[Bug 494171] Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171





--- Comment #8 from Marcin Łabanowski <chax at i-rpg.net>  2009-04-08 16:40:52 EDT ---
> Yes it does, so what? ;) (has nothing to do on how it is packaged, it will
> complain if you don't run it as root).
>
> Moved the files to /usr/sbin/ instead of /usr/bin/ to make this more clear.
I thought about priviledge separation, like some daemons do. If hostapd
supported that in its configuration files, or command line, adding an user
would have been beneficial.

>> * Build packages with separate user accounts: not-OK ;)
> ???
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Build_packages_with_separate_user_accounts
My wild guess was that you didn't build the package as the separate user,
because there was a rather generic username set as owner of the files in the
SRPM ;).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.