhat.com on 2009-04-03 09:23:38 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbalinux/libhbalinux.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbalinux/libhbalinux-1.0.7-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:38:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494550] New: Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494550 Summary: Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: distribution AssignedTo: pm-rhel at redhat.com ReportedBy: rpacheco at redhat.com QAContact: release-test-team at redhat.com CC: notting at redhat.com, mchristi at redhat.com, pm-rhel at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 494549 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Clone Of: 494549 Ronald Pacheco changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |pm_ack?, devel_ack?, | |qa_ack? +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #494549 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #489962 +++ SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhalinux/libhbalinux-1.0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhalinux/libhbalinux.spec This is HBAAPI vendor library to manage Fibre Channel Host Bus Adapters. Review request for libHBAAPI: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489929 --- Additional comment from jzeleny at redhat.com on 2009-04-03 09:23:38 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbalinux/libhbalinux.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbalinux/libhbalinux-1.0.7-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:34:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:34:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494548] New: Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494548 Summary: Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: distribution AssignedTo: pm-rhel at redhat.com ReportedBy: rpacheco at redhat.com QAContact: release-test-team at redhat.com CC: notting at redhat.com, mchristi at redhat.com, pm-rhel at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 494546 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Clone Of: 494546 Ronald Pacheco changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |pm_ack?, devel_ack?, | |qa_ack? +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #494546 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #489929 +++ Spec URL: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi.spec SRPM URL: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libHBAAPI-2.2-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Package contains HBA API library, used as a wrapper for other vendor specific libraries. Package will be used as a connector between FCoE Utilities and libhalinux. --- Additional comment from dan at danny.cz on 2009-03-30 10:13:18 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: BAD source files match upstream: BAD package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK* rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK headers in -devel OK pkgconfig files in -devel OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - full URLs for Sources are missing - the %name tag should be all in lowercase to be consistent with archive name (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines) - it's preferred to have the Requires for the devel sub-package on separate lines - rpmlint complains a bit: libHBAAPI-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license SNIA libHBAAPI-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license SNIA libHBAAPI.src: W: invalid-license SNIA libHBAAPI.x86_64: W: invalid-license SNIA => SNIA license was recently added to the list of good licenses and is not yet known to rpmlint libHBAAPI.src: E: invalid-spec-name => package name and spec filename are not in sync libHBAAPI-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation => can be ignored - you can apply the "includes" patch supplied by the hbaapi_build archive instead of using an own copy --- Additional comment from jzeleny at redhat.com on 2009-03-31 05:42:35 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi-2.2-3.fc10.src.rpm --- Additional comment from dan at danny.cz on 2009-03-31 06:34:22 EDT --- - the hbaapi_build_2.2.tar.gz tarball differs between this package and upstream URL (length 674018 vs. 672470) - the %description for the main package could be more verbose --- Additional comment from dan at danny.cz on 2009-03-31 06:37:04 EDT --- link to the thread about the SNIA license on fedora-legal mailing list - https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-February/msg00033.html --- Additional comment from jzeleny at redhat.com on 2009-04-01 09:09:11 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi-2.2-4.fc10.src.rpm I added one line to the description. It's not much, but hopefully it's enough for now. --- Additional comment from dan at danny.cz on 2009-04-01 10:15:39 EDT --- All issues are fixed, this package is APPROVED. --- Additional comment from jzeleny at redhat.com on 2009-04-02 03:40:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libhbaapi Short Description: Package contains HBA API library. It will be used as a connector between FCoE Utilities and libhbalinux. Owners: jzeleny Branches: InitialCC: --- Additional comment from kevin at tummy.com on 2009-04-03 16:41:57 EDT --- I used "SNIA HBAAPI library" as the Short Description as that seems more correct. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:42:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:42:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493958] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071242.n37Cg9W6000658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493958 Ronald Pacheco changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |494553 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:43:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:43:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494553] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071243.n37ChmCK000973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494553 Ronald Pacheco changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |494555 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:42:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494553] New: Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494553 Summary: Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at redhat.com ReportedBy: rpacheco at redhat.com CC: notting at redhat.com, mchristi at redhat.com, pm-rhel at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 493958 Blocks: 188271 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Clone Of: 493958 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #493958 +++ SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/fcoe-utils/fcoe-utils-1.0.7-2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/fcoe-utils/fcoe-utils.spec Fibre Channel over Ethernet utilities: fcoeadm - command line tool for configuring FCoE interfaces fcoemon - service to configure DCB Ethernet QOS filters, works with dcbd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:43:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494555] New: Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494555 Summary: Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: distribution AssignedTo: pm-rhel at redhat.com ReportedBy: rpacheco at redhat.com QAContact: release-test-team at redhat.com CC: notting at redhat.com, mchristi at redhat.com, pm-rhel at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 494553 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Clone Of: 494553 Ronald Pacheco changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |pm_ack?, devel_ack?, | |qa_ack? +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #494553 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #493958 +++ SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/fcoe-utils/fcoe-utils-1.0.7-2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/fcoe-utils/fcoe-utils.spec Fibre Channel over Ethernet utilities: fcoeadm - command line tool for configuring FCoE interfaces fcoemon - service to configure DCB Ethernet QOS filters, works with dcbd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:45:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:45:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494553] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071245.n37Cjxmg005923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494553 RHEL Product and Program Management changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |pm_ack? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:46:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494549] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071246.n37Ck1Jo001728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494549 RHEL Product and Program Management changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |pm_ack? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:46:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494549] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071246.n37CkssL002046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494549 --- Comment #1 from RHEL Product and Program Management 2009-04-07 08:46:53 EDT --- This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:46:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:46:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494553] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071246.n37Cko2A002007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494553 --- Comment #1 from RHEL Product and Program Management 2009-04-07 08:46:50 EDT --- This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 12:47:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:47:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494557] New: Review Request: zatacka - Arcade multiplayer game for 2-6 players on one keyboard Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zatacka - Arcade multiplayer game for 2-6 players on one keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494557 Summary: Review Request: zatacka - Arcade multiplayer game for 2-6 players on one keyboard Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sindrepb at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/zatacka.spec SRPM URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/zatacka-0.1.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Zatacka is an arcade multiplayer game for 2-6 players on one keyboard. Zatacka is a clone of Achtung die Kurve, the classic dos game. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 13:00:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071300.n37D0bJL009908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 --- Comment #4 from Alan Dunn 2009-04-07 09:00:37 EDT --- I remember now that I had looked at the X-Symbol part before, and was wondering if it should be left in as the X-Symbol distribution in Proof General is modified from the original: ---------------------------------------------- (in x-symbol.README.x-symbol-for-ProofGeneral:) The code in this directory is taken from http://x-symbol.sourceforge.net/ This is version 4.5.1-beta (dated 2003-05-11 15:00) Several changes have been made for Proof General, including: * the addition of 18pt and 24pt fonts, see etc/bigfonts. (thanks to Clemens Ballarin). * the addition of a mechanism to use Norbert Voelker's isaxsymb1.ttf (see etc/fonts-ttf) automatically on Mac using Carbon Emacs. You need to install isaxsymb1.ttf into Font Book This is experimental support and may have some issues. * Experimental (not yet working) support for Emacs 23 * Addition of `x-symbol-image-converter-required' which defaults to nil, to avoid X-Symbol giving warnings when it doesn't find ImageMagick convert. Images aren't used in Proof General, but if you want to use the same X-Symbol in LaTeX, you might want to customize this setting to t. * addition of the string "[Proof General]" to x-symbol-version The following rearrangements from the package directory layout have been made: for f in etc lisp man; do mv $f/x-symbol/* $f; rmdir $f/x-symbol; done Moreover, lisp/Makefile and lisp/makefile.pkg were copied from X-Symbol source package, and lisp/makefile.pkg edited to remove x-symbol-emacs from list of compiled files (since it breaks on XEmacs compile). ---------------------------------------------- Is there a good solution to this problem? We don't necessarily want these changes to persist when it's used in other programs... I suppose I can try and encourage upstream to rewrite this in a way that should work with a separate version of x-symbol. (I could also try and do this myself, but it might not be obvious whether the changes that are listed here are the only ones anyway.) I definitely missed mmm when I looked before though, and it claims to not be modified from the original, so I'll look into packaging that separately. (In reply to comment #2) > MUST items: > - rpmlint output: > emacs-proofgeneral.noarch: W: no-documentation > emacs-proofgeneral-el.noarch: W: no-documentation > xemacs-proofgeneral.noarch: W: no-documentation > xemacs-proofgeneral-el.noarch: W: no-documentation > 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. > - package name > - spec file name matches base package name > X packaging guidelines: as noted in comment #1, we may have a problem with > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Bundling_of_multiple_projects. > Also note that some files in the top-level lib directory may violate this > rule, too. > - good license > - license field matches actual license > - include license file in %doc > - spec file in American English > - spec file legible > - sources match upstream > - builds on at least one primary arch > - use ExcludeArch as necessary (N/A) > - all build dependencies in BuildRequires > - proper locale handling (N/A) > - call ldconfig as necessary (N/A) > - rationale if relocatable (N/A) > - own all created directories > - no duplicate %file listings > - proper file permissions > - %clean section > - consistent use of macros > - code or permissible content > - large documentation files in a subpackage (N/A) > - nothing in %doc needed at runtime > - header files in -devel (N/A) > - static libraries in -static (N/A) > - require pkgconfig if necessary (N/A) > - .so files in -devel (N/A) > - -devel requires base package (N/A) > - no libtool archives > - desktop files for GUI apps: rationale given in the description above > - don't own files or dirs created by other packages > - clean at top of %install > - filenames are UTF-8 > > SHOULD items: > - query upstream for license file (N/A) > - description and summary contain available translations (N/A) > ? package builds in mock: not checked > ? package builds on all suppported arches: not checked > - package functions as described > - sane scriptlets > - subpackages require main package > - pkgconfig files in -devel (N/A) > - package dependencies instead of file dependencies > > So we just need to investigate the use of bundled software and this package is > good to go. Thanks for submitting it! This will make a great addition to the > other prover-related software that has been pushed into Fedora recently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 13:22:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490723] Review Request: R-IRanges - Low-level containers for storing sets of integer ranges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071322.n37DMlpX011272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490723 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 09:22:47 EDT --- R-IRanges-1.1.55-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-IRanges-1.1.55-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 13:22:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490723] Review Request: R-IRanges - Low-level containers for storing sets of integer ranges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071322.n37DMgiZ015780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490723 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 09:22:41 EDT --- R-IRanges-1.1.55-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-IRanges-1.1.55-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 13:35:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071335.n37DZle6019135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-07 09:35:46 EDT --- One minor point before I start the full review, you don't need to give the bio of the upstream developer in the package description. This is sufficient: "JAMin is the JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface. JAMin is designed to perform professional audio mastering of any number of input streams. It uses LADSPA for its backend DSP work, specifically the swh plugins." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 13:36:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:36:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071336.n37Da1Aq015494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 14:18:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:18:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071418.n37EIaNv031887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #16 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-07 10:18:35 EDT --- look at comment #1 and comment #2 may be missing obsolete etherboot ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 14:35:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:35:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071435.n37EZBmd004275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #47 from David Halik 2009-04-07 10:35:05 EDT --- kwizart: Forcing the RPM_OPT_FLAGS is the cause for the buffer overflow. Allowing it to build normally results in a working SB 1.1.1 on F11. Without RPM_OPT_FLAGS: gcc -o host_ifparser.o -c -DXP_UNIX -O3 With RPM_OPT_FLAGS: gcc -o host_ifparser.o -c -DXP_UNIX -Os -g -pipe -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i586 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables Is it mandatory that we build with the RPM_OPT_FLAGS? I'm going to try a few things and see which option is causing the overflow, but it would be much simpler if we didn't have to modify them. Recommendations? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 14:50:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071450.n37EoZvI008794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #48 from Rex Dieter 2009-04-07 10:50:34 EDT --- More than likely, the stricter RPM_OPT_FLAGS are simply exposing an already-present coding problem. recommendation: fix the code, don't work-around it via different compiler flags than act only as a band-aid. May require some down-n-dirty debugging of host_ifparser.c though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 14:56:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494586] New: Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Any - Retrieve terminal size Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Any - Retrieve terminal size https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494586 Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Any - Retrieve terminal size Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Term-Size-Any.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Term-Size-Any-0.001-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a unified interface to retrieve terminal size. It loads one module of a list of known alternatives, each implementing some way to get the desired terminal information. This loaded module will actually do the job on behalf of Term::Size::Any. scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1282985 notes: Missing Term::Size::Win32 for tests is to be expected! t/08win32.t ......... skipped: Term::Size::Win32 not found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 14:59:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456242] Review Request: gavl - A library for handling uncompressed audio and video data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071459.n37Ex5DH010737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456242 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-07 10:59:04 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:06:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071506.n37F6F6s012852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #47 from Michal Nowak 2009-04-07 11:06:12 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- * Tue Apr 7 2009 Michal Nowak 3.2.1-1 - 3.2.1 - rebased patch: awesome-3.2-libev-pkg-config.patch - define XDG_CONFIG_DIR as %%{_sysconfdir}/xdg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:09:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071509.n37F97La013372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #49 from David Halik 2009-04-07 11:09:05 EDT --- FYI, host_ifparser.c is just an example of the compile options RPM_OPT_FLAGS was adding, not the specific problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:15:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:15:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456242] Review Request: gavl - A library for handling uncompressed audio and video data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071515.n37FFlxp015619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456242 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-07 11:15:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Mock build good. Does the explanation from 456256 apply here WRT ldconfig? Sorry, I tought to have already answeared. But yes, no needs for ldconfig call for -devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:14:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:14:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494588] New: Review Request: perl-Hash-Flatten - Flatten/unflatten complex data hashes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-Flatten - Flatten/unflatten complex data hashes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494588 Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-Flatten - Flatten/unflatten complex data hashes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Hash-Flatten.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Hash-Flatten-1.16-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Converts back and forth between a nested hash structure and a flat hash of delimited key-value pairs. Useful for protocols that only support key-value pairs (such as CGI and DBMs). scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1283041 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:25:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456242] Review Request: gavl - A library for handling uncompressed audio and video data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071525.n37FP7M8017851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456242 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-07 11:25:07 EDT --- Ok, then. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:25:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:25:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492125] Review Request: mingw32-pangomm - MinGW Windows C++ interface for Pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071525.n37FPCWQ013196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492125 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-07 11:25:11 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 2008-04-07 * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint output Only expected Errors/Warnings from a mingw package * Package is named according to Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * Spec file is named as the package * Package follows the Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * The stated license (LGPLv2+) is a Fedora approved license * The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding Fedora package * The package contains the license file (COPYING) * The spec file is written in legible English * Sources matches upstream c67228ea93dd977394d2872b61754b53 pangomm-2.14.1.tar.bz2 c67228ea93dd977394d2872b61754b53 SRPM/pangomm-2.14.1.tar.bz2 ! Accoding to guidelines the version should match the version of the corresponding Fedora package. The version in Fedora 11 is now 2.24.0 (built yesterday 2009-04-06 - so no shadow falls on the requester.) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=96784 Fedora 10 so far remains at 2.14.1 (in case a Fedora 10 package is considered) * Package builds in mock (Fedora 10) * BuildRequires look sane * Owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files * %files has %defattr * %clean clears %buildroot * Specfile uses macros consistently * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears %buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:32:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456242] Review Request: gavl - A library for handling uncompressed audio and video data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071532.n37FWLV6019813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456242 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-07 11:32:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gavl Short Description: A library for handling uncompressed audio and video data Owners: kwizart Branches: F-10 F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:40:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494520] Review Request: cdf - The NASA Common Data Format implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071540.n37FeXN9021893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494520 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-07 11:40:33 EDT --- Sorry Jussi, this license is poorly worded and non-free. NASA can put a man in space, but they can't seem to write a good FOSS license (they have a history of writing bad ones). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:48:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493232] Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071548.n37FmZ9u020134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493232 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 11:48:35 EDT --- redir-2.2.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:49:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071549.n37Fn2cj020267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 11:49:02 EDT --- globus-common-10.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:47:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493232] Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071547.n37Flr29019934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493232 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 11:47:52 EDT --- redir-2.2.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:48:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:48:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493232] Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071548.n37FmfHm020173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493232 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.2.1-3.fc9 |2.2.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:47:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:47:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493232] Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071547.n37FlvIC019980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493232 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.2.1-3.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:44:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489550] Review Request: qtscriptgenerator - A tool to generate Qt bindings for Qt Script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071544.n37FieR9019039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489550 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Rex Dieter 2009-04-07 11:44:39 EDT --- imported -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:48:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454010] Review Request: iaxclient - Library for creating telephony solutions that interoperate with Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071548.n37FmBUp020035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454010 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.1-0.3.beta3.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:48:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:48:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454010] Review Request: iaxclient - Library for creating telephony solutions that interoperate with Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071548.n37Fm5sH023497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454010 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 11:48:05 EDT --- iaxclient-2.1-0.3.beta3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:49:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071549.n37Fnvv2024029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|10.2-1.fc9 |10.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:49:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071549.n37Fn7GK023831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |10.2-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:49:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:49:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492113] Review Request: mingw32-glibmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071549.n37FnJf6023898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492113 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.19.2-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:50:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071550.n37FonHV021463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 11:50:48 EDT --- healpix-2.11c-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:49:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:49:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071549.n37FnpNt020788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 11:49:51 EDT --- globus-common-10.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:49:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492113] Review Request: mingw32-glibmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071549.n37FnFZT020455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492113 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 11:49:14 EDT --- mingw32-glibmm24-2.19.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:49:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454010] Review Request: iaxclient - Library for creating telephony solutions that interoperate with Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071549.n37FnZ6a020647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454010 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 11:49:35 EDT --- iaxclient-2.1-0.3.beta3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:49:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:49:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454010] Review Request: iaxclient - Library for creating telephony solutions that interoperate with Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071549.n37FnePg020685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454010 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1-0.3.beta3.fc10 |2.1-0.3.beta3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:59:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494548] Inclusion request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071559.n37Fx5oW023410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494548 Suzanne Yeghiayan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |syeghiay at redhat.com Summary|Review request: libhbaapi - |Inclusion request: |SNIA HBAAPI library |libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI | |library Status Whiteboard| |NwCmp: libhbaapi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:57:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071557.n37FvZqt023181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-07 11:57:35 EDT --- = Review = Good: - rpmlint checks return nothing - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPLv2+) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (d991da3fa6f531a1c8b7f6ef764aa13e7e9acbd3) - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales handled properly - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop file OK In fact, the biggest problem (besides the unnecessary information in the %description) wasn't with this package, but with ladspa-swh-plugins. When I went to test this package out to make sure it ran, it didn't start, because the swh plugins it was trying to load were missing symbols. I fixed that package up, it should not have this problem with -15 or later. Also, this app seems to need to run as root. You should probably use consolehelper (from the usermode package) to launch it. (look at liveusb-creator for an example of how to set it up). Show me a SRPM that uses consolehelper and has the description cleaned up and I'll approve this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:57:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071557.n37Fvjor026292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:59:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:59:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494546] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071559.n37FxeLk026679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494546 Suzanne Yeghiayan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |syeghiay at redhat.com Flag|pm_ack? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 16:01:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:01:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494553] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071601.n37G10jo027336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494553 Suzanne Yeghiayan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |syeghiay at redhat.com Flag|pm_ack? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 16:00:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494555] Inclusion request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071600.n37G03Rm027057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494555 Suzanne Yeghiayan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |syeghiay at redhat.com Summary|Review request: fcoe-utils |Inclusion request: |- utilities for fibre |fcoe-utils - utilities for |channel over ethernet |fibre channel over ethernet Status Whiteboard| |NwCmp: fcoe-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 15:59:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494550] Inclusion request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071559.n37FxShU023683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494550 Suzanne Yeghiayan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |syeghiay at redhat.com Summary|Review request: libhbalinux |Inclusion request: |- SNIA HBAAPI vendor |libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI |library |vendor library Status Whiteboard| |NwCmp: libhbalinux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 16:00:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:00:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494549] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071600.n37G0rYX024254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494549 Suzanne Yeghiayan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |syeghiay at redhat.com Flag|pm_ack? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 16:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494548] Inclusion request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071610.n37GAOLr026530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494548 Ronald Pacheco changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |488382 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 16:10:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488359] Review Request: dcbd - daemon and configuration tool for data center bridging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071610.n37GANr5026501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488359 Ronald Pacheco changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|488382 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 16:10:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:10:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494555] Inclusion request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071610.n37GAQKu026597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494555 Ronald Pacheco changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |488382 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 16:10:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494550] Inclusion request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071610.n37GAPQw026563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494550 Ronald Pacheco changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |488382 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 16:13:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:13:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494548] Inclusion request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071613.n37GDep1030102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494548 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 16:13:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494550] Inclusion request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071613.n37GDEqr030028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494550 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 16:18:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:18:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494555] Inclusion request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071618.n37GID5N031057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494555 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 16:28:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071628.n37GSPGx000903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(matt_domsch at dell. | |com) | --- Comment #17 from Matt Domsch 2009-04-07 12:28:24 EDT --- I don't know that it obsoletes etherboot in the RPM sense. The two can co-exist, and presumably one could load an etherboot orom into one instance of QEMU, while loading a gPXE orom into another instance. Also, the other etherboot images and gPXE images, meant for use on cards etc, can absolutely co-exist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 16:39:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:39:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071639.n37Gd2Yv000715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-07 12:39:01 EDT --- Thanks for the swh fix. But why do you think this application needs to be run as root? I can run and use it with a regular user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 16:38:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:38:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492125] Review Request: mingw32-pangomm - MinGW Windows C++ interface for Pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071638.n37GcHMb000623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492125 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-07 12:38:16 EDT --- Thank you for taking the review! I have updated the package: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-pangomm.spec http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-pangomm-2.24.0-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 16:46:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071646.n37GkrJf002635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #50 from David Halik 2009-04-07 12:46:51 EDT --- For tracking the buffer overflow with RPM_OPT_FLAGS: http://bugzilla.songbirdnest.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16022 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:00:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:00:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071700.n37H0a9c005692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #21 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-04-07 13:00:34 EDT --- I'd like to maintain debmirror for personal needs, so I've cleaned up the package according to the comments mentioned above and like to continue the review. SPEC: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/debmirror.spec SRPM: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/debmirror-20070123-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:05:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492974] Review Request: calf - Audio plugins pack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071705.n37H5RVF009953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492974 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-07 13:05:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > rpm -ivh /home/marca/calf-0.0.18.3-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm > \error: Failed dependencies: > liblash.so.1()(64bit) is needed by calf-0.0.18.3-1.fc11.x86_64 > Shouldn't be lash in requirements for calf package? > In the majority of cases, we don't need to express the library dependencies explicitly. See the first paragraph of: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requires > Also I can't check md5sum because on the upstream page is for download version > 0.0.17. Could you send me a link for download 0.0.18? Thanks. You can find it here: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=211458 The download URL is also listed in the Source0 field in the SPEC file. You can also use spectool to see the source links: spectool -S calf.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:08:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:08:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494586] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Any - Retrieve terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071708.n37H8wHY007874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494586 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:09:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:09:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494586] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Any - Retrieve terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071709.n37H90lC007895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494586 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:13:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:13:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494586] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Any - Retrieve terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071713.n37HDeTv009081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494586 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:13:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:13:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494586] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Any - Retrieve terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071713.n37HD1Iq009012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494586 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-07 13:13:00 EDT --- Looks good. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1282985 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): 63167e2bb4252c0722cd531e704a14ab727f3c9a Term-Size-Any-0.001.tar.gz 63167e2bb4252c0722cd531e704a14ab727f3c9a Term-Size-Any-0.001.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Term-Size-Any-0.001-1.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Term-Size-Any-0.001-1.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Term-Size-Any-0.001-1.fc10.src.rpm perl(Devel::Hide) perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Module::Load::Conditional) perl(Term::Size::Perl) perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) =====> perl-Term-Size-Any-0.001-1.fc10.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Term-Size-Any-0.001-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Term::Size::Any) = 0.001 perl-Term-Size-Any = 0.001-1.fc10 ====> requires for perl-Term-Size-Any-0.001-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Term::Size::Perl) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:15:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:15:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494586] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Any - Retrieve terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071715.n37HF7vk012217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494586 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Term-Size-Any -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:24:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494588] Review Request: perl-Hash-Flatten - Flatten/unflatten complex data hashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071724.n37HO7M9011165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494588 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:24:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494588] Review Request: perl-Hash-Flatten - Flatten/unflatten complex data hashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071724.n37HO5uh013731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494588 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:28:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494588] Review Request: perl-Hash-Flatten - Flatten/unflatten complex data hashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071728.n37HSeqM012150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494588 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Hash-Flatten Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:27:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:27:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494588] Review Request: perl-Hash-Flatten - Flatten/unflatten complex data hashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071727.n37HRROK012049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494588 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-07 13:27:27 EDT --- Looks good. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1283041 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPLv2); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): 23da4c7adee94eff2c34943d124432e3708a44c9 Hash-Flatten-1.16.tar.gz 23da4c7adee94eff2c34943d124432e3708a44c9 Hash-Flatten-1.16.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Hash-Flatten-1.16-1.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Hash-Flatten-1.16-1.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Hash-Flatten-1.16-1.fc10.src.rpm perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Log::Trace) perl(Test::Assertions) perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) =====> perl-Hash-Flatten-1.16-1.fc10.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Hash-Flatten-1.16-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Hash::Flatten) = 1.16 perl-Hash-Flatten = 1.16-1.fc10 ====> requires for perl-Hash-Flatten-1.16-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:29:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:29:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071729.n37HTfmL015322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-07 13:29:40 EDT --- Canceling CVS request, this needs sponsorship first. The sponsor should also be the one setting fedora-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:37:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494647] New: Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 Summary: Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: amdunn at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.phy.duke.edu/~amd34/emacs-mmm/emacs-mmm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.phy.duke.edu/~amd34/emacs-mmm/emacs-mmm-0.4.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: MMM Mode is an emacs add-on package providing a minor mode that allows Multiple Major Modes to coexist in one buffer. It is particularly well-suited to editing embedded code or code that generates other code, such as Mason or Embperl server-side Perl code, or HTML output by CGI scripts. MMM Mode defines a general syntax--the "submode class"--for telling it how one major mode should be embedded in another. At present, the list of supplied submode classes is rather limited, but that will hopefully change soon. Contributions are always welcome; writing a submode class can be a good introduction to Emacs Lisp, and is usually a simple excercise for those already proficient. MMM Mode was originally designed to work in Emacs 19 and 20 and XEmacs 20 and 21. This has been created as an emacs-only package as it already exists for XEmacs in xemacs-packages-extra. Testing: I have installed this on my own machine and it appears to work. It build in koji (f9, f10, though oddly not in f11 I just found out - perhaps something weird with Koji at the moment for rawhide? : f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1283407 f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1283409 f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1283419 ) rpmlint output: [adunn at localhost rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SPECS/emacs-mmm.spec ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/emacs-mmm-* ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/emacs-mmm-0.4.8-1.fc10.src.rpm emacs-mmm-el.noarch: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. and I believe that message is acceptable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:37:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:37:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494520] Review Request: cdf - The NASA Common Data Format implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071737.n37HbhLM017275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494520 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-07 13:37:43 EDT --- So, at this point review may seem pointless. Jussi, are you going to talk to them about the license? To me it seems that they didn't willingly make the software non-free and that they may agree to relicensing under the terms of 3-clause BSD or MIT license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:39:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:39:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071739.n37HdBeE014273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 --- Comment #5 from Alan Dunn 2009-04-07 13:39:11 EDT --- I packaged mmm for emacs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 I still have to figure out what to do for the other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:45:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:45:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494586] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Any - Retrieve terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071745.n37HjcZg019230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494586 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-07 13:45:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Term-Size-Any Short Description: Retrieve terminal size Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:46:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:46:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071746.n37HkhfO019397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-07 13:46:42 EDT --- Unpriviledged: [spot at velociraptor ~]$ jamin jamin 0.95.0 (C) 2003-2005 J. Depner, S. Harris, J. O'Quin, R. Parker and P. Shirkey This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; see the file COPYING for details. jackd 0.116.1 Copyright 2001-2005 Paul Davis and others. jackd comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; see the file COPYING for details JACK compiled with System V SHM support. loading driver .. creating alsa driver ... hw:0|hw:0|1024|2|48000|0|0|nomon|swmeter|-|32bit control device hw:0 control open "hw:0" (Permission denied) ALSA lib pcm_hw.c:1429:(_snd_pcm_hw_open) Invalid value for card ALSA lib pcm_hw.c:1429:(_snd_pcm_hw_open) Invalid value for card ALSA: Cannot open PCM device alsa_pcm for playback. Falling back to capture-only mode cannot load driver module alsa jamin: jack_client_open() failed, status = 0x11 [spot at velociraptor ~]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:47:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494650] [Intel 6.0 FEAT] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071747.n37HlOmP016331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494650 John Villalovos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|442586(Intel6.0Features) |494648 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:46:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:46:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494588] Review Request: perl-Hash-Flatten - Flatten/unflatten complex data hashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071746.n37HkDXb016111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494588 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-07 13:46:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Hash-Flatten Short Description: Flatten/unflatten complex data hashes Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:46:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494650] New: [Intel 6.0 FEAT] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Intel 6.0 FEAT] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494650 Summary: [Intel 6.0 FEAT] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Version: 6.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at redhat.com ReportedBy: jvillalo at redhat.com CC: notting at redhat.com, mchristi at redhat.com, syeghiay at redhat.com, pm-rhel at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 442586 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Clone Of: 494546 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #494546 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #489929 +++ Spec URL: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi.spec SRPM URL: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libHBAAPI-2.2-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Package contains HBA API library, used as a wrapper for other vendor specific libraries. Package will be used as a connector between FCoE Utilities and libhalinux. --- Additional comment from dan at danny.cz on 2009-03-30 10:13:18 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: BAD source files match upstream: BAD package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK* rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK headers in -devel OK pkgconfig files in -devel OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - full URLs for Sources are missing - the %name tag should be all in lowercase to be consistent with archive name (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines) - it's preferred to have the Requires for the devel sub-package on separate lines - rpmlint complains a bit: libHBAAPI-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license SNIA libHBAAPI-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license SNIA libHBAAPI.src: W: invalid-license SNIA libHBAAPI.x86_64: W: invalid-license SNIA => SNIA license was recently added to the list of good licenses and is not yet known to rpmlint libHBAAPI.src: E: invalid-spec-name => package name and spec filename are not in sync libHBAAPI-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation => can be ignored - you can apply the "includes" patch supplied by the hbaapi_build archive instead of using an own copy --- Additional comment from jzeleny at redhat.com on 2009-03-31 05:42:35 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi-2.2-3.fc10.src.rpm --- Additional comment from dan at danny.cz on 2009-03-31 06:34:22 EDT --- - the hbaapi_build_2.2.tar.gz tarball differs between this package and upstream URL (length 674018 vs. 672470) - the %description for the main package could be more verbose --- Additional comment from dan at danny.cz on 2009-03-31 06:37:04 EDT --- link to the thread about the SNIA license on fedora-legal mailing list - https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-February/msg00033.html --- Additional comment from jzeleny at redhat.com on 2009-04-01 09:09:11 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi-2.2-4.fc10.src.rpm I added one line to the description. It's not much, but hopefully it's enough for now. --- Additional comment from dan at danny.cz on 2009-04-01 10:15:39 EDT --- All issues are fixed, this package is APPROVED. --- Additional comment from jzeleny at redhat.com on 2009-04-02 03:40:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libhbaapi Short Description: Package contains HBA API library. It will be used as a connector between FCoE Utilities and libhbalinux. Owners: jzeleny Branches: InitialCC: --- Additional comment from kevin at tummy.com on 2009-04-03 16:41:57 EDT --- I used "SNIA HBAAPI library" as the Short Description as that seems more correct. cvs done. --- Additional comment from pm-rhel at redhat.com on 2009-04-07 08:36:44 EDT --- This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:51:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071751.n37HpkFn020539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #9 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-07 13:51:45 EDT --- rjones. my personal suggestion is to request a upgrade to your Fedora Account (sponsor + provenpackager), so you can sponsor the people yourself. is very hard to get sponsored, and you're the guy, if you're become the guy with the power will be best :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:53:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:53:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071753.n37Hr2Uu017664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 453850 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453850 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-07 13:53:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > - Added comment documenting source Sorry, but I don't see the comment documenting the source. Am I missing something? Other than this, there are a few other things I'd like to clarify: * Why is this package not noarch? (The .pc file can go to /usr/share/pkgconfig) * The guidelines say: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Here, the license file is supplied separately. Is there a reason that we should grant an exception to this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:53:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494655] New: [Intel 6.0 FEAT] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Intel 6.0 FEAT] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494655 Summary: [Intel 6.0 FEAT] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Version: 6.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at redhat.com ReportedBy: jvillalo at redhat.com CC: notting at redhat.com, mchristi at redhat.com, syeghiay at redhat.com, pm-rhel at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 494653 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Clone Of: 494549 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #494549 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #489962 +++ SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhalinux/libhbalinux-1.0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhalinux/libhbalinux.spec This is HBAAPI vendor library to manage Fibre Channel Host Bus Adapters. Review request for libHBAAPI: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489929 --- Additional comment from jzeleny at redhat.com on 2009-04-03 09:23:38 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbalinux/libhbalinux.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbalinux/libhbalinux-1.0.7-3.fc10.src.rpm --- Additional comment from pm-rhel at redhat.com on 2009-04-07 08:46:53 EDT --- This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:57:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494655] [Intel 6.0 FEAT] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071757.n37Hv7CA018922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494655 John Villalovos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |494657 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:58:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494657] [Intel 6.0 FEAT] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071758.n37HwPMf019288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494657 John Villalovos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |494659 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:57:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494657] New: [Intel 6.0 FEAT] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Intel 6.0 FEAT] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494657 Summary: [Intel 6.0 FEAT] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Version: 6.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at redhat.com ReportedBy: jvillalo at redhat.com CC: notting at redhat.com, mchristi at redhat.com, pm-rhel at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, luyu at redhat.com, robert.w.love at intel.com, jane.lv at intel.com, jvillalo at redhat.com Blocks: 494655 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Clone Of: 489962 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #489962 +++ SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhalinux/libhbalinux-1.0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhalinux/libhbalinux.spec This is HBAAPI vendor library to manage Fibre Channel Host Bus Adapters. Review request for libHBAAPI: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489929 --- Additional comment from jzeleny at redhat.com on 2009-04-03 09:23:38 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbalinux/libhbalinux.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbalinux/libhbalinux-1.0.7-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 17:58:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:58:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494659] New: Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494659 Summary: Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Version: 6.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at redhat.com ReportedBy: jvillalo at redhat.com CC: notting at redhat.com, mchristi at redhat.com, pm-rhel at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, luyu at redhat.com, robert.w.love at intel.com, jane.lv at intel.com, jvillalo at redhat.com Blocks: 494657 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Clone Of: 489929 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #489929 +++ Spec URL: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi.spec SRPM URL: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libHBAAPI-2.2-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Package contains HBA API library, used as a wrapper for other vendor specific libraries. Package will be used as a connector between FCoE Utilities and libhalinux. --- Additional comment from dan at danny.cz on 2009-03-30 10:13:18 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: BAD source files match upstream: BAD package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK* rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK headers in -devel OK pkgconfig files in -devel OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - full URLs for Sources are missing - the %name tag should be all in lowercase to be consistent with archive name (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines) - it's preferred to have the Requires for the devel sub-package on separate lines - rpmlint complains a bit: libHBAAPI-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license SNIA libHBAAPI-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license SNIA libHBAAPI.src: W: invalid-license SNIA libHBAAPI.x86_64: W: invalid-license SNIA => SNIA license was recently added to the list of good licenses and is not yet known to rpmlint libHBAAPI.src: E: invalid-spec-name => package name and spec filename are not in sync libHBAAPI-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation => can be ignored - you can apply the "includes" patch supplied by the hbaapi_build archive instead of using an own copy --- Additional comment from jzeleny at redhat.com on 2009-03-31 05:42:35 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi-2.2-3.fc10.src.rpm --- Additional comment from dan at danny.cz on 2009-03-31 06:34:22 EDT --- - the hbaapi_build_2.2.tar.gz tarball differs between this package and upstream URL (length 674018 vs. 672470) - the %description for the main package could be more verbose --- Additional comment from dan at danny.cz on 2009-03-31 06:37:04 EDT --- link to the thread about the SNIA license on fedora-legal mailing list - https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-February/msg00033.html --- Additional comment from jzeleny at redhat.com on 2009-04-01 09:09:11 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi-2.2-4.fc10.src.rpm I added one line to the description. It's not much, but hopefully it's enough for now. --- Additional comment from dan at danny.cz on 2009-04-01 10:15:39 EDT --- All issues are fixed, this package is APPROVED. --- Additional comment from jzeleny at redhat.com on 2009-04-02 03:40:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libhbaapi Short Description: Package contains HBA API library. It will be used as a connector between FCoE Utilities and libhbalinux. Owners: jzeleny Branches: InitialCC: --- Additional comment from kevin at tummy.com on 2009-04-03 16:41:57 EDT --- I used "SNIA HBAAPI library" as the Short Description as that seems more correct. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 18:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494520] Review Request: cdf - The NASA Common Data Format implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071801.n37I1UwC023440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494520 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-07 14:01:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > So, at this point review may seem pointless. Jussi, are you going to talk to > them about the license? To me it seems that they didn't willingly make the > software non-free and that they may agree to relicensing under the terms of > 3-clause BSD or MIT license. Yeah, there's no point in doing the review if the license is not compatible. I contacted upstream about the license issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 18:03:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491027] Review Request: fb-contrib - Extra findbugs detectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071803.n37I395G021057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491027 --- Comment #4 from Jerry James 2009-04-07 14:03:08 EDT --- Okay, new URLs: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/findbugs-contrib/findbugs-contrib.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/findbugs-contrib/findbugs-contrib-3.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 18:02:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:02:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494655] [Intel 6.0 FEAT] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071802.n37I2mOT021012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494655 John Villalovos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 18:02:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494650] [Intel 6.0 FEAT] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071802.n37I2LP4020939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494650 John Villalovos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 18:00:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071800.n37I0qK5020465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-07 14:00:51 EDT --- Hmm, it works fine here (unprivileged): --------------------------------------------------------------- [orcan at desitter ~]$ jamin jamin 0.95.0 (C) 2003-2005 J. Depner, S. Harris, J. O'Quin, R. Parker and P. Shirkey This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; see the file COPYING for details. jackd 0.116.1 Copyright 2001-2005 Paul Davis and others. jackd comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; see the file COPYING for details JACK compiled with System V SHM support. loading driver .. apparent rate = 48000 creating alsa driver ... hw:0|hw:0|1024|2|48000|0|0|nomon|swmeter|-|32bit control device hw:0 configuring for 48000Hz, period = 1024 frames (21.3 ms), buffer = 2 periods ALSA: final selected sample format for capture: 16bit little-endian ALSA: use 2 periods for capture ALSA: final selected sample format for playback: 16bit little-endian ALSA: use 2 periods for playback jamin: JACK server started --------------------------------------------------------------- But it seems to me that you have problems starting your jack daemon. Can you start it via: jackd -R -P4 -dalsa -r44100 -p512 -D -Chw:0 -Phw:0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 18:03:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:03:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494659] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071803.n37I3HLa023883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494659 John Villalovos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 18:03:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494657] [Intel 6.0 FEAT] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071803.n37I30fJ023764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494657 John Villalovos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 18:05:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485617] Review Request: pygrace - Python bindings for grace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071805.n37I55Cf024384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485617 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-07 14:05:04 EDT --- Hmm, it seems I forgot to put the bug number in the update manager. The package has been in Fedora a long time, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 18:13:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071813.n37IDXVD026171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-07 14:13:33 EDT --- [spot at velociraptor ~]$ jackd -R -P4 -dalsa -r44100 -p512 -D -Chw:0 -Phw:0 jackd 0.116.1 Copyright 2001-2005 Paul Davis and others. jackd comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; see the file COPYING for details JACK compiled with System V SHM support. cannot use real-time scheduling (FIFO at priority 10) [for thread -99817744, from thread -99817744] (1: Operation not permitted) cannot create engine But! This is because I don't have jack configured properly with pulseaudio. Had I read "/usr/share/doc/jack-audio-connection-kit-0.116.1/README.Fedora" before, I would have known that. Just clean up the description and I'll approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 18:19:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:19:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071819.n37IJr0E025704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 --- Comment #7 from Fernando Lopez-Lezcano 2009-04-07 14:19:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Unpriviledged: > > [spot at velociraptor ~]$ jamin > jamin 0.95.0 > (C) 2003-2005 J. Depner, S. Harris, J. O'Quin, R. Parker and P. Shirkey > This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it > under certain conditions; see the file COPYING for details. > jackd 0.116.1 > Copyright 2001-2005 Paul Davis and others. > jackd comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY > This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it > under certain conditions; see the file COPYING for details > > JACK compiled with System V SHM support. > loading driver .. > creating alsa driver ... hw:0|hw:0|1024|2|48000|0|0|nomon|swmeter|-|32bit > control device hw:0 > control open "hw:0" (Permission denied) Most probably something is using hw:0 in your system (pulse). Jack is meant to use the hw:x direct interfaces to the soundcard, if something else is using it then jack cannot start. > ALSA lib pcm_hw.c:1429:(_snd_pcm_hw_open) Invalid value for card > ALSA lib pcm_hw.c:1429:(_snd_pcm_hw_open) Invalid value for card But this is also suspect, the default parameters might be wrong for your soundcard (although the permission denied message would imply that the device is busy - by the way, the one that is busy is the control device, not the pcm one). > ALSA: Cannot open PCM device alsa_pcm for playback. Falling back to > capture-only mode > cannot load driver module alsa > jamin: jack_client_open() failed, status = 0x11 > [spot at velociraptor ~]$ Jamin depends on jack running fine. This appears to be a problem starting jack in your system. Try to start jack first, and if that is successful then try jamin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 18:50:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071850.n37Iot20004274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #62 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-07 14:50:54 EDT --- Whoops, I changed the wrong flag, sorry Dominik :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 18:49:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:49:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071849.n37InrJa000798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #61 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-07 14:49:48 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gromacs New Branches: Owners: jussilehtola Updated Description: Fast, Free and Flexible Molecular Dynamics -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 18:53:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:53:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071853.n37IrYXd004887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-07 14:53:33 EDT --- Here's an update: Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jamin.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jamin-0.95.0-5.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.95.0-5 - Suppress double ./configure (in autogen.sh) - Clean up unnecessary BR's - Minor SPEC file update for macro consistency - Update description By the way, I don't have any undefined symbols for swh plugins on my F-10 box: [orcan at desitter ~]$ rpm -q ladspa-swh-plugins ladspa-swh-plugins-0.4.15-12.fc9.x86_64 [orcan at desitter ~]$ ldd -r `rpm -ql ladspa-swh-plugins|grep so$` |grep ymbo [orcan at desitter ~]$ Was there something wrong with your setup? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 18:58:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:58:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071858.n37Iwxf8003347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-07 14:58:59 EDT --- I see that there are arch dependent non-binary files. Then, why are they going to %{_datadir} instead of %{_libdir}? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 19:13:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071913.n37JDA1v007230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-07 15:13:09 EDT --- No, they were definitely missing symbols in rawhide. I only noticed it when jamin tried to dlopen them. Gentoo had a fix for the issue, so I just applied it and it went away. I also fixed the optflags while I was in there. Your package looks good, APPROVED. Wanna take a crack at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 ? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 19:12:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:12:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071912.n37JCnr7007179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 Bug 454022 depends on bug 454018, which changed state. Bug 454018 Summary: Review Request: tcl-tkpng - Tcl/Tk support for PNG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454018 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 454022 depends on bug 454008, which changed state. Bug 454008 Summary: Review Request: iax - Implementation of Inter-Asterisk eXchange protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454008 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 454022 depends on bug 454010, which changed state. Bug 454010 Summary: Review Request: iaxclient - Library for creating telephony solutions that interoperate with Asterisk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454010 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-07 15:12:48 EDT --- New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/coccinella-0.96.10-3.fc11.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/coccinella.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 19:14:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:14:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071914.n37JEWKV007651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #22 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-07 15:14:31 EDT --- please open a new review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754#c8 I would like to do this review, if you don't object... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 19:17:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071917.n37JHduQ011670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 --- Comment #6 from Jerry James 2009-04-07 15:17:38 EDT --- Bummer that they modified X-Symbol without pushing their modifications upstream. Do you have any idea what they did to it? Maybe there is some way we can keep the namespace from getting polluted if their changes are localized. If nobody beats me to mmm, I'll try to get to it tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 19:18:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071918.n37JIUmN011792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-07 15:18:29 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=338581) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=338581) Patch to compile 1.4.1 with g++ 4.4 Some notes for 1.4.1-1: * Licensing - Now also files under src/plugins_3rdparty/script_debuger/src/qtscriptdebug/ are under GPLv2 (not under GPLv2+). (The license tag is still okay with "GPLv2+ and GPLv2") * build failure - Actually your srpm does not build. ! On Fedora Qt4 "qmake" is renamed to %_bindir/qmake-qt4 (or you can use %_qt4_bindir macro, which is /usr/lib/qt4/bin/qmake on i586) and Qt4 "lrelease" is renamed to %_bindir/lrelease-qt4. So you have to modify src/qtranslate.cmd, otherwise as I said before trying to launch ugene causes: ------------------------------------------------------- Translation not found: transl_ja_JP Translation not found: transl_en No translations found, exiting -------------------------------------------------------- Currently (after changing "qmake" to "qmake-qt4") build.log says: -------------------------------------------------------- 42 + qmake-qt4 -r INSTALL_BINDIR=/usr/bin INSTALL_LIBDIR=/usr/lib INSTALL_DATADIR=/usr/share INSTALL_MANDIR=/usr/share/man 43 ./qtranslate.cmd: line 1: lrelease: command not found 44 ./qtranslate.cmd: line 2: lrelease: command not found 45 cp: cannot stat `_debug/transl_en.qm': No such file or directory 46 cp: cannot stat `_debug/transl_ru.qm': No such file or directory -------------------------------------------------------- ! And the attached patch is needed for g++ 4.4 . * Desktop file - Installed desktop file must be treated by "desktop-file-install" or so: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files * Use of glob in %files - %files entry -------------------------------------------------------- %files %{_libdir}/* -------------------------------------------------------- is not acceptable - Because find-debuginfo.sh installs files for debugging into /usr/lib/debug (on i586) and %_libdir/* contains this directory. So some debuginfo files are also installed in ugene binary rpms, not only ugene-debuginfo rpm. This must be changed to %{_libdir}/ugene or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 19:23:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:23:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071923.n37JNRZW010015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #23 from Javier Palacios 2009-04-07 15:23:26 EDT --- Sorry, I'been quite busy for a few weeks, and had tons of email without opening. I have no problem with Ruben taking up the package, although I personally don't like to use macros for obvious commands. The reason that actually did stopped this review was basically the one from comment 8 from Ralf Corsepius, as well as comment 9. That two lines patch was intended to clean the circular dependency on debmirror.conf, exactly the same that Ruben cleaned with the block starting at # filter file dependency on debmirror.conf If the patch (which I believe much cleaner) is not acceptable, I don't see why this other way is. (just in case, the patch only prevents debmirror.conf to be detected as dependency, and if the file is there it is still read) Regarding the current developement, it is basically dead. According to debian information pages, the current maintainer of the package is Goswin von Brederlow, also listed as current author, but the email does not currently work. So there is no chance on including the patch in upstream version, as suggested on comment 13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 19:29:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:29:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071929.n37JT3Ul014249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-07 15:29:02 EDT --- Thanks spot. Sure. I'll do that next. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jamin Short Description: JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface Owners: oget nando Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 19:40:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:40:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494695] New: Review Request: qutIM - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qutIM - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 Summary: Review Request: qutIM - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/qutIM/qutIM.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/qutIM/qutIM-0.2-0.11.alphaSVN20080404.fc9.src.rpm Description: qutIM - free open-source multiprotocol ( ICQ, Jabber/GTalk/Ya.Online/LiveJournal.com, Mail.Ru, IRC ) instant messenger for Windows and Linux systems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 19:38:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494693] New: Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 Summary: Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/gloox/gloox.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/gloox/gloox-1.0-0.4.SVNr4003.fc9.src.rpm Description: gloox is a rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library, written in C++. It makes writing spec-compliant clients easy and allows for hassle-free integration of Jabber/XMPP functionality into existing applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 19:42:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:42:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutIM - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071942.n37Jg2pW014550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |494693 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 19:42:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:42:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071942.n37Jg2uW014573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |494695 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 19:45:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:45:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494238] Review Request: pyrrd - A Pure Python Wrapper for RRDTool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071945.n37JjFQF018225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494238 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 15:45:15 EDT --- pyrrd-0.0.7-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pyrrd-0.0.7-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 19:45:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:45:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494238] Review Request: pyrrd - A Pure Python Wrapper for RRDTool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071945.n37JjAG1018110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494238 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 15:45:10 EDT --- pyrrd-0.0.7-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pyrrd-0.0.7-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 19:52:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487067] Review Request: autopsy - Graphical front end for The Sleuth Kit Forensics software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071952.n37JqQtE016966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487067 --- Comment #5 from Adam Miller 2009-04-07 15:52:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/autopsy.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/autopsy-2.21-3.fc10.src.rpm I have fixed the -p and added the scripts to fix the requires/provides issue. Thank you for your comments, looking forward to more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 20:00:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:00:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904072000.n37K0xps019026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 --- Comment #3 from Armin 2009-04-07 16:00:59 EDT --- Yes, this package meets all the criteria. builds just fine in koji and no rpmlint errors. Good job. I will ask rdieter to double check it (since it's my first time), but I would approve it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 20:18:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:18:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904072018.n37KIT9L026466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2009-04-07 16:18:29 EDT --- > I won't mention the things that are okay. In many cases, it is worth mentioning, esp some important ones like mentioning licensing checks/audits, source checksums, scriptlets, rpmlint output... Otherwise nucleo is right (wrt locales), but for buildroot consistency, use the same buildroot reference, ie, dont' use ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} in one place and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in another. Otherwise, looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 20:30:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:30:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904072030.n37KU8Tm027191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-07 16:30:07 EDT --- spot, could you update to the latest version, so I can do the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 20:42:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:42:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904072042.n37KgqvS030055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #51 from David Halik 2009-04-07 16:42:47 EDT --- The buffer overflow is patched. src.rpm and spec have been updated and tested. 1.1.1 works nicely in F11 now. http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird.spec http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird-1.1.1-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 20:53:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904072053.n37Krm03002979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #24 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-07 16:53:48 EDT --- mh, debmirror isn't the ultimate debian mirror solution, i think the handling of debmirror is to laborious, compared with apt-mirror and i never was a fan of debmirror. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 21:24:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 17:24:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904072124.n37LO8Cw006724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 --- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-07 17:24:07 EDT --- Koji build successful https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1282986 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 21:19:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 17:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904072119.n37LJhjc005835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 --- Comment #5 from nucleo 2009-04-07 17:19:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. (see line 34 and 38, > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ond ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} (In reply to comment #4) > but for buildroot consistency, use the > same buildroot reference, ie, dont' use ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} in one place and > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in another. - fixed Build Root New Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/kcometen4/kcometen4.spec New SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/kcometen4/kcometen4-1.0.4-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 21:32:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 17:32:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904072132.n37LWasO011377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 --- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-07 17:32:35 EDT --- Whoops. Here's the latest: New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/coccinella-0.96.12-1.fc11.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/coccinella.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 21:51:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 17:51:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] New: Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 Summary: Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnote.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnote-0.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Gnote is a desktop note-taking application which is simple and easy to use. It lets you organise your notes intelligently by allowing you to easily link ideas together with Wiki style interconnects. It is a port of Tomboy to C++ and consumes less resources rpmlint throws up: gnote.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/gnote gnote.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnote.schemas First one, I welcome help in fixing it. Second warning should just be ignored. Do review the gconf schemas related post/pre scripts to make sure I got it right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 22:01:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:01:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutIM - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904072201.n37M1fD8017036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |qutIM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 22:01:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904072201.n37M1j8F017062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2009-04-07 18:01:45 EDT --- You seem to be missing a %pre script for the schemas, but %post/%postun look fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 22:10:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904072210.n37MAqiT019099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #25 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-04-07 18:10:51 EDT --- Simon, why should I open a new review request? There are valuable comments in this one I'd like to take into consideration. I agree that debmirror isn't the ultimate solution, but apt-mirror doesn't seem to be well maintained either. Javier, I'm not sure what your original patch did, the srpm linked to above gives a 404. I don't want to remove the config file from the package, just filter out the dependency which is added rpm because the config file is perl code. I'm aware of the fact that you can't override the values in the config file with command-line arguments (which Cobbler needs) but will have a look at writing a patch for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 22:31:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904072231.n37MVUVs019694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #26 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-07 18:31:29 EDT --- Ruben, ok reopen it again, it's no bother (for me). Both projects are completed. There is no feature missing (for me). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 22:37:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:37:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904072237.n37Mbsif023899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 --- Comment #2 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-04-07 18:37:54 EDT --- Included the %pre section as per guidelines. The binary was not stripped earlier because I hadn't installed redhat-rpm-config. A local issue resolved thanks to the tip from hadess. http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnote.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnote-0.1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm This one should be good to go, now. Please review. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 22:50:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904072250.n37Mo7i9022999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Blocks|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #27 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-04-07 18:50:06 EDT --- Thanks. I had a look at the debian bugtracker and although there are quite a few bugs open the maintainer seems to respond to them. He has another email address though (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=debmirror) I've added a manpage and a few Requires for things like rsync which debmirror uses. New version here: SPEC: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/debmirror.spec SRPM: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/debmirror-20070123-6.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 22:52:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904072252.n37Mqcau023412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #28 from Javier Palacios 2009-04-07 18:52:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > Javier, I'm not sure what your original patch did, the srpm linked to above > gives a 404. I don't want to remove the config file from the package, just > filter out the dependency which is added rpm because the config file is perl > code. I'm aware of the fact that you can't override the values in the config > file with command-line arguments (which Cobbler needs) but will have a look at > writing a patch for that. I made some changes, but didn't reflect the url because considering the package rejected. They are at http://www.freewebs.com/javiplx/Fedora/debmirror/ The patch didn't remove anything, although in the first package release the configuration was not included in the package because it interferes more than help with usage from within cobbler. The patch only replaces a couple of 'require' with 'use', which are not considered by standard perl dependencies search code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 23:11:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904072311.n37NBmKT026853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #29 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-07 19:11:48 EDT --- oh, you looked into the rules and the control, finally that did someone :-) I already missed the Requirements and the manpage :-) just 3 questions: 1.) Why your release jumps from -2 to -5? 2.) Don't you think the URL should be http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/debmirror.html A little content with a little bit design around is more attractive, than a directory listing is not a good URL. 3.) Why are you not using the name macro instead of the name in the whole specfile? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 23:22:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904072322.n37NMKiI031816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 --- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-07 19:22:20 EDT --- OK. Here's my review. There are some issues but most of them are very trivial. * The new guidelines prefer usage of %global instead of %define. But I don't think these lines are needed by this package anyways: %{!?tcl_version: %define tcl_version %(echo 'puts $tcl_version' | tclsh)} %{!?tcl_sitearch: %define tcl_sitearch %{_libdir}/tcl%{tcl_version}} They are not used. - the rpmlint "coccinella.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency tcl-zlib" can be ignored since this package really needs this explicit dependency. * Group: System Environment/Libraries is wrong. Should this be Applications/Internet ? * I believe that AUTHORS.txt should go to %doc. ? Should docs/ really go to %doc? I don't know what those files are for. * There are many files under contrib/ directory that are marked BSD and they end up in the final package. Hence, the package is GPLv3 and BSD. * rpm -qplv coccinella-0.96.12-1.fc11.noarch.rpm |grep -- "-rwxr-xr-x" shows a large amount of png, wav, ico and gif files with wrong executable permissions. I wonder why rpmlint doesn't complain. * Please swap the occurrence of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT with %{buildroot} for macro consistency. ! desktop-file-validate on the .desktop file complains: coccinella.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated ! Also please add a Comment=something to the .desktop file to please the gnome users. ! You can use themes/Oxygen/icons/128x128/coccinella.png as the application pixmap for better quality. ? About the software: - Info->Update Check shows wrong version. No big deal though. - Info->About Coccinella says "Looking for Img..." but it did not find it yet on my computer. No biggie either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 23:24:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:24:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904072324.n37NOOgZ028926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-07 19:24:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > - Added comment documenting source > > Sorry, but I don't see the comment documenting the source. Am I missing > something? Sorry for the confusion. I updated all the globus packages at the same time and pasted the same entry in the bugzilla comment for all of them (which was the right one for 28 of 30 packages). Since the source for this package is not extracted from upstream like for the other packages, the comment added to the other packages (which tells how the source was extracted from upstream) does not apply to this package - so I did not add that comment to this package. I will add a different comment to this package explaining what the source file is and why there is no upstream source for this package. > Other than this, there are a few other things I'd like to clarify: > > * Why is this package not noarch? (The .pc file can go to /usr/shar/pkgconfig) The content of the package differs for different architectures. (I guess you realised that based on your comment 5.) > * The guidelines say: > If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in > its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the > package must be included in %doc. > > Here, the license file is supplied separately. Is there a reason that we should > grant an exception to this package? I should just drop the license file. The argument I had for including it was quite weak, and not really convincing, so I will not bother you with it. (In reply to comment #5) > I see that there are arch dependent non-binary files. Then, why are they going > to %{_datadir} instead of %{_libdir}? The files in /usr/share/globus/packages are GPT metadata files. GPT expects all metadata files to be in the same directory. GPT supports installing packages from different architectures in parallel by using different filenames for different architectures for architecture dependent metadata, so there are no filename conflicts for a multi-arch installation. Even though the metadata describes architecture dependent information, the metadata itself is architecture independent. A query on the metadata can return information about multiple architectures on a multi-arch installation. An updated specfile is available here: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-openssl.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 23:56:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:56:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490399] (Rename) Review Request: WebKitGTK - GTK+ Web content engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904072356.n37NuERL001671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490399 --- Comment #7 from Peter Gordon 2009-04-07 19:56:13 EDT --- Hi, Kevin - and thanks for the review. > 1. I'm a bit confused by what package name we should use here. > > domain: webkitgtk.org > content on website: WebKitGTK+ > link to source on website: WebKitGTK+ > tar file downloaded: webkit-1.1.3.tar.gz > > So, the choices seem to be 'WebKitGTK+', 'webkit', 'webkitgtk'. > Can you please ask upstream what the desired package name should be? > Along with what case? ;) As Xan suggested earlier, I've changed this to simply 'webkitgtk'. > 2. Weird license issue: > > JavaScriptCore/runtime/DateMath.h has a odd multilicense. > I am assuming we are distributing it under LGPLv2+. Should we delete the > MPL parts as it suggests? Or do we care? My understanding is that we _are_ distributing it under LGPLv2+, but I leave the other clauses in there so that it is still feasible to re-use that code under the MPL/GPL's terms, since we're merely redistributing a pristine copy of the upstream tarball (and not changing anything in it). > 3. A few items from the build.log: > > checking whether to enable geolocation support... no > checking whether to enable WML support... no > checking whether to enable support for SVG filters... no > checking whether to enable code coverage support... no > SVG and WML support are included as build-time condtionals (`--with svg' and `--with wml', respectively). I've also added the code coverage support as a build conditional in 1.1.4-1 (`--with coverage') and enabled the geolocation support by default, following upstream's configure script settings. The new SRPM and spec file are on my webspace: SRPM: http://projects.thecodergeek.com/for-review/webkitgtk-1.1.4-1.src.rpm Spec: http://projects.thecodergeek.com/for-review/webkitgtk.spec Thanks again! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 00:05:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 20:05:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080005.n3805oW3006923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 --- Comment #17 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-07 20:05:49 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=96832 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 00:05:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 20:05:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080005.n38056Cs006706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 Armin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Armin 2009-04-07 20:05:05 EDT --- Approved. Waiting to install this kss :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 00:19:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 20:19:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080019.n380J7rk006030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-07 20:19:07 EDT --- Wait a little, I'm going to review this now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 00:53:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 20:53:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080053.n380rqej015698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-07 20:53:52 EDT --- OK, here are my comments, notes, questions etc. - rpmlints globus-openssl.x86_64: E: no-binary globus-openssl-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation globus-openssl-progs.x86_64: W: no-documentation can be ignored. ? Where does the version number come from? and why is the release number 0.x? * The license seems to be just ASL 2.0. Is there any non-trivial differences? If not, please use ASL 2.0: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses ! No need to BR: pkgconfig on the main package. It will be picked up by openssl-devel. ! No need to Requires: openssl on the progs subpackage since it already requires the main package which requires openssl. ! No need to Requires: zlib-devel and pkgconfig on the devel subpackage since openssl-devel will pull them up. * The new guidelines suggest that %global should be preferred over %define ! Could you collect all your "%global"s at one place? ! Please make the descriptions span 80 columns ? Why are you packaging the .filelist files? ? Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. /usr/share/globus and /usr/share/globus/packages is already owned by globus-core. Shouldn't you just put globus-core as a requirement to this package? Is this package useful without globus-core? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 01:05:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 21:05:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080105.n3815LV2018124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-07 21:05:20 EDT --- REVIEW for d7b9eb994e87725741b728a686490131 gnote-0.1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package: rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/gnote-* gnote.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnote.schemas 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. (GPLv3+) OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5 2a2578cc69df41bdb07c3d754c5593e6 OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. FAIL - MUST: Not all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires: dbus-devel and desktop-file-utils are missing N/A - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. FAIL - MUST: The packages owns files or directories already owned by other packages: %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/ OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. FAIL - SHOULD: The the package does not build in mock due to the missing BuildRequires mentioned above. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. OK - SHOULD: Scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Issues: - %files: you are owning all the apps folders inside %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor - BuildRequires: missing dbus-devel and desktop-file-utils - Requires: desktop-file-utils is not a requirement but a BuildReqiures - Requires: gtkmm24 is not necessary since gnote already requires libgdkmm-2.4.so.1 which is provided by that package - Gconf2 is missing for the scriptles: Requires(pre): GConf2 Requires(post): GConf2 Requires(preun): GConf2 Notes: - BuildRequires: libxml2-devel is pretty redundant since it is already required by libxml++-devel GConf2-devel and a lot more. - Consider using wildcards: %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/gnote.png - Desktop file: remove --vendor="" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 01:15:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 21:15:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080115.n381FIPM016728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #21 from Feng Yu 2009-04-07 21:15:16 EDT --- Thanks Christ. I've made a snapshot package (20080407svn2482) with the updated spec file at http://rainwoodman.dreamhosters.com/fedora-review/ With the changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 01:16:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 21:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080116.n381GbVt016985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-07 21:16:35 EDT --- How about adding gnote to the autostart? mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_sysconfdir}/autostart desktop-file-install \ --dir=%{buildroot}/%{_sysconfdir}/autostart \ data/gnote.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 01:18:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 21:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080118.n381I6DZ020520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-07 21:18:06 EDT --- Oops, needs to be %{buildroot}/%{_sysconfdir}/xdg/autostart of course -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 01:24:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 21:24:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080124.n381OpSL021898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #22 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-07 21:24:50 EDT --- Why a snapshot? Does it have any advantage over the stable version? IMO snapshots should be avoided in the stable Fedora releases. Any if you use a snapshot, the package version is wrong. Please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 01:36:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 21:36:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080136.n381a96Q024088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #23 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-07 21:36:08 EDT --- The tag license is still not correct, it's still GPLv3, but you said it's GPL2. Is it GPLv2 only or GPLv2 or later? Also libpanelapplet-2.0.vapi is LGPL 2.1. This would result in "LGPLv2 and GPLv2" as license tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 01:41:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 21:41:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080141.n381fLPc025096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #24 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-07 21:41:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > Thanks Christ. I'm not Jesus, just Christoph is ok ;) Please also change that in %changelog, because "suggested by Chirst" sounds a little funny. Regarding the snapshot: It's ok for me, I trust you as upstream. Do you think 0.7.5 will be released before F11 goes public? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:18:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080218.n382IGxA029111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-07 22:18:15 EDT --- Additionally, ! I suggest you to use macros such as %{_sbindir} and %{_datadir}, instead of the hardcoded /usr/sbin and /usr/share -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456242] Review Request: gavl - A library for handling uncompressed audio and video data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080231.n382VtAJ032549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456242 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-07 22:31:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:37:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:37:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080237.n382b8ak001372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #63 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-07 22:37:07 EDT --- you want to update the description on the devel branch only? I think description gets updated from the package, but not sure how often or when. I can check on that if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:39:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492831] Review Request: libmkv - An alternative to the official libmatroska library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080239.n382djfu005218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492831 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-07 22:39:44 EDT --- libmkv-0.6.3.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmkv-0.6.3.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:41:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:41:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491884] Review Request: atasm - 6502 cross-assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080241.n382fi7j006025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491884 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-07 22:41:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:38:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:38:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481159] Review Request: ocaml-autoconf - Autoconf macros for OCaml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080238.n382cJPv004985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481159 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-07 22:38:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:39:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:39:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080239.n382dml7005260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-07 22:39:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:40:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:40:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491805] Review Request: django-sct - A collection of Django applications for building community websites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080240.n382epEL005867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491805 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-07 22:40:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:47:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:47:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494339] Review Request: hyphen-hi - Hindi hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080247.n382lo7u004025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494339 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-07 22:47:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:46:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493530] Review Request: perl-Data-Dumper-Names - Data::Dumper::Names module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080246.n382kgYk003851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493530 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-07 22:46:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:45:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492122] Review Request: mingw32-cairomm - MinGW Windows C++ API for the cairo graphics library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080245.n382jVT2003564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492122 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-07 22:45:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:49:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494494] Review Request: hyphen-kn - Kannada hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080249.n382n3sP007598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494494 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-07 22:49:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:48:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494493] Review Request: hyphen-gu - Gujarati hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080248.n382mLQ8007489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494493 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-07 22:48:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:51:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:51:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494499] Review Request: hyphen-ta - Tamil hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080251.n382pwCJ005203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494499 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-07 22:51:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:50:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494497] Review Request: hyphen-or - Oriya hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080250.n382o8S2004750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494497 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-07 22:50:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:51:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:51:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494498] Review Request: hyphen-pa - Punjabi hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080251.n382pJTf005076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494498 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-07 22:51:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:49:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494495] Review Request: hyphen-ml - Malayalam hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080249.n382nSZU004278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494495 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-07 22:49:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:52:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494501] Review Request: hyphen-te - Telugu hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080252.n382qPe1005283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494501 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-07 22:52:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:56:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:56:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494586] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Any - Retrieve terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080256.n382ulAo009520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494586 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-07 22:56:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:53:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:53:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494503] Review Request: hyphen-sa - Sanskrit hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080253.n382r4WM008593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494503 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-07 22:53:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 02:57:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494588] Review Request: perl-Hash-Flatten - Flatten/unflatten complex data hashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080257.n382vd8C009731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494588 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-07 22:57:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 03:03:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 23:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080303.n3833Gdl007462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #25 from Feng Yu 2009-04-07 23:03:14 EDT --- COPYING now contains a copy of GPLv2. The spec file now states LGPL2 + GPL2. new src.rpm is 20080407svn2487 I came up with the new snapshot name from that page. Post-release is %{X}.YYYYMMDDsvn#### Pre-release is 0.%{X}.YYYYMMDDsvn#### Since I am still using 0.7.4 as package version this snapshot should be a post release? Did I get anything wrong? When is the release date of F11? The blockers for a 0.7.5 release are already cleared. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 03:11:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 23:11:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080311.n383Bfo6012702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Clasen 2009-04-07 23:11:40 EDT --- I don't think installing the package should autostart the application. That might make sense in some cases, but this is not one of them... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 03:19:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 23:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080319.n383JkeQ013936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #19 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-07 23:19:45 EDT --- There is a file conflict between globus-common-progs and grid-packaging-tools. The file /usr/share/globus/config.guess exists in both packages. This must be sorted out. Is this file really needed in any of these packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 04:12:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 00:12:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080412.n384CkxG020386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-08 00:12:46 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 04:11:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 00:11:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491240] Review Request: dropwatch - monitor for dropped network packets in the kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080411.n384BqLT020303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491240 --- Comment #17 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-08 00:11:52 EDT --- If this is built for all requested branches then can we have this closed now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 04:21:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 00:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080421.n384Lroq021869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-08 00:21:53 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 04:47:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 00:47:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467235] Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080447.n384lgms026182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 467235 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 467235 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 467235 depends on bug 453849, which changed state. Bug 453849 Summary: Review Request: globus-libtool - Globus Toolkit - Globus libtool package (virtual GPT glue package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453849 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 467235 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-08 00:47:41 EDT --- Here are my comments for this package. Please note that the bug that I pointed in bug 453851#c19 needs fixed in order to build this package in koji. - rpmlint "globus-callout-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation" can be ignored. ? Where does the version number come from? I don't see it in the sources. And why is the release number 0.x ? ! Please move the explanation of Source8 to where you define Source8. * The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc if (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file. The original source tree does not contain the license file in the callout/source/ folder, so Source9 should be left out. ? Should the license be ASL 2.0? The source files say they are ASL 2.0 on their headers. * Description needs to be descriptive. What is a callout library? * The new guidelines suggest that %global should be preferred over %define ! Could you collect all your "%global"s at one place? ! Please make the descriptions span 80 columns ? Why are you packaging the .filelist files? * Fedora specific compiler flags are not honored in the linking phase. At the least, "-g -Wall" needs passed. * The doc package is fairly small. Why don't you put this documentation in the devel subpackage? ! Please replace /usr/share with %{_datadir} ! Please explain the non-trivial things you do in the SPEC file with comments. Why do you remove those files in %build? Why are those sed's for? etc * On the main package: Requires: globus-libtool >= 1 BuildRequires: globus-libtool-devel >= 1 BuildRequires: globus-core >= 4 , on the devel subpackage: Requires: globus-libtool-devel >= 1 Requires: globus-core >= 4 Requires: pkgconfig are redundant. They will be picked up by other dependencies. ! If what you want to do is to erase lines, you can replace for l in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/globus/packages/%{_name}/*.filelist ; do grep -v 'lib.*\.la$' < $l > $l.new mv $l.new $l done with sed -i '/lib.*\.la$/d' \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/globus/packages/%{_name}/*.filelist to make the code simpler. Similarly for the .a files. Also, the multiple instances of cat some_file |sed s!some!expression! > new_file mv new_file some_file can be replaced by sed -i -e s!some!expression! \ -e s!other!expression! \ -e s!yetanother!expression! \ some_file These changes would shorten your SPEC file quite a bit. Again, explaining these things in the SPEC file as comments would be a great bonus for reviewers and other packagers who check your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 05:12:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 01:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080512.n385CiOs030143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 --- Comment #13 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-08 01:12:44 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase-1.1.0.20090406-1.fc11.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 05:28:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 01:28:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080528.n385S9I4032720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #16 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-08 01:28:08 EDT --- Fixed installation of python files. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems-1.1.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 05:35:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 01:35:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080535.n385ZgBo004834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #17 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-08 01:35:42 EDT --- Koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1284465 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 05:42:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 01:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080542.n385gEZ8002917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-08 01:42:13 EDT --- jamin-0.95.0-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jamin-0.95.0-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 05:42:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 01:42:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080542.n385gs0m002988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-08 01:42:54 EDT --- jamin-0.95.0-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jamin-0.95.0-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 05:58:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 01:58:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458440] Review Request: bluemindo - Simple audio player in python/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080558.n385w68h005226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458440 --- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-08 01:58:05 EDT --- Is this review dead? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 05:58:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 01:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080558.n385wfm9008293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 --- Comment #21 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-08 01:58:39 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 05:58:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 01:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479515] Review Request: Music Organizer - Music Organizer , organize your mp3, ogg, flac and mp4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080558.n385wk5e008322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479515 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-08 01:58:46 EDT --- Is this review dead? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 05:58:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 01:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080558.n385wCqZ008232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 --- Comment #19 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-08 01:58:11 EDT --- Is this review dead? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 06:07:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 02:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080607.n3867S5T006962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #14 from Zarko 2009-04-08 02:07:28 EDT --- bump! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 06:07:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 02:07:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080607.n3867kY7007002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 --- Comment #4 from Zarko 2009-04-08 02:07:46 EDT --- bump! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 06:08:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 02:08:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080608.n3868d5e007121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 --- Comment #1 from Zarko 2009-04-08 02:08:39 EDT --- bump! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 06:11:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 02:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080611.n386BMUx010887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 --- Comment #1 from Zarko 2009-04-08 02:11:22 EDT --- bump -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 06:17:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 02:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080617.n386HddW008867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #18 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-04-08 02:17:39 EDT --- My review is still not complete, but rpmlint shows these errors/warnings. At least problems with my comments should be fixed. sems-conf_auth.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib sems-conf_auth.i386: E: zero-length /etc/sems/etc/conf_auth.conf - try to add at least some comments to this file. An link to documentation can be useful for users. sems-gateway.i386: W: no-documentation sems-gsm.i386: W: no-documentation sems-ivr.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/sems/plug-in/log.py - please, consider, if this file should be executed directly or only included from other python script. For first situation add shebang, for second remove execute flag from this script. sems-mailbox.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib sems-pin_collect.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib sems-python.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/sems/plug-in/py_sems_log.py - same problem as above. sems-speex.i386: W: no-documentation sems.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 173, tab: line 1) - fix this sems.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: sems--openser_enable.diff - I think you can remove this patch, but if you need it for possible further usage, it's only a warning. Which version of openser is needed to use sems without this patch? Current fedora package is enough? 12 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 8 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 06:18:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 02:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080618.n386IFj6012075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 Jan ONDREJ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 06:20:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 02:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080620.n386KT2B009449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 nucleo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from nucleo 2009-04-08 02:20:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Approved. Waiting to install this kss :) Thank you for review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kcometen4 Short Description: An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 Owners: nucleo Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 07:04:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:04:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489117] Review Request: tulrich-tuffy-fonts - Generic sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080704.n3874L9w021092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489117 Felix Schwarz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Felix Schwarz 2009-04-08 03:04:20 EDT --- Package built successfully: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=97005 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 07:03:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:03:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080703.n3873rPr021038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #26 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-08 03:03:52 EDT --- Well, this is not post-release of 0.7.4 but actually a pre-relaease of 0.7.5. So the correct naming for Fedora would be: 0.7.5-0.1.20080407svn2487 A new release based on the same snapshot would become 0.7.5-0.2.20080407svn2487 and so on, the 0 as release number must be kept to indicate it's a pre-release. 0.7.5 final would become a normal 0.7.5-1 again. Fedora 11 will be released on May 26th, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Schedule -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 07:11:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080711.n387BHHB022812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-08 03:11:17 EDT --- Why not? The application resides in the tray normally and IMO tray apps should be autostarted. But I leave this up to Rahul. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 07:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:08:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080708.n3878gNr022107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #64 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-08 03:08:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #63) > you want to update the description on the devel branch only? > > I think description gets updated from the package, but not sure how often or > when. > I can check on that if you like. Yeah, I think devel is enough, since IIUC the only place the pkgdb description is visible is pkgdb itself? OK, and Bugzilla. In any case, yum shows the info from the rpms, so for a user there's no difference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 07:18:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080718.n387IEba021280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-08 03:18:13 EDT --- chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 07:20:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492122] Review Request: mingw32-cairomm - MinGW Windows C++ API for the cairo graphics library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080720.n387KSMr024869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492122 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-08 03:20:27 EDT --- mingw32-cairomm-1.6.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-cairomm-1.6.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 07:19:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080719.n387JaWT024332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-08 03:19:36 EDT --- chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 07:40:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080740.n387e8NU028920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 --- Comment #14 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-08 03:40:07 EDT --- Proposed fix of lib64: Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase-1.1.0.20090406-2.fc11.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 08:03:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 04:03:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - KVIrc is a free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080803.n3883IZg031494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-04-08 04:03:17 EDT --- Now everything seems fine. Here is the review: + rpmlint output without serious errors: kvirc.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/kvirc/4.0/modules/caps/tool/sharedfilewindow kvirc.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/kvirc/4.0/modules/caps/tool/iograph kvirc.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/kvirc/4.0/modules/caps/tool/filetransferwindow kvirc.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/kvirc/4.0/modules/caps/tool/logview kvirc.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/kvirc/4.0/modules/caps/action/url 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 0 warnings. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + File, containing the text of the licenses for the package is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source. + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture (x86_64). + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + Spec file handles locales properly (%find_lang doesn't work here). + Package call ldconfig in %post and %postun. + The package does not designed to be relocatable. + A package owns all directories that it creates. + A package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissable content. + Does not contain large documentation files. + Includes only doc files in %doc. + No headers. + No static libraries. + The package does not contain pkgconfig(.pc) files. + If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. + No devel packages. + The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. + Includes %{name}.desktop file. Properly installed with desktop-file-install. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. + All filenames in the package are valid UTF-8. + Package builds in mock. + Package functions as described even with QT 4.5. + Scriptlets are sane. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 08:06:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 04:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494503] Review Request: hyphen-sa - Sanskrit hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080806.n3886UdD002442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494503 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 08:04:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 04:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080804.n3884WUY031802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 --- Comment #15 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-08 04:04:31 EDT --- %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ibus-table-extraphrase.pc It should be under _datadir like we did for ibus-table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 08:11:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 04:11:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494501] Review Request: hyphen-te - Telugu hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080811.n388BuPa001712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494501 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 08:19:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 04:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494499] Review Request: hyphen-ta - Tamil hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080819.n388J0pp003432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494499 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 08:22:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 04:22:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494498] Review Request: hyphen-pa - Punjabi hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080822.n388MHR3004614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494498 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 08:31:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 04:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491884] Review Request: atasm - 6502 cross-assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080831.n388VLVD009220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491884 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-08 04:31:21 EDT --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 08:32:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 04:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494497] Review Request: hyphen-or - Oriya hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080832.n388WhTc007676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494497 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 08:31:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 04:31:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491886] Review Request: xa - 6502/65816 cross-assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080831.n388VvjC007499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491886 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: xa - |Review Request: xa - |6502/65816 cross assembler |6502/65816 cross-assembler -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 08:33:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 04:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494495] Review Request: hyphen-ml - Malayalam hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080833.n388XAnb009726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494495 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 08:37:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 04:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494494] Review Request: hyphen-kn - Kannada hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080837.n388bq6L009089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494494 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 08:41:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 04:41:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494493] Review Request: hyphen-gu - Gujarati hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080841.n388fv6A010356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494493 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 08:47:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 04:47:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492969] Review Request: lv2dynparam - LV2 dynamic parameters extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080847.n388lVoB012051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492969 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-08 04:47:30 EDT --- I tried to make a mock build on Fedora 10 of this package. It fails for both i386 and x86_64 with the following error during configure: configure: error: The pkg-config script could not be found or is too old. Make sure it is in your PATH or set the PKG_CONFIG environment variable to the full path to pkg-config. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables LV2_CFLAGS and LV2_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. To get pkg-config, see . See `config.log' for more details. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.gW9MDo (%build) I added the update-testing repo to the mock config for the build, and the build requirements were picked up: DEBUG backend.py:554: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-x86_64-19081239177430616696239/root/ install 'lv2core-devel' DEBUG util.py:280: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-x86_64-19081239177430616696239/root/ install 'lv2core-devel' DEBUG util.py:256: ================================================================================ DEBUG util.py:256: Package Arch Version Repository Size DEBUG util.py:256: ================================================================================ DEBUG util.py:256: Installing: DEBUG util.py:256: lv2core-devel x86_64 3.0-2.fc10 updates-testing 9.2 k DEBUG util.py:256: Installing for dependencies: DEBUG util.py:256: lv2core x86_64 3.0-2.fc10 updates-testing 11 k DEBUG util.py:256: Transaction Summary DEBUG util.py:256: ================================================================================ DEBUG util.py:256: Install 2 Package(s) DEBUG util.py:256: Update 0 Package(s) DEBUG util.py:256: Remove 0 Package(s) DEBUG util.py:256: Total download size: 20 k DEBUG util.py:256: Installed: DEBUG util.py:256: lv2core-devel.x86_64 0:3.0-2.fc10 DEBUG util.py:256: Dependency Installed: DEBUG util.py:256: lv2core.x86_64 0:3.0-2.fc10 DEBUG util.py:319: Child returncode was: 0 However, the pkg-config tools was not installed in the mock environment. The reason seems to be a missing requires on pkgconfig in the lv2core-devel package currently in the testing repo. According to the packaging guidelines section 1.22.1: "Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must Requires: pkgconfig (for directory ownership and usability)." [ellert at ellert ~]$ rpm -q --requires -p lv2core-devel-3.0-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm lv2core = 3.0-2.fc10 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 08:55:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 04:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494819] Review Request: python-bitarray - Efficient Array of Booleans --C Extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080855.n388tiID014862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494819 Ramakrishna Reddy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 08:57:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 04:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494339] Review Request: hyphen-hi - Hindi hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080857.n388vdht015349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494339 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 08:54:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 04:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494819] New: Review Request: python-bitarray - Efficient Array of Booleans --C Extensions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-bitarray - Efficient Array of Booleans --C Extensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494819 Summary: Review Request: python-bitarray - Efficient Array of Booleans --C Extensions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ramkrsna at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-bitarray.spec SRPM URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-bitarray-0.3.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Bitarrays are sequence types and behave very much like usual lists. Eight bits are represented by one byte in contiguous block of memory. The user can select between two representations; little-endian and big-endian. Most of the functionality is implemented in C.Methods for accessing the machine representation are provided. This can be useful when bit level access to binary files is required, such as portable bitmap image files (.pbm). Also, when dealing with compressed data which uses variable bit length encoding you may find this module useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 08:58:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 04:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080858.n388wrKn017895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 Ramakrishna Reddy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 08:58:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 04:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080858.n388w40x017724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 --- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-08 04:58:03 EDT --- > OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. The %description is British English. ;-) > FAIL - MUST: Not all build dependencies are listed in > BuildRequires: dbus-devel and desktop-file-utils are missing This is the infamous Fedora pkg-config problem, where Requires.private in the pkgconfig file is evaluated and suffers from a missing dependency on dbus-devel (for dbus-1.pc). Normally, BR GConf2-devel would suffice. --- gnote.spec.orig 2009-04-08 10:48:55.000000000 +0200 +++ gnote.spec 2009-04-08 10:50:09.000000000 +0200 @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ %build %configure --disable-schemas-install -make %{?_smp_mflags} +V=1 make %{?_smp_mflags} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 08:58:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 04:58:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494820] New: Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 Summary: Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ramkrsna at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-pytools.spec SRPM URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-pytools-8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Pytools is a big bag of things that are missing from the Python standard library. This is mainly a dependency of my other software packages, and is probably of little interest to you unless you use those. If you're curious nonetheless, here's what's on offer: * A ton of small tool functions such as len_iterable, argmin, tuple generation, permutation generation, ASCII table pretty printing, GvR's mokeypatch_xxx() hack, the elusive flatten, and much more. * Michele Simionato's decorator module * A time-series logging module, pytools.log. * Batch job submission, pytools.batchjob. * A lexer, pytools.lex. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 09:10:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 05:10:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080910.n389AdFX021539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-08 05:10:38 EDT --- Yes, the built-in test should be passed successfully. I will try to get in touch with upstream about this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 09:12:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 05:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080912.n389C2YI019895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #14 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-08 05:12:00 EDT --- Jason, thanks for your input. I will try to update this package soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 09:16:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 05:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080916.n389G0Xq021124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #22 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-04-08 05:15:58 EDT --- Updated Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dinotrace.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dinotrace-9.4a-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 09:28:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 05:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - KVIrc is a free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080928.n389SSlN024818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 nucleo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from nucleo 2009-04-08 05:28:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Now everything seems fine. Here is the review: Thank you for review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kvirc Short Description: KVIrc is a free portable IRC client Owners: nucleo Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 09:42:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 05:42:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080942.n389gCW0030723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #45 from Gratien D'haese 2009-04-08 05:42:06 EDT --- Sorry, used the wrong title (if some script searches this then it wouldn't catch it, right?) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rear Short Description: Relax and Recover (ReaR) is a Linux Disaster Recovery framework Owners: gdha Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: gdha -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 10:21:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 06:21:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489962] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081021.n38ALadj006633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489962 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-08 06:21:35 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: OK source files match upstream: c6461663ae3ca88c3028ee9308add53764fab76b libhbalinux-1.0.7.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (LGPLv2). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK* rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - IMO the ldconfig call is useless, because the library will be dlopened as a "plugin" - rpmlint complains a bit libhbalinux.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 44) => false positive libhbalinux.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libhbaapi => the dependency is correct libhbalinux.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun mv => can be ignored libhbalinux.x86_64: E: use-tmp-in-%postun => the copy could be created in /etc instead of /tmp This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 10:28:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 06:28:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081028.n38ASaYO008562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #13 from Ivan Efremov 2009-04-08 06:28:35 EDT --- 1) license issue fixed 2) qmake and lrelease issues fixed 3) g++ 4.4 issue fixed 4) according to the document we must not use 'desktop-file-install'. Instead I use 'desktop-file-validate'. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files 5) libdir issue fixed New links: SPEC: http://ugene.unipro.ru/downloads/ugene.spec SRPM: http://ugene.unipro.ru/downloads/ugene-1.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 10:42:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 06:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494845] New: Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 Summary: Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/xdrfile.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/xdrfile-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A small C-library for reading and writing trr and xtc files. The library is lightweight (no dependencies, portable) and can be incorporated in other software, because it is being distributed under the BSD license. The library also contains one program trr2xtc which does what you would expect, and the other way around. rpmlint output: xdrfile.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xdrfile-1.0/README xdrfile.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xdrfile-1.0/ChangeLog xdrfile.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xdrfile-1.0/AUTHORS xdrfile.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xdrfile-1.0/COPYING xdrfile.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xdrfile-1.0/NEWS xdrfile-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 10:46:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 06:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081046.n38AkWGi013917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-08 06:46:32 EDT --- The description is silly for an rpm, I'd remove most of the first paragraph altogether. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 10:48:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 06:48:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081048.n38Am7Yp013248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-08 06:48:07 EDT --- Please change the EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) of your srpm every time you modify your srpm to avoid confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 10:44:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 06:44:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081044.n38AiURU012373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-08 06:44:29 EDT --- I left in the empty files for the moment, since I'm waiting for a fix from upstream ( http://bugzilla.gromacs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312 ). Currently there's no license included and two header files specify the GPLv2+ license instead of BSD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 10:48:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 06:48:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494819] Review Request: python-bitarray - Efficient Array of Booleans --C Extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081048.n38AmAUv013277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494819 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 10:47:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 06:47:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081047.n38Alc9w013170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|jussi.lehtola at iki.fi | --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-08 06:47:38 EDT --- Parag, please remember to change the status to ASSIGNED whenever you take over a review.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 10:50:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 06:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081050.n38AoO3U014936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #30 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-04-08 06:50:21 EDT --- >> 1.) Why your release jumps from -2 to -5? I did a few internal builds to test. >> 2.) Don't you think the URL should be http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/debmirror.html Agreed, I changed that. >> 3.) Why are you not using the name macro instead of the name in the whole specfile? Fixed as well. New version: SPEC: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/debmirror.spec SRPM: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/debmirror-20070123-7.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 10:52:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 06:52:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492125] Review Request: mingw32-pangomm - MinGW Windows C++ interface for Pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081052.n38Aq8c7014309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492125 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-08 06:52:07 EDT --- The updated package builds in mock (Fedora 10) and its sources match upstream: fa0f44c37499433455857becad4bbcda pangomm-2.24.0.tar.bz2 fa0f44c37499433455857becad4bbcda SRPM/pangomm-2.24.0.tar.bz2 The rest of the review in comment 1 still applies. There is a tiny error in the specfile. The Source0 should be .../2.24/... not .../2.14/... due to an oversight when the package was updated: Source0: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/pangomm/2.24/pangomm-%{version}.tar.bz2 But that can be fixed without having to send an updated version for me to approve. Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 10:52:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 06:52:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081052.n38AqucY015391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #46 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-08 06:52:52 EDT --- Please set fedora-cvs flag to ? for CVS Request (the reason I don't do this for you is that I want to check if you can actually change fedora-cvs flag without error) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 10:54:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 06:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493958] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081054.n38AsYc6015013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493958 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-08 06:54:30 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: OK source files match upstream: 60565a7c2b4b7c70056892b8c93d5de2d4d00d1e fcoe-utils-1.0.7.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. Ok license is open source-compatible (GPLv2). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. BAD owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - %{_sysconfdir}/fcoe and %{_sysconfdir}/fcoe/scripts directories are unowned, add them with %dir directive -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 11:03:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494819] Review Request: python-bitarray - Efficient Array of Booleans --C Extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081103.n38B3mix018054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494819 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 11:03:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:03:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081103.n38B38gl017965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Gratien D'haese changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #47 from Gratien D'haese 2009-04-08 07:03:07 EDT --- Oh dear - missed that one indeed - fedora-cvs has been set to ? now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 11:02:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:02:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081102.n38B2WQm017813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 11:11:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081111.n38BB91n019800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-08 07:11:09 EDT --- Thanks Jussi. Ramakrishna, Can you resubmit package with correcting %description. I don't want you to increase release tag in SPEC for this minor change as I have not started yet review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 11:20:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449784] Review Request: rpmreaper - A tool for removing packages from system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081120.n38BKTHo021735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449784 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Lichvar 2009-04-08 07:20:27 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rpmreaper New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: mlichvar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 11:33:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493958] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081133.n38BXPST024794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493958 --- Comment #2 from Jan Zeleny 2009-04-08 07:33:25 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/fcoe-utils/fcoe-utils.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/fcoe-utils/fcoe-utils-1.0.7-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 11:36:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081136.n38BajcT025757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-08 07:36:45 EDT --- > Currently there's no license included and two header files > specify the GPLv2+ license instead of BSD. This asks for a licence clarification from upstream. > xdrfile.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xdrfile-1.0/README > xdrfile.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xdrfile-1.0/ChangeLog > xdrfile.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xdrfile-1.0/AUTHORS > xdrfile.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xdrfile-1.0/COPYING > xdrfile.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xdrfile-1.0/NEWS Hint: There are ways to avoid this. %prep %setup ... ## Exit build if these %doc files become non-empty and are added to %files. [ -s AUTHORS ] && exit 1 # exit if file has non-zero size #[ -s AUTHORS ] || exit 1 # exit if file has zero size [ -s COPYING ] && exit 1 #[ -s COPYING ] || exit 1 %files ... #doc AUTHORS #doc COPYING ... > %post devel -p /sbin/ldconfig > %postun devel -p /sbin/ldconfig These are wrong and ought to be deleted. > # Move include files to %{_includedir} instead > mv %{buildroot}/%{_includedir}/%{name}/* %{buildroot}/%{_includedir} > rmdir %{buildroot}/%{_includedir}/%{name} Better ask upstream for confirmation and a fix in the tarball. The headers need this change for 'include "xdrfile.h"' to work, but it changes the API because users of this library can no longer "#include ". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 11:41:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493958] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081141.n38BfPo1027468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493958 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-08 07:41:24 EDT --- All issues are fixed, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 11:43:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491240] Review Request: dropwatch - monitor for dropped network packets in the kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081143.n38Bhl1A027866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491240 Neil Horman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 11:45:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:45:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081145.n38Bj11n027733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 --- Comment #4 from Ramakrishna Reddy 2009-04-08 07:45:01 EDT --- Thanks Jussi. ParagN, here is the corrected version of the SPEC and SRPM. Spec URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-pytools.spec SRPM URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-pytools-8-1.fc11.src.rpm The newer description is as follows :: %description Pytools are a few interesting things that are missing from the Python Standard Library. Small tool functions such as :: * len_iterable, * argmin, * tuple generation, * permutation generation, * ASCII table pretty printing, * GvR's monkeypatch_xxx() hack, * The elusive flatten, and much more. * Michele Simionato's decorator module * A time-series logging module, pytools.log. * Batch job submission, pytools.batchjob. * A lexer, pytools.lex. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 11:47:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081147.n38Bliok028433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-08 07:47:44 EDT --- * Most certainly you want the -static subpackage to require the -devel subpackage instead of the main package. > %doc AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog INSTALL README In case this is the standard "INSTALL" file, it is irrelevant to RPM package users and typically is not included. * Further, is it necessary to include the same %doc files in all three packages? They are stored in three different doc directories. * The pkgconfig file is tuned for static linking and relinks against libgsasl and libgnutls. If you keep it like that, you're missing dependencies in the -devel package for the corresponding -devel pkgs that contain those lib symlinks: $ cat vmime.pc|grep l[ib]*g Requires: libgsasl Libs: -L${libdir} -lvmime -lgsasl -lgnutls $ rpm -qpR libvmime-0.9.0-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm |grep ^libg libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgnutls.so.26()(64bit) libgnutls.so.26(GNUTLS_1_4)(64bit) libgsasl.so.7()(64bit) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 11:51:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494852] Review Request: astronomy-backgrounds - Astronomy backgrounds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081151.n38BpN2U029950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494852 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 11:48:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494852] New: Review Request: astronomy-backgrounds - Astronomy backgrounds Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: astronomy-backgrounds - Astronomy backgrounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494852 Summary: Review Request: astronomy-backgrounds - Astronomy backgrounds Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmahut at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/astronomy-backgrounds/astronomy-backgrounds.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/astronomy-backgrounds/astronomy-backgrounds-1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The astronomy-backgrounds package contains astronomy related artwork intended to be used as desktop background image. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 11:50:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494853] Review Request: python-achoo - A fluent interface for testing Python objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081150.n38Bol1P029353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494853 Ramakrishna Reddy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 11:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494852] Review Request: astronomy-backgrounds - Astronomy backgrounds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081152.n38BqsPr029829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494852 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 11:50:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:50:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494853] New: Review Request: python-achoo - A fluent interface for testing Python objects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-achoo - A fluent interface for testing Python objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494853 Summary: Review Request: python-achoo - A fluent interface for testing Python objects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ramkrsna at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-achoo.spec SRPM URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-achoo-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Achoo is a fluent interface for unit testing Python objects. Achoo makes it easy to make assertions about the properties and behaviours of Python objects. For example, is this object equal to this other one? Does calling this function with these arguments raise an error? More Infomation on fluent from here http://www.martinfowler.com/bliki/FluentInterface.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 11:58:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:58:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081158.n38BwX8P031882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #15 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-08 07:58:32 EDT --- > Group: Applications/Productivity System Environment/Libraries > %configure --enable-static=no Wrong or not recognised option it seems. Library is static-only, and as soon as it would build shared libs, build would fail anyway due to installed files not included in %files. > %doc AUTHORS COPYING INSTALL README TODO In case this is the standard "INSTALL" file, it is irrelevant to RPM package users and typically is not included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 12:08:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:08:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081208.n38C8nS3002404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 --- Comment #10 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-04-08 08:08:49 EDT --- I didn't do autostart but fixed rest of the issues. http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnote.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnote-0.1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 12:11:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:11:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081211.n38CBr1Y002799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-04-08 08:11:52 EDT --- Any update on this review? It all builds fine in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1285122 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 12:14:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081214.n38CENtp003941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com --- Comment #20 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-08 08:14:22 EDT --- latest version of pidgin-musictracker repackaged here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 12:14:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:14:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081214.n38CEWI3004012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-08 08:14:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > Currently there's no license included and two header files > > specify the GPLv2+ license instead of BSD. > > This asks for a licence clarification from upstream. Yes, that's in the bug report I sent upstream. > > > # Move include files to %{_includedir} instead > > mv %{buildroot}/%{_includedir}/%{name}/* %{buildroot}/%{_includedir} > > rmdir %{buildroot}/%{_includedir}/%{name} > > Better ask upstream for confirmation and a fix in the tarball. The headers need > this change for 'include "xdrfile.h"' to work, but it changes the API because > users of this library can no longer "#include ". True. I suggested moving the headers in the same bug report. Now one just has to wait until upstream reacts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 12:12:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:12:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494857] New: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jan.klepek at hp.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://wwwnick.net/~wwwnick/fedora/pidgin-musictracker.spec SRPM URL: http://wwwnick.net/~wwwnick/fedora/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.16-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Musictracker is a plugin for Pidgin which displays the media currently playing in the status message for any protocol Pidgin supports custom statuses on. My package review # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. [makerpm at fetaciq SPECS]$ rpmlint pidgin-musictracker.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [makerpm at fetaciq SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.16-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [makerpm at fetaciq SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/ i386/ noarch/ [makerpm at fetaciq SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/pidgin-musictracker-* pidgin-musictracker-static.i386: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. No documentation available for -static package # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . - ok # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. - OK # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . - ok # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . - OK # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - OK # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] - OK # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - OK # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - IMHO OK # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. - OK # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - OK, builded on uname -a Linux fetaciq 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.i686 #1 SMP Mon Mar 23 23:37:54 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires - OK # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden - OK # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. - OK # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. - not relocatable package, OK # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. - OK # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. - OK # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. - OK, defattr() present # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. - imho OK # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. - ok # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). - OK, no large files present # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - OK # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - no header files are installed by make install # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - OK # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). - OK, no .pc files present # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - OK # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - No devel package # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. -OK, removed during %install # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - not gui # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - OK # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. -OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 12:15:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:15:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081215.n38CFjEm003895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #28 from Mikulas Patocka 2009-04-08 08:15:42 EDT --- I don't know anything about NSS, I thought that it is used by Mozilla and I didn't even know that other projects could be compiled against it. Dost the conversion mean only a recompile and relink? Or do I have to rewrite some of the code? I may try to compile Links with NSS, but even if it succeeds, you won't get good testing with NSS soon, Links always used OpenSSL and it is long-term tested with it, so if you want something proven stable, use OpenSSL. BTW. why do you want NSS instead of OpenSSL? Regarding that UTF-8 --- I have written most of it already for Links-2.3pre1, just have not released it yet. I could release it soon. Regarding the config script --- there is a bug that it selects hardcoded directories first and the user directory last. Easy to fix. Just keep in mind that the configure script must be generated with autoconf 2.13 --- that was current version 10 years ago when Links project was started and support for all the operating systems is tested with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 12:19:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:19:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490989] Review Request: subdownloader - A program for download/upload subtitles for videofiles and DVDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081219.n38CJlsd004907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490989 --- Comment #2 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-08 08:19:47 EDT --- Hi Lubomir, my other package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 12:29:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081229.n38CTDiE007298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #15 from Ivan Efremov 2009-04-08 08:29:13 EDT --- New links: SPEC: http://ugene.unipro.ru/downloads/ugene.spec SRPM: http://ugene.unipro.ru/downloads/ugene-1.4.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 12:31:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081231.n38CVkqu008122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 12:37:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:37:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081237.n38CbhoB010078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-08 08:37:42 EDT --- 1.) Don't disable the debug package %define debug_package %{nil} 2.) Don't ship static libraries unless necessary I bet here's no use of it. Probably configure accepts --disable-static %package static ... 3.) Don't strip debugging information. See 1.) strip src/.libs/musictracker.so 4.) Please add -f here ...so that short-circuited installs work rm %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/pidgin/musictracker.la 5.) You don't need to specify dist tag in changelog You may want to build a single spec file into multiple branches * Wed Apr 9 2009 Jan Klepek 0.4.16-1.fc10 6.) Don't call ldconfig unless you're packaging a library This DSO is just a plugin, not at the library location %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 12:39:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:39:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081239.n38CdDRn010304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|jussi.lehtola at iki.fi |lkundrak at v3.sk --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-08 08:39:12 EDT --- Jussi; I am going to steal this one, since I'm going to sponsor Jan. He just forgot to specify FE_NEEDSPONSOR, sorry for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 12:45:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081245.n38CjWAd012319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-08 08:45:32 EDT --- Oh, dbus-devel is redundant. And you can probably drop the explicit Requires, since they should be picked up by rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 12:43:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081243.n38Chv4K011589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-08 08:43:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Jussi; I am going to steal this one, since I'm going to sponsor Jan. He just > forgot to specify FE_NEEDSPONSOR, sorry for that. Damn, I was just about to commit the same comments as you :D No problem, I was a bit wondering about the oddness of the packaging.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 12:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494862] New: Review Request: podofo - Tools and libraries to work with the PDF file format Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: podofo - Tools and libraries to work with the PDF file format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494862 Summary: Review Request: podofo - Tools and libraries to work with the PDF file format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/podofo.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/podofo-0.7.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: oDoFo is a library to work with the PDF file format. The name comes from the first letter of PDF (Portable Document Format). A few tools to work with PDF files are already included in the PoDoFo package. The PoDoFo library is a free, portable C++ library which includes classes to parse PDF files and modify their contents into memory. The changes can be written back to disk easily. The parser can also be used to extract information from a PDF file (for example the parser could be used in a PDF viewer). Besides parsing PoDoFo includes also very simple classes to create your own PDF files. All classes are documented so it is easy to start writing your own application using PoDoFo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 12:50:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:50:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081250.n38Co2eK013307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 --- Comment #4 from Jan Blazek 2009-04-08 08:50:01 EDT --- Thanks for suggestions. New SPEC: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/dmenu.spec New SRPM: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/dmenu-3.9-3.fc10.src.rpm New mock log: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/build.log rpmlint doesn't have any complaints -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 12:52:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:52:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081252.n38CqIat013085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 --- Comment #5 from Jan Blazek 2009-04-08 08:52:17 EDT --- I've send the patch to upstream (mailing list) http://lists.suckless.org/dwm/0904/7801.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 12:55:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:55:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489962] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081255.n38CtEwa013908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489962 Jan Zeleny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jan Zeleny 2009-04-08 08:55:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libhbalinux Short Description: HBAAPI vendor library Owners: jzeleny Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 12:57:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493958] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081257.n38CvowB015349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493958 Jan Zeleny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jan Zeleny 2009-04-08 08:57:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fcoe-utils Short Description: Utilities for Fibre channel over ethernet Owners: jzeleny Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 13:07:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:07:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081307.n38D7OP2018176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|jussi.lehtola at iki.fi | Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 13:13:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:13:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494862] Review Request: podofo - Tools and libraries to work with the PDF file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081313.n38DDNcv019923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494862 --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-08 09:13:23 EDT --- koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1285199 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 13:30:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081330.n38DUv5s024371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 --- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-08 09:30:57 EDT --- updated spec/srpm file 1] done 2] static package removed, --disable-static used 3] when i have removed strip, rpmlint is complaining on pidgin-musictracker.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/pidgin/musictracker.so output of rpmbuild: http://wwwnick.net/~wwwnick/fedora/pidgin-musictracker.build.log 4] done 5] done 6] ldconfig removed dbus-devel removed from BuildRequire Jussi you mean that all Requires could be removed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 13:47:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081347.n38DlXWC028877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-08 09:47:33 EDT --- Still contains "Requires: gtkmm24" (see bottom of comment 4) and: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 13:47:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491805] Review Request: django-sct - A collection of Django applications for building community websites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081347.n38DlZhY028907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491805 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2009-04-08 09:47:35 EDT --- Built for F-10 and Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 13:58:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:58:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] New: Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Data-ObjectDriver/perl-Data-ObjectDriver.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Data-ObjectDriver/perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.05-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Data::ObjectDriver is an object relational mapper, meaning that it maps object- oriented design concepts onto a relational database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 13:58:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081358.n38DwnJa000984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 14:07:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:07:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081407.n38E7fH1002021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 --- Comment #6 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-08 10:07:40 EDT --- updated spec/srpm available here: Spec URL: http://wwwnick.net/~wwwnick/fedora/pidgin-musictracker.spec SRPM URL: http://wwwnick.net/~wwwnick/fedora/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.16-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 14:11:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081411.n38EBQXp005256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-08 10:11:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > This is the infamous Fedora pkg-config problem, where Requires.private in the > pkgconfig file is evaluated and suffers from a missing dependency on dbus-devel > (for dbus-1.pc). Normally, BR GConf2-devel would suffice. I have seen the error message too. Thanks a lot for your explanation and the hint, Michael. (In reply to comment #10) > I didn't do autostart but fixed rest of the issues. Ok. 78d037b7591dc016546bc11e34afebd1 gnote-0.1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm fixes the outstanding issues: OK - %files OK - BuildRequires OK - Requires: desktop-file-utils is not a requirement but a BuildReqiures OK - Gconf2 for the scriptles: OK - redundant BuildRequires: libxml2-devel dropped OK - Using wildcards: %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/gnote.png OK - Desktop file: --vendor="" removed Todo: - Please drop "Requires: gtkmm24" and let rpm pick up the libs automatically. - %description not ending with a dot. - If you use "V=1 make %{?_smp_mflags}" you don't need "BuildRequires: dbus-devel. These issues are minor and can be fixed after import. This package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 14:11:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:11:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081411.n38EB6Fo003100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 14:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492533] Review Request: Choqok - KDE Micro-Blogging Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081418.n38EIxd6005443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492533 --- Comment #4 from Tejas Dinkar 2009-04-08 10:18:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: choqok Short Description: KDE Twitter Client Owners: tejas Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: tejas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 14:17:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:17:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492533] Review Request: Choqok - KDE Micro-Blogging Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081417.n38EHHYb007521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492533 Tejas Dinkar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 14:20:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:20:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492969] Review Request: lv2dynparam - LV2 dynamic parameters extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081420.n38EKBoI006393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492969 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-08 10:20:10 EDT --- Thanks for pointing this. I am one of the co-maintainers of lv2core and I fixed the issue and rebuilt the package in devel and in F-10. Meanwhile, you can add BR: pkgconfig to the SPEC file of lv2dynparam to *work around* the mock build issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 14:34:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:34:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081434.n38EYgPY012239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 --- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-08 10:34:41 EDT --- > - If you use "V=1 make %{?_smp_mflags}" you don't need > "BuildRequires: dbus-devel. Not true. V=1 enables verbose output for the shave build tool and has nothing to do with the configure script check for GConf2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 14:41:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - KVIrc is a free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081441.n38EfMl5012181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 --- Comment #19 from nucleo 2009-04-08 10:41:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kvirc Short Description: KVIrc is a free portable IRC client Owners: nucleo Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 14:42:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081442.n38EgSLZ012318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 --- Comment #8 from nucleo 2009-04-08 10:42:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kcometen4 Short Description: An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 Owners: nucleo Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 15:06:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226108] Merge Review: lsof In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081506.n38F6vTn021760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226108 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED CC| |mnowak at redhat.com AssignedTo|kzak at redhat.com |mnowak at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(kzak at redhat.com) --- Comment #7 from Michal Nowak 2009-04-08 11:06:54 EDT --- Will do the Merge Review here, let's finish this one. -- * `upstream2downstream.sh' -- could have license statement * looks like there's new 4.82 version (not sure whether there are any Linux related stuff) * %define lsofrh lsof_4.81-rh -- incorporate %{version} here * [...] # 184338 - allow lsof access nptl threads Patch1: lsof_4.81-threads.patch # 480694 - lsof manpage mismarked and formats badly Patch2: lsof_4.81-man.patch [...] %patch1 -p1 %patch2 -p1 [...] Patching starts from "Patch0" :) * Don't mix macro and variable style - $RPM_OPT_FLAGS -> %{optflags} - ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} -> %{buildroot} * %defattr(644,root,root,755) -> %defattr(-,root,root,-) it's the same and the later preferred * %attr(0755,root,root) %{_sbindir}/lsof `-------^^^^^---(not necessary) -- The rest looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 15:17:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:17:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081517.n38FHqHK024690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-08 11:17:51 EDT --- Ok, I tested it in mock and it worked without buildrequiring dbus-devel. Tested again without V=1 and dbus-devel is now pulled in automatically. I don't see a GConf2 build in koji, so I have no idea what has changed between yesterday and today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 15:55:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081555.n38FtmCj032337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-08 11:55:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > updated spec/srpm file > 1] > done Not. You just prepended it with #, which doesn't cancel the effect of macro expansion. > 3] > when i have removed strip, rpmlint is complaining on > pidgin-musictracker.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object > /usr/lib/pidgin/musictracker.so See 1.) > Jussi you mean that all Requires could be removed? pcre and dbus. (See that the actual requires of built package overlap those with rpm -qp --requires You still need the explicit require of pidgin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 16:02:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:02:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225784] Merge Review: gdbm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081602.n38G2TD2001562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225784 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mnowak at redhat.com, | |skasal at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mnowak at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(skasal at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #11 from Michal Nowak 2009-04-08 12:02:27 EDT --- * rpmlint gdbm.spec: E: non-utf8-spec-file gdbm.spec newman at dhcp-lab-124 SPECS $ file gdbm.spec gdbm.spec: ISO-8859 English text gdbm.spec:30: E: prereq-use /sbin/install-info """ The use of PreReq is deprecated. In the majority of cases, a plain Requires is enough and the right thing to do. Sometimes Requires(pre), Requires(post), Requires(preun) and/or Requires(postun) can also be used instead of PreReq. """ gdbm.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A GNU set of database routines which use extensible hashing. > Summary: A GNU set of database routines which use extensible hashing. gdbm.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgdbm.so.2.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 gdbm.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgdbm.so.2.0.0 exit@@GLIBC_2.2.5 Should be investigated. * 1.8.3 was released but not sure whether is it good idea to incorporate it * Patch0: gdbm-1.8.0-jbj.patch Patch1: gdbm-1.8.0-fhs.patch Patch3: gdbm-1.8.0-64offset.patch Could be: 0-1-2 * Source: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gdbm-%{version}.tar.gz is wrong, correct it to Source: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gdbm/gdbm-%{version}.tar.gz * > BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag * -devel: Requires: gdbm = %{version} https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package * Generally, depend on packages not files with full path: Prereq: /sbin/install-info this might also be the case where you can safely depend on "info"package. * Consistency with the "-p1" option %patch1 -p 1 -b .fhs %patch3 -p1 -b .offset * > # refresh config.sub, the original one does not recognize "redhat" > # as vendorname: > for f in /usr/share/automake-1.1?/config.sub; do > : > done > cp -p $f . > libtoolize --force --copy > aclocal > autoconf Perhaps autoreconf and patching the build system seems better to me. But not that important. * discouraged: %makeinstall install-compat https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used * %defattr(-,root,root) -> %defattr(-,root,root,-) (twice in spec) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 16:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:08:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226195] Merge Review: newt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081608.n38G8gFP004918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226195 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(tibbs at math.uh.edu | |) --- Comment #11 from Michal Nowak 2009-04-08 12:08:39 EDT --- Any progress? What's blocking this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 16:13:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226157] Merge Review: module-init-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081613.n38GDksq004161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226157 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(jcm at redhat.com) --- Comment #11 from Michal Nowak 2009-04-08 12:13:43 EDT --- JCM, can you please have a look at Jon Ciesla's proposals? It's quite easy stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 16:16:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081616.n38GGvXe007060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com --- Comment #4 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-08 12:16:56 EDT --- I'm unable to build it on my system. 1] i would use in %install install -p instead install to preserve timestamps 2] in your Source you have reference to archive which contains package folder and make all in %build is trying to create package by itself. Not good, my build fails on this. you could remove folder and update Makefile in %prep section 3] %install section needs rewrite to correct paths -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 16:17:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:17:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081617.n38GH6Td005221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(kengert at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #5 from Michal Nowak 2009-04-08 12:17:05 EDT --- Kai, can you please have a look at Jon's proposals? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 16:21:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:21:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226195] Merge Review: newt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081621.n38GLk1q008167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226195 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tibbs at math.uh.edu | |) | --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-08 12:21:45 EDT --- Well, damn, somehow I keep dropping this. I'll look at it today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 16:41:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226322] Merge Review: psmisc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081641.n38GfrpQ012861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226322 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(dnovotny at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #11 from Michal Nowak 2009-04-08 12:41:51 EDT --- Daniel, can you please follow up to Jon's proposals? -- Also: * Not necessary to define globally when used only for make export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -D_GNU_SOURCE" also not sure whether is "-D_GNU_SOURCE" necessary, shouldn't $RPM_OPT_FLAGS take care of everything? * don't mix variable and macro style https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS * %defattr(-,root,root) A little bit old-school to me. Use %defattr(-,root,root,-) * point URL field to http://sourceforge.net/projects/psmisc/ the present one is useless (bogus content there) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 16:47:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081647.n38GlLEV012136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 --- Comment #15 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-08 12:47:21 EDT --- 1) You pass $V to "make" not "configure", so it _cannot_ make a difference. 2) Fedora 10: $ pkg-config --exists --print-errors gconf-2.0 && echo "true" true $ sudo rpm -e dbus-devel $ pkg-config --exists --print-errors gconf-2.0 && echo "true" Package dbus-1 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `dbus-1.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'dbus-1', required by 'gconf', not found $ grep Req /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gconf-2.0.pc Requires: glib-2.0 Requires.private: ORBit-2.0 dbus-1 3) Rawhide: $ rpm -qR GConf2-devel|grep dbus pkgconfig(dbus-1) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 16:55:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081655.n38Gtinx014979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com AssignedTo|rpm at greysector.net |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #65 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-08 12:55:41 EDT --- Looking into this. We have a script that should be updating this but it has obviously failed for Gromacs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 17:13:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452387] Review Request: netblox - A console-based, networked falling blocks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081713.n38HDPPj019291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452387 --- Comment #16 from Marcin ?abanowski 2009-04-08 13:13:22 EDT --- I've addressed these issues in the new release. Spec URL: http://rydzyk.net/fedora/netblox.spec SRPM URL: http://rydzyk.net/fedora/netblox-0.52-7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 17:09:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:09:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494647] Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081709.n38H9w9K018339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |loganjerry at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jerry James 2009-04-08 13:09:57 EDT --- I have a couple of questions about the spec file: 1) Is there some reason to avoid the %configure macro in the spec file? (And "s/Not/Note" in the comment above the configure invocation if so.) 2) Shouldn't this package "Requires: emacs(bin)"? You noted a problem with "make mmm.pdf". The problem is that the texinfo.tex in the mmm-mode distribution is being used, and it is too old (it's from 1999!). Just rm it, and then the system texinfo.tex gets used, and you get a good build. Some of the Emacs Lisp warnings have me concerned, especially the notes that regexp-opt is being called with 3 arguments but only accepts 1 or 2. This is almost certain to lead to broken compiled code. I'll make a patch for you. Hang on.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 17:18:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081718.n38HIRJT022461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-08 13:18:26 EDT --- Well, * For source tarball: --------------------------------------------------------- 4577346 2009-03-25 18:22 ugene-1.4.1.tar.gz 4582420 2009-03-21 09:13 ugene-1.4.1-1.fc10.src/ugene-1.4.1.tar.gz 4583899 2009-03-23 02:02 ugene-1.4.1-2.fc10.src/ugene-1.4.1.tar.gz --------------------------------------------------------- - The tarball included in your srpm differs from what I can download from the URL written in your spec file. You must use the contain the tarball the same as what is provided on the URL * Some miscs: - %{_bindir}/qmake-qt4 can just be qmake-qt4. - Please also add some comments in %changelog when you modify your spec file. Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 17:26:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:26:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226381] Merge Review: ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081726.n38HQBX1024178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226381 --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-08 13:26:07 EDT --- Sorry for delay. With the scriptlets in your comment 27: ------------------------------------------------------ ( iconv -f euc-jp -t utf-8 $i > $i.new \ && mv $i.new $i \ || rm -f $i.new ) ------------------------------------------------------ will always exit with 0 (unless "rm -f" fails with some _very_ strange reason) and the latter ------------------------------------------------------ if [ $? != 0 ]; then iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf-8 $i > $.new \ && mv $i.new $i \ || rm -f $i.new fi ------------------------------------------------------ will never be executed. i.e. the first "exit 1" before ) need not be changed, the latter "|| exit 1" has to be changed to "|| rm -f $i.new" as you wrote. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 17:31:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494647] Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081731.n38HV44q023297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James 2009-04-08 13:31:04 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=338763) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=338763) Patch to quiet the Emacs byte compiler Oops, my mistake, I managed to compile by hand with XEmacs instead of Emacs while trying out the mmm.pdf fix. :-( Nevertheless, the attached patch, while not necessary, does quiet the byte compiler down a bit. Take it or leave it as you see fit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 17:39:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:39:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494647] Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081739.n38HdQ0h027117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 --- Comment #3 from Alan Dunn 2009-04-08 13:39:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I have a couple of questions about the spec file: > > 1) Is there some reason to avoid the %configure macro in the spec file? (And > "s/Not/Note" in the comment above the configure invocation if so.) I actually would've, but I was told by another person ("pre-review"?) that it was wise to avoid %configure. I was trying to remember the reason for this, but I noticed that I have done this in many of my spec files, so I did it here too, adding exactly the options I thought was necessary. If I can't remember the reason, I'll change it back. (The "Not" was supposed to be a "Not" - it doesn't really matter here, but rpmlint complains otherwise. I suppose this would only occur if you didn't use %configure) > 2) Shouldn't this package "Requires: emacs(bin)"? Yes, it should, sorry. > You noted a problem with "make mmm.pdf". The problem is that the texinfo.tex > in the mmm-mode distribution is being used, and it is too old (it's from > 1999!). Just rm it, and then the system texinfo.tex gets used, and you get a > good build. Ah - great, I'll do that. > Some of the Emacs Lisp warnings have me concerned, especially the notes that > regexp-opt is being called with 3 arguments but only accepts 1 or 2. This is > almost certain to lead to broken compiled code. I'll make a patch for you. > Hang on.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 17:41:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:41:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081741.n38HfdlU025917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 --- Comment #16 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-08 13:41:39 EDT --- All of what you write is correct, but this still doesn't explain why two rawhide mockbuilds failed yesterday while it works today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 17:39:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452387] Review Request: netblox - A console-based, networked falling blocks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081739.n38HdsQt025323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452387 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-08 13:39:53 EDT --- Looks better, only two things. 1. Drop the explicit ncurses Requires. 2. I don't see the icon in my menus. Is it placed properly? Since you're this close, it's probably a good time to start those practice reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 18:04:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:04:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494647] Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081804.n38I4LCa032357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 --- Comment #4 from Alan Dunn 2009-04-08 14:04:21 EDT --- Ok, I the changes (switched back -> %configure, required emacs(bin), added patch) you suggested, and the new files are in the same locations as the old were. (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > I have a couple of questions about the spec file: > > > > 1) Is there some reason to avoid the %configure macro in the spec file? (And > > "s/Not/Note" in the comment above the configure invocation if so.) > > I actually would've, but I was told by another person ("pre-review"?) that it > was wise to avoid %configure. I was trying to remember the reason for this, but > I noticed that I have done this in many of my spec files, so I did it here too, > adding exactly the options I thought was necessary. If I can't remember the > reason, I'll change it back. (The "Not" was supposed to be a "Not" - it doesn't > really matter here, but rpmlint complains otherwise. I suppose this would only > occur if you didn't use %configure) > > > 2) Shouldn't this package "Requires: emacs(bin)"? > > Yes, it should, sorry. > > > You noted a problem with "make mmm.pdf". The problem is that the texinfo.tex > > in the mmm-mode distribution is being used, and it is too old (it's from > > 1999!). Just rm it, and then the system texinfo.tex gets used, and you get a > > good build. > > Ah - great, I'll do that. > > > Some of the Emacs Lisp warnings have me concerned, especially the notes that > > regexp-opt is being called with 3 arguments but only accepts 1 or 2. This is > > almost certain to lead to broken compiled code. I'll make a patch for you. > > Hang on.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 18:17:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:17:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226111] Merge Review: lvm2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081817.n38IHbZV003446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226111 --- Comment #16 from Alasdair Kergon 2009-04-08 14:17:36 EDT --- We've removed the DESTDIR build-time usage and fixed a missing build dependency that broke parallel make upstream, so those items can be fixed when we release 2.02.46. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 18:35:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494171] Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081835.n38IZRPm007911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 Marcin ?abanowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chax at i-rpg.net --- Comment #3 from Marcin ?abanowski 2009-04-08 14:35:26 EDT --- Note that it's a practice review, I need to do some in order to get a sponsoring. * Naming: OK * Version and release: OK * Legal: OK * No inclusion of pre-built binaries or libraries: OK * Spec Legibility: OK * Writing a package from scratch: OK * Modifying an existing package: N/A * Architecture Support: koji has built the package correctly, so I assume OK * Filesystem layout: OK - %{_datadir}/man/man5/hostapd.* - did you consider using %{_mandir} ? * Use rpmlint: OK * Changelogs: OK * Tags: OK * BuildRoot tag: OK * Requires: OK * BuildRequires: OK * Summary and description: OK * Documentation: not-OK - Did you think about including hostapd/README? - Did you think about building the documentation from hostapd/doc/ directory? I've made you a list of buildrequires for that: transfig, netpbm-progs, doxygen, graphviz, texlive-latex. I'm not sure if it's really necessary, since it contains information about API and friends and would make a little use for people outside the project. * Compiler flags: OK * Debuginfo packages: OK * Devel packages: N/A * Requiring Base Package: N/A * Shared Libraries: N/A * Packaging Static Libraries: N/A * Duplication of system libraries: OK * Beware of Rpath: OK * Configuration files: OK * Initscripts: not-OK - The package would certainly benefit from initscript, since it's a system daemon. * Desktop files: N/A * Macros: mainly OK - See my comment for "Filesystem layout" - You are mixing %{optflags} with $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. In my opinion it's not really bad, * Handling Locale Files: N/A, hostapd is not localised. * Timestamps: not-OK - Add -p to your install commands. * Parallel make: OK * Scriptlets: OK * Conditional dependencies: OK * Build packages with separate user accounts: not-OK ;) * Relocatable packages: OK * Code Vs Content: OK * File and Directory Ownership: OK * Users and Groups: N/A, hostapd requires root priviledges, doesn't it? * Web Applications: N/A * Conflicts: OK * No External Kernel Modules: OK * No Files or Directories under /srv: OK * Bundling of multiple projects: OK * All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment: not-OK - The Patch1 is Fedora-specific, but it doesn't say so. There is no description of it neither. * Application Specific Guidelines: N/A -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 18:34:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:34:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081834.n38IYZDX005343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 --- Comment #17 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-08 14:34:35 EDT --- Can't follow you with that. I only commented on $V which is unrelated to dbus-devel (comment 13) or %configure failures. Whether the package failed to build on Rawhide before, I don't know. Build logs would tell. I don't see any obvious reason why BR dbus-devel would be needed for Rawhide, since there are automatic pkgconfig(foo) dependencies in the packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 18:41:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:41:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452387] Review Request: netblox - A console-based, networked falling blocks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081841.n38IfSnL007163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452387 --- Comment #18 from Marcin ?abanowski 2009-04-08 14:41:27 EDT --- My first practice review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 The icon is in compressed SVG format and your desktop environment might not support it (I'm using only KDE, that's why I didn't spot this), so I'm going to rasterize it in the next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 18:49:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452387] Review Request: netblox - A console-based, networked falling blocks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081849.n38InOJ5011004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452387 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-08 14:49:23 EDT --- I'm using GNOME, but it's best to use something as many as possible can use. PNG would probably be best. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 19:08:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452387] Review Request: netblox - A console-based, networked falling blocks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081908.n38J8Mcj014144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452387 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-08 15:08:22 EDT --- See comments on 494171. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 19:08:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494171] Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081908.n38J85Al014064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-08 15:08:05 EDT --- Minor nitpick, linked spec and SRPM spec differ. . . < URL: http://hostap.epitest.fi/hostapd/ < # Generate tarball: < # git clone git://w1.fi/srv/git/hostap.git < # cd hostap < # git-archive --format=tar --prefix=hostapd-0.6.9/ %{gitversion} | bzip2 > hostapd.`date +%Y%m%d`git%{gitversion}.tar.bz2 --- > URL: http://hostap.epitest.fi/hostapd/ I assume the linked one is preferred, and is what my meta-review is of. Otherwise, a pretty good review, particulart WRT the docs and initscripts. Re: Macros, %{optflags} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT have little to do with each other. One is a macro and one a variable. Using each is fine. What is not recommended is mixing %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, you should pick one. Upstream patch status would be nice as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 19:09:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:09:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452387] Review Request: netblox - A console-based, networked falling blocks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081909.n38J9ZNR015835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452387 --- Comment #21 from Marcin ?abanowski 2009-04-08 15:09:35 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rydzyk.net/fedora/netblox.spec SRPM URL: http://rydzyk.net/fedora/netblox-0.52-8.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: - Drop explicit ncurses requirement - Rasterize icon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 19:17:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:17:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494171] Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081917.n38JH4m7017895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 --- Comment #5 from Marcin ?abanowski 2009-04-08 15:17:03 EDT --- Thank you. > Re: Macros, %{optflags} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT have little to do with each other. > One is a macro and one a variable. Using each is fine. What is not > recommended is mixing %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, you should pick one. I saw a review, where reviewer criticised the mixing, that's why I wasn't sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 19:30:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:30:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494171] Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081930.n38JUlQk019594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 --- Comment #6 from Adel Gadllah 2009-04-08 15:30:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Note that it's a practice review, I need to do some in order to get a > sponsoring. OK, thanks for looking at the package. > * Naming: OK > * Version and release: OK > * Legal: OK > * No inclusion of pre-built binaries or libraries: OK > * Spec Legibility: OK > * Writing a package from scratch: OK > * Modifying an existing package: N/A > * Architecture Support: koji has built the package correctly, so I assume OK > * Filesystem layout: OK > - %{_datadir}/man/man5/hostapd.* - did you consider using %{_mandir} ? OK, will fix. > * Use rpmlint: OK > * Changelogs: OK > * Tags: OK > * BuildRoot tag: OK > * Requires: OK > * BuildRequires: OK > * Summary and description: OK > * Documentation: not-OK > - Did you think about including hostapd/README? Missed that one, thanks will add. > - Did you think about building the documentation from hostapd/doc/ directory? > I've made you a list of buildrequires for that: transfig, netpbm-progs, > doxygen, graphviz, texlive-latex. I'm not sure if it's really necessary, since > it contains information about API and friends and would make a little use for > people outside the project. This docs are mostly useless. There are only relevant if you want to hack on hostapd itself, in this case you can build them or read the comments in the code. > * Compiler flags: OK > * Debuginfo packages: OK > * Devel packages: N/A > * Requiring Base Package: N/A > * Shared Libraries: N/A > * Packaging Static Libraries: N/A > * Duplication of system libraries: OK > * Beware of Rpath: OK > * Configuration files: OK > * Initscripts: not-OK > - The package would certainly benefit from initscript, since it's a system > daemon. Sure can add one. > * Desktop files: N/A > * Macros: mainly OK > - See my comment for "Filesystem layout" > - You are mixing %{optflags} with $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. In my opinion it's not > really bad, That does not matter at all. > * Handling Locale Files: N/A, hostapd is not localised. > * Timestamps: not-OK > - Add -p to your install commands. OK > * Parallel make: OK > * Scriptlets: OK > * Conditional dependencies: OK > * Build packages with separate user accounts: not-OK ;) ??? > * Relocatable packages: OK > * Code Vs Content: OK > * File and Directory Ownership: OK > * Users and Groups: N/A, hostapd requires root priviledges, doesn't it? Yes it does, so what? ;) (has nothing to do on how it is packaged, it will complain if you don't run it as root). Moved the files to /usr/sbin/ instead of /usr/bin/ to make this more clear. > * Web Applications: N/A > * Conflicts: OK > * No External Kernel Modules: OK > * No Files or Directories under /srv: OK > * Bundling of multiple projects: OK > * All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment: not-OK > - The Patch1 is Fedora-specific, but it doesn't say so. There is no description > of it neither. The patch is obivious (fixes the path in the makefile), but sure can add a comment. > * Application Specific Guidelines: N/A New spec & package: http://193.200.113.196/apache2-default/rpm/hostapd.spec SRPM URL: http://193.200.113.196/apache2-default/rpm/hostapd-0.6.9-0.2.20090405gita0b2f99.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 19:34:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452387] Review Request: netblox - A console-based, networked falling blocks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081934.n38JYDcw021591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452387 --- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-08 15:34:12 EDT --- Much better. Just a couple more practice reviews and we're on our way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 19:42:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494647] Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081942.n38Jgw2N023844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jerry James 2009-04-08 15:42:58 EDT --- Okay, now it looks like this bit of %install ... # Fix an issue that occurs in the info files (not quite sure where in # the process, so doing it here): mv %{buildroot}%{_infodir}/mmm.info-2.gz \ %{buildroot}%{_infodir}/mmm.info-2 && \ gzip %{buildroot}%{_infodir}/mmm.info-2 ... is no longer necessary. At least, it wasn't necessary for me. MUST items: - rpmlint output: emacs-mmm-el.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - package name - spec file name - packaging guidelines - Fedora approved license - license field matches actual license - license file in %doc - spec file in American English - spec file is legible - sources match upstream - builds on at least one primary arch - use of ExcludeArch (N/A) - build dependencies in BuildRequires - locale handling (N/A) - call ldconfig (N/A) - relocatable package (N/A) - own all created directories - no duplicates in %files - proper permissions - %clean section - consistent use of macros - code or permissible content - large documentation in -doc (N/A) - nothing in %doc needed at runtime - header files in -devel (N/A) - static libraries in -static (N/A) - Requires pkgconfig (N/A) - .so files in -devel (N/A) - -devel requires main package (N/A) - no libtool archives (N/A) - desktop file (N/A) - do not own previously owned dirs - clean at start of %install - filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD items: - ask upstream to include license file (N/A) - supply available translations (N/A) ? package builds in mock (didn't check) ? builds on all supported arches (didn't check) - package functions as described - sane scriptlets - subpackages require main package - pkgconfig file in -devel (N/A) - file vs. package dependencies Looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 19:45:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494171] Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081945.n38Jjwl1023456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-08 15:45:58 EDT --- >> * Build packages with separate user accounts: not-OK ;) > >??? I missed this in the last pass. What's this about? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 19:52:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:52:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489550] Review Request: qtscriptgenerator - A tool to generate Qt bindings for Qt Script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081952.n38Jqr4A024885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489550 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-08 15:52:53 EDT --- qtscriptgenerator-0.1.0-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qtscriptgenerator-0.1.0-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 19:53:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:53:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489550] Review Request: qtscriptgenerator - A tool to generate Qt bindings for Qt Script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081953.n38Jr7bL026416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489550 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-08 15:53:07 EDT --- qtscriptgenerator-0.1.0-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qtscriptgenerator-0.1.0-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 19:58:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:58:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081958.n38JwFwg027835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 --- Comment #8 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-08 15:58:15 EDT --- updated spec/srpm available here: Spec URL: http://wwwnick.net/~wwwnick/fedora/pidgin-musictracker.spec SRPM URL: http://wwwnick.net/~wwwnick/fedora/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.16-1.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint SPECS/pidgin-musictracker.spec /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.16-1.fc10.src.rpm /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.16-1.fc10.i386.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. thanks Lubomir for your help -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 20:28:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 16:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082028.n38KSdMv001224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 Marcin ?abanowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chax at i-rpg.net --- Comment #4 from Marcin ?abanowski 2009-04-08 16:28:39 EDT --- Note that it's a practice review, I need to do some in order to get a sponsoring. * Naming: OK * Version and release: OK * Legal: OK * No inclusion of pre-built binaries or libraries: OK * Spec Legibility: OK * Writing a package from scratch: OK * Modifying an existing package: N/A * Architecture Support: DON'T KNOW (try a koji scratchbuild, I don't have a sponsor yet, so I can't test it for you) * Filesystem layout: not-OK - Locale files in %{_datadir}/%{name} - are you sure it's the best place? * Use rpmlint: OK * Changelogs: OK * Tags: OK * BuildRoot tag: OK * Requires: OK * BuildRequires: OK, mockbuild was successful - I would rather suggest keeping qt4-devel in order to stay compatible with F8, even though it is not supported anymore. * Summary and description: OK * Encoding: OK * Documentation: OK * Compiler flags: not-OK - Consider using %cmake macro (see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/cmake ) * Debuginfo packages: OK * Devel packages: N/A * Requiring Base Package: N/A * Shared Libraries: N/A * Packaging Static Libraries: N/A * Duplication of system libraries: OK * Beware of Rpath: OK * Configuration files: N/A * Initscripts: N/A * Desktop files: OK - add: GenericName[pl]=Warcaby and Comment[pl]=Klasyczna gra planszowa - warcaby * Macros: OK, but see my comment for compiler flags * Handling Locale Files: OK, but see my comment for filesystem layout * Timestamps: OK * Parallel make: OK * Scriptlets: OK * Conditional dependencies: N/A * Build packages with separate user accounts: not-OK ;) * Relocatable packages: OK * Code Vs Content: OK * File and Directory Ownership: OK * Users and Groups: N/A * Web Applications: N/A * Conflicts: OK * No External Kernel Modules: OK * No Files or Directories under /srv: OK * Bundling of multiple projects: OK * All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment: not-OK - The Patch0 is Fedora-specific, but it doesn't say so. There is no description of it neither. - The Patch1 should probably be sent back to upstream. * Application Specific Guidelines: N/A -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 20:31:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 16:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452387] Review Request: netblox - A console-based, networked falling blocks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082031.n38KVcwQ003105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452387 --- Comment #23 from Marcin ?abanowski 2009-04-08 16:31:38 EDT --- OK, my next review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 20:38:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 16:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494965] New: Review Request: pianobooster - A MIDI file player that teaches you how to play the piano Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pianobooster - A MIDI file player that teaches you how to play the piano https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494965 Summary: Review Request: pianobooster - A MIDI file player that teaches you how to play the piano Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chkr at plauener.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/pianobooster.spec SRPM URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/pianobooster-0.6.2-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: A MIDI file player/game that displays the musical notes AND teaches you how to play the piano. PianoBooster is a fun way of playing along with a musical accompaniment and at the same time learning the basics of reading musical notation. The difference between playing along to a CD or a standard MIDI file, is that PianoBooster listens and reacts to what you are playing on a MIDI keyboard. - rpmlint SPECS/pianobooster.spec SRPMS/pianobooster-0.6.2-2.fc10.src.rpm RPMS/i386/pianobooster-0.6.2-2.fc10.i386.rpm RPMS/i386/pianobooster-debuginfo-0.6.2-2.fc10.i386.rpm 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - koji builds: F10: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1285986 F9:https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1285981 I could not build the package for rawhide today. It looks like that lots of other packages fail in F11 right now, too. The package built successfully in rawhide yesterday: F11: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1284073 - please note that the packages built in koji can't be used directly in F10 or F9 since there is an incompatible update of qt4 in updates-testing which has the build-f10-overrides tag set -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 20:40:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 16:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494171] Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082040.n38Kerha004269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 --- Comment #8 from Marcin ?abanowski 2009-04-08 16:40:52 EDT --- > Yes it does, so what? ;) (has nothing to do on how it is packaged, it will > complain if you don't run it as root). > > Moved the files to /usr/sbin/ instead of /usr/bin/ to make this more clear. I thought about priviledge separation, like some daemons do. If hostapd supported that in its configuration files, or command line, adding an user would have been beneficial. >> * Build packages with separate user accounts: not-OK ;) > ??? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Build_packages_with_separate_user_accounts My wild guess was that you didn't build the package as the separate user, because there was a rather generic username set as owner of the files in the SRPM ;). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 20:52:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 16:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492609] Review Request: hmaccalc - Tools for computing and checking HMAC values for files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082052.n38Kqfrg007521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492609 Nalin Dahyabhai changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-04-08 16:52:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hmaccalc Short Description: Tools for computing and checking HMAC values for files Owners: nalin at redhat.com Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 21:35:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:35:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225974] Merge Review: krb5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082135.n38LZVsN018897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225974 --- Comment #9 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-04-08 17:35:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Okay, finally worked through most of these. Comments in-line, apologies in advance for the length, I'll try to cut down duplicates. > rpmlint on SRPM: > > krb5.src:109: E: prereq-use grep, info, sh-utils, /sbin/install-info > The use of PreReq is deprecated. In the majority of cases, a plain Requires is > enough and the right thing to do. Sometimes Requires(pre), Requires(post), > Requires(preun) and/or Requires(postun) can also be used instead of PreReq. Cleaned these up to Requires(post)/Requires(preun)/Requires(postun) for the subpackages which include scriptlets. > krb5.src:110: E: buildprereq-use autoconf, bison, e2fsprogs-devel >= 1.35, > flex, gawk > The use of BuildPreReq is deprecated, build dependencies are always required > before a package can be built. Use plain BuildRequires instead. Done. > krb5.src:145: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes krb5-configs > The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all > older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update > problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it > was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if > possible. Removed the obsoletes, as the package being obsoleted last existed ca. RHL 6.2, which was long enough ago that it's not worth keeping in there. > krb5.src:1076: W: macro-in-%changelog _var > Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to > the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that > affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in > possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd > entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in > %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. Cleaned up all instances of unescaped macros in the changelog. > krb5.src:1399: E: use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR > You use $RPM_SOURCE_DIR or %{_sourcedir} in your spec file. If you have to use > a directory for building, use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT instead. The source package includes scripts. Calling them by name is more readable for me than calling them using macros such as %{sourceNN}, which is the only other alternative I know of. > krb5.src:1490: W: make-check-outside-check-section : make check > TMPDIR=%{_tmppath} > Make check or other automated regression test should be run in %check, as they > can be disabled with a rpm macro for short circuiting purposes. Last check, the test suite didn't run properly in buildroots because there's no controlling terminal. It's effectively commented out, though. > krb5.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 325, tab: line 1400) > The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic > annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. This feels needlessly pedantic to me. The scriptlets consistently use tabs for indentation, and the changelog consistently uses spaces. > krb5.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch26: krb5-1.3.2-efence.patch > A patch is included in your package but was not applied. Refer to the patches > documentation to see what's wrong. Patch includes comment at its top which notes that it's only useful in debugging setups. > krb5.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch55: krb5-1.6.1-empty.patch > A patch is included in your package but was not applied. Refer to the patches > documentation to see what's wrong. Patch includes comment at its top which notes that it's a work-in-progress. > krb5.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch57: krb5-1.6.2-login_chdir.patch > A patch is included in your package but was not applied. Refer to the patches > documentation to see what's wrong. Patch includes comment at its top which notes that it's a work-in-progress. > krb5.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch64: krb5-ok-as-delegate.patch > A patch is included in your package but was not applied. Refer to the patches > documentation to see what's wrong. Patch includes comment at its top noting that it's an ABI change and waiting on feedback/approval/motion upstream. > krb5.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch70: krb5-trunk-kpasswd_tcp2.patch > A patch is included in your package but was not applied. Refer to the patches > documentation to see what's wrong. This is an alternate version of patch59, waiting on feedback/approval/motion upstream. > krb5.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot The Kerberos network authentication system. > Summary ends with a dot. Fixed. > krb5.src: W: strange-permission krb5kdc.init 0755 > A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. > Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. I'm gonna need help from CVS admins for this one -- the permissions are set at checkout-time. > krb5.src: W: strange-permission krb5-tex-pdf.sh 0755 > A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. > Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. We run this script during the build. We could take the execute bit off and run a shell with the script as its argument, I guess. > krb5-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/krb5-devel-1.6.3/krb5-protocol/draft-jaganathan-rc4-hmac-03.txt > The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one > that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are > desired, and remove if not. Fixed. > krb5-libs.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/kerberos/man/man5/.k5login.5.gz > The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete > it from the package if not. > > ??????????? This is the man page for the use of ~/.k5login. Not really sure what to do with it. > krb5-pkinit-openssl.i386: W: no-documentation > The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include > documentation files. > > Fix if possible. It doesn't look like there are any docs specific to this module. > krb5-server.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/krb524 > Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent > upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an > executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig. File dropped (krb4-specific). > krb5-server.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/krb5kdc > Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent > upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an > executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig. > > krb5-server.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/kadmin > Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent > upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an > executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig. > > krb5-server.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/kprop > Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent > upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an > executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig. Fixed. > krb5-server.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/kadmin > A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A > way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: > %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here > > krb5-server.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/kprop > A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A > way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: > %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here > > krb5-server.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/krb5kdc > A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A > way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: > %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here Fixed by not marking them as configuration files. > krb5-server.i386: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/kprop > In your init script (/etc/rc.d/init.d/your_file), you don't have a 'reload' > entry, which is necessary for good functionality. > > Fix. If the software doesn't support it, just mirror the restart entry. Done. > krb5-server-ldap.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin > /usr/lib/libkdb_ldap.so.1.0 > This package contains a library and provides no %post scriptlet containing a > call to ldconfig. > > krb5-server-ldap.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun > /usr/lib/libkdb_ldap.so.1.0 > This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing a > call to ldconfig. > > Probably needs fixing. Fixed. > krb5-workstation.i386: E: setuid-binary /usr/kerberos/bin/ksu root 04755 > The file is setuid, this may be dangerous, especially if this file is setuid > root. > > Necessary, I suspect. Yup. For a while we took the setuid bit off, but it's actually useless without it, and the bug reports were rarely friendly. > krb5-workstation.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/kerberos/bin/ksu > > Fix if possible. The buildroot strip script misses setuid applications. I'm actually not sure if that's intentional or not. > krb5-workstation-clients.i386: E: info-files-without-install-info-postin > /usr/share/info/krb5-user.info.gz > This package contains info files and provides no %post scriptlet containing a > call to install-info. > > krb5-workstation-clients.i386: E: info-files-without-install-info-postun > /usr/share/info/krb5-user.info.gz > This package contains info files and provides no %postun scriptlet containing > a call to install-info. > > Fix. Done. > krb5-workstation-clients.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object > /usr/kerberos/bin/v4rcp > > Fix if possible. krb4-specific, so it's gone. > krb5-workstation-servers.i386: E: postin-without-chkconfig > /etc/rc.d/init.d/krb524 > The package contains an init script but doesn't call chkconfig in its %post. > > krb5-workstation-servers.i386: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-preun > /etc/rc.d/init.d/krb524 > The package contains an init script but doesn't contain a %preun with a call > to chkconfig. > > Probably needs fixing. The logic for figuring out which subpackage should chkconfig --del the symlinks would have been a nightmare. But it's krb4-specific, so triggering on removal of the older version of either subpackage isn't that bad. (Except for the part where it's a trigger, and triggers are best avoided if possible.) ... Okay, I think that's most of it. Can I trouble you to poke at it again and see what I've missed that still needs to be addressed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 21:49:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:49:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494518] Review Request: dontzap - Allows users to set the "DontZap" option in xorg.conf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082149.n38LnJN3021389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494518 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 21:50:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:50:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494517] Review Request: x-kit - A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082150.n38LoY9r020109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494517 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |494518 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 21:50:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494518] Review Request: dontzap - Allows users to set the "DontZap" option in xorg.conf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082150.n38LoXa6020085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494518 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |494517 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 21:51:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:51:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494517] Review Request: x-kit - A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082151.n38LpbAb020330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494517 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 21:56:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:56:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] New: Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 Summary: Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: yaneti at declera.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql.spec SRPM URL: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: The lib_mysqludf_xql library provides an array of functions, which can be used to create XML output directly from MySQL using a single SQL query. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 22:06:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494517] Review Request: x-kit - A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082206.n38M6n0l024083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494517 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-08 18:06:48 EDT --- - Why do you remove the egg? It should be included: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs - Drop explicit Requires: python, it is automatically picked up. - For clearness, remove "--record=INSTALLED_FILES" from install phase, since the record isn't used for anything. - Add "-O1 --skip-build" to install phase. - Extend description. Maybe use that from upstream: A kit to manipulate xorg.conf which is aimed at both developers and users. It is a distribution and desktop agnostic project. X-kit is composed of the following programs: * XorgParser: a simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser. * XorgValidator: a program which uses X-parser, tries to make sense of xorg.conf and operates accordingly. * XorgConfig-gtk: a simple GUI to xorg.conf * XorgConfig-kde: a simple GUI to xorg.conf ------- Review: rpmlint output: x-kit.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/x-kit-0.4.2/examples/0-example.py x-kit.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/x-kit-0.4.2/examples/1-example.py x-kit.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/x-kit-0.4.2/tests/run x-kit.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/x-kit-0.4.2/tests/run /usr/bin/python 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. - Remove executable perms in setup phase, after that rpmlint output becomes clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 22:13:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:13:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082213.n38MDv5m025480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #31 from Javier Palacios 2009-04-08 18:13:56 EDT --- For 'Source', it could be better to use the main ftp.debian.org site instead of ftp.de.debian.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 22:13:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:13:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494518] Review Request: dontzap - Allows users to set the "DontZap" option in xorg.conf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082213.n38MDKrL026968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494518 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-08 18:13:20 EDT --- Same issues as with x-kit: - Why do you remove the egg? It should be included: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs - Drop explicit Requires: python, it is automatically picked up. - For clearness, remove "--record=INSTALLED_FILES" from install phase, since the record isn't used for anything. - Add "-O1 --skip-build" to install phase. rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 22:14:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:14:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492087] Review Request: pidgin-latex - A Pidgin plugin that displays LaTeX equations as images in your conversations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082214.n38MEqLo025703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492087 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 22:26:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:26:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082226.n38MQQ2u029724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |watchman7 at bol.com.br --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-08 18:26:23 EDT --- *** Bug 475799 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 22:26:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:26:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082226.n38MQPQa029692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Resolution| |DUPLICATE Flag|needinfo?(watchman7 at bol.com | |.br) | --- Comment #21 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-08 18:26:23 EDT --- Julio hasn't responded for many months, closing this as duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 494857 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 22:25:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082225.n38MPg6Z028104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #32 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-08 18:25:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=338818) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=338818) GPL v3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 22:26:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082226.n38MQ4Jp028254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #33 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-08 18:26:03 EDT --- -= Review debmirror=- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. ----------- O.K rpmlint is silent # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. ----------- O.K # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. ----------- O.K. # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines ----------- O.K. # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines ----------- O.K. # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. ----------- NOT O.K. the License is GPLv3, because the copyright file says: [quote] License: The debmirror script is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License (see /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL). [/quote] and the /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL is GPLv3 in current stable Debian (Lenny), I added the file as attachment on this bug # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. ----------- N/A # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. ----------- O.K. # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. ----------- O.K. # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. ----------- my download e89d7b8aae00fbf0743b2cd6bc99d746 in srpm e89d7b8aae00fbf0743b2cd6bc99d746 in dsc e89d7b8aae00fbf0743b2cd6bc99d746 # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. ----------- N/A - noarch # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. ----------- N/A noarch # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. ----------- N/A # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. ----------- N/A # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. ----------- N/A # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. ----------- N/A # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. ----------- N/A - It doesn't create a directory # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. ----------- O.K. # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. ----------- O.K. # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). ----------- O.K. # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. ----------- O.K, BUT please don't use macros in URL. # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. ----------- O.K. # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). ----------- N/A # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. ----------- O.K. # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. ----------- N/A # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. ----------- N/A # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). ----------- N/A # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. ----------- N/A # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} ----------- N/A # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. ----------- N/A # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. ----------- N/A # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. ----------- N/A # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). ----------- O.K. # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. ----------- O.K. # SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. ----------- mh, I think this # SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. ----------- # SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. ----------- O.K. # SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. ----------- N/A - noarch # SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. ----------- O.K. # SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. ----------- N/A # SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. ----------- N/A # SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. ----------- N/A # SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. ----------- N/A # SOURCE0 ----------- don't use an country-specific mirror. just use ftp.debian.org - the server will redirect you to an mirror in your proximity # REQUIRES ----------- Requires: patch, ed, gnupg, rsync, coreutils, findutils, gzip, bzip2 Lets take a deeper look inside: patch & ed are optional, but okay! gnupg To check every packagesignature with the key. It's okay gzip & bzip It is highly unlikely that these aren't installed, but this is okay. rsync It`s a rsync based script, so this is okay. coreutils & findutils why are you added these? # FILTER FILE ----------- Your filter file is okay; as desired -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 22:28:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492398] Review Request: slv2 - LV2 host library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082228.n38MS4Jl029975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492398 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-08 18:28:04 EDT --- slv2-0.6.2-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/slv2-0.6.2-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 22:28:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494171] Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082228.n38MSMwt030038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 --- Comment #9 from Adel Gadllah 2009-04-08 18:28:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > > Yes it does, so what? ;) (has nothing to do on how it is packaged, it will > > complain if you don't run it as root). > > > > Moved the files to /usr/sbin/ instead of /usr/bin/ to make this more clear. > I thought about priviledge separation, like some daemons do. If hostapd > supported that in its configuration files, or command line, adding an user > would have been beneficial. It needs access to the kernel interfaces which are only available to root. > >> * Build packages with separate user accounts: not-OK ;) > > ??? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Build_packages_with_separate_user_accounts > My wild guess was that you didn't build the package as the separate user, > because there was a rather generic username set as owner of the files in the > SRPM ;). ... whatever --- New spec & srpm: http://193.200.113.196/apache2-default/rpm/hostapd.spec http://193.200.113.196/apache2-default/rpm/hostapd-0.6.9-0.3.20090405gita0b2f99.fc10.src.rpm Changed the license to BSD. "These program is dual-licensed under both the GPL version 2 and BSD license. Either license may be used at your option." As we build against openssl (which license is not compatible with the GPLv2) I opted for BSD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 22:29:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:29:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082229.n38MTtFq028855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-08 18:29:55 EDT --- Jan: did you check bugzilla if there was already a review request for this package? In the future, please do so before even starting to package something. [I myself have wasted a couple of hours on a few occasions working on something that has already been done.] This time it seemed that the old review was dead, so I closed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 22:52:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:52:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082252.n38Mqu2T001528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #34 from Javier Palacios 2009-04-08 18:52:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > license. > ----------- > NOT O.K. > the License is GPLv3, because the copyright file says: > [quote] > License: The debmirror script is licensed under the terms of the GNU > General Public License (see /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL). > [/quote] > and the /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL is GPLv3 in current stable Debian > (Lenny), I added the file as attachment on this bug Latest release is around 2007, and whichever were the standard Debian license at those times, it was probably not GPLv3. In my opinion, in absence of explicit license file and without contacting the author, GPLv2 is the most likely license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 22:49:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082249.n38MnlrR000745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 --- Comment #5 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-04-08 18:49:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Note that it's a practice review, I need to do some in order to get a > sponsoring. Great, thanks for comments! > * Architecture Support: DON'T KNOW (try a koji scratchbuild, I don't have a > sponsor yet, so I can't test it for you) Here is the koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1286188 > * Filesystem layout: not-OK > - Locale files in %{_datadir}/%{name} - are you sure it's the best place? Those are QT locales, they are usually being put in program's share dir, as done here by upstream. > * Compiler flags: not-OK > - Consider using %cmake macro (see: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/cmake ) This is qmake, not cmake. > * Desktop files: OK > - add: GenericName[pl]=Warcaby and Comment[pl]=Klasyczna gra planszowa - > warcaby Game itself doesn't have Polish locale. Will think about adding this. > * Build packages with separate user accounts: not-OK ;) Um, why not OK? > * All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment: not-OK > - The Patch1 should probably be sent back to upstream. Second patch is committed into upstream CVS two year ago. Will add comments for patches in next package revision. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 23:18:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 19:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082318.n38NIXtZ006515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #23 from manuel wolfshant 2009-04-08 19:18:31 EDT --- The good news is that in F-10 the package works OK. I have displayed a vcd from IUSR8.2 examples. There is one problem, but probably this should be taken care by upstream: [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ dinotrace /tmp/*vcd %E, Strange bit value U on line 293 of /tmp/wave1.vcd %E, Strange bit value U on line 300 of /tmp/wave1.vcd %E, Strange bit value U on line 307 of /tmp/wave1.vcd %E, Strange bit value U on line 314 of /tmp/wave1.vcd %E, Strange bit value U on line 321 of /tmp/wave1.vcd %E, Strange bit value U on line 328 of /tmp/wave1.vcd [...] %E, Strange bit value U on line 386 of /tmp/wave1.vcd %E, Strange bit value U on line 387 of /tmp/wave1.vcd %E, Strange bit value U on line 388 of /tmp/wave1.vcd wave1,vcd is in fact part of stock IUS82, that is /tools.lnx86/inca/examples/vhpi/waveform/test/golden/wave1.vcd On EL5 the package does not build: + emacs -batch -f batch-byte-compile dinotrace.el Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/igrep-init.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/lang-coding-systems-init.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/php-mode-init.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/po-mode-init.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/python-mode-init.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/rpm-spec-mode-init.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/rpmdev-init.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/tramp-init.el (source)... While compiling toplevel forms in file /builddir/build/BUILD/dinotrace-9.4a/lisp/dinotrace.el: !! File error (("Cannot open load file" "verilog-mode")) Done error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.88558 (%install) Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F-10/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPMs: dinotrace.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dinotrace-9.4a/traces/tempest.bt.gz emacs-dinotrace.x86_64: W: no-documentation => last one is ignorable, first one is a false alert [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type as specified by spec: GPLv2 License type as specified by sources: GPLv3+ => see note 1 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of source file: f75c339ade8e2e75eedd2e831e7faffbfddf102b dinotrace-9.4a.tgz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [!] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. See note 2 [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F-10/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. === Final Notes === 1. License should be changed to GPLv3+. I'll trust you to do that before import. 2. Is the emacs subpackage really supposed to be used without having dinotrace installed? I see no reason to not allow that, but I want your confirmation that this is intentional. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 23:20:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 19:20:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082320.n38NKkSk008706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #24 from manuel wolfshant 2009-04-08 19:20:45 EDT --- Hm, Centos 5.3 has emacs-21.4, I guess my enthusiasm to see this package as it is in EPEL is moot. Maybe if you would exclude the emacs bits ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 23:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 19:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082338.n38NcAsB011811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-08 19:38:09 EDT --- The fedora-review flag should only be set ('?') by the reviewer... clearing. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 23:56:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 19:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082356.n38Nusjf013439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #25 from wsnyder at wsnyder.org 2009-04-08 19:56:53 EDT --- >[wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ dinotrace /tmp/*vcd >%E, Strange bit value U on line 388 of /tmp/wave1.vcd >wave1,vcd is in fact part of stock IUS82, that is >/tools.lnx86/inca/examples/vhpi/waveform/test/golden/wave1.vcd U's aren't legal in VCDs. This is probably a EVCD file, which verilator doesn't support. EVCDs are used primarily by chip testers, it's a bit odd that an example would use that. >2. Is the emacs subpackage really supposed to be used without having dinotrace >installed? I see no reason to not allow that, but I want your confirmation that >this is intentional. No, the emacs part won't be usable without the verilog-mode.el package, but the rest of the tool will be. If you're distributing with emacs-21.4 then you really should be providing a verilog-mode.el RPM. It's far more in demand than Dinotrace/Verilator/Icarus all which you're including. Emacs-22 includes it as part of the Emacs core library, so if you release a more recent emacs that gets it too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 00:54:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 20:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491694] Review Request: Anyterm - Web based terminal emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090054.n390sWHY025804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694 --- Comment #13 from Mohammed Morsi 2009-04-08 20:54:31 EDT --- Reworked the rpm based on feedback. Since I bumped the dist / changelog the SRPM can now be accessed at http://mohammed.morsi.org/blog/files/anyterm-1.1.29-2.fc10.src_.rpm (location of spec still the same) Changes include: - Use official anyterm-1.1.29 tbz2 that can be d/l from anyterm site. Additional sources are added for init, sysconfig, anyterm-cmd, httpd conf. Additional patch has been included to url-parameterize various variables currently statically set (patch submitted to anyterm upstream community as well) - port is set to 81, less than 1024 as recommended - anyterm-cmd changes incorporated, and addition to make it loop back on failed login or logout - static content copied over and served by apache Enjoy! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 01:02:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 21:02:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494965] Review Request: pianobooster - A MIDI file player that teaches you how to play the piano In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090102.n3912B9v027177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494965 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-08 21:02:10 EDT --- Here are my notes for this package (* need definite attention. ! are suggestions): * We need to package rtmidi seperately and link to it. I already packaged rtaudio before. Things should be similar (you can take rtaudio SPEC file as your starting point) Note that rtmidi is MIT, but it is compatible with GPL. ! Please make use of the %{name} macro. ! I find it better to supply the .desktop file separately, to preserve the original creation date. But that's a matter of taste. ! I prefer using sed+iconv instead of dos2unix to save a BR. But then again this is a matter of taste. If you are going to use dos2unix, could you use the -k flags to preserve timestamps? * Similarly, please use the -p flag with install to preserve the timestamps (of the .png files in this case) ! Please add a GenericName to the .desktop file. Also AudioVideo needs to be added to the Category key, if you want this application to appear in Multimedia group. * There is a typo on the installation of the 64x64 icon. (32x32 should be 64x64) * Parallel make must be supported whenever possible. If it is not supported, this should be noted in the SPEC file as a comment. ! Summary seemed too long to me. It can be just something like "Piano Teacher" ! I think the comma should be removed from the end of this line (for proper English): "The difference between playing along to a CD or a standard MIDI file," -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 02:01:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 22:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] New: Review Request: bareFTP - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bareFTP - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 Summary: Review Request: bareFTP - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/bareftp/bareftp.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/bareftp/bareftp-0.2.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: bareFTP is a file transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP). It is written in C#, targeting the Mono framework and the GNOME desktop environment. bareFTP is free and open source software released under the terms of the GPL license. for more info http://www.bareftp.org/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 02:48:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 22:48:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490399] (Rename) Review Request: WebKitGTK - GTK+ Web content engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090248.n392muOM013961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490399 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-08 22:48:55 EDT --- ok. All those items look ok to me. I see no further blockers, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 02:53:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 22:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090253.n392rgOx015033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-08 22:53:40 EDT --- ok. That looks good. I don't see any further blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. You will need to keep updating the README.fedora when new non free tests appear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 03:15:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 23:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090315.n393FgKB022993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Joshua Wulf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwulf at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #66 from Joshua Wulf 2009-04-08 23:15:38 EDT --- Jens, FeSCO has approved the documentation naming guideline: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SteeringCommittee/Meeting-20090403#FPC_report_-_2009-03-31 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/DocumentationNaming Can you please approve this package now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 03:26:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 23:26:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090326.n393Qas6021586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 Joseph Smidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Joseph Smidt 2009-04-08 23:26:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: phoronix-test-suite Short Description: A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System Owners: jsmidt Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 03:32:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 23:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494853] Review Request: python-achoo - A fluent interface for testing Python objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090332.n393Wh5O022601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494853 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 04:16:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 00:16:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490578] Review Request: mod_perlite - Kinder, gentler embedded Perl for the Apache HTTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090416.n394G70c001371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490578 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |iarnell at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |iarnell at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-09 00:16:07 EDT --- - source files match upstream. I can't verify - this looks like a manual tar of a local tree complete with entire .git directory. Would be better to use git-archive and add a comment with the exact command(s) used to recreate it + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license (GPL+ or Artistic). + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1286552). + package installs properly. + debuginfo package looks complete. + rpmlint has no complaints: mod_perlite.src: I: checking mod_perlite.x86_64: I: checking mod_perlite-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: config(mod_perlite) = 0.09-0.1.git20090314.fc11 mod_perlite.so()(64bit) perl(Perlite) perl(Perlite::ConfigData) perl(Perlite::IO) mod_perlite = 0.09-0.1.git20090314.fc11 mod_perlite(x86-64) = 0.09-0.1.git20090314.fc11 = config(mod_perlite) = 0.09-0.1.git20090314.fc11 httpd-mmn = 20051115 ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit) ld-linux-x86-64.so.2(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libcrypt.so.1()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libnsl.so.1()(64bit) libperl.so()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libresolv.so.2()(64bit) libutil.so.1()(64bit) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(:WITH_PERLIO) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + %check is present and all tests pass. + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED assuming you'll make Source0 a little cleaner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 04:55:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 00:55:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490578] Review Request: mod_perlite - Kinder, gentler embedded Perl for the Apache HTTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090455.n394t492007993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490578 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-09 00:55:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > - source files match upstream. > I can't verify - this looks like a manual tar of a local tree complete with > entire .git directory. Would be better to use git-archive and add a comment > with the exact command(s) used to recreate it Will do :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 05:09:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 01:09:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490578] Review Request: mod_perlite - Kinder, gentler embedded Perl for the Apache HTTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090509.n3959c0G010643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490578 --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-09 01:09:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mod_perlite Short Description: Kinder, gentler embedded Perl for the Apache HTTP Server Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 05:11:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 01:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090511.n395BFBE011206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-09 01:11:15 EDT --- Looks fine now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 05:09:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 01:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490578] Review Request: mod_perlite - Kinder, gentler embedded Perl for the Apache HTTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090509.n3959ehq006916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490578 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 05:46:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 01:46:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493957] Review Request: skyviewer - Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090546.n395kwku014337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493957 --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-09 01:46:58 EDT --- Yay, got a response about license; essentially "written under contrect for goverment -- no copyright" (by the way, shouldn't this apply to cdf as well?). Added the copy of the e-mail to the package. Future versions will include the license file in distribution tarball. Applied your BR fix as well. SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/skyviewer.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/skyviewer-1.0.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 05:57:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 01:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492087] Review Request: pidgin-latex - A Pidgin plugin that displays LaTeX equations as images in your conversations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090557.n395v8AE020063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492087 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-09 01:57:08 EDT --- The package is beautiful, nothing to complain for, so I'll made up :) None of this are blockers, of course. 1.) How about removing the first line from description and replacing the summary with it? An one-line paragraph lines don't look well in descriptions and such short and concise sentence seems to be a good replacement for the long summary line. 2.) Lack of empty line between %prep and %build seems like a sin against the style. 3.) Though technically this does not require pidgin, it is of not much use without it. How about adding pidgin to requires? 4.) I believe that the patch is unneeded, you can accomplish the very same effect by passing LIB_INSTALL_DIR= parameter to make - Spec file is clean, legible and written using valid American English - Source tarball matches upstream - Rpmlint is happy - Compiler flags used properly - License is correct, license file included - No -devel subpackage, no libraries installed - Provides are sane - Requires are sane - Filelist is ok APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 06:06:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 02:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490989] Review Request: subdownloader - A program for download/upload subtitles for videofiles and DVDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090606.n3966rks017723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490989 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-09 02:06:53 EDT --- 1.) I believe this is not valid English (applies to %description as well) Summary: A program for download/upload subtitles for videofiles and DVDs Might better be "Program to download movie subtitles" (keep it short and concise). 2.) No useless comments #cp -p subdownloader.xpm %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps 3.) Do not use dist tag in changelogs You may want to build the package for multiple branches. None of the serious enough to block approval. Please address them upon import. - SPEC is mostly clean and legible - Noarch package, no compiler flags to use - Filelist sane - Requires/Provides sane - Rpmlist mostly quiet (complains only about 3.) - Written (apart from 1. in valid American English) - License specified correctly (complete license not included by upstream) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 06:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 02:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090619.n396JRC8023710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|493530 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 06:19:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 02:19:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493530] Review Request: perl-Data-Dumper-Names - Data::Dumper::Names module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090619.n396JSvE023741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493530 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|493531 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 06:20:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 02:20:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090620.n396K6iK020173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |493530 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 06:20:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 02:20:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493530] Review Request: perl-Data-Dumper-Names - Data::Dumper::Names module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090620.n396K50Y020145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493530 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |493531 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 06:28:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 02:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495021] Review Request: python-posix_ipc - POSIX IPC primitives for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090628.n396SfX8021538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495021 Ramakrishna Reddy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 06:28:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 02:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495021] New: Review Request: python-posix_ipc - POSIX IPC primitives for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-posix_ipc - POSIX IPC primitives for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495021 Summary: Review Request: python-posix_ipc - POSIX IPC primitives for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ramkrsna at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-posix_ipc.spec SRPM URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-posix_ipc-0.5.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: posix_ipc is a Python module (written in C) that permits creation and manipulation of POSIX inter-process semaphores, shared memory and message queues on platforms supporting the POSIX Realtime Extensions, POSIX 1003.1b-1993. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 06:31:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 02:31:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495021] Review Request: python-posix_ipc - POSIX IPC primitives for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090631.n396VKSH022291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495021 Ramakrishna Reddy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 06:48:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 02:48:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492974] Review Request: calf - Audio plugins pack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090648.n396m60h025058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492974 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-09 02:48:05 EDT --- OK Rpmlint must be run on every package. OK The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. OK The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file. OK The spec file must be written in American English. OK The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. ef4a48629df9104da6f6081c33d3cfa0 OK The package MUST successfully compile. OK Correct BuildRequires. OK Proper use of %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK Shared library files (not just symlinks) must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK Relocatable package must state this fact in the request for review. OK A package must own all directories that it creates. OK A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK Permissions on files must be set properly. OK Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK Each package must consistently use macros. OK The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK Header files must be in a -devel package. OK Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK Library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1) and files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in -devel. OK In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package. OK Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. OK Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. OK At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). It was some problem with wget, ACCEPTED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 06:59:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 02:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492974] Review Request: calf - Audio plugins pack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090659.n396xSot030607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492974 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-09 02:59:28 EDT --- Thank you Marcela, please let me know if/when you have a package that needs a review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: calf Short Description: Audio plugins pack Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 07:08:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 03:08:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090708.n3978Zo5000344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-04-09 03:08:35 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I will use scratch builds to confirm the BR and fix the other minor issues before importing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnote Short Description: Note Taking Application Owners: sundaram Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 07:15:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 03:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090715.n397FDxJ001693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #26 from manuel wolfshant 2009-04-09 03:15:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > >[wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ dinotrace /tmp/*vcd > >%E, Strange bit value U on line 388 of /tmp/wave1.vcd > >wave1,vcd is in fact part of stock IUS82, that is > >/tools.lnx86/inca/examples/vhpi/waveform/test/golden/wave1.vcd > > U's aren't legal in VCDs. This is probably a EVCD file, which verilator > doesn't support. EVCDs are used primarily by chip testers, it's a bit odd that > an example would use that. > Well, that's what Cadence distributes. And the company I work for has chip testing as major part of it's business. > >2. Is the emacs subpackage really supposed to be used without having dinotrace > >installed? I see no reason to not allow that, but I want your confirmation that > >this is intentional. > > No, the emacs part won't be usable without the verilog-mode.el package, but > the rest of the tool will be. My question was directed more towards Chitlesh. As packaged now, the emacs-dinotrace package does not require dinotrace. Which is OK if you only edit files but will lead to unpleasant experience if one wants to launch dinotrace from inside emacs, as "yum install emacs-dinotrace" would not have pulled in dinotrace. > If you're distributing with emacs-21.4 then you really should be providing a > verilog-mode.el RPM. It's far more in demand than Dinotrace/Verilator/Icarus > all which you're including. Emacs-22 includes it as part of the Emacs core > library, so if you release a more recent emacs that gets it too. Well, RHEL5 ships emacs-21.4 and it's not for us to decide what will be included in the future. What I am most interested in is having dinotrace available for my colleagues who use Centos. For the moment the free tool they could use is only gtkwave, if I am not mistaken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 07:33:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 03:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489929] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090733.n397XqNg032767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489929 Jan Zeleny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 07:33:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 03:33:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489962] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090733.n397XrtM000340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489962 Bug 489962 depends on bug 489929, which changed state. Bug 489929 Summary: Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489929 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 08:04:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 04:04:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494853] Review Request: python-achoo - A fluent interface for testing Python objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090804.n3984pTA008903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494853 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 08:07:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 04:07:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495021] Review Request: python-posix_ipc - POSIX IPC primitives for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090807.n39879Ov012455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495021 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 08:13:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 04:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492087] Review Request: pidgin-latex - A Pidgin plugin that displays LaTeX equations as images in your conversations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090813.n398DOXJ014826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492087 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-09 04:13:24 EDT --- Thanks for the review. Actually, pidgin IS a requirement since it owns the directory :) And the patch was not needed. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pidgin-latex Short Description: Use LaTeX formulas in your pidgin conversations Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 08:17:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 04:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494517] Review Request: x-kit - A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090817.n398HSxb015945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494517 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |giallu at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-04-09 04:17:27 EDT --- The naming of this package does not look correct, python libraries should live in the python- namespace. i.e. python-xkit would do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 08:22:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 04:22:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493957] Review Request: skyviewer - Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090822.n398MHD9012924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493957 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-09 04:22:16 EDT --- Looks good now, APPROVED. PS. Please add general.txt and notes-ngp.txt to %doc since they contain some important information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 08:25:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 04:25:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494517] Review Request: x-kit - A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090825.n398PEFu017962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494517 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-09 04:25:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > The naming of this package does not look correct, python libraries should live > in the python- namespace. i.e. python-xkit would do. You're right, the Python section of the Naming Guidelines does state that the names of packages that are purely in Python must either begin with py or get python- as a prefix. So the correct name of this package is python-x-kit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 08:27:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 04:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493957] Review Request: skyviewer - Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090827.n398ReeB018511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493957 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-09 04:27:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > PS. Please add general.txt and notes-ngp.txt to %doc since they contain some > important information. Sorry I forgot. I will do so upon import. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: skyviewer Short Description: Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files Owners: lkundrak Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: astronomy-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 09:05:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 05:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491694] Review Request: Anyterm - Web based terminal emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090905.n39957Xu023022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694 --- Comment #14 from Alexander Bostr?m 2009-04-09 05:05:06 EDT --- Argh, I'm sorry, I mislead you. The web content should be in /usr/share/anyterm rather than in /var/www/anyterm, as per the packaging guidelines. Btw, how come it defaults to ASCII? Double wide characters, Arabic script and Cyrillic only works to some degree, but UTF-8 seems to work fine for "extended latin" characters, so I see no reason not to enable it anyway. Now let's see if I can write an informal review. (I'm not sponsored.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 09:23:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 05:23:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495021] Review Request: python-posix_ipc - POSIX IPC primitives for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090923.n399NqxI027134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495021 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 09:23:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 05:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494853] Review Request: python-achoo - A fluent interface for testing Python objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090923.n399NkXv027094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494853 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-09 05:23:46 EDT --- 1)unable to verify sources. 2030a24b9daa0232aa776c08461e8061 achoo-1.0.tar.gz <= from upstream 00bcb086f715c41821d22748d123308c achoo-1.0.tar.gz <= from SRPM Please add correct upstream sources while building SRPM. submit new SRPM with adding Changelog and increasing release to -2 Changelog should add like "Add correct upstream source" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 09:23:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 05:23:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494819] Review Request: python-bitarray - Efficient Array of Booleans --C Extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090923.n399NWn0027039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494819 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-09 05:23:32 EDT --- I will sponsor you. Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1286713 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 322a25e04e7aece5e028e5b068329291 bitarray-0.3.5.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. + Package python-bitarray-0.3.5-1.fc11.i586 => Provides: _bitarray.so Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libpthread.so.0 libpython2.6.so.1.0 python(abi) = 2.6 rtld(GNU_HASH) Suggestions: 1) Use following line in %build as this is python arch package CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %{__python} setup.py build This will set correct compile flags for gcc compilation. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 09:23:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 05:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090923.n399NuqR031417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 09:33:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 05:33:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - Free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090933.n399Xukc001157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 nucleo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: kvirc - |Review Request: kvirc - |KVIrc is a free portable |Free portable IRC client |IRC client | --- Comment #20 from nucleo 2009-04-09 05:33:55 EDT --- New rpmlint warning kvirc.i386: W: name-repeated-in-summary KVIrc - svn snapshot 3173 - Summary changed to Free portable IRC client New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kvirc Short Description: Free portable IRC client Owners: nucleo Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 09:43:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 05:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090943.n399hC3I031504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-09 05:43:08 EDT --- remove unneeded lines from SPEC like %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} also, remove following from %build CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 09:40:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 05:40:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904090940.n399etIo031099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #19 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-09 05:40:54 EDT --- http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems-1.1.0-4.fc10.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Apr 9 2009 Peter Lemenkov 1.1.0-4 - Internally shipped xmlrpc++ now uses system optflags - Added more docs - Moved audiofiles from libdir to datadir - Removed empty conf_auth.conf - Splitted out g722 module - Splitted out xmlrpc2di module Koji scratchbuild: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1286792 rpmlint messages: sems-conf_auth.ppc: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib sems-gateway.ppc: W: no-documentation sems-gsm.ppc: W: no-documentation sems-mailbox.ppc: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib sems-pin_collect.ppc: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib sems-speex.ppc: W: no-documentation These messages means simply that not all of sems plugins are documented and that some of sems plugins contains only python code. I think that all these messages may be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 10:00:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 06:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091000.n39A0bq9002943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 --- Comment #6 from Ramakrishna Reddy 2009-04-09 06:00:36 EDT --- ParagN, here is the cleaned up version of the SPEC and the newer SRPM. Spec URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-pytools.spec SRPM URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-pytools-8-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 10:08:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 06:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492125] Review Request: mingw32-pangomm - MinGW Windows C++ interface for Pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091008.n39A8O17004547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492125 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-09 06:08:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-pangomm Short Description: MinGW Windows C++ interface for Pango Owners: sailer rjones Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 10:11:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 06:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091011.n39ABSBd009910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #20 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-09 06:11:27 EDT --- Koji scratchbuild for EPEL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1286797 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 10:16:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 06:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494853] Review Request: python-achoo - A fluent interface for testing Python objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091016.n39AGv8r006965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494853 --- Comment #2 from Ramakrishna Reddy 2009-04-09 06:16:57 EDT --- 1. Added the correct Source file. * http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-achoo-1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm 2. Updated the SPEC file with the changelog entries * http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-achoo.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 11:05:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 07:05:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494852] Review Request: astronomy-backgrounds - Astronomy backgrounds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091105.n39B5AdL018133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494852 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-09 07:05:10 EDT --- Looks fine. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 11:17:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 07:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091117.n39BHSvv021015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 --- Comment #6 from Marcin ?abanowski 2009-04-09 07:17:27 EDT --- > Great, thanks for comments! You're welcome ;) > Those are QT locales, they are usually being put in program's share dir, as done here by upstream. I see, psi does it the same way, but for example arora puts these under %{_datadir}/%{name}/locale . Well, if other packages can keep it just under %{_datadir}/%{name}, I assume it's ok. > This is qmake, not cmake. Uhm, I was mistaken. Anyway, using optflags is a must, so please try at least: CFLAGS="%{optflags}" CXXFLAGS="%{optflags}" make %{?_smp_mflags} > Um, why not OK? You didn't build as a separate user. While it is not necessary to build a correct package, this point is a part of the guidelines. And I noticed, that the SRPMS preserved ownership of an account which was named "alex", which I didn't suppose to be a separate account ;). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 11:32:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 07:32:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226342] Merge Review: python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091132.n39BWR94028332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226342 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mnowak at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mnowak at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(james.antill at redh | |at.com) --- Comment #8 from Michal Nowak 2009-04-09 07:32:25 EDT --- * mostly missing state of the patches w.r.t. upstream > Patch0: python-2.6-config.patch > Patch1: Python-2.2.1-pydocnogui.patch https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment * inconsistency in sub-packages "Requires" field: - python-libs : Requires: %{python} = %{version}-%{release} - python-tools: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} in case it's expected to be %{python} -eq %{name} I'd prefer to land on %{name} here. * inconsistency in patching > %patch6 -p1 -b .plural > %patch7 -p1 * old-school exec, back-ticks are BASH specific and non-POSIX, even in Python are now discouraged topdir=`pwd` -> topdir=$(pwd) * missing _"_ should cover LD_LIBRARY_PATH's value - LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$topdir $topdir/python Tools/scripts/pathfix.py -i "%{_bindir}/env python%{pybasever}" . - LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$topdir PATH=$PATH:$topdir make -s OPT="$CFLAGS" %{?_smp_mflags} - make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT * from what is this preventing? Considering that this is the only occurrence. [ -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ] && rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ * using path-based BR is discouraged /usr/bin/find, use "findutils" better, but note, that are listed in packages not necessary to be pulled to BR's https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions and thus always expected to be present. * BuildRoot is non-standard, use one of this ones: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag > BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root * is this hard-coded "/usr" necessary? mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir} -> mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir} * don't mix variable and macro style (e.g. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -> %{buildroot}) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS * old-school defattr %defattr(-, root, root) -> %defattr(-,root,root,-) * be consistent with %dir %{_libdir}/python%{pybasever} %dir %{_libdir}/python%{pybasever}/site-packages where when %{_prefix} is changed then %{_libdir} is changed too: """ %if "%{_lib}" == "lib64" %attr(0755,root,root) %dir /usr/lib/python%{pybasever} %attr(0755,root,root) %dir /usr/lib/python%{pybasever}/site-packages %endif """ -> """ %if "%{_lib}" == "lib64" %dir %{_prefix}/lib/python%{pybasever} %dir %{_prefix}/lib/python%{pybasever}/site-packages %endif """ * hard-coded includedir /usr/include/* -> %{_includedir}/%{name}%{pybasever} * %defattr(-,root,root,755) -> %defattr(-,root,root,-) * RPMLINT: - python.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided python-elementtree python-elementtree still present in F-9 and devel - python.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/python 2.6/lib-dynload/_sqlite3.so ['/usr/lib64'] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath - python.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2 .6/lib-dynload/_ssl.so 0555 [and a lot of others] should be 0755? - python.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/python2.6/run py.py Add shebang, or remove exec perm. - python-devel.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot The libraries and header files needed for Python development. - python-tools.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot A collection of de velopment tools included with Python. Fix, please. - python-test.x86_64: W: spelling-error-in-description pacakge pack age ditto - python-test.x86_64: W: no-documentation Ignore, perhaps... - python-test.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.6 /test/test_multibytecodec_support.py 0644 Add 0755 perms, or remove shebang. - python-test.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/lib64/python2.6/test/null cert.pem Is it necessary for the test? - python-test.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib64/python 2.6/test/test_pep263.py "-*-" rpmlint is confused here because of the leading _!_, which is hardly necessary there, MacCVS should be fixed, not that file. - python-test.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/lib 64/python2.6/test/test_pep263.py - python-tools.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib6 4/python2.6/Demo/embed/demo.c Probably not necessary to create python-tools-devel for two tests/4 .c files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 11:48:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 07:48:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226353] Merge Review: quota In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091148.n39BmT7U028306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226353 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(jakub at redhat.com) --- Comment #34 from Michal Nowak 2009-04-09 07:48:27 EDT --- Jakub, what you think of delivering /usr/include/rpcsvc/rquota.h /usr/include/rpcsvc/rquota.x files inside glibc package and not here with quota? Since it seems that glibc tarball includes them but we are intentionally not shipping them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 11:53:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 07:53:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490989] Review Request: subdownloader - A program for download/upload subtitles for videofiles and DVDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091153.n39BrPJE029494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490989 --- Comment #4 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-09 07:53:25 EDT --- 1,2,3] fixed rpmlint is quiet now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 11:52:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 07:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494852] Review Request: astronomy-backgrounds - Astronomy backgrounds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091152.n39Bqame029333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494852 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Marek Mahut 2009-04-09 07:52:36 EDT --- Many thanks. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: astronomy-backgrounds Short Description: Desktop wallpapers with Astronomy theme Owners: mmahut Branches: devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 12:09:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491694] Review Request: Anyterm - Web based terminal emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091209.n39C95NN003916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694 --- Comment #15 from Alexander Bostr?m 2009-04-09 08:09:05 EDT --- NOT A FORMAL REVIEW. I'll do this the verbose way. * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] anyterm.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Anyterm is a web-based terminal emulator. anyterm.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary Anyterm anyterm.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Anyterm is a web-based terminal emulator. anyterm.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary Anyterm "A web-based terminal emulator" should be ok I guess. anyterm.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/sbin/anytermd Maybe 'export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS"' or similar would fix this? anyterm.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/anytermd.1.gz anyterm.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/sysconfig/anyterm anyterm.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/httpd/conf.d/anyterm.conf Copypaste errors in %install - easy fix. anyterm.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/man/man1/anytermd.1.gz Might need to run dos2unix on it? anyterm.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/sysconfig/anyterm anyterm.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/httpd/conf.d/anyterm.conf Not a problem. anyterm.x86_64: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-postin /etc/rc.d/init.d/anyterm anyterm.x86_64: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-preun /etc/rc.d/init.d/anyterm anyterm.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/anyterm anyterm.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/anyterm Merge in stuff from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript to hopefully fix this. * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . Ok. * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . Ok. * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Some notes: 1.6 Writing a package from scratch BuildRoot is wrong. Easy fix. Whitespace mismatch in tags and %description has a newline, as compared to the sample .spec. (Don't know if that matters.) 1.8.1 Architecture Build Failures Doesn't build on rawhide i386. 1.20 Compiler flags - Need fixing. 1.42 Web Applications - Change /var/www to /usr/share. 1.47 All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment 1.47.1 If upstream doesn't have a bug tracker Add a comment: # http://anyterm.org/1.1/install.html#secid2252601 # http://anyterm.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=577 Patch0: url-parameterize-vars.patch Also, the patch should really be accepted upstream first. (The proxy URL part is ok since it's from upstream docs.) I'm slightly worried about the security implications of it so I think it's fairly important even though it's just a small patch. * MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Ok. * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] Ok. * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] Add: %doc LICENSE * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] Ok, AFAICT. * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] It's fine, but I think the definiton of "pbuild" can be removed and the use of "%{pbuild}/" removed since it will be equal to the current working directory anyway. * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Ok, matches. * MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] Not ok. (Rawhide i386 fails.) * MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] Ok, build problem is probably not a arch-related. * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Ok, I believe. * MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] Ok, I guess. No translation. * MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] Ok. No shared libraries. * MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [11] Ok. * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] Not ok. It should own /usr/share/anyterm. * MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] Ok. * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] Not ok. See rpmlint. * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] Ok. * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] Ok, unless __install should not be used. * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] Ok. * MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] Ok. * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] Ok. * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] * MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] * MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [21] * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] Ok. * MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] Ok, no devel package. * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20] Ok. * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [23] Ok. * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] Ok. * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] Ok. * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] Ok. * SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [27] Ok. * SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [28] Ok. * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [29] Not ok. * SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [30] * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. Not tested. * SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [31] Ok. * SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [22] Ok. * SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [21] Ok. * SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [32] Ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 12:35:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:35:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091235.n39CZhPJ006933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #28 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-09 08:35:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=338895) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=338895) rawhide mockbuild failed, buildlog attached. I tried to rebuild the latest package locally in mock, but it failed. Please take a look at the error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 12:39:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091239.n39Cds6V010588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #19 from Michal Nowak 2009-04-09 08:39:49 EDT --- What's blocking this review? Recent rpmlint does not complain on license because "GPLv2+" and "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ with exceptions" are valid now (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing). If anyone feels there's problem with licensing, let's block on bug fe-legal. -- Informal rpmlint review on recent rpm ===================================== SPECS/rpm.spec:571: W: macro-in-%changelog patch * Thu Sep 25 2008 Jindrich Novy - don't treat %patch numberless if -P parameter is present (#463942) rpm.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary RPM don't get this one... rpm.src: W: strange-permission fontconfig.prov 0755 rpm.src: W: strange-permission desktop-file.prov 0755 any idea? rpm.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib "There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share." Huh, what? rpm.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /var/lib/rpm newman at dhcp-lab-124 rpmbuild $ rpmquery -f /var/lib/rpm rpm-4.7.0-0.beta1.9.fc11.x86_64 rpmlint bug? rpm.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/rpm/rpm.xinetd rpm.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/rpm/rpm.log exec perm probably not necesary rpm-build.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/rpm/macros.python rpm-build.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/rpm/macros.php rpm-build.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/rpm/macros.perl ditto rpm-python.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/rpm/__init__.py ditto rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_recover ../../bin/db_recover rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_deadlock ../../bin/db_deadlock rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_stat ../../bin/db_stat rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_dump ../../bin/db_dump rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_archive ../../bin/db_archive rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_upgrade ../../bin/db_upgrade rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_printlog ../../bin/db_printlog rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_verify ../../bin/db_verify rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_load ../../bin/db_load rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_svc ../../bin/berkeley_db_svc Build system problem? Anyone seeing this too? rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Group rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Group rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Basenames rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Basenames rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Requireversion rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Requireversion rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Providename rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Providename rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.007 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.007 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Pubkeys rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Pubkeys rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.003 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.003 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.009 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.009 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Conflictname rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Conflictname rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Provideversion rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Provideversion rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Triggername rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Triggername rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Filedigests rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Filedigests rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Dirnames rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Dirnames rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.004 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.004 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.005 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.005 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.001 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.001 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.002 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.002 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Name rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Name rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.008 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.008 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Installtid rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Installtid rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Requirename rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Requirename rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Sigmd5 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Sigmd5 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Sha1header rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Sha1header rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Packages rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Packages rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.006 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.006 rpm Discussed already. rpm.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%posttrans rm Life's dangerous. rpm-build.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/rpm/perldeps.pl 0644 Investigate please. rpm-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation rpm-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation Upstream problem :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 12:48:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494171] Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091248.n39CmREF009697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-09 08:48:26 EDT --- >> >> * Build packages with separate user accounts: not-OK ;) >> > ??? >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Build_packages_with_separate_user_accounts >> My wild guess was that you didn't build the package as the separate user, >> because there was a rather generic username set as owner of the files in the >> SRPM ;). > >... whatever Pretty much. It doesn't matter what user you build the SRPM as, the ownership is set in the %files attr and defattr sections. Of course, don't build as root, but. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 12:56:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:56:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091256.n39CufxX014935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(pmatilai at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #11 from Michal Nowak 2009-04-09 08:56:38 EDT --- Panu, this seems to be stuck for some time due to not reply from package maintainers, can you follow to Robin's proposals & review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 12:56:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091256.n39Cuu9A012169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #29 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-09 08:56:55 EDT --- Ok, a scratch build succeeded: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1287295 I cannot eliminate a problem with my computer, eventually bad RAM, so I suggest to ignore the above comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 12:57:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091257.n39CvSkh012305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #338895|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 13:02:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 09:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091302.n39D2lb4013715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 Panu Matilainen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(pmatilai at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #12 from Panu Matilainen 2009-04-09 09:02:46 EDT --- Lets just say that it might help somewhat that this bug has been brought to my attention :) I'll look into this as soon as I've dealt with some other more pressing matters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 13:05:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 09:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491520] Review Request: shntool - shntool is a multi-purpose WAVE data processing and reporting utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091305.n39D5YCa014550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491520 Hedayat Vatankhah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |hedayat at grad.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |hedayat at grad.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 13:26:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 09:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091326.n39DQ4go023074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #30 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-04-09 09:26:04 EDT --- I updated "parrot.spec" and the source rpm. The URLs remain the same. - change 'make install' to 'make install-dev' to also install support for development - add subpackage "tools" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 13:22:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 09:22:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226482] Merge Review: tcp_wrappers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091322.n39DMN8v022046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226482 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mnowak at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(jsafrane at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #10 from Michal Nowak 2009-04-09 09:22:22 EDT --- * tcp_wrappers.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 249, tab: line 37) Sane. Easy. * tcp_wrappers.x86_64: E: obsolete-on-name I wonder why tcp_wrappers obsoletes itself, for clean update path is >N-V-R enough when the name is the same, right? * tcp_wrappers-devel.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized tcp_wrappers development libraries and headers * tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized tcp_wrappers libraries tcp_wrappers-libs... -> Tcp_wrappers-libs... * tcp_wrappers-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided tcp_wrappers * tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided tcp_wrappers preferably dump the whote "Obsoletes" and we are done. The rest looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 13:33:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 09:33:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452387] Review Request: netblox - A console-based, networked falling blocks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091333.n39DX1VE024579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452387 --- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-09 09:33:01 EDT --- See comments on 489728. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 13:33:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 09:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491520] Review Request: shntool - shntool is a multi-purpose WAVE data processing and reporting utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091333.n39DX0ij024542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491520 --- Comment #3 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-04-09 09:33:00 EDT --- Would you please update to version 3.0.10? Review: 1. rpmlint: silent, OK. 2. package name and spec name are OK. 3. license OK 4. md5 check OK 5. successfully built in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1287309 6. file owndership OK The package seems to be OK. Please update the package and I'll approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 13:32:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 09:32:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091332.n39DWl8f024501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-09 09:32:46 EDT --- Linked spec and SRPM spec differ, using linked spec. >- I would rather suggest keeping qt4-devel in order to stay compatible with F8, >even though it is not supported anymore. No. Target rawhide, and modify the spec if necessary for older supported releases. If someone needs to build for an unsupported release, they can modify it themselves. Marcin, what exactly to you mean by separate user? Separate from what? I see nothing about it here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Which is what we should be using as our criteria. SRPMS pick up ownership of the user under which the SRPM is built, but upon installation into a build tree, the files pick up the installing user's ownership. This is normal. You'll notice if you install a koji SRPM they report the user mockbuild as owner. Otherwise, Marcin, your comments and Alexey's repsonses are good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 13:37:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 09:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226353] Merge Review: quota In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091337.n39DbvnF023130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226353 --- Comment #35 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-04-09 09:37:56 EDT --- Just want to mention few differences: glibc: afaik no manpage rquota.x size 1569 quota: manpage rquota.3 rquota.x size 3470 There are several things added in rquota.x shipped with quota... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 13:35:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 09:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226482] Merge Review: tcp_wrappers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091335.n39DZX79022668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226482 Jan Safranek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jchadima at redhat.com, | |jsafrane at redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(jsafrane at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #11 from Jan Safranek 2009-04-09 09:35:31 EDT --- jchadima is current tcp_wrappers owner -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:01:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:01:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226510] Merge Review: udev In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091401.n39E1moI030052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226510 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(harald at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #14 from Michal Nowak 2009-04-09 10:01:46 EDT --- * udev.src: W: strange-permission start_udev 0755 Not that common to ship SourceX files with exec perms, but installed via 0755, so, OK. * udev.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 101, tab: line 104) Easy stuff. * udev.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /lib/udev/vol_id ['/lib64'] Rpath is blocker in review, even such common path, fix it, please. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath * udev.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/modprobe.d/floppy-pnp.conf Sure, this is in /etc but not expected to be changed by user but in spec file is expected to note, why you don't have %config(noreplace), see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Configuration_files That's what Jon asked for. * udev.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm * udev.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm OK. * udev.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/udev-post * udev.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/udev-post Clear. * udev.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Required-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/udev-post Easy to fix, but somewhat useless. * udev.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name udev-post Will you fix it to "udev", or what was the resolution? * libudev-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on libudev/libudev-libs/liblibudev Bad guess, rpmlint. OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:04:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226482] Merge Review: tcp_wrappers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091404.n39E4wfX000440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226482 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(jchadima at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:06:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091406.n39E6Rm5001127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:06:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:06:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091406.n39E6Cr1001053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 --- Comment #8 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-04-09 10:06:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > This is qmake, not cmake. > Uhm, I was mistaken. Anyway, using optflags is a must, so please try at least: > CFLAGS="%{optflags}" CXXFLAGS="%{optflags}" make %{?_smp_mflags} The CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS are usually set by rpm itself. Some mangling with optflags is needed when some build system is doesn't respect them properly. You can check that optflags are actually used when building. (Get optflags with "rpm -E %optflags" and look that it exist in build log) > > Um, why not OK? > You didn't build as a separate user. While it is not necessary to build a > correct package, this point is a part of the guidelines. And I noticed, that > the SRPMS preserved ownership of an account which was named "alex", which I > didn't suppose to be a separate account ;). Ah, you are talking about this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Build_packages_with_separate_user_accounts Well, you're definitely right. I usually do builds in mock, but not in this case :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:06:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:06:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491520] Review Request: shntool - shntool is a multi-purpose WAVE data processing and reporting utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091406.n39E64Bg031458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491520 --- Comment #4 from Felix Kaechele 2009-04-09 10:06:04 EDT --- Version Bump to 3.0.10: Spec URL: http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/shntool.spec SRPM URL: http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/shntool-3.0.10-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:09:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:09:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490989] Review Request: subdownloader - A program for download/upload subtitles for videofiles and DVDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091409.n39E920B031855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490989 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:08:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:08:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490989] Review Request: subdownloader - A program for download/upload subtitles for videofiles and DVDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091408.n39E8eso031794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490989 --- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-09 10:08:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: subdownloader Short Description: Program to download movie subtitles Owners: hpejakle Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: hpejakle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:05:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:05:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091405.n39E5vDb031245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 --- Comment #12 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-09 10:05:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pidgin-musictracker Short Description: Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status Owners: hpejakle Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: hpejakle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:10:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091410.n39EAGEB002173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:08:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226353] Merge Review: quota In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091408.n39E8jTO001548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226353 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jakub at redhat.com) | --- Comment #36 from Michal Nowak 2009-04-09 10:08:44 EDT --- Good point! So, let's create -devel and move rquota.x there, since you're not objecting it (comment #25), and close this nice review soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:09:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:09:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225974] Merge Review: krb5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091409.n39E9K7n001620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225974 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pmatilai at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-09 10:09:17 EDT --- Ok, let's see. >> krb5.src: W: strange-permission krb5kdc.init 0755 >> A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. >> Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. > >I'm gonna need help from CVS admins for this one -- the permissions are set at >checkout-time. Yeah, it was probably set this way when the SRPM that was imported was built. I'll set the CVS flag again for assistance. >> krb5.src: W: strange-permission krb5-tex-pdf.sh 0755 >> A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. >> Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. > >We run this script during the build. We could take the execute bit off and run >a shell with the script as its argument, I guess. Probably worth doing. >> krb5-libs.