[Bug 492113] Review Request: mingw32-glibmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X)

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492113


Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

Bug 492113 depends on bug 492110, which changed state.

Bug 492110 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libsigc++20 - MinGW Windows port of the typesafe signal framework for C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492110

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED



--- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se>  2009-04-05 03:27:13 EDT ---
Fedora review mingw32-glibmm24-2.19.2-1.fc11.src.rpm 2008-04-05

* OK
! needs attention

* rpmlint output
  Only expected Errors/Warnings from a mingw package

* Package is named according to Fedora mingw packaging guidelines

* Spec file is named as the package

* Package follows the Fedora mingw packaging guidelines

* The stated license (LGPLv2+) is a Fedora approved license

* The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding
  Fedora package

* The package contains the license file (COPYING)

* The spec file is written in legible English

* Sources matches upstream

9915c92a5a4b55fc2696bedf0d7af4cb  glibmm-2.19.2.tar.bz2
9915c92a5a4b55fc2696bedf0d7af4cb  SRPM/glibmm-2.19.2.tar.bz2

  Accoding to guidelines the version should match the version of the
  corresponding Fedora package - which it does. (It looks like there
  is an update of the corresponding Fedora package to 2.20.0 in
  preparation - the glibmm24 spec in CVS has been updated, so look
  out for that.)

  Fedora 10 has 2.18.1 (in case a Fedora 10 package is planned)

* Package builds in mock (Fedora 10)

* BuildRequires look sane

* Owns the directories it creates

* No duplicate files

* %files has %defattr

* %clean clears %buildroot

* Specfile uses macros consistently

* Package does not own other's directories

* %install clears %buildroot

* Installed filenames are valid UTF8

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.