[Bug 226195] Merge Review: newt

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Apr 9 19:04:36 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226195


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2009-04-09 15:04:35 EDT ---
Looks like "today" turned into "tomorrow", but here we go.

I checked out and built the latest rawhide branch of newt.  rpmlint is down to:
  newt.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libnewt.so.0.52.10 
   exit at GLIBC_2.2.5
which is a bad idea and arguably a bug in the library, but not a review
blocker.

  newt-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation
which is fine.

So rpmlint is fine now, and upon inspection the other issues I had are fixed as
well.  Really the only thing I see currently is that the license on the code is
rather unclear.  There's nothing in the tarball that I can see which specifies
which version of the LGPL is in use, which would, according to clause 13 of the
included COPYING file, indicate that we are free to choose any version (i.e.
LGPLv2+).  Only the included spec file indicates a specific version, and I'm
not absolutely certain whether or not that's a sufficient statement of intent
from a legal standpoint.

Still, since I believe you folks are the upstream and the specfile in the
tarball does say LGPLv2 so I'm going to say that things are OK, but I do
strongly suggest that you clarify the licensing, preferrably by including the
proper license blocks at the start of the source files as recommended by the
COPYING file, or at minimum at least say "version 2.1 of the LGPL only"
somewhere in the documentation or code.

APPROVED, and closing.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list