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/kerberos/man/man5/.k5login.5.gz >> The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete >> it from the package if not. >> >> ??????????? > >This is the man page for the use of ~/.k5login. Not really sure what to do >with it. Since it's a valid manpage with a valid name, file a bug for an rpmlint exception. >> krb5-workstation.i386: E: setuid-binary /usr/kerberos/bin/ksu root 04755 >> The file is setuid, this may be dangerous, especially if this file is setuid >> root. >> >> Necessary, I suspect. > >Yup. For a while we took the setuid bit off, but it's actually useless without >it, and the bug reports were rarely friendly. I can imagine. :) rpmlint exception here, too. >> krb5-workstation.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/kerberos/bin/ksu >> >> Fix if possible. > >The buildroot strip script misses setuid applications. I'm actually not sure >if that's intentional or not. CCing Panu for this one. >> krb5-workstation-servers.i386: E: postin-without-chkconfig >> /etc/rc.d/init.d/krb524 >> The package contains an init script but doesn't call chkconfig in its %post. >> >> krb5-workstation-servers.i386: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-preun >> /etc/rc.d/init.d/krb524 >> The package contains an init script but doesn't contain a %preun with a call >> to chkconfig. >> >> Probably needs fixing. > >The logic for figuring out which subpackage should chkconfig --del the symlinks >would have been a nightmare. But it's krb4-specific, so triggering on removal >of the older version of either subpackage isn't that bad. (Except for the part >where it's a trigger, and triggers are best avoided if possible.) Am I to understand that this will be deprecated upon removal of krb4 stuff? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:13:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:13:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091413.n39EDQN6000870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-09 10:13:26 EDT --- Alexey is correct WRT flags. And using mock is certainly a best practice, but has little bearing on the SRPM produced. I typically use a seperate user account for local builds, and do mock to test BuildRequires, but that's just me, YMMV. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:11:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:11:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091411.n39EBDDT000366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 --- Comment #9 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-04-09 10:11:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Linked spec and SRPM spec differ, using linked spec. Sorry, here is the new release. Spec URL: http://atorkhov.fedorapeople.org/kcheckers.spec SRPM URL: http://atorkhov.fedorapeople.org/kcheckers-0.8.1-4.fc10.src.rpm * Thu Apr 09 2009 Alexey Torkhov - 0.8.1-4 - Adding comments for patches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:09:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091409.n39E9ics032135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |promac at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-04-09 10:09:43 EDT --- Just add something like this, to convert ChangeLog to utf8: %prep %setup -q iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf8 ChangeLog -o ChangeLog.txt touch -r ChangeLog ChangeLog.txt mv ChangeLog.txt ChangeLog Also, in the changelog of your spec file, I would write only: * Thu Dec 16 2008 Gianluca Sforna - 1.5-4 - Adapted spec file based on freshrpms latest version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:10:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:10:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494647] Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091410.n39EABwp032494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 --- Comment #6 from Alan Dunn 2009-04-09 10:10:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Okay, now it looks like this bit of %install ... > > # Fix an issue that occurs in the info files (not quite sure where in > # the process, so doing it here): > > mv %{buildroot}%{_infodir}/mmm.info-2.gz \ > %{buildroot}%{_infodir}/mmm.info-2 && \ > gzip %{buildroot}%{_infodir}/mmm.info-2 > > ... is no longer necessary. At least, it wasn't necessary for me. Really? Any idea that is... the problem I found for my system was that mmm.info-2.gz was not actually a zipped archive. Thus, if you run info and navigate to a page that requires mmm.info-2, info actually segfaults. It still seems necessary for me: the result in the RPM is a (once zipped) info file. If this problem didn't occur on your system, then this "fix" would actually break things, so I want to know. (I suppose it might be safer to do file type detection and zip it if it isn't a zip file already.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:12:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091412.n39ECT1j000672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #35 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-09 10:12:27 EDT --- Debmirror released: 23. January 2007 GPLv3 released: 29. June 2007 the copyrightfile of debmirror says: License: The debmirror script is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License (see /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL). x> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 5 2009-03-05 20:57 /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL -> GPL-3 This file is linked with GPLv3 in debian stable, testing and sid/experimental. Debian says with the link to the actual gpl that this file is lincensed under GPL(actual_version) or higher. If today comes a GPLv4 the "debian license package" will be updated to GPL-> GPL-4 ( I asked Alexander "formorer" Wirth of the Debian Project). So it is in my (and Alexander's) view GPLv3+, even GPLv3 was later released than debmirror. I think, that GPLv2+ was right before the link switched to GPLv3. I'm not really schooled in license things, maybe I'm totally wrong. I think this should be clarified by people who knows best, so I added a legal blocker! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:17:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226353] Merge Review: quota In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091417.n39EHQG4003774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226353 --- Comment #37 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-09 10:17:26 EDT --- Works for me. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:20:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:20:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091420.n39EKwQE004808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #36 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-09 10:20:57 EDT --- Keep in mind that you cannot use the version found in the GPL license text to indicate versioning intent on code. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F Since the code doesn't specify anything, the correct license tag is "GPL+". Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:18:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:18:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494647] Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091418.n39EIBNT003862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 --- Comment #7 from Alan Dunn 2009-04-09 10:18:11 EDT --- Hmm, yes, it now seems unnecessary on my system too - the command isn't actually doing anything (I thought any error would've caused rpmbuild to stop, but on closer inspection the command was having an error - couldn't find the zipped file - and not doing anything...) (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Okay, now it looks like this bit of %install ... > > > > # Fix an issue that occurs in the info files (not quite sure where in > > # the process, so doing it here): > > > > mv %{buildroot}%{_infodir}/mmm.info-2.gz \ > > %{buildroot}%{_infodir}/mmm.info-2 && \ > > gzip %{buildroot}%{_infodir}/mmm.info-2 > > > > ... is no longer necessary. At least, it wasn't necessary for me. > > Really? Any idea that is... the problem I found for my system was that > mmm.info-2.gz was not actually a zipped archive. Thus, if you run info and > navigate to a page that requires mmm.info-2, info actually segfaults. It still > seems necessary for me: the result in the RPM is a (once zipped) info file. If > this problem didn't occur on your system, then this "fix" would actually break > things, so I want to know. (I suppose it might be safer to do file type > detection and zip it if it isn't a zip file already.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:21:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:21:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494647] Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091421.n39ELT7H003108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 Alan Dunn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Alan Dunn 2009-04-09 10:21:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: emacs-mmm Short Description: Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file Owners: amdunn Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:25:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:25:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091425.n39EPbOo004355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #31 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-09 10:25:35 EDT --- FYI: The build error from comment # 28 was caused by SELinux, so we don't need to care about it any further. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:30:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491520] Review Request: shntool - shntool is a multi-purpose WAVE data processing and reporting utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091430.n39EUFTK005870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491520 Hedayat Vatankhah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-04-09 10:30:14 EDT --- Thanks. This package is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:29:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:29:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226353] Merge Review: quota In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091429.n39ETw7m005451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226353 --- Comment #38 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-04-09 10:29:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #36) > Good point! So, let's create -devel and move rquota.x there, since you're not > objecting it (comment #25), and close this nice review soon. Already done for quite a long time ;) ... * Wed Sep 10 2008 Ondrej Vasik 1:3.16-5 - fix rpmlint warnings - absolute symlink and not using epoch in version in changelog (#226353) - rquota headers and manpage now in devel subpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:42:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091442.n39Eg52h009186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 226353, which changed state. Bug 226353 Summary: Merge Review: quota https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226353 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 14:42:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226353] Merge Review: quota In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091442.n39Eg4vp009161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226353 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #39 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-09 10:42:03 EDT --- Might've been good to've mentioned that. :) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 15:15:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:15:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456242] Review Request: gavl - A library for handling uncompressed audio and video data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091515.n39FFKbP020547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456242 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-09 11:15:20 EDT --- Imported and built for rawhide and F-10. Going to build for F-9? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 15:27:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491520] Review Request: shntool - shntool is a multi-purpose WAVE data processing and reporting utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091527.n39FRJd7021810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491520 --- Comment #6 from Felix Kaechele 2009-04-09 11:27:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: shntool Short Description: A multi-purpose WAVE data processing and reporting utility Owners: heffer Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 15:28:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491520] Review Request: shntool - shntool is a multi-purpose WAVE data processing and reporting utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091528.n39FS82k023829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491520 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 15:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091533.n39FXpUS025247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-09 11:33:50 EDT --- New package version: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-sippy.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-sippy-0-0.4.20090409cvs.fc10.src.rpm * New cvs-snapshot, in which upstream satisfies some our wishes, so I was able to drop almost all patches and workarounds from this package. * Changed versioning scheme a little. * Changed description. Koji scratchbuild for EL-5: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1287562 Koji scratchbuild for F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1287566 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 15:42:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:42:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456242] Review Request: gavl - A library for handling uncompressed audio and video data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091542.n39FgLcV025371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456242 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-09 11:42:21 EDT --- build failed on F-10 because libgdither wasn't within the buildroot. I hope it will be fixed on next push. I will close the bug once F-9/F-10 gavl got built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 15:43:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:43:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091543.n39Fhsha028016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #37 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-04-09 11:43:53 EDT --- That clarifies things, thanks. New version: SPEC: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/debmirror.spec SRPM: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/debmirror-20070123-7.fc11.src.rpm (in reply to comment #33): Simon, I've added findutils and coreutils to the Requires because debmirror uses cp and find. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 15:44:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:44:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495072] New: Review Request: gnome-theme-CompactClearlooks - A compact Clearlooks theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnome-theme-CompactClearlooks - A compact Clearlooks theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495072 Summary: Review Request: gnome-theme-CompactClearlooks - A compact Clearlooks theme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sindrepb at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnome-theme-ClearlooksCompact.spec SRPM URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnome-theme-ClearlooksCompact-1.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: ClearlooksCompact is a customized version of the Clearlooks theme for the GNOME desktop that tries to be very compact, but still maintain the beautiful Clearlooks look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 15:47:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:47:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456242] Review Request: gavl - A library for handling uncompressed audio and video data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091547.n39Fl4et026774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456242 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-09 11:47:04 EDT --- Gotcha. The same thing with gavl is blocking my rawhide mock build for frei0r-plugins. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 15:44:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091544.n39Fitku026018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #38 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-04-09 11:44:55 EDT --- Oops, that should be: SPEC: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/debmirror.spec SRPM: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/debmirror-20070123-8.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:06:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492191] Review Request: jmod - Java Sound MODules Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091606.n39G6nqD000694@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492191 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:07:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:07:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490996] Review Request: backup-light - A small backup bash utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091607.n39G7MIJ031076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490996 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:07:22 EDT --- backup-light-0.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:09:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478291] Review Request: shtool - Portable shell tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091609.n39G95Dt001310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478291 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:09:05 EDT --- shtool-2.0.8-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:11:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:11:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478291] Review Request: shtool - Portable shell tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091611.n39GBE33002375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478291 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.0.8-2.fc10 |2.0.8-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:10:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480235] Review Request: subtitlecomposer - A text-based subtitles editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091610.n39GAs6V002216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480235 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:10:53 EDT --- subtitlecomposer-0.5.2-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:09:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:09:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492122] Review Request: mingw32-cairomm - MinGW Windows C++ API for the cairo graphics library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091609.n39G9QFs001452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492122 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:09:26 EDT --- mingw32-cairomm-1.6.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:11:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490723] Review Request: R-IRanges - Low-level containers for storing sets of integer ranges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091611.n39GBQaI002437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490723 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:11:25 EDT --- R-IRanges-1.1.55-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:09:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478291] Review Request: shtool - Portable shell tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091609.n39G9AKh001348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478291 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.0.8-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:07:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:07:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490996] Review Request: backup-light - A small backup bash utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091607.n39G7Q6Z000971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490996 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:10:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:10:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480235] Review Request: subtitlecomposer - A text-based subtitles editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091610.n39GAx6T002289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480235 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.5.2-3.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:09:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492122] Review Request: mingw32-cairomm - MinGW Windows C++ API for the cairo graphics library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091609.n39G9VeC001519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492122 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.6.2-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:08:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:08:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494238] Review Request: pyrrd - A Pure Python Wrapper for RRDTool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091608.n39G82BN001081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494238 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:08:01 EDT --- pyrrd-0.0.7-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update pyrrd'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3436 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:11:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478291] Review Request: shtool - Portable shell tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091611.n39GB9aH032544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478291 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:11:09 EDT --- shtool-2.0.8-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:13:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490996] Review Request: backup-light - A small backup bash utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091613.n39GDbkY000803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490996 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:13:37 EDT --- backup-light-0.4-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:13:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:13:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490996] Review Request: backup-light - A small backup bash utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091613.n39GDfmO000903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490996 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4-2.fc10 |0.4-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:11:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486760] Review Request: mscore - Music Composition & Notation Software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091611.n39GBiKh032704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486760 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:11:44 EDT --- mscore-0.9.4-3.fc10.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:11:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:11:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490723] Review Request: R-IRanges - Low-level containers for storing sets of integer ranges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091611.n39GBV12032648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490723 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1.55-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:11:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:11:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486760] Review Request: mscore - Music Composition & Notation Software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091611.n39GBn0v032748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486760 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.4-3.fc10.1 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:16:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:16:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478432] Review Request: dwscan - Displays access point information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091616.n39GGMt4004646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478432 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:16:23 EDT --- dwscan-0.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:15:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:15:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492831] Review Request: libmkv - An alternative to the official libmatroska library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091615.n39GF7gN004053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492831 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:15:07 EDT --- libmkv-0.6.3.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:16:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:16:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478432] Review Request: dwscan - Displays access point information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091616.n39GGRq9004688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478432 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2-3.fc9 |0.2-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:15:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:15:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490723] Review Request: R-IRanges - Low-level containers for storing sets of integer ranges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091615.n39GFYFh004429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490723 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1.55-1.fc10 |1.1.55-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:15:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490723] Review Request: R-IRanges - Low-level containers for storing sets of integer ranges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091615.n39GFTnC004263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490723 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:15:29 EDT --- R-IRanges-1.1.55-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:16:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:16:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490580] Review Request: faust - Compiled language for real-time audio signal processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091616.n39GG3XC004533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490580 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.9.4-2.b.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:16:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478432] Review Request: dwscan - Displays access point information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091616.n39GGH3g004596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478432 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2-3.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:17:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:17:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091617.n39GH7Hj004843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:17:07 EDT --- jamin-0.95.0-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jamin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3493 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:13:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:13:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091613.n39GDQj5003341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:13:26 EDT --- chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3465 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:15:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490580] Review Request: faust - Compiled language for real-time audio signal processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091615.n39GFxdR002173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490580 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:15:58 EDT --- faust-0.9.9.4-2.b.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:16:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:16:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478432] Review Request: dwscan - Displays access point information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091616.n39GGCI0002352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478432 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:16:11 EDT --- dwscan-0.2-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:15:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492831] Review Request: libmkv - An alternative to the official libmatroska library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091615.n39GFCu2001963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492831 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6.3.1-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:18:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492398] Review Request: slv2 - LV2 host library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091618.n39GI1E1002792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492398 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:18:00 EDT --- slv2-0.6.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update slv2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3497 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:15:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:15:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494238] Review Request: pyrrd - A Pure Python Wrapper for RRDTool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091615.n39GFfGc002089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494238 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:15:41 EDT --- pyrrd-0.0.7-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pyrrd'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3489 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:18:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480235] Review Request: subtitlecomposer - A text-based subtitles editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091618.n39GI7pU005446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480235 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:18:07 EDT --- subtitlecomposer-0.5.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:18:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:18:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480235] Review Request: subtitlecomposer - A text-based subtitles editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091618.n39GIBhu005482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480235 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5.2-3.fc9 |0.5.2-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:28:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492191] Review Request: jmod - Java Sound MODules Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091628.n39GSi8p008295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492191 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-04-09 12:28:44 EDT --- Formal review: OK: rpmlint gives only one false positive. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: Script to fetch sources included. OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. The package is good to go. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091633.n39GX995006584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-09 12:33:08 EDT --- Some notes for 0.16-2: * License - The license tag "Distributable, see LICENSE" is invalid. For this package the license tag should be "LGPLv2+". * BuildRequires: - The following BR is invalid: --------------------------------------------------------------- BuildRequires: libwnck-devel >= @GNOME_WNCK@ --------------------------------------------------------------- * Requires - The following Requires are redundant. rpmbuild should automatically detect these dependencies --------------------------------------------------------------- Requires: perl(ExtUtils::Depends) >= 0.20 Requires: perl(ExtUtils::PkgConfig) >= 1.03 Requires: perl(Glib) >= 1.180 Requires: perl(Gtk2) >= 1.00 --------------------------------------------------------------- - The following misses the last ")" --------------------------------------------------------------- Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version) --------------------------------------------------------------- * Make build.log more verbose (and also on the bug 493250) - The current build.log shows: --------------------------------------------------------------- 62 chmod 644 Wnck.bs 63 [ CC xs/Wnck.c ] 64 [ CC xs/WnckApplication.c ] 65 [ CC xs/WnckClassGroup.c ] 66 [ CC xs/WnckPager.c ] --------------------------------------------------------------- This is not useful, e.g. we cannot check if Fedora specific compilation flags are correctly honored. The following method will show more verbose message, however there may be some other method (Parag, would you know?) --------------------------------------------------------------- make %{?_smp_mflags} NOECHO= --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:12:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091612.n39GCOlh000443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:12:23 EDT --- jamin-0.95.0-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update jamin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3461 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:10:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:10:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091610.n39GA0lp031823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:10:00 EDT --- chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3452 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 17:06:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:06:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492191] Review Request: jmod - Java Sound MODules Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091706.n39H69b3016822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492191 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-09 13:06:09 EDT --- Thanks Alexander! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jmod Short Description: Java Sound MODules Library Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 17:14:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091714.n39HERFD015837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 --- Comment #12 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-09 13:14:26 EDT --- All of the packaging issues are resolved in -2: Updated SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/coccinella-0.96.12-2.fc11.src.rpm Updated SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/coccinella.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 17:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091730.n39HU9nc022883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #39 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-09 13:30:06 EDT --- > (in reply to comment #33): Simon, I've added findutils and coreutils to the > Requires because debmirror uses cp and find. yeah, I can partly understand "findutils" but I never seen a machine without "coreutils", but hey - it was just a question, for me this thing was and is okay. subsequent correction: # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. ----------- O.K. last but not least a nice ASCII for Ruben :) |-------------------| | APPROVED | | DEBMIRROR | |-------------------| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 17:35:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091735.n39HZXds024167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Saou 2009-04-09 13:35:33 EDT --- * /!\ rpmlint output : ogmtools.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ogmtools-1.5/ChangeLog That will need fixing, like Paulo suggested for instance. * OK : naming is ok, spec is named ok, confirms to packaging guielines * /!\ license is GPL+ from what I dug up, please confirm then fix in the License * OK : sources are pristine * OK : builds and runs fine (tested on x86_64) * OK : build requires are ok, though libogg-devel could be excluded since libvorbis-devel requires it, but since the package explicitly requires libogg to build this is fine * OK : no libs, not relocatable, no unusual parent dirs * OK : %files, %clean, %defattr, consistency in macros * OK : no devel type files, no large docs * OK : no GUI, no .desktop file Cosmetic : The header lines aren't aligned with the BuildRequires ones. Please fix the ChangeLog file, the "License:" field and align the headers in the spec if you don't mind. Once that done, I'll approve the package. (and sorry for having stalled the review for so long, I really had hope to be able to get it over with much more quickly) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 17:45:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487007] Review Request: python-stomper - A python client implementation of the STOMP protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091745.n39HjbEc026577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487007 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-09 13:45:36 EDT --- Notes: * Requires ---------------------------------------------- Requires: python(abi) >= 2.5 ---------------------------------------------- - is not needed. rpmbuild adds python abi related dependency automatically (on rawhide it is "python(abi) = 2.6" Other things are okay. ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (python-stomper) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 17:54:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091754.n39Hsrg0025464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 --- Comment #11 from Marcin ?abanowski 2009-04-09 13:54:52 EDT --- Oh, my mistake, I was looking at the moc commands. You're definitely right, the flags are set correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 17:59:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091759.n39Hx1Am026464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-09 13:59:00 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is almost silent: [petro at Sulaco ppc]$ rpmlint gloox-* gloox-devel.ppc: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [petro at Sulaco ppc]$ [petro at Sulaco SRPMS]$ rpmlint gloox-* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SRPMS] + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (GPLv2). + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. However I failed to reproduce exact tarball using instructions in comments (it's a normal situation when creating tarball from SCM directly). [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ ll gloox-1.0-SVNr4003.tar.bz2* -rw-rw-r-- 1 petro petro 644824 ??? 9 21:41 gloox-1.0-SVNr4003.tar.bz2 -rw-r--r-- 1 petro petro 621743 ??? 5 12:57 gloox-1.0-SVNr4003.tar.bz2.from_srpm [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ I suggest you to consider rebasing patches against latest devel tarball ( http://camaya.net/download/gloox-1.0-beta8.tar.bz2 ) instead of fetching whole svn tree. + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + The package calls ldconfig in %post and %postun. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissable content. + No extremely large documentation files + Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + Header files are in a -devel package. + No static libraries. + The sub-package containing pkgconfig(.pc) files has 'Requires: pkgconfig' directive. + The library file that ends in .so (without suffix) is placed in a -devel package. + The devel sub-package requires the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. + Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. So, finally, please consider using http://camaya.net/download/gloox-1.0-beta8.tar.bz2 instead of svn tree (just for simplifying the process of verifying sources) or write few words explaining why it's necessary to use trunk and I'll approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 17:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471509] Review Request: extjs - Ext JS is a cross-browser JavaScript library for building rich internet applications. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091759.n39HxEhM026561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471509 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-09 13:59:13 EDT --- A quick look at the spec shows a few problems: 1) You didn't follow spot's directions -- there's no explanation of the licensing issues in the spec file. 2) The source URL doesn't have a comment explaining how to get the zip file 3) The Fedora README isn't included as a SourceX: line in the spec... that leads me to believe you've modified the upstream zip file to include it which is not allowed. As for packaging guidelines... That's somewhat my fault. I've been busy and there's been blockers in other packages that have made packaging javascript libraries not work the way I'd like. One package has been recently fixed which makes it possible for this to work again. I'm looking into updating the Guidelines. If you're interested in Javascript libraries, it would be highly beneficial to help drive this forward. You can take the existing Draft as a basis or talk to me about my idea for a static-library like change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 18:39:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:39:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareFTP - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091839.n39IdBtG007330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 18:38:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareFTP - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091838.n39IcxCW007274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 18:50:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:50:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091850.n39IoBt5006821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #40 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-04-09 14:50:10 EDT --- Thanks for the ASCII (and the review) ;-) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: debmirror Short Description: Debian partial mirror script, with ftp and package pool support Owners: ruben Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 19:04:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:04:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091904.n39J4buv012941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 226195, which changed state. Bug 226195 Summary: Merge Review: newt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226195 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 19:04:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:04:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226195] Merge Review: newt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091904.n39J4aRu012908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226195 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-09 15:04:35 EDT --- Looks like "today" turned into "tomorrow", but here we go. I checked out and built the latest rawhide branch of newt. rpmlint is down to: newt.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libnewt.so.0.52.10 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 which is a bad idea and arguably a bug in the library, but not a review blocker. newt-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation which is fine. So rpmlint is fine now, and upon inspection the other issues I had are fixed as well. Really the only thing I see currently is that the license on the code is rather unclear. There's nothing in the tarball that I can see which specifies which version of the LGPL is in use, which would, according to clause 13 of the included COPYING file, indicate that we are free to choose any version (i.e. LGPLv2+). Only the included spec file indicates a specific version, and I'm not absolutely certain whether or not that's a sufficient statement of intent from a legal standpoint. Still, since I believe you folks are the upstream and the specfile in the tarball does say LGPLv2 so I'm going to say that things are OK, but I do strongly suggest that you clarify the licensing, preferrably by including the proper license blocks at the start of the source files as recommended by the COPYING file, or at minimum at least say "version 2.1 of the LGPL only" somewhere in the documentation or code. APPROVED, and closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 19:37:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:37:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091937.n39Jb5CP020307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-09 15:37:04 EDT --- Great --------------------------------------------- This package (coccinella) is APPROVED by oget --------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 19:43:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:43:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091943.n39Jh6Ww017765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 15:43:02 EDT --- > What's blocking this review? As I mentioned in the previous comment, a licensing review. ;) I might have time to sit down and do it this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 20:15:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092015.n39KFkLt029454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-09 16:15:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: coccinella Short Description: Chat client with whiteboard Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ...and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 20:17:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092017.n39KHStZ025422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 16:17:28 EDT --- coccinella-0.96.12-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/coccinella-0.96.12-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 20:17:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:17:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092017.n39KHWB1025458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 16:17:33 EDT --- coccinella-0.96.12-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/coccinella-0.96.12-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 20:29:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:29:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456242] Review Request: gavl - A library for handling uncompressed audio and video data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092029.n39KTK54032354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456242 --- Comment #16 from Zarko 2009-04-09 16:29:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > build failed on F-10 because libgdither wasn't within the buildroot. > I hope it will be fixed on next push. I will close the bug once F-9/F-10 gavl > got built. I do not understand well what was happening here... I succesfully build libgdither, gavl and frei0r-plugins with mock and put all of these packages on my private repo...??!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 21:06:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:06:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092106.n39L6b7Z007628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #41 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 17:06:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 21:02:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449784] Review Request: rpmreaper - A tool for removing packages from system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092102.n39L2gqv006828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449784 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 17:02:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 21:08:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489962] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092108.n39L8ron004716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489962 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 17:08:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 21:05:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:05:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092105.n39L5QkN004233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #48 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 17:05:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 21:07:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225974] Merge Review: krb5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092107.n39L7sDo004592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225974 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-09 17:07:53 EDT --- >> krb5.src: W: strange-permission krb5kdc.init 0755 >> A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. >> Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. > >I'm gonna need help from CVS admins for this one -- the permissions are set at >checkout-time. cvs done. Note that I think this warning is ignorable if there's a reason for the file to be executable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 21:09:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:09:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490578] Review Request: mod_perlite - Kinder, gentler embedded Perl for the Apache HTTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092109.n39L9mUY008048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490578 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 17:09:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 21:08:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:08:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092108.n39L87kK007872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #24 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 17:08:06 EDT --- cvs done. Would you also consider maintaining this in EPEL? I'm not sure off hand if it builds/works there, but if so it would be nice to have. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 21:11:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:11:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491694] Review Request: Anyterm - Web based terminal emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092111.n39LBJ0P005566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694 --- Comment #16 from Mohammed Morsi 2009-04-09 17:11:19 EDT --- Updated based on feedback, current srpm can now be accessed here http://mohammed.morsi.org/blog/files/anyterm-1.1.29-3.fc10.src_.rpm changed /var/www/anyterm to /usr/share/anyterm, default to UTF8, took care of rpmlint output, hopefully catching everything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 21:15:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:15:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494517] Review Request: python-xkit - A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092115.n39LFfN5009334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494517 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: x-kit - A |Review Request: python-xkit |simple, transparent and |- A simple, transparent and |easy to extend xorg parser |easy to extend xorg parser --- Comment #4 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-04-09 17:15:41 EDT --- Fix issues noted in review. I am not extending the description since I haven't decided on packaging rest of the components beyond just the parser for now. http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-xkit.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-xkit-0.4.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 21:27:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:27:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491520] Review Request: shntool - shntool is a multi-purpose WAVE data processing and reporting utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092127.n39LR1LO011293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491520 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 17:27:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 21:25:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490989] Review Request: subdownloader - A program for download/upload subtitles for videofiles and DVDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092125.n39LPRcW011090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490989 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 17:25:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 21:27:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092127.n39LRudT011590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 --- Comment #8 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-04-09 17:27:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > * /!\ rpmlint output : > ogmtools.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ogmtools-1.5/ChangeLog > That will need fixing, like Paulo suggested for instance. Fixed > * /!\ license is GPL+ from what I dug up, please confirm then fix in the > License Confirmed and fixed > > Cosmetic : The header lines aren't aligned with the BuildRequires ones. Fixed > (and sorry for having stalled the review for so long, I really had hope to be > able to get it over with much more quickly) np Spec file updated if you want to have a look -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 21:31:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092131.n39LVdBJ009909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #25 from Michael Larabel 2009-04-09 17:31:39 EDT --- The Phoronix Test Suite should run just fine on RHEL with EPEL. The Phoronix Test Suite has been tested on CentOS, etc. It may not install the dependencies automatically from within the PTS program (it would just be a one-line patch to fix that upstream), but since you're handling that already with requiring all of the dependencies from the RPM, there should be no issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 21:36:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareFTP - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092136.n39LaGEb013200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 --- Comment #1 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-09 17:36:16 EDT --- a short resume of the fist touch (about 5 minutes) !!THE PACKAGE WON'T BUILD!! --missing BRs gettext perl-XML-Parser --missing Rs hicolor-icon-theme --- macros please use name macro instead of name --- permissions executing of *.dll is not necessary (didn't check this) --- ownage %{_libdir}/bareftp/bareFTP.Common.Utils.dll %{_libdir}/bareftp/bareFTP.Connection.dll %{_libdir}/bareftp/bareFTP.Gui.Dialog.dll %{_libdir}/bareftp/bareFTP.Gui.FileManager.dll %{_libdir}/bareftp/bareFTP.Gui.Preferences.dll %{_libdir}/bareftp/bareFTP.Gui.ProgressMonitor.dll %{_libdir}/bareftp/bareFTP.Gui.dll %{_libdir}/bareftp/bareFTP.Preferences.dll %{_libdir}/bareftp/bareFTP.Protocol.Ftp.dll %{_libdir}/bareftp/bareFTP.Protocol.Sftp.dll %{_libdir}/bareftp/bareFTP.Protocol.dll %{_libdir}/bareftp/bareftp.exe you own every file in the directory, but not the directory itself. %{_libdir}/%{name}/ instead of the list above would own the directory and all the files in it. --- filesection your: %{_bindir}/bareftp %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/*/*.png %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/*/*.svg %{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop i would write: %{_bindir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/%{name}.* --- docs INSTALL is not important for end-users, because YOU did the installation! please remove it --- timestamps make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" to preserve timestamps --- rpmlint bareftp.i386: E: no-binary bareftp.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib bareftp-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package --- License please check this again --- Name of this bug bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 21:48:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494517] Review Request: python-xkit - A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092148.n39Lm1eH013051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494517 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-09 17:48:00 EDT --- Okay, the package should be good to go now. APPROVED PS. For the sake of clearness, move chmod -x tests/* examples/* to the prer phase after setup, since it has nothing to do with install... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 21:59:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:59:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494518] Review Request: dontzap - Allows users to set the "DontZap" option in xorg.conf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092159.n39LxuQH017111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494518 --- Comment #2 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-04-09 17:59:56 EDT --- Fixed issues pointed out in review. http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/dontzap.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/dontzap-0.1.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 22:04:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494517] Review Request: python-xkit - A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092204.n39M4CQK018186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494517 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-04-09 18:04:11 EDT --- I have moved chmod into the prep stage and updated spec. Thanks for the quick review. Note to cvs admin. I only need a rawhide branch. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-xkit Short Description: A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser Owners: sundaram Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 22:24:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:24:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494518] Review Request: dontzap - Allows users to set the "DontZap" option in xorg.conf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092224.n39MOvZp019549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494518 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-09 18:24:57 EDT --- Okay, looks good, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 22:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492924] Review Request: python-unipath - Alternative to Python modules os, os.path and shutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092229.n39MTSwD022299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492924 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 22:35:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:35:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494518] Review Request: dontzap - Allows users to set the "DontZap" option in xorg.conf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092235.n39MZ2W8023441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494518 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-04-09 18:35:02 EDT --- Thanks again. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dontzap Short Description: Allows users to set the "DontZap" option in xorg.conf Owners: sundaram Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 22:38:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092238.n39McTI3023914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #26 from Joseph Smidt 2009-04-09 18:38:28 EDT --- Yes, I will maintain the EPEL branches. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: phoronix-test-suite Short Description: A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System Owners: jsmidt Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 22:42:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092242.n39MgEXV022407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #18 from Matt Domsch 2009-04-09 18:42:14 EDT --- OK, I fixed the two rpmlint warnings. $ rpmlint gpxe.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Please approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 22:44:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:44:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490269] Review Request: xfglenses - Gravitational lenses visualization program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092244.n39MiGGZ022579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490269 --- Comment #3 from Thibault North 2009-04-09 18:44:16 EDT --- GPLv3 has been chosen by the author. - Spec has been updated - SRPMS and SPEC are now : Spec URL: http://tnorth.ch/fedora/xfglenses.spec SRPM URL: http://tnorth.ch/fedora/xfglenses-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm AUTHORS and LICENSE file have been added. Source has been patched to remove code under uncertain licence. The final tarball which is contained in the package will appear on the project website soon. Could you please review it now ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 22:56:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:56:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492924] Review Request: python-unipath - Alternative to Python modules os, os.path and shutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092256.n39Mup8v024937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492924 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-09 18:56:50 EDT --- A few stylistic notes: - Do the file conversion more safely and shortly with this: for f in README.txt doc/reference/path_355.py ; do iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 -o $f.utf8 $f &&?\ touch -r $f $f.utf8 && \ mv $f.utf8 $f done - Why do you remove the first line of unipath/test.py? Add a comment about this, and maybe a few empty lines to clear up the setup phase. - Don't use macros for sed, cp, rm. - Defining pyver just to get the complete egg file name seems a bit overkill. I'd remove pyver and replace it with a * in the files section. - Change "%define oname" to "%global oname" *** Review: rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. ~OK - Please, go through the suggestions above. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. ~OK - Add PKG-INFO to %doc. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSFIX - No license file included. *** The problems are minor, you can do the fixes upon import to CVS. The package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 23:08:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490269] Review Request: xfglenses - Gravitational lenses visualization program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092308.n39N8KF7026685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490269 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-09 19:08:20 EDT --- rpmlint output: xfglenses.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1-0-2 ['1.0-2.fc10', '1.0-2'] 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK - The BuildRequires line is a bit long, you could chop it up in two. MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - Source code files contain no license headers, please ask upstream to add them. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. NEEDSFIX - Source URL gives 404, according to URL correct file is http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~frutto/xfglenses.zip - Source used does not match upstream. MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. ??? - No compiler commands are visible in the output. MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. ?? - If the program starts just by calling the binary, then a Desktop file should be written. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 23:11:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:11:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492087] Review Request: pidgin-latex - A Pidgin plugin that displays LaTeX equations as images in your conversations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092311.n39NBeev027470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492087 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 19:11:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 23:19:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:19:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092319.n39NJ92C030171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 19:19:08 EDT --- phoronix-test-suite-1.8.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phoronix-test-suite-1.8.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 23:21:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:21:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092321.n39NL26I030727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 19:21:02 EDT --- phoronix-test-suite-1.8.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phoronix-test-suite-1.8.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 23:26:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456242] Review Request: gavl - A library for handling uncompressed audio and video data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092326.n39NQvDa031627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456242 --- Comment #17 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-09 19:26:57 EDT --- newly built packages don't get automatically available to others build in stable Fedora branches. They need to be either requested to release engineer, either pushed to stable release. As libgdither is still in updates-testing... gavl cannot build on F-10/F-9. But it was released for rawhide. So other review can continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 23:24:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:24:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092324.n39NOtpS029090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #29 from Joseph Smidt 2009-04-09 19:24:54 EDT --- Yes, I will maintain the EPEL branches. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: phoronix-test-suite Short Description: A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System Owners: jsmidt Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 23:30:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:30:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492191] Review Request: jmod - Java Sound MODules Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092330.n39NUM1w032398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492191 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 19:30:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 23:30:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492533] Review Request: choqok - KDE Micro-Blogging Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092330.n39NUfjY032493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492533 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Choqok - |Review Request: choqok - |KDE Micro-Blogging Client |KDE Micro-Blogging Client Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 19:30:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 23:30:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:30:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492125] Review Request: mingw32-pangomm - MinGW Windows C++ interface for Pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092330.n39NU76F032251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492125 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ Bug 492125 depends on bug 492122, which changed state. Bug 492122 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-cairomm - MinGW Windows C++ API for the cairo graphics library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492122 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 19:30:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 23:31:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492609] Review Request: hmaccalc - Tools for computing and checking HMAC values for files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092331.n39NVZTI030569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492609 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 19:31:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 23:35:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492974] Review Request: calf - Audio plugins pack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092335.n39NZJeY031435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492974 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 19:35:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 23:34:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - Free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092334.n39NYOGU031066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 19:34:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 23:39:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092339.n39Nd63T031862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 19:39:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 23:41:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:41:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493958] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092341.n39NfKTG001848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493958 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 19:41:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 23:40:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:40:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493957] Review Request: skyviewer - Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904092340.n39NeOvr032393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493957 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 19:40:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 00:17:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100017.n3A0HLps006381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 20:17:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 00:15:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:15:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494647] Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100015.n3A0FfM4005946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 20:15:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 00:18:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:18:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494852] Review Request: astronomy-backgrounds - Astronomy backgrounds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100018.n3A0ITjW006578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494852 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 20:18:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 00:21:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:21:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494518] Review Request: dontzap - Allows users to set the "DontZap" option in xorg.conf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100021.n3A0LeqF008451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494518 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 20:21:39 EDT --- Is this package really a good idea anymore, given http://who-t.blogspot.com/2009/04/zapping-server.html ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 00:22:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:22:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494517] Review Request: python-xkit - A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100022.n3A0M68d007462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494517 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 20:22:06 EDT --- Since this package is just coming in for the dontzap package, is it still a good idea, given http://who-t.blogspot.com/2009/04/zapping-server.html ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 00:19:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:19:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100019.n3A0Jqko006783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 20:19:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 00:25:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:25:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100025.n3A0Poev009248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #30 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-09 20:25:49 EDT --- EL-5 and EL-4 branches created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 00:26:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:26:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100026.n3A0QhNu008414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 20:26:43 EDT --- kcometen4-1.0.4-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kcometen4-1.0.4-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 00:28:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:28:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100028.n3A0SAUl009627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 20:28:10 EDT --- kcometen4-1.0.4-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kcometen4-1.0.4-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 00:33:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100033.n3A0X4kT010549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #31 from Joseph Smidt 2009-04-09 20:33:03 EDT --- Thanks for everything everyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 00:32:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - Free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100032.n3A0Wc9h010466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 20:32:38 EDT --- kvirc-4.0.0-0.6.20090409svn3173.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kvirc-4.0.0-0.6.20090409svn3173.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 00:37:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - Free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100037.n3A0bSd5011312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 20:37:28 EDT --- kvirc-4.0.0-0.6.20090409svn3173.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kvirc-4.0.0-0.6.20090409svn3173.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:02:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:02:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492087] Review Request: pidgin-latex - A Pidgin plugin that displays LaTeX equations as images in your conversations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100102.n3A12rRM015069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492087 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 21:02:53 EDT --- pidgin-latex-1.3-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pidgin-latex-1.3-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:17:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:17:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226346] Merge Review: python-pyblock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100117.n3A1HTp1016905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226346 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:20:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:20:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226517] Merge Review: urw-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100120.n3A1KvgI018057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226517 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:21:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:21:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226515] Merge Review: unixODBC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100121.n3A1LAkn018089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226515 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:23:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226449] Merge Review: syslinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100123.n3A1N6gk017870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226449 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:22:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:22:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225808] Merge Review: gmime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100122.n3A1MBxl017741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225808 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:21:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:21:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225890] Merge Review: htmlview In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100121.n3A1LnnN017697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225890 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:21:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:21:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225865] Merge Review: gstreamer-plugins-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100121.n3A1LO51017652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225865 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:23:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226544] Merge Review: wpa_supplicant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100123.n3A1NsGU018053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226544 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:27:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:27:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100127.n3A1R7Sf019294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226572] Merge Review: xorg-x11-docs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100124.n3A1OW4T018591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226572 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:24:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:24:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226574] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-acecad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100124.n3A1On4q018637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226574 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:26:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:26:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463233] Review Request: Web App for Appliance Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100126.n3A1QVsg019170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463233 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:26:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:26:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100126.n3A1QfpE019227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:26:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:26:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100126.n3A1QuWM019074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:25:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226575] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-aiptek In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100125.n3A1P4eF018611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226575 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:25:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:25:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226640] Merge Review: xorg-x11-font-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100125.n3A1PTLZ018679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226640 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:25:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226638] Merge Review: xorg-x11-filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100125.n3A1PIU6018649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226638 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:27:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100127.n3A1RXIt019208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:28:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492990] Review Request: zynjacku - LV2 synths and plugins host In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100128.n3A1Sdfg019363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:27:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483859] Review Request: libg3d - Library for 3D file/object viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100127.n3A1RKLD019124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483859 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:28:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100128.n3A1SkOa019407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:28:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100128.n3A1SToe019325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:25:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:25:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251282] Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100125.n3A1PeEQ018718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251282 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:27:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488995] Review Request: pidgin-tlen - Tlen IM Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100127.n3A1Rf8L019240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488995 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:26:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433678] Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100126.n3A1QAbN018909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:28:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100128.n3A1SDsD019288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:26:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451773] Review Request: window-picker-applet - an alternative window chooser for small screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100126.n3A1QO6H018988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451773 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:25:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359941] Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100125.n3A1PsQa018754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359941 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:29:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:29:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareFTP - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100129.n3A1T5xg019438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:28:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:28:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494520] Review Request: cdf - The NASA Common Data Format implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100128.n3A1Sweo019648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494520 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:28:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:28:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100128.n3A1SKJY019546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Bug 490721 depends on bug 490723, which changed state. Bug 490723 Summary: Review Request: R-IRanges - Low-level containers for storing sets of integer ranges https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490723 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 01:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491946] Review Request: odfpy07 - compat package for odfpy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100130.n3A1UCMB020146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491946 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 02:30:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 22:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100230.n3A2UNRL031412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 22:30:23 EDT --- gnote-0.1.1-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnote-0.1.1-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 03:43:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 23:43:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492191] Review Request: jmod - Java Sound MODules Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100343.n3A3hcTj011769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492191 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 23:43:38 EDT --- jmod-0.9-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jmod-0.9-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 03:50:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 23:50:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492191] Review Request: jmod - Java Sound MODules Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100350.n3A3obhQ012720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492191 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 23:50:37 EDT --- jmod-0.9-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jmod-0.9-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 03:47:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 23:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492974] Review Request: calf - Audio plugins pack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100347.n3A3lfxl012119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492974 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 23:47:41 EDT --- calf-0.0.18.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/calf-0.0.18.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 04:46:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:46:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451095] libcxgb3 hardware driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100446.n3A4kF5B020934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451095 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |needinfo?(dledford at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-10 00:46:14 EDT --- What's the status of this ticket? Should we close it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 04:54:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458714] Review Request: libkate - Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100454.n3A4s8x9022011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458714 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #16 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-10 00:54:07 EDT --- I made the full review. Nothing major. There are a few things to go over: * rpmlint says: libkate-utils.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency liboggz This one can be ignored libkate-utils.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/kdj/ui_editor.py 0644 libkate-utils.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/kdj/finder.py 0644 libkate-utils.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/kdj/muxer.py 0644 libkate-utils.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/kdj/tools.py 0644 libkate-utils.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/kdj/options.py 0644 libkate-utils.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/kdj/ui_main.py 0644 libkate-utils.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/kdj/ui_options.py 0644 libkate-utils.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/kdj/constants.py 0644 libkate-utils.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/kdj/demuxer.py 0644 Could you remove the shebangs from these guys? ! Installing docs into %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} is the usual convention in Fedora. configure script must have a flag for setting this. * Could you package the AUTHORS, ChangeLog, COPYING, README and THANKS files? Especially COPYING is a requirement to package. ? Is examples/ directory worth packaging (into devel)? * New guidelines prefer %global over %define. ? Could you briefly explain (in the SPEC file as a comment) what the patch does? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 05:16:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 01:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100516.n3A5G67e025821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 --- Comment #4 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-10 01:16:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ ll gloox-1.0-SVNr4003.tar.bz2* > -rw-rw-r-- 1 petro petro 644824 ??? 9 21:41 gloox-1.0-SVNr4003.tar.bz2 > -rw-r--r-- 1 petro petro 621743 ??? 5 12:57 > gloox-1.0-SVNr4003.tar.bz2.from_srpm Hm... It is big surprise for me. I now repeat this procedura and got again another results: [pasha at x-www svn]$ ll gloox-1.0-SVNr4003.tar.bz2 -rw-r--r-- 1 pasha users 623149 ??? 10 08:39 gloox-1.0-SVNr4003.tar.bz2 How it can be at all with concrete single revision??? > I suggest you to consider rebasing patches against latest devel tarball ( > http://camaya.net/download/gloox-1.0-beta8.tar.bz2 ) instead of fetching whole > svn tree. > So, finally, please consider using > http://camaya.net/download/gloox-1.0-beta8.tar.bz2 instead of svn tree (just > for simplifying the process of verifying sources) or write few words explaining > why it's necessary to use trunk and I'll approve this package. Hm. I see it is not released yet (accordingly offsite http://camaya.net/glooxdownload when last present beta7). And my bugreport is not closed which was promised in next beta - http://bugs.camaya.net/horde/whups/ticket/?id=137 . Futhermore, the main reason why I get SVN checkout is absent some stuff (before rev 3873) required by qutIM (this review blocks it) also not present in beta8. If you interest in details ('grep "setServerImpl" gloox-1.0-beta8/src/socks5bytestream*' this present in my checkout, bot nor in beta8). So, I really do not known what I may do in this situation... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 05:36:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 01:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226346] Merge Review: python-pyblock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100536.n3A5arUR029424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226346 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-10 01:36:53 EDT --- rpmlint output: python-pyblock.src: W: no-url-tag python-pyblock.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libbdevid python-pyblock.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libbdevid-python python-pyblock.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libselinux python-pyblock.x86_64: W: no-url-tag python-pyblock-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-url-tag 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 3 warnings. [jzlehtol at politzer result]$ less build.log - The source url disclaimer must be added http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#We_are_Upstream - Explicit lib dependencies are probably what you would expect for this package, so that's OK. - The %files sections is a bit too complicated, since the following does the same thing: %files %defattr(-,root,root) /%{python_sitelib}/block/ %{_docdir}/pyblock-%{version}/ - Moreover, I don't like that the docdir is not /usr/share/doc/python-pyblock-version. What I'd do is put mv ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{_docdir}/pyblock-%{version} doc after 'make install' and then list the documentation in %files as %doc doc/* - Change the %define's into %global's. *** MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. ~OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX - %{optflags} are not respected!! - Add the definition %{!?pyver: %global pyver %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]")} and build with make CFLAGS="%{optflags} -I/usr/include/python%{pyver} -fPIC" %{?_smp_mflags} which also enables SMP make. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSFIX? - GPLv2 is included, GPLv3 is not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 05:43:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 01:43:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456242] Review Request: gavl - A library for handling uncompressed audio and video data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100543.n3A5hcKG029916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456242 --- Comment #18 from Zarko 2009-04-10 01:43:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > newly built packages don't get automatically available to others build in > stable Fedora branches. They need to be either requested to release engineer, > either pushed to stable release. Ah, now it is clear.... :) Thx, Zarko -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 05:53:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 01:53:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495179] New: Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495179 Summary: Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.xs4all.nl/~iarnell/fedora/perl-Number-Format.spec SRPM URL: http://www.xs4all.nl/~iarnell/fedora/perl-Number-Format-1.70-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module provides an easy means of formatting numbers in a manner suitable for displaying to the user. scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1288753 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 06:07:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 02:07:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487007] Review Request: python-stomper - A python client implementation of the STOMP protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100607.n3A673uU001567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487007 --- Comment #9 from Silas Sewell 2009-04-10 02:07:03 EDT --- Final build with last fix. SRPM: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/python-stomper-0.2.2-7.fc10.src.rpm Diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/diff?spec=svn221&r=221&format=side&path=/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/python-stomper/python-stomper.spec rpmlint [silas at silas ~]$ rpmlint python-stomper-0.2.2-7.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [silas at silas ~]$ rpmlint python-stomper-0.2.2-7.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 06:08:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 02:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487007] Review Request: python-stomper - A python client implementation of the STOMP protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100608.n3A68WCR001736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487007 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Silas Sewell 2009-04-10 02:08:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-stomper Short Description: A Python client implementation of the STOMP protocol Owners: silas Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 06:12:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 02:12:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100612.n3A6C6lm002520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 --- Comment #16 from Silas Sewell 2009-04-10 02:12:05 EDT --- Changelog: - Update to 0.1.1 - Up Paramiko version dependency to 1.7 - Remove Python version dependency - Make sed safer SRPM: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/fabric-0.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/diff?spec=svn221&r=221&format=side&path=/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/fabric/fabric.spec rpmlint silas at silas ~]$ rpmlint fabric-0.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [silas at silas ~]$ rpmlint fabric-0.1.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 06:16:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 02:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100616.n3A6GQ6N003217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: bareFTP - |Review Request: bareftp - |File transfer client |File transfer client |supporting the FTP, FTP |supporting the FTP, FTP |over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH |over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH |File Transfer Protocol |File Transfer Protocol |(SFTP) |(SFTP) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 06:49:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 02:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495184] New: Review Request: - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495184 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: aleksey200505 at mail.ru QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://oscada.org.ua/OpenSCADA/0.6.3/Fedora10/openscada-0.6.3.2-1.src.rpm SRPM URL: ftp://oscada.org.ua/OpenSCADA/0.6.3/Fedora10/openscada-0.6.3.2-1.src.rpm Description: The OpenSCADA system is intended for acquisition, archiving, visualization of the information, delivery of operating influences, and also for other related operations characteristic for full-function SCADA systems. Owing to a high level of abstraction and modularity, the system can be used in many adjacent areas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 06:53:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 02:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495184] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100653.n3A6rMO8009356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495184 Aleksey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|All |x86_64 Version|rawhide |6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 06:59:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 02:59:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100659.n3A6xu2v010345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mpatocka at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #29 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-10 02:59:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > I don't know anything about NSS, I thought that it is used by Mozilla and I > didn't even know that other projects could be compiled against it. Dost the > conversion mean only a recompile and relink? Or do I have to rewrite some of > the code? NSS provides and OpenSSL compat library which implements most (though definitely all) of OpenSSL API. See the patch included in the source package (most of it is just configure script modifications and like two ifdefs or so) > I may try to compile Links with NSS, but even if it succeeds, you won't get > good testing with NSS soon, Links always used OpenSSL and it is long-term > tested with it, so if you want something proven stable, use OpenSSL. It will get testing in Fedora. I believe there's not that much to test in SSL/TLS support anyways. > BTW. why do you want NSS instead of OpenSSL? Your license forbids use of OpenSSL. See: http://www.gnome.org/~markmc/openssl-and-the-gpl.html Besides that, NSS is used most of core SSL functionality in Fedora and pushing the redundant oddly-licensed library away as much as we can is indeed good, especially when it comes to cryptography where redundancy implies increased risk of serious flaws. > Regarding the config script --- there is a bug that it selects hardcoded > directories first and the user directory last. Easy to fix. Just keep in mind > that the configure script must be generated with autoconf 2.13 --- that was > current version 10 years ago when Links project was started and support for all > the operating systems is tested with it. Yup. If you have time, please take a look at the patch for NSS compatibility I bundled with the package. As Ondrej suggested, you may not be satisfied with it, but it's trivial enough for anyone to fit it their needs. (In reply to comment #23) > 2) > Many warnings "pointer targets in passing argument of differ in > signedness" in build.log still ... upstream should address those... maybe just > adding Mikulas to that review could be ok. Mikulas, any thoughts about these? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 07:07:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 03:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495186] New: Review Request: - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495186 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: x86_64 URL: http://oscada.diyaorg.dp.ua OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: aleksey200505 at mail.ru QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://diyaorg.dp.ua/OpenSCADA/0.6.3/openscada-0.6.3.2-1.src.rpm SRPM URL: ftp://diyaorg.dp.ua/OpenSCADA/0.6.3/openscada-0.6.3.2-1.src.rpm Description: The OpenSCADA system is intended for acquisition, archiving, visualization of the information, delivery of operating influences, and also for other related operations characteristic for full-function SCADA systems. Owing to a high level of abstraction and modularity, the system can be used in many adjacent areas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 07:24:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 03:24:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100724.n3A7OnYs014496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #30 from Matej Cepl 2009-04-10 03:24:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > I don't know anything about NSS, I thought that it is used by Mozilla and I > didn't even know that other projects could be compiled against it. Dost the > conversion mean only a recompile and relink? Or do I have to rewrite some of > the code? See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation for more explanation ... it's nice to have a patch and Fedora package should certainly use it when it is there, but let me just emphasize that this is certainly not issue which would break Fedora package review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 08:03:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:03:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494546] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100803.n3A83fiY022140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494546 Radek Vokal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rvokal at redhat.com Flag| |pm_ack? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 08:06:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494546] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100806.n3A86rwA021795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494546 --- Comment #2 from RHEL Product and Program Management 2009-04-10 04:06:53 EDT --- This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 08:11:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:11:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100811.n3A8BpO7024198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #12 from Gratien D'haese 2009-04-10 04:11:50 EDT --- Some remarks: - The LICENSE file mentions "GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 3, 29 June 2007" and the spec file GPL (W: invalid-license GPL). Change this in GPLv3 - The README file in the sources is just a text version of the main page? Would like to see a decent description and usage example of sslogger instead. - the sslogger.conf file should been explained in detail - The spec file: a/ W: non-standard-group User Interface: Group: User Interface => use one of the following: "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support" b/ change License (see above) c/ W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.9-0.28 ['0.9-0.29', '0.9-0.29'] The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. d/ W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. e/ W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/sslogger.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here f/ E: world-writable /usr/share/doc/sslogger/LICENSE 0666 A file or directory in the package is installed with world writable permissions, which is most likely a security issue. g/ W: non-standard-uid /usr/bin/sslogger slogger A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. => is there a specific reason to have a separate user/group for sslogger? h/ E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/sslogger slogger 06555 The file is setuid, this may be dangerous, especially if this file is setuid root. => explain/describe the reason in the README file for example. SYSAdmins should have a clear understanding of what kind of executable are installed on their systems. Any audit check will bring your executable up and a very good explanation should be given. So, help the poor sysadmin. i/ E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/sl 0750 A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs included in your package. %dir %attr(750,%{suser},%{sgroup}) /var/log/sl Why don't you make /var/log/sl mode 755 and create sub-dirs beneath with 750? Why don't you create a sub-dir per user account? However, it is still not clear why you cannot do it with root:root? Please explain. j/ sslogger.i386: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/sl This package contains files in /var/log/ without adding logrotate configuration for them. k/ %defattr(-,root,root) => change this into: %defattr(-,root,root,-) l/ convince me of the need of %pre, %post, %prein. If you use the user root you can remove these. m/ Use %global instead of %define, unless you really need only locally defined submacros within other macro definitions (a very rare case): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_defined n/ I advise to read the wiki page "Frequently made mistakes while packaging RPMs by new packagers" as it will help you to improve your package - URL https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FrequentlyMadeMistakes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 08:22:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:22:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495179] Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100822.n3A8M6Or026353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495179 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-Number-Format Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 09:25:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494546] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100925.n3A9Pk75005112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494546 Jan Zeleny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jzeleny at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Jan Zeleny 2009-04-10 05:25:45 EDT --- Fedora review: bug 489929 Package has been built for F11 in version 2.2-4: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=97056 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 09:32:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494549] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100932.n3A9W5FY006466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494549 Bug 494549 depends on bug 489962, which changed state. Bug 489962 Summary: Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489962 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 09:32:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:32:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489962] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100932.n3A9W4xV006416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489962 Jan Zeleny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Jan Zeleny 2009-04-10 05:32:03 EDT --- Package has been built in rawhide, closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 09:30:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:30:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494549] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100930.n3A9UtUi006175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494549 Jan Zeleny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jzeleny at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jan Zeleny 2009-04-10 05:30:54 EDT --- Fedora review: bug 489962 Package has been built for F11 in version 1.0.7-3: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=97304 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 09:36:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494553] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100936.n3A9aJZs008727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494553 Jan Zeleny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jzeleny at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jan Zeleny 2009-04-10 05:36:18 EDT --- Fedora review: bug 493958 Package has been built for F11 in version 1.0.7-3: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=97310 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 09:35:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493958] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100935.n3A9ZWlY007412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493958 Jan Zeleny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Jan Zeleny 2009-04-10 05:35:31 EDT --- Package has been built, closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 09:35:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:35:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494553] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904100935.n3A9ZYm1007462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494553 Bug 494553 depends on bug 493958, which changed state. Bug 493958 Summary: Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493958 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 10:33:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:33:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456256] Review Request: frei0r-plugins - Frei0r - a minimalistic plugin API for video effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101033.n3AAXXg4019713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456256 Bug 456256 depends on bug 456242, which changed state. Bug 456242 Summary: Review Request: gavl - A library for handling uncompressed audio and video data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456242 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 10:33:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456242] Review Request: gavl - A library for handling uncompressed audio and video data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101033.n3AAXWIQ019685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456242 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-10 06:33:31 EDT --- packages built and requested to updates-testing for Fedora stable releases. Thx for the reviews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 10:34:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:34:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101034.n3AAYGNC019121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #21 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-10 06:34:16 EDT --- Ver. 1.1.0-5 (iLBC source code removed from the main tarball) http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems-1.1.0-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 10:40:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101040.n3AAerYw020491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #31 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-10 06:40:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > Required to fix: > - Add Encoding=UTF-8 line to desktop file > - Do ship COPYING in %doc > - fix mixed tab/spaces and previously mentioned things in spec file All three are addressed here: SPECS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/links.spec SRPMS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/links-2.2-6.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 10:47:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:47:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101047.n3AAlo3O021823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 Jan ONDREJ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #22 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-04-10 06:47:50 EDT --- Well, license issues have been fixed. I see no more license problems for this package. Also no other problems. Attaching rpmlint output with only some warning, which can be ignored. [ondrejj at builder result]$ rpmlint *.rpm sems-conf_auth.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib sems-gateway.i386: W: no-documentation sems-gsm.i386: W: no-documentation sems-mailbox.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib sems-pin_collect.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib sems-speex.i386: W: no-documentation 14 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 10:58:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101058.n3AAwsfO024040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-10 06:58:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sems Short Description: SIP Express Media Server, an extensible SIP media server Owners: peter ondrejj Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 10:57:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:57:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101057.n3AAvV19024387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #32 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-04-10 06:57:31 EDT --- Looks sane for me now, APPROVED as the discussion with upstream maintainer about warnings/NSS is not review blocker... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 11:15:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:15:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495205] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101115.n3ABFdcw028062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495205 Aleksey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://oscada.diyaorg.dp.ua | |/index.php?id=2&L=1 Platform|All |x86_64 Version|rawhide |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 11:14:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:14:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495205] New: Review Request: - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495205 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: aleksey200505 at mail.ru QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://oscada.org.ua/OpenSCADA/0.6.3/Fedora10/openscada-0.6.3.2-1.src.rpm" SRPM URL: ftp://oscada.org.ua/OpenSCADA/0.6.3/Fedora10/openscada-0.6.3.2-1.src.rpm Description: The OpenSCADA system is intended for acquisition, archiving, visualization of the information, delivery of operating influences, and also for other related operations characteristic for full-function SCADA systems. Owing to a high level of abstraction and modularity, the system can be used in many adjacent areas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 11:42:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:42:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451095] libcxgb3 hardware driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101142.n3ABgOSK000549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451095 Doug Ledford changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dledford at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #7 from Doug Ledford 2009-04-10 07:42:23 EDT --- Yes, I think so. It's in CVS now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 11:49:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451095] libcxgb3 hardware driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101149.n3ABnTpM001948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451095 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 11:51:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:51:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450476] InfiniBand Connection Management library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101151.n3ABpgEp002652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450476 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 11:52:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450481] libibcommon package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101152.n3ABqNJd002067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450481 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 11:52:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450482] libibumad package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101152.n3ABqOod002101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450482 Bug 450482 depends on bug 450481, which changed state. Bug 450481 Summary: libibcommon package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450481 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 11:53:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:53:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450470] RDMA kernel stack initializing package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101153.n3ABrwOa002300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 11:54:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:54:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450481] libibcommon package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101154.n3ABs1wR002398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450481 Bug 450481 depends on bug 450470, which changed state. Bug 450470 Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 11:54:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:54:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451095] libcxgb3 hardware driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101154.n3ABs2TY002422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451095 Bug 451095 depends on bug 450470, which changed state. Bug 450470 Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 11:54:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450477] RDMA Connection Management library/API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101154.n3ABs08Z002370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450477 Bug 450477 depends on bug 450470, which changed state. Bug 450470 Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 11:53:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:53:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450476] InfiniBand Connection Management library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101153.n3ABrxcR002333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450476 Bug 450476 depends on bug 450470, which changed state. Bug 450470 Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 11:56:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495186] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101156.n3ABuap1003192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495186 Aleksey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 11:56:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495205] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101156.n3ABunwq003234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495205 Aleksey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 11:56:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:56:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495184] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101156.n3ABuBe8003110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495184 Aleksey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 12:30:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 08:30:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458714] Review Request: libkate - Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101230.n3ACUxHU010287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458714 --- Comment #17 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-10 08:30:58 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/libkate.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/libkate-0.3.1-3.fc11.src.rpm Description: Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format %changelog - Use Fedora compliant (using version) _docdir directory. - Remove shebangs when not needed. - Bundle examples within -devel - Use global instead of define Patches been send upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 13:01:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456256] Review Request: frei0r-plugins - Frei0r - a minimalistic plugin API for video effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101301.n3AD1VGj016185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456256 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-10 09:01:29 EDT --- Mock build and BRs good. What about #7? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 13:09:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:09:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101309.n3AD9hA7017883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #33 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-10 09:09:41 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: links Short Description: Web browser running in both graphics and text mode Owners: lkundrak Branches: EL-5 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 13:26:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:26:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456256] Review Request: frei0r-plugins - Frei0r - a minimalistic plugin API for video effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101326.n3ADQSvY021593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456256 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-10 09:26:28 EDT --- License: this library is GPLv2+ the "+" means and later, so it can be linked with GPLv3 library. But according to quick advices asked on IRC, the license should remains the one of the source code of the library itself. Not a computation over the dependencies. If a package using freir-plugin is GPLv2 (only), then it will not be compatible with our build of the freird-plugin. But that must be checked on the related review. The patch only change the default installation path for the dso. But each project will need to check and tweak the right path in order to find it, because they will use dlopen to access frei0r-plugins dso. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 13:34:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456256] Review Request: frei0r-plugins - Frei0r - a minimalistic plugin API for video effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101334.n3ADYDKn022971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456256 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-10 09:34:12 EDT --- Ok, sounds reasonable. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 13:37:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:37:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456256] Review Request: frei0r-plugins - Frei0r - a minimalistic plugin API for video effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101337.n3ADbc25023797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456256 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-10 09:37:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: frei0r-plugins Short Description: Frei0r - a minimalistic plugin API for video effects Owners: kwizart Branches: F-10 F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 15:51:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:51:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458714] Review Request: libkate - Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101551.n3AFp5Hm017568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458714 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-10 11:51:04 EDT --- Thanks. It's all good now. ------------------------------------------ This package (libkate) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 16:08:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101608.n3AG85pN020277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 16:07:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:07:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101607.n3AG7gJd020191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|ovasik at redhat.com |mcepl at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? |fedora-review- --- Comment #34 from Matej Cepl 2009-04-10 12:07:40 EDT --- This: # Incompatible with GPL BuildConflicts: openssl-devel is not good. Whatever conflicts between openssl-devel and GPL, the package should be buildable on computer where openssl-devel has been installed. You have to fix ./configure options, or patch the source code (if necessary) to avoid compiling in openssl, but this is not acceptable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 16:15:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101615.n3AGFHYg021562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 --- Comment #9 from Matthias Saou 2009-04-10 12:15:16 EDT --- Everything looks good now, but I've just double checked the source just in case, and looking closer at the "avilib" directory, there is code taken from transcode, which is "either version 2, or (at your option) any later version.". I'm no legal expert, but I'm assuming that the "License": field should then be either "GPL+ and GPLv2+" or (maybe simplified to) "GPLv2+". This license question needs to be sorted out :-/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 16:22:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101622.n3AGMCKk022724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #36 from Matej Cepl 2009-04-10 12:22:11 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=339108) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=339108) screenshot of Google with links -g ... and certainly it is not packaging review issue, but are you sure, that this is how Google should look like? (see the lines in the top left corner)? Mikul??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 16:21:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:21:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101621.n3AGLA6Z022527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #35 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-10 12:21:09 EDT --- Matej: Though this is mostly a pre-nss-patch relic (current version of the nss patch would not look for OpenSSL once NSS compat library is present) I believe this is completely legitimate use of BuildConflicts. Purpose of autoconf is to automatically configure package's features based on what software is available, and once such feature implies linking that should not be allowed it makes perfect sense to enforce that the offending piece of software is not present. (I am aware that --without-* is also a valid option). Seriously, if you believe this is a review blocker, please re-read the guidelines and elaborate on what use of BuildConflicts seems legitimate to you. Also, thank you for bringing this up once the review was finished, even though this was present in the SPEC file since my first revision. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 16:30:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:30:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101630.n3AGUmWZ024264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mpatocka at redhat.c |needinfo?(mcepl at redhat.com) |om) | --- Comment #37 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-10 12:30:47 EDT --- Thanks for the bug report. We have reviewed the information you have provided above, and there is some additional information we require that will be helpful in our diagnosis of this issue. Please attach your X server config file (/etc/X11/xorg.conf) and X server log file (/var/log/Xorg.*.log) to the bug report as individual uncompressed file attachments using the bugzilla file attachment link below. We will review this issue again once you've had a chance to attach this information. Thanks in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 16:48:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:48:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101648.n3AGmHYC027096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mcepl at redhat.com) | --- Comment #38 from Matej Cepl 2009-04-10 12:48:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) > Matej: Though this is mostly a pre-nss-patch relic (current version of the nss > patch would not look for OpenSSL once NSS compat library is present) I believe > this is completely legitimate use of BuildConflicts. No, it is not ... the fact that I have three versions of one library installed on my computer doesn't mean that you have to one particular of them (and if you want me to uninstall openssl, then please fix mysql, postifx, opal, nash, and dovecot ;-)). Either select the right one (which is what you do in your patch anyway), or add some ./configure option for it (--with-crypto={openssl,nss,gnutls} or something of that kind). And of course more important is that this line is there only to annoy people who would actually want to build this package on their own computer ... it doesn't make any sense for building in mock/koji, and it is totally unnecessary -- when I remove it and rebuild package, resulting package doesn't require openssl anyway: [matej at viklef redhat]$ rpm -qR links /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh /usr/sbin/alternatives /usr/sbin/alternatives /usr/sbin/alternatives libX11.so.6()(64bit) libbz2.so.1()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgpm.so.2()(64bit) libjpeg.so.62()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libnss_compat_ossl.so.0()(64bit) libpng12.so.0()(64bit) libpng12.so.0(PNG12_0)(64bit) libtiff.so.3()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) [matej at viklef redhat]$ > Seriously, if you believe this is a review blocker, please re-read the > guidelines and elaborate on what use of BuildConflicts seems legitimate to you. I have no clue what BuildConflicts is good for, and I have never seen it to be used before, but this is certainly not the case (see above). > Also, thank you for bringing this up once the review was finished, even though > this was present in the SPEC file since my first revision. I don't think there is any duty to be silent when I see stupidity in a package which is soon to come to Fedora -- I haven't thought it is necessary to review this package because I believed that ovasik will do proper job on it as usually he does. Only when I tried to rebuild this package on my computer I got hit by this, and so I jumped here before the damage would be hard to fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 16:56:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:56:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101656.n3AGuAJB028638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #39 from Matej Cepl 2009-04-10 12:56:10 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=339109) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=339109) /var/log/Xorg.0.log here you are :) although I quite sure, it doesn't help you to fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 16:59:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:59:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490269] Review Request: xfglenses - Gravitational lenses visualization program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101659.n3AGxARk028968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490269 --- Comment #5 from Thibault North 2009-04-10 12:59:10 EDT --- > xfglenses.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1-0-2 ['1.0-2.fc10', >'1.0-2'] >3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Fixed >MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as >provided in the spec URL. NEEDSFIX Upstream has been notified a while ago, it's just a matter of time. I will comment here again when it is done. >MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. ??? >- No compiler commands are visible in the output. There is one right after the green "Building C object src/CMakeFiles/xfglenses.dir/xfglenses.c.o" (followed by compilation warnings), march=i585 is used (eg) >MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. ?? >- If the program starts just by calling the binary, then a Desktop file should >be written. Has been added in category "Education". Icon has been added to source package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 17:01:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495237] New: Review Request: python-hash_ring - Python implementation of consistent hashing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-hash_ring - Python implementation of consistent hashing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495237 Summary: Review Request: python-hash_ring - Python implementation of consistent hashing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: silas at sewell.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/python-hash_ring/python-hash_ring.spec SRPM URL: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/python-hash_ring-1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: hash_ring implements consistent hashing that can be used when the number of server nodes can increase or decrease. Consistent hashing is a scheme that provides a hash table functionality in a way that the adding or removing of one slot does not significantly change the mapping of keys to slots. rpmlint silas at silas result]$ rpmlint python-hash_ring-1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [silas at silas result]$ rpmlint python-hash_ring-1.2-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 17:15:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492990] Review Request: zynjacku - LV2 synths and plugins host In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101715.n3AHFHbe000423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-10 13:15:16 EDT --- Fedora review zynjacku-4-1.fc10.src.rpm 2009-04-10 * OK ! needs attention ? needs confirmation * rpmlint silent $rpmlint *.rpm zynjacku.spec 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * Package is named according to guidelines * The spec file is named after the package * The stated license (GPLv2 and GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and Public Domain) is approved by Fedora ! The license tag in the specfile correctly discribes the license of the sources. However, the license tag should describe the license of the content of the binary packages. The content of the binary package in this case is the two python script lv2rack.py and zynjacku.py, and the shared library zynjacku_c.so. None of the header files are packaged as part of the binary package. - The python scripts are licensed under GPLv2. - The shared library is compiled from sources having the 4 different licenses you state in the License tag. A compiled unit compiled from sources with different but compatible licenses falls under the strictest of the licenses, in this case GPLv2. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#Multiple_licensing_situations So all components of the packaged binary package are GPLv2, so the License tag should simply be GPLv2. * The package includes the license file (gpl.txt) * The specfile is written in legible English * Source matches upstream and is latest version 20ead5385b1a47f0a148f9f27e8889ef zynjacku-4.tar.bz2 20ead5385b1a47f0a148f9f27e8889ef SRPM/zynjacku-4.tar.bz2 ! Package compiles in mock (Fedora 10), however the specfile uses sed to change configure and aclocal.m4 thereby changing the timestamps on these files resulting in compilation warnings like: aclocal.m4:14: error: this file was generated for autoconf 2.61. You have another version of autoconf. If you want to use that, you should regenerate the build system entirely. aclocal.m4:14: the top level autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 63 automake-1.10: autoconf failed with exit status: 63 WARNING: `automake-1.10' is probably too old. You should only need it if you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.ac'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. cd . && /bin/sh ./config.status Makefile depfiles config.status: creating Makefile config.status: executing depfiles commands cd . && /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/zynjacku-4/config/missing --run autoheader aclocal.m4:14: error: this file was generated for autoconf 2.61. You have another version of autoconf. If you want to use that, you should regenerate the build system entirely. aclocal.m4:14: the top level autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 63 autoheader: '/usr/bin/autom4te' failed with exit status: 63 WARNING: `autoheader' is probably too old. You should only need it if you modified `acconfig.h' or `configure.ac'. You might want to install the `Autoconf' and `GNU m4' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. The timestamps should either be restored after the change: sed s/A/B/ file > file.new ; touch -r file file.new ; mv file.new file or all files that are generated from the changed files should be touched in the appropriate order, so that regeneration is not triggered, or the full autoconf bootstrap chain should be rerun so that all files are generated with the autotools version of the distribution the RPM is compiled for. The first option is the easiest one to implement. At closer inspection, I don't think the modification is needed at all. The hardcoded path that is changed by the sed replacement is only used as a fallback when the call to sysconfig.get_python_lib fails, which should never happen. Rebuilding the package with the sed replacements removed still puts the library in /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/zynjacku_c.so on x86_64 - without the warnings caused by changing the timestamps. ? Build requires are sane, I think. But there is a "no" during configure: checking for LV2... yes checking for GTK... yes checking for PYGTK... yes checking for JACK... yes checking for LV2DYNPARAMHOST1... yes checking for SLV2... yes checking for JACK_MIDI... yes checking for OLD_JACK_MIDI... no I assume since JACK_MIDI is found OLD_JACK_MIDI isn't needed, right? * No shared libraries in default library search path ? The package owns the directories it creates, or depend on packages that do. The dependency path to the owner of the directory /usr/share/icons/hicolor/72x72/apps is quite long though: zynjacku ? pygtk2-libglade ? pygtk2 ? gtk2 ? hicolor-icon-theme You are confident that any future updates to any of the packages in this chain will not break it? * No double listed files * File permissions are sane and %files has %defattrs * %clean clears buildroot * The specfile uses macros consistently * Package contains code * %doc is not essential for running * No headers, no static libraries, no pkg-config files, no shared libraries in default library search path, no .la files * .desktop files are installed using desktop-file-install in the %install section * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 17:14:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492969] Review Request: lv2dynparam - LV2 dynamic parameters extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101714.n3AHEXxt032171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492969 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-10 13:14:33 EDT --- (I put the new lv2core SRPM from koji first in by mock chain build.) Fedora review lv2dynparam-2-1.fc10.src.rpm 2009-04-09 * OK ! Needs attention * rpmlint output - OK $ rpmlint *.rpm lv2dynparam.spec lv2dynparam-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. * Package is named according to guidelines * The spec file is named after the package * Package is licensed using a Fedora approved license (GPLv2) * The package license matches the license as stated in the sources * The license file in the sources (COPYING) is included in the package * The specfile is written in legible English * Sources matches upstream - and is the latest released version 708a7ce7e6604af2a58f521e343509d5 lv2dynparam1-2.tar.bz2 708a7ce7e6604af2a58f521e343509d5 SRPM/lv2dynparam1-2.tar.bz2 * Package builds in mock (Fedora 10) * BuildRequires are sane * Package calls ldconfig as appropriate * Package owns directories it creates * No double listed files * File permissions are sane and %files section has %defattr * %clean clear buildroot * The specfile uses macros consistently * Package contains code * %doc is not essential for running * headers are in -devel * No static libraries * -devel Requires: pkgconfig * .so files are in devel * -devel requires main with fully qualified version * No .la files * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears buildroot * Installed file names are valid UTF-8 Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 17:40:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101740.n3AHenkw005118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #15 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-04-10 13:40:48 EDT --- Upstream release a new stable version. New RPMs: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/libirman.spec http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/10/libirman-0.4.5-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 17:53:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:53:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226381] Merge Review: ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101753.n3AHrYom007220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226381 --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-10 13:53:31 EDT --- Well, my comment 28 is wrong, and the current ruby.spec is wrong in a different way. Now I am doing some trial for this part. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 18:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490269] Review Request: xfglenses - Gravitational lenses visualization program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101819.n3AIJRDq011473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490269 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-10 14:19:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > >MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. ??? > >- No compiler commands are visible in the output. > > There is one right after the green "Building C object > src/CMakeFiles/xfglenses.dir/xfglenses.c.o" (followed by compilation warnings), > march=i585 is used (eg) Okay, I just missed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 18:24:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:24:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101824.n3AIOUcQ011895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 --- Comment #17 from Lucian Langa 2009-04-10 14:24:29 EDT --- Thanks for the update. License is GPLv3+ because: // Slim is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify // it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by // the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or // (at your option) any later version. rpmlint complains: slimdata.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libslim.so.0.0 please set the exec bit on this, this was suggested in comment 1 perhaps you removed it accidentally, please set it back for /usr/lib64/libslim.so.0.0 With a little effort test suite can be made functional. It seems a mostly permissions issue. Unfortunately name of binary file in this package /usr/bin/slim cannot be used since it conflicts with binary from another package slim (Simple Login Manager). Also I notice that slimcat and unslim are actually symlinks to slim binary. make install target copies them over to /usr/bin, I do not think there is much sense to copy this file over and over, but symlink them instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 18:32:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495246] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Test-Loops - Reusable tests for POE::Loop authors Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Test-Loops - Reusable tests for POE::Loop authors Alias: perl-POE-Test-Loops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495246 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Test-Loops - Reusable tests for POE::Loop authors Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/POE-Test-Loops OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-POE-Test-Loops.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-POE-Test-Loops-1.005-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: POE::Test::Loops contains one function, generate(), which will generate all the loop tests for one or more POE::Loop subclasses. The SYNOPSIS example is a version of poe-gen-tests, which is a stand-alone utility to generate the actual tests. The poe-gen-tests manpage also documents the POE::Test::Loops system in more detail. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1289744 Additional Comment: This package is a dep of POE 1.004. *rt-0.05 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 18:46:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:46:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492969] Review Request: lv2dynparam - LV2 dynamic parameters extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101846.n3AIk8wX016847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492969 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-10 14:46:08 EDT --- Thanks a lot! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lv2dynparam Short Description: LV2 dynamic parameters extension Owners: oget Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 18:43:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:43:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492990] Review Request: zynjacku - LV2 synths and plugins host In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101843.n3AIh7Qt016120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-10 14:43:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Fedora review zynjacku-4-1.fc10.src.rpm 2009-04-10 > Thank you for the review! > > * The stated license (GPLv2 and GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and Public Domain) > is approved by Fedora > > ! The license tag in the specfile correctly discribes the license of > the sources. However, the license tag should describe the license of > the content of the binary packages. The content of the binary > package in this case is the two python script lv2rack.py and > zynjacku.py, and the shared library zynjacku_c.so. None of the > header files are packaged as part of the binary package. > > - The python scripts are licensed under GPLv2. > > - The shared library is compiled from sources having the 4 different > licenses you state in the License tag. A compiled unit compiled > from sources with different but compatible licenses falls under > the strictest of the licenses, in this case GPLv2. See: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#Multiple_licensing_situations > > So all components of the packaged binary package are GPLv2, so the > License tag should simply be GPLv2. > Thanks for the correction. Changed to GPLv2 > > ! Package compiles in mock (Fedora 10), however the specfile uses sed > to change configure and aclocal.m4 thereby changing the timestamps > on these files resulting in compilation warnings like: > > aclocal.m4:14: error: this file was generated for autoconf 2.61. > You have another version of autoconf. If you want to use that, > you should regenerate the build system entirely. > aclocal.m4:14: the top level > autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 63 > automake-1.10: autoconf failed with exit status: 63 > WARNING: `automake-1.10' is probably too old. You should only need it if > you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.ac'. > You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. > Grab them from any GNU archive site. > cd . && /bin/sh ./config.status Makefile depfiles > config.status: creating Makefile > config.status: executing depfiles commands > cd . && /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/zynjacku-4/config/missing --run > autoheader > aclocal.m4:14: error: this file was generated for autoconf 2.61. > You have another version of autoconf. If you want to use that, > you should regenerate the build system entirely. > aclocal.m4:14: the top level > autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 63 > autoheader: '/usr/bin/autom4te' failed with exit status: 63 > WARNING: `autoheader' is probably too old. You should only need it if > you modified `acconfig.h' or `configure.ac'. You might want > to install the `Autoconf' and `GNU m4' packages. Grab them > from any GNU archive site. > > The timestamps should either be restored after the change: > > sed s/A/B/ file > file.new ; touch -r file file.new ; mv file.new file > > or all files that are generated from the changed files should be > touched in the appropriate order, so that regeneration is not > triggered, > > or the full autoconf bootstrap chain should be rerun so that all > files are generated with the autotools version of the distribution > the RPM is compiled for. > > The first option is the easiest one to implement. > > At closer inspection, I don't think the modification is needed at > all. The hardcoded path that is changed by the sed replacement is > only used as a fallback when the call to sysconfig.get_python_lib > fails, which should never happen. > > Rebuilding the package with the sed replacements removed still puts > the library in /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/zynjacku_c.so on > x86_64 - without the warnings caused by changing the timestamps. > Yes, removing sed's don't break anything. I should've been more careful. I wiped out those sed's. > > I assume since JACK_MIDI is found OLD_JACK_MIDI isn't needed, right? > Correct. > > ? The package owns the directories it creates, or depend on packages > that do. The dependency path to the owner of the directory > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/72x72/apps is quite long though: > > zynjacku ? pygtk2-libglade ? pygtk2 ? gtk2 ? hicolor-icon-theme > > You are confident that any future updates to any of the packages in > this chain will not break it? > All of them are solid dependencies. gtk2 ? hicolor-icon-theme dependency is used in many packages. I don't think that will be broken in their lifetime. Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/zynjacku.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/zynjacku-4-2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 4-2 - License is GPLv2 - Clean up unnecessary bits from SPEC file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 19:36:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494546] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101936.n3AJaDrJ025045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494546 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 19:42:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458714] Review Request: libkate - Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101942.n3AJgdwT027174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458714 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-10 15:42:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libkate Short Description: Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format Owners: kwizart Branches: F-10 F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 19:55:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:55:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461119] Review Request: libtiger - Rendering library for Kate streams using Pango and Cairo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904101955.n3AJtB7E029487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461119 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-10 15:55:11 EDT --- Could you update this to the latest version? While you are there you can fix the %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} issue. Also, you don't need to add %doc when you are using %{_docdir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 20:07:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461119] Review Request: libtiger - Rendering library for Kate streams using Pango and Cairo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102007.n3AK7qA5031933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461119 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-10 16:07:52 EDT --- Thx for taking a preliminary review but libtiger isn't considered as ready for wide use at this time by upstream. I will fix/update the package anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 20:35:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493684] Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102035.n3AKZSBi003666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sindrepb at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #3 from Felix Kaechele 2009-04-10 16:35:27 EDT --- *** Bug 495072 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 20:35:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495072] Review Request: gnome-theme-CompactClearlooks - A compact Clearlooks theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102035.n3AKZRIL003638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495072 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |felix at fetzig.org Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Felix Kaechele 2009-04-10 16:35:26 EDT --- As this bug is a duplicate I'll be closing it. I hope that is okay with you. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 493684 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 20:47:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:47:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478429] Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102047.n3AKlCZc006928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |felix at fetzig.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |felix at fetzig.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Felix Kaechele 2009-04-10 16:47:12 EDT --- Let's see what we can do here :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 21:15:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493684] Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102115.n3ALFhOX010131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 21:33:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:33:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490399] (Rename) Review Request: WebKitGTK - GTK+ Web content engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102133.n3ALX3W1014137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490399 Peter Gordon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Peter Gordon 2009-04-10 17:33:02 EDT --- Hi, Kevin; and thanks again for the quick ack. :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: webkitgtk Short Description: GTK+ Web content engine library Owners: pgordon Branches: F-11 devel InitialCC: maxamillion, mso, mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 21:47:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:47:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456256] Review Request: frei0r-plugins - Frei0r - a minimalistic plugin API for video effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102147.n3ALl6Po015317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456256 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-10 17:47:06 EDT --- This is the plugins for frei0r right? The short description sounds like this is the base package, is that right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 21:48:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:48:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490140] Review Request: zsync - Client-side implementation of the rsync algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102148.n3ALmlhV015474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e Resolution|DUPLICATE | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 21:48:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102148.n3ALmRRI016799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 Jonathan Steffan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonathansteffan at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jonathansteffan at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 21:48:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493684] Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102148.n3ALmqVL016870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-10 17:48:51 EDT --- You package has a couple of issues that it does not make much sense to review it at this point: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme-1.4-2.fc11.* clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.4-1 ['1.4-2.fc11', '1.4-2'] clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme.noarch: W: no-documentation clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme.src:16: W: unversioned-explicit-provides clearlooks-compact Fix the changelog and include COPYING to make the the no docs warning disappear. Change the provides to Provides: clearlooks-compact = %{version} The license is not clear to me. COPYING from the source is LGPLv2.1, but you say it's GPLv2+. There is a new version available, see http://martin.ankerl.com/files/ClearlooksCompact-1.5.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 21:50:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102150.n3ALoLjk015990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 Jonathan Steffan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Jonathan Steffan 2009-04-10 17:50:21 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint fabric-0.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint fabric-0.1.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. PASSED # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/fabric/fabric.spec PASSED # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. PASSED # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. GPLv2+ PASSED # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. http://www.nongnu.org/fab/index.html -- Bottom of page PASSED # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/fabric/fabric.spec %doc LICENSE ... PASSED # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. PASSED # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. PASSED # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. $ curl -s http://savannah.inetbridge.net/fab/fab-0.1.1.tar.gz | md5sum b317a951d44abb2649b86c0539dadd3b - $ curl -sO http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/fabric-0.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm && rpmdev-extract fabric-0.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm &> /dev/null && md5sum fabric-0.1.1-1.fc10.src/fab-0.1.1.tar.gz b317a951d44abb2649b86c0539dadd3b fabric-0.1.1-1.fc10.src/fab-0.1.1.tar.gz # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. PASSWD # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. PASSED # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. PASSED # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. PASSED # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. PASSED # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. PASSED # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. PASSED # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. PASSED # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. PASSED # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). PASSED # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. PASSED # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. PASSED # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). PASSED # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. PASSED # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. PASSED # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. PASSED # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). PASSED # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. PASSED # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} PASSED # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. PASSED # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. PASSED # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. PASSED # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). PASSED # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. PASSED --------------------------------------------------- This package (fabric) is APPROVED by jsteffan --------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 21:59:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:59:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102159.n3ALx8ir018465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Silas Sewell 2009-04-10 17:59:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fabric Short Description: A simple Pythonic remote deployment tool Owners: silas Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 22:06:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:06:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490140] Review Request: zsync - Client-side implementation of the rsync algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102206.n3AM6Vkj019809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140 --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-10 18:06:31 EDT --- https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/134 has to be solved/approved first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 22:04:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458714] Review Request: libkate - Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102204.n3AM4hiQ019242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458714 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-10 18:04:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 22:07:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:07:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: sems - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102207.n3AM7nZc018530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ondrejj at salstar.sk Summary|Review Request: SEMS - an |Review Request: sems - an |extensible SIP media server |extensible SIP media server Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #24 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-10 18:07:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 22:09:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:09:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487007] Review Request: python-stomper - A python client implementation of the STOMP protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102209.n3AM9EGU020047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487007 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-10 18:09:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 22:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490399] (Rename) Review Request: webkitgtk - GTK+ Web content engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102212.n3AMC0Mw020731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490399 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|(Rename) Review Request: |(Rename) Review Request: |WebKitGTK - GTK+ Web |webkitgtk - GTK+ Web |content engine library |content engine library Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-10 18:12:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 22:13:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:13:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492969] Review Request: lv2dynparam - LV2 dynamic parameters extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102213.n3AMDQhs019403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492969 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-10 18:13:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 22:21:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:21:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456256] Review Request: frei0r-plugins - Frei0r - a minimalistic plugin API for video effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102221.n3AMLF5b022399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456256 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-10 18:21:15 EDT --- There is no frei0r main package actually or frei0r-plugins is the main package. We are not in the usual library world here. freir0-plugins bundled dso which are aimed to be dlopened by various applications. But this is not the usual library scheme here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 22:58:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:58:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495179] Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102258.n3AMwVoO026632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495179 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-10 18:58:31 EDT --- Looks good. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1288753 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): ab3fa027a9189941c7437929f49ce8c632b56d15 Number-Format-1.70.tar.gz ab3fa027a9189941c7437929f49ce8c632b56d15 Number-Format-1.70.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Number-Format-1.70-1.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Number-Format-1.70-1.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Number-Format-1.70-1.fc10.src.rpm perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Test::More) =====> perl-Number-Format-1.70-1.fc10.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Number-Format-1.70-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Number::Format) = 1.70 perl-Number-Format = 1.70-1.fc10 ====> requires for perl-Number-Format-1.70-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl >= 0:5.008 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(POSIX) perl(base) perl(strict) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 22:58:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495179] Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102258.n3AMwYKs028348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495179 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 23:10:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:10:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102310.n3ANA423030351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 23:10:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:10:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102310.n3ANA6hD030374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 23:15:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:15:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102315.n3ANFNuj031309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-10 19:15:23 EDT --- Koji (FAILURE) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1290136 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 23:37:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102337.n3ANbS6R000548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-04-10 19:37:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > Koji (FAILURE) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1290136 I can't see a failure here. What is wrong, exactly ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 23:44:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458714] Review Request: libkate - Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102344.n3ANivS6001485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458714 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 23:44:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461119] Review Request: libtiger - Rendering library for Kate streams using Pango and Cairo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102344.n3ANiwXG001510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461119 Bug 461119 depends on bug 458714, which changed state. Bug 458714 Summary: Review Request: libkate - Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458714 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 10 23:59:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:59:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904102359.n3ANx7lk003896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-10 19:59:07 EDT --- Sorry, that was more of a failure in my script than with the build. ('Connection reset by peer') -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 00:35:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110035.n3B0ZHt0010007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-10 20:35:17 EDT --- Things to fix: 1) The test suite needs to be run in %clean, or a compelling justification as to why not needs to be given. This includes adding as BR's all modules required to run the full test suite. (With the exception of Test::Pod::Coverage and Test::Perl::Critic). 2) While there is indeed a Build.PL, this module is actually using Module::Install, and cpanspec is getting it wrong by picking the Module::Build incantations over ExtUtils::MakeMaker/Module::Install. Modern versions of M::I have dropped support for the M::B style, so it's probably best we don't go that route. (For a typical specfile with EU::MM style build/install, run "rpmdev-newspec -t perl".) Things to think about: 1) It looks like all but one of the manual "Requires:" lines you have in the spec are redundant against the auto-generated requires; I wouldn't leave them in but they don't harm anything, so I'm not going to consider them blockers. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1290136 Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): 646bba8987696dbf2fca7fcb633cd907b370a8c6 Data-ObjectDriver-0.05.tar.gz 646bba8987696dbf2fca7fcb633cd907b370a8c6 Data-ObjectDriver-0.05.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.05-1.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.05-1.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.05-1.fc10.src.rpm perl(Class::Accessor::Fast) perl(Class::Data::Inheritable) perl(Class::Trigger) perl(DBI) perl(Module::Build) perl(Test::Exception) perl(Text::SimpleTable) =====> perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.05-1.fc10.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.05-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Data::ObjectDriver) = 0.05 perl(Data::ObjectDriver::BaseObject) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::BaseView) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::BaseCache) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::Cache::Apache) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::Cache::Cache) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::Cache::Memcached) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::Cache::RAM) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::DBD) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::DBD::Pg) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::DBD::SQLite) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::DBD::mysql) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::DBI) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::MultiPartition) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::Multiplexer) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::Partition) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::SimplePartition) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Errors) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Iterator) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Profiler) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::ResultSet) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::SQL) perl-Data-ObjectDriver = 0.05-1.fc10 ====> requires for perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.05-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Class::Accessor::Fast) perl(Class::Accessor::Fast) perl(Class::Data::Inheritable) perl(Class::Trigger) perl(Class::Trigger) perl(DBI) perl(DBI) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::DBD) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::MultiPartition) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Errors) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Iterator) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::ResultSet) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::SQL) perl(List::Util) perl(Storable) perl(Text::SimpleTable) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Switch the prep/build/install/test incantations to ExtUtils::MakeMaker and enable the test suite (or convince me why it should remain disabled) and I'll approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 01:08:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:08:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110108.n3B18TcG016894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #52 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-10 21:08:23 EDT --- I won't be able to test during the week-end, so if you have a 1.1.2 being prepared ... There is also a need to think about David sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 01:18:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225660] Merge Review: crash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110118.n3B1IHLD018462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225660 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #9 from manuel wolfshant 2009-04-10 21:18:15 EDT --- I am releasing the review. Due to $JOB issues I no longer have the time and the willingness to watch over the shoulder of an unresponsive maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 02:51:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110251.n3B2pBXL003121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-10 22:51:11 EDT --- Actually, after thinking about it for a while, I'm going to back off on #2. Using a depreciated build method in a spec file isn't a blocker, just a Bad Idea as you're basically guaranteeing yourself more work in the future. I suggest oyu change it, but I'm not going to insist on it. Also, is there a reason the latest version (0.06) isn't being packaged? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 04:03:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:03:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: sems - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110403.n3B43DVM013255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-11 00:03:14 EDT --- sems-1.1.0-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sems-1.1.0-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 04:03:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:03:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: sems - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110403.n3B43I4l013286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-11 00:03:19 EDT --- sems-1.1.0-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sems-1.1.0-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 04:18:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:18:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110418.n3B4I5oG015487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #40 from Mikulas Patocka 2009-04-11 00:18:04 EDT --- Google with links -g: Google in Links should really look like that. Links doesn't support CSS and google adds textarea field to the page and hides it with CSS. So without CSS, the field is visible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 04:26:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495179] Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110426.n3B4Q9YB014473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495179 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-11 00:26:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Number-Format Short Description: Perl extension for formatting numbers Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 04:29:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495246] Review Request: perl-POE-Test-Loops - Reusable tests for POE::Loop authors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110429.n3B4TrVn017059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495246 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |iarnell at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |iarnell at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 04:48:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:48:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110448.n3B4mHkj019996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #41 from Mikulas Patocka 2009-04-11 00:48:17 EDT --- > # Incompatible with GPL > BuildConflicts: openssl-devel Could anyone please explain, why so you think that it is illegal to dynamically link GPL and NON-GPL code? My point of view: 1. there is not any single legal case where it was found that dynamic linking is considered as creating derivate works. If it were viewed as creating derivate works, then loading browser plugins or running windows media player would be illegal activity, because it involves linking several dynamic libraries from different vendors with different licenses that do not allow creating derivate works (even normal commercial software could not have plugins, regardless of GPL). 2. even if dynamic linking were viewed as creating derivate works, the derivate work is created by the USER when he RUNS the program. Not by the packager who distributes the binary (Links binary package contains none of OpenSSL code, it contains only symbols names, and symbols names are not copyrightable). 3. GPL doesn't prevent anyone from creating derivate work of GPL programs and GPL-incompatible programs. It only prevents distributing such works. You can mix GPL code with whatever you like as long as you don't distribute it. So even if dynamic linking was viewed as creating derivate works, the only effective thing is that the user cannot distribute the core dump of the program (which contains both GPL-covered and GPL-incompatible code). He can definitelly run the program and let the dynamic linker create the "derivate work". When I said these arguments to Debian people, they basically couldn't say anything against them, but didn't really want to drop their policy anyway and asked me to add a paragraph to COPYING file. So I did. But I still don't understand WHY is it wrong to dynamically link GPL and non-GPL code? It almost looks like someone said it and people are repeating it like parrots. Is there any trustworthy legal opinion on this issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 04:53:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:53:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495278] New: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch - Automatic inflation/deflation of epoch-based DateTime objects for DBIx::Class Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch - Automatic inflation/deflation of epoch-based DateTime objects for DBIx::Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495278 Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch - Automatic inflation/deflation of epoch-based DateTime objects for DBIx::Class Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch-0.03-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module automatically inflates/deflates DateTime objects corresponding to applicable columns. Columns may also be defined to specify their nature, such as columns representing a creation time (set at time of insertion) or a modification time (set at time of every update). Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1290500 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 04:50:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495246] Review Request: perl-POE-Test-Loops - Reusable tests for POE::Loop authors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110450.n3B4oFo2018009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495246 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-11 00:50:15 EDT --- + source files match upstream. 85a7b805542ecfae32cec5319a3d4eb8f44e1fd1 POE-Test-Loops-1.005.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1289744 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no complaints: perl-POE-Test-Loops.src: I: checking perl-POE-Test-Loops.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Test::DondeEstan) perl(POE::Test::Loops) = 1.005 perl-POE-Test-Loops = 1.005-1.fc11 = /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(File::Find) perl(File::Path) perl(File::Spec) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(IO::File) perl(IO::Socket) perl(IO::Socket::INET) perl(POE) perl(POE::NFA) perl(POE::Session) perl(POE::Test::DondeEstan) perl(POE::Test::Loops) perl(POSIX) perl(Socket) perl(Symbol) perl(Test::More) perl(lib) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 + %check is present and all tests pass. All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.06 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.10 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 04:57:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:57:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110457.n3B4vq3U019012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #42 from Mikulas Patocka 2009-04-11 00:57:52 EDT --- "Many warnings "pointer targets in passing argument of differ in> signedness" in build.log" Use -Wno-pointer-sign. I think it's easier to use it than to add many needless "unsigned char * -> char *" casts. Links is written with the policy that all characters are unsigned ... to avoid hard-to-detect bugs coming from the fact that different systems have different char signedness. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 05:00:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495246] Review Request: perl-POE-Test-Loops - Reusable tests for POE::Loop authors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110500.n3B508nY019505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495246 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 05:00:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:00:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495246] Review Request: perl-POE-Test-Loops - Reusable tests for POE::Loop authors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110500.n3B506rw019482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495246 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-11 01:00:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-POE-Test-Loops Short Description: Reusable tests for POE::Loop authors Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 05:03:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:03:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495278] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch - Automatic inflation/deflation of epoch-based DateTime objects for DBIx::Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110503.n3B53ZIJ022212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495278 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |iarnell at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |iarnell at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 05:12:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490578] Review Request: mod_perlite - Kinder, gentler embedded Perl for the Apache HTTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110512.n3B5CA52023512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490578 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-11 01:12:10 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 05:23:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495278] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch - Automatic inflation/deflation of epoch-based DateTime objects for DBIx::Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110523.n3B5NtHq022642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495278 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-11 01:23:54 EDT --- + source files match upstream. 56c358f8f904fc0e939dd623a379c0884976a04d DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1290500 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no complaints: perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch.noarch: I: checking perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch.src: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(DBIx::Class::DateTime::Epoch) = 0.03 perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch = 0.03-1.fc11 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(DBIx::Class) perl(DateTime) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 + %check is present and all tests pass. All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=3, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.34 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.40 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 05:28:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495278] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch - Automatic inflation/deflation of epoch-based DateTime objects for DBIx::Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110528.n3B5SiWh023321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495278 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 05:28:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:28:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495278] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch - Automatic inflation/deflation of epoch-based DateTime objects for DBIx::Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110528.n3B5SgLL025624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495278 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-11 01:28:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch Short Description: Automatic inflation/deflation of epoch-based DateTime objects for DBIx::Class Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 05:34:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495279] New: Review Request: perl-Devel-NYTProf - Powerful feature-rich perl source code profiler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-NYTProf - Powerful feature-rich perl source code profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495279 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-NYTProf - Powerful feature-rich perl source code profiler Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Devel-NYTProf.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Devel-NYTProf-2.09-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Devel::NYTProf is a powerful feature-rich perl source code profiler. scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1290539 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 06:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495282] New: Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495282 Summary: Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-pyrad.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-pyrad-1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is an implementation of a RADIUS client as described in RFC2865. It takes care of all the details like building RADIUS packets, sending them and decoding responses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 06:12:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495282] Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110612.n3B6CpG2032152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495282 --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-11 02:12:51 EDT --- Koji scratchbuild for EL-5 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1290587 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 06:45:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495284] New: Review Request: perl-CSS-Minifier-XS - XS based CSS minifier Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS-Minifier-XS - XS based CSS minifier Alias: perl-CSS-Minifier-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495284 Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS-Minifier-XS - XS based CSS minifier Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CSS-Minifier-XS OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-CSS-Minifier-XS.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-CSS-Minifier-XS-0.03-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: 'CSS::Minifier::XS' is a CSS "minifier"; it's designed to remove un- necessary whitespace and comments from CSS files, while also *not* breaking the CSS. 'CSS::Minifier::XS' is similar in function to 'CSS::Minifier', but is substantially faster as it's written in XS and not just pure Perl. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1290530 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 06:45:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:45:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495279] Review Request: perl-Devel-NYTProf - Powerful feature-rich perl source code profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110645.n3B6jphX002007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495279 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 06:45:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495279] Review Request: perl-Devel-NYTProf - Powerful feature-rich perl source code profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110645.n3B6jnnh001986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495279 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 06:48:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:48:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110648.n3B6mQrP002366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #43 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-11 02:48:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > (In reply to comment #35) > > Matej: Though this is mostly a pre-nss-patch relic (current version of the nss > > patch would not look for OpenSSL once NSS compat library is present) > -- when I remove it and rebuild package, resulting package doesn't require > openssl anyway: If you bothered to read the above, I'm sure you would understand you are just re-stating what was already said. > > Seriously, if you believe this is a review blocker, please re-read the > > guidelines and elaborate on what use of BuildConflicts seems legitimate to you. > > I have no clue what BuildConflicts is good for, and I have never seen it to be > used before, but this is certainly not the case (see above). Thank you for answering the review blocker part. Now that we're clear, could you please return the review flag back? I'm not going to reroll the package at this point, and am going to remove the BuildConflict upon import. > > > Also, thank you for bringing this up once the review was finished, even though > > this was present in the SPEC file since my first revision. > > I don't think there is any duty to be silent when I see stupidity in a package > which is soon to come to Fedora -- I haven't thought it is necessary to review > this package because I believed that ovasik will do proper job on it as usually > he does. Only when I tried to rebuild this package on my computer I got hit by > this, and so I jumped here before the damage would be hard to fix. You're completely right, there's no other term that would describe one extra BuildConflict better than "unfixable damage". I think your colleague will also be glad that to hear that you saved the mankind from unfixable damage caused by his improper review he wasted time on. (In reply to comment #41) > > # Incompatible with GPL > > BuildConflicts: openssl-devel > > Could anyone please explain, why so you think that it is illegal to dynamically > link GPL and NON-GPL code? > > My point of view: If you believe this is the right place to troll about this (ever heard about the fedora-legal-list?), here you go: I believe that whether dynamic linking is creating derivative works was never tried in court and general consensus is that it's equivalent to static linking once it was done at build time (as opposed to say, browser plugins). Therefore links codebase linked with openssl is derivative work of the gpl and openssl license adds the advertisement clause which makes the license of the resulting product incompatible with GPL and thus is not allowed. IANAL, and I may be completly wrong and I reserve the right to "parrot" the decision of the lawyers instead of imposing my own uninformed decisions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 06:51:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:51:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495279] Review Request: perl-Devel-NYTProf - Powerful feature-rich perl source code profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110651.n3B6paUh005078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495279 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 06:51:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495279] Review Request: perl-Devel-NYTProf - Powerful feature-rich perl source code profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110651.n3B6pYhP005056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495279 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-11 02:51:34 EDT --- Looks good. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1290539 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): 687d1ef048412a69c1a278a0774798cddd1419b7 Devel-NYTProf-2.09.tar.gz 687d1ef048412a69c1a278a0774798cddd1419b7 Devel-NYTProf-2.09.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Devel-NYTProf-2.09-1.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Devel-NYTProf-2.09-1.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Devel-NYTProf-2.09-1.fc10.src.rpm perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) =====> perl-Devel-NYTProf-2.09-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Devel-NYTProf-2.09-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm perl(Devel::NYTProf) = 2.09 perl(Devel::NYTProf::Apache) = 0.02 perl(Devel::NYTProf::Constants) perl(Devel::NYTProf::Core) = 2.09 perl(Devel::NYTProf::Data) = 2.09 perl(Devel::NYTProf::FileInfo) perl(Devel::NYTProf::Reader) = 2.09 perl(Devel::NYTProf::ReadStream) = 2.09 perl(Devel::NYTProf::SubInfo) perl(Devel::NYTProf::Util) = 2.09 perl-Devel-NYTProf = 2.09-1.fc10 perl-Devel-NYTProf(x86-64) = 2.09-1.fc10 ====> requires for perl-Devel-NYTProf-2.09-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) librt.so.1(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) perl(base) perl(Carp) perl(Config) perl(constant) perl(Cwd) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Devel::NYTProf::Constants) perl(Devel::NYTProf::Core) perl(Devel::NYTProf::Data) perl(Devel::NYTProf::FileInfo) perl(Devel::NYTProf::Reader) perl(Devel::NYTProf::SubInfo) perl(Devel::NYTProf::Util) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Copy) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(List::Util) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(strict) perl(UNIVERSAL) perl(warnings) perl(XSLoader) rtld(GNU_HASH) /usr/bin/perl =====> perl-Devel-NYTProf-debuginfo-2.09-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Devel-NYTProf-debuginfo-2.09-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm perl-Devel-NYTProf-debuginfo = 2.09-1.fc10 perl-Devel-NYTProf-debuginfo(x86-64) = 2.09-1.fc10 ====> requires for perl-Devel-NYTProf-debuginfo-2.09-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 06:52:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:52:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110652.n3B6quA6005245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #44 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-11 02:52:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #42) > "Many warnings "pointer targets in passing argument of differ > in> signedness" in build.log" > > Use -Wno-pointer-sign. I think it's easier to use it than to add many needless > "unsigned char * -> char *" casts. Links is written with the policy that all > characters are unsigned ... to avoid hard-to-detect bugs coming from the fact > that different systems have different char signedness. Makes sense (was bitten in the nose by such bug in powerpc KinoSearch just a week ago). I'll add the compiler flag upon import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 06:58:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495279] Review Request: perl-Devel-NYTProf - Powerful feature-rich perl source code profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110658.n3B6wwgm003946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495279 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-11 02:58:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Devel-NYTProf Short Description: Powerful feature-rich perl source code profiler Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 07:00:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495284] Review Request: perl-CSS-Minifier-XS - XS based CSS minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110700.n3B70Stt004389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495284 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |iarnell at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |iarnell at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 07:13:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:13:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495284] Review Request: perl-CSS-Minifier-XS - XS based CSS minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110713.n3B7DIUP006281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495284 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-11 03:13:18 EDT --- + source files match upstream. 60628a9ee8c72852d08ebcdfb7090a58d8b044bb CSS-Minifier-XS-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1290530 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no complaints: perl-CSS-Minifier-XS.src: I: checking perl-CSS-Minifier-XS.x86_64: I: checking perl-CSS-Minifier-XS-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(CSS::Minifier::XS) = 0.03 perl-CSS-Minifier-XS = 0.03-1.fc11 perl-CSS-Minifier-XS(x86-64) = 0.03-1.fc11 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) perl >= 0:5.006 perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + %check is present and all tests pass. t/01-loads.t ................ ok t/02-minify.t ............... ok t/03-minifies-to-nothing.t .. ok t/99-benchmark.t ............ skipped: CSS::Minifier not available for benchmark comparison t/pod-coverage.t ............ ok t/pod.t ..................... ok All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=12, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.01 sys + 0.46 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.55 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. I assume that perl-CSS-Minifier is on its way soon to complete the test suite. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 07:48:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:48:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495237] Review Request: python-hash_ring - Python implementation of consistent hashing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110748.n3B7mMJI011185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495237 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 07:47:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495282] Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110747.n3B7lhs0012765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495282 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 08:02:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 04:02:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495282] Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110802.n3B82a8F013743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495282 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-11 04:02:36 EDT --- - Do you really need Provides: %{realname} = %{version}-%{release} I think you should use either python-pyrad or pyrad as the name of the package, not use both.. - Please change %{python_sitelib}/* in the files section to %{python_sitelib}/%{realname}/ %{python_sitelib}/%{realname}-%{version}-*.info ** rpmlint output: python-pyrad.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 5) 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. ~OK - The source code contains no license headers. Please contact upstream to add them. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSFIX - Add PKG-INFO to %doc. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 08:10:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 04:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495282] Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110810.n3B8AWZd015331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495282 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-11 04:10:32 EDT --- - Fix the rpmlint warning and remove the hash commented lines. and - Either remove the Provides line or convince me why it's needed. After this I'll approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 08:17:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 04:17:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495282] Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110817.n3B8HlIb016635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495282 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-11 04:17:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - Please change > %{python_sitelib}/* > in the files section to > %{python_sitelib}/%{realname}/ > %{python_sitelib}/%{realname}-%{version}-*.info Whoops, should be %{python_sitelib}/%{realname}-%{version}-*.egg-info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 08:18:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 04:18:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495237] Review Request: python-hash_ring - Python implementation of consistent hashing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110818.n3B8ItM5016792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495237 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-11 04:18:54 EDT --- - Why do you sed -i '/^import\ ez_setup$/,+1 d' setup.py Please add a comment about this. - Instead of %{python_sitelib}/* use %{python_sitelib}/hash_ring/ %{python_sitelib}/hash_ring-%{version}-*.egg-info ** rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSFIX - The license is BSD, not GPLv2. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSFIX - The BSD license is not included. SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK ** Fix the above and I'll approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 08:18:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 04:18:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110818.n3B8IeL4018392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #46 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-11 04:18:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #45) > > "it's equivalent to static linking once it was done at build time (as > > opposed to say, browser plugins)." > > And what if you create "dummy-openssl" [... blah blah blah blah...] Did I say I am a lawyer? What makes you believe the court decisions always have sane technical basis and this report is here to discuss your licensing worries? > > "IANAL, and I may be completly wrong and I reserve the right to > > "parrot" the decision of the lawyers" > > --- and where is the real "unparrotted" analysis? Would not fedora-legal-list be more suitable for this kind of question? I'm simply following the licensing guidelines? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing > I tried to install NSS --- it doesn't contain any general openssl functions, > such as SSL_read, in /usr/include/nss. Am I doing something wrong ... do I need > some other package? Which? Have you bothered looking at the BuildRequires? Or at least reading my comments? You need nss_compat_ossl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 08:00:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 04:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110800.n3B80AIf014777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #45 from Mikulas Patocka 2009-04-11 04:00:08 EDT --- > "it's equivalent to static linking once it was done at build time (as > opposed to say, browser plugins)." And what if you create "dummy-openssl" library that contains nothing but empty function declarations and you license it under GPL and you build Links against it ... and then the user takes the Links binary built this way and loads it into memory with real OpenSSL --- is it license violation or not and who is doing the violation? > "IANAL, and I may be completly wrong and I reserve the right to > "parrot" the decision of the lawyers" --- and where is the real "unparrotted" analysis? I tried to install NSS --- it doesn't contain any general openssl functions, such as SSL_read, in /usr/include/nss. Am I doing something wrong ... do I need some other package? Which? I managed to build Links against gnutls, but I'm getting runtime SSL errors. It needs some more debugging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 09:42:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 05:42:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493603] Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110942.n3B9gIoY031087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493603 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org --- Comment #1 from Lucian Langa 2009-04-11 05:42:18 EDT --- Please consider using this text as description: Unclutter hides the mouse cursor image from the screen so that it does not obstruct the area you are looking at. It hides the mouse cursor when it is not moved for a specified amount of time or no buttons are pressed on the mouse. Cursor image will be restored once the mouse is moved again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 09:46:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 05:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493684] Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110946.n3B9kZCQ001381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-11 05:46:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > You package has a couple of issues that it does not make much sense to review > it at this point: Excuse me? What exactly makes this unreviewable. > $ rpmlint > /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme-1.4-2.fc11.* > clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.4-1 > ['1.4-2.fc11', '1.4-2'] Will fix. > clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme.noarch: W: no-documentation No problem, no documentation included by upstream. > clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme.src:16: W: unversioned-explicit-provides > clearlooks-compact > > Fix the changelog and include COPYING to make the the no docs warning > disappear. Change the provides to > Provides: clearlooks-compact = %{version} Done. > The license is not clear to me. COPYING from the source is LGPLv2.1, but you > say it's GPLv2+. Pardon me? I read this there: License: LGPLv2+ COPYING file does not determine which licensing terms are in use. Comments in files do. COPYING merely contains the license text. > There is a new version available, see > http://martin.ankerl.com/files/ClearlooksCompact-1.5.tar.bz2 Updated. SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme-1.5-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 09:54:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 05:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495282] Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110954.n3B9sfvU002835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495282 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-11 05:54:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > - Fix the rpmlint warning and remove the hash commented lines. Done. > and > > - Either remove the Provides line or convince me why it's needed. I removed "Provides". I didn't add PKG-INFO to %doc because it just duplicates the contents of README.txt and CHANGES.txt but in less readable form. Also I added the only missing "Require". http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-pyrad.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-pyrad-1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 09:55:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 05:55:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493603] Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110955.n3B9t8jw001178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493603 --- Comment #2 from Till Maas 2009-04-11 05:55:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Please consider using this text as description: > > Unclutter hides the mouse cursor image from the screen so that it does not > obstruct the area you are looking at. It hides the mouse cursor when it is > not moved for a specified amount of time or no buttons are pressed on the > mouse. Cursor image will be restored once the mouse is moved again. Thanks, I will change it before importing it to Fedora or when another reason to update the spec file occurs earlier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 10:03:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:03:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111003.n3BA3a0h002603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 10:02:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495282] Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111002.n3BA2S9M002459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495282 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-11 06:02:28 EDT --- - You can remove Requires: python, since it is redundant (it's automatically picked up by rpm and also a requirement of python-twisted-core). You can do this upon import to cvs. The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 10:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226330] Merge Review: pychecker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111005.n3BA5d24005404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226330 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 10:11:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495282] Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111011.n3BABTpW006352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495282 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-11 06:11:29 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-pyrad Short Description: Python RADIUS client Owners: peter Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 10:10:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:10:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493603] Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111010.n3BAAhsu004123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493603 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cooly at gnome.eu.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa 2009-04-11 06:10:42 EDT --- I will review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 10:19:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:19:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226330] Merge Review: pychecker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111019.n3BAJ7cW005351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226330 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-11 06:19:07 EDT --- - Drop Requires: python and BuildRequires: python since both of these are redundant (first is automatically picked up and second is a requirement of python-devel). - Remove CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" from the build phase since this is a noarch package. ** rpmlint output: pychecker.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot A python source code checking tool. pychecker.noarch: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/Stack.py 0644 pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/OP.py 0644 pychecker.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/pychecker-0.8.17/MAINTAINERS pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/warn.py 0644 pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/printer.py 0644 pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/CodeChecks.py 0644 pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/Warning.py 0644 pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/msgs.py 0644 pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/utils.py 0644 pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/Config.py 0644 pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/checker.py 0644 pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/function.py 0644 pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/python.py 0644 pychecker.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A python source code checking tool. pychecker.src: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog pychecker.src: E: non-utf8-spec-file /tmp/rpmlint.pychecker-0.8.17-8.fc10.src.rpm.t9ghWq/pychecker.spec 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 15 errors, 3 warnings. - Fix the above. You can get rid of the non-executable script errors by removing the shebang with sed in the setup phase, e.g. sed -i -e '1d' pychecker/checker.py - Maybe add "-O1 --skip-build" to the install argument of setup.py? MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - Source code contains no license heders, please ask upstream to add them. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 10:25:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:25:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490989] Review Request: subdownloader - A program for download/upload subtitles for videofiles and DVDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111025.n3BAPLfS006678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490989 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-11 06:25:21 EDT --- subdownloader-2.0.9.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/subdownloader-2.0.9.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 10:32:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226341] Merge Review: python-docs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111032.n3BAWhj1009906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226341 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-11 06:32:43 EDT --- - What is the stuff at the beginning needed for? - You can use %{!?pyver: %global pyver %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]")} to get the Python base version. - Patches are not documented. - Commented patches should be removed. - BuildRoot should be %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) - Remove topdir, pushd and popd and use make -C Doc instead. - Remove buildroot check from install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 10:38:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493684] Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111038.n3BAcPL3008883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 --- Comment #6 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2009-04-11 06:38:25 EDT --- Looks good, you probably shouldn't install COPYING twice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 10:52:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:52:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226341] Merge Review: python-docs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111052.n3BAqePl013416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226341 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-11 06:52:41 EDT --- rpmlint output: python-docs.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot Documentation for the Python programming language. python-docs.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Documentation for the Python programming language. python-docs.src:28: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes python2-docs 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSFIX - See stuff mentioned above. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. NEEDSFIX - Why %defattr(-,root,root,755)? MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 11:15:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:15:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111115.n3BBFwFd015641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 --- Comment #17 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2009-04-11 07:15:57 EDT --- Package Review: ================================== ---------------------------------- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. ---------------------------------- ==> OK (no output) ---------------------------------- MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements. ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. ---------------------------------- ==> NOT OK The actual license seems to be "GPLv2" and not "GPLv2+" ---------------------------------- MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. ---------------------------------- ==> OK (Tested on F10 and Rawhide i386) ---------------------------------- MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. ---------------------------------- ==> N/A ---------------------------------- MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. ---------------------------------- ==> N/A ---------------------------------- MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. ---------------------------------- ==> N/A ---------------------------------- MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. ---------------------------------- ==> N/A ---------------------------------- MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). ---------------------------------- ==> N/A ---------------------------------- MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} ---------------------------------- ==> N/A ---------------------------------- MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. ---------------------------------- ==> OK ---------------------------------- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. ---------------------------------- ==> OK (builds fine on F10 and Rawhide i386) ---------------------------------- SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. ---------------------------------- ==> N/A ---------------------------------- SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. ---------------------------------- ==> N/A ---------------------------------- Summary ================================== Change the license in the license field ================================== So you remove a "+" and I confirm my APPROVING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 12:14:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 08:14:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111214.n3BCELWN026372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #7 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-04-11 08:14:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > ('Connection reset by peer') Damn you, peer! (Sorry, couldn't resist) (In reply to comment #6) > Actually, after thinking about it for a while, I'm going to back off on #2. I fexed it anyways. > Also, is there a reason the latest version (0.06) isn't being packaged? I forgot to refresh the specfile before submitting it. Updating to 0.06 makes the test suite pass (it crashed and burned in 0.05) so I re-enabled it in the %check section. rpm auto-generates perl(DBD::Oracle) as a dependency so I deactivated AutoReq and build the deps by hand. New spec and .src.rpm : http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Data-ObjectDriver/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 13:02:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 09:02:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493603] Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111302.n3BD25KR002392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493603 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Lucian Langa 2009-04-11 09:02:05 EDT --- This is is a simple program, it builds fine and rpmlint is silent. I note there are several sites where this program is distributed. There are tar.gz version of this package and seems a little smaller than tar.Z is there any reason not to use the smaller package ? Perhaps later would make sense to provide a xinitrc.d file to start this automatically when X is started. OK source files match upstream: 726e829b41e9cb4d6a14cd91ca7efa02125be2be unclutter-8.tar.Z OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK summary a short and concise description. OK description is OK - using alternate suggested text OK dist tag is present. OK build root is sane. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK license text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). OK package installs properly. OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. Ok final provides and requires are sane: unclutter = 8-1.fc11 unclutter(x86-64) = 8-1.fc11 = libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) OK %check there's no test suite upstream; I was able to run this program and it works as exected. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 13:51:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 09:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111351.n3BDpnBB013258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #29 from MERCIER 2009-04-11 09:51:48 EDT --- Someone for review it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 14:11:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:11:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111411.n3BEBeem016867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #30 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-11 10:11:38 EDT --- Still here. Sorry for the delay. I'll review Philippe's new srpm ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 15:06:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:06:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482757] Review Request: objcryst-fox - Viewing and solving crystal structures from powder diffraction data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111506.n3BF6LhP023472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482757 --- Comment #7 from Pascal 2009-04-11 11:06:21 EDT --- new srpm: http://fedora.debroglie.net/SRPMS/10/objcryst-fox-1.8.1.2-1.fc10.debroglie.src.rpm spec: http://svn.debroglie.net/specs/trunk/objcryst-fox.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 15:09:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:09:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493684] Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111509.n3BF918h025558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-11 11:09:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Looks good, you probably shouldn't install COPYING twice. Good point. Will fix on next package revision, which will probably take place after a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 15:26:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111526.n3BFQFmD026395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #2 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-04-11 11:26:14 EDT --- Another update: SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/kradio4-4.0.0-0.6.r829.20090411.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 15:39:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:39:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111539.n3BFdckC029883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 --- Comment #18 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-11 11:39:38 EDT --- Thanks a lot for this review. (In reply to comment #17) > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > ---------------------------------- > ==> NOT OK > The actual license seems to be "GPLv2" and not "GPLv2+" COPYING included in this package is GPLv2 and there is no way to distinguish, it this means "GPLv2 only" or "GPLv2+". In cases like these you need to look at the sourcecode and src/utils.c states: * Copyright 2008 PCMan * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. So the actual license really is GPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 16:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493684] Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111619.n3BGJ303001088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-11 12:19:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Excuse me? What exactly makes this unreviewable. I did not say it was "unreviewable" but that a review at that point did "not make much sense". The package contained a blocker (COPYING not included), but the main reason was that it was not the latest version. We are reviewing SRPMs, not the specs, so strictly speaking after updating the package I would have to perform another review. > No problem, no documentation included by upstream. COPYING _is_ documentation. > Pardon me? I read this there: > License: LGPLv2+ Sorry, I would have sworn the spec said GPLv2+. My bad. REVIEW FOR af3e76647b483eb253542a7ce8220ad6 clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme-1.5-1.fc11.src.rpm OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme-1.5-1.fc11.* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: LGPLv2+ OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The source used to build the package matches the upstream source by MD5 9d6f111db273f065cfd2e3ee5c390eac OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires (none). N/A - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. FAIL - MUST: The package contains duplicate files in the %files listing: COPYING OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. N/A - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures (noarch). OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Package is APPROVED, but please don't forget to remove the 2nd COPYING after import into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 16:32:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:32:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111632.n3BGWYvF003242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 --- Comment #19 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2009-04-11 12:32:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > > ---------------------------------- > > ==> NOT OK > > The actual license seems to be "GPLv2" and not "GPLv2+" > > COPYING included in this package is GPLv2 and there is no way to distinguish, > it this means "GPLv2 only" or "GPLv2+". In cases like these you need to look at > the sourcecode and src/utils.c states: > > * Copyright 2008 PCMan > * > * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or > * (at your option) any later version. > > So the actual license really is GPLv2+. Thanks for the advice, I didn't think about checking the source code. So you can begin the CVS procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 16:33:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:33:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493684] Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111633.n3BGXnGB005022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-11 12:33:50 EDT --- Thanks a lot for review, Christoph! (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Excuse me? What exactly makes this unreviewable. > > I did not say it was "unreviewable" but that a review at that point did "not > make much sense". The package contained a blocker (COPYING not included), but > the main reason was that it was not the latest version. We are reviewing SRPMs, > not the specs, so strictly speaking after updating the package I would have to > perform another review. We don't do new reviews for new versions once the package is CVS anyways. It would surely block approval, but I don't see why would it block doing a full review. Reviewer's choice anyway > > No problem, no documentation included by upstream. > > COPYING _is_ documentation. It was not present in 1.4. In fact, 1.4 was the latest version at the time the review request was last updated (in fact I made upstream release that version to address our concerns). > Package is APPROVED, but please don't forget to remove the 2nd COPYING after > import into CVS. Sure. :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme Short Description: GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays Owners: sindrepb, lkundrak Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 16:43:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:43:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495284] Review Request: perl-CSS-Minifier-XS - XS based CSS minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111643.n3BGhjlR004715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495284 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 16:42:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111642.n3BGgE7H004644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-11 12:42:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lxmusic Short Description: Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface Owners: cwickert Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 16:43:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495284] Review Request: perl-CSS-Minifier-XS - XS based CSS minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111643.n3BGhic6006410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495284 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-11 12:43:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CSS-Minifier-XS Short Description: XS based CSS minifier Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 16:45:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493684] Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111645.n3BGjERe006837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 --- Comment #10 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-11 12:45:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Thanks a lot for review, Christoph! NP, you are welcome. > We don't do new reviews for new versions once the package is CVS anyways. That's what commits-list is for. If a maintainer does something really stupid upon an update, (hopefully) someone reading the commits will recognize it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 16:51:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:51:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] New: Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 Summary: Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pdfposter.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pdfposter-0.4.6-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://pdfposter.origo.ethz.ch/ Description: Pdfposter can be used to create a large poster by building it from multple pages and/or printing it on large media. It expects as input a PDF file, normally printing on a single page. The output is again a PDF file, maybe containing multiple pages together building the poster. The input page will be scaled to obtain the desired size. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1291095 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint pdfposter-0.4.6-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint pdfposter-0.4.6-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 17:46:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 13:46:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226381] Merge Review: ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111746.n3BHkuqp014288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226381 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-11 13:46:53 EDT --- In the previous (-7) spec file: --------------------------------------------------------- for i in `find -type f ! -name "*.gif"`; do sh -c "iconv -f utf-8 -t utf-8 $i > /dev/null 2>&1 || (iconv -f euc-jp -t utf-8 $i > $i.new && mv $i.new $i || exit 1) if [ $? != 0 ]; then iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf-8 $i > $.new && mv $i.new $i || exit 1 fi" done --------------------------------------------------------- Here $? is always 0 like below: --------------------------------------------------------- $ sh -c "LANG=C ; foo bar ; echo $?" sh: foo: command not found 0 $ sh -c 'LANG=C ; foo bar ; echo $?' sh: foo: command not found 127 --------------------------------------------------------- With double quotation shell first evaluates the value of $? and expands it before actually executing sub-shell. However as we also want to use $i, we cannot easily change " to '. So I changed - not to use subshell - from ( to { --------------------------------------------------------- $ sh -c 'status=0 ; { status=1 ; } ; echo $status' 1 $ sh -c 'status=0 ; ( status=1 ) ; echo $status' 0 --------------------------------------------------------- - and not to "exit 1" but to use "status=1" And I addressed all I mentioned in my comment 23 (except for 64 bits handling) Closing this Merge Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 18:03:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:03:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111803.n3BI3Tit018202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org --- Comment #1 from Lucian Langa 2009-04-11 14:03:29 EDT --- rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint) rpmlint is not silent: gnome-mud.spec: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean gnome-mud.spec: E: specfile-error sh: ?dist: command not found gnome-mud.spec: E: specfile-error sh: ?_smp_mflags: command not found 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. Please do not package svn snapshot version just because you think it makes package solid, this argument makes no sense to me and please make sure your snapshot package actually builds. I would suggest you pack 0.11.2, cleanup spec file and we will take it from there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 18:28:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495237] Review Request: python-hash_ring - Python implementation of consistent hashing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111828.n3BISiA7021033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495237 --- Comment #2 from Silas Sewell 2009-04-11 14:28:44 EDT --- Thanks for the review Jussi. I added a comment to the spec regarding the sed, but in short the removed code checks to see if setuptools is installed and downloads+installs it if not. If you don't remove it the build will fail. I will send a request upstream for the license file to be included. Diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/diff?spec=svn227&r=227&format=side&path=/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/python-hash_ring/python-hash_ring.spec SRPM: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/python-hash_ring-1.2-2.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint [silas at silas result]$ rpmlint python-hash_ring-1.2-2.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [silas at silas result]$ rpmlint python-hash_ring-1.2-2.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 18:56:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:56:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487007] Review Request: python-stomper - A python client implementation of the STOMP protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111856.n3BIurUq025665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487007 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Silas Sewell 2009-04-11 14:56:53 EDT --- Built for F-11, closing. Thanks Mamoru and Kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 19:18:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494965] Review Request: pianobooster - A MIDI file player that teaches you how to play the piano In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111918.n3BJImcF029123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494965 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #2 from Christian Krause 2009-04-11 15:18:48 EDT --- I've found license problem in this package: The source (gplv3+) contains 3 files ("rtmidi") which are licensed under a modified MIT license. In general this would be ok, but this license contains the statement that modifications must be sent back to the author. I'll let this bug block FE-LEGAL to get their advice. Here is the complete license: RtMidi WWW site: http://music.mcgill.ca/~gary/rtmidi/ RtMidi: realtime MIDI i/o C++ classes Copyright (c) 2003-2009 Gary P. Scavone Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. Any person wishing to distribute modifications to the Software is requested to send the modifications to the original developer so that they can be incorporated into the canonical version. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 19:46:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485961] Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904111946.n3BJk2ik002784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485961 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 21:04:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904112104.n3BL4FNO014813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #15 from Hubert Plociniczak 2009-04-11 17:04:15 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dev.lshift.net/hubert/rabbitmq-server.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.lshift.net/hubert/rabbitmq-server-1.5.4-1.src.rpm This is the new minor release done just a couple of days ago. It contains fix for the sed problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 21:27:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485961] Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904112127.n3BLRwNc018654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485961 --- Comment #2 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-11 17:27:58 EDT --- -= Review gmusicbrowser =- buenas noches! * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. O.K. gmusicbrowser.src:60: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/menu/gmusicbrowser is the erasing of hardcoded, so this is OK * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines O.K. * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. O.K. * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines NOT O.K. - forbidden macro -- %makeinstall https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used --- make install prefix=%{buildroot}%{_prefix} - Timestamps -- SOURCE0 with broken timestamps (wget -N SOURCE0) -- Installation without preserve the files' timestamps -- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps --- make install prefix=%{buildroot}%{_prefix} INSTALL="install -p" - missing Requirements -- post / postun without Requires .:[ cassmodiah @ schafwiese : /home/cassmodiah ]:. $ rpm -qf /usr/bin/update-desktop-database desktop-file-utils-0.15-3.fc10.i386 --- Requires(post): desktop-file-utils Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils * MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines O.K. (GPL) * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NOT O.K. [quote] If the Program specifies that a certain numbered version of the GNU General Public License "or any later version" applies to it, you have the option of following the terms and conditions either of that numbered version or of any later version published by the Free Software Foundation. [/quote] No information in source for GPLv3 only so GPLv3+ * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. O.K. * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. O.K. * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. O.K. * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. O.K. my dl: f088bc27f4c1ddfb46e441b879560398 package: f088bc27f4c1ddfb46e441b879560398 * MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. O.K. noarch * MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. O.K. * MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. O.K. * MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A * MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. NOT O.K. %{_datadir}/%{name}/* owns the files in the directory, but not the directory itself it should be %{_datadir}/%{name}/ * MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. O.K. * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. O.K. * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). O.K. * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. O.K. one hint: you wrote: Source0: http://squentin.free.fr/gmusicbrowser/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz i would write: Source0: http://squentin.free.fr/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. O.K. * MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). N/A * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A * MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A * MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A * MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. N/A * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. O.K. * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. O.K. * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). O.K. * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. O.K. * SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A * SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. N/A * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. O.K. * SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. O.K. noarch * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. O.K. Package is installable. Application is startable, didn't test audiofunction (no speakers) * SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A * SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A * SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. N/A * SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. N/A -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 21:37:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495322] New: Review Request: python-cmd2 - Enhancements for Python's cmd module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-cmd2 - Enhancements for Python's cmd module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495322 Summary: Review Request: python-cmd2 - Enhancements for Python's cmd module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: silas at sewell.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/python-cmd2/python-cmd2.spec SRPM URL: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/python-cmd2-0.5.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A drop-in replacement for Python's cmd which adds several features for command-prompt tools: * Searchable command history (commands: "hi", "li", "run") * Load commands from file, save to file, edit commands in file * Multi-line commands * Case-insensitive commands * Special-character shortcut commands (beyond cmd's "@" and "!") * Settable environment parameters * Parsing commands with flags * > (filename), >> (filename) redirect output to file * < (filename) gets input from file * bare >, >>, < redirect to/from paste buffer * accepts abbreviated commands when unambiguous * py enters interactive Python console * test apps against sample session transcript (see example/example.py) rpmlint [silas at silas result]$ rpmlint python-cmd2-0.5.2-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [silas at silas result]$ rpmlint python-cmd2-0.5.2-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 21:43:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495322] Review Request: python-cmd2 - Enhancements for Python's cmd module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904112143.n3BLhuKr019393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495322 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 22:01:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494965] Review Request: pianobooster - A MIDI file player that teaches you how to play the piano In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904112201.n3BM1e67022183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494965 --- Comment #3 from Christian Krause 2009-04-11 18:01:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Here are my notes for this package (* need definite attention. ! are > suggestions): Thank you for the review. > * We need to package rtmidi seperately and link to it. I already packaged > rtaudio before. Things should be similar (you can take rtaudio SPEC file as > your starting point) I've checked the upstream rtmidi package ( http://www.music.mcgill.ca/~gary/rtmidi/ ) but unfortunately the package doesn't provide any Makefiles so that it is not easily possible to build a library out of the box. Since other projects also use rtmidi just by adding the 3 files, I would vote for not creating an extra library for rtmidi. Once rtmidi's upstream will provide a full-featured package to build dynamic (or static) libs this can be re-considered. > ! Please make use of the %{name} macro. Done. Besides the URL tag the specfile was changed to use the %{name} tag. > ! I find it better to supply the .desktop file separately, to preserve the > original creation date. But that's a matter of taste. Done. I've added the desktop file as separate source file. > ! I prefer using sed+iconv instead of dos2unix to save a BR. But then again > this is a matter of taste. If you are going to use dos2unix, could you use the > -k flags to preserve timestamps? Done. (Using sed now. However I haven't found an option to preserve the timestamp when using sed...) > * Similarly, please use the -p flag with install to preserve the timestamps (of > the .png files in this case) Done. > ! Please add a GenericName to the .desktop file. Also AudioVideo needs to be > added to the Category key, if you want this application to appear in Multimedia > group. Done. I've used your suggested "Piano Teacher" as GenericName and added the AudioVideo category. > * There is a typo on the installation of the 64x64 icon. (32x32 should be > 64x64) Done. > * Parallel make must be supported whenever possible. If it is not supported, > this should be noted in the SPEC file as a comment. Done. Changed to parallel build. I've seen no problems so far (in local as well as in koji/mock builds). > ! Summary seemed too long to me. It can be just something like "Piano Teacher" I've checked other specfiles too and I've seen a bunch of packages with similar summaries. I would rather leave the summary as it is. However, I've re-used the suggestion as the GenericName in the .desktop file. ;-) > ! I think the comma should be removed from the end of this line (for proper > English): > "The difference between playing along to a CD or a standard MIDI file," Done. The modified packages can be found here: Spec URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/pianobooster.spec SRPM URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/pianobooster-0.6.2-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 22:05:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:05:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904112205.n3BM5Tgd024307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 --- Comment #21 from Felix Kaechele 2009-04-11 18:05:28 EDT --- poke -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 22:05:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476359] Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904112205.n3BM5hOa024347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476359 --- Comment #4 from Felix Kaechele 2009-04-11 18:05:43 EDT --- poke -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 22:03:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:03:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494199] Review Request: drascula-international - Subtitles for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904112203.n3BM3Isv023711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494199 --- Comment #2 from Felix Kaechele 2009-04-11 18:03:18 EDT --- Is there any news on integrating this into the main drascula package? I don't want to make a review that proves to be unnecessary afterwards, ya know :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 22:05:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495322] Review Request: python-cmd2 - Enhancements for Python's cmd module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904112205.n3BM57Mm022704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495322 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Silas Sewell 2009-04-11 18:05:07 EDT --- After reviewing this package I found some errors which need to be addressed before it should be included in Fedora. Sorry for the noise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 22:10:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:10:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491520] Review Request: shntool - shntool is a multi-purpose WAVE data processing and reporting utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904112210.n3BMABDR023523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491520 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 22:14:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904112214.n3BMEwDb025359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 --- Comment #8 from Felix Kaechele 2009-04-11 18:14:58 EDT --- Contacted upstream about sources -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 22:14:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495322] Review Request: python-cmd2 - Enhancements for Python's cmd module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904112214.n3BMEZDK025307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495322 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #2 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-11 18:14:35 EDT --- please reopen it if you fixed these. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 22:44:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904112244.n3BMi0jW029790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #47 from Matej Cepl 2009-04-11 18:43:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #43) > If you bothered to read the above, I'm sure you would understand you are just > re-stating what was already said. OK, I may be stupid and you are ?ber-smart, but could you please bow down to my stupidity and explain me why in the world you haven't removed that BuildConflicts then, when it is so obvious that it is not needed? > Thank you for answering the review blocker part. Now that we're clear, could > you please return the review flag back? I'm not going to reroll the package at > this point, and am going to remove the BuildConflict upon import. I will mark this package as correct, when I think it is correct. Really, is running rpmdev-bumpspec -v -c '- removing unnecessary BuildConflicts' \ -u 'Lubomir Rintel ' SPECS/links.spec sed -e '/^BuildConflicts/d' SPECS/links.spec rpmbuild -ba SPECS/links.spec too much to ask? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 22:56:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495322] Review Request: python-cmd2 - Enhancements for Python's cmd module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904112256.n3BMuaSx031866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495322 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Depends on| |495324 Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #3 from Silas Sewell 2009-04-11 18:56:36 EDT --- Finally figured it out, dependency bug filed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 23:11:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904112311.n3BNBSrn001527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-11 19:11:28 EDT --- http://ispbrasil.com.br/bareftp/bareftp.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/bareftp/bareftp-0.2.2-2.fc11.src.rpm koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1291575 still some 2 rpmlint warning [itamar at itamar bareftp]$ rpmlint /home/itamar/rpmbuild/SRPMS/bareftp-0.2.2-2.fc11.src.rpm /home/itamar/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/bareftp-0.2.2-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm bareftp.x86_64: E: no-binary bareftp.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 01:06:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 21:06:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495327] New: Review Request: python-cly - A module for adding powerful text-based consoles to your Python application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-cly - A module for adding powerful text-based consoles to your Python application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495327 Summary: Review Request: python-cly - A module for adding powerful text-based consoles to your Python application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: silas at sewell.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/python-cly/python-cly.spec SRPM URL: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/python-cly-0.9-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: CLY is a Python module for simplifying the creation of interactive shells, much like the built-in "cmd" module on steroids. rpmlint [silas at silas result]$ rpmlint python-cly-0.9-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [silas at silas result]$ rpmlint python-cly-0.9-1.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 02:09:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 22:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490269] Review Request: xfglenses - Gravitational lenses visualization program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904120209.n3C29DI0026264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490269 --- Comment #7 from Thibault North 2009-04-11 22:09:13 EDT --- Source is online : http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~frutto/xfglenses-1.0.tar.bz2 I'll update the SRPM asap. There shouldn't be any other blocking thing now. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 02:22:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 22:22:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495330] New: Review Request: perl-CSS-Minifier - Remove unnecessary whitespace from CSS files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS-Minifier - Remove unnecessary whitespace from CSS files Alias: perl-CSS-Minifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495330 Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS-Minifier - Remove unnecessary whitespace from CSS files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CSS-Minifier OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-CSS-Minifier.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-CSS-Minifier-0.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module removes unnecessary whitespace from CSS. The primary requirement developing this module is to not break working stylesheets: if working CSS is in input then working CSS is output. The Mac/Internet Explorer comment hack will be minimized but not stripped and so will continue to function.This module understands space, horizontal tab, new line, carriage return, and form feed characters to be whitespace. Any other characters that may be considered whitespace are not minimized. These other characters include paragraph separator and vertical tab.For static CSS files, it is recommended that you minify during the build stage of web deployment. If you minify on-the-fly then it might be a good idea to cache the minified file. Minifying static files on-the-fly repeatedly is wasteful. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1291733 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 05:38:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 01:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485961] Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904120538.n3C5cVjm024471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485961 --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2009-04-12 01:38:30 EDT --- @quentin : can you fix the upstream Makefile to preserve timestamp (probably defining an INSTALL macro as -p option is perhaps not supported everywhere) @simon : I agree we should preserve timestamp as much as possible, but I don't think this is a must when upstream don't care (Guidelines says "When adding file copying commands in the spec file...") : anyway, fixed I've changed to "make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}" as it is supported by the Makefile. Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/gmusicbrowser.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/gmusicbrowser-1.0.1-2.fc8.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Apr 12 2009 Remi Collet - 1.0.1-2 - From review (#485961) - preserve timestamp - own all directory - missing Requires - fix license -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 06:23:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 02:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495336] New: Review Request: perl-Sort-Key - Fastest way to sort anything in Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sort-Key - Fastest way to sort anything in Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495336 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sort-Key - Fastest way to sort anything in Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Sort-Key.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Sort-Key-1.28-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Sort::Key provides a set of functions to sort lists of values by some calculated key value. scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1291779 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 06:31:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 02:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904120631.n3C6VEOl030172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #19 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-12 02:31:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) you should run rpmlint against rpm files, example [itamar at itamar gpxe]$ ls *.rpm gpxe-0.9.7-1.src.rpm gpxe-bootimgs-0.9.7-1.noarch.rpm gpxe-roms-0.9.7-1.noarch.rpm gpxe-roms-qemu-0.9.7-1.noarch.rpm [itamar at itamar gpxe]$ rpmlint *.rpm gpxe.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 10) gpxe-bootimgs.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - bootable USB, CD, floppy images and GRUB format gpxe-roms.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - boot roms in .rom format gpxe-roms-qemu.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - boot roms supported by QEMU, .rom format 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. the warning about summary-not-capitalized can be ignored so please fix the warning about mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 06:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 02:37:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904120637.n3C6boR8031035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #20 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-12 02:37:50 EDT --- for the there are something wrong with this package. since there are no rpms for PPC and PPC64, why not use ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 06:55:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 02:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904120655.n3C6tTG4002567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 --- Comment #9 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-04-12 02:55:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Can you please request the sources (and build instructions) To build .grf from sources it will need grfcodec program (http://www.ttdpatch.net/grfcodec/) which is has to be packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 07:14:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 03:14:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495322] Review Request: python-cmd2 - Enhancements for Python's cmd module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904120714.n3C7EE5e003522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495322 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-12 03:14:14 EDT --- k, i will review it after pyparsing 1.5.1 is available for rawhide! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 07:26:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 03:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485961] Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904120726.n3C7QlQQ005596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485961 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-12 03:26:47 EDT --- @remi > I agree we should preserve timestamp as much as possible, but I don't > think this is a must when upstream don't care I don't think this is a must, so I agree with you; but imho it is possible with a little maintenance (in your case you solved it with sed) and the result is more beautiful. :-) And imho if you have to fix some important issues, then you can do this little thing by the way :-) * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines O.K * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. O.K. * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. O.K. +-------------------+ | gmusicbrowser | | APPROVED | +-------------------+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 08:06:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 04:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485961] Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904120806.n3C86jBe014486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485961 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Remi Collet 2009-04-12 04:06:45 EDT --- Thanks for the review New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gmusicbrowser Short Description: Jukebox for large collections of music files Owners: remi Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 08:10:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 04:10:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494965] Review Request: pianobooster - A MIDI file player that teaches you how to play the piano In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904120810.n3C8A5CA015358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494965 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-12 04:10:05 EDT --- Thanks for the update. (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > > ! I prefer using sed+iconv instead of dos2unix to save a BR. But then again > > this is a matter of taste. If you are going to use dos2unix, could you use the > > -k flags to preserve timestamps? > > Done. (Using sed now. However I haven't found an option to preserve the > timestamp when using sed...) > The standard way of making this is: sed -e 's|\r||g' file > file.tmp touch -r file file.tmp mv file.tmp file Let's wait for FE Legal's resolution for the license issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 08:13:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 04:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495327] Review Request: python-cly - A module for adding powerful text-based consoles to your Python application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904120813.n3C8Di5P015902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495327 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 08:23:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 04:23:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495327] Review Request: python-cly - A module for adding powerful text-based consoles to your Python application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904120823.n3C8NH6F019060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495327 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-12 04:23:16 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK The package is APPROVED PS. Just a stylish note: maybe use make -C doc/ instead of make --directory doc/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 08:25:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 04:25:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493750] Review Request: netcf - a library for managing network configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904120825.n3C8P3nc018400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493750 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-12 04:25:03 EDT --- * Your home page points to a changed "URL: https://fedorahosted.org/netcf/" * Better summary: Cross-platform network configuration library (taken from README!) * Fedora 10 build needs augeas >= 0.5.0 from updates-testing * Build errors on Fedora 10: [...] checking for LIBAUGEAS... yes checking for LIBXML... [...] => Missing BuildRequires: libxml2-devel checking for LIBXSLT... => Missing BuildRequires: libxslt-devel (this requires libxml2-devel, too) * In "src" directory, NETCF_CFLAGS duplicates the CFLAGS. * netcf.pc file is missing "Requires: augeas" because it contains "-laugeas". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 08:37:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 04:37:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495327] Review Request: python-cly - A module for adding powerful text-based consoles to your Python application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904120837.n3C8baOt020390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495327 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Silas Sewell 2009-04-12 04:37:35 EDT --- Thanks for the review Jussi. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-cly Short Description: A module for adding powerful text-based consoles to your Python application Owners: silas Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 10:21:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 06:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253355] Review Request: twill - A simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121021.n3CALJLI007197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253355 --- Comment #21 from Matthias Saou 2009-04-12 06:21:17 EDT --- Just for reference, I've submitted python-twill for review as bug #495357. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 10:18:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 06:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495357] New: Review Request: python-twill - Simple scripting language for Web browsing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-twill - Simple scripting language for Web browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495357 Summary: Review Request: python-twill - Simple scripting language for Web browsing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matthias at rpmforge.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/python-twill/python-twill.spec SRPM URL: http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/python-twill/python-twill-0.9-1.src.rpm Description: twill is a simple language that allows users to browse the Web from a command-line interface. With twill, you can navigate through Web sites that use forms, cookies, and most standard Web features. Note: The original submission (bug #253355), so I'm re-submitting the latest cleaned up package I had ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 10:27:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 06:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493603] Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121027.n3CARCWF006986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493603 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Till Maas 2009-04-12 06:27:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I note there are several sites where this program is distributed. There are > tar.gz version of this package and seems a little smaller than tar.Z is there > any reason not to use the smaller package ? I simply used the same source that was mentioned in the debian Copyright file. The tar.Z tarball is probably the original tarball, therefore I prefer it. But I can also change it. > Perhaps later would make sense to provide a xinitrc.d file to start this > automatically when X is started. Imho it should be left to the user that logs in to decide, whether and with which options to start unclutter. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: unclutter Short Description: hide mouse cursor when idle Owners: till Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 11:17:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 07:17:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121117.n3CBHAOY016833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-12 07:17:10 EDT --- @Jason, do you want to take care of this or can I do this job? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 11:50:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 07:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495357] Review Request: python-twill - Simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121150.n3CBosO1023054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495357 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2009-04-12 07:50:55 EDT --- Just some quick observations: The pyver macro seems not to be used, therefore it should be probably skipped: %{!?pyver: %define pyver %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]")} Also this should use at least %global instead of %define: %{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")} Reference: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#System_Architecture Also the patch is not commented. Reference: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 12:31:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 08:31:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121231.n3CCVxxA031348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-12 08:31:59 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Pre-built_JAR_files_.2F_Other_bundled_software dnsjava is bundled, but you are lucky, dnsjava is okay and comes without "shipping external dependencies". please package dnsjava, remove the dnsjava.jar in rabbit and build it against dnsjava package! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 13:13:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:13:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495372] New: Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495372 Summary: Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-altgraph.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-altgraph-0.6.7-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://undefined.org/python/#altgraph Description: altgraph is a fork of graphlib: a graph (network) package for constructing graphs, BFS, and DFS traversals, topological sort, shortest paths, etc. with graphviz output. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1291954 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint python-altgraph-0.6.7-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-altgraph-0.6.7-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 14:15:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 10:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121415.n3CEFDd4019505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 --- Comment #10 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-12 10:15:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #7) > > Can you please request the sources (and build instructions) > > To build .grf from sources it will need grfcodec program > (http://www.ttdpatch.net/grfcodec/) which is has to be packaged. Well luckily that seems to be open source too, so it looks like that needs to be packaged too and then this package can BuildRequires it. I'll review it too when packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 14:16:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 10:16:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494199] Review Request: drascula-international - Subtitles for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121416.n3CEGeOQ019737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494199 --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-12 10:16:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Is there any news on integrating this into the main drascula package? > I don't want to make a review that proves to be unnecessary afterwards, ya know > :) There is no discussion about integrating this into the main drascula package. There only is some discussion about un-integrating (so making separate) the music out of the main package. IOW go ahead and review this, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 14:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 10:55:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121455.n3CEtK17028347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 --- Comment #14 from Till Maas 2009-04-12 10:55:18 EDT --- Sorry for the delay and thanks for the review. I now created a new logo in svg using cliparts from the Open Clip Art Library and it works here in Gnome. It now shows an image with an attached tag that shows coordinates. Please take a look if you want: SPEC: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/gpscorrelate.spec SRPM: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/gpscorrelate-1.6.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Icon: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/gpscorrelate-gui.svg New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gpscorrelate Short Description: A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool Owners: till Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 16:35:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 12:35:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121635.n3CGZ2Oi012585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #49 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-12 12:34:56 EDT --- For F-10, please visit bodhi and submit request to push the rebuild package into repositories: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 16:37:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 12:37:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121637.n3CGb8r8010823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-12 12:37:07 EDT --- Sorry, I missed your last comments. I will re-review this package soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 16:45:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 12:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121645.n3CGjrq4012141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #21 from Matt Domsch 2009-04-12 12:45:52 EDT --- Honestly folks, we're getting a bit pedantic with the tabs vs spaces warning. I didn't rebuild the RPMs after fixing that just to run rpmlint to prove that I can run 'tr' to remove tabs. Running rpmlint against the spec file is sufficient to see that I fixed those. Regarding exclusivearch - these ROMs run either on a physical machine where exclusivearch would make sense, or can be run inside QEMU on a completely different arch, where the RPM architecture makes no sense whatsoever (hence they're noarch). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 16:50:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 12:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121650.n3CGotQZ015033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-12 12:50:53 EDT --- Would you have some time to work on review request now? Usually review request is closed when no response is received within one month so that someone else can take over the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 16:51:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 12:51:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479147] Review Request: skanlite - A scanning program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121651.n3CGpg63013244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479147 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-12 12:51:40 EDT --- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 17:01:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:01:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492520] Review Request: swami - MIDI instrument and sound editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121701.n3CH14G8014778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492520 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 17:04:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:04:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493750] Review Request: netcf - a library for managing network configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121704.n3CH4Pva015119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493750 --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-12 13:04:25 EDT --- > * netcf.pc file is missing "Requires: augeas" because it > contains "-laugeas". Since libnetcf is linked with libaugeas already, it would be even better to drop "-laugeas" from Libs. Else, for static linking support in upstream tarball, add "Requires.private: augeas" to the pkgconfig file, move "-laugeas" from Libs to Libs.private, and add "Requires: augeas-devel >= 0.5.0" to the netcf-devel subpackage (for Fedora <= 10 which doesn't create automatic pkgconfig dependencies). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 17:15:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:15:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121715.n3CHFlWD018727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #48 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-12 13:15:46 EDT --- here you go.. SPECS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/links.spec SRPMS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/links-2.2-7.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 17:13:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121713.n3CHDrqa018189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-12 13:13:53 EDT --- Perhaps I'm a very picky :/ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache icon-cache scriplet changed, just saw this a few minutes ago. :-( sry why do you checked 2 of 3 packages with rpmlint!? You still have an empty debuginfo-package. What do you want to do to kill these issues, if you want to kill them? bareftp using foreign code, licensed unter different licenses. don't you think they have to take into account?! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 17:26:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495357] Review Request: python-twill - Simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121726.n3CHQcSD020265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495357 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Saou 2009-04-12 13:26:38 EDT --- I've removed the unused pyver, used %global instead of %define. The patch did have a comment, but above the %patch0 line instead of the Patch0: one. I've moved it. The logic here is simple : Upstream bundles a bunch of 3rd party python code to make things easier for end users, but we happen to already have them available as packages, so what the patch does is use the package provided code instead of the "internal" forked code. Definitely not worth reporting upstream. I've searched the wiki for the guideline about this, as I'm pretty sure there is one about always using a system wide library instead of a project-provided local version, but I've been unable to find it. Thanks for your comments, I've updated the spec and package (didn't bother bumping the release just for that, though). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 17:34:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495336] Review Request: perl-Sort-Key - Fastest way to sort anything in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121734.n3CHYCAg021458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495336 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 17:34:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:34:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495336] Review Request: perl-Sort-Key - Fastest way to sort anything in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121734.n3CHYEHq020058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495336 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 17:39:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:39:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495336] Review Request: perl-Sort-Key - Fastest way to sort anything in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121739.n3CHdpEV022303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495336 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 17:40:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:40:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495336] Review Request: perl-Sort-Key - Fastest way to sort anything in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121740.n3CHeeXf022815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495336 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Sort-Key -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 17:39:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:39:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495336] Review Request: perl-Sort-Key - Fastest way to sort anything in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121739.n3CHdmp2022279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495336 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-12 13:39:48 EDT --- I'd put the .so filtering bits before %description as (IMHO) it makes things look a touch cleaner, but having it where it is isn't a real issue. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1291779 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): 7b50c2a384a817c400d43835638ae5b99b4b217b Sort-Key-1.28.tar.gz 7b50c2a384a817c400d43835638ae5b99b4b217b Sort-Key-1.28.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Sort-Key-1.28-1.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Sort-Key-1.28-1.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Sort-Key-1.28-1.fc10.src.rpm perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Test::More) >= 0.54 =====> perl-Sort-Key-1.28-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Sort-Key-1.28-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm perl(Sort::Key) = 1.28 perl(Sort::Key::Maker) = 0.02 perl(Sort::Key::Multi) = 1.25 perl(Sort::Key::Natural) = 0.03 perl(Sort::Key::Register) = 0.14 perl-Sort-Key = 1.28-1.fc10 perl-Sort-Key(x86-64) = 1.28-1.fc10 ====> requires for perl-Sort-Key-1.28-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) perl >= 0:5.006 perl(Carp) perl(constant) perl(Exporter) perl(Sort::Key) perl(Sort::Key::Maker) perl(Sort::Key::Register) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rtld(GNU_HASH) =====> perl-Sort-Key-debuginfo-1.28-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Sort-Key-debuginfo-1.28-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm perl-Sort-Key-debuginfo = 1.28-1.fc10 perl-Sort-Key-debuginfo(x86-64) = 1.28-1.fc10 ====> requires for perl-Sort-Key-debuginfo-1.28-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:06:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495330] Review Request: perl-CSS-Minifier - Remove unnecessary whitespace from CSS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121806.n3CI6MXl025768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495330 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |iarnell at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |iarnell at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:12:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:12:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121812.n3CICvpv026770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 --- Comment #4 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-12 14:12:57 EDT --- If I correctly understand you I must package dnsjava into separate rpm package "and submit it on review? Or delete it from RabbIT and swith on non-threaded DNSSunHandler in default config? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:13:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121813.n3CIDcRx026865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-12 14:13:37 EDT --- Well, for 1.0-5: * GTK icon cache scriptlets, %define -> %global change - Guidelines again changed so please update to follow the last ones: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:12:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:12:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495330] Review Request: perl-CSS-Minifier - Remove unnecessary whitespace from CSS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121812.n3CICulO028286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495330 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-12 14:12:55 EDT --- + source files match upstream. c25ed99401dcf4e97d5ead79bfa2915dbbd6284c CSS-Minifier-0.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1291733 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no complaints: perl-CSS-Minifier.noarch: I: checking perl-CSS-Minifier.src: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(CSS::Minifier) = 0.01 perl-CSS-Minifier = 0.01-1.fc11 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 + %check is present and all tests pass. + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:14:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495336] Review Request: perl-Sort-Key - Fastest way to sort anything in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121814.n3CIEX50026999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495336 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-12 14:14:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Sort-Key Short Description: Fastest way to sort anything in Perl Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:21:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:21:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121821.n3CIL6xa029828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-12 14:21:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:21:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485961] Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121821.n3CILwbK029921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485961 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-12 14:21:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:19:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:19:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121819.n3CIJnW2029287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-12 14:19:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:18:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:18:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456256] Review Request: frei0r-plugins - Frei0r - a minimalistic plugin API for video effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121818.n3CIIeU7029163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456256 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-12 14:18:39 EDT --- ok, makes sense, just a bit confusing. ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:24:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121824.n3CIO0n1030258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 --- Comment #5 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-12 14:24:00 EDT --- you have to remove the bundled jars. (in your case you have only one jar, dnsjava) build dnsjaa from source as an extra package, with an extra review. this review should set as "depends on dnsjava-review" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:22:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:22:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493603] Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121822.n3CIMsMW030114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493603 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-12 14:22:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:24:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493684] Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121824.n3CIOTQd030357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-12 14:24:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:26:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494517] Review Request: python-xkit - A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121826.n3CIQcIj030975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494517 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-12 14:26:38 EDT --- Looks like there are some other packages that use this, not just dontzap. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:28:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:28:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495246] Review Request: perl-POE-Test-Loops - Reusable tests for POE::Loop authors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121828.n3CISJZY029448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495246 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-12 14:28:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:27:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:27:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495179] Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121827.n3CIRSqd031315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495179 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-12 14:27:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:30:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495278] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch - Automatic inflation/deflation of epoch-based DateTime objects for DBIx::Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121830.n3CIUiAu030032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495278 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-12 14:30:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:31:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:31:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495279] Review Request: perl-Devel-NYTProf - Powerful feature-rich perl source code profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121831.n3CIVai7030221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495279 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-12 14:31:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:33:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:33:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495284] Review Request: perl-CSS-Minifier-XS - XS based CSS minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121833.n3CIXSHG030423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495284 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-12 14:33:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:32:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:32:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495282] Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121832.n3CIWaGl032169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495282 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-12 14:32:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:35:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495336] Review Request: perl-Sort-Key - Fastest way to sort anything in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121835.n3CIZMdL030954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495336 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-12 14:35:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:34:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:34:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495327] Review Request: python-cly - A module for adding powerful text-based consoles to your Python application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121834.n3CIYUdg030579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495327 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-12 14:34:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:38:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:38:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495398] New: Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495398 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/perl-Net-UPnP.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package provides some functions to control UPnP devices. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:52:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495330] Review Request: perl-CSS-Minifier - Remove unnecessary whitespace from CSS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121852.n3CIqCmB001445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495330 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-12 14:52:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CSS-Minifier Short Description: Remove unnecessary whitespace from CSS files Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:52:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:52:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495330] Review Request: perl-CSS-Minifier - Remove unnecessary whitespace from CSS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121852.n3CIqEoi001463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495330 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:51:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121851.n3CIpYke001372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:55:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495398] Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121855.n3CItnPj004099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495398 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:55:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495398] Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121855.n3CItoaf002162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495398 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:59:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485961] Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121859.n3CIx1bI002708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485961 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-12 14:59:00 EDT --- gmusicbrowser-1.0.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gmusicbrowser-1.0.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 18:59:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121859.n3CIxrpi004624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #20 from Silas Sewell 2009-04-12 14:59:52 EDT --- Built. Thanks Fabian, Jonathan and Kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 19:00:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] New: Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 Summary: Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sanjay.ankur at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/NotCourier-sans-fonts/NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/NotCourier-sans-fonts/NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts-20080906-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 19:11:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495327] Review Request: python-cly - A module for adding powerful text-based consoles to your Python application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121911.n3CJBiGq005264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495327 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Silas Sewell 2009-04-12 15:11:43 EDT --- Built, thanks Jussi and Kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 19:15:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495398] Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121915.n3CJFH8P005955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495398 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-12 15:15:17 EDT --- Koji (FAILURE) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1292448 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 19:30:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495246] Review Request: perl-POE-Test-Loops - Reusable tests for POE::Loop authors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121930.n3CJU6hb010226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495246 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-12 15:30:06 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 19:29:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:29:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495403] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Storage - An serialization framework for Moose classes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Storage - An serialization framework for Moose classes Alias: perl-MooseX-Storage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495403 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Storage - An serialization framework for Moose classes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Storage OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Storage.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Storage-0.17-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: MooseX::Storage is a serialization framework for Moose, it provides a very flexible and highly pluggable way to serialize Moose classes to a number of different formats and styles. This is still an early release of this module, so use with caution. It's outward facing serialization API should be considered stable, but I still reserve the right to make tweaks if I need too. Anything beyond the basic pack/unpack, freeze/thaw and load/store should not be relied on. There are 3 levels to the serialization, each of which builds upon the other and each of which can be customized to the specific needs of your class. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1292522 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 19:39:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495398] Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121939.n3CJds0R012029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495398 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-12 15:39:54 EDT --- Whoops, forgot to try building in mock. Now builds fine. Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/perl-Net-UPnP.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 19:40:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495398] Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121940.n3CJe3oP010343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495398 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 19:45:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:45:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121945.n3CJj3I4011261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #49 from Matej Cepl 2009-04-12 15:45:02 EDT --- one more non-review note for Mikul??: + autoreconf -i autoheader: WARNING: Using auxiliary files such as `acconfig.h', `config.h.bot' autoheader: WARNING: and `config.h.top', to define templates for `config.h.in' autoheader: WARNING: is deprecated and discouraged. autoheader: autoheader: WARNING: Using the third argument of `AC_DEFINE' and autoheader: WARNING: `AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED' allows one to define a template without autoheader: WARNING: `acconfig.h': autoheader: autoheader: WARNING: AC_DEFINE([NEED_FUNC_MAIN], 1, autoheader: [Define if a function `main' is needed.]) autoheader: autoheader: WARNING: More sophisticated templates can also be produced, see the autoheader: WARNING: documentation. > Just keep in mind that the configure script must be generated with autoconf > 2.13 --- that was current version 10 years ago when Links project was started > and support for all the operating systems is tested with it. I really don't want to do much about this (I am not programmer myself and I don't claim to have any more knowledge about autofoo than sitting in our office to one its maintainers), but just I am confused: a) shouldn't be autofoo run only on the machine of the guy who creates the release tarball? So support on other operating systems shouldn't be that crucial, right? (I don't know why we do autoreconf here, and I don't care) b) 2.13 is REALLY old. Which platform does really need it these days, which wouldn't have the later one? Just questions, nothing to do with the package review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 19:57:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121957.n3CJvEV3013476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #51 from Matej Cepl 2009-04-12 15:57:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: links Short Description: Web browser running in both graphics and text mode Owners: lkundrak Branches: EL-5 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 19:56:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:56:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121956.n3CJurMo013395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #50 from Matej Cepl 2009-04-12 15:56:52 EDT --- [matej at viklef redhat]$ rpmlint -i SRPMS/links-2.2-7.fc11.src.rpm links.src:30: W: unversioned-explicit-provides webclient The specfile contains an unversioned Provides: token, which will match all older, equal, and newer versions of the provided thing. This may cause update problems and will make versioned dependencies, obsoletions and conflicts on the provided thing useless -- make the Provides versioned if possible. links.src:31: W: unversioned-explicit-provides text-www-browser The specfile contains an unversioned Provides: token, which will match all older, equal, and newer versions of the provided thing. This may cause update problems and will make versioned dependencies, obsoletions and conflicts on the provided thing useless -- make the Provides versioned if possible. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Wouldn't it be better to at least fake some version of those Provides so that we can obsolete them later (e.g., Provides: text-www-browser 2.0, Obsoletes: text-www-browser 1.0)? Anyway, that's certainly not something which would make me not approve the package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 20:24:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:24:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495278] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch - Automatic inflation/deflation of epoch-based DateTime objects for DBIx::Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904122024.n3CKOO2D017786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495278 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-12 16:24:24 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 20:25:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492520] Review Request: swami - MIDI instrument and sound editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904122025.n3CKPDn1018154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492520 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-12 16:25:13 EDT --- -= Review swami =- * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. O.K. rpmlint is silent * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines O.K. * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. O.K. * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines NOT O.K. // NOT SURE missing Requirement(s): hicolor-icon-theme missing Requirement(s) postun: desktop-file-utils shared-mime-info missing Requirement(s) post: desktop-file-utils shared-mime-info .:[ cassmodiah @ schafwiese : /home/cassmodiah ]:. $ rpm -qf /usr/bin/update-desktop-database && rpm -qf /usr/bin/update-mime-database desktop-file-utils-0.15-3.fc10.i386 shared-mime-info-0.51-5.fc10.i386 * MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines O.K. * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. O.K. * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. O.K. * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. O.K. * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. O.K. * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. O.K. my dl: 83da8e71ce1e6cda0f41d9f5e0ed3fdf package: 83da8e71ce1e6cda0f41d9f5e0ed3fdf * MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. O.K. i386 * MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. O.K. Hint (automake can removed from BuildRequires, because it is a dependency): ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Installing: ImageMagick i386 6.4.0.10-2.fc10 fedora 5.6 M audiofile-devel i386 1:0.2.6-9.fc10 fedora 16 k autoconf noarch 2.63-1.fc10 fedora 937 k ccache i386 2.4-13.fc9 fedora 52 k desktop-file-utils i386 0.15-3.fc10 fedora 60 k fluidsynth-devel i386 1.0.8-2.fc10 fedora 307 k gnome-libs-devel i386 1:1.4.2-10.fc10 fedora 500 k libpng-devel i386 2:1.2.35-1.fc10 updates-released 108 k libsndfile-devel i386 1.0.17-6.fc10 fedora 241 k libtool i386 1.5.26-4.fc10 fedora 694 k popt-devel i386 1.13-4.fc10 fedora 393 k ================================================================================ Installing for dependencies: GConf2 i386 2.24.0-1.fc10 fedora 1.7 M ORBit i386 1:0.5.17-23.fc9 fedora 350 k ORBit-devel i386 1:0.5.17-23.fc9 fedora 197 k ORBit2 i386 2.14.16-1.fc10 fedora 184 k PolicyKit i386 0.9-4.fc10 updates-released 168 k alsa-lib i386 1.0.19-2.fc10 updates-released 411 k alsa-lib-devel i386 1.0.19-2.fc10 updates-released 997 k atk i386 1.24.0-1.fc10 fedora 214 k audiofile i386 1:0.2.6-9.fc10 fedora 103 k automake noarch 1.10.1-2 fedora 532 k cairo i386 1.8.0-1.fc10 fedora 443 k cups-libs i386 1:1.3.9-8.fc10 updates-released 203 k dbus-glib i386 0.76-3.fc10 fedora 170 k esound-devel i386 1:0.2.41-1.fc10 updates-released 18 k esound-libs i386 1:0.2.41-1.fc10 updates-released 78 k flac i386 1.2.1-4.fc9 fedora 307 k fluidsynth-libs i386 1.0.8-2.fc10 fedora 490 k fontconfig i386 2.6.0-3.fc10 fedora 182 k freetype i386 2.3.7-2.fc10 updates-released 356 k ghostscript i386 8.63-5.fc10 updates-released 6.6 M ghostscript-fonts noarch 5.50-19.fc10 fedora 812 k giflib i386 4.1.3-9 fedora 39 k giflib-devel i386 4.1.3-9 fedora 107 k glib i386 1:1.2.10-30.fc10 fedora 139 k glib-devel i386 1:1.2.10-30.fc10 fedora 39 k gnome-libs i386 1:1.4.2-10.fc10 fedora 1.1 M gnutls i386 2.4.2-3.fc10 updates-released 388 k gtk+ i386 1:1.2.10-66.fc10 fedora 918 k gtk+-devel i386 1:1.2.10-66.fc10 fedora 355 k gtk2 i386 2.14.7-7.fc10 updates-released 4.3 M hicolor-icon-theme noarch 0.10-4 fedora 39 k imlib i386 1:1.9.15-9.fc10 fedora 420 k imlib-devel i386 1:1.9.15-9.fc10 fedora 110 k indent i386 2.2.10-2.fc10 fedora 115 k jack-audio-connection-kit i386 0.116.1-3.fc10 updates-released 203 k jasper-libs i386 1.900.1-9.fc10 updates-released 153 k lash i386 0.5.4-2.fc9 fedora 158 k lcms-libs i386 1.18-1.fc10 updates-released 109 k libICE i386 1.0.4-4.fc10 fedora 54 k libICE-devel i386 1.0.4-4.fc10 fedora 13 k libIDL i386 0.8.11-1.fc10 fedora 88 k libSM i386 1.1.0-2.fc10 fedora 26 k libSM-devel i386 1.1.0-2.fc10 fedora 10 k libX11 i386 1.1.5-2.fc10 updates-released 830 k libX11-devel i386 1.1.5-2.fc10 updates-released 1.1 M libXau i386 1.0.4-1.fc10 fedora 20 k libXau-devel i386 1.0.4-1.fc10 fedora 11 k libXcomposite i386 0.4.0-5.fc10 fedora 14 k libXcursor i386 1.1.9-3.fc10 fedora 29 k libXdamage i386 1.1.1-4.fc9 fedora 11 k libXdmcp i386 1.0.2-6.fc10 fedora 21 k libXdmcp-devel i386 1.0.2-6.fc10 fedora 8.0 k libXext i386 1.0.4-1.fc9 fedora 38 k libXext-devel i386 1.0.4-1.fc9 fedora 60 k libXfixes i386 4.0.3-4.fc10 fedora 14 k libXfont i386 1.3.3-1.fc10 fedora 226 k libXft i386 2.1.13-1.fc10 fedora 50 k libXi i386 1.1.3-4.fc9 fedora 28 k libXi-devel i386 1.1.3-4.fc9 fedora 52 k libXinerama i386 1.0.3-2.fc10 fedora 13 k libXpm i386 3.5.7-4.fc9 fedora 56 k libXrandr i386 1.2.3-1.fc10 fedora 26 k libXrender i386 0.9.4-3.fc9 fedora 28 k libXt i386 1.0.5-1.fc10 fedora 178 k libXt-devel i386 1.0.5-1.fc10 fedora 328 k libXxf86vm i386 1.0.2-1.fc10 fedora 17 k libavc1394 i386 0.5.3-4.fc10 fedora 46 k libcroco i386 0.6.1-5.fc9 fedora 109 k libdrm i386 2.4.0-0.21.fc10 fedora 41 k libfontenc i386 1.0.4-6.fc10 fedora 23 k libfreebob i386 1.0.11-3.fc10 fedora 160 k libgcrypt i386 1.4.4-1.fc10 updates-released 237 k libgpg-error i386 1.6-2 fedora 65 k libgsf i386 1.14.10-1.fc10 fedora 124 k libiec61883 i386 1.2.0-1.fc10 updates-released 37 k libjpeg i386 6b-43.fc10 fedora 144 k libjpeg-devel i386 6b-43.fc10 fedora 104 k libogg i386 2:1.1.3-9.fc9 fedora 20 k libpng i386 2:1.2.35-1.fc10 updates-released 252 k libpng10 i386 1.0.43-1.fc10 updates-released 129 k libraw1394 i386 2.0.1-1.fc10 updates-released 58 k librsvg2 i386 2.22.3-1.fc10 fedora 152 k libsndfile i386 1.0.17-6.fc10 fedora 235 k libtasn1 i386 1.5-1.fc10 fedora 294 k libthai i386 0.1.9-4.fc9 fedora 187 k libtiff i386 3.8.2-11.fc10 fedora 310 k libtiff-devel i386 3.8.2-11.fc10 fedora 465 k libtool-ltdl i386 1.5.26-4.fc10 fedora 40 k libutempter i386 1.1.5-2.fc9 fedora 22 k libwmf-lite i386 0.2.8.4-18.fc9 fedora 53 k libxcb i386 1.1.91-5.fc10 fedora 124 k libxcb-devel i386 1.1.91-5.fc10 fedora 144 k libxml2 i386 2.7.3-1.fc10 updates-released 859 k m4 i386 1.4.11-1.fc10 fedora 225 k mesa-dri-drivers i386 7.2-0.15.fc10 updates-released 2.0 M mesa-libGL i386 7.2-0.15.fc10 updates-released 167 k mesa-libGL-devel i386 7.2-0.15.fc10 updates-released 460 k pango i386 1.22.3-1.fc10 updates-released 375 k pixman i386 0.12.0-2.fc10 fedora 117 k pkgconfig i386 1:0.23-6.fc10 updates-released 69 k urw-fonts noarch 2.4-6.fc10 fedora 3.2 M xdg-utils noarch 1.0.2-5.20081121cvs.fc10 updates-released 52 k xorg-x11-filesystem noarch 7.3-2.fc10 fedora 5.6 k xorg-x11-font-utils i386 1:7.2-6.fc10 fedora 76 k xorg-x11-proto-devel noarch 7.4-5.fc10 updates-released 278 k zlib-devel i386 1.2.3-18.fc9 fedora 42 k ================================================================================ * MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A * MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A * MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. O.K. * MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. O.K. * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. O.K. * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). O.K. * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. O.K. you: Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/swami/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 me: Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. O.K. * MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). N/A * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. O.K. * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A * MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A * MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A * MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. O.K. * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. O.K. * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. O.K. * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). O.K. * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. O.K. * SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A * SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. N/A * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. O.K. * SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. O.K. * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. NOT O.K. * SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. O.K. * SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A * SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. N/A * SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. N/A -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 20:34:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491984] Review Request: emacs-twit - library for interfacing with twitter.com from Emacs. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904122034.n3CKYKfs020800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491984 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #2 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-12 16:34:20 EDT --- added FE-NEEDSPONSOR for this package .fas Dan Atmakin cassmodiah: beolnix 'Dan Atmakin' .fasinfo beolnix cassmodiah: User: beolnix, Name: Dan Atmakin, email: beolnix at gmail.com, Creation: 2009-03-25, IRC Nick: None, Timezone: UTC, Locale: C, Extension: 5127256, GPG key ID: None, Status: active cassmodiah: Approved Groups: cla_done cla_fedora cassmodiah: Unapproved Groups: packager -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 20:34:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:34:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166633] Review Request: mmv - move multiple files program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904122034.n3CKYH0l019414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=166633 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Till Maas 2009-04-12 16:34:15 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mmv New Branches: EL-5 Owners: till I would like to maintain a EL-5 branch of mmv, afaik the F-* maintainer does not want to participate in EPEL. He was asked a long time ago by Thorsten Leemhuis. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 20:42:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904122042.n3CKglQ0020974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |492810(RabbIT) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 20:42:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904122042.n3CKglEt020950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |495411 --- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-12 16:42:47 EDT --- In examples from Guidelines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java) groups "Development Documentation" and "Development/Documentation" both incorrect ot rpmlint wrong say about it?? I set it to simple Documentation now... And ok, I submit dnsjava as separate package, please review both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 20:41:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] New: Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 Summary: Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/dnsjava/dnsjava.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/dnsjava/dnsjava-2.0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: dnsjava is an implementation of DNS in Java. It supports all of the common record types and the DNSSEC types. It can be used for queries, zone transfers, and dynamic updates. It includes a cache which can be used by clients, and a minimal implementation of a server. It supports TSIG authenticated messages, partial DNSSEC verification, and EDNS0. dnsjava provides functionality above and beyond that of the InetAddress class. Since it is written in pure Java, dnsjava is fully threadable, and in many cases is faster than using InetAddress. dnsjava provides both high and low level access to DNS. The high level functions perform queries for records of a given name, type, and class, and return an array of records. There is also a clone of InetAddress, which is even simpler. A cache is used to reduce the number of DNS queries sent. The low level functions allow direct manipulation of dns messages and records, as well as allowing additional resolver properties to be set. A 'dig' clone and a dynamic update program are included, as well as a primary-only server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 20:43:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904122043.n3CKhTeL022353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 --- Comment #7 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-12 16:43:29 EDT --- New package http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/RabbIT/RabbIT-3.18-6.fc9.src.rpm which uses system wide dnsjava. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 20:45:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904122045.n3CKjmha021528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Philippe Makowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |488100 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 20:45:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904122045.n3CKjnsH021586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 Philippe Makowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |495412 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 20:45:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:45:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] New: Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Summary: Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: makowski.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ibphoenix.fr//fedora/flamerobin.spec SRPM URL: http://ibphoenix.fr//fedora/flamerobin-0.9.2-0.fc10.src.rpm Description: FlameRobin is a database administration tool for Firebird DBMS based on wxgtk toolkit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 20:50:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:50:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904122050.n3CKoW9J022358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #31 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-12 16:50:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > Still here. Sorry for the delay. > I'll review Philippe's new srpm ASAP. Thanks Firebird 2.1.2 is there, so after your review, I'll update it I also added Flamerobin (Bug 495412) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 20:56:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:56:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493603] Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904122056.n3CKuKbq024317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493603 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-12 16:56:21 EDT --- unclutter-8-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unclutter-8-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 20:56:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:56:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493603] Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904122056.n3CKuPeN024350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493603 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-12 16:56:25 EDT --- unclutter-8-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unclutter-8-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 21:05:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904122105.n3CL5h4D025934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #32 from MERCIER 2009-04-12 17:05:43 EDT --- great :D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 21:29:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492125] Review Request: mingw32-pangomm - MinGW Windows C++ interface for Pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904122129.n3CLTr5Y028153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492125 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-12 17:29:52 EDT --- mingw32-pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 21:44:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:44:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904122144.n3CLi78D031399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-04-12 17:44:06 EDT --- Ping. I'd like to get this into rawhide in time for F11 feature freeze :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 21:47:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904122147.n3CLlIk8032184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 --- Comment #9 from Levente Farkas 2009-04-12 17:47:18 EDT --- ping... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 22:13:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495418] New: Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495418 Summary: Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-upoints.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-upoints-0.11.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.jnrowe.ukfsn.org/projects/upoints.html Description: upoints, previously called earth_distance, is a collection of modules for working with points on a spherical object. It allows you to calculate the distance and bearings between points, mangle xearth/xplanet data files, work with online UK trigpoint databases and various other databases. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1292739 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint python-upoints-0.11.0-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-upoints-0.11.0-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 22:20:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:20:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] New: Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 Summary: Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rapid-photo-downloader.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rapid-photo-downloader-0.0.8-1.b7.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://damonlynch.net/rapid/ Description: Rapid Photo Downloader is written by a photographer for professional and amateur photographers. Released under the GNU GPL license, it is designed for use on the GNOME 2 Desktop. It can download photos from multiple memory cards and Portable Storage Devices simultaneously. It provides a variety of options for sub-folder creation, image renaming and backup. It does not download images directly from a camera unless the camera is recognized as an external drive. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1292914 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint rapid-photo-downloader-0.0.8-1.b7.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint rapid-photo-downloader-0.0.8-1.b7.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 23:23:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904122323.n3CNN7TR011816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-04-12 19:23:06 EDT --- Hello Subhodip, What is the status of the updates required to this package for the review? It would be great to get this into Fedora 11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 23:23:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:23:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904122323.n3CNN1n8013668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #37 from Peter Robinson 2009-04-12 19:22:57 EDT --- Hello Subhodip, What is the status of the updates required to this package for the review? It would be great to get this into Fedora 11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 00:08:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 20:08:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492520] Review Request: swami - MIDI instrument and sound editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130008.n3D08G3a019782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492520 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-12 20:08:16 EDT --- Thanks for the review! Sorry I was very busy earlier today. (In reply to comment #1) > > * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines > NOT O.K. // NOT SURE > missing Requirement(s): hicolor-icon-theme > missing Requirement(s) postun: desktop-file-utils shared-mime-info > missing Requirement(s) post: desktop-file-utils shared-mime-info > > .:[ cassmodiah @ schafwiese : /home/cassmodiah ]:. > $ rpm -qf /usr/bin/update-desktop-database && rpm -qf > /usr/bin/update-mime-database > desktop-file-utils-0.15-3.fc10.i386 > shared-mime-info-0.51-5.fc10.i386 > Here is a dependency chain to hicolor-icon-theme. There might be even more ways of getting down there. swami -> fluidsynth-libs -> lash -> gtk2 -> hicolor-icon-theme All are solid dependencies and I doubt that they will break in the foreseeable future. So we don't really need R: hicolor-icon-theme, but I'm adding it anyways. As for post(un): desktop-file-utils shared-mime-info, have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets Especially, in the notes of the desktop-database, mimeinfo and icon cache sections, they explictly say that "Note that no dependencies should be added for this." etc Here is an update: Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/swami.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/swami-0.9.4-4.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.9.4-4 - Add Requires: hicolor-icon-theme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 02:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495284] Review Request: perl-CSS-Minifier-XS - XS based CSS minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130220.n3D2KAVc007649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495284 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-12 22:20:10 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 05:13:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:13:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495282] Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130513.n3D5DeMs001302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495282 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 01:13:40 EDT --- python-pyrad-1.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pyrad-1.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 05:13:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:13:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495282] Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130513.n3D5DZFw001274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495282 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 01:13:35 EDT --- python-pyrad-1.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pyrad-1.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 05:38:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495179] Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130538.n3D5cxje003180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495179 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 01:38:59 EDT --- perl-Number-Format-1.70-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Number-Format-1.70-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 05:39:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495179] Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130539.n3D5d3Pa004974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495179 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 01:39:03 EDT --- perl-Number-Format-1.70-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Number-Format-1.70-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 05:41:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:41:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495179] Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130541.n3D5f7WV003772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495179 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 05:51:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495336] Review Request: perl-Sort-Key - Fastest way to sort anything in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130551.n3D5pIZU007152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495336 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 01:51:18 EDT --- perl-Sort-Key-1.28-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sort-Key-1.28-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 05:50:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495279] Review Request: perl-Devel-NYTProf - Powerful feature-rich perl source code profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130550.n3D5oOIg007028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495279 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 05:49:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495279] Review Request: perl-Devel-NYTProf - Powerful feature-rich perl source code profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130549.n3D5nuPN006567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495279 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 01:49:56 EDT --- perl-Devel-NYTProf-2.09-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-NYTProf-2.09-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 05:50:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495279] Review Request: perl-Devel-NYTProf - Powerful feature-rich perl source code profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130550.n3D5o143004742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495279 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 01:50:01 EDT --- perl-Devel-NYTProf-2.09-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-NYTProf-2.09-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 05:53:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495336] Review Request: perl-Sort-Key - Fastest way to sort anything in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130553.n3D5rQN4005399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495336 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 06:08:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 02:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457806] Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130608.n3D68rks007841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457806 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Kushal Das 2009-04-13 02:08:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-chardet Short Description: Character encoding auto-detection in Python Owners: kushal Branches: F-10 InitialCC: kushal Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 06:16:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 02:16:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130616.n3D6GTEP011285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-13 02:16:28 EDT --- One more thing: Shouldn't this package be called globus-gsi-openssl for consistency with other globus-gsi-openssl-* packages? All the source is in the source-trees/gsi/openssl* directories of the main tarball. Or conversely, shouldn't the other packages be called globus-openssl-* ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 06:16:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 02:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457806] Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130616.n3D6GuKF011365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457806 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |th0br0 at mkdir.name --- Comment #6 from Kushal Das 2009-04-13 02:16:56 EDT --- *** Bug 492612 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 06:16:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 02:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492613] Review Request: canto - Atom/RSS feed reader based on ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130616.n3D6GwV0011397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492613 Bug 492613 depends on bug 492612, which changed state. Bug 492612 Summary: Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492612 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 06:16:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 02:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492612] Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130616.n3D6Gu8Y011331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492612 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |kushaldas at gmail.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Kushal Das 2009-04-13 02:16:55 EDT --- Sorry , but python-chardet is already reviewed, the build got delayed. Closing as duplicate of 457806. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 457806 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 06:22:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 02:22:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495403] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Storage - An serialization framework for Moose classes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130622.n3D6Malq012282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495403 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |iarnell at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |iarnell at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-13 02:22:36 EDT --- + source files match upstream. 89f835ca0cad9a2c3707cb8f748bc44f43dc6112 MooseX-Storage-0.17.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. - summary matches upstream, but is poor English. Should be "A serialization framework for Moose classes" (not "An...") + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1292522 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no complaints: perl-MooseX-Storage.noarch: I: checking perl-MooseX-Storage.src: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - final provides and requires: perl(Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::DoNotSerialize) = 0.17 perl(Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::Trait::DoNotSerialize) = 0.17 perl(MooseX::Storage) = 0.17 perl(MooseX::Storage::Base::WithChecksum) = 0.17 perl(MooseX::Storage::Basic) = 0.17 perl(MooseX::Storage::Deferred) = 0.17 perl(MooseX::Storage::Engine) = 0.17 perl(MooseX::Storage::Engine::IO::AtomicFile) = 0.17 perl(MooseX::Storage::Engine::IO::File) = 0.17 perl(MooseX::Storage::Format::JSON) = 0.17 perl(MooseX::Storage::Format::Storable) = 0.17 perl(MooseX::Storage::Format::YAML) = 0.17 perl(MooseX::Storage::IO::AtomicFile) = 0.17 perl(MooseX::Storage::IO::File) = 0.17 perl(MooseX::Storage::IO::StorableFile) = 0.17 perl(MooseX::Storage::Meta::Attribute::DoNotSerialize) = 0.17 perl(MooseX::Storage::Meta::Attribute::Trait::DoNotSerialize) = 0.17 perl(MooseX::Storage::Util) = 0.17 perl-MooseX-Storage = 0.17-1.fc11 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Best) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Digest) perl(IO::AtomicFile) perl(IO::File) perl(JSON::Any) perl(Moose) perl(Moose::Role) perl(MooseX::Storage::Engine) perl(MooseX::Storage::Engine::IO::AtomicFile) perl(MooseX::Storage::Engine::IO::File) perl(MooseX::Storage::Meta::Attribute::DoNotSerialize) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Storable) perl(utf8) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 + %check is present and all tests pass. All tests successful. Files=27, Tests=349, 14 wallclock secs ( 0.20 usr 0.06 sys + 13.43 cusr 0.76 csys = 14.45 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. Minor niggle with the summary. And you need to filter the provides: perl(Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::DoNotSerialize) = 0.17 perl(Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::Trait::DoNotSerialize) = 0.17 Other than that, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 06:24:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 02:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130624.n3D6OJ3s010333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com Bug 453853 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453853 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453853 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-13 02:24:19 EDT --- Since this package is almost identical to bug 467235, most of my suggestions/objections in that bug apply to this one. Could you update this package accordingly, so I'll take the review from that point? (This probably also applies to most of the other globus packages.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 06:56:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 02:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495436] New: Review Request: perl-File-Pid - Pid File Manipulation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Pid - Pid File Manipulation Alias: perl-File-Pid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495436 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Pid - Pid File Manipulation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-Pid/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-File-Pid.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-File-Pid-1.01-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This software manages a pid file for you. It will create a pid file, query the process within to discover if it's still running, and remove the pid file. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1293567 *rt-0.05 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 07:27:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 03:27:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495436] Review Request: perl-File-Pid - Pid File Manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130727.n3D7R5Jq021709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495436 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-13 03:27:05 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1293567 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url d927b40215cbfbff233d9feb53529532 File-Pid-1.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=10, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.02 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.06 CPU) + Package perl-File-Pid-1.01-1.fc11.noarch => Provides: perl(File::Pid) = 1.1 Requires: perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 07:34:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 03:34:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495440] New: Review Request: perl-Devel-FastProf - Fast perl per-line profiler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-FastProf - Fast perl per-line profiler Alias: perl-Devel-FastProf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495440 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-FastProf - Fast perl per-line profiler Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-FastProf/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Devel-FastProf.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Devel-FastProf-0.08-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Devel::FastProf is a perl per-line profiler. What that means is that it can tell you how much time is spent on every line of a perl script (the standard Devel::DProf is a per-subroutine profiler). Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1293584 *rt-0.05 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 07:52:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 03:52:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495440] Review Request: perl-Devel-FastProf - Fast perl per-line profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130752.n3D7qA9c024582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495440 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-13 03:52:10 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1293584 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url f8185d084e0323b96ad69fc24775aa94 Devel-FastProf-0.08.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=5, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.11 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.17 CPU) + Package perl-Devel-FastProf-0.08-1.fc11.i586 => Provides: perl(Devel::FastProf) = 0.08 perl(Devel::FastProf::Reader) = 0.08 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) perl(Carp) perl(Devel::FastProf::Reader) perl(Exporter) perl(Getopt::Std) perl(Sort::Key) perl(strict) perl(warnings) perl(XSLoader) rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) /usr/bin/perl APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 07:54:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 03:54:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495436] Review Request: perl-File-Pid - Pid File Manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130754.n3D7sS8W026429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495436 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-13 03:54:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-File-Pid Short Description: Pid File Manipulation Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 07:55:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 03:55:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495440] Review Request: perl-Devel-FastProf - Fast perl per-line profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130755.n3D7tjrw025168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495440 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-13 03:55:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Devel-FastProf Short Description: Fast perl per-line profiler Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 08:06:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 04:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130806.n3D86lPQ027740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-13 04:06:23 EDT --- Quick comments: * Package does not obey - the "BuildRequires and Requires" section, - the GCJ section, - the Javadoc scriptlets section of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java Other than this, * Macros must start with %% in the comments and in the changelog. * We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) ? The %section macro is not used. Why is it defined? