[Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Apr 3 10:10:23 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703


Ondrej Vasik <ovasik at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mikulas at artax.karlin.mff.cu
                   |                            |ni.cz




--- Comment #25 from Ondrej Vasik <ovasik at redhat.com>  2009-04-03 06:10:21 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> > Ok, just quick check first...
> If I understand correctly, you're planning to do a more detailed review later,
> right? In that case, I'll wait with updating the package until then.

Yep, I do plan to check&fill review approval template I have step by step...
Hopefully today ;)

> > 2)
> > Many warnings "pointer targets in passing argument <N> of <variable> differ in
> > signedness" in build.log still ... upstream should address those...  maybe just
> > adding Mikulas to that review could be ok.
> 
> Mikulas? Which one? An upstream developer?

Exactly... adding him to CC...


> > Question: Shouldn't be that NSS support enabled via configure option (like in
> > elinks?). This should be easier to get into upstream ...  
> 
> It should. In fact, I have little motivation to fix configure scripts gotten
> obviously wrong -- see use of random include directories in openssl detection
> routine below.
> 
> So my plan is to throw this upstream and rewrite it (and the openssl detection)
> only once they complain. I don't really care about user choosing between NSS
> and OpenSSL.  

In general - I'm ok with that - that patch is not very complicated and NSS
compat could be full replacement for OpenSSL in that case. I guess that's not
review blocker anyway - any maintainer/comaintainer could improve that
configure script later to give user a chance to choose which library will be
used.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list