[Bug 497138] Review Request: perl-Text-VimColor - Syntax color text in HTML or XML using Vim
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Apr 22 15:06:21 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497138
Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |iarnell at gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> 2009-04-22 11:06:20 EDT ---
+ source files match upstream.
5073ae91074a41dd1e6d22c0cf2a6934f0bb3a39 Text-VimColor-0.11.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ summary is OK.
+ description is OK.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is OK.
+ license field matches the actual license.
GPL+ or Artistic
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ license text not included upstream.
+ latest version is being packaged.
- BuildRequires are missing
perl(XML::Parser)
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ package builds in mock
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1314782
+ package installs properly.
+ rpmlint has no complaints:
perl-Text-VimColor.noarch: I: checking
perl-Text-VimColor.src: I: checking
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
+ final provides are sane:
perl(Text::VimColor) = 0.11
perl-Text-VimColor = 0.11-1.fc12
- final requires need fixing
/usr/bin/perl
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
perl(Carp)
perl(File::Copy)
perl(File::Temp)
perl(Getopt::Long)
perl(IO::File)
perl(Path::Class)
perl(Path::Class) >= 0.02
perl(Text::VimColor)
perl(strict)
perl(warnings)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1
- %check is present and all tests pass.
t/01array.t ..... ok
t/02file.t ...... ok
t/05xml.t ....... skipped: XML::Parser module required for these tests.
t/10cmp.t ....... ok
t/15let.t ....... ok
t/20override.t .. ok
t/99pod.t ....... ok
All tests successful.
Files=7, Tests=29, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.02 sys + 1.64 cusr 0.34
csys = 2.06 CPU)
Result: PASS
+ no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no generically named files
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
There's a BuildRequires missing for perl(XML::Parser)
You don't need the explicit Requires: perl(Path::Class) since we've had >0.02
for a long time now.
But I think you should add a Requires: vim-enhanced since this package is
pretty useless without it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list