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 08:24:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 04:24:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495418] Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130824.n3D8Oe89031703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495418 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 09:21:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 05:21:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492520] Review Request: swami - MIDI instrument and sound editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130921.n3D9Lhxf013536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492520 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-13 05:21:43 EDT --- You are right. Sorry, my fault (for this case i added the "not sure" hint) * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines O.K. Done! +------------+ | APPROVED | | swami | +------------+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 09:19:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 05:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492898] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130919.n3D9JFnc012665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492898 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-13 05:19:15 EDT --- I reviewed this package. There are a few minor things to go over: * The binary .mo files need to be removed in %prep and be built from the source .po files. * lib/sqlalchemy shouldn't be packaged since it is a duplicate of the python-sqlalchemy package. ! I don't think issuing "make" is necessary. It doesn't build anything. Hence the %build section should be empty. ! Please make the description span 80 columns, AND/OR separate new paragraphs by blank lines. ! Normally, I prefer supplying such wrapper scripts as separate sources. This is also useful to preserve the original creation date. Since it is such a small and trivial script in this case, it shouldn't matter. But I leave it up to your consideration. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 09:32:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 05:32:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492520] Review Request: swami - MIDI instrument and sound editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130932.n3D9WWM0016019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492520 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-13 05:32:31 EDT --- Thanks a lot! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: oget Short Description: MIDI instrument and sound editor Owners: oget nando Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 09:40:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 05:40:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486804] Review Request: libferrisloki - customized build of Loki library from Modern C++ Design for libferris In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130940.n3D9e5p5017643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486804 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(monkeyiq at users.sf | |.net) --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-13 05:40:04 EDT --- Please point to the updated src.rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 09:39:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 05:39:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492613] Review Request: canto - Atom/RSS feed reader based on ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130939.n3D9dBTg017229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492613 --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-13 05:39:11 EDT --- REVIEW FOR 79ed4e70aaf0701cab00fca77695c5f0 canto-0.6.8-1.fc10.src.rpm FAIL - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/canto-* canto.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/canto/widecurse.so 0775 canto.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/canto/canto_html.py 0644 canto.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 7, tab: line 3) 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. -> widecurse.so should be 0644 -> can be ignored -> Ether use tabs _or_ spaces (cosmetics) OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license (GPLV2) and meets the Licensing Guidelines. FAIL - MUST: The License field in the package spec file does not match the actual license. License tag is GPLv2+, but canto/canto.py reads: # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as # published by the Free Software Foundation. So this is GPlv2 (only). OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package matche the upstream source by MD5 1fbfbff9f7037900fba60322d0b85eab OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. FAIL - MUST: Not all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires: Missing BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel for the egg info, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#Providing_Eggs_using_Setuptools N/A - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. FAIL - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line: widecurse.so is 0775 OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Issues: - Fix rpmlint - Fix license tag - Missing BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel - Missing Requires: python-chardet During build on F11 I see: + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile Compiling /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/canto-0.6.8-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/canto/const.py ... Sorry: TypeError: ('compile() expected string without null bytes',) ... Do you have an idea what is causing this? I don't think that it's related to the package itself since I don't see this error on F10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 10:08:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486804] Review Request: libferrisloki - customized build of Loki library from Modern C++ Design for libferris In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131008.n3DA8mmA023762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486804 Ben Martin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(monkeyiq at users.sf | |.net) | --- Comment #6 from Ben Martin 2009-04-13 06:08:48 EDT --- Sorry about the delay. I moved them to my fuuko subdomain: http://fuuko.libferris.com/fedora/ Also, since Extensions.cpp/hh are GPLv2+ I added that and metadata comment to the specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 10:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131026.n3DAQ7S8024951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ Bug 489233 depends on bug 488930, which changed state. Bug 488930 Summary: "W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package" in NO-noarch package with noarch subpackage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488930 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-13 06:26:05 EDT --- * Looks good. * Note though that typically one increases the "Release" value with every modification of the package (this also aids reviewers who use rpmdev-diff and similar tools). Your upstream tarball has also changed silently without increasing the minor release version. Please avoid this in the future. * If you like to continue with the Fedora Packager sign-up procedure prior to completing the SOCI review, feel free to do so, and I'll approve your account request. $ sha1sum rmol-0.19.0-1.fc10.src.rpm rmol-0.19.0.tar.gz a7ccc0cfb952a63123c7b9fff34ab93ae7b4d619 rmol-0.19.0-1.fc10.src.rpm d29bb310952168a043e104d5dd66feb68d5e1476 rmol-0.19.0.tar.gz APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 10:40:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:40:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131040.n3DAepWN031100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 06:40:50 EDT --- lxmusic-0.2.3-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxmusic-0.2.3-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 10:42:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:42:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131042.n3DAggTc028223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 06:42:42 EDT --- lxmusic-0.2.3-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxmusic-0.2.3-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 10:45:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131045.n3DAjOF9032179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 11:25:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:25:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488908] Review Request: cpptest - A portable and powerful and simple unit testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131125.n3DBPae2004898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488908 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-04-13 07:25:36 EDT --- Removed check section as it is not a test .. just an example. http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/cpptest.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/cpptest-1.1.0-3.fc10.src.rpm Had a chat with maintainer on IRC -- that it is not a test but an example and should fail, he has updated tracker also. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=550611&aid=2720762&group_id=77564 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 11:28:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131128.n3DBS2MU008757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #33 from Arnau S?nchez 2009-04-13 07:28:01 EDT --- Megaupload changed again the captcha some weeks ago (4 letters, rotated and overlapped). Both plowshare and megaupload-dl support it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 11:47:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494647] Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131147.n3DBlaBC010067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 07:47:36 EDT --- emacs-mmm-0.4.8-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/emacs-mmm-0.4.8-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 11:47:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:47:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494647] Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131147.n3DBlggF010104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 07:47:42 EDT --- emacs-mmm-0.4.8-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/emacs-mmm-0.4.8-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 12:23:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 08:23:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131223.n3DCNJ3L018946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cchance at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #1 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-13 08:23:19 EDT --- Missed BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 12:31:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 08:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487067] Review Request: autopsy - Graphical front end for The Sleuth Kit Forensics software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131231.n3DCVN4f024580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487067 --- Comment #6 from Till Maas 2009-04-13 08:31:22 EDT --- You have to adjust the filter scripts to the autopsy package, i.e. instead of literally writing "sed -e '/perl(unwanted_require)/d'", you have to add one sed command for each unwanted provides/requires entry, e.g. sed -e '/perl(Main)/d' -d '/perl(conf.pl)/d' and so on. Also it is better to prefix the filter scripts with the name of the package, i.e. autopsy: Source98: autopsy-filter-provides.sh Or you use the prefered way and create the filter scripts in %prep, as there is suggested in the Perl Packaging Guidelines. Also is sleuthkit really required at buildtime? It seems to build without any problems if it is not present. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 12:43:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 08:43:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489795] Review Request: backintime - Simple backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131243.n3DChpEd024257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489795 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 12:40:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 08:40:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488908] Review Request: cpptest - A portable and powerful and simple unit testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131240.n3DCeD6w023502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488908 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-13 08:40:13 EDT --- Okay. That explains why the "test" target is built by default, but not run by "make check" unless one does "cd test ; make check". Reading mytest.cpp I'm convinced it's an example. Would have been nice if it tested its own test features and exceptions, oh well, ... :-) [...] APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 12:53:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 08:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495357] Review Request: python-twill - Simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131253.n3DCrQXc029732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495357 --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2009-04-13 08:53:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I've searched the wiki for the guideline about this, as I'm pretty sure there > is one about always using a system wide library instead of a project-provided > local version, but I've been unable to find it. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries > Thanks for your comments, I've updated the spec and package (didn't bother > bumping the release just for that, though). Imho it is better to always bump the release, because it reduces confusion about different source rpm files with the same filename. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 13:03:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:03:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491886] Review Request: xa - 6502/65816 cross-assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131303.n3DD3okf029289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491886 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2009-04-13 09:03:50 EDT --- [OK] rpmlint output: silent [OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format [OK] license allowed: GPLv2 [OK] license matches shortname in License: tag [OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: COPYING [OK] package is code or permissive content: {NOT OK} patches sent to upstream and commented https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PatchUpstreamStatus https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes20080506 [OK] Source0 is a working URL {N/A} Sourceforge URL is Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name} [OK] Source0 matches Upstream: edd15aa8674fb86225faf34e56d5cab2 xa-2.3.5.tar.gz [OK] Package builds on all platforms: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1293948 [N/A] ExcludeArch bugs are filed and commented: [N/A] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds) (OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin [N/A] %find_lang used for locales [N/A] Every (sub)package containing libraries runs ldconfig [N/A] .h (header) files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] .a (static libraries) are in -static subpackage [N/A] contains .pc (pkgconfig) files and has Requires: pkgconfig (N/A) .pc files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] contains .so.X(.Y) files and .so is in -devel [N/A] -devel subpackage has Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [N/A] .la files (libtool) are not included [N/A] Has GUI and includes %{name}.desktop [N/A] Follows desktop entry spec [N/A] Valid .desktop Name [N/A] Valid .desktop GenericName [N/A] Valid .desktop Categories [N/A] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [N/A] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install [OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable) [OK] Owns all created directories [OK] no duplicates in %files [OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages [OK] included filenames are in UTF-8 [OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] Consistent macro usage [N/A] large documentation is -doc subpackage [OK] %doc does not affect runtime {GOOD ENOUGH} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries The tarball contains these binaries, which seem not to be shipped or used in the build: o65 executable, version 0, 6502, 16 bit, byte reloc, alignment 1 loader/ex2 loader/example2 {OK} well known BuildRoot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) {OK} PreReq not used {OK} RPM_OPT_FLAGS honoured {OK} Useful debuginfo generated {OK} no duplication of system libraries {OK} no rpath {NOT OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps The INSTALL="install -p" has to move to the make invocation in %install {OK} Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) {OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used {OK} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and %{buildroot} on %install and %clean) {OK} no Conflicts {OK} nothing installed in /srv {OK} Changelog in allowed format {OK} does not use Scriptlets Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch Sane Provides: and Requires: {OK} Follows Naming Guidelines A comment about the getline patch is missing and the 'INSTALL="install -p"' has to be moved. These are only minor issues, please fix them before you import them. Btw. the name of the binary "xa" may be too generic, please consider to get upstream to rename it to a longer name, e.g. xa65, which is debian's package name. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 13:25:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:25:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488908] Review Request: cpptest - A portable and powerful and simple unit testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131325.n3DDPa8t002554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488908 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-04-13 09:25:36 EDT --- Thanks. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cpptest Short Description: A portable and powerful and simple unit testing framework for C++ Owners: rakesh Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 13:41:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:41:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487067] Review Request: autopsy - Graphical front end for The Sleuth Kit Forensics software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131341.n3DDfjAa009421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487067 Adam Miller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #7 from Adam Miller 2009-04-13 09:41:45 EDT --- I have unfortunately hit the reality that I would do this package no justice as I have far too little experience with the source of the upstream project. I'm closing this package review as I would not be a good maintainer. I would like to thank the package reviewers for their time and apologize for having wasted it. -Adam -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 13:57:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:57:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490269] Review Request: xfglenses - Gravitational lenses visualization program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131357.n3DDv1X2013548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490269 --- Comment #8 from Thibault North 2009-04-13 09:57:01 EDT --- SRPM is now ok: URL: http://tnorth.ch/fedora/xfglenses-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm Also, there is a scratch koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1294051 Package is ready IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 14:06:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488908] Review Request: cpptest - A portable and powerful and simple unit testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131406.n3DE6RhY015636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488908 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 14:08:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131408.n3DE8jcX016236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 --- Comment #7 from Johan Vromans 2009-04-13 10:08:45 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/perl-Data-Report.spec SRPM URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/perl-Data-Report-0.10-2.fc10.src.rpm This version fixes the remarks (MUST FIX and SHOULD FIX) from the reviewers, as summarized in #6. No koji build, since it now requires perl-Text-CSV which is not yet part of Fedora. The package and .spec are rpmlint free except for a harmless warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 14:24:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:24:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493684] Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131424.n3DEOnht020785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 --- Comment #13 from Thomas J. Baker 2009-04-13 10:24:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=339322) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=339322) log of attempted yum install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 14:24:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:24:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493684] Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131424.n3DEOGot020664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 Thomas J. Baker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tjb at unh.edu --- Comment #12 from Thomas J. Baker 2009-04-13 10:24:15 EDT --- This package as built in koji is not x86_64 friendly. It apparently doesn't look for the 64bit version of libclearlooks.so and wants to pull in a bunch of i586 packages. Log attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 14:30:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486757] Review Request: divine-mc - Multi-core model checking system for proving specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131430.n3DEURLb019611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486757 --- Comment #17 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-04-13 10:30:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Sounds like everything's okay then. Yes, I did test building on both 1.5 and > 1.6. I did local builds, and then used koji to do builds on F10 and to-be-F11. > > Any other comments on this package? No, this seems to be sane -- what about promela? Have you already submitted a review request (couldn't find any)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 14:35:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:35:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495418] Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131435.n3DEZkxu023941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495418 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-13 10:35:46 EDT --- - Change BR: python, python-setuptools-devel to BR: python-devel, python-setuptools if you intend to branch to EPEL (EL5 has just a python-setuptools package). - Also, you can drop the ./ in front of setup.py. rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. ~OK - Maybe add PKG-INFO and {NEWS,README}.html to doc? MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 14:56:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:56:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490269] Review Request: xfglenses - Gravitational lenses visualization program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131456.n3DEuiU6029337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490269 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-13 10:56:44 EDT --- xfglenses.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 10) 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - You didn't update release tag, even though you modified the spec file. - Fix the rpmlint warning. Also, please don't use macros where they are not needed: rm, make, cp, mkdir &c. This makes the spec file unneededly difficult to read. - Vendor is incorrect, should be empty string "". If you're targeting solely for Fedora, it isn't even needed (EPEL still needs the explicit vendor argument). - Patch0 is highly dubitable since it is not necessary in order to build the package; it just modifies the credits of the program. Given that it's the only patch that is supplied and it does not modify the program in any way, I find it impossible to accept as such. If you have contributed to the package, the modifications should be put in by upstream. ** rpmlint output: MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSFIX MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. NEEDSFIX - Add Requires: hicolor-icon-theme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 15:26:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495372] Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131526.n3DFQsrp003669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495372 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 15:26:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:26:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495357] Review Request: python-twill - Simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131526.n3DFQphD032357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495357 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Till Maas 2009-04-13 11:26:51 EDT --- [GOOD ENOUGH] rpmlint output: python-twill.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/twill-fork 0775 It seems that the umask of the user building the rpm affects the permissions of the files inside the rpm. This is not nice imho. [OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format [OK] license allowed: MIT [OK] license matches shortname in License: tag [OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: LICENSE.txt [OK] package is code or permissive content: {OK} patches sent to upstream and commented [OK] Source0 is a working URL {N/A} Sourceforge URL is Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name} It is nicer to have future patches in the form: %{name}-%{version}-$SUFFIX.patch and to use -b .$SUFFIX in the according %patchX command to make rediffing easier. [OK] Source0 matches Upstream: c362307616696f4838e9456c42b70fdc twill-0.9.tar.gz [OK] Package builds on all platforms: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1294675 [N/A] ExcludeArch bugs are filed and commented: [OK] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds) (OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin [N/A] %find_lang used for locales [N/A] Every (sub)package containing libraries runs ldconfig [N/A] .h (header) files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] .a (static libraries) are in -static subpackage [N/A] contains .pc (pkgconfig) files and has Requires: pkgconfig (N/A) .pc files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] contains .so.X(.Y) files and .so is in -devel [N/A] -devel subpackage has Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [N/A] .la files (libtool) are not included [N/A] Has GUI and includes %{name}.desktop [N/A] Follows desktop entry spec [N/A] Valid .desktop Name [N/A] Valid .desktop GenericName [N/A] Valid .desktop Categories [N/A] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [N/A] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install [OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable) [OK] Owns all created directories [OK] no duplicates in %files [OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages [OK] included filenames are in UTF-8 [OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] Consistent macro usage [OK] large documentation is -doc subpackage [OK] %doc does not affect runtime {OK} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) {OK} well known BuildRoot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root {OK} PreReq not used {N/A} RPM_OPT_FLAGS honoured {N/A} Useful debuginfo generated {OK} no duplication of system libraries {N/A} no rpath {N/A} Timestamps preserved with cp and install {N/A} Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) {OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used {OK} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and %{buildroot} on %install and %clean) {OK} no Conflicts {OK} nothing installed in /srv {OK} Changelog in allowed format {OK} does not use Scriptlets Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch Sane Provides: and Requires: {OK} Follows Naming Guidelines Python {OK} Has BuildRequires: python - via BR: python-setuptools or python-devel {OK} Defines and uses %{python_sitelib}: %{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")} {N/A} Defines and uses %{python_sitearch}: %{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from %distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} {GOOD ENOUGH} Has BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel Seems not to be needed. Only easy_install seems to be in the -devel package. Not sure, why the Guidelines say it should be there. [OK] Python eggs must be built from source. They cannot simply drop an egg from upstream into the proper directory. [OK] Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [OK] If egg-info files are generated by the modules build scripts they must be included in the package. [N/A] When building a compat package, it must install using easy_install -m so it won't conflict with the main package. [N/A] When building multiple versions (for a compat package) one of the packages must contain a default version that is usable via "import MODULE" with no prior setup. (OK) A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. {NOT OK} Egg install: %install %{__python} setup.py install --skip-build --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT The "--single-version-externally-managed" is not needed anymore: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#Providing_Eggs_using_Setuptools There are only minor issues or issues that do not affect rpms building within the Fedora buildsystem: Please change the build to not let the umask of the user building the rpm affect the final rpm. I am not sure, whether this is a default bad beheaviour of the python build system or not. Please consider adding -b .fork to the %patch0 to make rediffing easier and plase use the package name in the patch in the future. Please remove the uneeded argument in %install before importing this package into Fedora. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 15:34:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490269] Review Request: xfglenses - Gravitational lenses visualization program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131534.n3DFYQue005095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490269 --- Comment #10 from Thibault North 2009-04-13 11:34:26 EDT --- >- You didn't update release tag, even though you modified the spec file. Yup, since the package is not part of the repo yet, I tought that was not required at that point. >- Fix the rpmlint warning. Also, please don't use macros where they are not needed: rm, make, cp, mkdir &c. This makes the spec file unneededly difficult to read. Okay i'll fix that. >- Patch0 is highly dubitable since it is not necessary in order to build the package;[...] You're actually right, but this patch adds credits for another contributer also. While upstream hasn't updated its source archive, I wanted to be sure that this contributor is present in the AUTHORS file. But alright, i'll remove it and wait till it is present upstream. I'll fix all that within the next few day. Thanks again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 15:36:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:36:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495372] Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131536.n3DFavO8006055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495372 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-13 11:36:57 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK - You could omit the ./ in front of setup.py since it's already run explicitly by python. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. ~OK - No license headers are present in source code (except __init__.py) and no license file is included. According to PKG-INFO and __init__.py license is MIT. - Please ask upstream to add license headers. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSFIX - Add PKG-INFO to %doc. Also, I'd just include test_altgraph.py and omit the test/ directory. MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK You can do the fixes upon import to CVS. The package has been APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 15:41:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166633] Review Request: mmv - move multiple files program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131541.n3DFfeEK007385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=166633 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-13 11:41:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 15:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131539.n3DFd1ue006642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2009-04-13 11:39:00 EDT --- Do you intentionally not use %cmake? Reference: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/cmake You should use an adapted version of this generic, recommended Sourceforge URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Reference: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 15:40:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488908] Review Request: cpptest - A portable and powerful and simple unit testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131540.n3DFe6qC002983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488908 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-13 11:40:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 15:42:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:42:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457806] Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131542.n3DFgICc007620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457806 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-13 11:42:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 15:48:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492520] Review Request: swami - MIDI instrument and sound editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131548.n3DFmJvQ005169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492520 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-13 11:48:18 EDT --- I assume the package name here is 'swami' ? cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 15:45:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131545.n3DFjH8m004433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: links 2 - |Review Request: links - |text mode browser with |text mode browser with |graphics |graphics Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #52 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-13 11:45:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 15:47:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493957] Review Request: skyviewer - Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131547.n3DFlQjW008831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493957 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-13 11:47:26 EDT --- You haven't pushed the F10 package as update yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 15:50:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:50:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495403] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Storage - An serialization framework for Moose classes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131550.n3DFoDxq009567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495403 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-13 11:50:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Storage Short Description: An serialization framework for Moose classes Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 15:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495440] Review Request: perl-Devel-FastProf - Fast perl per-line profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131550.n3DFoJFa009737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495440 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-13 11:50:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 15:49:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495330] Review Request: perl-CSS-Minifier - Remove unnecessary whitespace from CSS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131549.n3DFnQcH009171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495330 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-13 11:49:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 15:50:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495403] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Storage - An serialization framework for Moose classes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131550.n3DFoFFF006042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495403 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 15:52:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:52:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495436] Review Request: perl-File-Pid - Pid File Manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131552.n3DFqVWY006623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495436 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-13 11:52:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 15:51:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:51:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495403] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Storage - An serialization framework for Moose classes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131551.n3DFpa50006427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495403 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-13 11:51:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 16:07:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:07:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488908] Review Request: cpptest - A portable and powerful and simple unit testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131607.n3DG7NO7013848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488908 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 12:07:23 EDT --- cpptest-1.1.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cpptest-1.1.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 16:20:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:20:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493957] Review Request: skyviewer - Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131620.n3DGKMGn016757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493957 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-13 12:20:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > You haven't pushed the F10 package as update yet? Just done that, thanks for reminding! (By the way, I won't mind if you create updates for my packages, or commit to them or build them or anything. Feel free to do so anytime!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 16:21:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166633] Review Request: mmv - move multiple files program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131621.n3DGLgus014631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=166633 --- Comment #8 from Till Maas 2009-04-13 12:21:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > cvs done. Which branch did you use as the source for the new EL-5 branch? It seems not to be devel, because the spec is only at revision 9, but in devel it is at revision 11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 16:28:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:28:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166633] Review Request: mmv - move multiple files program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131628.n3DGSEYJ018267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=166633 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-13 12:28:14 EDT --- By default EL-5 branches use FC-6 (if it exists) and devel if it does not. (Since EL5 is based off of FC-6). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 16:59:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493684] Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131659.n3DGxMk9022171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-13 12:59:22 EDT --- Looks like a yum issue to me. I think we should require gtk2-engines instead of libclearlooks.so for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 17:21:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494518] Review Request: dontzap - Allows users to set the "DontZap" option in xorg.conf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131721.n3DHLd94028219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494518 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-13 13:21:39 EDT --- >From the above link: "Option DontZap is restored with this change to it's previous functionality - it disables zapping altogether (if enabled). Even if DontZap is disabled (the default), zapping only works if it is present in the xkb map." So, this package will really just confuse things IMHO. If you use it to "enable" dontzap, it means it will not work anywhere. If you use it to "disable" dontzap, it means it will depend on the xkb map. At least thats my understanding of how things are now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 17:45:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493684] Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131745.n3DHjNpe004094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 --- Comment #15 from Thomas J. Baker 2009-04-13 13:45:23 EDT --- Must be a yum issue. I nodep installed it and it seems to work fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 18:00:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:00:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493684] Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131800.n3DI0aFD006256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-13 14:00:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Looks like a yum issue to me. I think we should require gtk2-engines instead of > libclearlooks.so for now. No yum issue but packaging bug (in clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme-1.5-1.fc11). 64 bit gtk2-engines Provides libclearlooks.so()(64bit), not libclearlooks.so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 18:13:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488908] Review Request: cpptest - A portable and powerful and simple unit testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131813.n3DIDEZe009238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488908 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-04-13 14:13:14 EDT --- Imported in Rawhide. Will close for now .. in case problem comes .. will reopen! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 18:17:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:17:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493957] Review Request: skyviewer - Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131817.n3DIHhtX010349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493957 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-13 14:17:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > You haven't pushed the F10 package as update yet? > > Just done that, thanks for reminding! > > (By the way, I won't mind if you create updates for my packages, or commit to > them or build them or anything. Feel free to do so anytime!) Oh but I can't, since AFAIK I'm not a provenpackager :) PS. Add the Review Request to the bug field in the update manager, so it'll close the review bug automatically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 18:27:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:27:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131827.n3DIR1c9013785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 --- Comment #2 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-13 14:27:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > * Package does not obey > - the "BuildRequires and Requires" section, [Build]Requires added. > - the GCJ section, I add it. It is new for me, please check wht I do it properly. > - the Javadoc scriptlets section of Ok. ghost deleted. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java > > Other than this, > > * Macros must start with %% in the comments and in the changelog. Off course! Where I do not double it??? > * We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) Ok. > ? The %section macro is not used. Why is it defined? It come from JPackage imported rpm. Deleted. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/dnsjava/dnsjava-2.0.6-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 18:32:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492520] Review Request: swami - MIDI instrument and sound editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131832.n3DIWiim013800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492520 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 14:32:44 EDT --- swami-0.9.4-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/swami-0.9.4-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 18:33:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:33:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492520] Review Request: swami - MIDI instrument and sound editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131833.n3DIXS9p013919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492520 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 14:33:28 EDT --- swami-0.9.4-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/swami-0.9.4-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 18:34:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:34:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131834.n3DIYedU014243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 --- Comment #4 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-04-13 14:34:40 EDT --- Sorry for the very long delay on this. :-( Going through the review I realized I can't even install this on Fedora 10: ytnef-2.6-3.fc10.i386 from ../RPMS/ytnef-2.6-3.fc10.i386.rpm has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: perl(Mail::Mailer::test) is needed by package ytnef-2.6-3.fc10.i386 (../RPMS/ytnef-2.6-3.fc10.i386.rpm) Error: Missing Dependency: perl(Mail::Mailer::test) is needed by package ytnef-2.6-3.fc10.i386 (../RPMS/ytnef-2.6-3.fc10.i386.rpm) (yum localinstall results). Maybe this package is provided by rawhide? I'll check. a yum provides on my F10 repos comes up with nothing however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 18:47:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:47:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131847.n3DIl8Vg017499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 --- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-13 14:47:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) please hold, I will check this soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:25:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:25:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492520] Review Request: swami - MIDI instrument and sound editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131925.n3DJPeVH027876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492520 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-13 15:25:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I assume the package name here is 'swami' ? > > cvs done. Indeed. oops! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:31:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:31:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481695] Review Request: python-TraitsBackendQt - PyQt backend for Traits and TraitsGUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131931.n3DJVJAl029393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481695 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:31:18 EDT --- python-TraitsBackendQt-3.0.3-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:31:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:31:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481695] Review Request: python-TraitsBackendQt - PyQt backend for Traits and TraitsGUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131931.n3DJVOLd029434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481695 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3.0.3-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:30:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:30:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - Free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131930.n3DJUt2N029323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:30:54 EDT --- kvirc-4.0.0-0.6.20090409svn3173.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kvirc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3501 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:30:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:30:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131930.n3DJUa4h029237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:30:35 EDT --- gnote-0.1.1-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gnote'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3499 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:32:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:32:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131932.n3DJWbjR029026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:32:36 EDT --- lxmusic-0.2.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:33:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:33:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494164] Review Request: perl-Test-Assertions - Simple set of building blocks for both unit and runtime testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131933.n3DJXQRq029239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494164 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.054-1.fc9 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:31:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493603] Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131931.n3DJVErH028701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493603 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:31:10 EDT --- unclutter-8-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update unclutter'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3504 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:31:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:31:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495282] Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131931.n3DJV6AU028610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495282 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:31:05 EDT --- python-pyrad-1.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update python-pyrad'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3503 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:35:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494119] Review Request: perl-Devel-Hide - Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules (for testing) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131935.n3DJZoXF031153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494119 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:35:49 EDT --- perl-Devel-Hide-0.0008-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:33:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:33:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494164] Review Request: perl-Test-Assertions - Simple set of building blocks for both unit and runtime testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131933.n3DJXLu2030104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494164 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:33:20 EDT --- perl-Test-Assertions-1.054-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:36:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475098] Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131936.n3DJaAmg031319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475098 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3.0.2-2.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:35:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:35:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494119] Review Request: perl-Devel-Hide - Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules (for testing) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131935.n3DJZtgd031210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494119 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.0008-1.fc9 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:36:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485961] Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131936.n3DJaj6P031481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485961 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:36:43 EDT --- gmusicbrowser-1.0.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gmusicbrowser'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3541 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492398] Review Request: slv2 - LV2 host library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131935.n3DJZTB8030191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492398 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:35:28 EDT --- slv2-0.6.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:35:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:35:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492708] Review Request: xml2 - XML/Unix Processing Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131935.n3DJZGGN030101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492708 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:35:15 EDT --- xml2-0.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:39:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492708] Review Request: xml2 - XML/Unix Processing Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131939.n3DJdC6m031209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492708 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4-2.fc10 |0.4-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:36:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475098] Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131936.n3DJa58O030463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475098 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:36:04 EDT --- python-Traits-3.0.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:38:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:38:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494161] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Perl - Perl extension for retrieving terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131938.n3DJccUF031068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494161 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:38:37 EDT --- perl-Term-Size-Perl-0.029-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:38:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494119] Review Request: perl-Devel-Hide - Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules (for testing) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131938.n3DJcuRY031124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494119 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.0008-1.fc9 |0.0008-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:35:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:35:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492398] Review Request: slv2 - LV2 host library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131935.n3DJZbYv030244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492398 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6.2-3.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:35:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:35:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492708] Review Request: xml2 - XML/Unix Processing Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131935.n3DJZLwI030146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492708 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:38:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490989] Review Request: subdownloader - A program for download/upload subtitles for videofiles and DVDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131938.n3DJcTIA031025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490989 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.0.9.3-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:37:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493603] Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131937.n3DJbxk2030919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493603 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:37:58 EDT --- unclutter-8-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update unclutter'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3549 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:39:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:39:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492708] Review Request: xml2 - XML/Unix Processing Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131939.n3DJd7Cb032553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492708 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:39:06 EDT --- xml2-0.4-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:40:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:40:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131940.n3DJeNMW000757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:40:21 EDT --- coccinella-0.96.12-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:41:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:41:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492125] Review Request: mingw32-pangomm - MinGW Windows C++ interface for Pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131941.n3DJfjcG001239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492125 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:41:32 EDT --- mingw32-pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:37:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494164] Review Request: perl-Test-Assertions - Simple set of building blocks for both unit and runtime testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131937.n3DJbloi032148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494164 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:37:46 EDT --- perl-Test-Assertions-1.054-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:38:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490989] Review Request: subdownloader - A program for download/upload subtitles for videofiles and DVDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131938.n3DJcOXB032358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490989 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:38:23 EDT --- subdownloader-2.0.9.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:38:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:38:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494119] Review Request: perl-Devel-Hide - Forces the unavailability of specified Perl modules (for testing) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131938.n3DJcpSD032490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494119 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:38:50 EDT --- perl-Devel-Hide-0.0008-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:41:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492125] Review Request: mingw32-pangomm - MinGW Windows C++ interface for Pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131941.n3DJfn4b001326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492125 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.14.1-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:37:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494164] Review Request: perl-Test-Assertions - Simple set of building blocks for both unit and runtime testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131937.n3DJbppx032189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494164 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.054-1.fc9 |1.054-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:40:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131940.n3DJeSSO000800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.96.12-2.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:38:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494161] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Perl - Perl extension for retrieving terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131938.n3DJcggv032414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494161 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.029-2.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:38:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:38:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - Free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131938.n3DJcJhg032311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:38:18 EDT --- kvirc-4.0.0-0.6.20090409svn3173.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update kvirc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3553 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:39:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:39:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: sems - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131939.n3DJdeac032655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:39:38 EDT --- sems-1.1.0-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sems'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3560 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:42:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:42:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475098] Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131942.n3DJgQVL000431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475098 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:42:25 EDT --- python-Traits-3.0.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:43:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:43:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131943.n3DJhPI7000869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:43:24 EDT --- phoronix-test-suite-1.8.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:41:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494161] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Perl - Perl extension for retrieving terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131941.n3DJfJW0032624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494161 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:41:18 EDT --- perl-Term-Size-Perl-0.029-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:40:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131940.n3DJe9w9032084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:40:08 EDT --- phoronix-test-suite-1.8.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:43:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494647] Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131943.n3DJhkfB000983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:43:45 EDT --- emacs-mmm-0.4.8-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:44:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494647] Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131944.n3DJi0cW001069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:44:00 EDT --- emacs-mmm-0.4.8-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:43:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:43:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131943.n3DJhVKL000928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.8.0-1.fc10 |1.8.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:39:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484933] Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131939.n3DJdsAR031677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:39:53 EDT --- libwps-0.1.2-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:41:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:41:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494161] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Perl - Perl extension for retrieving terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131941.n3DJfNEd032656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494161 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.029-2.fc10 |0.029-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:43:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:43:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131943.n3DJhHpO000809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.6.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:44:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:44:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494647] Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131944.n3DJi5Dv001100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.8-1.fc9 |0.4.8-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:39:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:39:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484933] Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131939.n3DJdxdN031712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.1.2-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:40:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:40:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131940.n3DJeERw032193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.8.0-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:43:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:43:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494647] Review Request: emacs-mmm - Emacs minor mode allowing different major modes in the same file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131943.n3DJhpY0001024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4.8-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:40:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: sems - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131940.n3DJegJb032351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:40:41 EDT --- sems-1.1.0-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update sems'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3568 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:44:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492191] Review Request: jmod - Java Sound MODules Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131944.n3DJifs9002518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492191 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:44:41 EDT --- jmod-0.9-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:42:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492191] Review Request: jmod - Java Sound MODules Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131942.n3DJgDL3001459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492191 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:42:12 EDT --- jmod-0.9-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:46:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:46:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131946.n3DJkhn6003385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.96.12-2.fc9 |0.96.12-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:43:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131943.n3DJh39p002047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:43:03 EDT --- lxmusic-0.2.3-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:42:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:42:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475098] Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131942.n3DJgVBW001910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475098 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.0.2-2.fc10 |3.0.2-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:43:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131943.n3DJhCb2002101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:43:10 EDT --- libkml-0.6.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:42:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492191] Review Request: jmod - Java Sound MODules Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131942.n3DJgHcx001625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492191 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:46:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495282] Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131946.n3DJkSS5003331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495282 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:46:26 EDT --- python-pyrad-1.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-pyrad'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3618 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:46:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492974] Review Request: calf - Audio plugins pack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131946.n3DJksN6003443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492974 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:46:52 EDT --- calf-0.0.18.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update calf'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3623 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:44:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492191] Review Request: jmod - Java Sound MODules Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131944.n3DJikOv001812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492191 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9-1.fc10 |0.9-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:46:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:46:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131946.n3DJkbIX002764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:46:35 EDT --- coccinella-0.96.12-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:45:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:45:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481695] Review Request: python-TraitsBackendQt - PyQt backend for Traits and TraitsGUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131945.n3DJjoTb002412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481695 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.0.3-4.fc9 |3.0.3-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:45:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481695] Review Request: python-TraitsBackendQt - PyQt backend for Traits and TraitsGUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131945.n3DJjjIT002375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481695 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:45:44 EDT --- python-TraitsBackendQt-3.0.3-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:47:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:47:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492087] Review Request: pidgin-latex - A Pidgin plugin that displays LaTeX equations as images in your conversations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131947.n3DJldZJ002958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492087 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:47:37 EDT --- pidgin-latex-1.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:47:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492087] Review Request: pidgin-latex - A Pidgin plugin that displays LaTeX equations as images in your conversations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131947.n3DJlhEd002996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492087 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:47:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131947.n3DJl3et002836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:47:01 EDT --- kcometen4-1.0.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kcometen4'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3626 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:47:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131947.n3DJlH5D003666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:47:15 EDT --- kcometen4-1.0.4-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update kcometen4'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3630 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 20:01:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:01:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] New: Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 Summary: Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/febootstrap.spec SRPM URL: http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/febootstrap/files/febootstrap-1.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: febootstrap is a Fedora equivalent to Debian's debootstrap. You can use it to create a basic Fedora filesystem, and build initramfs (initrd.img) or filesystem images. febootstrap also includes a separate tool to minimize filesystems by removing unneeded locales, documentation etc. The main difference from other appliance building tools is that this one doesn't need to be run as root. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 20:03:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] New: Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 Summary: Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/libguestfs.spec SRPM URL: http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs/files/libguestfs-0.9-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Libguestfs is a library for accessing and modifying guest disk images. Amongst the things this is good for: making batch configuration changes to guests, getting disk used/free statistics (see also: virt-df), migrating between virtualization systems (see also: virt-p2v), performing partial backups, performing partial guest clones, cloning guests and changing registry/UUID/hostname info, and much else besides. Libguestfs uses Linux kernel and qemu code, and can access any type of guest filesystem that Linux and qemu can, including but not limited to: ext2/3/4, btrfs, FAT and NTFS, LVM, many different disk partition schemes, qcow, qcow2, vmdk. Libguestfs provides ways to enumerate guest storage (eg. partitions, LVs, what filesystem is in each LV, etc.). It can also run commands in the context of the guest. Also you can access filesystems over FTP. Libguestfs is a library that can be linked with C and C++ management programs. See also the 'guestfish' package for shell scripting and command line access. For Perl bindings, see 'libguestfs-perl'. For OCaml bindings, see 'libguestfs-ocaml-devel'. For Python bindings, see 'libguestfs-python'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 20:06:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:06:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132006.n3DK6i5M008789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |495564(libguestfs) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 20:06:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132006.n3DK6hqa008766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |495563(febootstrap) Alias| |libguestfs Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 20:05:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132005.n3DK5ebR008120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |febootstrap Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 20:07:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132007.n3DK7aN6009107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-13 16:07:35 EDT --- Marked as NotReady. This depends on an updated fakechroot package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 20:33:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:33:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] New: Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 Summary: Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/xsw.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/xsw-0.1.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://code.google.com/p/xsw/ Description: xsw is for all those who are looking for a console-based slideshow presentation tool. By using xsw, you create your presentation "by hand", using the xsw language described in the manual. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1295329 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint xsw* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint xsw-0.1.3-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 20:36:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:36:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495579] New: Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 Summary: Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maxamillion at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ifstatus.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ifstatus-1.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: IFStatus was developed for Linux users that are usually in console mode. It is a simple, easy to use program for displaying commonly needed / wanted statistics in real time about ingoing and outgoing traffic of multiple network interfaces that is usually hard to find, with a simple and effecient view. It is the substitute for PPPStatus and EthStatus projects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 20:41:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495418] Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132041.n3DKfYQ3017685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495418 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-13 16:41:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-upoints Short Description: Python modules for working with points on Earth Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 20:40:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:40:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495372] Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132040.n3DKeo92017578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495372 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-13 16:40:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-altgraph Short Description: Python graph (network) package Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 20:39:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495372] Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132039.n3DKdhMp016463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495372 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-13 16:39:42 EDT --- Jussi, thanks for the review. (In reply to comment #1) > MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used > consistently. OK > - You could omit the ./ in front of setup.py since it's already run explicitly > by python. OK, I will change that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 20:39:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495418] Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132039.n3DKdSPG016413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495418 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-13 16:39:27 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Jussi. (In reply to comment #1) > - Change > BR: python, python-setuptools-devel > to > BR: python-devel, python-setuptools > > if you intend to branch to EPEL (EL5 has just a python-setuptools package). At the moment I have no intention to maintain this package in EPEL. Perhaps in the future. > - Also, you can drop the ./ in front of setup.py. OK, thanks for this information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 20:40:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:40:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488618] Review Request: Likewise Open - Likewise Active Directory Authentication Services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132040.n3DKeEFg016856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488618 Krishna Ganugapati changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(krishnag at likewise | |.com) | --- Comment #5 from Krishna Ganugapati 2009-04-13 16:40:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > You need to provide a direct link to both the srpm and the spec file. > Currently, one have to go to the url then look for the srpm. The spec file is > not available at all and one need to download the 47 MB srpm to look at the > spec. > Preliminary comments : > - License tag is not valid. > - Release is not using the disttag. > - BuildRoot is not valid. > - Source0 and Source999 need to be a full URL. > - Spec file uses both spaces and tabs for indenting. > - The first half of the following line in %%build section is not needed : > [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > - Same as above for %%clean section. > - File attributes are not set. Add the following line at the top of all the > packages sections : > %defattr (-,root,root-) > - %{_libdir}/likewise is not owned by any of the packages. > - Config files are not marked as such use %config and %config(noreplace) where > appropriate. > - %{_sysconfdir}/likewise is not owned. > - {_bindir}/demo is not owned. > - {_prefix}/share should be {_datadir}. > - /var should be {_localstatedir} > - %{_prefix}/bin should be %{_bindir}. > - %{_prefix}/data is not a standard dir and should not be created at all. > - No version-release for the changelog entries. > - No documentation included. > - No license file included. > - Services are provided but initscripts is not in the Requires: list nor are > the proper %%pre, %preun, etc... scriptlet used. > - You can use sed -i rather than sed then move, this will make the spec easier > to read. > - The build should probably not temper with the RPM_OPT_FLAGS and CFLAGS. > - The whole %%build and %%install sctions look fishy. > - Doesn't build in mock, needs at least to BuildRequires: openldap-devel, > krb5-devel but even with that, build still fails. > The list above is nowhere near complete, this package needs a lot of work. > Please carefully read the packaging guidelines to fix all of the above. You > should also run rpmlint on all the rpms and srpm. > Also, not directly related to the review, one need to register to receive a > link to the download page > (http://www.likewise.com/community/index.php/download/). It seems there's no > tarball to download but rather a lot of different tarballs. This is > confusing... Thank you! We're working on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 20:55:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:55:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488618] Review Request: Likewise Open - Likewise Active Directory Authentication Services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132055.n3DKtlfT021501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488618 --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-13 16:55:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) ok, please look Comment #3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 21:35:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:35:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132135.n3DLZpMG030836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #18 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-13 17:35:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rmol Short Description: C++ library of Revenue Management and Optimisation classes and functions Owners: denisarnaud Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: denisarnaud -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 21:35:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132135.n3DLZJ7T030739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-13 17:35:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > * If you like to continue with the Fedora Packager sign-up procedure prior to > completing the SOCI review, feel free to do so, and I'll approve your account > request. I'll go on with the CVS package/module creation request on RMOL. [As for SOCI, I've worked a lot on lately, and I should be able to release a new version this week] Thanks a lot for your valuable support! I really appreciate the time and energy you have already spent on my training. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 21:38:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:38:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132138.n3DLcMXj030986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-13 17:38:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=339381) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=339381) Build log rpmlint is complaining: [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint ifstatus-1.1.0-1.src.rpm ifstatus.src: W: non-standard-group Applications/Utilities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. See 'less /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS' for valid groups. Isn't 'ncurses' picked up automatically by RPM? I'm not able to rebuild this package. See attachment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 21:42:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483859] Review Request: libg3d - Library for 3D file/object viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132142.n3DLgaO5032248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483859 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-13 17:42:34 EDT --- Hmmm, I guess that I will need some help with this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 21:52:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132152.n3DLqaN5002103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 --- Comment #2 from Adam Miller 2009-04-13 17:52:35 EDT --- I'm really sorry but I don't understand the language that the output in the attached file is in. Can I by any chance get that in English? I have fixed the group: Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ifstatus.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ifstatus-1.1.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 22:12:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:12:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132212.n3DMC7MB005660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |chkr at plauener.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chkr at plauener.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 22:25:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132225.n3DMPh6u008770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #16 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-13 18:25:40 EDT --- Thanks. Updated files SPEC: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libgarmin.spec SRPM: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libgarmin-0-0.6.20090212svn.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 22:28:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:28:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132228.n3DMSCvq009119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-13 18:28:11 EDT --- Personally I would prefer the group "Applications/Internet", as tcpdump, tcpick and iftop are very closed to the functionality (especially iftop) and they've the group "Applications/Internet". Package currently does not build in Rawhide: g++ -c -o BorderDecorator.o BorderDecorator.cc In file included from BorderDecorator.cc:25: Main.h:74: warning: 'typedef' was ignored in this declaration BorderDecorator.cc: In member function 'virtual void BorderDecorator::Draw(Interfaces&, bool)': BorderDecorator.cc:44: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' BorderDecorator.cc: In member function 'void BorderDecorator::DrawHelp(Interface&, bool)': BorderDecorator.cc:90: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' BorderDecorator.cc:91: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' BorderDecorator.cc:92: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' BorderDecorator.cc:93: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' g++ -c -o Config.o Config.cc In file included from Config.cc:25: Main.h:74: warning: 'typedef' was ignored in this declaration Config.cc: In member function 'void Config::LoadHomePath()': Config.cc:119: error: 'getenv' was not declared in this scope Config.cc: In member function 'void Config::LoadDefaultConfig()': Config.cc:132: error: 'getenv' was not declared in this scope make: *** [Config.o] Error 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 23:06:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132306.n3DN6S4S015428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-13 19:06:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=339395) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=339395) ifstatus-1.1.0-fedora.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 23:05:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:05:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132305.n3DN5KX5015226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 --- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-13 19:05:19 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=339394) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=339394) ifstatus-1.1.0-gcc44.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 23:09:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:09:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132309.n3DN9bod015702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 --- Comment #6 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-13 19:09:36 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=339396) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=339396) Diff of original ifstatus.spec with my suggested changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 23:21:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:21:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132321.n3DNLG2S017766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 --- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-13 19:21:15 EDT --- 1. Personally I would prefer the group "Applications/Internet", as tcpdump, tcpick and iftop are very closed to the functionality (especially iftop) and they've the group "Applications/Internet" (see comment #6) 2. Building your package in Rawhide fails for several reasons: a) Upstream has written not really C++ compliant code and lacks several #include lines (see comment #3, #4) b) Upstream has a non autotools generated makefile which lacks some needed functionality. I added the missing functionality and corrected a few things from your patch more etc. (see comment #5) c) Please write upstream an e-mail and explain, that these patches (or any better) have to make it upstream and should be included into the next release of ifstatus. Please set me on Cc: at that e-mail, thank you. 3. "Requires: ncurses" is not needed, because "Requires: libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libncurses.so.5()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libtinfo.so.5()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH)" from "rpm -qp --requires ifstatus-1.1.0-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm" already lists "libncurses.so.5", which makes a runtime dependency to ncurses, that will be resolved e.g. by yum (see comment #6) 4. "make CFLAGS=%{?_smp_mflags}" looks strange - CFLAGS and %_smp_mflags are two completely different things. CFLAGS are the compiler flags passed to the makefile while %_smp_mflags are SMP flags expanded into "-j2" for e.g. parallel builds during %build. As per my patch from comment #5 the $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are already honored to CFLAGS, just using "make %{?_smp_mflags}" is enough (see comment #6) 5. "make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name}" would have worked with the original patch, but I think, it's better to less touch upstream work and (sorry) my patch is hopefully near to get accepted by upstream. Thus replaced by a hopefully better construct (see comment #6) 6. As far as I can see, ifstatus requires either root permissions or the +s option (suid bit) to work. For security reasons, it's better, if only root can execute the binary in case of a security issue at ifstatus (this is how you've packaged it now - fine). And as it doesn't make sense to have root-only executable binaries in %{_bindir}, I'm hereby putting ifstatus into %{_sbindir} to satisfy that (see comment #6) Any objections to my suggestions and explanations so far? Rest looks fine so far to me, but the formal/official review is still missing. I will do that, once we've clarified all my points above... ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 23:24:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:24:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132324.n3DNOlc9017972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 --- Comment #8 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-13 19:24:46 EDT --- Oh, I forgot something to 4.: The makefile currently doesn't support parallel builds, thus "printdone" will show an error which is not true. I think, we just can ignore that echo, as it is nonsense. If you like, you can remove the %{?_smp_mflags} in %build and explain, that makefile is not ready for %{?_smp_mflags} - that's an alternative to the echo. Which one is up to you, I don't care here... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 23:27:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132327.n3DNROIg018265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-13 19:27:23 EDT --- Any news here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 23:33:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:33:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489418] Review Request: nssbackup - (Not so) Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904132333.n3DNXNfJ019054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489418 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-13 19:33:22 EDT --- Simon, you're writing, that upstream splitting is common, gtk, ftp and ssh. But much more important is: How is the dependency chain? So does nssbackup actually work without the gtk subpackage? Does it work without ftp and ssh subpackages? Do the ftp and ssh subpackages bring new huge dependencies? I would like to hear your answers. And if ftp and ssh do not introduce a huge dependency and the gtk interface is always needed, I would say one package fits completely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 00:33:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:33:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140033.n3E0X2qh028898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #5 from arthurguru 2009-04-13 20:33:01 EDT --- Thanks for the feedback Jan. 1] Timestamps are now preserved. 2] Which "Source" are you referring to, the SRPM or the upstream source file xmlfy-1.4.2-src.tar.gz? If you use the upstream source the build will fail at the packaging - I use another top level Makefile "Makefile_src_archive" to build the source archives including the SRPM. When I build from the SRPM it works for me, perhaps it could be the path issue that you refer to in point 3. 3] Path references in %install section have now been standardized. FYI: In the SRPM source the "make all" in the %build section also runs a package "stage" target which is also the build's own workspace. These package dir references have now been taken out of the spec file and replaced with a DESTDIR option making the spec file look more standard. Once again I?ve updated the files with the same names as to not break the links in the original post. Tested ok, rpmlint is still content. Looking forward to your feedback. Kind regards, Arthur Gouros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 01:58:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140158.n3E1wTEG010277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #9 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-13 21:58:28 EDT --- The RPM packaging is now based on the pristine version 3.0.0 (http://downloads.sourceforge.net/soci/soci-3.0.0.tar.gz) of the SOCI project (http://soci.sourceforge.net). The updated files are: Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/opentrep/soci.spec?use_mirror=ovh SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/opentrep/soci-3.0.0-3.fc10.src.rpm?use_mirror=ovh ---------------------------------------- * As the HTML documentation is present in the pristine tar-ball, I have kept the corresponding files, but converted them into Doxygen-generated documentation. And, as SourceForge teams require that their logo be present on the hosted Web site, I've added it in the sources. * Moreover, the general "GNU Autotools compatibility" patch could certainly be split into a few more specific patches, if needed. In fact, I first wanted to see whether I was back on the right track before pushing for some more refinements. * A full build has been made on Koji for i386 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1296097) and x86_64 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1296088) architectures. SRPMs can be fetched there as well. * rpmlint gives no error and no warning (on the specification file, as well as on source RPM and binary RPM packages). --------------------------------------- Thanks in advance for your feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 02:17:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495403] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Storage - An serialization framework for Moose classes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140217.n3E2HE46014210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495403 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-13 22:17:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - summary matches upstream, but is poor English. Should be > "A serialization framework for Moose classes" (not "An...") Ugh. Thanks :) > Minor niggle with the summary. And you need to filter the provides: > perl(Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::DoNotSerialize) = 0.17 > perl(Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::Trait::DoNotSerialize) = 0.17 Hm. Why would we need to filter these? They're valid packages, even if Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::Trait::DoNotSerialize is in lib/MooseX/Storage/Meta/Attribute/Trait/DoNotSerialize.pm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 02:19:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:19:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140219.n3E2JwGZ015237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 --- Comment #2 from Sean Middleditch 2009-04-13 22:19:58 EDT --- Backed down to 0.11.2. I didn't mean that the svn made packaging more solid, just that I wanted to be ready for 0.12 and all of its changes, but not a big deal. This builds perfectly for me. I fixed the rpmlint errors (typos in copying from the guidelines that surprising didn't cause build to failure, didn't even realize they weren't right, sorry). New links below. Just gave the upstream pristine 0.11.2 tarball link, included the actual SRPM, and renamed my copy of the spec file just to make it clear for everyone that it's not the same as the non-Fedora .spec included in the upstream tarball. Spec URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/gnome-mud.f11.spec SRPM URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/gnome-mud-0.11.2-1.src.rpm TGZ URL: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gnome-mud/0.11/gnome-mud-0.11.2.tar.gz rpmbuild output: elanthis at localhost:~/Source/gnome-mud-11.2$ rpmlint gnome-mud.f11.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I double checked that rpmbuild -ba produces installable and usable binary packages and that rpmbuild --rebuild works properly on the resulting srpm. Also, as a side question, is there any place that better documents the guidelines for packaging GNOME applications? I copied the gconf and scrollkeeper bits from another package, but I don't know if what I copied is "best practice" or not. The build/install tricks for those two always were kind of horrid, but figured I'd ask. (I maintained the GNOME 2.0 desktop packages for Arch Linux years and years ago; I'm obviously rusty at this packaging business, not to mention Fedora packaging and RPM are totally new to me.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 03:08:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140308.n3E38sn1025878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #8 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-13 23:08:53 EDT --- http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Data-ObjectDriver/perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.06-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 03:30:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:30:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495403] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Storage - An serialization framework for Moose classes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140330.n3E3UapG030308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495403 --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-13 23:30:35 EDT --- My simple test for provides is that after installing, I should be able to use them: # yum install 'perl(Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::DoNotSerialize)' $ perl -MMoose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::DoNotSerialize -e '' Can't locate Moose/Meta/Attribute/Custom/DoNotSerialize.pm in @INC It isn't particularly useful for rpm to provide things if they're not directly usable. Or is Moose able to make it available automagically? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 03:51:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:51:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495436] Review Request: perl-File-Pid - Pid File Manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140351.n3E3pGOB000752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495436 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-13 23:51:15 EDT --- Looks like something went wrong with cvs setup - no branch directories appear to have been created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 04:03:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494588] Review Request: perl-Hash-Flatten - Flatten/unflatten complex data hashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140403.n3E43O6l002535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494588 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-14 00:03:23 EDT --- perl-Hash-Flatten-1.16-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Hash-Flatten-1.16-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 04:04:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494586] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Any - Retrieve terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140404.n3E44VVQ003183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494586 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-14 00:04:30 EDT --- perl-Term-Size-Any-0.001-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Term-Size-Any-0.001-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 04:03:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:03:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494588] Review Request: perl-Hash-Flatten - Flatten/unflatten complex data hashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140403.n3E43TjY003110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494588 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-14 00:03:28 EDT --- perl-Hash-Flatten-1.16-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Hash-Flatten-1.16-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 04:04:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:04:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494586] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Any - Retrieve terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140404.n3E44aeh002667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494586 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-14 00:04:35 EDT --- perl-Term-Size-Any-0.001-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Term-Size-Any-0.001-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 04:05:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494586] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Any - Retrieve terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140405.n3E45FZe003070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494586 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 04:04:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494588] Review Request: perl-Hash-Flatten - Flatten/unflatten complex data hashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140404.n3E44h8e002708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494588 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 04:12:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:12:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140412.n3E4C82l004153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 --- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-04-14 00:12:07 EDT --- I've taken Michael's suggestions: New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/libvmime.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f11/SRPMS/libvmime-0.9.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 04:15:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140415.n3E4F3gO005109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 --- Comment #9 from Adam Miller 2009-04-14 00:15:02 EDT --- Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ifstatus.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ifstatus-1.1.0-3.src.rpm I have applied the patches suggested, I also fixed my spec file as well as sent the requested email upstream and have CC'd you on it. I would like to thank you for the level of detail that you covered in your review thus far, it has been extremely informative and I appreciate the amount of time and effort you put into it. Looking forward to further review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 04:29:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140429.n3E4TYHk006756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 04:37:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:37:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140437.n3E4bF6Z008435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 Axel Thimm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |axel.thimm at atrpms.net Bug 472639 depends on bug 464781, which changed state. Bug 464781 Summary: Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 04:58:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495436] Review Request: perl-File-Pid - Pid File Manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140458.n3E4wugQ011742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495436 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-14 00:58:55 EDT --- Try now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 05:31:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:31:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140531.n3E5VAW6017995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa 2009-04-14 01:31:09 EDT --- Thank you for the update. Please follow guidelines at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers gconf & scrollkeeper https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GConf https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets#Scrollkeeper You are still missing disttag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 05:37:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:37:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140537.n3E5bFFK018806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 --- Comment #16 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-14 01:37:14 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase-1.1.0.20090406-3.fc11.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 06:06:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:06:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140606.n3E66aUW023839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-14 02:06:35 EDT --- Okay, here is a more thorough review: * rpmlint says: dnsjava.src:106: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) This one is a false warning and can be ignored dnsjava.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dnsjava-2.0.6/Changelog We need to fix this. "iconv" will help. ! There are some example .java files in the root of the tarball. Their usage are explained in the USAGE file. I think these .java files need to go to %doc (of the main package). Alternatively, you can build them and put them in %{_datadir}/%{name} or so. (You mention about these files in the %description too) * There is a tests directory. The README file mentions about building and running these compile tests. We should make a %check section and run these tests, if possible. ? Shouldn't the group tag be "System Environment/Libraries"? ! Since you are building the javadoc from source, you can remove the existing doc/ directory in %prep * README file says: "dnsjava is placed under the BSD license. Several files are also under additional licenses; see the individual files for details." I found that the files org/xbill/DNS/Tokenizer.java, org/xbill/DNS/ZoneTransferIn.java are licensed under MIT This makes the license BSD and MIT * This comment contains single % macro #ant -Dj2se.javadoc=%{_javadocdir}/java clean docsclean dnssec jar docs Do we need this comment? ! Also these comments are not needed. They can be removed: #Epoch: 0 #Vendor: JPackage Project #Distribution: JPackage * This changelog entry contains single % macro - In Source0 tag inject %%{name} and %{version} macroses. (Also macroses->macros) * "%attr(-,root,root)" is redundant in the line %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} I reported this to java folks a while ago. They still didn't fix this guideline. ! In the description, please separate the paragraphs with blanks lines. It'll look better. * These BR's seem unnecessary: jce, java-javadoc * BR: jpackage-utils is listed twice. * You don't want to write "specific_version" in Requires. If you need to pull openjdk-devel instead of gcj-devel, you can use something like >=1.7 or >=1:1.6.0 * Also use the same number (>=1.7 or >=1:1.6.0) for Requires: java -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 06:31:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491886] Review Request: xa - 6502/65816 cross-assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140631.n3E6VDLl028642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491886 --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-14 02:31:12 EDT --- Thanks for the review, the patches were sent to the upstream maintainer by personal email, comments will be added. I will talk to him about renaming the binary to xa65, it will not only lower the chance of conflict with some other tool, but also bring consistency with the other tools in the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 06:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491886] Review Request: xa - 6502/65816 cross-assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140632.n3E6WJNB028619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491886 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-14 02:32:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xa Short Description: 6502/65816 cross-assembler Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 06:52:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:52:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140652.n3E6qYkv031969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 07:01:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:01:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140701.n3E71Tps001442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-14 03:01:28 EDT --- - Any possibility of removing the bundled fonts? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages - Time stamps are not conserved, e.g. /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/xsw-0.1.3/install-sh -c -m 644 'VeraMono.ttf' '/b uilddir/build/BUILDROOT/xsw-0.1.3-1.fc10.x86_64/usr/share/xsw/VeraMono.ttf' (it does preserve the time stamp of the man page) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 07:04:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489418] Review Request: nssbackup - (Not so) Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140704.n3E743d6001636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489418 --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-14 03:04:02 EDT --- missing Rs: pexpect (for ssh) curlftpfs (for ftp) missing conflict: sbackup > So does nssbackup actually work without the gtk subpackage? yeah, it should be! Description: NSsbackup Common files package NSsbackup common files package. This package is not the software itself but contains the minimum set of files to make it run. > Does it work without ftp and ssh subpackages? yes! Description: NSsbackup Fuse SSH plugin NSsbackup SSH plugin. This package will permit to have the ability to make backups from and over an SSH location. This plugin use FUSE file systems. Description: NSsbackup Fuse FTP/SFTP plugin NSsbackup FTP and SFTP plugin. This package will permit to have the ability to make backups from and over FTP/SFTP location. This plugin use FUSE file systems. > Do the ftp and ssh subpackages bring new huge dependencies? ftp: curlftpfs (currently missing) ssh: sshfs, pexpect (currently missing) > And if ftp and ssh do not introduce a huge > dependency and the gtk interface is always needed, > I would say one package fits completely. You are a fan of splitting it? I'm not a fan of it, because ftp and ssh shouldn't be excluded as seperate modules and there is only one frontend. If there are 2 frontends for example i would split it in 3 packages, common with ftp and ssh support and in the guis gtk and qt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 08:27:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:27:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140827.n3E8R1Gj020355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 Ivan Efremov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |iefremov at unipro.ru --- Comment #1 from Ivan Efremov 2009-04-14 04:27:00 EDT --- It's only 'pre-review' since I can't be a sponsor. 1) license should be 'GPLv3+' (according to headers in source files) 2) why do you use 'pre-release' Release tag? consider changing 0.1 -> 1 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Package_Release 3) consider writing more detailed description 4) preserving timestamps: your Makefile must preserve timestamps using 'install -p' http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Timestamps 5) your package doesn't own the directory '%{_datadir}/xcowsay/', see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories 6) note about desktop file: MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. 7) consider adding man pages describing other binaries than xcowsay: xcowdream, xcowthink etc. Good luck! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 08:28:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140828.n3E8SxqB020209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #17 from Ivan Efremov 2009-04-14 04:28:58 EDT --- 1) I updated the tarball (just added gcc 4.4 fixes, no version bumping) 2) i reviewed the following: bug 492927 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 08:00:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492898] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140800.n3E80wnE014136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492898 --- Comment #2 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-14 04:00:57 EDT --- update to 0.10-beta2 without internal dependency sqlalchemy needs sqlalchemy 0.5 or higher works well in rawhide SPEC http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/griffith-0.10-beta2/griffith.spec SRPM http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/griffith-0.10-beta2/griffith-0.10-0.1+beta2.fc10.src.rpm for F11 or higher only -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 08:42:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:42:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495357] Review Request: python-twill - Simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140842.n3E8groV023102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495357 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Matthias Saou 2009-04-14 04:42:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-twill Short Description: Simple scripting language for Web browsing Owners: thias Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 08:42:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:42:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495357] Review Request: python-twill - Simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140842.n3E8gZcT023856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495357 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Saou 2009-04-14 04:42:34 EDT --- Thanks a lot for the review! * Tue Apr 14 2009 Matthias Saou 0.9-2 - Add -b .noforks to the patch0 line. - Remove no longer needed --single-version-externally-managed option. About the file mode, I've found nothing special after a quick search in the sources, and saw that the koji build has "changing mode of /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-twill-0.9-1.fc11.noarch/usr/bin/twill-fork to 755", so I think it's the default python build/install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 08:57:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:57:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140857.n3E8v5UZ027213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-14 04:57:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > 1) I updated the tarball (just added gcc 4.4 fixes, no version bumping) Does this mean that you are one of the upstream developers? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 09:22:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140922.n3E9MV04031965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #19 from Ivan Efremov 2009-04-14 05:22:30 EDT --- Exactly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 09:44:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140944.n3E9iDQO005809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #4 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-04-14 05:44:12 EDT --- Fixed. Thanks. SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/kradio4-4.0.0-0.7.r829.20090411.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 10:22:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:22:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141022.n3EAMujZ013943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 --- Comment #71 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-04-14 06:22:46 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 10:47:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495669] New: Review Request: sgpio - Intel SGPIO enclosure management utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sgpio - Intel SGPIO enclosure management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495669 Summary: Review Request: sgpio - Intel SGPIO enclosure management utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jmoskovc at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/sgpio-1.2.0_10-1.fc11.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/sgpio.spec Description: Intel SGPIO enclosure management utility -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 11:12:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:12:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141112.n3EBCPWM022218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #51 from D Haley 2009-04-14 07:12:19 EDT --- Hi Orcan, Yes, just to clarify, I pushed that in as an update. Sorry I misread your original post as asking for a link in /usr/share/java/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 11:18:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:18:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495669] Review Request: sgpio - Intel SGPIO enclosure management utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141118.n3EBI4Qp023436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495669 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dan at danny.cz AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 11:22:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141122.n3EBMX77026569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-14 07:22:32 EDT --- Ping? This is blocking another package, which was already accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 11:38:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:38:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141138.n3EBcb3O028144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-14 07:38:36 EDT --- The pacakge bitstream-vera-fonts provides the same fonts that are used here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 11:59:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:59:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141159.n3EBxDZI000658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-14 07:59:11 EDT --- Thanks, I'm trying my best. As it was a tiny package, it didn't consume that much time anyway. Okay, let's go for the official review. [ OK ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/ifstatus-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ [ OK ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [ OK ] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [...] [ OK ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [ OK ] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines [ OK ] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license [ OK ] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc [ OK ] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [ OK ] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [ OK ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. -> f4d413f880754fd6677290160f8bc5d7 ifstatus-v1.1.0.tar.gz -> f4d413f880754fd6677290160f8bc5d7 ifstatus-v1.1.0.tar.gz.1 -> 64dc0d893fe58bfe94174db8717ece23ecc285d9 ifstatus-v1.1.0.tar.gz -> 64dc0d893fe58bfe94174db8717ece23ecc285d9 ifstatus-v1.1.0.tar.gz.1 [ OK ] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture [ N/A ] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line [ OK ] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [ N/A ] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden [ N/A ] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] [ N/A ] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [11] [ OK ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [ OK ] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [ OK ] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [ OK ] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [ OK ] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [ OK ] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [ N/A ] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [ OK ] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [ N/A ] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [ N/A ] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [ N/A ] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [ N/A ] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [ N/A ] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [ N/A ] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [ N/A ] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [ OK ] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [ OK ] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [ OK ] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. I'm not a native english speaker, but you might want to write "Command line" rather "Command Line" in Summary: tag. But that's so minor and not a must, so it can happen after review and before CVS import if you like. Nevertheless, the package looks well now, thus: APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 12:15:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495684] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-Lint - HTML::Lint module checking HTML errors Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Lint - HTML::Lint module checking HTML errors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495684 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Lint - HTML::Lint module checking HTML errors Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-HTML-Lint.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-HTML-Lint-2.06-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: HTML::Lint Perl module which checks HTML errors in a string or a file. HTML::Lint also comes with a wrapper program called weblint that handles linting from the command line. And finally, it can be also used Apache::HTML::Lint that passes any mod_perl-generated code through HTML::Lint and get it dumped into Apache error_log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 12:41:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:41:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489418] Review Request: nssbackup - (Not so) Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141241.n3ECfS1E012204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489418 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-14 08:41:27 EDT --- No, I'm not a fan of it. I even think, it makes sense how you've packaged it. Ideal place for backups is IMHO still remote and not local (think of e.g. hard disk drive issues). Can you please add the missing requirements to curlftpfs and pexpect (I think, fuse-sshfs == "sshfs" which is already mentioned)? As far as I can see, these dependency chains are not that huge and a regular desktop user will have most of the requirements anyway on his machine. As we figured out in IRC, there's no need for conflicting with sbackup, there are no overlaps, parallel use is possible. [ OK ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/nssbackup-* nssbackup.noarch: W: no-dependency-on usermode nssbackup.noarch: W: no-dependency-on usermode nssbackup.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/ console.apps/nssbackup-config-gui-su nssbackup.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/ console.apps/nssbackup-restore-gui-su 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. $ [ OK ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [ OK ] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [...] [ ?? ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines -> See points above and below. [ OK ] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines [FAILED] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license -> When looking through the code, I just can see GPLv2+ and GPLv3+, what makes you thinking, that it is GPLv3-only? [ OK ] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc [ OK ] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [ OK ] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [ OK ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. -> c7fac4bda21350022eda110c56739763 nssbackup_0.2-0~rc7.orig.tar.gz -> c7fac4bda21350022eda110c56739763 nssbackup_0.2-0~rc7.orig.tar.gz.1 -> a6a0a1dc46da44bc3149529ab8d473c0eb0c4de8 nssbackup_0.2- 0~rc7.orig.tar.gz -> a6a0a1dc46da44bc3149529ab8d473c0eb0c4de8 nssbackup_0.2- 0~rc7.orig.tar.gz.1 [ OK ] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture [ N/A ] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line [ OK ] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [ OK ] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden [ N/A ] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] [ N/A ] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [11] [ OK ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [ OK ] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [ OK ] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [ OK ] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [ OK ] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [ OK ] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [ N/A ] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [ OK ] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [ N/A ] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [ N/A ] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [ N/A ] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [ N/A ] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [ N/A ] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [ N/A ] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [ OK ] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [ OK ] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [ OK ] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [ OK ] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. nssbackup package seems very closed from the result to sbackup (bug #468462). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 12:44:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141244.n3ECiWiO012751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #22 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa 2009-04-14 08:44:31 EDT --- Of course here are ppc and ppc64 packages. They are just not built there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 12:47:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:47:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495692] New: Review Request: tslib - Touchscreen Access Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tslib - Touchscreen Access Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495692 Summary: Review Request: tslib - Touchscreen Access Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/tslib.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tslib-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Touchscreen Access Library rpmlint, no doc in -devel subpackage. (none are provided wrt -devel). rpmlint on installed package is clean build tested with mock for rawhide x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 12:50:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:50:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495693] New: Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6 - Perl 6 Syntax Highlighter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6 - Perl 6 Syntax Highlighter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495693 Summary: Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6 - Perl 6 Syntax Highlighter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6-0.040-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Syntax::Highlight::Perl6 parses Perl 6 source code using an embedded STD.pm. It matches parse tree nodes to colors then returns them in different output formats. It can be used to create web pages with colorful source code samples in its simple and snippet html modes, or it can be used as a learning tool in examining STD.pm's output using the JavaScript node viewer in its full html mode. Or you can use its parse tree Perl 5 records to build your next great idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 13:02:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:02:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495669] Review Request: sgpio - Intel SGPIO enclosure management utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141302.n3ED2sxo018324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495669 --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-14 09:02:53 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: BAD source files match upstream: BAD package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (GPLv2+). License text included in package. BAD latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK* rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - the Source tags points to diferent source archives - can you talk to upstream about the versioning of their source archives (1.2-0.10) - is a post-1.2 release or pre-1.2 release? - I would use package version as 1.2.0.10 in case of upstream version 1.2-0.10 (as post-1.2) - version 1.2.1 is available - drop the notes about RH support and Technology Preview in %description - move the EOL conversion and the removal of executable bits from %install to %prep section - output od rpmlint can be ignored sgpio.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary SGPIO sgpio.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary SGPIO -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 13:16:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495702] New: Review Request: perl-XXX - See Your Data in the Nude Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-XXX - See Your Data in the Nude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495702 Summary: Review Request: perl-XXX - See Your Data in the Nude Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-XXX.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-XXX-0.12-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: XXX.pm exports a function called XXX that you can put just about anywhere in your Perl code to make it die with a YAML dump of the arguments to its right. The charm of XXX-debugging is that it is easy to type and rarely requires parens and stands out visually so that you remember to remove it. XXX.pm also exports WWW, YYY and ZZZ which do similar debugging things. To use Data::Dumper instead of YAML: use XXX -dumper; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 13:19:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226033] Merge Review: libmng In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141319.n3EDJ60i020832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226033 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|limb at jcomserv.net |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-14 09:19:04 EDT --- Reassigning to Spot since I'm taking ownership of orphan. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 13:17:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:17:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141317.n3EDHMWl020419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 Adam Miller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Adam Miller 2009-04-14 09:17:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ifstatus Short Description: Command line real time interface graphs using ncurses Owners: maxamillion Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 13:27:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226033] Merge Review: libmng In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141327.n3EDRmra024857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226033 --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-14 09:27:47 EDT --- Looking at rawhide, here are the remaining issues: libmng.src:40: W: configure-without-libdir-spec I think this one is safe to ignore, because it is triggering off the "[ ! -x ./configure ]", not the %configure on line 41. libmng.x86_64: W: no-documentation Definitely needs to be fixed. The UTF-8 issues were fixed (ancient changelog entry now has proper UTF-8). Source0 should be: http://download.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Sha1sums match now (78ad516a1de79d00de720bf2a7c9afea2c896b09). - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 13:36:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141336.n3EDaT31027401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Philippe Makowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 13:37:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:37:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141337.n3EDb0Jx026712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Bug 492203 depends on bug 492191, which changed state. Bug 492191 Summary: Review Request: jmod - Java Sound MODules Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492191 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 492203 depends on bug 491421, which changed state. Bug 491421 Summary: fluid soundfont transition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491421 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 14:11:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:11:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141411.n3EEBql7006721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 --- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-14 10:11:51 EDT --- - Why do you %doc INSTALL? Doesn't make much sense to me. - To me it looks like the $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not honored, following seems to work for me so far and uses also parallel builds: > export EXTRA_CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" > %configure > make %{?_smp_mflags} - Is there really any need to ship the static libraries? So shouldn't link anything in Fedora anyway dynamically? - Group "Applications/System"? Wouldn't "System Environment/Libraries" be a bit better? - Regarding the documentation: Did you have a closer look to it, whether that one is usable and it's not just a waste of disk space? - Source0 should be like http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL; use: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 [ DONE ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/libvmime-* libvmime-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libvmime-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ -> Okay and accepted according to comment #2 [ OK ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [ OK ] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [...] [ ?? ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines -> See above. [ OK ] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines [ OK ] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license [ OK ] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc [ OK ] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [ OK ] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [ OK ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. -> 23feb9cff7ba3961c0693926e21448cf libvmime-0.9.0.tar.bz2 -> 23feb9cff7ba3961c0693926e21448cf libvmime-0.9.0.tar.bz2.1 -> 02215e1d8ea758f486c32e7bff63a04f71a9b736 libvmime-0.9.0.tar.bz2 -> 02215e1d8ea758f486c32e7bff63a04f71a9b736 libvmime-0.9.0.tar.bz2.1 [ OK ] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture [ N/A ] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line [ ?? ] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. -> See above (documentation related). [ N/A ] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden [ OK ] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] [ N/A ] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [11] [ OK ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [ OK ] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [ OK ] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [ OK ] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [ OK ] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [ OK ] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [ ?? ] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). -> See above (documentation related). [ ?? ] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. -> See above (documentation related). [ OK ] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [ OK ] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. -> Is the -static subpackage really needed and wanted? [ OK ] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [ OK ] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [ OK ] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [ OK ] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [ N/A ] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [ OK ] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [ OK ] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [ OK ] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Maybe let us short discuss about the documentation, that's the only real point of the review, where some time needs to be spend for now. Rest of my points is (or should) be trivial so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 14:13:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:13:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141413.n3EED521008164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-14 10:13:04 EDT --- Ah, one thing I forgot: %configure is looking for /usr/sbin/sendmail - so it could make sense to buildrequire sendmail package to ensure that dependency and the resulting build features. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 14:25:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:25:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141425.n3EEP223010299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 --- Comment #73 from Jeffrey Goh 2009-04-14 10:24:59 EDT --- Oh. Forgot 9. Pidgin (I use Spark) 10. Gnucash *wince* and the URL for the user guide is probably helpful - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F8_User_Guide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 14:29:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141429.n3EET134013532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 --- Comment #10 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-04-14 10:28:59 EDT --- ah... in that case, "GPLv2+" wins -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 14:16:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141416.n3EEGwtI009729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 --- Comment #72 from Jeffrey Goh 2009-04-14 10:16:55 EDT --- Sorry for the delay. It's been a busy month. After digging around, I managed to find a "User Guide" to the fedora desktop to use as a reference point. As a result, I have taken out Google Picasa and Adobe Acrobat from the default applications list. Nautilus doesn't make sense to be in applications, because all of "places" is basically nautilus, as I understand it (happy to be corrected), so I didn't add it back in. So, here is my proposed default apps list - any missing apps just don't get displayed, no weird behaviour whatsoever. Note that you can right click on any app to make it in/out of the favorite applications. 1. Firefox 2. Thunderbird 3. Spreadsheet (openoffice.org -calc) 4. Writer (openoffice.org -writer) 5. Banshee 6. Terminal (gnome-terminal) I'm thinking maybe the following makes sense as well: 7. Presentation (openoffice.org -impress) 8. Evolution - I never actually use this, since I'm able to crash it ever so often, but it's apparently the default mail app for both Fedora and SLED *shrug* If that's generally acceptable, I'll remake the RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 14:43:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495436] Review Request: perl-File-Pid - Pid File Manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141443.n3EEh310015467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495436 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-14 10:43:02 EDT --- perl-File-Pid-1.01-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-Pid-1.01-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 14:43:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:43:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495436] Review Request: perl-File-Pid - Pid File Manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141443.n3EEhpvU015603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495436 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 14:45:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462311] Review Request: raidutils - Utilities to manage Adaptec I2O compliant RAID controllers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141445.n3EEjnZU016474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462311 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-14 10:45:47 EDT --- can be closed or ...? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 14:45:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:45:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141445.n3EEj5Yo016241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #50 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-14 10:45:00 EDT --- Any other improvement ? If this package isn't usable, it "have to" be removed from the Fedora package collection. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 14:48:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495669] Review Request: sgpio - Intel SGPIO enclosure management utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141448.n3EEmiXG017137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495669 --- Comment #2 from Jiri Moskovcak 2009-04-14 10:48:44 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/sgpio-1.2.0_10-2.fc11.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/sgpio.spec Fixed according to review: BAD source files match upstream: BAD package meets naming and versioning guidelines. BAD latest version is being packaged. - i'm packaging the latest version -> bad upstream versioning - I asked the upstream developers to fix the versioning and update the download page. Fixed: - drop the notes about RH support and Technology Preview in %description - move the EOL conversion and the removal of executable bits from %install to -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 14:48:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:48:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492924] Review Request: python-unipath - Alternative to Python modules os, os.path and shutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141448.n3EEmAno019081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492924 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Terje R??sten 2009-04-14 10:48:08 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-unipath Short Description: Alternative to Python modules os, os.path and shutil Owners: terjeros Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 14:55:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495684] Review Request: perl-HTML-Lint - HTML::Lint module checking HTML errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141455.n3EEtFv8019116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495684 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |iarnell at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-14 10:55:14 EDT --- SRPM URL gives a 404 error -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 14:55:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141455.n3EEtL06019154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 --- Comment #4 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-14 10:55:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > * rpmlint says: > dnsjava.src:106: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) > This one is a false warning and can be ignored I also think it is wrong. Is there bug for that on rpmlint? > dnsjava.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dnsjava-2.0.6/Changelog > We need to fix this. "iconv" will help. Off course I seen this. But I do not know from *what* encoding it should be recoded. Enca also do not help me: $ enca Changelog Unrecognized encoding I think it is not very big problem in any case. > ! There are some example .java files in the root of the tarball. Their usage > are explained in the USAGE file. I think these .java files need to go to %doc > (of the main package). Alternatively, you can build them and put them in > %{_datadir}/%{name} or so. (You mention about these files in the %description > too) Ok, I put *.java into docs. > * There is a tests directory. The README file mentions about building and > running these compile tests. We should make a %check section and run these > tests, if possible. Tests added. > ? Shouldn't the group tag be "System Environment/Libraries"? I do not know. Seriously. Let it be, if you want. > ! Since you are building the javadoc from source, you can remove the existing > doc/ directory in %prep Added. > * README file says: > "dnsjava is placed under the BSD license. Several files are also under > additional licenses; see the individual files for details." > I found that the files org/xbill/DNS/Tokenizer.java, > org/xbill/DNS/ZoneTransferIn.java are licensed under MIT > This makes the license BSD and MIT I must place "BSD and MIT" into License tag? Or what I must do with it? > * This comment contains single % macro > #ant -Dj2se.javadoc=%{_javadocdir}/java clean docsclean dnssec jar docs > Do we need this comment? No, this commetn unneeded anymore. Deleted. > ! Also these comments are not needed. They can be removed: > #Epoch: 0 > #Vendor: JPackage Project > #Distribution: JPackage Off course. I comment out it, but leave for historical reasons. Any disadvantage from it? > > * This changelog entry contains single % macro > - In Source0 tag inject %%{name} and %{version} macroses. Fixed. Hmmm, very strange why rpmlint was silent on it?! I recheck it now and it is also silent about this concrete error. > (Also macroses->macros) > > * "%attr(-,root,root)" is redundant in the line > %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} > I reported this to java folks a while ago. They still didn't fix this > guideline. I thought also when copied... May you correct guidelines? Fixed in my spec. > ! In the description, please separate the paragraphs with blanks lines. It'll > look better. Ok :) Done. > * These BR's seem unnecessary: jce, java-javadoc Why? It comes from JPackage rpm and i do not touch this. > * BR: jpackage-utils is listed twice. Fixed. > * You don't want to write "specific_version" in Requires. If you need to pull > openjdk-devel instead of gcj-devel, you can use something like >=1.7 or > >=1:1.6.0 > * Also use the same number (>=1.7 or >=1:1.6.0) for Requires: java Sorry. It is my stupid copy/past. Fixed. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/dnsjava/dnsjava-2.0.6-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 15:03:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226033] Merge Review: libmng In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141503.n3EF3YUo023345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226033 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-14 11:03:34 EDT --- Fixed in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 15:04:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141504.n3EF4YpH021653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #51 from Conrad Meyer 2009-04-14 11:04:33 EDT --- Uh, what? It's quite usable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 15:14:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:14:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141514.n3EFEHwc023978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #52 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-14 11:14:16 EDT --- so, which package is using cddlib-devel then ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 15:26:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:26:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141526.n3EFQaXT027502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #53 from Conrad Meyer 2009-04-14 11:26:35 EDT --- Sage, which hasn't been admitted into Fedora yet. It's perfectly fine for libraries to be packaged for Fedora even if there is no software in Fedora uses them (yet). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 15:34:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462311] Review Request: raidutils - Utilities to manage Adaptec I2O compliant RAID controllers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141534.n3EFYAQi029197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462311 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-04-14 11:34:08 EDT --- Indeed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 15:42:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141542.n3EFgnTD032210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #54 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-14 11:42:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #53) > Sage, which hasn't been admitted into Fedora yet. It's perfectly fine for > libraries to be packaged for Fedora even if there is no software in Fedora uses > them (yet). yep, even if said package itself is (for whatever reason) forbidden in fedora, there is a need to be assured that cddlib package itself works. So how can I test that sage works against the current fedora cddlib package ? even if Sage is at preliminary packaging step ... BTW: I guess you didn't meant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198834 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 15:53:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:53:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489418] Review Request: nssbackup - (Not so) Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141553.n3EFr6PC000951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489418 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-14 11:53:05 EDT --- License tag on this should be GPLv3+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 15:53:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:53:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492520] Review Request: swami - MIDI instrument and sound editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141553.n3EFrn3v001113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492520 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-14 11:53:47 EDT --- swami-0.9.4-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update swami'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3645 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 15:55:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:55:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491550] Review Request: libass - Portable library for SSA/ASS subtitles rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141555.n3EFtkJd003161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491550 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-14 11:55:45 EDT --- libass-0.9.6-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 15:52:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491550] Review Request: libass - Portable library for SSA/ASS subtitles rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141552.n3EFqOOT001849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491550 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-14 11:52:23 EDT --- libass-0.9.6-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 15:55:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491550] Review Request: libass - Portable library for SSA/ASS subtitles rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141555.n3EFtrhH003336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491550 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.6-2.fc10 |0.9.6-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 15:54:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486584] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application - Framework for building reusable web-applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141554.n3EFsYBq002404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486584 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-14 11:54:33 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-4.21-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 15:52:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491550] Review Request: libass - Portable library for SSA/ASS subtitles rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141552.n3EFqTeO001892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491550 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.9.6-2.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 15:56:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491862] Review Request: kde-style-skulpture - Classical three-dimensional style for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141556.n3EFuMHf003473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491862 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-14 11:56:21 EDT --- kde-style-skulpture-0.2.2-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kde-style-skulpture'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3215 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 15:54:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491862] Review Request: kde-style-skulpture - Classical three-dimensional style for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141554.n3EFsko2002467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491862 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-14 11:54:45 EDT --- kde-style-skulpture-0.2.2-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update kde-style-skulpture'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3156 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 15:54:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486584] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application - Framework for building reusable web-applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141554.n3EFsdm7001567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486584 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |4.21-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 15:58:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:58:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492520] Review Request: swami - MIDI instrument and sound editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141558.n3EFwvqZ003220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492520 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-14 11:58:56 EDT --- swami-0.9.4-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update swami'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3676 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 16:02:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:02:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449135] Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141602.n3EG2vZu004657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449135 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #20 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-14 12:02:53 EDT --- closing to NOTABUG since there was no answear. I think there is some redesign within the gforge team, so maybe it can be re-opened later... If you think a gforge package can be reviewed for Fedora introduction. please re-open the bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 16:07:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:07:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141607.n3EG76BW006709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-14 12:07:05 EDT --- Well, your pre-review seems good for initial comments. Now I approve this package. ------------------------------------------------------ This package (ugene) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------ Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10/11, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 16:08:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491886] Review Request: xa - 6502/65816 cross-assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141608.n3EG8mi2006096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491886 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-14 12:08:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 16:08:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141608.n3EG8Mh0006028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 --- Comment #29 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-14 12:08:16 EDT --- ping ? 8.9.2 is here at least. We should be pretty close now... BTW: about Libs.private, there was a change lately with pkg-config behaviour. I think most projects were not using Requires.private appropriately...I don't remember if libMini could have been affected... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 16:07:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141607.n3EG7eKv007008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-14 12:07:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 16:09:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492924] Review Request: python-unipath - Alternative to Python modules os, os.path and shutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141609.n3EG9roT006458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492924 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-14 12:09:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 16:16:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:16:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495372] Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141616.n3EGGndO009156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495372 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-14 12:16:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 16:16:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495357] Review Request: python-twill - Simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141616.n3EGG6nx009031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495357 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-14 12:16:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 16:17:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495418] Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141617.n3EGHdLr009444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495418 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-14 12:17:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 16:21:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:21:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141621.n3EGL3M8010159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-14 12:21:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 16:25:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:25:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141625.n3EGPfct011145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-14 12:25:37 EDT --- What is the status of this package ? And why the currently in Fedora ace package wasn't renamed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 16:27:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141627.n3EGRlvT011751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 --- Comment #27 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-14 12:27:46 EDT --- I'm pretty sure this is still blocking on upstream licensing issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 16:34:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141634.n3EGYfdX013109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #67 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-14 12:34:36 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Minutes/20090331 contains the full discussion - note FPC explicitly expressed the hope that Fedora releases would not be flooded for multiple versions of every publican manual, unless it is really useful but deferred the individual decisions and burden to the Fedora Docs Project. (For the record: I am disappointed that it was decided to push these two changes into Fedora Packaging Guidelines rather than fix the real problems in publican, but nevermind: embedding desktop files in spec files is also generally a bad idea since it basically make them hard to translate.) So back to my questions in comment 59: * what package are we reviewing here: fedora-security-guide or fedora-security-guide-11? Note there is nothing to stop a fedora-security-guide.src source package from generating a fedora-security-guide-11.noarch binary package, though I don't recommend that personally. If you go for the later base package name than you will have to do a new package review for every release, and how are you planning to deal with OS package upgrades? The versioned package should really obsolete the old package so that the new package will get installed on upgrades. Hence making such parallel installs pretty useless: since rpm does not play well with parallel installs of packages that obsolete each other. In this sense Fedora is a very different OS from RHEL. Parallel packages is going to create a lot more work and packaging complexity - I warn you now here - it has already been well tried and is know (also from my personal experience) not to work well for RPM systems anyway. I fear the approach may be building on sand or thin ice. What you probably want and I would recommend is a base package called fedora-security-guide and then if you really want other version back or forward ported to a release they would be separate packages called fedora-security-guide-F10, etc, as Spot also suggested. In practice I am skeptical if it would really be useful for this particular guide. Also the kernel package for example is capable of parallel installs - in principle there is no reason why different versions of publican packages could not parallel installed too under the same name. Things are worse than that though if you read the above FPC meeting log they further were opposed to individual publican packages per language (though I am not personally opposed to this) they believe there should be one big package with all the translations and then just subpackages for all the language. While this would simplify the base package naming we know this is a bottleneck for building translations of manuals. So taking that into account my overall recommendation at this early stage of fedora publican packaging is just to go with fedora-security-guide-en_US.spec and fedora-security-guide-en_US.noarch. I don't see any win in including the OS version in the package names currently for fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 16:40:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141640.n3EGeBQc013977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #68 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-14 12:40:10 EDT --- I just add a comment that I think it should be pretty trivial to write a small script to massage publican generated .spec into a form more suitable to Fedora than RHEL - so I don't feel having to use the publican .spec verbatim to simplify packaging for writers and translators is a requirement here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 16:43:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479515] Review Request: Music Organizer - Music Organizer , organize your mp3, ogg, flac and mp4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141643.n3EGhTsB014439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479515 Camille GALLET changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(camillegallet at yah | |oo.fr) | --- Comment #4 from Camille GALLET 2009-04-14 12:43:28 EDT --- It's not dead I just didn't have any time to deal with this the last few month, I will try to find time do the modifications in the next weeks ( April or May more exactly). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 16:51:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:51:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495684] Review Request: perl-HTML-Lint - HTML::Lint module checking HTML errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141651.n3EGpJFE016594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495684 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-HTML-Lint --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-14 12:51:18 EDT --- Seems to be working now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 17:02:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:02:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492165] Review Request: rotoscope - A free rotoscoping application. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141702.n3EH2ONR018958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492165 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(yanstadel at googlem | |ail.com) --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-14 13:02:23 EDT --- Yannik, would you address issues pointed out by Kalev and reupload the new spec/srpm (with Epoch-Version-Release changed)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 17:04:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:04:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479832] Review Request: mmpong - a massively multiplayer pong game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141704.n3EH4B4B019548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479832 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(maintainer at mt2009 | |.com) | --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-14 13:04:09 EDT --- Once closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please submit another review request and mark this bug a duplicate of the new one, thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 17:02:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141702.n3EH2D9O019237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 --- Comment #6 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-14 13:02:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > ok great. Let's see if we can move this forward. > > As noted on bug 492395, it seems that you can just require php-common because > it requires php. > Or the other way round, just require php. That's what I've done on my local copy. > Then, I am not sure if there are guidelines against it, but installing the file > in {datadir}/php is probably not a wise idea. What about putting it in a > subdirectory (for example feedcreator would do). In that case, please remember > to let the package own the directory. Not sure what's best here. As this is only one file, I think it's ok to let it at the root of the php include dir. And anyway, looking at the pear include dir, I see that's what is done : /usr/share/pear/someclass.php, then a /usr/share/pear/someclass subdir with everything else. That's what I've done for php-geshi (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492395). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 17:20:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:20:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141720.n3EHKpwZ023780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-14 13:20:50 EDT --- For perl modules one should never use the package name but the perl module name. So BuildRequires: perl-XML-Parser needs to become BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 17:21:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141721.n3EHLQZ8023099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #52 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-14 13:21:25 EDT --- No problem, thanks for taking care of this :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 17:43:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:43:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141743.n3EHhPMb028922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-14 13:43:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > bareftp using foreign code, licensed unter different licenses. don't you think > they have to take into account?! Where is the foreign code? I only spotted GPLv2+ so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 17:50:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:50:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488995] Review Request: pidgin-tlen - Tlen IM Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141750.n3EHopZq030920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488995 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-14 13:50:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > %defattr(644,root,root,755) > > please use %defattr(-,root,root,-) > > Why? Because it's both in the packaging and the review guidelines. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FilePermissions > > makro couples > > please use: > > $RPM_OPT_FLAGS and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > > or > > %{buildroot} and %{optflags} > > please use one of this couples, but do not mix this. > > You're picky, but OK. No he's not, it's also part of the guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 18:14:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:14:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489418] Review Request: nssbackup - (Not so) Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141814.n3EIEBkW004095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489418 --- Comment #7 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-14 14:14:10 EDT --- SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/nssbackup-0.2~rc7/nssbackup.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/nssbackup-0.2~rc7/nssbackup-0.2-0.2.rc7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 18:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494965] Review Request: pianobooster - A MIDI file player that teaches you how to play the piano In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141814.n3EIE684004039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494965 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-14 14:14:05 EDT --- The additional clause in the MIT license is a request, not a requirement. Accordingly, it is not a problem. Since the MIT code is compiled together with GPLv3+ code, you do not need to mention it in the License tag (the GPLv3+ terms are more restrictive), unless you wish to do so. License: GPLv3+ is fine. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 18:21:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:21:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494965] Review Request: pianobooster - A MIDI file player that teaches you how to play the piano In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141821.n3EILGiT005939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494965 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-14 14:21:15 EDT --- OK, since we don't have a legal problem we can approve this package: ----------------------------------------------- This package (pianobooster) is APPROVED by oget ----------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 18:27:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:27:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494965] Review Request: pianobooster - A MIDI file player that teaches you how to play the piano In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141827.n3EIRVpb007394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494965 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Christian Krause 2009-04-14 14:27:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pianobooster Short Description: A MIDI file player that teaches you how to play the piano Owners: chkr Branches: F10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 18:32:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:32:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141832.n3EIWFBp007994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-14 14:32:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > --missing Rs > hicolor-icon-theme Nope, hicolor-icon-theme doesn't need to be specified explicitly, because we already have a valid dependency chain: bareftp -> gtk-sharp2 -> gtk -> hicolor-icon-theme > --- macros > please use name macro instead of name No need to use macros everywhere, just where it makes sense. > --- permissions > executing of *.dll is not necessary (didn't check this) Not sure about this, this could cause an debuginfo package. BTW: have you tried make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" STRIP="/bin/true"? Just a shot in the dark, didn't check this ether. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 18:33:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:33:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141833.n3EIXGZp008558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-14 14:33:15 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=339539) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=339539) Patch to compile with g++44 Some notes: * Summary - Fedora now considers that duplicating package name in Summary is just redundant. * License - tag should just be "GPLv2+" for this package. All files licensed under different licenses than GPLv2+ are used individably with files under GPLv2+ and GPLv2+ transcends all other licenses in this case. * BuildRequires - "BuildRequires: gtk+-devel" is not needed This is GTK+ version 2 package, while "gtk+-devel" on Fedora is for GTK+ version 1 package. And "gtk2-devel" is required by gutenprint-devel so "BuildRequires: gtk2-devel" is not needed, either. * Build Failure - Your srpm won't build on dist-f11 (using g++ 4.4). http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1298108 The attached patch is needed. * Timestamps - Use "-p" option when installing files using "cp" or "install" commands to keep timestamps on installed files: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps * Scriptlets - Scriptlets for GTK icon cache update is updated: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 18:37:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:37:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491952] Review Request: astronomy-menus - Astronomy menu for the Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141837.n3EIbtcw009124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491952 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-14 14:37:54 EDT --- Imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 18:49:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141849.n3EInCLj011813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #60 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-14 14:49:10 EDT --- Closing, since this continues in RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 18:51:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:51:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493684] Review Request: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme - GNOME Desktop theme optimized for small displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141851.n3EIpf1b012521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493684 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-14 14:51:40 EDT --- Imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 18:52:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141852.n3EIq9b3012083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #53 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-14 14:52:04 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 18:56:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494852] Review Request: astronomy-backgrounds - Astronomy backgrounds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141856.n3EIu5SE012981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494852 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-14 14:56:04 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 18:57:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:57:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477990] Review Request: xfce4-settings - Settings Manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141857.n3EIvw1E013257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477990 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-14 14:57:57 EDT --- I think this was imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 18:56:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478531] Review Request: tuxmeteor - Tux Meteor is a meteor counting program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141856.n3EIuXk7013085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478531 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-14 14:56:32 EDT --- Okay. I think we mutually agreed this sucks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 18:55:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:55:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141855.n3EItQd5012798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #53 from David Halik 2009-04-14 14:55:19 EDT --- 1.1.2 source tar balls haven't been released yet, but as soon as they are I'll post updates. As a side note, I just wanted to say thanks to Toni of SUSE who has been giving me rpm feedback in his efforts to port the src.rpm. They now have a nicely working rpm as well. kwizart, anything else in particular that needs to be done for sponsorship that I can help with? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 18:58:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:58:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481732] Review Request: stardict-dic-cs_CZ - czech dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141858.n3EIwh3x013799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481732 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-14 14:58:42 EDT --- I think this was imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 19:01:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461277] Package Review Request: radial In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141901.n3EJ1WEP014307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461277 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 19:00:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141900.n3EJ0lYQ014050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #24 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-14 15:00:44 EDT --- Stale review. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 19:10:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:10:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141910.n3EJAkqK016441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #55 from Conrad Meyer 2009-04-14 15:10:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #54) > yep, even if said package itself is (for whatever reason) forbidden in fedora, > there is a need to be assured that cddlib package itself works. > > So how can I test that sage works against the current fedora cddlib package ? > even if Sage is at preliminary packaging step ... It doesn't yet. > BTW: I guess you didn't meant > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198834 No. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/SciTech/SAGE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 19:44:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:44:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141944.n3EJiS5w024018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 --- Comment #1 from Christian Krause 2009-04-14 15:44:27 EDT --- I've reviewed your package and it looks quite good. There is one TODO item and I have a small usage question (see below). * rpmlint: OK rpmlint SPECS/razertool.spec RPMS/i386/razertool-* SRPMS/razertool-0.0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * naming: OK * spec file name: OK * License: OK - GPLv2+: acceptable - matches the actual license - license file packaged * spec file in English and legible: OK * Source0: OK - newest upstream version used - source file matches upstream - md5sum: dad8236b2fface39f054a7ca6d1a448c razertool_0.0.7.orig.tar.gz - spectool -g works * compilation: OK - mock (F10) - koji: F11, F10 and F9 - %{optflags} are used correctly - smpflags used * locale handling: OK * debuginfo: OK - debuginfo files are not empty and can be used in gdb * handling of shared/static libraries, header files, pkgconfig files: OK (n/a) * directory ownership: OK - no directories created - only directories used which are included in the base filesystem * no files listed twice: OK * file permissions and ownership: OK * %clean section: OK * macro usage: OK * code vs. content: OK (only code) * subpackage for large documentation: OK (n/a) * %doc: OK * rm -rf in %install: OK * filenames UTF8: OK * desktop file: OK - it may be debatable in which menu the razortool appears (Preferences vs. Administration), but since it changes the configuration values globally (in the mouse), Administration seems the best option... * buildrequires: OK * scriptlets: OK * final requires: OK * functional test: TODO - programs run without segfault ;-) - since I don't have such a device, I can't do a full functional test - razertool-gtk doesn't find its icon: ** (razertool-gtk:12930): WARNING **: Couldn't find pixmap file: razertool-icon.png This is caused by moving the pixmaps in the spec file (the program will search the icon in the old place). I would suggest the following: - don't move %{_datadir}/%{name}/pixmaps, but package %{_datadir}/%{name} completly - use the full path to the icon in the *.desktop file (That's OK according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Icon_tag_in_Desktop_Files) Additionally I have one (optional) question: I've seen that libusb tries to open the files in /dev/bus/usb/*/*. On my system the user has no write permissions to any of these files (not even the one of the mouse). Is there a need to run this program as root or do you have to explicitly change the permissions of these files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 19:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141950.n3EJoJZD025194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #18 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-14 15:50:16 EDT --- - compiler flags used correctly - spec file clean, legible, using American english - filelist sane - builds fine in mock 1.) Don't override reqprov generator please AutoReqProv: no 2.) This is useless, coreutils is in the build group (see "koji list-groups dist-f11-build") BuildRequires: coreutils 3.) Don't strip the binary Debuginfo generator will do that strip stapgui-server 4.) Please use %{_smp_mflags} make flags make 5.) You don't need to redundantly set 0755 mode 0755 is install's default anyways Moreover, you have a duplicate entry in filelist install -m0755 stapgui-server ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{_bindir}/stapgui-server ... %{_bindir}/* ... %attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/stapgui-server 6.) RPMlint whines Both problems failry simple to fix Source package: systemtapguiserver.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line 2) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. And lots of these for debuginfo: systemtapguiserver-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/systemtapguiserver-1.0/logger.cpp The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 20:01:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:01:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142001.n3EK1R59027847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #54 from Mikulas Patocka 2009-04-14 16:01:25 EDT --- "b) 2.13 is REALLY old. Which platform does really need it these days, which wouldn't have the later one?" I don't know. That is exactly the problem that it is impossible to check all the systems. Links runs on many systems that I have no longer access to (BeOS, AtheOS) or systems that I had never access to (RiscOS, AIX, Playstation, someone even run it on some Satellite receiver with Linux). Someone even found an old SunOS system without memmove, strstr or other, so Links contains definitions of these functions. So I don't upgrade the autoconf version. There is no benefit from doing it and it might break systems silently. BTW. do the autoconf developers have some QA test farm? I.e. a museum of old computers or emulators and testing the autoconf-generated script on all of them? I know that the configure script is supposed to run even on UnixV7 on PDP-11, the question is just how often someone tries it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 20:11:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:11:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457917] Review Request: stress - tool to impose stress on a POSIX-compliant operating system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142011.n3EKBplB030150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457917 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-14 16:11:49 EDT --- Final ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 20:11:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437574] Review Request: ruby-pg - A Ruby interface for the PostgreSQL database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142011.n3EKB0tu030018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437574 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-14 16:10:58 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 20:29:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492898] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142029.n3EKTCWd001668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492898 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-14 16:29:11 EDT --- You will need to replace the + in the release field with a . The guidelines say: "the period '.' should be used as the delimiter between the release number increment, and the non-numeric version string." ref: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages Otherwise the package is good to go. Please do the above change before you commit. ------------------------------------------- This package (griffith) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 20:32:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:32:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142032.n3EKW3UC003211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 --- Comment #7 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-14 16:32:02 EDT --- --- Licensing: cassmodiah: okay, so the code from SharpSSH and JSch is BSD, the Banshee bits are MIT, the Classpath bits are GPLv2+ with exceptions cassmodiah: if you combine all of that with GPLv2 only code, you end up with GPLv2 with exceptions cassmodiah: feel free to put that in comments above the License tag to explain it. :) --- hicolor > Nope, hicolor-icon-theme doesn't need to be specified explicitly, because we > already have a valid dependency chain: bareftp -> gtk-sharp2 -> gtk -> > hicolor-icon-theme my fault! --- macros >> please use name macro instead of name > No need to use macros everywhere, just where it makes sense. i think it's look more beautiful and i thought it was also meant with MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines --- BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser) you are absolutely right --- rpmlint bareftp.i386: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. bareftp.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. bareftp-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package This debuginfo package contains no files. This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early during the build, rpmbuild not being able to strip the binaries, the package actually being a noarch one but erratically packaged as arch dependent, or something else. Verify what the case is, and if there's no way to produce useful debuginfo out of it, disable creation of the debuginfo package. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. you can't fix no-binary, this is okay you can fix only-non-binary-in-usr-lib if you move it to datadir, but this won't make sense (imho) you can't create an debug package on normal way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430500 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo add a debug nil @Itamar i read my comment3 again. sounds 1) very rude 2) not very helpfully. No offense meant, I'm really sorry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 20:32:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:32:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483376] Review Request: fluid-soundfont - Pro-quality GM/GS soundfont In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142032.n3EKWqZh002684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483376 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-14 16:32:51 EDT --- fluid-soundfont-3.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fluid-soundfont-3.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 20:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492924] Review Request: python-unipath - Alternative to Python modules os, os.path and shutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142033.n3EKXpo8002786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492924 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Terje R??sten 2009-04-14 16:33:50 EDT --- Import, build and pushed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 20:36:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142036.n3EKaDJK004151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 --- Comment #11 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-04-14 16:36:11 EDT --- And I asked spot on IRC: giallu: spot, is GPLv2+ right for a package with some sources GPL+ and others GPLv2+? spot: giallu: if they compile together, yes. giallu: ok thanks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 20:53:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:53:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495801] New: Review Request: json - JavaScript Object Notation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: json - JavaScript Object Notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495801 Summary: Review Request: json - JavaScript Object Notation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: overholt at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/json.spec SRPM URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/json-2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) is a lightweight data-interchange format. It is based on a subset of the JavaScript Programming Language, Standard ECMA-262 3rd Edition - December 1999. JSON is a text format that is completely language independent but uses conventions that are familiar to programmers of the C-family of languages including C, C++, C#, Java, JavaScript, Perl, Python, and many others. Note: I based this on the JPackage .spec but used the Apache-licensed source zip instead of the "you must use this for good"-licensed one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 20:58:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:58:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142058.n3EKweDU007787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-14 16:58:39 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/febootstrap.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/febootstrap-1.5-2.fc11.src.rpm Now ready for review. However NOTE this requires fakechroot 2.9-20 which has only just been built for Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1298852 rpmlint is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 21:08:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:08:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492898] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142108.n3EL8N6o011108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492898 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-14 17:08:22 EDT --- thank you very much for your review, Orcan! yeah i will replace the + with the . before i commit New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: griffith Short Description: Media collection manager Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 21:20:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495805] New: Review Request: jsl - Check JavaScript code for common mistakes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jsl - Check JavaScript code for common mistakes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495805 Summary: Review Request: jsl - Check JavaScript code for common mistakes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/jsl.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/jsl-0.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: With JavaScript Lint, you can check all your JavaScript source code for common mistakes without actually running the script or opening the web page. JavaScript Lint holds an advantage over competing lints because it is based on the JavaScript engine for the Firefox browser. This provides a robust framework that can not only check JavaScript syntax but also examine the coding techniques used in the script and warn against questionable practices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 21:25:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:25:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495805] Review Request: jsl - Check JavaScript code for common mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142125.n3ELP6G0013772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495805 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-14 17:25:05 EDT --- Koji build (hopefully it finishes, otherwise I'll probably make a fool of myself) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1298961 rpmlint whines about no documentation. Upstream includes none. Really! Honestly! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 21:29:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:29:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142129.n3ELT2T2015374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-14 17:29:02 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/febootstrap.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/febootstrap-1.5-3.fc11.src.rpm * Tue Apr 14 2009 Richard Jones - 1.5-3 - Configure script has (unnecessary) BuildRequires on fakeroot, fakechroot, yum. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 21:28:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142128.n3ELSotB014333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 --- Comment #4 from Sean Middleditch 2009-04-14 17:28:49 EDT --- Added the disttag bit. Update the scrollkeeper and gconf bits to what the scripletssippets page had. I've followed the guidelines through the "Get a Sponsor" bit. Tested the package build on Koji on all Primary architectures. It builds on f11 just fine. It fails on f10 though due to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485667 Not sure whether or not I need to worry about f10. Updated spec file and SRPM: Spec URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/gnome-mud.f11.spec SRPM URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/gnome-mud-0.11.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 21:47:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:47:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488995] Review Request: pidgin-tlen - Tlen IM Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142147.n3ELlC9L019419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488995 --- Comment #5 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-04-14 17:47:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > >> please use commands like they are, not as a macro. > >> make instead of %{__make} > > OK, but what's wrong with using macros? > Nothing, it's just a sugestion. I would prefer make, so I tried to convince > you. If you don't like it, you can use macros of course, if you want. Changed. > >> %defattr(644,root,root,755) > >> please use %defattr(-,root,root,-) > > Why? > This is the part you should answer why you are not using > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_Permissions > If you have a good reason to differ from default, I will have no problem with > this. I don't. Changed. > > No, it has its own implementation. I'm not sure if it makes sense to ask > > upstream to use libtlen because libtlen hasn't been updated in quite a while. > That puts another complexion on the matter. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries It's not duplication, because the code is different (only auth.c is taken from an older release of libtlen). Anyway, I've sent upstream an email asking about libtlen usage. http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/pidgin-tlen.spec http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/pidgin-tlen-0-0.2.20090209.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 21:51:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:51:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142151.n3ELp22x018905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-14 17:51:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > Nope, hicolor-icon-theme doesn't need to be specified explicitly, because we > > already have a valid dependency chain: bareftp -> gtk-sharp2 -> gtk -> > > hicolor-icon-theme > my fault! No problem, it's not really an error but just a note. Requiring hicolor-icon-theme wont do no harm. > --- macros > >> please use name macro instead of name > > No need to use macros everywhere, just where it makes sense. > i think it's look more beautiful and i thought it was also meant with > MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Consistently means not to mix different macro styles (e.g. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}. The only must are dir names like %{_datadir} instead of /usr/share, the rest is up to the packager. For more info see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros > bareftp.i386: E: no-binary > The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain > any binaries. > > bareftp.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. These are false positives, rpmlint does not seem to be familiar with mono - but I am nether. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 21:55:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142155.n3ELtDnE020952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #54 from Stephen Lau 2009-04-14 17:55:10 EDT --- 1.1.2 source tarballs are up now: http://wiki.songbirdnest.com/Developer/Articles/Builds/Contributed_Builds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 21:57:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142157.n3ELvSiX019860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-14 17:57:27 EDT --- Now ready for review, but still dependent on bug 495563. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 21:59:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:59:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226033] Merge Review: libmng In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142159.n3ELxcKd021552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226033 --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-14 17:59:37 EDT --- Two more things I noticed: (1) The devel subpackage has: Requires: %{name} = %{version} That should be: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} (2) The spec is using %makeinstall, instead of make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install. The latter works fine, so there is no good excuse not to use it. With those two minor fixes committed to rawhide, I can close out this merge review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 22:28:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142228.n3EMSDSL024977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-14 18:28:12 EDT --- rmol-0.19.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rmol-0.19.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 22:30:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142230.n3EMUwKv025618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-14 18:30:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > > dnsjava.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dnsjava-2.0.6/Changelog > > We need to fix this. "iconv" will help. > Off course I seen this. But I do not know from *what* encoding it should be > recoded. Enca also do not help me: > $ enca Changelog > Unrecognized encoding > Isn't it iso-8859-1 ? Just guessing. > I think it is not very big problem in any case. > > > ! There are some example .java files in the root of the tarball. Their usage > > are explained in the USAGE file. I think these .java files need to go to %doc > > (of the main package). Alternatively, you can build them and put them in > > %{_datadir}/%{name} or so. (You mention about these files in the %description > > too) > Ok, I put *.java into docs. > install -d %{buildroot}/%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ install *.java %{buildroot}/%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ Just a notice: We generally pass a -p switch to install to preserve timestamps. But actually, you don't need to install them explicitly in %install It's enough to put *.java to %doc. Actually, when you put *.java to %doc, it will copy them one more time and the above installation will get overriden. > > * There is a tests directory. The README file mentions about building and > > running these compile tests. We should make a %check section and run these > > tests, if possible. > Tests added. > > > * README file says: > > "dnsjava is placed under the BSD license. Several files are also under > > additional licenses; see the individual files for details." > > I found that the files org/xbill/DNS/Tokenizer.java, > > org/xbill/DNS/ZoneTransferIn.java are licensed under MIT > > This makes the license BSD and MIT > I must place "BSD and MIT" into License tag? Or what I must do with it? > Yes. License: BSD and MIT > > ! Also these comments are not needed. They can be removed: > > #Epoch: 0 > > #Vendor: JPackage Project > > #Distribution: JPackage > Off course. I comment out it, but leave for historical reasons. Any > disadvantage from it? > No, it doesn't really matter. I just said that for making things cleaned up. > > > * These BR's seem unnecessary: jce, java-javadoc > Why? It comes from JPackage rpm and i do not touch this. > jce is provided by both java-1.6.0-openjdk and java-1.5.0-gcj. Adding BR:jce (without a version) will pull java-1.5.0-gcj, which is already being pulled by BR: java-gcj-compat-devel >= 1.0.31. Also, java-1.6.0-openjdk is pulled via java-devel >= 1.7 anyways. java-javadoc is not needed during the building of the package. The guidelines forbid unnecessary BR's. > > * BR: jpackage-utils is listed twice. > Fixed. > It's still there. I guess you removed R: jpackage-utils instead. Other than these, the package does not build with gcj. You need to add BR: java-devel >= 1.7 also R: java >= 1.7 (I'm confused. Didn't you have these before already? Did you remove them?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 22:51:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904142251.n3EMp3gB029038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 --- Comment #74 from Tim Niemueller 2009-04-14 18:51:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #72) > 5. Banshee Should probably be Rhythmbox as this is the default media player in Fedora AFAIK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 00:10:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:10:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150010.n3F0AMeO008741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 Rudolf Kastl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |che666 at gmail.com --- Comment #75 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-04-14 20:10:19 EDT --- how about using those that are set as preferred applications in gnome instead of hardcoding applications again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 00:13:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:13:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494518] Review Request: dontzap - Allows users to set the "DontZap" option in xorg.conf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150013.n3F0Dfsc010519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494518 Peter Hutterer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter.hutterer at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Peter Hutterer 2009-04-14 20:13:40 EDT --- as of xorg-x11-server-1.6.0-18, the default for DontZap is "off" (i.e. the same default as in F10 and before, it allows zapping). Zapping works in two-stages: - the trigger is the xkb symbol Terminate_Server (default - don't include symbol) - the final decision is the DontZap setting (default - allow zapping) I agree with Kevin that this package will confuse users. Disabling or enabling DontZap has no effect if the Terminate_Server symbol isn't present. In current Rawhide, this symbol must be explicitly added through the gnome keyboard settings or setxkbmap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 01:51:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150151.n3F1pxSI025260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #55 from David Halik 2009-04-14 21:51:52 EDT --- Thanks stevel. 1.1.2 src.rpm and spec: http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird-1.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird.spec As always, compiled Koji rpms are also located at the same address. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 01:57:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150157.n3F1v3v0026264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 --- Comment #17 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-14 21:57:02 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase-1.1.0.20090415-1.fc11.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 02:06:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:06:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150206.n3F26507028055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 --- Comment #18 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-14 22:06:04 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase-1.1.0.20090415-1.fc11.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase.spec Description: Extra phrase data for tables of ibus-table. This is a split from ibus-table-chinese, which was sub-package of ibus-table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 02:55:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150255.n3F2tUtq007499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 --- Comment #19 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-04-14 22:55:28 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase-1.1.0.20090415-2.fc11.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase.spec Description: Extra phrase data for IBus-Table which is one of the engines of input method framework IBus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 03:18:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150318.n3F3IIeI011570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #9 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-14 23:18:17 EDT --- Koji (success) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1299521 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 03:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:36:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495684] Review Request: perl-HTML-Lint - HTML::Lint module checking HTML errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150336.n3F3ah62013319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495684 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-14 23:36:42 EDT --- $ wget http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-HTML-Lint-2.06-1.fc11.src.rpm --2009-04-15 05:34:06-- http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-HTML-Lint-2.06-1.fc11.src.rpm Resolving mmaslano.fedorapeople.org... 128.197.185.45 Connecting to mmaslano.fedorapeople.org|128.197.185.45|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2009-04-15 05:34:07 ERROR 404: Not Found. Looks like you uploaded the noarch, not the src rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 03:33:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495693] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6 - Perl 6 Syntax Highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150333.n3F3XI8q012605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495693 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |iarnell at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |iarnell at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-14 23:33:16 EDT --- + source files match upstream. ac5652afbe2a89cb5df86cb069c2e6500cfb490e Syntax-Highlight-Perl6-0.040.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. - license field could be complicated This library also includes the following libraries: STD.pm by Larry Wall (Artistic License 2.0) JQuery by John Resig (dual licensed under the MIT and GPL licenses). more like (GPL+ or Artistic) and Artistic 2.0 and (MIT or GPLv2) ? + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1297595 - package installs properly. Error: Missing Dependency: perl(STD) is needed by package perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6-0.040-1.fc11.noarch (perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6-0.040-1.fc11.noarch.rpm) - rpmlint has complaints: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6.noarch: I: checking perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Cursor.pmc 0644 perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6.src: I: checking perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 9) 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. - final provides are missing (Cursor) and (STD) perl(LazyMap) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Perl6) = 0.040 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Perl6::Actions) perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6 = 0.040-1.fc11 + final requires are sane: /usr/bin/perl perl >= 1:5.010 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Cwd) perl(Encode) perl(English) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Spec) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Moose) >= 0.67 perl(Readonly) perl(Readonly) >= 1.03 perl(STD) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Perl6) perl(Term::ANSIColor) perl(YAML::Syck) >= 1.05 perl(feature) perl(open) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(utf8) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 + %check is present and all tests pass, though Text::VimColor needs to be packaged to complete the suite: t/00-syntax.t .... ok t/01-vim.t ....... skipped: Text::VimColor is not installed t/02-hilitep6.t .. ok All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=66, 11 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 3.06 cusr 0.16 csys = 3.26 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 03:45:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495702] Review Request: perl-XXX - See Your Data in the Nude In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150345.n3F3jOUJ016151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495702 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |iarnell at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |iarnell at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-14 23:45:23 EDT --- fails to build in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1299548 (missing BR on EU::MM) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 04:02:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150402.n3F421v5018926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-15 00:01:59 EDT --- Review: + koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1299534 + rpmlint gave only ibus-table-extraphrase.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pkgconfig/ibus-table-extraphrase.pc ==> can be ignored. + source files match upstream url c2f951fed13d626f4fc29fcdd7ac74ba ibus-table-extraphrase-1.1.0.20090415.tar.gz + Package now Provides: pkgconfig(ibus-table-extraphrase) = 1.1.0.20090415 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 04:10:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150410.n3F4ATfA020329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 04:39:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150439.n3F4dwkJ025004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mmaslano at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-15 00:39:57 EDT --- The reason I did not review this because I am continually checking updates here. See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1299555&name=root.log DEBUG util.py:256: No Package Found for perl(Data::Dumper::Names) >= 0.03 koji build for above log is Also I see package perl-Data-Dumper-Names is not built successfully yet http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8109 I also found failed build for perl-Data-Dumper-Names at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=97060 So I think I cannot proceed here until koji allows to build this package successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 05:09:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150509.n3F59rqq028936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 --- Comment #25 from Brennan Ashton 2009-04-15 01:09:51 EDT --- Sorry, but I got a little short on time the last month or so. It appears that this has some issues with SELINUX that are above me, and I am not interested in this package enough to track them down and submit patches to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 05:25:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150525.n3F5Pw0I031777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 --- Comment #26 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-15 01:25:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > Sorry, but I got a little short on time the last month or so. It appears that > this has some issues with SELINUX that are above me, and I am not interested in > this package enough to track them down and submit patches to upstream. If selinux's the only issue, I'll gladly help get the policy right; feel free to reopen and finish the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 05:43:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:43:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150543.n3F5hMXX001910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 --- Comment #27 from Brennan Ashton 2009-04-15 01:43:21 EDT --- Ok I will take another stab at it this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 05:47:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:47:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494853] Review Request: python-achoo - A fluent interface for testing Python objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150547.n3F5ltgb002838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494853 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-15 01:47:54 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1299561 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 2030a24b9daa0232aa776c08461e8061 achoo-1.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 05:47:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:47:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495021] Review Request: python-posix_ipc - POSIX IPC primitives for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150547.n3F5lsrv002814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495021 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-15 01:47:53 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1299556 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. ab3699b185e7e10918b21753e8b9c20b posix_ipc-0.5.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. + Package python-posix_ipc-0.5.3-1.fc11.i586 => Provides: posix_ipc.so Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.1) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.1.1) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2) libpython2.6.so.1.0 librt.so.1 librt.so.1(GLIBC_2.2) librt.so.1(GLIBC_2.3.4) librt.so.1(GLIBC_2.7) python(abi) = 2.6 rtld(GNU_HASH) Suggestions: 1) remove unnecessary comments 2) remove sitelib macro line in top of SPEC. 3) good to add directories demo and demo2 to %doc 4) License should be GPLv3+ APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 05:49:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495805] Review Request: jsl - Check JavaScript code for common mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150549.n3F5nvPQ003939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495805 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-15 01:49:56 EDT --- Got it right now: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1299598 Replacing the file in place, hopefully, noone will complain SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/jsl.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/jsl-0.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 05:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150550.n3F5oJ6J004280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #10 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-15 01:50:18 EDT --- Sorry this took so long -- used this as an excuse to update my "find a koji scratch build" code :) In any case, in all but trivial cases, we do need to have AutoProv on. Disabling it caused a number of deps to be skipped over... (see below) Once that's back on, we need to filter out perl(DBD::Oracle)... There's a good example in the Perl packaging guidelines to do this. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1299521 ====> requires with autoprov disabled perl(Class::Accessor::Fast) perl(Class::Trigger) perl(DBI) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) ====> requires with autoprov enabled perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Class::Accessor::Fast) perl(Class::Accessor::Fast) perl(Class::Trigger) perl(Class::Trigger) perl(DBD::Oracle) perl(DBI) perl(DBI) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::DBD) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::MultiPartition) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Errors) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Iterator) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::ResultSet) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::SQL) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::SQL::Oracle) perl(Digest::MD5) perl(List::Util) perl(Storable) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 05:55:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:55:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495398] Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150555.n3F5tJi8004326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495398 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-15 01:55:18 EDT --- Koji (success) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1299603 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 06:00:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:00:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495398] Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150600.n3F60MGd005867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495398 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-15 02:00:22 EDT --- There's an examples/ directory; why not include it in %doc? There are a slew of rpmlint errors -- these are all related to the execute bit being set on our .pm's. I find that including the following in %prep usually makes rpmlint happy: find . -type f -exec chmod -c -x {} \; Fix the rpmlint errors and warning, include examples/ in %doc and I'll approve. :-) koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1299603 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (BSD); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): 4ce2c0b734b2393f49f857f686b835bb2919eb05 Net-UPnP-1.41.tar.gz 4ce2c0b734b2393f49f857f686b835bb2919eb05 Net-UPnP-1.41.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: perl-Net-UPnP.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. =====> perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-2.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint perl-Net-UPnP.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-2.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-2.fc10.src.rpm perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Test::More) =====> perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-2.fc10.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint perl-Net-UPnP.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Net/UPnP/Device.pm perl-Net-UPnP.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Net/UPnP/AV/MediaServer.pm perl-Net-UPnP.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Net/UPnP/ControlPoint.pm perl-Net-UPnP.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Net/UPnP/Service.pm perl-Net-UPnP.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Net/UPnP/AV/MediaRenderer.pm perl-Net-UPnP.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Net/UPnP/AV/Content.pm perl-Net-UPnP.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Net/UPnP/HTTPResponse.pm perl-Net-UPnP.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Net/UPnP/QueryResponse.pm perl-Net-UPnP.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Net/UPnP/AV/Item.pm perl-Net-UPnP.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Net/UPnP/ActionResponse.pm perl-Net-UPnP.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Net/UPnP/GW/Gateway.pm perl-Net-UPnP.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Net/UPnP/HTTP.pm perl-Net-UPnP.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Net/UPnP/AV/Container.pm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 13 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-2.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Net::UPnP) = 1.41 perl(Net::UPnP::AV::Container) perl(Net::UPnP::AV::Content) perl(Net::UPnP::AV::Item) perl(Net::UPnP::AV::MediaRenderer) perl(Net::UPnP::AV::MediaServer) perl(Net::UPnP::ActionResponse) perl(Net::UPnP::ControlPoint) perl(Net::UPnP::Device) perl(Net::UPnP::GW::Gateway) perl(Net::UPnP::HTTP) perl(Net::UPnP::HTTPResponse) perl(Net::UPnP::QueryResponse) perl(Net::UPnP::Service) perl-Net-UPnP = 1.41-2.fc10 ====> requires for perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-2.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Net::UPnP) perl(Net::UPnP::AV::Container) perl(Net::UPnP::AV::Content) perl(Net::UPnP::AV::Item) perl(Net::UPnP::ActionResponse) perl(Net::UPnP::Device) perl(Net::UPnP::HTTP) perl(Net::UPnP::HTTPResponse) perl(Net::UPnP::QueryResponse) perl(Net::UPnP::Service) perl(Socket) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 06:13:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477949] Review Request: perl-Term-Highlight - Simple way to highlight perl-compatible regexp patterns on terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150613.n3F6DPE2007756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477949 Colin Coe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |colin.coe at gmail.com Flag| |needinfo?(alexey.radkov at gma | |il.com) --- Comment #2 from Colin Coe 2009-04-15 02:13:23 EDT --- Hi The .spec looks pretty good in my (inexperienced) opinion. Please post the output of rpmlint. Other than that, it seems to adhere to the guidelines pretty well. CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 06:13:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:13:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150613.n3F6D0bL007714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #6 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-15 02:12:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > 2] Which "Source" are you referring to, the SRPM or the upstream source file > xmlfy-1.4.2-src.tar.gz? If you use the upstream source the build will fail at > the packaging - I use another top level Makefile "Makefile_src_archive" to > build the source archives including the SRPM. When I build from the SRPM it > works for me, perhaps it could be the path issue that you refer to in point 3. Yes, I'm talking about upstream source. In upstream source which you are providing in your spec file, you have package subfolder which prevent successfull build. you could: 1] remove this directory and modify Makefile, to prevent rpmbuild which is executed by make in %build section 2] create upstream source which would be modified as per 1] 3] modify Makefile to prevent rpmbuild which is executed by make in %build section source tarball in your src.rpm differs from tarball which could be downloaded from Source0. This breaks following rule: MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum of tarball from provided src.rpm: 7da9b3ee78500687cc4f357f01e92f3b xmlfy-1.4.2-src.tar.gz md5sum of tarball from Source0: e02f4dfb6bd94676d3a72e315da2a10a xmlfy-1.4.2-src.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 06:15:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:15:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150615.n3F6FrFl007626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DEFERRED | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 06:48:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:48:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495684] Review Request: perl-HTML-Lint - HTML::Lint module checking HTML errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150648.n3F6m8pT012486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495684 --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-15 02:48:07 EDT --- I'm sorry :( Here is srpm: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-HTML-Lint-2.06-1.fc11.src.rpm Also here is koji scratch build (koji is finally working again): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1299620 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 06:51:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495398] Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150651.n3F6piwi013172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495398 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-15 02:51:43 EDT --- Okay, examples added and rpmlint output is now clean. Sorry for the shabby first versions, this was my first Perl package :) http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/perl-Net-UPnP.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 07:00:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:00:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486672] Review Request: python-hashlib - Secure hash and message digest algorithm library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150700.n3F70FD0014647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486672 --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-04-15 03:00:14 EDT --- Closing as its pushed now. Prefix ill remove next update -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 07:00:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486672] Review Request: python-hashlib - Secure hash and message digest algorithm library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150700.n3F70gJk014752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486672 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 07:09:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:09:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495805] Review Request: jsl - Check JavaScript code for common mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150709.n3F79EiR017270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495805 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com --- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-15 03:08:59 EDT --- pkg review: MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. - OK, except "no documentation" warning. Online documentation available, no documentation provided in upstream source. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines - OK # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . - OK # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . - OK # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . - OK # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - not sure, page on sourceforge present this as MPLv1.1 or GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+ # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - OK, no license file present # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - OK # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - OK # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. - OK # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - OK # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. - OK # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. - OK # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. - OK, no locales # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. - OK, no library found # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. - OK # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. - OK # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. - OK # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, - OK # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. - OK # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. - OK # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - OK, no documentation # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - OK # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - OK # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - OK # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). - OK, no .pc files # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - OK, no library # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - OK # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - OK, no .la files # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file - OK, no desktop application # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - OK # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - OK conclusion: - License reported on sourceforge differs from license in spec file. - Even it is not blocker, would be good to know issue id or source of patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 07:07:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150707.n3F77DTp015842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-15 03:07:12 EDT --- Koji scratch-build completed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1299642 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 07:28:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:28:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495805] Review Request: jsl - Check JavaScript code for common mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150728.n3F7SZjj019860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495805 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-15 03:28:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > conclusion: > - License reported on sourceforge differs from license in spec file. Fixed. > - Even it is not blocker, would be good to know issue id or source of patches. Patches are my own (see the comment in them). Code base in upstream SVN repository changed significantly since this stable release and I have not verified whether the patches apply against it. (Release early, release often...). I'll probably do upon next stable release. New package: SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/jsl.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/jsl-0.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 07:33:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:33:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495805] Review Request: jsl - Check JavaScript code for common mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150733.n3F7Xd5F021660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495805 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 07:34:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:34:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150734.n3F7YxHs021166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #21 from Ivan Efremov 2009-04-15 03:34:57 EDT --- I requested for sponsorship, FAS name iefremov. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 07:41:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150741.n3F7fg0R023395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mmaslano at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #5 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-15 03:41:40 EDT --- Omg, it's all about cyclic dependency :) Now I switched off tests in perl-Data-Dumper-Names, which needs perl-Test-Most, which needs perl-Data-Dumper-Names as BR. In an hour or so, it should perl-Data-Dumper-Names be in buildroot and this package will succeed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 07:47:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491886] Review Request: xa - 6502/65816 cross-assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150747.n3F7lMrm023666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491886 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-15 03:47:21 EDT --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 07:52:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:52:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495805] Review Request: jsl - Check JavaScript code for common mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150752.n3F7qB1v025481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495805 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-15 03:52:09 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 08:05:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150805.n3F850Im027203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Matthias Saou 2009-04-15 04:04:59 EDT --- Perfect, then the package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 07:59:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495805] Review Request: jsl - Check JavaScript code for common mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150759.n3F7x1jJ025803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495805 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-15 03:59:00 EDT --- Thanks a lot for the review Jan! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jsl Short Description: Check JavaScript code for common mistakes Owners: lkundrak Branches: EL-5 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 08:44:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150844.n3F8i04Z003748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-04-15 04:43:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ogmtools Short Description: Tools for Ogg media streams Owners: giallu Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 08:43:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150843.n3F8hkSB002858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 --- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-15 04:43:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Isn't it iso-8859-1 ? Just guessing. I even have no idea about it! > you don't need to install them explicitly in %install > It's enough to put *.java to %doc. Actually, when you put *.java to %doc, it > will copy them one more time and the above installation will get overriden. Ok. Thank you for the hint. Fixed. > Yes. > License: BSD and MIT Ok, license changed. > jce is provided by both java-1.6.0-openjdk and java-1.5.0-gcj. Adding BR:jce > (without a version) will pull java-1.5.0-gcj, which is already being pulled by > BR: java-gcj-compat-devel >= 1.0.31. Also, java-1.6.0-openjdk is pulled via > java-devel >= 1.7 anyways. > > java-javadoc is not needed during the building of the package. The guidelines > forbid unnecessary BR's. Ok, I delete its. Thank you for the explanation. > > > * BR: jpackage-utils is listed twice. > > Fixed. > > > > It's still there. I guess you removed R: jpackage-utils instead. Sory for mistake. Fixed (again :) ) > Other than these, the package does not build with gcj. So, in this case all work to add conditional GCJ build is nought??? > You need to add > BR: java-devel >= 1.7 > also > R: java >= 1.7 Added. > (I'm confused. Didn't you have these before already? Did you remove them?) I don't rememeber. I think no. (Sorry, I add it into my svn repository too late - when review was already in progress and can't say exact) And what is more strange: This package builded fine on my local machine, but failed in koji (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1299756) on %check stage. May be internet connection not available in mock chroot?? Any suggestions? http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/dnsjava/dnsjava-2.0.6-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 08:55:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:55:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494518] Review Request: dontzap - Allows users to set the "DontZap" option in xorg.conf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150855.n3F8tlYE006218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494518 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #8 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-04-15 04:55:46 EDT --- Thanks Peter for your work. I am closing out this review and won't be importing this package after all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 09:19:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150919.n3F9JCU3010907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-15 05:19:11 EDT --- Failed build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1299787 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 09:34:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:34:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150934.n3F9YvCd012541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #41 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-15 05:34:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > Btw. a different feature for xmonad-start I want to suggest is to test whether > xmonad.hs is newer than the binary and in case it is, recompile it. Or is this > something xmonad already does? I believe it should but I am a bit rusty on xmonad. > But it seems it does not recompile itself, when > I hit ALT-q. That also work from what I was reading on their wiki. > I meant to include it in the patch, otherwise the patch is not functional. I > uploaded a new version of the patch to above URL, but the config file is now > also available Thanks - will try that out! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 10:14:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494171] Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151014.n3FAExMJ021719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-15 06:14:57 EDT --- why is this build against a git snapshot whereas http://hostap.epitest.fi/releases/hostapd-0.6.9.tar.gz is here ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 10:20:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486009] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish - Quick two-way blowfish encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151020.n3FAKSH0023082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 --- Comment #14 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-15 06:20:26 EDT --- Remi, the earlier 1.1.0 rc1 or 1.0.1 versions don't have a require on pear >= 1.7.2, this would allow to build for F9 and EL5. Would you object if I build either version ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 10:20:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:20:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151020.n3FAKhTH023120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 Daniel Berrange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |berrange at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Daniel Berrange 2009-04-15 06:20:41 EDT --- Taking review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 10:57:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:57:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495684] Review Request: perl-HTML-Lint - HTML::Lint module checking HTML errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151057.n3FAvbFw030068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495684 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |paul at city-fan.org Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth 2009-04-15 06:57:36 EDT --- HTML::Lint is already in Fedora and maintained by Ralf (corsepiu) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 486528 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 10:57:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486528] Review Request: perl-HTML-Lint - Perl HTML parser and checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151057.n3FAvduX030106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486528 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmaslano at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth 2009-04-15 06:57:36 EDT --- *** Bug 495684 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 10:56:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:56:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151056.n3FAuk42029937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 Daniel Berrange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Daniel Berrange 2009-04-15 06:56:44 EDT --- * PASS rpmlint checks, no output generated * PASS package naming * PASS package guidelines * PASS approved license * PASS license matches code * PASS license text included * PASS specfile in english * PASS specfile is legible * PASS sources match upstream * PASS builds on F11 x86_64 * PASS all BRs listed - builds in koji OK * N/A locales * N/A ldconfig * N/A relocatable * PASS owns all directories * PASS permissions all correct * PASS %clean section * PASS macro usage * PASS permissble content/code * N/A large docs subpackage * PASS %doc not affecting package usage * N/A header files * N/A static libraries * N/A pkgconfig files * N/A library suffix * N/A libtool archives * N/A -devel packages requirements * N/A .desktop files * PASS not owning directories from other packages * PASS %install cleaning up buildroot * PASS valid UTF-8 Should rules * PASS builds in koji/mock * PASS febootstrap and febootstrap-run work correctly on x86_64 after install All guidelines PASS => APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 11:05:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495875] New: Review Request: leonidas-kde-theme - Leonidas KDE Theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: leonidas-kde-theme - Leonidas KDE Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495875 Summary: Review Request: leonidas-kde-theme - Leonidas KDE Theme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jreznik at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/leonidas-kde-theme/leonidas-kde-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/leonidas-kde-theme/leonidas-kde-theme-0.2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is Leonidas KDE Theme Artwork containing KSplash theme, KDM theme and wallpapers theme. Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1299924 This is first quick preview as we need this package asap... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 11:03:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:03:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494171] Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151103.n3FB3V9M029560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-15 07:03:30 EDT --- What is needed WRT openssl patches subdirectory. (given openssl version in F-10 openssl-0.9.8g-12.fc10.x86_64 / F-11 openssl-0.9.8k-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm ). About the initscript. having /etc/hostapd.conf used as a configuration file seems nice but could be better with using /etc/hostapd/hostapd.conf instead) Then the current configuration file should be provided as an example only. So the initscript should exit 6 if there is no configuration file. - I don't know what is mean by $OTHER_ARGS in the initscript. - Logwach support is lacking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 11:14:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473835] Review Request: autoarchive - Simple backup tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151114.n3FBEZIZ000761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473835 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-15 07:14:32 EDT --- * Wed Apr 15 2009 Fabian Affolter - 0.1.2-1 - Upstream renamed some parts from aa to autoarchive (symlinks) - Added examples - Updated to new upstream version 0.1.2 Here are the updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/autoarchive.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/autoarchive-0.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 11:21:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:21:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151121.n3FBLFSH000592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #11 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-04-15 07:21:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Sorry this took so long -- used this as an excuse to update my "find a koji > scratch build" code :) No sweat. > > In any case, in all but trivial cases, we do need to have AutoProv on. > Disabling it caused a number of deps to be skipped over... (see below) > > Once that's back on, we need to filter out perl(DBD::Oracle)... There's a good > example in the Perl packaging guidelines to do this. Okay, that took a bit of effort to get done. Src.rpm: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Data-ObjectDriver/perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.06-2.fc10.src.rpm spec file: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Data-ObjectDriver/perl-Data-ObjectDriver.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 11:30:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151130.n3FBUHvE004549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 --- Comment #1 from Colin Coe 2009-04-15 07:30:16 EDT --- rpmlint output --- [root at rpm01 ~]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch/editarea-0.7.2.3-2.noarch.rpm /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/editarea-0.7.2.3-2.src.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [root at rpm01 ~]# --- Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: - http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/editarea-0.7.2.3-2.src.rpm - http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/editarea.spec Change from release 1: - Provide better summary and description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 12:13:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:13:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495875] Review Request: leonidas-kde-theme - Leonidas KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151213.n3FCDmWd010099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495875 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2009-04-15 08:13:47 EDT --- I can take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 12:42:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492613] Review Request: canto - Atom/RSS feed reader based on ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151242.n3FCgWw7015996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492613 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-15 08:42:30 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/canto-0.6.8/canto.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/canto-0.6.8/canto-0.6.8-2.fc10.src.rpm Fixed the issues I hope. The error there might be caused by an incompatibility between Python 2.6 and canto, I shall research this further and contact upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 12:47:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:47:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151247.n3FClCcu018667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #19 from Anithra 2009-04-15 08:47:10 EDT --- Spec URL: http://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/stapgui/systemtapguiserver.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/stapgui/systemtapguiserver-1.0-7.src.rpm I had always had debuginfo disabled so have never verified it with rpmlint before :(. rpmlint output: [root at localhost SOURCES]# rpmlint -i systemtapguiserver.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [root at localhost SOURCES]# rpmlint -i /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i586/systemtapguiserver-1.0-7.i586.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [root at localhost SOURCES]# rpmlint -i /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i586/systemtapguiserver-debuginfo-1.0-7.i586.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [root at localhost SOURCES]# rpmlint -i /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/systemtapguiserver-1.0-7.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1300001 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 12:48:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495882] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: yaneti at declera.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP/perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP.spec SRPM URL: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP/perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP-0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: POE data filter which aims to make SMTP data transparent just before going onto the wire as per RFC 821 Section 4.5.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 12:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:55:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151255.n3FCtKsS020661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-15 08:55:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: febootstrap Short Description: Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) Owners: rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 13:06:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492613] Review Request: canto - Atom/RSS feed reader based on ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151306.n3FD6R9m023010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492613 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-15 09:06:26 EDT --- I just talked to upstream and apparently a new version is to be released tomorrow containing fixes and fixing the above problem with F11. Once it is released, I shall update this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 13:19:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:19:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495885] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP - Asynchronous mail sending with POE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP - Asynchronous mail sending with POE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495885 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP - Asynchronous mail sending with POE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: yaneti at declera.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP/perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP.spec SRPM URL: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP/perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP-0.21-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: POE::Component::Client::SMTP allows you to send email messages in an asynchronous manner, using POE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 13:28:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:28:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495888] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Log4perl - Logging extension for the POE environment. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Log4perl - Logging extension for the POE environment. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495888 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Log4perl - Logging extension for the POE environment. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: yaneti at declera.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl-0.02-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Log4perl encapsulation within the POE environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 13:42:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:42:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226033] Merge Review: libmng In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151342.n3FDg9bg028100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226033 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-15 09:42:08 EDT --- Fixed and built in rawhide (f12). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 13:41:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:41:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151341.n3FDf6vG030123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 --- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-04-15 09:41:05 EDT --- new version SRPM URL: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 13:43:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151343.n3FDhgoQ028331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #16 from Zarko 2009-04-15 09:43:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > * Summary > * License > * BuildRequires > * Build Failure > * Timestamps > * Scriptlets All done and tested with mock! Spec: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SPECS/photoprint.spec Source: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SRPMS/photoprint-0.4.0-6.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 13:54:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:54:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226033] Merge Review: libmng In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151354.n3FDsZGM032647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226033 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 13:54:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226033] Merge Review: libmng In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151354.n3FDsKnv032593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226033 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-15 09:54:19 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 13:58:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:58:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151358.n3FDw1J9001102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-15 09:58:00 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/razertool-0.0.7/razertool.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/razertool-0.0.7/razertool-0.0.7-2.fc10.src.rpm I fixed the pixmaps issue. Concerning that question regarding access rights... You are right, due to the permissions the tool has to be either run as root or a rule has to be added to udev. As I'm no fan of the adding-a-rule scenario, I'm wondering how to realize a password request here. Any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 14:01:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:01:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494553] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151401.n3FE1uf3000485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494553 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dhorak at redhat.com Blocks|188271(RHEL5.0-NEW) |188273(RHEL5.0-ACCEPT) --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-15 10:01:55 EDT --- this is the same package as in Fedora where I was the reviewer, moving into RHEL5.0-ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 14:00:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494549] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151400.n3FE0g4q002178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494549 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dhorak at redhat.com Blocks|188271(RHEL5.0-NEW) |188273(RHEL5.0-ACCEPT) --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-15 10:00:40 EDT --- this is the same package as in Fedora where I was the reviewer, moving into RHEL5.0-ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 14:07:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:07:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] New: Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 Summary: Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pgf at laptop.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~pgf/rpms/srpms/olpc-kbdshim.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~pgf/rpms/srpms/olpc-kbdshim-4-1.src.rpm Description: The olpc-kbdshim-hal daemon integrates with hal to monitor the keyboard and touchpad, enabling the XO "grab" keys and touchpad rotation (to match screen rotation), and reporting user (in)activity. The (in)activity reports are used by olpc-powerd, a companion package. This package is aimed specifically at the OLPC XO laptop. This is my first review submission: sponsor needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 14:10:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:10:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226033] Merge Review: libmng In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151410.n3FEAdj4002919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226033 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-15 10:10:38 EDT --- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 14:16:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:16:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495875] Review Request: leonidas-kde-theme - Leonidas KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151416.n3FEGSXV004180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495875 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |leonidas-kde-theme Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2009-04-15 10:16:27 EDT --- tested it out... for a first try, it looks pretty darn good. rpmlint leonidas-kde-theme leonidas-kde-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/wallpapers/leonidas_wide.png ../backgrounds/leonidas/lion/wide/1920x1200/leonidas-1-noon.png leonidas-kde-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/wallpapers/leonidas_high.png ../backgrounds/leonidas/lion/normalish/1280x1024/leonidas-1-noon.png 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Tested against leonidas-backgrounds-common-10.93.1-1.fc11.noarch looks like the targets are jpg's not png's, but that's something that can be sorted out later. (nonblocking) SHOULD: 1. Address rpmlint warnings (above) 2. near Source URL, include a comment pointing to fedorahosted.org/leonidas-kde-theme upstream 3. License: leonidas-backgrounds-common is CC-BY-SA, but GPLV2 is also included here, is that the other/plymouth bits? (either way, documenting which parts are licensed which in a comment would help clarify for posterity). Otherwise, it's really a simple noarch pkg, and conformant. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 14:18:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494553] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151418.n3FEIG5e004587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494553 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package-review at redha |dan at danny.cz |t.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 14:17:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494549] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151417.n3FEHxcr004456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494549 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package-review at redha |dan at danny.cz |t.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 14:32:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:32:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495875] Review Request: leonidas-kde-theme - Leonidas KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151432.n3FEW29V008347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495875 --- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-04-15 10:32:02 EDT --- Backgrounds are JPG, we need PNG for KSplash, must be sorted out... 1. could I have a hint? 2. ok, I forgot it (was on TODO) 3. kdm Leonidas.xml is GPLv2 copyrighted (actually it's GPLv2+, I have to correct it) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 14:29:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151429.n3FET88a007497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-15 10:29:07 EDT --- With pam: /etc/security/console.apps/razertool: . config-util PROGRAM=/usr/sbin/razertool SESSION=true In order to install razertool to /usr/sbin instead of /usr/bin, configure with %configure --bindir=%{_sbindir} /etc/pam.d/razertool: #%PAM-1.0 auth include config-util account include config-util session include config-util If you choose the pam approach, don't forget to require usermode-gtk. I would however prefer not to run this tool as root. Are these per-user or global settings? Running as root is ok if it's golbal, but as downside a weakness in the code could be exploited with root privileges. On the other hand I don't like the idea of making _all_ the usb device files writable. Does the program really need write access or is it just probing the devices? Or is there a special device for the razer mice? If so, a file in /etc/security/console.perms.d/ might suffice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 14:36:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494171] Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151436.n3FEaiU1009436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 --- Comment #13 from Adel Gadllah 2009-04-15 10:36:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > why is this build against a git snapshot whereas > http://hostap.epitest.fi/releases/hostapd-0.6.9.tar.gz is here ? Because it is needed to support mac80211 based drivers (works with anything but intel right now, intel support is missing on the driver side). where 0.6.9 only supports older drivers or out of tree stuff like madwifi. (In reply to comment #12) > What is needed WRT openssl patches subdirectory. (given openssl version in F-10 > openssl-0.9.8g-12.fc10.x86_64 / F-11 openssl-0.9.8k-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm ). The patches are for supporting EAP-FAST, they need to be applied to openssl and so this is out of the scope of this review. > About the initscript. having /etc/hostapd.conf used as a configuration file > seems nice but could be better with using /etc/hostapd/hostapd.conf instead) > Then the current configuration file should be provided as an example only. > So the initscript should exit 6 if there is no configuration file. OK, will change that. > - I don't know what is mean by $OTHER_ARGS in the initscript. Will remove. > - Logwach support is lacking. OK, will add it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 14:50:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151450.n3FEoHfv012538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-15 10:50:16 EDT --- I'm sponsoring kalev now, so this is approved (as per comment 2) and we would like CVS (as per comment 3). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 14:50:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:50:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151450.n3FEoi99012623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-15 10:50:43 EDT --- Well, I'm pretty unsure. The risk when using pam is clear to me... and should be avoided. ACTION=="add", BUS=="usb", SYSFS{idVendor}=="1532", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0101", MODE="0660", GROUP="plugdev" ACTION=="add", BUS=="usb", SYSFS{idVendor}=="1532", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0009", MODE="0660", GROUP="plugdev" This is the udev example rulefile. As you can see, this rulefile restricts the permission changes to Razer-only devices. There is no special device for Razer mice. The changes are rather hardware-side, as they are directly transmitted to the Razer (mouse) hardware. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 14:53:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492395] Review Request: php-geshi - Generic syntax highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151453.n3FErOLS013003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492395 --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-15 10:53:23 EDT --- New version : Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/php-geshi.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/php-geshi-1.0.8.3-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 15:01:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151501.n3FF1ZHN015331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 --- Comment #11 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-15 11:01:33 EDT --- I think we now need F-11 branch too after the mass-branching last night. Updated request: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libp11 Short Description: MingGW Windows libp11 library Owners: kalev rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 15:05:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:05:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151505.n3FF5bHp015952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-15 11:05:36 EDT --- In this case udev should IMO be preferred. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 15:07:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:07:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495875] Review Request: leonidas-kde-theme - Leonidas KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151507.n3FF73Bd016235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495875 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-04-15 11:07:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: leonidas-kde-theme Short Description: Leonidas KDE Theme Owners: jreznik rdieter kkofler than ltinkl Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 15:10:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:10:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151510.n3FFA4nt017910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-15 11:10:03 EDT --- Then I shall go for this. One last question remains though: in the example udev case, the permissions are assigned to a group. As on Fedora, the user is -- by default -- in no group, should permissions to write be set for everyone here (equaling 0666)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 15:19:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:19:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151519.n3FFJ4Tq019605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-15 11:19:03 EDT --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. Note: F-11 development freeze already came, so now on CVS admin procedure [1] devel branch points to F-12. If you want to import this package into F-12, F-11, and F-10, for example, please write "F-11 F-10" as "Branches" in "New Package CVS Request". [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 15:27:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495925] Review Request: pyxmlsec - Python bindings for the XML Security Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151527.n3FFRCam021777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495925 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-15 11:27:11 EDT --- Builds fine in el5 mock. Rpmlint has one warning, which can be safely ignored: pyxmlsec.i586: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/xmlsec.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. It's not executable and not meant to be executable. Shebang there is therefore just a comment, and thus I'm not going to patch it away. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 15:25:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:25:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495925] New: Review Request: pyxmlsec - Python bindings for the XML Security Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pyxmlsec - Python bindings for the XML Security Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495925 Summary: Review Request: pyxmlsec - Python bindings for the XML Security Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/pyxmlsec.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/pyxmlsec-0.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: PyXMLSec is a set of Python bindings for the XML Security Library, a C library based on LibXML2. The library supports major XML security standards including, XML Signature, XML Encryption, Canonical XML and Exclusive Canonical XML. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 15:31:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:31:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151531.n3FFVbCA021825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 --- Comment #7 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-15 11:31:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > Then, I am not sure if there are guidelines against it, but installing the file > > in {datadir}/php is probably not a wise idea. According to the guidelines, this is correct : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PHP#File_Placement -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 15:45:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151545.n3FFjTSP026191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-15 11:45:28 EDT --- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR, as I am now sponsored by Richard W.M. Jones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 15:47:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:47:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491758] Review Request: mingw32-opensc - MingGW Windows OpenSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151547.n3FFlEtZ028845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491758 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-15 11:47:12 EDT --- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR, as I am now sponsored by Richard W.M. Jones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 15:48:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:48:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151548.n3FFmjpq027085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 15:57:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495925] Review Request: pyxmlsec - Python bindings for the XML Security Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151557.n3FFvZgX032240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495925 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmahut at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 16:02:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:02:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151602.n3FG2PIn000843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Philippe Makowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 16:01:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:01:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485416] Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151601.n3FG1hAv000757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485416 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-15 12:01:42 EDT --- msp430-gcc-3.2.3-2.20090210cvs.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/msp430-gcc-3.2.3-2.20090210cvs.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 16:05:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:05:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495925] Review Request: pyxmlsec - Python bindings for the XML Security Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151605.n3FG5ou3001584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495925 --- Comment #2 from Marek Mahut 2009-04-15 12:05:49 EDT --- Liar, liar, pants on fire! + iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf8 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.88790: line 42: /usr/share/doc/pyxmlsec-0.3.0/AUTHORS: No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.88790 (%prep) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1300546 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 16:08:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:08:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495925] Review Request: pyxmlsec - Python bindings for the XML Security Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151608.n3FG8hhL000704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495925 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-15 12:08:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Liar, liar, pants on fire! > > + iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf8 > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.88790: line 42: /usr/share/doc/pyxmlsec-0.3.0/AUTHORS: No such > file or directory > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.88790 (%prep) Doh! I forgot to make the package BuildRequire itself! SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/pyxmlsec.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/pyxmlsec-0.3.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 16:11:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] New: Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 Summary: Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: th0br0 at mkdir.name QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/guimup-0.1.4/guimup.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/guimup-0.1.4/guimup-0.1.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: GUIMUP is a client for the music player daemon (MPD) written in C++ and GTKmm. The program can be used with most Linux desktops but, as a GTK program, is best suited for GNOME and XFCE. The focus of the program is on mouse handling: playlist management is done entirely by drag-&-drop; playback functions are directly accessible from the system tray. Guimup turns MPD into a perfect desktop music player. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 16:12:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151612.n3FGCU4a002905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 16:10:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477949] Review Request: perl-Term-Highlight - Simple way to highlight perl-compatible regexp patterns on terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151610.n3FGANiF002508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477949 Alexey Radkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(alexey.radkov at gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #3 from Alexey Radkov 2009-04-15 12:10:22 EDT --- Hi. Here is rpmlint output: $ rpmlint perl-Term-Highlight-1.5-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl-Term-Highlight-1.5-1.fc10.src.rpm perl-Term-Highlight.spec 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 16:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151619.n3FGJRm8004646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-15 12:19:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Isn't it iso-8859-1 ? Just guessing. > I even have no idea about it! I guess it is. Putting iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf8 Changelog > tmpfile touch -r Changelog tmpfile mv -f tmpfile Changelog into %prep solved the issue for me. > > > Other than these, the package does not build with gcj. > So, in this case all work to add conditional GCJ build is nought??? > I think this is my bad. I should've tested this before I spoke in the first place. Yes, if GCJ (which supports only up to java 1.5) doesn't build the jar file properly, it doesn't make sense to build the aot bits. So, you can change the first line of the SPEC file to: %global with_gcj 0 or alternatively, remove the GCJ related bits from the SPEC file. Sorry for the confusion. > > And what is more strange: This package builded fine on my local machine, but > failed in koji (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1299756) on > %check stage. May be internet connection not available in mock chroot?? > Any suggestions? > > http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/dnsjava/dnsjava-2.0.6-4.fc9.src.rpm Another thing I should have tested. Koji disables internet connection during package building, which is a good thing. Since we do need a connection for these tests, it doesn't make sense to run these tests during a standard build on koji. But I think we should keep the code there and comment it out (or put an %if do_test %check %endif clause around it and disable the tests on top of the SPEC file via %global do_test 0 ). In either case, we need to explain in the SPEC file why we disabled them by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 16:33:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:33:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495801] Review Request: json - JavaScript Object Notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151633.n3FGXuwv007746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495801 Lillian Angel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |langel at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(overholt at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Lillian Angel 2009-04-15 12:33:54 EDT --- Just a few questions inline (marked with XXXX). * 1 Packaging Guidelines o 1.1 Naming ok o 1.2 Version and Release ok o 1.3 Legal ok o 1.4 No inclusion of pre-built binaries or libraries ok o 1.5 Spec Legibility ok o 1.6 Writing a package from scratch ok o 1.7 Modifying an existing package n/a o 1.8 Architecture Support ok o 1.9 Filesystem Layout ok o 1.10 Use rpmlint none! o 1.11 Changelogs ok o 1.12 Tags ok o 1.13 BuildRoot tag ok o 1.14 %clean ok o 1.15 Requires ok o 1.16 BuildRequires ok XXXX 1.17 Summary and description Is the javadoc summary correct? o 1.18 Encoding ok XXXX 1.19 Documentation None. is there any? o 1.20 Compiler flags ok o 1.21 Debuginfo packages n/a o 1.22 Devel Packages n/a o 1.23 Requiring Base Package n/a o 1.24 Shared Libraries ok o 1.25 Packaging Static Libraries ok o 1.26 Duplication of system libraries n/a o 1.27 Beware of Rpath n/a o 1.28 Configuration files ok o 1.29 Initscripts ok o 1.30 Desktop files n/a o 1.31 Macros ok o 1.32 %global preferred over %define ok o 1.33 Handling Locale Files n/a o 1.34 Timestamps n/a o 1.35 Parallel make n/a o 1.36 Scriptlets n/a o 1.37 Conditional dependencies n/a o 1.38 Build packages with separate user accounts n/a o 1.39 Relocatable packages n/a o 1.40 Code Vs Content ok XXXX 1.41 File and Directory Ownership + 1.41.1 Duplicate Files ok + 1.41.2 File Permissions Should use: %defattr(-,root,root,-) not %defattr(-,root,root) o 1.42 Users and Groups n/a o 1.43 Web Applications n/a o 1.44 Conflicts n/a o 1.45 No External Kernel Modules n/a o 1.46 No Files or Directories under /srv n/a o 1.47 Bundling of multiple projects n/a o 1.48 All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment no patches. o 1.49 Use of Epochs ok o 1.50 Symlinks n/a o 1.51 Application Specific Guidelines n/a All ok: * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . * MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. * MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] * MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. * MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] * MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] * MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [11] * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] * MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] * MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] * MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] * MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [21] * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] * MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20] * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [23] * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] * SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [27] * SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [28] * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [29] * SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [30] * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. * SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [31] * SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [22] * SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [21] * SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [32] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 16:34:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495801] Review Request: json - JavaScript Object Notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151634.n3FGYRgS006489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495801 Lillian Angel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |langel at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 17:02:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:02:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495801] Review Request: json - JavaScript Object Notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151702.n3FH20Tf012586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495801 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(overholt at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2009-04-15 13:01:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > XXXX 1.17 Summary and description > Is the javadoc summary correct? It looks okay to me. > XXXX 1.19 Documentation > None. is there any? No. > XXXX 1.41 File and Directory Ownership > + 1.41.2 File Permissions > Should use: %defattr(-,root,root,-) not %defattr(-,root,root) Fixed: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/json.spec http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/json-2-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 17:06:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:06:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151706.n3FH6ipL014094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 Philippe Makowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |495949 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 17:03:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495801] Review Request: json - JavaScript Object Notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151703.n3FH3p8H012956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495801 Lillian Angel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Lillian Angel 2009-04-15 13:03:50 EDT --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 17:06:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:06:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151706.n3FH6fUO014026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 Philippe Makowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Depends on| |488100 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 17:05:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] New: Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 Summary: Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: makowski.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/kinterbasdb.spec SRPM URL: http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/kinterbasdb-3.3.0-0.fc10.src.rpm Description: KInterbasDB is a Python extension package that implements Python Database API 2.0-compliant support for the open source relational database Firebird and some versions of its proprietary cousin Borland Interbase. In addition to the minimal feature set of the standard Python DB API, KInterbasDB also exposes nearly the entire native client API of the database engine. Kinterbasdb is part of the Firebird project I'm member of the Firebird Admin Team, Q/A tester and I need a sponsor for that rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 17:10:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495950] New: Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495950 Summary: Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/safecopy.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/safecopy-1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://safecopy.sourceforge.net/ Description: safecopy is a data recovery tool which tries to extract as much data as possible from a problematic (i.e. damaged sectors) source - like floppy drives, harddisk partitions, CDs, tape devices, ..., where other tools like dd would fail doe to I/O errors. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1300628 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint safecopy* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint safecopy-1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 17:25:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:25:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495801] Review Request: json - JavaScript Object Notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151725.n3FHPG4g018149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495801 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-04-15 13:25:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: json Short Description: JavaScript Object Notation Java implementation Owners: overholt Branches: InitialCC: ebaron, langel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 17:34:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495925] Review Request: pyxmlsec - Python bindings for the XML Security Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151734.n3FHYK9s020413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495925 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Marek Mahut 2009-04-15 13:34:18 EDT --- Looks fine, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 17:49:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494518] Review Request: dontzap - Allows users to set the "DontZap" option in xorg.conf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151749.n3FHnSlG023531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494518 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 17:54:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:54:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495925] Review Request: pyxmlsec - Python bindings for the XML Security Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151754.n3FHs4OU024578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495925 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-15 13:54:03 EDT --- Danke schon Marek! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pyxmlsec Short Description: Python bindings for the XML Security Library Owners: lkundrak Branches: EL-5 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 17:58:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:58:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483376] Review Request: fluid-soundfont - Pro-quality GM/GS soundfont In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151758.n3FHwQCb025828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483376 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.1-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 17:58:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483376] Review Request: fluid-soundfont - Pro-quality GM/GS soundfont In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151758.n3FHwL4B025442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483376 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-15 13:58:19 EDT --- fluid-soundfont-3.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 17:58:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:58:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490318] Review Request: frescobaldi - Edit LilyPond sheet music with ease! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151758.n3FHwdjC025485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490318 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-15 13:58:38 EDT --- frescobaldi-0.7.8-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 18:00:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:00:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490318] Review Request: frescobaldi - Edit LilyPond sheet music with ease! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151800.n3FI0BmO026161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490318 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-15 14:00:10 EDT --- frescobaldi-0.7.8-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 18:00:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490317] Review Request: rumor - Really Unintelligent Music transcriptOR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151800.n3FI0dR8026342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490317 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-15 14:00:38 EDT --- rumor-1.0.3b-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 17:58:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:58:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490318] Review Request: frescobaldi - Edit LilyPond sheet music with ease! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151758.n3FHwinq025522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490318 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.7.8-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 18:00:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490318] Review Request: frescobaldi - Edit LilyPond sheet music with ease! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151800.n3FI0G82026664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490318 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.7.8-1.fc9 |0.7.8-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 18:02:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:02:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151802.n3FI2Buj027299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-15 14:02:09 EDT --- rmol-0.19.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 18:02:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151802.n3FI2lWt027496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.0.112-3.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 18:00:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490317] Review Request: rumor - Really Unintelligent Music transcriptOR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151800.n3FI0i3W026767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490317 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.3b-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 18:02:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:02:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151802.n3FI2h9a027207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-15 14:02:41 EDT --- google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 18:02:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:02:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151802.n3FI2HIT026899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.19.0-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 18:10:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:10:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493750] Review Request: netcf - a library for managing network configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151810.n3FIA6cR028848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493750 --- Comment #3 from David Lutterkort 2009-04-15 14:10:05 EDT --- Sorry for the lag, somehow your review got filed into the wrong mail folder. (In reply to comment #1) > * Your home page points to a changed "URL: https://fedorahosted.org/netcf/" Fixed. > * Better summary: Cross-platform network configuration library > (taken from README!) Thanks; indeed much better. > * Fedora 10 build needs augeas >= 0.5.0 from updates-testing Yeah, it just got pushed to updates > * Build errors on Fedora 10: > [...] > checking for LIBAUGEAS... yes > checking for LIBXML... > [...] > > => Missing BuildRequires: libxml2-devel > > > checking for LIBXSLT... > > => Missing BuildRequires: libxslt-devel > (this requires libxml2-devel, too) Added those BR's > * In "src" directory, NETCF_CFLAGS duplicates the CFLAGS. I don't see that - do you mean the duplication of -I/usr/include/libxml2 ? That comes from using cflags from both libxml2 and libxslt; though since netcf uses API's from both, i.e. it doesn't just use libxml2 via libxslt, I'd rather leave the explicit LIBXML_CFLAGS in the Makefile. > * netcf.pc file is missing "Requires: augeas" because it contains "-laugeas". Ok, I am adding a Requires for augeas, libxslt, and libxml-2.0 to netcf.pc and taking out the -laugeas. I'll post an updated spec/srpm in a minute. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 18:11:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:11:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151811.n3FIBYKJ029175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-15 14:11:33 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 18:10:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151810.n3FIAwSw029624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-15 14:10:57 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 18:10:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151810.n3FIAZBY029538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-15 14:10:34 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 18:09:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151809.n3FI9qKD029149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-15 14:09:51 EDT --- Well, * For this package - Actually the needed scriptlets are for "update-desktop-database", not for "update-mime-database": https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database * Usually a person who needs sponsorship is required to - either submit another review request - or do a pre-review of other person's request as written in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored I checked your other review requests very quickly and they looks good to some extent. ----------------------------------------------------------------- This package (photoprint) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10/11, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 18:23:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493750] Review Request: netcf - a library for managing network configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151823.n3FINdYs031799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493750 --- Comment #4 from David Lutterkort 2009-04-15 14:23:39 EDT --- Updated SRPM/spec: SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/netcf/download/netcf-0.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Spec: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/netcf/download/netcf.spec Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1300743 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 18:40:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:40:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481040] Review Request: skyeye - integrated simulation environment for typical Embedded Computer Systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151840.n3FIeNT9004756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481040 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant 2009-04-15 14:40:21 EDT --- The project we were using this tool for has ended, so my interest for this packaged kind of vanished. And since no one seems interested in doing a review, I am retiring this review request. Thanks Chitlesh and Aanjhan for the support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 18:48:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:48:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151848.n3FImYxH006733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-15 14:48:33 EDT --- Some notes: * Timestamps - Please add 'INSTALL="install -p"' to 'make install' to keep timestamps on installed files. This method usually works for Makefiles gerenated by recent autotools. * Directory ownership issue - This package should also own the directory %{_datadir}/photoprint/borders/ itself. ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership especially: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories#Wildcarding_Files_inside_a_Created_Directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 19:37:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151937.n3FJb3BK017209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-15 15:37:02 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.smartlink.ee/~kalev/powwow.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smartlink.ee/~kalev/powwow-1.2.14-1.fc11.src.rpm * Wed Apr 15 2009 Kalev Lember - 1.2.14-1 - Update to powwow 1.2.14. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 19:52:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:52:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427034] Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151952.n3FJqM6n020530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427034 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-04-15 15:52:18 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: nntpgrab New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 20:47:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904152047.n3FKllss001376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 Christopher Grebs changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cg at webshox.org --- Comment #21 from Christopher Grebs 2009-04-15 16:47:44 EDT --- Hey there, is there any progress on this? I'm running a local compiled version of the plugins right now, so it would be very cool to get the plugins from the repository. Thanks in advance, Christopher. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 21:02:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492133] Review Request: mingw32-libglade2 - MinGW Windows Libglade2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904152102.n3FL2Slk004427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492133 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kalev at smartlink.ee --- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-15 17:02:27 EDT --- Some quick notes: - The corresponding Fedora libglade2 package is now at version 2.6.4, and according to MinGW packaging guidelines the versions should match native package if possible. - Native libglade2-2.6.4-1 package has an additional libglade-secondary.patch which is probably useful to the mingw32 package too. - New, recently updated Fedora Packaging Guidelines prefer %global macro over %define: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define - Static libraries (libglade-2.0.a) need to go in a -static subpackage. - HTML documentation in %{_mingw32_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/libglade duplicates the one in native Fedora package and according to MinGW packaging guidelines it should be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 21:09:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904152109.n3FL97Ph006271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 --- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-15 17:09:05 EDT --- > I guess it is. Putting > iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf8 Changelog > tmpfile > touch -r Changelog tmpfile > mv -f tmpfile Changelog > into %prep solved the issue for me. Guess from what?? Using iso8859-15 give the same result. And any other 8-bit encoding may be on this place. "Ville Skytt?" is right family how you think? > I think this is my bad. I should've tested this before I spoke in the first > place. Yes, if GCJ (which supports only up to java 1.5) doesn't build the jar > file properly, it doesn't make sense to build the aot bits. Everyone has the right to make a mistake. No problem. I delete this bits. > > And what is more strange: This package builded fine on my local machine, but > > failed in koji (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1299756) on > > %check stage. May be internet connection not available in mock chroot?? > > Any suggestions? > > > > http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/dnsjava/dnsjava-2.0.6-4.fc9.src.rpm > > Another thing I should have tested. Koji disables internet connection during > package building, which is a good thing. Since we do need a connection for > these tests, it doesn't make sense to run these tests during a standard build > on koji. > > But I think we should keep the code there and comment it out (or put an > %if do_test > %check > > %endif > clause around it and disable the tests on top of the SPEC file via > %global do_test 0 > ). In either case, we need to explain in the SPEC file why we disabled them by > default. I think the same. Done. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/dnsjava/dnsjava-2.0.6-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 21:13:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:13:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904152113.n3FLDZp6007396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 --- Comment #7 from Christian Krause 2009-04-15 17:13:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Spec URL: > http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/razertool-0.0.7/razertool.spec > > SRPM URL: > http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/razertool-0.0.7/razertool-0.0.7-2.fc10.src.rpm > > I fixed the pixmaps issue. Thanks! Yes, that fixed the problem. A minor issue has leaked in with the latest fix: Since you've used %{_datadir}/%{name}/* to package the files in /usr/share/razertool/*, only the contents of the directory but not the directory itself is packaged. This lead to an directory which isn't owned by any package: rpm -qf /usr/share/razertool file /usr/share/razertool is not owned by any package The fix is quite easy, just use %{_datadir}/%{name}/ or %{_datadir}/%{name} to package the complete directory. Just for completness: please also removed the unused line: #rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/ from the spec file. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 21:40:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:40:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904152140.n3FLeebB012863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-15 17:40:39 EDT --- No correction of Christian's comment, just a more elaborate explanation for our new contributor: (In reply to comment #7) > %{_datadir}/%{name}/ > or > %{_datadir}/%{name} I would prefer %{_datadir}/%{name}/. It doesn't make a difference from the technical point of view, but another human that reads the spec will realize that it's a dir and not a file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 22:02:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:02:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904152202.n3FM2Quf016343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 22:11:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:11:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486757] Review Request: divine-mc - Multi-core model checking system for proving specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904152211.n3FMBqFi019305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486757 --- Comment #18 from Petr Rockai 2009-04-15 18:11:50 EDT --- Hi, I have uploaded divine-mc 1.4 today, that includes an important correctness fix for the nested DFS implementation that's by default used for single-threaded verification runs. Additionally, it improves performance of OWCTY in some cases (the algorithm used for multi-threaded verification). Unfortunately, I didn't get around to fix the administrative problems you have encountered while working on the package -- mostly the promela jars issue and the incomplete "make install" target. I'll try to make a 1.4.1 release next week that would address those. Thanks, Petr. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 22:44:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:44:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904152244.n3FMiHlI025085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-15 18:44:15 EDT --- REVIEW FOR 29fc1c52245dc4cb3af80a3c3fc52556 pdfposter-0.4.6-1.fc10.src.rpm OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/pdfposter-0.4.6-1.fc11.* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. CHECK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. CHECK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5 b392f7df419c6595a3ca6a80ebc80325 OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 (noarch) N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described, but I was able to crash it with a certain file N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. OK - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other Items: OK - Timestamps are preserved where necessary OK - Latest stable version packaged OK - egg info rebuilt from source and included in package Issues: - License: COPYING and PKG-INFO claim it's GPLv3, but according to the homepage it's LGPL. Please ask upstream whether it's GPL or LGPL and a single version only or any later version. - Application crashed with this file: http://www.arcor.de/pdf/arcor/privat/produkte/arcor_dsl/arcor_starterbox_bedienungsanleitung3.pdf $ pdfposter -p a2 Downloads/arcor_starterbox_bedienungsanleitung3.pdf testposter.pdf Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pdfposter", line 8, in load_entry_point('pdftools.pdfposter==0.4.6', 'console_scripts', 'pdfposter')() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pdftools/pdfposter/cmd.py", line 118, in run main(opts, *args) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pdftools/pdfposter/__init__.py", line 295, in main for i, page in enumerate(inpdf.pages): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyPdf/utils.py", line 78, in __getitem__ len_self = len(self) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyPdf/utils.py", line 73, in __len__ return self.lengthFunction() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyPdf/pdf.py", line 334, in getNumPages self._flatten() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyPdf/pdf.py", line 499, in _flatten catalog = self.trailer["/Root"].getObject() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyPdf/generic.py", line 466, in __getitem__ return dict.__getitem__(self, key).getObject() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyPdf/generic.py", line 165, in getObject return self.pdf.getObject(self).getObject() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyPdf/pdf.py", line 555, in getObject raise Exception, "file has not been decrypted" Exception: file has not been decrypted The crash should be investigated by upstream and is not a blocker. The license however is, so I cannot approve the package at this point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 00:10:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:10:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489418] Review Request: nssbackup - (Not so) Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160010.n3G0AdBm007118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489418 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-15 20:10:38 EDT --- Tom, thank you for confirming my licensing assumption. All points from comment #5 have been solved with the package mentioned in comment #7, thus the nssbackup package is: APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 00:48:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492969] Review Request: lv2dynparam - LV2 dynamic parameters extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160048.n3G0miq3012941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492969 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-15 20:48:43 EDT --- lv2dynparam-2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lv2dynparam-2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 01:28:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:28:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160128.n3G1Snwa019729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-15 21:28:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > > I guess it is. Putting > > iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf8 Changelog > tmpfile > > touch -r Changelog tmpfile > > mv -f tmpfile Changelog > > into %prep solved the issue for me. > Guess from what?? Using iso8859-15 give the same result. And any other 8-bit > encoding may be on this place. > "Ville Skytt?" is right family how you think? > It might work, but I don't know if Ville will allow you to decode his family. Anyway, I think what happens is: These iso8859-X encodings are very close to each other. They only have a small number of characters that differ between each other. Since this text doesn't contain any nontrivial characters that are different in some of these iso8859-X encodings, all (or most) of these encodings will work during the iconv conversion. The package is good to go. Beware that, on the last SRPM above, the default is set to *do* the tests. You will need to change that behavior before you commit, otherwise koji will fail. ------------------------------------------ This package (dnsjava) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------ Since you are now more experienced in packaging java stuff, would you like to check out my java review requests? They are all quite similar to this one in terms of packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 03:01:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492197] Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160301.n3G31VbX005244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-15 23:01:30 EDT --- Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/toot2.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/toot2-3-0.2.beta1.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 3-0.2.beta1 - Disable building of AOT bits, since this package requires java > 1.5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 03:02:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:02:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492201] Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160302.n3G32hN6005397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-15 23:02:42 EDT --- Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tootaudioservers.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tootaudioservers-2.0-2.64svn.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 2.0-2.64svn - Don't build AOT bits (this package requires java > 1.5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 03:41:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496021] New: Review Request: perl-Getopt-ArgvFile - Interpolates script options from files into @ARGV or another array Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Getopt-ArgvFile - Interpolates script options from files into @ARGV or another array https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496021 Summary: Review Request: perl-Getopt-ArgvFile - Interpolates script options from files into @ARGV or another array Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Getopt-ArgvFile.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Getopt-ArgvFile-1.11-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module simply interpolates option file hints in @ARGV by the contents of the pointed files. This enables option reading from files instead of or additional to the usual reading from the command line. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1301441 Note that current upstream release is under Artistic 1.0, but the author has agreed to relicense under Artistic 2.0 and grants permission to release the current version under Artistic 2.0. A copy of the email is included in the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:07:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496021] Review Request: perl-Getopt-ArgvFile - Interpolates script options from files into @ARGV or another array In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160407.n3G47R1G013507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496021 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-16 00:07:25 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1301441 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 42117db2af4a24c062b2da25d4fdf756 Getopt-ArgvFile-1.11.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=10, Tests=43, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.02 sys + 0.26 cusr 0.06 csys = 0.36 CPU) + Package perl-Getopt-ArgvFile-1.11-1.fc11.noarch => Provides: perl(Getopt::ArgvFile) Requires: perl >= 0:5.003 perl(Carp) perl(Cwd) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(Text::ParseWords) perl(strict) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:12:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492898] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160412.n3G4CoPb016827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492898 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-04-16 00:12:49 EDT --- Just a note that I had already submitted griffith long before you did at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458402 Overriding it by submitting a different review request just means that quite a bit of work has been duplicated which is unfortunate. In the normal course, I would have just marked it as a duplicate but since it has been already approved, maybe you can compare the spec and see if there any useful improvements you can copy? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:17:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:17:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160417.n3G4HO2Q015423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-16 00:17:23 EDT --- Attempted again to mock build at koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1301463 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:23:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:23:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160423.n3G4NS60016493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-16 00:23:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:22:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:22:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427034] Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160422.n3G4MFri016361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427034 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-16 00:22:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:24:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160424.n3G4Ojpc016792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-16 00:24:43 EDT --- Please use a cvs template here to let us know what you want: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:32:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:32:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495801] Review Request: json - JavaScript Object Notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160432.n3G4WCC9020392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495801 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-16 00:32:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:29:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494965] Review Request: pianobooster - A MIDI file player that teaches you how to play the piano In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160429.n3G4Tqk6019571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494965 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-16 00:29:50 EDT --- I assume you want a F-11 branch as well here. cvs done with an F-11 branch too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:28:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160428.n3G4SQdL019444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-16 00:28:24 EDT --- cvs done. Do remember to assign the bug to the reviewer and move it to assigned. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496021] Review Request: perl-Getopt-ArgvFile - Interpolates script options from files into @ARGV or another array In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160430.n3G4UCE6019915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496021 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-16 00:30:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Getopt-ArgvFile Short Description: Interpolates script options from files into @ARGV or another array Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:31:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:31:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160431.n3G4V0bn018099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-16 00:30:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:33:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495805] Review Request: jsl - Check JavaScript code for common mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160433.n3G4XPuc018664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495805 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-16 00:33:24 EDT --- I assume you want an F-11 branch here as well. cvs done with an F-11 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:34:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495875] Review Request: leonidas-kde-theme - Leonidas KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160434.n3G4YmmD020726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495875 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-16 00:34:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:35:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:35:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495925] Review Request: pyxmlsec - Python bindings for the XML Security Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160435.n3G4Zvhk019269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495925 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-16 00:35:55 EDT --- I assume you want a F-11 branch here. cvs done with F-11 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:38:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:38:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160438.n3G4c6pm021480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:53:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:53:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492898] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160453.n3G4rneo022086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492898 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-16 00:53:48 EDT --- Oops, we (me and Simon) both missed that. Comparing the SRPM's I see that both has its advantages. Rahul's package has the extra artwork (but its source should be mentioned in the SPEC file). On the other hand, Simon's package does not duplicate the python-sqlalchemy package. I can revoke my approval. But since this one passed the review already, would you like to maintain it together? It's Rahul's call, I'm fine either way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:55:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495403] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Storage - An serialization framework for Moose classes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160455.n3G4tovm024889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495403 --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-16 00:55:49 EDT --- (sorry this is taking so long; $work has its way of interfering... :)) Hrm. Well, I think that's a pretty reasonable approach. I tend to use "is it filtered in META.yml or otherwise hidden from the CPAN indexer", but TMTOWTDI :) In this case, that's a stub class that Moose uses to help do name resolution on traits. It's made available when the owning file is use'd, and could reasonably be looked for if we ever get the autoreq handling Moose-y bits. We also have precedent for this, in that, e.g. perl-RPC-XML does the same sort of thing (multiple packages in one .pm) and perl-App-Asciio does it in reverse (multiple .pm's for a single class). I guess the heart of the question is: are perl(*) provides file or package based? I'd say it's package based, given the way autoprov currently works, but it does seem ripe for discussion... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 05:00:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495398] Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160500.n3G50iRk025772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495398 --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-16 01:00:43 EDT --- Koji (success) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1301510 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 05:01:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160501.n3G51aEU025867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-16 01:01:36 EDT --- Koji (success) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1301504 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:57:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:57:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160457.n3G4vrui025081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:57:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160457.n3G4vsZL025104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 04:59:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:59:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492898] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160459.n3G4xD27025238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492898 --- Comment #7 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-04-16 00:59:12 EDT --- I have no personal interest in it. Someone asked in Fedora India list and I offered to do it with them. If you can integrate the useful portions of my spec file such as the extra artwork, that would be nice. Can be done post import as well. Artwork source is the same place as the software itself http://download.berlios.de/griffith/griffith-extra-artwork-0.9.4.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 05:00:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:00:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495398] Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160500.n3G502lY023249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495398 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Net-UPnP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 05:02:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:02:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495398] Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160502.n3G52nHT023619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495398 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 05:06:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:06:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160506.n3G56LOX026771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 05:06:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160506.n3G56DT8026735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-16 01:06:12 EDT --- is yaneti sponsored in packager group? I did search in packager for submitter but didn't find any information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 05:02:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:02:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495398] Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160502.n3G52kF1026046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495398 --- Comment #7 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-16 01:02:46 EDT --- Don't sweat it; there's always a first time :) Looks good! koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1301510 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (BSD); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): 4ce2c0b734b2393f49f857f686b835bb2919eb05 Net-UPnP-1.41.tar.gz 4ce2c0b734b2393f49f857f686b835bb2919eb05 Net-UPnP-1.41.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-3.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-3.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-3.fc10.src.rpm perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Test::More) =====> perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-3.fc10.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-3.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Net::UPnP) = 1.41 perl(Net::UPnP::AV::Container) perl(Net::UPnP::AV::Content) perl(Net::UPnP::AV::Item) perl(Net::UPnP::AV::MediaRenderer) perl(Net::UPnP::AV::MediaServer) perl(Net::UPnP::ActionResponse) perl(Net::UPnP::ControlPoint) perl(Net::UPnP::Device) perl(Net::UPnP::GW::Gateway) perl(Net::UPnP::HTTP) perl(Net::UPnP::HTTPResponse) perl(Net::UPnP::QueryResponse) perl(Net::UPnP::Service) perl-Net-UPnP = 1.41-3.fc10 ====> requires for perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-3.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Net::UPnP) perl(Net::UPnP::AV::Container) perl(Net::UPnP::AV::Content) perl(Net::UPnP::AV::Item) perl(Net::UPnP::ActionResponse) perl(Net::UPnP::Device) perl(Net::UPnP::HTTP) perl(Net::UPnP::HTTPResponse) perl(Net::UPnP::QueryResponse) perl(Net::UPnP::Service) perl(Socket) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 05:09:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:09:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160509.n3G592Eu024528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 05:06:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160506.n3G56JRr024318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-16 01:06:19 EDT --- I note that the LICENSE file is executable; please remove this bit before importing/building. (Note also the rpmlint warning on it.) Other than that, looks good. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1301504 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): 4e4f596fdd81d0c85f6f7359281903b4446b7f80 POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP-0.2.tar.gz 4e4f596fdd81d0c85f6f7359281903b4446b7f80 POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP-0.2.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP-0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP-0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP-0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm perl(POE) perl(Test::Pod) perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) =====> perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP-0.2-1.fc10.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP-0.2/LICENSE 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ====> provides for perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP-0.2-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(POE::Filter::Transparent::SMTP) = 0.2 perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP = 0.2-1.fc10 ====> requires for perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP-0.2-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(POE::Filter::Line) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED (provided LICENSE is made non-executable) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 05:09:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160509.n3G59udk027106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #12 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-16 01:09:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Okay, that took a bit of effort to get done. Yeah... Annoying but necessary, until rpm lets us exclude things better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 05:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160512.n3G5C0ai025207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #13 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-16 01:11:59 EDT --- Koji (success) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1301530 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 05:22:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160522.n3G5MREF029369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-16 01:22:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > is yaneti sponsored in packager group? I did search in packager for submitter > but didn't find any information. Erm... good question. Yanko, are you sponsored? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 05:36:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160536.n3G5a3eV031594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #14 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-16 01:36:02 EDT --- Hmm... so a couple things. 1) autoreq is still disabled :) 2) looks like we need to BR DBD::SQLite >From doing the two above and issuing a scratch build, we get: 3) looks like one test fails on ppc64?! http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1301541 # Failed test 'removing all bad wine' # at t/02-basic.t line 245. # got: '3' # expected: '0E0' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 67. t/02-basic.t ............... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/67 subtests This same test passes cleanly on my local machine (x86_64). Hm. I suspect this might have something to do with DBD::SQLite on this arch than anything else... Let me see if I can get the level of that module brought up to 1.21, and if that impacts anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 05:35:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160535.n3G5Zwwo028830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-16 01:35:57 EDT --- When I checked yaneti username on IRC with zodbot I see not a single approved group for this user. He need to first get approved for cla_done and cla_fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 05:38:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:38:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495805] Review Request: jsl - Check JavaScript code for common mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160538.n3G5cpmF029254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495805 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-16 01:38:50 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 05:39:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:39:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495925] Review Request: pyxmlsec - Python bindings for the XML Security Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160539.n3G5d5A9029318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495925 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-16 01:39:04 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 05:46:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160546.n3G5kdtj000854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-16 01:46:38 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/razertool-0.0.7/razertool.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/razertool-0.0.7/razertool-0.0.7-3.fc10.src.rpm * Thu Apr 16 2009 Andreas Osowski - 0.0.7-3 - Code cleanup - Permission fix - Added the rules file for udev -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 05:47:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160547.n3G5lkGK030800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 --- Comment #6 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-04-16 01:47:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > is yaneti sponsored in packager group? I did search in packager for submitter > > but didn't find any information. > > Erm... good question. Yanko, are you sponsored? Nope, sorry. This review submission as well as my recent others were more for "documentation" purposes. I happen to need rpms of these for work related reasons and now that I made them I might as well post them somewhere. The package review queue is the place I personally check first if something is not already packaged, so it seems like a good place to put these. I'll be happy if someone jumps in to maintain them... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 06:03:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:03:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160603.n3G63aM1001176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 --- Comment #7 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-04-16 02:03:35 EDT --- fixed LICENSE permissions http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP/perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP-0.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 06:23:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495398] Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160623.n3G6Nlic004567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495398 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-16 02:23:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-UPnP Short Description: Perl extension for UPnP Owners: jussilehtola Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 06:40:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492613] Review Request: canto - Atom/RSS feed reader based on ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160640.n3G6eBrt010099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492613 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-16 02:40:10 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/canto-0.6.9/canto.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/canto-0.6.9/canto-0.6.9-1.fc10.src.rpm * Thu Apr 16 2009 Andreas Osowski - 0.6.9-1 - Updated to 0.6.9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 06:46:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:46:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160646.n3G6kQqg008597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 --- Comment #7 from Ramakrishna Reddy 2009-04-16 02:46:25 EDT --- correct path of the SRPM and SPEC Spec URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-pytools.spec SRPM URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-pytools-8-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 07:12:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 03:12:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160712.n3G7CguB016329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-16 03:12:41 EDT --- gnote-0.1.