[Bug 491694] Review Request: Anyterm - Web based terminal emulator

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Apr 7 06:58:55 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694





--- Comment #11 from Gianluca Sforna <giallu at gmail.com>  2009-04-07 02:58:55 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Some updates (new spec / srpm has been uploaded)

Ok, please remember to bump the release number when you upload a new spec/srpm
so I can be sure I'm looking at an updated spec file.


> - been working w/ the anyterm upstream community to get some changes committed,
> including some necessary bugfixes, new features, and integration w/ httpd.
> After this no patches / additional changes should be needed for this

Great

> 
> - because of the previous I don't think anyterm 1.1.29 tarball from the site
> will cut it, so we'll need to either source this from the version control
> checkout tarball, or (less preferably) wait for the next release

Packaging a SVN checkout is OK; what is (still) not good is that I can't verify
your tarball matches upstream. If you want to stick to a svn snapshot until the
next release, please pick a suitable revision from upstream, then package it
with "svn export -r" and be sure to update the package version field according
to:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list