[Bug 492971] Review Request: lv2-zynadd-plugins - LV2 port of the ZynAddSubFX engine
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Apr 23 14:10:42 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492971
--- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se> 2009-04-23 10:10:41 EDT ---
Fedora review lv2-zynadd-plugins-1-2.fc10.src.rpm 2009-04-23
* OK
! Needs attention
? Needs clarification
rpmlint output:
lv2-zynadd-plugins.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab:
line 3)
lv2-zynadd-plugins.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab:
line 3)
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
! rpmlint warning is fixable (replace the space on line 12 with a tab)
* Package is named according to guidelines
* Specfile is named after the package
* The package is licensed as GPLv2 which is a Fedora approved license
* The license matches the license statements in the source
* The license file in the sources (gpl.txt) is packaged as %doc
* The spec file is written in legible English
* The source matches upstream and is the latest version
ead0a8db5440e480c8a23441195a76df zyn-1.tar.bz2
ead0a8db5440e480c8a23441195a76df SRPM/zyn-1.tar.bz2
* Package builds in mock (Fedora 10)
? BuildRequires on jack-audio-connection-kit-devel - is it needed?
* No shared libraries in the default library path
! Neither the package nor any of its Requires own %{_libdir}/lv2
(the other two plugin packages have Requires: lv2core)
* No duplicate files
* Permissions are sane and %files has %defattr
* %clean clear buildroot
* Macros are used consistently
* Contains code
* %doc is not essential at runtime
* Package does not own other's directories
* %install clears buildroot
* Installed filenames are valid UTF-8
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list