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnote-0.1.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 07:37:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 03:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225660] Merge Review: crash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160737.n3G7b35t019351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225660 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 07:38:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 03:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483641] Review Request: perl-Date-Tiny - Date object with as little code as possible In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160738.n3G7cuhQ022080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483641 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2009-04-16 03:38:55 EDT --- the package is in updates for some time, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 07:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 03:55:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160755.n3G7tKYK025666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-04-16 03:55:16 EDT --- Package imported and built. Thank you very much -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 08:03:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160803.n3G83x6Z027715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-16 04:03:56 EDT --- * Wed Apr 15 2009 Anithra P Janakiraman 1.0-7 - Changes to spec file. Anithra, this is the extreme example of poorly written changelog entry. When writing change log entries, describe what you changed, such as: - Don't strip binary anymore - Correct the file modes ... Anyways, not anything that would block the review. - compiler flags used correctly - spec file clean, legible, using American english - filelist sane - builds fine in mock - requires fine - provides fine - builds in mock - rpmlint happy The package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 08:12:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495669] Review Request: sgpio - Intel SGPIO enclosure management utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160812.n3G8COqp027347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495669 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-16 04:12:23 EDT --- The packager and I agreed to change the version to more standard 1.2.0.10, but what remains is the mess upstream is doing with their releases. We expect it will improve in the future. There are no blockers now and this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 08:14:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:14:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160814.n3G8Eb6E030178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Liang Suilong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #2 from Liang Suilong 2009-04-16 04:14:36 EDT --- Here is a new package. I have added the missed buildrequires. SRPM: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/shutter-0.70.2-2.ppa3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/shutter.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 08:46:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:46:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489418] Review Request: nssbackup - (Not so) Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160846.n3G8kMoW002475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489418 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-16 04:46:21 EDT --- thanks for your review Robert New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nssbackup Short Description: (Not so) Simple Backup Suite for desktop use Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-11 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 08:49:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160849.n3G8nqtX005688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-16 04:49:52 EDT --- febootstrap-1.5-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/febootstrap-1.5-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 08:51:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160851.n3G8pxLS006422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #15 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-04-16 04:51:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > > 1) autoreq is still disabled :) /me is an idiot. > This same test passes cleanly on my local machine (x86_64). Hm. Now that I've add perl(DBD::SQLite) to the BRs, I'm getting it on mock/fedora-rawhide-i386 but I can't reproduce on my local machine (fedora-10-i386). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 08:49:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160849.n3G8nTHK003033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-16 04:49:28 EDT --- Done for Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1301835 Done for F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1301844 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 08:58:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160858.n3G8wr4u005313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #21 from Anithra 2009-04-16 04:58:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > Anithra, this is the extreme example of poorly written changelog entry. When > writing change log entries, describe what you changed, such as: > > - Don't strip binary anymore > - Correct the file modes Point taken!. will do. > > The package is > > APPROVED Thanks Lubomir! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 09:03:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160903.n3G93q4d006955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Anithra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Anithra 2009-04-16 05:03:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: systemtapguiserver Short Description: Server for the eclipse-systemtapgui client Owners: anithra Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 09:07:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:07:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490725] Review Request: geanyvc - Version Controler plugin for geany In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160907.n3G97rlL008191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490725 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-16 05:07:52 EDT --- geanyvc-0.5-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/geanyvc-0.5-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 09:09:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160909.n3G99V7j010356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-16 05:09:30 EDT --- Fails to build on F-10 at the moment: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1301871 Requires fakechroot 2.9 which is still in F-10 updates-testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 09:16:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:16:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492133] Review Request: mingw32-libglade2 - MinGW Windows Libglade2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160916.n3G9Gop4010329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492133 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-16 05:16:49 EDT --- Thanks. Update according to your comments: Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libglade2.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libglade2-2.6.4-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 09:21:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:21:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486009] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish - Quick two-way blowfish encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160921.n3G9LnOm012809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-16 05:21:48 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish New Branches: EL-5 Owners: xavierb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 09:18:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495669] Review Request: sgpio - Intel SGPIO enclosure management utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160918.n3G9IExv011969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495669 Jiri Moskovcak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jiri Moskovcak 2009-04-16 05:18:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sgpio Short Description: Intel SGPIO enclosure management utility Owners: jmoskovc Branches: F11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 09:33:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160933.n3G9Xx0J013471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-16 05:33:57 EDT --- Looks good, approved! Once eekboek also is in good shape I'll sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 09:47:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:47:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160947.n3G9l8Hh016440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-16 05:47:07 EDT --- mingw32-libp11-0.2.4-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libp11-0.2.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 09:45:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160945.n3G9jVf0016180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-16 05:45:29 EDT --- mingw32-libp11-0.2.4-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libp11-0.2.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 09:48:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160948.n3G9mdem017975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Zarko changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zarko.pintar at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Zarko 2009-04-16 05:48:38 EDT --- Hello, I am not a sponsor, so I can not take a sponsorship of you, but I can make an unofficial review. At first, when writing a package from scratch, you should base your spec file on the Fedora spec file template, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Rpmdevtools command: rpmdev-newspec For naming, licensing and other conventions, see&study Package Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines For using macros inside od spec, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros Build fails with this error: usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lfbclient please, fix this... regards, Zarko -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 09:52:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:52:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160952.n3G9qpaM018983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-16 05:52:49 EDT --- I think you should split this into subpackes, so it can be used by other desktop environments as well without installing the Gnome bits. - gtk-nimbus-engine (arch, includes libnimbus.so and gtkrc, requires gtk-engines for dir ownership) - nimbus-icon-theme (noarch, contains all the icons, requires hicolor-icon theme for dir ownership) - nimbus-metacity-theme (noarch, includes %{_datadir}/themes/nimbus/metacity-1, requires metacity) - nimbus-theme-gnome (noarch, requires all the others and only includes index.theme) More issues/suggestions: - Group should be User Interface/X or UserInterface/Desktops - %configure --disable-static and drop the devel package - %{nimbus_dir}/index.theme is listed twice in %files section. Once as %{nimbus_dir}/index.theme and once as content of in %{_datadir}/themes/nimbus/ - don't use a define for %{nimbus_dir} because it makes %files more complicated (as the duplicate index.theme proves), it's only used twice in the spec and will most likely never change. - preserve timestamp during iconv, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackagingTricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 10:15:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161015.n3GAFAaF022332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 --- Comment #8 from Johan Vromans 2009-04-16 06:15:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I would say that bundling SQLite backend to main package is > undesired solution. However, in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286#c6, Hans de Goede writes: > I know this is optional but in Fedora we always try to enable as much > features in packaes as possible, even if this drags in a few additional > dependencies. Following this practice, it would be preferred to include the SQLite driver in the main package, especially since SQLite is relatively small and already a core part of many packages. This would result in a working installation for people that do not read READMEs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 10:24:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161024.n3GAOwAD025499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 --- Comment #10 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-16 06:24:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > It might work, but I don't know if Ville will allow you to decode his family. I speak what you may decode it from ANY encoding in any language (Greek, Russian, French, Polish) and I do not understood you guessing what it should be based on iso8859-X family!!! > The package is good to go. Beware that, on the last SRPM above, the default is > set to *do* the tests. You will need to change that behavior before you commit, > otherwise koji will fail. Off course. It is done. > > ------------------------------------------ > This package (dnsjava) is APPROVED by oget > ------------------------------------------ Orcan Ogetbil, tenk you very much for the review. > Since you are now more experienced in packaging java stuff, would you like to > check out my java review requests? They are all quite similar to this one in > terms of packaging. Ok, I try do review. But, but... do not wait it shortly. I do not make review until now! I start reading guidelines for that now. And, ok, first review will be yours! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 10:34:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:34:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161034.n3GAY6eU026012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 --- Comment #9 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-16 06:34:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #5) > > I would say that bundling SQLite backend to main package is > > undesired solution. > > However, in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286#c6, Hans de > Goede writes: > > > I know this is optional but in Fedora we always try to enable as much > > features in packaes as possible, even if this drags in a few additional > > dependencies. > > Following this practice, it would be preferred to include the SQLite driver in > the main package, especially since SQLite is relatively small and already a > core part of many packages. > > This would result in a working installation for people that do not read > READMEs. +1 Regards, Hans -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 10:37:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:37:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161037.n3GAbksY026811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 --- Comment #11 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-16 06:37:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dnsjava Short Description: Java DNS implementation Owners: hubbitus Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 10:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161038.n3GAcAhf028307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 11:11:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492613] Review Request: canto - Atom/RSS feed reader based on ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161111.n3GBBMai002409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492613 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-16 07:11:20 EDT --- The new package fa2b37ac68d154112a7be7754af846bd canto-0.6.9-1.fc10.src.rpm Fixes all outstanding issues: OK - rpmlint: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/canto-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - License tag matches actual license (GPLv2) OK - BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel OK - Requires: python-chardet APPROVED. Removing NEEDSPONSOR, because I'm going to sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 11:13:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492613] Review Request: canto - Atom/RSS feed reader based on ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161113.n3GBDchN001185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492613 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-16 07:13:37 EDT --- Thanks alot! I'm going to remove the flag from all my other tickets, too then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 11:14:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492583] Review Request: purple-gfire - Xfire plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161114.n3GBEVYB002820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 11:14:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161114.n3GBEix5002867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 11:15:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161115.n3GBFQnA003351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #10 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-16 07:15:24 EDT --- Christoph Wickert is sponsoring me, FE-NEEDSPONSOR removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 11:18:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493750] Review Request: netcf - a library for managing network configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161118.n3GBIkr2003764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493750 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-16 07:18:45 EDT --- Okay, packaging-wise the 0.0.2-1.fc10 src.rpm is fine: APPROVED [...] The remaining minor issues are within your upstream tarball: * Duplicated CFLAGS. Quoting from: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1300747&name=build.log >>> make[3]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/netcf-0.0.2/src' /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. --std=gnu99 -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -I ../gnulib/lib -Wall -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -Wextra -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Waggregate-return -Wstrict-prototypes -Winline -Wredundant-decls -Wno-sign-compare -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i586 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -MT netcf.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/netcf.Tpo -c -o netcf.lo netcf.c <<< Actually, it's _not_ duplicated CFLAGS as it seemed first, but that you AC_SUBST default NETCF_CFLAGS in the configure script (precisely: -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fasynchronous-unwind-tables), which are added a second time with Fedora's global optflags. I've expected Fedora's CFLAGS to override the defaults except for a hardcoded -fexceptions (which you want for interoperability with netcf API users written in C++). * pkgconfig file issues. The result of adding the "Requires" to the .pc file is this: $ pkg-config --cflags netcf -I/usr/include/libxml2 $ pkg-config --libs netcf -lnetcf -laugeas -lxslt -lz -lm -lxml2 This is not needed for shared linking (the default with Fedora), because you don't need all those libs and headers when building with the libnetcf API. You only need them when linking statically (comment 2), and then you would prefer "Requires.private" and "Libs.private" and "pkg-config --static ...". The current pkgconfig inter-package dependencies lead to dependency-bloat. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 11:36:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:36:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493750] Review Request: netcf - a library for managing network configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161136.n3GBaVkQ007549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493750 --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-16 07:36:30 EDT --- And similar to my earlier comment 2, on Fedora <= 10, where there are no automatic pkgconfig RPM dependencies added by rpmbuild, the netcf.pc file's current dependencies lead to missing RPM Requires in netcf-devel (for the needed -devel pkgs). So, really better switch to "Requires.private" and "Libs.private". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 11:53:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:53:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161153.n3GBr1lQ009973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 --- Comment #8 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-16 07:53:00 EDT --- Succes! http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1302103 The problem was with tag. Because perl-Data-Dumper-Names are tagged into dist-f11-updates-candidate or dist-f12 and my scratch builds were into dist-f11, which doesn't know about perl-Data-Dumper-Names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 12:11:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:11:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495950] Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161211.n3GCBx1R016986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495950 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 12:25:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:25:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495950] Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161225.n3GCP6g2020182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495950 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-16 08:25:05 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSFIX - Source code contains no license headers. - According to README: "Copyright 2009, distributed under terms of the GPL" - Attached COPYING is GPLv2. According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing the correct license tag in this case is GPL+. Please contact upstream, if this is what they intended. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSFIX - Add COPYING to %doc. Drop webpage/ and just include webpage/index.html. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 12:29:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492613] Review Request: canto - Atom/RSS feed reader based on ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161229.n3GCTZtg018371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492613 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-16 08:29:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: canto Short Description: Atom/RSS feed reader based on ncurses Owners: th0br0 Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: th0br0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 12:35:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:35:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496067] Review Request: perl-Net-OAuth - OAuth protocol support library for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161235.n3GCZ3Io019885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496067 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-16 08:35:02 EDT --- rpmlint silent builds in el5 mock (this time for real) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 12:34:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496067] New: Review Request: perl-Net-OAuth - OAuth protocol support library for Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-OAuth - OAuth protocol support library for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496067 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-OAuth - OAuth protocol support library for Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Net-OAuth.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/perl-Net-OAuth-0.14-1.el5.src.rpm Description: Perl implementation of OAuth, an open protocol to allow secure API authentication in a simple and standard method from desktop and web applications. In practical terms, a mechanism for a Consumer to request protected resources from a Service Provider on behalf of a user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 12:41:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492133] Review Request: mingw32-libglade2 - MinGW Windows Libglade2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161241.n3GCf0JJ021454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492133 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kalev at smartlink.ee Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-16 08:40:59 EDT --- Taking for review. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1302131 Rpmlint output contains only expected warnings/errors from a Mingw32 package: $ rpmlint mingw32-libglade2-2.6.4-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-libglade2-2.6.4-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-libglade2-static-2.6.4-1.fc11.noarch.rpm mingw32-libglade2-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libglade-2.0.a mingw32-libglade2-static.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 12:52:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:52:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496067] Review Request: perl-Net-OAuth - OAuth protocol support library for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161252.n3GCqea8024695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496067 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmahut at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 13:07:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496067] Review Request: perl-Net-OAuth - OAuth protocol support library for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161307.n3GD7Hmi030636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496067 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Marek Mahut 2009-04-16 09:07:16 EDT --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 13:13:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:13:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496067] Review Request: perl-Net-OAuth - OAuth protocol support library for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161313.n3GDDfYJ032275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496067 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-16 09:13:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-OAuth Short Description: OAuth protocol support library for Perl Owners: foo bar Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 13:15:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:15:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492133] Review Request: mingw32-libglade2 - MinGW Windows Libglade2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161315.n3GDFwb0001037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492133 --- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-16 09:15:57 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-libglade2-2.6.4-1.fc11.src.rpm 2008-04-16 + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint output Only expected Errors/Warnings from a Mingw32 package + Package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name ! Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines Right now static subpackage's requires line is: Requires: %{name} = %{version} But instead it should read: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora LGPLv2+ + License matches the actual package license It is also the same as in the corresponding Fedora libglade2 package + The package contains the license file (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm d1776b40f4e166b5e9c107f1c8fe4139 libglade-2.6.4.tar.bz2 d1776b40f4e166b5e9c107f1c8fe4139 SRPM/libglade-2.6.4.tar.bz2 + Package builds in mock (Fedora Rawhide i586) n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package + Static libraries should be in -static + Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 13:45:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:45:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495693] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6 - Perl 6 Syntax Highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161345.n3GDj3EF004367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495693 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-16 09:45:02 EDT --- > - license field could be complicated > This library also includes the following libraries: > STD.pm by Larry Wall (Artistic License 2.0) > JQuery by John Resig (dual licensed under the MIT and GPL licenses). > > more like (GPL+ or Artistic) and Artistic 2.0 and (MIT or GPLv2) ? > It looks like all of them are needed. > - package installs properly. > Error: Missing Dependency: perl(STD) is needed by package This is fixed by providing perl(STD) in this package. > perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6-0.040-1.fc11.noarch > (perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6-0.040-1.fc11.noarch.rpm) > > - rpmlint has complaints: > perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Cursor.pmc 0644 Other scripts in this directory aren't executable. > - final provides are missing (Cursor) and (STD) Cursor should be used only as internal part, so it shouldn't be provided? > t/01-vim.t ....... skipped: Text::VimColor is not installed I'll made a review ticket for this requirement and then upload new package with koji build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 14:25:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:25:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492133] Review Request: mingw32-libglade2 - MinGW Windows Libglade2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161425.n3GEPp6b013830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492133 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-16 10:25:49 EDT --- Fixed the -static Requires: Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libglade2.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libglade2-2.6.4-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 14:27:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161427.n3GERvC3014188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-16 10:27:56 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.smartlink.ee/~kalev/powwow.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smartlink.ee/~kalev/powwow-1.2.14-2.fc11.src.rpm * Thu Apr 16 2009 Kalev Lember - 1.2.14-2 - Remove COPYING from %%doc, because it is needed at runtime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 14:31:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:31:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495693] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6 - Perl 6 Syntax Highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161431.n3GEVvCZ020322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495693 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-16 10:31:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > - rpmlint has complaints: > > perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6.noarch: E: non-executable-script > > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Cursor.pmc 0644 > Other scripts in this directory aren't executable. Yep - looks like its caused by the shebang. Rather than use a patch to fix the path, how about just removing it instead? > > - final provides are missing (Cursor) and (STD) > Cursor should be used only as internal part, so it shouldn't be provided? it gets installed and is "use"able - why not provide it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 14:37:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492133] Review Request: mingw32-libglade2 - MinGW Windows Libglade2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161437.n3GEb3Pq016816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492133 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-16 10:37:01 EDT --- Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 14:41:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492133] Review Request: mingw32-libglade2 - MinGW Windows Libglade2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161441.n3GEfxno022728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492133 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-16 10:41:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libglade2 Short Description: MinGW Windows Libglade2 library Owners: sailer rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 14:55:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:55:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495403] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Storage - An serialization framework for Moose classes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161455.n3GEtj6h026331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495403 --- Comment #7 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-16 10:55:44 EDT --- I'd say file based myself, give the way autoreq currently seems to work ;) But probably best discussed on the list for real rather than as bugspam. Until it's resolved one way or the other, I bow to your experience - whatever you think is best. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 15:18:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161518.n3GFIHeU028072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-16 11:18:16 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/libguestfs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/libguestfs-0.9.9-12.fc11.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1302368 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 15:50:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:50:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161550.n3GFooWd003575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-16 11:50:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #5) > > I would say that bundling SQLite backend to main package is > > undesired solution. > > However, in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286#c6, Hans de > Goede writes: > > > I know this is optional but in Fedora we always try to enable as much > > features in packaes as possible, even if this drags in a few additional > > dependencies. > > Following this practice, it would be preferred to include the SQLite driver in > the main package, especially since SQLite is relatively small and already a > core part of many packages. > > This would result in a working installation for people that do not read > READMEs. Actually SQLite is rather small and I agree with you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 18:00:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:00:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161800.n3GI0miC001958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-16 14:00:45 EDT --- Removing the duplicated documentation caused a no-documentation complaint from rpm on the -devel package, but that's not an issue. Otherwise I think this is fine now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 18:13:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496117] New: Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496117 Summary: Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: txtoth at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/platformdownload.php?group_id=259513 SRPM URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/platformdownload.php?group_id=259513 Description: Python bindings for XCB -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 19:18:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161918.n3GJIFDM024319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 19:37:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:37:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161937.n3GJbk3I001760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-16 15:37:44 EDT --- I've been remiss in not getting back to this sooner. I did build and install it, but unfortinately after a reboot I was stuck without working uid lookups. nslcd seemed to be running properly at the time. So I guess there's more debugging to be done, but in the meantime I can go ahead and review the packaging. First, therpmlint complaints: nss-ldapd.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog Indeed, the most recent changelog is missing a version. nss-ldapd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/nss-ldapd.conf 0600 This is obviously a security-related file and needs to be hidden. nss-ldapd.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Required-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/nslcd That seems to be bogus; Required-Stop is optional. nss-ldapd.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/nslcd $prog nss-ldapd.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/nslcd $prog nss-ldapd.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/nslcd $prog rpmlint can't comprehend most initscripts. These are bogus. nss-ldapd.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name nslcd One does wonder why the daemon isn't just called "nss-ldapd", but I guess that would make sense. Instead the daemon is "nslcd" so it does make sense for the initscript to carry that name as well. Any reason for not just using a release of "1%{?dist}"? This doesn't seem to be a prerelease package so your release number should be a positive integer. If you're trying to make the initial import of the package have release 1 then it should be OK although I don't really understand why it would matter. I'll admit to not comprehending the dependency on pam_ldap.so, but only because I don't really know what you intend to do with nss_ldap in the future. I'm guessing that this package really doesn't have any need for pam_ldap, and you're just trying to make sure that it stays around in the case that nss-ldapd starts obsoleting nss_ldap. I'm curious as to whether that's really necessary or if you're just doing some CYA. There's a test suite present, but it seems to require an existing ldap server already loaded with test data and it requires the daemon to be running, which probably rules out running it at build time. The scriptlets are pretty complex and somewhat scary. I note that installing this prints 'USELDAP=yes' to the console, which it probably shouldn't. I suppose the egrep call needs -q or a redirect. Other than that, though, they seem to work well enough. However, there are some issues with things that are supported with nss_ldap that are deprecated or not supported with nss-ldapd and I wonder if it's worth worrying about migrating them? Starting nslcd: nslcd: /etc/nss-ldapd.conf:130: option tls_checkpeer is deprecated (and will be removed in an upcoming release), use tls_reqcert instead nslcd: /etc/nss-ldapd.conf:131: option tls_cacertfile is currently untested (please report any successes) I think something's off with the groupadd stuff: getent group nslcd > /dev/null || /usr/sbin/groupadd -r -g 55 ldap Shouldn't it try to add "nslcd" instead of "ldap"? Also, why does this need to have a specific numbered account? Shouldn't any low UID suffice? * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 9e1e44a2dcce2851deb8a402a8aabc5163f2bf26f4476109b3dbab7a230a54ac nss-ldapd-0.6.8.tar.gz * package meets naming guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: config(nss-ldapd) = 0.6.8-0.fc11.1 libnss_ldap.so.2()(64bit) libnss_ldap.so.2(EXPORTED)(64bit) nss-ldapd = 0.6.8-0.fc11.1 nss-ldapd(x86-64) = 0.6.8-0.fc11.1 = /bin/sh ? /lib64/security/pam_ldap.so /sbin/ldconfig chkconfig config(nss-ldapd) = 0.6.8-0.fc11.1 grep initscripts ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit) ld-linux-x86-64.so.2(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit) libgssapi_krb5.so.2()(64bit) libgssapi_krb5.so.2(gssapi_krb5_2_MIT)(64bit) liblber-2.4.so.2()(64bit) libldap_r-2.4.so.2()(64bit) libsasl2.so.2()(64bit) sed * shared libraries installed; ldconfig called properly. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 19:43:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:43:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496133] New: Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 Summary: Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: belegdol at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://belegdol.fedorapeople.org/EMBOSS.spec SRPM URL: http://belegdol.fedorapeople.org/EMBOSS-6.0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: EMBOSS is a new, free Open Source software analysis package specially developed for the needs of the molecular biology (e.g. EMBnet) user community. The software automatically copes with data in a variety of formats and even allows transparent retrieval of sequence data from the web. Also, as extensive libraries are provided with the package, it is a platform to allow other scientists to develop and release software in true open source spirit. EMBOSS also integrates a range of currently available packages and tools for sequence analysis into a seamless whole. Reference for EMBOSS: Rice,P. Longden,I. and Bleasby,A. "EMBOSS: The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite" Trends in Genetics June 2000, vol 16, No 6. pp.276-277 This package is not yet finished, but I thought that bringing the polishing part into public cannot hurt. It builds fine on all primary architectures: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1302809 rpmlint is not silent yet, since I'm not sure how to handle the warnings regarding the executable permissions: EMBOSS.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/profile.d/emboss.sh EMBOSS.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/profile.d/emboss.csh EMBOSS-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation EMBOSS-java.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/EMBOSS-java-6.0.1/api/makeDocs.csh EMBOSS-java.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/EMBOSS/jemboss/utils/install-jemboss-server.sh 0644 EMBOSS-java.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/EMBOSS/jemboss/utils/makeJar.csh 0644 EMBOSS-java.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/EMBOSS/jemboss/api/getClasses.pl 0644 EMBOSS-java.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/EMBOSS/jemboss/utils/makeFileManagerJNLP.sh 0644 EMBOSS-java.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/EMBOSS/jemboss/api/makeDocs.csh 0644 EMBOSS-java.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/EMBOSS/jemboss/runJemboss.sh 0644 EMBOSS-java.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/EMBOSS/jemboss/utils/makeJNLP.sh 0644 EMBOSS-java.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/EMBOSS-java-6.0.1/api/getClasses.pl EMBOSS-java.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/EMBOSS/jemboss/utils/keys.sh 0644 EMBOSS-java.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/EMBOSS-java-6.0.1/api/getClasses.pl /usr/bin/perl EMBOSS-java.x86_64: W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/EMBOSS/jemboss/lib/axis/commons-logging.jar EMBOSS-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libeplplot.so.3.2.7 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 EMBOSS-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 9 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 19:52:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:52:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491617] Review Request: mingw32-libxml++ - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for libxml2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161952.n3GJqG61000774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491617 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kalev at smartlink.ee Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 491617 depends on bug 492113, which changed state. Bug 492113 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-glibmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492113 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-16 15:52:15 EDT --- mingw32-glibmm24 is now in Fedora and we can go on with this review. - In Rawhide the native Fedora libxml++ package has been updated to 2.26.0, and according to MinGW packaging guidelines the versions should match native package if possible. - Please clean up the %install section. It only makes the spec file unreadable if most of a section contains leftovers that aren't actually used. - Removing *.a in %install section only matches the (needed) import library, because static libraries aren't built (configure --disable-static). It seems unnecessary to first delete the import lib and then manually copy it over from .libs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 19:53:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491617] Review Request: mingw32-libxml++ - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for libxml2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161953.n3GJrNau006059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491617 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 19:54:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:54:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161954.n3GJsOgm001068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-16 15:54:21 EDT --- This seems to be new: libirman.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/workmanir ['/usr/lib64'] Any idea why that's just showing up now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 20:05:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904162005.n3GK5CeW004069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-16 16:05:09 EDT --- This failed to build for me on the current F11 snapshot. Processing files: python-sippy-0-0.4.20090409cvs.fc11.noarch Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pHzHPI error: File not found by glob: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-sippy-0-0.4.20090409cvs.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin/*.pyc error: File not found by glob: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-sippy-0-0.4.20090409cvs.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin/*.pyo Looks like bug 182498 has been fixed. You'll need to touch those two files so that you can exclude them, or condititionalize the two exclude lines. I personally use the former approach. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 20:10:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:10:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904162010.n3GKA5on010822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #10 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-16 16:10:03 EDT --- The RPM packaging is now fully based on the pristine version 3.0.0 (http://downloads.sourceforge.net/soci/soci-3.0.0.tar.gz) of the SOCI project (http://soci.sourceforge.net). [And I have created a "soci-3.0.0" branch on my own Subversion repository within the OpenTREP project (http://opentrep.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/opentrep/branches/soci-3.0.0/), so as to allow further evolutions upstream (on the trunk)] The updated files are: Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/opentrep/soci.spec?use_mirror=ovh SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/opentrep/soci-3.0.0-3.fc10.src.rpm?use_mirror=ovh ---------------------------------------- * The HTML documentation is now just copied into %{docdir}, without further process. * Moreover, the general "GNU Autotools compatibility" patch now only contains configure files and makefiles (and alters those existing in the pristine tar-ball). * A full build has been made on Koji for i386 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1302910) and x86_64 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1302916) architectures. SRPMs can be fetched there as well. * rpmlint gives no error and no warning (on the specification file, as well as on source RPM and binary RPM packages). --------------------------------------- I now wait for your feedback/approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 20:52:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495357] Review Request: python-twill - Simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904162052.n3GKqn8v018309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495357 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Matthias Saou 2009-04-16 16:52:48 EDT --- Thanks Till and Kevin. All packages built and pushed to all branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 20:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904162057.n3GKva2w019351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #11 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-16 16:57:35 EDT --- The files have been moved onto http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org: Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/soci.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/soci-3.0.0-3.fc10.src.rpm [Patch URLs: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/soci-3.0.0-fix-gcc43-compatibility.patch and http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/soci-3.0.0-fix-gnu-autotools-compatibility.patch ] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 21:30:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:30:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493750] Review Request: netcf - a library for managing network configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904162130.n3GLUjbd027159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493750 --- Comment #7 from David Lutterkort 2009-04-16 17:30:44 EDT --- I'll fix up the pkg-config file to use Requires.private in the next release. As for the duplicate CFLAGS, I would realy like to keep NETCF_CFLAGS for development builds, and even if I build with CFLAGS then. Thanks for the thorough review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 21:32:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493750] Review Request: netcf - a library for managing network configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904162132.n3GLWMiG027768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493750 David Lutterkort changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from David Lutterkort 2009-04-16 17:32:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: netcf Short Description: Cross-platform network configuration library Owners: lutter Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 21:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494557] Review Request: zatacka - Arcade multiplayer game for 2-6 players on one keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904162137.n3GLbK4F029172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494557 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier at bachelot.org --- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-16 17:37:19 EDT --- I think SDL_prim should be packaged separately and the bundled version should be removed. Then zatacka needs to be patched to build against the external library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 21:58:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496166] New: Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496166 Summary: Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/sakura.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/sakura-2.3.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Sakura is a terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE. It's a terminal emulator with few dependencies, so you don't need a full GNOME desktop installed to have a decent terminal emulator. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 22:01:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:01:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496167] New: Review Request: lilyterm - Light and easy to use X Terminal Emulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lilyterm - Light and easy to use X Terminal Emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496167 Summary: Review Request: lilyterm - Light and easy to use X Terminal Emulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lilyterm.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lilyterm-0.9.6-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: LilyTerm is a light and easy to use libvte based X Terminal Emulator with a lot of features: * Supports multiple tabs, reorderable tabs and hides the tab tray when there is only one tab * Add, close, swith, move, rename tabs with function keys * Disable/Enable function keys for temporary (use <`> by default). * Shows the foreground running command on tab and/or window title. * Change the font name, size, and window size with right click menu. * User custom function keys (need to edit profile). * Support for User/System profiles. * Supports true transparency if the window manager is composited. * Support for transparent background and background saturation. * Support for text and background color (need to edit profile). * Good support for UTF-8. * Decide the text encoding via environment. Using UTF-8 by default. * Change the text encoding with right click menu. Note: Maybe the description is to elaborate, I know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 22:06:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:06:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496168] New: Review Request: termit - Simple terminal emulator based on vte library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: termit - Simple terminal emulator based on vte library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496168 Summary: Review Request: termit - Simple terminal emulator based on vte library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/termit.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/termit-2.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: TermIt is a simple terminal emulator based on vte library with a lot of features: * tabs * bookmarks * sessions * changing tab name * changing font for tabs * encodings (all available from GTK2) * integrated lua interpreter Configuration can be changed via $HOME/.config/termit/termit.cfg file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 22:12:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904162212.n3GMC9de009521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-16 18:12:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libgarmin Short Description: C library to parse and use Garmin image files Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 22:25:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:25:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904162225.n3GMPmYJ012579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |giallu at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 22:25:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:25:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904162225.n3GMPWVP012529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-04-16 18:25:31 EDT --- Ouch, and I did read that page, missing that sentence :( in the case I think I can review this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 22:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904162231.n3GMVQoR008477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-16 18:31:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Any possibility of removing the bundled fonts? > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages I added a patch and the fonts are removed in the prep section. 'bitstream-vera-fonts' as a requirement added. I not sure if the way of working with symlinks is desired but for now I have no better idea. Perhaps anybody can point me to an example. Here are the updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/xsw.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/xsw-0.2.2-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 22:45:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495950] Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904162245.n3GMjmRU011822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495950 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-16 18:45:46 EDT --- Thanks for pointing my mistakes out. (In reply to comment #1) > NEEDSFIX > - Source code contains no license headers. > - According to README: "Copyright 2009, distributed under terms of the GPL" > - Attached COPYING is GPLv2. > > According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing the correct license tag in > this case is GPL+. Please contact upstream, if this is what they intended. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2769572&group_id=141056&atid=748328 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 01:46:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170146.n3H1ksot019323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #7 from arthurguru 2009-04-16 21:46:53 EDT --- Once again thanks for the very accurate feedback Jan. Your analysis is very good. I have an intermediate process to build fedora source from the original source and then build the SRPM from that, but as this is causing another layer of concern I have logged a bug against my own code to get rid of that process. To fix this properly I need to do another formal release which involves more than just Fedora, so in the meantime I have branched the source code for this Fedora project and all changes provided will now come from this branch and in the end will be merged into the next release of xmlfy which is some weeks away. Now the upstream source specified in Source0 (from the branch) IS exactly the same file used in the SRPM. Once again I?ve updated the files with the same names as to not break the links in the original post. Tested ok, rpmlint is still content. Also note the new URL location of Source0: in the spec file. Kind Regards, Arthur Gouros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 02:10:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170210.n3H2AN76023564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #25 from D Haley 2009-04-16 22:10:18 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/scilab-5.1.1-1.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/scilab-5.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Koji: No, mising deps. rpmlint: $ rpmlint scilab.spec ../SRPMS/scilab-5.1-2.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/scilab-5.1-2.fc10.i386.rpm 2&>1 | grep -v lang Changelog: - Upgrade to 5.1.1 - Add patch to change xml-commons-external jarname - Updated LD_LIBRARY_PATH value - Removed patch to fix bug 4052, as this is now in upstream Known issues: *As per above: Still affected by the gluegen-rt/jogl classpath problem. I'm not going to resolve this until gluegen/jogl packages are approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 02:25:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170225.n3H2PDnA021255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #69 from Michael Hideo 2009-04-16 22:25:08 EDT --- Had a discussion with Jens to further understand his concerns. A solution would be do have the .src rpm w/o the version number but the resultant rpms would have the version number. This would ensure that the library system can still track the catalog. This would require a publican change and a policy change within documentation to sync the with tags. Probably best then to remove the tags. I'll poll the teams to check on how editions are being handled. fedora-Deployment_Guide-en-US-11-19.srpm |_ | fedora-Deployment_Guide-11-web-en-US-11-19.rpm |_ fedora-Deployment_Guide-11-desktop-en-US-11-19.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 04:44:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496166] Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170444.n3H4iMBL020131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496166 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |splinux25 at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-17 00:44:20 EDT --- *** Bug 234721 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 04:44:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234721] Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170444.n3H4iL4X020104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234721 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-17 00:44:20 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 496166 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 04:44:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:44:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170444.n3H4iapU020186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-17 00:44:35 EDT --- As already said please remove following from SPEC Requires: perl(Data::Dumper::Names) >= 0.03 Requires: perl(Exception::Class) >= 1.14 Requires: perl(Test::Deep) Requires: perl(Test::Differences) Requires: perl(Test::Exception) Requires: perl(Test::Warn) >= 0.1 I have tested again with yum install command and I see all those are automatically installed. Also, I have seen in most of your perl package submissions that you also uses BuildRequires: perl >= 0:5.006 This is not needed. Please submit new SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 04:57:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170457.n3H4vi0Z022724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-17 00:57:43 EDT --- sorry mistakenly changed flags to fedora-review+ reverting back -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 05:37:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:37:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170537.n3H5b5Jl023964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-17 01:37:04 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1301709 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 1cd76f03ac0280d8d22ed4f543812af8 pytools-8.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 05:58:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:58:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170558.n3H5wg62028142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kevin at tummy.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 05:58:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:58:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170558.n3H5wAcf000641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 --- Comment #22 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-04-17 01:58:09 EDT --- Package Name: ibus-table-extraphrase Short Description: Extra phrase data for IBus Table Owners: cchance Branches: devel InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 07:13:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:13:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170713.n3H7DSCr011364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 --- Comment #11 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-17 03:13:27 EDT --- http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Test-Most.spec http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Test-Most-0.21-3.fc11.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1303502 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 07:39:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170739.n3H7d6Ww016777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 Ramakrishna Reddy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Ramakrishna Reddy 2009-04-17 03:39:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-pytools Short Description: A collection of tools for python Owners: ramkrsna Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 07:42:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:42:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494819] Review Request: python-bitarray - Efficient Array of Booleans --C Extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170742.n3H7geb4021131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494819 Ramakrishna Reddy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Ramakrishna Reddy 2009-04-17 03:42:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-bitarray Short Description: Efficient Array of Booleans Owners: ramkrsna Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 07:46:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491617] Review Request: mingw32-libxml++ - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for libxml2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170746.n3H7kp41018773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491617 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-17 03:46:49 EDT --- Thanks! I removed the docs cruft... Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libxml++.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libxml++-2.26.0-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 07:44:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:44:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494853] Review Request: python-achoo - A fluent interface for testing Python objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170744.n3H7inrI018156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494853 Ramakrishna Reddy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Ramakrishna Reddy 2009-04-17 03:44:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-achoo Short Description: A fluent interface for testing Python Object Owners: ramkrsna Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 07:44:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495021] Review Request: python-posix_ipc - POSIX IPC primitives for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170744.n3H7icp1018117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495021 Ramakrishna Reddy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Ramakrishna Reddy 2009-04-17 03:44:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-posix_ipc Short Description: POSIX IPC primitives for Python Owners: ramkrsna Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 07:53:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:53:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170753.n3H7rL3H023101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-17 03:53:19 EDT --- Thanks! Fixed. Koji scratchbuild for F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1303532 http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-sippy.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-sippy-0-0.6.20090409cvs.fc10.src.rpm I also added missing "Requires:" - radiusclient-ng-utils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 08:09:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:09:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495950] Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170809.n3H89mJE023913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495950 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-17 04:09:47 EDT --- Okay. To me the license issue seems quite clear, since the Licensing guidelines are quite specific on the matter. I'll trust you to change the license to GPL+ [unless upstream makes a new release with a different license before that]?and fix the %doc section issues upon CVS import. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 08:13:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:13:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170813.n3H8DFb1028355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-17 04:13:14 EDT --- The information in the source header says that's GPLv3+ (or (at your option) any later version.) I will ask upstream to update their homepage. http://pdfposter.origo.ethz.ch/node/36 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 08:00:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170800.n3H80jrE025170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #12 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-17 04:00:43 EDT --- The patches have been submitted upstream. The developer team seems happy with that initiative: http://mateusz.loskot.net/2009/04/17/soci-300-rpm-packages/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 08:36:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170836.n3H8awTA029785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #33 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-17 04:36:55 EDT --- Notes: - The issue with excessive number of macros still not addressed. I advice you to ** completely remove %{major}, %{minor} macros - just use %{version} macro. ** remove "%global version %{major}.%{minor}" as well. No need to re-define this macro. ** combine %{pkgname} and %{pkgversion} together (since they used only in couple) In any case, these issues are cosmetic, mostly. + The issue with iconv was gone. - Please, do not use %{?dist}-suffixes in changelog. This also a minor issue. More nites will be after I rebuild the package in koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 08:58:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:58:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170858.n3H8woXr001524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-17 04:58:21 EDT --- Just patch the source code, then there's no need to ship fonts or make symlinks altogether. I'm not fluent enough in sed to be able to write a loop that replaces the occurrences in src/execute.c due to the double quotes: font = TTF_OpenFont(DATADIR "VeraBd.ttf", txt->size); font = TTF_OpenFont(DATADIR "VeraSeBd.ttf", txt->size); font = TTF_OpenFont(DATADIR "VeraMono.ttf", txt->size); font = TTF_OpenFont(DATADIR "VeraBd.ttf", txt->size); fprintf(stderr, "Default font %s could not be found. Are you sure you typed 'make install' after compiling xsd?", DATADIR "VeraBd.ttf"); Something of the like of for font in VeraBd.ttf VeraSeBd.ttf VeraMono.ttf; do sed -i 's|DATADIR "$font"|"/usr/share/fonts/bitstream-vera/$font"|g' src/execute.c done should do the trick. If you can't get that to work, then you can always patch the source code file and replace DATADIR "VeraBd.ttf" with "@VERABD@" and so on, and then just run sed to replace @VERABD@ et al with the correct paths in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 09:22:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491090] Review Request: kernel-firmware - firmware files for use with Linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170922.n3H9MIM8007159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491090 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-17 05:22:16 EDT --- Just FYI - debian firmware package contains some additional blobs: http://packages.debian.org/sid/firmware-linux * 3Com Typhoon firmware, version 03.001.008 ... * kaweth/new_code.bin, version unknown * kaweth/new_code_fix.bin, version unknown * kaweth/trigger_code.bin, version unknown * kaweth/trigger_code_fix.bin, version unknown * Matrox G200 WARP engine microcode, version unknown * Matrox G400/G550 WARP engine microcode, version unknown * Rage 128 CCE microcode, version unknown * Radeon R100-family CP microcode, version unknown * Radeon R200-family CP microcode, version unknown * Radeon R300-family CP microcode, version unknown * Radeon R400-family CP microcode, version unknown * Radeon R500-family CP microcode, version unknown * Radeon RS690 CP microcode, version unknown * Tehuti network card firmware, version unknown -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 09:27:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170927.n3H9R6jl012032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #34 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-17 05:27:04 EDT --- Sorry for the typo in my previous comment: s/nites/notes OK, koji just finished its job - building for ppc64 failed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1303566 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1303570 Is it a known issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 09:48:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:48:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170948.n3H9mQV6012416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 09:47:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170947.n3H9lY8s012247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-17 05:47:33 EDT --- Of course, you don't need to use loops, you can just do the changes in three lines: sed -i 's|DATADIR "VeraBd.ttf"|"/usr/share/fonts/bitstream-vera/VeraBd.ttf"|g' src/execute.c sed -i 's|DATADIR "VeraSeBd.ttf"|"/usr/share/fonts/bitstream-vera/VeraSeBd.ttf"|g' src/execute.c sed -i 's|DATADIR "VeraMono.ttf"|"/usr/share/fonts/bitstream-vera/VeraMono.ttf"|g' src/execute.c but looping would be neater. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 09:48:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:48:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496168] Review Request: termit - Simple terminal emulator based on vte library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170948.n3H9mH31012377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496168 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 09:48:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:48:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496167] Review Request: lilyterm - Light and easy to use X Terminal Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170948.n3H9mWaB016496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496167 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 09:51:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:51:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170951.n3H9ptFH013413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|482972 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 10:07:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171007.n3HA70Yw020974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 --- Comment #11 from Johan Vromans 2009-04-17 06:06:59 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/EekBoek.spec SRPM URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/EekBoek-1.04.03-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: EekBoek is a bookkeeping package for small and medium-size businesses. Unlike other accounting software, EekBoek has both a command-line interface (CLI) and a graphical user-interface (GUI, currently under development). Furthermore, it has a complete Perl API to create your own custom applications. EekBoek is designed for the Dutch/European market and currently available in Dutch only. An English translation is in the works (help appreciated). The spec file is non-trivial but well commented. The spec file and rpms are rpmlint free with the exception of two files that are not utf8. This is intentional, these files need to be latin1. All comments from the reviews are applied. SQLite is now included as default database backend. Source is upgraded to new upstream version. Results of last koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1303621 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 10:12:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:12:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171012.n3HAChTo017842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 --- Comment #6 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-04-17 06:12:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > - Why do you %doc INSTALL? Doesn't make much sense to me. It does make sense to me as it is upstream %doc and so I ship it but it's not a big deal. > - To me it looks like the $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not honored, following seems to > work for me so far and uses also parallel builds: > > export EXTRA_CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" > > %configure > > make %{?_smp_mflags} Fixed. > - Is there really any need to ship the static libraries? So shouldn't link > anything in Fedora anyway dynamically? This is a dependency for ISV products I'm packaging. > - Group "Applications/System"? Wouldn't "System Environment/Libraries" be a > bit better? You're right. Fixed. > - Regarding the documentation: Did you have a closer look to it, whether that > one is usable and it's not just a waste of disk space? As discussed on IRC, no detailed docs are shipped and are available online. I added a comment to the spec file to reflect that. > - Source0 should be like http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL; > use: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 > Fixed. New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/libvmime.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f11/SRPMS/libvmime-0.9.0-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 10:24:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:24:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171024.n3HAOmXQ024043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #56 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-17 06:24:43 EDT --- Anyway, I'm only interested in having this bug closed properly. So... good luck for the next steps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 10:24:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:24:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225784] Merge Review: gdbm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171024.n3HAO1cN023929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225784 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(skasal at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #12 from Stepan Kasal 2009-04-17 06:23:58 EDT --- Thank you for the review. I have fixed most of the issues, the remaining ones are explained below. Tell me if I missed any. (In reply to comment #11) > gdbm.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgdbm.so.2.0.0 > exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 > gdbm.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgdbm.so.2.0.0 > exit@@GLIBC_2.2.5 > > Should be investigated. exit() is called from _gdbm_fatal() which gets called if a malloc or read fails. The reason why calling exit from a library is a bad idea is that the caller should get a chance to clean up. With gdbm, you can register a hook function that gets called from _gdbm_fatal before the exit. This may not be the best design decision, but it still somehow works. Concerning this and the fact that the code has not changed the last five years, I conclude that is would not be a good idea to try to patch this issue. (At leat until a real life problem related to the issue appears.) > * 1.8.3 was released but not sure whether is it good idea to incorporate it Might be a good idea, but I believe that can be postponed after finishing this review. > Patch0: gdbm-1.8.0-jbj.patch > Patch1: gdbm-1.8.0-fhs.patch > Patch3: gdbm-1.8.0-64offset.patch > > Could be: 0-1-2 I don't think it is advisable to renumber each time a patch is dropped. Consequently, the sequence of the numbers can hardly be maintained. > * discouraged: %makeinstall install-compat > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used Quote: "%makeinstall macro [...] must NOT be used when make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} works" grep -r DESTDIR gdbm-1.8.0 returns nothig. Most projects get DESTDIR support for free from Automake but this one does not use Automake, as mentioned above. > > # refresh config.sub, the original one does not recognize "redhat" > > # as vendorname: > > for f in /usr/share/automake-1.1?/config.sub; do > > : > > done > > cp -p $f . > > libtoolize --force --copy > > aclocal > > autoconf > > Perhaps autoreconf and patching the build system seems better to me. But not > that important. config.{sub,guess} scripts are totally autonomous shell script. They can get copied to the project by "automake --add-missing --force-missing" but, unfortunately, this project does not use Automake. Otherwise, autoreconf is just another way to call the appropriate tools. Calling them directly is not a bad idea either, it is more transparent. Perhaps you meant that we could patch the build system to use Automake. That's a valid idea, I might decide to do that in future. But keeping the original build system should also be acceptible for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 10:29:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:29:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171029.n3HAT5Up024883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-17 06:29:03 EDT --- Thanks for performing the changes, everything is fine now and looks good, thus the package is: APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 10:50:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491617] Review Request: mingw32-libxml++ - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for libxml2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171050.n3HAoALQ028853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491617 --- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-17 06:50:09 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1303634 Rpmlint is quiet: $ rpmlint mingw32-libxml++-2.26.0-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-libxml++-2.26.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 10:57:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171057.n3HAvEVv030271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-04-17 06:57:13 EDT --- Hi Fabian, Status? I can review this once the above had been clarified. Peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 11:14:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171114.n3HBEjsU029989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-04-17 07:14:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libvmime Short Description: Library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 11:22:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171122.n3HBM7xg003105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 225784, which changed state. Bug 225784 Summary: Merge Review: gdbm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225784 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 11:22:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:22:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225784] Merge Review: gdbm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171122.n3HBM55t003069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225784 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |gdbm-1.8.0-32 Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Michal Nowak 2009-04-17 07:22:04 EDT --- I guess it's good idea to patch GDBM in version 1.8.3 to be auto*-aware. Thanks for changes in GDBM, this package is APPROVED & REVIEWED by me. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 11:24:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171124.n3HBOAnA032093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 --- Comment #9 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-17 07:24:09 EDT --- You may want to add F-11 as well, because devel/Rawhide is already dist-f12... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 11:36:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491617] Review Request: mingw32-libxml++ - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for libxml2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171136.n3HBaJRH005940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491617 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-17 07:36:17 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-libxml++-2.26.0-1.fc11.src.rpm 2008-04-17 + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint output + Package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora LGPLv2+ + License matches the actual package license It is also the same as in the corresponding Fedora libxml++ package + The package contains the license file (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm a52fc7e6e44bb5cc187672930b843f72 libxml++-2.26.0.tar.bz2 a52fc7e6e44bb5cc187672930b843f72 SRPM/libxml++-2.26.0.tar.bz2 + Package builds in mock (Fedora Rawhide i586) n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package n/a Static libraries should be in -static + Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 After the %install cleanup dos2unix is no longer needed in BuildRequires, but that can be fixed without having to send an updated version for me to approve. Package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 11:50:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:50:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491617] Review Request: mingw32-libxml++ - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for libxml2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171150.n3HBoCiQ005067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491617 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-17 07:50:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libxml++ Short Description: MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for libxml2 Owners: sailer rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 12:11:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:11:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496117] Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171211.n3HCB4uj012372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496117 Daniel Walsh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwalsh at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dwalsh at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 12:14:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492990] Review Request: zynjacku - LV2 synths and plugins host In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171214.n3HCE2eU009724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 08:14:00 EDT --- Package Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 12:20:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:20:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496117] Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171220.n3HCKJAQ011149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496117 Daniel Walsh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax at redhat.com, | |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Daniel Walsh 2009-04-17 08:20:18 EDT --- Shouldn't this just be a part of the libxcb package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 12:29:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:29:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491090] Review Request: kernel-firmware - firmware files for use with Linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171229.n3HCTQCC015742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491090 --- Comment #6 from David Woodhouse 2009-04-17 08:29:24 EDT --- Kaweth and tehuti are in the upstream repo; the 3D cards are from patches which have yet to go upstream; I'll be chasing them up for 2.6.31. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:09:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:09:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496117] Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171309.n3HD9Wug024493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496117 --- Comment #2 from Ted X Toth 2009-04-17 09:09:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Shouldn't this just be a part of the libxcb package? You're probably right as that makes better sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:08:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:08:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496230] New: Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496230 Summary: Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: txtoth at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/platformdownload.php?group_id=259513 SRPM URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/platformdownload.php?group_id=259513 Description: Python bindings for XCB -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:08:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496229] New: Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496229 Summary: Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: txtoth at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/platformdownload.php?group_id=259513 SRPM URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/platformdownload.php?group_id=259513 Description: Python bindings for XCB -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:09:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:09:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171309.n3HD9tr6021720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #13 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-04-17 09:09:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > First, the rpmlint complaints: > nss-ldapd.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog > Indeed, the most recent changelog is missing a version. Fixed. > Any reason for not just using a release of "1%{?dist}"? This doesn't seem to > be a prerelease package so your release number should be a positive integer. > If you're trying to make the initial import of the package have release 1 then > it should be OK although I don't really understand why it would matter. Good point. Fixed. > I'll admit to not comprehending the dependency on pam_ldap.so, but only because > I don't really know what you intend to do with nss_ldap in the future. I'm > guessing that this package really doesn't have any need for pam_ldap, and > you're just trying to make sure that it stays around in the case that nss-ldapd > starts obsoleting nss_ldap. I'm curious as to whether that's really necessary > or if you're just doing some CYA. Nope, that's it -- the F12 branch splits nss_ldap and pam_ldap into separate binary packages, but keeps them in the same source package (for now, at least). > The scriptlets are pretty complex and somewhat scary. I note that installing > this prints 'USELDAP=yes' to the console, which it probably shouldn't. I > suppose the egrep call needs -q or a redirect. Other than that, though, they > seem to work well enough. However, there are some issues with things that are > supported with nss_ldap that are deprecated or not supported with nss-ldapd and > I wonder if it's worth worrying about migrating them? The logic's copying any options that start with tls_ or ssl wholesale, and not doing anything smart about converting or dropping specific settings. I think that the settings which don't port over cleanly are important enough that triggering the error is, possibly perversely, a behavior worth keeping. > Starting nslcd: > nslcd: /etc/nss-ldapd.conf:130: option tls_checkpeer is deprecated (and will be > removed in an upcoming release), use tls_reqcert instead > nslcd: /etc/nss-ldapd.conf:131: option tls_cacertfile is currently untested > (please report any successes) > > I think something's off with the groupadd stuff: > getent group nslcd > /dev/null || /usr/sbin/groupadd -r -g 55 ldap > Shouldn't it try to add "nslcd" instead of "ldap"? Also, why does this need to > have a specific numbered account? Shouldn't any low UID suffice? It would, but I started the ball rolling on getting a new one (see bug #491899), and while that netted a UID, we end up sharing the 'ldap' group with the openldap package. The inconsistency was me missing half of correcting it when that happened, thanks for catching it! Fixed. > ? /lib64/security/pam_ldap.so Requiring pam_ldap by package name (F12) won't guarantee that you get one that matches your arch on multilib boxes, so it's being required as /%{_lib}/security/pam_ldap.so, to ensure thatwe get the pam_ldap.so that matches the arch of the libnss_ldap.so.2 that this binary package is supplying. We've had weird problems both composing trees and with things not always working with multilib and plugins (I'm thinking of cyrus-sasl, but PAM modules have similar problems), and I'm trying to avoid that. Spec updated, new source package built using it. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:26:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:26:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491758] Review Request: mingw32-opensc - MingGW Windows OpenSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171326.n3HDQhpV029024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491758 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:25:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:25:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491758] Review Request: mingw32-opensc - MingGW Windows OpenSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171325.n3HDPtKD025578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491758 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:24:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491758] Review Request: mingw32-opensc - MingGW Windows OpenSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171324.n3HDOw6q025158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491758 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-17 09:24:57 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-libxml++-2.26.0-1.fc11.src.rpm 2008-04-17 Another scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1303992 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint mingw32-opensc-0.11.7-2.fc12.src.rpm mingw32-opensc-0.11.7-2.fc12.noarch.rpm mingw32-opensc.spec mingw32-opensc.noarch: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/etc/opensc.conf mingw32-opensc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/sbin/opensc-install.bat mingw32-opensc.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/sbin/opensc-install.bat mingw32-opensc.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/cardos-info.bat mingw32-opensc.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/cardos-info.bat 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 0 warnings. As per Packaging/MinGW, these errors can be ignored (counting .bat files as "windows executables"). + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint output + Package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora LGPLv2+ + License matches the actual package license It is also the same as in the corresponding Fedora libxml++ package + The package contains the license file (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm 419e9be372c2f9bbb3ce9704c929d5ec opensc-0.11.7.tar.gz 419e9be372c2f9bbb3ce9704c929d5ec ../SOURCES/opensc-0.11.7.tar.gz n/a Package builds in mock n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package n/a Static libraries should be in -static + Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 ! use %global instead of %define -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:44:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:44:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453854] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171344.n3HDi2rL030068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 Bug 453854 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453854 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:44:01 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-1.5-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gsi-proxy-ssl.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171344.n3HDi6Hh030098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 Bug 453855 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453855 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453855 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:44:04 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-openssl-module-0.6-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-openssl-module.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:43:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171343.n3HDhwYC000687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:43:57 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gsi-openssl-error-0.14-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gsi-openssl-error.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:46:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:46:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171346.n3HDk0uL001741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-17 09:45:58 EDT --- Rpmlint is silent: $ rpmlint powwow.spec powwow-1.2.14-2.fc11.src.rpm powwow-1.2.14-2.fc12.x86_64.rpm powwow-debuginfo-1.2.14-2.fc12.x86_64.rpm powwow-devel-1.2.14-2.fc12.x86_64.rpm 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:46:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:46:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171346.n3HDkaov001936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #56 from Jasper Capel 2009-04-17 09:46:29 EDT --- I've tried building the source rpm in mock on my machine. How long is this build supposed to take? I've aborted it after 5 hours, and ended up with a cp process I can't kill which is eating my cpu cycles: jasper 9423 90.6 0.0 12364 204 pts/2 R 10:44 272:01 cp -RLfp bin idl include lib /builddir/build/BUILD/Songbird1.1.2/dependencies/linux-x86_64/mozilla/release/frozen That "cp" has been running for at least a couple of hours, could it be in a symlink dereferencing loop? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:44:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171344.n3HDiu3d000988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 Bug 478919 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:44:55 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-xio-gsi-driver-0.6-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-xio-gsi-driver.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:45:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478920] Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO BW Limit Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171345.n3HDj0VR001068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 Bug 478920 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:44:59 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-xio-popen-driver-0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-xio-popen-driver.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:45:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478928] Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171345.n3HDjUJR001660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478928 Bug 478928 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 478928 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:45:29 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-rsl-assist-2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-rsl-assist.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:45:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:45:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478922] Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171345.n3HDj79t001443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 Bug 478922 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 478922 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 478922 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:45:06 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-ftp-control-2.10-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-ftp-control.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:45:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl -Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171345.n3HDjQ8S001627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 Bug 478927 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 478927 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 478927 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:45:25 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-rsl-5.0-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-rsl.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:44:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:44:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478918] Review Request: gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171344.n3HDiqxX000955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 Bug 478918 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 478918 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 478918 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:44:51 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/gssapi-error-2.5-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/gssapi-error.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:44:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:44:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171344.n3HDiYEO000864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Bug 467237 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 467237 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 467237 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:44:32 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gssapi-gsi-5.9-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gssapi-gsi.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:45:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478923] Review Request: globus-ftp-client - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171345.n3HDjBZl001475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478923 Bug 478923 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 478923 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 478923 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:45:10 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-ftp-client-3.14-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-ftp-client.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:44:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:44:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171344.n3HDiAUM000734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 Bug 453856 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453856 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453856 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:44:09 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gsi-cert-utils-5.5-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gsi-cert-utils.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:43:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:43:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171343.n3HDhsTi000647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 --- Comment #10 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:43:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > ? Where does the version number come from? and why is the release number 0.x? The version is the same as for the upstream package (containing the copy of the openssl sources) this package replaces. The release was 0.x because I wanted to have a clear upgrade path from my third party repository containing the packages and the official Fedora version once the packages are accepted. My plan was to change the release to 1 when importing it to CVS. My new package that I list below now gives the release number as 1 already, but I didn't import it to my third party repo. > * The license seems to be just ASL 2.0. Is there any non-trivial differences? > If not, please use ASL 2.0: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses The licence is Apache-2.0 without any changes, and the specfile already states ASL 2.0 accordingly. > ! No need to BR: pkgconfig on the main package. It will be picked up by > openssl-devel. Fixed. > ! No need to Requires: openssl on the progs subpackage since it already > requires the main package which requires openssl. Fixed. > ! No need to Requires: zlib-devel and pkgconfig on the devel subpackage since > openssl-devel will pull them up. This Requires was put in there to workaround the broken openssl-devel package in RHL9 which is missing the Requires on zlib-devel. I have now made the Requires conditional so that it will only be used in this case and not for releases where openssl-devel is not broken. > * The new guidelines suggest that %global should be preferred over %define Fixed. > ! Could you collect all your "%global"s at one place? The globals are now first in the file (which seems to be the custom nowadays). Except for the global that defines %_name which must come after the Name tag, since it uses %name in its definition and this is not defined before the Name tag is parsed. This is also the most logical place for it. > ! Please make the descriptions span 80 columns Fixed. > ? Why are you packaging the .filelist files? This is part of the package GPT metadata. They are needed by GPT. > ? Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. > /usr/share/globus and /usr/share/globus/packages is already owned by > globus-core. Shouldn't you just put globus-core as a requirement to this > package? Is this package useful without globus-core? globus-core is a development only package. globus-openssl and globus-openssl-progs are runtime packages. Runtime packages must not Require development packages. (In reply to comment #8) > Additionally, > > ! I suggest you to use macros such as %{_sbindir} and %{_datadir}, instead of > the hardcoded /usr/sbin and /usr/share Fixed (In reply to comment #9) > One more thing: > > Shouldn't this package be called globus-gsi-openssl for consistency with other > globus-gsi-openssl-* packages? All the source is in the > source-trees/gsi/openssl* > directories of the main tarball. The package names are taken from the GPT source package description file pkgdata/pkg_data_src.gpt.in (by replacing underscores with hyphens to comply with the naming guidelines). They are not derived from the directory structure of the installer tarball. > Or conversely, shouldn't the other packages be called globus-openssl-* ? Same answer as above. New version is available here: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-openssl-3.0-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-openssl.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:44:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171344.n3HDiD0G000761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 Bug 453857 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453857 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453857 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:44:12 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gsi-sysconfig-2.2-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gsi-sysconfig.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:45:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171345.n3HDjXkO031055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 Bug 478929 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 478929 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:45:32 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-usage-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-usage.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:44:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171344.n3HDigYW030475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 Bug 467239 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 467239 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 467239 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:44:41 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gss-assist-4.0-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gss-assist.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:45:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface to stream and datagram st In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171345.n3HDj4cY030891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 Bug 478921 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 478921 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:45:02 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-io-6.3-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-io.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:44:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171344.n3HDims8030537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 Bug 478917 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 478917 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 478917 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:44:47 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-xio-2.7-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-xio.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:45:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:45:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478926] Review Request: globus-gass-copy - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171345.n3HDjMAR030981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478926 Bug 478926 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 478926 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 478926 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:45:21 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gass-copy-4.14-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gass-copy.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:44:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453865] Review Request: globus-proxy-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Utility Programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171344.n3HDijCL030508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453865 Bug 453865 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453865 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453865 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:44:44 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-proxy-utils-2.5-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-proxy-utils.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:44:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:44:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467235] Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171344.n3HDiV2X030411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:44:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Here are my comments for this package. Please note that the bug that I pointed > in bug 453851#c19 needs fixed in order to build this package in koji. The file in GPT is needed. The file in globus-common is also needed by a few Globus packages, but not by any of the packages I have packaged for Fedora so far - and it looks like it might be possible to work around it. I have prepared an update of globus-common where the file is dropped, I just haven't imported it into CVS yet. If you want to use it in a chain build for reviewing purposes it is available here: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-common-10.2-2.fc10.src.rpm (Since this update also backports the fixes based on your comments of this package to globus-common I would like your feedback on this package before importing it to CVS, since these could possible influence this update as well.) > ? Where does the version number come from? I don't see it in the sources. And > why is the release number 0.x ? The version number comes from the GPT source package description file pkgdata/pkg_data_src.gpt.in The release was 0.x because I wanted to have a clear upgrade path from my third party repository containing the packages and the official Fedora version once the packages are accepted. My plan was to change the release to 1 when importing it to CVS. My new package that I list below now gives the release number as 1 already, but I didn't import it to my third party repo. > ! Please move the explanation of Source8 to where you define Source8. Fixed > * The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be > included in %doc if (and only if) the source package includes the text of the > license(s) in its own file. The original source tree does not contain the > license file in the callout/source/ folder, so Source9 should be left out. Fixed > ? Should the license be ASL 2.0? The source files say they are ASL 2.0 on their > headers. The licence is Apache-2.0 without any changes, and the specfile already states ASL 2.0 accordingly. > * Description needs to be descriptive. What is a callout library? This descriptions has been extracted from the upstream GPT source package description file pkgdata/pkg_data_src.gpt.in. Upstream obviously thought this description was sufficient. For most globus packages the description in the GPT source package description is a bit more understandable, but for this package it is a bit cryptic. I have added a sentence from the Doxygen documentation to the package description. > * The new guidelines suggest that %global should be preferred over %define Fixed > ! Could you collect all your "%global"s at one place? The globals are now first in the file (which seems to be the custom nowadays). Except for the global that defines %_name which must come after the Name tag, since it uses %name in its definition and this is not defined before the Name tag is parsed. Defining %_name right after the Name tag is also the most logical place for it. > ! Please make the descriptions span 80 columns Fixed > ? Why are you packaging the .filelist files? These are part of the package GPT metadata. They are needed by GPT. > * Fedora specific compiler flags are not honored in the linking phase. At the > least, "-g -Wall" needs passed. They are. The package uses the %configure macro which expands to: CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-%optflags}" ; export CFLAGS ; CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS:-%optflags}" ; export CXXFLAGS ; FFLAGS="${FFLAGS:-%optflags}" ; export FFLAGS ; for i in $(find . -name config.guess -o -name config.sub) ; do [ -f /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/$(basename $i) ] && %{__rm} -f $i && %{__cp} -fv /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/$(basename $i) $i ; done ; ./configure --build=%{_build} --host=%{_host} \ --target=%{_target_platform} \ --program-prefix=%{?_program_prefix} \ --prefix=%{_prefix} \ --exec-prefix=%{_exec_prefix} \ --bindir=%{_bindir} \ --sbindir=%{_sbindir} \ --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} \ --datadir=%{_datadir} \ --includedir=%{_includedir} \ --libdir=%{_libdir} \ --libexecdir=%{_libexecdir} \ --localstatedir=%{_localstatedir} \ --sharedstatedir=%{_sharedstatedir} \ --mandir=%{_mandir} \ --infodir=%{_infodir} The build log says: /usr/bin/gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DPACKAGE=\"globus_callout\" -DVERSION=\"0.7\" -I. -I.. -I../library/oldgaa -I/usr/include/globus -I/usr/lib/globus/include -O -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -D_REENTRANT -Wall -c globus_callout_error.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/globus_callout_error.o All the Fedora compiler options are there. > * The doc package is fairly small. Why don't you put this documentation in the > devel subpackage? The globus library APIs are documented using doxygen comments. These are used to generate the documentation in the GPT doc packages. For some globus packages these packages are very large, while for others they are quite small. In order to provide consistent and user predictable packaging for all globus packages, the GPT doc packages should be packaged as separate doc RPMs for all globus packages regardless of their size. > ! Please replace /usr/share with %{_datadir} Fixed > ! Please explain the non-trivial things you do in the SPEC file with comments. > Why do you remove those files in %build? Why are those sed's for? etc Fixed > * On the main package: > Requires: globus-libtool >= 1 > BuildRequires: globus-libtool-devel >= 1 > BuildRequires: globus-core >= 4 , > on the devel subpackage: > Requires: globus-libtool-devel >= 1 > Requires: globus-core >= 4 > Requires: pkgconfig > are redundant. They will be picked up by other dependencies. The Requires and BuildRequires are autogenerated from the information in the GPT source package description file pkgdata/pkg_data_src.gpt.in, to manually delete some of them is not maintainable - and such changes are very likely to be dropped at the next upstream release since then the list will be regenerated from the new GPT source package description file. I did remove the Requires on pkgconfig - that one is not listed in the GPT file. > ! If what you want to do is to erase lines, you can replace > for l in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/globus/packages/%{_name}/*.filelist ; do > grep -v 'lib.*\.la$' < $l > $l.new > mv $l.new $l > done > with > sed -i '/lib.*\.la$/d' \ > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/globus/packages/%{_name}/*.filelist > to make the code simpler. Similarly for the .a files. > > Also, the multiple instances of > cat some_file |sed s!some!expression! > new_file > mv new_file some_file > can be replaced by > sed -i -e s!some!expression! \ > -e s!other!expression! \ > -e s!yetanother!expression! \ > some_file > > These changes would shorten your SPEC file quite a bit. Again, explaining these > things in the SPEC file as comments would be a great bonus for reviewers and > other packagers who check your package. I was always hesitant to use "sed -i" for compatibility reasons. But doing some tests shows that you have to go way back to RHL7.3 to get to a sed that doesn't understand the -i flag. I have taken your advice. New version is available here: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-callout-0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-callout.spec PS. I have collected the answers to the review comments by you and others in a Draft packaging guidelines document for Globus packages. This is available here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:44:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:44:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453862] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171344.n3HDiQbX030376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 Bug 453862 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453862 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453862 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:44:25 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gsi-proxy-core-3.4-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gsi-proxy-core.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:44:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453861] Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171344.n3HDiLP6030301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 Bug 453861 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453861 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453861 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:44:20 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gsi-credential-2.2-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gsi-credential.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:45:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:45:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478931] Review Request: globus-rls-server - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171345.n3HDjfTn031122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478931 Bug 478931 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 478931 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 478931 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:45:40 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-rls-server-4.7-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-rls-server.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:45:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478930] Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171345.n3HDjbLw031087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930 Bug 478930 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 478930 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 478930 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:45:35 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-rls-client-5.1-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-rls-client.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:44:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:44:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171344.n3HDiHiO030187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 Bug 453858 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453858 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453858 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:44:16 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gsi-callback-1.10-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gsi-callback.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 13:45:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478925] Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171345.n3HDjIlG030950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478925 Bug 478925 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 478925 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 478925 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 09:45:17 EDT --- Package updated due to new packaging guidelines - Change defines to globals - Remove explicit requires on library packages http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gass-transfer-3.4-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gass-transfer.spec Draft packaging guidelines for Globus packages are now available: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 14:03:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:03:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171403.n3HE3gOR003885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 14:03:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171403.n3HE3EMO003775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-17 10:03:13 EDT --- Fedora review powwow-1.2.14-2.fc11.src.rpm 2008-04-17 Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1304042 + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint output + Package is named according to Fedora Package Naming Guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora packaging guidelines + License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora GPLv2+ + License matches the actual package license + The package contains the license file (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm 5c1d600ca8e577dc620c1c15c01cfdf5 ../SOURCES/powwow-1.2.14.tar.gz 5c1d600ca8e577dc620c1c15c01cfdf5 powwow-1.2.14.tar.gz n/a Package builds in mock n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package + Header files should be in -devel n/a Static libraries should be in -static n/a Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 Now some general comments: - Filenames like "muc", "follow", and "movie_play" seem to be fairly generic and thus prone to conflicts in the future; they do not seem to conflict now - follow is described by the accompanying documentation as mainly a debugging aid - should this really be packaged, in the main package? - what is the use case for the -devel package? It contains only header files, no actual lib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 14:17:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:17:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496244] New: Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496244 Summary: Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kas at fi.muni.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://ftp.linux.cz/pub/linux/people/jan_kasprzak/vlna/vlna.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.linux.cz/pub/linux/people/jan_kasprzak/vlna/vlna-1.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Program vlna adds ties (Czech vlna or vlnka) after nonsyllabic prepositions (instead of spaces) in the TeX source files. This prevents line breaks at undesirable spaces. [Note: it is my first Fedora package, so I need a sponsor] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 14:17:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:17:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496244] Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171417.n3HEHfac007129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496244 Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 14:29:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171429.n3HETBWG009625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #57 from David Halik 2009-04-17 10:29:08 EDT --- The build should only take 20-30 minutes. Have you tried multiple builds, or was that the only one? This is the first that I have heard of such an issue despite many many builds, both locally and and on Koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 14:39:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:39:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496244] Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171439.n3HEdvNN012071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496244 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mcepl at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Matej Cepl 2009-04-17 10:39:56 EDT --- Taking the review (as a small repayment for all pain and suffering I have caused you ;-)). Plus I can sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 14:46:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:46:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496244] Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171446.n3HEkJrp017531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496244 --- Comment #2 from Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak 2009-04-17 10:46:17 EDT --- No pain or suffering on my side :-). Thanks for your time, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 14:58:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:58:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171458.n3HEwtJt020449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #58 from Jasper Capel 2009-04-17 10:58:52 EDT --- This was the only build, on a rawhide machine and rawhide buildroot. I will try again later then, with a clean buildroot, after I get a chance to reboot my machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 15:04:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491758] Review Request: mingw32-opensc - MingGW Windows OpenSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171504.n3HF480P018960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491758 --- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-17 11:04:07 EDT --- Thanks for the review. Spec URL: http://www.smartlink.ee/~kalev/mingw32-opensc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smartlink.ee/~kalev/mingw32-opensc-0.11.7-3.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Apr 17 2009 Kalev Lember - 0.11.7-3 - Replace %%define with %%global. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 15:12:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:12:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496117] Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171512.n3HFCKWl024290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496117 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-17 11:12:17 EDT --- *** Bug 496229 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 15:12:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496117] Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171512.n3HFCUj6024409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496117 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-17 11:12:27 EDT --- *** Bug 496230 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 15:12:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491758] Review Request: mingw32-opensc - MingGW Windows OpenSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171512.n3HFCd10024471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491758 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-17 11:12:37 EDT --- APPROVED by sailer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 15:12:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496230] Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171512.n3HFCTF1024358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496230 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-17 11:12:27 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 496117 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 15:12:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496229] Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171512.n3HFCJKj024229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496229 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-17 11:12:17 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 496117 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 15:15:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:15:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492990] Review Request: zynjacku - LV2 synths and plugins host In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171515.n3HFFntE022542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-17 11:15:48 EDT --- Thank you! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: zynjacku Short Description: LV2 synths and plugins host Owners: oget Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 15:16:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492990] Review Request: zynjacku - LV2 synths and plugins host In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171516.n3HFG13j022641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 15:18:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171518.n3HFIL0G026215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #59 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-17 11:18:17 EDT --- rpmlint on rpm package (not installed) built for local mock for F-11 x86_64. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 377 errors, 5 warnings. There is 3 common cases for the errors: 1/ songbird.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2/xulrunner/mangle ['/usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2', '$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] Whereas the /usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2 rpath was expected to use the internal xulrunner, the others are what the rpath policy expect to have removed. There is a need to track why thoses additionals rpathes are added. 2/ songbird.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2/xulrunner/dictionaries/en-US.aff Thoses files need to be chmod -x 3/songbird-debuginfo.x86_64: E: non-readable /usr/src/debug/Songbird1.1.2/dependencies/vendor/xulrunner/mozilla/xpcom/glue/pldhash.c 0640 The source code (ending in -debuginfo sub-package) need to be publicly accessible (0644) 4/songbird.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2/lib/sbGStreamerMediacore.so This one is a warning only... As I understand, it is meant to be dlopened and isn't registered as a system library; also, it doesn't have a SOVERSION. So this is acceptable for me. I still need to have rpmlint on installed files and runtime testing on F-11 x86_64 @Jasper I never experienced such problem in my case, either rpmbuild, mock or koji built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 15:25:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:25:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491758] Review Request: mingw32-opensc - MingGW Windows OpenSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171525.n3HFPpel028343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491758 --- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-17 11:25:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-opensc Short Description: MingGW Windows OpenSC library Owners: kalev rjones Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 15:22:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456256] Review Request: frei0r-plugins - Frei0r - a minimalistic plugin API for video effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171522.n3HFMjpM027509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456256 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 15:26:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:26:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491758] Review Request: mingw32-opensc - MingGW Windows OpenSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171526.n3HFQemF025111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491758 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 15:35:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:35:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491758] Review Request: mingw32-opensc - MingGW Windows OpenSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171535.n3HFZIL0030872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491758 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-17 11:35:17 EDT --- Why no F-10 branch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 15:43:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:43:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491758] Review Request: mingw32-opensc - MingGW Windows OpenSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171543.n3HFhVRx029093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491758 --- Comment #9 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-17 11:43:30 EDT --- My bad, it should be there. Updated request: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-opensc Short Description: MingGW Windows OpenSC library Owners: kalev rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 15:48:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171548.n3HFmoQ4001619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 --- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-17 11:48:49 EDT --- Thanks for the update. (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #7) > > > ! Could you collect all your "%global"s at one place? > > The globals are now first in the file (which seems to be the custom nowadays). > Except for the global that defines %_name which must come after the Name tag, > since it uses %name in its definition and this is not defined before the Name > tag is parsed. This is also the most logical place for it. > This shouldn't matter for rpm, i.e. rpm doesn't needs these to be in logical order. But it's a matter of taste. I won't say anything more. I have one last question: > > > ? Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. > > /usr/share/globus and /usr/share/globus/packages is already owned by > > globus-core. Shouldn't you just put globus-core as a requirement to this > > package? Is this package useful without globus-core? > > globus-core is a development only package. globus-openssl and > globus-openssl-progs are runtime packages. Runtime packages must not Require > development packages. > How about globus-common? That one is a runtime package and "sounds" like the one all the other globus packages would require. Multiple ownership is not much desired that's why I'm asking. Is the globus-openssh package worth anything without having globus-common installed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 16:23:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171623.n3HGNx7o006982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 12:23:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 16:23:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:23:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171623.n3HGN9eD010204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 12:23:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 16:28:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:28:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171628.n3HGSN5t008318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 12:28:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 16:30:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:30:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486009] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish - Quick two-way blowfish encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171630.n3HGUlI5012271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 12:30:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 16:34:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171634.n3HGYFQU009810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs?, |fedora-cvs+ |needinfo?(kevin at tummy.com) | --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 12:34:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 16:36:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:36:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489418] Review Request: nssbackup - (Not so) Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171636.n3HGaVkK013431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489418 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 12:36:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 16:40:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:40:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491617] Review Request: mingw32-libxml++ - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for libxml2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171640.n3HGeKf3014466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491617 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 12:40:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 16:41:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:41:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491758] Review Request: mingw32-opensc - MingGW Windows OpenSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171641.n3HGfIfn011900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491758 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 12:41:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 16:45:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492613] Review Request: canto - Atom/RSS feed reader based on ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171645.n3HGjjVd016145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492613 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 12:45:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 16:44:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:44:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492133] Review Request: mingw32-libglade2 - MinGW Windows Libglade2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171644.n3HGid9d012497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492133 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 12:44:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 16:47:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492898] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171647.n3HGlIsX016373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492898 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 12:47:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 16:51:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492990] Review Request: zynjacku - LV2 synths and plugins host In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171651.n3HGp388017213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 12:51:01 EDT --- I assume you want a F-11 branch here as well. cvs done with F-11 added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 17:10:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495801] Review Request: json - JavaScript Object Notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171710.n3HHAqGg019083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495801 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt 2009-04-17 13:10:50 EDT --- Built in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1304544 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 17:15:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171715.n3HHFHOw020235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #60 from Jasper Capel 2009-04-17 13:15:15 EDT --- My apologies, it builds just fine. :) It's a mystery to me what caused this. Anyway, I'll be testing songbird on my F11 x86_64 workstation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 17:48:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:48:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171748.n3HHmM79029442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #8 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-17 13:48:21 EDT --- Let me first talk to upstream about possible name clashes. Right now I think "follow" and "catrw" should be killed from this package and I'd rename the remaining questionable executables as follows: muc -> muc-play movie_play -> powmovie-play movie2ascii -> powmovie2ascii > - what is the use case for the -devel package? It contains only header files, > no actual lib powwow-devel contains headers that can be used to develop plugins for powwow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 18:04:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:04:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: sems - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171804.n3HI4Arq031287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 14:04:09 EDT --- sems-1.1.0-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 18:04:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: sems - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171804.n3HI43hl031255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1.0-5.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 18:01:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171801.n3HI1N98030529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 14:01:22 EDT --- gnote-0.1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gnote'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3713 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 18:03:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:03:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485416] Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171803.n3HI315s030913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485416 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 14:02:59 EDT --- msp430-gcc-3.2.3-2.20090210cvs.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update msp430-gcc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3721 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 18:03:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: sems - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171803.n3HI3xGI032691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 14:03:57 EDT --- sems-1.1.0-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 18:04:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171804.n3HI4OgQ000314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 14:04:21 EDT --- beteckna-fonts-0.3-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 18:04:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: sems - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171804.n3HI4FCa032731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1.0-5.fc10 |1.1.0-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 18:04:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492969] Review Request: lv2dynparam - LV2 dynamic parameters extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171804.n3HI4fSe000370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492969 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 14:04:40 EDT --- lv2dynparam-2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lv2dynparam'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3734 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 18:04:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171804.n3HI4Td8031635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.3-4.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 18:06:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:06:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171806.n3HI62vD032390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 14:06:01 EDT --- mingw32-libp11-0.2.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mingw32-libp11'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3739 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 18:32:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467235] Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171832.n3HIWK4B006689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-17 14:32:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Here are my comments for this package. Please note that the bug that I pointed > > in bug 453851#c19 needs fixed in order to build this package in koji. > > The file in GPT is needed. The file in globus-common is also needed by a few > Globus packages, but not by any of the packages I have packaged for Fedora > so far - and it looks like it might be possible to work around it. I have > prepared an update of globus-common where the file is dropped, I just > haven't imported it into CVS yet. If you want to use it in a chain build for > reviewing purposes it is available here: > > http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-common- > 10.2-2.fc10.src.rpm > > (Since this update also backports the fixes based on your comments of this > package to globus-common I would like your feedback on this package before > importing it to CVS, since these could possible influence this update as > well.) > This looks good to me except the inclusion of the external license file. Thanks. > > ? Should the license be ASL 2.0? The source files say they are ASL 2.0 on > > their headers. > > The licence is Apache-2.0 without any changes, and the specfile already > states ASL 2.0 accordingly. Sorry, I just confused myself :) > > > * Fedora specific compiler flags are not honored in the linking phase. At > > the least, "-g -Wall" needs passed. > > They are. The package uses the %configure macro which expands to: > No, I meant during the linking phase: (from build.log) libtool-gcc64pthr: link: /usr/bin/gcc -shared .libs/globus_callout.o .libs/globus_callout_error.o -L/usr/lib64 -lglobus_common -ldl -lltdl -lpthread -m64 -mtune=generic -m64 -m64 -Wl,-soname -Wl,libglobus_callout.so.0 -o .libs/libglobus_callout.so.0.0.7 But apparently, there is no general consensus among the packagers about this. We do need to discuss this in the mailing list. For now, you don't need to worry about it. > > PS. I have collected the answers to the review comments by you and others in a > Draft packaging guidelines document for Globus packages. This is available > here: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus Good resource. I will go through it this week and make comments in case. I think this one is good to go now. ------------------------------------------------- This package (globus-callout) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 18:42:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171842.n3HIgpEE007714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #27 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-17 14:42:47 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 19:10:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:10:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171910.n3HJAngM015906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-17 15:10:48 EDT --- Short on time today, but one quick comment: > Requiring pam_ldap by package name (F12) won't guarantee that you get one that > matches your arch on multilib boxes, so it's being required as > /%{_lib}/security/pam_ldap.so, to ensure thatwe get the pam_ldap.so that > matches the arch of the libnss_ldap.so.2 that this binary package is supplying. There's a different way to do this in F11 and perhaps F10 as well: %{_isa}. You'll see packages providing things like "nss_ldap(x86-64) = 264-2.fc11" now, so you can have a dependency like Requires: nss_ldap%{_isa} and it should do the right thing. I've no idea whether it makes any difference for what you're trying to do, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 19:07:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494199] Review Request: drascula-international - Subtitles for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171907.n3HJ7iJm015214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494199 --- Comment #4 from Felix Kaechele 2009-04-17 15:07:42 EDT --- Here's my review: The following items have been checked and are ok: 1. rpmlint is silent 2. package name complies to guidelines 3. package meets packaging guidelines 4. sha1sums match: [felix at polaris SOURCES]$ sha1sum drascula-int-1.0.zip* 87d1b63a46bb7f3a2c1a951e8332906ac98e2eec drascula-int-1.0.zip 87d1b63a46bb7f3a2c1a951e8332906ac98e2eec drascula-int-1.0.zip.orig 5. the spec file is beautifully crafted :-) 6. the package builds on all arches (especially well on noarch ;-) 7. Requires and BuildReqs are sane 8. file ownership is ok 9. macro usage is reasonable (although one could argue that the subpackages could be named %{name}-*) 10. package contains content 11. has great .desktop files 12. doesn't own stuff it shouldn't own The following items need to be addressed: 1. License seems to be called "Revolution Software Freeware License" (http://liberatedgames.org/licenses/Revolution_Software_Freeware_License.txt). Does this affect the naming of the License in the spec? Is this GPLv2+ at all? When the license question is cleared out I will approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 19:24:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:24:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492990] Review Request: zynjacku - LV2 synths and plugins host In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171924.n3HJOXP6018478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 15:24:33 EDT --- zynjacku-4-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zynjacku-4-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 19:26:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492990] Review Request: zynjacku - LV2 synths and plugins host In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171926.n3HJQsnR017592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-17 15:26:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I assume you want a F-11 branch here as well. > > cvs done with F-11 added. yes, indeed. thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 19:37:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:37:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171937.n3HJbjsk020432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 --- Comment #12 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 15:37:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Thanks for the update. > > (In reply to comment #10) > > (In reply to comment #7) > > > > > ! Could you collect all your "%global"s at one place? > > > > The globals are now first in the file (which seems to be the custom nowadays). > > Except for the global that defines %_name which must come after the Name tag, > > since it uses %name in its definition and this is not defined before the Name > > tag is parsed. This is also the most logical place for it. > > > > This shouldn't matter for rpm, i.e. rpm doesn't needs these to be in logical > order. But it's a matter of taste. I won't say anything more. I did actually test it before writing it. The order does matter. > I have one last question: > > > > > > ? Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. > > > /usr/share/globus and /usr/share/globus/packages is already owned by > > > globus-core. Shouldn't you just put globus-core as a requirement to this > > > package? Is this package useful without globus-core? > > > > globus-core is a development only package. globus-openssl and > > globus-openssl-progs are runtime packages. Runtime packages must not Require > > development packages. > > > > How about globus-common? That one is a runtime package and "sounds" like the > one all the other globus packages would require. Multiple ownership is not much > desired that's why I'm asking. Is the globus-openssh package worth anything > without having globus-common installed? There is at least one usecase for having globus-openssl without globus-common. This is for building globus-gsi-proxy-ssl (see review reqest bug #453854). This requires globus-core and globus-openssl, but not globus-common. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 19:40:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492613] Review Request: canto - Atom/RSS feed reader based on ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171940.n3HJegQx022293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492613 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 19:43:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171943.n3HJh36n021639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 15:43:02 EDT --- libgarmin-0-0.6.20090212svn.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgarmin-0-0.6.20090212svn.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 19:43:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:43:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171943.n3HJh8d7021699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 15:43:07 EDT --- libgarmin-0-0.6.20090212svn.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgarmin-0-0.6.20090212svn.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 19:43:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171943.n3HJhDMm022782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 15:43:12 EDT --- libgarmin-0-0.6.20090212svn.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgarmin-0-0.6.20090212svn.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 20:01:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478429] Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172001.n3HK1W12026435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 --- Comment #5 from Felix Kaechele 2009-04-17 16:01:30 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=340081) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=340081) m4 macro patch for tinc ppc tinc builds for me with this patch on ppc. However you will need to BuildReq autoconf then and run autoreconf -f -i in %prep. You should probably upstream this if possible. AFAIK SHA1_Init also indicates that openssl can be used with SHA1 stuff. You may test yourself. If you don't have a ppc testmachine check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 20:07:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:07:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495950] Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172007.n3HK73pX027835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495950 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-17 16:07:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: safecopy Short Description: Safe copying of files and partitions Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 20:06:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:06:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492898] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172006.n3HK6uXN026502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492898 --- Comment #9 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-17 16:06:55 EDT --- thank you Kevin. I will take a look next week to include the artwork. Thank you for your hint Rahul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 20:05:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495950] Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172005.n3HK5r1O026240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495950 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-17 16:05:52 EDT --- Thanks again for the review.(In reply to comment #1) > - Source code contains no license headers. > - According to README: "Copyright 2009, distributed under terms of the GPL" > - Attached COPYING is GPLv2. > > According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing the correct license tag in > this case is GPL+. Please contact upstream, if this is what they intended. Changed > MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect > runtime of application. NEEDSFIX > - Add COPYING to %doc. Drop webpage/ and just include webpage/index.html. Fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 20:04:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:04:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172004.n3HK4tNO025801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-17 16:04:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > > > This shouldn't matter for rpm, i.e. rpm doesn't needs these to be in logical > > order. But it's a matter of taste. I won't say anything more. > > I did actually test it before writing it. The order does matter. > That's interesting. It works either way here. Maybe the RPM version matters. I tested this on F-10 and F-11. Oh well... No big deal. > There is at least one usecase for having globus-openssl without globus-common. > This is for building globus-gsi-proxy-ssl (see review reqest bug #453854). > This requires globus-core and globus-openssl, but not globus-common. globus-common is not that common then :) I was just asking about the usage, not for building packages. If you think there might be people, who will use globus-openssl, but don't want to have globus-common installed, then multiple ownership is okay. I trust your judgement. ------------------------------------------------- This package (globus-openssl) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 20:08:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:08:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172008.n3HK87Hl028186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 --- Comment #14 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-17 16:08:06 EDT --- Let's have these three packages (globus-openssl, globus-callout and the updated globus-common) in rawhide. Then I'll go on with other packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 20:12:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:12:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492898] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172012.n3HKCPjH027761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492898 --- Comment #10 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-04-17 16:12:21 EDT --- *** Bug 458402 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 20:12:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458402] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172012.n3HKCOp1027728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458402 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #8 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-04-17 16:12:21 EDT --- Even though this review was submitted first, a duplicate review has already been approved. So I am going to close this one and hope that the improvements if any from this spec are incorporated there. Thanks for the review folks *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 492898 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 20:14:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458826] Review Request: s390utils - Linux/390 specific utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172014.n3HKEi9I028147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458826 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-17 16:14:41 EDT --- looks like the F-11 branch wasn't created during the mass branching Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: s390utils New Branches: F-11 Owners: sharkcz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 20:22:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172022.n3HKMina029729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 16:22:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-openssl Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Openssl Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 20:26:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172026.n3HKQgFR032134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 --- Comment #16 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 16:26:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Let's have these three packages (globus-openssl, globus-callout and the updated > globus-common) in rawhide. Then I'll go on with other packages. Many thanks for your review comments. I hope that when you do more of the packages it will be "easy" since I updated all the other packages with your comments from the callout library in mind. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 20:23:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:23:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467235] Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172023.n3HKNJsW031419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-17 16:23:18 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-callout Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 20:35:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:35:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492898] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172035.n3HKZKvH001306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492898 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 16:35:19 EDT --- griffith-0.10-0.1.beta2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/griffith-0.10-0.1.beta2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 20:35:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:35:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489418] Review Request: nssbackup - (Not so) Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172035.n3HKZBVl001163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489418 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 16:35:10 EDT --- nssbackup-0.2-0.2.rc7.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nssbackup-0.2-0.2.rc7.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 20:39:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489418] Review Request: nssbackup - (Not so) Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172039.n3HKdFPa001856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489418 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 16:39:14 EDT --- nssbackup-0.2-0.2.rc7.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nssbackup-0.2-0.2.rc7.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 20:51:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172051.n3HKpDbI002832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #15 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-04-17 16:51:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Short on time today, but one quick comment: > > There's a different way to do this in F11 and perhaps F10 as well: %{_isa}. > You'll see packages providing things like "nss_ldap(x86-64) = 264-2.fc11" now, > so you can have a dependency like > Requires: nss_ldap%{_isa} > and it should do the right thing. I've no idea whether it makes any difference > for what you're trying to do, though. Hmm, on my devel box, I do seem to be seeing an autoprovides on %{name}%{_isa} in other packages, which means it should work. So yes, that would probably be better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 20:56:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:56:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492133] Review Request: mingw32-libglade2 - MinGW Windows Libglade2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172056.n3HKuo1w004076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492133 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 16:56:49 EDT --- mingw32-libglade2-2.6.4-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libglade2-2.6.4-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 20:57:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492133] Review Request: mingw32-libglade2 - MinGW Windows Libglade2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172057.n3HKvSIF004151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492133 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 16:57:28 EDT --- mingw32-libglade2-2.6.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libglade2-2.6.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 20:59:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491617] Review Request: mingw32-libxml++ - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for libxml2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172059.n3HKx1bL004305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491617 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 16:59:00 EDT --- mingw32-libxml++-2.26.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libxml++-2.26.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 20:59:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:59:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491617] Review Request: mingw32-libxml++ - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for libxml2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172059.n3HKxksQ005940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491617 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 16:59:42 EDT --- mingw32-libxml++-2.24.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libxml++-2.24.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:17:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495372] Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172117.n3HLHI0o007714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495372 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 17:17:18 EDT --- python-altgraph-0.6.7-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-altgraph-0.6.7-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:17:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:17:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495372] Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172117.n3HLHNIE007742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495372 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 17:17:23 EDT --- python-altgraph-0.6.7-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-altgraph-0.6.7-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:17:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495372] Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172117.n3HLHSWl009159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495372 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 17:17:27 EDT --- python-altgraph-0.6.7-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-altgraph-0.6.7-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:20:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:20:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491758] Review Request: mingw32-opensc - MingGW Windows OpenSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172120.n3HLK12M007996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491758 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 17:20:00 EDT --- mingw32-opensc-0.11.7-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-opensc-0.11.7-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:22:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495418] Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172122.n3HLMIhC008678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495418 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 17:22:17 EDT --- python-upoints-0.11.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-upoints-0.11.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:22:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:22:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495418] Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172122.n3HLMOxX008771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495418 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 17:22:24 EDT --- python-upoints-0.11.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-upoints-0.11.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:22:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:22:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495418] Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172122.n3HLMUrP010165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495418 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 17:22:29 EDT --- python-upoints-0.11.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-upoints-0.11.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:22:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:22:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491758] Review Request: mingw32-opensc - MingGW Windows OpenSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172122.n3HLMJld010089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491758 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 17:22:18 EDT --- mingw32-opensc-0.11.7-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-opensc-0.11.7-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:25:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458826] Review Request: s390utils - Linux/390 specific utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172125.n3HLPg5C011054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458826 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 17:25:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:26:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467235] Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172126.n3HLQsVV009801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 17:26:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:25:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:25:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172125.n3HLP6HE009454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 17:25:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:24:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:24:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496244] Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172124.n3HLOQ48009028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496244 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |182235(FE-Legal) Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag| |fedora-review- --- Comment #3 from Matej Cepl 2009-04-17 17:24:24 EDT --- + rpmlint must be run on every package. rpmlint is NOT silent: [matej at viklef redhat]$ rpmlint SRPMS/vlna-1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm vlna.src: W: invalid-license TeX-like The license is (in Czech): Program poskytuji k ve?ejn?mu pou?it?. Pokud n?kdo ud?l? u?ite?n? zm?ny ve zdrojov?m textu CWEB, cht?l bych b?t o tom informov?n. Bez souhlasu autora nem??e b?t zm?n?n? program ???en pod stejn?m n?zvem. Ned?v?m ??dnou z?ruku, ?e program nepo?kod? mnohahodinovou pr?ci, kterou u?ivatel? editovali. Program sice vytv??? z?lohov? soubory, ale ty se p?i dal??m pou?it? programu ma?ou. and in English: The program may be freely used. If somebody makes useful changes in the CWEB source code, I want to be informed about it. The modified version must not be distributed under the same name without author's consent. Neither the program nor its modification must be selled. The author gives no warranty that the program will not damage your file that you have been editing for many hours. Although the program creates backup files, these files are deleted after subsequent use of the program. --- English is pretty bad, but as both of us can see it more or less faithfully conveyes the meaning in Czech. And unfortunately "Neither the program nor its modification must be selled." says to me pretty clearly (English is horrible, but Czech text is clear in this) that it could be distributed only non-commercially, which for Fedora (and other Linux distros) unfortunately means stop sign. Closing this review as WONTFIX, because there is not much we can do about it. Please, try to persuade Petr as the upstream author to relicense under some more common (e.g., OSI/FSF approved) license. I am really sorry about this, but there is not much we can do about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493750] Review Request: netcf - a library for managing network configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172131.n3HLVtrf012370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493750 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 17:31:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:28:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:28:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496244] Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172128.n3HLSrl7011606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496244 --- Comment #4 from Matej Cepl 2009-04-17 17:28:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > And unfortunately "Neither the program nor its > modification must be selled." says to me pretty clearly (English is horrible, > but Czech text is clear in this) that it could be distributed only > non-commercially, which for Fedora (and other Linux distros) unfortunately > means stop sign. It's too late, and I am too tired ... no Czech is not clear about this, actually Czech license doesn't correspond with the English one, which is too bad because obviously every English-speaking person (e.g., most of Fedora people) will look only in the English license. We really need some input from the author of the program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:35:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496244] Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172135.n3HLZR1E013300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496244 --- Comment #5 from Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak 2009-04-17 17:35:27 EDT --- OK, I will ask the upstream author. Thanks for your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:35:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:35:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172135.n3HLZiqt013374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 17:35:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:37:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495021] Review Request: python-posix_ipc - POSIX IPC primitives for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172137.n3HLbAo4013520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495021 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 17:37:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:35:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:35:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494819] Review Request: python-bitarray - Efficient Array of Booleans --C Extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172135.n3HLZ0ru012851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494819 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 17:34:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:33:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:33:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172133.n3HLX1kp012688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 17:33:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:36:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494853] Review Request: python-achoo - A fluent interface for testing Python objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172136.n3HLaQLF011763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494853 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 17:36:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:38:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:38:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495398] Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172138.n3HLc5q9013783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495398 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 17:38:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:39:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172139.n3HLdlMR012082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 17:39:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:42:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495669] Review Request: sgpio - Intel SGPIO enclosure management utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172142.n3HLgnNO014532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495669 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 17:42:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:44:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:44:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495950] Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172144.n3HLiA2B014625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495950 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 17:44:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:45:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496067] Review Request: perl-Net-OAuth - OAuth protocol support library for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172145.n3HLjrF5013238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496067 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 17:45:52 EDT --- foo bar? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496021] Review Request: perl-Getopt-ArgvFile - Interpolates script options from files into @ARGV or another array In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172145.n3HLjKLP013136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496021 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-17 17:45:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 21:54:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:54:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496244] Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172154.n3HLsPgd014792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496244 --- Comment #6 from Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak 2009-04-17 17:54:24 EDT --- Speaking of which, the (Czech language) license is really TeX-like, which means the texlive package (as of texlive-2007-35.fc10.x86_64 in Fedora 10) also has an incorrect License attribute: $ rpm -qi texlive|grep License Size : 4431291 License: GPLv2 and BSD and Public Domain and LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ and LPPL None of the above licenses apply to the TeX itself (and Metafont too). TeX can be distributed, but cannot be modified and distributed under the same name, unless the result passes the TRIP test. Should I fill a bug report for the TeXlive package too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 23:09:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:09:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496244] Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904172309.n3HN9J4m027379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496244 --- Comment #7 from Matej Cepl 2009-04-17 19:09:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > None of the above licenses apply to the TeX itself (and Metafont too). TeX can > be distributed, but cannot be modified and distributed under the same name, > unless the result passes the TRIP test. Should I fill a bug report for the > TeXlive package too? Could you please contact jnovy at redhat.com (maintainer of the TeXLive monster) what he thinks about that? I know for sure it was fought to the ground in the Debian world (if you ever read at least one thread at debian-legal you can understand why; apparently one piece of this debate was http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=153257) and I don't want to step to this hornets nest unnecessarily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 00:33:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492990] Review Request: zynjacku - LV2 synths and plugins host In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180033.n3I0Xqa5009105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 20:33:52 EDT --- zynjacku-4-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zynjacku-4-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 02:33:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180233.n3I2Xh6s025863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 22:33:43 EDT --- globus-openssl-3.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-openssl-3.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 02:33:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180233.n3I2XcNd025826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 22:33:37 EDT --- globus-openssl-3.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-openssl-3.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 02:33:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:33:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180233.n3I2XXLl027960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 22:33:32 EDT --- globus-openssl-3.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-openssl-3.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 03:01:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180301.n3I311xf000556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 --- Comment #21 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-17 23:01:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #14) > > Let's have these three packages (globus-openssl, globus-callout and the updated > > globus-common) in rawhide. Then I'll go on with other packages. > > Many thanks for your review comments. I hope that when you do more of the > packages it will be "easy" since I updated all the other packages with your > comments from the callout library in mind. No problem. I admit that they look scary in the first sight, but once I got into them, I realized there is not much to worry about. They are all well organized. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 06:11:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496021] Review Request: perl-Getopt-ArgvFile - Interpolates script options from files into @ARGV or another array In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180611.n3I6BU4C027926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496021 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-18 02:11:29 EDT --- perl-Getopt-ArgvFile-1.11-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Getopt-ArgvFile-1.11-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 06:11:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:11:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496021] Review Request: perl-Getopt-ArgvFile - Interpolates script options from files into @ARGV or another array In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180611.n3I6BPCI027892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496021 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-18 02:11:24 EDT --- perl-Getopt-ArgvFile-1.11-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Getopt-ArgvFile-1.11-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 06:26:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:26:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496021] Review Request: perl-Getopt-ArgvFile - Interpolates script options from files into @ARGV or another array In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180626.n3I6QQb5027971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496021 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-18 02:26:25 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 06:27:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496067] Review Request: perl-Net-OAuth - OAuth protocol support library for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180627.n3I6ROC1030197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496067 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-18 02:27:23 EDT --- Kevin, sorry, I somehow happened to fail to fill in the template. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-OAuth Short Description: OAuth protocol support library for Perl Owners: lkundrak Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 06:46:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180646.n3I6kZnZ030605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #17 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-04-18 02:46:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Any idea why that's just showing up now? It has something with autoconf used to generate files in original package. In CVS there was no configure scripts and they was regenerated from spec file. Only --disable-rpath parameter does not help. There are 2 solutions: 1. use autoreconf in spec to create new scripts 2. use chrpath Solution #1 applied in my spec file: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/libirman.spec http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/10/libirman-0.4.5-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 07:46:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:46:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496168] Review Request: termit - Simple terminal emulator based on vte library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180746.n3I7kT49006678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496168 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-18 03:46:28 EDT --- - Why is the test phase commented out? rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. ~OK - No license is mentioned in any of the source code files or documentation. - GPLv2 COPYING is attached and homepage specifies GPLv2. - Please contact upstream to clarify license in tarball. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK No blockers, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 07:58:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496167] Review Request: lilyterm - Light and easy to use X Terminal Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180758.n3I7wDxW010511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496167 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-18 03:58:12 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK No problems here. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 08:09:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 04:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496168] Review Request: termit - Simple terminal emulator based on vte library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180809.n3I89G2b010369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496168 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-18 04:09:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Why is the test phase commented out? Because it's in the cmake page of the wiki, but... Start processing tests Test project /home/chris/fedora/rpmbuild/BUILD/termit-2.2.0 No tests were found!!! If there are tests in a new release, I can easily enable the tests again. > - Please contact upstream to clarify license in tarball. Will do. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 08:11:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 04:11:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496167] Review Request: lilyterm - Light and easy to use X Terminal Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180811.n3I8BYNT010979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496167 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-18 04:11:33 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lilyterm Short Description: Light and easy to use X Terminal Emulator Owners: cwickert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 08:27:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 04:27:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180827.n3I8R5iq013430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #35 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-18 04:27:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > ** completely remove %{major}, %{minor} macros - just use %{version} macro. > ** remove "%global version %{major}.%{minor}" as well. No need to re-define > this macro. > ** combine %{pkgname} and %{pkgversion} together (since they used only in > couple) > - Please, do not use %{?dist}-suffixes in changelog. This also a minor issue. all done, thanks check here : http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird.spec http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 08:31:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 04:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495398] Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180831.n3I8V2Fu016205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495398 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-18 04:31:01 EDT --- perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 08:33:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 04:33:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495398] Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180833.n3I8XYXp014272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495398 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-18 04:33:33 EDT --- perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 08:39:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 04:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180839.n3I8d6M0015137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #36 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-18 04:39:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > > OK, koji just finished its job - building for ppc64 failed: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1303566 > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1303570 > > Is it a known issue? Not for what I know, and I don't understand why the build failed looking the build.log But even Debian (http://packages.debian.org/sid/firebird2.1-server-common) don't build ppc64 ;) may be we can try with the new one ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 09:11:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 05:11:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495237] Review Request: python-hash_ring - Python implementation of consistent hashing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180911.n3I9BeIA022332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495237 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-18 05:11:39 EDT --- Whoops, I thought I had already approved this so didn't check this. Sorry for the unnecessary delay. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 09:20:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 05:20:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180920.n3I9K2F0023610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #8 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-18 05:20:01 EDT --- Source0: http://xmlfy.sourceforge.net/submit/fedora/xmlfy/xmlfy-1.4.2-src.tar.gz 404, file not found. you doesn't need to branch source code... you could do in %prep following actions: %setup -q rm -rf package # remove package directory from Makefile sed -i 's/.*package.*//g' Makefile and build will be ok, tested with this source: Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}-src.tar.gz and in this tarball README and LICENSE are in dos encoding, so you have to convert it to unix encoding with help of sed and chmod it to more correct permissions (644 would be ok). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 09:44:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 05:44:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180944.n3I9i9mo026852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-18 05:44:08 EDT --- * Source tarball URL gives 404 Not Found. It's missing the "gvrpcd" directory. Correct would be: Source0: http://sokrates.mimuw.edu.pl/~sebek/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz * A proper exit(..) call at end of main() would eliminate the following compiler warning: gvrpcd.c:290: warning: control reaches end of non-void function * "Short-Description" in initscript contains a typo: s/annoucing/announcing/ * You've still got the start-by-default problem (see bottom of comment 2) where the daemon is started even if VLAN configuration is missing: $ sudo service gvrpcd start Starting gvrpcd-eth0: [ OK ] $ sudo service gvrpcd status gvrpcd-eth0 dead but pid file exists -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 09:52:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 05:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496166] Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180952.n3I9q6AA028226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496166 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-18 05:52:05 EDT --- You and your terminal emulators :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 09:55:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 05:55:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496166] Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180955.n3I9t3mp028748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496166 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-18 05:55:02 EDT --- Optflags are not honored: /usr/lib64/ccache/gcc -O2 -I/builddir/build/BUILD/sakura-2.3.3/. -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -DVERSION=\"2.3.3\" -DDATADIR=\"/usr/share\" -DBUILDTYPE=\"\" -o CMakeFiles/sakura.dir/src/sakura.o -c /builddir/build/BUILD/sakura-2.3.3/src/sakura.c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 10:00:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 06:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494862] Review Request: podofo - Tools and libraries to work with the PDF file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181000.n3IA0ANc027167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494862 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 10:26:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 06:26:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494862] Review Request: podofo - Tools and libraries to work with the PDF file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181026.n3IAQavT031031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494862 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-18 06:26:35 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSFIX - I don't think linking GPL/LGPL without exceptions to OpenSSL is okay due to OpenSSL's advertisement clauses. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSFIX - LaTeX documentation exists, but I wasn't able to build it. HTML documentation is probably enough. - You need to add AUTHORS and TODO to %doc of all packages. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 11:04:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 07:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181104.n3IB48N0003755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #37 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-18 07:04:07 EDT --- No, it doesn't help too much http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1306464 BTW, you, as a fedora developer, can try it by yourself $ koji list-targets .... .... $ koji build --scratch f.e.: $ koji build --scratch dist-f10 ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 11:03:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 07:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181103.n3IB3SLE003644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-18 07:03:27 EDT --- * I'll try to take a look at the latest rpms this weekend. * Fedora's optflags guidelines are still not adhered to -- only the mysql backend uses them. * Since you've made ##heavy## use of _with/_without, you might be interested in learning about the %bcond_with/%bcond_without macros. See section "Conditional build stuff" in /usr/lib/rpm/macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 11:07:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 07:07:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181107.n3IB76FG004478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #38 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-18 07:07:04 EDT --- And again about macros at the top of the spec - you don't need to define name and version. They defined automatically. E.g. you may remove these two lines %global name firebird %global version 2.1.2.18118.0 and you should change this one: -Version: %{version} +Version: 2.1.2.18118.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 11:26:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 07:26:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181126.n3IBQn0a007477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #39 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-04-18 07:26:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #36) > (In reply to comment #34) > > > > OK, koji just finished its job - building for ppc64 failed: > > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1303566 > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1303570 > > > > Is it a known issue? > Not for what I know, and I don't understand why the build failed looking the > build.log Seems that it installed some files that should be under %{_libdir} (/usr/lib64/) to /usr/lib/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 12:11:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 08:11:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181211.n3ICBpik016638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(avi at unix.sh) --- Comment #23 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-18 08:11:48 EDT --- Avi, any progress on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 12:23:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 08:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487098] Review Request: Djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181223.n3ICNh9j018389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-18 08:23:42 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 12:42:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 08:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181242.n3ICgdqX021424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #40 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-18 08:42:38 EDT --- Here is a scratchbuild with more detailed output of ./install/makeInstallImage.sh script: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1306559 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 13:37:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:37:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181337.n3IDbfr7030127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #41 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-04-18 09:37:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #40) > Here is a scratchbuild with more detailed output of > ./install/makeInstallImage.sh script: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1306559 See, it makes links under gen/buildroot/usr/lib/: + for i in 'libfb*.so*' + ln -s /usr/lib64/firebird/lib/libfbclient.so /builddir/build/BUILD/Firebird-2.1.2.18118-0/gen/buildroot/usr/lib/libfbclient.so and so on... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 13:54:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:54:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181354.n3IDsnDp030617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 --- Comment #21 from Panu Matilainen 2009-04-18 09:54:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > What's blocking this review? > > Recent rpmlint does not complain on license because "GPLv2+" and "GPLv2+ and > LGPLv2+ with exceptions" are valid now > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing). If anyone feels there's problem > with licensing, let's block on bug fe-legal. BTW rpm's source license has gotten somewhat less complicated since this review was started, as rpm no longer bundles 3rd party libraries in its tarball. So there's basically rpm's main GPL/LGPL dual license + two MIT-licensed Lua extensions. > -- > > Informal rpmlint review on recent rpm > ===================================== > > SPECS/rpm.spec:571: W: macro-in-%changelog patch > > * Thu Sep 25 2008 Jindrich Novy > - don't treat %patch numberless if -P parameter is present (#463942) Ok, will fix. > rpm.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary RPM > > don't get this one... Well it's a pretty bogus warning if you ask me. Rpm's summary contains RPM because it's not only name of the software, it's also name of the package format which the software in question manages. > rpm.src: W: strange-permission fontconfig.prov 0755 > rpm.src: W: strange-permission desktop-file.prov 0755 > > any idea? Another bogus (IMO) warning: these are executable scripts. Why should their permission in the source be anything else? > rpm.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > > "There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share." > > Huh, what? Most of /usr/lib/rpm/ contents would be more appropriate for /usr/share/ but changing that is not so simple, lots of things expect rpm scripts and stuff to live in the hardwired /usr/lib/rpm directory. This is not going to change anytime soon. > > rpm.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /var/lib/rpm > > newman at dhcp-lab-124 rpmbuild $ rpmquery -f /var/lib/rpm > rpm-4.7.0-0.beta1.9.fc11.x86_64 > > rpmlint bug? Yes, rpmlint bug. /var/lib/rpm belongs to rpm, not anything else. > > rpm.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/rpm/rpm.xinetd > rpm.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/rpm/rpm.log > > exec perm probably not necesary > > rpm-build.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/rpm/macros.python > rpm-build.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/rpm/macros.php > rpm-build.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/rpm/macros.perl > > ditto > > rpm-python.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/rpm/__init__.py > > ditto Nod, executable permission on all these is incorrect. This is an upstream issue, just fixed it in rpm.org HEAD. Doesn't seem worth bothering to fix in the spec but can/will do if deemed necessary. > > rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_recover > ../../bin/db_recover > rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_deadlock > ../../bin/db_deadlock > rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_stat > ../../bin/db_stat > rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_dump > ../../bin/db_dump > rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_archive > ../../bin/db_archive > rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_upgrade > ../../bin/db_upgrade > rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_printlog > ../../bin/db_printlog > rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_verify > ../../bin/db_verify > rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_load > ../../bin/db_load > rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_svc > ../../bin/berkeley_db_svc > > Build system problem? Anyone seeing this too? >From the spec: # plant links to db utils as rpmdb_foo so existing documantion is usable This is done on purpose, and the links aren't dangling when dependencies are installed (rpm main package requires db4-utils) > > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Group rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Group rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Basenames rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Basenames rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Requireversion rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Requireversion rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Providename rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Providename rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.007 rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.007 rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Pubkeys rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Pubkeys rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.003 rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.003 rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.009 rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.009 rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Conflictname rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Conflictname rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Provideversion rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Provideversion rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Triggername rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Triggername rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Filedigests rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Filedigests rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Dirnames rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Dirnames rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.004 rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.004 rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.005 rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.005 rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.001 rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.001 rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.002 rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.002 rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Name rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Name rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.008 rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.008 rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Installtid rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Installtid rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Requirename rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Requirename rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Sigmd5 rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Sigmd5 rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Sha1header rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Sha1header rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Packages rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Packages rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.006 rpm > rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.006 rpm > > Discussed already. Yeah, but this shouldn't have been an issue anymore. The files get installed as root:root since quite a while, but there's a leftover "%attr(0644, rpm, rpm)" in the spec. Will fix. > rpm.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%posttrans rm > > Life's dangerous. The rm is necessary for now. > rpm-build.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/rpm/perldeps.pl 0644 > > Investigate please. Explained in the spec: # avoid dragging in tonne of perl libs for an unused script chmod 0644 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{rpmhome}/perldeps.pl > rpm-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation > rpm-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation > > Upstream problem :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 14:01:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495950] Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181401.n3IE1ad9001247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495950 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-18 10:01:36 EDT --- safecopy-1.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/safecopy-1.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 14:01:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:01:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495950] Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181401.n3IE1f3u001279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495950 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-18 10:01:40 EDT --- safecopy-1.2-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/safecopy-1.2-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 14:01:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495950] Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181401.n3IE1jwk031958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495950 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-18 10:01:45 EDT --- safecopy-1.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/safecopy-1.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 14:10:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181410.n3IEAGSs002737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #42 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-18 10:10:15 EDT --- > Seems that it installed some files that should be under %{_libdir} > (/usr/lib64/) to /usr/lib/ it shouldn't and I don't understand why and x86_64 is ok, so why not ppc64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 14:32:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181432.n3IEWiRZ004213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-18 10:32:42 EDT --- gpscorrelate-1.6.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpscorrelate-1.6.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 14:32:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:32:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181432.n3IEWnx0005963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-18 10:32:49 EDT --- gpscorrelate-1.6.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpscorrelate-1.6.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 14:32:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:32:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181432.n3IEWsu2005997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-18 10:32:54 EDT --- gpscorrelate-1.6.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpscorrelate-1.6.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 14:44:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450442] Review Request: rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp - Copy tiddlers to files and vice versa In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181444.n3IEiW7Q005821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450442 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(jkeating at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Till Maas 2009-04-18 10:44:31 EDT --- Are you still interested in a review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 14:50:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450539] Review Request: service-discovery-applet - Service discovery applet based on Avahi for the Gnome panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181450.n3IEo9Pm006913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450539 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #12 from Till Maas 2009-04-18 10:50:06 EDT --- Please clear NotReady from the whiteboard when this request is ready for a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 14:52:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:52:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455539] Review Request: yui - JavaScript library for building dynamic web sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181452.n3IEqG4X008925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455539 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #6 from Till Maas 2009-04-18 10:52:14 EDT --- Please clear NotReady from the Whiteboard when this review request is ready for a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 14:54:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:54:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455622] Review Request: scriptaculous-js - JavaScript libraries for web user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181454.n3IEsFNu009111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455622 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2009-04-18 10:54:13 EDT --- The URLs for Spec/SRPM return a 404 error page. Please clear NotReady from the Whiteboard when this review request is ready for a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 15:12:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458279] Review Request: python-arm4 - Python language bindings for Applicatioon Response Measurement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181512.n3IFCTSd010181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458279 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2009-04-18 11:12:28 EDT --- Just two remarks I spoted: The Source0: URL for SF.net is downloads.sourceforge... not download.sourceforge..., there is an "s" missing. Instead of %define, %global should be used in the first line of the spec. I will try to make a full review later this day, so there is no need to update the spec yet for these two issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 15:16:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447755] Review Request: postgresql-plpgpsm - Implementation of SQL/PSM language for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181516.n3IFGOI4012621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447755 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2009-04-18 11:16:22 EDT --- It looks like $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not honoured. Reference: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags Also the package does not build on koji, which looks like missing BRs: bison -y -d gram.y /usr/bin/flex -o'pl_scan.c' scan.l make: execvp: bison: Permission denied make: /usr/bin/flex: Command not found make: *** [pl.tab.h] Error 127 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make: *** [pl_scan.c] Error 127 Please remove the NotReady from the Whiteboard when this review request is ready for a review, i.e. at least builds in koji and the $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured. You can test it yourself with: koji build --scratch dist-f12 /path/to/*.src.rpm Please post the URL of the koji scratch build, if you did one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 15:28:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:28:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492130] Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181528.n3IFSAn0014321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 492130 depends on bug 492125, which changed state. Bug 492125 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-pangomm - MinGW Windows C++ interface for Pango https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492125 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-18 11:28:09 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-gtkmm24-2.15.0-1.fc11.src.rpm 2009-04-18 * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint output Only expected Errors/Warnings from a mingw package * Package is named according to Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * Spec file is named as the package * Package follows the Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * The stated license (LGPLv2+) is a Fedora approved license * The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding Fedora package * The package contains the license file (COPYING) which is LGPL v2.1 ! The package also includes another license file (COPYING.tools) from the source tarball which is the GPL2 license. Is any of the components in the package released under this license? If there are components in the package released under this license the License tag should reflect this. If there are no components in the package released under this license this file shouldn't be in the package. The corresponding native Fedora package gtkmm24 doesn't seem to package this file. * The spec file is written in legible English * Sources matches upstream b1b3e8efa33425bf91ba49922fab13ac gtkmm-2.15.0.tar.bz2 b1b3e8efa33425bf91ba49922fab13ac SRPM/gtkmm-2.15.0.tar.bz2 ! Accoding to guidelines the version should match the version of the corresponding Fedora package. The current version of the native package (in F11 and devel) is 2.16.0. * Package builds in mock (Fedora 10). ! Since the documentation is deleted anyway after the build, wouldn't it make sense to pass --disable-doc to configure so that it is not built in the first place? * BuildRequires look sane * Owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files * %files has %defattr * %clean clears %buildroot * Specfile uses macros consistently * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears %buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 15:44:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492197] Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181544.n3IFijpF014722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 15:53:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:53:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181553.n3IFrnik016111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) --- Comment #41 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-18 11:53:47 EDT --- Please build this package on buildsystem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 15:56:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:56:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479147] Review Request: skanlite - A scanning program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181556.n3IFu9MM018446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479147 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-18 11:56:07 EDT --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 15:52:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:52:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181552.n3IFqxbM017856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #50 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-18 11:52:55 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 16:00:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181600.n3IG0jcu017342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(dignan.patrick at gm | |ail.com) --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-18 12:00:43 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 16:04:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181604.n3IG4FYX017759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #61 from David Halik 2009-04-18 12:04:13 EDT --- Ok, I reworked the files section and all of the rpmlint perm errors are fixed, this includes the debuginfo package. Below is the new rpmlint output: # rpmlint songbird-1.1.2-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm songbird.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2/.autoreg songbird.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2/.autoreg songbird.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2/xulrunner/mangle ['/usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2', '$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] songbird.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2/xulrunner/shlibsign ['/usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2', '$ORIGIN/../lib64', '$ORIGIN/../lib'] songbird.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2/lib/sbGStreamerMediacore.so songbird.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2/components/sbMetadataHandlerTaglib.so ['/usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2', '$ORIGIN/../xulrunner'] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 2 warnings. Everything above is accounted for. The .autoreg warning and error are expected. The zero byte file needs to be there for XPCOM registration to happen on first run (I checked with the devs). kwizart, I'm not sure which other RPATH errors you were seeing, but the above three (mangle, shlibsign, sbMetadataHandlerTaglib.so) are the only ones I have seen and all are correct. These three should be pointing back to the internal lib area rather than outside. # rpmlint songbird-debuginfo-1.1.2-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm /usr/share/rpmlint/Pkg.py:16: DeprecationWarning: The popen2 module is deprecated. Use the subprocess module. import popen2 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. debuginfo perms are now correct. I posted the update spec and src.rpm: http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird.spec http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird-1.1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 16:09:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:09:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181609.n3IG9URF018553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #41 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-18 12:09:27 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 16:12:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:12:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181612.n3IGCgjv020759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-18 12:12:41 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 16:14:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181614.n3IGEitv019299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-18 12:14:42 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 16:18:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492197] Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181618.n3IGIheM021528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-04-18 12:18:42 EDT --- Oget, The sources contains a local copy of tritonus-share which I think should be a separate rpm as it's originally from entirely different source. Let me know your opinion. Alex -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 16:34:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:34:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491614] Review Request: mingw32-libglademm24 - C++ wrapper for libglade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181634.n3IGYpRm023978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-18 12:34:50 EDT --- Building the package fails: ../../scripts/depcomp: line 571: exec: i686-pc-mingw32-g++: not found make[2]: *** [generate_defs_libglade.o] Error 127 I suspect this is due to a missing BuildRequires on mingw32-gcc-c++. Also, configure complains about the --enable-docs flag: configure: WARNING: Unrecognized options: --enable-docs ./configure --help does not list this flag for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 16:40:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181640.n3IGe6xK023507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #14 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-18 12:40:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > * Fedora's optflags guidelines are still not adhered to -- only the mysql > backend uses them. I have fixed the configure.ac file: the CXXFLAGS was copied into CXXFLAGS_OPT and then set to void. In the other side, the MySQL backend was compiled with the correct flags, because that was what the `mysql_config --cflags` command returned. But that latter may not be portable/consistent across all the platforms. The new configure.ac file does no longer override the CXXFLAGS, and I have changed the ax_{mysql,postgresql}.m4 files, so that the cppflags only add the "-I${includedir}" option when appropriate. The updated files are here: Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/soci.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/soci-3.0.0-4.fc10.src.rpm [Patch URLs: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/soci-3.0.0-fix-gcc43-compatibility.patch and http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/soci-3.0.0-fix-gnu-autotools-compatibility.patch has been updated ] And the corresponding Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1306924 (i586) and http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1306926 (x86_64) > * Since you've made ##heavy## use of _with/_without, you might be interested in > learning about the %bcond_with/%bcond_without macros. See section "Conditional > build stuff" in /usr/lib/rpm/macros. I have read that section, and it may help reduce a little bit my usage of _with/_without. Still, I have to figure how to replace part of those latter with the %bcond_with/%bcond_without macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 16:50:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:50:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458279] Review Request: python-arm4 - Python language bindings for Applicatioon Response Measurement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181650.n3IGofT6026878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458279 --- Comment #2 from David Carter 2009-04-18 12:50:40 EDT --- Hang on for a day. I've got an updated source to use, so I'll post an updated version later today or early tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 17:12:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:12:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181712.n3IHCn2s028166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #43 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-18 13:12:47 EDT --- Finaly I added ExcludeArch: ppc64 http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird.spec http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-1.fc10.src.rpm upgraded and here results : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1306893 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1306917 for me epel target is enough, no need ppc64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 17:20:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:20:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181720.n3IHK0aA031246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-18 13:19:58 EDT --- Meantime I think I resolve this trouble and source may be checked by hash. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/gloox/gloox-1.0-0.5.SVNr4003.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 17:33:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181733.n3IHX02k000728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-18 13:32:59 EDT --- $ rpmlint globus-xio*.rpm globus-xio.spec globus-xio.i586: W: no-documentation globus-xio-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1306953 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 17:41:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:41:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181741.n3IHfB9m002183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 17:40:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181740.n3IHej0H002109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-18 13:40:44 EDT --- Fedora review globus-xio-2.7-1.fc10.src.rpm 2008-04-18 (btw: the posted spec file and the spec file contained in the srpm are not consistent) + OK ! needs attention ! rpmlint output (including the license file as doc gets rid of the warning) + Package is named according to Fedora Package Naming Guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora packaging guidelines + License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora ASL 2.0 + License matches the actual package license ! The package contains the license file + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm the source repacking makes it impossible to compare md5sum's, thus: $ diff -urN globus_xio-2.7 globus_xio-2.7-dl reports no differences + Package scratch-builds n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content + Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage n/a Files marked %doc should not affect package + Header files should be in -devel n/a Static libraries should be in -static ! Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + libfoo.so must go in -devel + -devel must require the fully versioned base + Packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 17:40:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:40:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181740.n3IHeWIK032472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #44 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-04-18 13:40:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #42) > > Seems that it installed some files that should be under %{_libdir} > > (/usr/lib64/) to /usr/lib/ > it shouldn't > and I don't understand why > and x86_64 is ok, so why not ppc64 That happens because of self-written target checks in configure that treats ppc and ppc64 targets the same, and also disregards libdir passed as param to configure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 17:54:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:54:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl -Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181754.n3IHs7sq002032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-18 13:54:06 EDT --- $ rpmlint globus-rsl* globus-rsl.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libglobus_rsl.so.2.3.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 globus-rsl.i586: W: no-documentation globus-rsl-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1306958 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 18:00:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl -Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181800.n3II0jUr005268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 18:00:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:00:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl -Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181800.n3II0I9R003249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-18 14:00:17 EDT --- Fedora review globus-rsl-5.0-1.fc12.i586.rpm 2008-04-18 (btw: the posted spec file and the spec file contained in the srpm are not consistent) + OK ! needs attention ! rpmlint output (including the license file as doc gets rid of the no docs warning) + Package is named according to Fedora Package Naming Guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora packaging guidelines + License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora ASL 2.0 + License matches the actual package license ! The package contains the license file + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm the source repacking makes it impossible to compare md5sum's, thus: $ diff -urN globus_rsl-5.0 globus_rsl-5.0-dl reports no differences + Package scratch-builds n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage n/a Files marked %doc should not affect package + Header files should be in -devel n/a Static libraries should be in -static ! Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + libfoo.so must go in -devel + -devel must require the fully versioned base + Packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 18:02:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:02:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181802.n3II2inT005435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 18:04:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:04:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181804.n3II4thC005573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-18 14:04:54 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=340167) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=340167) Patch to compile with g++44 Some notes: * Summary - Including the name of the package into Summary * License - For this package the license tag should be GPLv2+. * BR - "BuildRequires: glib2-devel" is redundant because gtk2-devel requires glib2-devel - build.log says: --------------------------------------------------------- 225 checking for HAL... no --------------------------------------------------------- It seems this can be enabled by "BR: hal-devel". * %description - I don't think including sentences like --------------------------------------------------------- * My camera has a 2GB card and thus will frequently contain photographs spanning several weeks, or even months. --------------------------------------------------------- or so is proper, because these sentences look like personal comments or so. * Build failure - This package does not build on dist-f11-updates-candidate (with g++44). The attached patch is needed. * scriplets - Please update GTK icon cache related scripts: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 18:23:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181823.n3IINhp5006713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #45 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-18 14:23:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #44) > That happens because of self-written target checks in configure that treats ppc > and ppc64 targets the same, and also disregards libdir passed as param to > configure. no sure of that for what I see in the log target is good after configure task The Firebird2 package has been configured with the following options: Architecture : ClassicServer Debug : disabled 64 bit I/O for 32-bit platforms : enabled Raw devices : enabled Lock manager : enabled Service name : gds_db Service port : 3050 GPRE modules : c_cxx.cpp Install Dir : /usr/lib64/firebird The Firebird2 package has been configured with the following options: Architecture : SuperServer Debug : disabled 64 bit I/O for 32-bit platforms : enabled Raw devices : enabled Service name : gds_db Service port : 3050 GPRE modules : c_cxx.cpp Install Dir : /usr/lib64/firebird same as for x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 18:31:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181831.n3IIV1fh008005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 --- Comment #2 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-18 14:31:00 EDT --- Thanks but it cannot be builded without firebird-devel : BuildRequires: firebird-devel please re check it, I upgraded both spec and src.rpm And that package is a Mandriva -> Fedora move, it is not writen from scratch ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 18:32:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:32:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181832.n3IIWuBD008353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Liang Suilong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 18:31:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181831.n3IIVqtl008231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Liang Suilong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #43 from Liang Suilong 2009-04-18 14:31:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: iptux Short Description: A software for sharing in LAN Owners: liangsuilong Branches: F-10 devel InitialCC: liangsuilong Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 18:35:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492130] Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181835.n3IIZCIQ010471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-18 14:35:11 EDT --- Thanks for taking the review! In order to update mingw32-gtkmm24 to 2.16.0, mingw32-gtk2 also needs to be updated to 2.16.0 or later, otherwise gtkmm24 won't compile. I have applied for ACL's on mingw32-gtk2 to be able to do that, so stay tuned... COPYING.tools needs not be included, as the binary rpm does not distribute any of the tools in the ./tools directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 18:38:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:38:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181838.n3IIcZnL010881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #46 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-04-18 14:38:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #45) > (In reply to comment #44) > > That happens because of self-written target checks in configure that treats ppc > > and ppc64 targets the same, and also disregards libdir passed as param to > > configure. > no sure of that Those checks in configure sets libdir to /usr/lib64 only for x86_64*-*-linux*, for all other targets libdir got set to /usr/lib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 18:41:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:41:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181841.n3IIfsfZ011503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 Liang Suilong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #7 from Liang Suilong 2009-04-18 14:41:52 EDT --- Mamoru Tasaka I am so sorry that I am busy for studying in the university. And the school network is so bad that I can not connect to this page. As I see, perltetris.pl is running well on my Fedora. This is no reason to omit it. And the other users told me it is OK to them. So if we remove it, and Shutter can not run because of omitting this file, we will add it again. I think it does not need to do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 18:40:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:40:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181840.n3IIe7gb009640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #47 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-04-18 14:40:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #45) > Install Dir : /usr/lib64/firebird And this is installdir which is being set from prefix which you don't override. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 18:49:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492130] Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181849.n3IInYXx012521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl --- Comment #3 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-04-18 14:49:33 EDT --- Hi, I already have commit access to mingw32-gtk2, so I can update it to 2.16.1 if necessary. Does an update of gtk2 suffice or does glib2 also need to be updated to 2.20.1 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 19:03:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:03:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492130] Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181903.n3IJ3a1x013051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-18 15:03:34 EDT --- Erik, I'd be glad if you could update mingw32-gtk2. I have already updated mingw32-glib2 to 2.20.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 19:00:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:00:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181900.n3IJ0RHR012745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #48 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-18 15:00:25 EDT --- Sorry Alexey, I think I understand now but if we wanted to solve it, we need to make a patch only for ppc64 plateform it could be done, but it will take some time -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 19:21:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492130] Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181921.n3IJLCgc016011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 --- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-04-18 15:21:11 EDT --- mingw32-gtk2 2.16.1 is now being build for Rawhide/F12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1306975 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 20:24:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:24:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904182024.n3IKO3v8026513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 --- Comment #22 from Patrice Dumas 2009-04-18 16:24:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > > rpm.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > > > > "There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share." > > > > Huh, what? > > Most of /usr/lib/rpm/ contents would be more appropriate for /usr/share/ but > changing that is not so simple, lots of things expect rpm scripts and stuff to > live in the hardwired /usr/lib/rpm directory. This is not going to change > anytime soon. What about putting everything in /usr/share and doing a symlink to /usr/lib? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 20:28:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl -Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904182028.n3IKS22c026080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-18 16:28:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Fedora review globus-rsl-5.0-1.fc12.i586.rpm 2008-04-18 > > (btw: the posted spec file and the spec file contained in the srpm are not > consistent) Sorry about that. It seems I copied the last version of the SRPM to the server with the wrong name after the last update - so the previous one was not overwritten as I intended. The difference between the versions was that I added globus-common as a Requires so that the package Requires a package that owns the direcories where it puts its files. I have updated the SRPM with the intended one. The specfile was the intended one. > + OK > ! needs attention > > ! rpmlint output (including the license file as doc gets rid of the no docs > warning) I just removed the license file as doc in this version since a reviewer of a different package strongly argued that it shouldn't be there since it is not part of the source tree for this package (see bug 467235 comment 3). I really need all the packages to be the same, otherwise it is not maintainable. If you strongly disagree with the previous reviewer, I will try to do some arbitration. > ! The package contains the license file See above. > ! Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' globus-xio-devel Requires globus-core, which Requires pkgconfig. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 20:32:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491992] Review Request: mod_falcon - An embedded Falcon interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904182032.n3IKWMrF027892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491992 --- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel 2009-04-18 16:32:21 EDT --- Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/mod_falcon/mod_falcon.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/mod_falcon/mod_falcon-0.9.4-2.srpm Fixed up the License field. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 20:33:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904182033.n3IKXqmp028025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-18 16:33:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Fedora review globus-xio-2.7-1.fc10.src.rpm 2008-04-18 > > (btw: the posted spec file and the spec file contained in the srpm are not > consistent) Sorry about that. It seems I copied the last version of the SRPM to the server with the wrong name after the last update - so the previous one was not overwritten as I intended. The difference between the versions was that I added globus-common as a Requires so that the package Requires a package that owns the direcories where it puts its files. I have updated the SRPM with the intended one. The specfile was the intended one. > + OK > ! needs attention > > ! rpmlint output (including the license file as doc gets rid of the warning) I just removed the license file as doc in this version since a reviewer of a different package strongly argued that it shouldn't be there since it is not part of the source tree for this package (see bug 467235 comment 3). I really need all the packages to be the same, otherwise it is not maintainable. If you strongly disagree with the previous reviewer, I will try to do some arbitration. > ! The package contains the license file See above > ! Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' globus-xio-devel Requires globus-core, which Requires pkgconfig. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 20:36:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:36:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl -Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904182036.n3IKaBo6027513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-18 16:36:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > ! Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' > > globus-xio-devel Requires globus-core, which Requires pkgconfig. cut and paste error - the argument is still true though: globus-rsl-devel Requires globus-core, which Requires pkgconfig. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 20:44:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904182044.n3IKimOV029644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-18 16:44:47 EDT --- I understand that you want to keep the packages the same, this is a good thing. However, omitting the license file makes me nervous. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines states that the license file _must_ be included if the source archive contains one. The source archive downloaded from upstream contains a license file - just not in the directory that gets repackaged. I find Orcan Ogetbil's argument that the license file needs to be in the repackaged subdirectory quite unsustainable. IANAL but I think you're on pretty thin ice here. Ok about the rest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 20:44:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:44:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904182044.n3IKiN16028493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 --- Comment #4 from Zarko 2009-04-18 16:44:23 EDT --- OK, thanks on review... I'm now a little slow in my process to applying suggestion. But I will very soon. regards, Zarko -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 20:52:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904182052.n3IKqNuI030942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 --- Comment #3 from Zarko 2009-04-18 16:52:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > And that package is a Mandriva -> Fedora move, it is not writen from scratch ;) That is the problem. Some macros do not exist on Fedora. Exp: %{_iconsdir}/%{name}.png %{_liconsdir}/%{name}.png %{_miconsdir}/%{name}.png I think that we do not have these macros on Fedora. Check it. For desktop files you must do validate (it is commented for now) I do not currently ttied build this package, but I will. I see that the Firebird is in the review process, too, so I must build it in my personal repo for testing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 21:49:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:49:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486757] Review Request: divine-mc - Multi-core model checking system for proving specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904182149.n3ILn1m4006764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486757 --- Comment #19 from David A. Wheeler 2009-04-18 17:48:59 EDT --- Petr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 22:01:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:01:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904182201.n3IM1hVf008742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #309633|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-04-18 18:01:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=340181) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=340181) Updated spec file Here's an updated spec file for 0.4.8; it properly registers the GConf settings. Yaakov, do you have time to package, in which case I'd be more than happy to perform a review? I have a complete Netbook stack working now (Maximus/netbook-launcher/window-picker-applet); I can review this and you can review netbook-launcher and window-picker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 22:04:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:04:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486757] Review Request: divine-mc - Multi-core model checking system for proving specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904182204.n3IM4Hif007883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486757 --- Comment #20 from David A. Wheeler 2009-04-18 18:04:16 EDT --- (Sorry for the blank previous comment.) Petr: Would you mind "taking over" packaging divine-mc for Fedora? I feel silly trying to package this program for Fedora when there's a clear expert who could do it much better instead. Feel free to use my Fedora packaging for divine-mc version 1.3 as a starting point. If I were you, I'd wait for your divine-mc 1.4.1 release next week, and use that as the baseline. I haven't submitted a request to package the NIPS Promela compiler yet because my package has mysterious errors that I haven't figured out. It compiles fine on F10, but not on F11. On F11 (via koji) its test complains that in the XML, the attribute "line" doesn't have a value... but I looked at the XML and it DOES have a value. Ugh. I'm getting an F11 setup so I can track this down, but someone who's more familiar with this program's innards could probably figure this out far faster than I could. My draft package is here: http://www.dwheeler.com/nips-promela-compiler-1.2.5.20070327-1.fc10.src.rpm Milos: Can you give me advice? Should I submit a request for a package review of nips-promela-compiler, even though it doesn't work on F11 yet, in the hopes that someone can help me fix it? Alternatively, does someone want to take over that package? My goal is to get these things packaged into Fedora (see http://www.openproofs.org )... if someone else takes over lead, that's fine by me!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 22:14:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492130] Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904182214.n3IMERUq010212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-18 18:14:25 EDT --- Ok, I've updated the package: Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-gtkmm24.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-gtkmm24-2.16.0-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 22:14:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:14:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904182214.n3IME493010147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 --- Comment #4 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-18 18:14:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > That is the problem. Some macros do not exist on Fedora. > Exp: > %{_iconsdir}/%{name}.png > %{_liconsdir}/%{name}.png > %{_miconsdir}/%{name}.png > > I think that we do not have these macros on Fedora. Check it. checked no problem > For desktop files you must do validate (it is commented for now) done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 22:27:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491614] Review Request: mingw32-libglademm24 - C++ wrapper for libglade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904182227.n3IMRAhr012056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-18 18:27:09 EDT --- Thanks! Update: Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libglademm24.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libglademm24-2.6.7-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 22:24:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904182224.n3IMOrjc011552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #49 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-18 18:24:52 EDT --- Seems that I found the solution for ppc64 All builds are ok http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307088 http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird.spec http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-1.fc10.src.rpm upgraded -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 23:51:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473184] Review Request: clamz - Amazon Downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904182351.n3INpkxQ022963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473184 --- Comment #10 from Jim Radford 2009-04-18 19:51:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) => Required libgpg-error.so.0 library is part of libgpg-error-devel package > (missing) Interesting, I expect the library dependencies to found automatically by rpm. For example, I get: $rpm -qp --requires clamz*.rpm | grep error libgpg-error.so.0()(64bit) > A mock build tells us: > desktop-file-install: command not found Fixed and now builds in mock (fc10). Spec URL: http://blackbean.org/review/clamz.spec SRPM URL: http://blackbean.org/review/clamz-0.2-7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 23:49:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:49:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904182349.n3INnhVK021492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-04-18 19:49:42 EDT --- Review: * Package name is correct * spec file name correct * spec file is legible and in english * License field is correct and acceptable in Fedora * License text is included in package * sources match upstream * macros used consistently * Builds correctly on F-10 * rpmlint is silent APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 00:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495403] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Storage - An serialization framework for Moose classes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190007.n3J07XLQ024091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495403 --- Comment #8 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-18 20:07:32 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Storage.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Storage-0.17-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 00:19:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:19:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495330] Review Request: perl-CSS-Minifier - Remove unnecessary whitespace from CSS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190019.n3J0Jtru025565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495330 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-18 20:19:55 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 00:23:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:23:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190023.n3J0Nv89026262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #8 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-18 20:23:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Erm... good question. Yanko, are you sponsored? > > Nope, sorry. This review submission as well as my recent others were more for > "documentation" purposes. I happen to need rpms of these for work related > reasons and now that I made them I might as well post them somewhere. The > package review queue is the place I personally check first if something is not > already packaged, so it seems like a good place to put these. I'll be happy if > someone jumps in to maintain them... Do you want to be sponsored? If so, I'll take a look through your other submissions and if things look good, we can work on that... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 00:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450442] Review Request: rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp - Copy tiddlers to files and vice versa In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190024.n3J0OWeC026388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450442 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(jkeating at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #3 from Jesse Keating 2009-04-18 20:24:30 EDT --- Sorry, no, it is no longer necessary for building the package I was working on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 00:36:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:36:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190036.n3J0auuW029465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-18 20:36:55 EDT --- Thanks for the review Gianluca. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-feedcreator Short Description: Create RSS feeds Owners: xavierb Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 00:46:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495403] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Storage - An serialization framework for Moose classes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190046.n3J0kPOM030841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495403 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-18 20:46:24 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 01:01:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496424] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Aggregate - Aggregate C<*.t> tests to make them run faster Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Aggregate - Aggregate C<*.t> tests to make them run faster Alias: perl-Test-Aggregate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496424 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Aggregate - Aggregate C<*.t> tests to make them run faster Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Aggregate OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Test-Aggregate.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Test-Aggregate-0.35-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: *WARNING*: this is ALPHA code. The interface is not guaranteed to be stable. A common problem with many test suites is that they can take a long time to run. The longer they run, the less likely you are to run the tests. This module borrows a trick from 'Apache::Registry' to load up your tests at once, create a separate package for each test and wraps each package in a method named 'run_the_tests'. This allows us to load perl only once and related modules only once. If you have modules which are expensive to load, this can dramatically speed up a test suite. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307346 Additional Comment: This package is a new BR of Catalyst::Runtime 5.80001 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 01:00:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:00:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496166] Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190100.n3J10vom031640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496166 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-18 21:00:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > You and your terminal emulators :) Gift for Robert Scheck who complained there are no good light terminals in Fedora. ;) (In reply to comment #3) > Optflags are not honored: Good catch. This is because of IF (${CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE} MATCHES "Debug") SET (CMAKE_C_FLAGS "-Wall") ELSE (${CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE} NOT MATCHES "Debug") SET (CMAKE_C_FLAGS "-O2") ENDIF (${CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE} MATCHES "Debug") So it can't be overwritten with %cmake DCMAKE_C_FLAGS=%{optflags} . Two solutions that I can think of: Patch CMakeLists.txt and remove the 'else ...' statement or sed -i 's!CMAKE_C_FLAGS "-O2"!CMAKE_C_FLAGS "%{optflags}"!' CMakeLists.txt What do you think is better? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 01:09:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:09:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496425] New: Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check - Wrap OP check callbacks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check - Wrap OP check callbacks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496425 Summary: Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check - Wrap OP check callbacks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/B-Hooks-OP-Check OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-0.15-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module provides a C API for XS modules to hook into the callbacks of 'PL_check'. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307368 Additional Comment: This package is a new BR of Catalyst::Runtime 5.80001 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 01:25:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190125.n3J1PKvE004505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-18 21:25:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 01:27:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496167] Review Request: lilyterm - Light and easy to use X Terminal Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190127.n3J1RBxm004700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496167 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-18 21:27:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 01:26:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:26:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496067] Review Request: perl-Net-OAuth - OAuth protocol support library for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190126.n3J1QIvk004625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496067 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-18 21:26:17 EDT --- no problem. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 01:24:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:24:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190124.n3J1O1G0004030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #44 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-18 21:24:00 EDT --- I assume you want a F-11 branch here as well. cvs done with F-11 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 01:51:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:51:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496167] Review Request: lilyterm - Light and easy to use X Terminal Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190151.n3J1po4U008175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496167 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-18 21:51:49 EDT --- Where is the F-9 branch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 01:52:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496167] Review Request: lilyterm - Light and easy to use X Terminal Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190152.n3J1qRw8006219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496167 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-18 21:52:26 EDT --- My bad, was blind -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 02:21:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496167] Review Request: lilyterm - Light and easy to use X Terminal Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190221.n3J2LCSh010321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496167 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-18 22:21:12 EDT --- lilyterm-0.9.6-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lilyterm-0.9.6-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 02:20:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496167] Review Request: lilyterm - Light and easy to use X Terminal Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190220.n3J2KulH010181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496167 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-18 22:20:56 EDT --- lilyterm-0.9.6-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lilyterm-0.9.6-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 02:19:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496167] Review Request: lilyterm - Light and easy to use X Terminal Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190219.n3J2JTFE009753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496167 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-18 22:19:29 EDT --- lilyterm-0.9.6-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lilyterm-0.9.6-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 02:23:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496167] Review Request: lilyterm - Light and easy to use X Terminal Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190223.n3J2NQT2010474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496167 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 03:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 23:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496429] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange - Invoke callbacks when the stash code is being compiled in changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190329.n3J3Tdr0020944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496429 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |496425 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 03:29:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 23:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496425] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check - Wrap OP check callbacks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190329.n3J3TcTQ020924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496425 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496429 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 03:28:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 23:28:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496429] New: Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange - Invoke callbacks when the stash code is being compiled in changes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange - Invoke callbacks when the stash code is being compiled in changes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496429 Summary: Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange - Invoke callbacks when the stash code is being compiled in changes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChan ge/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange-0.05-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Register callbacks when an opcode is being compiled in a different namespace than the previous one. Additional Comment: This package is a new BR of Catalyst::Runtime 5.80001 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 05:20:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 01:20:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190520.n3J5KrGw002333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 --- Comment #20 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-19 01:20:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > There is a file conflict between globus-common-progs and grid-packaging-tools. > > The file /usr/share/globus/config.guess exists in both packages. This must be > sorted out. Is this file really needed in any of these packages? The file in GPT is needed. The file in globus-common is also needed by a few Globus packages, but not by any of the packages I have packaged for Fedora so far - and it looks like it might be possible to work around it. This has been fixed in rawhide. F9 and F10 never saw the problem (since the files in the two conflicting packages are identical there). The update for F11 (and F9 and F10 too, though less critical) have been submitted but not yet pushed as an update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 05:33:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 01:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481056] Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190533.n3J5X80d003888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(gavin at redhat.com) --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-19 01:33:06 EDT --- Ping. What's the status of this ticket? Why squeak-vm was not rebuilt? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 05:33:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 01:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481064] Review Request: squeak-image - the standard image file for the Squeak VM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190533.n3J5XeuS003937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481064 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |needinfo?(gavin at redhat.com) --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-19 01:33:39 EDT --- Ping. What's the status of this ticket? Why squeak-image was not rebuilt? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 05:34:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 01:34:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481066] Review Request: etoys - the Etoys image for the Squeak VM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190534.n3J5YSBx004059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481066 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |needinfo?(gavin at redhat.com) --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-19 01:34:26 EDT --- Ping. What's the status of this ticket? Why etoys was not rebuilt? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 05:39:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 01:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435470] Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190539.n3J5dNOn004817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435470 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #18 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-19 01:39:21 EDT --- Any news here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 06:05:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190605.n3J659S7008494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #66 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-19 02:05:04 EDT --- This has now been fixed. The scripts to update descriptions were looking for certain yum repositories. Unfortunately, those repositories could not be reached from inside of PHX. I've updated the scripts to use the mirrorlist and added a specific host (archives.fedoraproject.org) to the /etc/hosts files so that this is no longer an issue. Confirmed that gromacs' summary and description were updated after the changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 06:13:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:13:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458279] Review Request: python-arm4 - Python language bindings for Applicatioon Response Measurement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190613.n3J6DQ1d009433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458279 --- Comment #3 from David Carter 2009-04-19 02:13:25 EDT --- Updated versions: Spec URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/1.1-2/python-arm4.spec SRPM URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/1.1-2/python-arm4-1.1-2.fc9.src.rpm These include the spec changes you suggested. Thanks for reviewing! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 06:14:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:14:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458279] Review Request: python-arm4 - Python language bindings for Applicatioon Response Measurement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190614.n3J6EUfi009514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458279 --- Comment #4 from David Carter 2009-04-19 02:14:29 EDT --- Whoops! That's Spec URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/1.1-2/python-arm4.spec SRPM URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/1.1-2/python-arm4-1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 06:21:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:21:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190621.n3J6LXu2012302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #28 from Feng Yu 2009-04-19 02:21:31 EDT --- New spec and srpm files for pre0.7.5: http://rainwoodman.dreamhosters.com/fedora-review/ http://rainwoodman.dreamhosters.com/fedora-review/gnome-globalmenu-0.7.5-0.1.20080418svn2507.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 06:47:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] New: Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Summary: Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora There are some packages in Russian Fedora distribution (in "Free" section), that needs to be imported into main Fedora. This ticket is just for monitoring these packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 06:55:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:55:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190655.n3J6t4FK016549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 06:55:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:55:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190655.n3J6t7iN016674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 06:55:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:55:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489751] Review Request: btanks - Funny battle game with tanks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190655.n3J6t8td016698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489751 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 06:55:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190655.n3J6t6x2016622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 06:55:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:55:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456756] Review Request: alien - A program that converts between the rpm, dpkg, stampede slp, and slackware tgz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190655.n3J6t2VM016504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456756 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 06:55:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190655.n3J6t14G016162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |488100, 489751, | |469514(debmirror), | |457210(dpkg), | |457211(debhelper), | |456756(alien) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 06:55:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:55:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457211] Review Request: debhelper - Helper programs for debian/rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190655.n3J6t5Ep016577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457211 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433 Bug 457211 depends on bug 457213, which changed state. Bug 457213 Summary: Review Request: html2text - HTML-to-text converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457213 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 06:57:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:57:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190657.n3J6vlax017152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |492690 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 06:57:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - Free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190657.n3J6vmFK017192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 07:05:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190705.n3J75CG8018375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-19 03:05:12 EDT --- http://mirror.yandex.ru/fedora/russianfedora/russianfedora/free/fedora/development/source/SRPMS/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 07:07:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190707.n3J77aUv016370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480279 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 07:07:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190707.n3J77bkK016427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 07:10:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:10:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190710.n3J7Aclq019257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-19 03:10:37 EDT --- http://mirror.yandex.ru/fedora/russianfedora/russianfedora/free/fedora/updates/testing/10/SRPMS/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 07:10:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:10:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190710.n3J7A5oF019118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 --- Comment #2 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-04-19 03:10:04 EDT --- * Sun Apr 19 2009 Yanko Kaneti - 0.9.7-5 - file EOL encoding for some docs http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql.spec http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 07:09:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:09:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190709.n3J79mId016662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-19 03:09:47 EDT --- http://mirror.yandex.ru/fedora/russianfedora/russianfedora/free/fedora/updates/10/SRPMS/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 07:12:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:12:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190712.n3J7C6lu017239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-19 03:12:06 EDT --- Keep in mind, that not all of packages from Russian Fedora are suitable for inclusion in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 07:20:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:20:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495888] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Log4perl - Logging extension for the POE environment. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190720.n3J7Kjuu018582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495888 --- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-04-19 03:20:44 EDT --- * Sun Apr 19 2009 Yanko Kaneti - 0.02-2 - remove trailing dot from summary http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl.spec http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl-0.02-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 07:39:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP - Asynchronous mail sending with POE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190739.n3J7dVFT020986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495885 --- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-04-19 03:39:30 EDT --- * Sun Apr 19 2009 Yanko Kaneti 0.21-2 - Remove executable bits from doc files http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP/perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP.spec http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP/perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP-0.21-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 07:56:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:56:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190756.n3J7u6FQ025896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 07:56:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190756.n3J7uwXo026012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |495885 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 07:56:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:56:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP - Asynchronous mail sending with POE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190756.n3J7uv5Q025972@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495885 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Depends on| |495882 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 07:56:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:56:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190756.n3J7uIq9023823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |firebird -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 07:57:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495888] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Log4perl - Logging extension for the POE environment. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190757.n3J7vcTZ023916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495888 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 08:03:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 04:03:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190803.n3J83Jpl025304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |RussianFedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 08:02:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 04:02:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190802.n3J8262f024877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Alias| |gnome-globalmenu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 08:03:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 04:03:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - Free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190803.n3J83jHt027682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Alias| |kvirc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 08:03:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 04:03:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190803.n3J83kNU027706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 --- Comment #9 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-04-19 04:03:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #6) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > Erm... good question. Yanko, are you sponsored? > > > > Nope, sorry. This review submission as well as my recent others were more for > > "documentation" purposes. I happen to need rpms of these for work related > > reasons and now that I made them I might as well post them somewhere. The > > package review queue is the place I personally check first if something is not > > already packaged, so it seems like a good place to put these. I'll be happy if > > someone jumps in to maintain them... > > Do you want to be sponsored? If so, I'll take a look through your other > submissions and if things look good, we can work on that... Ok. Let's try that. I've massaged my other submissions (listed below) and...ahem.. completed the CLA. bug 495888 perl-POE-Component-Log4perl bug 495885 perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP (depends on this one) bug 494986 mysqludf_xql Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 08:09:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 04:09:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190809.n3J89xxo028625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #29 from Feng Yu 2009-04-19 04:09:58 EDT --- Updated to svn2511; which is pretty close to 0.7.5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 08:13:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 04:13:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190813.n3J8DmK4029411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-19 04:13:47 EDT --- dnsjava-2.0.6-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnsjava-2.0.6-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 08:15:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 04:15:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190815.n3J8FUGx029949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-19 04:15:29 EDT --- dnsjava-2.0.6-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnsjava-2.0.6-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 08:13:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 04:13:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190813.n3J8DgSJ029373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 --- Comment #3 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-04-19 04:13:42 EDT --- * Sun Apr 19 2009 Yanko Kaneti - 0.9.7-6 - ldconfig also in postun - remove explicit gcc-c++ http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql.spec http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 08:14:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 04:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190814.n3J8Ekpe027094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-19 04:14:46 EDT --- dnsjava-2.0.6-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnsjava-2.0.6-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 08:19:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 04:19:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489751] Review Request: btanks - Funny battle game with tanks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190819.n3J8JKN4030519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489751 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |btanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 08:28:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 04:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190828.n3J8S2v3000859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |483381, 469814, 252010 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 08:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 04:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190828.n3J8S3Y9000884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 08:28:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 04:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483381] Review Request: metromap - Simple program for finding paths in subway/metro maps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190828.n3J8S67T000948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483381 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 08:28:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 04:28:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190828.n3J8S5k8000918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 08:47:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 04:47:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496424] Review Request: perl-Test-Aggregate - Aggregate C<*.t> tests to make them run faster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190847.n3J8lAJA003851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496424 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |iarnell at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |iarnell at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-19 04:47:09 EDT --- + source files match upstream. 495a0c853951d326df5322e97bcbc9c53a71eea9 Test-Aggregate-0.35.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307346 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no complaints: perl-Test-Aggregate.noarch: I: checking perl-Test-Aggregate.src: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(Test::Aggregate) = 0.35 perl(Test::Aggregate::Builder) = 0.35 perl-Test-Aggregate = 0.35-1.fc11 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(File::Find) perl(Test::Aggregate) perl(Test::Aggregate::Builder) perl(Test::Builder) perl(Test::Builder::Module) perl(Test::More) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 + %check is present and all tests pass. All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=48, 4 wallclock secs ( 0.07 usr 0.02 sys + 0.58 cusr 0.07 csys = 0.74 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 08:53:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 04:53:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496425] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check - Wrap OP check callbacks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190853.n3J8rqWn001628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496425 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |iarnell at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |iarnell at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-19 04:53:51 EDT --- + source files match upstream. c794aef1af95ef73a51835274431ae23f5b3467f B-Hooks-OP-Check-0.15.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307368 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has an acceptable warning: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check.src: I: checking perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check.x86_64: I: checking perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/B/Hooks/OP/Check/Install/hook_op_check.h perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-debuginfo.ppc: I: checking 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(B::Hooks::OP::Check) = 0.15 perl(B::Hooks::OP::Check::Install::Files) perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check = 0.15-1.fc11 perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check(x86-64) = 0.15-1.fc11 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) perl >= 0:5.008001 perl(parent) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + %check is present and all tests pass. All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.04 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.09 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 09:06:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190906.n3J96KwO007002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-19 05:06:19 EDT --- php-feedcreator-1.7.2-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-feedcreator-1.7.2-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 09:06:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:06:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190906.n3J96TXI007043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-19 05:06:28 EDT --- php-feedcreator-1.7.2-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-feedcreator-1.7.2-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 09:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:06:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190906.n3J96OJf004036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-19 05:06:24 EDT --- php-feedcreator-1.7.2-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-feedcreator-1.7.2-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 09:07:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190907.n3J97Rgu004155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 --- Comment #2 from Fabien Georget 2009-04-19 05:07:26 EDT --- Thanks a lot I modified the spec according to your advice : Spec URL: http://www.bde.espci.fr/~george27/xcowsay.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bde.espci.fr/~george27/xcowsay-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm For point 6, I only create a .desktop file for xcowfortune since the others need an argument (the message, or the image, to display) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 09:09:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:09:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904190909.n3J99W6w007468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 --- Comment #15 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-04-19 05:09:31 EDT --- One last remark. It would be nice to check (I guess repoquery would work for this) if other php projects we are packaging embeds the feedcreator class and file bugs against them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 10:14:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191014.n3JAERkB015197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-19 06:14:26 EDT --- 4.0 was released apparently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 10:19:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191019.n3JAJBxP015993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #16 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-04-19 06:19:10 EDT --- After several tests, I can reproduce the errors only when I take rawhide's sqlite .src.rpm and rebuild it on F10 (and rebuilding perl-DBD-SQLite against that just in case). Using DBD::SQLite 1.14 or 1.21 gives the same result. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 10:29:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191029.n3JATlGN021368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-19 06:29:46 EDT --- Please don't use %{version} in the patch filenames since it breaks when bumping version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 10:58:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496166] Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191058.n3JAwjpP023277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496166 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-19 06:58:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Two solutions that I can think of: > Patch CMakeLists.txt and remove the 'else ...' statement or > sed -i 's!CMAKE_C_FLAGS "-O2"!CMAKE_C_FLAGS "%{optflags}"!' CMakeLists.txt > > What do you think is better? I'd patch the cmake file. Whatever you think is best. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 11:12:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 07:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496454] Review Request: pwmd - A server for storing application data at a central location In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191112.n3JBCoB1025791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496454 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |496453 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 11:12:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 07:12:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496454] New: Review Request: pwmd - A server for storing application data at a central location Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pwmd - A server for storing application data at a central location https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496454 Summary: Review Request: pwmd - A server for storing application data at a central location Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pwmd.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pwmd-1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://bjk.sourceforge.net/pwmd/ Description: Password Manager Daemon is a server that provides a way for applications to securely store and retrieve data at a centralized location. The data is stored in an (optionally AES256 encrypted) XML file and clients connect and send commands to manipulate the data. Some of the features include: * Multi-threaded. More than one client may access the data at the same time. * A key cache so clients won't need to enter a key each time a file is opened or saved. * Key retrieval via pinentry(1). * Configuration file which supports file specific settings including: encryption iterations, cache expiration and encryption key or key file and more. * Compressed data file support. * Logging to file and/or syslog. * Secure memory usage. PWMD will zero out memory before freeing it and also has the option to lock the entire process in RAM to avoid swapping the data to virtual memory. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307797 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint pwmd* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint pwmd-1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 11:21:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 07:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191121.n3JBL0vZ030450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-19 07:21:00 EDT --- php-pecl-runkit-0.9-10.CVS20090215.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-runkit-0.9-10.CVS20090215.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 11:19:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 07:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191119.n3JBJuu1026731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-19 07:19:54 EDT --- php-pecl-runkit-0.9-10.CVS20090215.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-runkit-0.9-10.CVS20090215.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 11:50:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 07:50:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191150.n3JBoWgN003750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-19 07:50:31 EDT --- Ok, due to failure of attempts to create exact tarball, I'm continuing from where I stopped last time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 12:01:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 08:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496166] Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191201.n3JC1aGO005754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496166 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-19 08:01:35 EDT --- I guess a patch is better because I can send it upstream. * Sun Apr 19 2009 Christoph Wickert - 2.3.3-2 - Add patch to honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS - Include INSTALL in %%doc since it contains some valuable information Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/sakura.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/sakura-2.3.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 12:15:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 08:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496067] Review Request: perl-Net-OAuth - OAuth protocol support library for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191215.n3JCFkih007883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496067 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-19 08:15:45 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 12:28:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 08:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191228.n3JCSPwq006022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 --- Comment #8 from Jan Blazek 2009-04-19 08:28:24 EDT --- Updated to 4.0 and corrected the patch filename. New SPEC: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/dmenu.spec New SRPM: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/dmenu-4.0-1.fc10.src.rpm New mock log: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 12:35:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 08:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191235.n3JCZlFU010972@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-19 08:35:46 EDT --- New branch please. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pecl-runkit New Branches: F-11 Owners: hubbitus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 12:46:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 08:46:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191246.n3JCknsv013177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 --- Comment #16 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-19 08:46:48 EDT --- Good point. It seems phpTodo is bundling this lib, but the phpTodo author added a feature to it and bumped the version to 1.7.3, I've also found another project on sourceforge (http://feedcreator.sourceforge.net) which ships a patched 1.7.2 version. I'll try to contact both the phpTodo author and the owner of the sourceforge project to see what can be done about this. Meanwhile, I've filed bug #496463 against phpTodo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 12:47:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 08:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191247.n3JCljEe013420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-19 08:47:44 EDT --- + MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/gloox-* gloox-devel.ppc: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ This warning is safe to ignore. + MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . + MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . + MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . + MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] + MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] + MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] + MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] + MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Actually, we cannot simply use md5sum for verifying sources from VCS, but we can diff -ru them. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ tar xf gloox-1.0-SVNr4003.tar.bz2 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ svn export -r4003 svn://svn.camaya.net/gloox/trunk gloox-1.0.svn > /dev/null [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ diff -ru gloox-1.0 gloox-1.0.svn/ [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. + MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. + MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] + MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] + MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] + MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] + MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] + MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] + MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] + MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] + MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [21] + MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] + MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] + MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20] + MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] + MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] + MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 13:16:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 09:16:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191316.n3JDGPYR019060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #32 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-19 09:16:21 EDT --- Uff, this seems to need a lot of work to be accepted. Sorry the review took so long. 1.) Don't require perl modules by package name: BuildRequires: perl-Test-Harness Requires: perl-Pod-Simple ... This would be better: BuildRequires: perl(Test::Harness) ... 2.) Source1 is useless: BuildRequires: ed Source1: reduce_rpmlint_err.tar.gz Do what the scripts do inline. It might be a lot easier to use sed instead of ed. 3.) Subpackage buildrequire %package docs ... BuildRequires: perl %package tools ... BuildRequires: ed Makes no sense. Please don't define BRs in subpackages. Furthermore, perl is in default buildgroup, thus can be ommited. 4.) Why would tools require pkgconfig? %package tools ... Requires: pkgconfig 5.) This always evaluates to false if test "%{_vendor}" = "suse" please remove it 6.) No architecture independence %ifarch %{ix86} x86_64 ... %else # PowerPC ... %endif Remove this, or explain. 7.) %{_smp_mflags} not used make make parrot_utils make installable make html Either use them or explain why you don't. 8.) No useless comments please #make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT ... #rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_docdir}/parrot # for Solaris? 9.) 10.) Don't strip anything %{__strip} %{RPM_PAR_LIB_DIR}dynext/*.so Remove this 11.) Bad comment rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_usr}/share/doc/parrot # necessary for SuSE Well, eh, SUSE? 12.) Use macros for directories where appropriate --lex=/usr/bin/flex \ --yacc=/usr/bin/yacc \ ... rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_usr}/share/doc/parrot # necessary for SuSE %{_bindir}, %{_datadir}, etc... 13.) Compiler generates .so-s executable # Force permissions on shared versioned libs so they get stripped. find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir} -type f -name '*.so.*' -exec chmod 755 {} \; Is this necessary? Explain if yes. 14.) Enable test suite # make test < /dev/null # %{?_with_fulltest:make fulltest < /dev/null} # make test || : # %{?_with_fulltest:make fulltest || :} 15.) Comment patches and submit them upstream? Patch0: parrot-install_files.patch What does this do? Was it submitted upstream? 16.) Provides not sane parrot-tools: perl(DB) Perl debugger? I guess not. perl(File::Which) = 0.05 You embed File::Which in /usr/lib/parrot/1.0.0/tools/lib/File/Which.pm You should not. Depend on perl-File-Which package instead. parrot-docs: perl(A) perl(B) You should not provide these. 17.) Doc shouldn't depend on perl: parrot-docs requires these: perl(strict) perl(warnings) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 13:20:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 09:20:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191320.n3JDKQJX015604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #33 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-19 09:20:24 EDT --- 18.) Don't use chrpaths to get rid of rpaths patch the build configuration instead. Comment the LD_LIBRARY_PATH hack. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 14:09:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:09:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191409.n3JE9HeZ027672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 14:08:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191408.n3JE8qpA027604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 --- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-19 10:08:51 EDT --- Peter Lemenkov, thank you very much for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gloox Short Description: A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library Owners: hubbitus Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 14:07:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496473] New: Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest Alias: perl-Mixin-Linewise https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 Summary: Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mixin-Linewise/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Mixin-Linewise.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Mixin-Linewise-0.002-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: It's boring to deal with opening files for IO, converting strings to handle- like objects, and all that. With Mixin::Linewise::Readers and Mixin::Linewise::Writers, you can just write a method to handle handles, and methods for handling strings and filenames are added for you. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307860 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 14:26:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191426.n3JEQOhT031098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Bug 496433 depends on bug 469514, which changed state. Bug 469514 Summary: Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 14:26:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:26:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191426.n3JEQNur031064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #42 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-04-19 10:26:19 EDT --- Packages have been build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 14:29:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496475] New: Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475 Summary: Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Lexical-Persistence/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Lexical-Persistence.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Lexical::Persistence does a few things, all related. Note that all the behaviors listed here are the defaults. Subclasses can override nearly every aspect of Lexical::Persistence's behavior. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307872 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 14:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496476] New: Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS Alias: perl-Clipboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496476 Summary: Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Clipboard/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Clipboard.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Clipboard-0.09-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Who doesn't remember the first time they learned to copy and paste, and generated an exponentially growing text document? Yes, that's right, clipboards are magical. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307884 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 14:40:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:40:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496477] New: Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496477 Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-C reate/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create-0.002-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The module provides means of pasting large texts into http://pastebin.com pastebin site. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307887 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 14:44:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191444.n3JEikYM029761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-19 10:44:44 EDT --- Patching the source is much nicer than my ugly symlink stuff. Thanks for that. No looping at the moment because I'm in contact with upstream about the embedded fonts. * Sun Apr 19 2009 Fabian Affolter - 0.2.3-1 - Removed symlink stuff - Changed the path of the fonts in Makefile - Updated to new upstream version 0.2.3 Here are the updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/xsw.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/xsw-0.2.3-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 14:45:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496478] New: Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496478 Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Creat e/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create-0.001-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The module provides means to create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ paste site. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307894 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 15:50:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 11:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496486] New: Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 Summary: Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/cclive.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc10/cclive-0.3.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: cclive is a command line video extraction utility similar to clive but with lower requirements. Its features are few and essential. Supports Youtube, Googlevideo, Break, Liveleak, Sevenload, Evisortv and Dailymotion. rpmlint is silent. srpm builds under mock, and on koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307947 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 16:00:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:00:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478429] Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191600.n3JG0tCG014850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-19 12:00:53 EDT --- Thanks Felix for the patch. Are you able to do a scratch build on koji? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 16:00:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:00:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] New: Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 Summary: Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/abby.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc10/abby-0.2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: abby is a front-end for clive and cclive, allowing users unfamiliar with command-line interfaces to make most of cclive using a graphical user-interface. abby is written in C++. Note that clive is already in Fedora repositories, and I asked a review for cclive (bug #496486). Rpmlint is silent. SRPM builds under mock and on koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307961 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 16:16:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191616.n3JGG0Ui017101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 16:16:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191616.n3JGG1Yg017130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 Bug 492810 depends on bug 495411, which changed state. Bug 495411 Summary: Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 16:17:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:17:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496492] New: Review Request: sing - Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sing - Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496492 Summary: Review Request: sing - Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/sing.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/sing-1.1-1.src.rpm Description: Sing is a little tool that sends ICMP packets fully customized from command line. The main purpose is to replace/complement the nice ping command with certain enhancements as: - Send fragmented and monster packets > 65534 bytes - Send/read spoofed packets - Send many ICMP Information types in addition to the echo request type, sent by default as address mask request, timestamp, information request, router solicitation and router advertisement - Send many ICMP error types: redirect, source quench, time exceeded, destination unreach and parameter problem - Send to host with loose or strict source routing - Use little fingerprinting techniques to discover Windows or Solaris boxes - Send ICMP packets emulating certain OS: Cisco, Solaris, Linux, Shiva, Unix and Windows at the moment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 16:23:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191623.n3JGNx6R018185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.info Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-19 12:23:58 EDT --- I'll [try] (it will be my first review) review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 16:23:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:23:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478429] Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191623.n3JGNWEp018156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 --- Comment #7 from Felix Kaechele 2009-04-19 12:23:31 EDT --- There you go: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1308030 However I changed the patch to already include the changes autoreconf -f -i generates. Because autoreconf depends on much more than just autoconf. As it would add a lot of additional BuildReqs I chose to patch the whole thing. Unfortunately the patch is 1.6M in size. So it would probably be the best to upstream it if possible (although I think that the problem might be Fedora specific). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 16:31:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:31:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191631.n3JGV7S1015305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 --- Comment #11 from Felix Kaechele 2009-04-19 12:31:05 EDT --- I tried to package grfcodec but it's a total mess. They mix C and ASM stuff and totally ignore that there are other arches than ix86. I hacked at the SPEC to at least build on x86_64 but due to my not so leet skills I'm probably unable to bring it to build on ppc{64}. Here's the task: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1308035 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 17:11:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191711.n3JHBH0H021548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 --- Comment #12 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-04-19 13:11:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I tried to package grfcodec but it's a total mess. They mix C and ASM stuff and > totally ignore that there are other arches than ix86. I hacked at the SPEC to > at least build on x86_64 but due to my not so leet skills I'm probably unable > to bring it to build on ppc{64}. They use ASM for stuff like self-decompressing-files. This part could be omitted either for all arches or only for non-x86. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 17:22:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492130] Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191722.n3JHM1iY023099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-19 13:21:59 EDT --- Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 17:22:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:22:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491614] Review Request: mingw32-libglademm24 - C++ wrapper for libglade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191722.n3JHMWUv023164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-19 13:22:31 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-libglademm24-2.6.7-4.fc11.src.rpm 2008-04-19 * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint output Only expected Errors/Warnings from a mingw package * Package is named according to Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * Spec file is named as the package * Package follows the Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * The stated license (LGPLv2+) is a Fedora approved license * The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding Fedora package * The package contains the license file (COPYING) * The spec file is written in legible English * Sources matches upstream f9ca5b67f6c551ea98790ab5f21c19d0 libglademm-2.6.7.tar.bz2 f9ca5b67f6c551ea98790ab5f21c19d0 SRPM/libglademm-2.6.7.tar.bz2 * According to guidelines the version should match the version of the corresponding Fedora package - which it does. * Package builds in mock (Fedora 10) ! The package contains documentation already present in the native Fedora package * BuildRequires look sane ! But is there a reason for having the "BuildArch: noarch" listed in the middle of the list of Thr BuildRequies? * Owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files * %files has %defattr * %clean clears %buildroot * Specfile uses macros consistently * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears %buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 17:35:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:35:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191735.n3JHZ7Mm030160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-19 13:35:06 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSFIX - License is GPLv3 not GPLv3+. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX - Time stamps are not preserved, e.g. /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/xsw-0.2.3/install-sh -c -m 644 'intro/bloc.bmp' '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/xsw-0.2.3-1.fc10.x86_64/usr/share/xsw/intro/bloc.bmp' MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK - No GUI, needs arguments to work. MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 17:55:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496424] Review Request: perl-Test-Aggregate - Aggregate C<*.t> tests to make them run faster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191755.n3JHt9mA001029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496424 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 17:55:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:55:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496425] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check - Wrap OP check callbacks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191755.n3JHtJw8001140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496425 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-19 13:55:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check Short Description: Wrap OP check callbacks Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 17:52:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496166] Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191752.n3JHqNUv000525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496166 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-19 13:52:22 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK - You're missing an 'f' in "%patch0 -p1 -b .clags" MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK The package has been APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 17:55:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496425] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check - Wrap OP check callbacks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191755.n3JHtLuf028768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496425 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 17:55:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:55:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496424] Review Request: perl-Test-Aggregate - Aggregate C<*.t> tests to make them run faster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191755.n3JHt7cQ028739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496424 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-19 13:55:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Aggregate Short Description: Aggregate C<*.t> tests to make them run faster Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:08:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496473] Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191808.n3JI8Lcj031138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:05:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495237] Review Request: python-hash_ring - Python implementation of consistent hashing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191805.n3JI570k030610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495237 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Silas Sewell 2009-04-19 14:05:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-hash_ring Short Description: Python implementation of consistent hashing Owners: silas Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:08:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:08:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496473] Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191808.n3JI8JKF003870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:14:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496475] Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191814.n3JIED3t032056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:14:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496473] Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191814.n3JIE21d032026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:14:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:14:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496475] Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191814.n3JIEBOZ004910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:13:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496473] Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191813.n3JIDxqp004872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-19 14:13:59 EDT --- Looks good. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307860 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): 690054ea0c6876192e8223f39c5c814ba8a6fef1 Mixin-Linewise-0.002.tar.gz 690054ea0c6876192e8223f39c5c814ba8a6fef1 Mixin-Linewise-0.002.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Mixin-Linewise-0.002-1.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Mixin-Linewise-0.002-1.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Mixin-Linewise-0.002-1.fc10.src.rpm perl >= 1:5.6.0 perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(IO::String) perl(Sub::Exporter) >= 0.9 perl(Test::More) =====> perl-Mixin-Linewise-0.002-1.fc10.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Mixin-Linewise-0.002-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Mixin::Linewise) = 0.002 perl(Mixin::Linewise::Readers) = 0.002 perl(Mixin::Linewise::Writers) = 0.002 perl-Mixin-Linewise = 0.002-1.fc10 ====> requires for perl-Mixin-Linewise-0.002-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(IO::File) perl(IO::String) perl(Sub::Exporter) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:18:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496475] Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191818.n3JIIK1c000340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:18:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496475] Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191818.n3JIIIRu000308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-19 14:18:18 EDT --- There's an examples directory (eg/), why not include it in %doc? koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307872 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): c2e97f5008c68f0b9f7f643a9ce4b21bfee572d7 Lexical-Persistence-0.98.tar.gz c2e97f5008c68f0b9f7f643a9ce4b21bfee572d7 Lexical-Persistence-0.98.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.src.rpm perl(Devel::LexAlias) >= 0.04 perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(PadWalker) >= 1.1 perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) =====> perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Lexical::Persistence) = 0.98 perl-Lexical-Persistence = 0.98-1.fc10 ====> requires for perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Devel::LexAlias) perl(PadWalker) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:25:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492130] Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191825.n3JIPqgN006988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-19 14:25:51 EDT --- Thank you for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-gtkmm24 Short Description: MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) Owners: sailer rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:27:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:27:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491614] Review Request: mingw32-libglademm24 - C++ wrapper for libglade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191827.n3JIRDFH001804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-19 14:27:11 EDT --- Thanks! Removed docs and reordered BR/BA Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libglademm24.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libglademm24-2.6.7-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:35:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:35:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496476] Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191835.n3JIZ0uA008150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496476 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:35:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496477] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191835.n3JIZEmr008570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496477 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:35:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:35:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496478] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191835.n3JIZjB5008667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496478 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:35:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:35:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496476] Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191835.n3JIZ20C003144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496476 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:35:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:35:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496478] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191835.n3JIZiNb003245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496478 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:35:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496477] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191835.n3JIZCfT003180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496477 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:56:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:56:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496473] Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191856.n3JIuLL5011587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:56:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:56:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496475] Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191856.n3JIuf1s006364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:56:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:56:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496473] Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191856.n3JIuJsb006309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-19 14:56:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Mixin-Linewise Short Description: Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 18:56:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496475] Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191856.n3JIuaIW006339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-19 14:56:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Lexical-Persistence Short Description: Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 19:02:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:02:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191902.n3JJ26EC012463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-19 15:02:04 EDT --- systemtapguiserver-1.0-8.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/systemtapguiserver-1.0-8.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 19:02:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:02:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191902.n3JJ2Ahe012520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-19 15:02:10 EDT --- systemtapguiserver-1.0-8.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/systemtapguiserver-1.0-8.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 19:28:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:28:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191928.n3JJSCDH011600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 --- Comment #9 from Till Maas 2009-04-19 15:28:10 EDT --- Sorry, I meant to reply earlier. The LDFLAGS now contain "-s", which strips the binaries. This should also be changed, maybe with advancing the Makefile patch to also allow to remove the -s flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 19:47:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496476] Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191947.n3JJlZmc019726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496476 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 19:47:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:47:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496476] Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191947.n3JJlWie019704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496476 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-19 15:47:31 EDT --- Looks good. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307884 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): ff44b197a4a33cac864bb4925e8b9c2e82c2f6e6 Clipboard-0.09.tar.gz ff44b197a4a33cac864bb4925e8b9c2e82c2f6e6 Clipboard-0.09.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Clipboard-0.09-1.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Clipboard-0.09-1.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Clipboard-0.09-1.fc10.src.rpm perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Spiffy) perl(Test::More) xclip =====> perl-Clipboard-0.09-1.fc10.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Clipboard-0.09-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Clipboard) = 0.09 perl-Clipboard = 0.09-1.fc10 perl(Clipboard::Xclip) ====> requires for perl-Clipboard-0.09-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Clipboard) perl(IO::All) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Spiffy) perl(strict) /usr/bin/perl xclip APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 20:04:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:04:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192004.n3JK4Lxh022299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |ville.skytta at iki.fi Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Comment #16 from Ville Skytt? 2009-04-19 16:04:19 EDT --- Build logs show $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not used at all. %configure --disable-dependency-tracking could speed up the build a bit and make problems like the above easier to spot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 20:06:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496477] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192006.n3JK6jZP017423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496477 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 20:06:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:06:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496477] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192006.n3JK6fs9017400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496477 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-19 16:06:40 EDT --- There's an examples/ directory, why not include it in %doc? Otherwise, looks good. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307887 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): 89808e8d97b52f47c4921508d0a79dc602e3d843 WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create-0.002.tar.gz 89808e8d97b52f47c4921508d0a79dc602e3d843 WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create-0.002.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create-0.002-1.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create-0.002-1.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create-0.002-1.fc10.src.rpm perl(LWP::UserAgent) >= 2.036 perl(Module::Build) perl(Test::Kwalitee) perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) perl(URI) >= 1.35 =====> perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create-0.002-1.fc10.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create-0.002-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(WWW::Pastebin::PastebinCom::Create) = 0.002 perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create = 0.002-1.fc10 ====> requires for perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create-0.002-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Carp) perl(LWP::UserAgent) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(URI) perl(warnings) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 20:14:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:14:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496478] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192014.n3JKElxj023932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496478 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 20:14:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496478] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192014.n3JKEjcE018416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496478 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-19 16:14:44 EDT --- There's an examples/ directory; why not include it under %doc? There's a missing dep on Class::Data::Accessor, due to a 'use base' construct. Please add this before building... Otherwise, looks good. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307894 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): af8ee45f6bbf1efede1c725ae6556a529199f29d WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create-0.001.tar.gz af8ee45f6bbf1efede1c725ae6556a529199f29d WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create-0.001.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane (with the above caveat): 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create-0.001-1.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create-0.001-1.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create-0.001-1.fc10.src.rpm perl(Class::Data::Accessor) >= 0.04001 perl(LWP::UserAgent) >= 2.036 perl(Module::Build) perl(Test::Kwalitee) perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) perl(URI) >= 1.35 =====> perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create-0.001-1.fc10.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create-0.001-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(WWW::Pastebin::RafbNet::Create) = 0.001 perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create = 0.001-1.fc10 ====> requires for perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create-0.001-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(base) perl(Carp) perl(LWP::UserAgent) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(URI) perl(warnings) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 20:20:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496166] Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192020.n3JKKO92025208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496166 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-19 16:20:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > - You're missing an 'f' in "%patch0 -p1 -b .clags" Good catch! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sakura Short Description: Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE Owners: cwickert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 20:25:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:25:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496478] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192025.n3JKPtsq026144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496478 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 20:25:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496478] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192025.n3JKPrSN026122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496478 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-19 16:25:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create Short Description: Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 20:25:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496477] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192025.n3JKPimv026091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496477 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-19 16:25:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create Short Description: Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 20:25:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:25:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496476] Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192025.n3JKPZGc020234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496476 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 20:25:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496476] Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192025.n3JKPSSF020206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496476 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-19 16:25:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Clipboard Short Description: Copy and paste with any OS Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 20:25:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:25:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496477] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192025.n3JKPl55020268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496477 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 20:57:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:57:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192057.n3JKvr4h030662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-04-19 16:57:52 EDT --- I've tried this on F11 and it doesn't work. I've filed this upstream bug on laptop.org trac. http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9304 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 20:59:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192059.n3JKxfVk024897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2009-04-19 16:59:40 EDT --- Ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 21:30:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:30:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192130.n3JLUYLA003562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 --- Comment #17 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-04-19 17:30:33 EDT --- Thanks for the notice. I assume the two suggestions are unrelated? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 21:43:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192143.n3JLhk3j005225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 --- Comment #18 from Ville Skytt? 2009-04-19 17:43:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > I assume the two suggestions are unrelated? Yes and no. --disable-dependency-tracking doesn't do anything to any compiler flags, but as said in comment 16, it might make such problems easier to spot for people who read build logs (and might also speed up builds slightly, but that's unrelated). