[Bug 493521] Review Request: perl-Log-Trace - A unified approach to tracing
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Apr 5 17:19:09 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493521
Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de
--- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2009-04-05 13:19:09 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
>
> > Can you please help me understand why to use AutoProv and why not to filter and
> > remove unnecessary provides perl(DB)?
>
> Sure :-) DB is used by the Perl debugger, and as such, is sometimes poked
> at... It shouldn't be provided by this package. In this case, turning off
> autoprov and manually providing perl(Log::Trace) is significantly easier than
> filtering the two provides autoprov finds. ...we've also done this before,
> e.g. perl-DateTime-Format-DBI.
@Chis: Please understand that I do not agree with your rationale. I consider
this kind of packaging to be grossly negligant sloppiness.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list