[Bug 497665] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CipherSaber - Perl module implementing CipherSaber encryption

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497665


Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |iarnell at gmail.com
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |iarnell at gmail.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com>  2009-04-26 05:12:08 EDT ---
+ source files match upstream.  
  2522e3de77fe005f13be3749e629b5234d449429  Crypt-CipherSaber-1.00.tar.gz

+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ summary is OK.
+ description is OK.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is OK.
+ license field matches the actual license.
  GPL+ or Artistic

+ license is open source-compatible.
+ license text not included upstream.
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ package builds in mock
  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1321099

+ package installs properly.
+ rpmlint has no complaints:
  perl-Crypt-CipherSaber.noarch: I: checking
  perl-Crypt-CipherSaber.src: I: checking
  2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

+ final provides and requires are sane:
  perl(Crypt::CipherSaber) = 1.00
  perl-Crypt-CipherSaber = 1.00-1.fc12

=
  perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)  
  perl(Carp)  
  perl(Scalar::Util)  
  perl(strict)  
  perl(vars)  
  rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
  rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
  rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
  rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1

+ %check is present and all tests pass (with the caveat about
  Module::Signature)
  All tests successful.
  Files=10, Tests=32,  1 wallclock secs ( 0.07 usr  0.02 sys +  0.59 cusr  0.10
csys =  0.78 CPU)
  Result: PASS

+ no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no generically named files
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.