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 21:43:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:43:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192143.n3JLhOL1005169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 --- Comment #10 from Jan Blazek 2009-04-19 17:43:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Sorry, I meant to reply earlier. The LDFLAGS now contain "-s", which strips the > binaries. This should also be changed, maybe with advancing the Makefile patch > to also allow to remove the -s flag. Is it OK to make one patch for both LDFLAGS and OPTFLAGS? New SPEC: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/dmenu.spec New SRPM: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/dmenu-4.0-2.fc10.src.rpm New mock log: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 22:11:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496524] New: Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 Summary: Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jorbis.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jorbis-0.0.17-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: JOrbis is a pure Java Ogg Vorbis decoder. JOrbis accepts Ogg Vorbis bitstreams and decodes them to raw PCMs. There are these kind of rpmlints: jorbis.src: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package which can be ignored since the package is not noarch by default -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 22:18:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492197] Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192218.n3JMIWk5010687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |496525 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 22:18:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192218.n3JMIXG4010704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496525 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 22:18:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496525] Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192218.n3JMIVPr010661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496525 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |492197 Depends on| |496524 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 22:20:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:20:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492197] Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192220.n3JMK4Fu011057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-19 18:20:03 EDT --- OK, I packaged tritonus and we'll use it instead of the built-in one. Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/toot2.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/toot2-3-0.3.beta1.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 3-0.3.beta1 - Use the system tritonus instead of the shipped one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 22:17:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:17:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496525] New: Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496525 Summary: Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tritonus.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tritonus-0.3.7-0.1.20090419cvs.src.rpm Description: Tritonus is an implementation of the Java Sound API. This package contains common files and shared classes required by all other Tritonus plug-ins. There are three kinds of rpmlints: tritonus.x86_64: E: no-binary tritonus.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Some tritonus packages contain JNI files and therefore they are binary specific. For consistency, I put all tritonus jar files and JNI so files in %{_libdir}/%{name}. I think this is reasonable to do, but unfortunately it results in the above RPMs. tritonus-src.x86_64: W: no-documentation Not all the subpackages have docs associated with them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 22:23:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:23:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192223.n3JMNq9M004719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-19 18:23:51 EDT --- This one is not java, but I'll be glad if you could review it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 22:50:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:50:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192250.n3JMorBo008707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 --- Comment #21 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-19 18:50:50 EDT --- When two packages contain the same file in the same path, there is always a problem, even if they are identical. The packages will not install because rpm will say that they conflict. Am I missing something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 22:55:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:55:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496492] Review Request: sing - Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192255.n3JMtArQ015773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496492 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 23:27:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192327.n3JNRgS9014143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 --- Comment #19 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-04-19 19:27:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=340264) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=340264) optflags patch The build looks good with the attached patch. can you please double check it is the correct thing to do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 23:36:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:36:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496492] Review Request: sing - Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192336.n3JNau37021822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496492 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-19 19:36:55 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=340265) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=340265) buildlog of a failed local F10 build on i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 23:35:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496492] Review Request: sing - Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192335.n3JNZo0k021768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496492 --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-19 19:35:49 EDT --- REVIEW for 9ed6f1ac2aa7ab76e77a92fbe3f3763f sing-1.1-1.src.rpm TODO - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review: Doesn't build, so no binaries. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: GPLv2+ OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5 f9f649c4b40174a983601d46e4a3daac FAIL - MUST: The package does not successfully compile and build into binary rpms on i386 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates: none exept in %{_docdir} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. The %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. FAIL - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock: Rawhide buildlog attached FAIL - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. TODO - SHOULD: The package functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. OK - SHOULD: The package has a file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin: {_includedir}/pcap.h, but for BuildRequires this is ok to allow easier maintainance cross several Fedora releases. Issues: Does not build in i386 rawhide mock, log attached Does not build on my i386 F-10, log attached Docs: Change %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING LEEME README THANKS to %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING README THANKS %lang(es) %doc LEEME Notes: Macros: IMO you are using too much macros. I would prefer not having macros in URL and Source0 (except %{version} of course). Description: "Sing is a little tool that sends ICMP packets fully customized from command line." should IMO be changed "Sing is a little tool that sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 23:38:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496492] Review Request: sing - Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192338.n3JNc2JQ015562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496492 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-19 19:38:01 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=340266) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=340266) buildlog of a failed rawhide mock build on i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 23:41:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192341.n3JNf8jM022493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 23:46:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:46:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192346.n3JNkhlC016910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-19 19:46:41 EDT --- OK then, since this was the only issue, the package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 23:50:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496492] Review Request: sing - Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192350.n3JNotmd017444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496492 --- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-19 19:50:54 EDT --- Looks like your Rawhide build in mock is Fedora 11 based. Because at real Rawhide, Fedora 12 based, the package builds. On Fedora 10, I'm waiting for https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libnet10-1.0.2a-17.fc10 to make it into the repositories. Same for Fedora 9. For Fedora 11, I'm waiting for a decision at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1538. Local build fails if too many autotool versions are installed in parallel, but a successful local build never have been a must, haven't it? De-macrofying the URL tag is possible, if that makes you happy. Other issue as well as notes are minor so far to me, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 23:57:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496492] Review Request: sing - Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192357.n3JNvPQB018248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496492 --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-19 19:57:24 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1308472 is a working scratch build in real Rawhide, Fedora 12 based. Package should be working on Fedora 10/11, if you install the latest libnet10 from URL above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 00:00:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:00:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200000.n3K00PWi025194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-19 20:00:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > - The email address in the changelog should be the same as in Bugzilla (for > your Bugzilla account). Otherwise it will be hard to find you. Why that? Email address need to match in bugzilla and in FAS, but IMO that's all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 23:57:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492778] Review Request: xwine - Graphic Interface for Wine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904192357.n3JNvPi1024605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492778 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-19 19:57:24 EDT --- URL is bad because http://darken33.free.fr/index.php does not mention xwine at all. Please preserve timestamps during iconv, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackagingTricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8 and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps Creation of desktop files inside a spec is forbidden now, include it as Source1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 00:01:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:01:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200001.n3K01TAL019024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(boni.vivek at gmail. | |com) --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-19 20:01:28 EDT --- BTW: Any progress with this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 01:32:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:32:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200132.n3K1WwkD032362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #15 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-19 21:32:56 EDT --- Some patches (on top of the CVS trunk version) have been submitted upstream (e.g., https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=b4f0e550904170119g70dd673fo3393ad0b01a9a7eb%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=soci-users), part of which have already been applied by the SOCI developer team. Further patches (on top of the CVS trunk version) are available here: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/cvstrunk/ , and have been submitted upstream. Discussions are on-going for their integration. The patches on top of the version 3.0.0 have been welcomed by the SOCI developer team: the RPM packages can therefore be generated for the version 3.0.0 of SOCI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 03:19:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 23:19:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200319.n3K3J7h4017043@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 --- Comment #28 from Brennan Ashton 2009-04-19 23:19:04 EDT --- Sorry ran out of time this weekend, I have a lot on my fedora plate right now. I will try in the next couple days. It should not take too much time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 04:15:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200415.n3K4Fpxh025744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 --- Comment #22 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-20 00:15:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > When two packages contain the same file in the same path, there is always a > problem, even if they are identical. The packages will not install because rpm > will say that they conflict. > > Am I missing something? The packages will only conflict if the files are different. If they are the same there is no problem installing both packages (like on F-9 and F-10 in this case): [ellert at ellert ~]$ rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/share/globus/config.guess globus-common-progs-10.2-1.fc9.i386 grid-packaging-tools-3.2-17.fc9.noarch That it is possible does of course not mean this is a good thing to do in this case. This feature is regularly used to allow multi-arch installations where e.g. header files are the same in the -devel package for i386 an x86_64, but can be installed simultaneously. But this is as far as I see the only really valid usecase for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 04:29:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200429.n3K4TEQP001335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #9 from arthurguru 2009-04-20 00:29:12 EDT --- So sorry about the link Jan, I missed an "xmlfy", anyhow I've moved the source file location to match the link path http://xmlfy.sourceforge.net/submit/fedora/xmlfy/xmlfy-1.4.2-src.tar.gz Thanks also for the pointers on updating the %prep section, however I feel that the changes I made on the branch are beneficial to the xmlfy project and will be incorporated in the next release in a few weeks. The pre-Fedora source of xmlfy had no "install" target and built a native package instead (blame my ITIL background), but the changes I've adopted through getting the xmlfy project up to the quality standards required by the fedora project now make the xmlfy project look like many other projects of similar category and scope. Thanks. The file perms and encoding of the files README and LICENSE were corrected in the tarball of the link in this post. Kind Regards, Arthur Gouros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 04:44:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:44:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200444.n3K4i1YJ003473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 --- Comment #23 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-20 00:44:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > This feature is regularly used to allow multi-arch installations where e.g. > header files are the same in the -devel package for i386 an x86_64, but can be > installed simultaneously. But this is as far as I see the only really valid > usecase for it. Hmm, the last time I tried installing a -devel package for i386 and x86_64, rpm complained about conflicts for identical files. Probably there was a glitch in my setup or the particular rpm version. I always wondered why they made identical files conflict. Thanks for clearing it up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 05:11:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 01:11:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200511.n3K5BBxK001927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-20 01:11:10 EDT --- This one is very simple to start only :) Java package will be next ;) + MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. rpmlint silent + MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2]. + MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . + MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . + MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] + MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] + MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] + MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] + MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. - MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] It is not compiled on PPC and PPC64 architectures: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1308092 Please, see logs. If you suppose it only for few architectures you must add ExclusiveArch tag and comment why you make this decision (and link to bugs, if it is not compiled on any arch). - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] + MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. + MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] No locales + MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] + MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [11] + MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] + MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] + MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] + MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] + MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] + MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] + MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] + MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] + MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] + MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] + MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [21] + MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] + MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] + MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20] + MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [23] + MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] + MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] + MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] So, package seems very nice for me. Please, do it compatible to build on each supported platforms and I approve them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 05:24:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 01:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200524.n3K5O6NG009661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #31 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-04-20 01:24:03 EDT --- IIRC, you have subsequently been sponsored. Can you put in a cvs request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 05:44:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 01:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200544.n3K5iJpW012733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-20 01:44:17 EDT --- The crash is reproducible, reported upstream http://pdfposter.origo.ethz.ch/node/37 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 05:45:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 01:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200545.n3K5jbvM007325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-20 01:45:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pdfposter Short Description: Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 05:53:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 01:53:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200553.n3K5r0US008630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #32 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-20 01:52:58 EDT --- I see that you are now sponsored. Can you update this to the latest upstream version before we do a complete review? Meanwhile I found some issues that you may want to fix while you are there: ? The group that for the dev package seems wrong. This is not a library, or is it? See /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS file for possible candidates. * There are some files in the source that refer to /usr/local/, /usr/lib/ etc. These need probably be patched, or sedded: lib/dpkg.h scripts/t/200_Dpkg_Shlibs.t scripts/t/200_Dpkg_Shlibs/ld.so.conf.d/normal.conf scripts/t/200_Dpkg_Shlibs/objdump.glib-ia64 scripts/t/200_Dpkg_Shlibs/objdump.dbd-pg scripts/Dpkg/Changelog.pm many files in man/*/* ? Can't this fix be done in %prep?: # ugly fix to get the translated man pages in utf-8 chmod 766 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/*/man*/* for file in %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/*/man*/* ; do ... ------------- Rahul, WOW! What is the probability of having a "mid-air collision" for a bug that was idle for 3 months? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 06:13:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 02:13:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492991] Review Request: mediawiki-InputBox - An extension to enable input box tags for mediawiki pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200613.n3K6DTmu012195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492991 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(guthrie at counterex | |ample.org) | --- Comment #2 from John Guthrie 2009-04-20 02:13:27 EDT --- I fixed the URLs that are listed in the spec file for obtaining the source code. I think that what I had before always gave you the HEAD version of the code. It should now give you a specific version (the version that I am using). I also updated to the latest version while I was at it. Here are the URLS for the new spec file and SRPM: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f10/mediawiki-InputBox.spec http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f10/mediawiki-InputBox-0-0.2.20090420svn.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 06:47:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 02:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200647.n3K6law3017820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-20 02:47:35 EDT --- I should have been more careful about compiler flags. Here you go: Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/minicomputer.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/minicomputer-1.3-2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 1.3-2 - Disable SSE on unsupported architectures F-11 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1308732 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 07:18:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:18:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491614] Review Request: mingw32-libglademm24 - C++ wrapper for libglade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200718.n3K7I1fY028647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-20 03:17:00 EDT --- Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 07:22:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:22:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478609] Review Request: djmount - Mounts UPnP Audio/Video/Photo shares as FUSE filesystems. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200722.n3K7MsQq023626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478609 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-20 03:22:52 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 07:23:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477958] Review Request: id3mtag - Command line mass ID3 tagging utility for audio files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200723.n3K7NOFo023713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477958 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(avi at unix.sh) --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-20 03:23:22 EDT --- Are you still interested in maintaining this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 07:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP - Asynchronous mail sending with POE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200726.n3K7QC0J024423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495885 --- Comment #2 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-04-20 03:26:11 EDT --- * Mon Apr 20 2009 Yanko Kaneti 0.21-3 - Add eg/ to the installed documentation http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP/perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP.spec http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP/perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP-0.21-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 07:38:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:38:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200738.n3K7ccPL032371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 Ivan Efremov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Ivan Efremov 2009-04-20 03:38:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ugene Short Description: Integrated bioinformatics toolkit Owners: iefremov Branches: F-11 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 07:45:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:45:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477948] Review Request: simple-ccsm - Simplified plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200745.n3K7j9sW027572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477948 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-20 03:45:08 EDT --- Just some quick comments on your spec file. I did only a 'look-at-it' review. - License is GPLv2+ (or (at your option) any later version) not GPLv2. Mentioned in the LICENSE file and the source header. PKG-INFO says GPL. - Is there no URL for Source0? If not, can you please describe the generation of the source tarball as mentioned in the guidelines. - Isn't 'BR: gettext' a duplicate? 'intltool' requires 'gettext' already. - INSTALL says '...depends on Python and PyGTK'. - Isn't 'Requires: hicolor-icon-theme' is missing? - '--vendor="fedora"' is no longer needed for new packages https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files Version 0.8.3 was released some weeks ago. http://gitweb.compiz-fusion.org/?p=compiz/compizconfig/ccsm;a=commit;h=2deb7e7194ddae144c98ea2cbef7e40f2d468b33 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 07:54:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:54:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200754.n3K7sUTL029212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 --- Comment #13 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-20 03:54:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I tried to package grfcodec but it's a total mess. They mix C and ASM stuff and > totally ignore that there are other arches than ix86. I hacked at the SPEC to > at least build on x86_64 but due to my not so leet skills I'm probably unable > to bring it to build on ppc{64}. > > Here's the task: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1308035 I agree with Alexey, try to get it to build without the self decompressing support. If that turns out to be a problem, we can probably come up with some hack where we make grfcodec and then build noarch files using it on x86, which we then can use everywhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 08:06:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:06:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200806.n3K86ZCT031956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 --- Comment #23 from Panu Matilainen 2009-04-20 04:06:34 EDT --- No, it's not at all that simple. Some of the non-binaries in /usr/lib/rpm are architecture specific configuration files and putting them to /usr/share would be just plain wrong and break things if you actually attempted to share the directory between say ppc and i386. Also rpmbuild puts some actual binaries (like debugedit) into the same directory too, which rpmlint doesn't know as it looks at things a sub-package at a time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 08:12:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:12:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200812.n3K8Cv3D007224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #20 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-20 04:12:54 EDT --- Updated to latest version 0.6 (java-plugin disabled since its installation is broken). http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq-0.6-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 08:23:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226423] Merge Review: smartmontools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200823.n3K8NsqI009656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226423 --- Comment #4 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-04-20 04:23:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > almost done, remains only > > > > License: GPLv2+ > > > > Missing license in: cciss.cpp cciss.h > > emailed upstream, waiting for response no response and no change in their cvs, I'll ping them again... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 08:34:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200834.n3K8Y8TI012016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #18 from Zarko 2009-04-20 04:34:06 EDT --- OK. I tested photoprint with Koji (only with --scratch option) for F9 F10 & F11, all four primary architecures, and all is clean. Now, I'm a little confused... How I understand the process, I must first request for a CVS module, isn't it? And I do this with: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: photoprint Short Description: Utility for printing digital photographs Owners: grof Branches: F9 F10 F11 InitialCC: grof after that I can build packages with Koji, but without --scratch option, and than going to Bodhi? In manual for CVS Admin request, stands this: Changing the fedora-cvs flag to "?" in a Bugzilla report means CVS admin attention is needed. But I can not find this flag on Bugzilla report?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 08:58:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225708] Merge Review: dovecot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200858.n3K8wTrk011486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225708 --- Comment #14 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-04-20 04:58:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Ping, any progress? dovecot.spec has been updated, waiting for objections :o) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 09:03:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 05:03:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491614] Review Request: mingw32-libglademm24 - C++ wrapper for libglade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200903.n3K93h4E012586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-20 05:03:41 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libglademm24 Short Description: MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for libglade Owners: sailer rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 09:48:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 05:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200948.n3K9mGgA027035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 09:56:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 05:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200956.n3K9uus2024360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-20 05:56:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Most Short Description: Most commonly needed test functions and features Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 10:31:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 06:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496606] New: Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496606 Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-Log-LogLite.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Log-LogLite-0.82-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Log::LogLite class helps create simple logs for applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 11:19:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 07:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201119.n3KBJCmt007644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-20 07:19:11 EDT --- Version 1.0.2 released: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/libguestfs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/libguestfs-1.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1308976 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 12:56:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201256.n3KCuDeP032677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #34 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-04-20 08:56:11 EDT --- Points 1, 3 and 18 are already done. Files are updated on the FTP-Server: ftp.uni-siegen.de. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 13:25:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:25:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201325.n3KDPotQ007258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 Mauricio Henriquez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 13:24:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496633] New: Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: buhochileno at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-debugger-gdb.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-debugger-gdb-2.0-1.1.src.rpm Description: GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop. This is my first package, and I'm seeking for a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 13:29:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:29:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] New: Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: buhochileno at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-debugger-mdb.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-debugger-mdb-2.0-1.1.src.rpm Description: Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop. This package is for Fedora 10 and 11 (rawhide). This is my first package, so I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 13:35:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201335.n3KDZl1j003427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #35 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-20 09:35:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > Points 1, 3 and 18 are already done. Thanks. > Files are updated on the FTP-Server: ftp.uni-siegen.de. I'll proceed with the review once all points are acted upon (either fixed or explained). Please post full URL of SRPM and SPEC file once it is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 14:07:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201407.n3KE7SB2015940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #6 from Matej Cepl 2009-04-20 10:07:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > - nimbus-theme-gnome (noarch, requires all the others and only includes > index.theme) Unfortuantely noarch package cannot have arch subpackage, so nimbus-theme-gnome must be arch as well. Otherwise took all your comments. Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1309215 SRC RPM: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/nimbus-theme-gnome-0.0.17-3.fc11.src.rpm Spec is in the same place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 14:13:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496486] Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201413.n3KEDGb9012271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-20 10:13:15 EDT --- Please don't use macros in the url, it makes it unnecessarily hard to paste the URL into a browser. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 14:14:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:14:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496606] Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201414.n3KEE97w017457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496606 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 14:12:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458826] Review Request: s390utils - Linux/390 specific utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201412.n3KECQOE017223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458826 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-20 10:12:23 EDT --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 14:16:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:16:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201416.n3KEGl88013344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 14:42:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496651] New: Review Request: Kazakh hunspell dictionaries - hunspell-kk Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Kazakh hunspell dictionaries - hunspell-kk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496651 Summary: Review Request: Kazakh hunspell dictionaries - hunspell-kk Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-kk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-kk-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Kazakh hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 15:29:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201529.n3KFTrCL002776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-20 11:29:52 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=340367) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=340367) Where to set fedora-cvs flag (In reply to comment #18) > I must first > request for a CVS module, isn't it? And I do this with: > > New Package CVS Request > ======================= > Package Name: photoprint > Short Description: Utility for printing digital photographs > Owners: grof > Branches: F9 F10 F11 > InitialCC: grof > > after that I can build packages with Koji, but without --scratch option, and > than going to Bodhi? Yes. > In manual for CVS Admin request, stands this: > Changing the fedora-cvs flag to "?" in a Bugzilla report means CVS admin > attention is needed. > > But I can not find this flag on Bugzilla report?? See the attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 16:11:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:11:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481056] Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201611.n3KGBP5w012160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 Gavin Romig-Koch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(gavin at redhat.com) | --- Comment #12 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-04-20 12:11:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Ping. What's the status of this ticket? Why squeak-vm was not rebuilt? This package was built, and is now part of rawhide. Was there some need to rebuild it again that I missed or was unaware of? As far as status of this ticket: the package was approved, checked into cvs, and built into rawhide; but I don't know what if anything should happen with this ticket. I don't see any directions for this in the wiki. If I've made a mistake here I apologise. Please let me know what needs doing and I'll get it done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 16:13:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:13:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496133] Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201613.n3KGDfgk006741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 --- Comment #1 from Julian Sikorski 2009-04-20 12:13:40 EDT --- For those not following the devel list, it turned out that the symlinks from -devel package are required by jemboss at runtime. One more thing that needs fixing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 16:38:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201638.n3KGc1qu011732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 --- Comment #20 from Ville Skytt? 2009-04-20 12:37:59 EDT --- I didn't test the patch but it looks like something that would work, although I'd personally use $CFLAGS and $CXXFLAGS instead of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS (the %configure macro sets them), and try to push the change upstream (obviously the patched file would be configure.in instead of configure in that case), noting to them that their configure doesn't quite behave how it says and how people expect (CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS are documented as "influential environment variables" in configure --help output). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 16:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496486] Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201645.n3KGjKss019259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 --- Comment #2 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-04-20 12:45:19 EDT --- Hi, thanks for taking the review. I'll change the url to a "humand readable" one in next releases, if there are some changes to do, or before importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 16:42:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:42:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] New: Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 Summary: Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/nfoview.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/nfoview-1.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://home.gna.org/nfoview/ Description: NFO Viewer is a simple viewer for NFO files, which are "ASCII" art in the CP437 codepage. The advantages of using NFO Viewer instead of a text editor are preset font and encoding settings, automatic window size and clickable hyperlinks. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1309515 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint nfoview* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint nfoview-1.4-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 17:30:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:30:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438452] Review Request: java-gnome: Java GNOME bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201730.n3KHUIga023042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438452 --- Comment #15 from Stepan Kasal 2009-04-20 13:30:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > [-] If the project name and the commonly used JAR filename differ, a symbolic > link with the usual name must also be provided. > > If I understand this guideline correctly, the jar file generated by > this package should be called java-gnome.jar, with gtk.jar as a > symbolic link. I think this qualifies as an exception: java-gnome was always a name for a collection of several smaller projects--the bindings for various layers of gnome libraries. Calling any of the jars delivered by this rpm as java-gnome.jar would make little sense and confuse people. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 17:32:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:32:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438452] Review Request: java-gnome: Java GNOME bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201732.n3KHWZo1029965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438452 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mgarski at post.pl --- Comment #16 from Stepan Kasal 2009-04-20 13:32:32 EDT --- *** Bug 242335 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 17:46:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:46:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201746.n3KHk4Xr000351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Philippe Makowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |flamerobin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 17:49:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201749.n3KHnlTX001196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 Zarko changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 17:49:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:49:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201749.n3KHnVZj027376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #20 from Zarko 2009-04-20 13:49:29 EDT --- OK, then New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: photoprint Short Description: Utility for printing digital photographs Owners: grof Branches: F9 F10 F11 InitialCC: grof -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 18:18:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481056] Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201818.n3KIILR2002654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 --- Comment #13 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-20 14:18:20 EDT --- Yes, maybe squeak-vm was built for devel - I don't watch the status of packages in Rawhide. But there are branches for F-9 and F-10, and the package still not built for these branches. For example, at F-10 we got the following: [petro at host-12-116 ~]$ yum info squeak-vm --enablerepo updates-testing Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Error: No matching Packages to list [petro at host-12-116 ~]$ You should build packages for these branches and push them into updates-testing/updates using Bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 18:28:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:28:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496688] Review Request: monodevelop-database - Addin for MonoDevelop for an integrated database explorer and editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201828.n3KISuip004953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496688 Mauricio Henriquez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 18:28:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496688] New: Review Request: monodevelop-database - Addin for MonoDevelop for an integrated database explorer and editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-database - Addin for MonoDevelop for an integrated database explorer and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496688 Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-database - Addin for MonoDevelop for an integrated database explorer and editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: buhochileno at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-database.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-database-2.0-1.2.src.rpm Description: Addin for MonoDevelop for an integrated database explorer and editor. Cureently only explorer is working, DB edition is not possible. This is one of my first packages so I need sponsor!!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 18:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496689] New: Review Request: monodevelop-java - Java language integration with MonoDevelop based on ikvm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-java - Java language integration with MonoDevelop based on ikvm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496689 Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-java - Java language integration with MonoDevelop based on ikvm Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: buhochileno at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-java.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-java-2.0-1.2.src.rpm Description: Java language integration with MonoDevelop based on ikvm. ikvm packages need urgently be updated!!! This is one of my first packages so I need a sponsor!!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 18:31:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:31:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496689] Review Request: monodevelop-java - Java language integration with MonoDevelop based on ikvm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201831.n3KIVndU005993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496689 Mauricio Henriquez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 18:55:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:55:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496697] New: Review Request: ikvm - This package provides IKVM.NET Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ikvm - This package provides IKVM.NET https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496697 Summary: Review Request: ikvm - This package provides IKVM.NET Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: buhochileno at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/ikvm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/ikvm-0.38.0.4-3.2.src.rpm Description: This package provides IKVM.NET, an open source Java compatibility layer for Mono, which includes a Virtual Machine, a bytecode compiler, and various class libraries for Java, as well as tools for Java and Mono interoperability. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 19:01:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201901.n3KJ1NTh017621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-20 15:01:22 EDT --- Some notes: * %define -> %global - For some reasons (especially due to rpm's "unexpected" behaviour with nested macros), Fedora now suggests to use %global instead of %define: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define * Including additional documents as Source - When including additional documents, please add them as Sources instead of making patch, like: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Source1: README.postgres ..... ..... %prep %setup -q %patch0 -p0 -b .script cp -p %SOURCE1 . ----------------------------------------------------------------- (Also see the below comments about timestamps) * Dependency between subpackages - Usually the dependency between packages rebuilt from the same srpm is strict EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) specific (not only version specific): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package ! %setup - "-n %{name}-%{version}" is the default of %setup, so "%setup -q" is enough here. * Timestamps - When using "cp" or "install" commands, use "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps * Permission ----------------------------------------------------------------- %{__find} blib/lib ! -type d -printf "%{__install} -m 0444 %p %{buildroot}%{ebshare}/lib/%%P\n" | sh -x ----------------------------------------------------------------- - Usually these files should have 0644 permission. * %files ----------------------------------------------------------------- # Collect the list of files. Basically we include all files except # the EB/DB (database specific) modules. ( cd %{buildroot}; %{__find} ./%{ebshare} -type d -printf "%%%%dir %{ebshare}/%%P\n"; %{__find} ./%{ebshare} -type f -printf "%{ebshare}/%%P\\n" | %{__grep} -v "lib/EB/DB/.*pm" ) > .files # Include the SQLite driver. echo '%{ebshare}/lib/EB/DB/Sqlite.pm' >> .files ----------------------------------------------------------------- - The following is much simpler: ----------------------------------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc ....... %dir %{_sysconfdir}/%{lcname} %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/%{lcname}/%{lcname}.conf %{ebshare}/ %exclude %{ebshare}/lib/EB/DB/Postgres.pm %{_bindir}/ebshell %{_mandir}/man1/* %files db-postgresql %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc README.postgres %{ebshare}/lib/EB/DB/Postgres.pm ----------------------------------------------------------------- * Documents - Usually the file "INSTALL" is for people who want to install the package by themselves and not needed for rpm users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 19:08:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:08:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494965] Review Request: pianobooster - A MIDI file player that teaches you how to play the piano In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201908.n3KJ8VLA013973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494965 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-20 15:08:30 EDT --- pianobooster-0.6.2-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pianobooster-0.6.2-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 19:07:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:07:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496701] New: Review Request: gxmessage - GTK2 based xmessage clone Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gxmessage - GTK2 based xmessage clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496701 Summary: Review Request: gxmessage - GTK2 based xmessage clone Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/gxmessage.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/gxmessage-2.12.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Gxmassage is a GTK2 based xmessage clone. It pops up a dialog window, displays a given message or question, then waits for the user's response. That response is returned as the program's exit code. Because gxmessage is a drop-in alternative to xmessage, gxmessage accepts any option xmessage would, and returns the same exit codes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 19:08:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:08:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201908.n3KJ8Udn019412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 --- Comment #13 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-20 15:08:29 EDT --- Mamoru thanks for the input, Johan what Mamoru said :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 19:27:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:27:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494965] Review Request: pianobooster - A MIDI file player that teaches you how to play the piano In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201927.n3KJRVhu023675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494965 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-20 15:27:31 EDT --- pianobooster-0.6.2-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pianobooster-0.6.2-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 19:35:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496486] Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201935.n3KJZRTb020579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-20 15:35:26 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSFIX - URL should not use %{name}. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX - Time stamps are not preserved in install phase, use make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" install instead of make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSFIX - Do not ship INSTALL, it only contains compilation instructions. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 19:51:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201951.n3KJpEQ1028074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-20 15:51:11 EDT --- Well, I figured out that my problems getting this to work simply go away with 'setenforce 0'. Here are the complaints I see while running in permissive mode: type=1400 audit(1240256724.128:55): avc: denied { write } for pid=1712 comm="nscd" name="socket" dev=dm-4 ino=409614 scontext=system_u:system_r:nscd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 tclass=sock_file type=1400 audit(1240256724.134:56): avc: denied { connectto } for pid=1712 comm="nscd" path="/var/run/nslcd/socket" scontext=system_u:system_r:nscd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0 tclass=unix_stream_socket The daemon started fine, but it seems that nothing could talk to it. I guess some policy tweaks will be needed before this gets to the point of being useful. BTW, does Simo know you're packaging this for inclusion? I thought SSSD was supposed to do the same thing in a different way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 19:47:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201947.n3KJliXC027306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-20 15:47:43 EDT --- - Shouldn't this package Requires: clive, cclive from a usability point of view..? rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSFIX - Don't use %{name} in URL. - "install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}" is redundant since "install -Dm 755 -p %{name} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}" already creates the directory for you. Also desktop-file-install seems to create the destination directory automatically, so you can drop the directory line altogether. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK You can do the fixes upon import to CVS. The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 19:55:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492130] Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201955.n3KJtoT2024397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496718(mingw32-plotmm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 19:55:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496718] New: Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications Alias: mingw32-plotmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496718 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 492130 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-plotmm.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for libxml2. Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 20:20:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:20:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496606] Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904202020.n3KKK3n4032613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496606 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-20 16:20:02 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. Provides are sane: perl(Log::LogLite) = 0.82 perl(Log::NullLogLite) = 0.82 perl-Log-LogLite = 0.82-1.fc10 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(IO::LockedFile) >= 0.21 perl(Log::LogLite) perl(strict) perl(vars) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSFIX - According to README: This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. - License of Perl is: (GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic) - Please contact upstream and ask them to clarify license. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Log /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Log/LogLite.pm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Log/NullLogLite.pm /usr/share/doc/perl-Log-LogLite-0.82 /usr/share/doc/perl-Log-LogLite-0.82/Changes /usr/share/doc/perl-Log-LogLite-0.82/README /usr/share/man/man3/Log::LogLite.3pm.gz /usr/share/man/man3/Log::NullLogLite.3pm.gz MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 20:34:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:34:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496486] Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904202034.n3KKYco6003308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 --- Comment #4 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-04-20 16:34:37 EDT --- Update : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/cclive.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc10/cclive-0.3.2-2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog : - URL fix - Preserve timestamps - Remove INSTALL file from doc section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 20:50:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496606] Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904202050.n3KKot8O009643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496606 --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-20 16:50:54 EDT --- Thanks for the review Jussi. (In reply to comment #1) > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > NEEDSFIX > - According to README: > This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. > - License of Perl is: (GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic) The perl license is GPL+ or Artistic, according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#License_tag Why do you say it should be (GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic) ? I never saw that until today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 20:56:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:56:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496606] Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904202056.n3KKuisx008134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496606 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-20 16:56:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > > NEEDSFIX > > - According to README: > > This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > > modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. > > - License of Perl is: (GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic) > > The perl license is GPL+ or Artistic, according to > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#License_tag > > Why do you say it should be (GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic) ? I > never saw that until today. Okay, I missed the guideline on that one. Thanks. rpm -qi perl states: License: (GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic). Maybe it's a bug in the perl RPM...? The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 20:58:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496486] Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904202058.n3KKwuTC011379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-20 16:58:55 EDT --- Everything has been fixed; the package has been APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 20:58:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904202058.n3KKwNpO011306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #9 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-20 16:58:22 EDT --- I talked to upstream powwow maintainer and he agreed to remove follow and catrw from "make install" target and to perform the following renames: muc -> powwow-muc movie_play -> powwow-movieplay movie2ascii -> powwow-movie2ascii Spec URL: http://www.smartlink.ee/~kalev/powwow.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smartlink.ee/~kalev/powwow-1.2.14-3.fc11.src.rpm * Mon Apr 20 2009 Kalev Lember - 1.2.14-3 - Rework powwow-devel description. - Rename movie_play and muc, remove catrw and follow to avoid possible name clashes and to reflect upstream changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 21:07:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:07:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904202107.n3KL7j9J010616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 --- Comment #2 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-04-20 17:07:44 EDT --- Thank you for the review. I'll fix URL. Before importing, about the first question, for requires : - at first, cclive was the only one compatible with abby. clive is compatible since last version. As cclive is lighter than clive, I think I could add cclive as a require for abby - an other solution is to create a virtual provide, in clive and cclive, like "clive_backend". Then abby could have a require on "clive_backend". I don't know if it's a good solution. BTW, cclive/abby is originally the "real" couple. I don't really know what i the best solution. May be we can also let the user choose himselft his own backend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 21:07:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:07:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496606] Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904202107.n3KL7K4j010554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496606 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-20 17:07:19 EDT --- Oh, ok, I understand now. The perl spec file says : # Modules Tie::File and Getopt::Long are licenced under "GPLv2+ or Artistic," # we have to reflect that in the sub-package containing them. License: (GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic) perl itself is GPL+ or Artistic, only some sub-packages are GPLv2+ or Artistic, but this needs to be reflected on the package as a whole. But when a module is released under the same license as perl, then the correct license is GPL+ or Artistic. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Log-LogLite Short Description: Create simple logs Owners: xavierb Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 21:13:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:13:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225974] Merge Review: krb5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904202113.n3KLDdxo011787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225974 --- Comment #12 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-04-20 17:13:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > >> krb5.src: W: strange-permission krb5-tex-pdf.sh 0755 > >> A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. > >> Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. > > > >We run this script during the build. We could take the execute bit off and run > >a shell with the script as its argument, I guess. > > Probably worth doing. Done. > >> krb5-libs.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/kerberos/man/man5/.k5login.5.gz > >> The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete > >> it from the package if not. > >> > >> ??????????? > > > >This is the man page for the use of ~/.k5login. Not really sure what to do > >with it. > > Since it's a valid manpage with a valid name, file a bug for an rpmlint > exception. Filed bug #496735. > >> krb5-workstation.i386: E: setuid-binary /usr/kerberos/bin/ksu root 04755 > >> The file is setuid, this may be dangerous, especially if this file is setuid > >> root. > >> > >> Necessary, I suspect. > > > >Yup. For a while we took the setuid bit off, but it's actually useless without > >it, and the bug reports were rarely friendly. > > I can imagine. :) rpmlint exception here, too. Filed, bug #496737. > ... > Am I to understand that this will be deprecated upon removal of krb4 stuff? Yup. When the code to handle the krb4 protocol gets turned off and eventually ejected, krb524 (and its client, krb524init) disappear as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 21:17:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496486] Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904202117.n3KLHD6h015393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 Nicoleau Fabien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-04-20 17:17:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cclive Short Description: Command line video extraction utility Owners: eponyme Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 21:28:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904202128.n3KLSc2x017845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-20 17:28:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Thank you for the review. I'll fix URL. > Before importing, about the first question, for requires : > - at first, cclive was the only one compatible with abby. clive is compatible > since last version. As cclive is lighter than clive, I think I could add cclive > as a require for abby > - an other solution is to create a virtual provide, in clive and cclive, like > "clive_backend". Then abby could have a require on "clive_backend". I don't > know if it's a good solution. > > BTW, cclive/abby is originally the "real" couple. > > I don't really know what i the best solution. May be we can also let the user > choose himselft his own backend. Since clive and cclive are trivial in size, I'd put both as requirements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 21:34:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:34:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496742] New: Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 Summary: Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/elfelli.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/elfelli-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://home.gna.org/elfelli/ Description: A tool to calculate and visualize electric flux lines around charged bodies. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1309775 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint elfelli* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint elfelli-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 21:41:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904202141.n3KLf0EK018229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-20 17:40:59 EDT --- APPROVED by sailer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 21:54:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904202154.n3KLsfI1020403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 --- Comment #4 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-04-20 17:54:40 EDT --- As clive will also generate some perl requriements, and if you are ok with that, I prefer put only cclive as an explicit requirement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 22:02:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904202202.n3KM2lpH024581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #11 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-20 18:02:46 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Thomas. Could you please set the fedora-review flag too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 22:10:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904202210.n3KMAwqV026425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 22:19:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:19:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904202219.n3KMJsw4028217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Kalev Lember 2009-04-20 18:19:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: powwow Short Description: A console MUD client Owners: kalev Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 22:25:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904202225.n3KMPBWt026966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 --- Comment #14 from Johan Vromans 2009-04-20 18:25:09 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/EekBoek.spec SRPM URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/EekBoek-1.04.03-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: EekBoek is a bookkeeping package for small and medium-size businesses. Unlike other accounting software, EekBoek has both a command-line interface (CLI) and a graphical user-interface (GUI, currently under development). Furthermore, it has a complete Perl API to create your own custom applications. EekBoek is designed for the Dutch/European market and currently available in Dutch only. An English translation is in the works (help appreciated). The spec file is non-trivial but well commented. The spec file and rpms are rpmlint free with the exception of two files that are not utf8. This is intentional, these files need to be latin1. All comments from review #12 are applied, although I must remark that I do not see why an Epoch is needed. The link is all but helpful, and some further reading reveals that 'Epoch should be avoided if possible'... Results of last koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310184 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 00:08:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:08:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] New: Package Review: ibus-table-yong Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: ibus-table-yong https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 Summary: Package Review: ibus-table-yong Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cchance at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, petersen at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, panemade at gmail.com, cchance at redhat.com, phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 488173 SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-yong-1.1.0.20090421-1.fc12.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-yong.spec Description: Yong table data for IBus-Table which is an engine of IBus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 00:32:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210032.n3L0WxGm015636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #70 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-20 20:32:56 EDT --- http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/publican/publican-0.45-0.2+naming.fc11.noarch.rpm is a test package with simplified srpm naming. Then fedora publican can have a make target koji-en-US which would submit fedora-security-guide-en-US-1.0-12.fc10.src to koji directly creating fedora-security-guide-en-US-1.0-12.fc10.noarch. BTW I thinking again about the naming: how about we just call the fedora package Fedora-Security_Guide - that would bring it in line with standard publican book naming I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 00:49:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210049.n3L0nZTZ017905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 01:41:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496651] Review Request: Kazakh hunspell dictionaries - hunspell-kk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210141.n3L1f8vi026814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496651 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 02:43:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:43:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210243.n3L2h1l3006716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #55 from Mikulas Patocka 2009-04-20 22:42:56 EDT --- Regarding alternate crypto routines --- I couldn't get them working: gnutls returns SSL_ERROR_ZERO_RETURN from SSL_get_error(c->ssl, SSL_connect(c->ssl)) I don't know why, gnutls says that their OpenSSL implementation is imcomplete. nss+nss_compat_ossl-0.9.4 gets a segfault in SSL_new(context) in s = SSL_ImportFD(templ_s, s); So if someone wants to try to make it compile, let he does (and I would accept Links patches for that), for me it doesn't work and I don't care about it much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 03:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210312.n3L3C0iL011234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-20 23:11:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > - gtk-nimbus-engine (arch, includes libnimbus.so and gtkrc, requires > gtk-engines for dir ownership) Sorry, it's gtk2-engines. And the reqirement for hicolor-icon-theme (not hicolor-icon) can be dropped since %{_datadir}/icons is provided by the filesystem package. My bad. (In reply to comment #6) > Unfortuantely noarch package cannot have arch subpackage, so nimbus-theme-gnome > must be arch as well. You can easily work around that by renaming spec and srpm to nimbus-theme, nimbus-gnome-theme or whatever, as long as it's not nimbus-theme-gnome. The 'pseudo' base package will have no requirements and no files and the gnome bits will be a new subpackage. gtk-nimbus-engine, nimbus-icon-theme and nimbus-metacity-theme must not require nimbus-theme-gnome but contrary nimbus-theme-gnome requires them. Again you have duplicate files in the files section, because you made the icon theme own %{_datadir}/themes/nimbus/ which also includes index.theme and gtk-2.0/{gtkrc,iconrc}. Correct would be %dir %{_datadir}/themes/nimbus/ %dir %{_datadir}/themes/nimbus/gtk-2.0/ %{_datadir}/themes/nimbus/gtk-2.0/iconrc %{_datadir}/themes/nimbus/gtk-2.0/*.png But IMO this is wrong anyway, because all these icons and iconrc should be installed to %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/24x24/stock. I will attach a patch to fix that and then you don't need to care for duplicate ownership any longer. gtk-nimbus-engine and nimbus-metacity-theme also need to own %dir %{_datadir}/themes/nimbus/ The gtk engine would also need to own %dir %{_datadir}/themes/nimbus/gtk-2.0/ but with the patch just owning %{_datadir}/themes/nimbus/gtk-2.0/ will be ok, since the icons were moved away. Drop NEWS ("No News") and README (Sun internal info) from %doc. All packages should ship AUTHORS, ChangeLog and COPYING, this is no violation of the duplicate files rule but we need to ship this info with every package (except the gnome one maybe). The icon theme needs to run the scriptlets from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache for the nimbus folder and include icon-theme.cache as %ghost. Regarding index.theme: Is there a nimbus-notification theme? The license is not clear. Is it LGPLv2 or LGPLv2+? Can you ask upstream for clarification please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 03:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:17:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210317.n3L3HicY012168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-20 23:17:43 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=340470) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=340470) Patch to separate stock icons from gtk engine Currently changing the gtk engine will also change the stock icons, because they are linked to gtkrc as an include. This patch makes the stock icons depend on the selected icon theme instead and moves them to the correct location, so icon theme and gtk engine can be used separately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 03:29:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:29:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495440] Review Request: perl-Devel-FastProf - Fast perl per-line profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210329.n3L3TtVG014644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495440 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 03:58:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210358.n3L3wL8S018205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 05:38:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 01:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210538.n3L5cjAv001990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-21 01:38:44 EDT --- Is that really such a big of an issue? How big are the perl packages? However, if abby fails quietly when trying to use clive, then it might be a courtesy to the user to require also clive. Otherwise s/he won't probably know why abby doesn't work. Anyway, I leave it for you to decide what is sensible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 05:55:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 01:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496777] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes - no summary found Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes - no summary found https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496777 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes - no summary found Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-MethodAttributes OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes-0.06-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module allows code attributes of methods to be introspected using Moose meta method objects. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310691 Additional Comment: This package is a new BR of Catalyst::Runtime 5.80001. *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 05:55:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 01:55:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210555.n3L5t48x004671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-21 01:55:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > All comments from review #12 are applied, although I must remark that I do not > see why an Epoch is needed. The link is all but helpful, and some further > reading reveals that 'Epoch should be avoided if possible'... Ah, I didn't say Epoch must be introduced, what I said is that -db-postgresql subpackage should have "%{name} = %{version}-%{release}" which is exact EVR specific, not just "%{name} = %{version}". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 06:10:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:10:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496779] New: Review Request: perl-RT-Client-REST - Talk to RT using REST protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-RT-Client-REST - Talk to RT using REST protocol Alias: perl-RT-Client-REST https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496779 Summary: Review Request: perl-RT-Client-REST - Talk to RT using REST protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/RT-Client-REST OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-RT-Client-REST.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-RT-Client-REST-0.37-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: *RT::Client::REST* is */usr/bin/rt* converted to a Perl module. I needed to implement some RT interactions from my application, but did not feel that invoking a shell command is appropriate. Thus, I took *rt* tool, written by Abhijit Menon-Sen, and converted it to an object-oriented Perl module. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310693 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 06:17:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:17:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496777] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes - Introspect your code attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210617.n3L6Hq6x009652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496777 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |perl-MooseX-MethodAttribute |perl-MooseX-MethodAttribute |s - no summary found |s - Introspect your code | |attributes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 06:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:20:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496777] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes - Introspect your code attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210620.n3L6KcB8009529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496777 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-21 02:20:38 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes-0.06-2.fc10.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310695 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 06:36:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496779] Review Request: perl-RT-Client-REST - Talk to RT using REST protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210636.n3L6aZgh013248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496779 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 06:36:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:36:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496777] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes - Introspect your code attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210636.n3L6aPTb013216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496777 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 07:06:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:06:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496779] Review Request: perl-RT-Client-REST - Talk to RT using REST protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210706.n3L76Hoc017818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496779 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-21 03:06:15 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310693 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 383bf572afdb8040641d4d413ef96476 RT-Client-REST-0.37.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=15, Tests=325, 24 wallclock secs ( 0.16 usr 0.03 sys + 5.09 cusr 0.31 csys = 5.59 CPU) + Package perl-RT-Client-REST-0.37-1.fc11.noarch => Provides: perl(RT::Client::REST) = 0.37 perl(RT::Client::REST::Attachment) = 0.03 perl(RT::Client::REST::Exception) = 0.19 perl(RT::Client::REST::Forms) perl(RT::Client::REST::HTTPClient) = 0.01 perl(RT::Client::REST::Object) = 0.09 perl(RT::Client::REST::Object::Exception) = 0.05 perl(RT::Client::REST::Queue) = 0.02 perl(RT::Client::REST::SearchResult) = 0.03 perl(RT::Client::REST::Ticket) = 0.09 perl(RT::Client::REST::Transaction) = 0.01 perl(RT::Client::REST::User) = 0.02 Requires: perl(Error) perl(Exception::Class) perl(Exporter) perl(HTTP::Cookies) perl(HTTP::Request::Common) perl(Params::Validate) perl(RT::Client::REST) >= 0.14 perl(RT::Client::REST) >= 0.18 perl(RT::Client::REST) >= 0.20 perl(RT::Client::REST::Attachment) perl(RT::Client::REST::Exception) perl(RT::Client::REST::Exception) >= 0.18 perl(RT::Client::REST::Forms) perl(RT::Client::REST::HTTPClient) perl(RT::Client::REST::Object) >= 0.01 perl(RT::Client::REST::Object::Exception) >= 0.01 perl(RT::Client::REST::Object::Exception) >= 0.03 perl(RT::Client::REST::Object::Exception) >= 0.04 perl(RT::Client::REST::SearchResult) >= 0.02 perl(RT::Client::REST::Ticket) perl(RT::Client::REST::Transaction) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) Also, Strange to see requires perl(RT::Client::REST::Object::Exception) >= 0.01 perl(RT::Client::REST::Object::Exception) >= 0.03 perl(RT::Client::REST::Object::Exception) >= 0.04 Do we really need to care to filter 2 of them? APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 07:15:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:15:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496777] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes - Introspect your code attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210715.n3L7Ffts019635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496777 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-21 03:15:40 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310695 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 9db312b0fe2b5311aac1f7c68b3133df MooseX-MethodAttributes-0.06.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=12, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.01 sys + 1.86 cusr 0.06 csys = 1.98 CPU) + Package perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes-0.06-2.fc11.noarch => Provides: perl(MooseX::MethodAttributes) = 0.06 perl(MooseX::MethodAttributes::Inheritable) = 0.06 perl(MooseX::MethodAttributes::Role::AttrContainer) = 0.06 perl(MooseX::MethodAttributes::Role::AttrContainer::Inheritable) = 0.06 perl(MooseX::MethodAttributes::Role::Meta::Class) = 0.06 perl(MooseX::MethodAttributes::Role::Meta::Method) = 0.06 perl(MooseX::MethodAttributes::Role::Meta::Method::MaybeWrapped) = 0.06 perl(MooseX::MethodAttributes::Role::Meta::Method::Wrapped) = 0.06 Requires: perl(Moose) perl(Moose::Exporter) perl(Moose::Role) perl(Moose::Util) perl(Moose::Util::MetaRole) perl(MooseX::MethodAttributes::Role::Meta::Method::Wrapped) perl(MooseX::Types::Moose) perl(namespace::clean) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 07:22:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:22:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210722.n3L7MNR2020661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 --- Comment #7 from Zarko 2009-04-21 03:22:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > * Timestamps > * Directory ownership issue I think that I resolved these issues. Please, take a look at: Spec URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SPECS/photoprint-borders.spec SRPM URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SRPMS/photoprint-borders-0.0.2-4.fc11.src.rpm Koji scratch builds are green: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310717 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310715 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310706 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 07:44:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210744.n3L7i0hC026056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 --- Comment #16 from Johan Vromans 2009-04-21 03:43:59 EDT --- Thanks for the clarification. I'll throw out the epoch related things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 07:48:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210748.n3L7mXoW025896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 Nicoleau Fabien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-04-21 03:48:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: abby Short Description: Front-end for cclive and clive Owners: eponyme Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 07:47:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:47:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210747.n3L7lJ1Q027161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 --- Comment #6 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-04-21 03:47:18 EDT --- If cclive is present, abby won't warn. It requires one, or the other, but not both. If none of them are found, abby will display a messagebox. I'll add cclive as an explicit requires. If users thinks that clive is needed too, I'll add it in further releases. I'll also fix URL. Thank you for this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 08:21:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 04:21:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210821.n3L8LKHk002303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 Liang Suilong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |liangsuilong at gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Liang Suilong 2009-04-21 04:21:18 EDT --- new SRPM http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Goo-Canvas-0.05-4.fc10.src.rpm SPEC http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Goo-Canvas.spec I do not omit the perltetris.pl, because I think that it is OK on Fedora 10. And no netizen tell me that it can not run on their Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 08:27:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 04:27:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210827.n3L8R0cY003844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 Liang Suilong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #6 from Liang Suilong 2009-04-21 04:26:59 EDT --- SRPM http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Gnome2-Wnck-0.16-3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Gnome2-Wnck.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 08:37:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 04:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210837.n3L8bAuW005323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #56 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-04-21 04:37:08 EDT --- NSS SSL_new segfault already reported as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496643 and was recently fixed (and submitted for updates). Several others possible segfaults were fixed as well... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 08:45:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 04:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210845.n3L8jEX3006782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 --- Comment #5 from Zarko 2009-04-21 04:45:13 EDT --- > * Summary > * License > * BR > * %description > * Build failure > * scriplets All resolved: SPEC: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SPECS/camcardsync.spec SRPM: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SRPMS/camcardsync-0.1.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310790 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310779 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310738 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 08:47:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 04:47:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904210847.n3L8lpRi008164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 --- Comment #3 from Zarko 2009-04-21 04:47:50 EDT --- Please, wait with this until I'll resolve GCC4.4 issue and other spec cleaning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 10:20:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:20:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211020.n3LAKnHp027512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 Zarko changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zarko.pintar at gmail.com --- Comment #50 from Zarko 2009-04-21 06:20:46 EDT --- Hello, I'm working on Flamerobin's review, and I checked Firebird for F11 branch, but builds Fails! Please, look at my Koji tasks: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310953 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310951 some troubles with libtoolize, see buildlogs.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 10:29:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:29:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211029.n3LATGQn029592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-21 06:29:14 EDT --- Version 2.0.4 was released 2.0.4 (2009-04-20) * Version 2.0.3 broke support for relative paths to the socket (-s option and socket-name parameter), now relative paths work again as in version 2.0.2. * Fixed change log format, made table of contents nicer. * Fixed author's email address. * Removed zpkg stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 10:49:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:49:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211049.n3LAngfr000845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #51 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-21 06:49:40 EDT --- Philippe, are you 100% sure, that this move from lib to lib64 doesn't hurt anyone (see line 237 of your spec)? Here is a full list of rpmlint messages: [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ~/Desktop/firebird-* firebird.ppc64: W: name-repeated-in-summary Firebird firebird.ppc64: E: no-binary firebird.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-classic.ppc64: W: obsolete-not-provided firebird-client-embedded firebird-classic.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-classic.ppc64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln firebird-classic.ppc64: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm firebird-devel.ppc64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/firebird/lib/libib_util.so libib_util.so firebird-devel.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-libfbclient.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-libfbembed.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: non-standard-uid /etc/firebird/security2.fdb firebird firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/firebird/security2.fdb firebird firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: non-readable /etc/firebird/security2.fdb 0660 firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/changeDBAPassword.sh ../tools/changeDBAPassword.sh firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: sourced-script-with-shebang /etc/profile.d/firebird.csh firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: executable-sourced-script /etc/profile.d/firebird.csh 0755 firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/gdef ../tools/gdef firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/firebird/firebird.log firebird firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/firebird/firebird.log firebird firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: zero-length /var/log/firebird/firebird.log firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/firebird/data firebird firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: non-standard-gid /usr/share/firebird/data firebird firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: sourced-script-with-shebang /etc/profile.d/firebird.sh firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: executable-sourced-script /etc/profile.d/firebird.sh 0755 firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/firebird/backup firebird firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: non-standard-gid /usr/share/firebird/backup firebird firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/gpre ../tools/gpre firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/changeRunUser.sh ../tools/changeRunUser.sh firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/gsec ../tools/gsec firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/firebird firebird firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: non-standard-gid /usr/share/firebird firebird firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/restoreRootRunUser.sh ../tools/restoreRootRunUser.sh firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/fbmgr ./usr/lib64/firebird/bin/fbmgr.bin firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/firebird firebird firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/firebird firebird firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm firebird-superserver.ppc64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/firebird firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: incoherent-init-script-name firebird 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 33 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 11:05:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496826] New: Review Request: ipa-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ipa-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496826 Summary: Review Request: ipa-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-mincho-fonts/ipa-mincho-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-mincho-fonts/ipa-mincho-fonts-003.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Mincho style font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 11:03:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496824] New: Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496824 Summary: Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-gothic-fonts/ipa-gothic-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-gothic-fonts/ipa-gothic-fonts-003.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Gothic (sans-serif) style font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 11:04:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496825] New: Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Summary: Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-pgothic-fonts/ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-pgothic-fonts/ipa-pgothic-fonts-003.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Proportional Gothic (sans-serif) style font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 11:06:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:06:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496827] New: Review Request: ipa-pmincho-fonts - Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ipa-pmincho-fonts - Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496827 Summary: Review Request: ipa-pmincho-fonts - Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-pmincho-fonts/ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-pmincho-fonts/ipa-pmincho-fonts-003.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Proportional Mincho style font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 11:07:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:07:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211107.n3LB7xr2004483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #52 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-21 07:07:56 EDT --- All messages regarding non-standart-[gu]id may be ignored, so here is a final rpmling messages list: [petro at Sulaco Desktop]$ rpmlint firebird-*|grep -v non-standard firebird.ppc64: W: name-repeated-in-summary Firebird firebird.ppc64: E: no-binary firebird.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-classic.ppc64: W: obsolete-not-provided firebird-client-embedded firebird-classic.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-classic.ppc64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln firebird-classic.ppc64: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm firebird-devel.ppc64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/firebird/lib/libib_util.so libib_util.so firebird-devel.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-libfbclient.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-libfbembed.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: non-readable /etc/firebird/security2.fdb 0660 firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/changeDBAPassword.sh ../tools/changeDBAPassword.sh firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: sourced-script-with-shebang /etc/profile.d/firebird.csh firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: executable-sourced-script /etc/profile.d/firebird.csh 0755 firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/gdef ../tools/gdef firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: zero-length /var/log/firebird/firebird.log firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: sourced-script-with-shebang /etc/profile.d/firebird.sh firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: executable-sourced-script /etc/profile.d/firebird.sh 0755 firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/gpre ../tools/gpre firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/changeRunUser.sh ../tools/changeRunUser.sh firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/gsec ../tools/gsec firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/restoreRootRunUser.sh ../tools/restoreRootRunUser.sh firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/fbmgr ./usr/lib64/firebird/bin/fbmgr.bin firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm firebird-superserver.ppc64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/firebird firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: incoherent-init-script-name firebird 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 33 warnings. [petro at Sulaco Desktop]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 11:30:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496244] Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211130.n3LBULRA008986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496244 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #8 from Matej Cepl 2009-04-21 07:30:20 EDT --- OK, let's try once more. There is fixed upstream tarball with new release of the package ftp://ftp.linux.cz/pub/linux/people/jan_kasprzak/vlna/vlna-1.3-2.fc10.src.rpm with fixed license: Program distribution: --------------------- The program may be freely used. If somebody makes useful changes in the CWEB source code, I want to be informed about it. The modified version must not be distributed under the same name without author's consent. The author gives no warranty that the program will not damage your file that you have been editing for many hours. Although the program creates backup files, these files are deleted after subsequent use of the program. ----------------------------------- I will try to make it through fedora-legal and let's see, where it ends. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 11:34:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:34:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211134.n3LBYi6V009593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #53 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-21 07:34:42 EDT --- * We may omit messages, regarding relative symlinks (just add a note somewhere in %doc that there may be some issues with chrooting) * we may ignore messages about no-documentation and about no-binary. * These messages needs fixing: firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: sourced-script-with-shebang firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: executable-sourced-script firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: sourced-script-with-shebang firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: executable-sourced-script Note, that files in /etc/profile.d should be 0644 and shouldn't have "#!/bin/whatever" * This message "firebird-superserver.ppc64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/firebird" warns you that your init-script ddidn't used /var/lock/subsys - this may be omitted, but more better idea is to fix init-script. All you need is to touch /var/lock/subsys/firebird at start and remove it at stop. See /etc/init.d/rsyslog for example. * regarding messages about dangerous-command-in- - Im afraid we cannot do much here, so we should omit them too. At least for now. If some issues will occur, then you should solve them as they will go. * Regarding "firebird.ppc64: W: name-repeated-in-summary Firebird" - easyfix. * Regarding "firebird-classic.ppc64: W: obsolete-not-provided firebird-client-embedded" - please add "Provides: firebird-client-embedded" also. * "firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: incoherent-init-script-name firebird" - should be ignored. * "firebird-devel.ppc64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/firebird/lib/libib_util.so libib_util.so" - should be ignored * "firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: zero-length /var/log/firebird/firebird.log" - should be ignored. Ok, please comment this remaining rpmlint message: * firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: non-readable /etc/firebird/security2.fdb 0660 And we'll move further. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 11:39:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:39:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211139.n3LBdbYY010696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #54 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-21 07:39:36 EDT --- Thanks, Zarko! Philippe, please, investigate this issue too: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100#c50 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 12:12:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211212.n3LCCd5R019086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/ | |Display.html?id=45186 --- Comment #17 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-04-21 08:12:37 EDT --- This is ticket #45186 on CPAN's RT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 12:43:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496742] Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211243.n3LChEvj026837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 12:53:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:53:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492991] Review Request: mediawiki-InputBox - An extension to enable input box tags for mediawiki pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211253.n3LCrlYh029325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492991 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from David Nalley 2009-04-21 08:53:46 EDT --- Hi John, That indeed fixed the issue and checksums match now. You should be able to request CVS now. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 13:16:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:16:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211316.n3LDGgap000958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #55 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-21 09:16:40 EDT --- Regarding build failure on F-11 - Philippe, please use "autoreconf -vfi" instead of your (probably buggy) handwritten "NOCONFIGURE=1 ./autogen.sh" See build log with autoreconf: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1311072 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 13:18:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496824] Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211318.n3LDIctt003262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496824 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-21 09:18:37 EDT --- I think correct Source URL is http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/ipag00301.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 13:18:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211318.n3LDIVGf003225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-21 09:18:30 EDT --- I think correct Source URL is http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/ipagp00301.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 13:35:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211335.n3LDZS0b005318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 --- Comment #5 from Zarko 2009-04-21 09:35:27 EDT --- * Validation of .desktop files needs this: BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils so include this BR into spec * Macro names: %{_iconsdir} %{_liconsdir} %{_miconsdir} do not pass in my mock build, please use standard macros from here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 13:57:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:57:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496742] Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211357.n3LDv4Oh010341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-21 09:57:03 EDT --- Package fails to build in mock for F10 src/XmlLoader.h:25:19: error: expat.h: No such file or directory When you get mock build to work I'll review the package. PS. You have an awful lot of packages and review requests for packages, but few have done few reviews. Maybe you could do a few, since the review queue is quite clogged? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 13:58:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:58:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211358.n3LDwJjN012560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-21 09:58:18 EDT --- perltetris.pl definitely does not work in rawhide (x86_64): [spot at velociraptor ~]$ /usr/bin/perltetris.pl GLib-GObject-WARNING **: cannot derive `GooCanvasWidgetAccessible' from non-fundamental parent type `GooCanvasItem' at /usr/bin/perltetris.pl line 761, line 35. GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed at /usr/bin/perltetris.pl line 761, line 35. GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed at /usr/bin/perltetris.pl line 761, line 35. CRITICAL **: atk_object_initialize: assertion `ATK_IS_OBJECT (accessible)' failed at /usr/bin/perltetris.pl line 761, line 35. You also have not resolved the legal issue here. There are two ways you can resolve it: 1) Remove perltetris.pl (and the perltetris.pl manpage) from the package. 2) Rename perltetris.pl (and the perltetris.pl manpage) to something that does not contain the trademark "Tetris", and go through both files and remove the trademark "Tetris" from every user visible location. This would mean that you'd need to take it out entirely from the manpage. I can't advise you on where it needs to come out of the .pl file, because, well, it doesn't work for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 14:24:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211424.n3LEO6eN019733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-21 10:24:05 EDT --- The conclusion of the thread on the fedora-packaging mailing list initiated in order to resolve the issue https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-April/msg00042.html was that the license file must be part of the package. The thread also concluded that the license file must be copied into and made part of the extracted tarfile and not be a separate source file. The package has been updated accordingly (including adding the cp command to the source generation description comment): http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-xio-2.7-2.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-xio.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 14:24:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl -Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211424.n3LEOH6w019772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-21 10:24:16 EDT --- The conclusion of the thread on the fedora-packaging mailing list initiated in order to resolve the issue https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-April/msg00042.html was that the license file must be part of the package. The thread also concluded that the license file must be copied into and made part of the extracted tarfile and not be a separate source file. The package has been updated accordingly (including adding the cp command to the source generation description comment): http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-rsl-5.0-2.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-rsl.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 14:27:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:27:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226515] Merge Review: unixODBC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211427.n3LER95p018075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226515 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-21 10:27:06 EDT --- Ok, since 2.2.14. is in Rawhide - here is my review request: - rpmlint is not silent: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/stuff/unixodbc_rpmlint.log We may ignore messages, regarding non-versioned so-files in %{_libdir} and zero-length /etc/odbc.ini, however other messages needs fixing. * You must convert ChangeLof from iso8859-1 in %prep * You must remove executable permisson from files, mentioned my rpmlint. +/- The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. Unfortunately (perhaps, due to historical reasons) GUI module for unixODBC is named as unixODBC-kde, although it has almost nothing to do with KDE (purely Qt-based - the only link between them is DataManager(II) applications, used by KDE afaik). To be honest, I'd like this package to be renamed to something like unixODBC-gui, but the unixODBC package has very long history and even this small change may be relatively painless. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. Although I'm not a native english speaker and, therefore, this requirement of Fedora Review Giiudelines always confusing me :). + The spec file for the package is be legible. + The sources used to build the package are matching the upstream source: [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum unixODBC-2.2.14.tar.gz* f47c2efb28618ecf5f33319140a7acd0 unixODBC-2.2.14.tar.gz f47c2efb28618ecf5f33319140a7acd0 unixODBC-2.2.14.tar.gz_from_srpm [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1311282 + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, calling ldconfig in %post and %postun. + A package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list any file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. +/- Permissions on files must be set properly, except those, noted above (easyfix). + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissable content. + The package does not contain etremely large chunks of documentation. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + C header files are in a -devel package. + No static libraries. + The package does not contains pkgconfig(.pc) files. + The devel sub-package requires the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}. + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. - The sub-package containing GUI applications does include a %{name}.desktop file. Unfortunately, it does NOT properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in the package must be valid UTF-8. So, please, * use proper installation procedure of desktop-files ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop ) * Suppress rpmlint messages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 14:31:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:31:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496880] New: Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 Summary: Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/wannier90.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/wannier90-1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://wannier.org/ Description: Wannier90 is a program for calculating maximally-localised Wannier functions (MLWF) from a set of Bloch energy bands that may or may not be attached to or mixed with other bands. The formalism works by minimising the total spread of the MLWF in real space. This is done in the space of unitary matrices that describe rotations of the Bloch bands at each k-point. As a result, wannier90 is independent of the basis set used in the underlying calculation to obtain the Bloch states. Therefore, it may be interfaced straightforwardly to any electronic structure code. The locality of MLWF can be exploited to compute band-structure, density of states and Fermi surfaces at modest computational cost. Furthermore, wannier90 is able to output MLWF for visualisation and other post-processing purposes. Wannier functions are already used in a wide variety of applications. These include analysis of chemical bonding in real space; calculation of dielectric properties via the modern theory of polarisation; and as an accurate and minimal basis set in the construction of model Hamiltonians for large-scale systems, in linear-scaling quantum Monte Carlo calculations, and for efficient computation of material properties, such as the anomalous Hall coefficient. rpmlint output: wannier90.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libwannier.so wannier90.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libwannier.so 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. I have no idea why rpm doesn't strip the library... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 14:34:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:34:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225974] Merge Review: krb5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211434.n3LEYLWR022736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225974 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla 2009-04-21 10:34:17 EDT --- >>> krb5-workstation.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/kerberos/bin/ksu >>> >>> Fix if possible. >> >>The buildroot strip script misses setuid applications. I'm actually not sure >>if that's intentional or not. > >CCing Panu for this one. Great, looks like this is all we have. Panu? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 14:44:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:44:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211444.n3LEi7Io025620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #56 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-21 10:44:05 EDT --- thanks for all reports, I'll take care of for : * firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: non-readable /etc/firebird/security2.fdb 0660 that's a security issue, only firebird may have rights on this file it is the database where are stored all users (and their passsword) that can connect to Firebird databases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 14:55:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:55:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496606] Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211455.n3LEtSrw025972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496606 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |496890 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 14:59:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225769] Merge Review: freeradius In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211459.n3LExLJg030285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225769 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-21 10:59:20 EDT --- I'll review it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 15:05:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:05:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226197] Merge Review: nfs-utils-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211505.n3LF5NN0032084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226197 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) Depends on|182235(FE-Legal) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 15:03:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:03:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211503.n3LF3ch6031471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-21 11:03:36 EDT --- What's the status of this ticket? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 15:06:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:06:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494520] Review Request: cdf - The NASA Common Data Format implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211506.n3LF67pt032261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494520 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) Depends on|182235(FE-Legal) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 15:39:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241095] Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211539.n3LFdSa5009976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241095 --- Comment #10 from Paul Wouters 2009-04-21 11:39:26 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-IO-LockedFile New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 15:41:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496777] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes - Introspect your code attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211541.n3LFfg8H010765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496777 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 15:39:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:39:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211539.n3LFdpf7010072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #17 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-04-21 11:39:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Well, I figured out that my problems getting this to work simply go away with > 'setenforce 0'. Here are the complaints I see while running in permissive > mode: > > type=1400 audit(1240256724.128:55): avc: denied { write } for pid=1712 > comm="nscd" name="socket" dev=dm-4 ino=409614 > scontext=system_u:system_r:nscd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 > tclass=sock_file > > type=1400 audit(1240256724.134:56): avc: denied { connectto } for pid=1712 > comm="nscd" path="/var/run/nslcd/socket" scontext=system_u:system_r:nscd_t:s0 > tcontext=system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0 tclass=unix_stream_socket > > The daemon started fine, but it seems that nothing could talk to it. I guess > some policy tweaks will be needed before this gets to the point of being > useful. Well, it can't talk to nscd, and nscd can't talk to it. I'm having trouble reproducing the case where this causes things to fail completely, but temporarily stopping nscd should take these out of the picture. (Until we get a policy for it, the daemon's running as initrc_t, which is effectively unconfined, so it shouldn't have difficulties itself. BTW which policy version do you have installed?) > BTW, does Simo know you're packaging this for inclusion? I thought SSSD was > supposed to do the same thing in a different way. I'm pretty sure, yes. It's pretty clear that SSSD won't replace nss_ldap or its successors for 100% of cases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 15:42:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496779] Review Request: perl-RT-Client-REST - Talk to RT using REST protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211542.n3LFg7W4006583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496779 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-21 11:42:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-RT-Client-REST Short Description: Talk to RT using REST protocol Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 15:42:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:42:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496779] Review Request: perl-RT-Client-REST - Talk to RT using REST protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211542.n3LFg9Bn006605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496779 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 15:40:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:40:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241095] Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211540.n3LFeiTs006194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241095 Paul Wouters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496890 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 15:39:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:39:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241095] Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211539.n3LFdnOt005791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241095 Paul Wouters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 15:41:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496777] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes - Introspect your code attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211541.n3LFfere006490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496777 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-21 11:41:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes Short Description: Introspect your code attributes Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 15:45:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:45:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496779] Review Request: perl-RT-Client-REST - Talk to RT using REST protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211545.n3LFj5N0007541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496779 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-21 11:45:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Also, > Strange to see requires > perl(RT::Client::REST::Object::Exception) >= 0.01 > perl(RT::Client::REST::Object::Exception) >= 0.03 > perl(RT::Client::REST::Object::Exception) >= 0.04 > Do we really need to care to filter 2 of them? Yeah, it's weird but outside of filtering them there isn't much we can do about it. The most restrictive one wins (the last one in this case), and nothing "bad" will happen due to this, so I don't think it's really worth filtering the redundant ones out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 16:01:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211601.n3LG15vs011589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #18 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-04-21 12:01:04 EDT --- Hmm, actually, nslcd can use nscd, but not the other way around. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 16:36:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211636.n3LGaTbR020913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-21 12:36:28 EDT --- I'm running whatever's in rawhide currently: selinux-policy-3.6.12-4.fc11.noarch selinux-policy-targeted-3.6.12-4.fc11.noarch Well, at least I've found that the caching works across reboots. After logging in with setenforce 0, I can reboot the machine (which resets selinux to enforcing) and still log in. But I can't resolve any other users. And indeed, stopping nscd does get things working, but of course nscd caches more than uid/gid lookups. BTW, do you know if this will cache autofs lookups as well? Finally, to packaging issues: You fixed the minor issues I had; personally I dont' care one way or the other about the /lib64/security/pam_ldap.so dependency. However, one issue concerns me: /lib64/libnss_ldap.so.2 /usr/lib64/libnss_ldap-264.so /usr/lib64/libnss_ldap.so /usr/lib64/libnss_ldap.so.2 This brings up a couple of issues: Does the library really need to live in the root directory? Generally we try not to install things there unless they're absolutely required that early in the boot process (or for recovery). I know it conveniently avoids a conflict in this case, but I'm wondering if it's just done that way because of the conflict or if there's another reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 16:42:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211642.n3LGg30i026475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-21 12:42:02 EDT --- Thank you for going through that process! APPROVED by sailer. I would like to encourage you to add the pkgconfig dependency to globus-xio-devel, or to add a comment to the globus-core spec file that this dependency is indirectly needed, to prevent this dependency to be accidentally removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 16:51:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl -Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211651.n3LGpEnS025149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-21 12:51:13 EDT --- APPROVED by sailer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 17:18:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211718.n3LHIKeB002638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #12 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-21 13:18:19 EDT --- As far as I'm concerned it can be closed, all comments made have been addressed, but I'm the xfig maintainer so it is not up to me to close it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 17:26:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:26:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211726.n3LHQ32d005029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-21 13:26:02 EDT --- Ok, I'm closing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 17:24:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:24:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211724.n3LHOOTE032581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-21 13:24:23 EDT --- Unfortunately now I'm seeing other strange behavior. I found that, even though I'm currently logged in, a second login fails unless I start nscd. But that causes things like sudo to complain that I'm not in the passwd file. Only running setenforce 0 gets things working properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 17:32:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211732.n3LHWoNG002242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #18 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-21 13:32:47 EDT --- As Hans says, all of those additional restrictions on top of the GPL are horribly non-free. If the old upstream (the original copyright holders) will waive all of those additional restrictions, you should be okay, but if not, this is not acceptable in Fedora as-is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 17:36:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211736.n3LHar48003815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-21 13:36:52 EDT --- Actually, there are still some things to fix, at least directory ownership: the package should Requires: hicolor-icon-theme. And maybe also explicitly libXt, since it owns /usr/share/X11/app-defaults/ (the lib dependency is however already picked up automatically). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 17:40:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211740.n3LHenVa008565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-21 13:40:48 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-xio Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 17:41:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl -Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211741.n3LHfc8i008675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-21 13:41:37 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-rsl Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 17:38:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:38:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496244] Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211738.n3LHckMe007854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496244 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-21 13:38:44 EDT --- Ugh. I just _LOVE_ crappy licenses. This license has no explicit right to copy, modify, or redistribute. There is an implicit grant for modification, but I would prefer that it was explicit. As is, I'm going to have to say no. Please ask upstream if they can use an established license, like MIT (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#Old_Style) or LPPL (http://www.latex-project.org/lppl/lppl-1-3a.txt). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 17:48:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:48:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211748.n3LHmT7u006025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 --- Comment #15 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-21 13:48:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Actually, there are still some things to fix, at least directory ownership: the > package should Requires: hicolor-icon-theme. > Good catch, fixed in CVS, will get picked up the next build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 17:49:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211749.n3LHnS3e010025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #57 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-21 13:49:23 EDT --- All builds are ok http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1311836 http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird.spec http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-2.fc10.src.rpm upgraded Seems that now rpmlint results are better I shouldn't trust as much the previous work that was made ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 17:52:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:52:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492231] Review Request: trac-watchlist-plugin - plugin for watching trac wiki pages and tickets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211752.n3LHq0VV010752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492231 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Till Maas 2009-04-21 13:51:59 EDT --- [OK] rpmlint output: trac-watchlist-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation [OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format [OK] license allowed: BSD [OK] license matches shortname in License: tag [OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: not in upstream tarball/SCM [OK] package is code or permissive content: {OK} patches sent to upstream and commented: no patches [GOOD ENOUGH] Source0 is a working URL Tarball generation instructions work {N/A} Sourceforge URL is Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name} [OK] Source0 matches Upstream: indidual files in tarball match locally generated tarball [OK] Package builds on all primary architectures: noarch http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1311889 [N/A] ExcludeArch bugs are filed and commented: [OK] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds) (OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin [N/A] %find_lang used for locales [N/A] Every (sub)package containing libraries runs ldconfig %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig [N/A] .h (header) files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] .a (static libraries) are in -static subpackage [N/A] contains .pc (pkgconfig) files and has Requires: pkgconfig (N/A) .pc files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] contains .so.X(.Y) files and .so is in -devel [N/A] -devel subpackage has Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [N/A] .la files (libtool) are not included [N/A] Has GUI and includes %{name}.desktop [N/A] Follows desktop entry spec [N/A] Valid .desktop Name [N/A] Valid .desktop GenericName [N/A] Valid .desktop Categories [N/A] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [N/A] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install [OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable) [OK] Owns all created directories [OK] no duplicates in %files [OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages [OK] included filenames are in UTF-8 [OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] Consistent macro usage [OK] large documentation is -doc subpackage [OK] %doc does not affect runtime {OK} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) {OK} well known BuildRoot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) {OK} PreReq not used {N/A} RPM_OPT_FLAGS honoured {N/A} Useful debuginfo generated {OK} no duplication of system libraries {OK} no rpath {GOOD ENOUGH} Timestamps preserved with cp and install {N/A} Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) {OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used {OK} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and %{buildroot} on %install and %clean) {OK} no Conflicts {OK} nothing installed in /srv {OK} Changelog in allowed format {OK} does not use Scriptlets Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch Sane Provides: and Requires: {OK} Follows Naming Guidelines {OK} Has BuildRequires: python {NOT OK} Defines and uses %{python_sitelib}: %{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")} you should use %global instead of %define [OK] Python eggs must be built from source. They cannot simply drop an egg from upstream into the proper directory. [OK] Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [OK] If egg-info files are generated by the modules build scripts they must be included in the package. [N/A] When building a compat package, it must install using easy_install -m so it won't conflict with the main package. [N/A] When building multiple versions (for a compat package) one of the packages must contain a default version that is usable via "import MODULE" with no prior setup. (OK) A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. {OK} Egg install: %install %{__python} setup.py install --skip-build --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Please change the two occurences of %define to %global before importing the package into Fedora. Except for this minor issue the package looks good and is therefore APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 18:00:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463808] Review Request: robotfindskitten - A game/zen simulation. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211800.n3LI0nb3008791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463808 --- Comment #2 from Till Maas 2009-04-21 14:00:48 EDT --- You do not use rpm macros here: /usr/games/robotfindskitten /usr/share/info/robotfindskitten.info.gz /usr/share/man/man6/robotfindskitten.6.gz %{_datadir} is iirc /usr/share, and %{_prefix} /usr. Also it is best practices to use a * instead of the .gz suffix for manpages and maybe also info pages, because they may not be gzipped depending on the rpm configuration. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 18:02:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:02:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211802.n3LI2ZY7013299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #16 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-21 14:02:32 EDT --- I've made a modified tarball that removes the ilbc bits, and committed it for F-11 and rawhide. If you push any updates for F-9 or F-10, you need to do the same thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 18:14:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496941] New: Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Apache module for Ruby on Rails support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Apache module for Ruby on Rails support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496941 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Apache module for Ruby on Rails support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: herlo1 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-passenger.spec SRPM URL: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-passenger-2.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Passenger is an Apache module for Ruby on Rails support. I would like to mention that this review is dependent upon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496937 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 18:20:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:20:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211820.n3LIKKPv017524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #21 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-04-21 14:20:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > I'm running whatever's in rawhide currently: > selinux-policy-3.6.12-4.fc11.noarch > selinux-policy-targeted-3.6.12-4.fc11.noarch > > Well, at least I've found that the caching works across reboots. After logging > in with setenforce 0, I can reboot the machine (which resets selinux to > enforcing) and still log in. But I can't resolve any other users. Yeah, we're going to have to get that sorted before it gets into any repositories. > And indeed, stopping nscd does get things working, but of course nscd caches > more than uid/gid lookups. > BTW, do you know if this will cache autofs lookups as well? It does not; autofs doesn't use libc's nsswitch subsystem to look up automount information (there's no interface for one, and for such an interface to be useful right away you'd have to add frontend the functions to libc, and then a backend for it to the various nsswitch modules, and by doing so duplicate a lot of code that you need to keep in the automounter until the older versions of libc that don't provide it go away, so in the end you haven't gained much). > Finally, to packaging issues: You fixed the minor issues I had; personally I > don't care one way or the other about the /lib64/security/pam_ldap.so > dependency. However, one issue concerns me: > /lib64/libnss_ldap.so.2 > /usr/lib64/libnss_ldap-264.so > /usr/lib64/libnss_ldap.so > /usr/lib64/libnss_ldap.so.2 > This brings up a couple of issues: > > Does the library really need to live in the root directory? Generally we try > not to install things there unless they're absolutely required that early in > the boot process (or for recovery). I know it conveniently avoids a conflict > in this case, but I'm wondering if it's just done that way because of the > conflict or if there's another reason. It doesn't need to live in /%{_lib}, but by convention nsswitch modules, following largely from what glibc does with its own modules, have been put there anyway. In practice, any location in the shared library path will do. The main reason to move one elsewhere is admitting that it has dependencies that will never be satisfiable without a working /usr. In this case, though, it avoids having to deal with file conflicts or working something out with alternatives (which I actually tried doing, but trying to select the "right" one without requiring manual intervention didn't lend itself to any elegant solutions). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 18:29:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:29:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496880] Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211829.n3LITRiG019363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-21 14:29:26 EDT --- Branched the library into its own package. Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/wannier90.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/wannier90-1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 18:27:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:27:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458279] Review Request: python-arm4 - Python language bindings for Applicatioon Response Measurement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211827.n3LIRr97019176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458279 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Till Maas 2009-04-21 14:27:51 EDT --- [OK] rpmlint output: silent [OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format [OK] license allowed: EPL [OK] license matches shortname in License: tag [NOT OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: COPYING should be %doc, because it specifies the license terms a local copy of the actual license would be nice there btw. [OK] package is code or permissive content: {N/A} patches sent to upstream and commented [OK] Source0 is a working URL {OK} Sourceforge URL is Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name} [OK] Source0 matches Upstream: 34571617ff63b28b6d28fd6d92030b04 arm4module-1.1.tar.gz [OK] Package builds on all primary architectures: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1311916 [N/A] ExcludeArch bugs are filed and commented: [OK] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds) (OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin [N/A] %find_lang used for locales [N/A] Every (sub)package containing libraries runs ldconfig %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig [N/A] .h (header) files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] .a (static libraries) are in -static subpackage [N/A] contains .pc (pkgconfig) files and has Requires: pkgconfig (N/A) .pc files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] contains .so.X(.Y) files and .so is in -devel [N/A] -devel subpackage has Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [N/A] .la files (libtool) are not included [N/A] Has GUI and includes %{name}.desktop [N/A] Follows desktop entry spec [N/A] Valid .desktop Name [N/A] Valid .desktop GenericName [N/A] Valid .desktop Categories [N/A] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [N/A] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install [OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable) [OK] Owns all created directories [OK] no duplicates in %files [OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages [OK] included filenames are in UTF-8 [OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] Consistent macro usage [OK] large documentation is -doc subpackage [OK] %doc does not affect runtime {OK} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) {OK} well known BuildRoot nearly this one: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) {OK} PreReq not used {OK} RPM_OPT_FLAGS honoured {OK} Useful debuginfo generated {OK} no duplication of system libraries {OK} no rpath {OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install {N/A} Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) {OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used {OK} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and %{buildroot} on %install and %clean) {OK} no Conflicts {OK} nothing installed in /srv {OK} Changelog in allowed format {OK} does not use Scriptlets Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch Sane Provides: and Requires: {OK} Follows Naming Guidelines {NOT OK} Has BuildRequires: python BR: is python2-devel, this should probably be python-devel {N/A} Defines and uses %{python_sitelib}: {OK} Defines and uses %{python_sitearch}: %{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from %distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} {UNCLEAR} Has BuildRequires: python-setuptools I am not sure, whether this is required or not, but certainly it is not in the spec. [OK] Python eggs must be built from source. They cannot simply drop an egg from upstream into the proper directory. [OK] Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [OK] If egg-info files are generated by the modules build scripts they must be included in the package. [N/A] When building a compat package, it must install using easy_install -m so it won't conflict with the main package. [N/A] When building multiple versions (for a compat package) one of the packages must contain a default version that is usable via "import MODULE" with no prior setup. (OK) A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. {OK} Egg install: %install %{__python} setup.py install --skip-build --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Other issues: Mixed whitespace: There are tabs uses after BR: arm4-devel and Requires: arm4, please use spaces here or use everywhere tabs. Please add COPYING to %doc, change python2-devel to python-devel and add BR: python-setuptools to the spec or reason, why you want to keep it the way it is and also fix the whitespace before importing this to CVS. Because the issues found are minor, the package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 18:38:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:38:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211838.n3LIcfO4017307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #58 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-04-21 14:38:39 EDT --- To benefit upstream the following bugs may be submitted: * Bugs in configure. First, ppc64 case should be added to target switch in configure.in (as powerpc64-*-linux* or so). And proper libdir set there. * Bug in autogen.sh. It relies on libtool message to get location of aclocal.m4. But in this case, in new libtool message that message somehow changed and pattern didn't handle that. Consider using of aclocal for this task (like autoreconf does). Fixing this bugs upstream will benefit them. But this won't have influnce on review as workarounds were made in spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 19:03:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211903.n3LJ3B9s026500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-21 15:03:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > Actually, there are still some things to fix, at least directory ownership: the > > package should Requires: hicolor-icon-theme. > > > > Good catch, fixed in CVS, will get picked up the next build. Maybe I'd better do a full review still, just in case. Reopening; don't do a release until I reclose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 19:07:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211907.n3LJ7h5D027740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-04-21 15:07:42 EDT --- > It does not; autofs doesn't use libc's nsswitch subsystem to look up automount > information I guess the "automount:" line in nsswitch.conf is confusing. Lack of caching of autofs lookups is the other half of the problem (or at least my problem). Completely off topic here, though. > It doesn't need to live in /%{_lib}, but by convention nsswitch modules, > following largely from what glibc does with its own modules, have been put > there anyway. Oh, good point. I guess nss_ldap is the one that's out of sorts, placing its libraries under /usr/lib instead. > In this case, though, it avoids having to deal with file conflicts or working > something out with alternatives (which I actually tried doing, but trying to > select the "right" one without requiring manual intervention didn't lend itself > to any elegant solutions). Indeed, I can't imagine how you would do this with alternatives. So where do we go from here? I think that from a packaging standpoint this is good, but without support from the selinux policy it's not as useful and the interactions with nscd are problematic (although it seems that at least some of the problems I'm seeing are due to nscd's negative caching). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 19:23:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492834] Review Request: spawn-fcgi - Simple program for spawning FastCGI processes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211923.n3LJNTAd031566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492834 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2009-04-21 15:23:27 EDT --- [OK] rpmlint output: silent [OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format [OK] license allowed: BSD [OK] license matches shortname in License: tag [OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: COPYING [OK] package is code or permissive content: {N/A} patches sent to upstream and commented [OK] Source0 is a working URL {N/A} Sourceforge URL is Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name} [OK] Source0 matches Upstream: ae893d12943fd4cd38a0a38835263c80 spawn-fcgi-1.6.1.tar.bz2 [OK] Package builds on all primary architectures: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1312054 [N/A] ExcludeArch bugs are filed and commented: [OK] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds) (OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin [N/A] %find_lang used for locales [N/A] Every (sub)package containing libraries runs ldconfig %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig [N/A] .h (header) files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] .a (static libraries) are in -static subpackage [N/A] contains .pc (pkgconfig) files and has Requires: pkgconfig (N/A) .pc files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] contains .so.X(.Y) files and .so is in -devel [N/A] -devel subpackage has Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [N/A] .la files (libtool) are not included [N/A] Has GUI and includes %{name}.desktop [N/A] Follows desktop entry spec [N/A] Valid .desktop Name [N/A] Valid .desktop GenericName [N/A] Valid .desktop Categories [N/A] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [N/A] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install [OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable) [OK] Owns all created directories [OK] no duplicates in %files [OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages [OK] included filenames are in UTF-8 [OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] Consistent macro usage [OK] large documentation is -doc subpackage {OK} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries find -print0 -type f | xargs -0 file | cut -d" " -f 2- | sed 's/^ *//' | sort -u {OK} well known BuildRoot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root {OK} PreReq not used {OK} RPM_OPT_FLAGS honoured {OK} Useful debuginfo generated {OK} no duplication of system libraries {OK} no rpath {OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install {OK} Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) {OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used {OK} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and %{buildroot} on %install and %clean) {OK} no Conflicts {OK} nothing installed in /srv {OK} Changelog in allowed format {OK} does not use Scriptlets Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch Sane Provides: and Requires: {OK} Follows Naming Guidelines minor issue: %files contains a -n spawn-fcgi, this should be removed before CVS import. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 19:35:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211935.n3LJZnUB031239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-21 15:35:47 EDT --- Reviewing version 3.2.5-19.a found in koji. - Other missing Requires: Common uses update-desktop-database => Requires(post): desktop-file-utils rpmlint output: xfig.x86_64: W: no-documentation xfig-plain.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. ~OK - Quite a few undocumented patches. A reason SHOULD be documented for having each patch. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. NEEDSFIX - Source not available upstream for this release. MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK [fixed in CVS] MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSFIX - Include in package: CHANGES, README, LATEX.AND.XFIG*, FIGAPPS MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSFIX - README contains license, which should be added in %doc as mentioned above. SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 19:40:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:40:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241095] Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211940.n3LJeKBF003509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241095 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-21 15:40:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 19:42:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:42:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211942.n3LJgsjF000606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-21 15:42:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 19:42:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211942.n3LJg5kn000428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #24 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-21 15:42:01 EDT --- There already is a F-11 branch. Note that you may have to do a 'cvs update -d' to see it locally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 19:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl -Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211944.n3LJi6KP004002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-21 15:44:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 19:46:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:46:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211946.n3LJkK1r004695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-21 15:46:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 19:45:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:45:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211945.n3LJj50e001240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #24 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-21 15:45:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 19:49:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458279] Review Request: python-arm4 - Python language bindings for Applicatioon Response Measurement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211949.n3LJnH1q005268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458279 David Carter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from David Carter 2009-04-21 15:49:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-arm4 Short Description: Python language bindings for Application Response Measurement V4.0 Owners: grandcross Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 19:50:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211950.n3LJo3H7002429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-21 15:50:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 19:52:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491614] Review Request: mingw32-libglademm24 - C++ wrapper for libglade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211952.n3LJqmUF006267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-21 15:52:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 19:57:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211957.n3LJvEvT003876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-21 15:57:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 19:54:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:54:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492130] Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211954.n3LJsM03003135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-21 15:54:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 20:01:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212001.n3LK1DWJ008322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-21 16:01:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 20:05:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458279] Review Request: python-arm4 - Python language bindings for Applicatioon Response Measurement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212005.n3LK5ic8009594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458279 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-21 16:05:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 20:11:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496166] Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212011.n3LKBgf3011602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496166 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-21 16:11:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 20:08:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495237] Review Request: python-hash_ring - Python implementation of consistent hashing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212008.n3LK84Bi010483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495237 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-21 16:08:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 20:10:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:10:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212010.n3LKAjmS011436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-21 16:10:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 20:21:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:21:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496424] Review Request: perl-Test-Aggregate - Aggregate C<*.t> tests to make them run faster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212021.n3LKL5qP009955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496424 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-21 16:21:04 EDT --- I assume you want a F-11 branch here as well. cvs done with F-11 added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 20:23:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496425] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check - Wrap OP check callbacks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212023.n3LKNkUl014172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496425 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-21 16:23:45 EDT --- I assume you wanted a F-11 branch as well. cvs done with F-11 added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 20:27:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496606] Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212027.n3LKRvhB015248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496606 Bug 496606 depends on bug 496890, which changed state. Bug 496890 Summary: perl-IO-LockedFile not available in EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496890 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 20:56:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:56:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212056.n3LKuiYJ021007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-21 16:56:44 EDT --- Just build this in the rawhide so I can jump on the next one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 20:53:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212053.n3LKru0V020274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-21 16:53:54 EDT --- I see that you updated all the packages with the license files in the tarballs already. That's good. I checked this package and found no problems. Also I made a rawhide build in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1312177 I downloaded and tested the resulting RPMs. Everything seems good. ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (globus-gsi-openssl-error) is APPROVED by oget ----------------------------------------------------------- We are almost out of the bottle neck :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 20:59:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212059.n3LKxYV7021501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496968(DebugInfo) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 21:04:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:04:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212104.n3LL4Prd022693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 17:04:23 EDT --- powwow-1.2.14-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/powwow-1.2.14-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 21:04:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212104.n3LL4TJc018449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 17:04:29 EDT --- powwow-1.2.14-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/powwow-1.2.14-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 21:04:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212104.n3LL4YK9018482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 17:04:34 EDT --- powwow-1.2.14-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/powwow-1.2.14-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 21:13:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212113.n3LLDXEi024423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 --- Comment #6 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-21 17:13:32 EDT --- sorry I really don't understand if I make a rpm --showrc , these macros are there (f10) and if not %{_iconsdir}, %{_liconsdir}, %{_miconsdir}, then what else ? Have you a suggestion ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 21:26:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496425] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check - Wrap OP check callbacks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212126.n3LLQoCH027204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496425 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-21 17:26:50 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 21:26:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496424] Review Request: perl-Test-Aggregate - Aggregate C<*.t> tests to make them run faster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212126.n3LLQdUp027169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496424 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-21 17:26:38 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 22:00:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:00:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492834] Review Request: spawn-fcgi - Simple program for spawning FastCGI processes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212200.n3LM0CMf001316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492834 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Saou 2009-04-21 18:00:10 EDT --- Thanks a lot for this thorough review! * Tue Apr 21 2009 Matthias Saou 1.6.2-1 - Update to 1.6.2. - Remove leftover -f from %%files section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 22:38:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:38:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212238.n3LMcHtU008358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 --- Comment #21 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-04-21 18:38:15 EDT --- Ok, I changed the patch per your suggestion and I am rebuilding the package. I will try to chase upstream, but being last release in 2004 I doubt there will be any reaction... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 22:40:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:40:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212240.n3LMeZqY008987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #71 from Michael Hideo 2009-04-21 18:40:31 EDT --- Thanks again, Jens for the patch. I have tested it in the build system, the indexer and the catalog systems and they are good! Well done! I do have one concern that I need to talk to some folks about and that is how to coordinate who does the rpm rolling of translated content and how they are going to make sure that multiple writers/translators, accountable for multiple branches, don't clobber each other's rpms. I need to think that through. - Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 22:41:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:41:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212241.n3LMfVmm004406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #72 from Michael Hideo 2009-04-21 18:41:30 EDT --- okay, so my plan is to talk to the writers and translation to get their feedback on replacing the product and edition tags and see how that will effect them. thank you again! ok cool - glad to be of assistance though maybe the current map: edition -> rpmversion pubsnum -> rpmrelease product version -> disttag ahh yes, clever! is workable anyway I feel for rhel at least jboss might be harder, dunno -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 23:05:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496166] Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212305.n3LN5hIn013078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496166 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 19:05:43 EDT --- sakura-2.3.3-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sakura-2.3.3-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 23:06:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:06:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496166] Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212306.n3LN6qrS013201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496166 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-21 19:06:51 EDT --- No package for F-9, because vte is too old. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 23:04:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496166] Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212304.n3LN4i6R007941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496166 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 19:04:43 EDT --- sakura-2.3.3-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sakura-2.3.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 23:08:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:08:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212308.n3LN8JUD008558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 --- Comment #11 from Christian Krause 2009-04-21 19:08:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) I've looked at the newest package and it looks quite good besides the following enhancement of the permission management for the mouse's device file. > - Added the rules file for udev Instead of the udev rule which sets the permissions of the device file to 0666 I would suggest the following: Add a hal rule to /usr/share/hal/fdi/policy/10osvendor: - let hal set for the specific vendor/device ID of the mice additional permissions for the local user (it is already done for mice for the /dev/input/event* device) for the "linux.device_file" (/dev/bus/usb/*/*). - make sure the number is lower than 20 (which defines the acl actions) I've attached a sample file which changes the permissions of linux's device file associated with a specific vendor and device id (which must be filled out). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 23:10:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212310.n3LNAUnd013945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 --- Comment #12 from Christian Krause 2009-04-21 19:10:29 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=340650) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=340650) sample hal policy file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 23:16:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:16:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453815] Review Request: globus-* - The Globus Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212316.n3LNGjND015007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453815 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Bug 453815 depends on bug 453847, which changed state. Bug 453847 Summary: Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453815 depends on bug 453848, which changed state. Bug 453848 Summary: Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453815 depends on bug 453849, which changed state. Bug 453849 Summary: Review Request: globus-libtool - Globus Toolkit - Globus libtool package (virtual GPT glue package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453849 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453815 depends on bug 453851, which changed state. Bug 453851 Summary: Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-21 19:16:43 EDT --- For the packages which carry modified tarballs from upstream we need to have one of the following happen: * Find out if upstream is willing to release multiple tarballs per component. Since they release multiple tarballs for their updates, this might not be a problem for them to do. having these split up will also help other distributions to package this software so it's something we should ask upstream about no matter what the results of the other option are. * Get a ruling from the Packaging committee about whether this is a case where the tarball can be split up by us or if we have to use the vanilla upstream tarball. This is definitely not one of the cases envisioned by the FPC for the current Guidelines. However, it could be a new use case that they will add to the Guidelines. But you'll have to make your case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 23:19:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:19:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212319.n3LNJ5nK010274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #340650|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 23:40:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:40:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497001] New: Review Request: auto-nng - A software for analysis and classification of data, using AI NN Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: auto-nng - A software for analysis and classification of data, using AI NN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497001 Summary: Review Request: auto-nng - A software for analysis and classification of data, using AI NN Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian.deutsch at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/autonng/1/auto-nng.spec SRPM URL: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/autonng/1/auto-nng-1.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: You can feed an amount of datasets consisting of certain input and output parameters into the program, to make it try to find a mathematical correlation between the input and output parameters. Afterwards the program tries to calculate the output parameters for datasets which only have known input parameters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 23:52:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:52:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453815] Review Request: globus-* - The Globus Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212352.n3LNqxfe020671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453815 --- Comment #5 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-21 19:52:58 EDT --- Mattias has proposed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 23:57:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:57:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904212357.n3LNvXNf016275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 --- Comment #1 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-04-21 19:57:31 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-yong-1.1.0.20090422-1.fc12.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-yong.spec Tarball URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-yong-1.1.0.20090422.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:48:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220048.n3M0mOXS024247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:48:22 EDT --- mingw32-libp11-0.2.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:48:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491617] Review Request: mingw32-libxml++ - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for libxml2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220048.n3M0mqKt024379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491617 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.24.2-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:48:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:48:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220048.n3M0mSQr024300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2.4-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:48:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:48:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491617] Review Request: mingw32-libxml++ - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for libxml2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220048.n3M0mlrM029220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491617 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:48:46 EDT --- mingw32-libxml++-2.24.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:48:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:48:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - Free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220048.n3M0m4J3029035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:48:03 EDT --- kvirc-4.0.0-0.6.20090409svn3173.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:51:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:51:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220051.n3M0pVIT030378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:51:31 EDT --- globus-openssl-3.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:51:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:51:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489550] Review Request: qtscriptgenerator - A tool to generate Qt bindings for Qt Script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220051.n3M0pPPH030336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489550 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.1.0-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:49:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:49:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494965] Review Request: pianobooster - A MIDI file player that teaches you how to play the piano In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220049.n3M0n1gs029294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494965 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:49:00 EDT --- pianobooster-0.6.2-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:50:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491862] Review Request: kde-style-skulpture - Classical three-dimensional style for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220050.n3M0omTf030222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491862 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2.2-4.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:49:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494965] Review Request: pianobooster - A MIDI file player that teaches you how to play the piano In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220049.n3M0n6bw029331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494965 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6.2-4.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:48:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:48:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - Free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220048.n3M0mAYE029086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |4.0.0-0.6.20090409svn3173.f | |c9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:52:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495950] Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220052.n3M0qDO6030495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495950 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:52:12 EDT --- safecopy-1.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update safecopy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3783 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:50:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220050.n3M0odQS030188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:50:37 EDT --- libgarmin-0-0.6.20090212svn.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update libgarmin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3770 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:48:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495418] Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220048.n3M0mJ5x029126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495418 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:48:18 EDT --- python-upoints-0.11.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-upoints'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3757 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:51:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495372] Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220051.n3M0p3CP030277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495372 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:51:01 EDT --- python-altgraph-0.6.7-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update python-altgraph'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3772 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:50:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220050.n3M0otAp025255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:50:54 EDT --- dnsjava-2.0.6-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:51:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:51:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489550] Review Request: qtscriptgenerator - A tool to generate Qt bindings for Qt Script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220051.n3M0pKpM025485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489550 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:51:19 EDT --- qtscriptgenerator-0.1.0-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:51:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:51:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220051.n3M0p8Yh025379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:51:07 EDT --- globus-openssl-3.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:51:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:51:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220051.n3M0paLc025542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.0-1.fc9 |3.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:50:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491862] Review Request: kde-style-skulpture - Classical three-dimensional style for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220050.n3M0ohSv025191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491862 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:50:42 EDT --- kde-style-skulpture-0.2.2-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:54:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495282] Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220054.n3M0sCPK026119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495282 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:51:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220051.n3M0pDJm025438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.0-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:51:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:51:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495418] Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220051.n3M0ptuE025610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495418 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:51:54 EDT --- python-upoints-0.11.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update python-upoints'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3778 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:52:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:52:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220052.n3M0qrR8025798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:52:52 EDT --- gpscorrelate-1.6.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update gpscorrelate'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3793 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:57:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:57:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493603] Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220057.n3M0vAC8032538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493603 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:57:09 EDT --- unclutter-8-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:54:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495282] Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220054.n3M0s8rv031354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495282 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:54:07 EDT --- python-pyrad-1.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:55:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485961] Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220055.n3M0tMdm032069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485961 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:55:19 EDT --- gmusicbrowser-1.0.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:55:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:55:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485961] Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220055.n3M0tQ9X032117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485961 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.1-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:55:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:55:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489418] Review Request: nssbackup - (Not so) Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220055.n3M0tuWT032207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489418 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2-0.2.rc7.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:56:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492990] Review Request: zynjacku - LV2 synths and plugins host In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220056.n3M0uuHR032501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:56:54 EDT --- zynjacku-4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update zynjacku'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3814 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:56:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:56:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491758] Review Request: mingw32-opensc - MingGW Windows OpenSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220056.n3M0uPL3032372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491758 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:56:24 EDT --- mingw32-opensc-0.11.7-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mingw32-opensc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3810 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:56:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493603] Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220056.n3M0uemj027490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493603 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:56:39 EDT --- unclutter-8-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:57:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:57:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495336] Review Request: perl-Sort-Key - Fastest way to sort anything in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220057.n3M0vNPU027701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495336 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:57:22 EDT --- perl-Sort-Key-1.28-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:55:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489418] Review Request: nssbackup - (Not so) Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220055.n3M0tpmH027258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489418 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:55:50 EDT --- nssbackup-0.2-0.2.rc7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:59:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489633] Review Request: mingw32-physfs - MinGW Windows port of the PhysicsFS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220059.n3M0x4Xi028079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489633 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:59:03 EDT --- mingw32-physfs-1.0.1-12.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:57:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493603] Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220057.n3M0vEHw027661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493603 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|8-2.fc9 |8-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:56:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493603] Review Request: unclutter - hide mouse cursor when idle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220056.n3M0ujFp027531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493603 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |8-2.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495950] Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220059.n3M0xEaS028138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495950 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:59:13 EDT --- safecopy-1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update safecopy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3824 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:55:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220055.n3M0t9wD027124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:55:08 EDT --- libgarmin-0-0.6.20090212svn.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libgarmin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3799 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:55:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220055.n3M0tFZH027152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 20:55:14 EDT --- gpscorrelate-1.6.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gpscorrelate'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3800 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 00:57:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495336] Review Request: perl-Sort-Key - Fastest way to sort anything in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220057.n3M0vSfQ000441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495336 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.28-1.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:02:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:02:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495282] Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220102.n3M12pvE029542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495282 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 21:02:50 EDT --- python-pyrad-1.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:01:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:01:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - Free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220101.n3M11QZR029251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 21:01:25 EDT --- kvirc-4.0.0-0.6.20090409svn3173.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:02:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:02:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495282] Review Request: python-pyrad - Python RADIUS client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220102.n3M12uQp029569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495282 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1-2.fc10 |1.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:02:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:02:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220102.n3M12dn7029507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 21:02:38 EDT --- kcometen4-1.0.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:01:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:01:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489550] Review Request: qtscriptgenerator - A tool to generate Qt bindings for Qt Script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220101.n3M11hjM029341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489550 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 21:01:42 EDT --- qtscriptgenerator-0.1.0-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:01:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:01:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489550] Review Request: qtscriptgenerator - A tool to generate Qt bindings for Qt Script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220101.n3M11mUq029374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489550 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1.0-5.fc9 |0.1.0-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:01:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - Free portable IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220101.n3M11W9x029299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|4.0.0-0.6.20090409svn3173.f |4.0.0-0.6.20090409svn3173.f |c9 |c10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:05:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:05:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220105.n3M15MRa003013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 21:05:20 EDT --- systemtapguiserver-1.0-8.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491862] Review Request: kde-style-skulpture - Classical three-dimensional style for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220107.n3M17CWr003594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491862 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 21:07:11 EDT --- kde-style-skulpture-0.2.2-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:07:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491862] Review Request: kde-style-skulpture - Classical three-dimensional style for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220107.n3M17G85003625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491862 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2.2-4.fc10 |0.2.2-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:05:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220105.n3M15Rvo003077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0-8.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:02:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:02:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220102.n3M12iE8002100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.4-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:07:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:07:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220107.n3M17Oqd031123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 21:07:23 EDT --- php-feedcreator-1.7.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:04:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:04:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495398] Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220104.n3M14StJ030221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495398 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 21:04:27 EDT --- perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:07:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220107.n3M17qm7031198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.4-2.fc10 |1.0.4-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:04:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:04:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495398] Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220104.n3M14XRE030310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495398 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.41-3.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:07:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220107.n3M17bNr004097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 21:07:37 EDT --- php-feedcreator-1.7.2-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:07:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:07:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220107.n3M17fWc004131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.7.2-3.fc10 |1.7.2-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:10:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:10:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492133] Review Request: mingw32-libglade2 - MinGW Windows Libglade2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220110.n3M1AYoe005251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492133 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 21:10:33 EDT --- mingw32-libglade2-2.6.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:07:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:07:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220107.n3M17mnY004173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 21:07:47 EDT --- kcometen4-1.0.4-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:07:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220107.n3M17STw004011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.7.2-3.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220110.n3M1ARvh032584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 21:10:26 EDT --- dnsjava-2.0.6-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:09:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:09:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485416] Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220109.n3M19xjg032186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485416 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 21:09:58 EDT --- msp430-gcc-3.2.3-2.20090210cvs.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:10:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:10:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492133] Review Request: mingw32-libglade2 - MinGW Windows Libglade2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220110.n3M1AcvT032644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492133 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.6.3-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:10:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:10:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485416] Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220110.n3M1A5sJ032519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485416 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.2.3-2.20090210cvs.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:11:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:11:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495372] Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220111.n3M1BDm6000465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495372 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 21:11:12 EDT --- python-altgraph-0.6.7-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-altgraph'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3866 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:15:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496824] Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220115.n3M1FTY6006523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496824 --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-21 21:15:29 EDT --- Yes, you're right. updated. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-gothic-fonts/ipa-gothic-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-gothic-fonts/ipa-gothic-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:15:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421871] Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220115.n3M1F1pj006194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421871 --- Comment #10 from Kaitlin Rupert 2009-04-21 21:14:58 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libvirt-cim New Branches: dist-f11 Owners: kaitlin, danms Add Fedora 11 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:59:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:59:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453854] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220159.n3M1xQ2I014097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 453854 depends on bug 453850, which changed state. Bug 453850 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-21 21:59:25 EDT --- These packages are almost identical so these reviews can go faster than usual. This one is good too. It builds in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1313748 I checked the built RPMs, there are no issues. There is one tiny thing, which is by no means a blocker: When you use %{_docdir}/... in %files, you don't need to tag it with %doc. It just doesn't matter. FYI ------------------------------------------------------- This package (globus-gsi-proxy-ssl) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 02:53:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:53:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496827] Review Request: ipa-pmincho-fonts - Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220253.n3M2r6WT021263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496827 --- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-21 22:53:06 EDT --- Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-pmincho-fonts/ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-pmincho-fonts/ipa-pmincho-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm Just updated to correct the source URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 02:53:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496826] Review Request: ipa-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220253.n3M2rbfA021353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496826 --- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-21 22:53:36 EDT --- Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-mincho-fonts/ipa-mincho-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-mincho-fonts/ipa-mincho-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm Just updated to correct the source URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 02:52:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220252.n3M2qTed021196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-21 22:52:28 EDT --- Yes, you're right. updated. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-pgothic-fonts/ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-pgothic-fonts/ipa-pgothic-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 03:38:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496429] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange - Invoke callbacks when the stash code is being compiled in changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220338.n3M3ctRu029287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496429 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |iarnell at gmail.com Bug 496429 depends on bug 496425, which changed state. Bug 496425 Summary: Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check - Wrap OP check callbacks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496425 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-21 23:38:54 EDT --- Fails to build in mock (missing BR ExtUtils::Depend) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1313832 And there's a 0.06 release now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 03:42:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:42:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495440] Review Request: perl-Devel-FastProf - Fast perl per-line profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220342.n3M3gFcO030051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495440 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-21 23:42:14 EDT --- perl-Devel-FastProf-0.08-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-FastProf-0.08-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 03:43:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495440] Review Request: perl-Devel-FastProf - Fast perl per-line profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220343.n3M3hCHS030161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495440 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 04:00:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220400.n3M40sXN000559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-22 00:00:53 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1313840 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 3d8a91a171e16c6eac4c9c2f2b3ac218 ibus-table-yong-1.1.0.20090422.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. Suggestions: 1) I think its ok to drop following line from %description Erbi is released under released under GPLv3. or modify to replace Erbi to Yong 2) can you remove following %verify(not md5 size mtime) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 04:17:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:17:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220417.n3M4HMb5003681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #59 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-22 00:17:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #57) > All builds are ok > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1311836 > > http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird.spec > http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-2.fc10.src.rpm > upgraded > > Seems that now rpmlint results are better > I shouldn't trust as much the previous work that was made ;) Ok, we almost finished. But few issues still remains: * Do not use grep while searching for users and grups. Although you're searching for already created user in a correct way, your attempt to check whether or not firebird group exists needs fixing. See comments from Pavel, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100#c17 and from Wart, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100#c18 . I suggest you to use getent group %{name} instead if grepping /etc/group. - grep -q %{name} /etc/group || /usr/sbin/groupadd -r %{name} || true + getent group %{name} || /usr/sbin/groupadd -r %{name} || true * I don't fully understand "|| true" at the end of oneliners for safe user/group creation. Are you assuming that there is a chance that user/group creation will fail? Should we simply abort installation in this case? I'm waiting for scratchbuild at F-10 ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1313853 ), but seems that trick with autoreconf works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 04:27:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496429] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange - Invoke callbacks when the stash code is being compiled in changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220427.n3M4RxSk009098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496429 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-22 00:27:58 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange-0.05-2.fc10.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1313887 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 04:32:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496429] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange - Invoke callbacks when the stash code is being compiled in changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220432.n3M4WxWp009879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496429 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-22 00:32:58 EDT --- Doh... that'll teach me to not scroll down and read the whole email :) Updating... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 04:43:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:43:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497035] New: Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 Summary: Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/creox.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/creox-0.2.2-0.1.rc2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Creox is a real-time sound processor. You can plug your electric guitar or any other musical instrument directly to the PC's sound card and start experimenting with various sound effects. Creox has a nice user-friendly GUI, a preset support, a low-latency DSP engine and each effect parameter can be altered "on the fly". As the creox is a JACK application, the output sound can be routed to the other JACK-aware applications and the input audio can be taken as the output from the other JACK client. Rpmlint: creox.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/creox/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common This is a typical KDE application rpmlint and this link is satisfied through the dependency chain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 04:43:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220443.n3M4hgfk011514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-22 00:43:41 EDT --- Koji build (dist-f12): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1313893 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 05:01:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220501.n3M51rPj015019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 05:01:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:01:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453854] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220501.n3M51TZS014939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 --- Comment #8 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-22 01:01:28 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 05:01:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:01:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220501.n3M51QOs014907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 Bug 453853 depends on bug 453850, which changed state. Bug 453850 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-22 01:01:25 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-gsi-openssl-error Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 05:02:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453854] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220502.n3M5249o010995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 05:08:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496429] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange - Invoke callbacks when the stash code is being compiled in changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220508.n3M58qq1012026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496429 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-22 01:08:51 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange-0.06-1.fc10.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1313904 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 05:47:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496429] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange - Invoke callbacks when the stash code is being compiled in changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220547.n3M5l014022513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496429 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |iarnell at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-22 01:46:59 EDT --- + source files match upstream. a56d9faf09f182af59384e56057bb1f0a79f89d4 B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange-0.06.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1313904 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has acceptable warnings (and there's not much you can do about the debuginfo error): perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange.ppc: I: checking perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange.ppc: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/ppc-linux-thread-multi/B/Hooks/OP/Check/StashChange/Install/hook_op_check_stashchange.h perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange-debuginfo.ppc: I: checking perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange-debuginfo.ppc: E: description-line-too-long This package provides debug information for package perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange. perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange.src: I: checking 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(B::Hooks::OP::Check::StashChange) = 0.06 perl(B::Hooks::OP::Check::StashChange::Install::Files) perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange = 0.06-1.fc12 perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange(ppc-32) = 0.06-1.fc12 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) perl(B::Hooks::OP::Check) perl(parent) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + %check is present and all tests pass. All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=4, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.11 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.18 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 05:51:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487148] Review Request: gearmand - A distributed job system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220551.n3M5pvAg019200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487148 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-22 01:51:56 EDT --- 404 while retrieving files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 05:52:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496429] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange - Invoke callbacks when the stash code is being compiled in changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220552.n3M5qlWL023523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496429 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 05:52:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:52:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496429] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange - Invoke callbacks when the stash code is being compiled in changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220552.n3M5qjL1023503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496429 --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-22 01:52:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange Short Description: Invoke callbacks when the stash code is being compiled in changes Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 05:54:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:54:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487587] Review Request: debuginfofs - network-mountable filesystem for debuginfo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220554.n3M5s63Q023653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487587 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-22 01:54:05 EDT --- Suravee, are you willing to continue your review? You started very good, and, I think, you should continue reviewing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 05:58:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:58:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482763] Review Request: compat-guichan07 - compatibility libraries for guichan 0.7.1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220558.n3M5wasH020191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482763 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-22 01:58:35 EDT --- Ping, Wart. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 05:55:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220555.n3M5tpDL019851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Alias| |kinterbasdb Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-22 01:55:50 EDT --- I'll review it (after we'll finish with firebird). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 06:05:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 02:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220605.n3M650qx025591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 06:04:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 02:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220604.n3M64xCn025549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |477750 Bug 496433 depends on bug 492690, which changed state. Bug 492690 Summary: Review Request: kvirc - Free portable IRC client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 06:17:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 02:17:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220617.n3M6H67r027800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 --- Comment #24 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-22 02:17:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > There is a file conflict between globus-common-progs and grid-packaging-tools. > > The file /usr/share/globus/config.guess exists in both packages. This must be > sorted out. Is this file really needed in any of these packages? The issue with the duplicate files has been reported as a separate bug #496921. For further comments on this issue please add them to that bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 06:13:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 02:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220613.n3M6D9Tp027108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 --- Comment #17 from Johan Vromans 2009-04-22 02:13:08 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/EekBoek.spec SRPM URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/EekBoek-1.04.03-3.fc11.src.rpm Description: EekBoek is a bookkeeping package for small and medium-size businesses. Unlike other accounting software, EekBoek has both a command-line interface (CLI) and a graphical user-interface (GUI, currently under development). Furthermore, it has a complete Perl API to create your own custom applications. EekBoek is designed for the Dutch/European market and currently available in Dutch only. An English translation is in the works (help appreciated). The spec file is non-trivial but well commented. The spec file and rpms are rpmlint free with the exception of two files that are not utf8. This is intentional, these files need to be latin1. Same as 1.04.03-2, with Epoch: removed. Results of last koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1313959 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 06:22:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 02:22:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220622.n3M6Mel3024058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 --- Comment #7 from Zarko 2009-04-22 02:22:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > sorry I really don't understand > if I make a rpm --showrc , these macros are there (f10) > > and if not %{_iconsdir}, %{_liconsdir}, %{_miconsdir}, then what else ? > Have you a suggestion ? I currently have three Fedora installations on my PC Two of F10 and one of F11 branches Only at one of my Fedora branches I have these macros defined, so I suggest to you that change these macros with: %{_iconsdir} change to: %{_datadir}/icons %{_liconsdir} change to: %{_datadir}/icons/large %{_miconsdir} change to: %{_datadir}/icons/mini Or, why you do not put these icons to standard dirs, like: %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/%{name}.png %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/%{name}.png %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/%{name}.png and reformat install and convert commands at %install section to use these dirs, and after that simply refresh icons cache? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 06:32:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 02:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220632.n3M6WI9A030630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #60 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-22 02:32:16 EDT --- sorry I forget this one ok http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird.spec upgraded http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-3.fc10.src.rpm available -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 06:49:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 02:49:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495237] Review Request: python-hash_ring - Python implementation of consistent hashing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220649.n3M6nXOA001108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495237 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Silas Sewell 2009-04-22 02:49:32 EDT --- Built. Thanks Jussi and Kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 07:46:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 03:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225769] Merge Review: freeradius In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220746.n3M7kLQ5007704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225769 Thomas Woerner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|twoerner at redhat.com |jdennis at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Thomas Woerner 2009-04-22 03:46:20 EDT --- jdennis is the maintainer, now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:01:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496824] Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220801.n3M81ZUQ015251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496824 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-22 04:01:33 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1313843 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. ipa-gothic-fonts.src: W: invalid-license IPA ipa-gothic-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license IPA ==> ignored as its present in wiki list. rpmlint need to be updated. + source files match upstream url 5ae6783ec8c1e0c6579eb2033bfc78f9 ipag00301.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts packaging guidelines used. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220801.n3M81U9o015214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-22 04:01:29 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1313839 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. ipa-pgothic-fonts.src: W: invalid-license IPA ipa-pgothic-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license IPA ==> ignored as its present in wiki list. rpmlint need to be updated. + source files match upstream url ab5e7e962b358a5579d08f09a9d07ebf ipagp00301.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts packaging guidelines used. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:05:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496651] Review Request: Kazakh hunspell dictionaries - hunspell-kk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220805.n3M85t0R016326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496651 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-22 04:05:54 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1313898 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 5d48b713f0252c0697edd3bd2e6fb289 dict-kk.oxt + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:16:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:16:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220816.n3M8GPqi018621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-22 04:16:23 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ipa-pgothic-fonts Short Description: Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-11 F-10 F-9 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:15:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496824] Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220815.n3M8FHP9013522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496824 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-22 04:15:15 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ipa-gothic-fonts Short Description: Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-11 F-10 F-9 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:16:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:16:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220816.n3M8GLR0013795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-22 04:16:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Spec URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/EekBoek.spec > SRPM URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/EekBoek-1.04.03-3.fc11.src.rpm Looks fine to me now, approved! Johan, can you please apply for packager group member ship in the account system (if you haven't done that already), and tell me your FAS username, then I'll sponsor you. Regards, Hans -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:17:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:17:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496827] Review Request: ipa-pmincho-fonts - Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220817.n3M8Hrs6013966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496827 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-22 04:17:52 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1314104 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. ipa-pmincho-fonts.src: W: invalid-license IPA ipa-pmincho-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license IPA ==> ignored as its present in wiki list. rpmlint need to be updated. + source files match upstream url be6bd5e5f09da8773d0361128340a0f1 ipamp00301.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts packaging guidelines used. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:18:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496826] Review Request: ipa-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220818.n3M8IAOE018904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496826 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-22 04:18:08 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1314105 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. ipa-mincho-fonts.src: W: invalid-license IPA ipa-mincho-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license IPA ==> ignored as its present in wiki list. rpmlint need to be updated. + source files match upstream url 583645bf37f787b2edec30e7d763e8b3 ipam00301.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts packaging guidelines used. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:24:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:24:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496827] Review Request: ipa-pmincho-fonts - Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220824.n3M8OE3R020040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496827 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-22 04:24:13 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing so quick :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ipa-pmincho-fonts Short Description: Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-11 F-10 F-9 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:24:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:24:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496651] Review Request: Kazakh hunspell dictionaries - hunspell-kk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220824.n3M8Oquu015165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496651 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-04-22 04:24:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-kk Short Description: Kazakh hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:34:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:34:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220834.n3M8YLJN017145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #61 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-22 04:34:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #58) > To benefit upstream the following bugs may be submitted: > > * Bugs in configure. First, ppc64 case should be added to target switch in > configure.in (as powerpc64-*-linux* or so). And proper libdir set there. > noted, seems that I need to propose a patch for this to Firebird Project > * Bug in autogen.sh. It relies on libtool message to get location of > aclocal.m4. But in this case, in new libtool message that message somehow > changed and pattern didn't handle that. Consider using of aclocal for this task > (like autoreconf does). > this one is done in the upstream "according to Alex from Firebird admin team : in Head autogen.sh have: echo "Running autoreconf ..." $AUTORECONF --install --force --verbose || exit 1 And some hacks to work around known bugs in old versions. This is in head. I do not backport it to release versions cause there are still troubles with some autoconf/libtoolize/automake combinations, but hope to solve and backport before 2.1.3." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:40:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220840.n3M8eTff023367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-22 04:37:18 EDT --- photoprint-0.4.0-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/photoprint-0.4.0-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:40:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:40:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220840.n3M8eaF3018660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-22 04:40:35 EDT --- photoprint-0.4.0-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/photoprint-0.4.0-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:40:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220840.n3M8egdr018710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-22 04:40:40 EDT --- photoprint-0.4.0-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/photoprint-0.4.0-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:40:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220840.n3M8eVAY018539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-22 04:36:53 EDT --- After freeze of F-11 it will be build as perl-Test-Most-0.21-3.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:40:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493530] Review Request: perl-Data-Dumper-Names - Data::Dumper::Names module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220840.n3M8eY87018621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493530 Bug 493530 depends on bug 493531, which changed state. Bug 493531 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:49:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220849.n3M8n3GZ020220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #62 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-22 04:49:02 EDT --- Before final review, I need to clarify one bureaucratic thing - who will be maintainer of this package - you, Philippe, or initial reporter, Jonathan? There is an technical issue (another one nail into the bugzilla's coffin) - AFAIK only Jonathan can raise/clear flags in this ticket (because he is an reporter), not you, Philippe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 09:12:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:12:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220912.n3M9C6A6025412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #44 from Zarko 2009-04-22 05:11:59 EDT --- This package transferred to RPM Fusion: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 Can you close it here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 09:13:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467363] Review Request: mlt++ - C++ wrapper for the MLT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220913.n3M9DPRx029962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467363 Zarko changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zarko.pintar at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Zarko 2009-04-22 05:13:23 EDT --- This package transferred to RPM Fusion: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528 Can you close it here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 09:19:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:19:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220919.n3M9JgH8031024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #63 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-22 05:19:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #62) > Before final review, I need to clarify one bureaucratic thing - who will be > maintainer of this package - you, Philippe, or initial reporter, Jonathan? > > There is an technical issue (another one nail into the bugzilla's coffin) - > AFAIK only Jonathan can raise/clear flags in this ticket (because he is an > reporter), not you, Philippe. As Jonathan wanted, I let him choose I have no problem to become the maintainer if need. but in that case, it seems that I needed to be sponsored for what I understand ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 09:34:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:34:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220934.n3M9YIcP001480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 --- Comment #18 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-22 05:34:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Reviewing version 3.2.5-19.a found in koji. > > > - Other missing Requires: > Common uses update-desktop-database => > Requires(post): desktop-file-utils > Fixed in CVS > MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as > provided in the spec URL. NEEDSFIX I cannot fix this, all I can do is replace this with a link the _orig tarbal on one of Debian mirrors. I've asked upstream to make this release available on the official webpage but he hasn't gotten around to this yet. > MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect > runtime of application. NEEDSFIX > - Include in package: CHANGES, README, LATEX.AND.XFIG*, FIGAPPS > Fixed in CVS Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 09:45:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220945.n3M9jE6g003820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-22 05:45:13 EDT --- Version 1.0.6 released, which includes Java bindings, hence more subpackages. There is some bug with qemu on PPC. It builds OK but does not run on PPC, so I have to disable PPC for the time being. This is unfortunate, but as usual because I don't have a PPC machine to run this on, there's not a lot I can do to look into the bug at this time. Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/libguestfs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/libguestfs-1.0.6-1.fc11.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1314307 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 09:45:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:45:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220945.n3M9jJtC032281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #25 from Zarko 2009-04-22 05:45:17 EDT --- Question: Once, when update of package will come up from upstream (example: photoprint 0.4.1 or 0.5.0...) what happened? - I must open a new bug for this new release, - or I make update by myself, put it onto Koji and Bodhi as new release and that is it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 09:56:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:56:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220956.n3M9uOs4001835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-22 05:56:23 EDT --- No problem. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 09:59:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496826] Review Request: ipa-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220959.n3M9xagj006512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496826 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-22 05:59:35 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ipa-mincho-fonts Short Description: Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-11 F-10 F-9 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 11:33:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 07:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491084] Review Request: medusa - parallel brute forcing pasword cracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221133.n3MBXqxL026741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491084 Jan F. Chadima changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 11:41:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 07:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221141.n3MBf868028420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 Bug 492266 depends on bug 491128, which changed state. Bug 491128 Summary: Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 11:41:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 07:41:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221141.n3MBf7lx028381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-22 07:41:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > Question: > > Once, when update of package will come up from upstream (example: photoprint > 0.4.1 or 0.5.0...) what happened? > > - I must open a new bug for this new release, > - or I make update by myself, put it onto Koji and Bodhi as new release and > that is it? You can just update the package by yourself, submit builds to koji, then submit new update requests on bodhi if needed. No new review request is needed. Closing this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 11:44:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 07:44:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221144.n3MBi8wh023127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 Johan Vromans changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Johan Vromans 2009-04-22 07:44:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: EekBoek Short Description: Bookkeeping package for small and medium-size businesses Owners: sciurius Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 11:46:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 07:46:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221146.n3MBkbrR029726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 Johan Vromans changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Johan Vromans 2009-04-22 07:46:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-CSV Short Description: Handling data with comma-separated values Owners: sciurius Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 11:47:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 07:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221147.n3MBljXo030063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 Johan Vromans changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Johan Vromans 2009-04-22 07:47:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Data-Report Short Description: A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework Owners: sciurius Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 12:05:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:05:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221205.n3MC5X67001806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #64 from Pavel Lis? 2009-04-22 08:05:31 EDT --- Do you think about making packages for epel-4, epel-5 too? I've tried rebuilt your latest src.rpm in my mock environment (epel-4, epel-5 for i386 and x86_64) and it was successful. Can I help with it, I will use it definitely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 12:24:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:24:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221224.n3MCOfmC031763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #25 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-22 08:24:40 EDT --- It is, but from times when it be "rawhide" if you understand me. Now, after sucessful build, I try make update and got error: php-pecl-runkit-0.9-10.CVS20090215.fc11 not tagged as an update candidate Where I wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 12:28:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221228.n3MCSfj6032668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #65 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-22 08:28:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #64) > Do you think about making packages for epel-4, epel-5 too? yes of course > Can I help with it, I will use it definitely. any help appreciate, I don't know all the details and procedure to make it append -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 12:44:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:44:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221244.n3MCiKCW010447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #66 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-22 08:44:18 EDT --- REVIEW: - rpmlint is not silent: [petro at host-12-116 Desktop]$ rpmlint firebird-* firebird.i386: E: no-binary firebird.i386: W: no-documentation firebird-classic.i386: W: no-documentation firebird-classic.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln firebird-classic.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm firebird-devel.i386: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/firebird/lib/libib_util.so libib_util.so firebird-devel.i386: W: no-documentation firebird-libfbclient.i386: W: no-documentation firebird-libfbembed.i386: W: no-documentation firebird-server-common.i386: W: no-documentation firebird-server-common.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/firebird/bin/gsec ../tools/gsec firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-standard-uid /etc/firebird/security2.fdb firebird firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-standard-gid /etc/firebird/security2.fdb firebird firebird-server-common.i386: E: non-readable /etc/firebird/security2.fdb 0660 firebird-server-common.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/firebird/bin/gpre ../tools/gpre firebird-server-common.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/firebird/bin/changeDBAPassword.sh ../tools/changeDBAPassword.sh firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/firebird.csh firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/firebird/firebird.log firebird firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/firebird/firebird.log firebird firebird-server-common.i386: E: zero-length /var/log/firebird/firebird.log firebird-server-common.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/firebird/bin/gdef ../tools/gdef firebird-server-common.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/firebird/bin/changeRunUser.sh ../tools/changeRunUser.sh firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/firebird/data firebird firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-standard-gid /usr/share/firebird/data firebird firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/firebird.sh firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/firebird/backup firebird firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-standard-gid /usr/share/firebird/backup firebird firebird-server-common.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/firebird/bin/restoreRootRunUser.sh ../tools/restoreRootRunUser.sh firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/firebird firebird firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-standard-gid /usr/share/firebird firebird firebird-superserver.i386: W: no-documentation firebird-superserver.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/firebird firebird firebird-superserver.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/firebird firebird firebird-superserver.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln firebird-superserver.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm firebird-superserver.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name firebird 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 32 warnings. [petro at host-12-116 Desktop]$ I commented almost all of these messages, except two if them, named as "non-conffile-in-etc": firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/firebird.csh firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/firebird.sh In order to suppress this messages, you should mark these two files as %config: - %{_sysconfdir}/profile.d/firebird.csh - %{_sysconfdir}/profile.d/firebird.sh + %config %{_sysconfdir}/profile.d/firebird.csh + %config %{_sysconfdir}/profile.d/firebird.sh Easy to fix. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. +/- The package meets the Packaging Guidelines, except %doc issues (see below). + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package MUST be included in %doc. Also there are other issues with doc-subpackage (see below). + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum Firebird-2.1.2.18118-0.tar.bz2* 063b3825a06d328f726b733fd74614b1 Firebird-2.1.2.18118-0.tar.bz2 063b3825a06d328f726b733fd74614b1 Firebird-2.1.2.18118-0.tar.bz2.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1314169 + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + Every sub-package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, is calling ldconfig in %post and %postun. +/- A package owns all directories that it creates. Unfortunately, some sub-packages claims ownership of the same directories. For example, libfbclient and libfbembed both have "%dir %{fbroot}/lib". This should be fixed. I advice you to move some or even all common directories to metapackage firebird, which is currently empty. - The package and its subpackages MUST not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings, unfortunately %dir %{fbroot}/tools-classic %dir %{fbroot}/bin listed twice in %files section of classic sub-package. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently use macros. + The package contains code, or permissable content. +/- Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage. But see below notes about %doc + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + Header files are in a -devel package. + No static libraries at all. + No pkgconfig(.pc) files. + The library files that end in .so (without suffix) are in a -devel package. - In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}, but firebird-devel requires only %{name} = %{version}. Please fix, or explain. + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. + Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. Except issues with sub-packages noted above. + At the beginning of %install, each package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. There is an issue with %doc. Firstly, you must include in every sub-package (except *-devel) doc/license/IDPL.txt and doc/license/README.license.usage.txt. Just add %doc doc/license/IDPL.txt %doc doc/license/README.license.usage.txt Secondly, you shouldn't include %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}/ and even create it in the %install section. Instead of this just include necessary files right in the %files section. E.g. - mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name} - mv %{buildroot}%{fbroot}/README %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}/README - mv %{buildroot}%{fbroot}/WhatsNew %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}/WhatsNew - mv %{buildroot}%{fbroot}/examples/ %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}/examples/ - mv %{buildroot}%{fbroot}/doc/ %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}/ ... %files doc %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) - %doc %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}/ + %doc doc + %doc examples %doc directive, if full path is omitted, looks at your ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/%{pkgname} directory, so feel free to add docs right from there. Please properly fix oneliner at line 232. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 12:54:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221254.n3MCsAbn006182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-22 08:54:09 EDT --- Orcan, why package use self compiller flags? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags Quoting the guidelines: | Adding to and overriding or filtering parts of these | flags is permitted if there's a good reason to do so; | the rationale for doing so should be reviewed and | documented in the specfile especially in the override | and filter cases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 12:55:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl - Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221255.n3MCtwwO014188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: globus-rsl |Review Request: globus-rsl |-Globus Toolkit - Resource |- Globus Toolkit - Resource |Specification Language |Specification Language |Library |Library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 13:04:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221304.n3MD4jxj009290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |herlo1 at gmail.com --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-22 09:04:43 EDT --- *** Bug 496941 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 13:08:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221308.n3MD88QI010344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #67 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-22 09:08:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #66) > There is an issue with %doc. Firstly, you must include in every sub-package > (except *-devel) doc/license/IDPL.txt and doc/license/README.license.usage.txt. > Just add > > %doc doc/license/IDPL.txt > %doc doc/license/README.license.usage.txt Hum, interesting it means that one file can be listed more than once ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 13:04:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496941] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Apache module for Ruby on Rails support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221304.n3MD4iNS009246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496941 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-22 09:04:43 EDT --- Once closing as a duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 470696 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 13:11:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493530] Review Request: perl-Data-Dumper-Names - Data::Dumper::Names module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221311.n3MDBOVg018293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493530 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 13:17:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:17:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495702] Review Request: perl-XXX - See Your Data in the Nude In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221317.n3MDHUVR012978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495702 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-22 09:17:29 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1314592 http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-XXX.spec http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-XXX-0.12-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 13:27:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221327.n3MDRmhI022402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #68 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-22 09:27:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #67) > (In reply to comment #66) > > %doc doc/license/IDPL.txt > > %doc doc/license/README.license.usage.txt > > Hum, interesting > it means that one file can be listed more than once ? Nope. Files listed as %doc are handled slightly different that other files. For example, if you add the following line %doc doc/license/IDPL.txt into %files section of subpackages "bar1" and "bar2" of package "foo" then rpmbuild will search for ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/%{pkgname}/doc/license/IDPL.txt and will place it as /usr/share/doc/foo-bar1-%{version}/IDPL.txt in the subpackage foo-bar1 and as /usr/share/doc/foo-bar2-%{version}/IDPL.txt in the subpackage foo-bar2. These files have different paths, so they are different. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 13:51:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497140] New: Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497140 Summary: Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david at gnsa.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-IDNA_Convert.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-IDNA_Convert-0.6.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This converter allows you to transfer domain names between the encoded (Punycode) notation and the decoded (UTF-8) notation. rpmlint output: [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-IDNA_Convert-0.6.3-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/php-IDNA_Convert-0.6.3-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./php-IDNA_Convert.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 13:50:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:50:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497138] New: Review Request: perl-Text-VimColor - Syntax color text in HTML or XML using Vim Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-VimColor - Syntax color text in HTML or XML using Vim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497138 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-VimColor - Syntax color text in HTML or XML using Vim Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Text-VimColor.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Text-VimColor-0.11-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module tries to markup text files according to their syntax. It can be used to produce web pages with pretty-printed colourful source code samples. It can produce output in the following formats: text-vimcolor --format html --filetype prolog foo.pl > foo.html This program is a command line interface to the Perl module Text::VimColor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 13:52:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497138] Review Request: perl-Text-VimColor - Syntax color text in HTML or XML using Vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221352.n3MDqUCo022933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497138 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |495693 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 13:52:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495693] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6 - Perl 6 Syntax Highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221352.n3MDqWgs022961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495693 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |497138 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 13:53:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497138] Review Request: perl-Text-VimColor - Syntax color text in HTML or XML using Vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221353.n3MDrdHX030460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497138 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|495693 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 13:53:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:53:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495693] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6 - Perl 6 Syntax Highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221353.n3MDrcML030440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495693 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|497138 | --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-22 09:53:37 EDT --- Hm after a few changes Cursor can't be provided because rpmlint is complaining. STD is provided. Please check new version http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6-0.040-2.fc11.src.rpm http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6.spec Test in this package are blocked by perl-Text-VimColor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 14:25:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496244] Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221425.n3MEPrmi031412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496244 --- Comment #10 from Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak 2009-04-22 10:25:52 EDT --- I have asked upstream about the possible license change, and the author has declined with rather long explanation. So, if the current license is not acceptable, close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 14:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:25:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221425.n3MEP4E0031302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-22 10:25:03 EDT --- Notes: On my system _iconsdir or so is defined, however ------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ grep %_iconsdir /etc/rpm/macros.* /etc/rpm/macros.jpackage:%_iconsdir %{_datadir}/icons [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ grep -l %_iconsdir /etc/rpm/macros.* | xargs rpm -qf jpackage-utils-1.7.5-2.7.fc11.noarch ------------------------------------------------------- i.e. only when jpackage-utils (Java related package) is installed, these macros can be used. So if you want to use macros such as _iconsdir, "BuildRequires: jpackage-utils" is needed to make it sure that %_sysconfdir/rpm/macros.jpackage surely exists. However - This package does not seem to be related to Java - So adding "BR: jpackage-utils" just to define %_iconsdir or so is not desired - Also almost all packages on Fedora installing files under %_datadir/icons/ use %_datadir/icons, not %_iconsdir So replacing %_iconsdir with %_datadir/icons is much preferable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 14:32:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221432.n3MEW5lP032735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #26 from Remi Collet 2009-04-22 10:32:04 EDT --- You probably forget to "cvs update" to get the new branch. In devel, package should be tagged F12. + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 14:37:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221437.n3MEbniI001400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-22 10:37:48 EDT --- Fabian A., who else? ;) Stay tuned for a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 14:41:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:41:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496244] Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221441.n3MEfS8h008968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496244 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 14:43:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496244] Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221443.n3MEhZxA002868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496244 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk --- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-22 10:43:34 EDT --- You may want to import the package into RPM Fusion instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 14:45:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221445.n3MEjHRB003604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-22 10:45:15 EDT --- ogmtools-1.5-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ogmtools-1.5-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 14:48:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:48:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495702] Review Request: perl-XXX - See Your Data in the Nude In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221448.n3MEmm1N004214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495702 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-22 10:48:47 EDT --- + source files match upstream. a9c46c1499d0ceae91504fe5fbcaade3173ebdfe XXX-0.12.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1314592 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no complaints: perl-XXX.noarch: I: checking perl-XXX.src: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(XXX) = 0.12 perl-XXX = 0.12-2.fc12 = perl >= 0:5.006001 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 + %check is present and all tests pass. t/test.t .. ok t/yyy.t ... ok All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=2, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.04 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.07 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 14:52:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:52:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221452.n3MEqIl5005132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #27 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-22 10:52:17 EDT --- No, "cvs ud -d" was runned few times. And oof course, I known what now devel is F-12, it is a reason why I think what F-11 should be added separately. But, when I try tag it, I get error what this tag applied on a different branch: $ make tag cvs tag -c php-pecl-runkit-0_9-10_CVS20090215_fc11 ERROR: The tag php-pecl-runkit-0_9-10_CVS20090215_fc11 is already applied on a different branch ERROR: You can not forcibly move tags between branches php-pecl-runkit-0_9-10_CVS20090215_fc11:devel:hubbitus:1237926729 php-pecl-runkit-0_9-10_CVS20090215_fc9:F-9:hubbitus:1237929134 php-pecl-runkit-0_9-10_CVS20090215_fc10:F-10:hubbitus:1237929597 php-pecl-runkit-0_9-10_CVS20090215_el5:EL-5:hubbitus:1237933086 php-pecl-runkit-0_9-11_CVS20090215_el5:EL-5:hubbitus:1240139384 cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first! make: *** [tag] error 1 Can I move tags? Or what I should do now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 15:04:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469613] Review Request: gnue-appserver - GNU Enterprise Application Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221504.n3MF4wJr007922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469613 Aaron S. Hawley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aaron.s.hawley at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Aaron S. Hawley 2009-04-22 11:04:56 EDT --- My email address has changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 15:06:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:06:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497138] Review Request: perl-Text-VimColor - Syntax color text in HTML or XML using Vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221506.n3MF6LQk008763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497138 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |iarnell at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-22 11:06:20 EDT --- + source files match upstream. 5073ae91074a41dd1e6d22c0cf2a6934f0bb3a39 Text-VimColor-0.11.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. - BuildRequires are missing perl(XML::Parser) + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1314782 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no complaints: perl-Text-VimColor.noarch: I: checking perl-Text-VimColor.src: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + final provides are sane: perl(Text::VimColor) = 0.11 perl-Text-VimColor = 0.11-1.fc12 - final requires need fixing /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Temp) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(IO::File) perl(Path::Class) perl(Path::Class) >= 0.02 perl(Text::VimColor) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 - %check is present and all tests pass. t/01array.t ..... ok t/02file.t ...... ok t/05xml.t ....... skipped: XML::Parser module required for these tests. t/10cmp.t ....... ok t/15let.t ....... ok t/20override.t .. ok t/99pod.t ....... ok All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=29, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.02 sys + 1.64 cusr 0.34 csys = 2.06 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. There's a BuildRequires missing for perl(XML::Parser) You don't need the explicit Requires: perl(Path::Class) since we've had >0.02 for a long time now. But I think you should add a Requires: vim-enhanced since this package is pretty useless without it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 15:07:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:07:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221507.n3MF7cie015253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-22 11:07:37 EDT --- In this case, the flags that I'm overriding for ppc/ppc64 are SSE related. Enabling SSE instruction set may provide some performance boost in those archs that support it. Unfortunately, ppc and ppc64 don't support it so we need to remove those flags when compiling minicomputer in these archs. Here is more info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streaming_SIMD_Extensions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 15:11:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:11:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221511.n3MFB1KI010297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #69 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-22 11:10:59 EDT --- just a note, in fact I made serious Q/A test on all that, and found on major issue a major re work is needed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 15:17:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:17:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221517.n3MFH7JJ011423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #7 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-22 11:17:06 EDT --- No, no, I now speak about using all flags hard defined in SConstruct. You are put standard Fedora %optflags into begin of its (via sed in spec file), but followed flags its override!!! I think it is bad idea at all. If you expect from SSE big advantage, you may add it to standard set, defined widely for current platform, but comment in spec for that needed why you do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 15:19:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221519.n3MFJN8V018234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #22 from David Nielsen 2009-04-22 11:19:21 EDT --- There appears to be a problem with splitting up the gnome-do-plugins package in the proposed manner. I have a bug to ask the Ubuntu folks to do the same here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351535 Which leads us to this upstream problem. https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/do/+bug/324168 to do this right we need to wait for 0.8.2 to be released it seems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 15:28:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221528.n3MFSMAn020389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-22 11:28:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > No, no, I now speak about using all flags hard defined in SConstruct. You are > put standard Fedora %optflags into begin of its (via sed in spec file), but > followed flags its override!!! > I am not familiar with all of those flags, but as far as I know, none of '-fwhole-program', '-ftree-vectorize', '-ffast-math', '-funit-at-a-time', '-fpeel-loops', '-ftracer', '-funswitch-loops', '-fprefetch-loop-arrays' is overriding the Fedora flags. The author picked these probably because these are application specific. > I think it is bad idea at all. If you expect from SSE big advantage, you may > add it to standard set, defined widely for current platform, but comment in > spec for that needed why you do that. Again, afaik the code should support SSE if you want to use those flags. I think that my comment is clear about this. It says that SSE is only enabled in those supported archs for obvious reasons. What do you want me to add to it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 15:46:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:46:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221546.n3MFkJg4024287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #9 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-22 11:46:19 EDT --- Guidelines says what *any* what "a adding to and overriding or filtering parts of these flags is permitted if there's a good reason to do so"... So, not only sse flags here, I speak about all others. I also not familiar with it. General question - is it needed at all?? Can be compiled application whithout those? And comment about SSE instructions is fully clear for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 15:49:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221549.n3MFnIZI024753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #70 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-22 11:49:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #69) > just a note, in fact I made serious Q/A test on all that, and found on major > issue > a major re work is needed Good. It's better to find it now, than later :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 15:58:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221558.n3MFwc6G026733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #23 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-04-22 11:58:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > > It doesn't need to live in /%{_lib}, but by convention nsswitch modules, > > following largely from what glibc does with its own modules, have been put > > there anyway. > > Oh, good point. I guess nss_ldap is the one that's out of sorts, placing its > libraries under /usr/lib instead. That's as much about not being able to link with various static libraries any longer, and the shared versions of those libraries living in /usr, as anything else. > > In this case, though, it avoids having to deal with file conflicts or working > > something out with alternatives (which I actually tried doing, but trying to > > select the "right" one without requiring manual intervention didn't lend itself > > to any elegant solutions). > > Indeed, I can't imagine how you would do this with alternatives. Well, the idea was to hook runlevel changes (you can do that sort of thing with upstart, at least I thought you could) and call alternatives to select one or the other depending on whether the daemon was enabled at all for any runlevel, not that it worked right. > So where do we go from here? I think that from a packaging standpoint this is > good, but without support from the selinux policy it's not as useful and the > interactions with nscd are problematic (although it seems that at least some of > the problems I'm seeing are due to nscd's negative caching). If you can leave aside the no-policy-for-it problem while the rest of the packaging review continues, I can take a first stab at getting a policy together and then impose on dwalsh to work on fixing it. I'm okay with leaving this bug open until the policy's sorted out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 16:59:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:59:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467235] Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221659.n3MGx9tx032456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-22 12:59:07 EDT --- globus-callout-0.7-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-callout-0.7-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 17:00:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:00:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221700.n3MH0K8r006968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-22 13:00:20 EDT --- globus-xio-2.7-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-2.7-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 17:00:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:00:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221700.n3MH0PHU007022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-22 13:00:24 EDT --- globus-xio-2.7-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-2.7-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 16:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467235] Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221659.n3MGxEE5006402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-22 12:59:14 EDT --- globus-callout-0.7-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-callout-0.7-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 16:59:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467235] Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221659.n3MGxKnF006467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-22 12:59:19 EDT --- globus-callout-0.7-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-callout-0.7-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 17:02:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl - Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221702.n3MH2DpX007319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-22 13:02:12 EDT --- globus-rsl-5.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-rsl-5.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 17:00:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:00:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221700.n3MH0FTo000712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-22 13:00:14 EDT --- globus-xio-2.7-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-2.7-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 17:01:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:01:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221701.n3MH1uGi001096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-22 13:01:55 EDT --- OK, I got your point now. I know very many packages for which their builders add some extra flags on top of %optflags and I never saw anyone documenting this (unless they are overriding the %optflags). It is an interesting point and I brought this into the attention of Fedora Packaging ML: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-April/msg00073.html Thanks for bringing this up. I will act according to the responses we will get. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 17:02:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:02:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl - Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221702.n3MH2N6P007518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-22 13:02:22 EDT --- globus-rsl-5.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-rsl-5.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 17:02:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:02:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl - Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221702.n3MH2HAJ007371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-22 13:02:17 EDT --- globus-rsl-5.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-rsl-5.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 17:12:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496742] Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221712.n3MHCJsY003654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-22 13:12:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Package fails to build in mock for F10 > src/XmlLoader.h:25:19: error: expat.h: No such file or directory > > When you get mock build to work I'll review the package. Sorry, I uploaded the copy to fedorapeople before building the package in mock and koji and haven't synchronized them. > PS. You have an awful lot of packages and review requests for packages, but few > have done few reviews. Maybe you could do a few, since the review queue is > quite clogged? sure Can you please download the stuff again? 'BuildRequires: expat-devel' was added. Thanks for your time to review my packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 17:37:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496742] Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221737.n3MHb96L015083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-22 13:37:08 EDT --- - Optflags are not used. - scons install recompiles targets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 17:37:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:37:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221737.n3MHbruL008828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 --- Comment #13 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-22 13:37:51 EDT --- Ping Adam? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 17:37:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:37:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221737.n3MHbYVA008762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 --- Comment #11 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-22 13:37:33 EDT --- Ping Jeroen? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 17:43:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:43:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221743.n3MHhXpf009974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-22 13:43:32 EDT --- --------------------------------------------------------------- This package (photoprint-borders) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 18:04:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:04:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497192] New: Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497192 Summary: Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/polkit-qt/ Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/polkit-qt/polkit-qt.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/polkit-qt/polkit-qt-0.9.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Polkit-qt is a library that lets developers use the PolicyKit API through a nice Qt-styled API. It is mainly a wrapper around QAction and QAbstractButton that lets you integrate those two component easily with PolicyKit. This will be needed for future incarnations of PolicyKit-kde -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 18:05:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497192] Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221805.n3MI5soJ015381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497192 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2009-04-22 14:05:53 EDT --- Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1315402 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 18:08:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:08:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497194] New: Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 Summary: Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/liblastfm/liblastfm.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/liblastfm/liblastfm-0.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Liblastfm is a collection of libraries to help you integrate Last.fm services into your rich desktop software. Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1315407 Will be needed for upcoming amarok-2.1.1 (and newer) releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 18:15:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:15:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221815.n3MIF797024938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-22 14:15:05 EDT --- Well, - I still think that including "I" in %description is not good, like -------------------------------------------------------------- * For speed and efficiency, "I" don't want to have to view the images, even in thumbnail form, to figure out which ones need copying. -------------------------------------------------------------- If you want to include this sentence in %descript, at least "I" should be changed to "you". Once %description is cleaned up, I would approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 18:49:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:49:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221849.n3MIntTX032588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-22 14:49:55 EDT --- This one builds in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1315384 I'll do this next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 19:02:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:02:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221902.n3MJ2hQv028215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 Adam Miller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Adam Miller 2009-04-22 15:02:41 EDT --- Forgot to tag bodhi with the bug to close it, it has been released into updates. I will close it now, sorry about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 19:27:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497140] Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221927.n3MJRu1R001617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497140 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 19:44:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:44:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221944.n3MJiYh7013357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-22 15:44:33 EDT --- Everything seems good, except: * Please add some more information to the description because "Usage Library" is too general to use for a description. Please do that before you commit. ----------------------------------------------- This package (globus-usage) is APPROVED by oget ----------------------------------------------- I also have a stack of packages that depend on each other. The ultimate goal is to get frinika approved: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Could you help me with that whenever you have time? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 19:44:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497140] Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221944.n3MJiLRp013286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497140 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-22 15:44:20 EDT --- - Does the package work with php4? Maybe a version could be added to Requires: php >=5. rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - No PECL, PEAR or CHANNEL; package belongs to category "other php", so name is correct. MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. NEEDSFIX - According to idna_convert.class.php license is LGPLv2+ not LGPLv2. Other php files do not contain any license specifications. MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 19:56:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:56:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221956.n3MJuEOP016575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 --- Comment #9 from Zarko (grof) 2009-04-22 15:56:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: photoprint-borders Short Description: Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility Owners: grof Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: grof -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 19:56:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904221956.n3MJuSsq016611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 20:02:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:02:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904222002.n3MK2qPP010069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-22 16:02:50 EDT --- For -3: * License - License tag is still invalid (please check my previous comment) * BuildRequires - This package won't build without "BuildRequires: libwnck-devel" (What I said in the previous comment is that "BuildRequires: libwnck-devel >= *@GNOME_WNCK@*" is invalid) * Directory ownership issue - This package should not own the directories %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/ and %{_mandir}/man3/ (I am saying of owning these directories themselves and not saying about files/directories under these directories) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 20:09:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904222009.n3MK95qc020112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-22 16:09:03 EDT --- ogmtools-1.5-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ogmtools-1.5-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 20:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904222019.n3MKJ1ME022244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 --- Comment #7 from Zarko (grof) 2009-04-22 16:19:00 EDT --- OK, I changed description text, and I hope that it will be good, now. SPEC: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SPECS/camcardsync.spec SRPM: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SRPMS/camcardsync-0.1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 20:24:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:24:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495179] Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904222024.n3MKOb0u023946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495179 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.70-1.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 20:22:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904222022.n3MKMKxt023047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 --- Comment #2 from John Guthrie 2009-04-22 16:22:19 EDT --- Just an update on the licensing. I contacted the listed author, and he said that when he initially wrote the extension, he placed it under GPLv2+. Since that time, it has been broken up into separate files. Some of them are derived files and are also under GPLv2+, but he has not written any part of RenameUserJob.php, so he doesn't know what the situation is with that file. The files SpecialRenameuser.alias.php and SpecialRenameuser.i18n.php are both internationalization files for SpecialRenameuser.php, so I would think that it is safe to call those dervied files. Also, SpecialRenameuser_body.php is the file that actually generates the Special page for this extension. Likewise, I would think that would be a dervied work as well. Moreover, the extension stops working if you remove any of those files. I am still working on finding out the license status for RenameUserJob.php. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 20:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495179] Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904222024.n3MKOWxu014685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495179 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-22 16:24:32 EDT --- perl-Number-Format-1.70-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 20:30:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:30:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495875] Review Request: leonidas-kde-theme - Leonidas KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904222030.n3MKUMEV026228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495875 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 20:55:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904222055.n3MKtmi9022295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-22 16:55:47 EDT --- A few links to packaging guidelines: List of important guideline points that all packages are reviewed for: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines Main Guidelines page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines Guidelines for packaging mono packages in Fedora: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Mono Review: Good: * Package is named according to the naming Guidelines * Spec file name matches the package name * License of the software is MIT * Source matches the upstream tarball * No locales * No shared libraries * No Prefix specified * No duplicate files or directories * Proper %clean section * Package is code, not content * No documentation, so no %doc subpackage * Not a standalone GUI app so no .desktop Needswork: * Spec file readability -- In Fedora the sections are usually in a different order. Having them be in a standard order doesn't help the package build but it does help other people reviewing the spec or who work on it later. There's many simple spec files in cvs to look at. For instance: - http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/monodoc/devel/monodoc.spec * License tag should just be "MIT" - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Valid_License_Short_Names * The Source: line needs to have the full URL to the source - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL * The vendor: tag should not be present in Fedora specfiles. It will be automatically files in by the buildsystem. * Autoreqprov should normally not be in Fedora spec files. It is on by defaul. * BuildArch: i386 does not belong in the spec file. In Fedora we really only use "BuildArch: noarch" which specifies that the package can be built on any architecture and will create an architecture independent package. If we need to limit the arches that the package builds on, we use ExcludeArch or ExclusiveArch * env_options isn't a macro used in Fedora * You should use %configure rather than ./configure unless there's a reason. * --prefix=%_prefix is included in the %configure macro so you don't need it if you use the %configure macro. * In Fedora, mono libraries are installed in %{_libdir} instead of /usr/lib. On x86_64 systems, that expands to /usr/lib6 instead of /usr/lib. So use this in the %files section: %{_libdir}/monodevelop/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Debugger/MonoDevelop.Debugger.Gdb.dll* * package needs to rm -rf %{buildroot} at the beginning of %install * All filenames are UTF-8 * No license file is included in the tarball so you should ask upstream if they'll provide one with their next release. Trying a build in mock now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 21:21:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:21:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497140] Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904222121.n3MLLklR004344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497140 --- Comment #2 from David Nalley 2009-04-22 17:21:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Does the package work with php4? Maybe a version could be added to Requires: > php >=5. This does work with php 4.3 and later per the internal comments. I'll be happy to add the requires with a version though since for current version of Fedora php5 is the only option. > MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the > Licensing Guidelines. NEEDSFIX > - According to idna_convert.class.php license is LGPLv2+ not LGPLv2. Other php > files do not contain any license specifications. The 'LICENCE' file included with the software distribution is LGPLv2, and given the lack of licensing for the rest of the .php files this leads me to believe that these are LGPLv2 and that thusly the package should be LGPLv2 instead of LGPLv2+. I am open to correction on this point, though, but this is my understanding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 21:26:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487148] Review Request: gearmand - A distributed job system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904222126.n3MLQ6Hj005300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487148 --- Comment #3 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-04-22 17:26:05 EDT --- Oops, somehow they disappeared. Please try again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 21:39:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:39:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492991] Review Request: mediawiki-InputBox - An extension to enable input box tags for mediawiki pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904222139.n3MLdUkK007513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492991 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from John Guthrie 2009-04-22 17:39:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mediawiki-InputBox Short Description: An extension to enable input box tags for mediawiki pages Owners: guthrie Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 22:09:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478920] Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO BW Limit Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904222209.n3MM9M7q005606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-22 18:09:21 EDT --- I have a couple questions for this one: * Please don't abbreviate BW in the description. Is it bandwidth? ? Do we really need to use the word "Globus" twice in the summary for this package? ? # This library is opened using lt_dlopenext,... Uhm, why? How many packages do that? Can't those packages be "fixed" instead? - Package builds on rawhide, the built packages were checked and they are fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1315798 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 22:16:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476524] Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904222216.n3MMGW4e015089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-22 18:16:30 EDT --- Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F10/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-zope-testing-3.7.1-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint python-zope-testing-3.7.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: ZPLv2.1 [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Upstream source: 23e9389228c79f4343e6b299d7d51fc0 Build source: 23e9389228c79f4343e6b299d7d51fc0 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales. [-] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete. [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [-] Timestamps preserved with cp and install. [-] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [?] Latest version is packaged. [1] [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F10/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1315805 [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Changelog in allowed format [1] Version 3.7.3 was released. CHANGES.txt and README.txt should be added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 22:26:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476528] Review Request: python-ZConfig - Structured Configuration Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904222226.n3MMQ4S4017228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476528 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-22 18:26:03 EDT --- Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F10/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-ZConfig-2.6.1-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint python-ZConfig-2.6.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: ZPLv2.1 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Upstream source: 9fcf43f4fe3432d49baa59f65b5d3b2c Build source: 9fcf43f4fe3432d49baa59f65b5d3b2c [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales. [?] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete. [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [-] Timestamps preserved with cp and install. [-] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F10/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1315686 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Changelog in allowed format It seems that the package works without 'python-zope-testing' with is commented out at the moment. OK, I only did a 30 seconds test. I guess that if 'python-zope-testing' is really needed it should end up as a requirement. Beside that I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 22:28:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904222228.n3MMSjOJ017553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-22 18:28:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > NEEDSFIX > - License is GPLv3 not GPLv3+. fixed > MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX > - Time stamps are not preserved, e.g. > /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/xsw-0.2.3/install-sh -c -m 644 'intro/bloc.bmp' > '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/xsw-0.2.3-1.fc10.x86_64/usr/share/xsw/intro/bloc.bmp' The man page is ok. But you are right about the rest of the files. I will see what I can do to preserve the time stamps. * Wed Apr 22 2009 Fabian Affolter - 0.3.0-1 - Fixed license - Added ImageMagick as a requirement for pdf support - Updated to new upstream version 0.3.0 Here are the updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/xsw.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/xsw-0.3.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 22:48:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904222248.n3MMmg0i012830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #71 from MERCIER 2009-04-22 18:48:37 EDT --- Makowski can be the maintainer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 23:16:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496492] Review Request: sing - Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904222316.n3MNG1sq017572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496492 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-22 19:15:59 EDT --- Ok, now that the update got pushed mockbuilds work for me, even in the wannabe rawhide mock that turned out to be F11. (In reply to comment #4) > Local build fails if too many autotool versions are installed in parallel, > but a successful local build never have been a must, haven't it? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#cite_ref-6 "MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture." IMO this also includes local builds. Anyway, the package must no break if more than one version of autotool is installed. How about: for file in %{_datadir}/automake-*/config.*; do cp -f $file . done Works fine here. > De-macrofying the URL tag is possible, if that makes you happy. Other issue > as well as notes are minor so far to me, right? Yes, they are minor non-blockers, but that doesn't mean the package can't be improved, right? The outstanding issues: OK - rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/sing-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 (with the change I suggested) As there are no blockers left, the package is APPROVED. Nevertheless I strongly advice you to also apply minor corrections and improvements fro this review. TIA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 23:51:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904222351.n3MNpXqk031834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 --- Comment #3 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-04-22 19:51:32 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-yong-1.1.0.20090422-2.fc12.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-yong.spec Tarball URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-yong-1.1.0.20090422.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 00:25:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230025.n3N0PrM0029411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-22 20:25:52 EDT --- Some initial comments: Please don't use %global srcname Guimup for something that only appears twice in the spec and never changes. Source0 gives a 403 error. This is most likely due to some weird configuration of the server, that only allows downloading via http://www.coonsden.com/cgi-bin/ShotGun.cgi?ammo=Guimup-stable-src Please tell upstream to stop this nonsense if he wants his package in Fedora. The install section is broken: make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} \ INSTALL="install -p" \ DESTDIR=%{buildroot} DESTDIR is used twice rm -rf %{buildroot}/usr/doc /usr should not be hardcoded, use %{_usr} instead. The package is a gui app, but lacks a desktop file. You need to add one as described in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files Macro usage is not consistent, you use both $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS The license is not correct. The program is GPLv3+, but the copy of libmpdclient is under a different license. remove libmpdclient.{c,h} during %prep, add libmpd-devel as BuildRequires and build against it, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries This will also clear the license issue I mentioned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 00:34:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496492] Review Request: sing - Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230034.n3N0YNDa030596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496492 --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant 2009-04-22 20:34:22 EDT --- Please consider https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Use_of_common_namespace before using a 4 letter binary name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 00:36:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:36:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497251] New: Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++ Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 Summary: Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bkoz at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/bkoz/documentation/libstdc++-docs.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/bkoz/documentation/libstdc++-docs-4.4.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The libstdc++-docs package contains documentation for the GNU C++ library. Included are three components: the manual, doxygen-generated API information for all files, namespaces and entities, and the frequently asked questions list. All documentation is provided in html format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 00:39:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230039.n3N0dSPd031502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #1 from Benjamin Kosnik 2009-04-22 20:39:27 EDT --- The man pages could be added to this. These are the man pages: ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/libstdc++/doxygen/libstdc++-man.4.4.0.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 00:53:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:53:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496492] Review Request: sing - Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230053.n3N0r9rd009107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496492 --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-22 20:53:08 EDT --- So what do you suggest? Work with upstream and rename the package wont work as there is no upstream any longer. I don't think the length will be an issue (we even have packages like gdm). I searched freshmeat and sourceforge and did not find anything that interfered, even in a wider sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 01:04:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496492] Review Request: sing - Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230104.n3N14JTa010806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496492 --- Comment #9 from manuel wolfshant 2009-04-22 21:04:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > So what do you suggest? Work with upstream and rename the package wont work as > there is no upstream any longer. Keep the name of the package but invent something else for the binary. sing-icmp for instance . > I don't think the length will be an issue (we even have packages like gdm). I > searched freshmeat and sourceforge and did not find anything that interfered, > even in a wider sense. I am very very very sure that noone will ever write a music player and name it "sing" ( because "play" is already taken, you know...). I am also very sure that no one will ever try to package that shiny new application for fedora :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 01:51:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496824] Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230151.n3N1pY33010565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496824 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-22 21:51:33 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 02:12:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230212.n3N2CopQ022224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-22 22:12:49 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 02:17:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496826] Review Request: ipa-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230217.n3N2Hw8R015370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496826 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-22 22:17:57 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 02:21:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:21:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496827] Review Request: ipa-pmincho-fonts - Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230221.n3N2LoOw016361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496827 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-22 22:21:49 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 03:49:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:49:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230349.n3N3nMEK032649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-22 23:49:21 EDT --- koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1316239 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 04:31:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:31:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230431.n3N4VOvp006869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 --- Comment #8 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-23 00:31:22 EDT --- LINE 105 you wrote: /sbin/chkconfig --del httpd should be: /sbin/chkconfig --del %{name} or not?! $ rpmlint *.fc11.*.rpm RabbIT.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary RabbIT RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18 rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/access rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/allowed rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs/public/smallRabbIT3.png rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/cache_only.conf rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/RabbIT.conf rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/README rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/nocache.conf rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs/index.html rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs/technical_documentation/thread_handling_overview.txt rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/users rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs/public rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/LICENSE rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/RabbIT rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs/README.txt rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs/menu.html rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs/public/NoAd.gif rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/ChangeLog rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/TODO rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs/LICENSE.txt rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/java/RabbIT-3.18.jar rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs/javadoc rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/bin/RabbIT rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs/technical_documentation rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/Help.txt rabbit RabbIT.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/rc.d/init.d/rabbit 0700 RabbIT.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /etc/rc.d/init.d/rabbit 0700 RabbIT.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/RabbIT RabbIT.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun userdel RabbIT.noarch: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/rabbit RabbIT.noarch: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/rabbit RabbIT} RabbIT.noarch: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/java/RabbIT-3.18.jar RabbIT.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary RabbIT 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 33 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 05:08:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487148] Review Request: gearmand - A distributed job system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230508.n3N58O9C019629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487148 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-23 01:08:22 EDT --- REVIEW: +/- rpmlint is not silent: [petro at host-12-116 Desktop]$ rpmlint *gearman* gearmand.i586: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/gearmand gearmand.i586: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/gearmand gearmand} 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. [petro at host-12-116 Desktop]$ The first warning may be omitted, hoewer I advice you to suppress it by adding necessary "# Default-Stop:" into init-script. You don't need even to assign some values to it. The second message is false positive and may be simply ignored. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum gearmand-0.3.tar.gz* 6acf8b8ca7087a1264ba2a96d58fcc5d gearmand-0.3.tar.gz 6acf8b8ca7087a1264ba2a96d58fcc5d gearmand-0.3.tar.gz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1316249 - The package failed to build on ppc64, due to missing gogle-perftools-devel for this target. So ppc64 architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch, and bug should be filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1316252&name=root.log http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/google-perftools/devel/google-perftools.spec?view=markup - All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, but it seems, that there is one missing "Requires: procps" (usage of pgrep in the init-script). + The subpackage which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, calls ldconfig in %post and %postun. - A package must own all directories that it creates. Unfortunately, you missed %{_includedir}/libgearman/ in the %files section of libgearman-devel subpackage. Please add it as %dir. + The package does not list any file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissable content. + No extremely large documentation files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + Header files are in a -devel package. + No static libraries. + The sub-package containing pkgconfig(.pc) files has 'Requires: pkgconfig'. + The library files that end in .so (without suffix) are in a -devel package. + devel sub-package requires the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}. + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. + Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Please fix issues, noted above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 05:19:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:19:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495702] Review Request: perl-XXX - See Your Data in the Nude In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230519.n3N5JI5L021680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495702 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-23 01:19:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-XXX Short Description: See Your Data in the Nude Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 05:42:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:42:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497138] Review Request: perl-Text-VimColor - Syntax color text in HTML or XML using Vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230542.n3N5gNr2025351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497138 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-23 01:42:22 EDT --- http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Text-VimColor.spec http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Text-VimColor-0.11-2.fc11.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1316254 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 06:05:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497140] Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230605.n3N65sNS023180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497140 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-23 02:05:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > - Does the package work with php4? Maybe a version could be added to Requires: > > php >=5. > > This does work with php 4.3 and later per the internal comments. I'll be happy > to add the requires with a version though since for current version of Fedora > php5 is the only option. Okay, then it's no problem. > > MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the > > Licensing Guidelines. NEEDSFIX > > - According to idna_convert.class.php license is LGPLv2+ not LGPLv2. Other php > > files do not contain any license specifications. > > The 'LICENCE' file included with the software distribution is LGPLv2, and given > the lack of licensing for the rest of the .php files this leads me to believe > that these are LGPLv2 and that thusly the package should be LGPLv2 instead of > LGPLv2+. I am open to correction on this point, though, but this is my > understanding. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F I think it has been mentioned also somewhere more visible in the guidelines, but I didn't find it in a couple of minutes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 06:10:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:10:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230610.n3N6Af2C030450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-23 02:10:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > > MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX > > - Time stamps are not preserved, e.g. > > /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/xsw-0.2.3/install-sh -c -m 644 'intro/bloc.bmp' > > '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/xsw-0.2.3-1.fc10.x86_64/usr/share/xsw/intro/bloc.bmp' > > The man page is ok. But you are right about the rest of the files. I will see > what I can do to preserve the time stamps. You probably have to patch the makefile. I'll have a new look once you have fixed the time stamp problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 06:21:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:21:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230621.n3N6LBuO025781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |497274 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 06:25:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230625.n3N6PwQn000400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-23 02:25:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > perltetris.pl definitely does not work in rawhide (x86_64): > > [spot at velociraptor ~]$ /usr/bin/perltetris.pl > GLib-GObject-WARNING **: cannot derive `GooCanvasWidgetAccessible' from > non-fundamental parent type `GooCanvasItem' at /usr/bin/perltetris.pl line 761, > line 35. > GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' > failed at /usr/bin/perltetris.pl line 761, line 35. > GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT > (object_type)' failed at /usr/bin/perltetris.pl line 761, line 35. > CRITICAL **: atk_object_initialize: assertion `ATK_IS_OBJECT (accessible)' > failed at /usr/bin/perltetris.pl line 761, line 35. Well, - Confirmed that perltetris.pl works with F-10 goocanvas, does not work with F-11 goocanvas (I am using i586) - Even demo/widgets-demo in goocanvas 0.13 tarball does not work and this shows the same warnings, where widgets-demo in goocanvas 0.10 tarball (used on F-10) works. Filed against goocanvas (bug 497274) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 06:30:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:30:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476524] Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230630.n3N6UrLt027212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2009-04-23 02:30:52 EDT --- Bumped to 3.7.3, added the two files. New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-zope-testing.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-zope-testing-3.7.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Thanks for taking a look at this :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 06:34:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:34:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476528] Review Request: python-ZConfig - Structured Configuration Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230634.n3N6YEDr027631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476528 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2009-04-23 02:34:13 EDT --- It needs python-zope-testing to run the tests, but because that hasn't been approved yet I had disabled them. I will enable them once python-zope-testing is included in Fedora. Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-ZConfig Short Description: Structured Configuration Library Owners: konradm Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 06:35:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:35:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230635.n3N6ZiPu002118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 06:38:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230638.n3N6cUxF002462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-23 02:38:29 EDT --- - The lines Obsoletes: libstdc++-docs <= 4.3.0 Provides: libstdc++-docs = %{version}-%{release} since they are redundant. - Please remove the empty %check section. - Use %{version} in the Source lines and in the %{build} phase. Once you have added the man pages, I will perform the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 06:43:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230643.n3N6hLcG029377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2009-04-23 02:43:20 EDT --- Isn't all this generated from gcc sources? What is needed to generate it? Just doxygen? If yes I'd say it would be better to ship this as subpackages of gcc, guarded by some spec macro that those who initially bootstrap gcc in a rpm based distro could turn off, so that gcc build doesn't require doxyen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 07:00:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:00:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477542] Review Request: mpdscribble - A mpd client which submits information about tracks being played to Last.fm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230700.n3N70Bac006381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477542 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 07:01:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:01:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225769] Merge Review: freeradius In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230701.n3N710K6006578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225769 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 06:59:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:59:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487148] Review Request: gearmand - A distributed job system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230659.n3N6xOaf005995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487148 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 06:59:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:59:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230659.n3N6xb4D032098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 07:03:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492945] Review Request: lv2-swh-plugins - LV2 ports of LADSPA swh plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230703.n3N73peB006876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492945 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 07:03:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492950] Review Request: lv2-vocoder-plugins - Add a robotic effect to vocals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230703.n3N73q6v006889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492950 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 07:03:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:03:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492971] Review Request: lv2-zynadd-plugins - LV2 port of the ZynAddSubFX engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230703.n3N73ioo006833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492971 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 07:04:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230704.n3N74C8l006935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-23 03:04:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Everything seems good, except: > > * Please add some more information to the description because "Usage Library" > is too general to use for a description. > > Please do that before you commit. I'll dig out some additional information from somewhere before committing. > I also have a stack of packages that depend on each other. The ultimate goal is > to get frinika approved: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 > Could you help me with that whenever you have time? Thank you for your review. I have built the your three lv2-*-plugins packages yesterday and will start reviewing them soon. I'll grab them in bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 07:06:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:06:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230706.n3N76Heu001107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-23 03:06:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-usage Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Usage Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 07:23:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230723.n3N7N4PB004056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-23 03:23:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Isn't all this generated from gcc sources? What is needed to generate it? > Just doxygen? > If yes I'd say it would be better to ship this as subpackages of gcc, guarded > by some spec macro that those who initially bootstrap gcc in a rpm based distro > could turn off, so that gcc build doesn't require doxyen. Yeah, this package should be part of the gcc package, since libstdc++ is also generated in the gcc srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 07:53:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497283] New: Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 Summary: Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate.spec SRPM URL:http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate-0.04-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate is a port to perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate text editor. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1316294 Problems: - strange description - can't rid of rpmlint warning. This file is here probably twice, but if I remove it, the test are complaining about missing file. perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate.noarch: E: useless-provides perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Alerts) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 08:12:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:12:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497138] Review Request: perl-Text-VimColor - Syntax color text in HTML or XML using Vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230812.n3N8CvGa014740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497138 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |iarnell at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-23 04:12:55 EDT --- Great - issues addressed - APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 08:42:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:42:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497138] Review Request: perl-Text-VimColor - Syntax color text in HTML or XML using Vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230842.n3N8gvwP020621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497138 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-23 04:42:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-VimColor Short Description: Syntax color text in HTML or XML using Vim Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 08:46:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230846.n3N8kZwJ027464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #36 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-04-23 04:46:31 EDT --- Thank you for the very helpful list of points to have fixed. All points are fixed now. I hope the comments in the spec file are sufficient. URLs: SRPM-file: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora/SRPMS/parrot-1.0.0.src.rpm SPEC-file: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora/specs/parrot.spec Scratch-Build-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1316317 rpmlint-output: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora/rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 08:57:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:57:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230857.n3N8vpiw023572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #32 from Bruno Mahe 2009-04-23 04:57:48 EDT --- I don't have enough time right now. So I give up and someone else can take over the package. Thanks a lot for your reviews and patience! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:10:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:10:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496477] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230910.n3N9ApPp032481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496477 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:11:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:11:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496473] Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230911.n3N9BjKP032646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:11:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496475] Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230911.n3N9BSWS032565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:12:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496117] Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230912.n3N9Cc9j026653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496117 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:13:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:13:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492971] Review Request: lv2-zynadd-plugins - LV2 port of the ZynAddSubFX engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230913.n3N9DWVL026741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492971 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:11:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:11:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496476] Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230911.n3N9BAgW026449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496476 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:10:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:10:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496478] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230910.n3N9AY5Z026285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496478 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:13:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492950] Review Request: lv2-vocoder-plugins - Add a robotic effect to vocals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230913.n3N9Dp1k026787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492950 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:14:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:14:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497295] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497295 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Email-MIME-Encodings/perl-Email-MIME-Encodings.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Email-MIME-Encodings/perl-Email-MIME-Encodings-1.313-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module simply wraps MIME::Base64 and MIME::QuotedPrint so that you can throw the contents of a Content-Transfer-Encoding header at some text and have the right thing happen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492945] Review Request: lv2-swh-plugins - LV2 ports of LADSPA swh plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230914.n3N9E6ei000522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492945 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:13:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:13:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230913.n3N9DD5B000387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:15:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484547] Review Request: pyfacebook - Python wrapper for Facebook's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230915.n3N9FQPJ001184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484547 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:14:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492197] Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230914.n3N9ETHb000577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:17:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437801] Review Request: php-ZendFramework-manual-en - Documentation for the Zend Framework in English In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230917.n3N9HdUb027778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437801 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:15:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:15:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230915.n3N9FvBU027513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:17:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437785] Review Request: php-ZendFramework-api-doc - Zend Framework API documentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230917.n3N9HSwS001578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437785 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:18:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497295] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Encodings - Unified interface to MIME encoding and decoding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230918.n3N9Ii64001822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497295 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Summary|Review Request:
- |Unified interface to MIME | |encoding and decoding --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-04-23 05:18:41 EDT --- This package became one of Bugzilla's dependencies a few days ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:30:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230930.n3N9U2gV004539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-23 05:30:01 EDT --- Again: (In reply to comment #9) > perltetris.pl definitely does not work in rawhide (x86_64): Would you test if perltetris.pl works if you have "Assistive Technologies" disabled? (although I don't know what at-spi exactuly does, disabling "Assistive Technologies" works). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:34:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:34:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456383] Review Request: python-plotkit - PlotKit Javascript Chart Plotting packed as TurboGears Widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230934.n3N9Y0vI031710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456383 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |needinfo?(pavel.khardikov at g | |mail.com) --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-23 05:33:59 EDT --- 404 while retrieving packages. Pavel, are you still interested in packaging this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:36:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:36:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 361701] Review Request: konserve - System tray application that performs periodic backups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230936.n3N9aqxa006172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361701 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Summary|Package review: konserve - |Review Request: konserve - |System tray application |System tray application |that performs periodic |that performs periodic |backups |backups -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:43:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230943.n3N9hD2B001304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 09:42:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230942.n3N9gjuk007382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #33 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-23 05:42:44 EDT --- No worry. Now I once close this bug. If you can have some time for review request again, please feel free to open a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one. Thank you anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 10:10:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:10:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496492] Review Request: sing - Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231010.n3NAAQGb006903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496492 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-23 06:10:25 EDT --- Christoph, I didn't question that I need to apply your suggestions and enhancements. I just wanted to make sure, that I don't need to create a new srpm for these minor changes. Sorry, if I was unclear. I'll have a look into the Packaging Tricks as well, before importing into CVS. But I am now requesting CVS branching, because it also takes some time - at least usually. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sing Short Description: Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line Owners: robert Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 10:17:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497140] Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231017.n3NAHS4m014123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497140 --- Comment #4 from David Nalley 2009-04-23 06:17:27 EDT --- Thanks for the clarification, please find corrected spec and srpm: Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-IDNA_Convert.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-IDNA_Convert-0.6.3-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 10:23:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496492] Review Request: sing - Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231023.n3NANfCk015228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496492 --- Comment #11 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-23 06:23:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I'll have a look into the Packaging Tricks as well, before importing into CVS. No, _after_ import. Please import the package as is and then make the changes, so the community can follow them on the commits list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 10:24:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:24:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497310] New: Review Request: php-simplepie - Simple RSS Library in PHP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-simplepie - Simple RSS Library in PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497310 Summary: Review Request: php-simplepie - Simple RSS Library in PHP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david at gnsa.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-simplepie.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-simplepie-1.1.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: SimplePie is a very fast and easy-to-use class, written in PHP, that puts the 'simple' back into 'really simple syndication'. Flexible enough to suit beginners and veterans alike, SimplePie is focused on speed, ease of use, compatibility and standards compliance. rpmlint output: [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./php-simplepie.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/php-simplepie-1.1.3-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-simplepie-1.1.3-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 10:27:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231027.n3NARAYG010095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-23 06:27:09 EDT --- Hello, I guess I fixed everything now. Regarding the Source0: The url supplied in the spec file is valid and working... only the link on the upstream homepage is bad. Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/guimup-0.1.4/guimup.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/guimup-0.1.4/guimup-0.1.4-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 10:37:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231037.n3NAb4LC017941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-23 06:37:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Hello, I guess I fixed everything now. Thanks, I will look into this tonight. > The url supplied in the spec file is valid and working... only the link on the > upstream homepage is bad. http://www.coonsden.com/dl0ads/%{srcname}-%{version}src.tar.gz resolves to http://www.coonsden.com/dl0ads/Guimup-0.1.4src.tar.gz $ wget http://www.coonsden.com/dl0ads/Guimup-0.1.4src.tar.gz --2009-04-23 12:33:48-- http://www.coonsden.com/dl0ads/Guimup-0.1.4src.tar.gz Aufl?sen des Hostnamen ?www.coonsden.com?.... 83.137.194.17 Verbindungsaufbau zu www.coonsden.com|83.137.194.17|:80... verbunden. HTTP Anforderung gesendet, warte auf Antwort... 403 Forbidden 2009-04-23 12:33:48 FEHLER 403: Forbidden. $ wget http://www.coonsden.com/cgi-bin/ShotGun.cgi?ammo=Guimup-stable-src --2009-04-23 12:35:49-- http://www.coonsden.com/cgi-bin/ShotGun.cgi?ammo=Guimup-stable-src Aufl?sen des Hostnamen ?www.coonsden.com?.... 83.137.194.17 Verbindungsaufbau zu www.coonsden.com|83.137.194.17|:80... verbunden. HTTP Anforderung gesendet, warte auf Antwort... 200 OK L?nge: nicht spezifiziert [text/html] ?Last-modified?-Kopfzeile fehlt -- Zeitstempel abgeschaltet. --2009-04-23 12:35:49-- http://www.coonsden.com/cgi-bin/ShotGun.cgi?ammo=Guimup-stable-src Verbindungsaufbau zu www.coonsden.com|83.137.194.17|:80... verbunden. HTTP Anforderung gesendet, warte auf Antwort... 200 OK L?nge: nicht spezifiziert [text/html] In ?ShotGun.cgi?ammo=Guimup-stable-src? speichern. [ <=> ] 387 --.-K/s in 0s 2009-04-23 12:35:49 (21,9 MB/s) - ?ShotGun.cgi?ammo=Guimup-stable-src? gespeichert [387] $ cat ShotGun.cgi\?ammo\=Guimup-stable-src ErrorError
Please either

1. Disable your download manager
2. Left click the file you are attempting to download

or

