[Bug 492971] Review Request: lv2-zynadd-plugins - LV2 port of the ZynAddSubFX engine

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Apr 23 14:10:42 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492971





--- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se>  2009-04-23 10:10:41 EDT ---
Fedora review lv2-zynadd-plugins-1-2.fc10.src.rpm 2009-04-23

* OK
! Needs attention
? Needs clarification

rpmlint output:

lv2-zynadd-plugins.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab:
line 3)
lv2-zynadd-plugins.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab:
line 3)
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

! rpmlint warning is fixable (replace the space on line 12 with a tab)

* Package is named according to guidelines

* Specfile is named after the package

* The package is licensed as GPLv2 which is a Fedora approved license

* The license matches the license statements in the source

* The license file in the sources (gpl.txt) is packaged as %doc

* The spec file is written in legible English

* The source matches upstream and is the latest version
  ead0a8db5440e480c8a23441195a76df  zyn-1.tar.bz2
  ead0a8db5440e480c8a23441195a76df  SRPM/zyn-1.tar.bz2

* Package builds in mock (Fedora 10)

? BuildRequires on jack-audio-connection-kit-devel - is it needed?

* No shared libraries in the default library path

! Neither the package nor any of its Requires own %{_libdir}/lv2
  (the other two plugin packages have Requires: lv2core)

* No duplicate files

* Permissions are sane and %files has %defattr

* %clean clear buildroot

* Macros are used consistently

* Contains code

* %doc is not essential at runtime

* Package does not own other's directories

* %install clears buildroot

* Installed filenames are valid UTF-8

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list