[Bug 492946] Review Request: eclipse-dltk - Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK) Eclipse plugin

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492946





--- Comment #6 from Mat Booth <fedora at matbooth.co.uk>  2009-04-02 06:26:30 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Mat,
> What do you think about dropping the gcj_support?
> It is giving us nothing as eclipse itself is compiled without it.
> And benefits for us will be a lot simpler spec file, faster compilation, noarch
> packages and etc.

I don't have a problem with dropping GCJ support. (Though I don't think it made
the spec too much more complicated ;-) ) In these days of stronger, better,
faster JDKs, are AOT bits desired in any Java package? If not, we probably
ought to change the guidelines. [1]

However, try this one on for size:

Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-dltk.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-dltk-1.0.0-0.2.M5.fc10.src.rpm

[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.