3. Enable your browser to send HTTP Referrers.
-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 10:39:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497283] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231039.n3NAd33n011802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 10:51:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:51:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231051.n3NApPNK020461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-23 06:51:24 EDT --- Hey, I'm sorry for that. As I only tried accessing the download URL via Firefox, I didn't notice that they are checking for the user agent... if you execute wget "http://www.coonsden.com/dl0ads/Guimup-0.1.4src.tar.gz" -U "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.8) Gecko/2009032713 Fedora/3.0.8-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.8" It works fine. Anyway, I'll contact upstream on this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 10:51:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:51:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231051.n3NApsqm014001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at gnsa.us AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 10:52:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483847] Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp - GStreamer RTSP server library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231052.n3NAq9KK014045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483847 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-23 06:52:07 EDT --- Failed to build on F-11, x86_64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1316484 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 10:59:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497283] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231059.n3NAxrQb021616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-23 06:59:52 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1316294 + rpmlint output is for SRPM and for RPM. perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate.noarch: E: useless-provides perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Alerts) ==> you should filter this + source files match upstream url 7f94ab9430a4c8504bb93c7974bb7493 Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=528, 99 wallclock secs ( 0.21 usr 0.01 sys + 96.32 cusr 0.21 csys = 96.75 CPU) Suggestions: 1) you should remove OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" And find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -size 0 -exec rm -f {} \; from SPEC as this is noarch package. 2) You must replace %attr(0644,root,root) /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Syntax/Highlight/Engine/Kate.pm %attr(0644,root,root) /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Syntax/Highlight/Engine/Kate.pod %attr(0644,root,root) /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Syntax/Highlight/Engine/Kate/* to %{perl_vendorlib}/* 3) When I filtered either one provides from perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Alerts) = 0.01 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Alerts) = 0.03 Got Unknown arguments to TAP::Harness::new (ignore_exit) at /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0/Test/Harness.pm line 255 maybe Ralf can help to fix this here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 11:02:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:02:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231102.n3NB2wVR022350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-23 07:02:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Hey, > I'm sorry for that. No need to feel sorry. :) > As I only tried accessing the download URL via Firefox Don't use firefox because of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps we need a downloadable URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 11:03:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:03:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497295] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Encodings - Unified interface to MIME encoding and decoding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231103.n3NB3l5O022425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497295 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-23 07:03:46 EDT --- This package already in Fedora and I see only new version of this package here. You should instead report bug against perl-Email-MIME-Encodings to update to latest upstream release. I did mock build for you. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1316543 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 11:23:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497295] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Encodings - Unified interface to MIME encoding and decoding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231123.n3NBNtLG019299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497295 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-04-23 07:23:54 EDT --- I'm an idiot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 11:28:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:28:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437785] Review Request: php-ZendFramework-api-doc - Zend Framework API documentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231128.n3NBSGib026822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437785 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kahl 2009-04-23 07:28:15 EDT --- Oh.. seems like I have missed the approval.. thank you for pinging David, want me to update to upstream's latest? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 11:35:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231135.n3NBZxix028473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ngompa13 at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #2 from David Nalley 2009-04-23 07:35:57 EDT --- Enano Review FIX: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SPECS/enano.spec SPECS/enano.spec: W: no-%build-section 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SRPMS/enano-1.1.6-2.20090301hge1ce6a91469b.fc10.src.rpm enano.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary Enano enano.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 rpmbuild]$ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/enano-1.1.6-2.20090301hge1ce6a91469b.fc10.noarch.rpm enano.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary Enano enano.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.6-2 ['1.1.6-2.20090301hge1ce6a91469b.fc10', '1.1.6-2.20090301hge1ce6a91469b'] enano.noarch: E: htaccess-file /usr/share/enano/cache/.htaccess enano.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/enano/.htaccess.new enano.noarch: E: htaccess-file /usr/share/enano/themes/.htaccess enano.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/enano/images/smilies/convert.sh 0644 enano.noarch: E: htaccess-file /usr/share/enano/install/.htaccess enano.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/enano/install/includes/cli-core.php enano.noarch: E: htaccess-file /usr/share/enano/includes/clientside/.htaccess enano.noarch: E: htaccess-file /usr/share/enano/files/.htaccess enano.noarch: E: htaccess-file /usr/share/enano/images/.htaccess enano.noarch: E: htaccess-file /usr/share/enano/files/avatars/.htaccess 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 3 warnings. So a few comments from rpmlint: Since you a providing a conf file for /etc/httpd/ you should push all of the .htaccess content to that and purge the .htaccess files. Put a comment in the build section and rpmlint will quit complaining about that. The rest should be relatively obvious. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . Though you may find it easier to use YYYYMMDDhg or something similar and note the change number in a comment. OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . FIX: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - code and readme indicate this is GPLv2+ not GPLv2 OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. FIX: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Using method in spec to grab source doesn't agree with what's packaged in the SRPM [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 tmp]$ md5sum ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/enano-1.1.6-20090301.tar.gz 52cdd1476c9d63238e487d05d437b724 /home/ke4qqq/rpmbuild/SOURCES/enano-1.1.6-20090301.tar.gz [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 tmp]$ md5sum ./enano-1.1.6-20090301.tar.gz 6450ad3e971d54680a07f69eb15ea7c6 ./enano-1.1.6-20090301.tar.gz OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. Though I will note that you can likely remove a number of the listings in %file by just claiming the entire directory. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. NA: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. I am also concerned about some of the bundled libraries in includes which are actually separate programs, and may need to be packaged separately. For instance the captcha stuff which is actually freecap. While this currently builds, I get a 403 (Forbidden) when I try and go to http://localhost/enanocms/ after installing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 11:38:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496824] Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231138.n3NBcdfj021985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496824 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-23 07:38:37 EDT --- available on koji now. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 11:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496826] Review Request: ipa-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231139.n3NBdT6N028897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496826 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-23 07:39:28 EDT --- available on koji now. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 11:39:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231139.n3NBd3bd028836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-23 07:39:01 EDT --- available on koji now. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 11:39:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:39:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496827] Review Request: ipa-pmincho-fonts - Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231139.n3NBdt2o028960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496827 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-23 07:39:54 EDT --- available on koji now. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 12:11:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:11:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231211.n3NCBPiW029210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-23 08:11:24 EDT --- I just talked to upstream, he gave me links to the source on SF. Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/guimup-0.1.4/guimup.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/guimup-0.1.4/guimup-0.1.4-3.fc10.src.rpm * Thu Apr 23 2009 Andreas Osowski 0.1.4-3 - Updated Source0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 12:34:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231234.n3NCYPTT009601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 08:34:24 EDT --- gnote-0.2.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnote-0.2.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 12:34:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:34:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492395] Review Request: php-geshi - Generic syntax highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231234.n3NCYliv002715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492395 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |david at gnsa.us AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 12:41:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:41:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497283] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231241.n3NCfF7H004306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-23 08:41:14 EDT --- The spec was recreated because it is not noarch. The problem in test, which I see is: PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/Kate.t .. 448/? Use of uninitialized value $ch in concatenation (.) or string at /home/marca/rpmbuild/BUILD/Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate-0.04/blib/lib/Syntax/Highlight/Engine/Kate/Template.pm line 534. Use of uninitialized value $ch in string ne at /home/marca/rpmbuild/BUILD/Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate-0.04/blib/lib/Syntax/Highlight/Engine/Kate/Template.pm line 535. Use of uninitialized value $ch in concatenation (.) or string at /home/marca/rpmbuild/BUILD/Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate-0.04/blib/lib/Syntax/Highlight/Engine/Kate/Template.pm line 534. This looks more like problem of wrong test, which didn't count with empty variable. I can't still get rid off double perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Alerts). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 12:50:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231250.n3NCoZ2t006066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag|needinfo?(extras-qa at fedorap |fedora-review? |roject.org) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 12:52:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497338] New: Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 Summary: Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-cclib.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-cclib-0.91-1.fc10.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://cclib.sourceforge.net/ Description: cclib is an open source library, written in Python, for parsing and interpreting the results of computational chemistry packages. The current version, cclib 0.9, parses output files from ADF, GAMESS (US), GAMESS-UK, Gaussian, Jaguar, Molpro, ORCA and PC GAMESS. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 12:55:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:55:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497339] Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231255.n3NCt8er013954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |497338 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 12:55:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:55:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231255.n3NCt8wm013975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |497339 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 12:56:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497339] Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231256.n3NCuXSQ007564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-23 08:56:33 EDT --- Even though this package contains Python modules, IMHO the name is correct since the primary use of the package is to act as a GUI. Which reminds me, I have to make a desktop file! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 12:54:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497339] New: Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 Summary: Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qmforge.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qmforge-2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://qmforge.sourceforge.net/ Description: QMForge reads output from various quantum mechanical calculations and provides tools for analyzing these results. Specifically, population (Mulliken and C-squared), fragment, and charge decomposition analyses are available. rpmlint output: qmforge.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-cclib 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. This is not a problem, it's just caused by the name of cclib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 13:05:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492395] Review Request: php-geshi - Generic syntax highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231305.n3ND5ifM009557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492395 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from David Nalley 2009-04-23 09:05:43 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./php-geshi.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/php-geshi-1.0.8.3-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-geshi-1.0.8.3-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] OK: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SOURCES]$ md5sum GeSHi-1.0.8.3.tar.gz fa7ad8e9f5d2573cfca58dd3d5945712 GeSHi-1.0.8.3.tar.gz [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SOURCES]$ md5sum GeSHi-1.0.8.3.tar.gz.1 fa7ad8e9f5d2573cfca58dd3d5945712 GeSHi-1.0.8.3.tar.gz.1 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Works on at least x86_64 - not that there is a real build here. NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. So this package is approved - you should be able to request CVS now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 13:09:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483847] Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp - GStreamer RTSP server library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231309.n3ND9r4Q017128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483847 --- Comment #2 from Bastien Nocera 2009-04-23 09:09:52 EDT --- Python requires missing it seems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 13:13:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497339] Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231313.n3NDDu8J018075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-23 09:13:55 EDT --- Although, there's no icon available for the application, and I'm not going to make one [not with my graphical skills!]. I'm going to invoke the Review guidelines: "If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 13:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:20:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483847] Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp - GStreamer RTSP server library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231320.n3NDKceg012348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483847 --- Comment #3 from Bastien Nocera 2009-04-23 09:20:37 EDT --- Fixed in: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/gstreamer-rtsp/gstreamer-rtsp-0.10.1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/gstreamer-rtsp/gstreamer-rtsp.spec Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1316764 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 13:23:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492395] Review Request: php-geshi - Generic syntax highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231323.n3NDNQ8B012794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492395 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-23 09:23:25 EDT --- Thanks for the review David. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-geshi Short Description: Generic syntax highlighter Owners: xavierb Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 13:30:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476524] Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231330.n3NDUnav014666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-23 09:30:47 EDT --- Thanks, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 13:34:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483847] Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp - GStreamer RTSP server library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231334.n3NDYh3M022197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483847 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 13:35:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231335.n3NDZHs6015571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-23 09:35:15 EDT --- AUTHORS, COPYING, NEWS, and README should be placed in %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 13:37:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:37:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487098] Review Request: Djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231337.n3NDbmoT023132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-23 09:37:47 EDT --- NEWS should go into %doc. 0.5beta1 was released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 13:51:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231351.n3NDpEa1026438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha 2009-04-23 09:51:13 EDT --- hi, sorry for this.. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 14:03:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483847] Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp - GStreamer RTSP server library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231403.n3NE3Qdf029024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483847 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-23 10:03:25 EDT --- REVIEW: - rpmlint is not silent: [petro at host-12-116 Desktop]$ rpmlint gstreamer-rtsp-* gstreamer-rtsp.i586: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libgstrtspserver-0.10.so.0.0.0 gstreamer-rtsp.i586: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libgstrtspserver-0.10.so.0.0.0 gstreamer-rtsp-devel.i586: W: no-documentation gstreamer-rtsp-python.i586: W: no-documentation gstreamer-rtsp-vala.i586: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings. [petro at host-12-116 Desktop]$ Regarding the first messages - please, add %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig Other messages may be ignored. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file must matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source: [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum gst-rtsp-0.10.1.0.tar.bz2* 67133d588a5153d80a4f8828aad2ec83 gst-rtsp-0.10.1.0.tar.bz2 67133d588a5153d80a4f8828aad2ec83 gst-rtsp-0.10.1.0.tar.bz2.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture (see koji log above). + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. - Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. See rpmlint messages above. - A package must own all directories that it creates. Unfortunately, %{_datadir}/gst-rtsp in devel-subpackage is not owned. Please, add it as %dir. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissable content. + No large documentation files. + Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + Header files are in a -devel package. + No static libraries. - The devel sub-package (containing pkgconfig(.pc) file) MUST have 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). + The library files that ends in .so (without suffix) are in a -devel package. + The devel sub-package requires the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. + Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - Missing "Requires:" * gstreamer-devel for devel sub-package (%{_includedir}/gstreamer-0.10/gst/) * pkgconfig for devel (see note above, %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/) * gstreamer-python for python syb-package (%{_libdir}/python*/site-packages/gst-0.10/gst) * vala for vala sub-package (%{_datadir}/vala/vapi/) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 14:07:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231407.n3NE7hNq022873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 14:10:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492945] Review Request: lv2-swh-plugins - LV2 ports of LADSPA swh plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231410.n3NEAXis030651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492945 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-23 10:10:32 EDT --- Fedora review lv2-swh-plugins-1.0.15-1.fc10.src.rpm 2008-04-23 rpmlint output: 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * OK ! needs attention ? needs clarification * Package is named according to guidelines. * Spec file is named after the package. * The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license (GPLv2+). * There are parts of the sources in the tarfile under other licenses, but as far as I can tell all files in the binary RPM have at least one source file under GPLv2+, so GPLv2+ is correct for the full binary RPM. * The sources has no (relevant) license file, and the binary package doesn't either. (There is a util/gsm/COPYRIGHT file, but the code in the util/gsm directory is not compiled during the build.) * The specfile is written in legible English The answer to the comment "FIXME: Fix weird permissions. How can we handle this in %%prep?" is to use "install -m 644" instead of "install" when installing the .ttl files. But then the command must be split in two because the .so files installed in the same command should not have 644 permission, but the default 755. It might be easier to do it the way it is currently done, and ask upstream to fix it for a later version. * Sources matches upstream and is the latest version: c78f42c36d7bf2fb5b17f795ef9636d1 swh-lv2-1.0.15.tar.gz c78f42c36d7bf2fb5b17f795ef9636d1 SRPM/swh-lv2-1.0.15.tar.gz * Package compiles in mock (Fedora 10) ! Some of the plugins have undefined symbols. This is OK if the undefined symbols are available in the application that loads the plugins, but it might be safer to link the plugins to the libraries providing the missing symbols if this can not always be guaranteed. 62 of the 91 plugins have missing symbols from libm (sin, cos, tan, exp, sqrt, log, pow, etc.) In addition the following undefined symbols are present: undefined symbol: shm_open (/usr/lib64/lv2/analogue_osc-swh.lv2/plugin-Linux.so) undefined symbol: shm_open (/usr/lib64/lv2/fm_osc-swh.lv2/plugin-Linux.so) undefined symbol: shm_open (/usr/lib64/lv2/hermes_filter-swh.lv2/plugin-Linux.so) undefined symbol: fftwf_plan_r2r_1d (/usr/lib64/lv2/mbeq-swh.lv2/plugin-Linux.so) undefined symbol: fftwf_execute (/usr/lib64/lv2/mbeq-swh.lv2/plugin-Linux.so) undefined symbol: fftwf_destroy_plan (/usr/lib64/lv2/mbeq-swh.lv2/plugin-Linux.so) undefined symbol: pitch_scale (/usr/lib64/lv2/pitch_scale-swh.lv2/plugin-Linux.so) At least the last one is potentially tricky since the header file that provides this symbol is within the source tarball, but the corresponding implementation file is not compiled: util/pitchscale.h and util/pitchscale.c. Or is there a different implementation of this function somewhere that is used to resolve the missing symbol when the plugin is loaded. The other undefined symbols in the list above are from librt and libfftw3f - are the applications loading the plugins always linked to these libraries? The plugins in the other two packages have no undefined symbols. * BuildRequires are sane. * No shared libraries in the default library path. * Owns or depends on packages that own it directories * No duplicate files * Permissions are sane and %files has %defattr * %clean clears buildroot * macros are used consistently * Contains code * %doc is not essential at runtime * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF-8 ? The plugins from this package are all labelled with a -Linux suffix, while this is not the case for the plugins from the other two plugin packages. What is the reason for not being consistent among the different packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 14:10:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492971] Review Request: lv2-zynadd-plugins - LV2 port of the ZynAddSubFX engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231410.n3NEAgdo030695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492971 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-23 10:10:41 EDT --- Fedora review lv2-zynadd-plugins-1-2.fc10.src.rpm 2009-04-23 * OK ! Needs attention ? Needs clarification rpmlint output: lv2-zynadd-plugins.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab: line 3) lv2-zynadd-plugins.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab: line 3) 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. ! rpmlint warning is fixable (replace the space on line 12 with a tab) * Package is named according to guidelines * Specfile is named after the package * The package is licensed as GPLv2 which is a Fedora approved license * The license matches the license statements in the source * The license file in the sources (gpl.txt) is packaged as %doc * The spec file is written in legible English * The source matches upstream and is the latest version ead0a8db5440e480c8a23441195a76df zyn-1.tar.bz2 ead0a8db5440e480c8a23441195a76df SRPM/zyn-1.tar.bz2 * Package builds in mock (Fedora 10) ? BuildRequires on jack-audio-connection-kit-devel - is it needed? * No shared libraries in the default library path ! Neither the package nor any of its Requires own %{_libdir}/lv2 (the other two plugin packages have Requires: lv2core) * No duplicate files * Permissions are sane and %files has %defattr * %clean clear buildroot * Macros are used consistently * Contains code * %doc is not essential at runtime * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 14:10:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:10:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492950] Review Request: lv2-vocoder-plugins - Add a robotic effect to vocals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231410.n3NEAaV6024282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492950 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-23 10:10:35 EDT --- Fedora review lv2-vocoder-plugins-1-1.fc10.src.rpm 2009-04-23 rpmlint output: 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * Package is named according to guidelines * The spec file is named after the package * The package is licensed as GPLv2, which is a Fedora approved license * The license matches the stated license in the sources * The license file in the sources (gpl.txt) is installed as %doc * The specfile is written in legible English * Sources matches upstream and is the latest version 8c0096978e9c58a252f247e1f7f7ed63 lv2vocoder-1.tar.bz2 8c0096978e9c58a252f247e1f7f7ed63 SRPM/lv2vocoder-1.tar.bz2 * Package compiles in mock (Fedora 10) * BuildRequires are sane * No shared libraries in default library path * Package owns or depend on packages that own its directories * No duplicate files * Permission are sane and %files has %defattr * %clean clears buildroot * Contains code * Uses macros consistently * %doc is not essential at runtime * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears buildroot * installed filenames are valid UTF-8 Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 14:16:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:16:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497310] Review Request: php-simplepie - Simple RSS Library in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231416.n3NEGSAB032288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497310 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 14:29:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483847] Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp - GStreamer RTSP server library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231429.n3NETOVS028694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483847 --- Comment #5 from Bastien Nocera 2009-04-23 10:29:23 EDT --- Fixed in: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/gstreamer-rtsp/gstreamer-rtsp-0.10.1.0-3.fc10.src.rpm http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/gstreamer-rtsp/gstreamer-rtsp.spec Let me know if I missed anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 14:31:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:31:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497310] Review Request: php-simplepie - Simple RSS Library in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231431.n3NEVheH029338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497310 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-23 10:31:42 EDT --- - No need to Requires: php since it is already pulled in by php-IDNA_Convert. - Why do you "rm -rf compatibility_test"? rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSFIX - Don't mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}. Choose one and stick with it. - You could clean up the install phase by replacing %{__mkdir} -p %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/php/%{name} cp -a create.php %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/php/%{name}/ cp -a simplepie.inc %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/php/%{name}/ with install -D -p -m 644 create.php %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/php/%{name}/create.php install -D -p -m 644 simplepie.php %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/php/%{name}/simplepie.php MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - No PECL, PEAR or CHANNEL. MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - simplepie.inc contains BSD headers. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 14:41:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:41:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231441.n3NEfSbI004993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-23 10:41:27 EDT --- Missing BR: numpy. OK, let's assume that you added this (koji scratchbuild with numpy - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1316865 ) REVIEW: + rpmlint is silent. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source: [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum cclib-0.91.tar.gz* 64dddde2cf1ab50cf8cb7f2882c88025 cclib-0.91.tar.gz 64dddde2cf1ab50cf8cb7f2882c88025 cclib-0.91.tar.gz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ +/- The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. But only after adding numpy as BR: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1316865 - All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, so, please add numpy. Definitely there are more missing runtime python dependencies - here is an output of "find -name "*py" -exec grep import {} \; | sort|uniq": http://peter.fedorapeople.org/cclib_imports.txt Please, add all necessary runtime python dependencies. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package must contains code, or permissible content. + No large documentation files + Everytnong, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. So, please add the only missign BuildRequire and all missing Requires. Also, I'm not sure, that we should ship *.pyc-files in %doc, however this is not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 14:42:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:42:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497310] Review Request: php-simplepie - Simple RSS Library in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231442.n3NEgx0s005301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497310 --- Comment #2 from David Nalley 2009-04-23 10:42:58 EDT --- compatibility_tests is a php page designed to display via a webserver whether or not your machine has the prerequisites (ie php 4.3 or greater) to use SimplePie. If you think it more appropriate, I can move it to %doc I'll remove the extra requires and push a new spec/srpm up shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 14:47:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:47:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476524] Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231447.n3NElBRS006712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2009-04-23 10:47:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-zope-testing Short Description: Zope Testing Framework Owners: konradm Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 14:47:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:47:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497310] Review Request: php-simplepie - Simple RSS Library in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231447.n3NElw8R007190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497310 --- Comment #3 from David Nalley 2009-04-23 10:47:57 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-simplepie.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-simplepie-1.1.3-2.fc10.src.rpm Extra requires stripped new spec and srpm above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 14:48:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483847] Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp - GStreamer RTSP server library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231448.n3NEmx1H007290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483847 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-23 10:48:58 EDT --- I don't see any other issues here, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 14:57:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497310] Review Request: php-simplepie - Simple RSS Library in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231457.n3NEvZvT009669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497310 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-23 10:57:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > compatibility_tests is a php page designed to display via a webserver whether > or not your machine has the prerequisites (ie php 4.3 or greater) to use > SimplePie. > > If you think it more appropriate, I can move it to %doc OK, no need to ship it then. But no need to delete it either! > I'll remove the extra requires and push a new spec/srpm up shortly. OK. - Use %{version} in Source0 line - You are still mixing $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}. This is a blocker. - Don't use a macro for mkdir, it's silly and makes the spec file harder to read. - Move the chmod's to the setup phase, since they're not related to the install phase - Don't remove compatibility_test, since it's not going anywhere from the builddir. [- You can copy both create.php and simplepie.inc in a single line.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 15:16:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231516.n3NFGQoS008250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-23 11:16:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I just talked to upstream, he gave me links to the source on SF. Argh, that was too simple ;) REVIEW FOR 0b9b2bc803e2fac3eb5396cb225c4a5a guimup-0.1.4-3.fc10.src.rpm OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines (GPLv3+). OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5 eeccdd2ef671f191f2c9a7170df99244 OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates (none except in docdir). OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. The %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. FAIL - SHOULD: The the package does not build in mock due to an libtool error. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. FAIL - SHOULD: The package does not function as described, it initially crashes. N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - Review is not a duplicate OK - All relevant doc included OK - Timestamps are preserved both during downlad and install OK - Latest stable version packaged Issues and Suggestions: Doesn't build in mock due to a libtool error. Attaching build.log Remove INSTALL from %doc, it only contents generic info that is not important when installing from rpm. Remove the trailing backslash after INSTALL="install -p" Desktop file: The key "Encoding" is no longer valid, remove that line Change guimup.png to guimp, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Icon_tag_in_Desktop_Files Icon: Use the 48px Icon instead of 64px GenericName is not really generic, just "Client for MPD" is enough here Category "Application" is no longer valid, see http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html The package doesn't require any Gnome bits, so you better use the category GTK instead of GNOME. Add the categories Audio and Player to allow nested menus. All together it becomes: "Categories=GTK;AudioVideo;Audio;Player;" App crashes initially: $ guimup MPD: using /etc/mpd.conf MPD: user is Config: using /home/chris/.guimup.conf Autoconnecting, as configured No host name: using "localhost" Invalid port #: using 6600 32ece453-5526-63e6-087d32aa-0e594c9c is dumped The previous version compiled against the included version of libmpdclient works fine though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 15:18:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:18:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231518.n3NFICXi016068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-23 11:18:11 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=340952) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=340952) build.log of a failed mockbuild -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 15:19:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:19:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231519.n3NFJ9cF016206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-23 11:19:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > +/- The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least > one primary architecture. But only after adding numpy as BR: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1316865 > > - All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, so, please add numpy. OK, sorry, didn't remember to test with mock :) Added numpy depedencies. > Definitely there are more missing runtime python dependencies - here is an > output of "find -name "*py" -exec grep import {} \; | sort|uniq": > > http://peter.fedorapeople.org/cclib_imports.txt > > Please, add all necessary runtime python dependencies. I don't think that there are any more, at least that's what the website says: http://cclib.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Install At least they're not necessary for operation. > So, please add the only missign BuildRequire and all missing Requires. > > Also, I'm not sure, that we should ship *.pyc-files in %doc, however this is > not a blocker. Oh, thanks for picking this up. I forgot about it since at first I didn't get the tests working, but then figured out how to pass the additional library dir argument. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-cclib.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-cclib-0.91-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 15:20:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497339] Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231520.n3NFKa5B009543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-23 11:20:35 EDT --- Added missing BRs for mock & koji. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qmforge.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qmforge-2.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 15:24:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:24:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483847] Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp - GStreamer RTSP server library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231524.n3NFOfnU010827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483847 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Bastien Nocera 2009-04-23 11:24:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gstreamer-rtsp Short Description: GStreamer RTSP server library Owners: hadess Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 15:27:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492971] Review Request: lv2-zynadd-plugins - LV2 port of the ZynAddSubFX engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231527.n3NFRhMp011622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492971 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-23 11:27:42 EDT --- In reply to comment #1) > Fedora review lv2-zynadd-plugins-1-2.fc10.src.rpm 2009-04-23 Thank you. > > ! rpmlint warning is fixable (replace the space on line 12 with a tab) > Fixed. I couldn't find any spaces in the line. Anyway, I removed all the whitespace and recreated the tabs, now there's no rpmlint. Weird. > ? BuildRequires on jack-audio-connection-kit-devel - is it needed? > I don't think so. No idea how it got there. Removed. > ! Neither the package nor any of its Requires own %{_libdir}/lv2 > (the other two plugin packages have Requires: lv2core) > My sloppiness. Added requires. Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/lv2-zynadd-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/lv2-zynadd-plugins-1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 15:32:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231532.n3NFWkTw019726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-23 11:32:45 EDT --- Hey, there is no INSTALL in %doc, what are you referring to ?!? Fixed the desktop file. I can not reproduce the mock failure. The crash is caused by MPD not running. What is the best way of solving this? Talk to upstream? Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/guimup-0.1.4/guimup.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/guimup-0.1.4/guimup-0.1.4-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 15:43:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:43:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497310] Review Request: php-simplepie - Simple RSS Library in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231543.n3NFhMHw015772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497310 --- Comment #5 from David Nalley 2009-04-23 11:43:21 EDT --- Thanks! Fixed those issues: New spec and srpm located here: Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-simplepie.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-simplepie-1.1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:06:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231606.n3NG6F8Y021636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |a.badger at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:08:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:08:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492091] Review Request: zikula-module-Content - Page editing module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231608.n3NG8Ejf028340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091 --- Comment #8 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-23 12:08:13 EDT --- Looks like the main zikula package is going to replace the libraries with symlinks to the php libraries installed on the system. That should work here as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:08:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:08:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231608.n3NG8vSJ028434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #12 from Liang Suilong 2009-04-23 12:08:56 EDT --- Mamoru Tasaka Is your mean that the latest goocanvas causes perltetris.pl does not work. Perl on my F-10: If I type /usr/bin/perltetris.pl into terminal, perltetris.pl will show a GUI window. It looks running well. Terminal do not show any error messages. If I close the window, terminal will show many messages. You see: [fedora at fedora-desktop ~]$ /usr/bin/perltetris.pl Use of uninitialized value $config_file in -e at /usr/bin/perltetris.pl line 1135, line 35. Use of uninitialized value $config_file in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/bin/perltetris.pl line 1155, line 35. Use of uninitialized value $config_file in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/bin/perltetris.pl line 1155, line 35. Can't create file : ????????? at /usr/bin/perltetris.pl line 1155, line 35. END failed--call queue aborted, line 35. PS?"?????????" means No that files or directories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:13:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:13:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231613.n3NGDnuq022976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 12:13:47 EDT --- rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-9.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-9.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:13:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:13:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231613.n3NGDsHr023008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 12:13:54 EDT --- rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-9.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-9.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:14:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:14:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231614.n3NGE00n023049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 12:13:59 EDT --- rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-9.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-9.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:15:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231615.n3NGFQiW030092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 12:15:25 EDT --- libvmime-0.9.0-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvmime-0.9.0-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:15:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:15:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492091] Review Request: zikula-module-Content - Page editing module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231615.n3NGFK9u030035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091 --- Comment #9 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-23 12:15:20 EDT --- ke4qq has a pair of packages that need to be reviewed in order to get zikula using all system packages: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497310 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497140 You can do the review to help demonstrate understanding of the packaging guidelines. Basically what happens is that you go through and check that the packages 1) Meet all the packaging guidelines 2) Aren't doing anything that will cause problems and aren't covered by the guidelines. I'll follow your work there. Once you and ke4qq deem the packages ready, I'll do a quick review to make sure everything is sound and either approve the package or sponsor you so you can approve it yourself. Some of the relevant guideline pages for reviewing php apps: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:15:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:15:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231615.n3NGFK32023626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 12:15:19 EDT --- libvmime-0.9.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvmime-0.9.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:15:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231615.n3NGFWcY023783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 12:15:31 EDT --- libvmime-0.9.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvmime-0.9.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:15:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:15:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231615.n3NGFdfV023821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #10 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-23 12:15:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Hey, > there is no INSTALL in %doc, what are you referring to ?!? Sorry, I just saw the INSTALL during build, but it was the one that gets removed afterwards. My bad. > I can not reproduce the mock failure. Against which release did you mock it? Mine was F11, which is treated as rawhide by the mirrorlist. > The crash is caused by MPD not running. > What is the best way of solving this? > Talk to upstream? No idea, but I think we agree that it should not crash. The older package didn't crash if mpd wasn't running but starts it correctly: $ guimup MPD: using /etc/mpd.conf MPD: user is Config: using /home/chris/.guimup.conf Autoconnecting, as configured No host name: using "localhost" Invalid port #: using 6600 Error: connection closed Is MPD running? Starting MPD, as configured problem opening log file "/var/lib/mpd/mpd.log" (config line 28) for writing So there is something not working with the communication between guimup and mpd. I will look into the new package later. Stay tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:21:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:21:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476524] Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231621.n3NGLnbw025283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:21:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:21:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453854] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231621.n3NGL0Ir025098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:20:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:20:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:20:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231620.n3NGKFwA024986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:20:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:22:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476528] Review Request: python-ZConfig - Structured Configuration Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231622.n3NGMpTc025410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476528 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:22:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:26:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:26:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231626.n3NGQDn8032244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:26:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:25:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:25:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231625.n3NGPNGV032124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:25:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:24:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231624.n3NGOSKE025731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:24:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:27:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231627.n3NGRgaw026570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:27:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:29:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:29:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231629.n3NGTPdh032689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:29:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:28:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:28:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483847] Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp - GStreamer RTSP server library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231628.n3NGSX1O032591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483847 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:28:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:30:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492395] Review Request: php-geshi - Generic syntax highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231630.n3NGUJ18027304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492395 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:30:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:32:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:32:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492991] Review Request: mediawiki-InputBox - An extension to enable input box tags for mediawiki pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231632.n3NGW9AN027669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492991 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:32:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:35:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:35:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495702] Review Request: perl-XXX - See Your Data in the Nude In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231635.n3NGZd7I002251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495702 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:35:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:36:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:36:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496429] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange - Invoke callbacks when the stash code is being compiled in changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231636.n3NGakJ3002381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496429 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:36:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:38:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496475] Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231638.n3NGcNtl029073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:38:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:37:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:37:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496473] Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231637.n3NGbbn0002778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:37:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:39:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:39:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496476] Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231639.n3NGd7tm003107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496476 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:39:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:43:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:43:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496486] Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231643.n3NGhUhY029968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:43:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:41:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:41:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496477] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231641.n3NGfmpp029806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496477 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:41:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:44:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:44:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231644.n3NGi3Jm004121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:44:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:42:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:42:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496478] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231642.n3NGgZfQ003981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496478 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:42:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:45:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496492] Review Request: sing - Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231645.n3NGjQGu004642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496492 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:45:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:46:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496606] Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231646.n3NGkHaE030674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496606 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:46:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:49:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496779] Review Request: perl-RT-Client-REST - Talk to RT using REST protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231649.n3NGnKRH031046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496779 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:49:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:48:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:48:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496777] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes - Introspect your code attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231648.n3NGmY74030888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496777 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:48:33 EDT --- cvs done. (Oh, I assumed you wanted F-11 on all these requests... you might update your template to include it moving forward). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:47:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496651] Review Request: Kazakh hunspell dictionaries - hunspell-kk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231647.n3NGlDfN030759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496651 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:47:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:50:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497138] Review Request: perl-Text-VimColor - Syntax color text in HTML or XML using Vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231650.n3NGoKFH031650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497138 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-23 12:50:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:52:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:52:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231652.n3NGqS76005842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 --- Comment #2 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-23 12:52:27 EDT --- Needswork: * Does not build in mock/koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1317154 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1317154&name=build.log Looks like you need to BuildRequire: monodevelop-devel rather than monodevelop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 16:54:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231654.n3NGsxag006027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-23 12:54:58 EDT --- Okay. ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (camcardsync) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 17:01:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:01:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497310] Review Request: php-simplepie - Simple RSS Library in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231701.n3NH1oK7007917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497310 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-23 13:01:48 EDT --- Okay, now it looks very clean. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 17:28:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:28:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231728.n3NHS9l1006370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 --- Comment #16 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-04-23 13:28:06 EDT --- The is no need to contribute for EPEL, so I wondering, that you have request ones? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 17:30:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:30:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480146] Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231730.n3NHU4L2013225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480146 --- Comment #14 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-04-23 13:30:02 EDT --- PIng aispo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 17:32:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:32:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231732.n3NHWWvg007662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-04-23 13:32:31 EDT --- Ping rpmandit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 17:31:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231731.n3NHVgc0007470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 --- Comment #11 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-04-23 13:31:40 EDT --- Ping rpandit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 17:41:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497310] Review Request: php-simplepie - Simple RSS Library in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231741.n3NHfevD009683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497310 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from David Nalley 2009-04-23 13:41:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-simplepie Short Description: Simple RSS Library in PHP Owners: ke4qqq Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 18:48:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:48:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231848.n3NIm5xf022974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2009-04-23 14:48:04 EDT --- Bumped to 2.0.4, thanks: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-zdaemon.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-zdaemon-2.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 18:47:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483847] Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp - GStreamer RTSP server library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231847.n3NIlOM9022829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483847 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Bastien Nocera 2009-04-23 14:47:23 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Peter. Built in F11 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 18:52:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492945] Review Request: lv2-swh-plugins - LV2 ports of LADSPA swh plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231852.n3NIqQhA024252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492945 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-23 14:52:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Fedora review lv2-swh-plugins-1.0.15-1.fc10.src.rpm 2008-04-23 > Thanks again! > ! Some of the plugins have undefined symbols. This is OK if the > undefined symbols are available in the application that loads the > plugins, but it might be safer to link the plugins to the libraries > providing the missing symbols if this can not always be guaranteed. > I made a patch to fix these issues. I also sent my modifications upstream via email, since they don't have a bugtracker. > ? The plugins from this package are all labelled with a -Linux suffix, > while this is not the case for the plugins from the other two plugin > packages. What is the reason for not being consistent among the > different packages? It is upstream's decision. There is no generic way of naming the plugins. There are other plugins that I haven't packaged yet which have named their .so files in their own way, like $pluginname.so Some plugins even contain multiple .so files in the same directory. I don't think it is worth to change the names manually. The plugin host applications usually scan the %{_libdir}/lv2/ directory for plugins and dlopen them. For instance, the lv2-calf-plugins made it to the rawhide repo, and it has its own conventions. Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/lv2-swh-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/lv2-swh-plugins-1.0.15-1.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: - 1.0.15-2 - Fix unresolved symbols -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 18:53:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:53:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231853.n3NIr8X3032021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 14:53:06 EDT --- pdfposter-0.4.6-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pdfposter-0.4.6-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 18:53:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231853.n3NIrIaU032097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 14:53:17 EDT --- pdfposter-0.4.6-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pdfposter-0.4.6-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 18:53:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:53:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231853.n3NIrD5j032064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 14:53:12 EDT --- pdfposter-0.4.6-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pdfposter-0.4.6-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 18:59:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:59:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492950] Review Request: lv2-vocoder-plugins - Add a robotic effect to vocals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231859.n3NIxsOZ001052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492950 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-23 14:59:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lv2-vocoder-plugins Short Description: Add a robotic effect to vocals Owners: oget Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 19:06:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231906.n3NJ6rSt027843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #37 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-23 15:06:49 EDT --- Seems much better. Thanks a lot for your effort! I'll take a closer look on weekend and approve this unless there's something serious, which is unlikely. Until then, there's a couple of minor issues that may need some attention: 1.) Are you sure you want to pin this to one specific version? Using >= 0.05 would make much more sense. Even if 0.06 or some later version breaks this, it wouldn't make things any worse and save you from having to bump this on updates. Requires: perl(File::Which) = 0.05 2.) Booo, this sucks :) ... %else # PowerPC, not all options work with the PowerPC-architecture, I do not test # which is not working (Gerd) When compiled on non-x86, compiler complains about non-existent -maccumulate-outgoing-args option. Why is it needed? Remove it, or make it conditional for x86, rest of Configure.pl options seem to work well on powerpc. 3.) Why is this conditional? %{?_with_fulltest: make fulltest} Does it take a lot of time? If yes, it should still be used for production builds and disabled for development ones; having the condition effectively reverted, replacing _with_fulltest by _without_fulltest. 4.) Please exclude static library: %{_libdir}/libparrot.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 19:12:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:12:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231912.n3NJCjZ3004957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Version|9 |rawhide AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-23 15:12:44 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 19:17:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:17:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231917.n3NJHhdR031018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #38 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-23 15:17:41 EDT --- Also, I see this blocks FE_NEEDSPONSOR. I can sponsor you, but I'll appreciate if you've picked a package or two from the review queue and done a informal reviews before. That is usually done to demonstrate that packager is familiar with RPM and packaging guidelines. This might be helpful to find a package that's waiting for a review: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 19:24:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492991] Review Request: mediawiki-InputBox - An extension to enable input box tags for mediawiki pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231924.n3NJOjQs000659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492991 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from John Guthrie 2009-04-23 15:24:44 EDT --- All builds have completed successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 19:35:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:35:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225126] Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol Compressor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231935.n3NJZ8XP011028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225126 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #28 from John Guthrie 2009-04-23 15:35:02 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: dxpc New Branches: F-11 Owners: guthrie -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 19:33:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462163] Review Request: checkdns - A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231933.n3NJXx2b010633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462163 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from John Guthrie 2009-04-23 15:33:55 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: checkdns New Branches: F-11 Owners: guthrie -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 19:36:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:36:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231936.n3NJa7I7003768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from John Guthrie 2009-04-23 15:36:05 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: simplyhtml New Branches: F-11 Owners: guthrie -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 19:38:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231938.n3NJcxI8011711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #39 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-23 15:38:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > Also, I see this blocks FE_NEEDSPONSOR. I can sponsor you, but I'll appreciate > if you've picked a package or two from the review queue and done a informal > reviews before. As i said in comment # 25 I'd like to sponsor Gerd once this package is reviewed. Nevertheless some informal pre-reviews wouldn't hurt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 19:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231939.n3NJd1OV011738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #20 from John Guthrie 2009-04-23 15:39:00 EDT --- Never mind. I was trying to check out the new branch incorrectly. I figured it out now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 19:41:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:41:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462163] Review Request: checkdns - A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231941.n3NJfSJ9005149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462163 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #22 from John Guthrie 2009-04-23 15:41:25 EDT --- Never mind. I was trying to check the F-11 branch out incorrectly. I figured it out now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 19:40:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225126] Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol Compressor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231940.n3NJeVf3004924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225126 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #29 from John Guthrie 2009-04-23 15:40:30 EDT --- Never mind. I was trying to check the F-11 branch out incorrectly. I figured it out now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 19:57:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231957.n3NJv8qc016104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 --- Comment #9 from Zarko (grof) 2009-04-23 15:57:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: camcardsync Short Description: tool for copying photos from a camera card Owners: grof Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: grof -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 19:57:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:57:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231957.n3NJvNLL009024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 20:11:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496701] Review Request: gxmessage - GTK2 based xmessage clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232011.n3NKB5th019986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496701 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chkr at plauener.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 20:15:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467814] Review Request: spin - Builds software appliances based on Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232015.n3NKF66Y021248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467814 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Jerry James 2009-04-23 16:15:04 EDT --- If some justification is needed for the rename, here's a page I've had on the web, one place or another, since September 2006: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/spin/ I can't submit that package to Fedora because it has a "noncommercial use only" license, but I may very well submit it to RPM Fusion. I'll have to think of a good renaming for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 20:45:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488397] Review Request: ghc-tar - Reading, writing and manipulating ".tar" archive files in Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232045.n3NKjXO2020404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488397 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jerry James 2009-04-23 16:45:31 EDT --- When I tried to build this package on an x86_64 F-10 machine, rpmbuild reported: Processing files: ghc-tar-devel-0.3.0.0-1.fc10 error: Could not open %files file /home/jamesjer/rpmbuild/BUILD/tar-0.3.0.0/ghc-tar-devel.files: No such file or directory RPM build errors: Could not open %files file /home/jamesjer/rpmbuild/BUILD/tar-0.3.0.0/ghc-tar-devel.files: No such file or directory I am not familiar with the various %ghc* macros. What is supposed to create ghc-tar-devel.files? I see that ghc-tar-prof.files got created. During the build, haddock was invoked, but I don't see it listed in the BuildRequires. Also, I see this in the build output: Running Haddock for tar-0.3.0.0... Warning: The documentation for the following packages are not installed. No links will be generated to these packages: rts-1.0 Should something else be listed in BuildRequires to pull in the documentation for rts-1.0 for linking? If so, will that same thing also be a Requires? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 20:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232056.n3NKuxN9022969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 --- Comment #3 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-04-23 16:56:58 EDT --- First the doubts: you say: "* Package is named according to the naming Guidelines" My packages don't end with .fc10.rpm , don't know how to instruct rpmbuild to use that kind of name convention. On "*Needswork" section you say: "* All filenames are UTF-8", that is good or bad?, need to change the text encoding? Fixed: * Spec file readability - DONE * License tag should just be "MIT" - DONE * The Source: line needs to have the full URL to the source - DONE * The vendor: tag should not be present in Fedora specfiles. - DONE * Autoreqprov should normally not be in Fedora spec files. - DONE * BuildArch: i386 does not belong in the spec file: Here some doubts don't know if this addins are goin to compile fine in all architectures, it seems to me that it have to just x86/x86_64 for now, how do I mix the "BuildArch: noarh" and "ExclusiveArch: x86 x86_64"? * env_options isn't a macro used in Fedora - DONE * You should use %configure rather than ./configure: Problem here, using "%configure" I get: ind-tables -I/usr/lib/gfortran/modules' + export FFLAGS + ./configure --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/var/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info Unknown argument --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu Usage : configure [OPTION]... [--config=CONFIG] So, it seems to me that the "%configure" macro use something that the package script don't know, so I use again "./configure" witch give now a error message: RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /home/buho/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/monodevelop-debugger-gdb-2.0-1.1.i386/usr/lib/lib/monodevelop/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Debugger/MonoDevelop.Debugger.Gdb.dll* Witch is related to the use of: %{_libdir}/lib/monodevelop/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Debugger/MonoDevelop.Debugger.Gdb.dll* instead of the original: %{_prefix}/lib/monodevelop/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Debugger/MonoDevelop.Debugger.Gdb.dll* * --prefix=%_prefix is included in the %configure macro so you don't need it if you use the %configure macro. - SEE PREVIOUS * In Fedora, mono libraries are installed in %{_libdir} instead of /usr/lib. On x86_64 systems, that expands to /usr/lib6 instead of /usr/lib.- SEE PREVIOUS * package needs to rm -rf %{buildroot} at the beginning of %install - DONE * All filenames are UTF-8 - GOOD/BAD? * No license file is included in the tarball so you should ask upstream if they'll provide one with their next release. - ASKING * Looks like you need to BuildRequire: monodevelop-devel rather than monodevelop. - DONE Reviewed file can be found: http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-debugger-gdb.spec.review1 Thanks Toshio Mauricio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 21:08:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:08:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496486] Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232108.n3NL8wQi025712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 17:08:58 EDT --- cclive-0.3.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cclive-0.3.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 21:07:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:07:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496486] Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232107.n3NL7vKC000313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 17:07:56 EDT --- cclive-0.3.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cclive-0.3.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 21:09:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:09:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496486] Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232109.n3NL9nOe026051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 17:09:48 EDT --- cclive-0.3.2-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cclive-0.3.2-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 21:10:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:10:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496701] Review Request: gxmessage - GTK2 based xmessage clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232110.n3NLA1kw026098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496701 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Christian Krause 2009-04-23 17:10:00 EDT --- Package looks good. There is only minor and non-critical issue: "Requires: info" is not needed - please remove it before importing the package. -> APPROVED * rpmlint: OK rpmlint SRPMS/gxmessage-2.12.1-1.fc10.src.rpm RPMS/i386/gxmessage-* SPECS/gxmessage.spec 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * naming: OK * spec file name: OK * License: - GPLv3+ acceptable - matches upstream - matches source - COPYING file packaged * Source0: OK - spectool -g works - matches upstream - md5sum: 48c0f8b2a18fa92724c1cec83a9aa46c gxmessage-2.12.1.tar.gz * Compilation: OK - locally in F10 - mock in F10 - koji for F10, F11, rawhide - RPMOPTFLAGS used correctly - no error messages during compilation * legible & American English: OK * BuildRequires: OK * Requires: TODO (minor) "Requires: info" should not be necessary * locale handling: OK * shared object files, static libraries, pkgconfig, header files: OK (n/a) * package owns directories that it creates: OK * no files listed twice: OK * file permissions: OK * %defattr used: OK * %clean section: OK * macro usage: OK * large documentation into subpackage: OK (n/a) * code vs. content: OK (only code) * GUI application need %{name}.desktop file: OK (not a gui application by itself) * rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install: OK * filenames UTF-8: OK * scriptlets: OK - info & gtk-update-icon-cache used according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets * functional test: OK - examples work -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 21:15:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232115.n3NLFc8x002475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 17:15:37 EDT --- abby-0.2.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abby-0.2.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 21:16:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:16:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470909] Review Request: wt - C++ library and application server for developing web applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232116.n3NLGXdN002592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470909 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |giallu at gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-04-23 17:16:30 EDT --- Any reason why you're deviating from the recommended steps for cmake based projects? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Cmake#Specfile_Usage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 21:16:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:16:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232116.n3NLGrpv027898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 17:16:53 EDT --- abby-0.2.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abby-0.2.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 21:18:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:18:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232118.n3NLICQd002903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 17:18:11 EDT --- abby-0.2.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abby-0.2.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 21:26:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492395] Review Request: php-geshi - Generic syntax highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232126.n3NLQZXx004953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492395 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 17:26:34 EDT --- php-geshi-1.0.8.3-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-geshi-1.0.8.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 21:26:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492395] Review Request: php-geshi - Generic syntax highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232126.n3NLQd3f004993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492395 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 17:26:39 EDT --- php-geshi-1.0.8.3-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-geshi-1.0.8.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 21:26:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:26:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492395] Review Request: php-geshi - Generic syntax highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232126.n3NLQUvM030511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492395 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 17:26:29 EDT --- php-geshi-1.0.8.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-geshi-1.0.8.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 21:28:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:28:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496606] Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232128.n3NLS0fU030709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496606 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 17:28:00 EDT --- perl-Log-LogLite-0.82-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Log-LogLite-0.82-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 21:28:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:28:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496606] Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232128.n3NLS9VM030746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496606 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 17:28:08 EDT --- perl-Log-LogLite-0.82-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Log-LogLite-0.82-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 21:28:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:28:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496606] Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232128.n3NLS5d5005271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496606 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 17:28:04 EDT --- perl-Log-LogLite-0.82-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Log-LogLite-0.82-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 21:34:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496701] Review Request: gxmessage - GTK2 based xmessage clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232134.n3NLY4rO032028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496701 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-23 17:34:03 EDT --- Thanks Christian! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gxmessage Short Description: GTK2 based xmessage clone Owners: cwickert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 21:38:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:38:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] New: Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Summary: Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: juriskovic.igor at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: Requesting hosting space for spec SRPM URL: Requesting hosting space for srpm Description: Mumble is a voice chat application for groups. While it can be used for any kind of activity, it is primarily intended for gaming. It can be compared to programs like Ventrilo or TeamSpeak. People tend to simplify things, so when they talk about Mumble they either talk about "Mumble" the client application or about "Mumble & Murmur" the whole voice chat application suite. Mumble is client application witch connects to running Murmur server. Murmur is server application to witch clients connect. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 21:42:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:42:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496651] Review Request: Kazakh hunspell dictionaries - hunspell-kk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232142.n3NLgZhA008601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496651 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 22:06:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:06:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232206.n3NM6BrG006720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #27 from Christian Krause 2009-04-23 18:06:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > Built packages succesfully for Fedora 11 and Fedora 10. > F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1255447 > F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1255459 > > It failed on F9. I think that's because some dependencies could not be Sorry for the late response. It looks like that Lubomir is officially taking care of this review and he may also be able to sponsor your. I've roughly looked at your most recent spec file: http://proyectofedora.org/mexico/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/blueman.spec and I have some minor remarks: - in %postun you call "gtk-update-icon-cache" twice (detailed information: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache ) - since data files are placed in %{_datadir}/hal/fdi/information/20thirdparty, the package should require "hal". Additionally I've tested it a little bit with my cell phone and it seems to work good (don't know why I couldn't get it running previously). I think that package is now ready for a final review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 22:28:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:28:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470909] Review Request: wt - C++ library and application server for developing web applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232228.n3NMSaha010992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470909 --- Comment #10 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-04-23 18:28:35 EDT --- More items to check: as said before the description is really too long and marketing oriented. I propose something like: === Wt (pronounced 'witty') is a C++ library and application server for developing and deploying web applications. A web application developed with Wt is written in only one compiled language (C++), from which the library generates the necessary HTML/XHTML, Javascript, CGI, SVG/VML/Canvas and AJAX code. === * The -devel subpackage needs to Require: its dependencies. * you are now adding files picking up the whole directories => no more need for explictly owning them with %dir; for example, one of: %dir %{_includedir}/Wt %{_includedir}/Wt is redundant * The library is GPLv2, but it has the OpenSSL exception, moreover some binaries are under different licenses; from the website: -The built-in httpd is based on an example of the asio C++ library, developed by Christopher M. Kohlhoff (Boost Software License). -Thread pool implementation from Philipp Henkel (threadpool; Boost Software License). -The Mini-XML 2.4 library by Michael Sweet (Mini-XML license , which is LGPL with some exceptions) Please check everything and compose a complete license field acoording to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios * There is some doxygen documentation available, consider packaging it (probably in a -doc subpackage) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 22:30:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:30:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232230.n3NMUMb4018661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-23 18:30:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - License is GPLv3, but is it GPLv3 only or GPLv3+? Forget this, this issue was cleared during review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 22:29:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232229.n3NMT0N0018087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-23 18:28:59 EDT --- REVIEW FOR aa321f12800c1d328e674446e773508a nfoview-1.4-1.fc10.src.rpm OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/nfoview-1.4-1.fc11.* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines (GPLv3+) OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5 ba0572d89ffacb7cd2d0e19010712f8c OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. OK - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Others: OK - Review is no duplicate, package is not yet in Fedora OK - Latest stable version packaged OK - Timestamp of Source0 preserved Issues: - Unresolved deps on Fedora <= 10: terminus-font needs to be terminus-font-x11 - License is GPLv3, but is it GPLv3 only or GPLv3+? - Desktop file contains the categories "GTK;Utility;Viewer;" but according to http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html Viewer belongs to Graphics or Office but not to Utilities. You may want to replace it with "TextTools" during desktop-file-install - Desktop file contains as mime type, but you are not running update-desktop-database, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database - No need to include PKG-INFO in %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 23:14:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232314.n3NNEi0K025735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g, | |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-23 19:14:43 EDT --- Hi Igor, thanks for submitting this review. I know there have been people already working on mumble, but so far nobody has managed to get it into Fedora. CC'ing Simon Wesp, he knows more about this. (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: Requesting hosting space for spec > SRPM URL: Requesting hosting space for srpm If you applied for a FAS account, you should already have some space at fedorapeolpe.org > This is my first package and I need a sponsor. OK, I added a blocker on bug # 177841, so potential sponsors can find you -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 23:15:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232315.n3NNFMML019336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #72 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-23 19:15:18 EDT --- Please can you check this : http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird.spec http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-4.fc10.src.rpm Waiting for scratchbuild at F-10 (may be I broke ppc64) : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1318031 There are some rpmlint Errors and Warning I'm not sure Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 23:34:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:34:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232334.n3NNYXrg022286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #16 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-23 19:34:32 EDT --- As it was almost impossible to contribute "additively" to the SOCI project (http://soci.sourceforge.net), I have created a new project, namely Extras-SOCI (http://sourceforge.net/projects/extras-soci), which aims to be for SOCI what Extras Boost (http://boost-extras.sourceforge.net/) is for Boost, that is: * wrap the pristine SOCI source code within standard GNU framework (Autotools, i18n, Manual & Info pages, etc.); * host the project on a Subversion repository; * welcome any contribution; * synchronise with the SOCI code base, every time that latter evolves (once every six month, more or less). Hence, I shall deliver RPM packages for extras-soci, synchronised with the code base of SOCI. That is, there will be extras-soci-3.0.0 and extras-soci-cvstrunk fully compatible with respectively soci-3.0.0 and soci-cvstrunk. Should I close that review report and open a new one for extras-soci? Or is that fine to keep that one for releasing extras-soci packages? Thanks in advance for your feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 23:37:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:37:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904232337.n3NNbsgF029445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-23 19:37:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Created an attachment (id=340952) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=340952) [details] > build.log of a failed mockbuild While looking at the libtool issue closer I remembered that it was discussed recently on devel-list. See https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-April/msg00965.html and follow-ups, especially the one from Mamoru. The new package aad87062659e66f7214a63cae5015934 guimup-0.1.4-4.fc10.src.rpm fixes all outstanding issues: OK - Trailing backslash was removed from INSTALL="install -p" OK - Desktop file follows latest fdo specs >From a packaging point of view there are no more blockers, so the package is APPROVED. Nevertheless I'd like to ask you to only build it for rawhide until the crash is fixed. Take your time, work it out with upstream and once it's fixed build packages for the stable releases. This also works around the current libtool problems mentioned above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 00:17:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:17:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240017.n3O0HllK029253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 --- Comment #5 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-23 20:17:46 EDT --- I realized that it's a little ambiguous which of the rpmlint output you have to act on. These are the ones that are false positives for this package: monodevelop-debugger-gdb.x86_64: E: no-binary monodevelop-debugger-gdb.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib monodevelop-debugger-gdb.x86_64: W: no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 00:16:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:16:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240016.n3O0G97x029141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 --- Comment #4 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-23 20:16:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > First the doubts: > you say: "* Package is named according to the naming Guidelines" > My packages don't end with .fc10.rpm , don't know how to instruct rpmbuild to > use that kind of name convention. > Ah... this is optional, but it actually is a good thing to do (so upgrades between releases work). Change the Release tag to: Release: 2%{?dist} The %{dist} macro expands to fc10 on fedora 10, fc11 on Fedora 11, etc. The "?" in the macro allows the rpm to build if the macro isn't defined on the system on which you're building. > On "*Needswork" section you say: "* All filenames are UTF-8", that is good or > bad?, need to change the text encoding? > Ah. Sorry. I should have put that in the Good section. Your encoding is fine. > Fixed: > * Spec file readability - DONE * Still need to move the %file section to just before the %changelog section > * BuildArch: i386 does not belong in the spec file: Here some doubts don't know > if this addins are goin to compile fine in all architectures, it seems to me > that it have to just x86/x86_64 for now, how do I mix the "BuildArch: noarh" > and "ExclusiveArch: x86 x86_64"? * You would do: ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 But what keeps the addins from compiling on other arches? mono itself is being built on: %ix86 x86_64 ia64 armv4l sparcv9 alpha s390 s390x ppc ppc64 monodevelop is being built on: ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 ia64 armv4l sparc alpha You probably want to go with monodevelop's version as it is the more restricted of the two. Since ppc and ppc64 is left off of there, you want to follow the directions here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Architecture_Support So that people associated with ppc and ppc64 ports can track this bug and attempt to fix it. > * You should use %configure rather than ./configure: Problem here, using > "%configure" I get: Yeah... I took a look. The package has a hand-coded configure script instead of an autoconf generated one so it has limited options. Try this for the configure line: ./configure --prefix=%{_prefix} --bindir=%{_bindir} --datadir=%{_datadir} --libdir=%{_libdir} And it looks like you'll also have to patch one of the make files. MonoDevelop.Debugger.Gdb.make hardcodes $(prefix)/lib/ instead of allowing libdir to override that. You can patch the file or put this sed line into your %prep section: sed -i 's!INSTALL_DIR = $(DESTDIR)$(prefix)/lib/monodevelop/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Debugger!INSTALL_DIR = $(DESTDIR)%{_libdir}/monodevelop/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Debugger!' MonoDevelop.Debugger.Gdb.make > RPM build errors: > File not found by glob: > /home/buho/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/monodevelop-debugger-gdb-2.0-1.1.i386/usr/lib/lib/monodevelop/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Debugger/MonoDevelop.Debugger.Gdb.dll* > > Witch is related to the use of: > > %{_libdir}/lib/monodevelop/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Debugger/MonoDevelop.Debugger.Gdb.dll* the goal is to be able to use: %{_libdir}/monodevelop/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Debugger/MonoDevelop.Debugger.Gdb.dll* So it looks like you'll need to modify the file line a little. New things: * You need to bump the Release: field with every revision. Since you also want to add the disttag, the next release should be: Release: 2%{?dist} I was able to build in mock with the changes mentioned here. So rpmlint output from the packages: monodevelop-debugger-gdb.src: E: no-changelogname-tag monodevelop-debugger-gdb.x86_64: E: no-changelogname-tag * You need to add a %changelog entry to tell what you've done. the format is shown here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs monodevelop-debugger-gdb.src: W: strange-permission monodevelop-debugger-gdb-2.0.tar.bz2 0755 * 0644 would be the normal permissions for a tarball. monodevelop-debugger-gdb.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line 1) * Converting all tabs in the specfile into spaces would be a good idea. monodevelop-debugger-gdb.x86_64: E: no-binary monodevelop-debugger-gdb.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib * mono packages that only contain assemblies have no ELF files but they use architecture specific directories so they cannot be noarch. monodevelop-debugger-gdb.x86_64: W: no-documentation * In this case upstream is not providing any documentation files monodevelop-debugger-gdb-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package * Presently, rpm doesn't know how to pull debug information from mono assemblies. So we should be stopping the generation of debuginfo files. This will change in the future. This page has details of how to fix this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Debuginfo#Useless_or_incomplete_debuginfo_packages_due_to_other_reasons You want to add this to your spec file: # rpm does not currently pull debuginfo out of mono packages %global debug_package %{nil} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 00:36:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:36:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240036.n3O0aL4I032243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-23 20:36:20 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341041) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341041) German translation for nfoview Patch to update the German translation. Full de.po is already submitted to Gnome bugzilla: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580061 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 01:05:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:05:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240105.n3O15Qab011204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #17 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-23 21:05:23 EDT --- Peter, It's been more than 4 months since the initial review and you made 9 builds since. Any chance you will have a look at the issues below this season? (In reply to comment #9) > > > * Remove the precompiled binaries during prep. So far I found: > > ./configure.exe > > ./samples/opalgw/messages.bin > > ./plugins/LID/TigerJet/TjIpSys.dll > > ./plugins/LID/CM_HID/CM_HID.dll > > ./plugins/LID/VPB/libvpb.lib > > ./plugins/video/H.263-ffmpeg/ffmpeg/libavcodec.dll > > ./plugins/video/H.263-ffmpeg/ffmpeg/libavcodec.so > > ./src/win32/vpbapi.lib: current ar archive > > Actually the ffmpeg stuff is patent encumbered. You should take that stuff off > > and provide a "clean" tarball for the SRPM. > > I'll speak to upstream to get this cleaned up. > (In reply to comment #11) > > Ok, How about the samples? > > I'll have a look > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 01:10:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240110.n3O1AGkf005676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #2 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-23 21:10:15 EDT --- Hello Christoph. Here are the required files: Spec URL: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble.spec SRPM URL: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble-1.1.8-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 01:31:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496168] Review Request: termit - Simple terminal emulator based on vte library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240131.n3O1V303015368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496168 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-23 21:31:02 EDT --- Reply from upstream: License is GPLv2 only, so my guess was right. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: termit Short Description: Simple terminal emulator based on vte library Owners: cwickert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 02:15:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240215.n3O2FSvA023167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #30 from Feng Yu 2009-04-23 22:15:24 EDT --- 0.7.5-1 srpm and the corresponding spec files are available at http://rainwoodman.dreamhosters.com/fedora-review/ Please take a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 03:26:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496475] Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240326.n3O3QkgZ005192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 23:26:45 EDT --- perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 03:26:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:26:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496475] Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240326.n3O3Qf3o005160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 23:26:40 EDT --- perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 03:27:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:27:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496476] Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240327.n3O3RbCH032492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496476 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 23:27:36 EDT --- perl-Clipboard-0.09-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Clipboard-0.09-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 03:25:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496473] Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240325.n3O3Pn2R032175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 23:25:48 EDT --- perl-Mixin-Linewise-0.002-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Mixin-Linewise-0.002-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 03:25:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496473] Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240325.n3O3PrQY032204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 23:25:53 EDT --- perl-Mixin-Linewise-0.002-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Mixin-Linewise-0.002-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 03:28:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496477] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240328.n3O3STXr032590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496477 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 23:28:28 EDT --- perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create-0.002-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create-0.002-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 03:27:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496476] Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240327.n3O3RgG2005357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496476 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 23:27:42 EDT --- perl-Clipboard-0.09-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Clipboard-0.09-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 03:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496478] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240329.n3O3TdXP005571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496478 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 23:29:38 EDT --- perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create-0.001-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create-0.001-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 03:29:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:29:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496478] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240329.n3O3Ti7m005607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496478 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 23:29:44 EDT --- perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create-0.001-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create-0.001-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 03:28:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:28:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496477] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240328.n3O3SYJo005449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496477 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-23 23:28:33 EDT --- perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create-0.002-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create-0.002-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 03:30:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496473] Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240330.n3O3ULVI006089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-23 23:30:20 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 03:30:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:30:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496476] Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240330.n3O3UTZk000758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496476 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-23 23:30:29 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 03:30:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496475] Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240330.n3O3UP9i000724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-23 23:30:25 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 03:30:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:30:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496477] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240330.n3O3UXvs000790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496477 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-23 23:30:33 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 03:30:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:30:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496478] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240330.n3O3UepH000825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496478 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-23 23:30:39 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 03:55:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:55:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478928] Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240355.n3O3tQkO010420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478928 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-23 23:55:25 EDT --- I finished reviewing this. There is only one issue that I need to ask: ? This one has doxygen documentation. Any reasons for not building/packaging it? The package build fine in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1318281 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 03:59:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] New: Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Config-INI.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Config-INI-0.014-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Config::INI - simple .ini-file format. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1318286 (and Chris, if you're reading, reviewtool refused to submit this - presumably because it found a review for perl-Config-IniHash - where do you want bug reports?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 04:57:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:57:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: python-Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240457.n3O4vF1b020802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-04-24 00:57:14 EDT --- This one needs to be redone .. as it is a standalone application and its name cannot start with python- Will redo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 05:22:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240522.n3O5MiYW019478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-24 01:22:43 EDT --- I just checked, which modules import whose additional python libraries, and found the following: * src/cclib/bridge/cclib2biopython.py explicitly imports python-biopython * src/cclib/bridge/cclib2openbabel.py explicitly imports python-openbabel * src/cclib/bridge/cclib2pyquante.py explicitly imports PyQuante * src/cclib/method/volume.py tries to import PyQuante and vtk-python and fallbacks to work w/o using them instead. And I'm afraid, that further usage of PyQuante in volme.py is broken (there is no check for module_pyq != False later). * many modules in src/cclib/method also imports numpy * some modules in src/cclib/parser imports only numpy * cclib/progress library tries to import PyQt3 first, then fallbacks to PyQt4 and after all imports text-based progress module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 05:28:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:28:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492259] Review Request: tucan - Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240528.n3O5Sv03020323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492259 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-24 01:28:56 EDT --- busy this week and weekend if nobody picks this will review by next week Also, I see you posted same comment 4 times???? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 05:31:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:31:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496429] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-StashChange - Invoke callbacks when the stash code is being compiled in changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240531.n3O5VRaY021094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496429 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-24 01:31:26 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 06:06:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240606.n3O66p82028219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-24 02:06:50 EDT --- Yeah. Well, I made a metapackage that pulls in the additional requirements. I don't want to put them in the main package, since the parser works fine without them. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-cclib.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-cclib-0.91-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 06:14:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240614.n3O6EtqV029562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 --- Comment #21 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-24 02:14:53 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 06:26:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496777] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes - Introspect your code attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240626.n3O6Q9Zp004548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496777 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-24 02:26:07 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 06:40:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:40:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495702] Review Request: perl-XXX - See Your Data in the Nude In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240640.n3O6eIPU007242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495702 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 06:40:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:40:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497138] Review Request: perl-Text-VimColor - Syntax color text in HTML or XML using Vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240640.n3O6eOo9002060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497138 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 06:51:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:51:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492259] Review Request: tucan - Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240651.n3O6pLJu009301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492259 --- Comment #9 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-24 02:51:20 EDT --- yeah, was a hiccup of my firefox or my internet connection. had this problem in a forum, too. Don't know was the matter was. it was just on this day. strange, sorry for spam. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 07:00:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 03:00:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496779] Review Request: perl-RT-Client-REST - Talk to RT using REST protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240700.n3O70L7H011054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496779 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-24 03:00:20 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 07:01:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 03:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495693] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6 - Perl 6 Syntax Highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240701.n3O71pxx006269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495693 --- Comment #5 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-24 03:01:49 EDT --- perl-Text-VimColor was built today. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1318438 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 06:59:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:59:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478928] Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240659.n3O6xxRs005666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478928 --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-24 02:59:58 EDT --- There are comments in the headers describing the API, but they are not proper doxygen markup. It is possible to build the package with the instructions to generate a doc package, but it will be rather empty: /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/doxygen.css /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/doxygen.png /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/ftv2blank.png /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/ftv2doc.png /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/ftv2folderclosed.png /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/ftv2folderopen.png /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/ftv2lastnode.png /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/ftv2link.png /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/ftv2mlastnode.png /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/ftv2mnode.png /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/ftv2node.png /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/ftv2plastnode.png /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/ftv2pnode.png /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/ftv2vertline.png /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/globus_rsl_assist.tag /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/graph_legend.dot /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/graph_legend.html /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/graph_legend.png /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/index.html /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/main.html /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/tab_b.gif /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/tab_l.gif /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/tab_r.gif /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/tabs.css /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/html/tree.html /usr/share/doc/globus-rsl-assist-2.1/refman.pdf /usr/share/globus/packages/globus_rsl_assist/noflavor_doc.filelist /usr/share/globus/packages/globus_rsl_assist/pkg_data_noflavor_doc.gpt As you can see there are no section 3 man pages, nor any html pages with content - only the empty stub created by doxygen. The pdf manual only has the frontpage and an empty content page. So the doc package is possible to produce, but is rather useless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 07:53:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 03:53:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240753.n3O7r0Eb016252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #18 from Peter Robinson 2009-04-24 03:52:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Peter, > It's been more than 4 months since the initial review and you made 9 builds > since. Any chance you will have a look at the issues below this season? Sorry, I've been very busy and haven't had a chance to get back to this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 09:51:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240951.n3O9pH5Q009473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 --- Comment #11 from Jasper Capel 2009-04-24 05:51:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > * Source tarball URL gives 404 Not Found. It's missing the "gvrpcd" directory. > Correct would be: > > Source0: http://sokrates.mimuw.edu.pl/~sebek/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz > Fixed. > * A proper exit(..) call at end of main() would eliminate the following > compiler warning: > gvrpcd.c:290: warning: control reaches end of non-void function > > I don't know C, if this is a blocker, could you propose a patch? Alternatively, I could ask upstream for a patch, but I think it'd be nicer if we just come up with the patch. > * "Short-Description" in initscript contains a typo: s/annoucing/announcing/ > > Fixed. > * You've still got the start-by-default problem (see bottom of comment 2) where > the daemon is started even if VLAN configuration is missing: > > $ sudo service gvrpcd start > Starting gvrpcd-eth0: [ OK ] > $ sudo service gvrpcd status > gvrpcd-eth0 dead but pid file exists Oops, missed that. $config was undefined, fixed now. http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/gvrpcd-1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/gvrpcd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 10:28:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225734] Merge Review: esound In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241028.n3OASktH022910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225734 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com, | |lpoetter at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-24 06:28:45 EDT --- Adding lennart as he's the current package owner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 10:27:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225304] Merge Review: avahi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241027.n3OARe64022758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225304 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com, | |lpoetter at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-24 06:27:39 EDT --- Adding lennart as he's the package owner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 10:41:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:41:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241041.n3OAfava025941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #73 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-24 06:41:30 EDT --- Found my mistake, I'll post new files in few hours rpmlint : 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 23 warnings. not so bad ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 10:37:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:37:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225995] Merge Review: libdaemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241037.n3OAbW7T025110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225995 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com, | |lpoetter at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-24 06:37:31 EDT --- Adding Lennart as he's the current owner -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 10:45:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:45:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492971] Review Request: lv2-zynadd-plugins - LV2 port of the ZynAddSubFX engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241045.n3OAjZXM026892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492971 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-24 06:45:33 EDT --- Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 10:45:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492945] Review Request: lv2-swh-plugins - LV2 ports of LADSPA swh plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241045.n3OAjTSq026841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492945 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-24 06:45:27 EDT --- I am well aware of "it's upstream's decision" issues. There are plenty of those in the packages I try to package as well. Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 10:50:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484798] Review Request: xiphos - Bible study and research tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241050.n3OAo7T7027974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484798 Deji Akingunola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xjakub at fi.muni.cz --- Comment #5 from Deji Akingunola 2009-04-24 06:50:04 EDT --- *** Bug 497497 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 11:06:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241106.n3OB6Rk7024113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #3 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-24 07:06:26 EDT --- It was pretty late last night and some things I forgot to mention. By default mumble doesn't include installation procedures. To changed that I recreated main.pro trough mumble.spec. So now every time you start building the project it adds install procedures into Makefile. But there is a problem with that. Obviously qmake doesn't make install procedures for files that have not been created yet. Calling qmake before make doesn't create Makefile with installation for binaries and libraries that are going to be created. To bypass this in my mumble.spec file I'm calling qmake twice. Once before make to create Makefile and once after make to recreate Makefile with proper installation procedures. Is this the right way? (I was trying some other ways but with no success) Currently mumble is compiled without support for g15 and similar devices because I couldn't find proper dependencies in repositories. (if there are please let me now the complete name) Mumble uses speex as a voice codec but not the speex from fedora repositories. It uses speex distributed with mumble. One more thing. Mumble consists of two parts. 1. mumble - client application. 2. murmur - server application. Right now both applications are compiled together. This means when you install mumble(but mumble as app suite not client app) you get mumble(client app) and murmur. Should it stay as suite or should I recreate two packages from this one? Thanks in advance, Igor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 11:24:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241124.n3OBO5eb027615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-24 07:24:04 EDT --- I'm not really into that but I suggest you look at the old bugs first to see if there is anything you can take from theses packages: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294001 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294001 Some quick comments on the spec file: Source0: Change it as described in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL BuildRequires: Use several lines for better legibility %description: line breaks at 80 characters Do not create main.pro in the spec but include it as Source1 Package murmur and mumble into different packages Include an initscript for the murmur server. Get it from one of the other reviews. Mumbles needs to be patched to use the speex from Fedora and not the included one. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries That's all I can say, because I have never used mumble and have no idea how it works. Simon, please step in here to get this review going. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 11:29:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:29:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241129.n3OBTQp4002597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-24 07:29:24 EDT --- My guess here is, that if MPD can not be started by the current user, it crashes. I shall do the CVS request though and build it on rawhide. Upstream will release version 0.2 soon anyway, let's see if the bug will be fixed then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 11:30:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241130.n3OBULS1003108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-24 07:30:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: guimup Short Description: A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD Owners: th0br0 Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: th0br0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 11:44:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241144.n3OBikpi005788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-24 07:44:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > My guess here is, that if MPD can not be started by the current user, it > crashes. guimupd should behave the same if compiled against libmpd-devel and the included libmpdclient.h, this means it should show the "not connected" message. (In reply to comment #13) > InitialCC: th0br0 InitialCC is for people other than yourself. BTW: I suggest you apply for libmpd watchcommits in pkgdb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 11:52:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:52:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241152.n3OBq84k008068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #5 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-24 07:52:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I'm not really into that but I suggest you look at the old bugs first to see if > there is anything you can take from theses packages: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294001 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294001 > > Do not create main.pro in the spec but include it as Source1 If I don't create main.pro inside spec file I cant use marcos. If I don't use macros then the installation path for files has to be set manually every time you change package version. e.g. if you change from 1.1.8-1 to 1.1.8-2 you would have to manually change main.pro. That's the reason I created main.pro inside mumble.spec Or should I manually install files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 11:51:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:51:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478920] Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Pipe Open Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241151.n3OBpCpO001460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |globus-xio-popen-driver - |globus-xio-popen-driver - |Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO |Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO |BW Limit Driver |Pipe Open Driver --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-24 07:51:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I have a couple questions for this one: > > * Please don't abbreviate BW in the description. Is it bandwidth? The package description was kind of weird, wasn't it? It didn't really fit the name of the package. My first response to your question was "of course it means bandwidth", but since I really had no backup for such a claim I started to look at the sources to figure it out. This package has no doxygen markup and not much other comments either, so this was not easy. I ended up writing an e-mail to the upstream author of this package asking him what the package description meant. It turned out that in this case the package description was way off, as it was the same as in the XIO skeleton driver template package (source-trees/xio/drivers/skeleton/source) and hadn't been adopted to describe what this driver is doing, when the skeleton had been used as a basis for this package. The upstream author has now fixed the description in the upstream CVS: http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/xio/drivers/popen/source/pkgdata/pkg_data_src.gpt.in?r1=1.3&r2=1.4&view=patch I have added this change as a patch to the updated package. I also added an additional sentence to the long description, since also the new description is a bit cryptic. > ? Do we really need to use the word "Globus" twice in the summary for this > package? Since this is in the autogenerated part of the specfile, I'd like to keep it. > ? # This library is opened using lt_dlopenext,... > Uhm, why? How many packages do that? Can't those packages be "fixed" instead? The XIO framework has a number of built-in drivers. But it is extendible by using plugins that contain additional drivers. These plugins are based on the libtool dynamic loader library (libltdl). The libltdl, when opening a plugin, reads the .la file to find out the real library name .so.X and then opens this library. If the .la file is not there it can not find which library to load. So runtime access to the .la file is needed. There is really no way to "fix" this as long as upstream uses libltdl to load plugins. I documented this feature in the Plugins section of the Packaging Draft: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus#Plugins Of the 30 globus packages I have submitted for review 2 are plugins that are opened using this mechanism. Updated package with corrected package description: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-xio-popen-driver-0.2-2.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-xio-popen-driver.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 12:05:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241205.n3OC5euS004696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #74 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-24 08:05:35 EDT --- Done : F10 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1318777 F11 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1318782 Epel5 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1318787 http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird.spec http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-4.fc10.src.rpm updated I think you can finish your review now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 13:24:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:24:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497525] New: Review Request: bubblemon-gnome - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bubblemon-gnome - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 Summary: Review Request: bubblemon-gnome - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: edwin at tenbrink-bekkers.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.very-clever.com/download/nongnu/bubblemon/fedora-stage/bubblemon-gnome.spec SRPM URL: http://www.very-clever.com/download/nongnu/bubblemon/fedora-stage/bubblemon-gnome-2.0.13-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: I would like to submit this fine small GNOME panel applet for inclusion into Fedora. This is my first package, so I will be requiring a sponsor. The Bubbling Load Monitor (or "Bubblemon" for short) is a panel applet that displays the CPU and memory load as a bubbling liquid. It displays something that looks like a vial containing water: - The water level indicates how much memory is in use. - The color of the liquid indicates how much swap space is used (watery blue means none and angry red means all). - The system CPU load is indicated by bubbles floating up through the liquid; lots of bubbles means high CPU load. On SMP systems CPU load distribution is visualized by having the most heavily loaded CPUs bubbles in the middle and the others nearer to the edges. - Seaweeds / reed growing up from the bottom indicate IO load; high weeds equals high load. - If you have unread mail, a message in a bottle falls into the water. Choose "Add to Panel"->"Bubbling Load Monitor" in your GNOME Panel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 13:25:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:25:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497525] Review Request: bubblemon-gnome - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241325.n3ODP3dv023544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 Edwin ten Brink changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 13:37:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:37:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495693] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6 - Perl 6 Syntax Highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241337.n3ODbZQO026166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495693 --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-24 09:37:34 EDT --- Now autoreq has picked up perl(mangle.pl) which it doesn't provide (and I agree, this one it shouldn't provide), so you'll need to filter it out. And I see that upstream has been busy and made three new release in the last couple of days! Let's see what new surprises 0.43 brings too (or 0.44...?). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 14:13:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:13:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241413.n3OEDL17008135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-24 10:13:20 EDT --- New! Upstream! Release! Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/libguestfs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/libguestfs-1.0.12-1.fc11.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1319142 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 14:21:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:21:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453854] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241421.n3OELGpd010195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-24 10:21:15 EDT --- globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-1.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-1.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 14:20:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:20:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241420.n3OEKFgI009979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-24 10:20:13 EDT --- rpmlint says: libguestfs-java.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libguestfs_jni.so.1.0.12 libguestfs-java.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libguestfs_jni.so.1.0.12 [These libraries are used/loaded internally by the JVM. I'm sure they don't require ldconfig] perl-libguestfs.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/Sys/Guestfs/Guestfs.so 0555 [This is how Perl installs the file] perl-libguestfs.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-libguestfs-1.0.12/examples/lvs.pl perl-libguestfs.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-libguestfs-1.0.12/examples/lvs.pl /usr/bin/perl [rpmlint being fussy - I want that demo script to be executable so that people can run it. It doesn't do anything dangerous] python-libguestfs.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libguestfsmod.so [Seems to be OK, packaged as per the Python guidelines] 13 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 14:21:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:21:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453854] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241421.n3OELLf3004536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-24 10:21:20 EDT --- globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-1.5-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-1.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 14:21:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:21:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241421.n3OELHlD004496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-24 10:21:17 EDT --- globus-gsi-openssl-error-0.14-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-openssl-error-0.14-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 14:21:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:21:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241421.n3OELDH1004457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-24 10:21:11 EDT --- globus-gsi-openssl-error-0.14-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-openssl-error-0.14-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 14:42:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241442.n3OEg3f9015575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-24 10:42:02 EDT --- I'm sorry, I didn't see that you had already done a make before make install, ignore the comment concerning the smp flags then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 14:43:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484798] Review Request: xiphos - Bible study and research tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241443.n3OEhbUi010754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484798 --- Comment #6 from Nils Philippsen 2009-04-24 10:43:35 EDT --- Deji, mind that you could simply list the license as "GPLv2" for the time being, until this is clarified by upstream. Do you have a version of the package where the other issue is fixed? I'm asking because I'll be away on vacation for a few weeks with low or even no internet access from next Wednesday on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 14:36:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241436.n3OEaJgi013987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |th0br0 at mkdir.name --- Comment #6 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-24 10:36:17 EDT --- Hello, damn, you were two days faster than me :D I was intending to request a review for mumble, too... Anyway... You've got a very interesting approach there. Might I ask why you create your own main.pro file? I've -- so far -- installed everything manually. Besides of that we don't want the speex version supplied with mumble, so disable it. -- oh I just saw that you appear to be disabling it... Same goes for XEVIE (as that requires a modification of the xorg.conf) and embedded qt translations I guess... You should set the PLUGIN_PATH to something when running qmake (it's a DEFINE) Otherwise it will locate to something default that we don't want. Thus, liblink.so should be isntalled to somewhere else like /usr/lib/mumble/ Christoph has already said that you should make two packages out of mumble and murmur, the server should not be installed automatically. The description contains incorrect English Mumble is client application witch connects to running Murmur server. Murmur is server application to witch clients connect. Should be: Mumble is a client application for the Murmur server. Murmur is the server application to which Mumble clients can connect. Mind that I'd -- personally -- not put those two phrases in there at all, it's already said in the paragraph above. According to the guidelines, packages ending with .so should only be included in the -devel packages. The license is not GPLv2+ but BSD. Source0 should not point to a specific SF server but rather to http://downloads.sourceforge.net Why are you only installing the icons with a 32x32 resolution and not all available? In %install you don't adhere to the smp_flags, make install should be: make install %{?_smp_mflags} So much for now and for a quick glance. If you are interested in seeing my spec file / SRPM: Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/mumble-1.1.8/mumble.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/mumble-1.1.8/mumble-1.1.8-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 14:54:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:54:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484798] Review Request: xiphos - Bible study and research tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241454.n3OEsQ44013965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484798 --- Comment #7 from Nils Philippsen 2009-04-24 10:54:25 EDT --- "... issues are fixed?" of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 15:03:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:03:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241503.n3OF3Dle021537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-24 11:03:12 EDT --- Hey, I just talked to Simon Wesp and he asked me to remove the files on my webspace again, that's why you'll only get 404s. After all, this is your first package and supposed to be a learning experience. Andreas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 15:09:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:09:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225734] Merge Review: esound In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241509.n3OF9SwF022861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225734 --- Comment #3 from Lennart Poettering 2009-04-24 11:09:27 EDT --- Uh? What is this about? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 15:22:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:22:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484798] Review Request: xiphos - Bible study and research tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241522.n3OFMT3H021056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484798 --- Comment #8 from Deji Akingunola 2009-04-24 11:22:28 EDT --- Thanks Nils, I've uploaded new spec and srpm files (see below) with fixes for packaging bugs in comment #2 and your suggestion in comment #6. As I pointed out in comment #3, the compile-time warnings have all being fixed in upstream SVN, but the its hard to pull it together in one patch without getting it mixed-up with the new stuff that had been introduced. Upstream is planning a new release, but I'm afraid not in good time before you leave for vacation. Hope this is sufficient for now. Spec URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/xiphos.spec SRPM URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/xiphos-3.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 15:35:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241535.n3OFZWjC030279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 --- Comment #7 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-04-24 11:35:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I realized that it's a little ambiguous which of the rpmlint output you have to > act on. These are the ones that are false positives for this package: > > monodevelop-debugger-gdb.x86_64: E: no-binary > monodevelop-debugger-gdb.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > monodevelop-debugger-gdb.x86_64: W: no-documentation mmm, not sure what to do about this, is that a good or bad thing? (probably a bad one :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 15:34:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:34:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241534.n3OFYJk6029733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 --- Comment #6 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-04-24 11:34:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Change the Release tag to: > DONE > > Ah. Sorry. I should have put that in the Good section. Your encoding is > fine. Great > * Still need to move the %file section to just before the %changelog section DONE > monodevelop is being built on: > ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 ia64 armv4l sparc alpha > > You probably want to go with monodevelop's version as it is the more restricted > of the two. Since ppc and ppc64 is left off of there, you want to follow the Ok yes, using the monodevelop one, please check that my ExclusiveArch is ok then, I remove the Build: noarch, that ok then? > Yeah... I took a look. The package has a hand-coded configure script instead > of an autoconf generated one so it has limited options. Try this for the > configure line: > > ./configure --prefix=%{_prefix} --bindir=%{_bindir} --datadir=%{_datadir} > --libdir=%{_libdir} DONE > And it looks like you'll also have to patch one of the make files. > > MonoDevelop.Debugger.Gdb.make hardcodes $(prefix)/lib/ instead of allowing > libdir to override that. You can patch the file or put this sed line into your > %prep section: > > sed -i 's!INSTALL_DIR = > $(DESTDIR)$(prefix)/lib/monodevelop/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Debugger!INSTALL_DIR = > $(DESTDIR)%{_libdir}/monodevelop/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Debugger!' > MonoDevelop.Debugger.Gdb.make DONE, added the "sed" thing, don't quite sure about not make a mess with a patch. > So it looks like you'll need to modify the file line a little. DONE, using: %{_libdir}/monodevelop/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Debugger/MonoDevelop.Debugger.Gdb.dll* now > New things: > > * You need to bump the Release: field with every revision. Since you also want > to add the disttag, the next release should be: > Release: 2%{?dist} not sure about what to do with this, I added that and package end with fc10.rpm... > > I was able to build in mock with the changes mentioned here. Great, reviewd file can be found here: http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-debugger-gdb.spec.review2 > So rpmlint output > from the packages: > > monodevelop-debugger-gdb.src: E: no-changelogname-tag > monodevelop-debugger-gdb.x86_64: E: no-changelogname-tag > > * You need to add a %changelog entry to tell what you've done. the format is > shown here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs Ok I add a simple one, I try to put one in more details but as soon as I write things like "Add sed to the %prep section.." or stuff like taht, rpmbuild claim about thing tha he think that are "sections" and not take the text as just comments even if put %prep in quotations.. > monodevelop-debugger-gdb.src: W: strange-permission > monodevelop-debugger-gdb-2.0.tar.bz2 0755 > > * 0644 would be the normal permissions for a tarball. Can this be fixed in the tarball on koji?, or I have to change the permission of the tarball on the site that I put it? > monodevelop-debugger-gdb.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, > tab: line 1) DONE, tabs removed > * mono packages that only contain assemblies have no ELF files but they use > architecture specific directories so they cannot be noarch. Not sure what to do about this. > monodevelop-debugger-gdb.x86_64: W: no-documentation > > * In this case upstream is not providing any documentation files Yeap no doc at the moment, so not my fault ;-) , probably because this is a really new addin. > monodevelop-debugger-gdb-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package > > * Presently, rpm doesn't know how to pull debug information from mono > assemblies. So we should be stopping the generation of debuginfo files. This > will change in the future. This page has details of how to fix this: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Debuginfo#Useless_or_incomplete_debuginfo_packages_due_to_other_reasons > > You want to add this to your spec file: > # rpm does not currently pull debuginfo out of mono packages > %global debug_package %{nil} Yeap, I read about that fixing other package, so I add the line to this one, DONE Thanks, Mauricio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 15:57:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492971] Review Request: lv2-zynadd-plugins - LV2 port of the ZynAddSubFX engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241557.n3OFvoqa030347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492971 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-24 11:57:50 EDT --- Oops I did it again. The correct request would be: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lv2-zynadd-plugins Short Description: LV2 port of the ZynAddSubFX engine Owners: oget Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 15:57:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:57:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492971] Review Request: lv2-zynadd-plugins - LV2 port of the ZynAddSubFX engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241557.n3OFv2DO030225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492971 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-24 11:57:01 EDT --- Thank you! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: oget Short Description: LV2 port of the ZynAddSubFX engine Owners: oget Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 16:01:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:01:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492945] Review Request: lv2-swh-plugins - LV2 ports of LADSPA swh plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241601.n3OG1FXO031268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492945 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-24 12:01:14 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lv2-swh-plugins Short Description: LV2 ports of LADSPA swh plugins Owners: oget Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 16:03:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241603.n3OG3m91005236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 Jim Meyering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |meyering at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |meyering at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Jim Meyering 2009-04-24 12:03:46 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 16:05:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:05:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478928] Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241605.n3OG5x9c000379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478928 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-24 12:05:58 EDT --- No need to produce it if it is useless. But take a note somewhere in case things change with the next upstream release. ---------------------------------------------------- This package (globus-rsl-assist) is APPROVED by oget ---------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 16:19:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241619.n3OGJZt1008839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #9 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-24 12:19:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341206) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341206) INIT SCRIPT FOR MURMUR (In reply to comment #4) > Simon, please step in here to get this review going. Fine. I'm here. Lets take a little look inside. First of all. This package is a hard package. It is not an easy package and should be imho for advanced packagers. The version 1.1.6 Rudolf Kastl, Andreas Osowski and me agonized over 1.1.6 Andreas creted a srpm for 1.1.8 a few days ago, based on our groupwork. ------------------------ (In reply to comment #3) > By default mumble doesn't include installation procedures. To changed that I > recreated main.pro trough mumble.spec. So now every time you start building the > project it adds install procedures into Makefile. But there is a problem with > that. Obviously qmake doesn't make install procedures for files that have not > been created yet. Calling qmake before make doesn't create Makefile with > installation for binaries and libraries that are going to be created. To bypass > this in my mumble.spec file I'm calling qmake twice. Once before make to create > Makefile and once after make to recreate Makefile with proper installation > procedures. > > Is this the right way? (I was trying some other ways but with no success) (In reply to comment #5) > If I don't create main.pro inside spec file I cant use marcos. If I don't use > macros then the installation path for files has to be set manually every time > you change package version. e.g. if you change from 1.1.8-1 to 1.1.8-2 you > would have to manually change main.pro. That's the reason I created main.pro > inside mumble.spec Imho this isn't the right way. remove this part completely. this makes you a lot of manual work and it is ugly. follow the steps in my little todo list. you won't need such things. ------------------------ (In reply to comment #4) > Mumbles needs to be patched to use the speex from Fedora and not the included > one. "no-bundled-speex" is a CONFIGS parameter to do this ------------------------ (In reply to comment #4) > Package murmur and mumble into different packages This is absolute correct... (In reply to comment #3) > Right now both applications are compiled together. Yeah, they compiled together, but they don't need each other, you can seperate it ------------------------ (In reply to comment #4) > Include an initscript for the murmur server. Get it from one of the other > reviews. Attached :-) ------------------------ WHAT YOU NEED TO DO (just to get in a right way, this list is not complete, there are still some things missing) (not good sorted) - remove your created make.pro - Correct the Description as cwickert says. -- You can use texts from upstreams hp/wiki - correct License the correct license is BSD - correct url http://mumble.sourceforge.net/ please don't use the "sf"-token - correct SOURCE http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Please don't select a specific sourceforge-mirror. - add missing build requirements -- spexx-devel is needed for build without bundled spexx -- desktop-file-utils is needed for the desktop file install you need some more, please recheck this. - split package in mumble and murmur (with -n) %package -n murmur this package needs a summary and a description and a group, too. you can add a description on this way %description -n murmur create an own filelist %files -n murmur for murmur - add a new user "murmur" for murmur you need a user for the murmur process. it makes sense to name this user "murmur" - add persmissions for "murmur" on murmur related files you can handle this with %attr in %files - Add to make install -- INSTALL="install -p" for perserve timestamps -- INSTALL_ROOT="%buildroot" will install in the buildroot - Use CONFIG and DEFINES parameters in qmake -- CONFIG+"no-bundled-speex" no additional comment. should be clear you can find more infos in the mumble wiki some configs would be problematical in different fedoraversions. like pulseaudioparameters. you should create seperate configstrings for these and seperate it with different if "instructions" examples: %if 0%{?fedora_version} = 9 CONFIG+"no-bundled-speex no-pulseaudio no-oss" %endif %if 0%{?fedora_version} = 10 CONFIG+"no-bundled-speex no-pulseaudio" %endif %if 0%{?fedora_version} >= 11 CONFIG+"no-bundled-speex" %endif - install all pixmaps and all icons you can find it in the "icons" directory - install all mumble plugins (seperate subopackage(s)) -- work with PLUGIN_PATH - a DEFINES parameter - murmurd should be installed in sbin - add the attached initfile as seperate source, like Source1 - add overlay (seperate subpackage) you can find it in the "scripts" directory -- add a desktopfile for mumble overlay add it as seperate source, like Source2 - you need to honor optflags QMAKE_CFLAGS_RELEASE="%{optflags}" QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_RELEASE="%{optflags}" ------------------------ I hope this will help you a little bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 16:26:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:26:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225734] Merge Review: esound In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241626.n3OGQBn5010675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225734 --- Comment #4 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-24 12:26:10 EDT --- You've done regular reviews before for pulseaudio stuff to get into the distro. A merge review is a review being done on a package that got pulled in from Fedora Core without a review. Until a reviewer picks this up, it's basically business as usual. Once a reviewer does start reviewing the package, someone needs to address the issues, answer questions, and apply the changes from the review to the package in cvs. That's usually the package owner which is why I CC'd you. Note that because we don't have enough reviewers, merge reviews have been getting short shrift compared to new review requests. At some point FESCo might give us a deadline for having the merge reviews done but that hasn't occurred yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 16:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478928] Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241629.n3OGTdpp011150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478928 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-24 12:29:38 EDT --- Thank you for the review. I will definitely check if the documentation is buildable in new releases. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-rsl-assist Short Description: Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 16:42:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478920] Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Pipe Open Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241642.n3OGg5Dj013998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-24 12:42:04 EDT --- Thanks for updating the description and adding information to the wiki page. I guess we will have to live with these .la files. The updated package meets our guidelines.Thus ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (globus-xio-popen-driver) is APPROVED by oget ---------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 16:48:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:48:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241648.n3OGmV5a008850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #8 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-24 12:48:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > monodevelop is being built on: > > ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 ia64 armv4l sparc alpha > > > Ok yes, using the monodevelop one, please check that my ExclusiveArch is ok > then, I remove the Build: noarch, that ok then? Yep, your ExclusiveArch line is fine now. > DONE, added the "sed" thing, don't quite sure about not make a mess with a > patch. > heh. You'll have to learn about diff and patch sooner or later since it's an integral part of package building but the sed line is fine for this package. > > > > * You need to bump the Release: field with every revision. Since you also want > > to add the disttag, the next release should be: > > Release: 2%{?dist} > not sure about what to do with this, I added that and package end with > fc10.rpm... Yep. %{?dist} is a macro. So when rpm builds the package on F-10, it expands Release: 2%{?dist} into: Release: 2.fc10 When you build on F-11 it expands to: Release: 2.fc11 and so on. > > * You need to add a %changelog entry to tell what you've done. the format is > > shown here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs > Ok I add a simple one, I try to put one in more details but as soon as I write > things like "Add sed to the %prep section.." or stuff like taht, rpmbuild claim > about thing tha he think that are "sections" and not take the text as just > comments even if put %prep in quotations.. > What happens is that macros/section headers are always expanded by rpmbuild. (Note: This happens even when the macro is commented out.) To get around that, escape the % with another %. So your changelog could look like: %changelog * Fri Apr 24 2009 Mauricio Henriquez - 2.0 - Fix the install directory via sed in the %%prep section. > > monodevelop-debugger-gdb.src: W: strange-permission > > monodevelop-debugger-gdb-2.0.tar.bz2 0755 > > > > * 0644 would be the normal permissions for a tarball. > Can this be fixed in the tarball on koji?, or I have to change the permission > of the tarball on the site that I put it? > This would be fixed by changing the permissions before you build the package/checkin the source. I got the tarball out of your source rpm originally. >> monodevelop-debugger-gdb.x86_64: E: no-binary >> monodevelop-debugger-gdb.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib >> monodevelop-debugger-gdb.x86_64: W: no-documentation > mmm, not sure what to do about this, is that a good or bad thing? (probably a bad one :-) In this case, these are false positives so they can all be ignored. The reason they're false positives for this package are written in comment #6 The only other thing I notice in the updated spec is the buildroot tag. If you look here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 16:54:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241654.n3OGs8t7009962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 --- Comment #9 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-24 12:54:07 EDT --- Oh -- and this just a readability nit. I'd move this up to the top: # rpm does not currently pull debuginfo out of mono packages %global debug_package %{nil} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 16:57:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:57:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478920] Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Pipe Open Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241657.n3OGvDI3017003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-24 12:57:12 EDT --- Thank you for the review. We all have to live with upstream... New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-xio-popen-driver Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Pipe Open Driver Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 16:57:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241657.n3OGvSUS017076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-24 12:57:27 EDT --- So this package has already been submitted for review by Paul Lange: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490030 It's polite to ask Paul if he wants to update his package or would be alright if you take over the package. If he updates his package, you can do a review of his package. If he would rather you take over you can look at his spec file for ideas, update your package with ideas from his spec and the other review we've done, and I'll review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 17:31:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241731.n3OHVoLr018458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #40 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-04-24 13:31:48 EDT --- For the closer look on weekend I fixed the four points from the second list today. So your weekend is saved but do not look too close. :-) Comments are in the spec file. The changed files have still the same URL: SRPM-file: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora/SRPMS/parrot-1.0.0.src.rpm SPEC-file: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora/specs/parrot.spec The URL of the scratch-build with fulltest: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13191 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 17:37:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:37:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241737.n3OHbXEB019758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #41 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-04-24 13:37:32 EDT --- Sorry, the URL from the scratch-build was wrong (it miss to numbers): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1319166 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 17:39:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:39:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241739.n3OHdbMC025599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 453855 depends on bug 453850, which changed state. Bug 453850 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-24 13:39:36 EDT --- - Package builds in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1319436 ! BuildRequires: globus-openssl-devel >= 1 on the main package and Requires: globus-openssl-devel >= 1 on the devel package seem unnecessary. They are not harmful though (they are picked up by other deps). ? Actually could you explain me those other Requires' in the devel package? The header file globus_openssl.h does not #include anything other than "globus_common.h". Where do the other dependencies come from? I bet it is a magical globus thingy, but I'd like to learn the mechanism. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 18:31:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:31:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241831.n3OIVltv032151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #5 from Benjamin Kosnik 2009-04-24 14:31:46 EDT --- I've updated this here: http://people.redhat.com/bkoz/documentation/ This adds the man packages. This essentially duplicates some of the libstdc++-devel package (html), and so should probably be integrated into that. Jakub, your call. Here are the dependencies: 1) for api html docs: doxygen, graphviz 2) for manual html docs: libxslt, libxml2, docbook-style-xsl 3) for manual pdf: prince, msttfonts To eliminate the deps for 2, use the pre-generated libstdc++-v3/doc/html directory in the gcc sources. To eliminate the deps for 1, use the pre-generated files on gcc.gnu.org. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 18:41:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494197] Review Request: drascula-music - Background music for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241841.n3OIfAUK007402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494197 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa 2009-04-24 14:41:09 EDT --- drascula-audio has been removed from main drascula package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 18:44:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241844.n3OIimie007970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-24 14:44:47 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341238) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341238) Patch to remove warnings on perltetris.pl exit (In reply to comment #12) > Is your mean that the latest goocanvas causes perltetris.pl does not work. I guess so. Once bug 497274 is resolved perltetris.pl should work also on rawhide. > If I close the window, terminal will show many messages. The attached patch should remove these messages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 19:10:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] New: Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 Summary: Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/peppy-0.9.27/peppy.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/peppy-0.9.27/peppy-0.9.27-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Peppy is a wxPython/Scintilla-based editor written in and extensible through Python. It attempts to provide an XEmacs-like multi-window, multi-tabbed framework with low coupling, so it's easy to add support for new types of files. This editor is an attempt to displace my dependency on XEmacs. My goal is to produce a work-alike with the feel of emacs but based on Python using the widget toolkit wxPython. I have enjoyed XEmacs for years, but my basic problem with it is this: I don't want to keep space in my brain to remember Emacs Lisp. My goal with peppy is to write an application framework that would become emacs-like in its extensibility and ability to support more than just text files, but using a modern UI toolkit for portability across platforms. RPMLINT: peppy.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/c.c A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. peppy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/c-shell_script.csh 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. peppy.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/cpp.cpp A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. peppy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/octave.oct 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. peppy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/perl.pl 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. peppy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/ruby.rb 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. peppy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/d.d 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. peppy.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/caml.ml A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. peppy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/tcl_tk.tcl 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. peppy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/korn_shell_script.ksh 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. peppy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/python.python 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 3 warnings. Just templatefiles! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 19:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241924.n3OJOYgj011485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #42 from David Fetter 2009-04-24 15:24:32 EDT --- What about 1.1.0? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 19:43:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241943.n3OJhlF0016386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #43 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-24 15:43:45 EDT --- 1.1.0 is not intended to be a stable release and we want 1.0.0 to appear in F-10 and F-11. We can easily upgrade to 1.1.0 in rawhide once this package is reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 19:52:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241952.n3OJqHFR022932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-24 15:52:16 EDT --- photoprint-0.4.0-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 19:48:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241948.n3OJmvpU021582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-24 15:48:55 EDT --- photoprint-0.4.0-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 19:49:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241949.n3OJn2G1021632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.4.0-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 19:49:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:49:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241949.n3OJnheK021831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #341206|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 19:53:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:53:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495179] Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241953.n3OJr7PK018955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495179 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-24 15:53:06 EDT --- perl-Number-Format-1.70-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 19:52:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:52:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241952.n3OJqMBx018763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.0-6.fc10 |0.4.0-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 19:55:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:55:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494238] Review Request: pyrrd - A Pure Python Wrapper for RRDTool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241955.n3OJtagW024698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494238 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.0.7-1.fc10 |0.0.7-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 19:52:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495279] Review Request: perl-Devel-NYTProf - Powerful feature-rich perl source code profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241952.n3OJqhKK023406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495279 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-24 15:52:42 EDT --- perl-Devel-NYTProf-2.09-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 19:54:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:54:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495279] Review Request: perl-Devel-NYTProf - Powerful feature-rich perl source code profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241954.n3OJsbfY024005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495279 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.09-1.fc9 |2.09-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 19:53:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495179] Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241953.n3OJrBI9023539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495179 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.70-1.fc10 |1.70-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 19:52:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495279] Review Request: perl-Devel-NYTProf - Powerful feature-rich perl source code profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241952.n3OJqlsk023445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495279 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |2.09-1.fc9 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 19:55:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494238] Review Request: pyrrd - A Pure Python Wrapper for RRDTool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241955.n3OJtM0i024636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494238 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.0.7-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 19:55:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:55:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494238] Review Request: pyrrd - A Pure Python Wrapper for RRDTool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241955.n3OJtVpu020532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494238 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-24 15:55:31 EDT --- pyrrd-0.0.7-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 19:55:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:55:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494238] Review Request: pyrrd - A Pure Python Wrapper for RRDTool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241955.n3OJtH1S020474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494238 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-24 15:55:16 EDT --- pyrrd-0.0.7-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 19:54:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:54:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495279] Review Request: perl-Devel-NYTProf - Powerful feature-rich perl source code profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241954.n3OJsXqs019867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495279 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-24 15:54:32 EDT --- perl-Devel-NYTProf-2.09-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 20:04:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:04:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242004.n3OK42Ps026413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #10 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-24 16:04:00 EDT --- Sorry for the late reply. I'll follow Simon's reply while creating/modifying mumble.spec. Don't expect it to be finished tomorrow. This will take some time for a newbie packager like I am. Thanks Simon for such good reply. I'm sure its going to help me a lot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 20:12:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242012.n3OKCDLK028298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #11 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-24 16:12:12 EDT --- np, if you need help or if you have questions. just ask! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 20:10:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489795] Review Request: backintime - Simple backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242010.n3OKANih024037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489795 --- Comment #5 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-24 16:10:22 EDT --- update.... SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/backintime-0.9.22/backintime.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/backintime-0.9.22/backintime-0.9.22-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 20:15:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242015.n3OKFDBq029039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Martin-Gomez Pablo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #37 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2009-04-24 16:15:09 EDT --- As it seems that the packages have been uploaded and pushed in Bodhi, I close this review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 20:32:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226483] Merge Review: tcsh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242032.n3OKWhZ6001400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226483 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-24 16:32:40 EDT --- vcrhonek: please rectify. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 20:34:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:34:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226450] Merge Review: sysreport In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242034.n3OKYeCn001593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226450 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |karsten at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-24 16:34:39 EDT --- Ping, please invoke dead package policy. No need for this package to be in Fedora anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 20:36:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226365] Merge Review: redhat-rpm-config In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242036.n3OKawGE002241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226365 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonathan at jonmasters.org, | |pmatilai at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-24 16:36:56 EDT --- Please address issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 20:41:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242041.n3OKfGEY003331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-24 16:41:15 EDT --- I will wait for a release tarball and update the package to 61. http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/801 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 20:39:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:39:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242039.n3OKd7D7002613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |OLPC 9304 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 20:39:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226341] Merge Review: python-docs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242039.n3OKdOVm002688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226341 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |james.antill at redhat.com, | |rrakus at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-24 16:39:23 EDT --- Please address the issues above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 20:42:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226312] Merge Review: ppc64-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242042.n3OKg7OH003459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226312 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org, | |rrakus at redhat.com, | |tony at bakeyournoodle.com --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-24 16:42:06 EDT --- Ping, please acknowledge. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 20:44:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226159] Merge Review: mozplugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242044.n3OKiIRl003771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226159 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |karsten at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-24 16:44:16 EDT --- Ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 20:45:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:45:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496492] Review Request: sing - Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242045.n3OKjRPQ031307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496492 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 20:46:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226146] Merge Review: mkinitrd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242046.n3OKkUsw031541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226146 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dcantrell at redhat.com, | |hdegoede at redhat.com, | |wtogami at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-24 16:46:28 EDT --- Ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 20:51:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:51:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225978] Merge Review: kudzu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242051.n3OKpSrd005329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225978 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-24 16:51:25 EDT --- Ping, I still don't see the new version in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 20:49:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226028] Merge Review: libIDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242049.n3OKniM6031949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226028 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax at redhat.com, | |alexl at redhat.com, | |caolanm at redhat.com, | |davidz at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-24 16:49:42 EDT --- Ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 20:52:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:52:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225886] Merge Review: hfsutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242052.n3OKqMlm005443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225886 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-24 16:52:21 EDT --- Ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 20:54:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:54:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225677] Merge Review: dbus-python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242054.n3OKsh3t005687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225677 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |davidz at redhat.com, | |richard at hughsie.com, | |rstrode at redhat.com, | |sandmann at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-24 16:54:42 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 20:56:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:56:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448458] Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242056.n3OKuQJ5006438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448458 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at gnsa.us Flag| |needinfo?(russell at coker.com | |.au) --- Comment #3 from David Nalley 2009-04-24 16:56:24 EDT --- This package review has been sitting idle for 10 months plus now. My preference is that the original packager would pick this up and continue it, however failing that one week from now I'll mark this as a dead review and close the ticket, and likely work on getting it packaged and reviewed. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews#Submitter_not_responding Russell: Please pick this review back up if you are interested in maintaining it within Fedora. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 21:03:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242103.n3OL3sss003952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 --- Comment #8 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-24 17:03:53 EDT --- The BuildRequires on globus-openssl-devel makes sense since there are direct dependencies on openssl in the sources (globus-openssl is the GPT glue package for openssl): #include "openssl/crypto.h" #include "openssl/err.h" #include "openssl/ssl.h" The requires in the devel package must not only satisfy the include dependencies in the installed headers but also the link dependencies. These can either be derived using GPT: [ellert at ellert ~]$ globus-makefile-header globus_openssl_module -flavor=gcc32pthr | grep GLOBUS_PKG_LIBS GLOBUS_PKG_LIBS = -lglobus_openssl -lglobus_openssl_error -lglobus_proxy_ssl -lglobus_common -ldl -L/usr/kerberos/lib -lssl -lcrypto -ldl -lz -lltdl or using pkg-config: [ellert at ellert ~]$ pkg-config --libs globus-openssl-module -L/usr/kerberos/lib -lglobus_openssl -lglobus_proxy_ssl -lglobus_openssl_error -lglobus_common -lltdl -lssl -lcrypto -ldl -lz The pkg-config file is generated from the GPT metadata, so the list should be the same (though the order might differ). The Requires and BuildRequires in the spec file are automatically derived from the GPT source package description file pkgdata/pkg_data_src.gpt.in. This information is also used during the build to generate the GPT package installed GPT metadata file for the development package, which is the input for the generation of the pkg-config file. So the Requires in the devel package and what ends up as dependencies in the pkg-config file should be consistent. The "magic globus thingy" is really only parsing and putting together the relevant part of the GPT source package description file which is XML. The perl script used is currently linked from the Packaging Draft page. It has been suggested to make the script part of globus-core (see the discussion page for the Packaging Draft). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 21:06:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226028] Merge Review: libIDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242106.n3OL6SlA009975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226028 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2009-04-24 17:06:26 EDT --- MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSFIX - ltmain.sh, parser.c and parser.h are under GPLv2+. License should thus probably be LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+. ltmain.sh is a part of libtool. I don't see how that could be relevant for the license of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 21:11:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:11:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226028] Merge Review: libIDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242111.n3OLBtCO011128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226028 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-24 17:11:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > NEEDSFIX > - ltmain.sh, parser.c and parser.h are under GPLv2+. License should thus > probably be LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+. > > ltmain.sh is a part of libtool. I don't see how that could be relevant for the > license of this package. Duh, what have I been thinking.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 21:21:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:21:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226028] Merge Review: libIDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242121.n3OLLTkH013087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226028 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-24 17:21:28 EDT --- parser.c states: " As a special exception, you may create a larger work that contains part or all of the Bison parser skeleton and distribute that work under terms of your choice, so long as that work isn't itself a parser generator using the skeleton or a modified version thereof as a parser skeleton." So the licensing is probably OK after all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 21:23:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242123.n3OLNKlQ008266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 21:25:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:25:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497339] Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242125.n3OLPGp9013885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |david at gnsa.us AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 21:32:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:32:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242132.n3OLWphL010165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-24 17:32:49 EDT --- Alright then. Thanks for the explanation. No further questions. This one is good to go: -------------------------------------------------------- This package (globus-openssl-module) is APPROVED by oget -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 21:40:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:40:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] New: Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 Summary: Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: awilliam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/gnome-alsamixer/gnome-alsamixer.spec SRPM URL: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/gnome-alsamixer/gnome-alsamixer-0.9.7-0.1.20090424aw_fc11.src.rpm Description: A full control ALSA mixer application for GNOME. Per FESco meeting of April 24th 2009, for Fedora 11 release. (Exists in CVS already from FC2 era, this is a fresh spec based on the Mandriva spec, since I worked on that one a while back.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 21:41:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:41:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242141.n3OLfj7L012012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |andreas at bawue.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andreas Thienemann 2009-04-24 17:41:44 EDT --- reviewing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 21:47:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:47:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242147.n3OLlUCK018024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-24 17:47:29 EDT --- - Don't refer to "I" or "me" in the %description. - Add Requires: python-enchant to get the spell checking part working. rpmlint output: peppy.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/c.c peppy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/c-shell_script.csh 0644 peppy.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/cpp.cpp peppy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/octave.oct 0644 peppy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/perl.pl 0644 peppy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/ruby.rb 0644 peppy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/d.d 0644 peppy.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/caml.ml peppy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/tcl_tk.tcl 0644 peppy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/korn_shell_script.ksh 0644 peppy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/python.python 0644 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 3 warnings. - Add executable flags to the non-executable-script files, that way at the end you only get 3 devel-file-in-non-devel-package warnings that cannot be circumvented. - Package does not install. This is caused by peppy/editra/tests/octave.oct:#! /bin/octave -qf in which /bin/octave should be /usr/bin/octave. The requirement on octave is, however, quite odd. The package also requires csh and ksh due to the example files. I'd sed the shebangs out of those files, since at least octave pulls in a lot of stuff. - Add -O1 to the setup.py install arguments. - The line mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/{applications,pixmaps} is not needed since both desktop-file-install and install -D create the directories. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSFIX - You are mixing $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}. This is not allowed: choose one and stick with it. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSFIX - Add also PKG-INFO to %doc. MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 21:56:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242156.n3OLuWit014619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 --- Comment #9 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-24 17:56:31 EDT --- http://ispbrasil.com.br/bareftp/bareftp.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/bareftp/bareftp-0.2.2-2.fc11.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1319780 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 22:08:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:08:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242208.n3OM8DTe021935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #2 from Adam Williamson 2009-04-24 18:08:12 EDT --- spec revised to fix a few errors and mandriva-isms and pass rpmlint and mock build, same URLs. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 22:09:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:09:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497339] Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242209.n3OM9wN9016999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 --- Comment #4 from David Nalley 2009-04-24 18:09:57 EDT --- Couple of notes up front: -This depends on python-cclib Bug 497338 which hasn't been approved yet, but is your package as well. -You have a python-openbabel listed twice as a requires OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./qmforge.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/qmforge-2.1-3.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/qmforge-2.1-3.fc10.noarch.rpm qmforge.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-cclib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. As the packager noted this is a false positive due to the pacakge name OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Several of the *.py files in source note that they are licensed under GPLv2+ OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NA: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 tmp]$ md5sum QMForge-2.1.tar.gz* 3caf2b40d1391ea1f6251cb598e8c32a QMForge-2.1.tar.gz 3caf2b40d1391ea1f6251cb598e8c32a QMForge-2.1.tar.gz.1 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Builds at least on x86_64 NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. N/A: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. N/A: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. OK: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. Packager has included such a comment in the .spec file OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 22:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497339] Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242225.n3OMP0MG019490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-24 18:24:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Couple of notes up front: > -You have a python-openbabel listed twice as a requires Right, the first one was supposed to be a BuildRequires: but as it seems it isn't even needed. Removed. I'll post a new spec if you find anything else to fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 22:28:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242228.n3OMSR2k025250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #12 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-24 18:28:26 EDT --- > ------------------------ > (In reply to comment #4) > > Mumbles needs to be patched to use the speex from Fedora and not the included > > one. > "no-bundled-speex" is a CONFIGS parameter to do this > Done > - remove your created make.pro Removed > > - Correct the Description as cwickert says. > -- You can use texts from upstreams hp/wiki Fixed > > - correct License > the correct license is BSD > Done > - correct url > http://mumble.sourceforge.net/ > please don't use the "sf"-token > Done > - correct SOURCE > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz > Please don't select a specific sourceforge-mirror. > Done > - add missing build requirements > -- spexx-devel is needed for build without bundled spexx > -- desktop-file-utils is needed for the desktop file install > you need some more, please recheck this. > Done > - split package in mumble and murmur (with -n) > %package -n murmur > this package needs a summary and a description and a group, too. > you can add a description on this way > %description -n murmur > create an own filelist > %files -n murmur > for murmur > Did but you'll have to take a look at it > - add a new user "murmur" for murmur > you need a user for the murmur process. it makes sense to name this user > "murmur" > Did but you take a look > - add persmissions for "murmur" on murmur related files > you can handle this with %attr in %files > Done but take a look > - Add to make install > -- INSTALL="install -p" for perserve timestamps > -- INSTALL_ROOT="%buildroot" will install in the buildroot > Problematic part. If you remove main.pro(like you said) then there is NO make install and you have to install everything by hand using "install". So there is no point in doing INSTALL_ROOT="%{buildroot}". Or am I wrong? > - Use CONFIG and DEFINES parameters in qmake > -- CONFIG+"no-bundled-speex" no additional comment. should be clear > you can find more infos in the mumble wiki As I said before I need to use no-g15 too cause I didn't found dependency for it on F9(witch I'm using now till F11 comes out). > some configs would be problematical in different fedoraversions. like > pulseaudioparameters. > you should create seperate configstrings for these and seperate it with > different if "instructions" > examples: > %if 0%{?fedora_version} = 9 > CONFIG+"no-bundled-speex no-pulseaudio no-oss" > %endif > %if 0%{?fedora_version} = 10 > CONFIG+"no-bundled-speex no-pulseaudio" > %endif > %if 0%{?fedora_version} >= 11 > CONFIG+"no-bundled-speex" > %endif Don't see the reason why would it be problematic? Pulseaudio works on F9(using it right now with mumble). > > - install all pixmaps and all icons > you can find it in the "icons" directory This part I can't understand. To witch directory should I install icons and how? How to choose witch icon will mumble use? There are many icons dirs and I get lost. I couldn't find anything in wiki that would help me. > > - install all mumble plugins (seperate subopackage(s)) > -- work with PLUGIN_PATH - a DEFINES parameter Can you explain this a little bit more? Should I make another package like I did with murmur. %package -n mumble-plugins > > - murmurd should be installed in sbin Done > > - add the attached initfile as seperate source, like Source1 Done > > - add overlay (seperate subpackage) > you can find it in the "scripts" directory Same as above: Can you explain this a little bit more? Should I make another package like I did with murmur. %package -n mumble-overlay > -- add a desktopfile for mumble overlay > add it as seperate source, like Source2 Should I create desktop file? > > - you need to honor optflags > QMAKE_CFLAGS_RELEASE="%{optflags}" > QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_RELEASE="%{optflags}" If i do: make %{optflags} it throws me an error. Really big one. Would be hard to read if I post it here. Here is the link: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble.error Compiling works with only make Here is the new spec file: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble.spec Currently spec file throws error cause installation isn't working but I want to be sure that I'm going to right direction with installation. Greetz, Igor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 22:31:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:31:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226312] Merge Review: ppc64-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242231.n3OMVaqn020918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226312 --- Comment #6 from Tony Breeds 2009-04-24 18:31:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Ping, please acknowledge. I'll look into this ASAP, (probably in 2 days). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 22:40:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:40:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242240.n3OMeoXT027717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #57 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-24 18:40:46 EDT --- Shall we close this bug now that it is imported ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 22:39:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:39:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242239.n3OMdtp1022109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #13 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-24 18:39:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Created an attachment (id=341206) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341206) [details] > INIT SCRIPT FOR MURMUR I think setting MURMUR_USER and MURMUR_GROUP in the init script IMO is bad, how about outsourcing it to /etc/sysconfig/murmur for example? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 22:47:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242247.n3OMl33Z023718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #4 from Adam Williamson 2009-04-24 18:47:03 EDT --- grr, now it's: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/gnome-alsamixer/gnome-alsamixer-0.9.7-0.1.20090424gitc540b26.aw_fc11.src.rpm -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 22:44:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242244.n3OMicNA023037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #3 from Adam Williamson 2009-04-24 18:44:37 EDT --- revised a bit more per comments from ixs, and srpm location changed slightly: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/gnome-alsamixer/gnome-alsamixer-0.9.7-0.1.20090424.aw_fc11.src.rpm -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 23:05:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242305.n3ON59Zs031754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #58 from Conrad Meyer 2009-04-24 19:05:08 EDT --- That is my thought. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 23:07:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:07:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242307.n3ON7QqG026946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-24 19:07:26 EDT --- yep, I'm still here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 23:07:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458279] Review Request: python-arm4 - Python language bindings for Applicatioon Response Measurement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242307.n3ON7bkZ032229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458279 David Carter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 23:19:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:19:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242319.n3ONJrKY028773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix at fetzig.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |felix at fetzig.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 23:41:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242341.n3ONfxKJ032544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Thienemann 2009-04-24 19:41:58 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341259) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341259) Patch fixing minor issues in the .spec (e.g. desktop-file-install etc.) and a bit of whitespacing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 00:10:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:10:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250010.n3P0Aj5W004680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Thienemann 2009-04-24 20:10:44 EDT --- Mandatory items =============== [ PASS ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm gnome-alsamixer.i586: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-alsamixer.schemas 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Warning is to be ignored [ OKAY ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ OKAY ] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [ OKAY ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [ OKAY ] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [ OKAY ] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [ OKAY ] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [ OKAY ] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [ OKAY ] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [ TODO ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 671ac31745fe4a8d4c40c18f6a5fd1aa gnome-alsamixer-20090424gitc540b26.tar.bz2 This has been verified to correspond to git sha1 c540b26. Please include specifics on generating the tarball. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control [ OKAY ] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Build successfully on i586, ppc, ppc64 and x86_64 [ NOOP ] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [ OKAY ] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. [ OKAY ] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. [ NOOP ] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [ NOOP ] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [ OKAY ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [ OKAY ] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [ OKAY ] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [ OKAY ] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [ OKAY ] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [ OKAY ] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [ NOOP ] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [ NOOP ] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [ NOOP ] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [ NOOP ] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [ NOOP ] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [ NOOP ] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [ NOOP ] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [ OKAY ] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [ TODO ] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. desktop-file-install is not used. [ OKAY ] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [ OKAY ] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [ OKAY ] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Optional items ============== [ NOOP ] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ PASS ] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [ OKAY ] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [ OKAY ] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ OKAY ] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [ TODO ] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [ NOOP ] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [ NOOP ] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [ NOOP ] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Notes ===== Package is mostly fine. See the attached patch, it fixes some minor issues such as the missing desktop-file-install usage and the correct source URL. Please apply. ToDo List ========= * Describe the processs of generating the tarball (e.g. rm -rf .git) * Use desktop-file-install (in patch) * Add error handler to %post handler (in patch) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 00:36:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489795] Review Request: backintime - Simple backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250036.n3P0amx7013390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489795 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-24 20:36:47 EDT --- Review for 18418dd31e8d17229258157e46fe9ff8 backintime-0.9.20-1.fc10.src.rpm OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/backintime-* backintime-gnome.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/backintime-gnome-root backintime-gnome.noarch: W: no-dependency-on usermode backintime-kde.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/backintime-kde4-root backintime-kde.noarch: W: no-dependency-on usermode 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines (GPLv2+) OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5 4fa800758e98f3bfad5850d6e7f5098c OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 (noarch) N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. OK - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. OK - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Notes: - Please change %description to "Gnome frontend for %{name}" and "KDE frontend for %{name}". - Add TRANSLATIONS to %doc, it's a credits file like AUTHORS - us cp -p when copying from bindir to sbindir - mark %{_datadir}/gnome/help/%{name}/ %doc None of these is a blocker, so I APPROVE this package and you can change it later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 00:39:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489795] Review Request: backintime - Simple backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250039.n3P0dFGF013616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489795 --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-24 20:39:15 EDT --- Final words: IMO the patch for the desktop files could be dropped. You can easily make these changes with sed and desktop-file-install, but this is just me being lazy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 01:24:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:24:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250124.n3P1OEAC015806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 --- Comment #15 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-24 21:24:13 EDT --- Please preserve the time stamp when installing the icon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 01:48:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:48:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497525] Review Request: bubblemon-gnome - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250148.n3P1mQwO019784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-24 21:48:25 EDT --- Preserve timestamps during install: make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 01:46:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497525] Review Request: bubblemon-gnome - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250146.n3P1kpQ0019643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-24 21:46:50 EDT --- Thanks for this submission, I was thinking about packaging this just yesterday. IMO this package should be named gnome-applet-bublemon to follow the fedora naming conventions, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28General.29 You can add a provides for bubblemon-gnome if you like. The other bubblemon package from bug # 165483 should be renamed to bubblemon-dockapp because it violates the naming guidlines, but that's different issue. License: GPLv2 is not correct, this is GPLv2+, because if you look at the sourcecode you will find GPLv2 "or any later version". See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#.22or_later_version.22_licenses BuildRequires: gettext is not really necessary, will be pulled in by intltool automatically. Remove "AutoReqProv: yes" & comment, it's a default that should not be mentioned explicitly. Also it wont work in this case: $ rpm -qp --requires bubblemon-gnome-2.0.13-2.fc10.i386.rpm | grep panel libpanel-applet-2.so.0 $ rpm -q --whatprovides libpanel-applet-2.so.0 gnome-panel-libs-2.24.3-2.fc10.i386 But gnome-panel-libs is not enough to actually run the applet, add "Requires: gnome-panel". Drop ABOUT-NLS again, generic info, not needed when installed from rpm. %{_mandir}/hu/man1/bubblemon-gnome2.1.gz and %{_mandir}/sv/man1/bubblemon-gnome2.1.gz are not utf-8, use iconv to convert them, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackagingTricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8 The rest looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 04:02:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:02:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250402.n3P42vE0011269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #31 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-25 00:02:54 EDT --- OK - License OK OK - License tag matches OK - Source0 maches by md5sum bafbad33ad43ba401d228dbaa10f26a0 OK - Package works fine $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/gnome-* gnome-applet-globalmenu.i386: W: no-documentation gnome-globalmenu.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-globalmenu.schemas gnome-globalmenu.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 1) gnome-globalmenu-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Please fix the mixed-use ... warning. directory %{_datadir}/doc/gnome-globalmenu/ is still unowned. I told you how to install the docs in comment # 17 Do not install generic INSTALL files Is it possible to move %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/gnome-globalmenu.schemas into the gnome-applet-globalmenu package? I guess gconf is not really needed when runing in xfce. Please fix the changelog, one blank between entries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 04:23:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:23:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497339] Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250423.n3P4N2g6019928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(jussi.lehtola at iki | |.fi) --- Comment #6 from David Nalley 2009-04-25 00:23:01 EDT --- There are some missing requires it would seem: I installed qmforge from the above rpm, and when I try and launch I get the following tracebacks: [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 noarch]$ qmforge Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/qmforge", line 19, in from qmforge.qmforge import * File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/qmforge/qmforge.py", line 36, in from popwidget import * File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/qmforge/popwidget.py", line 20, in from glwidget import * File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/qmforge/glwidget.py", line 17, in from OpenGL.GL import * ImportError: No module named OpenGL.GL I'll go through the source tomorrow and try and see what else is missing here. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 04:51:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:51:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497614] New: Review Request: icoutils - Utility for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: icoutils - Utility for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497614 Summary: Review Request: icoutils - Utility for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eric.moret at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/linux/icoutils/icoutils.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/linux/icoutils/icoutils-0.26.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The icoutils are a set of programs for extracting and converting images in Microsoft Windows icon and cursor files. These files usually have the extension .ico or .cur, but they can also be embedded in executables or libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 04:56:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:56:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250456.n3P4uFGF019489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-04-25 00:56:13 EDT --- Is there a reason you are picking this project which is dead upstream instead of using the one included in Fedora 10 which is part of gnome-media? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 05:37:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250537.n3P5bMrS025690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #44 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-25 01:37:20 EDT --- Thanks Gerd, seems perfect now. - Spec file clean and legible, American English used - Filelists sane - Requires & Provides ok - Uses compiler flags - Respects FHS - RPMlint reasonably happy - Compiles fine in mock - Works Tadaaaa... APROVED (Contrary to what I stated in comment #38, Christoph is probably going to sponsor you now.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 06:15:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 02:15:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250615.n3P6FKtM004558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #8 from Adam Williamson 2009-04-25 02:15:19 EDT --- Rahul: my reasoning is that the one from gnome-media in f10 is the one that's truly 'dead', because it's been turning into the new Pulse-style mixer that this is intended to supplement. I think it'd be more of a hack to take the old g-v-c from f10 era and call it something else than it is to just take a different project. what we're demonstrating here is that there's likely to be space for a 'full' mixer for GNOME for the foreseeable future, so to me it seems to make more sense to pick gnome-alsamixer, which - if the demand turns out to be there - could easily be resurrected as a fully maintained project upstream; the space is there for it and it's still a part of GNOME git. You couldn't do that with the old gnome-volume-control, because that's already become the *new* gnome-volume-control... I wouldn't really mind if people felt strongly that we should take the old g-v-c instead, though. my goal is only to have a decent GUI alsa-level mixer available out of the box in f11, I'm not that strongly wedded to one or the other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 06:17:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 02:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497525] Review Request: bubblemon-gnome - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250617.n3P6HjEu004778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 --- Comment #3 from Edwin ten Brink 2009-04-25 02:17:45 EDT --- Thank you for your thorough commenting. I have two points where I need some additional clarification. 1) I've included gettext since it does not appear to be really pulled in by intltool, see below. Additionally it is suggested by the packaging guidelines: "If the package includes translations, add BuildRequires: gettext. If you don't, your package could fail to generate translation files in the buildroot." (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files). $ rpm -q gettext gettext-0.17-8.fc10.i386 $ rpm -q --whatrequires gettext gettext-devel-0.17-8.fc10.i386 [edwin at localhost ~]$ rpm -q intltool intltool-0.40.5-1.fc10.i386 [edwin at localhost ~]$ rpm -q --requires intltool /bin/sh /usr/bin/perl automake gettext-devel patch perl(Cwd) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Find) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Text::Wrap) perl(XML::Parser) perl(strict) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 -> Do you still feel that gettext is not required? In that case I would like to suggest a change in the Packaging Guidlines Wiki. 2) The conversion to UTF-8 has been taken care of by the upstream maintainer during my creation of the rpm spec file since I've found that warning too. Since it was a 'warning' with a a 'consider' considering the two translated manpages, I figured this would solve itself in the next upstream release. W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/sv/man1/bubblemon-gnome2.1.gz The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile's %prep section for example using iconv(1). W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/hu/man1/bubblemon-gnome2.1.gz The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile's %prep section for example using iconv(1). -> Do you think the conversion is a must for this release or a nice to have? It doesn't really bother to include in this release, but I thought it unnecessary since I will be removing it the next release anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 06:33:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 02:33:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250633.n3P6XCMt001573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #9 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-04-25 02:33:10 EDT --- IMO, your understanding seems incorrect. Refer http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2009-January/msg00330.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 07:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 03:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497339] Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250733.n3P7Xpl3016290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jussi.lehtola at iki | |.fi) | --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-25 03:33:50 EDT --- Try this one. For me qmforge worked perfectly, but I had PyOpenGL installed. I added it as a requirement. I don't know whether PyQt4 should pull in PyOpenGL, it might be a packaging bug in PyQt4. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qmforge.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qmforge-2.1-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 07:44:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 03:44:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494517] Review Request: python-xkit - A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250744.n3P7iFoY011794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494517 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-25 03:44:13 EDT --- Ping, are you going to import? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 07:42:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 03:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490576] Review Request: bibtex2html - Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250742.n3P7gEtM011665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-25 03:42:13 EDT --- Ping, have you done any reviews and do you still need a sponsor? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 07:48:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 03:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492979] Review Request: python-cliutils - A collection of utilities easing the creation of command line scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250748.n3P7mrPU018508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492979 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-25 03:48:52 EDT --- Ping, do you still need a sponsor? Do you have other submissions and have you done reviews of other packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 07:51:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 03:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493335] Review Request: perl-RTx-Calendar - Calendar for RT due tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250751.n3P7pip4019228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493335 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-25 03:51:43 EDT --- It *is* a problem. According to the file system standard, everything that comes with the distro should be in libdir; /usr/local is for software that hasn't been packaged and is locally built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 07:59:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 03:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250759.n3P7x2Zk014485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #10 from Adam Williamson 2009-04-25 03:59:01 EDT --- Quoting Dave Airlie from the list: "I took a quick look at this, and gnome-media has the code moved to the gst-mixer subdir, but thats it, the code still believes its called g-v-c, all the files are called that, the gconf schema keys, the desktop, etc. So I suspect the effort to do that vs ship gnome-alsamixer at this point in the development cycle isn't going to provide any useful advantages to the advanced sound configuration people are requiring. Like it the answer to the question is otherwise run a cli app called alsamixer, I'd ship a kde app quicker :)" To this I'd add that we don't necessarily *want* a fairly heavy gstreamer mixer applet that supports Pulse as well as ALSA mixer control. We want a simple standalone application that simply lets you poke the ALSA mixers, nothing else. gnome-alsamixer seems to fit that description. But again I will go for the old g-v-c if more people favour it. I'd just ask that someone else do the work of completing the re-write to identify as something different from the new g-v-c, and handling the package, as I'm not familiar with it at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 07:57:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 03:57:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494517] Review Request: python-xkit - A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250757.n3P7vfAr020357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494517 --- Comment #10 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-04-25 03:57:40 EDT --- There has been a build failure. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=97763 I haven't had time to look into it yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 08:05:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:05:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250805.n3P85LBB022240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #11 from Adam Williamson 2009-04-25 04:05:19 EDT --- Just uploaded an updated .spec and .src.rpm with the patch applied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 08:05:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:05:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250805.n3P85Nqh022279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-25 04:05:21 EDT --- Doesn't build in mock: ERROR: Bad build req: No Package Found for perl(Mixin::Linewise::Readers) >= 0.001. Exiting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 08:09:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484567] Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250809.n3P89eBZ022884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484567 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2009-04-25 04:09:38 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-ezc-File.src: I: checking php-ezc-File.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name + spec file name + package meet the PHP Guidelines (new update) + License ok : BSD + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources 36ff7eeb3699b2bf36ccf9b64c224154 File-1.2.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F10.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + no documentation + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in mock (fedora-rawhide-x86_64) + no test suite + scriptlets ok + Final Requires ok php-common >= 5.1.1 php-pear(components.ez.no/Base) >= 1.4 + Final Provides ok php-pear(components.ez.no/File) = 1.2 php-ezc-File = 1.2-2.fc8 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 08:16:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250816.n3P8Gfbb024534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andreas at bawue.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 08:16:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250816.n3P8G6WC018373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Andreas Thienemann 2009-04-25 04:16:03 EDT --- Looks good. Approved. Please be so kind and add all commands needed for tarball generation as a comment. Not only git clone, but the appropriate tar command. But we don't need a new review-round for that. Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests to have the existing gnome-alsamixer ACLs changed and a new branch created for F11 and devel. A "Package Change Request" would be appropriate for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 08:19:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:19:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488538] Review Request: php-ezc-Authentication - eZ Components Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250819.n3P8JD3B018673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488538 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 488538 depends on bug 484509, which changed state. Bug 484509 Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-Base - eZ Components Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484509 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2009-04-25 04:19:12 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-ezc-Authentication.src: I: checking php-ezc-Authentication.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name + spec file name + package meet the PHP Guidelines (new update) + License ok : BSD + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources a736fac4611c5d8e495fb7d8831b4fa8 Authentication-1.2.3.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F10.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + small documentation not required to run + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in mock (fedora-rawhide-x86_64) + no test suite + scriptlets ok + Final Requires ok php-bcmath php-common >= 5.2.1 php-ldap php-pear(components.ez.no/Base) >= 1.5.2 + Final Provides ok php-pear(components.ez.no/Authentication) = 1.2.3 php-ezc-Authentication = 1.2.3-1.fc8 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 08:21:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:21:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] New: Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 Summary: Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fenn at stanford.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/apbs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/apbs-1.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: APBS is a software package for the numerical solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation (PBE), one of the most popular continuum models for describing electrostatic interactions between molecular solutes in salty, aqueous media. APBS was designed to efficiently evaluate electrostatic properties for such simulations for a wide range of length scales to enable the investigation of molecules with tens to millions of atoms. It is also widely used in molecular visualization (in such applications as PyMOL). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 08:27:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:27:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250827.n3P8RikH026244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-25 04:27:42 EDT --- does build in mock (see the scratch build url). The problem is that "rawhide" is currently pointing at F11 and perl-Mixin-Linewise doesn't exist there yet (the update is pending). You need to tweak your mock configuration to include the latest F12 stuff from koji. Something like: [local] name=local baseurl=http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f12-build-current/x86_64/ cost=2000 enabled=1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 08:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:51:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250851.n3P8pUuf024379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-25 04:51:29 EDT --- Right, that's why yum --enablerepo=rawhide didn't find anything, either. Well, in a couple of days the requirements should be in older releases as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 08:51:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250851.n3P8pNDY024341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-25 04:51:22 EDT --- notify-python was added as a requirement. Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rapid-photo-downloader.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rapid-photo-downloader-0.0.8-2.b7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 09:26:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 05:26:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489795] Review Request: backintime - Simple backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250926.n3P9QeQu004056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489795 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 09:25:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 05:25:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489795] Review Request: backintime - Simple backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250925.n3P9PtgG003970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489795 --- Comment #8 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-25 05:25:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: backintime Short Description: Simple backup system Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: - Please change %description to "Gnome frontend for %{name}" and "KDE frontend for %{name}". DONE (will be in CVS) - Add TRANSLATIONS to %doc, it's a credits file like AUTHORS DONE (will be in CVS) - use cp -p when copying from bindir to sbindir DONE (will be in CVS) - mark %{_datadir}/gnome/help/%{name}/ as %doc DONE (will be in CVS) - Desktopfile yeah, it was hard for me to come to a decision. I prefer sed and desktopinstall, too. But on the other hand i saw in other packages that they patch the whole desktopfile with categories and so on, because they have to edit them, so they decided to make the whole with the patch instead of splitting patch and desktopfileinstall. it's good to hear that you would make it like i would prefer. this agreement shows me that my line of thought is not unsolicited. DONE (will be in CVS) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 09:33:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 05:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904250933.n3P9XIFH031471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #13 from manuel wolfshant 2009-04-25 05:33:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341305) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341305) thanks for providing a decent alternative to PA Thanks for bringing this tool in, guys. Despite what PA team thinks, I prefer the topmost control panel over the one in the bottom. With alsa I can individually control the left and right output channel. And a couple more inputs which are doomed in PA as being irrelevant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 10:12:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 06:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497525] Review Request: bubblemon-gnome - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251012.n3PACi39011569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-25 06:12:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > [edwin at localhost ~]$ rpm -q --requires intltool > /bin/sh > /usr/bin/perl > automake > gettext-devel And gettext-devel requires gettext. On the other hand it does not harm to mention it, I recall in Fedora > 7 intlttol did not pull in gettext-devel. It's up to you, that's why I said "not *really*". > -> Do you think the conversion is a must for this release or a nice to have? It's a nice to have, I wouldn't call it a blocker. I will do the final review tomorrow, stay tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 10:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 06:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251026.n3PAQCCC007702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #45 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-25 06:26:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #44) > (Contrary to what I stated in comment #38, Christoph is probably going to > sponsor you now.) Gerd, I 'm sponsorind you now in order to get parrot into Fedora 11. Nevertheless I'd like to see some review efforts from you before you submit other packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 10:50:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 06:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251050.n3PAoGGO017266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-25 06:50:15 EDT --- Please don't use %makeinstall, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used Inline desktop file creation ws forbidden recently, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.desktop_file_creation rpmbuild --rebuild does not work for F-10, see http://fpaste.org/paste/10125 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 11:52:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:52:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251152.n3PBqvGH026585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz --- Comment #15 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-25 07:52:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Inline desktop file creation ws forbidden recently, see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.desktop_file_creation The guidelines were not updated yet, but inline creating of desktop files is allowed for few weeks now, see https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/129 for details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 12:02:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:02:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251202.n3PC25e9022409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #16 from Andreas Thienemann 2009-04-25 08:02:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Please don't use %makeinstall, see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used As discussed on IRC: make DESTDIR doesn't work, I checked. Patching the makefile would be an option, but using %makeinstall does work as expected. If the maintainer wants to patch the Makefile to make DESTDIR work, that is fine. I'd leave it to his discretion. It's not a blocker as is. > Inline desktop file creation ws forbidden recently, see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.desktop_file_creation The wiki does state "You can do this by including a .desktop file you create as a Source: (e.g. Source3: %{name}.desktop) or generating it in the spec file." As you mentioned on IRC, there seems to have been a mail somewhere stating this. So even though it seems not (yet) to be official policy, I've attached a patch fixing this potential future problem. > rpmbuild --rebuild does not work for F-10, see http://fpaste.org/paste/10125 Old file. That was already fixed. http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/gnome-alsamixer/gnome-alsamixer-0.9.7-0.1.20090424gitc540b26.fc10.src.rpm was the last submission from packager and does not exhibit that problem. Not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 12:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251207.n3PC7C0t029034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #18 from Andreas Thienemann 2009-04-25 08:07:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > The guidelines were not updated yet, but inline creating of desktop files is > allowed for few weeks now, see https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/129 for > details. Thanks for clearing that up. Considering that, I'd retract my latest patch. Package is fine as is. If Adam wants to externalize the .desktop file, it's up to him. I don't consider any of the raised points blockers for inclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 12:02:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:02:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497634] New: Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon Alias: perl-App-Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 Summary: Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/App-Daemon/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-App-Daemon.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-App-Daemon-0.06-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: App::Daemon helps running an application as a daemon. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1320265 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 12:04:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:04:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251204.n3PC4XXD022683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #17 from Andreas Thienemann 2009-04-25 08:04:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341313) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341313) changing inline .desktop to external -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 12:18:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251218.n3PCIYBJ030768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #19 from manuel wolfshant 2009-04-25 08:18:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > > rpmbuild --rebuild does not work for F-10, see http://fpaste.org/paste/10125 > > Old file. That was already fixed. > http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/gnome-alsamixer/gnome-alsamixer-0.9.7-0.1.20090424gitc540b26.fc10.src.rpm at least in a mockbuild for F10 the construct cat > /%{name}.desktop << EOF fails because / is not writable by mock. cat > %{name}.desktop << EOF however works just fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 12:27:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:27:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251227.n3PCR24f032324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #20 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-25 08:27:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Old file. That was already fixed. > http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/gnome-alsamixer/gnome-alsamixer-0.9.7-0.1.20090424gitc540b26.fc10.src.rpm > was the last submission from packager and does not exhibit that problem. > Not a blocker. This *is* the latest submission and it fails: $ rpmbuild --rebuild Desktop/gnome-alsamixer-0.9.7-0.1.20090424gitc540b26.fc10.src.rpm Installiere Desktop/gnome-alsamixer-0.9.7-0.1.20090424gitc540b26.fc10.src.rpm Warnung: Benutzer adamw existiert nicht - benutze Root Warnung: Gruppe adamw existiert nicht - benutze Root Warnung: Benutzer adamw existiert nicht - benutze Root Warnung: Gruppe adamw existiert nicht - benutze Root Warnung: Benutzer adamw existiert nicht - benutze Root Warnung: Gruppe adamw existiert nicht - benutze Root Warnung: Benutzer adamw existiert nicht - benutze Root Warnung: Gruppe adamw existiert nicht - benutze Root Warnung: Benutzer adamw existiert nicht - benutze Root Warnung: Gruppe adamw existiert nicht - benutze Root Warnung: Benutzer adamw existiert nicht - benutze Root Warnung: Gruppe adamw existiert nicht - benutze Root Warnung: Benutzer adamw existiert nicht - benutze Root Warnung: Gruppe adamw existiert nicht - benutze Root Warnung: Benutzer adamw existiert nicht - benutze Root Warnung: Gruppe adamw existiert nicht - benutze Root Fehler: Zeile 24: Ung?ltiges Zeichen '-' in release: Release: 0.1.20090424gitc540b26.gnome-alsamixer-20090424gitc540b26.tar.bz210 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 12:33:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:33:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251233.n3PCXZwK000800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #21 from manuel wolfshant 2009-04-25 08:33:34 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341315) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341315) successfull build log of alsamixer-0.9.7-0.1.20090424gitc540b26.fc10.src.rpm (with one small change in the spec) only change versus http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/gnome-alsamixer/gnome-alsamixer-0.9.7-0.1.20090424gitc540b26.fc10.src.rpm is removing the leading "/" in the name of the desktop file when creating it inline. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 12:38:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:38:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251238.n3PCcvB9027881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #22 from Andreas Thienemann 2009-04-25 08:38:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > This *is* the latest submission and it fails Works for me: [andreas at workstation ~]$ wget -q http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/gnome-alsamixer/gnome-alsamixer-0.9.7-0.1.20090424gitc540b26.fc10.src.rpm [andreas at workstation ~]$ rpmbuild --rebuild gnome-alsamixer-0.9.7-0.1.20090424gitc540b26.fc10.src.rpm Installing gnome-alsamixer-0.9.7-0.1.20090424gitc540b26.fc10.src.rpm warning: user adamw does not exist - using root warning: group adamw does not exist - using root warning: user adamw does not exist - using root warning: group adamw does not exist - using root warning: user adamw does not exist - using root warning: group adamw does not exist - using root warning: user adamw does not exist - using root warning: group adamw does not exist - using root warning: user adamw does not exist - using root warning: group adamw does not exist - using root warning: user adamw does not exist - using root warning: group adamw does not exist - using root warning: user adamw does not exist - using root warning: group adamw does not exist - using root warning: user adamw does not exist - using root warning: group adamw does not exist - using root Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.EDaoPb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 12:41:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251241.n3PCfPFj002133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #23 from Andreas Thienemann 2009-04-25 08:41:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > at least in a mockbuild for F10 the construct > cat > /%{name}.desktop << EOF > fails because / is not writable by mock. > cat > %{name}.desktop << EOF > however works just fine. good catch. My fault in the patch when I changed to desktop-file-install which I "corrected" when I switched to the external .desktop file so I never noticed that part during the review... Should be fixed for the import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 13:01:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 09:01:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] New: Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 Summary: Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: leigh123linux at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/review/gmixer/1/gmixer.spec SRPM URL: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/review/gmixer/1/gmixer-0.3.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Just Another MIXer A GTK+ 1.2 based mixer. Nothing fancy, just a simple audio mixer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 13:11:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 09:11:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497640] New: Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dpierce at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-RedCloth.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-RedCloth-4.1.9-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Textile parser for Ruby. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 13:53:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 09:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251353.n3PDrQqU006802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #42 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-25 09:53:22 EDT --- http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/xmonad/xmonad.spec http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/xmonad/xmonad-0.8.1-9.fc10.src.rpm I have been using this package now recently and it works ok for me - uses most of Till's latest package but slightly simpler: just xmonad.desktop for xmonad-start. I feel this is probably enough for the initial fedora xmonad package. We can get more sophisticated later if necessary, but for now I suggest advanced users who want to customize their session startup can use xorg-x11-xinit-session and ~/.xsession say. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 14:47:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:47:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251447.n3PElt0B020798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 --- Comment #9 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-25 10:47:54 EDT --- ok, upgraded Spec URL: http://ibphoenix.fr//fedora/flamerobin.spec SRPM URL: http://ibphoenix.fr//fedora/flamerobin-0.9.2-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 15:30:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 11:30:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488539] Review Request: php-ezc-Configuration - eZ Components Configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251530.n3PFUIsW021228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488539 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 488539 depends on bug 484509, which changed state. Bug 484509 Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-Base - eZ Components Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484509 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2009-04-25 11:30:17 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-ezc-Configuration.src: I: checking php-ezc-Configuration.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name + spec file name + package meet the PHP Guidelines (new update) + License ok : BSD + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources e588fc7317e45674998d42d064ae731a Configuration-1.3.2.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F10.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2, php-channel(components.ez.no)) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + small documentation not required to run + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in mock (fedora-rawhide-x86_64) + no test suite + scriptlets ok + Final Requires ok /usr/bin/pear php-common >= 5.2.1 php-pear(components.ez.no/Base) >= 1.5.2 + Final Provides ok php-pear(components.ez.no/Configuration) = 1.3.2 php-ezc-Configuration = 1.3.2-1.fc8 -------- APPROVED -------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 15:39:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 11:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251539.n3PFdCYi028425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet 2009-04-25 11:39:12 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-ezc-Database.src: I: checking php-ezc-Database.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name ok + spec file name ok + package meet the PHP Guidelines (new update) + License ok : BSD + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources b48377b4153f49da304337a7e768bf38 Database-1.4.4.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F10.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2, php-channel(components.ez.no)) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + small documentation not required to run + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in mock (fedora-rawhide-x86_64) + no test suite + scriptlets ok + Final Requires ok /usr/bin/pear php-common >= 5.2.1 php-pdo php-pear(components.ez.no/Base) >= 1.6.1 + Final Provides ok php-pear(components.ez.no/Database) = 1.4.4 php-ezc-Database = 1.4.4-1.fc8 -------- APPROVED -------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 16:33:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251633.n3PGXeK1004030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-25 12:33:39 EDT --- Hold on, I said "no further questions" but I need to take a step back and ask another: * The installed package gives the rpmlint: $ rpmlint globus-openssl-module globus-openssl-module.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libglobus_openssl.so.0.0.6 /lib64/libdl.so.2 globus-openssl-module.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libglobus_openssl.so.0.0.6 /lib64/libz.so.1 globus-openssl-module.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libglobus_openssl.so.0.0.6 /usr/lib64/libltdl.so.3 globus-openssl-module.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libglobus_openssl.so.0.0.6 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 Also, some of the other globus packages that we approved have these kind of warnings. Are these warnings given because the .pc files report more links than they actually need to? Or how can we fix these? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 16:46:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:46:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251646.n3PGka8S032287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-25 12:46:35 EDT --- Alright, I updated the flags one more time: Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/minicomputer.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/minicomputer-1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 1.3-3 - Cleanup the compiler flags Rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1320465 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 16:49:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251649.n3PGnqHd032498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #49 from leigh scott 2009-04-25 12:49:50 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: qbittorrent New Branches: F-11 Owners leigh123linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 16:57:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485580] Review Request: netactview - Graphical network connections viewer for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251657.n3PGvjgl001305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from leigh scott 2009-04-25 12:57:42 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: netactview New Branches: F11 Owners: leigh123linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 16:58:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:58:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485580] Review Request: netactview - Graphical network connections viewer for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251658.n3PGwExA001359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580 --- Comment #11 from leigh scott 2009-04-25 12:58:13 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: netactview New Branches: F-11 Owners: leigh123linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 16:59:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:59:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457213] Review Request: html2text - HTML-to-text converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251659.n3PGxwbo007477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457213 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #45 from leigh scott 2009-04-25 12:59:54 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: html2text New Branches: F-11 Owners: leigh123linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 17:12:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:12:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251712.n3PHCu33003668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 17:12:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:12:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251712.n3PHCMOV003622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 --- Comment #3 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-04-25 13:12:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-ezc-Database Short Description: A lightweight database layer on top of PHP's PDO Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 17:15:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488539] Review Request: php-ezc-Configuration - eZ Components Configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251715.n3PHFQlH010125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488539 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 17:15:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251715.n3PHFQwJ010141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) | --- Comment #45 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-25 13:15:23 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 17:15:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488539] Review Request: php-ezc-Configuration - eZ Components Configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251715.n3PHFBXr004146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488539 --- Comment #2 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-04-25 13:15:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-ezc-Configuration Short Description: Allows you to use configuration files in different formats Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 17:14:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251714.n3PHEXDY003799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(alexeskin at yahoo.c | |om) --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-25 13:14:30 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 17:18:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:18:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488538] Review Request: php-ezc-Authentication - eZ Components Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251718.n3PHIuPG004519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488538 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-04-25 13:18:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-ezc-Authentication Short Description: Support for different means of identification & authentication Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 17:19:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:19:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251719.n3PHJwrD010509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-25 13:19:57 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 17:20:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:20:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484567] Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251720.n3PHKHvK010952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484567 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-04-25 13:20:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-ezc-File Short Description: Provides support for file operations which are not covered by PHP Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 17:29:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251729.n3PHTbEt012027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-25 13:29:35 EDT --- Ok it seems fine for me now, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 17:27:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226146] Merge Review: mkinitrd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251727.n3PHRcqf011928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226146 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jussi.lehtola at iki.fi |hdegoede at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-25 13:27:37 EDT --- Sorry, -ENOTIME, atleast not for the coming month. I'm assigning this to me (even though I'm not the reviewer) so that this does not drop of my radar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 17:32:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:32:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251732.n3PHWYKw012682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #50 from Rex Dieter 2009-04-25 13:32:33 EDT --- fyi, F-11 branches have already been made for all packages. (you may need a cvs -d up) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 17:57:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:57:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485580] Review Request: netactview - Graphical network connections viewer for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251757.n3PHvB1v016321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 17:55:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251755.n3PHtmPV010149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #51 from leigh scott 2009-04-25 13:55:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #50) > fyi, F-11 branches have already been made for all packages. (you may need a > cvs -d up) Thank you for the info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 17:56:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457213] Review Request: html2text - HTML-to-text converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251756.n3PHuewC010337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457213 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 17:57:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251757.n3PHvPhT010410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-25 13:57:24 EDT --- Thank you Pavel! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: minicomputer Short Description: Software Synthesizer Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 19:06:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:06:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251906.n3PJ6410020186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 --- Comment #9 from Zach Carter 2009-04-25 15:06:01 EDT --- New upstream version, built for f11: http://www.zachcarter.com/rpms/schroot.spec http://www.zachcarter.com/rpms/schroot-1.2.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 19:31:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:31:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251931.n3PJV5Gu029616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #14 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-25 15:31:04 EDT --- I think you need to assign yourself to the bug and set the bug to ASSIGNED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 19:50:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904251950.n3PJoA4Z032600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #14 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-25 15:50:09 EDT --- Nah, don't like to wait. So I did almost everything as I think it should be. -------------------------------------------- MUMBLE: [makerpm at localhost SPECS]$ rpmls ../RPMS/i386/mumble-1.1.8-2.fc9.i386.rpm -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/mumble -rwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/libmumble.so -rwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/libmumble.so.1 -rwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/libmumble.so.1.1 -rwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/libmumble.so.1.1.8 -rwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/mumble/liblink.so drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/mumble-1.1.8 -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/mumble-1.1.8/CHANGES -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/mumble-1.1.8/LICENSE -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/mumble-1.1.8/README -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/mumble-1.1.8/README.Linux [makerpm at localhost SPECS]$ [makerpm at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/mumble-1.1.8-2.fc9.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [makerpm at localhost SPECS]$ ------------------------------------------------- MURMUR: [makerpm at localhost SPECS]$ rpmls ../RPMS/i386/murmur-1.1.8-2.fc9.i386.rpm lrw-rw-r-- /etc/mumble-server.ini -rw-rw-r-- /etc/murmur/murmur.ini -rwxr-xr-x /etc/rc.d/init.d/murmur lrwxrwxrwx /usr/bin/mumble-server lrwxrwxrwx /usr/sbin/murmur -rwxr-xr-x /usr/sbin/murmurd drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/murmur-1.1.8 -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/murmur-1.1.8/CHANGES -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/murmur-1.1.8/LICENSE -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/murmur-1.1.8/README -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/murmur-1.1.8/README.Linux [makerpm at localhost SPECS]$ [makerpm at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/murmur-1.1.8-2.fc9.i386.rpm murmur.i386: W: non-standard-uid /etc/rc.d/init.d/murmur murmur murmur.i386: W: non-standard-gid /etc/rc.d/init.d/murmur murmur murmur.i386: W: non-standard-uid /etc/murmur/murmur.ini murmur murmur.i386: W: non-standard-gid /etc/murmur/murmur.ini murmur murmur.i386: W: non-standard-uid /usr/bin/mumble-server murmur murmur.i386: W: non-standard-gid /usr/bin/mumble-server murmur murmur.i386: W: non-standard-uid /usr/sbin/murmur murmur murmur.i386: W: non-standard-gid /usr/sbin/murmur murmur murmur.i386: W: non-standard-uid /etc/mumble-server.ini murmur murmur.i386: W: non-standard-gid /etc/mumble-server.ini murmur murmur.i386: W: non-standard-uid /usr/sbin/murmurd murmur murmur.i386: W: non-standard-gid /usr/sbin/murmurd murmur murmur.i386: W: spurious-bracket-in-%preun 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings. [makerpm at localhost SPECS]$ All those warnings are related to new user and group murmur:murmur. They shouldn't make any problems? But W13 is related to if[] in %preun. Tried to fix it but no success. Its something related to space before ]? ------------------------------------------------------------- SRPM: [makerpm at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/mumble-1.1.8-2.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [makerpm at localhost SPECS]$ ------------------------------------------------------------- SPEC: [makerpm at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint mumble.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [makerpm at localhost SPECS]$ ------------------------------------------------------------- INIT: When I do /etc/init.d/murmur it throws me an error. Should I remove this line or fix it somehow? root /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SPECS # /etc/init.d/murmur /etc/init.d/murmur: line 16: /lib/lsb/init-functions: No such file or directory Usage: {start|stop|status|restart|reload|force-reload|condrestart root /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SPECS # - fixed murmur.init. lockfile pointed to /var/log/subsys/murmur correct one is /var/lock/subsys/murmur --------------------------------------------------------------------- SPEC: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.spec SRPM: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble-1.1.8-2.fc9.src.rpm NEW INIT: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/murmur.init TODO: Install: icons - where, how...? scripts - should I add them as %doc or /usr/share/mumble/? desktop-file for mumble subpackage for mumble-overlay and desktop file - can somebody explain this a little bit more. As far as I see mumble-overlay is just bash script that preloads library before starting chosen program. Why would I create desktop file for script? Hmm, that's all? Review wanted. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 20:32:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490380] Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904252032.n3PKWoIA000774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380 --- Comment #12 from Muayyad Alsadi 2009-04-25 16:32:48 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341325) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341325) spec file, fixing the icon I noticed that the icons are put in %{_datadir}/pixmaps/qtcreator_logo_*.png so I added links to them in %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/Nokia-QtCreator.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 21:03:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497660] Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904252103.n3PL3qrE005496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |497661 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 21:03:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497661] Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904252103.n3PL3ptp005474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497661 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |497660 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 21:03:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497661] New: Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497661 Summary: Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-MIME-EncWords.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-MIME-EncWords-1.010.101-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: perl module to deal with RFC 2047 encoded words. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 21:01:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497660] New: Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 Summary: Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-MIME-Charset.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-MIME-Charset-1.006.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: MIME::Charset provides informations about character sets used for MIME messages on Internet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 21:05:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:05:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497663] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904252105.n3PL5n3I011393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497663 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |497662 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 21:05:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:05:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497662] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts - Strip scripting constructs out of HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904252105.n3PL5oMt011413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497662 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |497663 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 21:02:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:02:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497525] Review Request: bubblemon-gnome - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904252102.n3PL2csL010723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 --- Comment #5 from Edwin ten Brink 2009-04-25 17:02:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) I've uploaded the changed files for your final review. (The previous locations were URL's of a different mirror.) Spec URL: http://savannah.inetbridge.net/bubblemon/fedora-stage/gnome-applet-bubblemon.spec SRPM URL: http://savannah.inetbridge.net/bubblemon/fedora-stage/gnome-applet-bubblemon-2.0.13-3.fc10.src.rpm In these files all your remarks are incorporated with the exception of: - gettext (where I decided to follow the suggestions in the Packaging Guidelines), and - the conversion of the two manpages (languages sv and hu) since they are already included by the upstream maintainer in the upcoming next release and these files have a small target audience which should have the used character encoding anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 21:06:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497665] New: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CipherSaber - Perl module implementing CipherSaber encryption Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CipherSaber - Perl module implementing CipherSaber encryption https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497665 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CipherSaber - Perl module implementing CipherSaber encryption Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-Crypt-CipherSaber.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Crypt-CipherSaber-1.00-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Crypt::CipherSaber module implements CipherSaber encryption, described at http://ciphersaber.gurus.com/. It is simple, fairly speedy, and relatively secure algorithm based on RC4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 21:05:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497663] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497663 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser-1.02-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This class provides an easy interface to HTML::StripScripts, using HTML::Parser to parse the HTML. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 21:04:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:04:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497662] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts - Strip scripting constructs out of HTML Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts - Strip scripting constructs out of HTML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497662 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts - Strip scripting constructs out of HTML Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-HTML-StripScripts.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-HTML-StripScripts-1.04-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module strips scripting constructs out of HTML, leaving as much non-scripting markup in place as possible. This allows web applications to display HTML originating from an untrusted source without introducing XSS (cross site scripting) vulnerabilities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 21:04:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:04:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904252104.n3PL4dED005604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-25 17:04:37 EDT --- -------REVIEW PACKAGENAME------- template: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines -------------- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. O.K. bareftp.i386: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. bareftp.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. StartWrapper - okay dll=lib - okay -------------- MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . O.K. -------------- MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. O.K. -------------- MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . O.K. -------------- MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . O.K. -------------- MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. O.K. -------------- MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. O.K. -------------- MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. O.K. -------------- MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. O.K. -------------- MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Package: d19c2cb8ea26703e4d9314772a0acc94 my DL: d19c2cb8ea26703e4d9314772a0acc94 -------------- MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. O.K. -------------- MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. O.K. -------------- MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. O.K. -------------- MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. O.K. -------------- MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A -------------- MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. O.K. -------------- MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. O.K. -------------- MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. O.K. -------------- MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. O.K. -------------- MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). O.K. -------------- MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. O.K. -------------- MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. O.K. -------------- MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). N/A -------------- MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. N/A -------------- MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A -------------- MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A -------------- MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A -------------- MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A -------------- MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A -------------- MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. N/A -------------- MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. O.K. -------------- MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. O.K. -------------- MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). O.K. -------------- MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. O.K. -------------- SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A -------------- SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. N/A -------------- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. O.K. -------------- SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. N/A -------------- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. O.K. -------------- SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. O.K. -------------- SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A -------------- SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb N/A -------------- SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. N/A ================== bareftp approved ================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 21:13:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:13:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497525] Review Request: bubblemon-gnome - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904252113.n3PLD8Mt007129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 --- Comment #6 from Edwin ten Brink 2009-04-25 17:13:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Preserve timestamps during install: > > make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" > > See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps This is a valid comment. I'm only wondering why the generated template spec file does not include the part INSTALL="install -p". Isn't this something which should be changed in rpmdev-newspec, which I used to generate the 'offending' line? Future newcomers might be making this same mistake again by following the generated spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 21:50:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904252150.n3PLoKc8017653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-25 17:50:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bareftp Short Description: File transfer client supporting ftp, ftps and sftp protocols Owners: itamarjp cassmodiah Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 22:15:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:15:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490380] Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904252215.n3PMFrnM021421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-25 18:15:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) thanks for the patch, applyed --------------------------------------------------------------------- qt 4.5.1 has been pushed for F-9 and F-10, I like to make qt-creator available for these branches too Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: qt-creator New Branches: F-9 F-10 Owners: itamarjp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 22:54:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:54:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904252254.n3PMsZEW021593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-25 18:54:34 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 23:14:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:14:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904252314.n3PNESOP024257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 Clint Savage changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |herlo1 at gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Clint Savage 2009-04-25 19:14:27 EDT --- The pam security patch seems fine to me. It's a straight over move from a non-fedora pam to our system-auth model. Looks pretty good. I'd say a cursory review from someone a bit more experienced than I is a good idea, but it sure seems like a nice applcation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 00:33:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260033.n3Q0XtYo007290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #17 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-25 20:33:54 EDT --- The files for the new Extras-SOCI project are as following: Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/extras-soci/extras-soci.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/extras-soci/extras-soci-3.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm And the corresponding Koji builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1320781 (i586) and http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1320788 (x86_64) Those files correspond to the CVS trunk version of SOCI, i.e., when installing those RPM packages, we install the latest version of the SOCI library (and header files). ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: for the (pristine) version 3.0.0 of SOCI, the files have been moved to the following location, and are still valid: Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci-3.0.0-4.fc10.src.rpm [Patch URLs: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci-3.0.0-fix-gcc43-compatibility.patch and http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci-3.0.0-fix-gnu-autotools-compatibility.patch has been updated ] [As that release (pristine 3.0.0 version) is fully based on the official release of the SOCI library, they are not hosted by the Extras-SOCI project] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 04:45:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260445.n3Q4j0eN004541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-26 00:44:59 EDT --- gloox-1.0-0.5.SVNr4003.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gloox-1.0-0.5.SVNr4003.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 04:46:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260446.n3Q4k1td004967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-26 00:46:00 EDT --- gloox-1.0-0.5.SVNr4003.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gloox-1.0-0.5.SVNr4003.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 04:45:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260445.n3Q4jTFB004902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-26 00:45:29 EDT --- gloox-1.0-0.5.SVNr4003.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gloox-1.0-0.5.SVNr4003.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 04:55:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:55:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260455.n3Q4tRwG011488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 04:55:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:55:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutIM - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260455.n3Q4tSs7011514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 Bug 494695 depends on bug 494693, which changed state. Bug 494693 Summary: Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 05:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:06:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496718] Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260506.n3Q56Okb013073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496718 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-26 01:06:23 EDT --- Build fails: + libtoolize --force --copy /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sWKsRh: line 44: libtoolize: command not found Missing BuildRequires on: libtool, automake, autoconf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 05:06:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260506.n3Q56IOV013034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-26 01:06:16 EDT --- Build fails: i686-pc-mingw32-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOUR\ CE=2 -fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -mms-bitfields -O2 -Wall -c sqlite3\ x_command.cpp -DPIC env: i686-pc-mingw32-g++: Permission denied make[1]: *** [sqlite3x_command.lo] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libsqlite3x-2007.10.18' make: *** [all] Error 2 Probable cause: missing BuildRequires: mingw32-gcc-c++ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 05:52:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:52:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260552.n3Q5qvUD014121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 05:53:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:53:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260553.n3Q5rJdI014175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 05:52:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260552.n3Q5qREX019339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 06:39:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 02:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] New: Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 Summary: Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at famillecollet.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/libmemcached.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/libmemcached-0.28-1.fc8.src.rpm Mock log: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/libmemcached-mock.log Koji Scratch build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1321061 Description: libmemcached is a C client library to the memcached server (http://danga.com/memcached). It has been designed to be light on memory usage, and provide full access to server side methods. It also implements several command line tools: memcat - Copy the value of a key to standard output. memflush - Flush the contents of your servers. memrm - Remove a key(s) from the server. memstat - Dump the stats of your servers to standard output. memslap - Generate testing loads on a memcached cluster. memcp - Copy files to memcached servers. memerror - Creates human readable messages from libmemcached error codes. --------- libmemcached is required by some memcached client. I will submit php-pecl-memcached for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 07:01:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:01:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478683] Review Request: perl-Net-Google-AuthSub - Provides interface to interact with sites that implement Google style AuthSub In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260701.n3Q71uMU028799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478683 Andy Shevchenko changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #3 from Andy Shevchenko 2009-04-26 03:01:55 EDT --- I relocated sources to following site: http://starua.com/~andy/Fedora/Fedora.html So, the direct links are: http://starua.com/~andy/Fedora/perl-Net-Google-AuthSub.spec http://starua.com/~andy/Fedora/perl-Net-Google-AuthSub-0.4-1.sh7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 07:21:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260721.n3Q7LcZc026397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-26 03:21:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > (and Chris, if you're reading, reviewtool refused to submit this - presumably > because it found a review for perl-Config-IniHash - where do you want bug > reports?) Yah. The searching was a little too... inclusive :) I just pushed out some revisions I'd been meaning to do for a while now; they should address that as well as a bunch of other bits: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/reviewtool/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 07:24:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260724.n3Q7OVYA031658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #10 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-26 03:24:28 EDT --- in your xmlfy/Makefile you have LDFLAGS = -O2 -s could you remove -s and add into CFLAGS -g ? or you could do in %prep add sed -i 's/CFLAGS=-O2/CFLAGS=-O2 -g/g' xmlfy/Makefile sed -i 's/LDFLAGS=-O2 -s/LDFLAGS=-O2/g' xmlfy/Makefile for reason, please see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo otherwise rpmlint complains on empty debuginfo package. so, my full package review MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. - debuginfo package empty - Not OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . - OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} - OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines - debuginfo package empty - NOT OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . - OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - OK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc - OK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. -OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source - OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - OK, koji build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1321066 MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture - OK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires - OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - OK, no locales available MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. - OK, no shared library available MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. - OK, no relocatable package MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. - OK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. - OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. - OK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. - OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. - OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - OK, no large documentation MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. - OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - OK, no header files MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - OK, no static libraries MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). - OK, no .pc files MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - OK, no library files MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - OK, no devel package MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - OK, no .la files MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file - OK, no gui available MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - OK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - OK Conclusion, not properly created debuginfo package => does not meet http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Debuginfo_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 07:33:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:33:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497686] New: Review Request: perl-Archive-RPM - Work with an RPM Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-RPM - Work with an RPM Alias: perl-Archive-RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497686 Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-RPM - Work with an RPM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Archive-RPM OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Archive-RPM.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Archive-RPM-0.04-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Archive::RPM provides a more complete method of accessing an RPM's meta- and actual data. We access this information by leveraging RPM2 where we can, and by "exploding" the rpm with rpm2cpio and cpio when we need information we can't get through RPM2. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1321073 *rt-0.07 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 07:52:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:52:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260752.n3Q7q79k030647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(arthurg.work at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-26 03:52:06 EDT --- arthurguru: you need to find someone to sponsor you before Jan can approve your package. I can sponsor you, but I'd be thankful if you could informal reviews of a package or two before. That's usually done to demonstrate that you are familiar with packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 08:09:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:09:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497688] New: Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at famillecollet.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pecl-memcache.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pecl-memcached-0.1.5-1.fc8.src.rpm Mock log: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pecl-memcached-mock.log Description: This extension uses libmemcached library to provide API for communicating with memcached servers. memcached is a high-performance, distributed memory object caching system, generic in nature, but intended for use in speeding up dynamic web applications by alleviating database load. It also provides a session handler (memcached). ---- Can't provide koji scratch build as libmemcached not yet available. rpmlint is silent : php-pecl-memcached.src: I: checking php-pecl-memcached.x86_64: I: checking php-pecl-memcached-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 08:10:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:10:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260810.n3Q8A2gi001484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |497688 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 08:10:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:10:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260810.n3Q8A1Hu001172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |497682 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 08:37:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:37:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497690] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents Alias: perl-HTML-GenToc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497690 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-GenToc/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-HTML-GenToc.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-HTML-GenToc-3.10-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: HTML::GenToc generates anchors and a table of contents for HTML documents. Depending on the arguments, it will insert the information it generates, or output to a string, a separate file or STDOUT. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1321091 *rt-0.07 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 08:40:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260840.n3Q8en9I013175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 488549 depends on bug 484509, which changed state. Bug 484509 Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-Base - eZ Components Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484509 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2009-04-26 04:40:48 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-ezc-EventLog.src: I: checking php-ezc-EventLog.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name ok + spec file name ok + package meet the PHP Guidelines (new update) + License ok : BSD + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources fc076796311c9571a6fe62774d288ef0 EventLog-1.3.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F10.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2, php-channel(components.ez.no)) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + small documentation not required to run + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in mock (fedora-rawhide-x86_64) + no test suite + scriptlets ok + Final Requires ok /usr/bin/pear php-common >= 5.2.1 php-pear(components.ez.no/Base) >= 1.5 + Final Provides ok php-pear(components.ez.no/EventLog) = 1.3 php-ezc-EventLog = 1.3-1.fc8 -------- APPROVED -------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 08:44:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:44:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497686] Review Request: perl-Archive-RPM - Work with an RPM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260844.n3Q8iGO6007789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497686 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |iarnell at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |iarnell at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-26 04:44:15 EDT --- + source files match upstream. 54cc46c5e670796ebd2134f83b0d8a346bfb447c Archive-RPM-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. LGPLv2+ + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1321073 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no complaints: perl-Archive-RPM.noarch: I: checking perl-Archive-RPM.src: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(Archive::RPM) = 0.04 perl(Archive::RPM::ChangeLogEntry) = 0.04 perl-Archive-RPM = 0.04-1.fc12 = cpio perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Archive::RPM::ChangeLogEntry) perl(DateTime) perl(English) perl(File::Temp) perl(Moose) perl(MooseX::AttributeHelpers) perl(MooseX::Types::DateTimeX) perl(MooseX::Types::Path::Class) perl(Path::Class) perl(RPM2) >= 0.67 perl(namespace::clean) perl(overload) rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 + %check is present and all tests pass. t/00-load.t ........... ok t/100-archive-rpm.t ... ok t/101-archive-srpm.t .. ok t/102-changelog.t ..... ok All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=28, 5 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.01 sys + 4.67 cusr 0.49 csys = 5.22 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 08:49:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260849.n3Q8n54B014349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2009-04-26 04:49:04 EDT --- After a clean yum localinstall of the packages provided in the link mentioned above, I get : [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ reviewtool --help couldn't load Fedora::App::ReviewTool::Command::import: IPC::System::Simple required for Fatalised/autodying system() at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Fedora/App/ReviewTool/Command/import.pm line 20 BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Fedora/App/ReviewTool/Command/import.pm line 20. Compilation failed in require at (eval 2157) line 3. [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ rpm -q reviewtool -i Name : reviewtool Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 0.07 Vendor: (none) Release : 1.fc10 Build Date: Sun 26 Apr 2009 10:06:43 AM EEST Install Date: Sun 26 Apr 2009 11:42:12 AM EEST Build Host: athena Group : Development/Libraries Source RPM: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool-0.07-1.fc10.src.rpm And BTW (wrt Fedora::App::ReviewTool), cpio is included by default in the buildroot and your source URL points to a not yet existing source file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 09:12:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 05:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497665] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CipherSaber - Perl module implementing CipherSaber encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904260912.n3Q9C9MB017970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497665 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |iarnell at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |iarnell at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-26 05:12:08 EDT --- + source files match upstream. 2522e3de77fe005f13be3749e629b5234d449429 Crypt-CipherSaber-1.00.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1321099 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no complaints: perl-Crypt-CipherSaber.noarch: I: checking perl-Crypt-CipherSaber.src: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(Crypt::CipherSaber) = 1.00 perl-Crypt-CipherSaber = 1.00-1.fc12 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(strict) perl(vars) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 + %check is present and all tests pass (with the caveat about Module::Signature) All tests successful. Files=10, Tests=32, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.07 usr 0.02 sys + 0.59 cusr 0.10 csys = 0.78 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 10:15:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 06:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497665] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CipherSaber - Perl module implementing CipherSaber encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261015.n3QAFpxe021409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497665 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-26 06:15:50 EDT --- Thanks for the review Iain. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Crypt-CipherSaber Short Description: Perl module implementing CipherSaber encryption Owners: xavierb Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 11:38:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 07:38:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491579] Review Request: jjack - JACK audio driver for the Java Sound API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261138.n3QBcDwj006793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491579 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-26 07:38:12 EDT --- Fedora review jjack-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm 2009-04-26 rpmlint: 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * Package is named according to guidelines * Specfile is named after the package * The package follows the guidelines for a java package using JNI * License is Fedora approved: LGPLv2+ * The License tags in the sources only says LGPL without version. According to the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing page LGPL without version is equivalent to LGPLv2+. ("Note that this is LGPLv2+, not LGPL+, because version 2 was the first version of LGPL.") The version number in the LICENSE file itself is not relevant for (L)GPL. * The LICENSE file is packaged as %doc * Specfile is written in legible English * Sources matches upstream to the extent possible (differences are documented): $ diff -ur SRPM/jjack-0.3 jjack-0.3 Only in jjack-0.3/doc/www: mp3 Only in SRPM/jjack-0.3/doc/www: ogg * Package compiles in mock (Fedora 10) * BuildRequires are sane * Package owns directories it creates * No duplicate files * Permissions are sane and %files has %defattr * %clean clears buildroot * Macros are used consistently * Documentation is in javadoc subpackage * %doc is not runtime essential * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears buildroot * Installed files are valid UTF-8 One small suggestion: The wrapper script passes its arguments on as $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 It is probably better to instead do "$@" (including the quotes). This will work better in cases where there are empty arguments ("") or quoted arguments containing spaces, subtleties that now get lost. Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 11:44:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 07:44:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261144.n3QBiGkJ007729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 King InuYasha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ngompa13 at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #3 from King InuYasha 2009-04-26 07:44:14 EDT --- I'm looking into the issues brought up by rpmlinit, but a few things to note. .htaccess.new and config.new.php absolutely must be there because Enano autogenerates .htaccess and config.php during secondary install (either commandline installation or web based installation) I don't know about removing the .htaccess files, since I don't really know how to delete them as part of the build process of the package, but I have moved the data to enano.conf The 403 error was from an accidental redundancy in the enano.conf, which is fixed in my sources now. To fix it locally, just remove the second line in enano.conf AFAIK, the extra libraries bundled are modified a bit to work within Enano I believe. In any case, I don't really think there will be problems keeping it all in one package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 11:50:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 07:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497705] New: Review Request: spawn - Simple tool to run several Linux command-lines in parallel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: spawn - Simple tool to run several Linux command-lines in parallel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497705 Summary: Review Request: spawn - Simple tool to run several Linux command-lines in parallel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/spawn.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/spawn-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://code.google.com/p/spawntool/ Description: spawn is a simple parallel execution utility written to appeal to the Unix mindset. spawn reads shell command lines from stdin, one per line, and then executes them as maximum of N child processes in parallel, and waits for all of the children to exit. If a child process fails with a non-zero exit code, no new children are spawned. Then spawn waits for all existing children to exit and returns the failed exit code. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1321171 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint spawn* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint spawn-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 12:03:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 08:03:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261203.n3QC3KUb005565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-26 08:03:19 EDT --- Still are only 3 of 4 test successful passed for i386. There are a lot of compiler errors... Anyway updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ccrypt.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ccrypt-1.7-4.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1321176 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 12:07:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 08:07:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261207.n3QC76W6011782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 --- Comment #2 from Felix Kaechele 2009-04-26 08:07:05 EDT --- So here's my review: Here's what I checked and what is OK: source files match upstream: 41d7fb2afe921ec82e040773757d0b1c6257285c rapid-photo-downloader-0.0.8~b7.tar.gz 41d7fb2afe921ec82e040773757d0b1c6257285c ../SOURCES/rapid-photo-downloader-0.0.8~b7.tar.gz package meets naming and versioning guidelines. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. dist tag is present. build root is correct. license is open source-compatible: GPLv2+ license text not included upstream. latest version is being packaged. BuildRequires are proper. compiler flags are appropriate. %clean is present. package builds in mock. package installs properly. rpmlint is silent. final provides and requires are sane: [felix at polaris result]$ rpm -q --provides rapid-photo-downloader rapid-photo-downloader = 0.0.8-2.b7.fc11 [felix at polaris result]$ rpm -q --requires rapid-photo-downloader /usr/bin/python gnome-python2 gnome-python2-gconf gtk2 hicolor-icon-theme notify-python pyexiv2 pygtk2 python(abi) = 2.6 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. owns the directories it creates. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. no duplicates in %files. file permissions are appropriate. code, not content. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. no headers. no pkgconfig files. no libtool .la droppings. desktop files valid and installed properly. Here's what I found what seems do need some work: license field matches the actual license: the spec says GPLv2 but the code seems to be GPLv2+ since no specific requirements are mentioned that it is v2 only the spec installs icons but the icon cache is not updated. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets As soon as these problems are addressed I'll approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 12:51:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 08:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261251.n3QCpNxM013307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-26 08:51:22 EDT --- Thanks for the review. (In reply to comment #2) > Issues: > - Unresolved deps on Fedora <= 10: terminus-font needs to be terminus-font-x11 fixed > - License is GPLv3, but is it GPLv3 only or GPLv3+? see Comment #3 > - Desktop file contains the categories "GTK;Utility;Viewer;" but according to > http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html Viewer belongs to > Graphics or Office but not to Utilities. You may want to replace it with > "TextTools" during desktop-file-install fixed > - Desktop file contains as mime type, but you are not running > update-desktop-database, see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database -fixed > - No need to include PKG-INFO in %doc fixed. There are different opinions about to include this file or not. Updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/nfoview.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/nfoview-1.4-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 12:52:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 08:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261252.n3QCqLXw013451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com --- Comment #1 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-26 08:52:19 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. - OK [makerpm at fetaciq result]$ rpmlint perl-App-Daemon-0.06-1.fc11.src.rpm perl-App-Daemon-0.06-1.fc11.noarch.rpm ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/perl-App-Daemon.spec 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines - OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} - OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines - OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines - OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - OK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file - OK, no license file present MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - OK MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture... - OK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires - OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. - OK, no locales MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. - OK MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable.... - OK, not relocatable MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. - OK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. - OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. - OK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section... - OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. - OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. -OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - OK MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. - OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - OK, no header files MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - OK, no static package MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). - OK, no .pc files MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - OK, no .so library MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - OK, no devel package MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. -OK, no libtool archives MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, -OK, no GUI MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - OK, perl package MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] - OK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - OK Conclusion: Looks OK, I would rather to have double checking from somebody else as I'm doing review for perl package for first time. should we put perl-sig mailing list into CC? