[Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package)

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850


Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #13 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com>  2009-04-17 16:04:53 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > 
> > This shouldn't matter for rpm, i.e. rpm doesn't needs these to be in logical
> > order. But it's a matter of taste. I won't say anything more.
> 
> I did actually test it before writing it. The order does matter.
> 

That's interesting. It works either way here. Maybe the RPM version matters. I
tested this on F-10 and F-11. Oh well... No big deal.

> There is at least one usecase for having globus-openssl without globus-common.
> This is for building globus-gsi-proxy-ssl (see review reqest bug #453854). 
> This requires globus-core and globus-openssl, but not globus-common.  

globus-common is not that common then :)

I was just asking about the usage, not for building packages. If you think
there might be people, who will use globus-openssl, but don't want to have
globus-common installed, then multiple ownership is okay. I trust your
judgement.

-------------------------------------------------
This package (globus-openssl) is APPROVED by oget
-------------------------------------------------

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.