[Bug 496475] Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475





--- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl <cweyl at alumni.drew.edu>  2009-04-19 14:18:18 EDT ---
There's an examples directory (eg/), why not include it in %doc?

koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307872

Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic);
make test passes cleanly.

Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum):
c2e97f5008c68f0b9f7f643a9ce4b21bfee572d7 Lexical-Persistence-0.98.tar.gz
c2e97f5008c68f0b9f7f643a9ce4b21bfee572d7 Lexical-Persistence-0.98.tar.gz.srpm

Final provides / requires are sane:

0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
=====> perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.src.rpm <=====
====> rpmlint
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
====> provides for perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.src.rpm
====> requires for perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.src.rpm
perl(Devel::LexAlias) >= 0.04
perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)  
perl(PadWalker) >= 1.1
perl(Test::More)  
perl(Test::Pod)  
perl(Test::Pod::Coverage)  

=====> perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.noarch.rpm <=====
====> rpmlint
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
====> provides for perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.noarch.rpm
perl(Lexical::Persistence) = 0.98
perl-Lexical-Persistence = 0.98-1.fc10
====> requires for perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.noarch.rpm
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)  
perl(Devel::LexAlias)  
perl(PadWalker)  
perl(strict)  
perl(warnings)  

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.