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 13:08:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 09:08:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261308.n3QD8TRX021462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-26 09:08:28 EDT --- Felix, thanks for your time to make this review. (In reply to comment #2) > license field matches the actual license: the spec says GPLv2 but the code > seems to be GPLv2+ since no specific requirements are mentioned that it is v2 > only The license is GPLv2+ (mentioned in the source headers) > the spec installs icons but the icon cache is not updated. See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets fixed Updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rapid-photo-downloader.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rapid-photo-downloader-0.0.8-3.b7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 13:24:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 09:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261324.n3QDOc4W023900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 --- Comment #4 from King InuYasha 2009-04-26 09:24:37 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/enano.spec SRPM URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/enano-1.1.6-4.20090415hg4babf8545826.fc10.src.rpm I updated the package to the 20090415 Mercurial snapshot of Enano CMS 1.1.x, and I fixed a whole bunch of issues that rpmlint spewed out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 13:50:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 09:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261350.n3QDoF6h022313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Felix Kaechele 2009-04-26 09:50:14 EDT --- Since the errors mentioned have been fixed this Package is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 13:49:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 09:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497720] New: Review Request: hunspell-ln - Lingala hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ln - Lingala hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497720 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ln - Lingala hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-ln.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-ln-0.02-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Lingala hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 14:15:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261415.n3QEFprI026253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #15 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-26 10:15:50 EDT --- Ok, I added icons. But only 16x16,32x32,48x48 to hicolor directory. Other icons idk where to put. All scripts from scripts dir(except murmur.ini/init/overlay/user-wrapper) are included as %doc. Desktop file is added for mumble. All things are done now except: ---------------------------------------------------- I need to register protocol mumble:// so mumble can use it but in wiki there is nothing related to register protocols. How to do that? ---------------------------------------------------- Mumble-overlay - as I said before I don't understand what really you want with this. Explain this a little bit more. ---------------------------------------------------- Error that throws /etc/init.d/murmur: root /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SPECS # /etc/init.d/murmur /etc/init.d/murmur: line 16: /lib/lsb/init-functions: No such file or directory Usage: {start|stop|status|restart|reload|force-reload|condrestart root /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SPECS # ---------------------------------------------------- OLD SPEC(the one from my last post): http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.spec_old NEW SPEC: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.spec SRPM: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble-1.1.8-3.fc9.src.rpm INIT(nothing changed from last post): http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/murmur.init DESKTOP: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.desktop btw, did somebody died so nobody answers or my posts are nonsense so everyone is laughing? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 14:49:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:49:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261449.n3QEngUD031155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-26 10:49:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rapid-photo-downloader Short Description: Images downloader for external devices Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 15:10:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:10:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491579] Review Request: jjack - JACK audio driver for the Java Sound API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261510.n3QFAjxH007901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491579 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-26 11:10:44 EDT --- Thanks a lot, I will update the script. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jjack Short Description: JACK audio driver for the Java Sound API Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 15:07:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:07:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261507.n3QF7mt5007336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com --- Comment #4 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-26 11:07:47 EDT --- Hi, 1] md5sum of tarball from Source0 differs from tarball in src.rpm 2] specfile have useless comments # documents #chmod -x debian/* 3] files are listed multiple times Processing files: shutter-0.70.2-2.ppa3.fc10 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/locale/ar/LC_MESSAGES/shutter.mo warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/locale/bg/LC_MESSAGES/shutter.mo warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES/shutter.mo warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/shutter.mo warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/locale/da/LC_MESSAGES/shutter.mo .... 4] rpmlint is complaining a lot (on spec file, src.rpm and on final rpm) Please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines If you need help, do not hesitate to contact me or anybody from mentors ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Getting_Help ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 15:19:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261519.n3QFJurv003092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 16:07:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:07:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497705] Review Request: spawn - Simple tool to run several Linux command-lines in parallel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261607.n3QG7BoK015982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497705 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-26 12:07:09 EDT --- Hmm, this looks useful as a complementary to batch queue managers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 16:10:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257941] Review Request: hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261610.n3QGAwUp010683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257941 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bojanpopovic at beotel.rs --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-26 12:10:56 EDT --- *** Bug 491521 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 16:10:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:10:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491521] Review Request: Hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261610.n3QGAvTs010651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491521 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-26 12:10:56 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 257941 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 16:23:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:23:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261623.n3QGNB2c012544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-04-26 12:23:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-ezc-EventLog Short Description: Allows you to log events or audit trails Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 16:25:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:25:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478617] Review Request: zsync - Partial/differential file transfer client over HTTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261625.n3QGPGw9018696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478617 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix at fetzig.org --- Comment #9 from Felix Kaechele 2009-04-26 12:25:15 EDT --- The zlib that is included in zsync is patched to support some more functions on manipulating the compressed stream. Thus it is not possible to just patch it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 16:41:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:41:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497705] Review Request: spawn - Simple tool to run several Linux command-lines in parallel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261641.n3QGfI3e015337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497705 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-26 12:41:18 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 16:47:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:47:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497735] New: Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497735 Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: llaumgui at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Cache is a part of eZ Components : https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/php-channel-ezc A solution for caching, supporting multiple backends allowing you to specify the best performing solution for your caching-problem. SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Cache.spec SRPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Cache-1.4-1.fc10.src.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Cache-1.4-1.fc10.noarch.rpm rpmlint: builder at enterprise ~> rpmlint rpmbuild/**/php-ezc-Cache* 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Pear CompatInfo: +-----------------------------+---------+---+------------+--------------------+ | Files | Version | C | Extensions | Constants/Tokens | +-----------------------------+---------+---+------------+--------------------+ | Cache/* | 5.0.0 | 0 | apc | ...CTORY_SEPARATOR | | | | | date | abstract | | | | | hash | implements | | | | | pcre | instanceof | | | | | spl | interface | | | | | | private | | | | | | protected | | | | | | public | | | | | | throw | +-----------------------------+---------+---+------------+--------------------+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 16:55:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497736] New: Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497736 Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: llaumgui at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Mail is a part of eZ Components : https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/php-channel-ezc The component allows you construct and/or parse Mail messages conforming to the mail standard. It has support for attachments, multipart messages and HTML mail. It also interfaces with SMTP to send mail or IMAP, POP3 or mbox to retrieve e-mail. SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Mail.spec SRPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Mail-1.6.1-2.fc10.src.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Mail-1.6.1-2.fc10.noarch.rpm rpmlint: builder at enterprise ~> rpmlint rpmbuild/**/php-ezc-Mail* 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Pear CompatInfo: +-----------------------------+---------+---+------------+--------------------+ | Files | Version | C | Extensions | Constants/Tokens | +-----------------------------+---------+---+------------+--------------------+ | Mail/* | 5.2.1 | 0 | date | ...CTORY_SEPARATOR | | | | | fileinfo | __CLASS__ | | | | | hash | abstract | | | | | iconv | catch | | | | | mcrypt | implements | | | | | pcre | instanceof | | | | | spl | interface | | | | | zip | private | | | | | | protected | | | | | | public | | | | | | throw | | | | | | try | +-----------------------------+---------+---+------------+--------------------+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 17:07:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478617] Review Request: zsync - Partial/differential file transfer client over HTTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261707.n3QH75Z6024899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478617 --- Comment #10 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-26 13:07:04 EDT --- We (Robert Scheck, Toshio Kuratomi, ?Christoph Wickert? and I) already know that. Robert is in contact with upstream (zlib, rync and zsync) to find a solution. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495310 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/134 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 17:06:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497705] Review Request: spawn - Simple tool to run several Linux command-lines in parallel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261706.n3QH6rBp024847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497705 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-26 13:06:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: spawn Short Description: Simple tool to run several Linux command-lines in parallel Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 17:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:08:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490140] Review Request: zsync - Client-side implementation of the rsync algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261708.n3QH8gkt019523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |495310 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 18:21:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492165] Review Request: rotoscope - A free rotoscoping application. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261821.n3QILgwF003603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492165 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-26 14:21:41 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 18:21:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:21:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261821.n3QILDTM030769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-26 14:21:12 EDT --- Regarding desktop-file-install I meant suggested to replace Viewer with TextTools --add-category="TextTools;" \ --remove-category="Viewer;" \ --delete-original Anyway, this is minor. nfoview-1.4-2.fc10.src.rpm is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 18:57:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261857.n3QIv6kg003392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #18 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-26 14:57:04 EDT --- * About the %bcond_ macros, they shorten the setup of the conditional builds in the spec file. Compared with what you do currently (evaluate the --with/--without options, set a default if neither one is defined, throw an error if both are defined, overwrites the values with options to pass to %configure), it would reduce to # Defaults: %bcond_with empty %bcond_without mysql %bcond_without postgresql %bcond_with sqlite3 %bcond_with odbc %bcond_with firebird %bcond_with oracle %bcond_without nls where all lines with "_with" are for features that are off by default and all with "_without" are enabled by default. You can toggle these defaults simply by replacing "with" with "without" and vice versa. No other changes (such as evaluating _with/_without vars or reordering assignment of defaults) are necessary. You query the features like: %configure ... %if %{with foo} --enable-backend-foo \ %else --disable-backend-foo \ %endif %if ! %{with foo} # feature "foo" is disabled # do something %endif %if %{with foo} %package foo ... %endif %{?with_foo:BuildRequires: foo-devel} More examples in the RPM macros definition file. * Something has truncated/damaged the extras-soci-doc package. It's down to 57KB with an empty main page and only a very few pages that either contain not much or broken links to non-existent files. * The soci -> extras-soci rename is incomplete: $ extras-soci-config --libs -lextras-soci $ pkg-config --libs extras-soci -lextras-soci_core $ rpm -ql extras-soci-devel|grep \.so$ /usr/lib/libsoci_core.so Plus, currently, even without renamed libs, the extras-soci* packages would conflict with an installation made with the pristine SOCI tarballs. One could make the packages conflict explicitly using proper "Conflicts: ..." tags, but they are not compatible/interchangable either due to the renamed files (e.g. the pkg-config file, the M4 macro file, the -config script). Do you want all the extras-soci* packages to be parallel installable with any soci* package somebody may add to the dist? Do you want them to become alternatives, i.e. interchangable and ABI+API compatible? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 19:11:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:11:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261911.n3QJB40I006755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Rudolf Kastl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |che666 at gmail.com --- Comment #16 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-04-26 15:11:03 EDT --- /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libmumble.so.1 is not a symbolic link library symlinking seems broken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 19:17:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261917.n3QJH9bg007681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #17 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-04-26 15:17:08 EDT --- the category for the mumble menu entry is broken too: Categories=Audio; Actually the entry is missing AudioVideo which is a must according to: http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html maybe Categories=Network;Chat; would fit better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 19:36:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:36:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261936.n3QJaxOp014639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-26 15:36:57 EDT --- Some notes for 1.4.0-1: * Calling autotools - Please avoid to use autotools as much as possible. Calling autotools can break things in many ways.... For this package, just ----------------------------------------------------------- %prep %setup -q sed -i.flags -e 's|-O2 -DNDEBUG|-DNDEBUG|' configure %build %configure --disable-static make %{?_smp_mflags} ----------------------------------------------------------- is enough (and please remove unneeded BuildRequires) * Timestamps - Please try to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible (for this package, especially for installed header files). slightly related: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps This package uses "install-sh". In this case, usually ----------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT CPPROG="cp -p" ----------------------------------------------------------- works. * Filename conflict ----------------------------------------------------------- # yum --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=koji-11 whatprovides '/usr/bin/xtest' Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2 starlab-4.4.3-5.fc11.i586 : A Software Environment for Collisional Stellar Dynamics Repo : koji-11 Matched from: Filename : /usr/bin/xtest xml-security-c-1.4.0-1.fc11.i586 : C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML Repo : installed Matched from: Other : Provides-match: /usr/bin/xtest ----------------------------------------------------------- - This means the name "%_bindir/xtest" is already used by other packages in Fedora and cannot be used by this package. Anyway I don't think the name "%_bindir/xtest" is proper because its naming is too generic: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts#Binary_Name_Conflicts * Requires - For -devel subpackage, please check if all needed Requires are properly listed. ! For example, (note that I am only saying an example) %_includedir/xsec/dsig/DSIGXPathHere.hpp contains: ----------------------------------------------------------- 26 #include 27 28 #include ----------------------------------------------------------- This means that xml-security-c-devel should have "Requires: xerces-c-devel". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 19:45:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:45:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904261945.n3QJjPQB015946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #18 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-26 15:45:24 EDT --- Thanks for reply Rudolf. Category AudioVideo wouldn't fit because Mumble isn't video program. So I changed it to suggested Network;Chat; witch fits better. About symlink. I don't now why is it broken. Right now mumble libraries are installed normally without any modifications: install -p release/libmumble.so* %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/ eg. libmumble.so -> libmumble.so.1.1.8 libmumble.so.1 -> libmumble.so.1.1.8 libmumble.so.1.1 -> libmumble.so.1.1.8 All of those files are symlinks to libmumble.so.1.1.8. Why would libmumble.so and *.so.1.1 work and *.so.1 wouldn't work? You have any suggestion how to fix this problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 20:03:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904262003.n3QK35Xc014457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #19 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-04-26 16:03:04 EDT --- ll libmumble.so* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 36044 26. Apr 21:06 libmumble.so -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 36044 26. Apr 21:06 libmumble.so.1 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 36044 26. Apr 21:06 libmumble.so.1.1 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 36044 26. Apr 21:06 libmumble.so.1.1.8 actually they are hardlinks here after installing the resulting mumble binary rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 20:25:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904262025.n3QKPnrB022061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #20 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-04-26 16:25:48 EDT --- dont want to flood you with issues but: init script doesent work: LANG=C /etc/init.d/murmur start /etc/init.d/murmur: line 16: /lib/lsb/init-functions: No such file or directory Starting murmur: /etc/init.d/murmur: line 30: start_daemon: command not found changing: . /lib/lsb/init-functions to: . /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions resolves that. and changing: start_daemon ... to: daemon ... makes it actually start. to clean up more: /etc/init.d/murmur start Starting murmur: Unknown argument --PIDFile [ OK ] murmur -h shows there is no such commandline switch --PIDFile and the last issue i can spot after looking over it really quick that it is missing lsb headers. look into other init scripts here is an example taken from xinetd: ### BEGIN INIT INFO # Provides: # Required-Start: $network # Required-Stop: # Should-Start: # Should-Stop: # Default-Start: 3 4 5 # Default-Stop: 0 1 2 6 # Short-Description: start and stop xinetd # Description: xinetd is a powerful replacement for inetd. \ # xinetd has access control mechanisms, extensive \ # logging capabilities, the ability to make services \ # available based on time, and can place \ # limits on the number of servers that can be started, \ # among other things. ### END INIT INFO i will checking more and let you know what else i can find. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 20:36:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904262036.n3QKaArl023604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #21 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-04-26 16:36:09 EDT --- specfile: can be removed from the murmur subpackage: Provides: murmur = %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 22:08:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:08:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904262208.n3QM8ZVX032587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-26 18:08:34 EDT --- EekBoek-1.04.03-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EekBoek-1.04.03-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 22:08:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:08:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904262208.n3QM8ToE004399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-26 18:08:27 EDT --- EekBoek-1.04.03-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EekBoek-1.04.03-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 22:39:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:39:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904262239.n3QMdMl2008998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |486365 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 22:37:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:37:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] New: Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 Summary: Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at matbooth.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/lpg.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/lpg-1.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The LALR Parser Generator (LPG) is a tool for developing scanners and parsers written in Java, C++ or C. Input is specified by BNF rules. LPG supports backtracking (to resolve ambiguity), automatic AST generation and grammar inheritance. Packaging notes: - This package is needed to build outstanding parts of eclipse-dtp that we don't yet build. - This is a reasonably ancient version of the package because of eclipse-dtp and unfortunately later versions of LGP have incompatible APIs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 23:37:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904262337.n3QNbP4g017100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 Igor Juri?kovi? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |juriskovic.igor at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-26 19:37:24 EDT --- Hi Mat, first of all this is not official review. I'm in need of sponsor. URL: http://lpg.sourceforge.net/ It is much better to use macro. If the package name changes you will not need to change the url too. URL: http://%{name}.sourceforge.net/ You are using cp to install files. You should use install. Like: install -pD %{name}javaruntime.jar %{buildroot}%{_javadir}/%{name}javaruntime-%{version}.jar When doing symlinks you don't need to change directory. You can do it this way: ln -s ../%{javadir}/%{name}javaruntime-%{version}.jar %{buildroot}%{_javadir}/%{name}-%{version}.jar %description manual I wouldn't use that small description because many don't now what LPG is. You could use description of LPG then simply add at the end "This is programmers manual for LPG." Why are you naming package lpg then later using name lpgdistribution? You should use the real name of library as the name of the package. If you have good reason for not doing so comment the spec file. You are packaging manual files as different package. Why? There are only 2 files. If they are large(definition of large is left to you) package them as %{name}-doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 26 23:44:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:44:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904262344.n3QNiGwu017909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #22 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-26 19:44:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > specfile: > > can be removed from the murmur subpackage: > Provides: murmur = %{version}-%{release} Fixed INIT: Fixed: /lib/lsb/init-functions Fixed: start_daemon Fixed: --PIDFile - it should be --pidfile Fixed: lsb header --chuid isn't working. Looks like that func doesn't exists. Murmur start fine without it but with user:group root:root witch I don't want. It needs to be started as murmur:murmur. While looking at /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions I couldn't find any function that would start murmur as murmur:murmur. --RunAsDaemon doesn't exist in functions. It would be logical that when u start app as daemon that it is already started as daemon so I dont see point in this func? SPEC: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.spec SRPM: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble-1.1.8-4.fc9.src.rpm INIT: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/murmur.init DESKTOP: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.desktop ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I just made unofficial review of LPG: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 00:16:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:16:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497759] New: Review Request: funcshell - A shell interface to Func Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: funcshell - A shell interface to Func https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759 Summary: Review Request: funcshell - A shell interface to Func Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: silas at sewell.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec Url: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/funcshell/funcshell.spec SRPM Url: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/funcshell-0.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: funcshell is a shell interface to Func. rpmlint [silas at silas result]$ rpmlint funcshell-0.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [silas at silas result]$ rpmlint funcshell-0.0.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. NOTE: I am the creator of this package. NOTE 2: python-cly (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/python-cly) is available in devel and F11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 00:19:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:19:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270019.n3R0J4bN018218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #19 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-26 20:19:03 EDT --- Thanks for your feedback! 1. %bcond_with: I've integrated your suggestions. The result is indeed much more compact... and readable! Thanks. 2. (HTML) doc package: the doc/doxygen.cfg still incorporated the ${src_topdir}/extras-soci source code directory, instead of ${src_topdir}/soci. It has now been fixed. The full API (and source code) is now accessible, and the main page (index.html) now reproduces the content of the SOCI project (http://soci.sourceforge.net) main page. The links were broken because the HTML pages in the doc/local directory had not been migrated to SGML format for Doxygen to take it into account. I've migrated those files. 3. soci -> extras-soci renaming is now fine for extras-soci-config and pkg-config scripts. 4. (Potential) conflicts with any soci* package. If somebody else wants to deliver soci* packages, he or she will be more than welcome (!), and we should join our forces, so that there remain a single set of packages. So, if somebody reaches a point where a soci* set of packages is fully supported by the SOCI developer team, that new set of packages will of course deprecate mine, and that will be an happy end :) And I shall be happy to contribute to that, of course! In summary, I do not intend the extras-soci* packages to be parallel installable with any soci* package somebody may add to the distribution. The extras-soci* packages do intend to provide SOCI-compatible (ABI+API) libraries. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The updated files for the Extras-SOCI project are as following: Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/extras-soci/extras-soci.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/extras-soci/extras-soci-3.1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm And the corresponding Koji builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1321640 (i586) and http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1321642 (x86_64) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 02:30:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:30:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270230.n3R2U48h006845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-26 22:30:01 EDT --- Sorry for the long delay here. - 0.9.5 is current now. :) - There are a bunch of 'warning: File listed twice...' messages, due to listing some files twice in the %files section, can you fix that up? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 02:41:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:41:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270241.n3R2fD2u009014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 Bug 476527 depends on bug 476524, which changed state. Bug 476524 Summary: Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 02:41:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:41:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476600] Review Request: python-ZODB3 - Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270241.n3R2fFrR009057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476600 Bug 476600 depends on bug 476524, which changed state. Bug 476524 Summary: Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 02:41:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476528] Review Request: python-ZConfig - Structured Configuration Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270241.n3R2fEL2009036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476528 Bug 476528 depends on bug 476524, which changed state. Bug 476524 Summary: Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 02:41:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:41:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476526] Review Request: python-zope-event - Zope Event Publication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270241.n3R2fDTZ008989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476526 Bug 476526 depends on bug 476524, which changed state. Bug 476524 Summary: Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 02:41:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:41:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476523] Review Request: python-zope-proxy - Generic Transparent Proxies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270241.n3R2fBeC008948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476523 Bug 476523 depends on bug 476524, which changed state. Bug 476524 Summary: Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 02:41:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476525] Review Request: python-zc-lockfile - Basic Inter-Process Locks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270241.n3R2fChp008968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476525 Bug 476525 depends on bug 476524, which changed state. Bug 476524 Summary: Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 02:41:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476524] Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270241.n3R2fAP4008900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2009-04-26 22:41:08 EDT --- Imported and built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1321776 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 04:34:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497766] New: Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 Summary: Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eric.moret at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/linux/paintdotnet/paintdotnet.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/linux/paintdotnet/paintdotnet-0.1.63-0.6.fc10.src.rpm Description: Paint.NET is an image and photo editing software. It features an intuitive and innovative user interface with support for layers, unlimited undo, special effects, and a wide variety of useful and powerful tools. An active and growing online community provides friendly help, tutorials, and plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 04:41:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492197] Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270441.n3R4fE87030604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-27 00:41:13 EDT --- Upstream split the vst bits into a separate package, so no need to patch them out anymore: Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/toot2.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/toot2-3-0.4.beta2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 3-0.3.beta2 - Update to 3beta2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 04:43:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:43:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492201] Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270443.n3R4hHJN001434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-27 00:43:16 EDT --- New upstream version in conjunction with toot2 Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tootaudioservers.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tootaudioservers-3-0.1.beta2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 3-0.1.beta2 - Update to 3beta2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 04:49:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270449.n3R4n6Bk031702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 04:48:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270448.n3R4mEvi031621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Bug 492203 depends on bug 483376, which changed state. Bug 483376 Summary: Review Request: fluid-soundfont - Pro-quality GM/GS soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483376 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-27 00:48:13 EDT --- New checkout and some cleanups: Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/frinika.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/frinika-0.5.1-2.510svn.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.5.1-2.510svn - Update to svn revision 510 - Add tritonus_share.jar to the classpath - Fix default soundfont issue - Don't build the AOT bits, since the package requires java > 1.5 No rpmlint anymore! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 04:50:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:50:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270450.n3R4oeNm002966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #15 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-27 00:50:39 EDT --- Oget, sorry. I have done it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 04:50:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270450.n3R4o5b5002788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pahan at hubbitus.info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 04:51:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:51:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497766] Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270451.n3R4pbml003064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 04:55:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270455.n3R4tYwk003810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2009-04-27 00:55:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Hi Mat, > > first of all this is not official review. I'm in need of sponsor. > > URL: http://lpg.sourceforge.net/ > It is much better to use macro. If the package name changes you will not need > to change the url too. > URL: http://%{name}.sourceforge.net/ But on the other hand - names of the projects very rarely change - using macros in the URL / SOURCE tags block usage of certain automated verification tools. And even simple copy / paste does not work any more. So I beg to differ, but using macros here is not at all much better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:06:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:06:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478920] Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Pipe Open Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270506.n3R568wW005543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:06:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:06:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478928] Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270506.n3R56xE7002550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478928 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:06:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:08:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484567] Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270508.n3R58mfL002725@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484567 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:08:47 EDT --- I assume you want a F-11 branch here too... cvs done with F-11 added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:12:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:12:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488539] Review Request: php-ezc-Configuration - eZ Components Configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270512.n3R5C1qW006435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488539 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:11:59 EDT --- cvs done with F-11 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:10:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488538] Review Request: php-ezc-Authentication - eZ Components Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270510.n3R5AVhT006275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488538 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:10:30 EDT --- I assume you wanted a F-11 branch here. cvs done with F-11 added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:14:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270514.n3R5EZpc006710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:14:33 EDT --- cvs done with F-11 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:15:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:15:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270515.n3R5FZvo007198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:15:34 EDT --- cvs done with F-11 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270518.n3R5IxuP005029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:18:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:16:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:16:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489795] Review Request: backintime - Simple backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270516.n3R5GilT004766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489795 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:16:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:17:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490380] Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270517.n3R5Hp0K004904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:17:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:21:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491579] Review Request: jjack - JACK audio driver for the Java Sound API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270521.n3R5Ld3F005700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491579 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:21:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:23:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270523.n3R5NXlp005874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:23:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:25:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:25:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492950] Review Request: lv2-vocoder-plugins - Add a robotic effect to vocals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270525.n3R5Pfcf008863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492950 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:25:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:26:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:26:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492971] Review Request: lv2-zynadd-plugins - LV2 port of the ZynAddSubFX engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270526.n3R5QaID008973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492971 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:26:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:24:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270524.n3R5OSfS008329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 --- Comment #5 from Liang Suilong 2009-04-27 01:24:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341386) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341386) the latest spec file Jan Klepek, I have corrected the spec file. Rpmlint does no longer complain anything. But now the problem is that rpmbuild add perl(Proc::Simple) to Requires, which does not exist in Fedora official repository. I can make sure that it is not needed. Because the old package which I build can run well on my Fedora 10. I upload the latest spec file as an attachment. Should I obsolete perl(Proc::Simple)?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:24:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:24:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492945] Review Request: lv2-swh-plugins - LV2 ports of LADSPA swh plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270524.n3R5OoxJ006030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492945 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:24:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:28:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270528.n3R5S6ll006730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:28:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:29:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270529.n3R5Tasl009243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:29:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:33:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:33:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270533.n3R5XKxD007650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:33:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:34:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:34:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496168] Review Request: termit - Simple terminal emulator based on vte library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270534.n3R5YL3Y010073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496168 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:34:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:36:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497310] Review Request: php-simplepie - Simple RSS Library in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270536.n3R5aikK010739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497310 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:36:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:35:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496701] Review Request: gxmessage - GTK2 based xmessage clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270535.n3R5ZQ2q010579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496701 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:35:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:37:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497665] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CipherSaber - Perl module implementing CipherSaber encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270537.n3R5bppv011011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497665 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:37:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:39:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:39:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270539.n3R5dvJu011231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #46 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-04-27 01:39:55 EDT --- Please add an ExcludeArc for ppc64 and ppc on the package. The build of the package fails on this architecture. Because I have try it too, I have open a bug on upstream.complaining about this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:42:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270542.n3R5gw6C009622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #47 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-04-27 01:42:56 EDT --- Sorry for the additional comment. But I will point out, that It's possible to do a scratch build for a package on koji without the need, that a cvs module may exist for it. This may be hekpful to find out issue described on #46 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:39:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:39:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497705] Review Request: spawn - Simple tool to run several Linux command-lines in parallel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270539.n3R5dZtY008848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497705 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 01:39:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:44:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270544.n3R5iPKt012281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #48 from David Fetter 2009-04-27 01:44:23 EDT --- Gerd, rakudo doesn't build on 1.0. Please consider an upgrade. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:52:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:52:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497766] Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270552.n3R5qwe0011252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-27 01:52:57 EDT --- The license for logos and text is NOT OKAY: http://www.getpaint.net/license.html http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Bad_Licenses_2 Raising FE_LEGAL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:54:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497766] Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270554.n3R5skYM011473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-27 01:54:45 EDT --- Also, the Fedora wishlist states the package as non-valid for inclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 05:58:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497766] Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270558.n3R5wShp014778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-27 01:58:27 EDT --- FE-Legal topic: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-February/msg00024.html Request from the Fedora art team to replace the artwork: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/DesignService#Paint.NET_icon_replacement I think these will solve the issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 06:02:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270602.n3R62K67015619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #23 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-27 02:02:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > ---------------------------------------------------- > I need to register protocol mumble:// so mumble can use it but in wiki there is > nothing related to register protocols. How to do that? Don't know how, but should be imho a seperate package (In reply to comment #15) > ---------------------------------------------------- > Mumble-overlay - as I said before I don't understand what really you want with > this. Explain this a little bit more. > ---------------------------------------------------- The overlay is an extension for mumble. you can create a subpacakge like murmur without -n parameter. -n will give a complete name. if you named it %package overlay it is a subpackage and named mumble-overlay automaticly. You need a desktopfile that can start mumble in overlay mode in the overlay subpackage (In reply to comment #12) > Can you explain this a little bit more? Should I make another package > like I did with murmur. > %package -n mumble-plugins %package plugins < as i said it above (In reply to comment #13) > I think setting MURMUR_USER and MURMUR_GROUP in the init script IMO is bad, > how about outsourcing it to /etc/sysconfig/murmur for example? Never said it's the perfect or ultimate initscript. Just add it from another review like you said in C4 (In reply to comment #13) > Include an initscript for the murmur server. Get it from one > of the other reviews. (In reply to comment #15) > btw, did somebody died so nobody answers or my posts are nonsense so everyone > is laughing? :) We are crying No, was a joke! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 06:07:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497766] Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270607.n3R67t8Y013858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-27 02:07:54 EDT --- There are also other things that are under a non-free license: * Exception 2: Paint.NET makes use of certain text and graphic resources that it comes with (e.g., toolbar icon graphics, text for menu items and the status bar). These are collectively referred to as "resource assets" and are defined to include the contents of files installed by Paint.NET, or included in its source code distribution, that have a .RESOURCES, .RESX, or .PNG file extension. This also includes embedded resource files within the PaintDotNet.Resources.dll installed file. These "resource assets" are covered by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 license which is detailed here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ . However, permission is granted to create and distribute derivative works of the "resource assets" for the sole purpose of providing a translation to a language other than English. Some "resource assets" are included in unmodified form from external icon or image libraries and are still covered by their original, respective licenses (e.g., "Silk", "Visual Studio 2005 Image Library"). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 06:13:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:13:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484567] Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270613.n3R6DMPq014730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484567 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 02:13:21 EDT --- php-ezc-File-1.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-File-1.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 06:13:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:13:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484567] Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270613.n3R6DDrd017513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484567 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 02:13:12 EDT --- php-ezc-File-1.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-File-1.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 06:13:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:13:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484567] Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270613.n3R6DHvB017545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484567 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 02:13:17 EDT --- php-ezc-File-1.2-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-File-1.2-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 06:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:20:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488538] Review Request: php-ezc-Authentication - eZ Components Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270620.n3R6Kcf7019062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488538 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 02:20:37 EDT --- php-ezc-Authentication-1.2.3-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Authentication-1.2.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 06:20:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:20:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488538] Review Request: php-ezc-Authentication - eZ Components Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270620.n3R6KgwF019096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488538 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 02:20:41 EDT --- php-ezc-Authentication-1.2.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Authentication-1.2.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 06:20:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:20:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488538] Review Request: php-ezc-Authentication - eZ Components Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270620.n3R6KXre016062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488538 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 02:20:32 EDT --- php-ezc-Authentication-1.2.3-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Authentication-1.2.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 06:32:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488539] Review Request: php-ezc-Configuration - eZ Components Configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270632.n3R6WIBk020919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488539 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 02:32:17 EDT --- php-ezc-Configuration-1.3.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Configuration-1.3.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 06:32:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:32:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488539] Review Request: php-ezc-Configuration - eZ Components Configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270632.n3R6WDFx020887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488539 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 02:32:12 EDT --- php-ezc-Configuration-1.3.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Configuration-1.3.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 06:33:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497766] Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270633.n3R6Xf4I018095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-27 02:33:40 EDT --- Jussi, thanks for your investigation. But is there anything else that is nonfree other than what the art team is working on? Did you look at the link I gave at all? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 06:32:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488539] Review Request: php-ezc-Configuration - eZ Components Configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270632.n3R6WMml020995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488539 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 02:32:22 EDT --- php-ezc-Configuration-1.3.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Configuration-1.3.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 06:57:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497766] Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270657.n3R6vThP022457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-27 02:57:28 EDT --- So the logo and icon artworks under CC-BY-NC-ND are now _already_ replaced or replacing them with free ones is now _under working_ ? If it is still under working, this cannot be imported into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 06:58:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497766] Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270658.n3R6wppJ025788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-27 02:58:50 EDT --- The package doesn't build on x86_64, failing at RPM build errors: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/paintdotnet-0.1.63-0.6.fc10.x86_64 /usr/lib64/paintdotnet Child returncode was: 1 The file is in /usr/lib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 07:01:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497766] Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270701.n3R71GUF026461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-27 03:01:15 EDT --- Files that fall under exception 2: paintdotnet-0.1.63/HistoryForm.resx paintdotnet-0.1.63/SavePaletteDialog.resx paintdotnet-0.1.63/LayerForm.resx paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources.mui/resx/PaintDotNet.Strings.3.FR.resx paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources.mui/resx/PaintDotNet.Strings.3.KO.resx paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources.mui/resx/PaintDotNet.Strings.3.PT-BR.resx paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources.mui/resx/PaintDotNet.Strings.3.ES.resx paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources.mui/resx/PaintDotNet.Strings.3.ZH-CN.resx paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources.mui/resx/PaintDotNet.Strings.3.JA.resx paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources.mui/resx/PaintDotNet.Strings.3.DE.resx paintdotnet-0.1.63/UnsavedChangesDialog.resx paintdotnet-0.1.63/ChooseToolDefaultsDialog.resx paintdotnet-0.1.63/PdnLib/CommandLink.resx paintdotnet-0.1.63/ColorsForm.resx paintdotnet-0.1.63/AboutDialog.resx paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Images/RoundedEdgeLR.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Images/RoundedEdgeUR.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Images/RoundedEdgeUL.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Images/Icon50x50.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Images/TransparentLogo.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Images/RoundedEdgeLL.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Images/AnchorChooserControl.AnchorImage.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Images/Banner.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuWindowLayersIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/PolarInversionEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuEditFillSelectionIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuEditInvertSelectionIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/FrostedGlassEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuHelpPluginsIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuLayersFlipHorizontalIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuViewZoomToSelectionIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuViewZoomInIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/FontItalicIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/TextAlignCenterIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuImageResizeIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/RedEyeRemoveEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/EmbossEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/TileEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuFilePrintIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/LinearClampedGradientIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MotionBlurEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuFileOpenIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/HistoryFastForwardIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/TextAlignLeftIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuEditRedoIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuHelpForumIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/WarningIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuImageRotate90CCWIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/ColorAddOverlay.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/GradientToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/BulgeEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuWindowToolsIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/AllColorChannelsIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/ShapeBothIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/FontUnderlineIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuImageCropIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuViewGridIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/ShapeInteriorIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MoveToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuFileCloseIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuFileAcquireFromScannerOrCameraIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuImageRotate180CWIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/ColorPickerToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/LineToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/todo.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/CloudsEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/ReliefEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/HueAndSaturationAdjustment.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/FontBoldIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/HistoryRewindIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/BlendingEnabledIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuHelpDonateIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuHelpSendFeedbackIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/RadialGradientIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuLayersDeleteLayerIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuEditCutIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/SwapIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuViewRulersIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/SelectionIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuEditCopyIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MoveSelectionToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuImageRotate270CCWIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuImageFlipVerticalIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuFileAcquireFromClipboardIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuHelpCheckForUpdatesIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MinusButtonIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/EraserToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuLayersAddNewLayerIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/AntiAliasingDisabledIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/CursorXYIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuViewZoomToWindowIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/PaintBucketIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/ShapeOutlineIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuFileSaveIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/RadialBlurEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuEditDeselectIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/UnsavedChangesDialog.CancelButton.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/LassoSelectToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/RecoloringToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuImageFlipHorizontalIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuViewActualSizeIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/EdgeDetectEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuEditEraseSelectionIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/RectangleToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/RotateZoomIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/AutoLevel.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/LevelsEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/CloneStampToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/PanToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/DesaturateEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuImageRotate90CWIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuLayersMergeLayerDownIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuWindowHistoryIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuFileSaveAsIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/SharpenEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuWindowOpenMdiListIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/TextToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/ColorPalettes.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuEditPasteInToNewImageIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/LinearDiamondGradientIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/TwistEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/CurvesEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuEditPasteInToNewLayerIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/RectangleSelectToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/EllipseToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/BlackAndWhiteIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuLayersLayerPropertiesIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/CancelIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuImageCanvasSizeIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuImageRotate270CWIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/OutlineEffectIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuLayersFlipVerticalIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuWindowColorsIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/SavePaletteIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuFileNewIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/GlowEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/ConicalGradientIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/ImageSizeIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/RoundedRectangleToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/InvertColorsEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/ImageFromDiskIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuLayersImportFromFileIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuHelpTutorialsIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/ZoomToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/BlurEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/FreeformShapeToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuViewZoomOutIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuImageFlattenIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/BlendingOverwriteIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuImageRotate180CCWIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuEditPasteIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/AlphaChannelOnlyIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuHelpLanguageIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/EllipseSelectToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/AntiAliasingEnabledIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/PencilToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/OilPaintingEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MagicWandToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/PaintBrushToolIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuHelpAboutIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/ZoomBlurEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/AddNoiseEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuLayersMoveLayerUpIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/BrightnessAndContrastAdjustment.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/PixelateEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/UnsavedChangesDialog.SaveButton.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/SepiaEffect.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuHelpPdnWebsiteIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/UnfocusEffectIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuLayersDuplicateLayerIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/TextAlignRightIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuEditSelectAllIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/SettingsIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/LinearReflectedGradientIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuEditUndoIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/PlusButtonIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuLayersMoveLayerDownIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/SwatchIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MenuHelpHelpTopicsIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources/Icons/MedianEffectIcon.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/SystemLayer/PropertyItem.png paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources.mui/PaintDotNet.Strings.3.KO.resources paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources.mui/PaintDotNet.Strings.3.ZH-CN.resources paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources.mui/PaintDotNet.Strings.3.DE.resources paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources.mui/PaintDotNet.Strings.3.ES.resources paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources.mui/PaintDotNet.Strings.3.JA.resources paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources.mui/PaintDotNet.Strings.3.PT-BR.resources paintdotnet-0.1.63/Resources.mui/PaintDotNet.Strings.3.FR.resources paintdotnet-0.1.63/bin/Debug/PaintDotNet.Strings.3.resources -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 06:59:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270659.n3R6xYda022783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #49 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-04-27 02:59:32 EDT --- David, rakudo doesn't build on an installed Parrot 1.1.0 or on an installed current svn-version. May be patches from Reini Urban help: http://code.google.com/p/cygwin-rurban/source/browse/trunk/release/parrot For discussing that you should post to: parrot-dev at lists.parrot.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 07:25:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:25:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270725.n3R7PT7q031097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #50 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-04-27 03:25:27 EDT --- about #46 and #47: Of course the package with the SPEC and SRPM files in this review build on ppc64 and ppc. It is tested with scratch builds without a cvs module for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 07:26:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:26:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270726.n3R7Q2NK031157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 --- Comment #5 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-27 03:26:00 EDT --- -------INFORMAL PREREVIEW pure------- template: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines -------------- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. pure.i386: W: name-repeated-in-summary Pure The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary brief and to the point without including redundant information in it. pure.i386: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libpure-0.19.so pure.i386: E: shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libpure-0.19.so The listed shared libraries contain object code that was compiled without -fPIC. All object code in shared libraries should be recompiled separately from the static libraries with the -fPIC option. Another common mistake that causes this problem is linking with ``gcc -Wl,-shared'' instead of ``gcc -shared''. pure.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/pure-0.19/runtime.h A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. pure.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary Pure The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary brief and to the point without including redundant information in it. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#no-soname -------------- MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK -------------- MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK -------------- MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . FAIL NO devel-package NO ldconfig in %post and %postun -------------- MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK -------------- MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK -------------- MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK -------------- MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK -------------- MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK -------------- MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK package: e592ef727a8470708e2da480d3bc0546 my dl: e592ef727a8470708e2da480d3bc0546 -------------- MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK -------------- MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A -------------- MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK -------------- MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A -------------- MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. FAIL -------------- MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK -------------- MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK -------------- MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK -------------- MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK -------------- MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK -------------- MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK -------------- MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK -------------- MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK -------------- MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK -------------- MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. FAIL -------------- MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A -------------- MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A -------------- MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. FAIL -------------- MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} FAIL -------------- MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. OK -------------- MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A -------------- MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK -------------- MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK -------------- MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK -------------- SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A -------------- SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. N/A -------------- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK -------------- SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK -------------- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. N/A -------------- SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. FAIL (scriplets are missing) -------------- SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A -------------- SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb N/A -------------- SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. N/A -------------- make check failed --build.log-- + make check Running tests. prelude.pure: FAILED test001.pure: FAILED test002.pure: FAILED test003.pure: FAILED test004.pure: FAILED test005.pure: FAILED test006.pure: FAILED test007.pure: FAILED test008.pure: FAILED test009.pure: FAILED test010.pure: FAILED test011.pure: FAILED test012.pure: FAILED test013.pure: FAILED test014.pure: FAILED test015.pure: FAILED test016.pure: FAILED test017.pure: FAILED test018.pure: FAILED test019.pure: FAILED test020.pure: FAILED test021.pure: FAILED test022.pure: FAILED test023.pure: FAILED test024.pure: FAILED test025.pure: FAILED test026.pure: FAILED test027.pure: FAILED test028.pure: FAILED test029.pure: FAILED test030.pure: FAILED --------------- macro-conflict version = mainver why? it's confusing that you are using 2 macros in a row like this. They having the same content (the version number) and it is clearer to use version in all cases instead of mixing version and mainver --------------- llvm problems?? --build.log-- cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm-c/Core.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm-c/ExecutionEngine.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm-c/Target.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/APFloat.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/BitVector.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/DepthFirstIterator.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/FoldingSet.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/SmallSet.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/Statistic.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/StringExtras.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/StringMap.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/StringSet.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/UniqueVector.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/VectorExtras.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/ilist_node.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/iterator.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/AbstractTypeUser.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Argument.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Attributes.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/BasicBlock.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CallingConv.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/AsmPrinter.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/CallingConvLower.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/DAGISelHeader.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/LiveVariables.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineBasicBlock.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineCodeEmitter.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineConstantPool.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineFrameInfo.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunction.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstr.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstrBuilder.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineJumpTableInfo.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineLocation.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineMemOperand.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineModuleInfo.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineOperand.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineRelocation.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/Passes.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/RuntimeLibcalls.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAG.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAGISel.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAGNodes.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/CodeGen/ValueTypes.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Constant.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Constants.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/DerivedTypes.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ExecutionEngine/ExecutionEngine.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ExecutionEngine/GenericValue.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ExecutionEngine/JITMemoryManager.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Function.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/GlobalAlias.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/GlobalValue.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/GlobalVariable.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/InlineAsm.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/InstrTypes.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Instruction.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Instructions.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Intrinsics.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Module.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ModuleProvider.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/OperandTraits.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Pass.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/PassSupport.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Support/AlignOf.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Support/Allocator.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Support/CFG.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Support/CallSite.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Support/CommandLine.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Support/Debug.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Support/Dwarf.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Support/GetElementPtrTypeIterator.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Support/Mangler.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Support/MutexGuard.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Support/Recycler.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Support/RecyclingAllocator.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Support/Registry.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Support/Streams.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/SymbolTableListTraits.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/System/Host.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/System/Memory.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/System/Mutex.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/System/TimeValue.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Target/DarwinTargetAsmInfo.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Target/ELFTargetAsmInfo.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Target/SubtargetFeature.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Target/TargetAsmInfo.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Target/TargetData.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Target/TargetELFWriterInfo.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Target/TargetFrameInfo.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Target/TargetInstrDesc.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Target/TargetInstrInfo.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Target/TargetInstrItineraries.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Target/TargetJITInfo.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Target/TargetMachine.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Target/TargetMachineRegistry.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Target/TargetOptions.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Target/TargetRegisterInfo.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Target/TargetSubtarget.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Type.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Use.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/User.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Value.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/ExecutionEngine: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/ExecutionEngine/ExecutionEngine.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/ExecutionEngine/ExecutionEngineBindings.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/Intercept.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/JIT.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/JIT.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/JITDwarfEmitter.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/JITDwarfEmitter.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/JITEmitter.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/JITMemoryManager.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/TargetSelect.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/AsmPrinter: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/AsmPrinter/X86ATTAsmPrinter.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/AsmPrinter/X86ATTAsmPrinter.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/AsmPrinter/X86AsmPrinter.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/AsmPrinter/X86IntelAsmPrinter.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/AsmPrinter/X86IntelAsmPrinter.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86COFF.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86CodeEmitter.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86ELFWriterInfo.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86ELFWriterInfo.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86FastISel.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86FloatingPoint.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86GenAsmWriter.inc: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86GenAsmWriter1.inc: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86GenCallingConv.inc: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86GenDAGISel.inc: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86GenFastISel.inc: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86GenInstrInfo.inc: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86GenInstrNames.inc: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86GenRegisterInfo.h.inc: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86GenRegisterInfo.inc: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86GenRegisterNames.inc: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86GenSubtarget.inc: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrBuilder.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86JITInfo.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86JITInfo.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86MachineFunctionInfo.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86RegisterInfo.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86RegisterInfo.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86Relocations.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86Subtarget.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86Subtarget.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetAsmInfo.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetAsmInfo.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.h: Cannot stat: No such file or directory --------------- to include pure in F10 you need to remove the gcc4.4 patch, because in F10 is gcc4.3 or is this patch compatible? Perhaps you should split it for before F11 and F11 and higher (didn't test it yet) --pure.spec-- Patch0: pure-0.18-gcc44.patch %patch0 -p1 -b .gcc44 --pure.spec-- if 0%{?fedora_version} >= 11 Patch0: pure-0.18-gcc44.patch %endif if 0%{?fedora_version} >= 11 %patch0 -p1 -b .gcc44 %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 07:26:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495693] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6 - Perl 6 Syntax Highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270726.n3R7Q6ib027579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495693 --- Comment #7 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-27 03:26:05 EDT --- Yes, I wonder why I packaged Text::VimColor. Maybe I should wait for more stable package, which won't release every second day or until Padre-plugins won't need this package ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 07:27:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:27:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270727.n3R7RMrg031398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2009-04-27 03:27:21 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-ezc-Template.src: I: checking php-ezc-Template.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name ok + spec file name ok + package meet the PHP Guidelines (new update) + License ok : BSD + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources 2a6c226f185f884bbca084ba95576aba Template-1.3.2.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F10.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2, php-channel(components.ez.no)) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + small documentation not required to run + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in mock (fedora-rawhide-x86_64) + no test suite + scriptlets ok + Final Requires ok /usr/bin/pear php-common >= 5.2.1 php-pear(components.ez.no/Base) >= 1.6.1 + Final Provides ok php-pear(components.ez.no/Template) = 1.3.2 php-ezc-Template = 1.3.2-1.fc8 (END) -------- APPROVED -------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 07:38:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:38:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497766] Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270738.n3R7cw63000630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-27 03:38:57 EDT --- Jussi, please calm down. We are not in a hurry. I am well aware of what is going on with this package. It was brought to my attention before it was submitted here. Of course, it will not be approved until the offending artwork is replaced. Patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 07:47:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495693] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6 - Perl 6 Syntax Highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270747.n3R7lHbo002259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495693 --- Comment #8 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-27 03:47:16 EDT --- Ok, this is not needed for the latest release of Padre-Plugins so you can close it. I'm not interested in maintainace any more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 07:48:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:48:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490849] Review Request: php-ezc-Archive- eZ Components Archive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270748.n3R7m85E002443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490849 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2009-04-27 03:48:06 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-ezc-Archive.src: I: checking php-ezc-Archive.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name ok + spec file name ok + package meet the PHP Guidelines (new update) + License ok : BSD + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources 0400c9d03f8a3bba4ec3093428e7ef2a Archive-1.3.3.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F10.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2, php-channel(components.ez.no)) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + small documentation not required to run + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in mock (fedora-rawhide-x86_64) + no test suite + scriptlets ok + Final Requires ok php-common >= 5.2.1 php-pear(components.ez.no/Base) >= 1.6.1 php-posix + Final Provides ok php-pear(components.ez.no/Archive) = 1.3.3 php-ezc-Archive = 1.3.3-1.fc8 Good catch for php-posix (split from php-common in F11) -------- APPROVED -------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 08:00:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491579] Review Request: jjack - JACK audio driver for the Java Sound API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270800.n3R803s4005071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491579 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 04:00:02 EDT --- jjack-0.3-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jjack-0.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 08:00:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495693] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6 - Perl 6 Syntax Highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270800.n3R80ZJZ005260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495693 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 08:01:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491579] Review Request: jjack - JACK audio driver for the Java Sound API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270801.n3R81WUo005413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491579 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 04:01:31 EDT --- jjack-0.3-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jjack-0.3-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 08:02:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:02:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491579] Review Request: jjack - JACK audio driver for the Java Sound API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270802.n3R82W6x005972@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491579 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 04:02:31 EDT --- jjack-0.3-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jjack-0.3-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 08:11:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489795] Review Request: backintime - Simple backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270811.n3R8BQmp008073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489795 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 04:11:25 EDT --- backintime-0.9.22-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/backintime-0.9.22-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 08:12:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:12:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489795] Review Request: backintime - Simple backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270812.n3R8Chc8004376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489795 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 04:12:42 EDT --- backintime-0.9.22-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/backintime-0.9.22-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 08:11:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:11:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270811.n3R8BrGg004266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #18 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-04-27 04:11:48 EDT --- Since the last comment on this bug : - An update to sqlite on all maintained branches pushed its version to 3.5.9, making the building of this rpm fail on all branches. - Upstream has patched the test suite. I've patched the test on my side to pass. Src rpm: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Data-ObjectDriver/perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.06-3.fc10.src.rpm Spec file: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Data-ObjectDriver/perl-Data-ObjectDriver.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 08:35:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:35:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270835.n3R8Z8Ev012945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 --- Comment #17 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-04-27 04:35:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Sorry for the long delay here. > > - 0.9.5 is current now. :) > "Fixed" ;-) > - There are a bunch of 'warning: File listed twice...' messages, due to listing > some files twice in the %files section, can you fix that up? Fixed too. New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-mocha.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f11/SRPMS/rubygem-mocha-0.9.5-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 08:36:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497786] New: Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC - Perl implementation of JSON-RPC 1.1 protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC - Perl implementation of JSON-RPC 1.1 protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497786 Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC - Perl implementation of JSON-RPC 1.1 protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-JSON-RPC/perl-JSON-RPC.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-JSON-RPC/perl-JSON-RPC-0.96-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: JSON-RPC is a stateless and light-weight remote procedure call (RPC) protocol for inter-networking applications over HTTP. It uses JSON as the data format for of all facets of a remote procedure call, including all application data carried in parameters -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 09:16:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:16:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493335] Review Request: perl-RTx-Calendar - Calendar for RT due tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270916.n3R9GpVr021274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493335 --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-04-27 05:16:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > It *is* a problem. According to the file system standard, everything that comes > with the distro should be in libdir; /usr/local is for software that hasn't > been packaged and is locally built. Correct. Nothing being shipped with Fedora must install anything to /usr/local. The fact, rt3 owns some (%ghost'ed) directories therein, doesn't mean vendor supplied packages may install something there. (In reply to comment #2) > Anyway, even with 3.6 the files installed under > /usr/local/lib/rt3 are probably a problem I haven't checked all details yet, but as far as I understand (so far), your package is facing a design flaw in rt3: Lack of a "system-wide plugins directory". I am not sure what to do about it. We could try to hack rt3 to add one, we could try to change rt3 to using a plugins-directory somewhere below /usr (not /usr/local), or we can try to change/configure this package such that it installs into perl's standard system search paths. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 09:33:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270933.n3R9XIC5024873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-27 05:33:17 EDT --- Update: Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libsqlite3x.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-6.fc11.src.rpm Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1322147 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 09:38:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496718] Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270938.n3R9cVEY021770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496718 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-27 05:38:29 EDT --- Update: Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-plotmm.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1322149 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 09:37:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497766] Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270937.n3R9bq3f025864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-27 05:37:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Jussi, please calm down. > > We are not in a hurry. I am well aware of what is going on with this package. > It was brought to my attention before it was submitted here. Of course, it will > not be approved until the offending artwork is replaced. > > Patience. I am calm :) You are the one who asked: (In reply to comment #5) > But is there anything else that is nonfree other than what the art team is > working on? Did you look at the link I gave at all? The link only had spot's answer that if the one icon is the only thing that is nonfree the package is OK for inclusion in Fedora. This is clearly not the case. If someone's ready to replace all those files with free work, then there's no problem. Otherwise this package should go to rpmfusion, where the review process seems to have begun. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 09:47:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:47:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270947.n3R9lRW7028069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mi at v3.sk --- Comment #28 from Michal Ingeli 2009-04-27 05:47:24 EDT --- I updated package tu current version of blueman (1.10). Based on previous spec file, removed patch0 (as it was fixed in recent versions). rpmlint silent, builds fine in mock for fedora-10-i386. http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/blueman-1.10-1.fc10.src.rpm http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/blueman.spec > - in %postun you call "gtk-update-icon-cache" twice (detailed information: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache ) Updated according to wiki. > - since data files are placed in %{_datadir}/hal/fdi/information/20thirdparty, > the package should require "hal". Added hal as requirement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 09:52:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:52:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270952.n3R9qvwb029099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2009-04-27 05:52:56 EDT --- Based on Simon Wesp's suggestion over IRC, I've added a short README.Fedora, which instructs users to look at the bundled "hidden" file. New versions are at Spec URL: http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/jnettop/jnettop.spec SRPM URL: http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/jnettop/jnettop-0.13.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 09:58:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:58:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270958.n3R9wIwO025414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-27 05:58:17 EDT --- -------REVIEW JNETTOP------- template: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines -------------- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. OK -------------- MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK -------------- MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK -------------- MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK -------------- MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK -------------- MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK -------------- MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK -------------- MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK -------------- MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK -------------- MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK package: 9529d75011026b3fcaf185b2fb063881 mydl: 9529d75011026b3fcaf185b2fb063881 -------------- MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK i386 -------------- MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A -------------- MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. N/A -------------- MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A -------------- MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A -------------- MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A -------------- MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK -------------- MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK -------------- MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK -------------- MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK -------------- MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK -------------- MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK -------------- MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). N/A -------------- MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK -------------- MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A -------------- MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A -------------- MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A -------------- MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A -------------- MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A -------------- MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. N/A -------------- MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A -------------- MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK -------------- MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK -------------- MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK -------------- SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A -------------- SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. N/A -------------- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK -------------- SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK -------------- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. N/A -------------- SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A -------------- SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A -------------- SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb N/A -------------- SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. N/A ================== jnettop approved ================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 10:10:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:10:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271010.n3RAA1Vs000885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #51 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-27 06:09:59 EDT --- Gerd, now that you're sponsored, please request CVS and import the package (as described in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure) When it comes to the ppc issue, please do not ExcludeArch it. Feel free to ask for help in case you'll be having trouble getting it build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 10:17:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490849] Review Request: php-ezc-Archive- eZ Components Archive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271017.n3RAHD65029187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490849 --- Comment #4 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-04-27 06:17:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-ezc-Archive Short Description: reate, modify, and extract archive files of various formats Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 10:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271016.n3RAGEMW029066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-04-27 06:16:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-ezc-Template Short Description: A fully functional Templating system Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 10:21:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271021.n3RALJFS003308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2009-04-27 06:21:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jnettop Short Description: Network traffic tracker Owners: wolfy Branches: F9 F10 F11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 10:23:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:23:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271023.n3RANvuA003573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #24 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-04-27 06:23:56 EDT --- we are all happy you are going for mumble. dont worry. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 10:36:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:36:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497800] New: Review Request: perl-Acme-PlayCode - Perl module for enhancement of code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Acme-PlayCode - Perl module for enhancement of code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497800 Summary: Review Request: perl-Acme-PlayCode - Perl module for enhancement of code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Acme-PlayCode.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Acme-PlayCode-0.11-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: It aims to change the code to be better (to be worse if you want). http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1322216 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 10:34:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271034.n3RAYb1K005503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #3 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-27 06:34:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Hi Mat, > > > > first of all this is not official review. I'm in need of sponsor. > > > > URL: http://lpg.sourceforge.net/ > > It is much better to use macro. If the package name changes you will not need > > to change the url too. > > URL: http://%{name}.sourceforge.net/ > But on the other hand > - names of the projects very rarely change > - using macros in the URL / SOURCE tags block usage of certain automated > verification tools. And even simple copy / paste does not work any more. > So I beg to differ, but using macros here is not at all much better. You're right. I used macro in my review request and nobody complained. I guess both ways are right. You could wait for advanced packager to tell you what is better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 11:07:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271107.n3RB7GTt005712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #52 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-04-27 07:07:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: parrot Short Description: Parrot is a virtual machine Owners: gerd Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: gerd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 11:06:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497805] New: Review Request: cppcheck - A tool for static C/C++ code analysis Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cppcheck - A tool for static C/C++ code analysis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497805 Summary: Review Request: cppcheck - A tool for static C/C++ code analysis Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/cppcheck.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/cppcheck-1.31-1.fc10.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://cppcheck.wiki.sourceforge.net Description: This program tries to detect bugs that your C/C++ compiler don't see. The goal is no false positives. Your compiler can detect many problems that cppcheck don't try to detect. We recommend that you enable as many warnings as possible in your compiler. Cppcheck is versatile. You can check non-standard code that includes various compiler extensions, inline assembly code, etc. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 11:11:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271111.n3RBB91W012311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 Gerd Pokorra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 11:21:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497806] New: Review Request: Transmission 1.52 - Fast and light-weight BitTorrent Client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Transmission 1.52 - Fast and light-weight BitTorrent Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497806 Summary: Review Request: Transmission 1.52 - Fast and light-weight BitTorrent Client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: e.bulle at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://78.111.75.56/f10/transmission.spec SRPM URL: http://78.111.75.56/f10/transmission-1.52-1.src.rpm Description: The famous Transmission BitTorrent Client as a new version. Build 8229. If someone likes this package, I would really appreciate if he/she would sponsor me, since this is my first package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 11:29:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497807] New: Review Request: perl-Capture-Tiny - Capture stdin or stdout from Perl, XS or external programs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Capture-Tiny - Capture stdin or stdout from Perl, XS or external programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497807 Summary: Review Request: perl-Capture-Tiny - Capture stdin or stdout from Perl, XS or external programs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Capture-Tiny.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Capture-Tiny-0.05-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Capture::Tiny provides a simple, portable way to capture anything sent to STDOUT or STDERR, regardless of whether it comes from Perl, from XS code or from an external program. Optionally, output can be teed so that it is captured while being passed through to the original handles. Yes, it even works on Windows. Stop guessing which of a dozen capturing modules to use in any particular situation and just use this one. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1322307 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 11:53:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:53:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497806] Review Request: Transmission 1.52 - Fast and light-weight BitTorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271153.n3RBrKUU017375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497806 --- Comment #2 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-27 07:53:19 EDT --- Hey Eric, this application is still in Fedora! please open a "please update this application"-bug like this: #438626 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 11:51:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:51:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206266] Review Request: transmission - lightweight GTK+ BitTorrent client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271151.n3RBpmlH017071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206266 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |e.bulle at gmx.de --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-27 07:51:46 EDT --- *** Bug 497806 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 11:51:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:51:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497806] Review Request: Transmission 1.52 - Fast and light-weight BitTorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271151.n3RBplVE017041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497806 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-27 07:51:46 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 206266 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 11:53:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271153.n3RBrNrP022054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #25 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-27 07:53:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #15) > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > I need to register protocol mumble:// so mumble can use it but in wiki there is > > nothing related to register protocols. How to do that? > Don't know how, but should be imho a seperate package /usr/share/services/ has protocol files. I installed protocol file there but its not working. Some articles on internet says that protocol are handle by DE(Gnome,KDE...). I can install protocol inside /usr/share/kde4/services/ but then it wouldnt work at Gnome - I think. > > > (In reply to comment #15) > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Mumble-overlay - as I said before I don't understand what really you want with > > this. Explain this a little bit more. > > ---------------------------------------------------- > The overlay is an extension for mumble. you can create a subpacakge like murmur > without -n parameter. -n will give a complete name. if you named it %package > overlay it is a subpackage and named mumble-overlay automaticly. > You need a desktopfile that can start mumble in overlay mode in the overlay > subpackage It is installed. > > > (In reply to comment #12) > > Can you explain this a little bit more? Should I make another package > > like I did with murmur. > > %package -n mumble-plugins > %package plugins < as i said it above Done. > > > (In reply to comment #13) > > I think setting MURMUR_USER and MURMUR_GROUP in the init script IMO is bad, > > how about outsourcing it to /etc/sysconfig/murmur for example? > Never said it's the perfect or ultimate initscript. Just add it from another > review like you said in C4 How do you mean outsource? Make another file murmur then set user:group inside then include that file inside init script or something else? > (In reply to comment #15) > > btw, did somebody died so nobody answers or my posts are nonsense so everyone > > is laughing? :) > We are crying > No, was a joke! :-) :D SPEC: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.spec SRPM: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble-1.1.8-5.fc9.src.rpm INIT(nothing changed): http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/murmur.init DESKTOP MUMBLE: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.desktop DESKTOP OVERLAY: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble-overlay.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 12:08:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497806] Review Request: Transmission 1.52 - Fast and light-weight BitTorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271208.n3RC8L59025109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497806 Denis Leroy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |denis at poolshark.org --- Comment #3 from Denis Leroy 2009-04-27 08:08:20 EDT --- I'll push a 1.52 update after F-11 is released. No reason to do this now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 12:38:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271238.n3RCcBh2030952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-27 08:38:10 EDT --- Scratch build fails, but seems to be an infrastructure problem: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1322151 Mock build also fails, due to missing gssapi-error-devel Sources match upstream: diff -urN globus_xio_gsi_driver-0.6 globus_xio_gsi_driver-0.6-dl is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 12:42:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:42:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271242.n3RCgsnJ027426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 08:42:53 EDT --- photoprint-borders-0.0.2-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/photoprint-borders-0.0.2-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 12:42:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271242.n3RCgnpJ032192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 08:42:48 EDT --- photoprint-borders-0.0.2-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/photoprint-borders-0.0.2-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 12:42:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271242.n3RCgwni032232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 08:42:58 EDT --- photoprint-borders-0.0.2-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/photoprint-borders-0.0.2-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 12:49:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:49:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497806] Review Request: Transmission 1.52 - Fast and light-weight BitTorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271249.n3RCnj7m028758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497806 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Component|Package Review |transmission AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |denis at poolshark.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 12:52:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271252.n3RCqiN8002172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:15:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497827] New: Review Request: shortrpm - Short-circuit binary RPM package build Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: shortrpm - Short-circuit binary RPM package build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497827 Summary: Review Request: shortrpm - Short-circuit binary RPM package build Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/shortrpm.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/shortrpm-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: shortrpm tricks rpmbuild(1) into thinking certain scriptlets in SPEC file are empty, effectively skipping their run and proceeding to build the binary package from files from previous %%install scriptlet run in BuildRoot. The trickery only takes place if both -bb and --short-circuit options are specified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:19:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494518] Review Request: dontzap - Allows users to set the "DontZap" option in xorg.conf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271319.n3RDJTJA002576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494518 Bug 494518 depends on bug 494517, which changed state. Bug 494517 Summary: Review Request: python-xkit - A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494517 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:19:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:19:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494517] Review Request: python-xkit - A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271319.n3RDJSSh002542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494517 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-04-27 09:19:27 EDT --- I have build it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:24:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271324.n3RDO0Gb009396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 --- Comment #13 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-27 09:23:58 EDT --- Hello, first of all sorry for the bi~g delay. I added the hal policy and removed the udev rule. Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/razertool-0.0.7/razertool.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/razertool-0.0.7/razertool-0.0.7-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:24:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:24:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271324.n3RDO3eo009427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #26 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-27 09:24:01 EDT --- Can I request a full review of all files? I would like that someone reviews every file, package, attributes, spec, desktop files, init scripts and tells me what needs to be fixed. Like this I'm catching errors "on-the-fly" and can't keep track of them. Its pretty big package so please don't mind. With above I would like that someone tells me: - how to register mumble protocol - how to start murmur as daemon with user:group -> murmur:murmur (inside murmur.init) Thanks in advance, Igor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:29:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478918] Review Request: gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271329.n3RDThSO010547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-27 09:29:42 EDT --- Source matches upstream: diff -urN gssapi_error-2.5 gssapi_error-2.5-dl Scratch Build fails: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1322463 globus-gss-assist-devel is missing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:42:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271342.n3RDg5NS013833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 09:42:04 EDT --- camcardsync-0.1.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/camcardsync-0.1.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:41:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:41:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271341.n3RDfqTl013768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 09:41:51 EDT --- camcardsync-0.1.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/camcardsync-0.1.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:41:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271341.n3RDfxxo007710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 09:41:58 EDT --- camcardsync-0.1.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/camcardsync-0.1.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:45:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496701] Review Request: gxmessage - GTK2 based xmessage clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271345.n3RDjQ7E014827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496701 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 09:45:26 EDT --- gxmessage-2.12.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gxmessage-2.12.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:44:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:44:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496701] Review Request: gxmessage - GTK2 based xmessage clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271344.n3RDiFgF014277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496701 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 09:44:14 EDT --- gxmessage-2.12.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gxmessage-2.12.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:46:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:46:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271346.n3RDkKRj014964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:44:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496701] Review Request: gxmessage - GTK2 based xmessage clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271344.n3RDiupE008177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496701 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 09:44:55 EDT --- gxmessage-2.12.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gxmessage-2.12.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:47:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496168] Review Request: termit - Simple terminal emulator based on vte library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271347.n3RDlkiW009060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496168 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 09:47:45 EDT --- termit-2.2.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/termit-2.2.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271344.n3RDirwC008145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-04-27 09:44:52 EDT --- I'll take this one. It sucks that DTP needs such an old version of LPG. I wonder if that's because this version is the one included in Orbit [1]? If so, perhaps we can work with the DTP people -- CDT uses lpg, too -- to update their API usage. Full review forthcoming. [1] http://eclipse.org/orbit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:46:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:46:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271346.n3RDkVVp008871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:48:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:48:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496168] Review Request: termit - Simple terminal emulator based on vte library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271348.n3RDm47q015534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496168 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 09:48:03 EDT --- termit-2.2.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/termit-2.2.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:52:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:52:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271352.n3RDqjfc016819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt 2009-04-27 09:52:44 EDT --- Mat, are there C/C++ bits we're not building? If so, we should probably either build them (and make it not noarch, etc.) or remove the comments from the description about "... C, C++ ..." and rename to lpgjavaruntime. What do you think? Also, we'll need OSGi metadata for DTP, right? And I don't think we should be injecting the license if upstream doesn't include it (see [1]). I'll post a more formal review in a bit. Thanks for submitting this! [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:58:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:58:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497833] New: Review Request: tuna - Application tuning GUI & command line utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tuna - Application tuning GUI & command line utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497833 Summary: Review Request: tuna - Application tuning GUI & command line utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: acme at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~acme/tuna/tuna.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~acme/tuna/tuna-0.8.4.tar.bz2 Description: Provides interface for changing scheduler and IRQ tunables, at whole CPU and at per thread/IRQ level. Allows isolating CPUs for use by a specific application and moving threads and interrupts to a CPU by just dragging and dropping them. Operations can be done on CPU sockets, understanding CPU topology. Can be used as a command line utility without requiring the GUI libraries to be installed. Uses the interfaces provided by the python-ethtool, python-schedutils and python-linux-procfs. Also includes the oscilloscope as a subpackage, description: Plots stream of values read from standard input on the screen together with statistics and a histogram. Allows to instantly see how a signal generator, such as cyclictest, signaltest or even ping, reacts when, for instance, its scheduling policy or real time priority is changed, be it using tuna or plain chrt & taskset. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:59:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:59:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496168] Review Request: termit - Simple terminal emulator based on vte library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271359.n3RDxUb8018083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496168 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 13:59:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496701] Review Request: gxmessage - GTK2 based xmessage clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271359.n3RDxYr1011745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496701 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 14:02:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:02:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271402.n3RE2PdQ012561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt 2009-04-27 10:02:23 EDT --- Actually, I'm going to hold off on an full review until we decide whether or not to build the native bits. I know it won't help the DTP situation, but I'm thinking we should build all of the latest release -- 2.0.16 -- and help DTP to update their usage to the new API. What do you think, Mat? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 14:05:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:05:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271405.n3RE5GfV019855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Overholt 2009-04-27 10:05:15 EDT --- Alternatively, we could just build the latest lpg-java-runtime and call the package that. Then we don't have to worry about the C/C++ stuff. They are distributed separately on SourceForge so I don't think that would be too crazy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 14:08:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497736] Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271408.n3RE805V014062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497736 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2009-04-27 10:07:59 EDT --- This package detect if fileinfo is present to guess the mine type of file. It can also use a bundle trivial function, but "fileinfo" seems really better Even if this is an optional dependency, I think you should add it (as it's available in Fedora : in php-pecl-Fileinfo, probably in php-common for 5.3.0) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 14:11:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271411.n3REBQvk015512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |th0br0 at mkdir.name --- Comment #9 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-27 10:11:25 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: [x] F10/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [makerpm at hattan vidalia]$ rpmlint vidalia-0.1.12-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [makerpm at hattan vidalia]$ rpmlint vidalia-0.1.12-1.fc10.i386.rpm vidalia-doc-0.1.12-1.fc10.i386.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [!] Spec file is legible and written in American English. Summary: GUI controller for Tor Onion Routing Network should be Summary: GUI controller for the Tor Onion Routing Network [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: c2ac49d051e67db9f4b15ecbdd8c02fb5a4c20be [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [x] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [!] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. You create a -doc subpackage, yet you do not pack the corresponding header files. If you do create a -devel subpackage, vidalia should link against a shared library. At the moment, vidalia has no library of its own. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [!] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. Fix the GenericName according to the changes to Summary (see above). [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F10/i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: - [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. Remaining issues: * -devel subpackage, see explanation above * Fix grammar in Summary and in the desktop file Regardless of that, I -- personally -- would prefer the summary without the word "controller" as "GUI" is completely sufficient. After all, it is a Graphical User Interface. Thus, a following "controller" is not required and rather confuses the reader. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 14:17:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497827] Review Request: shortrpm - Short-circuit binary RPM package build In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271417.n3REH9uu016844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497827 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-27 10:17:08 EDT --- Assiging to myself as I definitely want this package :) I tried with cairo-dock.spec and this actually works! - Please specify full URL for Source: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Please fix above before importing. ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (shortrpm) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 14:21:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271421.n3RELwOZ024528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sven at lank.es AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |th0br0 at mkdir.name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 14:34:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271434.n3REYdB6028476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-27 10:34:38 EDT --- After discussing my review with Simon on IRC, we decided that the -doc subpackage is to be dropped and that the Summary string and the description in the .desktop file are to be changed to "Controller GUI for the Tor Onion Routing Network" according to the Vidalia homepage. Regardless of that, from a packaging point of view there are no remaining blockers thus the package is ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 14:44:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:44:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271444.n3REipsM031034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 Y Giridhar Appaji Nag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |giridhar at appaji.net --- Comment #41 from Y Giridhar Appaji Nag 2009-04-27 10:44:46 EDT --- Axel 2.4 has been release with the said bugs fixed. Please file a bug at the axel bug tracker in case there is something else that you would like to see being addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 14:50:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497705] Review Request: spawn - Simple tool to run several Linux command-lines in parallel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271450.n3REoVAb000609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497705 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-27 10:50:30 EDT --- Thanks guys -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 14:49:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497705] Review Request: spawn - Simple tool to run several Linux command-lines in parallel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271449.n3REnxev032555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497705 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 10:49:58 EDT --- spawn-0.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spawn-0.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 14:50:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497705] Review Request: spawn - Simple tool to run several Linux command-lines in parallel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271450.n3REo3xh025933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497705 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 10:50:02 EDT --- spawn-0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spawn-0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 14:50:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497705] Review Request: spawn - Simple tool to run several Linux command-lines in parallel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271450.n3REo8Qh025978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497705 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 10:50:07 EDT --- spawn-0.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spawn-0.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 14:53:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:53:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271453.n3RErEmW001259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-27 10:53:13 EDT --- Thanks for the review and the cvs stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 14:52:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271452.n3REqP5r001040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-27 10:52:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nfoview Short Description: Viewer for NFO files Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 14:55:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226341] Merge Review: python-docs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271455.n3REt9iS002128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226341 --- Comment #4 from Roman Rakus 2009-04-27 10:55:08 EDT --- diff -u -p -r1.18 python-docs.spec --- python-docs.spec 26 Feb 2009 21:14:56 -0000 1.18 +++ python-docs.spec 27 Apr 2009 14:52:41 -0000 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ %define pybasever 2.6 -Summary: Documentation for the Python programming language. +Summary: Documentation for the Python programming language Name: %{python}-docs Version: %{pybasever} Release: 2%{?dist} @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files -%defattr(-,root,root,755) +%defattr(-,root,root) %doc Misc/NEWS Misc/README Misc/cheatsheet %doc Misc/HISTORY Doc/build/html Is it ok? > python-docs.src:28: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes python2-docs Any idea which version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 15:07:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271507.n3RF7FhW005010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #29 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-04-27 11:07:13 EDT --- Thanks for the update Michal, With the whole "FLISoL" business, I've been a bit too busy to change/update blueman, but I'm ready to continue with the package audit ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 15:14:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271514.n3RFEwYI006678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 11:14:56 EDT --- rapid-photo-downloader-0.0.8-3.b7.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rapid-photo-downloader-0.0.8-3.b7.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 15:14:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:14:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271514.n3RFEliH006629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 11:14:46 EDT --- rapid-photo-downloader-0.0.8-3.b7.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rapid-photo-downloader-0.0.8-3.b7.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 15:14:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:14:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271514.n3RFEqe8031557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 11:14:51 EDT --- rapid-photo-downloader-0.0.8-3.b7.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rapid-photo-downloader-0.0.8-3.b7.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 15:19:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497766] Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271519.n3RFJW1v000526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 --- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-27 11:19:31 EDT --- No, I meant this link I gave before: (From comment #3) > > Request from the Fedora art team to replace the artwork: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/DesignService#Paint.NET_icon_replacement > As you can see, the art team is notified about everything that needs to be done. What I asked you was if there is anything else that they need to cover, other than .RESOURCES, .RESX, or .PNG files (to be specific). And the above page says that work is in progress. So let us wait what comes out. OK? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 15:35:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:35:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497766] Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271535.n3RFZ0sP004608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-27 11:34:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > As you can see, the art team is notified about everything that needs to be > done. What I asked you was if there is anything else that they need to cover, > other than .RESOURCES, .RESX, or .PNG files (to be specific). > > And the above page says that work is in progress. So let us wait what comes > out. OK? Oh sorry, I thought you were only thinking about the logo. Everything's fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 15:40:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226341] Merge Review: python-docs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271540.n3RFesFH013988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226341 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-27 11:40:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > %files > -%defattr(-,root,root,755) > +%defattr(-,root,root) > %doc Misc/NEWS Misc/README Misc/cheatsheet > %doc Misc/HISTORY Doc/build/html > > Is it ok? Should be %defattr(-,root,root,-) > > python-docs.src:28: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes python2-docs > Any idea which version? This isn't a problem. Please address the issues in comment #1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 15:42:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:42:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271542.n3RFgQXJ006552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #27 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-04-27 11:42:25 EDT --- issues left i can currently see: 1. mumble.logrotate needs to be copiedto %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d 2. you might want to use runuser within the init script to get the daemon started as $DAEMONUSER 3. i still see /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libmumble.so.1 is not a symbolic link (1.1.8-5) 4. the protocol file is kde4 stuff and needs to go to %{_datadir}/kde4/services/%{name}.protocol 5. murmur.conf (from scripts directory) needs to go to %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/murmur.conf 6. id recommend adding no-embed-qt-translations because it gets rid of embedded qt translation probs. 7. id recommend adding no-update because we want to have users update the rpm way anyways. 8. adding DEFINES+=PLUGIN_PATH=%{_libdir}/%{name} cant really hurt 9. DEFINES+=DEFAULT_SOUNDSYSTEM=PulseAudio also makes sense to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 15:43:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:43:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271543.n3RFhhm5014511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #13 from Sandro Mathys 2009-04-27 11:43:42 EDT --- ping? I understand it that you wanted to look at the latest CVS - am I mistaken here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 15:48:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271548.n3RFmXqc007796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org --- Comment #28 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-27 11:48:32 EDT --- Services are always desktop-specific. /usr/share/services is the old KDE 3 services directory. The services need to be installed to /usr/share/kde4/services. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 15:47:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:47:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497862] New: Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497862 Summary: Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-paida.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-paida-3.2.1_2.10.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: PAIDA is pure Python scientific analysis package and supports AIDA (Abstract Interfaces for Data Analysis). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 15:48:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497863] New: Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497863 Summary: Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/mb2md.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/mb2md-3.20-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Convert your emails folders in mailbox format to maildirs. Currently mb2md.pl has the following features: * converting the user's main mailbox that is referenced by the ENV variable $MAIL * converting a single mailbox into corresponding maildir * converting multiple mailboxes in a directory into corresponding maildirs * recursive operation on a given directory to convert the complete mail storage of one user * replaces all occurrences of dots ('.') in a mailbox name by underscores ('_') * is able to handle spaces in mailbox names * is able to handle leading/trailing spaces in mailbox names * converts mbox files in DOS format (CRLF) to Unix file format * can strip an extension (e.g. ".mbx") from a mailbox name prior to converting * uses the Content-Length: header if told to * removal of dummy message that a couple of IMAP servers (e.g. UW-IMAPD) put at the beginning of a mailbox * removal of the "From " line that starts every mail in a mailbox * removal of the special escape character (>) that the MTA puts in front of lines starting with "From " other than the first line * setting the file date of a converted message according to the date found in the "From " line of the original mail * setting the flags F,R,S,T (flagged, replied, seen, deleted) on the filename of the converted message according to the flags found in "Status:"/"X-Status:"/"X-Mozilla-Status:"/"X-Evolution:" headers of the original mail -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:02:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497686] Review Request: perl-Archive-RPM - Work with an RPM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271602.n3RG2KWU012954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497686 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-27 12:02:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Archive-RPM Short Description: Work with an RPM Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:02:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497686] Review Request: perl-Archive-RPM - Work with an RPM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271602.n3RG2LJp012972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497686 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490592] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObject - eZ Components PersistentObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271605.n3RG5dwT014021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490592 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet 2009-04-27 12:05:38 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-ezc-PersistentObject.src: I: checking php-ezc-PersistentObject.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name ok + spec file name ok + package meet the PHP Guidelines (new update) + License ok : BSD + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources 59fc321865ed557c2cab024fbc3b0d28 PersistentObject-1.5.1.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F10.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2, php-channel(components.ez.no)) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + small documentation not required to run + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in mock (fedora-rawhide-x86_64) + no test suite + scriptlets ok + Final Requires ok /usr/bin/pear php-common >= 5.2.1 php-pear(components.ez.no/Base) >= 1.6.1 php-pear(components.ez.no/Database) >= 1.3 + Final Provides ok php-pear(components.ez.no/PersistentObject) = 1.5.1 php-ezc-PersistentObject = 1.5.1-1.fc8 -------- APPROVED -------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:11:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:11:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497862] Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271611.n3RGB1IX022647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497862 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:15:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271615.n3RGFJw7024395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-27 12:15:17 EDT --- I see no further blockers here, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:18:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497686] Review Request: perl-Archive-RPM - Work with an RPM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271618.n3RGIIMb024970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497686 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |484485 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:18:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271618.n3RGIHIp024950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |497686(perl-Archive-RPM) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:22:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:22:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271622.n3RGM0uQ025781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 --- Comment #6 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-27 12:22:00 EDT --- 1] what is meaning of share/shutter/resources/system/plugins directory in your tarball? in bash plugins you are using convert from imagemagick, without imagemagick in requirements this plugins wouldn't work. Are this plugins (both, perl and bash) needed for work of shutter? or they just to extend functionality? 2] in bin/shutter you have "use Proc::Simple" that's why rpmbuild add it as requirements. 3] rpmlint is still not silent, no %build section in spec file %build could be empty 4] you have %doc without any file specified 5] during %prep you delete all files in app-install directory but no directory, why not remove whole directory? 6] why do you want to have share/resources/modules in /usr? Do you have any reason why not to put perl modules into better location? see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl 7] please do not use "mv", use install -p or cp -p see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:23:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271623.n3RGNdqP019150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-27 12:23:38 EDT --- What I said is that I want you to check the latest CVS if license issue is resolved. However if you provide the URL of the upstream CVS I can check about license issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:21:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:21:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490851] Review Request: php-ezc-SystemInformation - eZ Components SystemInformation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271621.n3RGLFo5018876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490851 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2009-04-27 12:21:15 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-ezc-SystemInformation.src: I: checking php-ezc-SystemInformation.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name ok + spec file name ok + package meet the PHP Guidelines (new update) + License ok : BSD + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources 7cb58a3adf1b0507688333a258e1fa83 SystemInformation-1.0.7.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F10.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2, php-channel(components.ez.no)) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + small documentation not required to run + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in mock (fedora-rawhide-x86_64) + no test suite + scriptlets ok + Final Requires ok /usr/bin/pear php-common >= 5.2.1 php-pear(components.ez.no/Base) >= 1.5.2 + Final Provides ok php-pear(components.ez.no/SystemInformation) = 1.0.7 php-ezc-SystemInformation = 1.0.7-1.fc8 -------- APPROVED -------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:30:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:30:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497735] Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271630.n3RGU3Jn020564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497735 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2009-04-27 12:30:02 EDT --- Shouldn't you consider adding APC as a dependency ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:10:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271610.n3RGAr7h022575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #1 from Terje R??sten 2009-04-27 12:10:52 EDT --- Could not find any issues except license stuff. Could you please check with Brian that all files have BSD license. Seems like the hash files crc.c, hsieh_hash.c jenkins_hash.c md5.c and murmur_hash.c need special attention in this regard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:33:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271633.n3RGXeJk028131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 --- Comment #25 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-04-27 12:33:38 EDT --- Ping Charles -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:35:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:35:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497869] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-XMLRPC-Client - Provide the needed bits to be a XML-RPC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271635.n3RGZk7w028757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497869 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |484485 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:35:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:35:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497686] Review Request: perl-Archive-RPM - Work with an RPM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271635.n3RGZkcs028741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497686 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |484485 Depends on|484485 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:35:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:35:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271635.n3RGZjKc028719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|497686(perl-Archive-RPM) | Depends on| |497869, | |497686(perl-Archive-RPM) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:36:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271636.n3RGaMFR021907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #19 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-27 12:36:21 EDT --- Two new deps up for review; will build 0.08 as soon as those are in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:34:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:34:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271634.n3RGYsAm021250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #15 from Sandro Mathys 2009-04-27 12:34:54 EDT --- My apologies, I misunderstood you, in that case. For me, it looks like ASL 2.0 in CVS now - but as you know, I'm not good in checking licenses. I'd appreciate if you could verify that the code in their CVS is allright now. The information about upstream's CVS can be found on the following page: http://www.l2fprod.com/common/contribute.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:35:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:35:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497869] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-XMLRPC-Client - Provide the needed bits to be a XML-RPC client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-XMLRPC-Client - Provide the needed bits to be a XML-RPC client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497869 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-XMLRPC-Client - Provide the needed bits to be a XML-RPC client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Role-XMLRPC-Client OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Role-XMLRPC-Client.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Role-XMLRPC-Client-0.03-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is a Moose role that provides the methods and attributes needed to enable a class to serve as an XML-RPC client. It is parameterized through MooseX::Role::Parameterized, so you can customize how it embeds in your class. You can even embed it multiple times with different paramaterization, if it strikes your fancy :-) Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1323070 *rt-0.08 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:43:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:43:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497690] Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271643.n3RGhANY030199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497690 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:43:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:43:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497690] Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271643.n3RGhBeX030216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497690 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:48:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:48:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271648.n3RGmDZE024207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #53 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-04-27 12:48:11 EDT --- Sorry, I have to point out, that F-8 is EOL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 16:48:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497870] New: Review Request: gtodo - Organizing tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gtodo - Organizing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497870 Summary: Review Request: gtodo - Organizing tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: e.bulle at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://78.111.75.56/f10/gtodo.spec SRPM URL: http://78.111.75.56/f10/gtodo-0.14-1.2.src.rpm Description: gtodo is a nice organizing tool, can be compared to other programs like Tasque. If you like this package, feel free to sponsor me as I don't have a sponstor yet... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 17:06:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:06:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271706.n3RH683Y028519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-27 13:06:07 EDT --- After thorough discussion, we decided that the -doc subpackage might as well be kept. There might -- after all -- be someone out there who is interested in it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 17:07:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271707.n3RH7eOr028792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-27 13:07:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > The information about upstream's CVS can be found on the following page: > http://www.l2fprod.com/common/contribute.php I checked this CVS and currently all files are under ASL 2.0. If you create new srpm based on the latest CVS I will remove FE-Legal blocker. By the way, how about skinlf? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 17:16:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271716.n3RHGQcb030631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Thorvald Natvig changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |slicer at users.sourceforge.ne | |t --- Comment #29 from Thorvald Natvig 2009-04-27 13:16:24 EDT --- Mumble doesn't depend on or use sqlite; it depends on Qt's sqlite database driver, which includes (or depends on) sqlite3. Same goes for DBus. Speaking of DBus, please include the murmur.conf file for registering murmur on the system dbus. Are there no builds of the g15daemon for Fedora? :( Why do you have both a murmur.ini and a mumble-server.ini? You only need one, which should be whatever you use in the init file. murmur.ini should be based on murmur.ini.system, not murmur.ini (which is intended for use when you run this from your home directory). Unless you happen to use the same paths as Debian, you'll need to regexp a few paths. When building on x86_64, you also need to build i386 libmumble.so, and stuff that in the appropriate directory. Otherwise you won't be able to use the overlay for 32-bit processes (which include most binary-only games). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 17:21:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:21:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271721.n3RHLHeu005891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 13:21:15 EDT --- minicomputer-1.3-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/minicomputer-1.3-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 17:22:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271722.n3RHMXwM031899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 13:22:32 EDT --- minicomputer-1.3-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/minicomputer-1.3-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 17:23:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271723.n3RHNbUR032050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 13:23:36 EDT --- minicomputer-1.3-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/minicomputer-1.3-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 17:26:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:26:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490380] Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271726.n3RHQn4r006913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 13:26:49 EDT --- qt-creator-1.1.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt-creator-1.1.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 17:26:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:26:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490380] Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271726.n3RHQ1ko006791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 13:26:00 EDT --- qt-creator-1.1.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt-creator-1.1.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 17:27:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490380] Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271727.n3RHRojb000637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 13:27:49 EDT --- qt-creator-1.1.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt-creator-1.1.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 17:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271730.n3RHU9h8007669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet 2009-04-27 13:30:08 EDT --- ----------- Mail to Brian : I haven't do a full license review of your code... (shame on me) It's seems that some files are provided by external sources. Have you some information about how do this license apply to your project : crc.c => ?? hsieh_hash.c => http://www.azillionmonkeys.com/qed/weblicense.html jenkins_hash.c => http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/index.html md5.c => RSA ?? murmur_hash.c => http://murmurhash.googlepages.com/ is "public domain" At least some of them (RSA notice) should be distributed in the library/RPM documentation (perhaps a COPYING.xxx and in AUTHORS file). ------------ Response from Brian We leave the external copyright in the top. All other code is BSD. If someone needed to chop something out they could with ease. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 17:45:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:45:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490592] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObject - eZ Components PersistentObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271745.n3RHjkjr011106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490592 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-04-27 13:45:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-ezc-PersistentObject Short Description: Allows you to store an arbitrary data structures to a fixed database table Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 17:46:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490851] Review Request: php-ezc-SystemInformation - eZ Components SystemInformation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271746.n3RHkgP5005075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490851 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-04-27 13:46:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-ezc-SystemInformation Short Description: Provides access to common system variables Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 17:44:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:44:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497863] Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271744.n3RHis0d004344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497863 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-04-27 13:44:54 EDT --- First comment for this review: 1.) I have got the following error messages: $ rpmbuild -bp mb2md.spec Ausf?hrung(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.cGZGxo + umask 022 + cd /home/s4504kr/rpmbuild/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /home/s4504kr/rpmbuild/BUILD + rm -rf mb2md-3.20 + /bin/mkdir -p mb2md-3.20 + cd mb2md-3.20 + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + gunzip -c /home/s4504kr/rpmbuild/SOURCES/mb2md-3.20.pl.gz + touch -r /home/s4504kr/rpmbuild/SOURCES/mb2md-3.20.pl.gz mb2md.pl + cp -a /home/s4504kr/rpmbuild/SOURCES/changelog.txt . + grep -v '#-----' ++ wc -l mb2md.pl ++ awk '{print $2}' + grep -v '#!/' + grep -B mb2md.pl '#---------' mb2md.pl + cut -c3- grep: mb2md.pl: invalid context length argument 2.) It may be nice, if you can create a shorter description of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:02:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:02:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271802.n3RI2uEC008736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-27 14:02:55 EDT --- Some notes: * SourceURL - Please consider to use %{version} macro on %SOURCE0. In this way you probably won't have to rewrite Source0 when version is upgraded: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_.25.7Bversion.7D * BuildRequires - "BR: dbus-devel" is redundant because dbus-glib-devel has "Requires: dbus-devel". * Documents - "INSTALL" file is usually for people who want to build/compile packages by themselves and not needed for rpm users - And "ABOUT-NLS" is almost no related to this package (this shows general information for translating). Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271804.n3RI4I45015263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 14:04:17 EDT --- php-ezc-Database-1.4.4-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Database-1.4.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:04:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271804.n3RI4D5x015233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 14:04:12 EDT --- php-ezc-Database-1.4.4-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Database-1.4.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:04:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271804.n3RI4M9A015296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 14:04:21 EDT --- php-ezc-Database-1.4.4-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Database-1.4.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:25:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:25:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271825.n3RIPlie020837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 14:25:46 EDT --- php-ezc-EventLog-1.3-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-EventLog-1.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:25:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271825.n3RIPgxM020808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 14:25:41 EDT --- php-ezc-EventLog-1.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-EventLog-1.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:25:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:25:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271825.n3RIPpPx020869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 14:25:50 EDT --- php-ezc-EventLog-1.3-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-EventLog-1.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:34:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492945] Review Request: lv2-swh-plugins - LV2 ports of LADSPA swh plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271834.n3RIYRPl022678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492945 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 14:34:26 EDT --- lv2-swh-plugins-1.0.15-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lv2-swh-plugins-1.0.15-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:37:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:37:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492950] Review Request: lv2-vocoder-plugins - Add a robotic effect to vocals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271837.n3RIbE9B023425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492950 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 14:37:13 EDT --- lv2-vocoder-plugins-1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lv2-vocoder-plugins-1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:38:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:38:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271838.n3RIcr7e016850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 14:38:52 EDT --- perl-Text-CSV-1.10-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-CSV-1.10-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:38:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:38:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271838.n3RIcmMP016810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 14:38:47 EDT --- perl-Text-CSV-1.10-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-CSV-1.10-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:39:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492971] Review Request: lv2-zynadd-plugins - LV2 port of the ZynAddSubFX engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271839.n3RIdJ8s016912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492971 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 14:39:18 EDT --- lv2-zynadd-plugins-1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lv2-zynadd-plugins-1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:35:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492945] Review Request: lv2-swh-plugins - LV2 ports of LADSPA swh plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271835.n3RIZAQR016200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492945 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 14:35:09 EDT --- lv2-swh-plugins-1.0.15-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lv2-swh-plugins-1.0.15-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:36:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:36:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492950] Review Request: lv2-vocoder-plugins - Add a robotic effect to vocals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271836.n3RIaYZg016582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492950 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 14:36:33 EDT --- lv2-vocoder-plugins-1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lv2-vocoder-plugins-1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:38:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:38:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492971] Review Request: lv2-zynadd-plugins - LV2 port of the ZynAddSubFX engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271838.n3RIcka5023767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492971 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 14:38:45 EDT --- lv2-zynadd-plugins-1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lv2-zynadd-plugins-1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:41:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:41:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497736] Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271841.n3RIfTk2024699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497736 --- Comment #2 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-04-27 14:41:28 EDT --- Add php-pecl-Fileinfo : SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Mail.spec SRPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Mail-1.6.1-3.fc10.src.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Mail-1.6.1-3.fc10.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:40:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497862] Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271840.n3RIefF6017520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497862 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-27 14:40:40 EDT --- Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F10/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-paida-3.2.1_2.10.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint python-paida-3.2.1_2.10.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: Python [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Upstream source: 8a56bfbf037891d542f771cf50da13ed Build source: 8a56bfbf037891d542f771cf50da13ed [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales. [-] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete. [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [-] Timestamps preserved with cp and install. [-] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged. [-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F10/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1323045 [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Changelog in allowed format === ISSUES === - $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} are mixed. - The README says 'If zlib module is enabled, you can use compressed XML store files.'. Would this be a nice option? - Application crashed on my F10/i386 machine with this file: http://paida.sourceforge.net/documentation/histogram/sampleHistogram3D.py [fab at laptop24 ~]$ python sampleHistogram3D.py Exception in thread Thread-1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/threading.py", line 486, in __bootstrap_inner self.run() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/paida/paida_gui/tkinter/PRoot.py", line 67, in run self._setRoot(Tk()) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/lib-tk/Tkinter.py", line 1636, in __init__ self.tk = _tkinter.create(screenName, baseName, className, interactive, wantobjects, useTk, sync, use) TclError: out of stack space (infinite loop?) The crash should be investigated by upstream and is not a blocker from my point od view. Perhaps it's only a handling error from my side. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:45:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497735] Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271845.n3RIjwXu025897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497735 --- Comment #2 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-04-27 14:45:57 EDT --- I do not think. APC is an option of php-ezc-Cache. You can use php-ezc-Cache and have an auther opcode cache solution (like php accelerator) and is this fact, install 2 opcode cache can make conflicts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:44:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:44:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271844.n3RIiALt025252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Bug 492203 depends on bug 491579, which changed state. Bug 491579 Summary: Review Request: jjack - JACK audio driver for the Java Sound API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491579 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 18:44:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:44:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491579] Review Request: jjack - JACK audio driver for the Java Sound API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271844.n3RIiAaq025231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491579 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-27 14:44:08 EDT --- Package imported and built. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 19:11:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:11:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271911.n3RJBtPn032721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 15:11:53 EDT --- perl-Data-Report-0.10-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-Report-0.10-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 19:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271912.n3RJC0mJ032767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 15:11:59 EDT --- perl-Data-Report-0.10-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-Report-0.10-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 19:16:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271916.n3RJG0Wl025819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #30 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-27 15:15:59 EDT --- Issues and suggestions pointed by Rudolf and Thorvald will be fixed in few hours(I hope). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 19:22:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497862] Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271922.n3RJMRT3002939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497862 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-27 15:22:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > === ISSUES === > - $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} are mixed. Whoops, missed one. I should probably make an own template that uses %{buildroot} instead of the Fedora standard template's $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. Fixed. > - The README says 'If zlib module is enabled, you can use compressed XML store > files.'. Would this be a nice option? Yeah, I just don't know what is this zlib module, at least I can't find anything with yum :) > - Application crashed on my F10/i386 machine with this file: > http://paida.sourceforge.net/documentation/histogram/sampleHistogram3D.py > > [fab at laptop24 ~]$ python sampleHistogram3D.py > Exception in thread Thread-1: > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/threading.py", line 486, in __bootstrap_inner > self.run() > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/paida/paida_gui/tkinter/PRoot.py", > line 67, in run > self._setRoot(Tk()) > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/lib-tk/Tkinter.py", line 1636, in __init__ > self.tk = _tkinter.create(screenName, baseName, className, interactive, > wantobjects, useTk, sync, use) > TclError: out of stack space (infinite loop?) > > The crash should be investigated by upstream and is not a blocker from my point > od view. Perhaps it's only a handling error from my side. Odd. Yes, this should go upstream. I must admit that I haven't done any testing of this package as it is just a library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 19:31:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497862] Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271931.n3RJV3Cb004922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497862 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-27 15:31:02 EDT --- Updated spec&srpm: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-paida.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-paida-3.2.1_2.10.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 19:30:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:30:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490030] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - MonoDevelop Debugger AddIn In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271930.n3RJUqLT004876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490030 Mauricio Henriquez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |buhochileno at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-04-27 15:30:51 EDT --- Hi Paul, We are wroking with new mdb code that is more updating at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 do you mind that I take over this package? Thanks Mauricio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 19:31:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:31:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271931.n3RJVFd9004959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #2 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-04-27 15:31:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > So this package has already been submitted for review by Paul Lange: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490030 > > It's polite to ask Paul if he wants to update his package or would be alright > if you take over the package. If he updates his package, you can do a review > of his package. If he would rather you take over you can look at his spec file > for ideas, update your package with ideas from his spec and the other review > we've done, and I'll review. Your are absolutly right, I'm asking him... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 19:30:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:30:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497863] Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271930.n3RJUG9i029513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497863 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-27 15:30:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > First comment for this review: > > 1.) I have got the following error messages: clip > + cut -c3- > grep: mb2md.pl: invalid context length argument That's true, I had the same error message but didn't notice it among the other output. In retrospect, awk argument should be $1 not $2. Fixed. > 2.) It may be nice, if you can create a shorter description of this package. Well, OK. Now it fits well in a single 80x24 screen. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/mb2md.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/mb2md-3.20-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 19:39:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:39:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271939.n3RJdiAb006993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 15:39:43 EDT --- bareftp-0.2.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bareftp-0.2.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 19:37:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:37:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271937.n3RJbmLg006654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 --- Comment #13 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-27 15:37:47 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8263 F-9 and F-11 build failed seems to be not related with bareftp, I am looking for a fix about this issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 19:38:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:38:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271938.n3RJcbMs006769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 --- Comment #10 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-04-27 15:38:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Oh -- and this just a readability nit. I'd move this up to the top: > # rpm does not currently pull debuginfo out of mono packages > %global debug_package %{nil} Ok, I have to move that to the tip of the file? or just before %description ? Also, waiting Paul answer about take over the mdb package, as soon as I get the response I going to apply what I learn with this review to that one for your review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 19:52:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:52:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271952.n3RJqSDH002069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #31 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-27 15:52:26 EDT --- > When building on x86_64, you also need to build i386 libmumble.so, and stuff > that in the appropriate directory. Uh, no, you must not build i386 stuff in the x86_64 package, Koji won't even let you do that. The way this has to work is that the package containing libmumble.so has to be multilibbed (i.e. both the i386/i586 and the x86_64 package available in the x86_64 repository) and people who use 32-bit apps need to install the 32-bit package explicitly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 20:01:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:01:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493335] Review Request: perl-RTx-Calendar - Calendar for RT due tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272001.n3RK1ANd011914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493335 --- Comment #5 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-27 16:01:08 EDT --- RTx-Calendar is using Module-Install-RTx (a bundled copy, this probably needs to be fixed too). Module-Install-RTx uses rt3.pm and get the install directories from there. The following layout is defined ; customdir: %{_prefix}/local/lib/rt3 custometcdir: %{_prefix}/local/etc/rt3 customhtmldir: ${customdir}/html customlexdir: ${customdir}/po customlibdir: ${customdir}/lib I believe changing this to the default rt3 dirs would do, but I'm not sure this is the proper "fix". Oh, and also, there's no Module-Install-RTx that supports the rt 3.8 plugins framework yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 19:58:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271958.n3RJwLLo011095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 --- Comment #11 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-04-27 15:58:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #6) > > > monodevelop is being built on: > > > ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 ia64 armv4l sparc alpha > > > > > Ok yes, using the monodevelop one, please check that my ExclusiveArch is ok > > then, I remove the Build: noarch, that ok then? > > Yep, your ExclusiveArch line is fine now. Good :-) > > > DONE, added the "sed" thing, don't quite sure about not make a mess with a > > patch. > > > heh. You'll have to learn about diff and patch sooner or later since it's an > integral part of package building but the sed line is fine for this package. > yeap I know basic diff/patch commands, just that I don't want to mess my first package and the "sed" command seems to be more proved for now... > > > > > > * You need to bump the Release: field with every revision. Since you also want > > > to add the disttag, the next release should be: > > > Release: 2%{?dist} > > not sure about what to do with this, I added that and package end with > > fc10.rpm... > > Yep. %{?dist} is a macro. So when rpm builds the package on F-10, it expands > Release: 2%{?dist} > into: > Release: 2.fc10 > > When you build on F-11 it expands to: > Release: 2.fc11 > > and so on. > > > > * You need to add a %changelog entry to tell what you've done. the format is > > > shown here: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs > > Ok I add a simple one, I try to put one in more details but as soon as I write > > things like "Add sed to the %prep section.." or stuff like taht, rpmbuild claim > > about thing tha he think that are "sections" and not take the text as just > > comments even if put %prep in quotations.. > > > > What happens is that macros/section headers are always expanded by rpmbuild. > (Note: This happens even when the macro is commented out.) To get around that, > escape the % with another %. So your changelog could look like: > > %changelog > * Fri Apr 24 2009 Mauricio Henriquez - 2.0 > - Fix the install directory via sed in the %%prep section. > ok, I apply this to the following changelog comments.. > > > > monodevelop-debugger-gdb.src: W: strange-permission > > > monodevelop-debugger-gdb-2.0.tar.bz2 0755 > > > > > > * 0644 would be the normal permissions for a tarball. > > Can this be fixed in the tarball on koji?, or I have to change the permission > > of the tarball on the site that I put it? > > > This would be fixed by changing the permissions before you build the > package/checkin the source. I got the tarball out of your source rpm > originally. Ok changed > > >> monodevelop-debugger-gdb.x86_64: E: no-binary > >> monodevelop-debugger-gdb.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > >> monodevelop-debugger-gdb.x86_64: W: no-documentation > > > mmm, not sure what to do about this, is that a good or bad thing? (probably a > bad one :-) > > In this case, these are false positives so they can all be ignored. The reason > they're false positives for this package are written in comment #6 > > The only other thing I notice in the updated spec is the buildroot tag. If you > look here: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag > > BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) Ok, updated files are: http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-debugger-gdb-2.0-2.fc10.src.rpm http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-debugger-gdb.spec.review3 By the way, my main goal is to have this also for fed10, for that all the mono and monodevelop packages for fed11 from koji have to be rebuilded for fed10, currently I made that by hand, but the idea is to let koji to do that right? As soon as I get the Paul answer I going to apply what I learn here to the mdb and other packages for your review... Thanks for your kind help Toshio Mauricio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 20:17:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:17:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497827] Review Request: shortrpm - Short-circuit binary RPM package build In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272017.n3RKH4UV015810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497827 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-27 16:17:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Please specify full URL for Source: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL > > Please fix above before importing. Will do. Thanks a lot for review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: shortrpm Short Description: Short-circuit binary RPM package build Owners: lkundrak Branches: EL-5 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 20:27:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:27:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497862] Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272027.n3RKRQUQ010066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497862 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-27 16:27:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > - The README says 'If zlib module is enabled, you can use compressed XML store > > files.'. Would this be a nice option? > > Yeah, I just don't know what is this zlib module, at least I can't find > anything with yum :) I only know one zlib : https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/zlib ;-) Package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 20:42:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225978] Merge Review: kudzu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272042.n3RKgH8e021412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225978 --- Comment #11 from Bill Nottingham 2009-04-27 16:42:15 EDT --- It didn't seem worth a freeze break to add a kudzu-static provide without any other functional changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 20:40:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272040.n3RKeVgI021186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #30 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-27 16:40:29 EDT --- Seems mostly fine. - Builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1324720 - Packaged latest version - Requires & provides sane - Filelist ok - Uses compiler flags correctly - Patches present submitted upstream - SPEC file clean, legible, written in American English 1.) RPMlint: > blueman.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 4) > The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic > annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. EasyFix > blueman.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: blueman-build-pygtk.patch > A patch is included in your package but was not applied. Refer to the patches > documentation to see what's wrong. With this not applied, it's probably not needed to require and run autoconf, right? 2.) Summary & Description Formatted text will not look good in GUIs. You may want to change the description to be a descriptive paragraph instead of a bulleted list. Summary may also need some improvement; I would not be able to decide whether I want the application or not just by reading the summary. Please think of the casual user; something like "Tool to manage Bluetooth enable devices" or might be more appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 20:47:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:47:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497862] Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272047.n3RKlgnS022817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497862 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-27 16:47:41 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-paida Short Description: Pure Python scientific analysis package Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 20:54:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272054.n3RKsmvX023874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-27 16:54:47 EDT --- thanks for your review imho doxygen docs should be buzild, because they are available... it doesn't hurt anybody New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vidalia Short Description: Controller GUI for the Tor Onion Routing Network Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:01:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272101.n3RL1eIe025403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 --- Comment #12 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-27 17:01:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > Oh -- and this just a readability nit. I'd move this up to the top: > > # rpm does not currently pull debuginfo out of mono packages > > %global debug_package %{nil} > > Ok, I have to move that to the tip of the file? or just before %description ? > top of the file. It's easiest to spot definitions of global variables when they're at the top. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:19:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:19:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272119.n3RLJHmc020566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.11.6-9.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:19:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272119.n3RLJCwx020527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:19:11 EDT --- rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-9.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:20:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:20:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467235] Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272120.n3RLKKRY029106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:20:17 EDT --- globus-callout-0.7-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:22:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272122.n3RLMKkJ029619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:22:19 EDT --- camcardsync-0.1.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:18:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272118.n3RLIWCe028242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:18:28 EDT --- libgarmin-0-0.6.20090212svn.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:21:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:21:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467235] Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272121.n3RLLKVd029397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.7-2.fc9 |0.7-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:18:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272118.n3RLIbas028300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0-0.6.20090212svn.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:20:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:20:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492395] Review Request: php-geshi - Generic syntax highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272120.n3RLK1b9021032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492395 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:20:00 EDT --- php-geshi-1.0.8.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:21:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467235] Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272121.n3RLLEbB021619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:21:14 EDT --- globus-callout-0.7-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:23:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489795] Review Request: backintime - Simple backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272123.n3RLNTlt022151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489795 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:23:28 EDT --- backintime-0.9.22-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:23:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:23:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496168] Review Request: termit - Simple terminal emulator based on vte library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272123.n3RLNFYk022085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496168 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:23:14 EDT --- termit-2.2.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:19:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272119.n3RLJZTt020737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:19:34 EDT --- jamin-0.95.0-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:20:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:20:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492395] Review Request: php-geshi - Generic syntax highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272120.n3RLK68X021234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492395 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.8.3-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:23:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:23:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489795] Review Request: backintime - Simple backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272123.n3RLNYCE022188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489795 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.22-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:20:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:20:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467235] Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272120.n3RLKQpj021327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.7-2.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:23:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:23:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490380] Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272123.n3RLN2x3022034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1.0-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:19:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272119.n3RLJesQ020778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.95.0-5.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:21:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497705] Review Request: spawn - Simple tool to run several Linux command-lines in parallel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272121.n3RLLWbF021707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497705 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:21:31 EDT --- spawn-0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update spawn'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3924 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:21:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:21:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272121.n3RLLRWD021671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:21:26 EDT --- rapid-photo-downloader-0.0.8-3.b7.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update rapid-photo-downloader'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3923 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:23:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:23:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496701] Review Request: gxmessage - GTK2 based xmessage clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272123.n3RLNgv1030296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496701 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:23:41 EDT --- gxmessage-2.12.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492520] Review Request: swami - MIDI instrument and sound editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272126.n3RLQ7aa031409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492520 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:26:06 EDT --- swami-0.9.4-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:22:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:22:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490380] Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272122.n3RLMvOG030123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:22:56 EDT --- qt-creator-1.1.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:26:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:26:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490380] Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272126.n3RLQpvG031562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:26:50 EDT --- qt-creator-1.1.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:24:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:24:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453854] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272124.n3RLO8uN030445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:24:06 EDT --- globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-1.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:24:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:24:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272124.n3RLOsjC030653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1.1-2.fc10 |0.1.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:22:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:22:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272122.n3RLMOZ3029767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.1.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:24:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:24:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272124.n3RLOX5G030574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0-0.6.20090212svn.fc10 |0-0.6.20090212svn.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:24:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:24:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453854] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272124.n3RLODt9030485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.5-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:28:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:28:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272128.n3RLS9aM023916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:28:08 EDT --- ogmtools-1.5-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:24:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:24:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272124.n3RLOntj022815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:24:48 EDT --- camcardsync-0.1.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:24:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:24:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272124.n3RLOQlt022485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:24:25 EDT --- libgarmin-0-0.6.20090212svn.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:26:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:26:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490380] Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272126.n3RLQuT9023593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1.0-2.fc10 |1.1.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:27:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:27:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272127.n3RLRHZu023684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:27:16 EDT --- libvmime-0.9.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492520] Review Request: swami - MIDI instrument and sound editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272126.n3RLQC8Z023419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492520 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.4-4.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:27:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:27:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272127.n3RLRMQ1023724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.0-3.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:27:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488539] Review Request: php-ezc-Configuration - eZ Components Configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272127.n3RLRTcZ023766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488539 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:27:28 EDT --- php-ezc-Configuration-1.3.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update php-ezc-Configuration'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3970 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:29:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497705] Review Request: spawn - Simple tool to run several Linux command-lines in parallel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272129.n3RLTFHw024101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497705 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:29:14 EDT --- spawn-0.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update spawn'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3976 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:25:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:25:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488539] Review Request: php-ezc-Configuration - eZ Components Configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272125.n3RLPTPL023221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488539 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:25:28 EDT --- php-ezc-Configuration-1.3.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-Configuration'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3957 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:30:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492395] Review Request: php-geshi - Generic syntax highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272130.n3RLUPik000855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492395 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:30:25 EDT --- php-geshi-1.0.8.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:31:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495436] Review Request: perl-File-Pid - Pid File Manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272131.n3RLV2m7001097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495436 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:31:01 EDT --- perl-File-Pid-1.01-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:31:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491579] Review Request: jjack - JACK audio driver for the Java Sound API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272131.n3RLVq5n001346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491579 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:31:52 EDT --- jjack-0.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:30:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492395] Review Request: php-geshi - Generic syntax highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272130.n3RLUVhq000940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492395 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.8.3-1.fc9 |1.0.8.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:28:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495372] Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272128.n3RLSRGq032262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495372 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:28:26 EDT --- python-altgraph-0.6.7-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:29:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:29:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl - Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272129.n3RLT30D032448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:29:02 EDT --- globus-rsl-5.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:31:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:31:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495436] Review Request: perl-File-Pid - Pid File Manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272131.n3RLV7VK001144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495436 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.01-1.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:31:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:31:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491579] Review Request: jjack - JACK audio driver for the Java Sound API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272131.n3RLVv2L001386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491579 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.3-2.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496606] Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272129.n3RLTdsa032730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496606 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.82-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:28:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495372] Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272128.n3RLSWUg032299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495372 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6.7-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:29:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl - Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272129.n3RLT8lg032543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |5.0-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:32:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272132.n3RLWHQs001538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:32:16 EDT --- minicomputer-1.3-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update minicomputer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3998 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:28:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272128.n3RLSMTv032224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:28:21 EDT --- minicomputer-1.3-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update minicomputer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3973 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:29:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:29:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272129.n3RLTKqE032663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:29:19 EDT --- pdfposter-0.4.6-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update pdfposter'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3977 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:28:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272128.n3RLSHeo032191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:28:15 EDT --- EekBoek-1.04.03-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update EekBoek'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3972 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:30:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488538] Review Request: php-ezc-Authentication - eZ Components Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272130.n3RLULDW000802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488538 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:30:20 EDT --- php-ezc-Authentication-1.2.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update php-ezc-Authentication'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3987 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:29:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496606] Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272129.n3RLTYBg024514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496606 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:29:34 EDT --- perl-Log-LogLite-0.82-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:33:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496606] Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272133.n3RLXvG1026105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496606 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:33:56 EDT --- perl-Log-LogLite-0.82-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:32:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:32:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272132.n3RLWsjW025746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:32:52 EDT --- photoprint-borders-0.0.2-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:31:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272131.n3RLVWEw025481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.0.2-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:31:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:31:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272131.n3RLVRGW025420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:31:25 EDT --- photoprint-borders-0.0.2-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272130.n3RLU90b025040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:30:08 EDT --- jamin-0.95.0-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:34:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:34:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272134.n3RLYHkt026162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:34:16 EDT --- globus-gsi-openssl-error-0.14-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:33:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:33:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495372] Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272133.n3RLXkfD026042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495372 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.6.7-2.fc10 |0.6.7-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:34:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272134.n3RLYMg3026196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.14-1.fc10 |0.14-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:29:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272129.n3RLTr6Y024615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:29:52 EDT --- globus-gsi-openssl-error-0.14-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:30:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489080] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272130.n3RLUFZq025087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489080 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.95.0-5.fc10 |0.95.0-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:33:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:33:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272133.n3RLXQCs025997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.7-2.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:33:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495418] Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272133.n3RLX8JB025805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495418 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.11.0-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:29:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:29:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272129.n3RLTwAP024658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.14-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:33:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:33:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272133.n3RLXGHA025869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:33:15 EDT --- pdfposter-0.4.6-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pdfposter'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4002 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:33:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488538] Review Request: php-ezc-Authentication - eZ Components Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272133.n3RLXqE0026076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488538 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:33:51 EDT --- php-ezc-Authentication-1.2.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-Authentication'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4006 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:29:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:29:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496486] Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272129.n3RLTQg5024236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:29:24 EDT --- cclive-0.3.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update cclive'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3978 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:34:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:34:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492974] Review Request: calf - Audio plugins pack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272134.n3RLYifY002667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492974 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:34:43 EDT --- calf-0.0.18.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:35:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:35:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496701] Review Request: gxmessage - GTK2 based xmessage clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272135.n3RLZIHr003235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496701 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:35:17 EDT --- gxmessage-2.12.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:33:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:33:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272133.n3RLXLgG002396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:33:20 EDT --- globus-xio-2.7-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:37:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:37:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491579] Review Request: jjack - JACK audio driver for the Java Sound API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272137.n3RLbF4D003648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491579 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:37:14 EDT --- jjack-0.3-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:34:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:34:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494586] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Any - Retrieve terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272134.n3RLYsKY002715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494586 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:34:54 EDT --- perl-Term-Size-Any-0.001-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:36:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:36:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492969] Review Request: lv2dynparam - LV2 dynamic parameters extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272136.n3RLaF3t003465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492969 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:36:14 EDT --- lv2dynparam-2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:34:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496606] Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272134.n3RLY1E9002520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496606 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.82-1.fc10 |0.82-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:33:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495372] Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272133.n3RLXfbV002465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495372 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:33:40 EDT --- python-altgraph-0.6.7-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491579] Review Request: jjack - JACK audio driver for the Java Sound API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272137.n3RLbKeB003686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491579 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3-2.fc10 |0.3-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:33:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495418] Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272133.n3RLX4PX002313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495418 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:33:03 EDT --- python-upoints-0.11.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:36:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl - Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272136.n3RLaTET003514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:36:28 EDT --- globus-rsl-5.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:34:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:34:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495418] Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272134.n3RLYBxh002587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495418 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.11.0-2.fc10 |0.11.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:34:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495418] Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272134.n3RLY7xE002556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495418 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:34:06 EDT --- python-upoints-0.11.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:32:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:32:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272132.n3RLWwW4002275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.0.2-4.fc10 |0.0.2-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453854] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272135.n3RLZTQ5003304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.5-1.fc9 |1.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:34:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:34:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494586] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Any - Retrieve terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272134.n3RLYx5C002750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494586 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.001-1.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:34:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:34:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494588] Review Request: perl-Hash-Flatten - Flatten/unflatten complex data hashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272134.n3RLYXog026555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494588 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:34:32 EDT --- perl-Hash-Flatten-1.16-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:37:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:37:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494588] Review Request: perl-Hash-Flatten - Flatten/unflatten complex data hashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272137.n3RLbWsC027867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494588 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:37:31 EDT --- perl-Hash-Flatten-1.16-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:37:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:37:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272137.n3RLbhL6027920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:37:42 EDT --- rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-9.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:35:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:35:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453854] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272135.n3RLZORJ027204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:35:23 EDT --- globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-1.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:39:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:39:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272139.n3RLdEME028292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.7-2.fc9 |2.7-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:37:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:37:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272137.n3RLbmtg027959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.11.6-9.fc10 |0.11.6-9.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:36:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:36:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl - Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272136.n3RLaYll027640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|5.0-2.fc10 |5.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:34:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:34:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494588] Review Request: perl-Hash-Flatten - Flatten/unflatten complex data hashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272134.n3RLYcCM026739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494588 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.16-1.fc9 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:34:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492974] Review Request: calf - Audio plugins pack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272134.n3RLYmZZ026787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492974 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.0.18.3-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:36:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:36:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492969] Review Request: lv2dynparam - LV2 dynamic parameters extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272136.n3RLaK0O027589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492969 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:34:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:34:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496486] Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272134.n3RLYSnr026375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:34:27 EDT --- cclive-0.3.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cclive'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4009 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:38:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:38:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484567] Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272138.n3RLcwD4028224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484567 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:38:56 EDT --- php-ezc-File-1.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update php-ezc-File'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4041 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:39:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:39:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272139.n3RLd9cx004369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:39:08 EDT --- globus-xio-2.7-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:40:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:40:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492520] Review Request: swami - MIDI instrument and sound editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272140.n3RLeAtg004909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492520 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.4-4.fc9 |0.9.4-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:39:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:39:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494586] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Any - Retrieve terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272139.n3RLdXPG004458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494586 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:39:32 EDT --- perl-Term-Size-Any-0.001-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:41:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:41:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272141.n3RLf2U9005226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:41:01 EDT --- libvmime-0.9.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:37:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:37:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494588] Review Request: perl-Hash-Flatten - Flatten/unflatten complex data hashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272137.n3RLba6x004037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494588 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.16-1.fc9 |1.16-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:41:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:41:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272141.n3RLfI73005404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:41:18 EDT --- abby-0.2.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update abby'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4060 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:39:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:39:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484567] Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272139.n3RLdKHq004412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484567 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:39:20 EDT --- php-ezc-File-1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-File'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4047 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:41:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272141.n3RLfEbx005366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:41:13 EDT --- abby-0.2.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update abby'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4059 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:40:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:40:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492520] Review Request: swami - MIDI instrument and sound editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272140.n3RLe5SF029170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492520 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:40:04 EDT --- swami-0.9.4-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:41:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:41:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272141.n3RLf7ld029517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.0-3.fc10 |0.9.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:39:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:39:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494586] Review Request: perl-Term-Size-Any - Retrieve terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272139.n3RLdbrk028750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494586 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.001-1.fc10 |0.001-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 21:39:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:39:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272139.n3RLdRDm028447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 17:39:26 EDT --- rapid-photo-downloader-0.0.8-3.b7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rapid-photo-downloader'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4051 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 22:11:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488397] Review Request: ghc-tar - Reading, writing and manipulating ".tar" archive files in Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272211.n3RMB3Sq002640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488397 --- Comment #2 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-04-27 18:11:02 EDT --- This package won't build on F-10, because F-10 uses an older version of the macros. The current release of the macros uses -devel in order to be ready for future releases of GHC, which will use shared libraries. I doubt F-10 will ever see that. I'm guessing tar may be dependant on rts, which would be a BR. I will look into it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 22:17:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:17:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272217.n3RMHe95012114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 --- Comment #14 from Christian Krause 2009-04-27 18:17:39 EDT --- Hi Andreas, Thanks for the new pacakge - we're very close to approval now. ;-) Unfortunately one minor issue appeared by adding the hal rule: Since the package contains a file in /usr/share/hal/fdi/policy/10osvendor/ and this directory belongs to hal, razertool must require hal: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership Best regards, Christian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 22:26:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:26:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272226.n3RMQeHm014078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 --- Comment #9 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-04-27 18:26:37 EDT --- I would love to. If you don't hear from me in a week, ping me here again. Also, i suppose we'll want to co-maintain packages, so we can stay on top of things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 22:25:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:25:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467363] Review Request: mlt++ - C++ wrapper for the MLT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272225.n3RMP9Fv013718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467363 Bug 467363 depends on bug 459979, which changed state. Bug 459979 Summary: Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 22:25:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:25:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272225.n3RMP8YD013689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(moe at blagblagblag. |fedora-review- |org) | --- Comment #45 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-04-27 18:25:02 EDT --- Fail's legal. It uses ffmpeg, so it's being transferred. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 22:23:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:23:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456383] Review Request: python-plotkit - PlotKit Javascript Chart Plotting packed as TurboGears Widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272223.n3RMN0sn013045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456383 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(pavel.khardikov at g |fedora-review- |mail.com) | --- Comment #4 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-04-27 18:22:59 EDT --- Pavel's gone AWOL/MIA. I haven't heard from him since last summer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 22:30:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:30:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497665] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CipherSaber - Perl module implementing CipherSaber encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272230.n3RMUjcN015066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497665 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 18:30:44 EDT --- perl-Crypt-CipherSaber-1.00-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-CipherSaber-1.00-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 22:38:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456383] Review Request: python-plotkit - PlotKit Javascript Chart Plotting packed as TurboGears Widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272238.n3RMcVCJ007159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456383 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 22:55:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:55:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272255.n3RMtWg2018899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |palango at gmx.de --- Comment #3 from Paul Lange 2009-04-27 18:55:30 EDT --- *** Bug 490030 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 22:55:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:55:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490030] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - MonoDevelop Debugger AddIn In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272255.n3RMtV0C018872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490030 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Paul Lange 2009-04-27 18:55:30 EDT --- Since I currently don't have time to update it I would be verry happy if you would take care to get it reviewed. Thanks for the help! *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 496635 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 22:56:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272256.n3RMuwur010100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #4 from Paul Lange 2009-04-27 18:56:58 EDT --- I don't have time to work on this right now, so I declared my review request at duplicate of this. Move on Mauricio! Thanks for the help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 23:17:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:17:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272317.n3RNHT6C013472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #17 from Sandro Mathys 2009-04-27 19:17:27 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common-7.3-3.20090428cvs.fc11.src.rpm New version based on the latest CVS. The spec file was only changed to: - reflect the 'post release' packaging based on a cvs checkout - use some new paths which were changed upstream - nothing major Looking at skinlf's latest CVS (same server, but project is named skinlf instead of l2fprod-common), upstream did not adapt the licenses there AFAICS. I'll check what upstream has to say about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 23:19:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:19:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456383] Review Request: python-plotkit - PlotKit Javascript Chart Plotting packed as TurboGears Widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904272319.n3RNJtRY022452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456383 --- Comment #5 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-04-27 19:19:54 EDT --- Ah, was i supposed to change the blocker too? There's another bug i closed recently for a similar reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 00:14:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475971] Review Request: gadget - MPP server component for tracking presence In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280014.n3S0E1M9022546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475971 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 00:11:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280011.n3S0BOBR022333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #32 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-27 20:11:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > issues left i can currently see: > > 1. mumble.logrotate needs to be copiedto %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d Done > > 2. you might want to use runuser within the init script to get the daemon > started as $DAEMONUSER Fixed - its not working right now but will be fixed till tomorrow.(problem with permissions I think) > > 3. i still see /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libmumble.so.1 is not a symbolic link > (1.1.8-5) Fixed > > 4. the protocol file is kde4 stuff and needs to go to > %{_datadir}/kde4/services/%{name}.protocol Fixed > > 5. murmur.conf (from scripts directory) needs to go to > %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/murmur.conf Done > > 6. id recommend adding no-embed-qt-translations because it gets rid of embedded > qt translation probs. Done > > 7. id recommend adding no-update because we want to have users update the rpm > way anyways. Done > > 8. adding DEFINES+=PLUGIN_PATH=%{_libdir}/%{name} cant really hurt Done > > 9. DEFINES+=DEFAULT_SOUNDSYSTEM=PulseAudio also makes sense to me. Done (In reply to comment #29) > Mumble doesn't depend on or use sqlite; it depends on Qt's sqlite database > driver, which includes (or depends on) sqlite3. Same goes for DBus. Done > > Speaking of DBus, please include the murmur.conf file for registering murmur on > the system dbus. Done > > Are there no builds of the g15daemon for Fedora? :( In F9 nope. > > Why do you have both a murmur.ini and a mumble-server.ini? You only need one, > which should be whatever you use in the init file. mumble-server.ini is symlink to murmur.ini > > murmur.ini should be based on murmur.ini.system, not murmur.ini (which is > intended for use when you run this from your home directory). Unless you happen > to use the same paths as Debian, you'll need to regexp a few paths. Fixed > > When building on x86_64, you also need to build i386 libmumble.so, and stuff > that in the appropriate directory. Otherwise you won't be able to use the > overlay for 32-bit processes (which include most binary-only games). The issue with murmur.init will be fixed tomorrow - its pretty late here :) SPEC: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.spec SRPM: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble-1.1.8-6.fc9.src.rpm INIT: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/murmur.init DESKTOP MUMBLE: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.desktop DESKTOP OVERLAY: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble-overlay.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 00:14:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467363] Review Request: mlt++ - C++ wrapper for the MLT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280014.n3S0EnMq022795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467363 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|459979(mlt) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 00:14:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:14:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280014.n3S0Eldo022748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|467363 |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 00:16:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:16:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467363] Review Request: mlt++ - C++ wrapper for the MLT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280016.n3S0Gdrd023338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467363 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |loupgaroublond at gmail.com Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag| |fedora-review- --- Comment #3 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-04-27 20:16:38 EDT --- ok, can do -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:19:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:19:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492950] Review Request: lv2-vocoder-plugins - Add a robotic effect to vocals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280119.n3S1JIwk000563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492950 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 21:19:17 EDT --- lv2-vocoder-plugins-1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lv2-vocoder-plugins'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4066 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:21:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280121.n3S1LJPw009819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 21:21:18 EDT --- gpscorrelate-1.6.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:21:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:21:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280121.n3S1LDYx009784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.6.0-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:19:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:19:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280119.n3S1JgvG009082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 21:19:42 EDT --- php-ezc-Database-1.4.4-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update php-ezc-Database'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4073 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:19:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280119.n3S1JNc3009024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 21:19:22 EDT --- php-ezc-Database-1.4.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-Database'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4067 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:19:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:19:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492945] Review Request: lv2-swh-plugins - LV2 ports of LADSPA swh plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280119.n3S1JqaE009125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492945 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 21:19:51 EDT --- lv2-swh-plugins-1.0.15-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lv2-swh-plugins'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4075 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:21:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:21:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280121.n3S1L2HP009739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 21:21:00 EDT --- perl-Text-CSV-1.10-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Text-CSV'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4080 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:21:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492971] Review Request: lv2-zynadd-plugins - LV2 port of the ZynAddSubFX engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280121.n3S1LUF4009872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492971 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Bug 492971 depends on bug 492969, which changed state. Bug 492969 Summary: Review Request: lv2dynparam - LV2 dynamic parameters extension https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492969 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 21:21:29 EDT --- lv2-zynadd-plugins-1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lv2-zynadd-plugins'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4081 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:21:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:21:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280121.n3S1L87p001355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 21:21:05 EDT --- gpscorrelate-1.6.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:21:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:21:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280121.n3S1LOla001424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.6.0-2.fc10 |1.6.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:21:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:21:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280121.n3S1LZx3001465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 21:21:34 EDT --- bareftp-0.2.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:20:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:20:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280120.n3S1K1lL000893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 21:20:01 EDT --- php-ezc-EventLog-1.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update php-ezc-EventLog'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4077 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:19:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:19:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280119.n3S1JlNB000732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 21:19:46 EDT --- php-ezc-EventLog-1.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-EventLog'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4074 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:22:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280122.n3S1Mght010181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 21:22:41 EDT --- perl-Data-Report-0.10-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Data-Report'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4085 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:31:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280131.n3S1VEOO011720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:30:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280130.n3S1URDb011586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(loupgaroublond at gm | |ail.com) | --- Comment #43 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-04-27 21:30:23 EDT --- New update SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/xmonad.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/xmonad-0.8.1-11.fc10.src.rpm This does a few new things. 1) carries around a ppc workaround that really should go in macros.ghc 2) only builds on fedora 12 (yay?) so you need koji to make this work for you http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1325396 3) converts the value added default config into a patch directly against the upstream source. what this patch does is replaces the xmonad line of the default verbose config with an expansion that loads xterm with the man page showing. in the future, i'll probably add a comment to the user 4) includes just xmonad-start without doing xmonad-session. 5) renumbers the source to make more sense 6) includes other changes proposed here enjoy! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:40:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497690] Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280140.n3S1e6jS004787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497690 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:40:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497690] Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280140.n3S1e4YY004756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497690 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-27 21:40:03 EDT --- Looks good to me. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1321091 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPLv2+); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): 37fc0632800c1f0965e564f2ed1084e3550d3055 HTML-GenToc-3.10.tar.gz 37fc0632800c1f0965e564f2ed1084e3550d3055 HTML-GenToc-3.10.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-HTML-GenToc-3.10-1.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-HTML-GenToc-3.10-1.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-HTML-GenToc-3.10-1.fc10.src.rpm perl(Getopt::ArgvFile) >= 1.09 perl(HTML::Entities) perl(HTML::LinkList) >= 0.1501 perl(HTML::SimpleParse) >= 0.1 perl(Module::Build) perl(Test::Distribution) perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) =====> perl-HTML-GenToc-3.10-1.fc10.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-HTML-GenToc-3.10-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(HTML::GenToc) = 3.10 perl-HTML-GenToc = 3.10-1.fc10 ====> requires for perl-HTML-GenToc-3.10-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Getopt::ArgvFile) perl(Getopt::Long) >= 2.34 perl(HTML::Entities) perl(HTML::GenToc) perl(HTML::LinkList) perl(HTML::SimpleParse) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Pod::Usage) perl(strict) perl(vars) /usr/bin/env APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:55:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:55:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226654] Merge Review: xorg-x11-xkb-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280155.n3S1ttmI016075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226654 Peter Hutterer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:59:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497800] Review Request: perl-Acme-PlayCode - Perl module for enhancement of code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280159.n3S1x31P008371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497800 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 01:59:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497800] Review Request: perl-Acme-PlayCode - Perl module for enhancement of code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280159.n3S1x5FF016542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497800 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 02:01:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497800] Review Request: perl-Acme-PlayCode - Perl module for enhancement of code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280201.n3S21pL9017216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497800 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-27 22:01:49 EDT --- Updating line-endings (such as via dos2unix) is generally done in %prep... perl(Test::Pod) also needs to be included as a BR. Do the two updates above and I'll approve :) koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1322216 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): 0034e6c7961d2f9ed8b5e6ad60ac7333941d73d9 Acme-PlayCode-0.11.tar.gz 0034e6c7961d2f9ed8b5e6ad60ac7333941d73d9 Acme-PlayCode-0.11.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Acme-PlayCode-0.11-1.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Acme-PlayCode-0.11-1.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Acme-PlayCode-0.11-1.fc10.src.rpm dos2unix perl(List::MoreUtils) perl(Module::Build) perl(Moose) >= 0.57 perl(MooseX::Object::Pluggable) >= 0.0008 perl(Path::Class) >= 0.16 perl(PPI) >= 1.201 perl(Test::More) =====> perl-Acme-PlayCode-0.11-1.fc10.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Acme-PlayCode-0.11-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Acme::PlayCode) = 0.11 perl-Acme-PlayCode = 0.11-1.fc10 perl(Acme::PlayCode::Plugin::Averything) = 0.10 perl(Acme::PlayCode::Plugin::DoubleToSingle) = 0.10 perl(Acme::PlayCode::Plugin::ExchangeCondition) = 0.10 perl(Acme::PlayCode::Plugin::NumberPlus) = 0.11 perl(Acme::PlayCode::Plugin::PrintComma) = 0.10 ====> requires for perl-Acme-PlayCode-0.11-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Data::Dumper) perl(List::MoreUtils) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Moose) perl(Moose::Role) perl(Path::Class) perl(PPI) perl(PPI::Token::Comment) perl(vars) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 02:49:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280249.n3S2n60j019304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 22:49:05 EDT --- globus-usage-1.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-usage-1.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 02:49:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:49:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280249.n3S2n1IT019263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 Bug 478929 depends on bug 478917, which changed state. Bug 478917 Summary: Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 22:49:00 EDT --- globus-usage-1.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-usage-1.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 02:49:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478928] Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280249.n3S2nvaT027771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478928 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 22:49:57 EDT --- globus-rsl-assist-2.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-rsl-assist-2.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 02:49:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:49:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478928] Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280249.n3S2nrED027729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478928 Bug 478928 depends on bug 478927, which changed state. Bug 478927 Summary: Review Request: globus-rsl - Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 22:49:52 EDT --- globus-rsl-assist-2.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-rsl-assist-2.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 02:50:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:50:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478920] Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Pipe Open Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280250.n3S2oass019914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 22:50:35 EDT --- globus-xio-popen-driver-0.2-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-popen-driver-0.2-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 02:50:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478920] Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Pipe Open Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280250.n3S2oVmT019869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 Bug 478920 depends on bug 478917, which changed state. Bug 478917 Summary: Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-27 22:50:30 EDT --- globus-xio-popen-driver-0.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-popen-driver-0.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 02:54:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] New: Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 Summary: Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: anthonybryan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1405673 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/libmetalink/libmetalink-0.0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: libmetalink is a Metalink C library. It adds Metalink functionality such as parsing Metalink XML files to programs written in C. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 03:00:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] New: Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 Summary: Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: anthonybryan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1405677 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/mulk/mulk-0.4.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Multi-connection command line tool for downloading Internet sites with image filtering and Metalink support. Similar to wget and cURL, but it manages up to 50 simultaneous and parallel links. Main features are: HTML code parsing, recursive fetching, Metalink retrieving, segmented download and image filtering by width and height. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 03:09:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:09:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497720] Review Request: hunspell-ln - Lingala hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280309.n3S39Ikk031273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497720 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 03:12:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:12:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280312.n3S3Cw2H032012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 Bug 453855 depends on bug 453854, which changed state. Bug 453854 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453855 depends on bug 453853, which changed state. Bug 453853 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-27 23:12:56 EDT --- This is a different, but related, issue. This happens quite frequently for packages using pkg-config as well - so it is not a GPT specific issue. This issue is documented here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CommonRpmlintIssues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency The above reference also suggests a solution for the problem. The solution involves a sed replacement in the libtool file. In the Globus case this is easily implemented, since there is a common libtool file in globus-core used by all packages. So the fix only needs to be applied in globus-core, and then all other packages will be OK once they are rebuilt. I have applied the fix for globus-core and rebuilt the already approved packages. If you rebuild this package using the new globus-core this package will be OK too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 03:36:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:36:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497720] Review Request: hunspell-ln - Lingala hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280336.n3S3aBbh027500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497720 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 03:35:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:35:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497720] Review Request: hunspell-ln - Lingala hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280335.n3S3ZYvC027355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497720 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-27 23:35:33 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1325605 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 5ad7bc5fba5f6815aadcead1368929d8 hunspell-ln-0.02.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 03:44:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280344.n3S3iM42004827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-27 23:44:21 EDT --- Yes, that fixed it. Thanks. I'm glad that was an easy fix. --------------------------------------------------------------- This package (globus-openssl-module) is really APPROVED by oget --------------------------------------------------------------- Do you need to rebuild everything against the new globus-core now? :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 03:43:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280343.n3S3hksw004702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: globus-io - |Review Request: globus-io - |Globus Toolkit - uniform |Globus Toolkit - uniform |I/O interface to stream and |I/O interface |datagram st | Bug 478921 depends on bug 478917, which changed state. Bug 478917 Summary: Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 04:19:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:19:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280419.n3S4JSNN010786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 --- Comment #15 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-28 00:19:27 EDT --- Oh, that's true. I totally forgot about that requirement :) Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/razertool-0.0.7/razertool.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/razertool-0.0.7/razertool-0.0.7-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 04:19:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497807] Review Request: perl-Capture-Tiny - Capture stdin or stdout from Perl, XS or external programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280419.n3S4JaZc010848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497807 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-28 00:19:35 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1322307 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url e242915f57878465ef0b947eaf2e0b5c Capture-Tiny-0.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=8, Tests=316, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.12 usr 0.01 sys + 1.65 cusr 0.47 csys = 2.25 CPU) + Package perl-Capture-Tiny-0.05-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Capture::Tiny) = 0.05 Requires: perl >= 0:5.006 perl(Exporter) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Temp) perl(IO::Handle) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestions: 1) Again you included BuildRequires: perl >= 0:5.006 Remove that. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 04:19:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:19:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497869] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-XMLRPC-Client - Provide the needed bits to be a XML-RPC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280419.n3S4JU1T010819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497869 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-28 00:19:29 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1323070 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a36fcf49cb66435a59978e52050aead4 MooseX-Role-XMLRPC-Client-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=30, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 1.22 cusr 0.10 csys = 1.36 CPU) + Package perl-MooseX-Role-XMLRPC-Client-0.03-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(MooseX::Role::XMLRPC::Client) = 0.03 Requires: perl(HTTP::Cookies) perl(MooseX::Role::Parameterized) perl(MooseX::Types::Moose) perl(MooseX::Types::Path::Class) perl(MooseX::Types::URI) perl(RPC::XML::Client) perl(namespace::clean) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 04:41:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:41:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497869] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-XMLRPC-Client - Provide the needed bits to be a XML-RPC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280441.n3S4fUMO006297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497869 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-28 00:41:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Role-XMLRPC-Client Short Description: Provide the needed bits to be a XML-RPC client Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 04:41:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497869] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-XMLRPC-Client - Provide the needed bits to be a XML-RPC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280441.n3S4fWF0006327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497869 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 04:53:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497786] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC - Perl implementation of JSON-RPC 1.1 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280453.n3S4rOPk016306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497786 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-28 00:53:23 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1325668 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 3912464c3cf59b60131fd2b15400192a JSON-RPC-0.96.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=13, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.28 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.34 CPU) + Package perl-JSON-RPC-0.96-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(JSON::RPC) = 0.96 perl(JSON::RPC::Client) = 0.93 perl(JSON::RPC::Procedure) = 0.90 perl(JSON::RPC::ReturnObject) perl(JSON::RPC::Server) = 0.92 perl(JSON::RPC::Server::Apache2) perl(JSON::RPC::Server::CGI) = 0.92 perl(JSON::RPC::Server::Daemon) = 0.03 perl(JSON::RPC::Server::system) perl(JSON::RPC::ServiceObject) perl(JSONRPC) = 1.01 Requires: perl(APR::Table) perl(Apache2::Const) perl(Apache2::RequestIO) perl(Apache2::RequestRec) perl(Apache2::RequestUtil) perl(CGI) perl(Carp) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(HTTP::Request) perl(HTTP::Response) perl(JSON) perl(JSON::RPC::Server) perl(LWP::UserAgent) perl(attributes) perl(base) perl(lib) perl(strict) Suggestions: 1) For perl packages yum resolves automatic dependencies so you don't need Requires: perl(CGI) >= 2.92 Requires: perl(HTTP::Request) Requires: perl(HTTP::Response) Requires: perl(JSON) >= 2 Requires: perl(LWP::UserAgent) >= 2.001 Requires: perl(Test::More) remove them from SPEC. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 05:04:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280504.n3S54i4r018165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 05:08:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280508.n3S58spV010889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 05:04:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280504.n3S54j2I010051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 05:05:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497660] Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280505.n3S55Cqw010408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-28 01:05:11 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1325834 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. perl-MIME-Charset.noarch: E: useless-provides perl(MIME::Charset) =>This package provides 2 times the same capacity. It should only provide it once. remove this. + source files match upstream url 22a140a7f323518301d9998bf50e2e17 MIME-Charset-1.006.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=77, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.08 usr 0.01 sys + 0.43 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.56 CPU) + Package perl-MIME-Charset-1.006.2-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(MIME::Charset) perl(MIME::Charset) = 1.006.2 perl(MIME::Charset::_Compat) = 1.003 Requires: perl >= 0:5.004 perl >= 0:5.005 perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) Suggestions: 1) remove perl(MIME::Charset) provides in SPEC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 05:08:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280508.n3S58pUI019060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-28 01:08:50 EDT --- %summary and %description are kinda weak, but that's more upstream's issue here. Aside from that, looks good :) koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1318286 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): 79deb0cf66c7b56c6352cfb24f34f0a7f249a2cb Config-INI-0.014.tar.gz 79deb0cf66c7b56c6352cfb24f34f0a7f249a2cb Config-INI-0.014.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Config-INI-0.014-1.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Config-INI-0.014-1.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Config-INI-0.014-1.fc10.src.rpm perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Mixin::Linewise::Readers) >= 0.001 perl(Mixin::Linewise::Writers) >= 0.001 perl(Test::More) =====> perl-Config-INI-0.014-1.fc10.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Config-INI-0.014-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Config::INI) = 0.014 perl-Config-INI = 0.014-1.fc10 perl(Config::INI::Reader) = 0.014 perl(Config::INI::Writer) = 0.014 ====> requires for perl-Config-INI-0.014-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Carp) perl(IO::File) perl(IO::String) perl(Mixin::Linewise::Readers) perl(Mixin::Linewise::Writers) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(strict) perl(warnings) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 05:14:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:14:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497662] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts - Strip scripting constructs out of HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280514.n3S5EPvm011949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497662 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-28 01:14:24 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1325851 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url aecd01e273bddbf60dca2a923163826d HTML-StripScripts-1.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=12, Tests=1894, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.07 sys + 1.48 cusr 0.10 csys = 1.69 CPU) + Package perl-HTML-StripScripts-1.04-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(HTML::StripScripts) = 1.04 Requires: perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) Suggestions: 1) you don't need Requires: perl(Test::More) remove it from SPEC APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 05:34:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:34:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280534.n3S5Ynhv023823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-28 01:34:48 EDT --- - What's this for? %if %{fedora} < 11 %exclude %{_bindir}/psize.pyc %exclude %{_bindir}/psize.pyo %endif - Instead of pushd bin make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p' CPPROG="cp -p" popd and so onyou can just use make -C bin install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p' CPPROG="cp -p" make -C src/aaa_lib install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p' CPPROG="cp -p" - Why do you generate autoconf files, aren't they distributed in the tarball..? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 05:59:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280559.n3S5xWhl028341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 05:59:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:59:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280559.n3S5xTtY028313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 --- Comment #7 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-28 01:59:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Config-INI Short Description: Config::INI Perl module Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 06:00:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:00:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280600.n3S6060d028709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 --- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-28 02:00:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Application crashed with this file: > http://www.arcor.de/pdf/arcor/privat/produkte/arcor_dsl/arcor_starterbox_bedienungsanleitung3.pdf > > $ pdfposter -p a2 Downloads/arcor_starterbox_bedienungsanleitung3.pdf > testposter.pdf > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/pdfposter", line 8, in > load_entry_point('pdftools.pdfposter==0.4.6', 'console_scripts', > .... Upstream fixed the bug. According to upstream the specific file is encrypted (but with an empty password, so the user normally does not recognize this). Update to 0.5.0 will follow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 05:59:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:59:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497690] Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280559.n3S5xg1e020183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497690 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 05:59:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:59:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497690] Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280559.n3S5xeOm020156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497690 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-28 01:59:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-GenToc Short Description: Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 07:02:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497807] Review Request: perl-Capture-Tiny - Capture stdin or stdout from Perl, XS or external programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280702.n3S72Epf032382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497807 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-28 03:02:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Capture-Tiny Short Description: Capture stdin or stdout from Perl, XS or external programs Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 07:06:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280706.n3S76KIn008766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-28 03:06:19 EDT --- Thanks - that's a very comprehensive review. There are a couple of gotchas with perl packages that aren't directly covered by the review guidelines, though - just implied by the perl packaging guidelines. Since most perl packages come with a comprehensive test suite, it is policy to run as much of the suite as possible. Reviewers will usually check this and point out any skipped/failed tests due to missing build dependencies. In this case, you can see from the mock build.log that all tests ran and passed: t/001Basic.t ... ok t/002Params.t .. ok All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=8, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.28 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.34 CPU) Result: PASS And unfortunately, RPM's dependency generator sometimes misses (or adds unnecessary) requires or provides. Again, reviewers will usually mention that they have checked them. In this case, they look reasonable to me (but the point of the review is that they look reasonable to someone else, too): rpm -qp --provides perl-App-Daemon-0.06-1.fc11.noarch.rpm perl(App::Daemon) = 0.06 perl-App-Daemon = 0.06-1.fc11 rpm -qp --requires perl-App-Daemon-0.06-1.fc11.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Exporter) perl(Fcntl) perl(File::Basename) perl(Getopt::Std) perl(Log::Log4perl) perl(POSIX) perl(Pod::Usage) perl(Proc::ProcessTable) perl(strict) perl(warnings) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 07:18:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:18:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280718.n3S7Igvp010879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-28 03:18:41 EDT --- Thank you for the review. I'm happy it was easy too. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-openssl-module Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 07:24:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:24:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497800] Review Request: perl-Acme-PlayCode - Perl module for enhancement of code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280724.n3S7Oslo011940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497800 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-28 03:24:53 EDT --- Updated srpm http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Acme-PlayCode-0.11-2.fc11.src.rpm I think dos2unix in prep is not needed but I moved it for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 07:22:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:22:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461429] Review Request: zsync - Incremental file-transfer program without special server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280722.n3S7Mna9011719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461429 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 07:23:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:23:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461385] Review Request: hydra - A very fast network logon cracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280723.n3S7N8fm011779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461385 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 07:25:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497720] Review Request: hunspell-ln - Lingala hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280725.n3S7PwZY012495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497720 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-04-28 03:25:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-ln Short Description: Lingala hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 07:32:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:32:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280732.n3S7Wr2s005288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 --- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-28 03:32:52 EDT --- Finally! The updated fakechroot is in F-10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 07:38:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280738.n3S7c3BM014512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-28 03:38:02 EDT --- febootstrap-1.7-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/febootstrap-1.7-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 07:44:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280744.n3S7igD4007419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 07:44:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280744.n3S7ihlF007443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 Bug 495564 depends on bug 495563, which changed state. Bug 495563 Summary: Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 07:47:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497870] Review Request: gtodo - Organizing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280747.n3S7lDbU008084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497870 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-28 03:47:12 EDT --- Just some comments on your spec file: - Spec file says GPL, COPYING says GPLv2 - URL is invalid - Release tag is wrong and disttag is missing - Source is not accessible http://download.qballcow.nl/programs/gtodo/gtodo-0.14.tar.gz From where did you get the source to build this? - Other points do not match the guidelines too (.desktop files, make install, changelog entry, BuildRequires, %defattr...) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines Just copy a three years old spec file will in most cases not work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 08:30:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 04:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280830.n3S8U6vF017261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-28 04:30:05 EDT --- 0.5.1 was released 4 March 2008 - Animation in GIF format can be created now. - Add option to save each frame in separate JPEG file. - Add picture export into GIF format. - Add error message of unbalanced '. - Add "Delete All" buttons for clearing all data. - Help window is always raised now. - Data page is shown by default now. - Bug with wrong opening of "Animation setup" dialog if file contain animation info is corrected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 08:35:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 04:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492979] Review Request: python-cliutils - A collection of utilities easing the creation of command line scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280835.n3S8ZCK0018152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492979 --- Comment #5 from Jason Friedland 2009-04-28 04:35:11 EDT --- Yes, I still need a sponsor. I have only reviewed the following package so far: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492612 And have also submitted this package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492744 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 08:36:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 04:36:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280836.n3S8anSw018582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-28 04:36:48 EDT --- 1.8.1 was released at 4 March 2009 - Add GIF animation features via functions StartGIF/NewFrame/EndFrame/CloseGIF. - Add new plot Tens() for tension plot (curve with variable color). - Add ColumnPlot function for making column of plots. - Add AdjustTicks function for automatic ticks adjusting for current axis ranges. - Add image export to GIF files. - Add NumPy import for Python interface. - Improve documentation (add descriptions of new functions; add sections about animation and about utilities). - Add new functions SetRanges(), SetAutoRanges() for setting axis ranges (Python style) and for setting ranges of automatic variables. - Add TickLen parameter for setting length of ticks/subticks - Colorbar now can have arbitrary size and position - Add mgl_set_[xyzc]ttw() functions into C/Fortran interface. - Add error message if string is not closed in MGL script. - Add data export functions from std::vector - Add new tool mgl2gif for exporting to GIF files (including animated GIF) - Add option -Lval for setting locale to val. Option is added to mgl2png, mgl2eps, mgl2cpp, mglview. For example, use "mglview fname -Lru_RU.utf8" for file in UTF-8 encoding. - Extend TriPlot() by adding manual coloring array (like SurfC()). - Extend Dots() by adding transparency for dots. - Improve STFA() by adding smoothed mask at the edges. - Improve tick labels drawing if RotatedText = false. - Add mglGraphAB::LastMousePos - Add argument to show window maximazed - Bug correction in configure script with unsual GSL setup. - Bug correction in configure script with extra Qt options. - Bug correction in subticks if ticks origin is specified. - Bug correction with MGL command 'call'. - Bug with subticks (having the same size as normal ticks). - Improve labels for curved coordinates. I think it would be worth to think about an update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 08:42:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 04:42:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497980] New: Review Request: perl-String-Diff - Simple diff to String Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-String-Diff - Simple diff to String Alias: perl-String-Diff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497980 Summary: Review Request: perl-String-Diff - Simple diff to String Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/String-Diff/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-String-Diff.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-String-Diff-0.04-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: String::Diff is the difference of a consecutive string is made. after general diff is done, the difference in the line is searchable. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1326023 *rt-0.07 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 08:53:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 04:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480434] Review Request: xcall - Packet Radio Terminal Program for ham radio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280853.n3S8rMon030254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480434 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-28 04:53:20 EDT --- The URL in the spec file seams to be broken ( http://www.qsl.net/pg4i/linux/xcall.html ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 09:01:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:01:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280901.n3S91m92032189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-28 05:01:47 EDT --- febootstrap-1.7-1.fc10.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/febootstrap-1.7-1.fc10.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 09:12:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492979] Review Request: python-cliutils - A collection of utilities easing the creation of command line scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280912.n3S9CppT026493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492979 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-28 05:12:49 EDT --- Okay, I can sponsor you, but first I need to see that you know the packaging guidelines. You have done only python packages so far, so I'd like to see reviews of some packages of other types as well. You can also package something yourself; if you don't have anything on your todo list you can look up something from the Fedora Wishlist, just remember to check first if a) the package is already in Fedora or b) there is already a review request of the package in bugzilla http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 09:18:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497980] Review Request: perl-String-Diff - Simple diff to String In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280918.n3S9IAqF027459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497980 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-28 05:18:09 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1326023 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 440bd85674f8602f18a2ab7978f1fa53 String-Diff-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=12, Tests=132, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.07 usr 0.01 sys + 1.93 cusr 0.10 csys = 2.11 CPU) + Package perl-String-Diff-0.04-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(String::Diff) = 0.04 Requires: perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestions: 1) remove Requires: perl(Algorithm::Diff) from SPEC. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 09:44:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497980] Review Request: perl-String-Diff - Simple diff to String In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280944.n3S9i41N008596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497980 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 09:43:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:43:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497980] Review Request: perl-String-Diff - Simple diff to String In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280943.n3S9hm2i008551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497980 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-28 05:43:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-String-Diff Short Description: Simple diff to String Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 09:56:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:56:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280956.n3S9uUAr011595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 09:56:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497690] Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280956.n3S9uwMb003682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497690 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 09:57:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497980] Review Request: perl-String-Diff - Simple diff to String In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280957.n3S9vxb9011808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497980 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-28 05:57:58 EDT --- perl(Algorithm::Diff) is required but not automatically detected. Will add comment to spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 10:12:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 06:12:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497870] Review Request: gtodo - Organizing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281012.n3SACxdc008309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497870 e.bulle at gmx.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 10:11:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 06:11:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497991] New: Review Request: hunspell-as - Assamese hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-as - Assamese hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497991 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-as - Assamese hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-as.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-as-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Assamese hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 10:13:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 06:13:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497870] Review Request: gtodo - Organizing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281013.n3SADHs0016060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497870 e.bulle at gmx.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |INSUFFICIENT_DATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 10:23:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 06:23:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281023.n3SAN8jl010257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 Antti Andreimann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |xml-security-c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 10:43:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 06:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497991] Review Request: hunspell-as - Assamese hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281043.n3SAh48I022430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497991 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-28 06:43:02 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1326189 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 4eb80c65de5c40cf0c622ff34bc28463 as_IN.oxt + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. Suggestions: 1) Nothing related to Fedora or its packaging but you can ask upstream to package all files only once in zip file. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 11:01:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497991] Review Request: hunspell-as - Assamese hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281101.n3SB1YnY026301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497991 --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-04-28 07:01:33 EDT --- Yeah, that was my own little cock-up when trying to help out. Do either of you guys want to be the Fedora maintainer of this package, either aphukan as the also upstream maintainer, or paragn as the maintainer of the other Indic dictionaries. I can do it if not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 11:31:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281131.n3SBVDJK032099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 --- Comment #6 from D Haley 2009-04-28 07:31:12 EDT --- Thanks for the reminder. I will attend to this this coming weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 11:31:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:31:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281131.n3SBVxck023877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #7 from D Haley 2009-04-28 07:31:57 EDT --- As per UDAV, thanks for the reminder. I will also attend to this package this coming weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 11:33:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:33:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281133.n3SBXXvw024144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #8 from Mat Booth 2009-04-28 07:33:32 EDT --- Holy crap, comments! Andrew, I especially like how you compose all of your thoughts into a single coherent comment. ;-) I agree we should build the latest LPG (and adding the native bits will be trivial), but porting DTP/CDT isn't something I'd be confident doing or have the time to commit to. However, the jar and Java package names changed between LPG 1 and LPG 2 so it would be possible to package both jars without conflict until such time as the LPG 1 jar can be obsoleted. So I propose the following packages: lpg: the main package containing the tool to generate grammar parsers (this is the native C++ bit) lpg-java: subpackage containing the java runtime library for java parsers generated by the tool in the main package (lpgruntime.jar) lpg-java-compat: subpackage containing the old java runtime library (lpgjavaruntime.jar) lpg-manual: programmer/user guides for both lpg and lpg-java lpg and lpg-java could be combined, of course, but DTP's dependency is only on the Java portion -- just depends on how much you care about that sort of thing. I can knock up such a package this evening if you approve. I will also fix my licence injection (a copy of the licence is packaged with the newest version) and fix my use of cp to install files (thanks Igor). Igor: The *-manual subpackage is just convention for java packages. API documentation goes in *-javadoc and other literature goes in *-manual. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 12:02:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:02:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281202.n3SC2Pkl030072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #9 from Mat Booth 2009-04-28 08:02:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Why are you naming package lpg then later using name lpgdistribution? When extracting source archives, %setup assumes by default that the top-level directory will be called %{name}-%{version}, which wasn't true in this case. This is why it was necessary to use the -n option to tell setup the name of the top-level directory inside the archive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 12:08:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:08:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497991] Review Request: hunspell-as - Assamese hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281208.n3SC8STg031297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497991 aphukan.fedora at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aphukan.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from aphukan.fedora at gmail.com 2009-04-28 08:08:27 EDT --- Hello, I would like to volunteer as the maintainer of this Fedora package. Thanks a lot Caolan and Parag for your help. Amit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 12:39:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497991] Review Request: hunspell-as - Assamese hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281239.n3SCdONi005164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497991 --- Comment #5 from Caolan McNamara 2009-04-28 08:39:23 EDT --- http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-as-1.0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm and http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-as.spec updated to the 1.0.3 release that takes care of the duplicate dir I don't think that aphukan has an packaging account at the moment, at least I don't see one in the packager list, so lets just set pnemade as owner, and you guys can sort it out between you at your leisure :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 12:39:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497991] Review Request: hunspell-as - Assamese hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281239.n3SCdlli005231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497991 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Caolan McNamara 2009-04-28 08:39:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-as Short Description: Assamese hunspell dictionary Owners: pnemade Branches: F-11, devel InitialCC: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 12:50:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281250.n3SCoOS9007820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 --- Comment #2 from Antti Andreimann 2009-04-28 08:50:23 EDT --- Thank You for feedback. I have revised the package according to the problems You pointed out. Here is the changelog: * Tue Apr 28 2009 Antti Andreimann - 1.4.0-2 - Execute sed magic against configure instead of configure.ac to avoid calling autotools - Removed build dependency on autotools. - Do not ship test binaries (not needed for end-users) - Added proper dependencies for devel sub-package - Added CPPROG="cp -p" to preserve header file timestamps. The most significant change is probably the removal of all test binaries. I have looked at the packages for other linux distribution (eg Debian at http://packages.debian.org/lenny/libxml-security-c14) and they do not ship those binaries as well so neither should we. Spec URL: http://anttix.org/fedora/pkg/xml-security-c.spec SRPM URL: http://anttix.org/fedora/pkg/xml-security-c-1.4.0-2.src.rpm SPEC diff URL: http://anttix.org/fedora/pkg/xml-security-c.spec.changes Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1326315 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 12:58:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281258.n3SCwTrv009411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Overholt 2009-04-28 08:58:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Andrew, I especially like how you compose all of your thoughts into a single > coherent comment. ;-) :P > I agree we should build the latest LPG (and adding the native bits will be > trivial), but porting DTP/CDT isn't something I'd be confident doing or have > the time to commit to. I can take a look at porting DTP. CDT is less of a big deal since we're not using this functionality now. I think it's their c99 parser that uses LPG. > So I propose the following packages: > > lpg: the main package containing the tool to generate grammar parsers (this > is the native C++ bit) > > lpg-java: subpackage containing the java runtime library for java parsers > generated by the tool in the main package (lpgruntime.jar) > > lpg-java-compat: subpackage containing the old java runtime library > (lpgjavaruntime.jar) > > lpg-manual: programmer/user guides for both lpg and lpg-java This sounds good to me. It doesn't look like this is done yet, but soon you'll be able to have lpg-java be a noarch sub-package and the C++ bits be arch-specific: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NoarchSubpackages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 13:09:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281309.n3SD98od011940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #52 from leigh scott 2009-04-28 09:09:05 EDT --- Hi Rex, I have built a F-12 package from svn as the 1.4.0beta2 source isn't that complete. http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/qbittorrent/trunk/changes I reported the faults and got them fixed upstream, I was wondering what would be the correct way to version the F-12 package ? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=99635 Thanks Leigh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 13:09:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492744] Review Request: python-grizzled - The Grizzled Utility Library is a general-purpose Python library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281309.n3SD9qjJ020434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492744 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-28 09:09:51 EDT --- Same things here: - don't use macros where they aren't needed (python, cp, mv, rm and so on) - BR should be python-devel, not python [BR: python, python-devel is also redundant since python-devel requires python] - Don't use filelists in install phase, but list the files and directories explicitly in the %files section (you can use wildcards, though), also %defattr should be (-,root,root,-) - Remove empty %post and %postun sections -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 13:15:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281315.n3SDFkR5013706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 David Carter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dcarter at davidcarter.ca -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 13:15:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281315.n3SDFHGT013632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 David Carter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 13:23:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:23:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281323.n3SDN9MI015132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-28 09:23:08 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-6.fc11.src.rpm 2009-04-28 * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint output Only expected Errors/Warnings from a mingw package * Package is named according to Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * Spec file is named as the package * Package follows the Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * License is MIT, which is Fedora approved * The license is the same as the corresponding native package ! How was it determined that the native's package license should be MIT? * There is no License file in the source tarfile (though some license statements are in the README file which is packaged). * The spec file is written in legible English * Source matches upstream f5015c83030236205aec1494b13ee334 libsqlite3x-2007.10.18.tar.gz f5015c83030236205aec1494b13ee334 SRPM/libsqlite3x-2007.10.18.tar.gz * According to guidelines the version should match the version of the corresponding Fedora package - which it does. * Package builds in mock (Fedora 10) ! The package contains documentation already present in the native Fedora package * BuildRequires look sane ! But is there a reason for having the "BuildArch: noarch" listed in the middle of the list of Thr BuildRequies? * Owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files * %files has %defattr * %clean clears %buildroot * Specfile uses macros consistently * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears %buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 13:23:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:23:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496718] Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281323.n3SDNL2c015179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496718 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-28 09:23:20 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm 2009-04-28 * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint output Only expected Errors/Warnings from a mingw package * Package is named according to Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * Spec file is named as the package * Package follows the Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * The package's license is LGPLv2, which is Fedora approved * The license is the same as the corresponding native package * The license file (COPYING) in the sources is packaged as %doc * The spec file is written in legible English * Source matches upstream d8a49db390be5de5965e52ef8d8581f3 plotmm-0.1.2.tar.gz d8a49db390be5de5965e52ef8d8581f3 SRPM/plotmm-0.1.2.tar.gz * According to guidelines the version should match the version of the corresponding Fedora package - which it does. * Package builds in mock (Fedora 10) * BuildRequires look sane * Owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files * %files has %defattr * %clean clears %buildroot * Specfile uses macros consistently * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears %buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF8 Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 14:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:01:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281401.n3SE1iqt032465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 David Carter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from David Carter 2009-04-28 10:01:39 EDT --- Re-review is the same, builds ok and clean under Koji. So now that I can, I approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 14:19:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281419.n3SEJNIe028660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #33 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-28 10:19:21 EDT --- Ok, got it running. Under these circumstances: - using runuser crashes murmur every time if you try to run it as daemon. Running /sbin/runuser murmur -g murmur -c 'murmur -ini /etc/mumble-server.ini' works but inside init it crashes. IDK why. Tried to fix the problem but found no success. - to start it I had to modify /etc/mumble-server.ini and change uname to murmur. This causes murmur to be started with user murmur if you try to start it as root. I supplied new ini file as Source4. SPEC: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.spec SRPM: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble-1.1.8-6.fc9.src.rpm INIT: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/murmur.init ini: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/murmur.ini.system -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 14:19:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226158] Merge Review: mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281419.n3SEJeL5004814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226158 Kirby Zhou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kirbyzhou at sohu-rd.com --- Comment #14 from Kirby Zhou 2009-04-28 10:19:38 EDT --- mono-1.2 is very very old, we want to deploy mono-2.4 in our linux servers. But it is missing in EPEL5. I here trouble the maintainers backport the whole mono-2.4 series to RHEL5. Thanks Package Change Request =================== Package name : mono Owners : alexl, laxathom New branch : EL-5-2.4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 14:49:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:49:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281449.n3SEnha5011606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #18 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-04-28 10:49:42 EDT --- PING, anything else, what I can do to be this package approved? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 14:55:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281455.n3SEtoqr013266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #20 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-28 10:55:49 EDT --- 0.09 is out at http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/reviewtool/. It needs Fedora::Bugzilla 0.10 (currently making its way through testing) as well as Archive::RPM and MooseX::Role::XMLRPC::Client (both up for review, and out there as well). We should be correctly pulling in IPC::System::Simple correctly now, as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 15:13:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:13:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498029] New: Review Request: kio-ftps - An ftps KIO slave for KDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kio-ftps - An ftps KIO slave for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498029 Summary: Review Request: kio-ftps - An ftps KIO slave for KDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jreznik at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kio-ftps/kio-ftps.spec SRPM URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kio-ftps/kio-ftps-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: An ftps KIO slave for KDE, based on rfc4217. It should work yet with most server implementations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 15:39:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226483] Merge Review: tcsh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281539.n3SFdLOv023122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226483 --- Comment #7 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-04-28 11:39:18 EDT --- Hi Jussi, Thanks for adding me to the CC. (In reply to comment #4) > - The patches are not commented. Comments should be added why any specific > patch is needed. I think it's good idea with new patches, but I don't want comment them retrospectively. > > - A newer version 6.16 has been released in September. Rebased. > > - Requires(post): grep and Requires(postun): coreutils, grep are a bit silly, > aren't these already required by some minimal system rpm? Probably not (e. g. when you have busybox, then you don't need coreutils). We should rewrite these scripts to RPM Lua maybe...:) > > - Is the autoreconf really necessary? Yes, it is. Because of using ltinfo instead of ltermcap. We need to refresh configure. > > - Drop the buildroot checks > [ -n "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" -a "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != / ] > in install and clean phase. Fixed. > > - Consider safening the %post and %postun phases with > > %post > if [ ! -f /etc/shells ]; then > echo "%{_bindir}/tcsh" >> /etc/shells > echo "%{_bindir}/csh" >> /etc/shells > else > grep -q '^%{_bindir}/tcsh$' /etc/shells || \ > echo "%{_bindir}/tcsh" >> /etc/shells > grep -q '^%{_bindir}/csh$' /etc/shells || \ > echo "%{_bindir}/csh" >> /etc/shells > fi > > %postun > if [ ! -x %{_bindir}/tcsh ]; then > grep -v '^%{_bindir}/tcsh$' /etc/shells | \ > grep -v '^%{_bindir}/csh$' > /etc/shells.rpm && > mv /etc/shells.rpm /etc/shells > fi Done. > > > - Package does not handle locales in the right manner. Installing manually is > OK, but after that use %{find_lang} to build the file list. See comment #2 from Miroslav, %{find_lang} doesn't work here. The file list (tcsh.lang) is assembled in %install, locales manually installed here too and finally packed in %files (taken from the file list). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 15:50:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226483] Merge Review: tcsh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281550.n3SFoOPA026510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226483 --- Comment #8 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-04-28 11:50:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > rpmlint output: > tcsh.