[Bug 493957] Review Request: skyviewer - Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Apr 5 10:18:02 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493957
--- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> 2009-04-05 06:18:02 EDT ---
Thanks for the review.
(In reply to comment #3)
> - You didn't try to build in mock, did you? Missing BRs:
> BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils
> BuildRequires: libQGLViewer-devel
> BuildRequires: qt4-devel
Nope, dependencies weren't in yet, and I did not bother constructing
repositories. Thanks for that.
Will fix. (Will reroll the package once the license is settled)
> MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
> Licensing Guidelines. NEEDSFIX
> MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
> NEEDSFIX
> - There is no license file included, or any license mentioned in the source
> code or the homepage. Must get license information from upstream before the
> package can be approved.
Trying to do that. Contacted via a web form a week ago, no response.
Sent mail to the authors now.
> SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
> upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSFIX
Done.
> MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
> runtime of application. NEEDSFIX
> - Add general.txt and notes-ngp.txt
(In reply to comment #4)
> Also, IIUC there is documentation that can be generated using doxygen, please
> have a look if you can get it to build.
I'm not going to do this. This is a software package, not a substitution for
developer's infrastructure. If upstream wanted me to do this, they would
integrate it in the build system.
I doubt anyone will miss it anyways.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list