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/tcsh-6.15/Fixes > tcsh.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun rm > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. > > - Convert Fixes file to utf8 with iconv. Fixed. > > > MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used > consistently. ~OK > - Some comments could be nice in the install phase, it would make the spec file > a lot easier to read and understand. > > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > NEEDSFIX > - The license in source code is 3-clause BSD, not BSD with advertising. Change > License tag to BSD. > - Contact upstream to clarify this, since CopyRight is 4-clause. Fixed (I was probably confused with this Copyrigt file). > > MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as > provided in the spec URL. ~OK > - The file matches but source URL is bad; now the correct url has old/ before > the release. Switch to newest release will fix this. Fixed (rebase). > > MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK > MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. NEEDSFIX Commented before. > > MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX > - SMP make is not enabled. > - Use -p flag to install in install phase. Fixed. > > MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package > that owns the directory. OK > - Please change %{_mandir}/*/* to %{_mandir}/man1/*.1, since it's safer this > way. Fixed. > > MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect > runtime of application. NEEDSFIX > - Include BUGS and WishList in the package. Remember to convert the files to > utf8. Fixed. > > SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from > upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK > MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK > MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK > MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the > Licensing Guidelines. OK > MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK > MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK > MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK > MUST: Clean section exists. OK > MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK > MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK > MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK > MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK > MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files > ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK > MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base > package using a fully versioned dependency. OK > MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK > MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK > MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK > MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK > SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK > SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK Changes commited to the devel branch. Please check it and let me know your opinion. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 15:59:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497786] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC - Perl implementation of JSON-RPC 1.1 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281559.n3SFxjnt028748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497786 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-04-28 11:59:44 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Parag. I've updated the spec file to remove the Requires you pointed out. Spec file : http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-JSON-RPC/perl-JSON-RPC.spec Src rpm : http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-JSON-RPC/perl-JSON-RPC-0.96-2.fc10.src.rpm Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-JSON Short Description: Perl implementation of JSON-RPC 1.1 protocol-RPC Owners: eseyman Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 16:34:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:34:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281634.n3SGYlm8029567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #34 from Thorvald Natvig 2009-04-28 12:34:45 EDT --- Just a quick comment: If you're using scripts/murmur.conf as it is, that expects murmur to be running under the username "mumble-server". If you want the user to be named "murmur", you'll need to change it :) Unless it clashes with Fedora policy, I would actually recommend keeping the username as "mumble-server", as that will allow you to use the majority of the config-files as-is. Also the input-policy file -- please check that it does indeed work. It's a complete hack, has only been tested on Ubuntu (and does not work on e.g. Debian), and so it might not give the result you wish. Also, unless you happen to run an older X server, X will lock input devices so they can't be read, which means it won't work anyway. May be better to just remove it. BTW: I may be missing something obvious here, but why target F9? F10 is released, and F11 is due in a month? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 16:54:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281654.n3SGsd7M001670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-28 12:54:38 EDT --- New upstream release: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/libguestfs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/libguestfs-1.0.15-1.fc11.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1326784 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 17:00:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:00:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497833] Review Request: tuna - Application tuning GUI & command line utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281700.n3SH0WqC003471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497833 --- Comment #1 from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-04-28 13:00:31 EDT --- More information about tuna and the oscilloscope can be found in this article, that has some screenshots: http://www.osadl.org/Single-View.111+M5aa14d3660e.0.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 17:25:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:25:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281725.n3SHPcdD016384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-28 13:25:36 EDT --- Okay, now this package itself is good - I think "BR: pkgconfig" is not needed, however anyway "pkgconfig" is included in buildroot because "rpm-build" has "Requires: pkgconfig" due to a reason. So, I will wait for your another review request or your pre-review of other person's review requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 17:36:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:36:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226324] Merge Review: psutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281736.n3SHa44X018944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226324 Martin Bacovsky changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tsmetana at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 17:33:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226324] Merge Review: psutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281733.n3SHXEOj018241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226324 Martin Bacovsky changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mbacovsk at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #3 from Martin Bacovsky 2009-04-28 13:33:13 EDT --- I found out this bug is waiting on me. Since I'm no longer maintainer of psutils, I changed the needinfo requestee to the current one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 17:47:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:47:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281747.n3SHlw0i021294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #35 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-28 13:47:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > Just a quick comment: If you're using scripts/murmur.conf as it is, that > expects murmur to be running under the username "mumble-server". If you want > the user to be named "murmur", you'll need to change it :) > Unless it clashes with Fedora policy, I would actually recommend keeping the > username as "mumble-server", as that will allow you to use the majority of the > config-files as-is. Yeah, I was thinking to do that but it was late last night. And mumble-server fits better because most files and directories are called mumble-server. I'll change that today. > > Also the input-policy file -- please check that it does indeed work. It's a > complete hack, has only been tested on Ubuntu (and does not work on e.g. > Debian), and so it might not give the result you wish. Also, unless you happen > to run an older X server, X will lock input devices so they can't be read, > which means it won't work anyway. May be better to just remove it. > > BTW: I may be missing something obvious here, but why target F9? F10 is > released, and F11 is due in a month? Mine system is F9. Its heavily modified and doing an upgrade is not an option. I'll do a complete new installation of F11 when it comes out. Anyway I wont need to change nothing in spec file. g15 is still missing in F11. :( I would try to make package but I don't have G15 keyboard so I can't test binaries. I'll upload new spec and srpms later(few hours). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 17:59:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480434] Review Request: xcall - Packet Radio Terminal Program for ham radio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281759.n3SHx0LN023363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480434 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #6 from Randall Berry 2009-04-28 13:58:58 EDT --- Closing request for review. Project appears to be abandoned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 17:59:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281759.n3SHxZd0015781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 18:53:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:53:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281853.n3SIrV8O002330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-28 14:53:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Updated: SRPM: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-7.fc11.src.rpm Spec: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libsqlite3x.spec > ! How was it determined that the native's package license should be MIT? Good you noticed that. It isn't MIT, it is under zlib. There are a few copyright notices as comments in source files, eg. sqlite3x.hpp. I changed the license tag in the above spec file, and I will also change the native package. David Woodhouse (the reviewer of the native package), has also been notified, he is ok with the change. > ! The package contains documentation already present in the native > Fedora package Removed. > ! But is there a reason for having the "BuildArch: noarch" listed in > the middle of the list of Thr BuildRequies? Reordered. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 18:57:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281857.n3SIvKPs028362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 --- Comment #4 from Fabien Georget 2009-04-28 14:57:18 EDT --- I have updated the package : Spec URL: http://www.bde.espci.fr/~george27/xcowsay.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bde.espci.fr/~george27/xcowsay-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm But I have a question about the files section : Are we allowed (encouraged ?) to not include all files that we don't think it is necessary ? I will take a look on review Guidelines. Thank you for this advice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 18:58:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:58:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498073] New: Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498073 Summary: Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loupgaroublond at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ekg.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ekg-0.3.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: EKG is a community health scanner. Currently this targets mailing list archives, in the future, we may also pay closer attention to code contributions and other details. Note: We are in discussion what the name should be. There is a definite python library component. The big question is the scripts that come with this package, should they also be considered 'python-fedora', or would we be better off with a subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 19:07:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:07:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281907.n3SJ76pM030816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag|needinfo?(red at fedoraproject |fedora-review? |.org) | --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-28 15:07:04 EDT --- Well, for 7.3-3: * License - Sorry, I missed it however one file is still under ASL 2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------- src/tests/com/l2fprod/common/demo/MainUnitTest.java ------------------------------------------------------------- Can this file be removed at %prep? (Your spec file seems to be using files only under src/java, so I guess it is possible) ! Note that only removing this file at %prep is enough. No need to remove this file from tarball itself. * CVS directory - It is recommended to clean up CVS directory at %prep like: ------------------------------------------------------------- find . -type d -name CVS | sort -r | xargs rm -rf ------------------------------------------------------------- * Comments - What are the comments like ------------------------------------------------------------- ###############################################################rm -rf docs lib src/com/l2fprod/common/springrcp ------------------------------------------------------------- for? (I guess you just copy-and-pasted mistakenly...) * Multilue jar files (including symlink) - The following guideline seems to be saying that this package should create a directory and move all jar files (including symlinks) into the directory: ------------------------------------------------------------- If the number of provided JAR files exceeds two, you must place them into a sub-directory. ------------------------------------------------------------- And some suggestion about spec file clean up ! Using xargs - From the line ------------------------------------------------------------- javac -d target -cp `build-classpath nachocalendar jcalendar` `find src/java -name '*.java'` ------------------------------------------------------------- build.log shows lots of output messages brought from `find src/java -name '*.java'` like: ------------------------------------------------------------- 46 + javac -d target -cp /usr/share/java/nachocalendar.jar:/usr/share/java/jcalendar.jar src/java/totd/com/l2fprod/common/swing/tips/DefaultTip.java src/java/totd/com/l2fprod/common/swing/tips/DefaultTipModel.java src/java/totd/com/l2fprod/common/swing/tips/TipLoader.java src/java/totd/com/l2fprod/common/swing/TipModel.java ..... ------------------------------------------------------------- In this case I usually use xargs like: ------------------------------------------------------------- find src/java -name '*.java' -print0 | xargs -0 javac -d target -cp `build-classpath nachocalendar jcalendar` ------------------------------------------------------------- With this, build.log shows: ------------------------------------------------------------- 48 + find src/java -name '*.java' -print0 49 ++ build-classpath nachocalendar jcalendar 50 + xargs -0 javac -d target -cp /usr/share/java/nachocalendar.jar:/usr/share/java/jcalendar.jar 51 src/java/sheet/com/l2fprod/common/beans/BeanUtils.java:41: warning: non-varargs call of varargs method with inexact argument type for last parameter; 52 cast to java.lang.Class for a varargs call ------------------------------------------------------------- which is much easier to look at. ! About creating many symlinks manually - I think this is error-prone. I guess the following is better: -------------------------------------------------------------- install -m644 %{name}-%{version}.jar $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-all-%{version}.jar ln -s %{name}-all-%{version}.jar $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-all.jar for dir in src/java/*/ do subname=$(basename $dir) for exception in \ demo springrcp do if [ $subname = $exception ] ; then continue 2 ; fi done ln -sf %{name}-all-%{version}.jar $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-${subname}.jar ln -sf %{name}-all-%{version}.jar $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-${subname}-%{version}.jar done --------------------------------------------------------------- Also I would just use "%{_javadir}/%{name}-*.jar" in %files (however also see the previous comment about "Multilue jar files (including symlink)". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 19:17:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498029] Review Request: kio-ftps - An ftps KIO slave for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281917.n3SJHnqe000578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498029 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jiri.reischig at ecn.cz --- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-28 15:17:47 EDT --- *** Bug 498005 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 19:18:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:18:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281918.n3SJIoGa007538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #36 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-04-28 15:18:49 EDT --- you did really great work but unfortunately i have a few small issues left: 1. Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} missing in subpackages (overlay and protocol) that dont do proper autodeptracking cause of their payload. 2. one has to think about if it is really necassery to symlink the binary so many times or instead focus on the upstream method and fix everything else. but i will leave that up to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 19:26:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:26:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497662] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts - Strip scripting constructs out of HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281926.n3SJQLlv009217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497662 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-28 15:26:20 EDT --- Thanks for the review Parag. I'll fix the point you outlined above before building. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-StripScripts Short Description: Strip scripting constructs out of HTML Owners: xavierb Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 19:50:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281950.n3SJoAYv008040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #37 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-28 15:50:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #36) > you did really great work but unfortunately i have a few small issues left: > > 1. > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} missing in subpackages (overlay and > protocol) that dont do proper autodeptracking cause of their payload. Yea, forgot that. :) Its fixed now. > > 2. one has to think about if it is really necassery to symlink the binary so > many times or instead focus on the upstream method and fix everything else. but > i will leave that up to you. I was thinking of calling it mumble-server everywhere but got confused when Mumble devs call it sometimes murmur sometimes mumble-server. I don't now what is the proper name(Thorvald can tell us probably). I guess its murmur. But if I call it murmur users will get confused because many don't now what is murmur. They only now what is mumble. I changed it a little bit. Now there is only /usr/sbin/murmur and /usr/bin/mumble-server. Spec coming in one hour - if I'm lucky and everything goes well. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 20:28:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282028.n3SKSxKJ015911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-04-28 16:28:57 EDT --- Thanks for the review David, and welcome to the Fedora Packagers. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-foolscap Short Description: Next-generation RPC protocol Owners: ruben Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 20:40:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282040.n3SKeTwr025584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #3 from Terje R??sten 2009-04-28 16:40:28 EDT --- I have sent a mail to spot to assist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 20:48:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:48:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282048.n3SKmAe1027026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Christian Krause 2009-04-28 16:48:09 EDT --- Thanks for the update! All open issues were addressed in the last package: -> APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 20:48:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282048.n3SKmrEs027135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #24 from Adam Williamson 2009-04-28 16:48:50 EDT --- just an update here: I am currently not working on this, as I'm trying to build a package of the old gnome-volume-control code instead to make Bastien happy. He would rather have the old gnome-volume-control (which is still maintained for use in non-Pulse situations like Solaris) rather than the effectively unmaintained gnome-alsamixer. I'm trying to get a fully working old gnome-volume-control, parallel installable with the new one, built by the end of today - it has to be patched to identify itself as something other than gnome-volume-control, but Ubuntu has some patches to do that which I should be able to steal. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 20:51:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:51:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282051.n3SKpQmB021153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-28 16:51:25 EDT --- Looking at those files: crc.c: BSD [OK] hsieh_hash.c: New license [Checking with RH Legal] jenkins_hash.c: Copyright Only (I will interpret "Do NOT use for cryptographic purposes." as advice after the license, rather than license terms, since it conflicts with "You may use this code any way you wish". The upstream for this file should really change that line to say "We do not recommend that you use this code for cryptographic purposes.") [OK] md5.c: BSD [OK] murmur_hash.c: Public Domain [OK] (They really should have a proper declaration for PD on their website, but I'll let it slide) As soon as I hear back on the hsieh licensing, I'll comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 20:52:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:52:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282052.n3SKq3ix021323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #20 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-28 16:52:01 EDT --- To be clear, I just ask for approval for the packaging of the pristine SOCI version 3.0.0 (i.e., the lastest release). The corresponding files are still here: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci-3.0.0-4.fc10.src.rpm [Patch URLs: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci-3.0.0-fix-gcc43-compatibility.patch and http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci-3.0.0-fix-gnu-autotools-compatibility.patch has been updated ] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- On the other hand, the extras-soci project is, for now, rather a proof-of-concept for later releases of SOCI (if any!), and a framework for easy patching (for instance, the test programs for the ODBC and Firebird backends do not compile in the pristine CVS trunk), before those patches are incorporated upstream. Of course, no RPM package should be released for later versions (> 3.0) of SOCI, as those do not exist yet... When the upstream developer team will make new releases, the extras-soci project will be ready to package those, after the synchronisation of the source code with the pristine tar-ball. At that time, I shall of course ask again for review and approval. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 21:02:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:02:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498106] New: Integrated Development Environment for the Vala programming language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Integrated Development Environment for the Vala programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498106 Summary: Integrated Development Environment for the Vala programming language Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bioinfornatics at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=341652) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341652) SPEC file I want package val(a)ide but before need apply a patch to vala lib such as (shell script) : ________________________________________________________________________ vala_dir="$(dirname $(which valac))/../share/vala" patch -p0 -d "$vala_dir" < $(cd `dirname $0` && pwd)/gtk+-2.0.vapi.diff ________________________________________________________________________ The .spec add an attachment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 21:05:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:05:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498106] Integrated Development Environment for the Vala programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282105.n3SL5OFu024363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498106 MERCIER changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |val(a)ide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 21:17:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282117.n3SLHVB7000948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #11 from Mat Booth 2009-04-28 17:17:28 EDT --- How about this: Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/lpg.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/lpg-2.0.16-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 21:34:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497805] Review Request: cppcheck - A tool for static C/C++ code analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282134.n3SLYPXu004369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497805 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |chkr at plauener.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chkr at plauener.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 21:37:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:37:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282137.n3SLbaID005094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-04-28 17:37:35 EDT --- Hi Ant, long time no see! I'll review your package tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 21:49:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282149.n3SLn4MG000554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-28 17:49:03 EDT --- In the spec file in comment 8 I disabled the %check section because it took a long time to run. This build has the %check tests reenabled, and it works, although it does take a pretty long time to complete (almost 1 hour): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1327042 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 21:48:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282148.n3SLmnWK000505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #21 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-28 17:48:48 EDT --- I have just "back-ported", on one of the 3.0.0 patches and on the specification file, the work you suggested on the building switches (%bcond macros in the specification file): ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci-3.0.0-5.fc10.src.rpm [Patch URLs: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci-3.0.0-fix-gcc43-compatibility.patch (same file as before) and http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci-3.0.0-fix-gnu-autotools-compatibility.patch (has been updated) ] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 21:48:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497660] Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282148.n3SLmxBG007078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-28 17:48:58 EDT --- Thanks for the review Parag. New version, duplicate provide is filtered : Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-MIME-Charset.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-MIME-Charset-1.006.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 21:56:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282156.n3SLuwsN002200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #38 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-28 17:56:56 EDT --- Done. :) SPEC: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.spec SRPM: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble-1.1.8-7.fc9.src.rpm DESKTOP MUMBLE: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.desktop DESKTOP OVERLAY: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble-overlay.desktop INIT: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/murmur.init -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 22:00:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282200.n3SM0ET1009507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 --- Comment #9 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-04-28 18:00:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > LINE 105 > you wrote: > /sbin/chkconfig --del httpd > should be: > /sbin/chkconfig --del %{name} > or not?! Thank you! I'm copy it form httpd and accidentally forgot change name. Fixed. About other errors I wrote in first message. For what you post it again? Do you think what any of them must be fixed? Additionally I fill bug on rpmlint for mentioned error - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498107 And one question. Should I delete user in %postun If I add it in %post? Rpmlint fire warning about it as dangerous operation. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/RabbIT/RabbIT-3.18-7.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 22:20:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:20:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282220.n3SMKZeq013762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #7 from Benjamin Kosnik 2009-04-28 18:20:34 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341660) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341660) patch 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 22:21:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:21:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282221.n3SMLZkb013879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #9 from Benjamin Kosnik 2009-04-28 18:21:34 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341662) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341662) gcc.spec file with libstdc++-devel doc enhancements -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 22:20:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282220.n3SMKuN4006918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #8 from Benjamin Kosnik 2009-04-28 18:20:55 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341661) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341661) patch 2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 22:19:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:19:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282219.n3SMJvwC006487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #6 from Benjamin Kosnik 2009-04-28 18:19:56 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341659) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341659) gcc.spec patch for libstdc++-devel doc enhancements This plus the small patches also attached will generate the doxygen html and man pages for libstdc++-devel. This is configurable via the build_libstdcxx_docs switch in gcc.spec. This seems like the way to go, all is ok except that the man pages are not installed in /user/share/man/* but instead in /user/share/docs/libstdc++-devel/. Not quite sure what is going on there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 23:38:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282338.n3SNcON1020877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #73 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-28 19:38:20 EDT --- I sort of missed these comments at the time. (In reply to comment #63) > "Another option is to look at a streamlined set of review items for > publican-created doc packages... We've never explicitly done this but in > practice, people know they don't have to check, for instance, shared > library guidelines when writing and reviewing a pure python module." > > Someone would first need to propose what the specific set of review items for > publican-created doc packages should be. The way to do this is to create a wiki > page under: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ I agree with this idea: it would be good to have an explicit Packaging Guideline for publican documentation. Basically it all rests on publican since it can generate srpm packages directly from SCM and should be capable of submitting packages directly to koji from svn (like it does for brew inside Red Hat), so in that sense this is nothing to review once publican's templates have been approved as good for Fedora. The general view seems to be that documentation writers and translators in particular should not have to do all the cvs jigs to get books built in the buildsystem so I think yes some special provisions are needed for publican publishing to Fedora. (Other options would include a special writer packager category say in FAS/koji or even a separate repo for documentation publishing (eg dist-f12-docs?).) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 23:45:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282345.n3SNjDOp028777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 Ant Bryan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |497948 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 23:45:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:45:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904282345.n3SNjCJP028746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 Ant Bryan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |497947 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 00:00:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498073] Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290000.n3T00Yqq024720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498073 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lmacken at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Luke Macken 2009-04-28 20:00:33 EDT --- I am unable to get this package working in F10 with spython-sqlalchemy-0.4.8-1.fc10 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/ekg-scan", line 16, in import ekg.model File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ekg/model.py", line 112, in Base = declarative_base(metadata=metadata, cls=SqlBase, metaclass=MetaSqlBase) TypeError: declarative_base() got an unexpected keyword argument 'cls' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 00:07:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:07:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290007.n3T0740E032722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-28 20:07:03 EDT --- Red Hat Legal says the hsieh licenses are non-free. Hopefully, you should be able to delete that hsieh_hash.c file in %pre without any difficulty. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 00:13:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:13:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290013.n3T0DhKH001533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #39 from Thorvald Natvig 2009-04-28 20:13:42 EDT --- Definitely getting there :) Right now, all the descriptions are identical. Wouldn't it be better if the different packages explained what they contained, instead of just a common description of what Mumble is? Unless you already know, it's not very clear what "mumble-overlay" does. You're calling the package "murmur", which provides "mumble-murmur". If you make it provide "mumble-server" instead (or simply make it the "server" subpackage), you'll match the naming used in other distros, which means less confusion :) You're currently renaming the binary from murmurd to murmur. The 'd' is kind of standard for daemons, and I suggest leaving it. Read the comment about the input-policy file above :) Unless you know it to work in current revisions of Fedora, I recommend dropping it. There needs to be a post-install for murmur/mumble-server that reloads the dbus service. You're installing a logrotate, and your murmur.ini contains logging information for /var/log/murmur, but this directory isn't created anywhere. Same goes for /var/run/murmur (where murmur will try to store it's pid file) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 00:56:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:56:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498125] New: Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 Summary: Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-settings-daemon.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-settings-daemon-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package contains the XSettings daemon for LXDE, the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment. It allows XSettings aware applications (all GTK+ 2 and GNOME 2 applications) to be informed instantly of changes in LXDE configuration, such as theme name, default font and so on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 01:23:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:23:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498130] New: Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 Summary: Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxinput.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxinput-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: LXInput is a keyboard and mouse configuration utility for LXDE, the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 02:14:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:14:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290214.n3T2EqUP015265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 arthurguru changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(arthurg.work at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #12 from arthurguru 2009-04-28 22:14:50 EDT --- Jan, Thanks for your feedback. The debuginfo rpm issue has now been resolved using RPM_OPT_FLAGS, thanks. In the meantime I've made another point release of xmlfy that also incorporates all the good work identified in this review process (branch merge). This also means the links to the RPMs have changed from the original post. Spec file http://xmlfy.sourceforge.net/submit/fedora/xmlfy.spec Source RPM http://xmlfy.sourceforge.net/submit/fedora/xmlfy-1.4.3-1.src.rpm Binary RPM derived from the above source RPM http://xmlfy.sourceforge.net/submit/fedora/xmlfy-1.4.3-1.i386.rpm Other files http://xmlfy.sourceforge.net/submit/fedora/xmlfy-debuginfo-1.4.3-1.i386.rpm Tested ok, rpmlint is content. Lubomir, Thanks for sponsoring the xmlfy project. I have enjoyed the review process and the quality it yields, and totally agree with strengthening ones knowledge of the package review guidelines rather than it being a "one-off" process. I would be more than happy to participate in an informal package review or three. How are these informal reviews conducted? Thanks to all Arthur Gouros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 02:22:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:22:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498136] New: Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 Summary: Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: awilliam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, andreas at bawue.net, bnocera at redhat.com, fedora at christoph-wickert.de, sundaram at redhat.com, itamar at ispbrasil.com.br, dan at danny.cz, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, leigh123linux at googlemail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/gst-mixer/gst-mixer.spec SRPM URL: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/gst-mixer/gst-mixer-2.26.0-1.aw_fc11.src.rpm Description: A full control ALSA mixer application for GNOME. Per FESco meeting of April 24th 2009, for Fedora 11 release. I previously submitted gnome-alsamixer to satisfy this proposal - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 - but Bastien Nocera said the old gnome-volume-control code would be preferable as it is still actively maintained. This is a package of the old gnome-volume-control code from gnome-media, renamed gst-mixer (the name of the directory it lives in within the gnome-media code). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 02:28:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290228.n3T2Si6a018974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #25 from Adam Williamson 2009-04-28 22:28:42 EDT --- here's the review request for gst-mixer: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 I'd rather focus on that for now, after that we can decide if it's a good idea to put gnome-alsamixer in too or not. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 02:51:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290251.n3T2pXP9032613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 22:51:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 02:48:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290248.n3T2ms0c031755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 22:48:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 02:50:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290250.n3T2oZXO032410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 22:50:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 02:53:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:53:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290253.n3T2rl0B000584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #54 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 22:53:44 EDT --- cvs done (without F-8, as we do not allow branches for F-8 anymore). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 02:57:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:57:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290257.n3T2vp6Q001324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 22:57:50 EDT --- cvs done (with F11 branch added). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:04:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490592] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObject - eZ Components PersistentObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290304.n3T34MmX002342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490592 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:04:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:06:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:06:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290306.n3T36e5g003030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:06:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:05:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:05:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490851] Review Request: php-ezc-SystemInformation - eZ Components SystemInformation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290305.n3T35QK6026832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490851 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:05:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:10:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:10:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497662] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts - Strip scripting constructs out of HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290310.n3T3A3k0003930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497662 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:10:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:08:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290308.n3T38MZL003370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:08:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290307.n3T37X9h003264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:07:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:11:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497686] Review Request: perl-Archive-RPM - Work with an RPM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290311.n3T3B2Oj027944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497686 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:11:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:11:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:11:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497690] Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290311.n3T3Bjbe028121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497690 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:11:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:14:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497720] Review Request: hunspell-ln - Lingala hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290314.n3T3E1eS028365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497720 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:14:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:16:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:16:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497827] Review Request: shortrpm - Short-circuit binary RPM package build In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290316.n3T3G7bv005195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497827 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:16:06 EDT --- cvs done (with F11 branch added). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:15:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497807] Review Request: perl-Capture-Tiny - Capture stdin or stdout from Perl, XS or external programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290315.n3T3F5rg028827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497807 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:15:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:18:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:18:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497862] Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290318.n3T3IuND005555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497862 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:18:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:20:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497980] Review Request: perl-String-Diff - Simple diff to String In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290320.n3T3KdOP006166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497980 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:20:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:21:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:21:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497991] Review Request: hunspell-as - Assamese hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290321.n3T3LXHA030006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497991 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:21:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:19:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:19:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497869] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-XMLRPC-Client - Provide the needed bits to be a XML-RPC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290319.n3T3JsCX029394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497869 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:19:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 04:39:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290439.n3T4dJ7A011401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #2 from Ant Bryan 2009-04-29 00:39:18 EDT --- Hi Ruben! Cool running into you here! :) Thanks in advance for the review. This is my first library package, & I based it off another so hopefully it's a good start. I also packaged mulk (bug 497948) which depends on libmetalink here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 04:36:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:36:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290436.n3T4aUcS011146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 --- Comment #1 from Ant Bryan 2009-04-29 00:36:28 EDT --- Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1406989 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/mulk/mulk-0.4.0-1.fc10.src.rpm One tiny change BuildRequires: libmetalink-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 04:39:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290439.n3T4djhA020163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 04:44:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:44:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497690] Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290444.n3T4iAU3012352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497690 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 04:47:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:47:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498136] Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290447.n3T4lEl8013136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-29 00:47:12 EDT --- I have tested and for me are good, now I can make the volume higher -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 04:48:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:48:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498136] Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290448.n3T4muUM022033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andreas at bawue.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 04:54:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:54:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497980] Review Request: perl-String-Diff - Simple diff to String In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290454.n3T4s1Ue022958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497980 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 04:55:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:55:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497980] Review Request: perl-String-Diff - Simple diff to String In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290455.n3T4tG69014594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497980 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 00:55:15 EDT --- perl-String-Diff-0.04-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-String-Diff-0.04-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 04:55:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:55:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497980] Review Request: perl-String-Diff - Simple diff to String In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290455.n3T4tBlB014557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497980 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 00:55:10 EDT --- perl-String-Diff-0.04-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-String-Diff-0.04-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 05:01:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290501.n3T515Iv015863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 05:00:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290500.n3T50bcb015703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 --- Comment #17 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-29 01:00:36 EDT --- thanks a lot for your review New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: razertool Short Description: Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice Owners: th0br0 Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 05:28:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498147] New: Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin Alias: perl-App-Nopaste https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 Summary: Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/App-Nopaste/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-App-Nopaste.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-App-Nopaste-0.10-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Pastebins (also known as nopaste sites) let you post text, usually code, for public viewing. They're used a lot in IRC channels to show code that would normally be too long to give directly in the channel (hence the name nopaste). Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1327573 *rt-0.07 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 05:51:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:51:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497759] Review Request: funcshell - A shell interface to Func In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290551.n3T5pbrp000590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com --- Comment #1 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-29 01:51:36 EDT --- 1] md5sum of tarball in source rpm 1c4ffd7be2aee86743b5aa5f64cc7971 funcshell-0.0.1.tar.gz is different from tarball downloaded from Source0 20d2b36a2ec3bebfaf7eb2acd317e269 funcshell-0.0.1.tar.gz 2] is this your first package for fedora? Or are you maintainer of any other packages for fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:02:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:02:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290602.n3T62A9r026057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-29 02:02:09 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1327573 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 78d560ad4fb67cb8ceb0d84c4de40ed0 App-Nopaste-0.10.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=8, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.17 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.23 CPU) + Package perl-App-Nopaste-0.10-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(App::Nopaste) = 0.10 perl(App::Nopaste::Command) perl(App::Nopaste::Service) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Gist) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Husk) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Mathbin) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::PastebinCom) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Pastie) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Rafb) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Shadowcat) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Snitch) Requires: /usr/bin/env perl(App::Nopaste) perl(App::Nopaste::Command) perl(Module::Pluggable) perl(Moose) perl(WWW::Mechanize) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestion: 1) you don't need following # autoreq doesn't catch this Requires: perl(MooseX::Getopt) # necessary for optional modules Requires: perl(Clipboard) Requires: perl(Config::INI::Reader) Requires: perl(Git) Requires: perl(WWW::Pastebin::PastebinCom::Create) Requires: perl(WWW::Pastebin::RafbNet::Create) Remove them and then import new SRPM. I see yum auto processed all these Requires APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:05:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290605.n3T65HbH003292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-29 02:05:16 EDT --- requires seems reasonable for me, I have compared it with modules which are used in Daemon.pm and it fits. Ok, i didn't find anything wrong (except that Log::Log4perl is required two times in source code, but this imho doesn't affect runtime) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:04:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226483] Merge Review: tcsh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290604.n3T64iEx002836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226483 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-29 02:04:43 EDT --- - Time stamps are not conserved. for i in Fixes WishList; do iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 < "$i" > "${i}_" mv "${i}_" "$i" done should be for i in Fixes WishList; do iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 "$i" > "${i}_" && \ touch -r "$i" "${i}_" && \ mv "${i}_" "$i" done - Defattr should be (-,root,root,-) not (-,root,root) Fix these before building the new release. The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:11:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290611.n3T6BI7r004420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 02:11:18 EDT --- jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:11:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290611.n3T6Bg0C004490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 02:11:41 EDT --- jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:10:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:10:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290610.n3T6AYKI027639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 02:10:33 EDT --- jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:16:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:16:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497759] Review Request: funcshell - A shell interface to Func In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290616.n3T6GtNS005823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759 --- Comment #2 from Silas Sewell 2009-04-29 02:16:54 EDT --- 1). Updated Source0 to match tar.gz found in the source rpm. [silas at silas ~]$ curl --silent http://cloud.github.com/downloads/silas/funcshell/funcshell-0.0.1.tar.gz | md5sum 1c4ffd7be2aee86743b5aa5f64cc7971 - 2). I maintain other packages: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/silas Just a quick clarification, when I say "I am the creator of this package" I mean I wrote funcshell (my original wording was somewhat ambiguous). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:24:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:24:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290624.n3T6OCOW030297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 02:24:11 EDT --- php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:24:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:24:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290624.n3T6OGYq030331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 02:24:16 EDT --- php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:24:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290624.n3T6O7Hb007178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 02:24:06 EDT --- php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:30:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:30:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492259] Review Request: tucan - Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290630.n3T6UeM0031709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492259 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-29 02:30:38 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1327590 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM tucan.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency librsvg2 ==> looks false message + source files match upstream url 21cc03fe952da8a0ae44ba66956a0766 tucan-0.3.6.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + tucan desktop file installed correctly. + GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:37:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290637.n3T6b1vt000369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #13 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-29 02:36:59 EDT --- Hi Arthur, I will take a look at your latest package during today/tommorow. For informal package review, you should follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process Just pickup any review request which is not yet assigned and perform review (for example, you could do review on this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759, please be aware that there are specific checks for perl/python/php.... packages http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Application_Specific_Guidelines ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:41:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:41:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290641.n3T6f7f4010569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:39:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290639.n3T6drW0009983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-29 02:39:52 EDT --- ???!!?!?! Without those explicit requires in the spec, I get an rpm that doesn't require any of those packages and results in a broken installation - MooseX-Getopt is absolutely required - the nopaste command definitely doesn't work without it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:41:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290641.n3T6f4Ta010542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-29 02:41:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-App-Daemon Short Description: Start an Application as a Daemon Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:39:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290639.n3T6dj4H000842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet 2009-04-29 02:39:44 EDT --- @tom : thanks for this. I will work on a build whithout hsieh_hash.c (I don't understand what you mean about %pre, should be deleted in %prep and Makefile patched to not try to use it) Rehards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:47:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:47:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497862] Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290647.n3T6lCxH011657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497862 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 02:47:11 EDT --- python-paida-3.2.1_2.10.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-paida-3.2.1_2.10.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:46:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:46:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497862] Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290646.n3T6kDpK011555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497862 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 02:46:13 EDT --- python-paida-3.2.1_2.10.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-paida-3.2.1_2.10.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:48:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290648.n3T6mdAS002584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 06:56:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:56:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290656.n3T6uqQB013574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #19 from Sandro Mathys 2009-04-29 02:56:51 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common-7.3-4.20090428cvs.fc11.src.rpm * License - Removing file in %prep - Notified upstream * CVS directory - Removing in %prep * Comments - Removed (no copy-paste but sort of backup during the last edit...simply forgot to remove them before uploading) * Multilue jar files (including symlink) - Done. ! Using xargs - Done. ! About creating many symlinks manually - Great input, thanks. Done. ! use "%{_javadir}/%{name}-*.jar" in %files - Done. FYI: Right now, there's still some stuff from 7.3-3 in 7.3-4 but commented, in case there's a problem with the new changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 07:14:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497720] Review Request: hunspell-ln - Lingala hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290714.n3T7EKHf006963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497720 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 07:24:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:24:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497827] Review Request: shortrpm - Short-circuit binary RPM package build In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290724.n3T7O8cG008766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497827 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-29 03:24:07 EDT --- Hm, testsuite was failing since %a seems to be ignored with most recent glibcs even when the source is not an ISO C source, contrary to what was documented. The package was updated to 1.1, imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 07:35:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290735.n3T7ZEJ1020488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-29 03:35:13 EDT --- Argh! my bad. I forgot to remove them from SPEC while testing and installing this package locally. Please add Requires: back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 07:35:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:35:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478918] Review Request: globus-gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290735.n3T7ZVTr011300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |gssapi-error - Globus |globus-gssapi-error - |Toolkit - GSSAPI Error |Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI |Library |Error Library --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-29 03:35:29 EDT --- The upstream name of this package (gssapi-error) fails the "to common name" rule. Therefore I have changed it to have the globus- prefix like all the other globus packages. Patch for this is submitted upstream. New version: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gssapi-error-2.5-2.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gssapi-error.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 07:39:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290739.n3T7drDJ021203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 07:39:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:39:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290739.n3T7dpVB011830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-29 03:39:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-App-Nopaste Short Description: Easy access to any pastebin Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 08:03:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:03:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497660] Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290803.n3T83TRp017177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-29 04:03:27 EDT --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 08:06:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:06:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497660] Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290806.n3T86ii1027309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-29 04:06:44 EDT --- Thanks. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MIME-Charset Short Description: Charset Informations for MIME Owners: xavierb Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 08:08:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:08:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290808.n3T88ZtD027515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 Ramakrishna Reddy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 08:09:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290809.n3T89YMt018927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #7 from Remi Collet 2009-04-29 04:09:33 EDT --- ------------ Response from Brian Thanks for the heads up. I'll look into adding a configure switch to disable it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 08:14:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497991] Review Request: hunspell-as - Assamese hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290814.n3T8EkWm020254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497991 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-29 04:14:45 EDT --- Built for F-11 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 08:26:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494819] Review Request: python-bitarray - Efficient Array of Booleans --C Extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290826.n3T8QvqS022959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494819 Ramakrishna Reddy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 08:34:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495021] Review Request: python-posix_ipc - POSIX IPC primitives for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290834.n3T8YVRw024207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495021 Ramakrishna Reddy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 08:46:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494853] Review Request: python-achoo - A fluent interface for testing Python objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290846.n3T8k2gX003137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494853 Ramakrishna Reddy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 08:47:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290847.n3T8lfbs003385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 04:47:41 EDT --- globus-openssl-module-0.6-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-openssl-module-0.6-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 08:47:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290847.n3T8laUY003343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 04:47:33 EDT --- globus-openssl-module-0.6-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-openssl-module-0.6-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 09:27:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290927.n3T9Re2m011369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-29 05:27:38 EDT --- Do you still need BuildRequires: doxygen? Anyway, that you can check post-review. Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 09:38:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290938.n3T9cxiM013704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 10:05:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498029] Review Request: kio-ftps - An ftps KIO slave for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291005.n3TA53JQ019741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498029 --- Comment #2 from Jiri Reischig 2009-04-29 06:05:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) I try compile and install the package and it's working good. Thank you very much. I hope that the package will be included in the next Fedora version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 10:02:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:02:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291002.n3TA2P5e019093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch Bug 453857 depends on bug 453850, which changed state. Bug 453850 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453857 depends on bug 453853, which changed state. Bug 453853 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-29 06:02:24 EDT --- Sources match upstream: $ diff -urN globus_gsi_sysconfig-2.2/ globus_gsi_sysconfig-2.2-dl/ is silent. Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328247 $ rpmlint globus-gsi-sysconfig*.rpm globus-gsi-sysconfig-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 10:10:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:10:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498029] Review Request: kio-ftps - An ftps KIO slave for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291010.n3TAAvMD020980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498029 --- Comment #3 from Jiri Reischig 2009-04-29 06:10:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) Please, do you know how can I insert to the KDE new CA key or site selfsigned key which will be acepted in this kio-ftps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 10:11:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:11:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492259] Review Request: tucan - Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291011.n3TABraB021105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492259 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-29 06:11:52 EDT --- thank you for your review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tucan Short Description: Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 10:08:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:08:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291008.n3TA8D3B020306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-29 06:08:12 EDT --- Fedora review globus-gsi-sysconfig-2.2-1.fc10.src.rpm 2009-04-29 + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint output See above; the "no documentation" warning can be ignored. + Package is named according to Fedora Package Naming Guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora packaging guidelines + License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora ASL 2.0 + License matches the actual package license + The package contains the license file + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm the source repacking makes it impossible to compare md5sum's, thus: $ diff -urN globus_gsi_sysconfig-2.2/ globus_gsi_sysconfig-2.2-dl/ reports no differences + Package scratch-builds n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content + Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage n/a Files marked %doc should not affect package + Header files should be in -devel n/a Static libraries should be in -static + Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' indirectly, via R: globus-core + libfoo.so must go in -devel + -devel must require the fully versioned base + Packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 APPROVED by sailer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 10:09:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:09:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291009.n3TA9sWv012215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 10:15:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496718] Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291015.n3TAFcag021975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496718 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-29 06:15:37 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-plotmm Short Description: MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications Owners: sailer rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 10:16:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291016.n3TAGZQe013923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 10:16:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:16:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291016.n3TAGLkM013871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-29 06:16:19 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libsqlite3x Short Description: MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database Owners: sailer rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 10:21:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:21:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226108] Merge Review: lsof In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291021.n3TALMt8023123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226108 Karel Zak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kzak at redhat.com) | --- Comment #8 from Karel Zak 2009-04-29 06:21:19 EDT --- Michal, thanks for your review. I'll fix all in the next rawhide update (probably together with some others issues). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 10:21:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291021.n3TALxBa023196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #22 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-29 06:21:57 EDT --- > soci-3.0.0-5.fc10.src.rpm APPROVED So you can squash remaining issues in pkg cvs, which will be more convenient than going through the upload-bugzilla-review cycle. [...] With a caveat, though, as the conditional build options don't seem to work [yet]: configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-backend-empty, --disable-backend-sqlite3 And although it recognises the other --disable-backend options, it ignores them and still builds various backends if the needed -devel pkgs are installed. E.g. --without mysql ends with RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/include/soci/backends/mysql/soci-mysql.h /usr/lib/libsoci_mysql.so /usr/lib/libsoci_mysql.so.3 /usr/lib/libsoci_mysql.so.3.0.0 Unless you can disable the backends at "configure"-time, you could add "BuildConflicts: mysql-devel" to enforce uninstalling unwanted -devel pkgs. ;o) [...] > %define mydocs __tmp_docdir Not used anywhere. * The many %{?with_foo:...} switches throughout the spec file could be grouped together and could be replaced with a much more readable %if/%endif block that covers everything for each conditional subpkg except the %build/%install sections. In other words, for e.g. MySQL you would end up with: %if %{with mysql} %package mysql ... %description mysql ... %files mysql ... %post mysql -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun mysql -p /sbin/ldconfig ... %package mysql-devel ... %description mysql-devel ... %files mysql-devel ... %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 10:19:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:19:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291019.n3TAJdaE014315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch Bug 453856 depends on bug 453850, which changed state. Bug 453850 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453856 depends on bug 453853, which changed state. Bug 453853 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-29 06:19:36 EDT --- Sources match upstream: 48987f39031ac79949a9b0913aa42c67 ORIG/globus_gsi_cert_utils-5.5.tar.gz 48987f39031ac79949a9b0913aa42c67 SOURCES/globus_gsi_cert_utils-5.5.tar.gz $ rpmlint globus-gsi-cert-utils*.rpm globus-gsi-cert-utils.spec globus-gsi-cert-utils.x86_64: W: no-documentation globus-gsi-cert-utils-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation globus-gsi-cert-utils-progs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328252 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 10:25:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291025.n3TAPB97015805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-29 06:25:10 EDT --- Fedora review globus-gsi-cert-utils-5.5-1.fc10.src.rpm 2009-04-29 + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint output See above; the "no documentation" warning can be ignored. Source Tarball does not contain a license file + Package is named according to Fedora Package Naming Guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora packaging guidelines + License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora ASL 2.0 + License matches the actual package license n/a The package contains the license file none shipped by upstream tarball + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm 48987f39031ac79949a9b0913aa42c67 ORIG/globus_gsi_cert_utils-5.5.tar.gz 48987f39031ac79949a9b0913aa42c67 SOURCES/globus_gsi_cert_utils-5.5.tar.gz + Package scratch-builds n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content + Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage n/a Files marked %doc should not affect package + Header files should be in -devel n/a Static libraries should be in -static + Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' indirectly, via R: globus-core + libfoo.so must go in -devel + -devel must require the fully versioned base + Packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 APPROVED by sailer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 10:25:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291025.n3TAPS0f015868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 10:43:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291043.n3TAh2bx019201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-29 06:43:00 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-gsi-cert-utils Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 10:43:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291043.n3TAh4UT019238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-29 06:43:03 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-gsi-sysconfig Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 11:04:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497807] Review Request: perl-Capture-Tiny - Capture stdin or stdout from Perl, XS or external programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291104.n3TB4Os5032485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497807 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 11:32:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498186] New: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Beautifier - beautifier for javascript Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Beautifier - beautifier for javascript https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498186 Summary: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Beautifier - beautifier for javascript Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JavaScript-Beautifier.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JavaScript-Beautifier-0.04-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module is mostly a Perl-rewrite of http://github.com/einars/js- beautify/tree/master/beautify.js http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328326 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 11:39:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:39:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291139.n3TBdEDV030641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 11:43:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:43:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291143.n3TBhpRV031731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 11:46:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291146.n3TBkHQl009092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 11:43:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291143.n3TBh5kV008330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-29 07:43:05 EDT --- A few notes: - .la files need to be removed, add find . -name *.la -exec rm {} \; to the end of the install phase - if possible, static library build should be disable (usually %configure --disable-static) - devel package needs to Requires: pkgconfig - you're running autoreconf, but not BRing the packages => the package will not build in mock. Autoreconf'ing is frowned upon, and should not be done unless it is specifically necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 11:52:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498188] New: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier - Perl extension for minifying JavaScript code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier - Perl extension for minifying JavaScript code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498188 Summary: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier - Perl extension for minifying JavaScript code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JavaScript-Minifier.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JavaScript-Minifier-1.05-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module removes unnecessary whitespace from JavaScript code. The primary requirement developing this module is to not break working code: if working JavaScript is in input then working JavaScript is output. It is ok if the input has missing semi-colons, snips like '++ +' or '12 .toString()', for example. Internet Explorer conditional comments are copied to the output but the code inside these comments will not be minified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 11:55:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498188] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier - Perl extension for minifying JavaScript code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291155.n3TBtYDK002235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498188 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |498189 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 11:57:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291157.n3TBvGBa002609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-29 07:57:15 EDT --- Fedora review jorbis-0.0.17-1.fc10.src.rpm 2009-04-29 rpmlint output: [ellert at ellert jorbis]$ rpmlint 1256512409979681881233819/result/jorbis/*.rpm jorbis.spec jorbis.src:156: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %dir %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} jorbis.src:157: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.jar.* jorbis.src:170: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package player %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-player*.jar.* jorbis.src:178: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package comment %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-comment*.jar.* jorbis.spec:156: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %dir %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} jorbis.spec:157: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.jar.* jorbis.spec:170: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package player %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-player*.jar.* jorbis.spec:178: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package comment %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-comment*.jar.* 6 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint warnings are bogus - rpmlint does not understand the conditional BuildArch. * Package is named according to the guidelines * The specfile is named after the package * The package follows the guidelines for a native Java package * Package license is Fedora approved (LGPLv2+) * The README file says that the license is LGPL with no version, but that is equivalent to LGPLv2+ according to the Fedora License list * The license file (COPYING.LIB) in the sources is installed as %doc * The specfile is written in legible English * Sources matches upstream: 6141edfb16d34412a86c95a97fd4b10f jorbis-0.0.17.zip 6141edfb16d34412a86c95a97fd4b10f SRPM/jorbis-0.0.17.zip * Package builds in mock (Fedora 10) * BuildRequires are sane * No shared libraries * Package owns the directories it creates ! The jars in -comment and -player are also in main (duplicate files) * Permissions are sane and %files has %defattr * %clean clears buildroot * Consistent use of macros * Documentation in -javadoc package * %doc is not runtime essential * subpackages require main with fully versioned dependencies * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 11:55:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498189] New: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 Summary: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 498188 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.05-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: JavaScript::Minifier::XS is a JavaScript "minifier"; its designed to remove un-necessary whitespace and comments from JavaScript files, which also not breaking the JavaScript. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:02:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:02:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291202.n3TC2R7T003818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-29 08:02:26 EDT --- - Require system-icon-theme instead of fedora-icon-theme, as one should be able to remove Fedora brandings altogether. - Is the obsoletes&provides really necessary since there AFAIK is not and hasn't ever been a lxde-settings package in Fedora? rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - lxde-settings-daemon.c is under GPLv2+, other files are under MIT. - I'm not sure, however, if the MIT license needs to be mentioned since it's compatible with GPLv2+. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. NEEDSFIX - Package already Requires: lxde-common which provides /usr/share/lxde => remove %dir %{_datadir}/lxde/ MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:05:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:05:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498191] New: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR - Install .par's into any installed perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR - Install .par's into any installed perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498191 Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR - Install .par's into any installed perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR-0.03-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module installs PAR distributions (i.e. .par files) into any perl installation on the system. The PAR::Dist module can install into the currently running perl by default and provides the necessary parameters to override any installation directories. Figuring out how to use those overrides in order to install into an arbitrary perl installation on the system may be beyond most users, however. Hence this convenience wrapper using ExtUtils::InferConfig to automatically determine the typical site installation paths of any perl interpreter than can be executed by the current user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:08:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291208.n3TC891k005071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 08:08:06 EDT --- PyQwt-5.1.0-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PyQwt-5.1.0-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:12:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291212.n3TCCDDf014904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-29 08:12:12 EDT --- Whoops, I was too fast: SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:11:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:11:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291211.n3TCBVUl014786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-29 08:11:30 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:18:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291218.n3TCILrQ007176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-29 08:18:20 EDT --- I meant %prep, not %pre. :) Sorry! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:14:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498193] New: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig - Infer Perl Configuration for non-running interpreters Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig - Infer Perl Configuration for non-running interpreters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498193 Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig - Infer Perl Configuration for non-running interpreters Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig-1.03-1.fc11.src.rpm Description:This module can determine the configuration and @INC of a perl interpreter given its path and that it is runnable by the current user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:22:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:22:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498196] New: Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C - Interface to the W3C CSS Validator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C - Interface to the W3C CSS Validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498196 Summary: Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C - Interface to the W3C CSS Validator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module is an interface to the W3C CSS Validation online service http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/, based on its SOAP 1.2 support. It helps to find errors in Cascading Style Sheets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:23:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:23:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498197] New: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-mobile - Zarafa Webaccess Mobile is a simple web interface for mobile phones Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-mobile - Zarafa Webaccess Mobile is a simple web interface for mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498197 Summary: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-mobile - Zarafa Webaccess Mobile is a simple web interface for mobile phones Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, tcallawa at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, kanarip at kanarip.com, fedora-jasper at newnewyork.nl Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: [Will come very soon] SRPM URL: [Will come very soon] Description: The Zarafa Webaccess Mobile is a simple web interface for mobile phone users unable to use the Zarafa Webaccess based on Ajax and whose mobile phone is not supported via ActiveSync yet. View your e-mail, calendar and contacts via your mobile device. Zarafa Webaccess Mobile has a text interface only and allows users to create simple e-mails, appointments, contacts and tasks. I'll add the spec file, once I clarified some library dependency issues with Jeroen or so. SRPM shipping is for now a legal problem as I'm testing with an non-official release candidate, nevertheless, there are still some licensing issues with Zarafa, Tom is investigating into. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:22:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498194] New: Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 Summary: Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, tcallawa at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, kanarip at kanarip.com, fedora-jasper at newnewyork.nl Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: [Will come very soon] SRPM URL: [Will come very soon] Description: Zarafa Outlook Sharing is a Microsoft Exchange replacement. The Open Source Collaboration provides an integration with your existing Linux mail server, native mobile phone support by ActiveSync compatiblity and a webaccess with 'Look & Feel' similar to Outlook using Ajax. Including an IMAP4 and a POP3 gateway as well as an iCal/CalDAV gateway, Zarafa can combine the usability with the stability and flexibility of a Linux server. The proven Zarafa groupware solution is using MAPI objects, provides a MAPI client library as well as programming interfaces for C++, PHP and Perl. The other Zarafa related packages need to be installed to gain all the features and benefits of Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration. I'll add the spec file, once I clarified some library dependency issues with Jeroen or so. SRPM shipping is for now a legal problem as I'm testing with an non-official release candidate, nevertheless, there are still some licensing issues with Zarafa, Tom is investigating into. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:22:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498195] New: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess - Zarafa Webaccess featuring a 'Look & Feel' similar to Outlook Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess - Zarafa Webaccess featuring a 'Look & Feel' similar to Outlook https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498195 Summary: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess - Zarafa Webaccess featuring a 'Look & Feel' similar to Outlook Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, tcallawa at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, kanarip at kanarip.com, fedora-jasper at newnewyork.nl Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: [Will come very soon] SRPM URL: [Will come very soon] Description: Zarafa Webaccess features the familiar Outlook 'Look & Feel' interface and you can keep using the features in Outlook that have always allowed you to work efficiently. View your e-mail, calendar and contacts via a web browser. And opening your colleagues calendar or sending a meeting request is only a piece of cake. The Zarafa Webaccess is using the ajax technology to give a more interactive feeling to the users. I'll add the spec file, once I clarified some library dependency issues with Jeroen or so. SRPM shipping is for now a legal problem as I'm testing with an non-official release candidate, nevertheless, there are still some licensing issues with Zarafa, Tom is investigating into. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:27:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498198] New: Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C - Access the W3Cs online HTML validator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C - Access the W3Cs online HTML validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498198 Summary: Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C - Access the W3Cs online HTML validator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C-0.24-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: WebService::Validator::HTML::W3C provides access to the W3C's online Markup validator. As well as reporting on whether a page is valid it also provides access to a detailed list of the errors and where in the validated document they occur. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:42:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:42:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] New: Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 Summary: Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sereinity at online.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tmp.sereinity.homelinux.org/rpm/dynamic-wallpaper.spec SRPM URL: http://tmp.sereinity.homelinux.org/rpm/dynamic-wallpaper-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Dynamic wallpaper is based on weather-wallpaper and generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season, time of day and others. It supports themes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:45:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:45:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484423] Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291245.n3TCj8rG013199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484423 --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-04-29 08:45:06 EDT --- Thanks! And sorry for the delay. I've been running 1.6.21 and most things work (apart from, strangely, the Log Out button). http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/netbook-launcher.spec http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/netbook-launcher-1.6.21-1.fc11.src.rpm Should we ask the legal team about the netbook trademark? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:54:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:54:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498200] Review Request: window-picker-applet - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291254.n3TCsNL4015080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498200 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462851(FedoraMini) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:50:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:50:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291250.n3TCorWj014455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:55:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:55:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291255.n3TCttkT025166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:53:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498200] New: Review Request: window-picker-applet - Window picker applet for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: window-picker-applet - Window picker applet for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498200 Summary: Review Request: window-picker-applet - Window picker applet for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/window-picker-applet.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/window-picker-applet-0.4.23-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A gnome-panel applet that displays open windows as icons on the panel, and has integrated window title-bar functionality. Optimised for use on netbook-size screens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:56:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484423] Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291256.n3TCuDTP016006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484423 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |462851(FedoraMini) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:57:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:57:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484423] Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291257.n3TCv2wi016176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484423 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462851(FedoraMini) Depends on|462851(FedoraMini) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 12:58:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291258.n3TCwsuW025691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-29 08:58:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lxinput Short Description: Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE Owners: cwickert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:00:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:00:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498203] New: Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML - YAML::LibYAML Perl module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML - YAML::LibYAML Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498203 Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML - YAML::LibYAML Perl module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-YAML-LibYAML.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.32-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Kirill Siminov's "libyaml" is arguably the best YAML implementation. The C library is written precisely to the YAML 1.1 specification. It was originally bound to Python and was later bound to Ruby. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:07:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498204] New: Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498204 Summary: Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker-0.02-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Wx::Perl::DataWalker implements a Wx::Frame subclass that shows a relatively simple Perl data structure browser. After opening such a frame and supplying it with a reference to an essentially arbitrary data structure, you can visually browse it by double-clicking references. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:08:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291308.n3TD8Ls1018948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |498195, 498196 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:08:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:08:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498196] Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C - Interface to the W3C CSS Validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291308.n3TD8NJt019010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498196 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |498194 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:08:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498195] Review Request: zarafa-webaccess - Zarafa Webaccess featuring a 'Look & Feel' similar to Outlook In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291308.n3TD8MpO018986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498195 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |498194 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:09:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:09:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291309.n3TD9faW028146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|498196 |498197 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:09:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:09:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498196] Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C - Interface to the W3C CSS Validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291309.n3TD9gtg028178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498196 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|498194 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:09:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:09:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498197] Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-mobile - Zarafa Webaccess Mobile is a simple web interface for mobile phones In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291309.n3TD9he3028206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498197 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |498194 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:29:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:29:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291329.n3TDTMit023744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #40 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-29 09:29:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) > Definitely getting there :) > > Right now, all the descriptions are identical. Wouldn't it be better if the > different packages explained what they contained, instead of just a common > description of what Mumble is? Unless you already know, it's not very clear > what "mumble-overlay" does. Changed for everything except for protocol. Dont now what to write. > > You're calling the package "murmur", which provides "mumble-murmur". If you > make it provide "mumble-server" instead (or simply make it the "server" > subpackage), you'll match the naming used in other distros, which means less > confusion :) It's called mumble-server now. > > You're currently renaming the binary from murmurd to murmur. The 'd' is kind of > standard for daemons, and I suggest leaving it. Changed. > > Read the comment about the input-policy file above :) Unless you know it to > work in current revisions of Fedora, I recommend dropping it. To be honest with you I don't even now what it does. I'll put it as documentation so if somebody wants it, it can get it there. > > There needs to be a post-install for murmur/mumble-server that reloads the dbus > service. dbus uses inotify to monitor conf files. They'll get updated automatically. > > You're installing a logrotate, and your murmur.ini contains logging information > for /var/log/murmur, but this directory isn't created anywhere. Same goes for > /var/run/murmur (where murmur will try to store it's pid file) Are you sure about this? I just untared mumble-1.1.8.tar.gz and opened scripts/murmur.ini.system and it says this: logfile=/var/log/mumble-server/mumble-server.log pidfile=/var/run/mumble-server/mumble-server.pid murmur.logrotate first line is: /var/log/mumble-server/mumble-server.log Files coming in about one hour. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:37:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:37:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291337.n3TDbXdg026130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #4 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-04-29 09:37:30 EDT --- Ant, have you been sponsored yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:36:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:36:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291336.n3TDalhL025953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #41 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-04-29 09:36:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #40) > (In reply to comment #39) > > Definitely getting there :) > > > > You're installing a logrotate, and your murmur.ini contains logging information > > for /var/log/murmur, but this directory isn't created anywhere. Same goes for > > /var/run/murmur (where murmur will try to store it's pid file) > > Are you sure about this? I just untared mumble-1.1.8.tar.gz and opened > scripts/murmur.ini.system and it says this: > > logfile=/var/log/mumble-server/mumble-server.log > > pidfile=/var/run/mumble-server/mumble-server.pid > > murmur.logrotate first line is: > /var/log/mumble-server/mumble-server.log that is correct but you need to mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_localstatedir}/log/mumble-server and mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_localstatedir}/run/mumble-server and %dir them both in the files section: %dir %{_localstatedir}/log/mumble-server %dir %{_localstatedir}/run/mumble-server > > Files coming in about one hour. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:39:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:39:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291339.n3TDdxhk026638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(oded at geek.co.il) --- Comment #20 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-04-29 09:39:55 EDT --- Ping again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:41:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:41:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291341.n3TDfTbl027340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-29 09:41:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Require system-icon-theme instead of fedora-icon-theme, as one should be able > to remove Fedora brandings altogether. The reason for choosing fedora-icon-theme over system-icon-theme is that I explicitly set Fedora in the patch. Changed. > - Is the obsoletes&provides really necessary since there AFAIK is not and > hasn't ever been a lxde-settings package in Fedora? You are correct. I made one as a subpackage of the current lxde-common, but I never built it. Removed. > - lxde-settings-daemon.c is under GPLv2+, other files are under MIT. > - I'm not sure, however, if the MIT license needs to be mentioned since it's compatible with GPLv2+. Agreed and removed. BTW: The included COPYING is GPLv3, not v2. Upstream confirmed this was an error. You want me to replace the file in the package or leave it as is for now. > - Package already Requires: lxde-common which provides /usr/share/lxde => > remove > %dir %{_datadir}/lxde/ That was intentional. I omitted the dir from lxde-common-0.4 and made it require lxde-settings-daemon instead. Updated package: SPEC: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-settings-daemon.spec SRPM: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-settings-daemon-0.4-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:47:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498214] New: Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 Summary: Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gausssum.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gausssum-2.1.6-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: GaussSum is a GUI application that can analyse the output of ADF, GAMESS (US), GAMESS-UK, Gaussian, Jaguar and PC GAMESS to extract and calculate useful information. This includes the progress of the SCF cycles, geometry optimisation, UV-Vis/IR/Raman spectra, MO levels, MO contributions and more. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:51:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:51:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498216] New: Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode Alias: perl-Perl-Tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498216 Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Perl-Tags/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Perl-Tags.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Perl-Tags-0.26-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Generate (possibly exuberant) Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode. Recursively follows use and require statements, up to a maximum of max_level. The implemented tagger, Perl::Tags::Naive is a more-or-less straight ripoff, slightly updated, of the original pltags code, and is rather naive. It should be possible to subclass using something like PPI or Text::Balanced, though be aware that this is alpha software and the internals are subject to change. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328528 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:55:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:55:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291355.n3TDtjKh006751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 Edwin ten Brink changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:55:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498218] New: Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 Summary: Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: edwin at tenbrink-bekkers.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.tenbrink-bekkers.nl/fedora/picturetile.spec SRPM URL: http://www.tenbrink-bekkers.nl/fedora/picturetile-20050314-1.fc10.src.rpm Introduction: Users need this perl script in order to use the Create Photowall option (provided by extension PictureTile 0.5.0.0 in F-Spot). The script itself is not packaged anywhere in Fedora until now. When user click Create Photowall in F-Spot, only the message "picturetile.pl not found" appears, which is not very user-friendly. Unfortunately, F-Spot has a problem with its extensions at the moment, therefore live testing of the interaction with F-Spot is at the moment impossible. I already filed a bug upstream, and add I will add a tracker bug here in Bugzilla as well. Since it is not required for F-Spot to have this package or vice versa, I deliberately left out these dependencies. This is my second package under review, but I have no sponsor up to now. My first package is under review under bug 497525. Description of the script: Takes a bunch of images and tiles them into one large image. Not so much a collage, as a "photo wall." The images are selected randomly from the given directory, and packed together as tightly as possible. Images that are very small are assumed to be thumbnails and are ignored. No image will be used more than once, and the images need not be of the same size or aspect ratio. This script can be used stand-alone from the command-line, or from the F-Spot plugin "create photowall" (PictureTile). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:56:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:56:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498220] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Used - Find modules loaded by Perl code without running it Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Used - Find modules loaded by Perl code without running it Alias: perl-Module-Used https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498220 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Used - Find modules loaded by Perl code without running it Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Used/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Module-Used.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Module-Used-1.2.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Modules are found statically based upon use and require statements. If use of the base or parent is found, both that module and the referenced ones will be returned. If Moose or Moose::Role are found, this will look for extends and with sugar will be looked for; presently, this will miss modules listed in parentheses. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328535 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:03:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291403.n3TE3F33001662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 Edwin ten Brink changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |498222 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:01:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291401.n3TE1imZ001230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-29 10:01:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > - lxde-settings-daemon.c is under GPLv2+, other files are under MIT. > > - I'm not sure, however, if the MIT license needs to be mentioned since it's > compatible with GPLv2+. > > Agreed and removed. BTW: The included COPYING is GPLv3, not v2. Upstream > confirmed this was an error. You want me to replace the file in the package or > leave it as is for now. Leave it as it is. The license of the program is the one in the source code. > > - Package already Requires: lxde-common which provides /usr/share/lxde => > > remove > > %dir %{_datadir}/lxde/ > > That was intentional. I omitted the dir from lxde-common-0.4 and made it > require lxde-settings-daemon instead. Oh, okay, no problem then. ** The package has been APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:07:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:07:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476530] Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291407.n3TE73U0009926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476530 --- Comment #3 from Darryl L. Pierce 2009-04-29 10:07:02 EDT --- Updated release is available: Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/projxp.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/projxp-0.2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:02:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:02:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490576] Review Request: bibtex2html - Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291402.n3TE2h6h008911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 --- Comment #13 from Guido Grazioli 2009-04-29 10:02:42 EDT --- Hi, no and yes actually; i'm trying to help packaging an eclipse feature right now (wtp), which is software i use daily. If someone would take over the maintenance of this package because i'm not sponsored, its no problem for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:11:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:11:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497640] Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291411.n3TEBR6M011060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476530 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:11:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476530] Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291411.n3TEBQmY011022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476530 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |472819, 497640 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:11:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472819] Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291411.n3TEBQQd011043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472819 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476530 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:10:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:10:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492259] Review Request: tucan - Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291410.n3TEAJt4004083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492259 --- Comment #12 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-29 10:10:17 EDT --- new version available 0.3.7 alpha @parag in new version i removed shipped mo-files and built it from source -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:11:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:11:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291411.n3TEBkLE004384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora_requires_release_not | |e? --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-29 10:11:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lxde-settings-daemon Short Description: XSettings Daemon for LXDE Owners: cwickert Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:15:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:15:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291415.n3TEF2qF012075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-29 10:15:01 EDT --- Sorry, no F-9 please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:16:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:16:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291416.n3TEGp6o005571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora_requires_release_not |fedora-cvs? |e? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:18:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:18:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484423] Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291418.n3TEIZ5Z012813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484423 --- Comment #10 from Traxtopel 2009-04-29 10:18:33 EDT --- The logout button will not work since it prereqs an older gdm (needs socket), needs a rewrite. The patch I proposed adds functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:19:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:19:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484423] Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291419.n3TEJXMG013031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484423 --- Comment #11 from Traxtopel 2009-04-29 10:19:32 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341758) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341758) Update logout/etc patch Workaround for logout button issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:23:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:23:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291423.n3TENvuS014168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #42 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-29 10:23:55 EDT --- Done. Everything pointed by Thorvald and Rudolf has be fixed or changed. NEW SPEC: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.spec SRPM: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble-1.1.8-7.fc9.src.rpm DESKTOP MUMBLE: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.desktop DESKTOP OVERLAY: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble-overlay.desktop NEW INIT: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/murmur.init -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:25:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487148] Review Request: gearmand - A distributed job system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291425.n3TEP7M8007611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487148 --- Comment #5 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-04-29 10:25:05 EDT --- Hi Peter, thanks for the review. I've fixed all the issues mentioned above, and disabled building with tcmalloc (from google-perftools-devel) for ppc64. In the meantime upstream released a new version. New version here: SPEC: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/gearmand.spec SRPM: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/gearmand-0.5-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:40:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:40:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291440.n3TEedVm011629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:49:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498216] Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291449.n3TEnArd013966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498216 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:48:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:48:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498220] Review Request: perl-Module-Used - Find modules loaded by Perl code without running it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291448.n3TEmttN013827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498220 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:50:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498204] Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291450.n3TEojOV022066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498204 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:49:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498203] Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML - YAML::LibYAML Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291449.n3TEna5a021432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498203 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:50:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498196] Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C - Interface to the W3C CSS Validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291450.n3TEo5q1014653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498196 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:50:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498198] Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C - Access the W3Cs online HTML validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291450.n3TEohDn014787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498198 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 15:00:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291500.n3TF0nWK024723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 nucleo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alekcejk at googlemail.com --- Comment #5 from nucleo 2009-04-29 11:00:48 EDT --- There is bareftp-0.2.0 in RussianFedora and bareftp-0.2.2 in Fedora. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 15:08:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:08:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487973] Review Request: lxmenu-data - Data files for the LXDE menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291508.n3TF8hi2019030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487973 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 11:08:42 EDT --- lxmenu-data-0.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxmenu-data-0.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 15:22:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:22:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498246] New: Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 Summary: Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/towhee.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/towhee-6.2.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Towhee is a Monte Carlo molecular simulation code originally designed for the prediction of fluid phase equilibria using atom-based force fields and the Gibbs ensemble with particular attention paid to algorithms addressing molecule conformation sampling. The code has subsequently been extended to several ensembles, many different force fields, and solid (or at least porous) phases. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 15:30:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:30:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291530.n3TFUai4032109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #5 from Ant Bryan 2009-04-29 11:30:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > A few notes: > > - .la files need to be removed, add > find . -name *.la -exec rm {} \; > to the end of the install phase > > - if possible, static library build should be disable (usually %configure > --disable-static) > > - devel package needs to Requires: pkgconfig > > - you're running autoreconf, but not BRing the packages => the package will not > build in mock. Autoreconf'ing is frowned upon, and should not be done unless it > is specifically necessary. Done. Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1407423 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/libmetalink/libmetalink-0.0.3-2.fc10.src.rpm (In reply to comment #4) > Ant, have you been sponsored yet? Yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 15:37:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:37:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498248] New: Review Request: viewmol - An open source graphical front end for computational chemistry programs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: viewmol - An open source graphical front end for computational chemistry programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498248 Summary: Review Request: viewmol - An open source graphical front end for computational chemistry programs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/viewmol.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/viewmol-2.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Viewmol is an open source graphical front end for computational chemistry programs. It is able to graphically aid in the generation of molecular structures for computations and to visualize their results. Viewmol has originally been developed by J?rg-R?diger Hill and Andreas Bleiber in the Quantum Chemistry Group of Humboldt University with contributions by Arne Dummer, Mariann Krossner, Andreas B?nger, and Andries de Man. Viewmol was named an outstanding product in the German/Austrian Academic Software Award 1993. rpmlint output: viewmol.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/viewmol/readdmol.awk 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 15:42:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498203] Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML - YAML::LibYAML Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291542.n3TFgcQj028095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498203 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-29 11:42:37 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328734 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 7a8b9258a311e52d0938744ad2ddfc4d YAML-LibYAML-0.32.tar.gz Build failed. Add BR:perl-Test-More -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 15:46:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291546.n3TFkHbp029047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |495001 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-29 11:46:16 EDT --- Added to our watchlist, thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 15:46:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:46:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291546.n3TFkIL7029079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 15:50:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:50:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291550.n3TFoYsI030383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #43 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-29 11:50:33 EDT --- Oops, forgot to add openssl-devel and libogg-devel as dependency. Ill upload new spec when I finish building in mock on all architectures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 15:58:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498196] Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C - Interface to the W3C CSS Validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291558.n3TFwrZ7031993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498196 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-29 11:58:52 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328750 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url bac54611541f72e1cfd12949afae9a1f WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C-0.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=3, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.23 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.29 CPU) + Package perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C-0.2-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(WebService::Validator::CSS::W3C) = 0.2 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(LWP::UserAgent) perl(SOAP::Lite) >= 0.65 perl(URI) perl(URI::QueryParam) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 15:58:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498216] Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291558.n3TFwTc5031930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498216 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-29 11:58:28 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328528 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 7ce83250ffa83ca25c40c9aaa9adc9b2 Perl-Tags-0.26.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=8, Tests=47, 4 wallclock secs ( 0.08 usr 0.03 sys + 1.51 cusr 0.16 csys = 1.78 CPU) + Package perl-Perl-Tags-0.26-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Perl::Tags) = 0.26 perl(Perl::Tags::Naive) perl(Perl::Tags::Naive::Lib) perl(Perl::Tags::Naive::Spiffy) perl(Perl::Tags::PPI) perl(Perl::Tags::Tag) perl(Perl::Tags::Tag::Constant) perl(Perl::Tags::Tag::Field) perl(Perl::Tags::Tag::Label) perl(Perl::Tags::Tag::Package) perl(Perl::Tags::Tag::Recurse) perl(Perl::Tags::Tag::Stub) perl(Perl::Tags::Tag::Sub) perl(Perl::Tags::Tag::Var) Requires: perl(Data::Dumper) perl(File::Spec) perl(Module::Locate) perl(PPI) perl(base) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 15:58:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:58:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487148] Review Request: gearmand - A distributed job system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291558.n3TFwtgh006423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487148 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-29 11:58:53 EDT --- + md5 correct [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum gearmand-0.5.tar.gz* 41946441094bc260c46b1391ae6ef3a4 gearmand-0.5.tar.gz 41946441094bc260c46b1391ae6ef3a4 gearmand-0.5.tar.gz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + Issue with warning "missing-lsb-keyword" fixed. + Issue with unowned directories fixed + Koji scratchbuild http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328821 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 15:58:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498220] Review Request: perl-Module-Used - Find modules loaded by Perl code without running it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291558.n3TFwSxM006363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498220 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-29 11:58:27 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328535 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url ba3421bb8f990f1729b8e2ad7fa233dc Module-Used-v1.2.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=22, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.28 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.35 CPU) + Package perl-Module-Used-1.2.0-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Module::Used) Requires: /usr/bin/env perl >= 0:5.008003 perl(English) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Next) perl(Module::Used) perl(PPI::Document) perl(Readonly) perl(strict) perl(utf8) perl(version) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:00:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:00:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498198] Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C - Access the W3Cs online HTML validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291600.n3TG02iF006822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498198 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-29 12:00:01 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328794 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 7c58ebb1df29fdc0b88474217c064f10 WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C-0.24.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=16, Tests=82, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.02 sys + 1.05 cusr 0.14 csys = 1.27 CPU) + Package perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C-0.24-1.fc12.noarch=> Provides: perl(WebService::Validator::HTML::W3C) = 0.24 perl(WebService::Validator::HTML::W3C::Error) perl(WebService::Validator::HTML::W3C::Warning) Requires: perl(HTTP::Request::Common) perl(LWP::UserAgent) perl(URI::Escape) perl(WebService::Validator::HTML::W3C::Error) perl(WebService::Validator::HTML::W3C::Warning) perl(base) perl(strict) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:18:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:18:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498204] Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291618.n3TGIM3G011324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498204 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-29 12:18:21 EDT --- koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328860 build failed DEBUG util.py:256: No Package Found for perl(YAML::XS) >= 0.32 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:22:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:22:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498198] Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C - Access the W3Cs online HTML validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291622.n3TGMos8005565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498198 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-29 12:22:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C Short Description: Access the W3Cs online HTML validator Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:24:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498196] Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C - Interface to the W3C CSS Validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291624.n3TGO9IY012320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498196 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-29 12:24:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C Short Description: Interface to the W3C CSS Validator Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:26:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498191] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR - Install .par's into any installed perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291626.n3TGQmoe012996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498191 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:26:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:26:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498193] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig - Infer Perl Configuration for non-running interpreters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291626.n3TGQiFr012965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498193 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:30:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291630.n3TGUJfU013869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 12:30:16 EDT --- vidalia-0.1.12-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vidalia-0.1.12-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:36:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:36:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291636.n3TGacb5015421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #44 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-29 12:36:37 EDT --- New spec uploaded. Same URL as above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:35:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497736] Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291635.n3TGZE6J014932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497736 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2009-04-29 12:35:13 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-ezc-Mail.src: I: checking php-ezc-Mail.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name ok + spec file name ok + package meet the PHP Guidelines (new update) + License ok : BSD + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources 81cb0b0f2e21508e54891ab1358379d4 Mail-1.6.1.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F10.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2, php-channel(components.ez.no)) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + small documentation not required to run + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in mock (fedora-rawhide-x86_64) + no test suite + scriptlets ok + Final Requires ok php-common >= 5.2.1 php-mcrypt php-pear(components.ez.no/Base) >= 1.6.1 php-pecl-Fileinfo + Final Provides ok php-pear(components.ez.no/Mail) = 1.6.1 php-ezc-Mail = 1.6.1-3.fc8 -------- APPROVED -------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:43:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498203] Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML - YAML::LibYAML Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291643.n3TGhZ8K017058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498203 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-29 12:43:34 EDT --- You are fast, thank you. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328927 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:44:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498203] Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML - YAML::LibYAML Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291644.n3TGihZH017197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498203 --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-29 12:44:43 EDT --- http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-YAML-LibYAML.spec http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.32-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:44:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:44:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291644.n3TGino9017250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 12:44:48 EDT --- vidalia-0.1.12-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vidalia-0.1.12-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:48:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:48:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498216] Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291648.n3TGm5Rb011628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498216 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:48:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498220] Review Request: perl-Module-Used - Find modules loaded by Perl code without running it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291648.n3TGmFa9011673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498220 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-29 12:48:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Module-Used Short Description: Find modules loaded by Perl code without running it Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:44:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497735] Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291644.n3TGibsb010758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497735 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2009-04-29 12:44:36 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-ezc-Cache.src: I: checking php-ezc-Cache.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name ok + spec file name ok + package meet the PHP Guidelines (new update) + License ok : BSD + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources d1f3d512828f50274f62f6af82b30ad5 Cache-1.4.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F10.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2, php-channel(components.ez.no)) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + small documentation not required to run + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in mock (fedora-rawhide-x86_64) + no test suite + scriptlets ok + Final Requires ok /usr/bin/pear php-common >= 5.2.1 php-pear(components.ez.no/Base) >= 1.5 + Final Provides ok php-pear(components.ez.no/Cache) = 1.4 php-ezc-Cache = 1.4-1.fc8 SHOULD: As you remove empty (dummy) file, you can probably also remove empty dir in docdir So : rm -rf ./docdir/cache Please add a note about the use of APC for cache storage only available if php-pecl-apc extension installed (in %description). -------- APPROVED -------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:48:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:48:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498220] Review Request: perl-Module-Used - Find modules loaded by Perl code without running it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291648.n3TGmHn8018519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498220 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:48:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:48:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498216] Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291648.n3TGm3Gc018469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498216 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-29 12:48:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Perl-Tags Short Description: Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:49:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:49:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498203] Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML - YAML::LibYAML Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291649.n3TGnPso011831@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498203 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |498204 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:49:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498204] Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291649.n3TGnOhK011783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498204 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |498203 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-29 12:49:23 EDT --- http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker.spec http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker-0.02-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:59:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:59:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498203] Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML - YAML::LibYAML Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291659.n3TGxIHO013962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498203 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-29 12:59:17 EDT --- + make test gave All tests successful. Files=25, Tests=254, 4 wallclock secs ( 0.08 usr 0.03 sys + 3.47 cusr 0.39 csys = 3.97 CPU) + Package perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.32-2.fc12.i586 => Provides: LibYAML.so perl(YAML::LibYAML) = 0.18 perl(YAML::XS) = 0.32 perl(YAML::XS::LibYAML) Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) perl >= 0:5.008003 perl(B::Deparse) perl(XSLoader) perl(YAML::XS::LibYAML) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:57:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291657.n3TGvhN8013765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-29 12:57:41 EDT --- Well, - For the line "javadoc -classpath ..." I recommend to use find - xargs also here, like: ------------------------------------------------------------------ find src/java -name '*.java' -print 0 \ xargs -0 javadoc -classpath \ `build-classpath nachocalendar jcalendar` -d doc ------------------------------------------------------------------ - I recommend to remove unneeded comments because it makes spec file less readable. - Please make main package own %_javadir/%name Please fix the issues above before importing. ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (l2fprod-common) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 17:02:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:02:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494862] Review Request: podofo - Tools and libraries to work with the PDF file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291702.n3TH2Jur014869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494862 --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-29 13:02:18 EDT --- The licensing issue was taken upstream, I am waiting for response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 17:08:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:08:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498073] Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291708.n3TH8Qvi023512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498073 --- Comment #2 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-04-29 13:08:24 EDT --- I should do a better job packaging. This needs SA 0.5. Stay tuned for an updated package in the next couple of days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 17:13:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291713.n3THD2uj024546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-29 13:13:01 EDT --- Now this package itself is okay. So as I wrote in comment 3, I will wait for your another review request or your pre-review of other person's review request. (In reply to comment #4) > But I have a question about the files section : Are we allowed (encouraged ?) > to not include all files that we don't think it is necessary ? Yes. Removing unneeded files is always recommended (here it doesn't mean that unneeded files should be removed from the source tarball itself) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 17:19:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:19:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490592] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObject - eZ Components PersistentObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291719.n3THJwR1025969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490592 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 13:19:58 EDT --- php-ezc-PersistentObject-1.5.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-PersistentObject-1.5.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 17:19:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:19:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490592] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObject - eZ Components PersistentObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291719.n3THJstC025935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490592 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 13:19:53 EDT --- php-ezc-PersistentObject-1.5.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-PersistentObject-1.5.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 17:33:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:33:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498276] New: Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 Summary: Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dennis at ausil.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/yubikey/ykclient.spec SRPM URL: http://ausil.us/packages/yubikey/ykclient-2.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: commandline for yubikeys -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 17:35:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:35:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498277] New: Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498277 Summary: Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dennis at ausil.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/yubikey/pam_yubico.spec SRPM URL: http://ausil.us/packages/yubikey/pam_yubico-2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is pam_yubico, a pluggable authentication module that can be used with Linux-PAM and yubikeys. This module supports yubikey OTP checking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 17:35:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291735.n3THZq0A023174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |498277 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 17:35:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:35:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498277] Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291735.n3THZp3v023149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498277 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |498276 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 17:35:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:35:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291735.n3THZVMF023091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-29 13:35:30 EDT --- Ah, * is greedy :) Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jorbis.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jorbis-0.0.17-2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.0.17-2 - Fix duplicate files issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 17:39:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291739.n3THdsKK032739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-29 13:39:53 EDT --- By the way from next time please change the release number every time you modify your spec file to aviod confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 17:48:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291748.n3THmN1s003182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-29 13:48:21 EDT --- https://answers.launchpad.net/bauble/+question/66622 mh, 23 days without response... We should ask spot, or what dou you mean? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 18:00:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490851] Review Request: php-ezc-SystemInformation - eZ Components SystemInformation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291800.n3TI0gTA029224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490851 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 14:00:41 EDT --- php-ezc-SystemInformation-1.0.7-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-SystemInformation-1.0.7-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 18:00:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490851] Review Request: php-ezc-SystemInformation - eZ Components SystemInformation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291800.n3TI0b0C006249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490851 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 14:00:36 EDT --- php-ezc-SystemInformation-1.0.7-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-SystemInformation-1.0.7-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 18:00:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:00:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498285] New: Review Request: mozilla-adblockplus - Adblocking extension for Mozilla Firefox Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mozilla-adblockplus - Adblocking extension for Mozilla Firefox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498285 Summary: Review Request: mozilla-adblockplus - Adblocking extension for Mozilla Firefox Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andreas at bawue.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/mozilla-adblockplus/mozilla-adblockplus.spec SRPM URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/mozilla-adblockplus/mozilla-adblockplus-1.0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Adblock Plus is a content-filtering extension for the Mozilla Firefox- and Mozilla Application Suite-based web browsers. Adblock Plus allows users to prevent page elements, such as advertisements, from being downloaded and displayed. It features improvements to the user interface, filter subscriptions, and element hiding over the original Adblock extesion. rpmlint complains a bit: mozilla-adblockplus.i386: W: no-documentation mozilla-adblockplus.i386: E: no-binary mozilla-adblockplus.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib These errors are ignorable. Normally this extension would better be packed as a noarch rpm as no architecture specific binaries are included. This is not possible however due to the use of /usr/lib and /usr/lib64 by the mozilla-filesystem rpm, which is arch specific. Documentation: There's none, there is only a webpage... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 18:12:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497662] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts - Strip scripting constructs out of HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291812.n3TIC9qt009177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497662 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 14:12:08 EDT --- perl-HTML-StripScripts-1.04-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-StripScripts-1.04-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 18:13:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:13:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291813.n3TIDNii032463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #10 from Benjamin Kosnik 2009-04-29 14:13:22 EDT --- Jakub, I've done this both ways: as maintainer of gcc.spec, can you pick what you want? My suggestion is to mod libstdc++-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 18:12:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:12:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497662] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts - Strip scripting constructs out of HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291812.n3TICEsF032304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497662 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 14:12:13 EDT --- perl-HTML-StripScripts-1.04-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-StripScripts-1.04-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 18:12:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:12:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497662] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts - Strip scripting constructs out of HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291812.n3TICI4x032343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497662 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 14:12:18 EDT --- perl-HTML-StripScripts-1.04-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-StripScripts-1.04-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 18:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291826.n3TIQCtR003319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #45 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-04-29 14:26:10 EDT --- > You're calling the package "murmur", which provides "mumble-murmur". If you > make it provide "mumble-server" instead (or simply make it the "server" > subpackage), you'll match the naming used in other distros, which means less > confusion :) It's called mumble-server now. hmm in your spec it is still called murmur. just a notifier. great work otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 18:29:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291829.n3TITXbM004320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-29 14:29:31 EDT --- http://code.google.com/p/xsw/issues/detail?id=27 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 18:37:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:37:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291837.n3TIbseE016064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #46 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-29 14:37:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #45) > > You're calling the package "murmur", which provides "mumble-murmur". If you > > make it provide "mumble-server" instead (or simply make it the "server" > > subpackage), you'll match the naming used in other distros, which means less > > confusion :) > It's called mumble-server now. > > hmm in your spec it is still called murmur. just a notifier. great work > otherwise. O_o Server subpackage is called murmur. Subpackage murmur provides mumble-server. Something wrong with that? Or did you mean that I call the whole subpackage mumble-server? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 18:47:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472819] Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291847.n3TIl3rX018062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472819 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 18:48:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291848.n3TImF6I018345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2009-04-29 14:48:14 EDT --- Just as an aside; I've been trying to split packages in the App::* namespace into two: the main perl-App-Fizz-Bin and a subpackage of "fizz-bin". To me, this helps make it clearer to the end user that this isn't "just another perl module package" but has an actual executable assoicated with it... especially when the sub-package is included in comps.xml somewhere. See, e.g., perl-App-Asciio/asciio, perl-Git-CPAN-Patch/git-cpan, perltidy (though perltidy goes too far in the other direction, ditching a perl-Perl-Tidy at all). It's certainly not mandated :), but I do think it helps overall adoption of the programs in question, so I offer it up for consideration. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 18:55:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:55:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291855.n3TItN69020099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #47 from Thorvald Natvig 2009-04-29 14:55:21 EDT --- Only thing left that I can see is that you're installing the manpage for murmur-user-wrapper without installing or supporting that script. That script is only necesarry if a non-privileged user wants to run their own murmur instance from their home directory, so I recommend dropping the manpage (rather than installing the script). Have you thought about creating a mumble-server-web package containing the registration script? It turns out to be very handy to have a package that sets up PHP and Ice for use with Murmur, as it's rather non-trivial to get right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 18:58:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291858.n3TIwN5F020634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #48 from Thorvald Natvig 2009-04-29 14:58:22 EDT --- Er. libmumble.so.x.y.z is currently installed in the plugins package; that belongs in the overlay package. I should probably also note that the Mumble binary will complain quite loudly if it can't find libmumble.so, so you might want to strongly encourage it's installation :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 19:08:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472819] Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291908.n3TJ8pqK022881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472819 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-29 15:08:50 EDT --- - I don't know if this is normal for ruby gems, but you're using a non-standard documentation location: %doc %{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version} %doc %{geminstdir}/README.txt %doc %{geminstdir}/CHANGELOG.txt %doc %{geminstdir}/CREDITS.txt Please fix this, for example by adding %setup -c -T and after the install: mkdir doc/ mv %{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version} %{geminstdir}/README.txt \ %{geminstdir}/CHANGELOG.txt %{geminstdir}/CREDITS.txt doc/ Then your %doc section should be just %doc doc/* - The line Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8 is missing. Please add this. [ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Packaging_Guidelines ] - You can probably drop the %define ruby_sitelib %(ruby -rrbconfig -e "puts Config::CONFIG['sitelibdir']") since you're not using it anywhere. --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSFIX SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 19:18:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497640] Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291918.n3TJI9Gq014902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 19:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291924.n3TJOYi8016184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #49 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-04-29 15:24:32 EDT --- checking everything again: 1. mumble-plugins also needs to Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} (just checked it) 2. i am curious if the menu entry for mumble-overlay makes sense really because it doesent start that way (one needs to start a binary with it.). your decision! ;) 3. gtk-update-icon-cache -q %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor >& /dev/null ||: is probably a typo -> &> /dev/null ||: fixing that lets it install nearly cleanly 4. i still get the warnings from ldconfig that /usr/lib64/libmumble.so.1 is not a symbolic link (infact it is a hardlink) id suggest to remove the 2>/dev/null from /sbin/ldconfig calls because that just hides issues (and not even that correctly in this case) going to investigate the issue deeper and let you know if i figure out how to fix that correctly. i hope that you see now that it would be quite impossible to find all issues in one run because you picked a really complex package there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 19:30:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291930.n3TJUfU1028085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #50 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-29 15:30:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #48) > Er. libmumble.so.x.y.z is currently installed in the plugins package; that > belongs in the overlay package. libmumble.so.x.y.z is installed with mumble package. Plugins package installs liblink.so and overlay install mumble-overlay scripts. You are saying that libmumble.x.y.z part of overlay package? That would mean that I should package libmumble.so.x.y.z with overlay package? > > I should probably also note that the Mumble binary will complain quite loudly > if it can't find libmumble.so, so you might want to strongly encourage it's > installation :) libmumble.so is installed together with mumble binary. Its not possible to install only mumble binary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 19:41:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:41:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291941.n3TJfH3G020365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #51 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-29 15:41:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #49) > checking everything again: > > 1. mumble-plugins also needs to Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} (just > checked it) Fixed > 2. i am curious if the menu entry for mumble-overlay makes sense really because > it doesent start that way (one needs to start a binary with it.). your > decision! ;) It was always senseless to me but Simon told me in earlier replies that it should be installed. I tought "well he is already a packager, he nows better than me". Thats the reason why I was installing it. Its removed now. > 3. gtk-update-icon-cache -q %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor >& /dev/null ||: is > probably a typo -> &> /dev/null ||: > fixing that lets it install nearly cleanly Fixed. > 4. i still get the warnings from ldconfig that /usr/lib64/libmumble.so.1 is not > a symbolic link (infact it is a hardlink) > id suggest to remove the 2>/dev/null from /sbin/ldconfig calls because that > just hides issues (and not even that correctly in this case) > going to investigate the issue deeper and let you know if i figure out how to > fix that correctly. I think the solution for this is mine bad packaging. It looks like that libmumble.so.x.y.z is part of mumble-overlay package. Thats why it reports it is hardlink. Im waiting for Thorvalds reply to confirm this. > > i hope that you see now that it would be quite impossible to find all issues in > one run because you picked a really complex package there. Complex guy needs a complex package. :) Anyway, I'm jobless so I have really a lot of spare time. When Thorvald answers my previous post about libraries I'll upload a new spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 19:46:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498246] Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291946.n3TJkRNw031784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 --- Comment #1 from Fabien Georget 2009-04-29 15:46:26 EDT --- It's only 'pre-review' since I can't be a sponsor. - You package doesn't build. It seems that a BuildRequire is missing (I suppose openmpi-devel ) - Instead of using command for adding shebang, you should better use a patch in the spec, and give it at upstream ! - I think that "%doc license.gpl Examples/" is not a good thing. Because Examples/ contains some executable. Install it with the doc flags modify the rights. - In the file /usr/share/towhee/Forcefields, you remove Makefile but not Makefile.am and Makefile.in - Some macros are available in rpm like %{_cat}, %{_cp} ... for coherence you should consider to use them. - Extract from guidelines " Use %global instead of %define, unless you really need only locally defined submacros within other macro definitions (a very rare case)." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 19:54:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:54:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498306] New: Review Request: kde-plasma-stasks - Alternate Task-Switcher plasma applet Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-stasks - Alternate Task-Switcher plasma applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498306 Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-stasks - Alternate Task-Switcher plasma applet Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sven at lank.es QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/kde-plasma-stasks.spec SRPM URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/kde-plasma-stasks-0.5.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A plasmoid offering an alternate task-switcher. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 20:08:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:08:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498246] Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904292008.n3TK87GZ026523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-29 16:08:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > It's only 'pre-review' since I can't be a sponsor. But you don't need to be a sponsor to do reviews, just an approved packager (you need to be sponsorED). > - You package doesn't build. It seems that a BuildRequire is missing (I suppose > openmpi-devel ) I copypasted the MPI stuff from another spec file and didn't see that the openmpi requirement was elsewhere. Forgot to try mock build. Fixed. > - Instead of using command for adding shebang, you should better use a patch in > the spec, and give it at upstream ! True. Emailed upstream. > - I think that "%doc license.gpl Examples/" is not a good thing. Because > Examples/ contains some executable. Install it with the doc flags modify the > rights. No, it is quite standard to ship executable scripts in %doc, as the program works without them; they're just examples of use. > - In the file /usr/share/towhee/Forcefields, you remove Makefile but not > Makefile.am and Makefile.in Nope, find Examples/ -name "Makefile*" -exec rm {} \; also removes Makefile.* > - Some macros are available in rpm like %{_cat}, %{_cp} ... for coherence you > should consider to use them. On the contrary, it is not considered clean to use macros for these sorts of things. Macros should only be used when absolutely necessary, not for standard unix commands as cp, mv, rm, mkdir and so on. > - Extract from guidelines " Use %global instead of %define, unless you really > need only locally defined submacros within other macro definitions (a very rare > case)." Good catch, this was also because of cut'n'paste. Fixed. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/towhee.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/towhee-6.2.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 20:15:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497736] Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904292015.n3TKF6eT005827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497736 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-04-29 16:15:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-ezc-Mail Short Description: Construct and/or parse Mail messages conforming to the mail standard Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 F11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 20:17:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:17:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497735] Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904292017.n3TKHYa1006356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497735 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-04-29 16:17:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-ezc-Cache Short Description: Provides a collection of lightweight classes to cache different kinds of data Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 20:19:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472819] Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904292019.n3TKJuJm029145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472819 --- Comment #6 from Darryl L. Pierce 2009-04-29 16:19:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > - I don't know if this is normal for ruby gems, but you're using a non-standard > documentation location: That's a standard location for Ruby gems: (mcpierce at mcpierce-laptop:~)$ ls /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ actionmailer-2.1.1 activeresource-2.1.1 daemons-1.0.7 gruff-0.3.4 rake-0.8.4 rufus-scheduler-1.0.13 actionpack-2.1.1 activesupport-2.1.1 fastthread-1.0.1 hoe-1.12.1 RedCloth-4.1.9 tlsmail-0.0.1 activerecord-2.1.1 cgi_multipart_eof_fix-2.3 gem_plugin-0.2.3 mongrel-1.0.1 rubyforge-1.0.3 Maybe the Ruby packaging guidelines should add a guideline for this? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Build_Architecture_and_File_Placement > - The line > Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8 > is missing. Please add this. [ > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Packaging_Guidelines ] Fixed. > > - You can probably drop the > %define ruby_sitelib %(ruby -rrbconfig -e "puts Config::CONFIG['sitelibdir']") > since you're not using it anywhere. Removed. > SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from > upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSFIX Fixed. LICENSE.txt is in the RPM but I didn't note it as a doc. Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-rufus-scheduler.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-rufus-scheduler-1.0.13-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 20:24:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904292024.n3TKOxYM008158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #52 from Thorvald Natvig 2009-04-29 16:24:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #50) > (In reply to comment #48) > > Er. libmumble.so.x.y.z is currently installed in the plugins package; that > > belongs in the overlay package. > libmumble.so.x.y.z is installed with mumble package. Plugins package installs > liblink.so and overlay install mumble-overlay scripts. You are saying that > libmumble.x.y.z part of overlay package? That would mean that I should package > libmumble.so.x.y.z with overlay package? > > > > > I should probably also note that the Mumble binary will complain quite loudly > > if it can't find libmumble.so, so you might want to strongly encourage it's > > installation :) > libmumble.so is installed together with mumble binary. Its not possible to > install only mumble binary. Oops. My bad, I misread the .spec file. Just ignore me ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 20:31:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491650] Review Request: libica - Library for accessing ICA hardware crypto on IBM zSeries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904292031.n3TKV3Nd009811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491650 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dpierce at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dpierce at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 20:57:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498324] New: Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chkr at plauener.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JSON-RPC-Common.spec SRPM URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JSON-RPC-Common-0.03-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module provides abstractions for JSON-RPC 1.0, 1.1 (both variations) and 2.0 (formerly 1.2) Procedure Call and Procedure Return objects (formerly known as request and result), along with error objects. It also provides marshalling objects to convert the model objects into JSON text and HTTP requests/responses. - rpmlint: no errors, no warnings - koji builds: builds for all Fedora releases F10: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329269 F11: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329265 F12: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329259 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 21:01:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472819] Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904292101.n3TL1Y1e016322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472819 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-29 17:01:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > - I don't know if this is normal for ruby gems, but you're using a non-standard > > documentation location: > > That's a standard location for Ruby gems: OK, in that case. > Maybe the Ruby packaging guidelines should add a guideline for this? > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Build_Architecture_and_File_Placement Indeed. ** The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 21:02:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904292102.n3TL2gRA016604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #53 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-29 17:02:41 EDT --- No problem. :) Here is the new spec: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.spec Same error pops up when installing mumble. /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libmumble.so.1 is not a symbolic link But it should be sym link to mumble.so.1.1.8. In $HOME/rpmbuild/BUILD/mumble-.1.1.8/release it is symlink but after installation its not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 21:09:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:09:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491650] Review Request: libica - Library for accessing ICA hardware crypto on IBM zSeries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904292109.n3TL9Ob2017817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491650 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Darryl L. Pierce 2009-04-29 17:09:23 EDT --- Is the warning regarding no documentation considered fatal? Other than that, this package looks fine to me. I'll approve this and the documentation issue should be fixed or ignored. MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] rpmlint output: (mcpierce at mcpierce-laptop:Desktop)$ for rpm in *.rpm; do rpmlint $rpm; done 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. libica-devel.s390x: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. libica-utils.s390x: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] [OK] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] [OK] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] [OK] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [29] [OK] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [30] [OK] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 21:13:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:13:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225624] Merge Review: booty In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904292113.n3TLDRnG008502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225624 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(pjones at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-29 17:13:25 EDT --- The package has been proclaimed dead, closing as NOTABUG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 21:24:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225861] Merge Review: grub In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904292124.n3TLO6j6010668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225861 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-29 17:24:04 EDT --- - You're doing installs in build phase and not cleaning tree in install phase. If you need to do many builds with different flags, use out-of-root builds. - Where does the stuff in /boot/grub come from (stages &al)? They're not owned by any package, except splash.xpm. The stage files seem to exist in %{_datadir}/grub. Does grub-install copy them to /boot? - Any reason why you're not using standard %{optflags}? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 21:22:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:22:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497525] Review Request: gnome-applet-bubblemon - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904292122.n3TLMDNs010449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |bubblemon-gnome - Bubbling |gnome-applet-bubblemon - |Load Monitoring Applet for |Bubbling Load Monitoring |the GNOME Panel |Applet for the GNOME Panel --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-29 17:22:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > - gettext (where I decided to follow the suggestions in the Packaging > Guidelines), and Ok, didn't remember that > - the conversion of the two manpages (languages sv and hu) since they are > already included by the upstream maintainer in the upcoming next release and > these files have a small target audience which should have the used character > encoding anyway. Ok, I guess we should trust the translators here. Hope it gets fixed upstream though. (In reply to comment #6) > This is a valid comment. I'm only wondering why the generated template spec > file does not include the part INSTALL="install -p". Some Makefiles already use the -p option by default, but not this one. Others don't understand the INSTALL parameter and will fail. REVIEW FOR gnome-applet-bubblemon-2.0.13-3.fc10.src.rpm OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: GPLv2+ OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5 0f0e72376c112126f0b0d1487ac7c57c OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on all archs http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1321531 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. OK - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. (None) OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: The package contains a Gnome panel plugin, whcih needs no desktop-file-install OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. FAIL - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock on F-10, but not F-11 and F-12 OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Issues - mock build for F-11 and F-12 fails, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329436 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329461 - SourceURL not found, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Referencing_Source We need a downloadable URL in the Source0 tag, use spectool to verify. - Minor: When renaming the package you forgot the comment at the head of the spec Regarding your sponsorship: Do you have any other packages or have you participated in other reviews? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 21:38:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:38:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498200] Review Request: window-picker-applet - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904292138.n3TLcZuq013722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498200 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-29 17:38:34 EDT --- There already is a review for this package, bug # 451773. Please read and ask Jonathan who ig going to do this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 21:44:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477948] Review Request: simple-ccsm - Simplified plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904292144.n3TLivaH025338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477948 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-29 17:44:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Isn't 'BR: gettext' a duplicate? 'intltool' requires 'gettext' already. It's not really needed but it's a close following of the packging guidelines that say: "If the package includes translations, add BuildRequires: gettext." > - INSTALL says '...depends on Python and PyGTK'. > - Isn't 'Requires: hicolor-icon-theme' is missing? No, because pygtk requires gtk2 requires hicolor-icon-theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 21:43:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:43:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904292143.n3TLhNMB025128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-29 17:43:21 EDT --- when in doubt, trust the code. (With GPL licensing version, you can never go off what is in COPYING/LICENSE. The GPL/LGPL are special like that. The long explanation is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F) So, based on what I see in Comment #3 (I have not looked at the code, I'm assuming that Pierre got it right), the correct license tag would be: License: GPLv2+ Which... is what Simon used. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 21:48:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:48:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497805] Review Request: cppcheck - A tool for static C/C++ code analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904292148.n3TLmCxS026170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497805 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Christian Krause 2009-04-29 17:48:11 EDT --- * rpmlint: OK rpmlint SPECS/cppcheck.spec RPMS/i386/cppcheck-* SRPMS/cppcheck-1.31-1.fc10.src.rpm 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * naming: OK - name matches upstream - spec file name %{name}.spec * License: OK - GPLv3+ acceptable for Fedora - license matches the actual license in the source files - license file packaged * spec file in English and legible: OK * sources matches upstream: OK - spectool -g cppcheck.spec works - md5sum: db500cee39ceaa7379bb105046d36cce cppcheck-1.31.tar.bz2 * package compiles: OK - rpm's %{optflags} are used correctly - mock build successful - koji builds for F10, F11 and F12 successful for all architectures: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329473 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329468 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329463 * build requirements: OK - the BR: gcc-c++ is not necessarily needed, since gcc-c++ is already in the minimum build environment: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 - however, it is not forbidden to add it anyway * locales handling: OK (n/a) * handling of static/shared objects, pkgconfig, header files, etc: OK (n/a) * owns all directories it creates: OK * no files listed twice in %files: OK * permissions on files: OK - %defattr used - actual permissions in binary rpm OK * clean section: OK - rm -rf %{buildroot} used * macro usage: OK * code vs. content: OK - only code and test c++ files * large documentation in subpackage: OK (n/a) - the test files are only 300K * no *.la files: OK * GUI application needs *.desktop file: OK (n/a) * package must not own files/dirs owned by other packages: OK * rm -rf %{buildroot} at beginning of %install: OK * filenames UTF-8: OK * functional test: OK - used some of the code snippets from the test files to verify the functionality of cppcheck * debuginfo: OK - debuginfo package not empty - debuginfo actually usable No problems found => APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 22:07:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:07:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498073] Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904292207.n3TM74t5030000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498073 --- Comment #3 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-04-29 18:07:03 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ekg.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ekg-0.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Since i upgraded to setuptools along with fixing the dependencies, i decided this needed a new upstream release. Anyways, that should force the issue. If you need a 0.5.x SA package in F10, you should pull the SRPM from koji and rebuild it, because just installing from rawhide will try to pull the new python and everything else in too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 22:03:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:03:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497805] Review Request: cppcheck - A tool for static C/C++ code analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904292203.n3TM3RD0029164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497805 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-29 18:03:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > * build requirements: OK > - the BR: gcc-c++ is not necessarily needed, since gcc-c++ is already in > the minimum build environment: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 > - however, it is not forbidden to add it anyway You're right, I'll remove it. Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cppcheck Short Description: A tool for static C/C++ code analysis Owners: jussilehtola Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 23:04:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:04:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904292304.n3TN46Fo003222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |chkr at plauener.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chkr at plauener.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 00:46:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:46:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467718] Review Request: rubygem-gruff - Beautiful graphs for one or multiple datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300046.n3U0kv3t026723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467718 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 00:45:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:45:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472819] Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300045.n3U0jgdf002320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472819 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Darryl L. Pierce 2009-04-29 20:45:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-rufus-scheduler Short Description: Scheduler for Ruby Owners: mcpierce Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 01:53:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300153.n3U1ro0M014979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-29 21:53:49 EDT --- Alright, here is the review. Nothing serious: ! Please make the description span 80 columns evenly (as much as possible) ! The file Changes can be packaged as %doc ! There is no information about the license except at the end of the lib/JSON/RPC/Common.pm file. Could you advise upstream for putting a COPYING file into the tarball and adding headers that contain license information to the source files? ! It looks like these BR's can be removed: BuildRequires: perl(Moose) BuildRequires: perl(namespace::clean) The package builds fine without them. The other packages pull them in so they don't cause any harm. I'll leave this up to you. * Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. I don't think this package should own %{perl_vendorlib}/JSON/ . It should own %{perl_vendorlib}/JSON/RPC instead. Ownership of %{perl_vendorlib}/JSON/ will be satisfied by rpm's automatic dependency generation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 02:14:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300214.n3U2EK1q019197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ngompa13 at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #5 from David Nalley 2009-04-29 22:14:17 EDT --- [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./enano.spec ./enano.spec: W: no-%build-section 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. You must at least have the %build section and then put a comment in that section to make rpmlint shut up. I know there is no real building going on - but it will make things cleaner. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/enano-1.1.6-4.20090415hg4babf8545826.fc10.src.rpm enano.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary Enano enano.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. You repeated the name of the package in the summary (and of course the no build section) Please clean that up - the description generally doesn't need to refer to the package name itself. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/enano-1.1.6-4.20090415hg4babf8545826.fc10.noarch.rpm enano.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary Enano enano.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.6-4 ['1.1.6-4.20090415hg4babf8545826.fc10', '1.1.6-4.20090415hg4babf8545826'] enano.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/enano/.htaccess.new 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. If we can fix the description and the build section I think it's good to go from that particular perspective. WRT to the other packages being included: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries And while your package isn't Java take a look at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Pre-built_JAR_files_.2F_Other_bundled_software I tell you this because I also have a web app that I packaged that essentially had the same problems, and I had to package up the included software that's separate. >From my brief analysis there are at least two packages there that appear to be directly verbatim from another package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 02:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300229.n3U2TdAV022805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-29 22:29:38 EDT --- The issue is with aot bits on ppc64 is reported in bug 498351. Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jVorbisEnc.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jVorbisEnc-0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.1-2 - Disable building of aot bits on ppc64 (RHBZ #498351) Package now builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329608 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 03:08:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497339] Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300308.n3U38Odl031067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from David Nalley 2009-04-29 23:08:23 EDT --- this works with no problem so the buildrequires and requires issues are sorted. Of course there is still the outstanding Bug 497338 that is a dependency, and a koji build will fail, so the review itself is approved, but sure you know to wait before requesting a build. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:14:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498362] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any - Add to Any: Share/Bookmark/Email Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300414.n3U4Enb5002507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498362 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:16:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:16:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498363] New: Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe - Add to Any Subscribe Button plugin for WordPress Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe - Add to Any Subscribe Button plugin for WordPress https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498363 Summary: Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe - Add to Any Subscribe Button plugin for WordPress Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ian at ianweller.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe/0.9.6.4.1-1/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe/0.9.6.4.1-1/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe-0.9.6.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Helps readers subscribe to your blog using any feed reader, such as Google Reader, My Yahoo!, Netvibes, Windows Live, and all other RSS readers. The button comes with Add to Any's customizable Smart Menu, which places the services visitors use at the top of the menu, based on each visitor's browsing history. * Add to Any Smart Menu * Includes all services * Services updated automatically * WordPress optimized, localized (i18n for English, Chinese, Danish) * Searchable on key-down * Keyboard navigation * Many more publisher and user features -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498362] New: Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any - Add to Any: Share/Bookmark/Email Button plugin for WordPress Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any - Add to Any: Share/Bookmark/Email Button plugin for WordPress https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498362 Summary: Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any - Add to Any: Share/Bookmark/Email Button plugin for WordPress Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ian at ianweller.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any/0.9.9.2.3-1/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any/0.9.9.2.3-1/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-0.9.9.2.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Help readers share, save, bookmark, and email your posts and pages using any service, such as Facebook, Twitter, Digg, Delicious, and over 100 more social bookmarking and sharing sites. The button comes with Add to Any's customizable Smart Menu, which places the services visitors use at the top of the menu, based on each visitor's browsing history. The E-mail tab makes it easy to share via Gmail, Y! Mail, Hotmail, AOL, and any other web-based e-mailer or desktop program. The Add to Favorites button (or Bookmark tab) helps users bookmark using any browser (Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome, Safari, Opera, etc.). Individual service icons let you optimize your blog posts for specific social sites. * Add to Any Smart Menu * Includes all services * Individual service links (new!) * Services updated automatically * WordPress optimized, localized (i18n for English, Spanish, Chinese, Danish, Belarusian) * Google Analytics integration * Many more publisher and user features -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:17:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:17:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498363] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe - Add to Any Subscribe Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300417.n3U4HJ4Q011403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498363 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:20:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:20:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498188] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier - Perl extension for minifying JavaScript code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300420.n3U4KeLw012045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498188 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-30 00:20:39 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329655 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 14c1fa2fcf76c97de4d0fe0d8d7fc145 JavaScript-Minifier-1.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=17, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.04 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.07 CPU) + Package perl-JavaScript-Minifier-1.05-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(JavaScript::Minifier) = 1.05 Requires: perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:20:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:20:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498186] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Beautifier - beautifier for javascript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300420.n3U4Kbwf012018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498186 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-30 00:20:36 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329653 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 327dfecd8ad2d5cb69cbf5bd14774c31 JavaScript-Beautifier-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=64, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.02 sys + 0.24 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.35 CPU) + Package perl-JavaScript-Beautifier-0.04-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(JavaScript::Beautifier) = 0.04 Requires: perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:37:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:37:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498193] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig - Infer Perl Configuration for non-running interpreters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300437.n3U4bTsY015144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498193 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-30 00:37:28 EDT --- koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329659 Build failed. Need BR: perl(Test::More) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:37:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498191] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR - Install .par's into any installed perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300437.n3U4bQuZ006948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498191 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-30 00:37:25 EDT --- koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329657 Build failed. Need BR: perl(Test::More) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:42:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300442.n3U4gBS0007728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-30 00:42:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:38:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:38:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300438.n3U4cfG7007081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-30 00:38:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:43:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492259] Review Request: tucan - Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300443.n3U4hdf7016069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492259 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-30 00:43:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:39:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:39:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300439.n3U4dRIn015357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-30 00:39:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:41:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472819] Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300441.n3U4f9e5015871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472819 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-30 00:41:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:46:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300446.n3U4krpc008526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-30 00:46:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:48:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496718] Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300448.n3U4m1dJ016950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496718 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-30 00:48:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:51:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497735] Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300451.n3U4pN1L009421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497735 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-30 00:51:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:49:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:49:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300449.n3U4nDdG008758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-30 00:49:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:50:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497660] Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300450.n3U4o7lS017502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-30 00:50:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:53:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:53:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497736] Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300453.n3U4rcRs017922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497736 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-30 00:53:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:56:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497786] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC - Perl implementation of JSON-RPC 1.1 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300456.n3U4uHoX010227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497786 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-30 00:56:16 EDT --- This package is already in fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:57:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:57:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497805] Review Request: cppcheck - A tool for static C/C++ code analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300457.n3U4vV3t010339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497805 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-30 00:57:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:59:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:59:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300459.n3U4xiU8010538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-30 00:59:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 05:01:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:01:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498196] Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C - Interface to the W3C CSS Validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300501.n3U51o5Z011116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498196 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-30 01:01:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:58:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:58:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300458.n3U4wg7p010446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-30 00:58:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 05:00:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300500.n3U50osF019314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-30 01:00:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 05:04:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:04:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498220] Review Request: perl-Module-Used - Find modules loaded by Perl code without running it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300504.n3U546Vo019757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498220 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-30 01:04:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 05:05:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498198] Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C - Access the W3Cs online HTML validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300505.n3U55iTn011974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498198 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-30 01:05:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 05:03:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498216] Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300503.n3U53GkQ011324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498216 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-30 01:03:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 05:21:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497786] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC - Perl implementation of JSON-RPC 1.1 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300521.n3U5Ld37014440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497786 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-30 01:21:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Requesting CVS. > > New Package CVS Request > ======================= > Package Name: perl-JSON I guess this should be perl-JSON-RPC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 05:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300535.n3U5ZThr016724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #12 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-30 01:35:26 EDT --- Here are my notes for this package: - Package builds fine in koji rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329697 * rpmlints: zfstream-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation zfstream.x86_64: W: no-documentation The file ChangeLog can go to %doc. I don't think it is worth packaging the LICENSE file as it doesn't say much about the license. * Patches should be explained and be submitted to upstream. Since the project seems dead, it won't hurt to bypass the submission part. But please explain in the SPEC file what the patch does. * Similarly, please give the reasoning of Source1. * Please remove the duplicate copy of minizip, which we already have in Fedora, from Source1 and adjust the BR's. Note that minizip-devel already requires zlib-devel. * The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. The upstream tarball has a different name. Why don't we use it? * No need to explicitly BR automake. libtool does and always will pull that for you. ! Please make use of the %{name} macro. * The devel package must require "bzip2-devel", "zlib-devel or minizip-devel (?)", and "pkgconfig" ? About "touch NEWS README AUTHORS": Wasn't there an --add-missing flag to automake? ! No need for blank %doc's. ! Please make the descriptions span 80 columns. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 05:50:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498196] Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C - Interface to the W3C CSS Validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300550.n3U5o910019163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498196 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 05:49:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:49:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498198] Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C - Access the W3Cs online HTML validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300549.n3U5n9LA018765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498198 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 05:54:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:54:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498188] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier - Perl extension for minifying JavaScript code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300554.n3U5sFDY027761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498188 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-30 01:54:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-JavaScript-Minifier Short Description: Perl extension for minifying JavaScript code Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 05:53:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:53:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300553.n3U5rrtp019614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-04-30 01:53:52 EDT --- I ll take a look at it around mid may when I m back from my current trip if no one beats me to it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 05:52:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498186] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Beautifier - beautifier for javascript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300552.n3U5qQiI019456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498186 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-30 01:52:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-JavaScript-Beautifier Short Description: beautifier for javascript Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 06:04:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:04:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497805] Review Request: cppcheck - A tool for static C/C++ code analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300604.n3U64GJN021765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497805 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 02:04:16 EDT --- cppcheck-1.31-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cppcheck-1.31-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 06:04:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:04:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497805] Review Request: cppcheck - A tool for static C/C++ code analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300604.n3U64ve1029505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497805 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 02:04:57 EDT --- cppcheck-1.31-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cppcheck-1.31-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 06:11:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490576] Review Request: bibtex2html - Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300611.n3U6BUxi023238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-30 02:11:29 EDT --- Okay. I can sponsor you, but first I want to see that you know the packaging guidelines. This means you must do a) informal reviews of other packages [you can do real ones after you have been sponsored] and b) submit a few other packages for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 06:13:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:13:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300613.n3U6DSiQ031107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 02:13:27 EDT --- mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-7.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-7.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 06:09:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:09:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498203] Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML - YAML::LibYAML Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300609.n3U69btn030312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498203 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-30 02:09:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-YAML-LibYAML Short Description: YAML Serialization using XS and libyaml Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 06:19:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498193] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig - Infer Perl Configuration for non-running interpreters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300619.n3U6J64r032105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498193 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-30 02:19:05 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329843 http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig-1.03-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 06:17:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:17:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300617.n3U6H8tP031920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 02:17:07 EDT --- mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-7.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-7.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 06:16:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498371] New: Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498371 Summary: Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loupgaroublond at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/fedora-devshell.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/fedora-devshell-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Fedora Devshell is a developers toolbox for creating packages and developing software for Fedora. It aims to simplify the process of creating and maintaining packages in the Fedora repositories, and simplify the workflow between other Fedora components. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 06:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498191] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR - Install .par's into any installed perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300619.n3U6J3S8024437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498191 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-30 02:19:02 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329831 http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR-0.03-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 06:41:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300641.n3U6fAYm028158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 02:41:09 EDT --- razertool-0.0.7-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/razertool-0.0.7-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 06:51:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:51:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300651.n3U6pQg9030182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 02:51:26 EDT --- razertool-0.0.7-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/razertool-0.0.7-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 07:00:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492130] Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300700.n3U70YJ7007704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 03:00:33 EDT --- mingw32-gtkmm24-2.14.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-gtkmm24-2.14.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 07:05:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300705.n3U75RER000632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 07:04:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300704.n3U74CbX032467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #21 from Sandro Mathys 2009-04-30 03:04:11 EDT --- Sure will do, thanks. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: l2fprod-common Short Description: In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces Owners: red Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 07:34:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:34:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300734.n3U7YWIo005844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 03:34:31 EDT --- perl-App-Daemon-0.06-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-App-Daemon-0.06-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 07:35:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498216] Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300735.n3U7ZRxT006368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498216 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 03:35:27 EDT --- perl-Perl-Tags-0.26-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Perl-Tags-0.26-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 07:35:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:35:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498216] Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300735.n3U7ZNIc006333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498216 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 03:35:22 EDT --- perl-Perl-Tags-0.26-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Perl-Tags-0.26-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 07:36:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498220] Review Request: perl-Module-Used - Find modules loaded by Perl code without running it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300736.n3U7aCJQ006468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498220 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 03:36:11 EDT --- perl-Module-Used-1.2.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Used-1.2.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 07:36:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:36:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498220] Review Request: perl-Module-Used - Find modules loaded by Perl code without running it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300736.n3U7aHMG006508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498220 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 03:36:16 EDT --- perl-Module-Used-1.2.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Used-1.2.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 07:36:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498216] Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300736.n3U7arsx006615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498216 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-30 03:36:52 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 07:36:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:36:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300736.n3U7al4G006576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-30 03:36:46 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 07:36:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:36:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498220] Review Request: perl-Module-Used - Find modules loaded by Perl code without running it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300736.n3U7auwQ006672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498220 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-30 03:36:55 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 07:34:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300734.n3U7YRlN013501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 03:34:26 EDT --- perl-App-Daemon-0.06-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-App-Daemon-0.06-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 07:44:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300744.n3U7ihHh008044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #19 from Sandro Mathys 2009-04-30 03:44:41 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tvbrowser.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tvbrowser-2.7.3-2.fc11.src.rpm Changes in the l2fprod-common package made it necessary to adapt the path of one dependency. --- As an update to the legal blocker: - l2fprod-common now good - skinlf still incompatible ...both have the same upstream and I'm positive that all issues will be fixed (i.e. upstream prefers ASL 2.0 but didn't apply the changes to this new license everywhere yet) - but upstream isn't very responsive and seems not to have enough time to quickly fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 08:04:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:04:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492259] Review Request: tucan - Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300804.n3U84ABp012293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492259 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 04:04:09 EDT --- tucan-0.3.7-0.1.alpha.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tucan-0.3.7-0.1.alpha.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 08:05:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492259] Review Request: tucan - Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300805.n3U85CKR012764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492259 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 04:05:11 EDT --- tucan-0.3.7-0.1.alpha.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tucan-0.3.7-0.1.alpha.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 08:36:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497640] Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300836.n3U8aAd8018851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-30 04:36:09 EDT --- first notes: - the license is MIT (see COPYING and README from inside of the gem) - it doesn't build in mock for both F-10 and Rawhide on x86_64 + gem install --local --install-dir /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/rubygem-RedCloth-4.1.9-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8 --force --rdoc /builddir/build/SOURCES/RedCloth-4.1.9.gem ERROR: Error installing /builddir/build/SOURCES/RedCloth-4.1.9.gem: ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension. /usr/bin/ruby extconf.rb install --local --install-dir /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/rubygem-RedCloth-4.1.9-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8 --force --rdoc /builddir/build/SOURCES/RedCloth-4.1.9.gem can't find header files for ruby. Gem files will remain installed in /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/rubygem-RedCloth-4.1.9-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/RedCloth-4.1.9 for inspection. - is it possible to run the included testsuite during the build (using the %check section)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 08:40:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498193] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig - Infer Perl Configuration for non-running interpreters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300840.n3U8eSeR019761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498193 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-30 04:40:26 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329843 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url bc428af291b36b1c0ffa1e5c96408f72 ExtUtils-InferConfig-1.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=2213, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.45 usr 0.03 sys + 1.45 cusr 0.09 csys = 2.02 CPU) + Package perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig-1.03-2.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(ExtUtils::InferConfig) = 1.03 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Config) perl(IPC::Cmd) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 08:40:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498191] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR - Install .par's into any installed perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300840.n3U8eLKe027382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498191 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-30 04:40:20 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329831 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 88832cdff670a78bb44e25cadd700f4d ExtUtils-InstallPAR-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.07 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.11 CPU) + Package perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR-0.03-2.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(ExtUtils::InstallPAR) = 0.03 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Config) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Spec) perl(PAR::Dist) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 08:43:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:43:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497663] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300843.n3U8hY53027848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497663 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-30 04:43:32 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1330026 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 0fb38dc2c632844883f3e716b056a88a HTML-StripScripts-Parser-1.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=217, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.10 usr 0.02 sys + 0.43 cusr 0.06 csys = 0.61 CPU) + Package perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser-1.02-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(HTML::StripScripts::Parser) = 1.02 Requires: perl(HTML::Parser) perl(HTML::StripScripts) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 08:49:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:49:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491650] Review Request: libica - Library for accessing ICA hardware crypto on IBM zSeries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300849.n3U8np6m029000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491650 --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-30 04:49:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Is the warning regarding no documentation considered fatal? Other than that, > this package looks fine to me. I'll approve this and the documentation issue > should be fixed or ignored. The warning is harmless here, because there is no documentation other than the AUTHORS and LICENSE files and these are included in the main package that will be always installed (it is the library). New scratch build using the same srpm this time for F-11 is at https://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=55252 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 08:52:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498193] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig - Infer Perl Configuration for non-running interpreters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300852.n3U8qbmC029760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498193 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-30 04:52:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig Short Description: Infer Perl Configuration for non-running interpreter Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 08:53:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:53:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498191] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR - Install .par's into any installed perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300853.n3U8r8dT022153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498191 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-04-30 04:53:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR Short Description: Install .par's into any installed perl Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 08:59:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497663] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300859.n3U8xoRe023661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497663 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-30 04:59:49 EDT --- Thanks for yet another review Parag :-) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser Short Description: XSS filter using HTML::Parser Owners: xavierb Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 09:02:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300902.n3U92LTQ024408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-30 05:02:20 EDT --- I separated the wine related parts in a -wine subpackage. This subpackage will be built only on ix86 and I will ask releng to push the ix86 package to x86_64 repo. This way we will keep all ix86 and x86_64 users happy. Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/dssi-vst.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/dssi-vst-0.8-2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.8-2 - Make a ix86 only -wine subpackage Builds fine in koji rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1330071 Question: Should I change the name of the -wine subpackage to something else (like -wrapper)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 09:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498390] New: Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498390 Summary: Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gp at zimt.uni-siegen.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/rakudo/rakudo.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/rakudo/rakudo.src.rpm Description: Rakudo Perl is a Perl 6 compiler for the Parrot virtual machine. This is only a placeholder, because Rakudo do not build from an installed parrot. It makes no sense to make a rpm for Rakudo with an integrated parrot. The Parrot community is at the moment activ working that general languages build with an installed parrot. I think it will coming soon so I made already this 'Review Request' but it is only a placeholder until Rakudo build on an installed parrot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 09:10:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:10:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494862] Review Request: podofo - Tools and libraries to work with the PDF file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300910.n3U9ApDe001157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494862 --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-30 05:10:50 EDT --- Updated spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/podofo.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/podofo-0.7.0-2.fc11.src.rpm ChangeLog: - removed dependency on openssl, upstream told me, that it is actually not required and when it will become required, they will add the exception clause to the license - added AUTHORS and TODO to the libs subpackage only, because it is always installed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 09:16:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:16:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498390] Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300916.n3U9GJXi002572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498390 Gerd Pokorra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://rakudo.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 09:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300919.n3U9J1Pt002972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |zfstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 09:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:17:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300917.n3U9Hi8F002787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #75 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-30 05:17:38 EDT --- Sorry for the delay. Still there are some issues with directories owning: * devel sub-package should own %{fbroot}/include/ * libfbclient and libfbembed both owns %{fbroot}/lib and they both can be installed. * server-common sub-package should own %{_localstatedir}/log/%{name} * server-common sub-package should own %{fbroot}/intl * server-common sub-package should own %{_sysconfdir}/%{name} Other things looks sane. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 09:34:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:34:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497661] Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300934.n3U9Y0i0030740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497661 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 09:41:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:41:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300941.n3U9fLRB032407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 --- Comment #9 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-30 05:41:20 EDT --- Package available in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 09:41:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:41:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300941.n3U9fVKf032449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 --- Comment #9 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-30 05:41:30 EDT --- Package available in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 09:39:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:39:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300939.n3U9dnQx031821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #16 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-04-30 05:39:48 EDT --- Sorry for the delay. OK, the spec-file is legible, but I overlooked the naive approach to security with rabbit_wrapper. I think that this trick is useless, so I advise you just to remove all %{_rabbit_wrapper}-related stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 09:39:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491650] Review Request: libica - Library for accessing ICA hardware crypto on IBM zSeries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300939.n3U9dfX4006947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491650 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-30 05:39:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libica Short Description: Library for accessing ICA hardware crypto on IBM zSeries Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 10:04:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 06:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498397] New: Review Request: perl-Devel-REPL - Modern perl interactive shell Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-REPL - Modern perl interactive shell Alias: perl-Devel-REPL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498397 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-REPL - Modern perl interactive shell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-REPL/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Devel-REPL.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Devel-REPL-1.003006-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is an interactive shell for Perl, commonly known as a REPL - Read, Evaluate, Print, Loop. The shell provides for rapid development or testing of code without the need to create a temporary source code file. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1330112 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 10:08:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 06:08:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498363] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe - Add to Any Subscribe Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301008.n3UA8km9013082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498363 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 10:08:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 06:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498362] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any - Add to Any: Share/Bookmark/Email Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301008.n3UA8b68013039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498362 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 10:09:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 06:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497192] Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301009.n3UA93GG013132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497192 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-30 06:09:02 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1330027 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. polkit-qt.src: E: description-line-too-long Polkit-qt is a library that lets developers use the PolicyKit API through a nice polkit-qt.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab: line 1) polkit-qt.i586: E: description-line-too-long Polkit-qt is a library that lets developers use the PolicyKit API through a nice polkit-qt.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libpolkit-qt-core.so.0.9.2 exit at GLIBC_2.0 polkit-qt-examples.i586: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.qt.policykit.examples.conf ==> plz fix those before cvs import. + source files match upstream url 14cb821f8917c13ed4154a3ab8e596be polkit-qt-0.9.2.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + polkit-qt.pc, polkit-qt-core.pc,polkit-qt-gui.pc file present. + -devel subpackage present. + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + ldconfig scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package polkit-qt-0.9.2-1.fc12.i586 => Provides: libpolkit-qt-core.so.0 libpolkit-qt-gui.so.0 Requires: libQtCore.so.4 libQtDBus.so.4 libQtGui.so.4 libQtXml.so.4 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libdbus-1.so.3 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libglib-2.0.so.0 libm.so.6 libpolkit-dbus.so.2 libpolkit-grant.so.2 libpolkit-qt-core.so.0 libpolkit-qt-gui.so.0 libpolkit.so.2 libpthread.so.0 libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package polkit-qt-devel-0.9.2-1.fc12.i586 => Provides: pkgconfig(polkit-qt) = 0.9.2 pkgconfig(polkit-qt-core) = 0.9.2 pkgconfig(polkit-qt-gui) = 0.9.2 Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config libpolkit-qt-core.so.0 libpolkit-qt-gui.so.0 pkgconfig(QtCore) pkgconfig(QtGui) pkgconfig(polkit) pkgconfig(polkit-dbus) pkgconfig(polkit-grant) + Package polkit-qt-examples-0.9.2-1.fc12.i586 => Requires: libQtCore.so.4 libQtDBus.so.4 libQtXml.so.4 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libdbus-1.so.3 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libglib-2.0.so.0 libm.so.6 libpolkit-dbus.so.2 libpolkit-grant.so.2 libpolkit-qt-core.so.0 libpolkit.so.2 libpthread.so.0 libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) Suggestions: 1) I think polkit-qt-examples should Requires: dbus 2) Should query upstream to change COPYING file with text of GPLv2+. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 10:14:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 06:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497525] Review Request: gnome-applet-bubblemon - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301014.n3UAEv7X006855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 --- Comment #8 from Edwin ten Brink 2009-04-30 06:14:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > - the conversion of the two manpages (languages sv and hu) since they are > > already included by the upstream maintainer in the upcoming next release and > > these files have a small target audience which should have the used character > > encoding anyway. > > Ok, I guess we should trust the translators here. Hope it gets fixed upstream > though. It currently is, the upstream maintainer assured me of this fact. > (In reply to comment #6) > > This is a valid comment. I'm only wondering why the generated template spec > > file does not include the part INSTALL="install -p". > > Some Makefiles already use the -p option by default, but not this one. Others > don't understand the INSTALL parameter and will fail. I'll see if I can get that fixed upstream as well. Perhaps it's just a question of moving to a more recent automake/autoconf. > REVIEW FOR gnome-applet-bubblemon-2.0.13-3.fc10.src.rpm > Issues > - mock build for F-11 and F-12 fails, see > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329436 > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329461 The build.log is pretty clear and fortunately identical in F11 and F12. Strange that it does not happen under F10 or earlier (I used F9 for an earlier version, and F10 for this submission). I will check myself as well as with the upstream maintainer what happened. > - SourceURL not found, see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Referencing_Source > We need a downloadable URL in the Source0 tag, use spectool to verify. Sorry, that's my mistake. The download page on upstream's project page embeds the source directory which is on another server. It should read: http://savannah.inetbridge.net/bubblemon/bubblemon-%{version}.tar.gz > - Minor: When renaming the package you forgot the comment at the head of the > spec I see, consider it corrected. Because of the upcoming release of F11, I suggest not to incorporate this package until the build issues for F11 and F12 have been resolved. I assume you agree with me on this. I will incorporate the above issues and revert as soon as possible. That will probably be with a new upstream release to fix the build issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 10:32:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 06:32:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497525] Review Request: gnome-applet-bubblemon - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301032.n3UAWqXx010371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 --- Comment #9 from Edwin ten Brink 2009-04-30 06:32:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Regarding your sponsorship: Do you have any other packages or have you > participated in other reviews? Just yesterday I have submitted another very small package for review (see bug 498218), which has not had a reviewer yet. I have some plans for submitting yet another package (log4cpp, http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=15190), after playing around with it a bit more. From the concept it is an interesting package, however does not seem to be very actively maintained at the moment judging from the bug, patch and feature trackers on sourceforge. I'm therefore not sure if this would make a good candidate at the moment. I have not yet participated in any reviews yet. My main activities on Bugzilla so far have been bug reporting (sometimes signalling dupes when I stumbled upon them) and commenting on other bugs which were reported by others before me. I have been actively using RedHat Linux around 1996-2002, and returned to Fedora again about a year ago. I therefore do not possess much recent experience of Fedora packaging and its guidelines, but I am familiar with rpm. Your sponsorship would be very much appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 11:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498407] Review Request: bind-dyndb-ldap - LDAP back-end plug-in for BIND In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301112.n3UBC0WS018698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498407 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 11:10:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498407] New: Review Request: bind-dyndb-ldap - LDAP back-end plug-in for BIND Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bind-dyndb-ldap - LDAP back-end plug-in for BIND https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498407 Summary: Review Request: bind-dyndb-ldap - LDAP back-end plug-in for BIND Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mnagy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mnagy.fedorapeople.org/bind/bind-dyndb-ldap.spec SRPM URL: http://mnagy.fedorapeople.org/bind/bind-dyndb-ldap-0.1.0-0.1.a1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package provides an LDAP back-end plug-in for BIND. It features support for dynamic updates and internal caching, to lift the load off of your LDAP server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 11:14:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:14:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301114.n3UBEYdo019106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-30 07:14:33 EDT --- Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 11:21:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301121.n3UBLE6V020940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #55 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 07:21:10 EDT --- parrot-1.0.0-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/parrot-1.0.0-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 11:21:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301121.n3UBLSmJ021028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #57 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 07:21:26 EDT --- parrot-1.0.0-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/parrot-1.0.0-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 11:21:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:21:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301121.n3UBLLEw028040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #56 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 07:21:19 EDT --- parrot-1.0.0-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/parrot-1.0.0-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 11:32:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:32:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301132.n3UBWrfS023310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 --- Comment #10 from Levente Farkas 2009-04-30 07:32:52 EDT --- Richard is there an reason not to approved? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 11:34:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498407] Review Request: bind-dyndb-ldap - LDAP back-end plug-in for BIND In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301134.n3UBYkAv030426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498407 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-30 07:34:45 EDT --- - Respects compiler flags - Filelists sane - SPEC file clean and legible, American English used - Provides sane - Uses compiler flags correctly - Uses parallel make correctly - RPMlint happy 1.) Requires You install /usr/lib/bind/ldap.so, but you don't depend on anything that would own /usr/lib/bind. 2.) BuildRequires -BuildRequires: bind-devel >= bind-devel-9.6.1-0.3.b1 +BuildRequires: bind-devel >= 9.6.1-0.3.b1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 11:41:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301141.n3UBf4HX025323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 07:41:03 EDT --- lxinput-0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxinput-0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 11:39:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:39:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301139.n3UBdEsW024716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 07:39:13 EDT --- lxde-settings-daemon-0.4-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxde-settings-daemon-0.4-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 11:42:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301142.n3UBg1U5025449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-30 07:41:59 EDT --- Probably because I'm super-busy. Unassigning myself from review. If you ask on the fedora-mingw mailing list I'm sure you can get someone to review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 11:38:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301138.n3UBcEqR024593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 --- Comment #7 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-30 07:38:13 EDT --- My first thought was that it could be a bit confusing for those coming from CPAN to install perl-App-Foo and not find the corresponding foo binary installed. But the more I think about it, I'm starting to like the idea of giving foo a bit more prominence. Since this was reviewed as is, I've checked it in without changes, but offer a split nopaste and perl-App-Nopaste for further consideration before going ahead and arbitrarily making the change. Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-App-Nopaste.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-App-Nopaste-0.10-2.fc12.src.rpm koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1330196 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 11:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301139.n3UBdTsg031489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 07:39:29 EDT --- lxde-settings-daemon-0.4-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxde-settings-daemon-0.4-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 11:48:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301148.n3UBmxpH026669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 07:48:59 EDT --- lxinput-0.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxinput-0.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 11:49:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226483] Merge Review: tcsh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301149.n3UBnllT000905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226483 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-04-30 07:49:44 EDT --- Built in tcsh-6.16-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 11:54:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498407] Review Request: bind-dyndb-ldap - LDAP back-end plug-in for BIND In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301154.n3UBslX7002046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498407 --- Comment #2 from Martin Nagy 2009-04-30 07:54:45 EDT --- Done, new spec uploaded. I added a Require for bind >= 9.6.1-0.3.b1. I also fixed the BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 11:57:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497786] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC - Perl implementation of JSON-RPC 1.1 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301157.n3UBvCV2002805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497786 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-04-30 07:57:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > I guess this should be perl-JSON-RPC Yes, you're right. I'm sorry, that was a stupid mistake on my part. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-JSON-RPC Short Description: Perl implementation of JSON-RPC 1.1 protocol-RPC Owners: eseyman Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 12:02:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:02:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301202.n3UC20pU029414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |498413(vfrnav) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 12:01:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] New: Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) Alias: vfrnav https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 Summary: Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 438588 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/vfrnav.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/vfrnav-0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: vfrnav is a flight planning and navigation application for flights under visual flight rules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 12:05:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498407] Review Request: bind-dyndb-ldap - LDAP back-end plug-in for BIND In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301205.n3UC5HJS004619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498407 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-30 08:05:16 EDT --- Good work - Requires sane - Builds fine in mock now APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 12:06:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:06:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301206.n3UC6m05004982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch Bug 453858 depends on bug 453850, which changed state. Bug 453850 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453858 depends on bug 453854, which changed state. Bug 453854 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453858 depends on bug 453853, which changed state. Bug 453853 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-30 08:06:46 EDT --- Source matches upstream: $ diff -urN globus_gsi_callback-1.10 globus_gsi_callback-1.10-dl is silent. Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1330235 Rpmlint: $ rpmlint globus-gsi-callback* globus-gsi-callback.spec globus-gsi-callback-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 2 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 12:12:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301212.n3UCC9MA031788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-30 08:12:08 EDT --- Fedora review globus-gsi-callback-1.10-1.fc10.src.rpm 2009-04-30 + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint output The no-documentation warning can be ignored as there is a separate doc package + Package is named according to Fedora Package Naming Guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora packaging guidelines + License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora ASL 2.0 + License matches the actual package license + The package contains the license file + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm the source repacking makes it impossible to compare md5sum's, thus: $ diff -urN globus_gsi_callback-1.10 globus_gsi_callback-1.10-dl reports no differences + Package scratch-builds n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content + Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage n/a Files marked %doc should not affect package + Header files should be in -devel n/a Static libraries should be in -static + Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' indirectly, via globus-core + libfoo.so must go in -devel + -devel must require the fully versioned base + Packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 APPROVED by sailer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 12:12:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:12:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498407] Review Request: bind-dyndb-ldap - LDAP back-end plug-in for BIND In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301212.n3UCC5al006048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498407 Martin Nagy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Martin Nagy 2009-04-30 08:12:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bind-dyndb-ldap Short Description: LDAP back-end plug-in for BIND Owners: mnagy Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 12:11:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497192] Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301211.n3UCBId8005946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497192 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2009-04-30 08:11:17 EDT --- Thanks, good suggestions, will do. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: polkit-qt Short Description: Qt bindings for PolicyKit Owners: rdieter Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 12:13:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301213.n3UCD6iW031980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #53 from leigh scott 2009-04-30 08:13:04 EDT --- Bump! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 12:34:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301234.n3UCYAel010403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 Igor Juri?kovi? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |juriskovic.igor at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-30 08:34:09 EDT --- Hello Thomas, this is not official review. I'm in need of sponsor but I can tell you what can be better or fixed. - your Release: doesn't match changelog version. - Group doesn't exist. You should use most appropriate Group available. less /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS* - will give you all possible groups. - you dont need Require: gypsy. It will get pulled by gypsy-devel - gcc-c++ is not needed. Read here why: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines - in %files section you can omit INSTALL. You are making installation so other users have no need to look into that file. - NEWS is empty. You can remove it. Same goes for README - package doesn't own %{_datadir}/%{name} dir. Include it to %files section with %dir. - You can speed up packaging by using asterix(*) to own all files in some directory. You can use this on %{_datadir}/%{name}/* to own all files inside. That's what I can see in fast - 10 minute - review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 12:37:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301237.n3UCb19P011265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 --- Comment #2 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-30 08:37:00 EDT --- Oops, forgot to tell you about licence. Its wrong. src file says GPLv2 or any later version. So you should change it from GPLv2 to GPLv2+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 12:43:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:43:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301243.n3UChALQ006120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #54 from Rex Dieter 2009-04-30 08:43:08 EDT --- Either Version: 1.4.0 Release: 0.1.beta2 or Version: 1.4.0 Release: 0.1.svn works, conforming to Naming guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Package_Version -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 12:47:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:47:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301247.n3UClVWs007493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #76 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-30 08:47:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #75) > * devel sub-package should own %{fbroot}/include/ > * server-common sub-package should own %{_localstatedir}/log/%{name} > * server-common sub-package should own %{fbroot}/intl > * server-common sub-package should own %{_sysconfdir}/%{name} > ok easy to fix but this one : > * libfbclient and libfbembed both owns %{fbroot}/lib and they both can be > installed. I don't know how to fix the fact that both use %{fbroot}/lib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 13:05:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:05:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488995] Review Request: pidgin-tlen - Tlen IM Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301305.n3UD5KJ8017801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488995 --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-30 09:05:18 EDT --- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495310 I will wait, because this topic is hot! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 13:30:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:30:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301330.n3UDUQEN024124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 Jim Meyering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 13:32:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:32:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301332.n3UDW2LN024391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-30 09:32:01 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-gsi-callback Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 13:32:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:32:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301332.n3UDWXPA017649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 13:35:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:35:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301335.n3UDZmgp018393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #55 from leigh scott 2009-04-30 09:35:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #54) > Either > Version: 1.4.0 > Release: 0.1.beta2 > or > Version: 1.4.0 > Release: 0.1.svn > works, conforming to Naming guidelines: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Package_Version Thank you, I went with your second example. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=100393 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 13:45:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301345.n3UDjDpx020887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-30 09:45:09 EDT --- Update Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/zfstream.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/zfstream-20041202-3.fc11.src.rpm (In reply to comment #12) > The file ChangeLog can go to %doc. I don't think it is worth packaging the > LICENSE file as it doesn't say much about the license. Done and agreed. > * Patches should be explained and be submitted to upstream. Since the project > seems dead, it won't hurt to bypass the submission part. But please explain in > the SPEC file what the patch does. I have sent the patch upstream by PM (the project lacks a bug tracker). While the original author said he integrated the patch into his tree, he apparently hasn't gotten around to release a new version. > * Similarly, please give the reasoning of Source1. See comment #9. Basically because I couldn't get toc working, and furthermore allows autotools to cross-compile the lib (I have also submitted mingw32-zfstream for review). > * Please remove the duplicate copy of minizip, which we already have in Fedora, > from Source1 and adjust the BR's. Note that minizip-devel already requires > zlib-devel. Done. > * The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. The > upstream tarball has a different name. Why don't we use it? The project is named just "zfstream" on the author's homepage. It's just that the tarball has libs11n_ prefixed. s11n.net is another project by the same author, so I guess that's where the prefix comes from. zfstream however has nothing to do with s11n.net, so I found it more natural to just name the package zfstream. > * No need to explicitly BR automake. libtool does and always will pull that for > you. Done > ! Please make use of the %{name} macro. Done. > * The devel package must require "bzip2-devel", "zlib-devel or minizip-devel > (?)", and "pkgconfig" Done. I think zlib-devel is enough, as zipstream.hpp does not include anything from minizip-devel, minizip is only needed for building > ? About "touch NEWS README AUTHORS": Wasn't there an --add-missing flag to > automake? Actually, -a (which is already present) or --add-missing (the full name for -a) only adds missing files _other_ than NEWS, README and AUTHORS. So build will fail if you remove the touch. > ! No need for blank %doc's. Done. > ! Please make the descriptions span 80 columns. Shortened. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 13:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301352.n3UDqsOF029417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 14:08:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:08:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497640] Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301408.n3UE8kN7026240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 --- Comment #2 from Darryl L. Pierce 2009-04-30 10:08:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > first notes: > - the license is MIT (see COPYING and README from inside of the gem) Fixed. > - it doesn't build in mock for both F-10 and Rawhide on x86_64 Fixed that. Added BuildRequires: ruby-devel >= 1.8 > - is it possible to run the included testsuite during the build (using the > %check section)? Running them will require someone to submit echoe as a package for Fedora. If somebody does that, I'll add running the tests to the spec. Updated spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-RedCloth.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-RedCloth-4.1.9-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 14:46:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498246] Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301446.n3UEk1cx002701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 --- Comment #3 from Fabien Georget 2009-04-30 10:46:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > But you don't need to be a sponsor to do reviews, just an approved packager > (you need to be sponsorED). It was that I meant, I am not an approved packager. Sorry. > > - I think that "%doc license.gpl Examples/" is not a good thing. Because > > Examples/ contains some executable. Install it with the doc flags modify the rights. > > No, it is quite standard to ship executable scripts in %doc, as the program > works without them; they're just examples of use. > If you think people don't have to run them, I think it is good. > - In the file /usr/share/towhee/Forcefields, you remove Makefile but not > > Makefile.am and Makefile.in > > Nope, > find Examples/ -name "Makefile*" -exec rm {} \; > also removes Makefile.* I don't talk about Examples, but about /usr/share/towhee/Forcefields. (16:21:58)-[manawy at teatime ~]$ ls /usr/share/towhee/ForceFields Makefile.am Makefile.in ... I mix the two files it's right sorry. You don't remove nothing from this file. Anyway, Makefile.am and Makefile.in are installed but useless without the configure script. > > > - Some macros are available in rpm like %{_cat}, %{_cp} ... for coherence you should consider to use them. > > On the contrary, it is not considered clean to use macros for these sorts of > things. Macros should only be used when absolutely necessary, not for standard unix commands as cp, mv, rm, mkdir and so on. That's surprising ... defined but useless macros. But of course, it is not mandatory. (And I read a new time the packaging guidelines, nothing are mentionned about this (except for directory). It is not in this document I read it is better to use macros. So like you want :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 14:56:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:56:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301456.n3UEuLKe013349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 --- Comment #7 from Fabien Georget 2009-04-30 10:56:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > By the way from next time please change the release number > every time you modify your spec file to aviod confusion. Of course :/ sorry ! I discover an interesting package in review request, so I start a pre-review : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 I think I need more time to read review done by others people to understand some points. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 15:00:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:00:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301500.n3UF0LVW006080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-30 11:00:20 EDT --- Thanks, Igor, for your comments! I've updated the package: Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/vfrnav.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/vfrnav-0.3-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 15:04:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:04:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301504.n3UF4u72006645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-30 11:04:54 EDT --- Thank you for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jorbis Short Description: Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 15:21:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498397] Review Request: perl-Devel-REPL - Modern perl interactive shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301521.n3UFLgmc019559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498397 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-30 11:21:38 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1330112 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url e052cac4b6d55eee9a0ced5a76b5a7be Devel-REPL-1.003006.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs Files=1, Tests=17, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.46 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.51 CPU) +Package perl-Devel-REPL-1.003006-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Devel::REPL) = 1.003006 perl(Devel::REPL::Error) perl(Devel::REPL::Meta::Plugin) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::B::Concise) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::Colors) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::Commands) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::Completion) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::CompletionDriver::Globals) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::CompletionDriver::INC) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::CompletionDriver::Keywords) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::CompletionDriver::LexEnv) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::CompletionDriver::Methods) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::CompletionDriver::Turtles) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::DDS) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::DumpHistory) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::FancyPrompt) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::FindVariable) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::History) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::Interrupt) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::LexEnv) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::MultiLine::PPI) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::NewlineHack) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::Nopaste) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::OutputCache) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::PPI) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::Packages) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::Packages::DefaultScratchpad) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::Peek) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::ReadLineHistory) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::Refresh) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::ShowClass) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::Timing) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin::Turtles) perl(Devel::REPL::Profile) perl(Devel::REPL::Profile::Default) perl(Devel::REPL::Script) Requires: /usr/bin/env perl >= 0:5.008001 perl(B::Concise) perl(B::Keywords) perl(Data::Dump::Streamer) perl(Devel::Peek) perl(Devel::REPL) perl(Devel::REPL::Error) perl(Devel::REPL::Meta::Plugin) perl(Devel::REPL::Plugin) perl(Devel::REPL::Script) perl(File::HomeDir) perl(File::Next) perl(File::Spec) perl(Lexical::Persistence) perl(Module::Refresh) perl(Moose) perl(Moose::Role) perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints) perl(MooseX::AttributeHelpers) perl(PPI) perl(PPI::Dumper) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Term::ANSIColor) perl(Term::ReadLine) perl(Time::HiRes) perl(namespace::clean) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) suggestions: 1) Not needed BuildRequires: perl >= 1:5.8.1 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 15:42:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:42:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498397] Review Request: perl-Devel-REPL - Modern perl interactive shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301542.n3UFg9eX015129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498397 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 15:38:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301538.n3UFcTk9014296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 King InuYasha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ngompa13 at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #6 from King InuYasha 2009-04-30 11:38:25 EDT --- Which packages in the Enano package are verbatim from another package? Give me a list, and I can check with upstream. If they are truly verbatim, I will start stripping them out and doing to work necessary to symlink in the required parts. However, if they are modified, can I leave them in, or will I have to split them out into an enano-* package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 15:42:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498397] Review Request: perl-Devel-REPL - Modern perl interactive shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301542.n3UFg3Eh024091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498397 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-30 11:42:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Devel-REPL Short Description: Modern perl interactive shell Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 15:39:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301539.n3UFdrDV023473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-30 11:39:49 EDT --- Thanks for adding the source file explanations to the specfile. Everything looks good, except > > ! Please make the descriptions span 80 columns. > > Shortened. I don't see any change. In fact, you shouldn't shorten them. Some lines in the description are even smaller than 70 columns. They need stretched out a little. But this is not a blocker. You can do it before you commit ------------------------------------------- This package (zfstream) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 15:43:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301543.n3UFhEpa015339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 --- Comment #13 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-04-30 11:43:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #10) > > (In reply to comment #9) > > > Oh -- and this just a readability nit. I'd move this up to the top: > > > # rpm does not currently pull debuginfo out of mono packages > > > %global debug_package %{nil} > > > > Ok, I have to move that to the tip of the file? or just before %description ? > > > top of the file. It's easiest to spot definitions of global variables when > they're at the top. Sorry for the delay, to bussy the last ones...Ok, here is the new review: http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-debugger-gdb.spec.review4 I get the Paul answer for the mdb package, so I going to apply what to learn here...stay tune.. Thanks Toshio Mauricio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 15:49:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301549.n3UFnHkV016569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-30 11:49:15 EDT --- Okay. - Your pre-review seems good for initial comments - This package itself is okay. _____________________________________ < This package is approved by mtasaka > ------------------------------------- \ ^__^ \ (oo)\_______ (__)\ )\/\ ||----w | || || Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10/11, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 15:53:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301553.n3UFrNeU026483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-30 11:53:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > I don't see any change. In fact, you shouldn't shorten them. Some lines in the > description are even smaller than 70 columns. They need stretched out a little. Ah sorry, I misunderstood what you meant. Will fix before checkin, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 15:55:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301555.n3UFtYXq027056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-30 11:55:32 EDT --- Any progress with this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 15:54:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:54:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301554.n3UFsnZF026670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-30 11:54:48 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: zfstream Short Description: C++ iostream like access to compressed files Owners: sailer Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 15:58:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301558.n3UFwrTg018661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #77 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-30 11:58:49 EDT --- One question : for defaut directory to store data (databases files) is it better to use %{_localstatedir}/lib/%{name}/data/ or %{_datadir}/%{name}/data/ with %attr(0770,%{name},%{name}) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 16:02:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:02:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301602.n3UG2st2019715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch --- Comment #12 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-30 12:02:51 EDT --- The native zlib package also generates the minizip and minizip-devel packages. These are also libraries and thus eligible for mingw32. Why have they been dropped? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 16:05:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497640] Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301605.n3UG5iO9029451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-30 12:05:43 EDT --- > > - is it possible to run the included testsuite during the build (using the > > %check section)? > > Running them will require someone to submit echoe > as a package for Fedora. > If somebody does that, I'll add running the tests to the spec. OK I have found another issues - because there is a library written in C, the %build and %install sections need to be handled differently - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Gem_with_extension_libraries_written_in_C and I have seen some inspiration in rubygem-gettext (http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/rubygem-gettext/devel/rubygem-gettext.spec?revision=1.6&view=markup) - rpmbuild complains that COPYING, CHANGELOG and README are listed twice, probably they don't need to be explicitly specified with %doc - and rpmlint complains about "summary ended with dot" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 16:12:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:12:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301612.n3UGCPAv021845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #5 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-04-30 12:12:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > So this package has already been submitted for review by Paul Lange: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490030 > > It's polite to ask Paul if he wants to update his package or would be alright > if you take over the package. If he updates his package, you can do a review > of his package. If he would rather you take over you can look at his spec file > for ideas, update your package with ideas from his spec and the other review > we've done, and I'll review. Ok, Paul marked his package as duplicated, so you can find the new ones that I'm submiting at: Spec http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-debugger-mdb.spec Source RPM http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-debugger-mdb-2.0-1.1.fc10.src.rpm I apply all the thing that you told (at least I think that I not forget nothing...but probably I do :-S Please check the all the spec file, but specially the %install and %file sections in witch I have more doubts.. The package seems to be builded ok, as soon as you tell me that is ok I going to test it in some machines here... Thanks again Toshio... P.D: What about the full mono/monodevelop plus the mdb and gdb packages for fed10?, how to procede with that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 16:41:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:41:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301641.n3UGfilo027293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-30 12:41:41 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 16:39:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:39:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479147] Review Request: skanlite - A scanning program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301639.n3UGd7HS026575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479147 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(tpr at d5k.net) | --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-30 12:39:04 EDT --- Once closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please submit a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 16:48:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:48:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301648.n3UGm5gE005342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #45 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-30 12:48:00 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 16:50:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301650.n3UGoHYg029181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 --- Comment #9 from Fabien Georget 2009-04-30 12:50:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Okay. > - Your pre-review seems good for initial comments > - This package itself is okay. > _____________________________________ > < This package is approved by mtasaka > > ------------------------------------- > \ ^__^ > \ (oo)\_______ > (__)\ )\/\ > ||----w | > || || > Thanks :) > Please follow the procedure written on: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join > from "Get a Fedora Account". > After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor > members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies > that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on > this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and > your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. I apply to the packager group. > If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10/11, you also have > to look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT > (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). I will take a look at this tomorrow. > If you have questions, please ask me. Thanks again for helping and sponsoring me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 16:53:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301653.n3UGriQl006490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(iefremov at unipro.r | |u) --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-30 12:53:41 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 17:02:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:02:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494862] Review Request: podofo - Tools and libraries to work with the PDF file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301702.n3UH2mu6031575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494862 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-30 13:02:46 EDT --- Okay. The package has been APPROVED. PS. Your last changelog entry seems rather longish; maybe you should break it down to match the 80 character width limit? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 17:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498246] Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301705.n3UH5dck032266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-30 13:05:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > But you don't need to be a sponsor to do reviews, just an approved packager > > (you need to be sponsorED). > It was that I meant, I am not an approved packager. Sorry. No problem. I see Mamoru is your sponsor. Reviewing packages is really important, even more so with the very long review queue we have at the moment. > > > - I think that "%doc license.gpl Examples/" is not a good thing. Because > > > Examples/ contains some executable. Install it with the doc flags modify the rights. > > > > No, it is quite standard to ship executable scripts in %doc, as the program > > works without them; they're just examples of use. > > If you think people don't have to run them, I think it is good. Yes, this is the way %doc is supposed to work: extra stuff that is not mandatory for the program to run, such as manuals and examples. > > - In the file /usr/share/towhee/Forcefields, you remove Makefile but not > > > Makefile.am and Makefile.in > > > > Nope, > > find Examples/ -name "Makefile*" -exec rm {} \; > > also removes Makefile.* > > I don't talk about Examples, but about /usr/share/towhee/Forcefields. Duh, sorry, I must have misread you the first time. Removed. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/towhee.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/towhee-6.2.2-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 17:23:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:23:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484423] Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301723.n3UHN27V013074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484423 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |Ubuntu Launchpad 369942 --- Comment #12 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-04-30 13:23:00 EDT --- Thanks. I've stayed away from the UI changes -- on a netbook, the right-hand side is cluttered enough already with my bookmarks that adding any more default buttons makes the interface less usable. I've fixed the GDM calls for logout, shutdown and restart: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/netbook-launcher-1.6.21-2.fc11.src.rpm http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/netbook-launcher.spec http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1330621 and send the patches upstream (see external bug report link) Would you like to do a formal review? The only unpatched thing right now is the Ubuntu icon -- I'd perhaps ask the art team to take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 17:23:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:23:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301723.n3UHNAKf013126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-30 13:23:09 EDT --- Fedora review jVorbisEnc-0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm 2009-04-30 rpmlint output: [ellert at ellert jVorbisEnc]$ rpmlint 5310124110877769772196/result/jVorbisEnc/*.rpm jVorbisEnc.spec jVorbisEnc.src:97: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} jVorbisEnc.x86_64: W: no-documentation jVorbisEnc.spec:97: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint warnings are bogus - rpmlint does not understand the conditional BuildArch. * Package is named according to the guidelines * The specfile is named after the package * The package follows the guidelines for a native Java package. Disabling the broken AOT bits for ppc64 makes sense, and a bug report is filed. * Package license is Fedora approved (BSD) ! The sources say: "THIS LIBRARY SOURCE IS GOVERNED BY A BSD-STYLE SOURCE LICENSE INCLUDED WITH THIS SOURCE IN 'COPYING'", but there is no COPYING file in the source tree! This is strange... Did upstream make a mistake creating the source tarfile? Also - one (and only one) of all the source files (src/biniu/vorbis/AllocChain.java) says it is LGPL. Is this an oversight from upstream, or is it intentional? This too seems strange. If this one source file really is LGPL, I don't think you can release the package as BSD, since LGPL is more restrictive and the most restrictive license "wins". But it seems strange that the licensing of the package should depend on a single source file containing 5 lines of code (excluding comments and empty lines). Is upstream aware of this bizarre situation? * There is no license file, and hence it can not be installed as %doc * The specfile is written in legible English * Sources matches upstream: 8476478045d6f7c0114272bc8bab97e1 jVorbisEnc_src.zip 8476478045d6f7c0114272bc8bab97e1 SRPM/jVorbisEnc_src.zip * Package builds in mock (Fedora 10) * BuildRequires are sane * No shared libraries * Package owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files * Permissions are sane and %files has %defattr * %clean clears buildroot * Consistent use of macros * Documentation in -javadoc package * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 17:23:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497640] Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301723.n3UHNIkm003974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 --- Comment #4 from Darryl L. Pierce 2009-04-30 13:23:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > > - is it possible to run the included testsuite during the build (using the > > > %check section)? > > > > Running them will require someone to submit echoe > > as a package for Fedora. > > If somebody does that, I'll add running the tests to the spec. > > OK > > I have found another issues > - because there is a library written in C, the %build and %install sections > need to be handled differently - > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Gem_with_extension_libraries_written_in_C > and I have seen some inspiration in rubygem-gettext > (http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/rubygem-gettext/devel/rubygem-gettext.spec?revision=1.6&view=markup) > > - rpmbuild complains that COPYING, CHANGELOG and README are listed twice, > probably they don't need to be explicitly specified with %doc Removed the duplicate listings. > - and rpmlint complains about "summary ended with dot" Fixed that. Updated spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-RedCloth.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-RedCloth-4.1.9-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 17:30:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:30:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494862] Review Request: podofo - Tools and libraries to work with the PDF file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301730.n3UHUXs5005710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494862 --- Comment #6 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-30 13:30:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Okay. The package has been > > APPROVED. Thanks for the review. > > PS. Your last changelog entry seems rather longish; maybe you should break it > down to match the 80 character width limit? Sure, will do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 17:31:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494862] Review Request: podofo - Tools and libraries to work with the PDF file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301731.n3UHVq0U005850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494862 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-30 13:31:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: podofo Short Description: Tools and libraries to work with the PDF file format Owners: sharkcz Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 17:42:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] New: Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 Summary: Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattdm at mattdm.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mattdm.org/misc/fedora/smem.spec SRPM URL: http://mattdm.org/misc/fedora/smem-0.1-1.fc11.mattdm.src.rpm Description: smem is a tool that can give numerous reports on memory usage on Linux systems. Unlike existing tools, smem can report proportional set size (PSS), which is a more meaningful representation of the amount of memory used by libraries and applications in a virtual memory system. Because large portions of physical memory are typically shared among multiple applications, the standard measure of memory usage known as resident set size (RSS) will significantly overestimate memory usage. PSS instead measures each application's "fair share" of each shared area to give a realistic measure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 17:49:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497660] Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301749.n3UHndms010006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 13:49:39 EDT --- perl-MIME-Charset-1.006.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-MIME-Charset-1.006.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 17:49:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497660] Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301749.n3UHnZtm009970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 13:49:33 EDT --- perl-MIME-Charset-1.006.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-MIME-Charset-1.006.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 17:49:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:49:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497660] Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301749.n3UHnhLE019018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-30 13:49:43 EDT --- perl-MIME-Charset-1.006.2-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-MIME-Charset-1.006.2-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 18:00:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301800.n3UI0nge021893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #1 from Matthew Miller 2009-04-30 14:00:48 EDT --- Whoops -- updated Group. Spec URL: http://mattdm.org/misc/fedora/smem.spec SRPM URL: http://mattdm.org/misc/fedora/smem-0.1-2.fc11.mattdm.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 17:59:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301759.n3UHxpO3021471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-30 13:59:50 EDT --- Good catch. When I saw that there is no COPYING file, I looked at the website http://zbigniew.sudnik.org/app/vorbis/vorbis.html which says the license is BSD. The file src/biniu/vorbis/AllocChain.java contains only a 5-line class definition. It might be a mistake by the author. The header of that file also suggests that that part of the code is borrowed from jorbis. But when I checked the jorbis code, I found that it does not contain such a class. Unfortunately, the only way to contact the author is the email address I found on the website (I downloaded all the other packages on his website, they don't carry contact information either). I sent an email to this address but I am not sure if he still uses this email, as the website hasn't been touched in the last 4 years. Meanwhile, what is the best way out of this in case we can't get a hold of him? Should I make the license tag BSD and LGPLv2+? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 18:03:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498492] New: Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498492 Summary: Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxshortcut.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxshortcut-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: LXShortcut is a small utility to edit application shortcuts created with freedesktop.org Desktop Entry spec. Now editing of application shortcuts becomes quite easy. Note: This tool is meant to be started by other applications. Currently it works with lxpanel 0.4.0 (right click on a menu entry -> properties), but lxlaucher and pcmanfm will soon make use of it. To test it's functionality use something like lxshortcut -i 0 -o ~/Desktop/testlauncher.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 18:13:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301813.n3UIDiLK024747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #78 from Philippe Makowski 2009-04-30 14:13:38 EDT --- Please check : http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird.spec http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 19:30:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301930.n3UJU2eU000911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |497905 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 19:31:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:31:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301931.n3UJV0pN010060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 --- Comment #16 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-30 15:30:58 EDT --- F-9 build failure, bug reported https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497905 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 19:31:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:31:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497640] Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301931.n3UJV6if010174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 --- Comment #5 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-30 15:31:04 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341984) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341984) patch for compliance with guidelines This patch should make the spec compliant with guidelines, but there is still a problem with the debuginfo package because it doesn't include the sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 19:35:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497640] Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301935.n3UJZH02011151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-30 15:35:16 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: OK source files match upstream: 0d47a2b72b160bc7c94a0cab4d8e96702aee3e61 RedCloth-4.1.9.gem OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (MIT). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). ?? debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK* file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - the issue with the source files missing in debuginfo package opened on fedora-packaging, running strip on the library is IMHO wrong - the shared library should have 0755 permissions instead of 0775 Both issues are not blockers, but should be resolved before importing the package. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 19:44:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301944.n3UJi0eh013012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yaneti at declera.com --- Comment #2 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-04-30 15:43:59 EDT --- rpmlint complaints a bit smem.src:31: W: setup-not-quiet - perhaps %setup -q smem.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install - install can become %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -p -D -m 755 smem $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/smem smem.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/smem-0.1/capture - perhaps chmod -x capture builds OK in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 19:46:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:46:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301946.n3UJk3pF013924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 --- Comment #4 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-30 15:46:02 EDT --- No problem. rpmlint says: vfrnav.spec:32: W: non-standard-group Applications/Navigation You should change that group too to something appropriate. You can simplify this part: %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/%{name}/vfrnav.png %{_datadir}/%{name}/bluetooth.png %{_datadir}/%{name}/BlankMap-World_gray.svg %{_datadir}/%{name}/dbeditor.glade %{_datadir}/%{name}/navigate.glade %{_datadir}/%{name}/routeedit.glade %{_datadir}/%{name}/prefs.glade %{_datadir}/%{name}/acftperformance.glade Like this: %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/%{name}/* - you are supplying desktop file but you are not installing it. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files Desktop file supplied with vfrnav is weird - I never seen that kind of file. I would recommend you to make your own desktop file. All of this is explained at previous link. - You are installing icons for your desktop file but you never update icon cache. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Icon_Cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 19:50:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:50:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301950.n3UJoiQv005584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #3 from Matthew Miller 2009-04-30 15:50:43 EDT --- Updated to fix those. Thanks. Spec URL: http://mattdm.org/misc/fedora/smem.spec SRPM URL: http://mattdm.org/misc/fedora/smem-0.1-3.fc11.mattdm.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 20:09:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302009.n3UK9ipN019115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 --- Comment #6 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-04-30 16:09:42 EDT --- Taking into account spot's comment: Review: + package builds koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1279214 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 98aaaa80c146fa3bbf8117b0ea2edef7 bauble-0.8.6-1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. ! BuildRequires are proper. (see below) + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package bauble-0.8.6-2.fc11.noarch => Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Requires: /usr/bin/env /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.6 + GUI App + Desktop file present and installed according to the guidelines ------------------ I saw in the install.py this: > install_requires=["SQLAlchemy>=0.4.4,<0.5b1", For your information Fedora has : 0.4.8-1.fc10 0.5.2-2.fc11 This is the last point before I approve this package, do you have any way to check if it works in F11 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 20:15:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302015.n3UKFADW020854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 Michal Schmidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschmidt at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Michal Schmidt 2009-04-30 16:15:08 EDT --- Matthew, I see you submitted your package before me while I was waiting for Matt to add the license. No problem. My spec is here http://michich.fedorapeople.org/smem/smem.spec Take a look at it and take whatever you think is a good idea. Some things worth considering: - I did not add the PDF as documentation because I did not think is was very useful and it made the package much bigger. - I have Requires: python python-matplotlib matplotlib is needed for graphical output of smem. Unfortunately rpmlint complains: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-matplotlib . I don't know if it's a real problem or not. - I installed the capture script as /usr/sbin/smem-capture , but on second thought I believe that installing it as documentation should be enough (as you did it). Michal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 20:25:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:25:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302025.n3UKPQe6023612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #5 from Matthew Miller 2009-04-30 16:25:25 EDT --- Thanks Michal. I could take or leave the PDF -- I included it because documentation is scarce and it's only a hundred K. Still, 100k here, 100k there, and soon you have a megabyte. :) I left off the matplotlib dep kinda on purpose, because the package works fine in its basic usage without it. That may need revisited as the program itself grows. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 20:33:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302033.n3UKXF0G025393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #6 from Matthew Miller 2009-04-30 16:33:14 EDT --- I'm considering also adding a requirement on kernel >= 2.6.27, because the program in its current state appears to work but gives incorrect results on older kernels. Thoughts on that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 20:32:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302032.n3UKWKU8025290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-30 16:32:19 EDT --- I've updated the package: Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/vfrnav.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/vfrnav-0.3-4.fc11.src.rpm (In reply to comment #4) > You should change that group too to something appropriate. Ugh. Oversaw that one. Fixed now. > Like this: > %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} > %{_datadir}/%{name}/* Yes I know I can use wildcards, however I'd like to get notified (by the unpackaged files check) if something changes there, so I would like to keep tne enumeration of all files in that directory. > - you are supplying desktop file but you are not installing it. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files Fixed (now validating them) > Desktop file supplied with vfrnav is weird - I never seen that kind of file. I > would recommend you to make your own desktop file. All of this is explained at > previous link. What is actually wierd about them? They conform to the spec as I read it... > - You are installing icons for your desktop file but you never update icon > cache. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Icon_Cache Fixed, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 20:38:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:38:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497640] Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302038.n3UKcfIN027071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Darryl L. Pierce 2009-04-30 16:38:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-RedCloth Short Description: Textile parser for Ruby Owners: mcpierce Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 20:40:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:40:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302040.n3UKeWIZ016686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #7 from Michal Schmidt 2009-04-30 16:40:31 EDT --- F10 was released with 2.6.27. It might make sense for F9, but even there we had 2.6.27 in updates since November. And such a dependency will not have any effect when someone has more kernel versions installed and boots into the old one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 20:46:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302046.n3UKkLgg018468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #8 from Matthew Miller 2009-04-30 16:46:20 EDT --- My concern is basically to act as a warning flag for EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 20:46:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302046.n3UKkkei018540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 --- Comment #6 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-04-30 16:46:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > Desktop file supplied with vfrnav is weird - I never seen that kind of file. I > > would recommend you to make your own desktop file. All of this is explained at > > previous link. > > What is actually wierd about them? They conform to the spec as I read it... Take a look at other desktop files. None of them has Encoding, Version, X-WIndow-Icon, X-Osso-Type. I never seen such desktop file. Best thing would be to wait for advanced packager to tell you is it ok or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 20:47:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302047.n3UKlh8j029740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #9 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-04-30 16:47:42 EDT --- > works fine in its basic usage without it. and fails gracefully if its not installed. Not to mention the ridiculous depchain difference between only python and pythin-matplotlib. > I'm considering also adding a requirement on kernel >= 2.6.27, because the > program in its current state appears to work but gives incorrect results on > older kernels. Thoughts on that? providing incorrect results without a hint should be an upstream bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 20:51:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:51:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498492] Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302051.n3UKp5NO019822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498492 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 20:51:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:51:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481066] Review Request: etoys - the Etoys image for the Squeak VM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302051.n3UKpPfW019909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481066 Gavin Romig-Koch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(gavin at redhat.com) | --- Comment #6 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-04-30 16:51:22 EDT --- I have built, tested, and pushed this package into Bodhi for both f10 and f9. Please test, comment, and karma++/-- as appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 20:51:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481064] Review Request: squeak-image - the standard image file for the Squeak VM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302051.n3UKpiq6020011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481064 Gavin Romig-Koch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(gavin at redhat.com) | --- Comment #7 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-04-30 16:51:42 EDT --- I have built, tested, and pushed this package into Bodhi for both f10 and f9. Please test, comment, and karma++/-- as appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 20:51:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:51:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481056] Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302051.n3UKpa7C030831@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 --- Comment #14 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-04-30 16:51:34 EDT --- I have built, tested, and pushed this package into Bodhi for both f10 and f9. Please test, comment, and karma++/-- as appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 20:56:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:56:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498371] Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302056.n3UKu2IP021422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498371 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-30 16:56:02 EDT --- A few initial comments: - Don't use macros in the URL, since this makes copy-pasteing impossible (well, at least awkward) from the specfile. - I see you're also upstream. %attr(755,root,root) %{_bindir}/ports %attr(755,root,root) %{_bindir}/devshell should be just %{_bindir}/ports %{_bindir}/devshell with the 755 flags set by the install script (setup.py). I'll do the review tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 20:53:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498371] Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302053.n3UKrAL5020461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498371 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 20:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:52:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302052.n3UKqgxn020325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #10 from Matthew Miller 2009-04-30 16:52:41 EDT --- > providing incorrect results without a hint should be an upstream bug. Yeah. First two posts on the project mailing list, in fact: http://selenic.com/pipermail/smem/2009-April/000001.html But it seems like the right thing to do in the meantime. And when the issue is fixed, it'll still be a dependency. (Since this program pokes into kernel information, it's not unreasonable for it to actually be marked as requiring the kernel, since it requires it in a much more specific way than most programs who just happen to run on top of it do.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 20:59:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498136] Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302059.n3UKxJIh022612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-30 16:59:17 EDT --- A few things worth noting: * You really, really, really don't need those macro defines at the top. Half of them aren't used. Just put the versions in the BuildRequires explicitly. * Fix the patch to apply without fuzz, please? :) Then, drop the default_fuzz macro define. * The %{gettext_package} macro is fine, but please use %global instead of %define. * Are you sure --disable-pulseaudio is correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 22:21:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:21:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491616] Review Request: mingw32-zfstream - MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302221.n3UMLnM0008879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491616 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |498508 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-30 18:21:47 EDT --- Update: Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-zfstream.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-zfstream-20041202-4.fc11.src.rpm Incorporate changes to native zfstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 23:10:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302310.n3UNAbIG017888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-30 19:10:35 EDT --- According to the licensing guidelines the License tag should reflect the license of the components of the binary RPM, not the sources. The binary RPM has only one component - the jarfile. So the license tag should reflect its license. If you only have the present situation and the author can not provide clarification the jarfile is a unit compiled from some sources licensed as BSD and some sources as LGPLv2+. The license of the resulting unit must be the most restrictive license, i.e. LGPLv2+. So the only component in the binary RPM is LGPLv2+, and no component is BSD - so the license tag should then be LGPLv2+. It really is weird that the license of the package is given by the license of 5 lines of code - but this is how I read the Licensing guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 23:35:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:35:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498136] Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302335.n3UNZmhj022444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 --- Comment #3 from Adam Williamson 2009-04-30 19:35:46 EDT --- For the first point: I wanted to keep the gst-mixer spec as close as possible to the gnome-media spec, this seemed sensible. So that's where the %define forest comes from. I wouldn't have created it myself. :) If you don't think it's important to have the two specs as similar as possible, I'll happily take them out. The patch applies without fuzz, I think, that setting just came from the gnome-media spec again. I'll take it out. Yes, I want --disable-pulseaudio, because we really just want this mixer to talk to ALSA, not Pulse. The *new* mixer is intended to be the mixer for Pulse. Having said that, it doesn't seem to have any particular effect, because gst-mixer once built still seems able to talk to Pulse - you get a choice in the drop-down in gst-mixer for Pulse mixer as well as ALSA mixer. Sigh. Updated package coming in a few minutes. I'll wait to hear back on the define forest, but change the other bits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 23:39:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:39:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498136] Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904302339.n3UNdI2Q032621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 --- Comment #4 from Adam Williamson 2009-04-30 19:39:16 EDT --- OK - spec and .src.rpm updated, same URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.